UTC 2016 Program

48
Premium Media Partner: Main Sponsors: Organising Partners: Hosted by the Underwater Technology Foundation The 22 nd Underwater Technology Conference Lean Subsea – the way forward! Bergen, Norway (14) 15 - 16 June 2016 www.utc.no • Subsea Market Outlook and Investors Perspectives • International RDI workshop Introducing new seminars 14 June – included in registration fee:

description

Subsea Technology Conference in Bergen, Norway 14 - 16 June 2016

Transcript of UTC 2016 Program

Page 1: UTC 2016 Program

1

Premium Media Partner:Main Sponsors: Organising Partners:

Hosted by the Underwater Technology Foundation

The 22nd Underwater Technology Conference

Lean Subsea – the way forward!

Bergen, Norway (14) 15 - 16 June 2016

www.utc.no

• Subsea Market Outlook and Investors Perspectives

• International RDI workshop

Introducing new seminars 14 June

– included in registration fee:

Page 2: UTC 2016 Program

2

THE UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION WELCOMES YOU TO THE UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (UTC), THE 22ND UTC SINCE THE FIRST HELD IN 1980.

The theme of this year’s conference is “Lean Subsea – the way forward” and tells us that we have to engineer, construct and install subsea facilities smarter and more cost-efficient. Optimization, standardizing interfaces and closer collaboration across the industry will strengthen subsea competitiveness and make subsea the preferred field development concept.

We believe that this year’s technical programme is the best ever, based on the record high number of well qualified abstracts received. UTF will commend the Program Committee for their efforts in putting together a highly topical program that we very much look forward to learn from. The cooperation in this great group of subsea professionals motivates us to further develop the conference to be a high-level international arena for discussions for the future underwater technologies and system solutions. With great challenges ahead, it is important that individuals from major subsea operators from all over the world gather together with suppliers and service providers to share initiatives, developments and solutions. We will provide the collaborative environment for you all to thrive.

This year UTC will feature Market, Investors and R&D seminars, a new format for the warm-up to the main conference. The seminars will be arranged at USF Verftet hosted in collaboration with valued partners GCE Subsea and DNB. The Icebreaker event will take place at the same venue later in the evening. The programme for the Market, Investors and R&D seminars, 14 June, will consist of two parallel sessions in the afternoon; one focusing on Subsea Market Outlook and Investors Perspectives, and the other, the International RDI workshop, focusing on Subsea R&D and Innovation for the future – presenting the new Global Subsea University Alliance. We need to keep updated on Investors strategies and assessments, capital market influence and adapting to achieve competitiveness.

Norway is at the forefront globally in terms of development and operation of subsea technology. The Underwater Technology Foundation is a non-commercial entity established in 1980 when several large oil-related companies joined forces to hold an Underwater Technology Conference. The overall objective of the foundation is to promote increased knowledge of the subsea sector. This is something the foundation will achieve through UTC which features an exhibition open to everyone interested in learning more about subsea, and with a high level technical programme. Since last year the UTF has been strengthened and we are very pleased that both FMC Technologies and OneSubsea have become new members.

UTF was a strong contributor to the establishment of the cluster NCE Subsea which last year became a Global Centres of Expertise in Subsea (GCE Subsea). UTF and GCE Subsea have strong cooperation on common objectives – the UTC conference is one of the most important projects for the partners.

UTC offers you several facilitated and renowned networking arenas. UTC is a full-service conference. This means that all meals and drinks during the conference are included in the conference fee. Many thanks to our sponsors, exhibitors, speakers and attendees who are making this conference a great success!

We look forward to a rewarding conference and welcome you to Bergen in June!

On behalf of UTF

Tor Willgohs Knudsen Chairman of the Board, UTF

Welcome to UTC 2016

Page 3: UTC 2016 Program

3

CONTENTS

Organised by: Underwater Technology Foundation Editor / Project Management: Irmelin Grønevik, Possibility AS Layout: Lasse Hellen, Bembell AS Interviews: John Bradbury Print: Haugesund Bok & Offset AS Frontpage photo: ©Xvision ©UTC 2016 © Sverre Hjørnevik / www.fjordnorway.com

MILJØMERKET

241 Trykksak 600

Welcome 2|

Greetings from UTC Program Committee 5|

The Underwater Technology Foundation 6|

UTF Subsea Award 2016 7|

Learning to be Lean subsea,

interview with Marilyn Tears, ExxonMobil 8|

UTC 2015 Attendee Profile 10|

Q&A with Neil Saunders, GE Oil&Gas 11|

Student Presentations 12|

Introducing new seminars 13|

Seminar Program:

Subsea Market Outlook and Investors Relations 14|

Seminar Program:

International RDI Workshop 15|

Program 15 June 16|

Program 16 June 17|

Parallell sessions 18|

Increased Recovery/Life of field, 15 June 21|

SURF and SPS, 15 June 22|

Field Development/Layout/Soultions, 15 June 23|

Marine Operations and IMR, 15 June 24|

Field Development/ Layout/Soultions, 16 June 27|

Marine Operations and IMR, 16 June 27|

Subsea Power, Controls and Umbilicals, 16 June 28|

Increased Recovery/ Life of field, 16 June 28|

SURF and SPS, 16 June 29|

Subsea Completion, Intervention and Drilling, 16 June 30|

Back up presentations 31|

UTC Program Committee 32|

Global Centres of Expertise Subsea (GCE Subsea) 36|

Society of Underwater Technology (SUT) 37|

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) 37|

UTC Exhibitors 38|

UTC Exhibition - opening hours for the public 43|

UTC Invitational Golf Tournament 43|

Map of Bergen 44|

Socialize at UTC 45|

Registration and hotel reservations 46|

UTC Sponsors and Partners 48|

Page 4: UTC 2016 Program

4

Not because they are bad, but because they come to life at great depths. Statoil was born in Norway in 1972 and is today the worlds largest offshore operator. Half of our production comes from our 500 subsea wells. Though Oslo is located hundreds of kilometers from the North Sea, the region is leading the way with innovative thinking within subsea technology. One of these innovators, our subsea engineer William, challenges the impossible every day - at great depths. Knowing that no one might ever see his best ideas.

Learn more at Statoil.com/stories

Statoil. The Power of Possible

Some

of

our

best

ideas

will

never

see

the

light

of

day.

Foto: Laukli Modell: Subsea teknologirådgiver i Statoil.

Page 5: UTC 2016 Program

5

On behalf of the Underwater Technology Conference Program Committee, our sponsors and exhibitors, it is my great pleasure and privilege to welcome all of you to UTC 2016.

Once again, we received a record number of abstracts, but what impressed the Committee was not the sheer number of submissions, but the quality of the work going on right now in the subsea industry. I have no doubt that this year’s technical program will encourage stimulating conversations and will inspire us all.

Our great industry is facing very challenging times. Three years ago, the subsea industry could not respond fast enough to quench operators’ thirst for subsea equipment in their frenetic hunt to explore increasingly complex and deeper wells. Today, the situation could not be more different. We are all shaken by the state of the international oil and gas industry – even those among us who have been in the oil patch for some time, have never seen a downturn of this magnitude.

But maybe there’s a silver lining. The crude collapse provides an incentive to take a careful look at how we operate and to find better ways to work. The theme for this year’s forum “Lean Subsea – The Way Forward” reflects the need of the entire oil and gas industry–not just subsea–to adopt a lean manufacturing mindset to continuously improve and reduce cost.

Lean is about learning and adapting in order to continuously improve productivity and become more efficient. In my opinion, lean is also about being brave and smart. And here lies the high potential for improvement, because today new technology and new business models are hugely underutilized in our industry. My hope is that the current market conditions will encourage companies to bring new technology much faster to market and that we can find business models that drive profit upward for all involved. I’m sure that there are several other interpretations of lean and I can’t wait to learn more about them during UTC 2016.

The new market reality calls for a more proactive approach to subsea exploration: One that aggressively drives costs down and that puts subsea development into the profitable zone once again. A leaner subsea industry is truly the only way forward.

Our industry is ready for a change and is eager to take the necessary measures to emerge leaner, stronger and with a more efficient cost base.

We all have a part to play in this transformation and it is now our time to take the lead and push the lean agenda forward.

I look forward to seeing you in Bergen!

Nils Arne Sølvik

Chair UTC 2016 Program Committee Vice President, Processing Systems, OneSubsea

Not because they are bad, but because they come to life at great depths. Statoil was born in Norway in 1972 and is today the worlds largest offshore operator. Half of our production comes from our 500 subsea wells. Though Oslo is located hundreds of kilometers from the North Sea, the region is leading the way with innovative thinking within subsea technology. One of these innovators, our subsea engineer William, challenges the impossible every day - at great depths. Knowing that no one might ever see his best ideas.

Learn more at Statoil.com/stories

Statoil. The Power of Possible

Some

of

our

best

ideas

will

never

see

the

light

of

day.

Foto: Laukli Modell: Subsea teknologirådgiver i Statoil.

Greetings from the UTC Program Committee

The Underwater Technology Foundation are proud to announce that HRH Crown Prince Haakon will visit UTC 2016. This is a great honor for the conference and for the entire subsea community. HRH Crown Prince Haakon will learn more about subsea technology and the challenges that the industry is facing when visiting the UTC exhibition and a plenary session.

HRH Crown Prince Haakon will attend UTC 2016

Jørg

en G

omnæ

s / D

et k

onge

lige

hoff

©

Page 6: UTC 2016 Program

6

UTF Board: Tor Willgohs Knudsen, Statoil – Chairman of the Board Jarle Daae, Aker Solutions Sonia Faaland, CMR Hans Erik Berge, DNV GL Stig Instanes, FMC Technologies Jon A. Sværen, OneSubsea

UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION

SINCE 1980, BERGEN HAS SERVED AS THE HOST CITY FOR THE WORLD’S OLDEST SUBSEA CONFERENCE, AND THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THE EVENT IS THE UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION (UTF).

The Underwater Technology Foundation is a non-commercial entity established in 1980 when several large oil-related companies joined forces to arrange the first Underwater Technology Conference in Bergen. At that time, the subsea industry was in its infancy, and the foundation was the first in the world to put on a conference with sole focus on this sector.

UTC – AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORKING ARENA Ever since the first UTC, the conference has been a regular event in Bergen. For the first 30 years, it was held biennially, but from 2010 onwards, it became an annual event. In addition to the large Norwegian oil and gas operators and suppliers, the proportion of international representatives is high – and is steadily rising. 21 different nations was represented in 2015. The conference attracts between 800 and 1000 participants annually. Hence, this June event in Bergen is an international meeting point for the world’s leading subsea technology companies. New technology is presented, challenges are discussed and UTF is the host and organiser.

THE FOUNDATION PROMOTES KNOWLEDGE UTF is, however, far more than just the Underwater Technology Conference – although focus on this event is high. The overall objective of the foundation is to promote increased knowledge of the subsea sector in the Bergen region. This is something the foundation will achieve through conferences such as UTC, which features an exhibition open to everyone interested in learning more about subsea. In addition, the foundation will hold exhibitions and meetings, and will contribute to research and training at university level. As an example, the University of Bergen was granted NOK 100 000 in 2013, in order to increase the places available to subsea students.

GRANT To fulfil the latter, the foundation offers a grant available to applicants in need of financial support for a subsea related research or training project. The foundation would like to see more applicants for the grant, and encourages anyone with a relevant project to apply.

EXPANSION OF THE FOUNDATION In 2015 the Foundation welcomed two new members, FMC Technology and OneSubsea. The Foundation now consists of Aker Solutions, City of Bergen, CMR, DNV GL, FMC Technologies, NUI, OneSubsea, Sparebanken Vest and Statoil.

www.utc.no/utf

Har

ald

Pette

rsen

- St

atoi

l ASA

©

Page 7: UTC 2016 Program

7

The Underwater Technology Foundation (UTF) Subsea Award is designed to recognize the many outstanding achievements within the subsea industry. The award can be given to a person or a group of people that have contributed to knowledge and understanding in subsea technology through new products, services and/or processes. On the basis of UTF position in the industry, UTF will credit the individuals behind new breakthroughs and innovation. Furthermore, we will share the story of the winner, not only with you, but also through our partner Offshore Engineer, to a wider audience outside the UTC conference halls. The objective is to tell everyone with a brilliant idea what it takes to succeed and what all the work resulted in for the industry. The jury has been appointed by the UTF board and consists of prominent individuals from valuable UTF partners. The first UTF Subsea Award was awarded Tracerco for their Discovery at UTC 2015. The jury recognized Discovery’s™ innovative technology, the large global potential, the fact the technology is field proven with excellent results and that it contributes to operators, IMR companies and suppliers. Paul Featonby, Technology Manager and Tim Hough, Discovery

Technology Lead, both at Tracerco, are recognized for the technology and project execution. The second UTF Subsea Award will be presented at UTC 15 June 2016. The winner(s) will be invited to attend the conference and all social gatherings.

Deadline May 18th.

THE JURY:Magne Husebø Chairman, UTF Council - Jury leaderGisle Nondal R&D Manager, GCE SubseaBjørn Søgård Segment Director, Business Development, Subsea and Floaters, DNV GLElaine Maslin Editor, Offshore Engineer MagazineDan Hill Board of Directors, SPE InternationalDr. Bob Allwood Chief Executive of the Society for Underwater Technology (SUT)Vidar Fondevik Independent Advisor (NUI AS-recently retired)

The UTF Subsea Award can be received by individuals or groups from both intra- and inter-company subsea projects that represent solutions to challenges where the project team has accomplished the task successfully with focus on project execution innovation, increased efficiency, HSE and a global commercial potential.

GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS • This call for proposals is open to persons engaged in subsea projects only • The persons(s) association to the project has to be recognized within the subsea industry and in operation with successful results. • The award aims to recognize the persons(s) behind the project. • Project teams can apply on behalf of their project. People related to the project is also encouraged to send proposals. In both cases valid 3rd party references must be presented.

• The person(s) mentioned in the application is/are the rightful owner(s), or is an employee of the rightful owner of the project/technology.

• The nominee(s) is/are the appropriate individual(s) according to guidelines for the award • The person(s) is/are given the opportunity to present why the project was successful during the UTC conference. • Members of the panel of judges shall have access to the application, provided that statements of confidentiality are signed by the persons involved. • UTF shall be entitled to publicly announce all nominees and to disclose a description of each project and the person’s involvement.

NOMINATION FORMwww.utc.no/utf/utf-subsea-project-award/nomination-form

GUIDELINES

NOMINATE INDIVIDUALS FOR THE UTF SUBSEA AWARD 2016

Deadline May 18th

Page 8: UTC 2016 Program

8

Learning to be Lean subsea: the way forwardThis summer’s Underwater Technology Conference in Bergen will feature one of the best industry line-ups, seen for years with senior executives from Schlumberger, ExxonMobil, Statoil, Aker Solutions and GE Oil and Gas providing keynote presentations.

Marilyn Tears, who has already distinguished herself within the offshore industry, most recently as an ExxonMobil project manager leading the Julia deepwater development in the US Gulf of Mexico and who is now Safety, Security, Health and Environment manager for ExxonMobil Development Company, will be bringing to UTC this year her own perspectives on how HSE issues can impact subsea developments.

She will be joined on the conference platform by Arne Sigve Nylund, Statoil’s executive vice president of development and production, whose keynote speech will be themed “Transforming for the future.”

Luis Arajuo CEO of Aker Solutions, is due to discuss the prospects for a sustainable subsea industry in a longer-lasting low oil price environment.

Neil Saunders, president and CEO of Subsea Systems and Drilling at GE Oil and Gas, will outline how to prepare for operating in a digital industrial era: He will also address ways of optimising industry processes, to achieve leaner, simpler and more efficient project designs.

Marilyn Tears will be bringing her considerable experience both of the Julia development and her focus on HSE to bear on this year’s conference theme, “Lean subsea - the way forward.”

Tears will talk about subsea cost reduction: This is one of, if not the single biggest issue facing the subsea industry in the current price climate.

With this in mind, Tears says, HSE sets the stage for managing all other aspects of business in the subsea sector. “We often see HSE as a predictor of cost, schedule and quality performance. This is why excellence in HSE is important through the entire life-cycle of subsea projects,” she says.

Offshore development teams need to consider all aspects of HSE and understand their implications for manufacturing, installation, operations and maintenance throughout a project cycle Tears says. “HSE design solutions that are both excellent and fit-for-purpose will ultimately reduce cost across the life cycle of subsea equipment.”

She advocates focusing on equipment reliability and quality, which in turn

requires structure and consistency in work execution: “The same focus on structure and consistency for work execution will remove variability. Removing variability from execution will reduce rework and extra costs while also improving reliability and quality,” she argues. “There have been many scientific studies which show that improving quality leads to improved cost control. A structured approach to safety, integrity, quality and risk management is an enabler to get “leaner” while improving results.”

At UTC this year, Tears will also discuss leaner operations in more detail, she says: “Being ‘lean’ is about creating more value for customers with fewer resources. A lean organization understands customer value and focuses its key processes to continuously increase it. By elimination of efforts that do not support value to customers, costs will be reduced,” she states. “When working to get leaner, it is important to not forget to focus on the high-risk areas as they drive execution uncertainty. Teams that gain clarity around what is required to address these high-risk areas are rewarded with improved performance.”

While Tears says the industry needs to work “appropriately and collaboratively,” she says it also has to become more adaptable to market and industry development needs. Emphasising the need to learn lessons to improve performance, she says subsea technology has to support the twin challenges of higher pressure and

Bus

ines

s Re

gion

Ber

gen

©

Page 9: UTC 2016 Program

9

greater depths: “Leveraging learning from others contributes to identifying risks as well as potential savings,” she says.

Advocating creative thinking to use or expand the deployment of common components in different configurations, she suggests this approach can also deliver lower cost alternatives to unique, purpose-designed and built solutions. “We have to figure out how to use technology to enable alternative subsea solutions to save costs over traditional surface solutions.”

Industry standardisation has been embraced by the subsea sector, Tears says, and real inroads have been made recently, she says, citing the DnV Subsea Forging Standard - a recommended practice for steel forgings for subsea application - as one example. Tears points out other joint industry projects are progressing subsea quality, subsea welding standards, documentation, topside control and electrical power systems. She says the International Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP) Association is also starting to standardize subsea trees for the four primary types of subsea trees used today. “I am proud to say that ExxonMobil has played key leadership roles in many of these efforts/initiatives to date,” Tears adds.

Other efforts to standardise equipment have been undertaken too: “ExxonMobil has developed standard part numbers with several suppliers on a concentric, monobore vertical tree design that was used for both the Hadrian South and Julia projects,” Tears points out. Another

innovation, an ExxonMobil Universal Master Control Station, was also used for the first time on Julia. Tears says this is a precursor for standardized subsea and topside controls interfaces. “In the future for example, subsea controls will be nothing more than a node on a conventional topside (or onshore) process control system.”

Exxon is continuing research and development for producing offshore oil

and gas at depths that were technically impossible a generation ago and in “challenged resource development areas.” Capex savings associated with infrastructure reductions for offshore opportunities are also being sought. “These include subsea processing technologies, where ExxonMobil has recently qualified subsea compression, subsea separation, and subsea water treatment,” Tears explains. Other technology focus areas include wet gas compression, high pressure boosting, and long distance subsea power distribution and transmission. ExxonMobil has also begun researching subsea gas dehydration, Tears reveals.

With the current oil price, Exxon staff are examining the way subsea systems work together, from their design and manufacture, through to installation

and operations, to increase efficiency. This requires an “open conversation” by customers and suppliers Tears says, and an “...active discussion/debate on needs and potential options to meet those needs.” Tears suggests this has to happen across all project phases, while maintaining a focus on quality and the reliability of products, and execution.

This year will be the 22nd UTC to take place in Bergen, hosted by the the Underwater

Technology Foundation, and the conference and related industry exhibition will again set the highest standards: More than 800 conference delegates are expected to attend. They will hear from the highest echelon of industry leaders who will provide key insights to the subsea industry today and outline how it will be going

forward as part of a technical conference programme compiled by a committee of Norwegian and international industry experts. Over 50 subsea technology related exhibitors will also be accommodated in Dovregubbens Hall, within Bergen’s Grieghallen, where there will be space for networking and discussions between operators and suppliers.

Written by John Bradbury

HSE design solutions that are both excellent and fit-for-purpose will ultimately reduce cost across the life cycle of subsea equipment

Page 10: UTC 2016 Program

10

Executive Management 12 %

Management 30 %

Chief/Senior Engineer 14 %

Engineer 6 %

Business Development/Sales 23 %

Marketing/Administrative 6 %

R&D 5 %

Student 2 %

Other 2 %

Operator 16 %

EPCI 6 %

System Supplier 15 %

Equipment Supplier 24 %

Subsea Services 17 %

Support Services 5 %

R&D 8 %

Education and Training 2 %

Other 7 %

UTC 2015 ATTENDEE PROFILE

Job function

Industry affiliation

UTC 2015 Facts

• 811 attendees• 27% international delegates • Delegates from 21 countries• 70 exhibiting companies

EXHIBITION & SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIESThe UTC Exhibition is an exclusive arena for subsea related technology and services. We have a limited space available for the exhibition, making all stands visible for the conference delegates. Refreshments and lunches are served in the exhibition hall, in addition to social gatherings before and after the banquet dinner. The exhibition is the most important networking arena for the conference delegates.

UTC offers two types of sponsoring packages, based on two levels of profiling: Main Sponsor and Sponsor Partner. We have chosen an egalitarian sponsoring strategy, not singling out any event or marketing item for sole publicity.

Find out more at www.utc.no/exhibition/information

Page 11: UTC 2016 Program

11

1. What are the themes you plan to address in your keynote speech to the UTC conference?

Whether the price of oil sits at $100+ or sub-$40 per barrel, for me it’s about how we as an industry become more resilient and more efficient, regardless of oil price.For GE Oil & Gas, this means focusing our efforts on what we can control, such as introducing smarter and more cost-effective technologies together with the right level of disruptive thinking. In some cases, this will lead us to shake up some of the deep-rooted conventions of our industry, while at the same time inject some fresh thinking into our current practices.At UTC, I will share some of the efforts we are leading in this direction, from a renewed emphasis on optimization and enhanced digital capabilities to the investment we are making to create the factories of the future. The integration of sensing, communications and analytics capabilities is key to providing enhanced operational insights, driving optimization, improving reliability and performance, and reducing cycle time – creating new value for operators and the supply chain. For example, we are looking at scenarios in which we can create, test and build equipment virtually, with manufacturing simulations and digital representations designed to significantly enhance the manufacturing process.

2. How can the subsea sector best achieve cost reductions without comprising equipment reliability and quality?

In the recent past, the cost of execution in the subsea arena has risen significantly, due to a combination of factors such as greater complexity, stringent local content requirements and government policies – but also due to inefficiencies in our industry. We need to unlock improvements across the entire lifecycle of a project while maintaining the highest safety standards and boosting quality. We should also look closely at our business practices and drastically simplify them.This will require a substantial cultural change. In the supply chain specifically, operations are complex and fragmented with multiple stakeholders influencing a project’s successful execution. As OEMs, we need to go back to full ownership of the end-to-end process, reinstating

mutual trust and collaboration with our partners. There is an important element of innovation that we can bring to the discussion too, one that could encourage the adoption of new commercial models centred on sharing risk as well as reward.

3. What things need to happen to reduce industry costs? What is GE Oil & Gas doing to address this?

I believe that the key to shaping a viable path forward for our industry is to go beyond cost reduction, re-thinking some of the fundamentals and creating value for the long-term. Unique to GE Oil & Gas is our ability to tap into the power of the wider GE enterprise, combining technologies, capabilities and expertise from across all our industrial businesses to drive performance and outcomes. We call this ability to transfer intellect and technology across industries the “GE Store”. It enables us to re-define our practices and develop smarter technology to meet the demands of today’s constrained industry landscape. For what concerns product and technology development, at GE we have recently adopted a new framework of principles and techniques called ‘FastWorks’, which involves rapid learning cycles and close collaboration with customers throughout the project development phase. With quick deliverables and fast learning, we can develop a product or solution that fully meets market needs in the fastest possible time.

4. Where is the focus of your company’s research and development?

We are focusing on developing equipment and systems that not only deliver cost reductions, but also enable simplified and reliable operations. System integration across the full life of field is also high on our agenda – especially in areas like subsea intervention, where our efforts are aimed at providing customers with a lean and cost-effective approach to operate a growing number of mature fields.As part of our subsea power and processing portfolio, we are developing a seawater treatment and injection system built on an innovative design which allows prolonged intervention intervals, longer lifetime and that uses vertically connected modules in order to reduce footprint. Reduced size and lighter infrastructure are at the core of our efforts on wet gas compression, where we are working to develop more compact, reliable and cost-effective subsea compression solutions. We are exploring a completely new way to simplify subsea boosting, also as part of this family of capabilities, that consists of a highly innovative system to help us achieve greater operational flexibility, reduced lifecycle cost and smaller subsea and topside footprint. As subsea operations shift to increasingly challenging environments, our teams are working on developing suitable cost

reduced, and efficient solutions. Testament to this is the work our engineering teams are undertaking to deliver a new composite flexible riser solution, expanding GE’s existing portfolio of flexible risers and flowlines to reach into deeper waters and more extreme operational environments.

5. Which elements of subsea architecture (trees, wellheads, flexible pipelines and risers, umbilicals, jumpers, subsea manifolds, subsea processing equipment) ...offer the greatest scope for improvement/cost reduction or further development?

There is significant room for improvement across core subsea equipment, where project execution has become too complex and costly over the years. We can achieve this by harnessing greater engagement across the supply chain. From our perspective as an OEM, this means co-engineering initiatives and greater transparency and open communication with our suppliers as well as early engagement with our customers. Having the opportunity to contribute to field layout options from the onset, and jointly agree on key specifications can trigger a fundamental cultural change around accountability on quality and speed of execution. Non-conventional commercial models and new supplier ecosystems could lead to reshaping the role of OEMs in the future. 6. Why?

Today, project execution of core technology such as subsea production systems is way too complex. We have a great opportunity to simplify interactions and re-think our entire ecosystem. This is not just an issue to be tackled at the component level but involves the entire design and delivery process.

Q&A with keynote speaker Neil Saunders, GE Oil & Gas

Page 12: UTC 2016 Program

12

STUDENT PRESENTATIONS @UTC 2016

UTF INVITES STUDENTS TO ATTEND UTC

The Underwater Technology Conference is interested in student projects at Master or PhD level in the field of subsea technology. The student presentations will be included in the technical presentations at the conference 15 - 16 June. The featured students will be listed in the conference program, receive complimentary conference fee, flight fare and hotel accommodation for the duration of the conference, sponsored by the Underwater Technology Foundation (UTF).

Attendance at the UTC conference in Bergen gives the student the possibility to meet technologists from most of the major operators and suppliers in the international subsea community. As a speaker at UTC, the student will get invaluable exposure to future employers and an international network in the industry.

Read more about UTF´s focus on students and the promotion of subsea knowledge at www.utf.no.

The Underwater Technology Foundation sponsors students with delegate passes to the UTC. Students can apply to get free attendance at the conference proceedings and lunches. The UTC is an international meeting point for the world’s leading subsea technology companies. New subsea technology is presented, challenges are discussed and students will be able to meet the companies face to face in the exhibition hall. Please send an e-mail to [email protected] with the following information:

Your name:Level: Bachelor, Master or PhDInstitution: School with department/faculty

The student admission does not give access to UTCs social events. It will not be possible to buy tickets to the events, this due to limited seats available.The Underwater Technology Foundation does not cover travel expenses.

Bus

ines

s Re

gion

Ber

gen

©

Page 13: UTC 2016 Program

13

INTRODUCING NEW SEMINARS: MARKET, INVESTORS AND R&D

This year, UTC will feature a new format for day zero, offering a nice warm-up to the main conference in Grieghallen. The Market, Investors and R&D seminars will be hosted in collaboration with valued partners GCE Subsea, CMR and DNB.

The program for June 14th, will consist of two parallel sessions in the afternoon; one focusing on Subsea Market Outlook and Investors Perspectives, and the other focusing on Subsea R&D and Innovation for the future – presenting the new Global Subsea University Alliance.

UTC´s core asset is the high quality technical program. Still, in the current market climate, a deeper insight into both market and RDI is of interest to both engineers, economists and academics. We would like them to meet and share their thoughts for the future.The important issues deserves a more extensive attention than what we are able to include in the format of the main conference program. This year the seminars will replace the traditional UTC field trips, and will take place at USF Verftet, where the Icebreaker will be arranged in the evening.

INTRODUCTION TO THE SEMINARS:

Subsea Market Outlook and Investors PerspectivesAt the Market & Investors seminar, you will get insights into oil and gas prize developments and an analysis of the subsea market. Industry leaders from operators and suppliers will present perspectives on their markets, followed by updates on investor strategies and assessments, and opportunities in the capital market with low oil price.

International RDI Workshop Several world-renowned engineering universities, collocated with the oil and gas industry, have come together and formed the Global Subsea University Alliance (GSUA), addressing the workforce development and R&D challenges in the area of subsea engineering. The alliance simplifies researcher exchange, facilitates new research developments and eases access to company and research agency labs and infrastructure, which will help increase R&D interaction between companies and universities.The RDI session brings together the subsea industry, policy makers and GSUA members, focussing on subsea technology, strategy, R&D and innovation for the future.

Attendance will be included in the conference fee. See program in the following pages.

Valued partners

Page 14: UTC 2016 Program

14

SEMINAR PROGRAM @RØKERIET, USF VERFTET 14 JUNE

14:00 – 14:30 Registration and coffee

14:30 – 14:40Welcome Moderator Carl Andreas Holm, Boston Consulting Group

Market development and analysis

14:40 – 15:00Oil price development Jarand Rystad, Managing Partner, Rystad Energy

15:00 – 15:20Gas price development Karen Sund, Partner, Sund Energy

15:20 – 15:40Subsea Market Outlook Eirik Ronold Mathisen, Equity Analyst Oil Services, DNB Markets

Operator and Supplier Outlook

15:40 – 16:00Challenges and perspectives for New Field Developments Karl Johnny Hersvik, CEO, DetNorske

16:00 – 16:20 Energy perspectives. Statoil’s long-term macro and energy market outlook Olav Kolbeinstveit, VP Market Analysis, Statoil

16:20 – 16:50 Coffee break

16:50 – 17:10Global outlook for the SURF market Øyvind Mikaelsen, EVP Southern Hemisphere and Global Projects, Subsea 7

17:10 – 17:30Global utlook for the OSV & OCV market Mons Aase, CEO, DOF

Investor Perspective

17:30 – 17:50What is required to get investors trust in the subsea marketTor Espedal, Sr Partner, HitecVision

17:50 – 18:10Where are investors putting their money the next 5 years Hogne Tyssøy, Partner, Holberg Fondene

18:10 – 18:30Opportunities in the capital markets in a low oil price market Rune Magnus Lundetræ, Managing Director, DNB Markets, Investment Banking Division

18:30 – 18:45Closing remarks Carl Andreas Holm

19:30 – 22:00 Icebreaker

Bus

ines

s Re

gion

Ber

gen

©

Subsea Market Outlook and Investors Perspectives

Page 15: UTC 2016 Program

15

SEMINAR PROGRAM @SARDINEN, USF VERFTET 14 JUNE

14:30 – 14:40Welcome / introductionGCE Subsea with UTF/GSUA

Setting the scene

14:40 – 15:00Global Subsea University Alliance (GSUA) - A platform for international education and RDI projects Prof. Geir Anton Johansen, Bergen University College and Prof. Ekaterina Pavlovskaia, University of Aberdeen

15:00 – 15:20OG21 – National technology strategy: Strategy and technology needs going forward Kjetil Skaugset, Chief Researcher Upstream Technology, Statoil/ Head of OG21-TTA4

15:20 – 15:35 Coffee break

Subsea R&D and innovation

15:35 – 15:55Presentation from the industry DOF Subsea

15:55 – 16:15 R&D Challenges in the Global Subsea Industry Hervé Valla, Chief Technology Officer, Aker Solutions

16:15 – 16:35Multiphase Flow and Flow Assurance Wai Lam Loh, Associate Professor Centre for Offshore Research and Engineering, National University of Singapore

16:35 – 16:55Game changing technology wantedOddbjørn Gjerde, Wood Group Kenny, Leader of Subsea Equipment Australian Reliability (SEAR) JIP

16:55 – 17:15A new paradigm in drilling and potential applications to seabed drillingDr. Masood Mostofi, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

17:15 – 17:30 Coffee break

Subsea R&D workshop

17:30 – 18:20Roundtable discussion on R&D needs, strategy and joint project ideasChair: GCE Subsea

18:20 – 18:30 Closing remarks

19:30 – 22:00 Icebreaker

International RDI Workshop

Page 16: UTC 2016 Program

16

PROGRAM, DAY 1 @PEER GYNT 15 JUNE

08:30 – 09:30 Badge pick-up and coffee

09:30 – 09:40Welcome UTC Program Committee Chairman Nils Arne Sølvik and Conference Moderator Simon Davies, Statoil

09:40 – 10:00Opening speech TBA

10:00 – 10:20Transforming for the Future Arne Sigve Nylund, EVP Development and Production, Statoil

10:20 – 10:40TBA Scott Rowe, Group President, Schlumberger

10:40 – 11:00A Sustainable Subsea Industry in a Lower for Longer Oil Price Environment Luis Araujo, CEO, Aker Solutions

11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break and exhibition

19:30 – 01:00 Banquet dinner

11:30 – 13:00PARALLEL SESSIONS, TRACK 1 - 3– SEE DETAILED PROGRAM, PAGE 18-19

13:00 – 14:30 Lunch and exhibition

14:30 – 15:30

Panel discussion:

New Business and Execution Models – are we becoming leaner in our approach?

Moderator: Simon Davies • Carl Andreas Holm, Senior Partner & Managing Director, Boston Consulting Group • Arild Selvig, SVP and Head of Front End, Forsys Subsea• Erik Sverre Jenssen, COO, Lundin • Torkild Reinertsen, President, Reinertsen AS • Jon Arnt Jacobsen, Chief Procurement Officer, Statoil• Øyvind Mikalesen, EVP, Subsea 7

15:30 – 16:00 Coffee break and exhibition

16:00 – 18:00PARALLEL SESSIONS, TRACK 1 - 3– SEE DETAILED PROGRAM, PAGE 18-19

Subject to change

Page 17: UTC 2016 Program

17

PROGRAM, DAY 2 @PEER GYNT & @KLOKKEKLANG 16 JUNE

08:00 – 09:00 Morning coffee and refreshments in exhibition hall

Students @Klokkeklang Session leader: Marie B Holstad, CMR and Terje Clausen, Subsea 7

08:30 – 09:00Student presentation IWill be annonced by June 1st

09:00 – 09:30Student presentation II Will be annonced by June 1st

15:45 – 16:00 Summary and closing

09:30 – 11:00PARALLEL SESSIONS, TRACK 1 - 3– SEE DETAILED PROGRAM, PAGE 18-19

11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break and exhibition

Plenary session @Peer Gynt

11:30 – 12:00Preparing for the digital industrial era. Optimizing the way we work for leaner, simpler and more efficient design and project execution Neil Saunders, President & CEO Subsea Systems & Drilling, GE Oil & Gas

12:00 – 12:30Lean Subsea – Safely! Marilyn Tears, EMDC SSH&E Manager, ExxonMobil

12:30 – 13:45 Lunch and exhibition

13:45 – 15:45PARALLEL SESSIONS, TRACK 1 - 3– SEE DETAILED PROGRAM, PAGE 18-19

Subject to change

Page 18: UTC 2016 Program

18

Increased Recovery/Life-of-field Session moderators Johan Kr Mikkelsen, Peretroika and Mike Starkey, ExxonMobil

SURF & SPS Session moderators Torolf Hæhre, Shell and Tim Crome, Technip

Subsea Power, Controls and Umbilicals Session Moderators Henrik M. Madsen, Siemens and Tonje Dahl, ClampOn

11:30 – 12:00 Troll Pilot - The world's first and longest-running subsea separation system celebrating 15 years of operation and increased oil production William Bakke, Advisor Subsea Technology and Operation Subsea Processing, Statoil / Hans Kristian Sundt Product Management Leader Subsea Power and Processing, GE Oil & Gas

Total’s way towards Industrialization / Standardization Wolfgang Amadeus, Specialist Subsea Systems, Total

Clean, Highly Efficient Offshore Power Bernt Skeie, CEO, Prototech AS

12:00 – 12:30 Application of a structured optimization process to subsea compression systems Knut Nyborg, VP Head of Advanced Subsea Production, Aker Subsea AS

Cutting subsea cost through further standardization and industrialisation Roald Sirevaag, Project manager Standardization, Boosting and Compression, Statoil

Qualifying subsea power distribution for the future Gilles Chene, Senior Sales Manager, GE Power Conversion

12:30 – 13:00 The Deployment of the World’s First Subsea Multiphase Compression System – Enabling Increased Recovery at Reduced Costs Mads Hjelmeland, Director - Emerging Technologies, OneSubsea Processing AS

Adopting an Integrated Approach to Flexible Riser Life Extension Ram Subramanian, Subsea & Pipelines Surveillance Engineer, Shell E&P UK

DCFO - A powerful DC subsea control system Ronan Michel, Product Line Manager, Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks

13:00 – 14:30 Lunch and exhibition

14:30 – 15:30 Panel discussion, more information at page 16

Field Development/Layout/Solutions Session moderators Terje Clausen, Subsea 7 and Per Christian Eriksen, Aker Solutions

Increased Recovery/Life-of-field Session moderators Torkild Reinertsen, Reinertsen AS and Tom Eddy Johansen, Forsys Subsea

Marine Operations and IMR Session Moderators Arne Henning Larsen, DOF and Tom Eriksen, GCE Subsea

16:00 – 16:30 Achieving Lower CAPEX and Better Economics through Technologies Integration Nicolas Lefebvre, Subsea Processing Lead / Francois Gooris, New Pipeline Technologies Lead, Forsys Subsea

Åsgard Subsea Compression Torstein Vinterstø, Project Director/ Nils Petter Time, Commission Manager, Statoil

How can we take the next step to a more effcient and lean IMR vessels? Asmund Sætre, Manager Sales & Business Development, AXTech

16:30 – 17:00 Cost efficient subsea tie-back development concept in 1000m water depth and mitigation of hydrate challenges Ole Heggdal, Chief Engineer, Aker Solutions

Subsea sulphate removal and Injection System Hans Kristian Sundt, Product Manager Leader, GE Oil & Gas

Leak repair on deep water X-Mas tree Bozidar Sevic, Lead Engineer, IK-Norway

17:00 – 17:30 “The Statoil Cap-XTM Solution” - next step in subsea green and brown field development Rune M Ramberg, Chief Engineer, Statoil

Subsea cooling; Passive, Active or Sea Current Controlled? Mattias Rudh, Specialist Engineer, Process, FMC Kongsberg Subsea AS

How Lean thinking can be used to optimise the O&G Industry Radu Achim, Lean Program Coordinator/ Executive Master Black Belt in Lean & Six Sigma, Oceaneering

17:30 – 18:00 Subsea produced water separation with SpoolSep: a reliable pipe-based solution for Deepwater applications Shaiek Sadia, R&D Subsea Separation Technologies Manager, SAIPEM SA

HSEQ and Lean Inspiring Best HSEQ Practices Through Lean Leadership Celina Thom, Project Manager, DOF Subsea

A novel system design for fast and flexible horizontal tie-in’s Alexander Fjeldly, Product Leader, GE Oil & Gas

PARALLEL SESSIONS DAY 1 15 JUNE

Track 1@Peer Gynt

Track 1@Peer Gynt

Track 2@Klokkeklang

Track 2@Klokkeklang

Track 3@Troldtog

Track 3@Troldtog

Subject to change

Page 19: UTC 2016 Program

19

Field Development/Layout/Solutions Session moderators Per Christian Eriksen, Aker Solutions and Torolf Hæhre, Shell

Marine Operations and IMR Session moderators Martin Dove, BP and Kenneth Solbjør, Oceaneering

Subsea Power, Controls and Umbilicals Session moderators Hans Kristian Sundt, GE Oil & Gas and Mike Starkey, ExxonMobil

09:30 – 10:00 Subsea Processing for Leaner Fitter Remote Gas Field Development Nino Fogliani, Technology Development Manager, Woodside Energy

Diverless outer sheaht repair solution for flexible pipes Gry Karin Vestbøstad, VP Integrity Management Services, 4Subsea

Next generation control systems with backwards compatibility Karstein Berge Kristiansen, Key Expert Subsea Communication Systems, Siemens AS

10:00 – 10:30 Total cost of ownership analysis in subsea value chain Nina Jevnaker, Manager supply chain, category manager Subsea, Statoil ASA

Permanent deployed & internet piloted ROV system from shore Bjarte Langeland, CEO, Stinger Technology AS

Subsea Electric Systems: Past, Present and Future Andrea Rubio, Product Manager, OneSubsea

10:30 – 11:00 Tuning subsea concepts and project execution for a competitive future Arne Moe Tvedt, Department Manager Subsea, Reinertsen AS

Cost savings using Manned Underwater Intervention method in suitable water depths Rolf Røssland, Managing Director, NUI AS

Subsea All-Electric Initiative Daniel Abicht, Principal Engineer Subsea Production Systems, Statoil

11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break and exhibition

11:30 – 12:30 Plenary session @Peer Gynt, more information at page 17

12:30 – 13:45 Lunch and exhibition

Increased Recovery/Life-of-field Session moderators Per Arild Nesje, Kongsberg Oil&Gas Technologies and Marie H Bueie, CMR

SURF & SPS Session moderators Tim Crome, Technip and Tom Eriksen, GCE Subsea

Subsea Completion, Intervention

and Drilling Session moderators Vidar Fondevik, UTF and Bård Espelid, DNV GL

13:45 – 14:15 Subsea Diagnostics and Prognostics Technologies for Improved Equipment Reliability and Production Availability Mohan G. Kulkarni, Subsea Engineering Associate, ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company

Subsea separation – an undervalued tool for Increased Oil Recovery (IOR)? Lachlan McKenzie, Specialist Engineer, Process, FMC Kongsberg Subsea AS

7" Subsea VXT Standardization Hans Egil Vangås, Advisor Well Technology Subsea Wellheads and Xmas Trees, Statoil

14:15 – 14:45 Solving the wet gas compression challenge from the inside out Jørgen Corneliussen, Engineering Manager, Subsea Processing, GE Oil & Gas

Lean Documentation Jan Arthur Grip Nilsen, Engineering Director, Norway, Subsea 7

Successful introduction of competition in recertification of subsea well control equipment Perry Kopperstad, Principal Subsea / Eivind Håvarstein, Well Systems Engineer, Dong E&P Norge

14:45 – 15:15 How to select the separation solution to maximize the economics of a subsea development Amandine Idrac, Senior Engineer Process, FMC Kongsberg Subsea AS

Subsea Sampling on the Critical Path of Flow Assurance Shailesh Rathod, Product Champion, Schlumberger

Industry challenge or opportunity? Consequences of edition 4 of NORSOK U-001 subsea production system Harald Holden, Lead Engineer, 4Subsea

15:15 – 15:45 Subsea Processing JIP - Standardization of Subsea Pumping Kristin Nergaard Berg, Group Leader Subsea Technology, DNV GL

Flexible Riser Integrity Assessment with advanced MEC-FIT technique Andreas Boenisch, Group Managing Director, Innospection Ltd

Pressure Balanced Safety Joint Bernt-Olav Tømmermo, Specialist Product Engineer, FMC Technologies

Track 1@Peer Gynt

Track 1@Peer Gynt

Track 2@Klokkeklang

Track 2@Klokkeklang

Track 3@Troldtog

Track 3@Troldtog

PARALLEL SESSIONS DAY 2 16 JUNE

Subject to change

Page 20: UTC 2016 Program

20Hear more from Sarah at onesubsea.slb.com/sarah.

SARAH IS ONE OF MANY.Our Integrated Asset Modeling experts like Sarah take a holistic view of

your entire asset, generating probabilistic cost models for the life of the field. Sarah is one of our many experts who, from the reservoir to topside

and exploration to abandonment, can collaborate with you to optimize your field architecture and improve your profitability.

Optimize field architecture economics.That’s our Pore to Process™ approach.

Sarah Kunz Integrated Asset Model ing ( IAM) Team Leader

Integrate subsurface and subsea engineering domains to optimize life-of-field economics. Meet Sarah.

Page 21: UTC 2016 Program

21

SUBSEA COMPLETION, INTERVENTION AND DRILLING SUBSEA POWER, CONTROLS AND UMBILICALS

Applying ROV based Workover and Control Systems to achieve more flexible and effective XT installations Steffan Kruse Lindsø, Project Manager, Oceaneering

All-electric technology status and gaps - Including OPEX and CAPEX SPS and Process system benefit examples Einar Winther-Larssen, Concept Line Manager All Electric, Aker Solutions

INCREASED RECOVERY/LIFE-OF-FIELD

Testing of first ever subsea 12.5MW vertical high-speed motorcompressor Bigi Manuele, Technical Leader, GE Oil & Gas

INCREASED RECOVERY/LIFE-OF-FIELD

June 15th, 1130-1200, Track 1@Peer GyntTroll Pilot - The world’s first and longest-running subsea separation system celebrating 15 years of operation and increased oil productionWilliam Bakke, Advisor Subsea Technology and Operation Subsea Processing, Statoil and Hans Kristian Sundt, Product Management Leader Subsea Power and Processing GE Oil & GasIn May 1997 the contract for the Troll Pilot subsea separation system was awarded at a time when the oil price was $19 per barrel. The Troll Pilot is tied back 3.3km to the Troll C platform in 340m of water. The system separates produced water from oil on the seafloor so the water does not have to be transported back to the platform. Water is then injected back to the water aquifer in the reservoir 200 meters below the oil water contact. The main objective of the project at the time was to mitigate the possible early breakthrough of water in the field and make subsea separation part of the toolbox for the future. On the 25th of August 2001, the Troll Pilot was put into production. On average, the system has increased oil production with thousands of barrels per day and is still operating at 100% availability. We are now celebrating the 15th anniversary for the system in operation. This paper will explore Troll C subsea separation from both a technical and economic perspective, discussing key aspects of the project, such as the impact of subsea separation on operations at Troll C; the resulting environmental benefits; the factors allowing Troll C separation to be sanctioned with a focus on what has changed since and whether the same project would be viable in today’s constrained industry landscape.. The paper will then explore how the economics compare in today’s environment. A 5% annual growth rate would have resulted in an oil price at $48 today vs 19$ in 1997, compared with the average US inflation rate of 2.3% over the same period. Lessons learnt will be discuss along with the Troll Pilot’s influence on future solutions.

June 15th, 1200-1230, Track 1@Peer GyntApplication of a structured optimization process to subsea compression systemsKnut Nyborg, VP Head of Advanced Subsea Production, Aker SolutionsIn the current challenging oil and gas market scenario, there is a consensus across the supply-chain that a major focus should be on developing more cost-effective and optimized systems, with no major qualification efforts and ensuring required robustness. In order to maximize the success rate of similar optimization processes, it is key to combine an unrestricted and collaborative idea generation process with a structured and solid validation phase. The purpose of this validation is to challenge anticipated benefits and evaluate them against the potential impact on the functionality of the system. This should be a data-driven process, preferably based on test results and actual field experience. An example of the application of a similar process to subsea compression systems will be presented, starting from various hypotheses and ideas for simplification and cost reduction, such as revised sparing philosophy and redundancy requirements, new modularization concepts and compressor operating conditions. Among those options, a limited number of specific items has been selected for further investigation and validation together with suppliers and operators. Details on the validation process for these optimization ideas will be presented, based on the experience from the testing and operation of Åsgard subsea compression, and the assessment of related limitations in non-core functionalities of the system.

June 15th, 1230-1300, Track 1@Peer GyntThe Deployment of the World’s First Subsea Multiphase Compression System – Enabling Increased Recovery at Reduced CostsMads Hjelmeland, Director - Emerging Technologies, OneSubsea Processing ASThe challenge of increased recovery in development of subsea fields has driven the advancement of subsea processing technologies, in particular within the subsea boosting

domain. The successful operation of large subsea boosting systems on a global scale, coupled with significant added value of pre- compression systems in gas fields, has driven the next technology step; subsea multiphase compression. The application of a multiphase compressor in a subsea environment simplifies the subsea compression system significantly, as there is no need for pre-processing. This enables development of simplified subsea systems at lower capital expenditure and field development costs. The subsea multiphase compressor is designed for pressure boosting of unprocessed well stream. The compressor, which is based on a contra-rotating principle, allows for a compact and robust design easy to install by use of light intervention vessels, and is based on the well proven design developed for subsea booster pumps. The compressor is furthermore designed to operate across any multiphase flow regime. This paper will provide an overview of the Technology Qualification Program (TQP) completed for the Gullfaks Subsea Compression (GSC) Project, as well as present the WGC4000TM compressor performance characteristics and mechanical design. Experience from the commissioning of the compression system in the second half of 2015 will also be described. An overview of currently ongoing technology qualification work, which includes increased compressor performance, will be provided. June 15th, 1600-1630, Track 2@KlokkeklangÅsgard Subsea CompressionTorstein Vinterstø, Project Director and Nils Petter Time, Commission Manager, StatoilSeveral fields are now approaching the tail production phase and mitigating actions to secure the gas reserves and prolong the production is needed. The more efficient measure is to boost the production close to the wells and since 2012 Statoil has been running a Subsea Factory Portfolio with two subsea compression projects in parallel, Gullfaks Subsea Compression and Åsgard Subsea Compression. The Åsgard field was started up in 1999 and includes the Smørbukk oil and Midgard gas assets. Midgard is located approximately 45 km (28 miles) from the field centre and Mikkel located nearly

BACKUP PRESENTATIONS

DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSIONS

Page 22: UTC 2016 Program

22

40 km (25 miles) further away is tied back to Midgard. To extend the life time of Midgard and Mikkel, boosting of well stream is necessary. The Åsgard Subsea Compression (ÅSC) project has since 2011 been building the world’s first Subsea Compression Station (SCSt). The ÅSC SCSt includes two individual compressor train installed in a shared template with a total weight of 5100 tons, a footprint of more than 3300 m2, and height around 26 meters. The SCSt is connected to a subsea manifold station routing all inflow pipelines from the wells and export flow lines to ÅGS B. The installation includes a comprehensive SURF scope with more than 60 km new flowlines, 11 PLEMs, and 50 tie-in points. The compressor station is powered from ÅSG A where a separate HV electro module of 850 tons weight has been installed. The subsea station is remotely operated from ÅSG B. The Subsea commissioning has been carried out during summer and autumn 2015. It has involved control system commissioning, dynamic commissioning with N2 and MEG, before final commissioning with hydrocarbons. In order to secure an efficient commissioning with involvement of a large number of vendors, a remote operation room for the commissioning team was installed at Statoil’s Stjørdal office where the Åsgard Operations land organisation is housed, avoiding constraints imposed by offshore training, helicopter travel, and shortage of offshore cabins. Challenges including cooperation between onshore room, offshore platform, and installation vessel simultaneously, as well as performing commissioning on one train with the other in operation, is discussed. The paper gives an overview of the schedule and execution of the implementation. A large number of people and companies have contributed both to the development phase and to the actual fabrication and installation and the main vendors and sub-suppliers that has made it possible to realize the two projects are summarized. The paper also describes the subsea commissioning phase, including lessons learnt from the subsea commissioning phase. In addition, is gives an outline of the experiences gained during start-up and operational phase.

June 15th, 1630-1700, Track 2@KlokkeklangSubsea sulphate removal and Injection SystemJose Luis Plasencia Cabanillas, Product Manager Subsea Processing, GE Oil & GasOffshore Oil &Gas industry is shifting exploration & production efforts towards deeper waters and longer step-out distances. Enhanced oil production can be achieved through the injection of seawater into oil reservoirs to maintain or increase oil production. The injection of seawater can cause sulfate scaling issues in the reservoir, the formation of sulfate scale deposits in the production pipes and lead to reservoir souring and equipment corrosion in the production system. Sulfate removal systems for seawater injection are the preferred treatment technology to prevent the build-up of sulfate scales and ensure productivity. GE proposes a robust and reliable solution for subsea sulfate removal and injection. This system concept is based on GE membrane technology products that operate at lower fluxes than in conventional topside systems. This novel design has several advantages including the elimination of Cleaning In Place (CIP) for system simplification, a membrane life of 5 years to prolong intervention intervals and high robustness to operate with

different inlet seawater qualities. The proposed solution applies different technologies including radiation for inlet water disinfection, coarse solids removal, fines removal using ultra-filtration technology and sulfates removal using nano-filtration membrane technology. The resulting Subsea Seawater Treatment and Injection System is modularized with vertically connected modules, which optimizes footprint and ensures easy access to connections and valves. This subsea seawater treatment system is proposed as an alternative to conventional topside systems in brownfields and tie-backs.

June 15th, 1700-1730, Track 2@KlokkeklangSubsea cooling; Passive, Active or Sea Current Controlled?Mattias Rudh, Specialist Engineer, Process, FMC Kongsberg Subsea ASLowering the temperature of a high temperature subsea well stream can enable tie in to an existing flow line network or permit the use of lower grade flow line steel. It can also help to reduce corrosion inhibitor rates or be employed upstream a subsea separator in order to enhance liquid removal. As there are varying types of cooling applications, the requirements on the subsea cooling system will also be different. A passive cooler, utilizing seawater as heat sink is robust, but provides no temperature control. Active coolers employing forced convection of seawater, provides control over the cooling duty by varying the seawater flow rate. The downside to active coolers is additional topside scope and complex subsea equipment. A novel concept utilizing naturally occurring sea current (Sea Current Controlled(?)) can provide the same degree of control as a forced convection cooler without the extra topside scope. This paper presents the novel Sea Current Control cooler. A systems approach is applied to a generic subsea cooling application using three different cooler types; a) a passive cooler, b) an active forced convection sea water cooler and c) the novel Sea Current Controlled active cooler. The system impact of the cooler technology will be assessed such as; the size and weight of the subsea cooler module, ease of installation and possible challenges with retrieveability, required topside scope, the achieved degree of temperature control, flow assurance issues like hydrates/erosion/wax, operability, and turndown capabilities over the life of a field.

June 15th, 1730-1800, Track 2@KlokkeklangInspiring Best HSEQ Practices Through Lean LeadershipCelina Thom, Project Manager, DOF Subsea NorwayOur industry is in the midst of a period of significant personnel cutbacks. Although there can be disagreement as to which jobs and how many positions must be lost, there exists a consensus on one point: safety cannot be compromised. Is this an achievable goal during a time when job security is at an all-time low and HSEQ departments are as vulnerable as any other to workforce cuts? In this presentation I argue that a “no-compromise” approach to health and safety offshore IS feasible, but that the methods to get there are not the same methods we’ve been crafting over the past 10 years. I present an approach based on the principles of LEAN leadership, of inspiring our ground floor workforce to enthusiastically take real ownership of core HSEQ principles. This

ownership hinges on two fundamental beliefs that all of our industry colleagues, at all levels of our organizations, need to internalize: 1. I am a leader (regardless of my title) who can inspire others to make the right choices 2. I truly care and want the best for all of my colleagues, within my own organization and across the industry at large. In this presentation I will present a strategy for implementing an attitude change in our workforce and explain why smaller, more compact, teams should be able to continue and even accelerate the positive downward trend in reportable incidents. Working smaller, working smarter, working safer.

SURF & SPS

June 15th, 1130-1200, Track 2@KlokkeklangTotal’s way towards Industrialization / StandardizationWolfgang Amadeus, Specialist Subsea Systems, TotalConsidering the current oil price coupled with the historic and continuing cost escalation in the subsea industry, cost saving is a necessity for the subsea business to be profitable. The SPS system might not be the largest cost contributor to CAPEX, but can also become a significant factor to OPEX. For this reason it is vital during early phase engineering to design the Subsea Systems considering both CAPEX and OPEX. The opportunities for improvements are large for both cost and schedule savings. One potential area that can realise the needed cost and schedule savings is Industrialization / Standardization of Subsea hardware. Potentially the biggest challenge the industry has is that each Operator have their unique SPS design requirements, which the SPS Contractors follows. These requirements are often based on lessons learnt and preferred subjective design solutions not jointly agreed throughout the industry. Key elements with regards to cost saving is to allow the SPS Contractors and their suppliers to use established work processes and standard equipment without the need to customize for each Operator and project. Due to the uncertainties with the direction the industry is approaching industrialization; Total has instigated several industrialization initiatives. In 2014 we aligned the Total specifications with four of the SPS contractors; In 2015 we started working actively with the SPS contractors on standardizing / industrializing the conventional SPS equipment, i.e. well heads, trees, controls. The first standardization exercise with one SPS contractor is completed, with the aim to utilize their standard products, mostly without Total requirements. Based on all the work initiatives to standardize/industrialize and to simplify internal specifications to better reflect the subsea industry norms, we expect a significant cost and schedule saving.

June 15th, 1200-1230, Track 2@KlokkeklangCutting subsea cost through further standardization and industrialisationRoald Sirevaag, Project Manager, StatoilStatoil has a clear strategy on simplification, standardization and industrialization (SSI) to enable competitiveness of subsea with today’s oil price. The main elements of this strategy will be highlighted and reviewed. The central means for executing on the strategy is co-operation within the industry with other operators and

Page 23: UTC 2016 Program

23

suppliers in a number of different forms, forums and arenas. The key initiatives and supported collaborative efforts on NCS and internationally will be described and discussed.

June 15th, 1230-1300, Track 2@KlokkeklangAdopting an Integrated Approach to Flexible Riser Life ExtensionRam Subramanian, Subsea & Pipelines Surveillance Engineer, Shell E&P UKThis paper details an integrated approach to flexible riser life extension where Shell worked with key suppliers, combining traditional riser annulus testing, innovative NDT and advanced analysis techniques in order to safely extend the operating life of risers on a Northern North Sea asset. The case study highlights the complexity inherent in life extension and the logical engineering decisions which require to be taken to advance knowledge relating to late life assets. The principle failure modes under consideration included carcass erosion, armour wire general corrosion and corrosion fatigue. The case study presents an interesting oversight of how best to responsibly operate and maintain flexible risers. There is no simple one size fits all approach, but a carefully considered combination of testing, inspection and analysis can give much increased confidence levels enabling the safe continued operation of risers which have exceeded their initial design life.

SUBSEA POWER, CONTROLS AND UMBILICALS

June 15th, 1130-1200, Track 3@TroldtogClean, Highly Efficient Offshore PowerBernt Skeie, CEO, Prototech ASFor the offshore industry to reduce emissions, increase power efficiency and limit the need for long power cables to remote offshore locations, a fuel cell system developed for offshore power is an ideal candidate. Fuel cells convert chemical energy directly into electricity without the need for combustion. With electric efficiencies of 60%, the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions can be reduced to 50% of the original values. Fuel cells can be placed subsea and produce the power necessary for an increasing number of subsea factories, in situ. Local natural gas resources will be utilized as fuel, and air will be drawn from sea level. The Subsea Fuel Cell will hence remove the need for additional power in subsea factories, both from land cables and platforms. For topside utilization, the goal is to replace existing gas turbines with fuel cells. Due to the importance of footprint and mass on offshore facilities, a key element is to keep the fuel cell modules compact without the need for extended structures. An ongoing RCN-funded project (Petromaks 2) at CMR Prototech will develop a robust and compact 10kW Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) system applicable for both topside and subsea applications. Simultaneously a MW-scale system for topside application will be designed. The focus areas are technical challenges regarding offshore application of traditional fuel cell technology. Industrial partners are Statoil Petroleum AS and AS Norske Shell.

June 15th, 1200-1230, Track 3@TroldtogQualifying subsea power distribution for the futureGilles Chene, Senior Sales Manager, GE Power ConversionIn several landmark projects over the last few years, many key technologies required for subsea power & processing systems have been installed, operated and proven to work. However, one important development that has been qualified and yet to be implemented is the subsea distribution of power. This constitutes placing switchgears and variable speed drives at the seabed to allow multiple processing units to be supplied through a single cable while being independently run. Benefits of such a system include increased step-out distance, reduced cost for medium/long tie-backs, and reduced need for topside space. After GE components have had more than 4,000 hours of submerged system testing for Shell’s Ormen Lange Pilot, GE has shown that all the technology elements to realize subsea power distribution are available and reliable. Comprehensive testing over a period of 3 years have shown both the individual equipment and integrated system to meet or exceed expectations. This presentation will give an overview of the technology development and qualification program leading up to the world’s first system test incorporating subsea switchgear and subsea drives. It will emphasize important technology choices and what it takes to design power electric equipment to meet subsea requirements of function and availability. From the submerged system test, key learnings will be shared. The presentation will conclude with some thoughts on the viability of these systems from a technical and economic perspective.

June 15th, 1230-1300, Track 3@TroldtogDC/FO - A lean but powerful DC subsea control infrastructureRonan Michel, Product Line Manager, Alcatel-Lucent Submarine NetworksSubsea controls architectures have been traditionally based on large size project-specific umbilicals integrating hydraulics, data, power and chemicals. Tieback length and power consumption drive the dimensioning of umbilical cross-section. The submarine telecom industry has an extensive track record of highly reliable, long reach, standardized solutions for DC powering and data transport. An alternative cost effective subsea control infrastructure solution has been developed leveraging on the submarine telecom industry experience, based on reliable super-structural and standardized DC subsea power and optical fiber communication cable network, compatible with existing brown fields and future green fields subsea control systems, so-called DCFO System. This innovative solution offers a number of advantages inspired from the telecom industry: Standardization – the same standard cross section can be used regardless of tie back length or power consumption demand; Reparability and Extendibility – The cable and its end terminations can be lifted to surface for repairs or extensions at sea with standardized jointing technology, simplifying the tie-back of new prospects and enabling phased development; Open platform – electrical power and communication interfaces can be connected to any SPS supplier equipment; Virtually unlimited reach within Oil and Gas fields – the system is dimensioned to serve the longest tie backs currently contemplated by the industry; Large power supply capability. This solution is an enabler for new applications such as AUV

recharge or E-Field sensing. On longer term, all-Electric trees can be powered through DCFO System, allowing further downsizing and cost reduction of legacy umbilical cross-section with the removal of hydraulic tubes.

FIELD DEVELOPMENT/LAYOUT/SOLUTIONS

June 15th, 1600-1630, Track 1@Peer GyntAchieving Lower CAPEX and Better Economics through Technologies IntegrationNicolas Lefebvre, Subsea Processing Lead, and Francois Gooris, New Pipeline Technologies Lead, Forsys SubseaAll offshore projects now have to be developed at significantly lower CAPEX to provide robust economics and allow project sanction in a low oil price environment. In the past few years, the subsea industry has qualified a large range of technology building blocks to address the flow assurance issues relating to increasingly complex reservoir and fluids, greater water depths and much longer step-outs. Among them, the flowline heating technologies should enable substantially more cost-effective innovative architectures including subsea scope simplification and long tie-backs. Further improvement is brought by early integration of advanced SPS solutions like construction-friendly structures and all-electric controls, standardized interfaces and subsea processing. Moreover, from a global field development project perspective, the new subsea technologies can contribute to the topsides process and positively impact the cost of surface facilities. This paper will assess the costs (CAPEX) & operating benefits of the subsea scope simplification through advanced technology and global integration for a typical 30-km oil tie-back in 1,500-m water depth. Benefits assessment will be supported by the comparison between a conventional approach and a stepwise integration of new technologies. Co-authors: Francois Gooris, Wilfrid Merlin, Geoffrey Guindeuil, Peter Bergman & Nicolas Lefebvre

June 15th, 1630-1700, Track 1@Peer GyntCost efficient subsea tie-back development concept in 1000m water depth and mitigation of hydrate challenges.Ole Heggdal, Chief Engineer, Aker SolutionsAn extensive study has been performed to identify the technical and commercial most attractive solution for flow assurance control for a 30 km, 2 x 12” subsea tie back from 1000m water depth to the host platform at 150m water depth in the South China Sea. The flow assurance study concluded that hydrate formation may take place in the subsea pipeline during transient operations. As part of subsea tieback development of the field, hydrate management is required to ensure efficient uninterrupted production. The following solutions are studied to mitigate hydrate formation: The pros and cons for each of the systems will be presented along with final selection criteria. Cost estimates for topside modifications for each of the proposed hydrate management actions are stipulated for selection of preferred option. The conclusion from the work shows large CAPEX cost savings by using electrical heated flow line systems. Electrically heated solutions offer cleaner system compare to use of chemical option. The

Page 24: UTC 2016 Program

24

DEH system turned out to be more promising than the other options on account of its constructability, system operability and track record. The operating costs of these systems are considerably reduced compared to the use of chemicals. Heated systems have been evaluated for oil and gas field project developments and this technology will give higher flexibility in operation of the fields during planned or unplanned shut downs or continuous heating. An increased number of Direct Electrical Heated Flow lines have been applied actively in the past 15 years to prevent hydrate formation in continuous or intermittent use. Use of electricity for hydrate management is now breaking new ground also in new regions. Improved technology offers flexibility in using AC power from platforms in the area or from shore. Next step in optimizing will be to use higher frequency that reduces the cable size and to place the entire electrical hydrate management system on the seabed. The technology is emerging from the Ormen Lange and Åsgaard Project technology Programs. This will reduce topside weight and space considerably and increase the efficiency, reliability and flexibility.

June 15th, 1700-1730, Track 1@Peer Gynt“The Statoil Cap-XTM Solution” - next step in subsea green and brown field developmentRune M Ramberg, Chief Engineer, StatoilAs part of the corporate cost saving strategy and need for a solution for shallow reservoirs, Statoil has launched a new protection and foundation concept called Statoil Cap-XTM solution. For the Statoil 23rd round application, it provided a cost effective solution and became an enabler for reaching horizontal wells in shallow reservoirs with typically 250-300m overburden. The concept consist of a standard structural design for protection and support for single and dual well satellites, as well as other process equipment. The Cap-XTM solution consist of a single suction anchor support, a deflection skirt

and top hatch protection. The concept has been designed to accommodate various equipment envelopes (such as XT, tie-in, control system etc.) independent of supplier and thus form a standard platform for the supplier marked. This strategy will allow suppliers to compete within package envelopes allowing more competition to the table. The intellectual rights and 3D model and documentation for the Cap-X will belong to Statoil. Hence future modification and facilitation for new technology will be handled by Statoil. The cost level within subsea has increased by a factor 2.5 over the last 10-12 years The goal is to reduce costs and improve competitiveness of subsea developments with flexibility to adapt. Due to the technical simplicity of the Cap-X Solution, Statoil ownership and the gained marked opportunity, the concept provides a cost efficient tool for new or existing equipment. The paper describes the ongoing work to achieve brown and green field developments. It describes how the supplier marked to a larger extent will be invited to tender, as well as the flexibility to adapt.

June 15th, 1730-1800, Track 1@Peer GyntSubsea produced water separation with SpoolSep: a reliable pipe-based solution for Deepwater applicationsShaiek Sadia, R&D Subsea Separation Technologies Manager, SAIPEM SAThe Oil & Gas Industry has to bring new solutions to develop more and more challenging deep-water fields while optimizing production costs and project delivery times. Subsea processing technologies benefit from an increased interest to tackle these challenges as they are able to meet stringent operating requirements while improving oil recovery factor. Based on gravity separation, which is a field proven, robust and reliable process, SAIPEM has developed the SPOOLSEP, an innovative subsea liquid-liquid separator made of several horizontal pipes working in parallel. The pipes are designed as subsea spools which can be

connected and disconnected individually for easy installation and maintenance. The technology allows then to combine robustness and efficiency required for subsea water separation for its reinjection into the reservoir network, while being suitable for deepwater and high pressure conditions. Moreover, such solution allows field development optimization with reducing topsides produced water treatment capacity and injection water needs, bringing then the opportunity for cost-effective tie-backs. Two test campaigns have been performed on a purpose built multiphase flow loop operating with model fluids at ambient conditions in order to qualify the efficiency and operability of the separator. A transparent reduced scale model has been built with 4 parallel pipes of 200mmID and 18m length each. The tests were performed to validate system symmetry and to assess the separator design criteria on required performances for several flow conditions (changing flowrates, WC, GVF, shear, water residence time, spool inclination). A third tests campaign has been recently launched to confirm the separation design rules with more representative oil/water systems. The presentation will give the main outcomes of the separation tests and will focus on the structural design and connection arrangements for offshore installation and maintenance of the subsea separator.

MARINE OPERATIONS AND IMR

June 15th, 1600-1630, Track 3@TroldtogHow can we take the next step to a more effcient and lean IMR vessels?Asmund Sætre, Manager Sales & Business Development, AXTechModern IMR vessels are large and advanced vessels with high costs. We would like to present different technologies that enable both to decrease the vessel size and cost, and enable use of traditional PSVs and AHTSs for IMR operations. Most module handling systems

Page 25: UTC 2016 Program

25

require large modifications on the vessel, causing expensive mobilization and installation. What are the actual cost factors and technical challenges, and how they can be prevented. Is it possible to make small versatile module handling systems that can quickly be installed on almost any vessel and handle 90% of the modules in the North Sea? How can you make such system that can be installed in a few days with little or none modifications on the vessel? We would like to present our ideas and concept around this approach. Heave compensated winch are essential in module handling. But what if the vessel also is “heave compensated”? AXTech are in cooperation with MRPC developing a concept for module handling from small vessels with synchronized active roll and pitch control. We would like to present the theory behind this and compare it with the experiences we have made so far. Both topics are tied together and we believe the change in mind and concept around this is interesting. The trend for years have been bigger and bigger vessels for IMR, but now lean and smart is maybe better than bigger. How can we use smaller vessels, and if possible utilize the large number of vessels already built?

June 15th, 1630-1700, Track 3@TroldtogLeak repair on deep water X-mas treeBozidar Sevic, Lead Engineer, IK-NorwayIK-Norway AS has, together with the operator and co-suppliers developed and installed a new and low cost method for repairing a leaking X-mas tree in a South East Asia deep water gas field. The leak was caused by a failure of a flange couple resulting in a leak path downstream of the X-mas tree production choke. The main challenges were the location of the leakage with limited accessibility and limited space preventing the installation of a conventional repair clamp. Hence, the possible rectification alternatives were a full work over / pulling the tree or alternatively the development of this new concept. The technical solution settled for included a combined structural and sealing clamp with circumferential packers to mechanically

secure the flange couple, in combination with external injection of a pressure activated sealant. A comprehensive test program was developed and successfully followed in order to ensure that it would be possible to install the clamp subsea and perform the sealant injection. On completion of the clamp installation and sealant injection, the tree was de-isolated and then pressure tested to demonstrate the integrity of the repair. The tree was then commissioned and declared available for routine operations following a visual confirmation of the tree’s integrity by ROV.

June 15th, 1700-1730, Track 3@TroldtogHow Lean thinking can be used to optimise the O&G IndustryRadu Achim, Lean Program Coordinator/Executive Master Black Belt in Lean & Six Sigma, OceaneeringBased on Oceaneering success in implementing a Lean pilot project for vessel operations in Norway & UK from 2013 to 2015, we would like to share this knowledge with other companies within the O&G industry. By introducing Lean thinking, every company can benefit by significantly increasing utilisation of existing resources, but even more: to reduce project risks by enhancing the communication between Partners while planning/executing complex projects. The Oceaneering vessel operation pilot program delivered excellent results on increased operational efficiency utilizing the same number of personnel focusing on workflow efficiency within the targeted business unit. Oceaneering is only at the beginning of the Lean journey and the actual investment for the pilot project paid dividend in less than 12 months. We hope our presentation can be a door opener for wider use of Lean philosophies in the O&G industry and a milestone in embedding Lean into our corporate cultures. Lean is now part of Oceaneering workstreams and is deployed at corporate level. We are looking at various pilot projects to increase resource efficiency by collaboration between Partners (2 business cases presented in few words) Imagine how Norway could look if

we were able to get Lean totally embedded in our culture.

June 15th, 1730-1800, Track 3@TroldtogA novel system design for fast and flexible horizontal tie-in’sAlexander Fjeldly, Product Leader, GE Oil & GasA new light-weight horizontal tie-in system has been developed to enhance system cost, installation process and flexibility of use. Both the operators need for subsea cost reductions and the installation companies need for faster subsea installation have been addressed. The system is based on a standardized and field proven family of pressure containing hubs and clamps that are used across several alignment systems, both vertical and horizontal. Welding is omitted to avoid costly weld qualifications and allow “flat packing” to meet local content requirements. The new system offers a universal termination for 4 inch-12 inch flexibles, rigid pipe and umbilical’s. The same structure will be used across all applications with bolt on features for umbilical termination hubs and pig launchers. A range of new features is introduced such as the functionality to allow subsea inboard to outboard clamp transfer. A clamp can be installed as part of e.g. the manifold and later retrieved as part of the jumper, providing a new level of flexibility in installation and service. Another feature is a stroke-in system that allows access between the hubs in the retracted position, with the stroking tool in place. This enables a direct landing and stroke-in operation with the stroke-in cylinder pre-mounted on the installation vessel. The new tie-in system will also impact the overall SPS system with its compact design. A 30% reduced width compared to previous horizontal systems allows the branches on the manifold to be packed closer together to achieve lighter more compact designs.

Bus

ines

s Re

gion

Ber

gen

©

Page 26: UTC 2016 Program

26

1. What is your main job function?(check one box only)

❑ 01 Executive & Senior Mgmt (CEO,CFO, COO,Chairman, President, Owner, VP, Director, Managing Dir., etc)

❑ 02 Engineering or Engineering Mgmt.❑ 03 Operations Management❑ 04 Geology, Geophysics, Exploration❑ 05 Operations (All other operations

personnel, Dept. Heads, Supv., Coord. and Mgrs.)

❑ 99 Other (please specify)

2. Which of the following best describes your company’s primary business activity?

(check one box only)❑ 21 Integrated Oil/Gas Company❑ 22 Independent Oil & Gas Company❑ 23 National/State Oil Company❑ 24 Drilling, Drilling Contractor❑ 25 EPC (Engineering, Procurement.,

Construction), Main Contractor❑ 26 Subcontractor❑ 27 Engineering Company❑ 28 Consultant❑ 29 Seismic Company❑ 30 Pipeline/Installation Contractor❑ 31 Ship/Fabrication Yard❑ 32 Marine Support Services❑ 33 Service, Supply, Equipment Manufacturing❑ 34 Finance, Insurance❑ 35 Government,Research, Education,

Industry Association❑ 99 Other (please specify)

3. Do you recommend or approve the purchase of equipment or services?

(check all that apply)❑ 700 Specify❑ 701 Recommend❑ 702 Approve❑ 703 Purchase

4. Which of the following best describes your personal area of activity?(check all that apply)

❑ 101 Exploration survey❑ 102 Drilling❑ 103 Sub-sea production, construction

(including pipelines)❑ 104 Topsides, jacket design, fabrication,

hook-up and commissioning❑ 105 Inspection, repair, maintenance❑ 106 Production, process control

instrumentation, power generation, etc.

❑ 107 Support services, supply boats, transport, support ships, etc

❑ 108 Equipment supply❑ 109 Safety prevention and protection❑ 110 Production❑ 111 Reservoir❑ 99 Other (please specify)

YES!I would like a FREE subscription to OE

How would you prefer to receive OE?Print Digital

Name:

Job Title:

Company:

Address:

City: State/Province:

Zip/Postal Code: Country:

Phone: Fax:

E-mail address*:

By providing your fax and/or email address,you are granting AtComedia permission to contact you regarding your subscription and other product offerings. May AtComedia contact you about other 3rd party offers for:

Email: Yes No Fax: Yes No

Signature (Required):

Date (Required):

Please Note: Only completed forms can be processed. Your signature does not obligate you or your company any way.

• Actionable Intelligence, on and

for the global o shore industry

• Field development reports

• Global coverage with regional

updates on key exploration areas

• Case studies on new technology

O�shore Engineer

FAX this form to+1 866. 658. 6156 (USA)

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE!

PRINT or

or visit us at

www.oedigital.com

Digital .com

Required reading for the Global Oil & Gas Industry since 1975

PRINT or

Asset Integrity special report 34

Required reading for the Global Oil & Gas Industry since 1975

oedigital.com

Off

shor

e E

ngi

nee

r •

Oct

ober

20

15

Octo

be

r 20

15o

ed

igita

l.com

R

OV

s • N

ano

techn

olo

gy •

Brazil O

ffsh

ore

Vo

l. 40

• N

o. 10

oedigital.com▼

• Market overview 64• Taking on Papa Terra 66

• Research and development 28, 30

Brazil Offshore

Nanotechnology

SUBSEA ROVs 50, 52

PRODUCTION Artificial Lift 48

GEOLOGY & GEOPHYSICSScientific Drilling 42

OE_Subscription_Ad_UTC.indd 1 4/4/16 8:55 AM

Page 27: UTC 2016 Program

27

DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSIONSFIELD DEVELOPMENT/LAYOUT/SOLUTIONS

June 16th, 0930-1000, Track 1@Peer GyntSubsea Processing for Leaner Fitter Remote Gas Field DevelopmentNino Fogliani, Technology Development Manager, Woodside EnergyAs oil and gas provinces mature and infrastructure proliferates, it becomes more cost-effective to develop fields by tying back using subsea facilities. However, the lengths of tiebacks can be limited by operational difficulties arising during the transportation of wellstream fluids over distance. For example, increased pressure drops leading to degraded production, hydrate blockages and/or wax deposition, or liquids management and slugging. But history demonstrates that subsea tiebacks produce significant reductions in capital expenditure and the consensus is now that cost pressures will lead to the emergence of true subsea factories achieving lean field developments compared to equivalent surface facility solutions. This paper presents the results of our subsea gas processing investigations – including cooling, separation, chemical injection and compression/pumping – to condition wellstream fluids for long distance subsea transportation. The objective is to simplify operations, removing surface facilities or replacing them with unmanned installations. Numerous benefits have been identified, and these are explained through gas processing case studies including subsea gas dehydration and gas cycling. It is clear that with only rudimentary processing, using simple and robust unit operations, wellstream fluids can be conditioned sufficiently for subsea transportation over hundreds of kilometres, even facilitating direct tieback to shore. This promises to radically change the current orthodoxy, leading to disruptive enhancement of offshore field developments and the emergence of leaner fitter solutions!

June 16th, 1000-1030, Track 1@Peer GyntTotal cost of ownership analysis in subsea value chainNina Jevnaker, Manager supply chain, category manager Subsea, Statoil ASAFacing industry challenges and increasing environmental focus, subsea has a great opportunity: Become the selected field development alternative based on cost efficiency and low carbon emissions. Total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis can be the tool we need to grab this opportunity: Total cost of ownership analysis enable better decisions and thereby directs focus on the most important improvement initiatives in our industry value chains. TCO is a methodology to identify and analyze all related cost (historical), often called life cycle costs, connected to a product, service or value chain. The reason is to ensure that we have a full picture to reveal cost drivers along the entire value chain and avoid sub-optimization in other parts. TCO can also be used to develop should-cost (future) for complex product/value chains like subsea. This is the key to future competitiveness. Statoil would like to share how we leverage this approach to set ambitious cost targets and key performance indicators. We would also like to share how TCO can contribute in the strategic development of the

subsea suppliers and supply chain through category strategy implementation. The subsea industry has to a limited extent collaborated to find industry improvement initiatives. A subsea industry TCO may be the key to identify such initiatives and make subsea the selected field development alternative. A subsea industry TCO requires contributions and collaboration from both technical and commercial competence across suppliers and operators.

June 16th, 1030-1100, Track 1@Peer GyntTuning subsea concepts and project execution for a competitive futureArne Moe Tvedt, Department Manager Subsea, Reinertsen ASWith the current oil price level and volatility of the market, many subsea field developments are put on hold. The subsea industry is presently shifting focus from technology development to cost reduction. Reinertsen’s ambition is to contribute to a subsea cost reduction in the range of 30 to 50 percent. There has been a remarkable cost increase for subsea field development, following the rise in oil prices for the past 15 years. Reinertsen’s major focus during the last years has been to reduce project costs. Together with other EPC-contractors and Statoil considerable efforts have been concentrated on eliminating non-value-adding activities, identify root causes, utilize market competition, perform standardization, simplify project logistic and improve project execution models. As a result, cost saves of 30 percent are projected for recent topside projects. These results are analyzed in terms of applicability to subsea developments. A key aspect is to rely on standard solutions, modules and interfaces instead of tailor-made systems. This will allow for re-use of solutions and result in less engineering as well as a simpler set of industry standards and technical requirements. Yet, the need for more compact and cost-efficient technology is acknowledged by allowing full freedom inside of standard modules, leaving it up to the industry’s creativity to innovate solutions. The importance of system engineering and flow assurance in early phase is emphasized. Several examples with regard to simplifications are described, including control systems, power systems, SPS and SURF. Furthermore, an example is given from subsea processing where the dimensions and complexity of modules are reduced. The associated cost reductions are presented for the above examples.

MARINE OPERATIONS AND IMR

June 16th, 0930-1000, Track 2@KlokkeklangDiverless outer sheaht repair solution for flexible pipesGry Karin Vestbøstad, VP Integrity Management Services, 4SubseaCutting costs and extending the service life of assets are receiving increased attention in light of the current oil prices. This is also highly relevant for flexible risers, and the considerable riser replacement costs initiate both life extension projects and riser repairs. Damage to the outer sheath represents a significant risk to the integrity of flexible risers as it may lead to corrosion of the armoring wires. A damage may be detected by e.g. visual inspections, periodic

annulus testing or by a permanent annulus monitoring system. If detected at an early stage, mitigation actions may be implemented, reducing the risk of continuous corrosion and subsequent riser replacement. 4Subsea have over the years developed and installed several outer sheath repair solutions for topside-, diver- and ROV installation. Special attention has recently been given to the development of an improved and cost efficient ROV installable repair solution with low installation time. An actual case is presented where an outer sheath damage was detected at 300m water depth. Due to the water depth, the ROV installable clamp solution was selected. The clamp and ROV tooling were fabricated and tested in less than 8 weeks, and testing proved a pressure holding capacity significantly higher than the required test pressure. The clamp was installed without affecting the normal operation of the flexible pipe. Installation time offshore was less than 2 hours, providing a highly cost efficient permanent repair solution for the flexible pipe.

June 16th, 1000-1030, Track 2@KlokkeklangPermanent deployed & internet piloted ROV system from shoreBjarte Langeland, CEO, Stinger Technology ASStavanger, Norway – A Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) spent 19 months operating continuously in what is believed to be the longest uninterrupted deployment of a single ROV of any class. The operation began in November 2013 as an experimental emergency preparedness solution for the offshore oil & gas sector. The “Resident Micro ROV” was deployed off the coast of Stavanger and piloted via an internet link from Stinger’s offices. The trials ended on May 20, 2015, and significantly outlasted any of the expectations. The goal for the project was to test the system’s limits, determine the implications of long-term continuous use underwater, and ultimately to prove the ROV as an extended or resident emergency preparedness solution. Having an “on-call” ROV system can significantly reduce the time and resources needed for an ROV operation, especially in emergency situations when every minute counts. While the ROV is a ‘remotely operated’ vehicle, standard operations require the pilot to stay fairly close to the system. Eliminating the need for the operator to be physically near the surface unit has been a long term goal at Stinger.

June 16th, 1030-1100, Track 2@KlokkeklangCost savings using Manned Underwater Intervention method in suitable water depths.Rolf Røssland, Managing Director, NUI ASManned Underwater Operations (Diving) has been a well-proven method for effective work under water since the start-up of the offshore oil and gas industry. Some of the most profitable fields on the NCS was installed using diving services based on oil prices below 11 dollar/barrel. For some years, there was in Norway much negative focus on diving, and at the same time, the operators focused on new technology to reduce diving depth and to operate deeper. This led to reduced volume of diving and some of the operators stated that diving was to be avoided if possible. This resulted in new and

Page 28: UTC 2016 Program

28

expensive technology used even for shallow water installation and maintenance. Installation and maintenance using ROV very often requires more planning and vessel days than diving operations, and thereby higher total cost. Mean time the diving industry, especially in the North Sea, has improved its procedures, equipment and Dive support Vessels (DSV). The global oil and gas industry as well as international and domestic regulators consider diving as a sustainable intervention method, and on the NCS its HSE statistic is compatible to any other activity in the offshore industry. Today the focus on cost effective solutions are paramount. With oil prices below 50 dollar and high cost for developing new fields, some of the discovered fields are not economically justifiable to develop with the current cost level, but might be if simpler technology and approved intervention method is used. Using diver friendly technology from modern Diving Support Vessels in combination with ROV might be what makes the field profitable to develop. The open question is: With the focus on safe and cost-effective solutions, we all are obliged to consider use proven and cost effective solutions where applicable, and leave the advanced technology and intervention method, as well as the aim of standardization for fields where it is required? Statoil has through experience harvest benefits of combining modern technology on vessels and ROV with manned underwater intervention (Diving), regarding efficiency, cost and safety. To catch the benefits, it is important to evaluate combined interventions at an early stage in both new and modifications projects.Co-author: Pål Atle Solheimsnes, Statoil

SUBSEA POWER, CONTROLS AND UMBILICALS

June 16th, 0930-1000, Track 3@TroldtogNext generation control systems with backwards compatibilityKarstein Berge Kristiansen, Key Expert Subsea Communication Systems, Siemens ASPurpose of this paper is to present a solution feasible for both new installations and upgrading of existing subsea installations. Proposed next generation control system could utilize both fiber optical and copper cable infrastructure, and regardless of chosen implementation increase communication bandwidth between subsea and topside installation. Benefits with the next generation control system are the use of open standards for interfaces both topside and subsea, avoiding vendor lock down for the operators. The proposed control system is scalable during the total lifetime of the system, assuring the opportunity to upgrade and reconfigure the control system with new units without having to reconfigure or upgrade existing installed units. Use of open standards would give financial benefits with lower financial cost for the control system during the expected lifetime of the system. Cost regarding obsolescence management would also decrease due to use of standard interfaces. This control system solution gives operators ownership of the communication link between topside and subsea making it easier to mix subsea units from different vendors without establishing a separate communication link for each vendor. To be able to use existing subsea units with non standard interfaces without upgrading them the proposed next generation control system assure

backwards communication compatibility by including intelligent jumper cables. Different implementation of the intelligent jumper cable exist assuring backwards compatibility for a wide range of existing subsea units, and other types of intelligent jumper cables could be provided. Compatibility for future requirements/standards is also possible based on the standard interfaces provided and the use of intelligent jumper cables as described in this abstract. Key Words: Open standards, backwards compatibility, intelligent jumper cables, upgradable during lifetime, cost saving during expected lifetim. June 16th, 1000-1030, Track 3@TroldtogSubsea Electric Systems: Past, Present and FutureAndrea Rubio, Product Manager, OneSubseaAll-electric subsea production control systems have been around since the late nineties. We have developed and tested various prototypes using a rigid product development and qualification program. In 2006, project execution began for the first all-electric subsea production system, consisting of 2-off subsea trees with associated production controls systems, and intervention workover and control systems (IWOCS). This all-electric field has been in production since 2008. A third electric tree is scheduled for installation in 2016, and will include a novelty in the industry—an all-electric surface-controlled subsurface safety valve (ESCSSV). Future subsea systems will require additional and new capabilities compared to today’s electro-hydraulic systems. A key design priority in the development of subsea systems is to reduce the size and weight of equipment for very deep water. An all-electric solution has the potential to provide better condition monitoring while reducing weight and improving HSE due to zero discharges. In this presentation we will discuss the history, current offerings, and future benefits – including operational performance, flexibility, HSE, and cost – of the all-electric system. The goal is twofold: to provide an understanding of currently existing electrical components, and to present the all-electric system as an alternative product offering for the subsea industry of the future.

June 16th, 1030-1100, Track 3@TroldtogSubsea All-Electric InitiativeDaniel Abicht, Principal Engineer Subsea Production Systems, StatoilA Subsea All-Electric initiative has been initiated to prove the feasibility of flexible, cost efficient subsea production system solutions. While most of the main technology elements have been around for a while with according operational experience, full market and operator acceptance seems to be a challenge. Using a revised approach the Statoil Subsea All-Electric initiative intends to overcome existing thresholds. This contribution will focus on explaining fundamental features of the subsea all-electric technology along with the key business drivers and associated risks. It will also provide a vision for future subsea production system solutions funded on today’s state of art while taking into account current market and development trends.

INCREASED RECOVERY/LIFE-OF-FIELD

June 16th, 1345-1415, Track 1@Peer GyntSubsea Diagnostics and Prognostics Technologies for Improved Equipment Reliability and Production AvailabilityMohan G. Kulkarni, Subsea Engineering Associate, ExxonMobil Upstream Research CompanyIntegrity and reliability of subsea equipment are critical for ensuring continuous hydrocarbon production and processing operations. Specifically, subsea production control systems are well known for their low reliability which can result in deferred hydrocarbon production. The use of complex production-critical processing equipment continues to grow at a steady pace within the subsea industry. As a consequence, improved equipment condition monitoring and, more importantly, subsea diagnostics as well as prognostics tools are needed for integrity management of complex subsea equipment. Such tools can effectively convert equipment condition data into operations/maintenance actions and therefore can assist in planning for subsea intervention which typically are resource-intensive. ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company has conducted a rigorous study on diagnostics and prognostics technologies that have potential to improve the integrity and reliability of subsea control systems and rotating machinery. Such technologies include new sensor instrumentation, use of existing sensor data to improve equipment troubleshooting, data processing algorithms, and fault detection, location and prediction tools. This presentation will provide an overview of the high consequence and high frequency failure modes for subsea control systems and subsea rotating machinery. We will identify new ways of using existing subsea sensor data and new sensors to provide the information necessary for detecting key failure modes. We will outline implementation requirements for new sensor instrumentation for Greenfield and Brownfield applications. Further, we will summarize the key fault detection, location and prediction tools for the key failure modes. Finally, we will discuss opportunities for industry collaboration on subsea diagnostics and prognostics technology development. Co-author: Kamran Gul Paul M. Sommerfield

June 16th, 1415-1445, Track 1@Peer GyntSolving the wet gas compression challenge from the inside outJørgen Corneliussen, Engineering Manager, Subsea Power & Processing, GE Oil & GasSubsea compression technology is still in the early days of development. With the first two subsea compression projects deployed in 2015, significant efforts are on-going in the industry in order to further develop and optimize technology. The focus of GE Oil & Gas’s development has been on developing smaller, more reliable and cost competitive subsea compression solutions. Since 2010, GE has been working on the next generation subsea compression system, aiming at solving the challenge by considering the fundamentals of how to compress wet gas more efficiently. GE Oil & Gas has taken a fundamental step towards solving the wet gas compression challenge. Instead of removing the liquid upfront in the compressor, the equipment design has been revisited in order to operate with liquid while remaining efficient and robust. Building on GE

Page 29: UTC 2016 Program

29

Oil & Gas’ experience on compression from the Ormen Lange Pilot, a special liquid tolerant centrifugal impeller with several innovative design features has been developed in close co-operation with customers and academic research institutes. The presentation will show how the qualification campaign and now the innovative centrifugal impeller design has moved from idea to reality, from component and single stage testing into a full scale prototype now going through its final qualification at K-lab.

June 16th, 1445-1515, Track 1@Peer GyntHow to select the separation solution to maximize the economics of a subsea developmentAmandine Idrac, Senior Engineer, Process, FMC Kongsberg Subsea ASGas/liquid separation is a key technology to enable and maximize the value proposition of the new offshore developments. It is effective in increasing production and reserves while minimizing operational flow assurance issues such as hydrate formation and slugging. It also enables production of complex reservoirs containing heavy, viscous oil and low pressures. Subsea Gas/Liquid separation has a significant impact on the topside processing and typically reduces the requirements on the topside 1st stage separator and thus contributes to simplify and de-bottleneck the topside system. Gas/liquid separation with liquid pumping can also be an attractive alternative to multiphase boosting and gas compression. Driven by these motivations, the industry has developed gas/liquid separation technologies for the past 15 to 10 years, resulting in a filled toolbox of technical solutions to choose from. But how does one select the optimal solution for a given field, resulting in the best return on investment and increased asset value? This presentation will address the technology selection options and premises to maximize the economics of a subsea development. It is important to understand how the selection impacts performance, risks, costs and ultimately the attractiveness of deepwater subsea processing. Further it will give an update on the latest technology development for gas/liquid separation, including FMC’s ongoing qualification program of a deep water separation concept, the MultiPipe.

June 16th, 1515-1545, Track 1@Peer GyntSubsea Processing JIP - Standardization of Subsea PumpingKristin Nergaard Berg, Group Leader Subsea Technology, DNV GLDecember 11 2015, Petrobras, Woodside, Shell and Statoil, together with DNV GL, kicked off the Joint Industry Project (JIP) to standardize within subsea processing. Initially, the JIP will focus on standardization of subsea pumping, an important enabler for a profitable and reliable subsea future. Our industry is looking towards standardization for ensuring profitability and reliable technology. Over the recent years, experience has grown with subsea processing developments as Total’s Pazfloor project, Petrobras’ Marlim project and Statoil’s Troll Pilot, Tordis, Åsgard and Gullfaks. This experience may serve as input to standardized solutions for the future. Equal to more conventional solutions, subsea processing must prove to be cost efficient in order to be seen as an attractive solution. At the same time, subsea processing will be an enabler for increased oil recovery. The objective of this JIP is to reduce cost in a lifetime perspective for subsea

processing, starting off with subsea pumping. The JIP will initially focus on subsea pumping through two phases, where the directions for the work are set in Phase 1 and the details and subsea pumping guideline are defined in Phase 2 Phase 1 will establish a common ambition among the participants for achievable benefits from standardization. A Functional Description for subsea pumping will be developed and a specific Plan for Standardisation for subsea pumping will be defined. Building on Phase 1, the JIP will continue with development of detailed descriptions of standardized solutions for subsea pumping. The developed standardization will be captured in a guideline and the intention is to issue the guideline as a DNV GL Recommended Practice for industry use. This presentation will give a status for the JIP work 2/3rds into Phase 1 and provide insight into the plans ahead.

SURF & SPS

June 16th, 1345-1415, Track 2@KlokkeklangSubsea separation – an undervalued tool for Increased Oil Recovery (IOR)?Ove Fritz Jahnsen, Manager, SSP Eastern Region Sales, FMC Kongsberg Subsea ASOver the past 10 to 15 years subsea processing has been globally established as a market segment within the subsea development arena, and subsea separation has been a vital part of this development with Troll C, Tordis SSB, Pazflor and others. The track record of these installations have been outstanding, some of them with documented uptime of more than 99%. Still focus in the market seems to turn towards more ‘clean’ pumping or compression solutions at a time where the boosting technology options increases, while separation seems to be linked to more complexity and higher capex and are often not included as an option in evaluating a field. Still, subsea separation has some distinguished qualities that cannot be matched by other IOR methods. The more obvious scenarios are linked to flow assurance issues such as hydrate or slugging conditions in a field, but in addition come fields with very low production pressure or very long transportation distance to shore. Equally important is the operators need for flexibility in the design to cover for uncertainty in the production over the life of field and to count for future unexpected situations. This could be for a greenfield, redevelopment of a brownfield, or in general uncertainties about future sand or water production. Subsea separation is a simple way of mitigating these uncertainties, while at the same time increasing the operational envelope of the overall system compared to a pump or compressor alone. The paper will present examples of how separation can hugely add value compared to boosting alone by using simple, robust technology, resulting in more predictability an increased Net Present Value for the operator.

June 16th, 1415-1545, Track 2@KlokkeklangLean DocumentationJan Arthur Grip Nilsen, Engineering Director, Norway, Subsea 7From late 2010 and onwards, the increase in activity in the industry resulted in a massive need for manning up in all areas. This led to experts being in demand and diluted, we needed to build safety nets to cope with the added risks. We started to spend more money on

checking and double checking each other. This quality check has probably been instrumental in getting to where we are today, but now, when we find ourselves needing to scale back on the activity level, there is an expectation that we become less diluted in the industry and we need to understand if this significantly changes the need for the very costly second opinion. We have analyzed the cost benefit of the tail end of documentation, the external reviews. The results: For some of the key documents, we use up to 30% of our resources in the tail end process of responding to external reviews, discussing second opinions and revising the documents. However, the changes that come of this are classified as none, insignificant or minor changes. Do we still need the same safety nets as we did a few years ago? Yearly external review cost for Subsea 7 Norway is in the range of NOK 100 mill. Include Operator costs, and the total cost picture is possibly in the range of NOK 200-300mill per year. Our analyses show that when you get the front end quality right there is a significant potential in resetting the heavy tail end activity on documentation. We have developed a high quality knowledge-based industry. Now we need to adapt to the changed conditions without weakening these strengths but by re-setting costs to match current risk.

June 16th, 1445-1515, Track 2@KlokkeklangSubsea Sampling on the Critical Path of Flow AssuranceShailesh Rathod, Product Champion, SchlumbergerIncreasing water depths require longer tiebacks, resulting in reservoir fluids experiencing a range of pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) variations during the lengthy journey from the deepwater reservoir to the surface processing facility. The subsequent changes in fluid compositions as a result of this elongated journey can lead to many flow assurance threats, including scale, hydrate, wax, and asphaltene depositions. In addition, produced fluids from different reservoirs are often commingled at the manifolds and mixed in the common flowlines, thus further complicating the correct understanding of produced fluids. These flow assurance challenges can impact the operational plans, contingency plans and remediation programs. Availability of representative fluid samples to characterize phase behaviors and anticipate associated flow problems becomes a keystone for flow assurance strategy when determining how production facilities can be operated to prevent or manage these problems. The hardware technologies developed in subsea sampling have enabled the collection of representative fluid samples directly from the point of interest. This advanced sample transport and analysis has ensured the supply of representative fluid data into flow assurance assessment. This paper demonstrates in detail the evolution of subsea sampling technology, as well as explains the benefits of representative subsea multiphase sampling and the beneficial outcomes enabled when combined with flow assurance modeling. Additionally, this paper provides an overview of the flow assurance drivers experienced from the point-of-view of a subsea services and solutions provider over the last decade, and how these drivers have influenced the evolution of its subsea sampling technology.

Page 30: UTC 2016 Program

30

June 16th, 1515-1545, Track 2@KlokkeklangFlexible Riser Integrity Assessment with advanced MEC-FIT techniqueAndreas Boenisch, Group Managing Director, Innospection LtdCorrosion is a constant challenge especially in ageing subsea assets. For flexible risers, the complex layer structure of corresponds to challenges in the integrity evaluation. Potential cracking in the outer and inner armour layers is a critical integrity issue and solutions for crack detection is increasing in demand. One flexible riser integrity assessment technology is the electromagnetic MEC-FIT technique. Originally developed to inspect flexible risers with 37° wire angle structure, this technique has been further developed to tackle challenges such as inspecting flexible risers with a 55° wiring angle structure and having tight crack-like defects and a thick outer sheath of 15.3mm. Prior to the inspection campaign, the capability of the MEC-FIT technique was successfully verified on a simulated test sample with various flaw types including EDM cracks in 45° and 90° angle. Blind test results showed that all through-cracks in all the layers as well as part-depth cracks in the outer layer were detected. The detectable crack size in relation to the wire thickness is 30% for the near side top layer, 60-70% for the far side top layer and 100% for both the near and far side of the bottom layer. The technique was deployed onto the asset using the MEC-Hug Crawler tool which was rebuilt to enable circumferential scanning of the 55° wire angle structure and for deployment by an inspection-class ROV from the installation. The experience from this successful inspection as well as other flexible riser inspection operations in the North Sea will be presented.

SUBSEA COMPLETION, INTERVENTION AND DRILLING

June 16th, 1345-1415, Track 3@Troldtog7” Subsea VXT StandardizationHans Egil Vangås, Advisor Well Technology Subsea Wellheads and Xmas Trees, StatoilIn 2012 Statoil’s extensive in-house subsea experience was used to analyse total subsea well costs with an objective was to endeavour significant cost reduction through simplification and standardization for subsea wells without compromising HSE. Through this work a change to 7” VXT (Vertical Xmas-tree) from Statoil’s long practice of using 7” HXT (Horizontal Xmas-tree) for NCS subsea wells was identified a major cost reduction potential. A strategy for development and implementation of concentric bore design 7” VXT was sanctioned by Statoil Management Dec. 2012. Typical business drivers: • Reduced CAPEX through XT installation by vessel rather than using rig. • Reduced OPEX through XT replacement by vessel rather than mobilizing a rig. • Reduced well fatigue loading by landing BOP on wellhead rather than on top of XT. • XT replacement without pulling the well completion. • Reduced operational risk through fewer heavy lifts offshore. Business case work documented a cost saving potential of 35 MUSD and elimination of 35 rig days for a typical subsea well during field life time, creating a 0.8-1.0 BUSD short term Statoil business case which was presented at Statoil’s capital markets day in London February 2014. The standardization on 7” VXT for NCS

will pave the way for additional future cost savings, typically through cross-field utilization. In 2013 the design and technology qualification was initiated with four major subsea equipment Vendors (Aker Solutions, FMC, GE Oil & Gas and OneSubsea). The concentric 7” VXT bore ID will allow for reuse of Work Over Systems acquired for 7”HXT’s. The Tubing Hanger is locked in the wellhead and has an annulus bore sealing device. The first user is accomplished through the Johan Sverdrup contract awarded FMC September 2015.

June 16th, 1415-1445, Track 3@TroldtogSuccessful use of Non-Original Equipment Manufacturer in the recertification of subsea well control equipmentPerry Kopperstad / Eivind Håvarstein, Principal Subsea & Well Systems Engineer & CEO WellPartner AS, Dong E&P NorgeHistorically, the five yearly recertification and major overhaul of subsea well control equipment is performed by the original equipment manufacturers (OEM) due to strong aftermarket position and access to original documentation/specification. DNV GL Recommended Practice DNV-RP-E101 ‘Recertification of Well Control Equipment’ permits the use of non-OEMs for such activities. Dong E&P Norge invited both OEM and Non-OEM Contractors to tender for the five yearly recertification of its HP Riser System. Non-OEM Contractor Wellpartner in cooperation with Head Energy Multicontrol (HEM) won the contract based on an evaluation of technical ability and competence, quality, risk, and cost. DnV GL was awarded the contract for the third party verification. WellPartner was responsible for the overall management of the work, assembly and testing, inspections and refurbishment, while HEM was responsible for the analyses and fatigue re-assessment. The original delivered documentation, data collected during offshore operations, and available field data formed the basis for the work. All activities were performed without any incidents, and no variation orders were issued. As part of the activities an increased knowledge regarding Vortex Induced Vibration (VIV) and wave induced fatigue was gained, indicating that the latter is the largest fatigue damage contributor in shallow water applications for this HP Riser System. A key success factor for the work was the close and constructive cooperation experienced between all involved parties with great willingness to share experiences and knowledge. The work was completed with DNV-GL issuance of the Recertification Certificate of Compliance (RCC) for the entire HP Riser system. June 16th, 1445-1515, Track 3@TroldtogIndustry challenge or opportunity? Consequences of edition 4 of NORSOK U-001 subsea production system.Harald Holden, Lead Engineer, 4SubseaA new edition of NORSOK U-001 Subsea production systems was released in October 2015. 4Subsea has been involved in numerous subsea delivery projects as an independent advisor. NORSOK U-001 is based on the ISO 13628 series of standards. Different design philosophies between ISO 13628-4 and 13628-7 has led to challenges both for the operator and for the subsea equipment suppliers. A

common system approach for the design of subsea equipment and riser systems is provided in the new edition of NORSOK U-001. Subsea systems are subjected to external loads from the riser/BOP system. Rated pressure based design as prescribed by 13628-4 does not include these external loads. A new set of design load classes are proposed. These are in some cases significantly larger than previous design loads. 4Subsea have measured riser and wellhead response on several drilling campaigns. A comparison of design load classes and actual measurements will be presented. The new knowledge on load magnitude may pose challenges for existing equipment. For design of new equipment the standard proposes a set of material requirements and design criteria that allows higher utilization of the structural capacity inherent in the design. This represents an opportunity which will be discussed. The new edition of NORSOK U-001 provides an opportunity for the industry to standardize design, material and fabrication of new subsea systems. The presentation will highlight our perception of the consequences for the industry, both challenges and opportunities. Some specific examples will be presented. Co-author: Sveinung Eriksrud

June 16th, 1515-1545, Track 3@TroldtogPressure Balanced Safety JointBernt-Olav Tømmermo, Specialist Product Engineer, FMC TechnologiesSafe operation is fundamental and a prerequisite for all subsea well operations. With an intensified demand for well interventions on mature and live wells globally, there is an increased need for improved system and component safety functions. Traditional weak links (safety joints) have been used in completion and workover riser systems, operated from floating vessels for many years. Historically, the main purpose of a weak link has been limited to prevent loss of well barriers. Protection of environment, rig and personnel has been considered secondary priorities. The Pressure Balanced Safety Joint is designed to increase the safety and operating envelope of well interventions and drilling operations in the case of unintended operational events. The Pressure Balanced Safety Joint will become a critical safety element within these systems and replace traditional Weak Links. The Pressure Balanced Safety Joint provides overload protection of both primary and secondary barrier envelopes, protects personnel and rig from riser recoil effects, prevents hydrocarbon spill to the environment and increase the time to perform a successful emergency quick disconnect. The Pressure Balanced Safety Joint maintains riser tension after activation and has multi-redundancy on critical functions. The presentation will introduce the Pressure Balanced Safety Joint in a traditional workover system and highlight the benefits this new technology provides with regards to overall safety and increased operating envelopes.

Page 31: UTC 2016 Program

31

INCREASED RECOVERY/LIFE-OF-FIELD

Testing of first ever subsea 12.5MW vertical high-speed motorcompressorBigi Manuele, Technical Leader, GE Oil & GasThis presentation discusses the results of GE Oil & Gas’ motorcompressor test campaign to validate the functionality of the full pilot compression station at Ormen Lange. The motorcompressor represents the first fully marinized motorcompressor unit ever built. This unit, which was in development for four years, was designed for a specific project at a GE Oil & Gas’ customer site (Nyhamna, Norway) and was fully submerged in a water pit during the test. The pilot unit was a 12.5MW (16763HP) integrated motorcompressor, which runs up to 10.5krpm in a vertical configuration. The test included the following activities: Static-dynamic tuning of the Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs); Mechanical running test; Compressor performance test; Motocompressor full load test; Electric motor performance test; Overall cooling system check; Test in plant upset condition; Maximum power test; Maximum speed test; 72h performance test. During testing, efforts were taken to tune the process control dynamics in order to increase machine protection during transient operations. Process dynamics were also tested taking into account the AMB’s limited capacity to counteract external loads in the diverse machine operative modes. Specific emphasis while testing was dedicated to understanding the influence of the AMBs setting on the rotordynamic behavior of the machine, especially when operating on saturated gas. During the test, the issues discovered were addressed through root cause analysis and adjustments were implemented. The test campaign was completed successfully and has fully confirmed the functionality, robustness and reliability of this prototype unit operating in both normal service and upset conditions. In order to increase and optimize the operating envelope of the motorcompressor, the development and testing of an increased capacity axial active magnetic has been finalized.

SUBSEA POWER, CONTROLS AND UMBILICALS

All-electric technology status and gaps - Including OPEX and CAPEX SPS and Process system benefit examplesEinar Winther-Larssen, Concept Line Manager All Electric, Aker SolutionsAvailability of solutions, products and technology for All electric systems and different system comparisons to indicate the benefit both in OPEX and CAPEX cost going all electric vs conventional electrohydraulic As the current subsea production systems are struggling to meet the cost challenges in today’s environment, the need for a suitable, flexible and cost efficient technology has emerged. All-electric systems and electrical actuation have this potential capability. It is believed that electrical systems will play a key role in the future for the development of greener, more reliable and better maintainable subsea systems. This technology can expand brownfield applications utilizing existing infrastructures, reduce the OPEX of the field, provide better control and monitoring, increase the oil recovery and be a cost efficient solution for both regular prospects and for deeper and longer offset projects. The paper will show OPEX and CAPEX cost comparisons to indicate the benefit going all electric vs conventional electrohydraulic on Process and SPS systems. This paper will also show how Aker Solutions has gradually developed and delivered technology and new solutions to solve the main challenges for all electric systems and created a portfolio of products and solutions to secure high quality, lower cost and short lead times for future subsea systems. The paper will touch on gaps and areas of technology that still need to be solved to enable a complete all electric system delivery.

SUBSEA COMPLETION, INTERVENTION AND DRILLING

Applying ROV based Workover and Control Systems to achieve more flexible and effective XT installationsSteffan Kruse Lindsø, Project Manager, OceaneeringTraditional Workover and Control Systems may pose operational challenges with respect to open water umbilicals. Heavy equipment, such as umbilical reels and skidding systems, take up considerable deck space. Weather and sea current limitations can reduce the number of available operation days. In addition special handling systems onboard the rig are often personnel intensive and require special training. By introducing an ROV based Workover and Control System there are potentially significant cost and schedule saving opportunities. The majority of rigs and vessels already have ROV systems in place thereby providing power and communication between topside and subsea. Utilizing these available capacities in an ROV carried system will allow installation, control and testing of the various XT functions as well as provide a communication link to the Subsea Control Modules. From a field development perspective this solution can offer a more flexible installation. Freeing up the rig while a vessel performs batch installation of trees is one example. Reducing the number of heavy lifts and the number of personnel required for the operation will also reduce HSE exposure. This paper describes a field proven, compact ROV Powerskid solution for XT installation and testing. It summarizes the experiences and lessons learned during several offshore campaigns and also look at the operational benefits and future potential within this technology segment.

BACKUP PRESENTATIONS

Bus

ines

s Re

gion

Ber

gen

©

Page 32: UTC 2016 Program

32

UTC PROGRAM COMMITTEE 2016

NILS ARNE SØLVIK (CHAIR) Chair UTC 2016 Program Committee/ Vice President, Emerging Technologies, Processing Systems, OneSubsea Nils Arne graduated as a Master of Science in Electrical Power Engineering from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) in 1991. He started his career as a Consultant with Norwegian Contractors in the area of the large concrete platforms, such as Sleipner, Draugen, Troll A and Heidrun. In 1994 he joined ABB as a Technical Trainee and after several periods with different ABB companies he joined ABB Corporate Research and became involved in subsea processing and power distribution development programs. In 1997 he joined ABB Offshore Technology AS as Project Manager and later Department Manager before he went on to become Sales Manager, Subsea Processing for ABB Offshore Systems Inc. in Houston from 2001. In 2003 he joined Framo Engineering AS and now holds the position as Vice President, Emerging Technologies, Processing Systems, OneSubsea.

PER CHRISTIAN ERIKSEN Vice President Technology Strategy, Aker Solutions Per Christian holds 12 years’ experience in the industry and has been part of Aker Solutions organization since 2002. He has been part of the full value chain in subsea ranging from studies, tenders, projects and services. More specifically he has been in Angola for the Dalia project, and further he built up the Global Lifecycle Services Support department as a support entity for the regional onshore and offshore operations. Currently he is heading the Technology Strategy in Aker Solutions’ Subsea area, setting the technology direction for the Aker Solutions subsea products in the years to come. Per Christian graduated as Master of Science in Petroleum Engineering from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in 2002.

MARTIN DOVE Project Director, BP Martin Dove holds the position of Project Director in the GOO Subsea Production team, and is based in BPs Sunbury offices. Martin has responsibility for ensuring that subsea operational experience input is provided to the BP projects organisation ‘GPO’, assuring subsea operational readiness and start-up efficiency on major subsea projects and facilitating the common process implementation for smaller subsea projects across the Regions. Martin joined BP in 1988, working most recently as the Subsea Production Operations Manager in Norway. Prior to this Martin has worked as the Subsea Team Leader for Greater Plutonio in Angola where he set up the subsea operations organisation and led the team through start-up into operations. Earlier in his career Martin has undertaken subsea and facilities roles in Azerbaijan, Aberdeen, Sullom Voe, Southern North Sea and Grangemouth. Martin has an M.Eng from London University in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering.

TONJE DAHL Marketing & Communications Manager, ClampOn Tonje has been with ClampOn since 1997 and has been a vital part of the company’s marketing strategies and activities. She graduated from the University of Stavanger with a bachelor degree in business administration, with a specialization in export marketing. Tonje has been a volunteer on the Board of SPE Bergen Section for several years and has just concluded a two years position as Chairman of the section. Over the years, she has gained extensive knowledge of instrumentation, and subsea instrumentation in particular.

MARIE BUEIE HOLSTAD Department Manager Measurement Science, Christian Michelsen Research(CMR) Marie graduated as Dr. Scient in industrial instrumentation from the University of Bergen in 2004. She started working as a development phycisist for Tracerco, supplier of measurement systems and diagnostics services for subsea and topside offshore industries. Marie has been working for Christian Michelsen Research AS for the last 7 years, mainly focusing on measurement technology R&D for the oil and gas sector, including subsea measurement concepts and studies . Marie currently heads the CMR Measurement Science Department.

BÅRD ESPELID Head of Department, DNV GL Bård Espelid holds a M.Sc. in electrochemistry from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTNU). He has been working for DNV GL within materials technology and integrity management the last 32 years. Today he holds a position as business development leader within “Subsea and Wells”. In DNV GL he also execute the role as customer service manager for some prioritized customers. The last years Espelid has been especially involved in DNV GL services related to re-certification of well control equipment. Bård Espelid is an active member of different national and international corrosion societies.

ARNE HENNING LARSEN Business Development Manager, DOF Subsea Arne Henning Larsen graduated as a Master of Science in Subsea Engineering from Heriot Watt University in 1992. He started his career with Stolt Seaway/Stolt Comex Seaway as a project and field engineer with diving subsea construction and SURF projects in Atlantic and APAC regions. He further worked with B&R/Rockwater/Halliburton as senior lead engineer before moving to Bergen to work with FMC Technologies as Operations Manager in Norway and Angola. After working as subsea lead with Statoil on Gullfaks Wet Gas Compression he has since 2014 been working as a Business Development Manager for DOF Subsea, a global vessel owner and EPCI subsea project enabler.

TERJE CLAUSEN Deputy Chair UTC 2016 Program Committee/ Business Development Director, Subsea 7 Terje holds a MSc in Marine Technology from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTNU), specializing in Marine Hydrodynamics and Marine Operations. He has over 20 years experience within the offshore industry, within marine operations, pipelines, mooring, deepwater risers systems and field development. The last 10 years he has held several management roles in Subsea 7 within Technology & Business Development. He was previously employed by Aker, DNV, Global Maritime and Brown & Root.

Page 33: UTC 2016 Program

33

MIKE STARKEY Subsea Engineering Advisor – Global Engineering, ExxonMobil Mike Starkey graduated from Strathclyde University, U.K. in 1984 with a BSc in Mining and Petroleum Engineering. He has worked for ExxonMobil for 30 years and has spent time in the Production, Development and Research Companies. He started working in the North Sea spending time as a Completions Engineer and in Operations prior to becoming a Subsea Engineer. During time in Houston and Stavanger he has worked on numerous subsea projects around the globe and at various phases from pre-FEED through execution. He is now based in the U.K. and provides Subsea Engineering support to the production units in W. Africa, Europe and N. America.

TOM EDDY JOHANSEN SPS Manager, Forsys Subsea Paris Tom Eddy has been working in the subsea business since he graduated in 1982 and with FMC Technologies for more than 25 years. He is educated mechanical engineer and has a degree in marine/offshore engineering. Tom Eddy has worked in most of the product lines within the subsea business and in the last 15 years as engineering manager and chief engineer in several major international subsea development projects for various customers. His current position is manager for subsea production system at Forsys Subsea in Paris. Forsys is a joint venture between FMC Technologies and Technip.

HANS KRISTIAN SUNDT Product Manager Subsea Boosting & Compression, GE Oil & Gas Hans Kristian graduated from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in 2000 with a Master of Science in Chemical Engineering. He has more than 10 years of experience within technology development and sales in the oil and gas industry. He started his career as a topside process engineer and has since followed new products from the initial idea, through the development and finally to the market. In 2008 he left dry land and joined the subsea community. Hans Kristian currently works with GE Oil & Gas as Product Manager for Subsea Processing.

PER ARILD NESJE Business Area Director, Special Solutions, Kongsberg Oil & Gas Technologies Per Arild currently works as Director for the business area Special Solutions at Kongsberg Oil & Gas. He was one of the founders of Nemo Engineering AS back in 1989. The company changed name to Kongsberg Oil & Gas Technologies in 2013. He holds a B.Sc. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, England from 1982. His entire career has been devoted to pipeline and subsea design, and development and delivery of subsea equipment and tooling for temporary and permanent use. Today his field of responsibility within Kongsberg Oil & Gas Technology cover business development and special responsibilities for repair tools and systems; modifications to subsea pipelines and structures; intervention and handling systems; and development of special products to cover challenges and requirements subsea in a new and/or improved manner.

Smart maintenance and logistics for leaner subsea solutions

PB 55N 5347 Ågotnes

Tel: + 47 56 32 30 00www.ccb.no

CCB Subsea offers what the oil and gas industry is looking for: high quality and low cost turnkey solutions for maintenance and decommissioning of subsea systems, tools and equipment.

Co-owned and operated by established market leaders, namely Coast Center Base AS and Norsea Group Operations AS, CCB Subsea specialises in 3rd party maintenance of subsea tooling and equipment.

We are dedicated to the challenges that lie at the oceans’ depths, delivering predictably, low cost and low risk - just what theindustry needs.

CCB Subsea – Your trusted partner in smart subsea maintenance

Page 34: UTC 2016 Program

34

JOHAN KR. MIKKELSEN Chief Technology Officer, Perestroika AS Johan Kr Mikkelsen has 40 years experience from Norsk Hydro and Statoil. He entered the oil and gas industry at the Mongstad refinery in 1974 as process engineer and a couple of years later as Production Manager at the refinery. In 1983 he moved on as Production Director for Oseberg field and in 1992 as SVP for Norsk Hydro drilling. In 2000 he continued as SVP for Oseberg asset and in 2003 as SVP for the Troll asset. In 2005 he became Country manager for Norsk Hydro Canada before he moved on as Peregrino Project Director and later Production Director for the field in Brasil. In 2012 he returned to Norway as VP for the Statoil Subsea Improvement Project until early 2014 when he retired from Statoil. At present he is the Chief Technology Officer with Perestroika AS. He holds a Master degree from NTH from 1973 in Industrial Chemistry and a Master degree in Chemical Engeneering from University of Wisconsin, USA in 1979.

TORKILD REINERTSEN Ph.D, Managing Director, Reinertsen AS Responsible for the oil&gas activity in the family owned company, Reinertsen AS for more than 30 years. Reinertsen is an Engineering and EPC contractor working within Subsea and Process Facilities.

TOROLF F. HÆHRE Subsea Team Lead, Shell Technology Norway Torolf graduated as a Master of Science in Civil & Structural Engineering (1974) from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). He has extensive experience in offshore and subsea field developments since 1980. He joined Shell in 1989 and was leading the Draugen Subsea Facilities EPC contract from 1990 – 94.Therafter he worked as Operations Manager in Rockwater before he again joined Shell in 1996 as the Shell representative on the Technology Agreement between Kongsberg Offshore (now FMC), Statoil, Elf, Mobil and Shell. During 1998-2001 he was responsible for the deepwater manifold and tie-in systems on the Shell Philippines Malampaya development and he was working on the Sakhalin II development project from 2001-2003. Since 2003 he has been working with Shell Technology Norway.

TOM ERIKSEN Senior Subsea Innovator, GCE Subsea Tom Eriksen started his underwater career as combat swimmer in the Royal Norwegian Navy in 1969. Graduated as officer serving as diving instructor and Operational officer at the Navy’s Special Forces unit. He is an Engineer in Sub Sea Technology from Bergen University College in 1982. In 1987 he graduated as Business Candidate from Norwegian School of Management, BI, where he also qualified as Project Manager in 1996. 1991-1992 he served as UN-Observer, Middle East (UNTSO) and 1992 -1993 in former Yugoslavia (UNPROFOR). From 1999, he worked at Bennex Transmark AS as Manager Sub Sea Solutions, responsible for selling ROV systems and related equipment. When Siemens AS acquired Bennex AS he led the internal NITO group, managing the employed engineer’s rights in the takeover. From February 2013, he has been working for GCE Subsea as Senior Subsea Innovator.

VIDAR FONDEVIK Private Consultancy Vidar Fondevik has 45 years of subsea experience. He holds a M.Sc. in Underwater Technology and Subsea Engineering from Heriot-Watt University, besides bachelor degrees in Naval Architecture and Business Economics. He served four years as combat diver in the Navy from 1969. Then he worked offshore as diving surveyor for DNV throughout the seventies. Later he was involved in early experimental diving at NUTEC. He became pilot and manager for the manned submersible ‘Check Mate’ - now displayed at NOM. He spent seven years as general manager in a local company producing hydrophones for military submarines. He was technical manager and senior advisor at NUI until his retiring age of 67. Vidar has held a number of directorships. He is elected Fellow in the Society for Underwater Technology UK.

KENNETH SOLBJØR Sr. Project Manager - Rig, ROV Engineering & Installation, Oceaneering AS Kenneth Solbjør`s background is from the aviation industry as an EASA Certified Technician within the Mechanical, Power Plant and Avionic Systems of the Boeing 737 Series aircraft. Kenneth worked with the Braathens SAFE airline for 14 years, then Norsk Helikopter(Bristow), and started his career in the Oil & Gas Business in 2008 with Oceaneering AS. Since then Kenneth have been a Project Manager for engineering and installation of turnkey Remote Operated Vehicle Systems on board vessels and rigs. The past years he has held the position as Senior Project Manager - Rig, with the responsibility for all rig installations. Current ongoing projects within the portfolio are the Statoil CAT D and CAT J ROV Installations.

HENRIK MELAND MADSEN Vice President & Head of Subsea Systems, Siemens H. M. Madsen has been part of the Siemens Subsea organisation since 2010, and has held various positions in sales and marketing and is now holding the position as head of Subsea System. This organisation is responsible, amongst others, for the development of the Siemens Subsea Power Grid. H. M. Madsen has more than 10 years of experience in the subsea industry and prior to working for Siemens he held various positions with Framo Engineering AS, a renown supplier of subsea boosting systems. In this company H. M. Madsen worked with subsea installations, system integration tests for various projects, was responsible for development and deliveries of subsea control systems prior to working in sales and marketing. H. M. Madsen holds a degree of Sivilingeniør (Master of Science) from NTNU the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Marine Engineering. As part of this study, one of the years was spent at ESIM in France.

RICK KOPPS Subsea Specialist, Chevron

Page 35: UTC 2016 Program

35

RUNE MODE RAMBERG Chief Engineer Subsea Technology & Operations, Statoil Rune has 25 years’ experience within the oil and gas industry. He experience includes: research, early phase development, project execution and field operations. He worked 4 years in Houston with Chevron on Jack St. Malo and as Technology Manager for Statoil Houston office. In the position as Chief Engineer in Subsea Technology and Operations, he is heading the professional network of 400 subsea engineers in Statoil. Ramberg holds a M.S degree and a Ph.D from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. He has worked for Statoil since 1997. In his spare time he is riding bikes and coaching soccer.

TIM CROME VP Subsea Mediterranean, Technip Tim Crome has worked in the offshore pipeline / subsea industry since graduation from Imperial College, London, in 1980. For more than 30 years his work and home has been in Norway. He joined Technip in 1997, was Engineering Manager for the Oslo office from 2001 until 2007, Director for Sales and Business Development for Norway until the end of 2014 and is now VP Subsea Mediterranean. Prior to joining Technip he worked for JPKenny, DNV and Norsk Hydro.

PER ARNE NILSEN Head of Subsea Department, Total S.A France Per Arne has for many years held Senior Management positions internationally (Norway, US, Canada, UK, Singapore, Australia, France). He has been employed by several Oil & Gas operators globally, with roles spanning from asset management, via project management and delivery management to R&D/Technology management. Specialties: International negotiations, project execution management, change management, professional leader with multicultural skills and experience. Professional in Subsea technologies.

TOR WILLGOHS KNUDSEN Chairman of the Board, Underwater Technology Foundation Mechanical and Petroleum Engineering from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) in 1981. He also holds a bachelor degree in Business Economics from The Norwegian Business School. He started his career as Petroleum Engineer for Statoil in 1981 and was Subsea Completion- and Production Operation Manager for Statoils first producers and injector during 1985-87. Tor has managed Subsea Pool and various subsea modification projects for more than 10 years and contributed to develop the Statoil operated Subsea Pool and subsea base operations & services in Norway. He has been on international assignments to Exxon for two years as Field Engineer in East Texas and two years in the BP/Statoil Alliance UK working with field developments in the Caspian area. During 1994-2000 he was Project Manager for the Gullfaks South and Rimfaks Satellite developments. During 2007-2012 Project Manager for the Gullfaks Subsea Compression Project. Tor presently holds a Sr. Advisor Position in Statoil Technology and Projects. Tor represent the host of UTC, the Underwater Technology Foundation in the committee.

ACHIEVING THE POTENTIAL OF THE SUBSEA SECTOR

From the drawing board to decommissioning, DNV GL supports operators, suppliers, governments and industry associations in solving complex subsea challenges through tailored solutions and global best practice. Driven by a curiosity for technical progress, our worldwide network of experts provides independent advice and a neutral ground for collaboration, enabling customers to implement technology safely and efficiently.

For more information on how we help the subsea sector achieve its potential through our services, standards and recommended practices, visit: dnvgl.com/oilgas

SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Page 36: UTC 2016 Program

36

BERGEN AREA ORGANISING PARTNERS FOR UTC 2016

GCE Subsea is an industry driven initiative for strengthening and internationalisation of businesses, research and education. We represent the world’s most complete cluster for subsea life-of-field solutions. Our goal is to increase the cluster’s competitiveness and global market share, and take a leading position in sustainable utilisation of ocean resources.

All organisations established in Norway providing products or services to the subsea industry, or intend to do so, can become members of GCE Subsea. Partners are companies viewed as particularly important for the development of the cluster, as well as R&D and education institutions and governmental organisations.

GCE Subsea’s combination of companies, specialised service providers, research and development (R&D) environments and development agencies make the cluster a global knowledge hub. The cluster develops and supplies innovative products and services to install, operate and maintain subsea oil and gas production systems (subsea life-of-field). The cluster’s resource base consists of industry companies, R&D and higher education institutions, joint innovation support resources and joint test facilities and R&D infrastructure.

The cluster’s key players are located within half an hour’s drive from the city centre of Bergen. The close proximity between businesses, R&D environments and support agencies enables good mobility, communication and knowledge sharing.

GCE Subsea companies operate globally and serve primarily clients on the Norwegian/British continental shelf, in the Gulf of Mexico, Brazil, Asia, Australia and West Africa.

SUBSEA INDEX We own and operate Subsea Index, a bi-lingual matchmaking tool in English and Portuguese. The intent of the database is to create business opportunities by providing accessible and searchable high quality, business relevant data about companies and organisations related to the subsea industry.

Subsea Index is open for registration for all companies and organisations delivering products and services in the worldwide subsea industry. Use the database to find your partner in business, R&D, education and training.

GLOBAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE GCE Subsea is one of three Global Centres of Expertise in Norway and a part of the Norwegian Innovation Clusters government supported cluster programme. The programme aims to trigger and enhance collaborative development activities in clusters. The goal is to increase the cluster dynamics and attractiveness, the individual company’s innovativeness and competitiveness.

The programme is organized by Innovation Norway, and supported by Siva (The Industrial Development Corporation of Norway) and the Norwegian Research Council.

The GCE status is the highest level in the Norwegian Innovation Clusters programme

GCESUBSEA.NO

Page 37: UTC 2016 Program

37

Society for Underwater Technology

SUT is a worldwide, multi-disciplinary, learned society that brings together organisations and individuals with a common interest in underwater technology, ocean science and offshore engineering. SUT was founded in 1966 and has members from more than 40 countries, including engineers, scientists, other professionals and students working in these areas.

The organisation has comprehensive expertise within its area of activity, whereby it influences the development of new techniques to further explore and exploit the world’s oceanic resources, such as through annual prize-giving ceremonies.

Today the association is established in London with branches in Bergen, Aberdeen, Houston, Rio de Janeiro, Perth, Melbourne, Kuala Lumpur and Lagos, where they carry out learned courses and programmes for members and others who are interested in subsea technology and their wide range of other ocean-related activities. The latest branch, SUT Norway (Bergen) was established in 2009.

SUT Norway is a non-profit organisation, to be developed through networking and interaction between individuals and companies working professionally with underwater technology. Its objective is to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and information, e.g. by arranging courses and seminars with agendas relevant to subsea activities.

WWW.SUT.ORG.UK

SPE Bergen

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) is a professional association whose 100,000-plus members worldwide are engaged in energy resources development and production. Local sections of the SPE are established around E&P communities all over the world. SPE Bergen Section is one of five sections in Norway. We host a variety of activities and events, focusing on networking and knowledge.

SPE Bergen hosts regular member meetings, the annual SPE Sailing with the Statsraad Lehmkuhl in late spring, SPE Bergen Lutefisk in early winter and the SPE Bergen YP.lnk hosted by our YP program. Our largest event during the year is the annual SPE Bergen One Day Seminar in April. This international E&P conference and exhibition attracts some 500 participants and approximately 45 exhibiting E&P companies.

SPE recognizes the importance of those who one day will be leaders of the E&P industry. Along with many SPE sections, the SPE Bergen Section has developed a Young Professionals (YP) programme, to support and assist those in the industry with fewer than ten years of experience.

SPE also offers student memberships. The SPE Bergen Student Chapter counts several hundred members and is the most important link between students and the petroleum industry in the Bergen area. The SPE Bergen Section is proud to support and sponsor one of the world’s largest and most vibrant SPE student chapters. The chapter hosts its own events, and students also participate on regular section events. 

BERGEN.SPE.NO

250.000 unique users weekly on tu.no100.000 unique users weekly on digi.no

77.650 managers286.000

READERS EACH ISSUE

105.000 technologists/engineers

Technology Weekly was first published in 1854, and is the oldest polytechnicalmagazine in the world.

Milliardsluket som endret Hammerfest

To fortellinger om Goliat¤¤SIDE 30–41

T E K N I S K U K E B L A D

FOR DEG SOM SKAPER FREMTIDEN 0316163. ÅRGANG 17. MARS 2016

Page 38: UTC 2016 Program

38

UTC 2016 EXHIBITORSAKER SOLUTIONS – www.akersolutions.com Aker Solutions is an international provider of subsea production equipment and offshore field design. Its portfolio of oilfield products, systems and services stretches from concept studies and front-end engineering to subsea production systems, maintenance, modifications and operations services and solutions for extending the lifetime of oil and gas fields. The company is committed to operational excellence. The main customers are international, national and independent oil and gas companies around the globe. Aker Solutions employs approximately 17,000 people in about 20 countries.

BLUE LOGIC – www.bluelogic.no Blue Logic was established July 2009, and provides products in the following 4 areas: • Fluid connection/interfaces • Electrical interfaces • Mechanical interfaces • Project Engineering The Entrepreneurs have long experience from subsea Installation, Operation, Tooling and Maintenance. Both for intervention and permanent installation.Blue Logic Vision is “One Subsea World” Key words in this respect is – standardisation of interfaces – harmonisation of requirements – module based thinking We know that standardisation is a necessity for innovation and product development. Togheter with our customers we will industrialise the Subsea Industry and prepare for a step change and a Paradigm Shift for the Subsea World.

CASTROL OFFSHORE – www.castrol.com Castrol Energy Lubricants provide a full range of subsea control fluids, lubricant solutions and specialist chemicals to the global Oil & Gas Industry. We are a one stop shop for all offshore lubrication issues – Subsea Production, Surface Production & Drilling.

CLAMPON – www.clampon.com ClampOn is the industry leader in non-intrusive sensors for Sand, PIG, Vibration, Leak, and Corrosion-Erosion monitoring. All sensors incorporate proprietary DSP ultrasonic intelligence for subsea and topside hardware applications. We work with our customers in the oil & gas industry to optimize their productivity and to safeguard their investments.

DNV GL – www.dnvgl.com Driven by its purpose of safeguarding life, property and the environment, DNV GL enables organizations to advance the safety and sustainability of their business. We provide classification and technical assurance along with software and independent expert advisory services to the maritime, oil & gas and energy industries. We also provide certification services to customers across a wide range of industries. Our advanced testing capabilities, technical expertise and standards help customers apply technology safely, efficiently and cost effectively. Our Global network of experts and test facilities comprises laboratories and test sites in Norway (Bergen and Høvik), UK, Germany, Netherlands, Singapore and USA. Operating in more than 100 countries, our 15,000 professionals are dedicated to helping our customers make the world safer, smarter and greener.

EAB ENGINEERING – www.eabeng.no EAB is your specialist on Subsea tie-in and infrastructure from wellhead to point of export – and a part of OneSubsea. EAB delivers: – Subsea connection systems – Equipment for installation and commissioning – Subsea intervention and tie-in tooling – Subsea tie-in structures like PLEM’s, TEE’s, Riser Bases, Manifolds and UTA’s – FEED studies and Subsea engineering in general Our solutions are based on standard products and executions, or are tailor made towards customer requirements. EAB has advanced engineering resources specialized on Subsea engineering, a network of experienced sub-suppliers and access to extensive test facilities. EAB’s main shareholder is OneSubsea Processing as EAB has been in business since 1952

CCB SUBSEA AS Smart maintenance and logistics for leaner subsea solutions CCB Subsea offers what the oil and gas industry is looking for: high quality and low cost turnkey solutions for maintenance and decommissioning of subsea systems, tools and equipment. Co-owned and operated by established market leaders, namely Coast Center Base AS and Norsea Group Operations AS, CCB Subsea specialises in 3rd party maintenance of subsea tooling and equipment. From our bases along the Norwegian coastline, our team of experts combines extensive subsea operations and maintenance knowhow with in-depth logistics and warehousing expertise, facilities and infrastructures. We are able to support all subsea installations with contingency services at all offshore base locations. We are dedicated to the challenges that lie at the oceans’ depths, delivering predictably, low cost and low risk - just what the industry needs. CCB Subsea - Your trusted partner in smart subsea maintenance

Page 39: UTC 2016 Program

39

FMC TECHNOLOGIES – www.fmctechnologies.com FMC Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: FTI) is the global market leader in subsea systems and a leading provider of technologies and services to the oil and gas industry. We help our customers overcome their most difficult challenges, such as improving shale and subsea infrastructures and operations to reduce cost, maintain uptime, and maximize oil and gas recovery. Named by Forbes® Magazine as one of the World’s Most Innovative Companies in 2013, the company has approximately 20,000 employees and operates 24 production facilities in 14 countries. Visit www.fmctechnologies.com or follow us on Twitter @FMC_Tech for more information.

FORCE TECHNOLOGY – www.forcetechnology.com

FUTURE SUBSEA – www.futuresubsea.no Future Subsea is a Technology- and Consultancy- company. We are specialized in Technical Safety, Flow Assurance, and Subsea Engineering. Services within Oil&Gas- and Renewable- Industry. We are located with offices both in Sandefjord and Oslo. Our dedicated Engineers, committed to solving complex challenges adapted to our Clients’ needs. FSCC - Future Subsea Controllable Cooler is a second generation passive subsea cooler, developed by Future Subsea AS. It is characterized by being simple, robust and reliable, and uses well-proven principles to operate. Competency is our greatest asset. We aim to offer optimized, innovative solutions – improving profitability, performance and safety.

GCE SUBSEA – www.gcesubsea.no GCE Subsea is an industry driven initiative for strengthening and internationalisation of businesses, research and education. We represent the world’s most complete cluster for subsea life-of-field solutions. Our goal is to increase the cluster’s competitiveness and global market share, and take a leading position in sustainable utilisation of ocean resources. In order to achieve these goals we focus on: • Develop competence and attract talents and investors • Develop subsea solutions beyond oil and gas • Stimulate technology development • Create new entrepreneurs and grow businesses • Succeed in the global market • Improve work and production processes More than 120 companies and organisations form the foundation of the GCE Subsea cluster.

GE OIL & GAS – www.ge-energy.com GE Oil & Gas is inventing the next industrial era in the oil and gas sector. In our labs and factories, and in the field, we constantly push the boundaries of technology to solve today’s toughest operational & commercial challenges. We have the skills, knowledge and technical expertise to bring together the physical and digital worlds to fuel the future.

INNOVA – www.innova.no Innova is a leading provider of equipment and solutions to the international underwater industry. They effectively combine operational experiences and engineering skills with quality products from respected suppliers of underwater equipment. Innova have provided integrated turn-key solutions to all major operators in the North Sea, including control and instrumentation system, data acquisition systems and remote controlled tooling. Key development areas the last years have been on electric and hydraulic power conversion, electric drives, fibreoptic multiplexers and solutions for permanent applications (ISO-13628-6). A broad range of equipment is available for rental; Matrix fibreoptic multiplexers, manipulator-systems, survey-equipment, fibreoptic gyros, camera-systems, zip-pumps, sonar-systems.

KONGSBERG OIL & GAS – www.kongsberg.com KONGSBERG has 25 years’ experience in delivering solutions for the subsea field. A full suite of products, equipment and solutions In the design phase of new field development, lifetime extension or brownfield upgrade, in-depth knowledge of multiphase flow and process simulation combined with subsea product experience, ensure our services to optimise the oilfield performance. Subsea field development High quality analysis and engineering studies. Delivery of subsea products from the flange of the tree to the topside hang-off solving challenges at any stage of subsea production operations. Maintenance, modification and repair We define appropriate repair method, provide procedures and deliver the subsequent repair solutions for equipment, components and tools.

MECHMAN – www.mechman.no Mechman AS do fabrication of tailor made subsea buoyancy, mechanical constructions and product development.

Page 40: UTC 2016 Program

40

NAMTVEDT SEALMAKER SERVICES – www.namtvedt.org Namtvedt Sealmaker Service is the sealing of leaks expert company. Our company is expanding from only operating on the Norwegian Continental shelf to performing operations in UK sector and in Danish sector. Our specialists have also executed work in the Middle East. The company is growing due to excellent working agreement with Sealmaker Int. (Our Sealmaker division) and with Citadel Technologies Inc. (Our Carbon fibre pipe repair division). Due to leaks, wells are shut in and by using our technology, we bring it back on production with operation cost just a fraction of what the oil company’s gain is.

NEXANS NORWAY – www.nexans.no Nexans Norway AS is a leading supplier of power, telecommunications, installations and heating cables in Norway, and is among the world’s leading manufacturers of offshore control cables and high-voltage submarine cables. The company’s head office is in Oslo, and it has manufacturing plants at Rognan, Namsos, Langhus, Karmøy and Halden. The company has nearly 1,600 employees and organized into three product areas: Market Lines, Hybrid Underwater Cables and Submarine High Voltage.

NLI SUBSEA – www.nli.no The subsea history of NLI first started in the early 70’s. This means we have 40 years of experience in subsea fabrication including delivery to the system supplier and installer companies. We are on the international-and Norwegian Continental Shelf and subsea fabrication is therefore a culture and tradition in NLI. NLI has delivered its own subsea products to a global market for over 20 years. During this time we have developed a unique expertise in our products, and products that are tailored to our customers. NLI has, during the last 7 years, built up experience in subsea engineering. This involves FEED projects and implementing EPC deliveries to system suppliers and installers. NLI Subsea is a group of 6 companies consisting delivering Engineering, Products & Fabrication services to the subsea marked. We are today approximately 370 highly qualified employees, and expect a turnover of 650 MNOK in 2015. Our core business: Subsea Connections & Connection Products Subsea Tools Subsea Valves Subsea Engineering Services Fabrication of multidiscipline Subsea Modules, Structures & Components

OFFSHORE ENGINEER MAGAZINE – www.oedigital.com Celebrating its 40th anniversary of publication in 2015, OE (Offshore Engineer) provides actionable intelligence for technical professionals who are actively involved in the offshore oil and gas industry. Each monthly issue contains engineering analysis and data, industry reporting and forecasts, project updates, technological advances, case studies and best practices. OE staff also provides daily news and exclusive articles through OEDIGITAL.COM and social media channels.

OFFSHORE MEDIA GROUP – www.offshoremediagroup.com Offshore Media Group is the company behind the exhibition concept Offshore Technology Days (OTD). OTD is established as the leading annual oil exhibition for the supplier industry to the Norwegian continental shelf, gathering over 500 exhibitors and 25 to 30,000 visitors. The show alternates between Stavanger and Bergen and is a contributor to build a stronger bridge between the Western Norway’s two major oil cities and markets.

PLM TECHNOLOGY – www.plm-technology.no PLM Technology is a certified partner of Dassault Systèmes, which provides 3D Experience solutions to help companies innovating with dedicated expertises for design, engineering, simulation and manufacturing. We are providing the 3DEXPERIENCE® platform, with dedicated solutions for Marine, Offshore & Subsea… The 3DEXPERIENCE platform is a business experience platform providing software solutions for every organization in your company – from marketing to sales to engineering. It is a unified collaborative platform to manage all project information. This ensures no data duplication or risk due to working on an incorrect version of data. It offers an integrated set of cross discipline design tools and collaborative design review tools that enable highly productive cross discipline and intra-discipline development and review. Avoiding design conflicts and issues from the start of the design process results in significant cost savings.

PG FLOW SOLUTIONS – www.pg-marinegroup.com

ONESUBSEA – www.onesubsea.com OneSubsea® delivers integrated solutions, products, systems and services for the subsea oil and gas market. The company offers a step change in reservoir recovery for the subsea oil and gas industry through integration and optimization of the entire production system over the life of the field.

MRC SOLBERG & ANDERSEN – www.saas.no MRC Solberg & Andersen has been active on the offshore market since the early 80s. The company is the market leader within its field, and has supplied valves and related services to most platforms on the Norwegian continental shelf, making it a leading supplier of technological-based services and solutions on our markets. We help cut costs by becoming an active link in the customer’s value chain. We possess solid specialist knowledge to undertake advanced design and engineering within our core areas. The result is reliable, effective solutions focusing on cost-effectiveness, quality and function.

Page 41: UTC 2016 Program

41

ROXAR FLOW MEASUREMENTS – www.emersonprocess.com/roxar Roxar is a leading provider to the oil & gas industry of advanced technology for production optimization, production regularity and improved decision making. Our technologies help operators maximize their reservoir’s performance. Roxar understands reservoir description and flow dynamics. Our technologies take operators through the entire reservoir lifecycle from interpretation of geological data through to collection and analysis of real-time production data. Roxar’s seismic to simulation software, and our comprehensive range of flow metering, flow assurance and downhole monitoring instrumentation maximizes return from your reservoir assets.

SENSE OFFSHORE – www.senseoffshore.com Sense Offshore develops state of the art autonomous sensors for monitoring of subsea structures. IMU sensors with optional connection Vibration, Strain, Pressure and temperature logging, extreme low power consumption and very long service life. Wireless Data Transfer via ROV Modem to topside control room. Our sensors have a proven track record with over 12 000 days of logging since 2009, on over 40 wells on the Norwegian continental shelf.

SPE – www.spe.org The Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) is a not-for-profit professional association whose members are engaged in energy resources, development, and production. SPE serves more than 110,000 members in 141 countries worldwide. SPE is a key resource for technical knowledge related to the oil and gas exploration and production industry and provides services through its publications, events, training courses, and online resources. The SPE Bergen Section monthly meetings. The annual SPE Bergen Sailing and the annual SPE Bergen Lutefisk are other events hosted by the section. The International SPE Bergen One Day Seminar is our largest event during the year.

STANGELAND GLASSFIBER PRODUKTER – www.glassfiber.no Stangeland Glassfiber Produkter AS has established a range of products resistant to corrosive environments, with reduced weight compared to similar materials solutions in metallic quality. The product range consists of: • Gratings • Piping • Cable management system • Structural Profiles • Subsea structures • Customised products Base materials comprising reinforcing fibre in various grades, glass fibre, carbon fibre, aramid fibre or other synthetic fibres with binders such as polyester, vinyl ester, epoxy, polyurethane or phenolic. Our market is the oil & gas industry (subsea and topside) and transport (railway). We have established procedures and is operating according to ISO9001: 2008. Qualified supplier under Achilles, Sellihca and TransQ qualification system.

SUBSEA 7 – www.subsea7.com Subsea 7 is a world-leading seabed-to-surface engineering, construction and services contractor to the offshore energy industry. We provide cost-effective technical solutions to enable the delivery of complex projects in all water depths and challenging environments. Our vision is to be acknowledged by our clients, our people and our shareholders as the leading strategic partner in our market. We focus on segments of the subsea market where we can differentiate ourselves by delivering high-quality services built around our core strengths of engineering and end-to-end project management. Our extensive experience in deepwater Subsea, Umbilical, Riser and Flowline (SURF) and Life-of-Field projects has made us the preferred contractor and trusted partner for national and international energy companies. We provide integrated services and we plan, design and manage the delivery of complex projects in harsh and challenging environments. Many of our activities fall within Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Installation (EPCI) project delivery, where our experience is based on a proven track record of successful delivery.

SUBSEA DESIGN – www.subseadesign.com

SUBSEA SMART SOLUTIONS – www.subseasmartsolutions.com Subsea Smart Solutions introduces the Life Time Extension SHPU System and the Scale Squeeze Tree Cap. These flexible and light intervention solutions will reduce replacement time and cost radically. There are also important environmental and safety benefits to be gained. Subsea Smart Solutions delivers engineering services and products to extend lifetime of brown field and green field subsea wells and maintain maximum operability of XT systems.

Page 42: UTC 2016 Program

42

SUT – www.sut.org.uk The Society for Underwater Technology (SUT) is a multidisciplinary learned society that brings together organisations and individuals with a common interest in underwater technology, ocean science and offshore engineering. SUT was founded in 1966 and has members from more than 40 countries, including engineers, scientists, other professionals and students working in these areas.

TEKNISK UKEBLAD MEDIA – www.tu.no Teknisk Ukeblad is Norway’s leading technology and business magazine and is published with 18 issues each year.

TRACERCO – www.tracerco.com Tracerco is a world leading industrial technology company providing unique and specialized detection, diagnostic and measurement solutions. Our goal is to drive technical innovation to bring significant benefits to our customers in the petroleum industry and in the security tagging niches we serve. Our field proven, advanced technologies deliver real time condition monitoring and are a vital component in the optimum management of subsea assets. They provide efficient and effective troubleshooting. The products and services we provide enable solutions to be implemented without intervention and delay. This ensures our customers improve efficiency, reduce risk and save money.

TRELLEBORG OFFSHORE – www.trelleborg.com/en/offshore

Enabling a new era ofsubsea productionThere is tremendous potential for power and processing technologies to revolutionize subsea operations.

GE Oil & Gas is at the forefront of this movement with a full range of modular and integrated systems designed to

increase recovery, reduce development cost, and improve overall system reliability.

Drawing on the strengths of the GE Store, we are turning decades of subsea innovations into

a whole new era of subsea production.

geoilandgas.com/SP&P

GE_SS_P&P_UTC_HalfPage-040116.indd 1 16-04-01 10:07 AM

Page 43: UTC 2016 Program

43

EXHIBITION OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

With 50 companies the UTC Exhibition will be a vibrant and important arena for subsea updates and information. At UTC you will meet executives, managers, engineers and other strategic and planning personnel related to the subsea field of the petroleum industry. Students are also especially invited to the UTC exhibition. The exhibition hall will accommodate lunches and refreshments, and banquet dinner.

The exhibition will be open for other professionals, not participating at the conference, at these hours:

Wednesday 15 June: 10:30 – 16:00 Thursday 16 June: 09:00 – 14:30

Guests have to register at the entrance, no entrance fee will apply. Guests will be given the opportunity to buy lunch tickets at registration.

We encourage all exhibitors to invite their business partners to visit the UTC Exhibition.

Enabling a new era ofsubsea productionThere is tremendous potential for power and processing technologies to revolutionize subsea operations.

GE Oil & Gas is at the forefront of this movement with a full range of modular and integrated systems designed to

increase recovery, reduce development cost, and improve overall system reliability.

Drawing on the strengths of the GE Store, we are turning decades of subsea innovations into

a whole new era of subsea production.

geoilandgas.com/SP&P

GE_SS_P&P_UTC_HalfPage-040116.indd 1 16-04-01 10:07 AM

UTC INVITATIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT

Welcome to the UTC Invitational Golf Tournament, hosted by alliance partners OneSubsea and Subsea 7.

UTC Invitational is an 18-hole shotgun start, Texas scramble tournament with mixed teams and played with ¾ handicap (mixed handicap fourball). Prizes will be awarded for first, second and third place. Invited to UTC Invitational are UTC participants and exhibitors and our sponsors’ employees and business partners. Upon arrival you will receive a complimentary sleeve of golf balls, bottle of water and sandwich. After the round, we will serve lunch in the Albatross restaurant at Fana Golf Club.

Venue: Fana Golf Club, Bergen (address: Vestre Rå 82, NO-5329 Rådal)

When: 14 June, 08:30 – 14:30

Page 44: UTC 2016 Program

44

MAP OF BERGEN CITY

1

4

2

5

3

1 USF Verftet – Seminar and Icebreaker

2 Grieghallen – Conference venue

3 Scandic Ørnen Hotel

4 Radisson Blu Hotel Norge

5 Grand Hotel Terminus

LOCATIONS AND RECOMMENDED HOTELS

Page 45: UTC 2016 Program

45

Join us for an informal networking event at Bergen’s unique culture arena by the sea, USF Verftet. Meet fellow delegates, exhibitors and speakers, while enjoying tasty tapas and drinks at Bergen’s largest terrace. The focus this evening is to network in relaxed surroundings before the conference proceedings start Wednesday morning.

The United Sardine Factory (USF) is located at the Georgernes Verft in Bergen.

This old factory was once the largest cannery in Norway. Now, USF is a multiple cultural arena, unique in size and variety. This is the home for arts and culture productions in its various forms and genres.

DRESS CODE: Smart casual VENUE: Georgernes Verft 12 WHEN: 14 June, 19:30 – 22:30 Upon arrival, please pick up your accreditation inside. You need this to access the premises and bars.

As a perfect end to the first day of the conference, you are invited to a Banquet Dinner in the exhibition hall. You will experience great entertainment and a three course meal. After dinner there will be a full service cash bar.

The evening will provide an excellent setting for discussions and networking for both delegates and speakers.

DRESS CODE: Business VENUE: UTC Exhibition, Grieghallen WHEN: 15 June, 19:30 – 01:00

Please register for the banquet when you register for the conference. Your Banquet ticket will be enclosed in your name badge.

BANQUET DINNER IN EXHIBITION HALL

SOCIALIZE AT UTC!

Main sponsors:Premium Media sponsor:

UTC is a full-service conference. This means that all meals and drinks during the conference are included in the conference fee.

Take part in the UTC networking gatherings; start off with the Icebreaker event, right after the seminars June 14th! After the first day of the conference you are invited to the Banquet Dinner in the Exhibition Hall.

Please register for the events when you register for the conference.

Bus

ines

s Re

gion

Ber

gen

©

ICEBREAKER AT USF VERFTET

Page 46: UTC 2016 Program

46

DATES 14 June: Golf tournement at Fana Golfklubb 14 June: Seminars and Icebreaker at USF Verftet 15 June: Conference, Exhibition and Banquet Dinner in Grieghallen 16 June: Conference and Exhibition

CONFERENCE FEE NOK 9.750 ($1.130, by March 2016) + 25% VAT 20 % discount: to all delegates from our Main Sponsor companies OneSubsea, Subsea 7 and Statoil NOK 7800 + 25% VAT INCLUDED IN THE CONFERENCE FEE: • Participation at the conference both days • Access to download the conference presentations after the conference • Lunches and all day refreshments • Attendance at seminar June 14th – in the afternoon at USF Verftet • Icebreaker Event at USF Verftet June 14th • Conference Banquet June 15th (Specified registration is required for attendance at the seminars and social events)

PAYMENT We accept Amex, Diners, MasterCard and Visa. You will receive a detailed receipt as soon as your credit card has been charged.

Payment by invoice: Many companies require a purchase order and a specified invoice address to receive an invoice. If this is applicable for your company, please contact the organizer by email with necessary invoicing information. You will receive a “invoice reference number” needed for your registration.

Contact information technical organiser: [email protected]/ +47 916 94 214

25% VAT will be added to the invoice in accordance with Norwegian tax regulations.

ACCOMMODATION – HOTELS IN WALKING DISTANCE FROM THE VENUES Radisson Blu Hotel Norge NOK 1945,- (Available 14 – 17 June) Rica Ørnen Hotel NOK 1890,- (Available 13 – 17 June. only 60 meters from conference venue) Grand Hotel Terminus NOK 1550,- (Available 13 – 17 June) Double rooms are available upon request

REGISTRATION AT WWW.UTC.NO YOUR CONFERENCE BADGE You can pick up your conference badge at these hours and locations: Tuesday 14 June: at USF Verftet between 14:00 – 21:00 Wednesday 15 June: Grieghallen, 08:30 – 09:30, entrance Peer Gynt Late arrivals: All day Wednesday and Thursday at the conference information desk.

CANCELLATIONS Your registration is binding. Cancellations must be received in writing by 13 May 2016, and will be subject to a cancellation fee of NOK 1000,- ex vat, unless a substitute delegate is offered. After this date, afull registration fee will apply; however, substitutions will be accepted. Substitution for registered delegates may be made at any time prior to the conference, but we would appreciate prior notification. All cancellations and substitutions must be in writing.

AIRPORT AND TRANSPORTATION Bergen Airport Flesland There will be buses to the airport after the conference 16 June, free of charge to conference delegates.

TECHNICAL ORGANISER Possibility AS Kanalveien 11 NO-5068 Bergen Norway

E-mail: [email protected]

REGISTRATION, HOTEL RESERVATIONS AND ACCOUNTING: Lene Vikre, Registration and Accounting Manager E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +47 916 94 214 UTC EXHIBITION: Ståle Eiken, Exhibition Manager E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +47 928 05 779

REGISTRATION AND HOTEL RESERVATIONS

CONTACT PERSONS:

MEDIA: Irmelin Grønevik, Project Manager UTC E-mail: [email protected]/ [email protected] Phone: +47 922 37 093

Fryda Dygd, Conference Coordinator UTC E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +47 416 05 135

Ole

Kris

tian

Ols

en ©

Page 47: UTC 2016 Program

47

DELIVERING COST-EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONSDeveloping and applying solutions that reducecost, enhance production and extend fi eld life.

We take pride in our project management, engineering and execution. Collaboration with our clients and suppliers is key to joint success.The result is more cost effi cient, faster and smarter solutions. Read more on subsea7.com

Visit us at stand no. 1.

seabed-to-surface

07

Page 48: UTC 2016 Program

48

Return address: Possibility AS

Kanalveien 11, 5068 BergenNorway

Premium Media Partner Media Partner

Seminar PartnerSeminar PartnerSeminar Partner

Sponsor PartnerSponsor PartnerSponsor Partner

Main Sponsor Main Sponsor Main Sponsor

WWW.UTC.NO

UTF THANKS ALL PARTNERS FOR THEIR SUPPORT IN 2016!

The Underwater Technology Foundation (UTF) is a non-commercial entity established in 1980 when several large oil-related companies joined forces to arrange the Underwater Technology Conference in Bergen.

The foundation’s goal is to promote increased knowledge of the subsea sector. This is achieved by hosting the conference and giving contributions to research and training at university level. UTF offers a grant available to applicants in

need of financial support for a subsea related research or training project. The foundation would like to see more applicants for the grant, and encourages anyone with a relevant project to apply.

Organising Partners: