Www.aodhealth.org1 Update on Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health May–June 2015.
Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.
-
Upload
kory-norman -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.
![Page 1: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 1
Journal Club
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
May–June 2010
![Page 2: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 2
Featured Article
β-Blockers for Chest PainAssociated with
Recent Cocaine Use
Rangel C, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(10):874 –9.
![Page 3: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 3
Study Objective
• To determine whether β-blockers, which are known to decrease adverse events after myocardial infarction but are thought to be potentially harmful following recent cocaine use, are safe for patients with cocaine-related chest pain.
![Page 4: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 4
Study Design
• Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to San Francisco General Hospital with chest pain and cocaine-positive urine test results between January 2001 and December 2006 (N=331).
• Mortality data were collected from the Department of Health & Human Services National Death Index.
• The primary predictor was receipt of a β-blocker in the Emergency Department (ED). Secondary predictors were receipt of any β-blocker during post-ED hospitalization and discharge on a β-blocker regimen.
![Page 5: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 5
Study Design (cont’d)
• The primary outcome measure was death. Secondary outcomes were:
– peak troponin level in the first 24 hours of
admission
– ventricular fibrillation or ventricular
tachycardia requiring defibrillation
– need for intubation
– need for vasopressor agents
![Page 6: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 6
Assessing Validity of an Article About Harm
• Are the results valid?
• What are the results?
• How can I apply the results to patient care?
![Page 7: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 7
Are the Results Valid?
• Did the investigators demonstrate similarity in all known determinants of outcomes? Did they adjust for differences in the analysis?
• Were exposed patients equally likely to be identified in the two groups?
• Were the outcomes measured in the same way in the groups being compared?
• Was follow-up sufficiently complete?
![Page 8: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 8
Did the investigators demonstrate similarity in all known determinants
of outcomes? Did they adjust for differences in the analysis?
• Yes.– Covariables were included in the multivariable
model based on convention (e.g., age and sex) or if they were associated with both the predictor and outcome with a p-value of <.20.
– Analyses were adjusted for the following:–age, race, and sex–history of end-stage
renal disease–outpatient angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitoruse
–outpatient angiotensin-receptor blocker use–troponin level–discharge on a calcium
channelblocker regimen
![Page 9: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 9
Were exposed patients equally likely
to be identified in the groups?
Yes.
– Exposure for all subjects was documented in paper medical charts and in electronic medical records.
![Page 10: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 10
Were the outcomes measured in the same way in the groups being
compared?
Yes.
– The National Death Index was used to determine deaths (primary outcome) that occurred after admission among all subjects.
– Data on secondary outcomes were obtained from paper medical charts and the electronic medical record.
![Page 11: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 11
Was follow-up sufficiently complete?
• Yes.
– Information was available from the National Death Index for 317 of 331 subjects (96%) at 5-year follow-up.
![Page 12: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 12
What are the Results?
• How strong is the association between exposure and outcomes?
• How precise is the estimate of the risk?
![Page 13: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 13
How strong is the association between exposure and outcome?
How precise is the estimate of the risk?
• The researchers were not able to detect an association between receipt of a β-blocker and incident mortality:
– received a β-blocker in the ED (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.53–1.79).
– received a β-blocker during hospitalization (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44 –1.48).
– discharged on a β-blocker regimen (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47–1.71).
• Discharge on a β-blocker regimen was associated with a significant (70%) reduction in the risk of cardio-vascular death (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09–0.98).
![Page 14: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 14
How Can I Apply the Results to Patient Care?
• Were the study patients similar to the patients in my practice?
• Was the duration of follow-up adequate?
• What was the magnitude of the risk?
• Should I attempt to stop the exposure?
![Page 15: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 15
Were the study patients similar to the patients in my practice?
• Subjects were predominantly black males and were approximately 50 years of age.
• More than 80% were current smokers.
![Page 16: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 16
Was the duration of follow-up adequate?
• Yes.
– Five years is an adequate period of time for follow-up of cardiovascular mortality and effects of β-blocker exposure.
![Page 17: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 17
What was the magnitude of the risk?
• The researchers were unable to determine whether β-blockers placed patients with cocaine-related chest pain at increased risk of mortality:
– received a β-blocker in the ED (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.53-1.79).
– received a β-blocker during hospitalization (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44-1.48).
– discharged on a β-blocker regimen (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47-1.71).
![Page 18: Www.aodhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cec5503460f949b92dc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
www.aodhealth.org 18
Should I attempt to stop the exposure?
• The findings do not support limiting β-blocker treatment in patients with cocaine-related chest pain due to concerns over unopposed alpha-adrenergic stimulation.
• The findings are limited by the following:– lack of blinding.– potential surveillance bias (only patients with
cocaine-metabolite–positive urine tests were included in the study).