VOL21NO11

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

1/12

SUBSCRIPTION RATES (2013) TWELVE ISSUES

South Africa ...................................... R30Neighbouring States .......................... $15All Other Countries .............................. $20

R ASULULLAH (SALLALLAHU ALAYHI

WASALLAM ) FORBADE IDLE CONVERSATION AFTER ISHA SALAAT .

Roses have thornsThe Haqq too

has thorns!We strike

baatil with theHaqq. Then it

crushes thebrains of

baatil. (Quraan)

KKKK HOMEINI ' S popu-lar slogan is: "NOSUNNI'ISM ANDNO SHI'ISM". This overtcall of the Shi'i priests isdesigned for the consump-tion of Sunni Muslims whoconstitute the Ummah of Rasulullah (sallallahualayhi wasallam).

However, like numerousverbal professions of theShi'i priests are based ontheir doctrine of Taqiyah, sotoo, is this vociferous sloganof "No Sunni'ism and NoShi'ism". (Taqiyah is theShiah doctrine of holy hy-

pocrisy by which it is per-missible for them to concealtheir true beliefs and professverbally what they do not

believe.) How is it possiblefor there not to be Sun-ni'ism? And, how is it possi-

ble for there not to beShi'ism? The foundation onwhich Sunni'ism is reared is

Love for the Sahaabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) while the corner-stone of Shi'ism is Hatredfor the Sahaabah . The tworeligions, viz., Islam andShi'ism are irreconcilableopposites. The one repels theother.

The slogan of Khomeiniis nothing other than a pieceof political trickery to gainthe support of the Ahl-e-Sunnah for the fulfilment of his despicable motives of

political power. A groupwhich pours out such ex-treme hatred for the Sahaa-

bah of Nab i-e-Ka reem(sallallahu alayhi wasallam)as the Shiah sect, cannever stand on the same platformwith those whose article of faith includes love and re-spect for all the Sahaabah.Shiahs who proclaim that thehighest among the Sahaabahwere murtads and kaafirs

cannever themselves beMuslims. Such vile claim-ants cannever be the friendsof those who follow the Pathof the Sunnah, the Path of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) and the illustriousSahaabah.

Khomeini stated in a mes-sage for a youth rally:"The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the worldwill not admit our power tillsuch time that we establishour hold over Makkah andMadinah because these arethe centres and citadels of Islam. Hence our dominationover these places is an essen-tial requirement. . . . . .whenas a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, thefirst thing to be done at thattime by me would be to digout the two idols (i.e. Ha-dhrat Abu Bakr and HadhratUmar) lying by the side of

t h e P r o p h e t ' sgrave." (Khomeinism & Is-lam by Abu Rehan Faarooqi)

This attitude of Khomei-ni is not only his personal

belief and personal hatredfor the two greatest Sahaa-

bah, but it mirrors the belief of Shi'ism regarding HadhratAbu Bakr Siddique and Ha-dhrat Umar (radhiyallahuanhuma). In the books of Shi'i theology, the followingnoxious beliefs are propagat-ed:* When Imaam Mahdi ap-

pears, he will order the exhu-mation of the bodies of Ha-dhrat Abu Bakr and HadhratUmar. Their bodies will behung on a tree for publicshow. Their bodies whicheven according to Shi'ismhave not decomposed, will

be stripped of their kafan.Thus, the nude bodies of these noble Sahaabah will be

put up for a disgraceful

show.* Imaam Mahdi will re-store Hadhrat Abu Bakr andHadhrat Umar to life.* The sins of entire man-kind, right from the incep-tion of the world until thetime of Imaam Mahdi's ap-

pearance, collectively de-volves on these two nobleSahaabah. Hence, ImaamMahdi will put them todeath. They will then be re-vived and Imaam Mahdi will

put them to death. They willthen be revived and death

will continuously be in-flicted on them a thousandtimes daily, forever and ever.These corrupt and vileclaims are stated in the Shi'i

book, Haqqul Yaqeen, theauthor of which is among thehighest Shiah theologians,Mullah Baqir who is also theauthor of another book

Zaadul Ma'aad which like-wise contains many vile fab-rications about the Sahaabah.In his book, Zaadul Ma'aad, Mullah Baqir asserts that:* Hadhrat Umar, the se-cond Khalifah of Rasulullah(sallallahu alayhi wasallam),was a kaafir. Nauthubillaah!

Not only a kaafir, but theleader of the munaafiqeen.* Rasulullah (sallallahualayhi wasallam) had cursedHadhrat Umar and had

prayed for his destruction.As a result of the la'nat(curse) which Rasulullah(sallallahu alayhi wasallam)and Hadhrat Faatimah(radhiyallahu anha) invokedon Umar (radhiyallahu an-hu), he was murdered by thekaafir Persian, Lu'lu'.* The murderer of HadhratUmar (radhiyallahu anhu),

by virtue of having murderedHadhrat Umar, deserves themercy of Allah, hence, Ha-dhrat Huzaifah (according toShi'i falsehood) prayed for Allah's Rahmat to be on thekaafir, Lu'lu', the murderer o f H a d h r a t U m a r (radhiyallahu anhu).* The most auspicious day

(Continued on page 10)

A modernist aunt who be-lieves herself to be a member of the so-called enlightenedintelligentsia poses thequestion: Why cant womenattend universities? Pre-senting what she perceives to

be a logical discourse in sub-stantiation of the modernist

baatil view, the aunt whomwe believe is ghutha pass her sell-by date, says:

Being the offspring of achemical analyst and a cost accountant, tertiary educa-tion was never a foreign con-cept with myself and my sib-lings. We always knew that

school would not signify theend of our study years.

Our Ulama have the be-lief that Muslims, in particu-lar muslim girls, are prohib-ited from attending universi-ty. They feel it is an immoral

place for girls, yet somehow suitable for boys and that they should remain in their homes. If they really wish toobtain further education it

should be sought via corre-

spondence. Now as a staunch Mus-

lim and educationalist myself, I find this thought ra-ther contradictory and quiteintriguing. While people who

follow the same path of thought wouldnt dare agreeto send their daughters to

university, they, at the sametime, would only have mus-lim female doctors, dentistsand teachers attend to their daughters. So how do aalims

suggest we obtain access tomuslim female doctors, den-tists, teachers, etc.?

Let alone the ambitiouslot, what of those who are

forced to study and seek em- ployment? If a woman iniddat is given permission toleave home to work, whycant the same be given to a

girl looking to make a differ-ence?

Yes I know it is a mansduty to provide, but unfore-

seen circumstances will al-ways arise. Either the men inquestion, at times her own

flesh and blood are finan-cially unable, or flat out re-

fuse to. What then? We arenot an Islamic state? No in-dividual can order a man tomaintain an adult woman if he wishes not to.

OUR ANSWER ANDCOMMENT

According to the Shariah,women have been created byAllah Taala with an attrib-ute which is ingrained in allfemales, thus forming anintegral natural constituentof their thinking faculty, andon the basis of this naturala t t r i b u t e R a s u l u l l a h(sallallahu alayhi wasallam)described women with thehonor i f ic appel la t ion ,

Naaqisaatul Aql , which liter-ally means females of intel-lectual deficiency. This des-ignation is not to be con-strued as having a pejorativeconnotation, nor didRasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) direct it to fe-males in an objugatorysense. In a nutshell, there is

no stigma attached to thenuqs fil aql (deficiency in the

brains) of a female.However, the discourse

of the enlightened aunt palpably displays the intel-lectual malady from whichshe suffers. There is a varie-ty of intellectual maladies

nuqs fil aql of females is ex-cluded since it is not a mala-dy in relation to them which affects persons, espe-cially the westernized so-called intellegentsia whoare the victims of the opson-ic indoctrination of the im-moral institutions termeduniversities.

Respectable aunt! Ascrutiny of your discourseand lament convinces us thatyou are afflicted with themental disease called IFS(Intellectual FossilizationSyndrome). This mental dis-ease is described as suchsince it causes blighting of the brains which locks a sec-tion of the brain into a stag-


7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

2/12

The MajlisVol. 21 no. 11 Page 2

Q. I have come across a very goodkitaab written by a TV molvi. Willit be proper to read this book andderive benefit from it?A. Regardless of how good a kitaabmay be, if the author is a faasiq, ab-stain from reading it. The effect of theauthor's fisq spiritually permeates hiswriting, and this has a spiritually det-rimental effect on the reader. Q. The will of the deceased is un-Islamic. Two heirs were excluded.However, the two excluded heirssay that they do not want anythingfrom the estate and the remainingheirs may share the estate as stipu-lated in the will. Will it be permissi-ble to distribute the estate amongthe other heirs with the consent of the two excluded sons?A. Even if the heirs willingly do notwant anything from the mayyit's es-tate, the haraam will is not valid. Sec-ondly, the statements of the two sonshave no validity in the Shariah prior to taking possession of their assets.They have to incumbently take physi-cal possession of their assets. Onlythereafter may they do whatever theywish with their inheritance. However,

prior to distribution and taking pos-session, the forfeiture of their sharesis not valid. Q. Is it permissible for a Muslimcontractor to build a warehouse fora company which also deals in liq-uor?A. As long as the warehouse is not

being built specifically for storing

liquor or for a haraam purpose, thecontractor may build it for the compa-ny. Q. We are a manufacturing com-pany and supply to major retailoutlets. Can we run a lucky drawcompetition to win computers if consumers buy our products anddrop the receipt with their nameand number in a box? After amonth the draw takes place and thelucky numbers get the prizes.A. You may go ahead with the 'luckydraw' competition. It is permissible.As long as a separate entry fee is notcharged, the 'lucky draw' competitionwill be permissible. Q. Is it permissible to work as anauditor?A. Working as an auditor per se is

permissible. However, there are other factors to be taken into consideration.Each case will have a different ruling.For example, it will not be permissi-

ble to work as an auditor for a bank or a liquor company, nor will it be per-missible for a female auditor to work in an environment in which her pur-dah/Hijaab is violated. Q. We are owners of a large whole-sale grocery business. We purchasegoods in large quantities. Theweight and volume is marked on

each container by the supplier. Webuy and pay according to weight/volume. When selling the goods werely on the weight stated on thecontainers by the suppliers. Recent-ly when we made a random check

and weighed a few packets, we dis-covered some packets weighed lessthan the stated weight on the pack-et. Is it permissible for us to sell thegoods relying on the weight statedon the containers or are we obligedto weigh all the packets before sell-ing?

What is the position if certaingoods lose some weight due to theheat? What happens if this is thegeneral trade practice and is ac-cepted? Should the wholesaler havea large scale and weigh each itembefore selling? Can he demandcompensation from the supplier forthe short-weight?A. It is totally haraam to sell a prod-uct by weight if the weight is lessthan the stated weight on the packet/

bag. Allah Ta'ala warns of under-weight in several aayats of theQur'aan Majeed. There are also sto-

ries of the fearful consequences whichovertook those who gave underweightor were careless in this regard.

A simple solution would be to putup prominently displayed notices toinform customers of the probability of the containers containing less weight.A scale should be placed nearby toenable every customer to weigh theitem. And, if found to be less thanwhat the weight states, either a reduc-tion should be made in the price or the short weight should be made upwith the same product. For example,if there is 500 gm flour short, then500gm flour should be given to thecustomer.

The other more difficult option isto employ extra staff to weigh each

packet and mark those which are un-derweight.

Regardless of the manner inwhich the weight is reduced, e.g. byheat, etc., if the customer is under theimpression that the product weighs 5kg., then it is the obligation of theseller to ensure that the item weighs 5kg. If it weighs less, then the correctweight should be written on the pack-et with the new price.

The wholesaler may claim fromhis supplier the weight which wasgiven less to him. It may be given tothe wholesaler in the form of the same

products or a monetary compensation.The bottom line is that the seller

has to ensure that the customer re-ceives the exact weight which ismarked on the container.Q. When performi ng JanaazahSalaat outside, people remove theirshoes and stand on them when per-forming Salaat. Is this correct?A. It is meaningless to stand on theshoes if these are impure. If clean,then too it is meaningless to removethe shoes when Janaazah Salaat is

performed outside. If the shoes aretaahir/paak/clean and Janaazah Salaat

is being performed outside, then thereis no need to remove them. If impure,then it will not be permissible to standon the shoes. The Salaat will then not

be valid. Q. Some people when writing the

name of Rasulullah (sallallahualayhi wasallam), write S.A.W. Isthis proper?A. It is not permissible to write anyabbreviated form of Durood such asS.A.W. The full Durood of Sallallahualayhi wasallam should be written. Q. Is health insurance permissible?A. Health insurance and all kinds of insurance are haraam. Q. Why are rhino and elephantharaam?A. For the same reason that pig, fox,

wolf, hyena, lion, tiger, snake, tor-toise, worms, insects and numerousthings are haraam. And, the only rea-son why these creations are haraam is

because the Shariah says they areharaam. As for the reasons and wis-dom for these things being haraam weare not aware. As far as we are con-cerned these animals are haraam be-cause according to the Shariah theyare haraam. There are thousands of masaa-il of the Shariah whose reasonsare unknown to us. Q. Why do some Imaams reciteevery Friday during Fajr SalaatSurah Alif Laam Meem Sajdah?A. It is Sunnat to recite Surah Alif Laam Meem Sajdah in Fajr on Fri-days. However, this does not meanthat it should be adopted as a perma-nent practice to the exclusion of other Surahs. The Imaam should occasion-ally recite other Surahs as well.Q. Are Ferreros products halaal?A. Ferreros products are not halaal. Q. What should a woman do if herhusband dies during Hajj? Doesshe have to be in iddat in Makkah?And what about the remainder of Hajj?A. If the womans husband dies dur-ing Hajj, then she should completeher Hajj, and return immediately

thereafter to spend the balance of her iddat in the marital home. Q. Is it permissible for a personwho performed Ifraad Hajj or Ta-mattu to perform Nafl Umrah?A. A person who has performed Hajj

Ifraad may perform Nafl Umrah after the 13 th Zil Hajj. The Mutamatti mayalso perform Nafl Umrah whilst wait-ing to don Ihraam for Hajj.Q. Is the meaning of the Jewishterm, Kosher the same as the Islam-ic word Halaal ?A. In terms of the Shariah (IslamicLaw), Kosher does not mean Halaal which means permissible for Muslimconsumption. There are items whichmay be permissible for Jews, hencemarked Kosher, but which are not

Halaal for Muslims. Furthermore, just as the term Halaal has been com-mercialized by unscrupulous Muslimswho operate the haraam certificateindustry by which carrion is ha-laalized, so too has the word Kosher

become commercialized. The vastmajority of even halaal stamped

processed foods sold commerciallyare also not Halaal. The prohibitionapplies with greater emphasis to foods

prepa red by non-Mus lims andstamped with the Kosher logo. It isincumbent for Muslims to abstainfrom consuming all commercial Ko-

sher products, and from all meat andchicken products sold as halaal by

non-Muslims.Q. Please explain the Sufi conceptof Wahdatul Wujood. Salafis vehe-mently criticize the Sufis on the ba-sis of this concept.A. Salafis are spiritually barren andmorally bankrupt. They are a crudesect of crass materialists. Withouteven understanding the meaning of the term, they baselessly revile theAuliya.

Wahdatul Wujood is a technicalterm of the Auliya. It means that allcreated things owe their existence tothe only One True Existent, namely,Allah Taala. Besides Him, there is noindependent existence. He is the oneand only true independent existence.This is all what is meant by this termwhich the ignorant Salafis have delib-erately misconstrued to defame andslander the Ulama and Auliya of Deo-

band and the Auliya of Islam.

THE MAJLIS Q & ATHE MAJLIS Q & ATHE MAJLIS Q & ATHE MAJLIS Q & AP.O. BOX 3393P.O. BOX 3393P.O. BOX 3393P.O. BOX 3393

PORT ELIZABETHPORT ELIZABETHPORT ELIZABETHPORT ELIZABETHSOUTH AFRICA 6056SOUTH AFRICA 6056SOUTH AFRICA 6056SOUTH AFRICA 6056

THE OPINIONS OF A JAAHIL

Question: I have read an article inwhich the writer says: (1) Wudhumade after releasing wind will not bevalid if the anus is not first washed.(2) Cigarettes are not haraam. (3)

Masturbation is permissible. Pleasecomment on these views.Answer: The writer of the article is amoron. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) said that in times in close

proximity to Qiyaamah, true Ulamawill increasingly become non-existent. Then, jihala (morons) willrefer their questions to juhala. Thesemorons will issue moronic fatwasas this particular moron writer has.Both the questioner and the moronwho answers will be astray.

The answers which the moron

gave portray his stark ignorance. He

is a real jaahil. If someone wishes towash his hind after releasing wind, itis well and good. But to hinge thevalidity of wudhu on such washing isthe effect of only jahaalat.

Cigarettes on account of the fac-tor of dharar (harm) are haraam. Themoron is too dense in his brains tounderstand the operation of the prin-ciples of the Shariah.

Masturbat ion i s haraam.Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) said that on the Day of Qiyaamah the masturbator will beresurrected with his hand blown uplike the belly of a pregnant woman.In other words, his hand will bepregnant on the Day of Qiyaamah.Furthermore, Rasulullah (sallallahualayhi wasallam) said that the mas-turbator is mal-oon (accursed). Wecan conclude that this moron whomade the moronic statements is alsomal-oon.

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

3/12




Q. Is it permissible to listen to thesinging of Zakir Naik? He appearson television as well?A. Anyone who appears on televisionis from the progeny of Shaitaan. Weare informed that the character Zakir

Naik is a singer. He sings to audienc-es. As such he is a faasiq-faajir. Hisfisq and fujoor are compounded withhis haraam television appearances. Itis haraam to listen to his singing. Q. How should one write Insha Al-lah to avoid changing its meaning?A. You may write the term as it ap-

pears in the question or a hyphen may be inserted (Insha-Allah) or it may bewritten, In sha Allaah. Q. Our Musjid is being renovated.The fans, doors and windows whilststill attached to the building havebeen sold by auction. Was it properto sell these items without first re-moving them?A. The sale of the items which werestill fixed is not permissible. Theitems had to be firstly separated. Q. The girl and the boy are in dif-ferent countries. Can the marriagebe performed by telephone?A. A nikah is not valid if conducted

by telephone. The validity of Nikah isreliant on the Ijaab and Qubool being

pronounced verbally in the presenceof two Muslim male witnesses at the

same venue. The simple way of per-forming such a marriage is for thewoman to appoint a representative inthe town/city where the man is. Hewill represent her at the Nikah cere-

mony which will be performed asusual. Or the man can appoint some-one to represent him in the placewhere the woman is. The representa-tive will then attend the Nikah cere-mony on his behalf. The appointmentof representatives may be done tele-

phonically. Another method is to perform the

Nikah by letter. One party can fax or e-mail a letter in which he/she pro-

poses Nikah to the other spouse. Thisletter will be read out in the presenceof witnesses, and the prospectivespouse will verbally announce hisacceptance Q. A Salafi sheikh says that it is notpermissible for a woman to adoptthe surname of her husband. Heclaims that the Quraan forbidsthis.A. The Salafi Sheikh talks drivel. Awoman can adopt the surname of her husband. Neither the Quraan nor theHadith prohibits this. He generalizesfrom the Quraanic aayat which in-structs that adopted children retaintheir names. This is to prevent confu-sion so that the adopted child does notgrow up believing that he/she is thechild of his/her adoptive parents. Q. Who is more entitled to havecustody of a minor in the absence of

the mother the sister or the ma-ternal aunt?A. The sister of the child has a prior right over the maternal aunt.Q. Is selling cigarettes and wigspermissible. If this relative invites

one for meals, may we eat his food?A. Selling wigs and cigarettes is not

permissible. The money is not halaal.People should not accept his invita-tion. Decline his invitation politelyand inform him of the reason. Dont

eat his food. Q. In a vehicle the speakers are atground level or under the seat. Is itpermissible to listen to the Quraanfrom such speakers?A. The speakers at ground level andunder the seat should not be used for Quraan recital. It is most disrespect-ful to the Quraan Majeed. Q. I have been told that the TablighJamaat is a deviant sect, and that Ishould not join them. Please en-lighten me in this matter.A. The Tabligh Jamaat is not a sect.Members from all Math-habs join theTabligh Jamaat to learn and propagatethe very basic teachings of Islam - theKalimah, Tahaarat, Salaat and Saum.The Tabligh Jamaat does not teachanything new. It teaches only theSunnah of Rasulullah (sallallahualayhi wasallam), and it concentrateson only the basic acts necessary for the daily life of the Muslim. They donot delve into any academic issues. Those who say that the Tabligh Ja-maat is a deviated sect are in grievouserror. You should join the Jamaat anddiscover for yourself what they teachto satisfy yourself. Q. Whose duty is it to pay theMehr?A. The Mehr has to be paid by the

man who is getting married. It is hisobligation to pay the Mehr and it be-comes the property of the bride.Q. Is there any wedding engage-ment custom in Islam Besides theMehr, what else has to be paid?A. According to the Shariah there isnothing besides the Mehr to pay.There is no wedding engagement cus-tom. However, people have intro-duced many baseless practices whichhave no origin in Islam. Q. Is it permissible to wear leathersocks on top of ordinary socks?A. Khuffain (leather socks) may beworn over ordinary socks. Q. When should khuffain be puton? Must it be donned immediatelyafter Wudhu or could it be put onlater?A. The khuffain may be put on at anytime as long as one has wudhu. It isnot necessary to don the khuffain atthe time of making wudhu. Q. From when should the time forvalidity of masah be calculated af-ter donning khuffain? From thetime the khuffain are donned orfrom the time wudhu was made?A. The time of 24 hours for amuqeem (resident/not a traveller) or 72 hours for a musaafir is from thetime the wudhu breaks, not from thetime the khuffain are donned nor fromthe time one made wudhu. Whenwudhu breaks, then from that timewill the period be calculated.Q. My friend says that it is not nec-essary to recite Iqaamah in the left

ear of the newborn child. He saysonly Athaan is Sunnah. Accordingto him a Saudi Aalim, ShaikhUthaymeen issued this fatwa. Is the

Shaikh correct?A. It is Sunnat and necessary to recitethe Iqaamah in the left ear of the ba-

by. Shaikh Uthaymeen was a Salafi.Salafis have their own religion. Simp-ly ignore whatever you hear fromSalafis. They do not follow the Pathof the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah.They are one of the 72 deviant sects

predicted by Rasulullah (sallallahualayhi wasallam).Q. If a woman has to perform Sa-laat in a public place such as Mus-

jidul Haraam, will it be permissiblefor her to don her Niqaab?A. Normally it is not permissible for awoman to cover her face whilst per-forming Salaat in privacy. However,if there are ghair mahram males pre-sent, then it is necessary that she co-vers her face even whilst performingSalaat.Q. I have a large sum of haraammoney. How should this be dis-posed?A. There are different categories of haraam money. If the owner of theharaam money is traceable, then it isWaajib (compulsory) to return themoney to him/her, e.g. stolen propertyor interest taken from a debtor; good-will charged for an empty shop or for a house besides rent. Regarding some

types of haraam money, the ownersare not traceable, e.g. money won ingambling. It is Waajib to give thistype of haraam money to the poor. Bank interest and insurance moneyare also in this category, i.e. it has to

be given to the poor. Q. Fish, especially of the bigger spe-cies such as tuna are clubbed todeath after being caught in nets.Since it takes some time for the fishto die, the impatient fishermen hitthem with sticks to kill them. Is itpermissible to eat such fish?A. Whilst the fish remains halaal, theact of cruelty perpetrated on it isharaam. Abstaining from eating suchfish relates to the domain of Taqwa.Something may be halaal, but if pro-cured in ways in conflict with theteachings of the Shariah, it has a spir-itually detrimental effect on onesRooh (Soul). For example, an animal

slaughtered not facing the Qiblah,while halaal, is spiritually repugnant.But since the hearts of people are cor-roded with spiritual rust and filth, the-

se issues are beyond their comprehen-sion. Q. My friend fishes for sport. Hespends many hours late at nightcatching fish. I know that fishingand hunting for sport are not per-missible. What is the status of thefish he gives me? Is it permissible toeat such fish?A. The fish remains halaal. But your conscience agitates, hence you have

posed this ques tion. Rasululla h(sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:Sin is that which agitates your con-

science. Abstain from eating thistype of fish which will harden your heart.Q. I have read that according toShaikh Uthaymeen, it is not permis-sible to keep Nafl fast on Fridaysand Saturdays.A. Shaikh Ibn Uthaymeen was aSalafi. His ruling is incorrect. It is

permissible to fast Nafl on Fridaysand Saturdays. Salafis have their ownreligion. Q. Is it permissible for a woman toget a belly-button piercing?A. It is haraam and satanic for a wom-an to get a belly button piercing. Sucha woman is accursed. Q. In places like Bangladesh whereprawns are almost a staple food, itis said that they are halaal on thebasis of Urf. Is this reason valid?A. Urf (Customary Practice) can nev-er make halaal what the Shariah hasmade haraam. The Urf here in SouthAfrica is to consume halaalized carri-on chickens and halaalized carrionmeat. Obviously the Urf does notmake it halaal. There are manyharaam deeds which have becomecustomary. However, these acts re-main haraam regardless of how preva-lent they become. Since the hurmat (prohibition/being haraam) of ghair-

samak (that which is not fish) is Man- soos for the Ahnaaf, the Urf cannot

halaalize it. In Bangladesh and else-where they consume shrimps/prawns by self-deception. They do not saythat it is halaal because of urf. Theysay that prawns are fish, hence halaal.For eating prawns, they select to be-come temporary morons, hence they

Q. What is the significance interms of the Shariah of the targetof 50 million Durood of a radiostation?A. The radio 'durood' programme isa shaitaani programme. It is not per-missible to participate in these de-ceptive programmes. The motivationis cheap publicity, name, fame andacclaim. The Devil's Radio is mak-ing a mockery of the Deen in gen-eral, and of pure ibaadat practices in

particular. Iblees La-een has secure-

ly roped in the personnel of RadioShaitaan to serve his satanic objec-tives. The one and only objective of the 50 million stunt is publicity andnafsaaniyat. Among the lesser signsof Qiyaamah according to the Had-ith is:

"The dunya will be pursued withdeeds of the Aakhirah."

Whilst reciting Durood Shareef is anact of the Aakhirah, it is beingabused and misused for satanic ob-

jectives of the nafs by Radio Iblees.

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

4/12


argue abortively that prawns are fish. Q. A man says in his mind: I di-vorce my wife, without saying itverbally. Is his wife divorced?A. As long as the man has not statedthe words with his tongue and lips, it

will not be Talaaq. Talaaq is validonly if verbally expressed. Q. A husband says to his wife: Iwant to divorce you. Is this a validTalaaq?A. If a man says verbally: I want todivorce you, Talaaq does not comeinto effect because he said I want to.... But if he says verbally even if he is alone: I divorce my wife, thenone Talaaq Raji comes into effect.Before expiry of her iddat he can takeher back without the need to perform

Nikah.Q. Does the Muqtadi have to reciteThana?A. Yes, the Muqtadi should reciteThana.Q. I am a third year medical stu-dent. My parents can no longer af-ford to pay the expenses for mystudies. Is it permissible to obtain aloan on which interest has to bepaid?A. An interest-bearing loan isharaam. The circumstance of secular studies or even Deeni studies does notmake permissible paying interest. Theobjective of secular study is to estab-lish a means of earning rizq. Suchmeans may not be acquired in aharaam way. Rizq is predeterminedand sealed. We are allowed to pursue

our Rizq in only halaal ways. If aninterest free loan cannot be obtainedfrom some Muslims, and if there is noone prepared to grant a bursary, thenthe student has to abandon his studiesfor the present. If the only way inwhich a business could be com-menced is by acquiring a bank-loan, itwill not be permissible to initiate the

business. The person will have to ra-ther go cut grass, wash cars or dosomething else for his livelihood. But,he may not acquire an interest-bearingloan. Q. Is it permissible to have a televi-sion at home to watch educationalprogrammes? This is better thangoing to the cinema for entertain-ment.A. Television is haraam. It is not per-missible to have a television at homenor to sell or even repair televisions.Regardless of educational programs,

pictures of animate objects areharaam. The argument that televisionis better than going to the cinema for entertainment is absolutely corrupt,deceptive and baseless. It is like say-ing that haraam mutton is better than

pork, hence haraam mutton may beconsumed, or fornicating with astrange woman is better than forni-cating with ones own daughter,

therefore fornicating with the strangewoman is the lesser evil, hence per-missible. These are satanically-inspired baseless arguments. One evilis not better than another evil. An evilis worse than another evil. But both

acts are evil and haraam, hence maynot be committed. Q. Is it permissible for a Muslimwife who had converted from Hin-duism to Islam, to attend Hindufunctions of her parents?

A. It is haraam for a Muslim womanor man to attend the Hindu functionsof his/her Hindu parents. Q. Is bungee jumping permissible?A. Bungee jumping is not permissi-

ble. Q. Is keeping zulfah hair Sunnat?The man shaves his beard but saysthat he keeps long zulfah hair be-cause it is SunnatA. This man is perpetrating self-deception and satanic deception. A

person who does not keep a beard butsays that he wants to keep zulfah be-cause it is Sunnat, is a shaitaan.. Heuses the Deen to justify his nafsaanidesires. Such an attitude is close tokufr. It is not permissible for a beard-less man to keep zulfah hair.Q. Is it permissible for women tovisit the Qabrustaan? Please see theenclosed Fatwa which is ambiguousin its response. It appears from thefatwa that at times it is permissiblefor females to go to theQabrustaan. Please comment onthis issue.A. The objective of a fatwa is to guidethe questioner in the avenue of practi-cal implementation of the masaa-il.The purpose of a fatwa is not diaboli-cal and dialectical discussion. TheMufti who issued the fatwa on the

question posed, simply attempted todisplay expertise. When answeringquestions for public consumption, aMufti should not speak with twotongues and ambiguity thereby grant-ing latitude for the operation of thenafs of the questioner to pick andchoose issues at the behest of desire.The layman is not in a position to de-cide applicability in different scenari-os. The fatwa is an unequivocal prohi-

bition for women to attend theQabrustaan in the same way as it is

prohibited for them to attend the Mus- jid. Q. Is the game monopoly permissi-ble?A. The game of monopoly and allsimilar games such as chess, back-gammon, carum, etc. are haraam.Q. Is it permissible to purchase fishfrom a market which also sellscrabs, crayfish and other kinds of sea-animals? Will there not becross-contamination?A. It is permissible to purchase fishfrom a market which also sells other kinds of sea animals. All sea animalsdespite being haraam for Hanafis, aretaahir (paak/clean). Thus there is nocontamination. Q. Is it permissible to use Miswaaksfrom a mango tree?

A. Miswaaks from mango trees are permissible. Miswaaks from any treewhich is not poisonous are permissi-

ble.Q. Is it permissible for women totravel by plane when it is known

that they will have to submit tobody scanners?A. It is not permissible for women togo for Umrah and holidays if theywill be submitted to such haraam,lewd, immoral searching methods. Q. I have read several articles byUlama explaining why MasturaatTabligh Jamaat is permissible, infact incumbent. Please comment indetail on these articles which I haveenclosed.A. Right now, we lack the time tocomment in detail. The scope of thesecolumns also precludes a detailed ref-utation which is necessary to debunk the baseless arguments tendered in

justification of Makshufaat Jamaat.The name, Masturaat , is a misnomer.

Mastur means hidden/concealed. Awoman according to the Quraan andHadith is Aurah . In other words, her entire body has to be concealed fromthe public, and such concealment is

possible only within the sacred pre-cincts of the home. In fact her de-scription as Aurah in the Hadith isstated in the context of her remaining

indoors. A woman who emerges intothe public domain is no longer a mas-toorah. When outside the home, shesheds her mastoorah attribute whichAllah Taala has ordained for her.Denuded of this holy and honourableattribute, she acquires the contempti-

ble appellation of makshoofah , henceMakshufaat Jamaat is more applicableto the women who become globe trot-ters regardless of the purpose of their globe-trotting.

InshaAllah, when and if AllahTaala bestows to us the taufeeq, anadequate response in refutation of thespurious arguments in favour of Makshufaat Jamaat shall be forthcom-ing. Q. Whilst The Majlis says thatwomen are not allowed to drive, Ihave seen the wife of a prominentMaulana driving. What is wrong if our wives also follow the example of

the wife of the pious Maulana whois a senior in the community? Wecan always make taubah.A. Your deeds and the deeds of theMaulana and of his wife are not our concern. Your deeds and your taubahare between yourself and AllahTaala. Our duty is only to deliver theMessage of Allahs Law. The haraamdeeds of the prominent Maulanaswife are not the Shariah. If you are aMuslim, you have to follow AllahsShariah, not the shariah of the nafsof Maulanas and their wives.Q. My baby has been put on abreathing machine through hernostrils. The doctors want to putthe contraption down her throat. Irefused because one doctor saidthat this could continue for a wholeyear down the throat. If the throatmethod is used, the baby has to besedated for 24 hours and cannot bemoved. There are also high risksthat she can go into a heart attack when inserting and removing it.She had it previously 11 days downher throat and suffered considera-

bly, hence I have refused. They alsowant me to agree to a heart trans-plant. Is this permissible? Thesedoctors also said that if shes notgetting better they want to takeaway the IV medicine. Without themedicine the heart cannot function.They asked me if I agree to this. If Iagree to discontinue the medicinegradually will I be sinful?

After a few days on this kind of treatment, I have seen my baby.She is not gasping for air. She isquiet calm and even smiling withthe air tube in her nose, and play-ing with toys. I told them to leaveher alone and not to resort to thethroat contraption. Am I wrong? A. No, you are not wrong. The doc-tors are wrong. If the child is strug-gling to breathe, then it is necessaryto put her on a breathing system.However, if she is lying calmly with-



Q. Many females have the problemof frequent discharge. I have seena fatwa in which three differenttypes of fluid being discharged by

females are explained. The fatwaoutlines confusing technical andmedical details regarding the flu-ids. It has really complicated theissue. I am now in a quandary re-garding the purity or impurity of the fluids which are discharged.According to the fatwa one type of fluid is pure and neither breakswudhu nor contaminates the gar-ment. I must admit that I feel veryuncomfortable and in fact dirty if Ihave to perform Namaaz knowingof a discharge regardless of thetechnical or medical classificationof the fluid. Please throw morelight on this issue.A. Leave aside the technical andmedical details and intricacies whichare explained in the fatwa. Let suchtechnicalities be relegated to the text

books.. No woman will be able to practica lly determine what exactlythe fluid discharged is. Namaaz istoo important and delicate an

ibaadat. One should not risk per-forming Namaaz in an impure state.The ruling therefore is that such dis-charge is najis (impure). It nullifieswudhu. When any discharge takes

place, consider wudhu to be nulli-fied. Cleanse the affected part of thegarment and body, and renew wudhufor Namaaz. Caution in this regardhas to be incumbently exercised. Weurge Muftis to act with insight whenanswering questions of this nature.Always bear in mind Ihtiyaat. For the benefit of the honourable Muf-tiyaan-e-Kiraam we say in this re-gard that the determinant for practi-cal implement is to take into consid-eration the makhraj of the dischargeand the difficulty of discernment for the females.

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

5/12

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

6/12


TTTT he satanic insanity of the newfound western-iza t ion ideologyadopted by the Saudi rulers is asure sign of the looming de-struction awaiting the Saudiregime. A South African sister confronted with Saudi obsceni-ty wrote to the Saudi press:

Could you kindly requestyour Saudi sheikhs to adviseyour airport authorities regard-ing the laws of Hijaab/Veiling

because it appears that theymay be followers of sheikhgoogle (i.e. Shaikh Shaitaan or Sheikh Obama). I have justreturned from Umrah on

Thursday last week (December 2012). When I arrived at Jed-dah airport, there was some

photo-security system at thecounter where a woman is ex-

pected to remove her Niqaab infull view of hundreds of fussaaq and other types of menin the queue and millingaround all over the place.

The Arabic woman in frontof me unveiled without protestfor at least three minutes, butwhen it was my turn I refused

point blank to the fellow be-hind the counter. Cant thisharaam photo thing be done

pr iv a t el y i n a r oo m?

(Barbarians understand onlyobscenity The Majlis). But hewas adamant that this was thelaw. How disgusting! I imag-ined that your country under-stood better the laws of Hijaaband of the Shariah than others.Finally I had to get my mah-rams to hold up their Ihraamtowels to form a screen for shielding me so that I couldunveil for the haraam photo-check thing (and for the faasiqbarbarian The Majlis). Icould not believe this moronicintransigence.

The general demeanour of the Saudi officials leaves much

to be desired. They are scorn-ful, arrogant boorish buffoons.If it was not for the HaramainShareefain, I would not set footin Saudi Arabia because of their attitude. There are old,wearily travellers, crabby ba-

bies, etc. in the long queues, but these chaps behind thecounters are nonchalant, con-temptuous and merciless. Theytake their time, strutting off for no apparent reason, keepingthe queue waiting for up to 15minutes with no one attending,and for no reason. (This is

standard Saudi practice at theairport The Majlis). Basical-ly, their work-ethics stink.

There were a few Arabwomen with whining kids wholost their composure and creat-ed a scene shouting at the offi-cials, but to no avail. Reallysomething has to be done tothis miserable state of affairs.

These pilgrims are Allahsguests. They ought to be treat-ed with dignity and respect.(The Saudis reserve the digni-ty, respect and honour for theimmoral U.S. and other Euro-

pean tourists at whose feet theytruckle The Majlis). Instead

they treat Allahs guests likenajaasat. This has always beenthe situation in the so-calledholy kingdom.

Please contact the relevantsheikhs, imams and authoritiesand get the ball rolling so thatthey get their act together in-stead of procuring the cursesof people.. For Allahs Sake,they need to be told that theyare not doing anyone a favour.

Returning to my country(South Africa) yesterday was a

breath of fresh air. The woman behind the immigration coun-ter, a non-Muslim, took mecourteously to a private roomto identify me with my pass-

port picture and even asked meif my veil is on properly (i.e.after replacing it). I couldcheck in a mirror provided be-fore we left the room. Wouldyou believe! This in a non-Muslim country. (End of theSisters letter)

There is no need for us tofurther comment on the rotten,stinking western culture intowhich Saudi Arabia is sinkingto its ultimate destruction anddemise.

Q) Is Umrah for women per-missible in the prevailing im-moral conditions in which the

journey is undertaken?A) Any person with sound

intelligence and cognizantwith the laws of Hijaab willunderstand without the slight-est difficulty that it can never

be permissible for women tocast themselves in the cauldronof fisq and fujoor right fromthe time they leave home until

the time they return home.Gross and obscene viola-

tion of Hijaab in addition toother haraam acts, are perpe-trated throughout the journey,

and this shameless disease ison the increase. The obscenitylambasted by the Sister is anew addition to the incremen-tal immorality which womenare confronted with.

It is haraam for women togo for Umrah. It is never per-

missible to indulgein the deluge of im-

moral Hijaab violations for thesake of a Nafl Umrah. Anyonewho is in a sincere quest for the thawaab of an Umrah,should perform four rakats

Ishraaq Salaat. This guaranteesthe thawaab of a Maqbool(Accepted) Hajj and Umrah.There is no goodness and nothawaab for women who gofor Umrah in the currentharaam immoral scenarios.

MUFTI MAAJIN Mufti Maajin is similar to Muf-ti Jaahil. One of the character-istics of a mufti maajin is thefabrication of baseless strata-gems to legalize prohibitions.He is unconcerned with hisvillainy of halaalizing what theShariah has made haraam, or haraamizes what the Shariahhas made halaal. He corruptsthe Deen and the beliefs andmorality of people with hisevil and stupid fatwas.

Examples of mufti maajinsgiven in the kutub are muftiswho:

Halaalize alcohol on the basis of technicalities.

Halaalize music and sporton the basis of Ahaadith inwhich is mentioned the war-dance of the Abyssinians, thelittle girls singing, etc.Issue fatwas to placate the rul-ers for gratifying their lust for money and worldly objectives.

In this age of fitnah and fasaad in which we find our-selves, some of the corruptfatwas of the jaahil/maajinmuftis are: Halaalization of photog-raphy of animate objects onthe stupid basis that a photo isa reflection, not a picture. Halaalization of DajjaalsEye, namely, television despitethe preponderance of immoral-

ity, nudity and vice. Halaalization of televisionon the basis of tabligh. Halaalization of the riba

products of the banks with thedeception of Islamic nomen-clature. Halaalization of carrion haraam chickens and meat. Halaalization of sport onthe basis of it being physicalexercise. Halaalization of injuriousand poisonous contraceptiveson the basis of azal. Legalization of the interest

penalty charge on late pay-ments on the basis of it being adeterrent for payment default.

The contention that a divorcedecree issued by a secular

court is a Shari Talaaq on the basis of the judge being theWakeel (agent) of the husband.These are some of the corrupt

fatwas issued my maajin/jaahil muftis. All the grounds theytender for these corrupt fatwasare conspicuously faasid andbaatil.

Generally the motivation for corrupt and baseless fatwas ishubb-e-jaah (love for acclaim) and to a greater extent, hubb-e-maal (love for money).

The corrupt fatwas of maajin/jaahil muftis are so

glaringly baseless that it is notexpected of even laymen to

believe and accept such baatil.Allah Taala has endowed the

Mumineen with adequate in-telligence and a pure con-science (provided carrion isnot devoured) to realize theexistence of some corruptionin the erroneous fatwas. Sincethe masses of Bani Israaeelfailed to utilize their naturalintelligence to distinguish be-tween Haqq and baatil, AllahTaala castigating them, saysin the Quraan Majeed: Theytake their scholars and their

saints as gods besides Al-lah. Muslims are not sup-

posed to become entrapped inthis same rut and rot in whichthe masses of Bani Israaeelwere mired.

O NCE , Abdul Malik, theKhlaifah, wondered at the in-numerable Ahaadith whichHadhrat Abu Hurairah(radhiyallahu anhu) narrated.He conjectured that perhapsHadhrat Abu Hurairah(radhiyallahu anhu) para-

phrased the Ahaadith which hehad heard from Rasulullah(sallallahu alayhi wasallam)and presented it in his ownwords, not exactly as stated byRasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam).

In order to test AbuHurairahs memory, the Kha-lifah, invited him and manyother Sahaabah. The Khalifahhad concealed two persons

behind a screen to record inwriting every Hadith whichHadhrat Abu Hurairah(radhiyallahu anhu) would benarrating. At that session Ha-d h r a t A b u H u r a i r a h(radhiyallahu anhu) narrated ahundred Ahaadith. The scribeswrote every word exactly aswas stated by Hadhrat AbuHurairah (radhiyallahu anhu).

After one year, Abdul Ma-lik, again invited Hadhrat AbuHurairah (radhiyallahu anhu).The two scribes who had rec-orded the 100 Ahaadith wereagain present behind thescreen with their written notes.The Khalifah, addressing Ha-d h r a t A b u H u r a i r a h

(radhiyallahu anhu) said:Hadhrat the last time I de-rived immense pleasure fromthe 100 Ahaadith you had nar-rated. I shall appreciate it if you will again narrate thesame 100 Ahaadith.

Hadhrat Abu Hurairah(radhiyallahu anhu) com-menced the narration of theAhaadith. After he had com-

pleted, the two writers wereamazed at the prodigiousmemory of Hadhrat AbuHurairah (radhiyallahu anhu).There was not a change of even a single word. HadhratAbu Hurairah (radhiyallahuanhu) had repeated the 100Ahaadith exactly as he hadnarrated them a year ago. Thiswas the wonderful bounty of memory which Allah Taalahad bestowed to the Muhad-ditheen.

A Sister from Ireland writes:We reside in Ireland. It has

been a long road of almost 4 years before we have been able to source local unstunned halaal chickens for personal consump-tion. It is our preference to eat unstunned meat mainly due towitnessing dead chickens on theconveyor belt after being stunned,before being slaughtered. Alham-dulillah, an awareness has beencreated among Muslims.

With the help of HMC in theU.K. (a Sanha type of halaalizing body The Majlis) who sourceunstunned halaal chickens from

Ireland to U.K., our local butch-ery was able to place an order with the slaughterhouse. Unfortu-nately, this slaughterhouse out-

sources pork, haraam beef and

other haraam meats as well. The slaughterhouse is not Muslim.,but allocates a section of its

premises for the purpose of Is-lamic thabah, all sanctioned by

HMC U.K.Where the trouble lies is that

over the weekend it was brought to our attention that all theseharaam meats are transported inthe same chiller with the halaal chickens to the depot in Dublin.What is your verdict on the con-

sumption of such chickens? Lo-cally, a lot of fitnah and threats

from the business sector will erupt if any Mufti here issues a

fatwa condemning these chickens. However, if you pass the fatwathat these chickens are not fit for consumptions, we shall have no


7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

7/12


The truth about vac-cines and disease out-breaks all hiddenfrom public viewA 2012 study led by Dr. DavidWitt, an infectious disease spe-cialist at the San Rafael, Cali-fornia Kaiser Permanente

Medical Center concluded thatwhooping cough occurs moreamong vaccinated childrenthan children not vaccinated.

In 2010, a mumps outbreak occurred among 1000 childrenin upper New Jersey and lower

New York. Almost 80% of them had been vaccinated withthe MMR (measles, mumps &rubella) vaccine.

Throughout the 1980s, offi-cial agencies reported severaloutbreaks of measles occurringamong children who had beenvaccinated in various locationsincluding an Illinois junior high and high school, a Massa-chusetts high school, a regionin France, and a rural area near Helisinki, Finland.

Both USA schools had wellover 90% vaccinated againstmeasles. The vaccinators claima 90% vaccination rate amongany specific population guar-antees herd immunity for that

population . This bogus claimserves to create more revenuewhile blaming non-vaccinatorsfor endangering humanity.

Meanwhile, despite the factthat only five percent of vac-cine adverse events get report-ed to the "voluntary" FDA'svaccine adverse event report-ing system (VAERS), there aremany serious adverseevents recorded and manymore that seep through thecracks to vaccine concerned

internet sites.Thank goodness for the few

MDs and others who darespeak out despite the danger it

potentially puts them in. It's upto us to learn from them and

just say no to vaccinations.How many of these vac-cine facts do you know?

NaturalNews) In 1988, I wasresearching my first book,AIDS INC. Interested in thesubject of vaccines, I delvedinto published accounts of vac-cination gone wrong.

The following series of quotes from authors only be-gins to cover the territory of vaccine damage, deception,and failure. It is neverthelessthe start of a history which has

been hidden from the public bycorporate media, whose ties to

pharmaceutical interests areinfamous.

In 1988, I knew nothingabout mercury in vaccines, or about the numerous chemicalsand contaminating germs invaccines that cause human ill-ness and damage. I was merelylooking for evidence that pastvaccination campaigns had

backfired.What I found was shocking.

Here are the statements I un-covered:

"The combined death ratefrom scarlet fever, diphtheria,whooping cough and measlesamong children up to fifteen

shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 hadoccurred before the introduc-tion of antibiotics and wide-spread immunization . In part,this recession may be attribut-ed to improved housing and to

a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor wasa higher host-resistance due to

better nutrition." (Ivan Illich,Medical Nemesis, BantamBooks, 1977)

"In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough, for exam-

ple, even fully immunizedchildren contracted the dis-ease in fairly large numbers;and the rates of serious compli-cations and death were reducedonly slightly. In another recentoutbreak of pertussis, 46 of the8 5 f u l l y i m m u n -ized children studied eventual-ly contracted the dis-ease." (Richard Moskowitz,MD, The Case Against Im-munizations, 1983, AmericanInstitute of Homeopathy)

"In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on0 thecampus of UCLA, in a popula-tion that was supposedly 91%immune, according to carefulserological testing. Another 20cases of measles were reportedin the Pecos, New Mexico,area within a period of a fewmonths in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immun-ized, some of them quite re-cently. A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunizedurban community revealed thatabout 15% of this age groupare still susceptible to rubella,a figure essentially identicalwith that of the pre-vaccine

era. (Moskowitz, The CaseAgainst Immunizations)"Of all reported whooping

cough cases between 1979 and1984 in children over 7 monthsof age - that is, old enough tohave received the primary

course of the DPT shots(diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus)- 41% occurred in childrenwho had received three or more shots and 22% in chil-dren who had one or two im-munizations.

"Among children under 7months of age who hadwhooping cough, 34% had

been immunized between oneand three times

"... Based on the only U.S.findings on adverse DPT reac-tions, an FDA-financed studyat the University of California,Los Angeles, one out of every350 children will have a con-vulsion; one in 180 childrenwill experience high-pitchedscreaming; and one in 66 willhave a fever of 105 degrees or more." [Note: All these symp-toms can indicate serious neu-rological damage.] (Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chroni-cle, Rochester, New York, spe-cial supplement on DPT, datedApril, 1987)

"A study undertaken in1979 at the University of Cali-fornia, Los Angeles, under thesponsorship of the Food andDrug Administration, andwhich has been confirmed byother studies, indicates that inthe U.S.A. approximately1,000 infants die annually as adirect result of DPT vaccina-tions, and these are classifiedas SIDS (Sudden Infant DeathSyndrome) deaths. These rep-resent about 10 to 15% of thetotal number of SIDS deathsoccurring annually in the

U.S.A. (between 8,000 and10,000 depending on whichstatistics are used)." (LeonChaitow, Vaccination and Im-munization, CW Daniel Com-

pany Limited, Saffron Walden,Essex, England, 1987.)

"Assistant Secretary of

Health Edward Brandt, Jr.,MD, testifying before the U.S.Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, round-ed... figures off to 9,000 casesof convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for atotal of 35,000 acute neurolog-ical reactions occurring withinforty-eight hours of a DPT shotamong America's children eve-ry year." (DPT: A Shot in theDark, by Harris L. Coulter andBarbara Loe Fischer, HarcourtBrace Jovanovich)

"While 70-80% of Britishchildren were immunizedagainst pertussis in 1970-71,the rate is now 39%. The com-mittee predicts that the next

pertussis epidemic will proba- bly turn out to be more severethan the one in 1974/75. How-ever, they do not explain why,in 1970/71, there were morethan 33,000 cases of pertussiswith 41 fatal cases among the

very well immunized Brit-ish child population; whereasin 1974/75, with a decliningrate of vaccination, a pertussisepidemic caused only 25,000cases with 25 fatali-ties." (Wolfgang Ehrengut,Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370)

"... Barker and Pichichero,in a prospective study of 1232children in Denver, Colorado,found after DTP that only 7%of those vaccinated were freefrom untoward reactions,which included pyrexia (53%),acute behavioural changes(82%), prolonged screaming(13%), and listlessness, ano-rexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injec-tions of DTP experienced twoor more of the reactions moni-tored." (Lancet, May 28, 1983,

p. 1217)

Carrion and cancer HAVE MERCY ON YOUR SOUL AND

BODY!W HATEVER ALLAH T AALA has made haraam is injurious for both the

body and soul. Ignoring Allahs commands and perpetrating wanton

violation of His Shariah will most assuredly have devastating physicaland spiritual consequences in this world as well as in the Aakhirat.

There are cancer cells in every persons body . These cells thrive oncarrion chicken and carrion meat. The poison of carrion is aggravated

by antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites with which the industrycontaminates all processed chickens and animals.

The body by nature finds it difficult to digest carrion, especially thediseased, rotten halaalized type of carrion chicken and meat which ac-cording to the Shariah is haraam to feed even dogs. Yet, Muslims de-vour such carrion unfit for even dogs and fit for only the shayaateen.Digesting carrion requires an enormous amount of digestive enzymeswhich the body is unable to provide. The undigested carrion meat andchicken rot in the intestines. This putrefaction leads to build-up of tox-ins (poisons) which give impetus for the flourishing of cancer cells. TheMashaaikh say: The stomach is the headquarters of disease.

Cancer has acquired epidemic proportions in western society wherefood is a commercialized commodity laced with many poisons and filth.The spread of cancer in even the Muslim community is not surprising.There is no conundrum underlying the prevalence of cancer. The delugeof halaalized carrion chickens and other halaalized meat products is thecause of cancer and the other many diseases afflicting society.

Muslims are required by the Shariah to abstain from all SANHA andMJC halaalized carrion chickens and meat products. In such abstention

body and soul will find strength and health.

Q. Often sheikhs andimams from Saudi Arabia

visit the country. There isa group of people who dothe body-guarding for the-se sheikhs and imams.This group of people con-duct themselves very arro-gantly. They harass andmistreat Muslims whocome to listen to the lec-tures of the sheikhs andwhen they try to greetthem. This group of peoplehave no respect for theyoung and old. Why dothese sheikhs get treatedlike kings and the commonman is mistreated in hisown Musjid and land bythese so-called Muslimswho protect and escort thesheikhs. The group usesJMPD Metro Police inGauteng, blue lights andsirens to speed through

streets recklessly. Is thiswhat Islam has been re-

duced to?A. The sheikhs get treatedlike kings because they arethe corrupt agents and am-

bassadors of the corruptSaudi regime and part of thekufr interfaith movement,hence they conduct them-selves like kuffaar. They arenot ambassadors of Islamnor representatives of theShariah. They have no rela-tionship with Islam

T h e s t u p i d b u l l y - bodyguards are paid lucra-tive wages to conduct

themselves in the stupid andarrogant manner you havedescribed. They are simplydoing their haraam job for the haraam boodle. The bluelights, sirens and recklessspeeding are the hallmarksof morons. All in the entou-

rage are morons, includingthese establishment sheikhs

and imams. They are members of the ulama-e-soogang, hence they love to be

protected by gangsters, andthey love the antics dis-

played by these gangster bodyguards. There is noth-ing Islamic about these mor-on visitors. Their Arab gar-ments too are un-Islamic.

The people who attendthe lectures of these agentsof corruption deserve to be

bullied and humiliated be-cause they lack honour. Anhonourable man will notattend a function where hewill be subjected to suchdisgraceful treatment asmentioned by you. Whenyou visit rubbish, expect to

be treated like rubbish. Allcogs in the set-up are rub-

bish.

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

8/12


What is the meaning of theSunnah? The following epi-sode will present a better un-derstanding of the meaning of the Sunnah.

A Buzrug once came to Ha-dhrat Mujaddid Alf-e-Thaani(rahmatullah alayh) and said:I was in a state of Qabdh(spiritual depression) pertain-ing to Nisbat with Allah Taala for a number of years. I wentto Hadhrat Khwaajah BaaqiBillah (rahmatullah alayh) andcomplained of my state of Qabdh. By the tawajjuh(spiritual focus) and dua of Hadhrat Baaqi Billah my stateof Qabdh vanished and wasreplaced by the state of Bast (spiritual exhilaration). I im-

plore you to also direct ta-wajjuh on me. HadhratKhwaajah (rahmatullah alayh)have entrusted all his khulafaand mureedeen to you.

In response, Hadhrat Mu- j a d d i d A l f - e - T h a a n i(rahmatullah alayh) said: Ihave nothing besides Ittibaa-e-Sunnah (following the Sun-nah). This statement exer-cised such a profound effect onthe Buzrug that an extremelylofty spiritual haal (state)overcame him. The effect of

his spiritual power and Nisbat caused the entire land to trem-

ble. A tremor was felt through-out the land.

H a d h r a t M u j a d d i d(rahmatullah alayh) instructeda mureed to bring his miswaak from the shelf. When the mi-swaak was brought, HadhratMujaadid took it and fixed itinto the ground. Immediately,the tremor ceased and alongwith it the spiritual state of theBuzrug terminated.

Hadhrat Mujaddid Alf-e-Thaani (rahmatullah alayh)then commented: By your karaamat (miracle) the land of Sarhind trembles. If this Fa-qeer (referring to himself)makes Dua, then Insha-Allah,all the dead in Sarhind will

become alive. However, mak-ing miswaak during Wudhuaccording to the Sunnah is in-finitely superior to both theseacts of Karaamat.

This is the conception of theSunnah according to the Sa-haabah and the Auliya. Noth-ing is better and more meritori-ous than acting in accordancewith the Sunnah, regardless of the Fiqhi classification of theSunnah act, be it Mustahab or

be it an Adab. The Sunnah of

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) in every detail is for

practical implementation. TheSunnah is not for mere studyand for relegation to the ki-taabs

Since the Madaaris no longer impart the correct knowledgeof the Sunnah, the Asaatizah

themselves lacking in proper comprehension of the Sunnah,today we find even the Ulamafrowning askance when forgot-ten and dead aspects of theSunnah are revived. By Ulamain this context, is meant sin-cere Ulama. As far as the flot-sam of ulama-e-soo is con-cerned, they are beyond thescope of this naseehat. TheQuraan Majeed says: Nonebut the people of intelligence

ponder (and derive lesson).

Mujaddid Alf-e-Thaani wasthe Mujaddid (Reviver of the

Deen) of the second Islamicmillennium. At the beginning of each century, Allah Taaladispatches a Mujaddid whose

function it is to combat and weed out the accretions of bidah and baatil which havebecome attached to the Deenlike parasites.

Q. I am a married womanwithout any children. Wehave been married for about10 years. After many at-tempts including one failedIVF cycle, we have embarkedon a second IVF cycle. Read-ing the insert of some stimu-latory injections that I havealready taken for 2 daysnow, have perturbed megreatly. I have therefore de-cided to write to you. Myquery is based on two points:1. Firstly, the permissibilityof In Vitro Fertilization(IVF) in my scenario stimu-lation for egg productionwith hormonal injection, eggretrieval, assisted fertiliza-tion in test tube, embryotransfer back and pregnancytest after 12 days?2. The permissibility of in-

jecting oneself with hor-mones derived from human

urine (trade name Menopur)and another hormonal injec-tion derived from geneticallyengineered hamster ovarycells (trade name Gonal F)?A. The IVF technique isharaam. It is not permissible tosubmit to the haraam, demean-ing and immoral tests andtechniques. The human urineand hamster hormones aggra-vate the prohibition. The Crea-tor is only Allah Taala. A souldestined to appear on earth will

be created regardless of what isdone or not done. Conversely,if Allah Taala has decreed that

there will be no children for you, then all the doctors of the

world with all their techniqueswill be helpless. The Qudrat of Allah Taala cannot be thwart-ed by ways and means. And,while ways and means are nec-essary on earth, the Muslim isnot allowed to adopt haraammethods for the acquisition of halaal objectives. He may notconsume pork and carrion tosatisfy his hunger.

Regarding children, theQuraan Majeed states withclarity and emphasis: Unto

Allah belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth. Hecreates whatever He wills. Hebestows females to whomever

He wills, and He bestowsmales to whomever He wills,or He bestows to them maleand female. And, He makesbarren whomever He wills.Verily, He is The All-Knowing One, The All-Powerful One. (Aayat 50, Surah Ash-

Shura).Just as we are bound toadopt lawful ways of earningour Rizq, so too is it incumbentto resort to only lawful andnatural means for acquiringoffspring. If after adoption of the lawful ways, the desiredresult and objective are notachieved, the Mumin under-stands that it is the Will of Al-lah Taala with which he/sheshould be satisfied. It is abso-lutely haraam to get yourself injected with the haraam filthyou have mentioned. In addi-tion the technique consists of

other haraam factors as well.

I never thought that I would see the day that Shaitaan will

play with the Ulama likechildren play with balls. (Hadhrat Habeeb Ajmi)

The fussaaq of the times of Jaahiliyyah had more haya(shame) than the Ulama of

our time. (Abdul Azeez Bin Abi Rawaad)

There is a treasure of naseehat in these warningsand admonition of the Auliyafor the Ulama of our age. TheUlama should reflect on their condition of fisq and fujoor,and worst, on their misdeedsof kitmaanul haq (concealingthe truth), and mutilating theShariah to achieve their n a f s a a n i a n d m u n d a n e

objectives. The Ulama of thisage have become the toys andtools of shaitaan. Reflect andlament your condition.

Tomorrow Maut will

overtake you. It will then betoo late to make amends. Youwill depart with a heartsmitten with futile regret. MayAllah Taala save us from theevils lurking in our nafs andthe snares of Iblees.

Question: In our Musjid wehave taleem every day after

Isha Salaat at the front of the Musjid. We try to start imme-diately after Sunnah and Witr

Salaat to ensure that as many people as possible participate. If we delay until the majorityhas not completed their Sa-laat, many will be deprived of the ijtimaa-ee benefit of the

Taleem as they will simply gohome due to the delay.The Taleem commences in

a low voice to prevent disturb-ing those performing Salaat.

However, someone objected,saying that it is not permissi-ble to commence Taleemwhilst others are performing

Salaat. The objection however contradicts the fact that an-nouncements regarding fund-r a i s i n g , p r o g r a m m e -announcements, etc. by the

Imaam take place whilst musallis (latecomers) arecatching up with on the Fardhrakats they had missed.

Please comment and explainthis issue.Answer: (1) There should be no taleemimmediately after the Fardh of Zuhr, Maghrib and Isha since it

is Waajib to immediately com-mence the Sunnatul Muakka-dah after the short Dua. Insome Musaajid this Shari re-quirement is ignored and great-er importance is accorded tothe taleem than to the Sharicommand of Ittisaal, i.e. to per-form the Sunnats immediatelyafter the Fardh).(2) Taleem may commence

after the Sunnat and Nafl Sa-laat. In this regard what wehave personally observed, isthat even before most musallishave completed even tworakats of Sunnatul Muakka-dah, e.g. after Magrib, the

brother, goes to the front, facesthe Jamaat whilst 90% of themusallis are in Salaat, and be-gins with his announcement

per ta in in g to Ta le em/Tableegh/Bayaan. He evencomments; Those who havecompleted Salaat should come

forward. How can they havecompleted when he did notallow adequate time to performeven two rakats decently?Such an announcement at sucha juncture is undoubtedly verydisturbing and does distract the


WHAT ARE THEY SNUG (IN THE THOUGHT) THAT OUR PUNISHMENT WILL NOT OVERTAKE THEM DURING THE DAYTIME WHILST THEY ARE

ROMPING? (QURAAN)

245 DIE IN NIGHTCLUB BLAZE245 DIE IN NIGHTCLUB BLAZE245 DIE IN NIGHTCLUB BLAZE245 DIE IN NIGHTCLUB BLAZE Marco SibajaA BLAZE raced through a

packed nightclub in southernBrazil early yesterday, kill-ing 245 people as the air filled with deadly smokeand panicked partygoersstampeded toward the exits,

police and witnesses said. Itappeared to be the world'sdeadliest nightclub fire inmore than a decade.

Witnesses said that a flareor fireworks lit by the bandmem-bers might have start-ed the fire.

Police Major ClebersonBrai-da said the 245 bodieswere brought for identifica-

tion to a gymnasium in thecity of Santa Maria, at thesouthern tip of

Brazil. TV imagesshowed smoke pouring outof the Kiss nightclub asshirtless young male par-tygoers joined firefighterswielding axes and sledge-hammers, pounding at win-dows and walls to break through to those trapped in-side.

Teenagers sprinted fromthe scene desperately tryingto find help. Others carriedinjured and burnt friendsaway.

Firefighters and ambu-

lance staff responded quick-ly, but the fire spread toofast inside the packed clubfor them to help.

Most of the dead suffocat-ed, according to Dr PauloAfonso Beltrame, a profes-sor at the medical school of the Federal University of Santa Maria, who raced tothe city's Caridade Hospitalto help. "Large amounts of

toxic smoke quickly filledthe room and 1 would saythat at least 90% of the vic-tims died of asphyxiation,"Beltrame said.

The Herald 28-Jan-2013

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

9/12


nant mode, hence its fossiliza-tion. This fossilization of theintellectual faculty is the con-sequence of the straitjacketinto which the brain is fitted bythe system of indoctrination of western educational institu-tions. Thus, it is seen that thevast majority of the westernintelligentsia dwells in an im-

permeabl e frozen cocoonwhich precludes independentthinking, especially in issues of transcendental import whichIFS characters believe are sub-servient to the theories pro-

pounded by their atheist mas-ters wallowing in kufr and ja-naabat.

One of the serious effectsof IFS is the vermiculation of the sensorium. Whilst psychia-trists and the medical establish-ment as a whole have hithertofailed to provide a viable aetio-logical explanation for the typeof IFS which afflicts your

brains, this malady in terms of aetiology poses no conundrumfor those who are experts in theIslamic sciences of the Quraanand Sunnah. IFS is the conse-quence of hidden kufr of whicheven the addicted person isunaware, nevertheless, it per-colates his thinking, speechand general lifestyle.

A person afflicted withIFS, especially if she is a mod-ernist aunt, is incapable of comprehending simple Islamicfacts, as well as tangible issuesvisible to the naked eye andrequiring no intellectual per-ception for their acknowledge-ment, hence it constitutes aneedless extravagance in thedivine bounty of time to evenattempt a Shari or a rationalexplanation for a person withISF. However, since unwaryand simple folk are likely to bemisled into deception by thetwisted and convoluted logic

pervading the arguments of theunfortunate IFS aunt, there is aneed to respond for their bene-fit.

Firstly, responding to theaunts self-laudatory state-

ments would be redundant anddemeaning to intelligence. Weshall therefore mirthfully by-

pass her introductory drivel.Among the Ulama there are

two classes: Ulama-e-Haqqand Ulama-e-Soo (Evil Ula-ma), the latter category having

enslaved themselves to thedunya. The views of the ulamaof the dunya whose objectiveis monetary gain, are of nocognizance and cannot be pre-sented in defence of the incon-gruity which you have prof-fered, namely, the contradicto-ry approach to the prohibition.

As far as the Ulama-e-Haqq are concerned, there isuniformity in their fatwa, viz.,the immoral western educa-tional system of colleges anduniversities, is haraam for bothgirls and boys. According tothe Ulama, it is not permissiblefor females to attend even theMusjid for Fardh Salaat, whenthey are even fully dressed inHijaabgear, where there is nointermingling of the sexes,where the atmosphere is one of holiness, and the evils and im-moralities of a university envi-

ronment are totally absent. It istherefore quite logical to un-derstand that these Ulamacannever condone females at-tending the educational

brothels which are known asuniversities. Hence, the chargeon this score is baseless andmisdirected.

The prohibition is based ona variety of extremely harmfulfactors and morally and spiritu-ally detrimental consequencewhich lead to even effacementof Imaan. This naseehat is notmeant for such persons whose

brains are fossilized and whosespiritual eyes are blind, for they are in abnegation of thefact that when the sun shines itis day time. Who can deny the

preponderence of zina, inter-mingling of sexes, drugs, lewd-ism, immorally clad females(even Muslim females), - fisq,fujoor and even kufr at univer-sities? Who can honestly denythat universities are cauldronsof vice and evil? A prominentuniversity professor who haslectured for many years in anumber of universities, de-scribing the university scenar-

io, writes:Within the university en-vironment our students are

faced with a myriad of chal-lenges. Some of them includethe open marketing of zina and a lifestyle of complete immo-rality and immodesty. There

are absolutely no restrictionson interactions between mem-bers of the opposite sex. In

fact, they are encouraged to beas friendly and intimate as theywish to be. Unlike the work

place, there are no unwrittenboundaries of respect betweenmen and women.

On the other hand, one of the most devastating issues

plaguing our universities to-day, is the growth of so manyorganizations that promoteharaam under the banner of

Islam. Whether it is student organizations that are unmind-

ful of basic Islamic issues likehijaab or salaah or the threat of deviant sects like the Shiahsor Ahmediyas, our young

friends are constantly being misguided. Many of our broth-ers and sisters are under theimpression that they are carry-

ing out acts of ibaadat whenin fact they are indulging inharaam .

In short, the campus envi-ronment markets a lifestylethat is completely foreign and un-Islamic. The mode of dress,character, greed for moneyand complete disregard of any-thing religious are all charac-teristics of a secular, universityenvironment

Islam in our lives is dying because the younger genera-tion is not prepared to livetheir lives as Muslims. Theyare influenced by a foreignlifestyle at school and universi-ty, and we as parents havedone little to assist in protect-ing or preparing them for suchdifficulties. Over time, our women lost their bashfulnessand the deen was removed

from our hearts. This resulted in a new generation that has

Muslim names, attended Mus-lim schools and (even) madras-ahs, can recite the Quraanand sometimes even speak Ara-bic, yet they are a generationwho do not believe in Islamwith their hearts. More of the

Professors appraisal of thezina-lifestyle of universitiesappears elsewhere in these col-umns.

The aforementioned com-ments are not the statements of a Molvi. The Professors frank appraisal should assist sincere

Muslims to understand the fat-wa of prohibition. Whilst it isnot permissible for even Mus-lim males to attend such hot-

beds of zina, the prohibitionhas greater emphasis for Mus-lim girls, and there should beno difficulty in understanding

the greater emphasis.With regard to the issue of access to Muslim female doc-tors in the light of the prohibi-tion, the simple answer is thatwhen circumstances compel,then consumption of pork be-comes permissible to the de-gree of need. It is stupid to re-tort that if Muslims do not op-erate piggeries, how will theyobtain access to pork whenon the verge of death due tostarvation. Irrespective of themanner in which the pork be-comes available during thehour of dire need, it shall be

acquired. The same applies toMuslim female doctors. Theyare the pork in the time of need. Furthermore, the ab-sence of Muslim female doc-tors is the lesser of the evils inrelation to the rotten zina andkufr university environment. Inthe absence of Muslim femaledoctors, the Shariah allows theservices of non-Muslim femaledoctors. If they too are unavail-able, then Muslim male doc-tors, and in their absence, theservices of non-Muslim maledoctors will be permissible.But, the respectable aunt suf-fering from IFS is not expectedto understand this simple logicand approach of the Shariah.

As for the sustenance andmaintenance of females, it isIslamically irrational and not

permissible to plunge theminto haraam, zina, fisq, fujoor and kufr when they are noteven affected with an eventwhich the IFS mind halluci-nates for the distant future anevent which may or may nothappen. Furthermore, the argu-ment raised by the IFS auntexhibits extreme deficiency of

Imaan which requires the Mus-lim to believe that Allah Taalais the Sole Raaziq and thatRizq is predetermined andsealed, and that regardless of what is done or not done, our

predestined Rizq will neither

increase nor decrease by onemorsel or one cent. Denial of this fundamental doctrinewhich is integral to Imaan, ex-

pels one from the fold of Is-lam.

It is to inverse the naturalIslamic system of life com-

manded by Allah Taala for Muslims, to plunge headlonginto haraam, fisq, fujoor andkufr on the basis of hallucinat-ed dangers which may occur inthe distant future. Instead of

promoting the expulsion of females from the home envi-ronment for plunging them intothe vile immoral universityenvironment, Muslims should

preach and promote the obliga-tions and duties which Muslimmales have to discharge withregard to the maintenance of women who lack a source of income. The obligation of

providing for such womendoes not stop at only closefamily members. If the Asbaat relatives (relatives from thefathers side) of a destitutewoman refuse or are unable tofulfil their obligation, it willdevolve on other relatives,male and female, and if theytoo fail, then it is the duty of neighbours and ultimately of the entire Muslim community.

Maintaining destitute fe-males is in fact a Waajib alalKifaayah obligation devolvingon the whole Muslim commu-nity. The argument that noindividual can order a man tomaintain a woman if he wishesnot to is the product of a ver-miculated brain smitten withthe IFS disease. A man of means to whom Allah Taalahas granted abundant wealth, isunder Shari compulsion to aiddestitute women. He will beguilty of a major sin if he re-fuses despite possessing themeans.

As for a woman working tosustain herself during her id-dat, it is a case of consuming

pork in dire circumstances, and

for her consumption of pork her relatives, neighbours andher Muslim society as a wholewill have to answer in the Di-vine Court. The IFS aunts ar-gument is devoid of Shari aswell as logical substance.

(Continued from page 1)

THE HOLOCAUST THE HOLOCAUST THE HOLOCAUST THE HOLOCAUST

OUTRAGEOUS MUSLIM

PARTICIPATION Q. I am outraged at anevent organized by Mus-lims. They are organizinga COMMEMORATIONOF THE NAZI HOLO-CAUST service. Muslim

speakers at this event areYasmin Sooka, Farid Es-sack, Kayum Ahmed andsupporters listed are Ah-

med Kathrada Foundationand Coalition for a FreePalestine. Please commenton this commemorationfunction.A. There is nothing out-rageous about this event.Generally, it is not our poli-cy to comment on non-Muslim affairs and activi-ties. You are outraged be-cause you have mistaken thecharacters (in your question)to be Muslims. There aremillions of people living in

Lebanon, Syria. Iraq andEgypt who bear Muslim-sounding names, but areChristians. Similarly, thosein your question with Mus-lim-sounding names are notMuslims. You should there-fore not be surprised. What,however, is surprising is thatour friend, the Rt. ReverendAbraham Bham is not partic-i p a t i n g . H i s n o n -

participation in this type of an event is indeed intri-guing.

THE JAMIATUL ULAMAKWAZULU-NATAL, WITH-DRAWING AND CANCEL-LING ALL HALAAL CERTIFI-CATES IT HAD ISSUED, IS-SUES THE FOLLOWINGSTATEMENT:

TERMINATION OF HALAAL SERVICES

THE MUSLIM PUBLIC IS ADVISEDTHAT AFTER CAREFUL CONSID-

ERATION, THE JAMIATUL ULAMAHAS DECIDED TO TERMINATEHALAAL CERTIFICATION ANDINSPECTION. THIS DECISION WASTAKEN DUE TO THE FACT THATENSURING THE HALAAL SUITA-BILITY OF OUTLETS AND ESTAB-LISHMENTS REQUIRES A GREATDEAL OF CHECKS AND BALANC-ES. HENCE, ALL FOOD OUTLETSAND ESTABLISHMENTS PREVI-OUSLY CERTIFIED BY THE JAMIATARE NO LONGER CERTIFIED ORINSPECTED BY THE JAMIAT.

7/27/2019 VOL21NO11

10/12


THE BIDAH THE BIDAH THE BIDAH THE BIDAHOF MOULOODOF MOULOODOF MOULOODOF MOULOOD AND THE CO- AND THE CO- AND THE CO- AND THE CO-NUNDRUM OFNUNDRUM OFNUNDRUM OFNUNDRUM OF

PROMINENT PROMINENT PROMINENT PROMINENT SCHOLARSSCHOLARSSCHOLARSSCHOLARS

Q. The Ahlul Bidah in anarticle, backed up their mou-lood celebrations with sayings

from some prominent scholarssuch as Ibn Hajr Qustulaani,

Ibn Jauzi and others, and even Haji Imdaadullah, the

Shaikh of Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi. What an-swer is there for this proof which the Barelwis cite?A. We are not the muqallideenof prominent scholars. Weare the Muqallideen of ImaamAbu Hanifah (rahmatullahalayh), and we follow the Sha-riah as it existed during the era

of Khairul Quroon. The Shari-ah is the Deen whichRasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) and the Sahaabahtaught and practised. Innova-tions having a faade of ibaadat, which were introducedcenturies after Rasulullah(sallallahu alayhi wasallam),have no validity in terms of theShariah.

Even if thousands of prominent scholars supportthe bidah of moulood, it willremain bidah sayyiah (evil innovation) . Ibaadat is whathad existed during KhairulQuroon and substantiated bythe Aimmah-e-Mujtahideen

and imparted to posterity bythe Fuqaha of our Math-hab.

We are not awed by thenames of the prominent schol-ars which the Qabar Pujaaris(grave worshippers) cite insubstantiation of their evil

bidah of moulood which con-sists of acts of fisq, fujoor andshirk. The personal opinions of

prominent scholars opinionsunsubstantiated by the Nusoosof the Shariah, remain theopinions of people, and re-gardless of the lofty stature of the prominent scholars, their opinions may not be hoisted onto the Ummah as if these acts

are practices of the Sunnah or deeds commanded by the Sha-riah.

If a moulood practice istotally bereft of any of the rub-

bish actions with which theQabar Pujaaris adorn their sa-tanic exhibitions of merrymak-ing functions, such as the una-dulterated personal practice of Haji Imdaadullah (rahmatullahalayh), then too, it does notconstitute a Shari act of ibaadat which could be im-

posed on others. In fact, it isnot permissible to invite othersto personal acts of devotioneven if such acts are devoid of any of the evil flotsam of theBidatis. Personal expressionsof devotion and love for

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) are to be restrictedto the privacy of the home by

the individuals engaging inthem. They should not beflaunted as acts of Masnoonibaadat or presented to theUmmah as if they are deedscommanded by Rasulullah(sallallahu alayhi wasallam)and practised by the Sahaabah.

Moulood is a baseless prac-tice which has no origin in theSunnah. The many acts of fan-fare, fun, singing, clowning,feasting and merrymaking,render the function haraam and

participation in these bidah practices is haraam. The mou-lood practices in vogue, as

prac tised by the Grave-

Worshippers, should not beconfused with the simple and private act of Haji Imdaadullah

(rahmatullah alayh).It will be salubrious for the

Qabar Pujaaris to understandthat we are not members of Bani Israaeel whom theQuraan Majeed castigates:The take their (prominent)

scholars and their saints as gods besides Allah Thatwas the practice of Bani Is-raaeel. We, the followers of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhiwasallam) acquire our Deenfrom the Sahaabah via thetransmission Chain of ImaamAbu Hanifah (rahmatullahalayh). Our Islam does not

beg in 8 centuries af ter


in the year is the day HadhratUmar (radhiyallahu anhu) wasmurdered and the virtues andexcellences of this day stemfrom the murder of Umar. Inhonou r o f Rasu lu l l ah(sallallahu clay' wa sa ll am )and Hadhrat Ali (radhiyallahuanhu), Allah Ta'ala annuallygrants Shiahs three consecutivedays in which they are permit-ted to sin freely. The Record-ing Angels are instructed tocease recording sins on thesethree days commencing on thed a y H a d h r a t U m a r (radhiyallahu anhu) was mur-dered. Three free days of sin-ning are among the ways of rejoicing the murder of Umar (radhiyallahu anhu). HadhratUmar (radhiyallahu anhu) al-tered the Qur'aan Shareef and

prevented others from Islam.These corruptions as well

as many other falsehoods are

imputed by the Shiahs to Ha-dhrat Umar, the man aboutwhom Rasulullah (sallallahualayhi wasallam) said: "If after me there had to be a Nabi, it would have been Umar." "Themost resolute in the Law of

Allah is Umar." But, Shi'i

priests hypocritically shout:"No Sunni'ism and NoShi'ism".

Among the worst accusationswhich the Shi'i priests levelagains t Hadhra t Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) is thecharge that he interpolated in

the Qur'aan Shareef. On the basis of this slander againstHadhrat Umar (radhiyallahuanhu), the Shiahs believe thatthe Qur'aan which we havenow is not the authenticQur'aan. The true Qur'aan, ac-cording to official Shi'i belief,will be brought by ImaamMahdi when he appears fromhis cave of concealment ac-cording to Shi'i fabrication.

The high ranking Shiah priest, Mullah Baqir Majlisi of the 10th century of the Hijri

era, and regarded by the Shiahsas "Khaatamul Muhadditheen",writes in his book, ZaadulMa'aad, about Hadhrat Umar:". . . There will be one idolamong the munafiqeen, whowill be the leader of the hypo-

crites. He (i.e. Hadhrat Umar)will have the whip of oppres-sion and injustice in his hand;he will debar people from thetruth; he will alter the Qur'aanof Allah and will change my(i.e. Ra

VOL21NO11

Documents

Transcript of VOL21NO11