we - University of Illinois at Chicago
Transcript of we - University of Illinois at Chicago
Lecture 7
Last time we defined noetherian rings and proved Hilbert's Basis Than
Th If R is noetherian,then REX , , . . . , xn) is noeth .
Def " : An R-algebra S is
D of finitelype-vwkcabbrv.f.tt if a a ring mapREX
, .. . .
.xn) → s
D ekcnkallyoffinitetype.ae#Cabbrv.eft) if S is the
localization of a finite type R- algebra .
Example : k Cx, y)- (y, )⇐,g,
is eft 1k ,
where k is a field
and E.g ) is the maximal ideal of KEI generated byX. xy)
the I :-. x t (x', xy ) ; I :-. y t ( x
'
, xy ) .
Upshot of Hilbert 's Basis Theorem o
.
Coro : ① Ayy algenbra which is ef.to?.erafIield is noetherian ;-
③
Recall that R is noeth . iff any non- empty collection of ideals of
R has a maximal element writ . I .
Prpoo. Let R be a meth ring and I FR be an ideal .
I 7 a finite set Lp , , . .. . Pn } E Speck it .
I EP; and P , ooo Pn E I .
Pf : Let E =L I ¥12 : the conclusion of Prop 2 doesn't hold
for I} .
Assume for contradiction that I f- of .
Since R is meth .
,E has
a max element wrt E, say I .
Claim : I is a prime ideal (which would be a contradiction )
Ff of claim : Let a,b ER - I Srt
. ab EI . Then
I ¥ LI , a ) , CI , b ) ⇒ ⇐ al, CI , b) ¢ E .
LI , a) FR .Otherwise I IEI
,x ER s.tl = it xa
⇒ b = ibtxab E I,a contradiction
. Similarly , CI , b) FR .
ooo By def" of E ,F pi , . . . ,Pn , 9 , , . . .
, am E Speck e. t .
① H i = I,. . .
, n , LI , a) I pi and Pio - opn ELI, a)② H j = l, . . .
,m, CI , b) E9j and 9 , .
. . gm E (I, b) .
Then I EP ; ,IE 9J Hi ,j and
Pi . - - Png ,. . - q m E CI , a ) CI , b)
⇐
I.
This contradicts IE 'S .
I
Def " : For an ideal I of R ,a minimal prime of I- is a prime
ideal p it . I Ep and it. If QE Speck it .
I Eg EP .
Ciro. Let R be a meth . ring and I FR be an ideal .- Then the set of minimal primes of I is
finite . In particular , R has finitely many minimal primes .
Pf : By Prop .2
,let Pi , . . . , Pn E Speer s - t .
I EPIand P ,
o . . pn E I . Let g be a minimal prime
of R . Then
P,o . . Pn EI Eg, ⇒ 7- i sit . P ; E g, .
Minimality ⇒ P;= q .
I. { minimal prime of I} E LP , , . . . . Pn} .
R has finitely many min . primes by applying Corollary to I = .
I
Associated:
tefxeru.se. Let 12 be a ring , M be an R-mod and I be-
an ideal of R .TFAE :
① F me M sit . I = Anna (m )⑦ F an injective R- linear map RII → M
.
③ F a submodule of M isomorphic to RII .
Def " : For an R - mod M, PE Speck is an tedpimefM
if it satisfies the equivalent conditions of previous lemma.
Notation : Assam denotes the set of associated primes of M .
Example : Let R = Klay] and M= kcx.gg(x3xy,
i
Let I := x t (x? xy) .
Then x. I =O and y - I = 0
in M ⇒ Ann ,z(I) Z ¢ , y ) .But 4.y) is maximal
and I t O in M ⇒ Anna # I = ( x , y) .
% ④ y ) is an associated prime of M .
Theorem 5 : Let R be a meth . ring and M to be an R- mod.=
Then any maximal element of[ := { Ann ,z(m) : me M
,m to}
is an associated prime of M . ooo Assam to .
Remark : Need R to be meth .to conclude E has a max't element
under E .
Pf : Let I C- I be a max 'd element .
Let me M- Lol at .
I = Anne (m) .
Suppose a,b E R s - t . ab E I , and a ¢ I . Then
am FO
and I I Anna (am) . By maximally ,I = Anne (am) .
But be Ann,z(am) since ab E I = Annie (m) . I. be I .
I
Corollary 68 Let M¥0 be a fig . module over a meth . ring R .
=
Then I an increasing sequence of labmodules
0 = Mo E M,E
. . - E Mn = M e. t . H IE i En,
Milka; . ,I Rlpi ,
with pie Speck .
tf : R meth .t M f - g . ⇒ M is noelh
.
Since M t O, by Thin 5
,choose p
,E Asse M .
Let M,be a lubmod of M t - t . M
, I RIP,
.
If MIM,to
,let Pz C- Asse MIM , and choose a submodule
Mz of M containing M,
s- t .
pyo"21M
,I Rlpz .
11
We have O E M,E Mz . If 141µL to repeat the process
using P,E Assr Mlpaz ,
and so on .
Get an increasing chain of submodule of MO = Mo E M ,
E Mz E . . .
which must stabilize by M is noeth .
Exercise : Check that the chain must stabilize at M by construction .
I
Recall from HH l that Suppa M = L PE Speck : Mp to} .
Lemma 7 : Assr M E Supp ,z M -
I
Pf : PE Assam ⇒ 7 Rip ↳ M
Localizing⇒ (Rip ) p → Mp ⇒ Mp to .
at p511
Frae (Rip) (afield)
I
L_8 : Let R be a meth . ring , SER a multiplicative set-
and Me be an R -mod .Then I a one - to - one correspondence
Ass S- ' M I { pe Assam : p n s =p }S- 'R
p s- 'R 4-1 p expansion
of 1-7 g n R contraction
Pf : It suffices to show via the bijection between specs - 'R
and { PE Speck : pns =p} that the above operationsmap into the desired sets .
PE Assam and pns = of ⇒ I Rip ↳ M
localization⇒ I s
- '
(Rip) → 5 'M ⇒ p s- 'R E Asse, S
-'M .
is exact11
s-' R 1ps- 'R
If g C- Asss . .pe s-' M
,choose my E S
- ' M it. Arms. .ir (F) = g .
Let p = gnr and suppose p = ( r, , ooo, rn ) .
Then ri 7=0⇒ Hi
,2- si Es et .
r; Sim = O.
Let s := s,. . .sn .
Exer : Show p= Annie Csm) ,and so
, p EASSRM .
I