Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

57
Watershed Management in Saint John, New Brunswick (2011) An update on the status of watershed management recommendations for Marsh Creek, Hazen Creek, Little River and Alder Brook Atlantic Coastal Action Program (ACAP) Saint John

description

An update on the status of watershed management recommendations for Marsh Creek, Little River and Alder Brook.

Transcript of Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

Page 1: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

 

Watershed  Management  in  Saint  John,  New  Brunswick  (2011)  An  update  on  the  status  of  watershed  management  recommendations  for    Marsh  Creek,  Hazen  Creek,  Little  River  and  Alder  Brook  

 

 

 

 

 

Atlantic  Coastal  Action  Program  (ACAP)  Saint  John  

Page 2: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

ii  |  P a g e    

 

Acknowledgements  

 

This  project  was  made  possible  through  grants  provided  by  the  New  Brunswick  Environmental  Trust  Fund,   Environment   Canada’s   Atlantic   Ecosystem   Initiative,   and   the   New   Brunswick  Wildlife   Trust  Fund  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

iii  |  P a g e    

 

Table  of  Contents  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive  Summary   1  

Colour  Coding   2  

Marsh  Creek   3  

Little  River   29  

Alder  Brook   44  

Hazen  Creek   49  

Summary   54  

Page 4: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

1  |  P a g e    

 

 

 

Executive  Summary  

 

ACAP  Saint  John  conducted  extensive  field  surveys  of  four  Saint  John,  New  Brunswick  watersheds  in  2006   and   used   the   direct   observations   to   develop   watershed   management   recommendations   to  improve   the   environmental   integrity   in   each   of  Marsh   Creek,   Hazen   Creek,   Little   River   and   Alder  Brook.  The  2006  reports,  which  are  available  on-­‐line  at  www.acapsj.com,  have  served  as  a  roadmap  from   which   to   target   and   advance   specific   watershed   improvement   projects.   Development   and  infrastructure-­‐related  alterations  in  each  of  these  watersheds  since  2006  have  resulting  in  the  need  to  update  the  status  of  the  previous  recommendations  so  as  to  maintain  the  focused  and  efficient  advancement   of  watershed  management   priorities.  Overall,   the   nature   of   the   alterations   in   these  four  watersheds   appears   to   have   resulted   in   net   improvements   in   their   respective   environmental  integrity.  This  report  summarises  the  status  of   the  2006  watershed  management  recommendation  for  each  of  the  watersheds,  and  highlights  the  pending  management  priorities  for  the  next  five  years,  of  which  ‘big  ticket  items’  top  the  priorities  list.  

 

 

Page 5: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

2  |  P a g e    

Colour  Coding  

 

This  report  builds  on  watershed  management  recommendations  developed   in  2006.  A  colour  code  has   been   employed   to   assist   in   the   assessment   of   current   management   priorities   whereby   red  represents   no   change   in   recommendation   status;   yellow   indicates   that   some   activity   is   currently  directed   towards   this   recommendation,  with   green   signifying   that   the   recommendation   has   been  fully  implemented.  

 

 

   

Page 6: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

3  |  P a g e    

 

Marsh  Creek  Sub-­‐Drainages  

 

The   large   size   of   the   Marsh   Creek   watershed   necessitates   that   each   sub-­‐drainage   be   examined   as   an  individual   entity,   even   though   they   collectively   contribute   to   the   overall   environmental   integrity   of  Marsh  Creek  proper.  The  greater  Marsh  Creek  watershed  can  be  divided  into  six  distinct  sub-­‐drainages,  and  for  the  purposes   of   this   management   plan,   these   sub-­‐drainages   will   be   used   to   divide   the   plan   into   smaller  geographic   portions.   These   six   sub-­‐drainages   are   as   follows:   Marsh   Creek,   Majors   Brook,   Fisher   Lakes  Tributary,   Cold   Brook,   Little  Marsh   Creek   and   Ashburn   Creek.  While   each   of   these   sections  maintain   their  unique  physical   characteristics,   drain   their   own   tributaries   and   vary   greatly   in   length  and  area,   they   are   all  major  contributors  to  the  Marsh  Creek  drainage  pattern  and  are  essential  parts  of  this  management  plan.    

 

 

Figure 1: The Marsh Creek watershed is divided into six sub-drainages.

 

Page 7: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

4  |  P a g e    

Marsh  Creek  

 

Marsh  Creek   is   the  single   longest  watercourse  within   the  Marsh  Creek  watershed  and  serves  as  a  common  outlet   for   all   Marsh   Creek   tributaries.   The   headwaters   of   this   11.42   km   creek   originate   just   outside   the  northeastern  Saint   John  City   limits  at   the  Renforth  Bog.  The  physical  and  biological  characteristics  of  Marsh  Creek   change   dramatically   between   its   headwaters   and   the   terminus.   The   observed   changes   in   the  surrounding  environment  allow  Marsh  Creek  to  be  divided  into  eight  distinct  management  sections.      

 

 

Figure 2: Aerial photo of the Marsh Creek sub-drainage, indicating the 8 management sections.

 

Stream Section  

Location  Recommendations  

       1   Quarry road along the

edge of the Renforth bog  Organize a cleanup of the area to remove illegal dumping  

       1   ATV trail   Install corduroy roads along the trail in wet,

environmentally sensitive areas  

Page 8: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

5  |  P a g e    

       2   Entire length of section   Protect from further development  

       3   Entire length of section   Organize a cleanup of the area  

       3   Concrete flood control

dam  Replace dam with a new one allowing better fish passage  

       4   Throughout Glen Falls   Plant Native riparian vegetation along stream banks  

       4   Culverts   Replace all culverts in this section with a large, open

bottom version  

       

4   Culverts   The banks near the culverts should be reinforced with native riparian vegetation paired with gabions, riprap, or granite blocks  

       5     Organize a cleanup to remove litter and illegally

dumped refuse  

       5     Plant Native riparian vegetation along stream banks  

       6   Sewage outlets various

locations throughout stream  

Redirect sewage to eliminate discharge into Marsh Creek  

       6   Entire length of Section   Develop a walking trail and canoeing facility  

       7   Behind Canada Post

Corporation  Remove creosote & Plant native vegetation  

       7   Sewage outfalls   Redirect sewage to eliminate discharge into Marsh

Creek  

       7   Railway bridge   Rebuild bridge with fewer in stream pylons  

8 Forebay Develop a wetland/waterfowl plan for a public park

8 Forebay & Causeway Replace Tide Gates

 

Page 9: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

6  |  P a g e    

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

To  improve  the  quality  and  sustain  the  natural  beauty  of  the  Renforth  Bog  a  mass  cleanup  of  illegal  dumping  should  be  conducted.    

 

Measures   should   be   taken   to   improve   the   state   of   the   ATV   trails   and   to   prevent   further   environmental  damage.  This  can  be  achieved  by  implementing  corduroy  roads  in  the  areas  subject  to  deep  rutting  due  to  the  soft  soil  along  the  banks  of  the  wetland.  A  corduroy  road  creates  a  bridge  like  structure  by  lining  logs  side  by  side   (looks   like   corduroy).   Corduroy   roads   are   an   old  method  developed  by   early   settlers   to   allow  passage  though   wet   lands.   Creating   sections   of   these   corduroy   roads   would   allow   a   less   destructive   passage   for  recreational  ATV  usage.    

 

Action:   several   cleanups   were   conducted,   including   a   significant   one   in   2011   which   saw   one   hundred   and  twenty-­‐eight  hard  working  volunteers  spend  a  total  of  nine  hours  collecting  fifty  bags  and  a  front  end  loader  full  of  garbage.  

 

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

Page 10: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

7  |  P a g e    

This  section  is  virtually  undisturbed  and  in  a  very  natural  healthy  state.  The  management  suggestion  for  this  section  is  to  preserve  the  ecological  integrity  and  discourage  future  development  of  the  area.  A  cleanup  the  debris  in  the  stream  serving  as  a  barrier  to  fish  passage  should  be  conducted.  

 

Section  3  Management  Recommendations  

The   stream   is   in   very   good   condition   for   the  majority   of   this   section.   It   is   suggested   the   present   state   be  maintained.  A  clean  up  should  be  conducted  to  remove  the  small  amount  of  garbage  found  along  the  stream.  

 

Action:  as  part  of  the  annual  Marsh  Creek  cleanup,  this  area  was  remediated  by  local  volunteers  in  2009,  2010  and  2011.  

 

The  dam  located  in  the  middle  of  the  section  should  be  replaced  or  modified  to  allow  for  better  fish  passage.    

 

Section  4  Management  Recommendations  

This   section   is   lacking  natural   riparian  vegetation   in  many   locations.  The   stream  bank  may  be   restored  and  strengthened   by   planting   natural   riparian   vegetation,   thus   creating   a   natural   buffer   between   residential  houses  and  the  stream.  

 

Education   is   also   an   important   part   of   this   section’s   management,   as   residents   should   be   educated   as   to  proper   stream   management   practices.   Local   ATV   groups   should   also   be   brought   into   discussions   on  management  to  ensure  cooperation  and  so  that  any  remediation  activities  are  sustainable  in  the  long-­‐term.  

 

All   culverts   in   this   section   are   of   poor   quality.  New,   open  bottom   culverts   should   be   installed   to  meet   the  requirements   for   proper   fish   passage   and   stream   flow.   Also   new   bank   reinforcements   should   be   installed  around  the  culverts  to  reduce  the  amount  of  silt  and  gravel  washing  into  the  stream.  

 

Action:  The  culverts  in  question  were  replaced  over  several  years  (2007-­‐2010)  as  part  of  the  City  of  Saint  John’s  drainage  improvements  and  capital  programs.  The  new  culverts  are  much  larger  box  culverts,  offer  increases  in  flow  capacity  and  significantly  improved  fish  passage.  

Page 11: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

8  |  P a g e    

 

 

 

Page 12: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

9  |  P a g e    

Section  5  Management  Recommendations  

This  area  needs  to  be  monitored  and  protected  from  improper  future  development.    

 

A  cleanup  should  be  organized  to  remove  debris  deposited  along  the  stream  and  surrounding  riparian  zone.  

 

Native   riparian   vegetation   should   be   planted   along   banks   in   various   locations   near   industry   and  developments,   such   as   Strescon   and   Atlantic   Metal   Recycling,   to   reduce   stream   bank   erosion,   pollutants  running  into  the  stream  and  to  increase  the  canopy  cover.  

 

Action:  as  part  of  ACAP’s  annual  Marsh  Creek  cleanup,  this  area  was  remediated  by  local  volunteers  in  2009,  2010  and  2011.  

 

Section  6  Management  Recommendations  

For  this  section  of  the  stream  a  major  improvement  in  water  quality  is  suggested  eliminating  any  point  source  pollution   (such  as  sewage)  being  dispersed   into   the  stream.  Once   the  water  quality  has  been   improved  the  creek   could   host   a   trail   system   including   boardwalks   along   wet   stream   banks   and   trails   though   the   dry  forested  areas.  The  creek  is  also  wide  and  slow  moving  and  when  combined  with  the  beautiful  scenery  serves  to  be  prime  canoeing  territory.  Water  quality  improvements  and  preservation  from  further  development  will  also   benefit   the   large   amount   of  wildlife   (i.e.   deer,   raccoons,  mink,  muskrat,  waterfowl,   etc.)   that   use   this  section.  

 

Action:  The  Harbour  Cleanup  project,  which  will   redirect   the   sewage   in   this   section   toward   the  new  Eastern  Wastewater  Treatment  Plant,  is  currently  under  construction  and  is  scheduled  for  completion  within  the  next  12  months.    

 

 

Section  7  Management  Recommendations  

The  most   important  management   suggestion   for   this   section   of   stream  would   be   to   remove   the   creosote  contamination   from   the  Marsh  Creek  and   the   riparian   zone.  Barry   Leger  MEng  and  Alan  Drake  B.  Tech  Env  conducted  an  extensive  study  of  creosote  removal  in  1998  for  ACAP  Saint  John.  Sc.  titled  “Study  of  the  Extent  of  Contamination  in  Marsh  Creek”.    A  copy  of  this  is  available  at  the  ACAP  office  upon  request.  

 

Page 13: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

10  |  P a g e    

The  raw  sewage  expelled  into  Marsh  Creek  each  day  poses  a  significant  health  threat.  The  sewage  should  not  be  from  discharging  into  Marsh  Creek.  Securing  the  federal  funding  needed  to  complete  the  Harbour  Cleanup  wastewater  infrastructure  remains  a  top  priority  for  the  remediation  of  Marsh  Creek.  

 

An  increase  in  riparian  vegetation  would  also  be  beneficial  to  increase  water  quality  and  stabilize  the  stream  banks.   This   can   be   implemented   though   the   introduction   of   live   cuttings   in   various   locations   along   this  section.  

 

The  railway  bridges  in  this  section  should  be  rebuilt  without  in-­‐stream  pylons,  or  at  least  fewer  pylons,  which  prove  to  be  obstructions  in  the  channel.    

 

Action:  The  Harbour  Cleanup  project,  which  will   redirect   the   sewage   in   this   section   toward   the  new  Eastern  Wastewater  Treatment  Plant,  is  currently  under  construction  and  is  scheduled  for  completion  within  the  next  12  months.    

 

 

Section  8  Management  Recommendations  

Develop   a   wetland   plan   suitable   for   birdwatchers,   hikers,   et   cetera,   that   encircles   the   Forebay   area,   and  provides  access  to  this  unique  urban  wetland.  Replace  tide  gates  with  more  modern  gates  which  allow  for  fish  passage.  

Page 14: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

11  |  P a g e    

Cold  Brook  

 

Cold   Brook   is   the   most   extensive   tributary   in   the   Marsh   Creek   watershed.   This   6.7   km   sub-­‐drainage   also  contains   the   greatest   number   of   continuous   lakes,   providing   a   rich   environment   for  wildlife   as  well   as   for  residential  development.  The  brook  originates  as  the  drainage  stream  to  Quinn  Lake,  and  continues  through  Shaw’s,  Kelly  and  Mystery  Lakes  before  descending  into  the  Great  Marsh  basin  where  it  joins  Marsh  Creek  in  the  vicinity  of  Glen  Falls.  Along   its  entire   length,  Cold  Brook   is  paralleled  by  Golden  Grove  Road,  a  medium-­‐density  throughway  for  local  traffic.  Cold  Brook  passes  through  a  variety  of  terrains,  ranging  from  barren  bog  to  canopied  cascades,  which  allow  it  to  be  divided  into  four  distinct  management  areas.  

 

 

Figure 3: Aerial Photo of the Cold Brook sub-drainage, indicating the 4 management sections.

 

Page 15: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

12  |  P a g e    

 

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

The  majority  of  management  suggestions  for  this  section  pertain  to  culvert  crossings.  The  location  where  Cold  Brook  exits  Quinn  Lake,  where  there  are  three  poorly  installed.  The  grates  need  to  be  repaired,  and  large  rock  or  riprap  be  installed  to  stabilize  the  banks.  

 

Stream Section  

Location  Recommendations  

       1   Culverts as Cold

Brook leaves Quinn Lake  

Replace culverts with large, open bottom culverts. Reinforce banks  

       1   Culvert where Cold

Brook flows beneath Willis Road  

Replace culverts with large, open bottom culverts. Reinforce banks  

       1   Willis road crossing   Remove and properly dispose of Japanese Knotweed  

       2   Clayton Lane   Remove and properly dispose of Japanese Knotweed  

       2   Acadia Drywall   Create a protective buffer between Acadia Drywall

parking lot and Cold Brook  

3 Mystery Lake Dam Modify to improve upstream fish passage

       3   Behind residential

areas  Organize a cleanup of the area  

       3   Between Golden

Grove Road and Roxbury Drive  

Collect a sample of reddish brown sludge for chemical composition testing and determine the origin of the sludge  

       

3   Residential area   Inform local landowners of proper watershed management techniques and the importance of both native riparian vegetation and chemical free lawn care  

       4   Flood basin   Preserve flood basin and discourage any future

development of the area  

Page 16: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

13  |  P a g e    

The   invasive   species   Japanese   Knotweed   is   an   extremely   aggressive   and   noxious   weed.   Once   established,  Japanese  Knotweed  will  spread  throughout  an  area  choking  out  native  species  to  create  a  monoculture  along  the  riparian  zone.  There  is  a  small  colony  of  knotweed  located  along  the  stream  banks  near  the  Willis  Road.  This  colony  should  be  removed  as  soon  as  possible  to  prevent  further  spreading.  

 

Conservation  of  the  existing  natural  capital  in  this  section  is  a  priority.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

A   second   patch   of   Japanese   knotweed   is   located   streamside   along   Clayton   Lane.   This   patch   of   knotweed  should   also   be   removed   from   the   area   and   properly   disposed   of   before   given   the   chance   to   completely  destroy  the  riparian  zone.    

 

The  parking  lot  for  Acadia  Drywall  closely  borders  Cold  Brook  for  a  short  distance.  There  is  no  protection  along  this  section  of  the  stream  from  parking  lot  runoff  that  may  contain  traces  of  oil  and  other  car  fluids  as  well  as  sediments.  A  protective  buffer  containing  natural  vegetation,  such  as  cattails,  would  serve  to   filter  much  of  the  contamination  from  the  parking  lot  runoff.  

 

Section  3  Management  Recommendations  

The  amount  of  litter  and  pollution  along  the  stream  banks  of  section  three  prove  to  be  the  major  concern.  The  litter   is   mostly   small   to  medium   in   size   and   would   be   easily   removed   with   a   small   team   of   volunteers.   A  concern  is  the  thick  white  foam  and  a  slimy  reddish-­‐brown  runoff  from  the  left  stream  bank.  The  source  and  chemical  composition  of  both  foam  and  runoff  is  unknown.  This  should  be  further  investigated  to  determine  origin  and  possible  environmental  effects.  

 

A  small  section  along  the  right  hand  stream  bank  near  the  juncture  with  Golden  Grove  Road  contains  homes  within   close   vicinity   to   Cold   Brook.   In   some   cases   the  mowed/landscaped   lawn   butts   up   directly   with   the  stream  providing  no  vegetative  buffer.  It  is  suggested  that  the  land  owners  be  informed  of  the  importance  of  protecting  local  urban  streams  and  be  encouraged  to  plant  native  vegetation  streamside  and  refrain  from  the  use  of  both  pesticides  and  herbicides.  

 

The  Mystery  Lake  dam  should  be  modified  to  allow  for  upstream  fish  passage.  

 

Action:  as  part  of  the  annual  Marsh  Creek  cleanup,  this  area  was  remediated  by  local  volunteers  in  2008,  2009,  2010  and  2011.  In  addition,  this  section  was  a  major  feature  of  outreach  initiatives  as  part  of  the  Marsh  Creek  Restoration   Initiative,  highlighting   the   importance  of  proper  watershed  management   to   the   residents  of   the  neighbourhood  and  the  Greater  Saint  John  region  as  a  whole.  

Page 17: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

14  |  P a g e    

 

 

Section  4  Management  Recommendations  

This  section  is  well  barriered  from  the  everyday  activity  of  humans,  whether  by  natural  buffer  or  by  installed  fencing,   and   should   be   maintained   as   such   to   avoid   further   flood-­‐basin   degradation,   an   important  consideration  given  the  region’s  history  of  water  level  rise  during  heavy  rainfalls  and  spring  freshets.  

 

Action:   In   2010-­‐2011,   as   part   of   the  Marsh   Creek   Restoration   Initiative,   and   a   joint   project   with   the   New  Brunswick   Department   of   the   Environment,   this   floodplain   has   been   added   to   an   inventory   of   wetland  compensation  sites,  slated  for  conservation  and  enhancement.  

Page 18: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

15  |  P a g e    

Ashburn  Creek  

 

Ashburn  Creek  headwaters  originate  from  two  bodies  of  water,  Harrigan  Lake  and  Long  Lake,  in  the  far  north-­‐western  stretches  of  Rockwood  Park.  The  two  separate  headwater  streams  are  joined  within  the  park  to  form  Ashburn   Creek,   which   is   4.91   km   Long.   The   creek   goes   through   changes   resulting   in   four   distinct   stream  sections  ranging  from  cedar  bog  to  rocky  mountain  stream.  The  stream  is  fairly  isolated  for  the  majority  of  its  run  with  the  exception  of  the  last  section.  

 

 

Figure 4: Aerial photo of the Ashburn Creek sub-drainage, indicating the management section divisions.

 

Stream Section  

Location  Recommendations  

       1b   Long Lake   Improve and stabilize bank where the hiking trail

crosses Long Lake  

       1c   Cherry Brook Zoo   Replace the perimeter fence surrounding the Cherry

Page 19: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

16  |  P a g e    

Brook Zoo allowing for better stream passage          2   Ashburn Lake   Install a new dam where Ashburn Creek exits Ashburn

Lake  

       2   Glen Carpenter

Center  Plant native vegetation  

       3   Middle of section   Remove old logging dam          3   Behind commercial

development  Re-vegetate and clean up fire pit area  

       4   Throughout section   Increase natural riparian vegetation    

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

This   section   is   in   very   good   condition.   Some   suggestions   would   be   to   create   better   culverts   for   easy   fish  passage  and   improve   retaining  walls   and   stream  banks   surrounding   culverts   (such  as  building   the   retaining  wall   slightly   higher   than   the   trail).     This  will   reduce   the   amount   of   erosion   and   silt   being  washed   into   the  streams  and  lakes  during  heavy  rainfall  and  high  winds.    

 

The   fence   located  at   the  Cherry  Brook  Zoo  also  needs   to  be   replaced  and   should  be  designed   in  a  manner  which  will  not  inhibit  the  flow  of  the  stream  either  upon  entrance  or  exit  from  the  zoo.  

 

Action:  Trail  maintenance   in  2010  replaced  one  of   the  stream/lake  crossings   in  question  with  a  much   larger  and  less  intrusive  structure,  however  there  remains  work  to  be  done  on  the  other  structures  in  this  section.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

The  rock  dam  separating  Ashburn  Lake  from  the  stream  is  unsuitable  for  proper  fish  passage.  The  dam  should  be  replaced  and  a  fish  ladder  should  be  installed.  This  solution  will  not  only  solve  the  problem  of  proper  fish  passage  but  can   later  be  used  as  an  educational   tool  during  the  summer  program  informing  children  of  the  proper  way  to  obtain  the  desired  result  while  causing  the  least  amount  of  environmental  damage.    

 

Natural  native  plants  should  also  be  planted  along  the  stream  banks  creating  a  buffer  zone  to  filter  and  trap  wind  blown  garbage,   increase  canopy  cover  and  naturally  stabilize  the  stream  banks.  Again  this  can  also  be  used  as  a  future  educational  tool  for  the  summer  educational  program.    

 

Page 20: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

17  |  P a g e    

Section  3  Management  Recommendations  

The  old  logging  dam  is  inhibiting  the  natural  flow  of  the  stream  and  should  be  removed  allowing  Alder  Creek  to  revert  to  its  natural  state.  

 

The   riparian   area   near   the   fire   pit   should   be   re-­‐vegetated  with   natural   vegetation   to   protect   the   area   and  create  canopy  cover.  

 

Section  4  Management  Recommendations  

Riparian  vegetation  has  been  greatly  reduced  in  many  portions  of  this  section  allowing   litter,  sediment,  and  roadway  runoff   to  enter   the  stream  with  ease.  Throughout   this  section  native  species  should  be  planted  to  help  provide  a  vegetative  buffer  from  human  stress  and  increase  the  canopy  cover  for  the  stream.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 21: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

18  |  P a g e    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 22: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

19  |  P a g e    

Little  Marsh  Creek  

 

Little  Marsh  Creek  is  a  4.22  km  long  secondary  tributary  of  the  Marsh  Creek  watershed,  extending  between  Moosepath   and   Brookville   in   east   Saint   John.   The   creek   forms   a   380   ha   sub-­‐drainage   in   the  Marsh   Creek  watershed,   consisting  mostly   of   bogs   and  marshes,   including   the   area   known   as   Drury’s   Pasture.   The   sub-­‐drainage  can  be  divided  into  2  distinct  sections  for  management.  

 

 

Figure 5: Aerial photo of Little Marsh Creek, indicating the management section divisions.

 

 

Stream Section  

Location  Recommendations  

       1   Near Lawlor Lake   Limit stream crossing and when crossing is necessary

create a crossing which causes the least environmental damage  

       

Page 23: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

20  |  P a g e    

1   Quarry 1   Sections of the stream in close vicinity to the quarry should be monitored for increased sediment load and runoff  

       2   Drury Cove

vicinity  Clean up and prevent further illegal dumping  

       2   Near Foster

Thurston  Re-vegetate riparian zone with native species to create a natural buffer  

       2   Quarry 2   Replace old culvert with a larger, opened bottom culvert  

       2   Quarry 2   Reinforce banks along culvert crossing with large rock and

native vegetation  

 

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

ATV   access   to   this   area   should   be  monitored   and   any   areas  where   stream   crossing   is   necessary   should   be  properly  reinforced  to  limit  damage  to  the  stream.    

 

The  section  of  the  stream  located  near  the  quarry  should  also  be  monitored  for  runoff  and  sediment  loading.  

 

Action:  The  outlet  of  Lawlor  Lake  was  replaced  by  the  Brookville  quarry  in  2009  with  a  modern  structure  with  proper   fish   passage   and   stormwater   drainage.   Subsequent   modifications   and  monitoring   of   sediment   flow  continued  for  two  years  hence  and  have  since  been  completed.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

There   is   a   small   amount   of   illegal   dumping   located   off   dirt   access   roads   near   Drury   Cove   Road.   Action   to  remove   the   garbage   should  be   taken  along  with   a  preventative  measures  protecting   from   future  dumping.  These  could  include  simple  measures  such  as  blocking  off  the  areas  prone  to  dumping  with  large  boulders,  or  it  could  mean  installing  cameras  to  capture  illegal  dumping  violators  in  order  to  publicly  embarrass  them.    

 

The   riparian   vegetation   along   the   banks   of   Little  Marsh  Creek   near   Foster   Thurston  Road  has   been   greatly  reduced,   allowing   an   increase   in   environmental   stress,   erosion,   sediment   load,   and   reduced   canopy   cover.  The  natural  riparian  vegetation  should  be  replaced  along  the  banks  restoring  the  protective  buffer.  

 

As  Little  Marsh  Creek  crosses  the  throughway  to  the  second  quarry  two  major  problems  are  encountered.  The  first  is  the  unacceptable  culvert  that  allows  the  stream  to  cross  the  quarry’s  access  road.  Secondly  the  banks  

Page 24: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

21  |  P a g e    

are  not  stable  allowing  much  loose  gravel  to  wash  into  the  stream  altering  the  streams  ecology.  This  culvert  should   be   replaced   with   a   large   open   bottom   version   accompanied   with   reinforced   banks   to   reduce   the  sedimentation.  The  banks  can  be  reinforced  with  large  riprap  accompanied  with  vegetation  to  create  a  buffer.    

 

Action:  While  a  number  of  cleanups  have  taken  place  over  each  of  the  past  five  years  in  this  section,  little  has  been  done  to  address  the  ongoing  issue  of  illegal  dumping  and  it  continues  to  be  a  problem  in  this  part  of  the  Marsh  Creek  watershed.  

Page 25: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

22  |  P a g e    

Majors  Brook  

 

Majors  Brook,  with  a  length  of  2.18  km,  is  a  small  tributary  to  Marsh  Creek.  The  headwaters  for  Majors  Brook  stem   from   a   small   stream   located   near   Michael   Crescent   and   a   small   wetland   located   adjacent   to   the  southeast   parking   lot   of   McAllister   Place.   The   stream   can   be   broken   into   four   major   sections   based   on  environmental  criteria.  

 

 

Figure 6: Aerial Photo of Majors Brook indicating the 4 management sections.

 

Stream Section  

Location  Recommendations  

       1   Wetland adjacent

McAllister Place  Clean the area of all refuse and backfill  

       1   Wetland adjacent

McAllister Place  Protect from further development. Maintain 30 m vegetation buffer. Educate citizens on its value for wildlife and flood abatement  

Page 26: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

23  |  P a g e    

       2   Adjacent McAllister

Place  Increase natural riparian vegetation  

       2   Adjacent McAllister

Place  Install new culvert where Majors Brook crosses Westmorland Road  

       2   Adjacent McAllister

Place  Install signs educating people of the importance of healthy streams  

       3   Between Wal-Mart

and Parkway Mall  Increase natural riparian vegetation along stream banks  

       4   Between Majors

Brook Road and Union with Marsh Creek  

Increase natural riparian vegetation along stream banks (focus on culvert near Rothesay Avenue)  

       4   Between Majors

Brook Road and Union with Marsh Creek  

Redirect raw sewage from entering Majors Brook  

                       All Sections   Total length of

Majors Brook  Major Clean up on a regular basis to remove all C&D, industrial, and household refuse from Majors Brook and riparian zone  

 

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

This  wetland   is   a   prime  piece  of   natural   capital   amidst   an  urban   setting,   and   should  be   conserved  or   even  enhanced   for   public   enjoyment.   The   wetland   should   be   protected   from   further   degradation   and   the   silt  removed.  The   legislated  30  m  buffer   zone  should  be  strictly  adhered   to/  Development  around   this  wetland  should  be  a  major  concern  for  urban  planner  concerned  about  flooding  in  east  Saint  John.  

 

Action:  While   annual   cleanups   have   taken   place   over   each   of   the   past   five   years   in   this   section   of  Majors  Brook,  little  has  been  done  to  address  the  ongoing  issue  of  illegal  dumping  and  it  continues  to  be  a  problem  in  this  part  of  the  Marsh  Creek  watershed.  In  addition,  while  portions  of  in-­‐fill  from  the  adjacent  mall  parking  lot  were   removed   in   2010   as   part   of   an   enforcement   action,   the   wetland   could   still   be   further   expanded   for  stormwater  holding  capacity  if  historic  in-­‐fill  were  also  removed.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

Page 27: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

24  |  P a g e    

This   section  of   the   stream   is   highly   contaminated  and   contains   little   riparian   vegetation.   In   2005  and  2006  ACAP  Saint  John  planted  shrubbery  to  begin  to  alleviate  this  issue,  however  the  stream  banks  should  continue  to  be  re-­‐vegetated  and  better  stream  buffers  established  to  further  reduce  erosion  and  parking  lot  runoff.    

 

Education  plays  a  key  role  in  improving  and  protecting  this  section  of  the  stream.  Many  citizens  of  Saint  John  do  not  realize  that  Majors  Brook  flows  adjacent  the  retail  stores  in  the  area  and  believe  it  is  merely  a  plebian  ditch.   By   educating   the   public   and   increasing   awareness   of   the   importance   of   our   urban   streams   we   can  reduce  the  amount  of  negative  anthropogenic  impacts.  

 

The  culvert  on  Westmorland  Road  needs  to  be  increased  in  size  and  the  surrounding  banks  must  be  stabilized.  

 

Section  3  Management  Recommendations  

It  is  suggested  that  the  amount  of  large  native  trees  be  increased  along  the  stream  banks,  focusing  on  the  left  hand  stream  bank  next  to  the  Parkway  Mall  parking  lot.  

 

Action:  Tree  plantings  of  native  conifer  species  were  conducted  by  ACAP  Saint  John  in  2008  and  2009,  seeking  to  improve  riparian  cover  in  this  section  of  Majors  Brook.  

Page 28: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

25  |  P a g e    

 

Section  3  Management  Recommendations  

The   primary   management   suggestion   for   this   section   of   stream   would   be   to   treat   and   eliminate   the   raw  sewage  discharging  into  the  stream.    

 

Native  riparian  vegetation  should  be  planted  along  the  stream  banks  near  Rothesay  Avenue.  This  vegetation  will  increase  canopy  cover  and  provide  a  natural  buffer  reducing  the  amount  of  runoff  and  litter  entering  the  stream.  

 

Action:  The  Harbour  Cleanup  project,  which  will   redirect   the   sewage   in   this   section   toward   the  new  Eastern  Wastewater  Treatment  Plant,  is  currently  under  construction  and  is  scheduled  for  completion  within  the  next  12  months.    

Page 29: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

26  |  P a g e    

Fisher  Lakes  Tributary  

 

Fisher  Lakes  tributary,  as  the  name  implies,  flows  from  the  three  Fisher  Lakes  located  in  Rockwood  Park  for  a  length  of  2.4  km  to  its  terminus  with  Marsh  Creek.  The  Fisher  Lakes  Tributary  can  be  divided  into  two  distinct  management  sections.  

 

 

Figure 7: Aerial photo of the Fisher Lakes Tributary indicating the 2 management sections.

 

Stream Section  

Location  Recommendations  

       1   Emerging from

under parking lot adjacent Fisher Lake 3  

Remedy hanging culvert  

       1   Entire section   Organize a cleanup to remove litter and illegal dumping  

Page 30: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

27  |  P a g e    

       1   Where FLT leaves

Fisher Lake 3  Plant native riparian vegetation along the stream banks  

       1   After entrance to

camp ground  Replace old dam with a new version more suitable for fish passage  

       1   After entrance to

camp ground  Groom and improve existing trail connecting the Allison Grounds ball field and Rockwood Park  

 

 

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

The   hanging   culvert   at   the   beginning   of   the   stream   (crossing   under   the   parking   lot)   can   be   improved   by  building  up  the  stream  creating  a  small  pool  and  raising  the  water  level  to  become  even  with  the  culvert.  

 

A  clean  up  is  suggested  for  the  entire  section  to  remove  the  littler  scatter  through  the  stream.  The  clean  up  should  focus  a   large  effort  on  the  final  stretches  of  the  section  because  this   is  where  the  garbage  and   litter  deposition  is  greatest.    

 

It  is  suggested  that  native  riparian  vegetation  be  planted  along  the  bank  as  the  stream  leaves  Fisher  Lakes  to  increase  canopy  cover,  create  a  buffer  and  decrease  erosion.    

 

The   dam   and   bridge   located   near   the   large   waterfall   should   be   replaced   with   a   more   structurally   sound  alternative  which  will  also  improve  the  trail  allowing  pedestrian  access  to  the  park  from  the  Allison  Grounds.    

 

Action:   Cleanups   were   conducted   in   this   section   over   several   years   ranging   from   2006   through   2011.   In  addition,  planned  improvements  to  the  dam  near  the  entrance  to  the  Rockwood  campground  are  pending.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 31: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

28  |  P a g e    

 

 

Page 32: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

29  |  P a g e    

Little River  

The   Little  River’s  headwaters   stem   from   two   lakes   located   in   East   Saint   John,  Cooks   Lake  and  Douglas   Lake.   Little   River   flows   for   15.65   km,   from  headwaters   to   the   terminus   at   the  Bay  of  Fundy,   making   Little   River   the   longest   sub-­‐drainage   within   the   watershed.   Based   on  geographical,   habitat   types   and   developmental   changes   Little   River   is   divided   into   seven  management  sections.  

 

 

 

Figure 8: Aerial view of Little River showcasing the seven management sections.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 33: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

30  |  P a g e    

 

Watershed  Management  Recommendations  -­‐  Little  River  

 

Stream Section  

Location   Recommendations  

       1a   Douglas Lake   Protect undeveloped shoreline; educate public as to the

importance of maintaining native riparian vegetation  

       1b   Cooks Lake  

 Preserve undeveloped shoreline and revegetate cleared riparian buffers  

       2   Entire length of section   Assess ATV crossings and create proper ATV fords

where appropriate  

       2   Norris Road and Bustin Lake   Three locations require riparian vegetation renewal

including alder or willow joint plantings  

       3   Entire section   Cleanups on a regular basis to remove all C&D,

industrial, and household refuse from Little River and riparian zone  

       3   Pipeline Road East and

Phinney Hill    

Road reconstruction with a proper culvert crossing to prevent further washout  

       3   Little River Reservoir  

 Assess ATV crossings and create proper ATV fords or bridges where appropriate  

       

4   Culverts  Between  Little  River  Reservoir  and  Simonds  High  School  

Stream bank revegetation, repair gabions, improve canopy cover, reduce ATV traffic through the stream itself  

       4   Silver  Falls  Reservoir   Remediation of stream bank vegetation, removal of sand

plume, erosion protection measures.  

       5   Silver  Falls   Maintain natural status of the falls, monitor upstream

dam  

       

Page 34: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

31  |  P a g e    

6   Adjacent to the Irving Oil Refinery  

Replace antiquated culvert crossings, remove all abandoned stream crossings  

 

Section  1a  Management  Recommendations  

The   management   recommendations   for   this   section   would   include   discouraging   future  development   of   any   remaining   undeveloped   sections   of   the   shoreline.   Also   residents   who  landscape   directly   to   the   lake   should   be   provided   with   an   information   packet   stressing   the  importance  of  riparian  vegetation  along  the  shoreline.  

 

Section  1b  Management  Recommendations  

Preserve   undeveloped   shoreline   and   re-­‐vegetate   areas   where   riparian   vegetation   has   been  removed.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

Recreational  ATV  trails  can  be  detrimental   to   the  health  of  any  watercourse.  As  vehicles  cross  the  stream  they  may  cause  erosion  of  the  stream  banks,  disturbance  of  the  streambed,  and  act  as   a   point   source   pollutant   by   depositing   oil,   gas   and   other   fluids   into   the   stream.   It   is  recommended   that   any   necessary   crossings   of   Little   River   be   assessed   to   create   an   ATV   ford  which   will   not   be   environmentally   damaging.   Alternatively,   a   small   bridge   with   appropriate  reinforcement  of  the  stream  and  banks  could  be  installed.  

The   stream   banks   at   three   locations   need   an   increase   in   native   riparian   vegetation.   The   first  location   is  downstream  of  where   Little  River   crosses   the  Norris  Road   in   section  2a.  Additional  native   riparian   vegetation   should   be  planted   along   the   stream  banks   to   buffer   the   residential  lawns   from   the  watercourse.   Local   residents   also   should   be   informed   of   the   danger   of   using  lawn  care  chemicals.  The  second  location  is  the  newly  installed  crossing  also  on  the  Norris  Road,  located   in   section  2b.   Joint  plantings  of   alder  or  willow   should  be   included  with   the   riprap   to  create  a  vegetative  buffer  helping  to  filter  road  runoff.  The  third  location  is  further  downstream,  in  section  2c,  as  Little  River  approaches  Bustin  Lake.  There  is  a  location  on  the  left  stream  bank  near  a  residential  home  where  riparian  vegetation  has  been  removed.  Native  riparian  vegetation  should  be  replanted.  

 

Section  3  Management  Recommendations  

The  major  issue  of  concern  within  this  section  is  the  large  amount  of  illegal  dumping.  The  main  entrance  to  the  Pipe  Line  Road  East  (near  the  Little  River  Reservoir  parking  lot)  has  been  blocked  with  a  chain   to  prevent  easy  vehicular  access;  however,   there  are  other  methods  of  access   to  both   this   road   and   the   surrounding   network   of  ATV   trails.  One   such   entrance   is   simply   a   few  hundred   feet   down   the   road   allowing   people   to   bypass   the   chain   blocking   access   to   the  entrance.  An  increased  amount  of  monitoring  in  this  area  and  harsher  consequences  for  illegal  

Page 35: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

32  |  P a g e    

dumping  would  be  beneficial   in  reducing  the  amount  of   illegal  dumping   in  the  area.  The  other  entrances  to  the  area  should  also  be  blocked  to  reduce  the  amount  of  traffic  entering  the  area.  

Not   all   dumpsites   were   targeted   during   the   first   cleanup   because   of   the   limited   time   and  resources.  A  second  clean  up  should  be  organized  to  remove  remaining  refuse  deposited  within  the  Little  River  Reservoir  area.  

Actions:  The  City  of  Saint  John  has  increased  signage  and  installed  video  surveillance  cameras  to  deter  illegal  dumping.  Increased  pedestrian  activity  associated  with  upgrades  to  the  Pipeline  Rd  also  appears  to  be  acting  as  an  effective  deterrent  to  illegal  dumping  activities.  

 

Little  River   crosses  directly   over   the  Pipe   Line  Road  East   after   passing   through  a  beaver  dam.  This   crossing   has   resulted   in   erosion   of   the   Pipe   Line   Road   East   and   nearby   stream   banks,  resulting  in  a  general  widening  of  the  streambed.  The  road  should  be  reconstructed  to  include  a  proper  culvert  crossing  for  Little  River.  

Actions:  The  City  of  Saint  John  completed  upgrades  to  the  water  main  running  beneath  Pipe  Line  Rd  East,  resulting  in  the  creation  of  proper  culverts  and  bridges,  as  well  as  the  creation  of  a  new  stream   (Phinney  Hill   Stream)   that  effectively   channels  water   through   salmonid  habitat  directly  into   Little   River.   This   project   also   improved   fish   passage   through   culverts   at   Graham’s   Brook.    There  are  no  longer  any  existing  water-­‐related  issues  identified  for  this  section  of  Little  River.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 36: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

33  |  P a g e    

Man-­‐made   Phinney   Hill   Stream   (left)   has   shown   remarkable   capacity   to   provide   habitat   for  Brook  trout,  Brown  trout,  black  nosed  dace  and  sticklebacks.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Improved  fish  passage  at  Graham’s  Brook,  Little  River  watershed.  

 

Downstream  from  where  Little  River  crosses  Pipe  Line  Road  East,  another  ATV  trail   crossing   is  encountered.   This   trail   is   a   wide   dirt   road   and   Little   River   flows   beneath   through   three   old,  clogged,  concrete  culverts.  These  culverts  should  be  replaced  with  one  large  open  bottom  metal  culverts  and  the  surrounding  stream  banks  should  be  reinforced  with  gabions  and  joint  plantings  of  alder  and  willow.  

Actions:   A   new   bridge   was   installed   as   a   condition   of   the   water   main   upgrade   resulting   in  exception  ATV  and  city  vehicle  access  across  Little  River.  

 

 

 

 

Page 37: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

34  |  P a g e    

A  newly   (2010)   constructed  bridge  over   Little   River   can  be   viewed   in   the  background  as  ACAP  staff  conduct  riparian  vegetation  work  along  the  man-­‐made  Phinney  Hill  Stream.  

 

The   Little   River   Restoration   Association   has   developed   a   number   of   suggestions   for  improvements   to   the   reservoir   and   surrounding   area.   Their   main   goal   is   to   develop   a  recreational  park  complete  with  walking  trails  for  the  residents  of  east  Saint  John  to  enjoy.  Their  goal  is  to  create  a  natural  and  environmentally  friendly  trail  system  allowing  people  to  relax  and  enjoy  walking  in  a  natural  setting.  

Action:  The  Little  River  Restoration  Association  has  successfully  partnered  with  Irving  Oil  Ltd.  to  develop  the  aforementioned  trail  system.  This  work  commenced  in  2011,  including  a  new  bridge  over  Little  River  that  is  expected  to  be  completed  in  2012.  

 

Section  4  Management  Recommendations  

Native   riparian   vegetation  has  been   reduced   in   various   locations   throughout   this   section.   The  first  location  encountered  in  need  of  increased  vegetation  is  located  along  the  left  stream  bank  as   Little   River   leaves   the   reservoir.   The   left   bank   vegetation   has   been   reduced   by   the  aquaculture   facility   located  beside   the  bank.  An   inquiry  of   this   facility   should  be  conducted   to  ensure  the  aquaculture  practices  meet  provincial  standards  for  operation  near  a  watercourse.  

Page 38: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

35  |  P a g e    

The  second  area  in  need  of  re-­‐vegetation  is  located  along  the  right  stream  bank  where  Simonds  High  School   sports   field   is   located.   The  manicured   lawn  of   the   field   and   surrounding   sidelines  extends  to  the  right  bank  of  Little  River.  A  small  portion  of  the  bank  is  reinforced  with  gabions,  however  the  gabions  are   loose  and  sagging  towards  the  stream.  The  un-­‐reinforced  portions  of  the  bank  are  eroding  as  the  stream  flows,  particularly  with  increased  water  levels.  By  increasing  the  native  riparian  vegetation,  such  as  alder  and  willow,  banks  stabilization  reducing  erosion  is  only  one  of   the  benefits.   The   reduced  erosion  will   also  decrease   the   sediment   load  deposited  into   the   stream   and   the   vegetation   will   provide   canopy   cover   and   in   stream   wood   debris,  creating  better  fish  habitat.  

The  third  area  with  a  significant  decrease  in  riparian  vegetation  is  the  sand  plume  created  from  the  mass  wasting  of  sand  from  a  nearby  sand  pit  into  Silver  Falls  Reservoir.  The  sand  plume  has  resulted   in  removal  of  all   riparian  vegetation  and  an   increase   in  the  area  of  the  shoreline.  The  sand  plume  should  be  physically  removed  to  restore  the  bank  to  the  natural  shape  and  the  use  of   fascines   with   live   staking   can   be   installed   in   tiers   to   create   a  multi-­‐leveled   barrier   against  future  mass   wasting.   A   fascine   is   a  method,   using   bundles   of   live   dormant   cuttings,   allowing  large  amounts  of  riparian  vegetation  to  take  root  establishing  a  health  population  within  a  small  time  frame.  

Action:  ACAP  Saint   John   (2007)  created  a  barrier   to   the  movement  of  sand   into   the  Silver  Falls  Reservoir.   The   barrier   was   constructed   of   large   pieces   of   shale,   with   grass   and   rose   bushes  planted   across   the   plume   channel   to   reduce   water   velocities   and   increase   opportunities   for  vegetation.  The  rock  barriers  were  also  constructed  to  deter  ATV  traffic  which  had  created  the  furrows  that  channeled  water  and  sand  into  the  reservoir.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barrier  to  sand  deposition  in  the  Silver  Falls  Reservoir  of  Little  River.  

 

Page 39: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

36  |  P a g e    

Chemical  analyses  of  the  murky  and  orange  water  from  the  small  tributary  connecting  from  the  south  should  be  conducted.  The  test  will  reveal  the  composition  of  the  substances  causing  water  discolouration  in  the  steam  and  whether  they  are  detrimental  to  the  health  of  wildlife  using  the  stream.  

Recreational   ATV   use   is   common   throughout   this   section,   particularly   behind   Simonds   High  School  and  near  the  Silver  Falls  Reservoir.  The  trails  show  the  frequent  use  by  the  presence  of  deep  ruts,  muddy  pools,  and  eroded  trail  edges,  which  result  in  a  general  widening  of  the  trails.  There  are  portions  where  these  trails  come  close  to,   in  contact  with,  or  cross   the  stream.  The  small  tributary  from  the  south  is  crossed  twice  by  ATV  trails.  The  first  crossing  allows  the  stream  to   cross   under   the   trail   through   two   culverts.   Further   downstream   another   trail   crossed   the  tributary   over   branches   local   residents   have   deposited   into   the   stream.   The   branches   are  causing  a  blockage   in   the   stream  reducing   the  natural   flow.  This  makeshift   crossing   should  be  removed  and  redesigned  to  provide  an  environmentally  friendly  crossing  for  recreational  ATV.  

 

Section  5  Management  Recommendations  

The  natural  beauty  of  Silver  Falls  should  be  preserved  and  maintained.  

A  closer  look  at  the  Silver  Falls  Dam  is  suggested.  The  dam  should  not  be  inhibiting  fish  passage  and  should  include  a  fish  ladder.  

 

Section  6  Management  Recommendations  

This  section  is  currently  managed  by  Ducks  Unlimited.  

 

Section  7  Management  Recommendations  

The  crossing  beneath  the  railroad  is  in  poor  condition.  A  new  train  bridge  should  replace  this  old  culvert  crossing.  Also  the  old,  unused  crossing  should  be  removed  allowing  the  stream  to  flow  freely.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 40: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

37  |  P a g e    

Graham  Brook    

 

Graham  Brook  has  a  total  length  of  7.36  km  originating  from  a  Finnegan’s  Bog  located  just  above  Churchland   Road   to   the   Little   River   Reservoir   where   it   meets   Little   River.   The   stream   flows  through  a   forested,   boggy,   and   residential   area.  Based  on   changes  within   the   stream  Graham  Brook  is  divided  into  three  sections  for  management.    

 

 

Figure 9: Aerial photo of Graham Brook indicating the three management sections.

 

Stream Section  

Location   Recommendations  

       1   Long Lake  

 Cleanup of refuse along stream banks, preserve undeveloped lake shore.  

       1   Long Lake  

 Monitor runoff from agriculture to ensure water quality and safety.

Page 41: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

38  |  P a g e    

 

       2   Loch Lomond Road   Increase riparian vegetation  

       2   Entire Length of Section   Conserve vast natural areas  

       3   Concrete Dam  

 Replace or repair dam with a new one allowing better fish passage (incorporating open-bottomed culverts)  

       3   Little River Reservoir  

 Proper ATV crossings should be installed where appropriate  

 

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

A   cleanup   of   the   area   should   be   conducted   to   remove   the   litter   deposited   along   the   stream  banks.  

The  well-­‐vegetated  and  currently  undeveloped  shore  of  Long  Lake  should  be  preserved.  

Long   Lake   appears   to   be   well   buffered   from   Lakewood   Stables,   however   water   quality   tests  should   be   conducted   to   ensure   the   fecal   coliform   levels   are   within   acceptable   boundaries.  Manure  piles  from  the  stable  may  increase  the  fecal  coliform  levels.  Bacteria  can  be  transported  via  rainwater  runoff  into  the  lake.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

Increase  the  native  riparian  vegetation  along  the  stream  banks  near  Loch  Lomond  Road.  

Conserve  the  natural  areas  that  presently  exist  within  this  stretch.  

 

Section  3  Management  Recommendations  

The   dam   located   near   Little   River   Reservoir   is   in   very   poor   condition.   This   dam   should   be  replaced  and  a  new  open  bottom  culvert  should  be   installed  where  Graham  Brook  crosses  the  dirt  access  road  to  allow  better  fish  passage.  

If   ATV   use   is   not   eliminated   from   the   Little   River   Reservoir   and   surrounding   area,   then   an  appropriate  stream  crossing  should  be  installed  where  an  ATV  trail  crosses  Graham  Brook.  

 

Page 42: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

39  |  P a g e    

Actions:  Refer  to  Little  River  Reservoir  Association  and  City  of  Saint  John  activities  in  Section  3.  

 

Page 43: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

40  |  P a g e    

Buck  Lake  Tributary  

 

The   Buck   Lake   Tributary,   as   the   name   implies,   flows   north   from   Buck   Lake,   located   south   of  Latimore  Lake  Road,  for  a  length  of  2.55  km  to  its  terminus,  where  it  intersects  with  Little  River  in   the   Little   River   Reservoir.   The   Buck   Lake   Tributary   can   be   divided   into   two   distinct  management  sections.  

 

 

Figure 10: Aerial photo indicating the two management sections of the Buck Lake Tributary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 44: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

41  |  P a g e    

Stream Section  

Location   Recommendations  

       1   Buck Lake  

 Preserve the natural lake habitat and monitor the impact of nearby resource operations  

       2   Latimore Lake Road  

 Improve culverts by using open-bottomed type  

       2   Latimore Lake Road  

 Increase natural riparian vegetation and improve canopy cover for the stream  

       2   Little River Reservoir  

 Assess ATV crossings and create proper ATV fords where appropriate  

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

 

Given   the   lack   of   development   on   the   lake   itself,   no   immediate   action   is   necessary.  However  given  all  the  closely  bordering  influences,  the  area  should  be  monitored  to  ensure  it  remains  as  protected  as  possible.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

 

The   culverts   under   Latimore   Lake   Road   should   be   improved   by   removing   the   antiquated  concrete   pipes   and   replacing   them   with   a   single   large   open-­‐bottomed   culvert.   This   would  improve  fish  passage  and  reduce  the  chances  of  debris  clogging  the  culverts.  Riparian  vegetation  along   the   residential   property   on   the   upstream   side   of   the   road   could   also   be   improved   by  planting  native  riparian  species  to  provide  canopy  and  reduce  runoff.  

The  ATV  crossings  near  the  Little  River  Reservoir  should  be  given  consideration,  preferably  with  the   construction   of   a   proper   bridge   structure   so   that   the   vehicles   do   not   drive   through   the  watercourse  itself.  

 

Actions:  Refer  to  Little  River  Reservoir  Association  and  City  of  Saint  John  activities  in  Section  3.  

 

 

Page 45: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

42  |  P a g e    

Blackall  Lake  Tributary  

 

The  Blackall  Lake  Tributary  flows  south  from  Blackall  Lake,  located  north  of  Loch  Lomond  Road,  for  a   length  of  1.2  km  to   its   terminus,  where   it   intersects  with  Little  River.  This   intersection   is  approximately   half   a   kilometre   downstream   from   the   Little   River   Reservoir.   The   Blackall   Lake  Tributary  can  be  divided  into  two  distinct  management  sections.  

 

 

Figure 11: Aerial photo of the Blackall Lake Tributary indicating the two management sections.

 

 

 

 

 

Page 46: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

43  |  P a g e    

Stream Section  

Location   Recommendations  

       1   Blackall Lake  

 Monitor new development to ensure minimal impact on lake habitat  

       1   Blackall Lake  

 Increase native riparian vegetation in new residential areas  

       1   Old Lake Trail   Improve silt and road runoff protection measures  

       1   Entire Length of Section   Organize community cleanups/awareness programs

to reduce the onslaught of litter unto the stream  

       2   Loch Lomond Road  

 Remove invasive riparian monocultures and replace with native riparian vegetation  

 

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

The  shoreline  around  Blackall   Lake   is  experiencing   residential  development.  This  development  should   be   monitored   to   find   a   balance   between   the   human   use   of   the   lake   and   ecological  concerns.   The   new   residents   should   be   informed   of   the   benefits   of   riparian   vegetation   and  urged  to  landscape  their  property  in  the  most  environmentally  friendly  manner.  

Action:   Construction   activities   including   associated   post   development   landscaping   have   been  completed  resulting  in  the  alleviation  of  this  issue.  

The  debris  and  collapsed  silt  fencing  should  be  removed  from  the  culvert,  which  carries  Blackall  Lake   Tributary   beneath   Old   Lake   Trail.   A   community   based   clean-­‐up   of   the   area   should   be  organized  to  remove  the  litter  that  has  blown  into  the  stream.  

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

The   Japanese  Knotweed  along   the   stream  banks   should  be   removed  and   replaced  with  native  riparian  vegetation.  

 

 

Page 47: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

44  |  P a g e    

Alder  Brook  

 

The  Alder  Brook  watershed,   located   in  Milledgeville,   Saint   John,  NB  encompasses  a   total   land  area  of  245  hectares.  The  watershed  contains  one  predominant  stream  (Alder  Brook),  which  originates  at   the  southern  end  of  Crescent  Lake  and  extends  2.5  km  to  its  terminus  in  Brothers  Cove  of  the  Kennebecasis  River.  Alder  Brook  also  receives  point  source   inputs  of  water  from  a  culvert  which  carries   intermittent  runoff  from  a  hillside  near  the  Saint  John  Regional  Hospital,  and  a  small,  permanent,  spring  fed  tributary  which  drains  from  a  steep  northern  slope  in  its  lower  section.  The  major  watercourse  contained  within  the  Alder  brook  watershed  can  be  divided  into  six  distinct  sections  based  upon  physical  characteristics.  

 

 

Figure 12: Aerial view of Alder Brook divided into six distinct management sections.

 

Page 48: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

45  |  P a g e    

 

 

Section  1  Management  Recommendations  

The   stature   of   Crescent   Lake   as   a   component   of   Rockwood   Park   has   provided   a   measure   of  protection  against  commercial  or  residential  developments.  Furthermore,  Rockwood  Park  does  not   administer   pesticides   to   its   properties   (Bernie   Morrison,   City   of   Saint   John,   personal  communication),  and  as  such,  acts  as  a  green  barrier  against  such  chemicals.    It  is  recommended  that   the   watershed   surrounding   Crescent   Lake   be   maintained   at   its   present   state.   Annual  cleanups   of   debris   from   the   shoreline   of   Crescent   Lake   would   minimize   the   risks   to   wildlife  associated  with  discarded  fishing  tackle  and  plastic  bags.  

Actions:  Cleanups  of  litter  and  debris  have  been  conducted  throughout  Alder  Brook,  and  followed  up   with   electrofishing   surveys.   This   small   stream   has   proven   to   contain   an   abundance   of  cyprinids  and  Brook  trout.  

 

 

 

Stream Section  

Location  Recommendations  

       1   Watershed around

Crescent Lake  Maintain existing green zone around lake. Conduct annual cleanups of litter along shoreline  

       2   Water control

structure at outlet to Crescent Lake  

Design and construct structure to enable fish passage to and from Crescent Lake  

       2   Throughout entire

section  Increase number of pools and improve fish passage though in stream structures  

       2   Pond created by

wooden dam  Remove old irrigation, pump structure  

       2   New Development   Monitor new development and plant native tress

where erosion may become a problem  

       4   Entire section   Monitor for toxins          5   Entire section   Develop a plan to improve in stream fish habitat and

preserve current condition of this section  

       6   Outlet to Brothers

Cove  Remove debris inhibiting fish passage and maintain improved  

Page 49: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

46  |  P a g e    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACAP   staff   conduct   electrofishing   survey   of   Alder   Brook   following   cleanup   of   litter   and   debris  from  stream  and  riparian  zones.  

 

 

Section  2  Management  Recommendations  

This   upper   section   of   Alder   Brook   possesses   a   unique   opportunity   to   conduct   fish   habitat  improvement  work,  possibly   in   conjunction  with   the  Canadian  Rivers   Institute  associated  with  the  nearby  University  of  New  Brunswick.  Specifically,  an  annual  field  course  could  be  conducted  whereby   fish   habitat   and  water   quality   parameters   are   quantified   and   qualified;   a   number   of  improvement  options  are  produced,  debated,  decided  upon,  and  ultimately  implemented  in  the  field.       The   course   could  monitor   characteristics   of   the   brook   trout   population   each   year   and  determine  the  success  of  their  efforts.  

 

Specific  habitat  improvement  options  identified  in  this  report  include  increasing  the  amount  of  pool  habitat,  improving  fish  passage  through  the  water  control  structure  at  Crescent  Lake,  at  the  man-­‐made  irrigation  dam,  and  through  the  cascades  amidst  the  section  dominated  by  bedrock  substrates.  Removing  the  Styrofoam  and  plastic   imbedded   in   the   irrigation  dam  as  well  as   the  old  pump  housing  itself  would  reduce  the  amount  of  debris  entering  the  brook.  

Page 50: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

47  |  P a g e    

 

The  obvious  degradation  of  water  quality  and  fish  habitat  associated  with  the  runoff   from  the  former  Howe’s   Lake   dumpsite   needs   to   be   addressed.  Watercourses   in   Saint   John   have   been  subjected  to  anthropogenic  stresses  (including  physical  disruption,  siltation  and  chemical  inputs)  for   far   too   long.     The   activities   associated   with   this   new   development   should   be   closely  monitored  to  assist  the  proponent  with  maintaining  the  environmental  integrity  of  Alder  Brook.  This  construction  has  also  removed  some  of  the  vegetative  cover  from  the  riparian  zone  along  this  section  that  should  be  replaced  upon  the  completion  of  activities.  

 

Large,   native   trees   should   be   planted   along   sections   where   openings   in   the   vegetative   cover  occur  next   to  University  Avenue.  The  vegetation  has  proven   to  be  an  effective  natural  barrier  against  litter,  debris  and  human  activities  near  the  watercourse.    

 

The  terminus  of  Section  2  occurs  at  a  culvert  that  collects  debris.    This  needs  to  be  cleared  on  a  regular   basis   to   ensure   fish   passage   and   prevent   bank   erosion   from  water   backing   up   during  heavy  flow  periods.  

 

Overall,  the  watershed  in  this  section  requires  little  in  terms  of  remediation.    The  greatest  threat  comes  from  contaminants  in  the  old  Howe’s  Lake  dumpsite,  and  from  residential  developments.    Ensuring   that   existing   guidelines   for  working   near  watercourses   are   followed   should  maintain  the  quality  of  this  brook.  

 

Section  4  Management  Recommendations  

This   section   of   Alder   Brook   flows   through   a   secluded   patch   of   grasses   and   shrubs,   which   is  surrounded  by  mature   forest.  The  primary  recommendation   for   this  section   is   to  maintain  the  vegetative   integrity   of   the   extended   riparian   zone.     However,   a   proposed   (northern   variant)  route  for  the  Liquefied  Natural  Gas  (LNG)  pipeline  cuts  through  the  unspoiled  wooded  sections  of  the  watershed  (Figure  17).  The  removal  of  large  trees,  coupled  with  the  unfettered  access  to  Alder  Brook  that  will  accompany  the  required  right-­‐of-­‐way  for  the  LNG  pipeline  will  undoubtedly  reduce  the  existing  environmental  integrity  and  spectacular  natural  capital  in  this  portion  of  the  watershed.    Specifically,  the  LNG  right-­‐of-­‐way  will   fragment  the  contiguous  wooded  areas  that  exist  on  the  northern  slope  of  the  watershed.  Given  the  amount  of  large,  wooded  habitat  in  this  portion  of   the  watershed,   it   is   recommended   that   the   LNG   right-­‐of-­‐way  not  pass   through   this  area.  However,   if  the  LNG  pipeline  cuts  through  this  portion  of  the  watershed,  measures  must  be   taken   to   ensure   vehicle   traffic   (especially   ATV’s)   is   prevented   from  using   the   right-­‐of-­‐way.    Such  vehicles  would  reduce  the  physical  integrity  of  the  steep  northern  slope,  and  would  cause  considerable   damage   to   the   soft   streambed.       Noise   pollution   from   such   activity   would   also  reduce   the   quality   of   life   for   residents   of   the   High   Ridge   Road   area,   and   could   disturb   any  wildlife   using   the   area   for   breeding.     The   proposed   right   of   way   would   also   allow   for   easy  migration   of   many   invasive   plant   species   (such   as   purple   loosestrife,   Indian   balsam,   and  

Page 51: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

48  |  P a g e    

Japanese  knotweed).  Given  the  opportunity  these  invasive  plant  species  could  strongly  compete  with   native   species   (which   currently   form   the   riparian   vegetation)   for   nutrients   and   light,  resulting  in  a  decrease  of  the  native  species.  

Maintaining  the  existing  natural  capital  in  this  section  of  the  watershed  should  be  a  top  priority  for  urban  planners  given  that  the  number  of  watercourses  in  urban  Saint  John  that  possess  the  ability   to   provide   diverse   wildlife   habitat   and   recreational   opportunities   for   our   youth   are   in  decline.   It   should   also   be   noted   that   any   pollutants   entering   the   upstream   watercourse   (for  example   from   the  old  Howe’s   Lake  dump  site)   could  have  an  adverse  effect  on  persons  using  Alder  Brook  as  a   swimming  hole.   It   is   imperative   that   regulatory  agencies  ensure  no   chemical  pollutants,  especially  toxins  that  could  affect  human  health,  be  allowed  to  enter  the  Alder  Brook  watershed.  

 

Section  5  Management  Recommendations  

The  lower  section  of  Alder  Brook  is  one  of  the  most  scenic  watercourses  in  Saint  John.  The  well-­‐treed  riparian  and  buffer  zones,  which  are  natural  extensions  of  those  in  Section  4,  are  covered  with  white-­‐tailed   deer   tracks   and   game   trails.     As  with   the   previous   section,  maintaining   the  environmental  integrity  of  this  watershed  is  vital  to  conserving  the  invaluable  natural  capital  in  this   region  of   Saint   John.     This   is   especially   true  of   the   small   cold   spring   that   feeds   into  Alder  Brook,  which  undoubtedly  helps  to  maintain  suitable  temperatures  for  brook  trout.  

 

A   well-­‐designed   fish   habitat   improvement   project   would   be   needed   to   increase   fish   passage  without  detracting  from  the  natural  aesthetics  of  the  watercourse.  It  is  recommended  that  any  such  work  be  conducted  with  the  utmost  care  and  planning  to  ensure  the  existing  cascades  and  waterfalls  are  not  eliminated.    

 

Section  6  Management  Recommendations  

This  portion  of  Alder  Brook   is   the  most  critical   for   the  passage  of  anadromous  fishes.  As  such,  the   blockage   caused   by   the   beaver   dam   should   be   removed   and   maintained   such   that   fish  passage  is  possible  year  round.  

 

Actions:  Following  an  erosion-­‐related  breach  in  road  integrity,  the  City  of  Saint  John  installed  a  new  at  Brother’s  Cove  culvert  beneath  Kennebecasis  Drive,   resulting   in   improved  opportunities  for  the  passage  of  diadromous  fishes  into  Alder  Brook.  

 

   

Page 52: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

49  |  P a g e    

Hazen  Creek  

Recommendations      Cleanup and dredging off estuary and stabilization of the gravel bar  

   Stream braided near Sewer Line and Marsh  

   Raised culvert under Railbed

 

   Raised culvert under access road  

   Stream piped between Old Black River Road and Bourques Industrial  

   Culverts on Expansion Avenue should be bottomless type

   Replace all culverts in with large, open bottom version  

   

Raised culvert at Cromwell Drive  

   Raised culvert behind NBCC. Access blocked to upper reaches  

   Stream diverted by refinery in 1975. Water from Champlain heights  

   Raised culvert under railbed  

   Enhancement behind Wirsbo  

   Mackin Brook. Restore and protect riparian zone  

   Install bottomless culvert under Gulf Operator pit road above NBCC  

   Clean silt from brook – Mackin – between Old Black River Road and Marsh  

Page 53: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

50  |  P a g e    

 

Action:  In  2010-­‐2011,  improvements  were  made  as  recommended  to  Hazen  Creek  both  upstream  of,   and   directly   adjacent   to,   the   New   Brunswick   Community   Collage   [NBCC]   campus   on  Grandview  Avenue  (see  photo  below).    

 

An  aluminium  culvert  modification  was  bolted-­‐onto  the  hanging  culvert  below  Cromwell  Drive  in  2009,  allowing  for   improved  access  by   fishes  to  the  headwaters  of   that  branch  of  Hazen  Creek  and  facilitating  better  regulation  of  in-­‐stream  water  levels.  

 

Several   management   recommendations   have   been   identified   as   pending   in   this   document,  owning   to   significant   changes   which   are   schedules   for   completion   in   the   2012-­‐2013.   These  include   the   replacement  of  culverts  under  several   roadways  and  access   roads   in   the  McAllister  Industrial   Park,   as   well   as   changes   to   existing   culverts   under   railbeds   to   allow   for   improved  drainage  and  fish  passage.  Also  included  are  remediation  projects  to  address  stream  braiding  in  lower   Hazen   Creek.   These   improvements   represent   regulated   HADD   compensation   projects  directed  toward  the  Hazen  Creek  watershed.      

 

 

 

Page 54: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

51  |  P a g e    

 

Figure 13: Hazen Creek between Bayside Drive and McIlveen Drive

Page 55: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

52  |  P a g e    

 

 

Figure 14: Improvements near NBCC. Photo by CBCL Limited

Page 56: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

53  |  P a g e    

Figure 15: Fish ladder installed on Cromwell Drive hanging culvert.

   

Page 57: Watershed Management in Saint John: 2011 Updates

 

54  |  P a g e    

Summary  

All   four   watersheds   have   been   subjected   to   alterations   since   the   original   watershed  management   plans   were   developed   in   2006.   These   management   plans   have   served   as   an  excellent  guide  to  directing  fish  habitat  compensation  requirements  (“HADD”)  towards  issues  of  priority.   Management   priorities   over   the   next   five   years   should   focus   on   ‘big   ticket   items’  associated   with   HADD   requirement   of   infrastructure   developments,   so   as   to   advance   overall  watershed   integrity   as   quickly   as   possible.   Specifically,   Marsh   Creek   needs   to   see   an  improvement   in   the   accessibility   of   diadromous   fishes   through   the   Courtenay   Bay   tide   gates  now   that   the   largest   pollution   issue   (raw   sewage   discharges)   will   be   alleviated   by   Harbour  Cleanup.   Hazen   Creek   should   have   the   multitude   of   hanging   culverts   resolved   to   enable  diadromous   and   resident   fishes   access   to   upstream   habitats.   Little   River   should   have   the  concrete  dam  at  the  outlet  of  the  Rez  modified  to  enable  upstream  passage  of   fish,  and  Alder  Brook  requires  the  barrier  between  it  and  Crescent  Lake  (beneath  Sandy  Point  Road)  alleviated  to  enable  upstream  movement  of  fish.  

Overall,  there  has  been  a  net  improvement  of  fish  habitat  in  all  four  watersheds,  indicating  the  value   of   the   original   2006   watershed   management   plans.   It   is   expected   that   this   report   will  provide  a  renewed  focus  on  resolving  the  remaining  issues  in  each  of  the  four  aforementioned  watersheds,  while  helping  to  elucidate  the  importance  of  preventing  new  problem.