What's new and what's special? The televised debates in the 2002 German election campaign Marcus...

20
What's new and what's special? The televised debates in the 2002 German election campaign Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Transcript of What's new and what's special? The televised debates in the 2002 German election campaign Marcus...

What's new and what's special?

The televised debates in the 2002 German election campaign

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann,U of Mainz, Germany

What was new in the 2002 German debates?

• Number of debates: Two debates

• Timing: 4 and 2 weeks before election day

• Length: 75 and 85 minutes

• Participants: Only two candidates

• Setting: Candidates standing, strict rules

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Why are TV debates different from other forms of campaign communications?

• Audience size: Bigger audience than all other events

• Audience structure: Also undecided voters and opposing party

• "Free" format: Possibility to argue, not only sound-bites

• Confronting the opponent: Only format of direct interaction

• They generate large amounts of pre- and post-debate coverage(that also reaches those not watching the debate)

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

What are the effects of TV debates?

• During debate: Immediate reactions

• Post-debate: - Perceived "Winner" of the debate - Opinions about the candidates

- Knowledge (e.g. about the state of the country)

- Perceived winner of the coming election

- Importance of candidates for voting decisions - Voting intentions

• Post-debate media coverage: see the above

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

The effects process triggered by TV-debates

Short-term effects:Immediate reactions during the debate

(CRM)

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

7

Viewers’ evaluations of the candidates during the debateMean of means of supporters of incumbent parties, opposition and undecided voters

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

20:3

3:10

20:3

6:27

20:3

9:43

20:4

3:00

20:4

6:17

20:4

9:34

20:5

2:50

20:5

6:07

20:5

9:24

21:0

2:41

21:0

5:58

21:0

9:15

21:1

2:31

21:1

5:48

21:1

9:05

21:2

2:22

21:2

5:40

21:2

8:57

21:3

2:13

21:3

5:30

21:3

8:47

21:4

2:04

21:4

5:20

21:4

8:37

21:5

1:54

21:5

5:11

21:5

8:28

Schröderevaluated

better

Stoiberevaluated

better

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

8

What are the effects of …

- Specific statements about candidates’ views and political plans.

- Statements mentioning facts and figures (e.g. number of unemployed, economic situation)

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

9

Statements polarizing the political campsMean CRM-score of supporters of incumbent parties and opposition

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

20:3

3:10

20:3

5:37

20:3

8:05

20:4

0:33

20:4

3:00

20:4

5:28

20:4

7:55

20:5

0:23

20:5

2:50

20:5

5:18

20:5

7:45

21:0

0:13

21:0

2:41

21:0

5:08

21:0

7:36

21:1

0:04

21:1

2:31

21:1

4:59

21:1

7:27

21:1

9:54

21:2

2:22

21:2

4:50

21:2

7:18

21:2

9:46

21:3

2:13

21:3

4:41

21:3

7:09

21:3

9:36

21:4

2:04

21:4

4:31

21:4

6:59

21:4

9:26

21:5

1:54

21:5

4:22

21:5

6:49

Stoiberevaluated better

Schröderevaluated better

Supporters of the opposition (CDU/CSU and FDP)

Supporters of the incumbent parties (SPD and B90/Green Party)

1 2 3 45

6 7

89

10 11

12 13

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

10

What are the effects of …

- Statements arousing emotions

- Commonplaces

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

11

Example: Emotionalizing a non-emotional issueMean CRM of means of supporters of incumbent parties, opposition and undecided voters

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

21:2

4:21

21:2

4:32

21:2

4:43

21:2

4:55

21:2

5:06

21:2

5:17

21:2

5:28

21:2

5:40

21:2

5:51

21:2

6:02

21:2

6:13

21:2

6:25

21:2

6:36

21:2

6:47

21:2

6:58

21:2

7:10

21:2

7:21

21:2

7:32

21:2

7:43

21:2

7:55

21:2

8:06

21:2

8:17

21:2

8:28

21:2

8:40

21:2

8:51

21:2

9:02

21:2

9:13

21:2

9:25

21:2

9:36

21:2

9:47

Schröder speaking

"I received my degrees through evening classes"

"As my upbringing wasn’t privileged, I was lucky that I had the chance to make my secondary school exams."

Stoiber speaking

Schroederevaluated better

Stoiberevaluated better

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Longer-term effects:Debate-induced opinion changes

pre-debate – post-debate(Panel-Analysis)

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

13

Changes of viewers' opinions about the candidates

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

More positive opinion (%)

More negative opinion (%)

Schröder Stoiber

Percentage of participants

20

3

17

19

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

14

Changes of the certainty of voting decisions

10

10

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

more certainless certain

Percentage of participants

15

Changes of the assessment of the state of the labour market

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Long-term effects:Opinion changes

immediately after the debate – five days after the debate

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

0

25

50

75

100

125

150 Statements

26/8

27/8

28/8

30/8

31/8 2/

93/

95/

96/

97/

99/

910

/911

/912

/913

/914

/916

/917

/918

/919

/920

/921

/9 29

/8 4/9

1. TV-debate 2. TV-debate

Lastparliamentary

debate

Number of statements

Post-debate coverage: Focusing on the candidatesNumber of evaluative statements about the candidates

four weeks prior to the election in four national newspapers (50% sample)

18

Changes of perceptions of who won the debate

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

19

Changes of opinions about the candidates

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Marcus Maurer & Carsten Reinemann, U of Mainz, Germany

Suggestions for future debates:

• Independent organization

• Thinking about participants

• Discussing not more than 3-4 issues

• No media interventions in viewers’ opinion formation immediately after the debate