Visegrad, 29 April 2011
-
Upload
sydnee-cross -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Visegrad, 29 April 2011
Date <date,see Header and Footer>
Slide 1
Report on survey of implementation of legal provisions to improve availability of veterinary medicines
Visegrad, 29 April 2011
J. Gabriel Beechinor
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 2
Background
• Survey conducted in 2006 on impact of specific provisions of 2001/82/EC to address availability (as amended by 2004 directive)
• 2006 conclusion was that it was still too early to gauge their effectiveness
• February 2011 HMA asked that an update be provided
• Survey undertaken in Spring 2011• Same scoring system used (0-3 scale)
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 3
Survey details
• Responses received up to 8 April 2011• 26 countries responded (including AU, BE, BU,
CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, EL, FI, FR, IE, IS, IT, HU, LT, LV, NL, NO, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK and UK)
• Survey was in two sections•Use of legal provisions in MSs to meet
availability needs•Views on situation and whether further
measures possible without new legislation
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 4
Results 1
• Article 4(2) exemptions for medicines intended for aquarium fish, cage birds, homing pigeons, small rodents, rabbits etc
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 5
Results 2
• Article 6(3) [Horses declared as not for use for human consumption]• 2006: 1.8• 2011: 1.5
• Article 7 [Health situation so requires..]• 2006: 2.2• 2011: 2.0
• Article 8 [serious epizootic disease identified ...]• 2006: 2.0• 2011: 1.8
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 6
Results 3
• Article 10 (1) [cascade for non food-producing animals]
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 7
Results 4
• Article 11 (1) [cascade for food-producing animals]
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 8
Results – impact of data protection 1
• 13 year data protection for fish and bees
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 9
Results – impact of data protection 2
• Ten year data protection extended by one year in respect of each additional food-producing species authorised within first 5 years
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 10
Conclusions on survey of legal tools
• Are being used to a greater or lesser extent • Apart from market exclusivity provisions,
most others are found to be useful (i.e. impact score > 1.5)
• Cascade provisions are indispensible in most countries
• Scores from current survey are lower than that in 2006 – anticipated benefits might not have materialised
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 11
Results of section 2 of survey
• Availability – improved or disimproved?• Improved or slightly improved – 12
countries (BE,CY, DK, FI, IE, IS, LT, NO, PO, RO, SK and UK)
•Mixed or unchanged – 12 countries (BG, CZ, DE, EE, EL, ES, FR, HU, IT, LV, NL, SE)
•Disimproved – 1 country (IS)
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 12
Issues
• Impact of company mergers• Only 45% of centrally authorised products
are on the market in some MSs• Overall problem of availability continues,
especially for MUMS• Extrapolation of MRLs helps but does not
often result in marketing authorisations
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 13
Possible national initiatives which do not need new legislation
• Proactive engagement in identifying candidate products being proposed for MRP/DCP
• Fee waivers/ fee reduction• Focus only on administrative issues
(rather than risking scientific discussions)• Use of Article 7 provision [the Cyprus
clause]
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 14
Possible network initiatives not requiring legislation
• Use of multilingual packs• Further commitment to the spirit of MRP/DCP• Harmonisation of SPCs• Worksharing – especially offical batch review of
IVMPs• Communication of SME office, free scientific advice
and fee waivers• Further support for products for MUMS• Research initiatives• Best practice sharing of experiences
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 15
Views on impact of Regulation 470/2009
• Does not address core issue• Even if MRLs are available, still need
specific PK and/or residue data
29 April 2011 HMA Visegrad, Hungary Slide 16
Overall conclusion
• Available tools are a help pending a long-term resolution of availability issue
• Final solution must await legislative review• Key driver must be sufficient incentives for
industry to develop new products by way of data protection
• MSs can do much in the meantime by adopting a proactive but Community-centred approach
• Further potential exists for use of multilingual labels
Many of life’s failures are people who did not realise how close they were to
success when they gave upThomas Edison
Thank you
Date <date,see Header and Footer>
Slide 17