Usingtropicalarchivesofprecipitationisotopic ...crlmd/these/presentation_CRisi_AGUdec2011.pdf ·...
Transcript of Usingtropicalarchivesofprecipitationisotopic ...crlmd/these/presentation_CRisi_AGUdec2011.pdf ·...
Using tropical archives of precipitation isotopic
composition to assess the credibility of projected
changes in precipitation
Camille Risi
LMD/IPSL/CNRS (Paris, France)
with the contribution of: S. Bony, F. Vimeux, R. Eagle, A. Tripati
AGU: 6 December 2011
Spread in precipitation projections
precipitation change
by 2100 (%)
<2/3 agree on sign
IPCC AR4
2/10
Spread in precipitation projections
precipitation change
by 2100 (%)
<2/3 agree on sign
IPCC AR4
◮ Can we assess the credibility of future precip projections oftropical precip using past changes?
2/10
Spread in precipitation projections
precipitation change
by 2100 (%)
<2/3 agree on sign
IPCC AR4
◮ Can we assess the credibility of future precip projections oftropical precip using past changes?
1. if a model is better for the past, is it better for the future?only if common mechanisms
2/10
Spread in precipitation projections
precipitation change
by 2100 (%)
<2/3 agree on sign
IPCC AR4
◮ Can we assess the credibility of future precip projections oftropical precip using past changes?
1. if a model is better for the past, is it better for the future?only if common mechanisms
2. if robust proxy for past precip changes:δ18O (ice cores, speleothems...)?
2/10
1) Past/future precipitation changes
◮ 11 climates using LMDZ GCM forced by SST anomalies
2xCO2 MIROChi 2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 IPSL4xCO2 IPSLpresent−day
ITC
Z l
atit
ude
(°N
)
shift to North annual, zonal mean
shiftto
Southwarmer North
Eemien IPS THC+
MH IPSLEemien IPSL
LGM IPSL THCoffLGM IPSLLGM climapClimates:
SST gradient (K)(30N−10N − 30S−10S)
cooler Northwarmer South
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2-1.5-1-0.500.511.5
3/10
1) Past/future precipitation changes
◮ 11 climates using LMDZ GCM forced by SST anomalies
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2xCO2 MIROChi 2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 IPSL4xCO2 IPSLpresent−day
ITC
Z l
atit
ude
(°N
)
shift to North annual, zonal mean
shiftto
Southwarmer North
Sensitivity tests
Eemien IPS THC+
MH IPSLEemien IPSL
LGM IPSL THCoffLGM IPSLLGM climapClimates:
less condensationmore detrainment
SST gradient (K)(30N−10N − 30S−10S)
cooler Northwarmer South
SST gradient (K)(30N−10N − 30S−10S)
ITC
Z l
atit
ude
(°N
)
less diffusioncontrole
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2-1.5-1-0.500.511.5
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2
◮ precipitation response depends strongly on the physics
3/10
1) Past/future precipitation changes
◮ 11 climates using LMDZ GCM forced by SST anomalies
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2xCO2 MIROChi 2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 IPSL4xCO2 IPSLpresent−day
ITC
Z l
atit
ude
(°N
)
shift to North annual, zonal mean
shiftto
Southwarmer North
Sensitivity tests
Eemien IPS THC+
MH IPSLEemien IPSL
LGM IPSL THCoffLGM IPSLLGM climapClimates:
less condensationmore detrainment
SST gradient (K)(30N−10N − 30S−10S)
cooler Northwarmer South
SST gradient (K)(30N−10N − 30S−10S)
ITC
Z l
atit
ude
(°N
)
less diffusioncontrole
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2-1.5-1-0.500.511.5
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2
◮ precipitation response depends strongly on the physics◮ work in progress: regional scale over land? 3/10
2) What controls δ18O in the tropics?
◮ the amount effect: precipր=⇒ δ ց (Dansgaard 1964)◮ obs+modelling (Risi et al 2008 JGR,GRL, 2010 JGRb,QJRMS)
4/10
2) What controls δ18O in the tropics?
◮ the amount effect: precipր=⇒ δ ց (Dansgaard 1964)◮ obs+modelling (Risi et al 2008 JGR,GRL, 2010 JGRb,QJRMS)
Rayleigh distillation
In mid/high latitudes:
4/10
2) What controls δ18O in the tropics?
◮ the amount effect: precipր=⇒ δ ց (Dansgaard 1964)◮ obs+modelling (Risi et al 2008 JGR,GRL, 2010 JGRb,QJRMS)
In the tropics:
clear−skysubsidence
convective system
Rayleigh distillation
In mid/high latitudes:
4/10
2) What controls δ18O in the tropics?
◮ the amount effect: precipր=⇒ δ ց (Dansgaard 1964)◮ obs+modelling (Risi et al 2008 JGR,GRL, 2010 JGRb,QJRMS)
In the tropics:
clear−skysubsidence
convective system
Rayleigh distillation
In mid/high latitudes:
unsaturated downdraftsrain evaporation
4/10
2) What controls δ18O in the tropics?
◮ the amount effect: precipր=⇒ δ ց (Dansgaard 1964)◮ obs+modelling (Risi et al 2008 JGR,GRL, 2010 JGRb,QJRMS)
In the tropics:
clear−skysubsidence
convective system
Rayleigh distillation
In mid/high latitudes:
unsaturated downdraftsrain evaporation
◮ Paleo time scales: precip or temperature (Thompson et al 2000)?
=⇒analysis with LMDZ-iso (Risi et al 2010 JGRa) 4/10
Simulated paleo δ18O: example in Asia
−18
−21
−15
−12
−9
12N
6N
18N
24N
30N
36N
70E 80E 90E 120E110E100E−9
−7
−6−5−4
−3−2
−101
3
LMDZ simulations
data(Thompson et al 1997)
δ18O
(h)Guliya i e ore
( 250x350km)LGM-present, standard simulation∆δ18O (h)
Guliya Hulu avePuxianDundepresent Mid Holo ene LGMAge (ka before 1950)
5/10
Simulated paleo δ18O: example in Asia
70E 80E 90E 120E110E100E
12N
6N
18N
24N
30N
36N
−18
−21
−15
−12
−9
12N
6N
18N
24N
30N
36N
70E 80E 90E 120E110E100E−9
−7
−6−5−4
−3−2
−101
3
LMDZ simulations
data(Thompson et al 1997)
δ18O
(h)Guliya i e ore
( 250x350km)LGM-present, standard simulation LGM-present, zoomed simulation(down to 50km)∆δ18O (h)
Guliya Hulu avePuxianDundepresent Mid Holo ene LGMAge (ka before 1950)
◮ high resolution -> regional circulation changes5/10
Simulated paleo δ18O: South America
−9 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 3
40S
30S
20S
10S
Eq
10N
40W60W80W
LGM−present, standard(250 x 350km)
Sajama
Illimani
Huascaran
Botuvera cave
Rio Grande cave
UyuniSantana cave
◮ LGM depletion=long standing problem in GCMs
6/10
Simulated paleo δ18O: South America
−9 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 3
40S
30S
20S
10S
Eq
10N
40W60W80W 40W60W80W40S
30S
20S
10S
Eq
10N
LGM−present, zoomedLGM−present, standard(250 x 350km) (down to 50km)
Sajama
Illimani
Huascaran
Botuvera cave
Rio Grande cave
UyuniSantana cave
◮ LGM depletion=long standing problem in GCMs◮ resolution is only part of the problem
6/10
δ18O controls in LMDZ: Asia
15N6N33N24N
50E 60E 70E 80E 90E 100E0.90.70.50.3-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.94xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 MIROChipresent-dayClimates: LGM limapLGM IPSLLGM IPSL THCo�MH IPSLEemien IPSLEemien IPS THC+
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-7-6-5-4-3-2-1012
regional ∆P (mm/d)∆δ18O
p
(h)Guliya i e ore
Correlation δ18Op - P
7/10
δ18O controls in LMDZ: Asia
15N6N33N24N
50E 60E 70E 80E 90E 100E0.90.70.50.3-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.94xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 MIROChipresent-dayClimates: LGM limapLGM IPSLLGM IPSL THCo�MH IPSLEemien IPSLEemien IPS THC+
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-7-6-5-4-3-2-1012
regional ∆P (mm/d)∆δ18O
p
(h)Guliya i e ore
Correlation δ18Op - P
◮ δ18O =good proxy for past regional precipitation changes7/10
δ18O controls in LMDZ: South America
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
−0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.90.70.50.3-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.94xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 MIROChipresent-dayClimates: LGM limapLGM IPSLLGM IPSL THCo�MH IPSLEemien IPSLEemien IPS THC+
70W 50W 30W90W30S20S10SEq10N
Illimani i e ore regional ∆P (mm/d)∆δ18O
p
(h)Correlation δ18Op - P
8/10
δ18O controls in LMDZ: South America
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
−0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.90.70.50.3-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.94xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 IPSL2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 MIROChipresent-dayClimates: LGM limapLGM IPSLLGM IPSL THCo�MH IPSLEemien IPSLEemien IPS THC+
70W 50W 30W90W30S20S10SEq10N
Illimani i e ore regional ∆P (mm/d)∆δ18O
p
(h)Correlation δ18Op - P
◮ δ18O =good proxy for past regional precipitation changes8/10
Is P-δ18O sensitive to model physics?
−7.5
−7
−6.5
−6
−5.5
−5
−4.5
−4
−3.5
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
2xCO2 MIROChi 2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 IPSL4xCO2 IPSLpresent−day
Eemien IPS THC+
MH IPSLEemien IPSL
LGM IPSL THCoffLGM IPSLLGM climapClimates:
Regional pre ipitation (mm/d)
δ18O
(h)Illimani
9/10
Is P-δ18O sensitive to model physics?
−7.5
−7
−6.5
−6
−5.5
−5
−4.5
−4
−3.5
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
2xCO2 MIROChi 2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 IPSL4xCO2 IPSLpresent−day
Eemien IPS THC+
MH IPSLEemien IPSL
LGM IPSL THCoffLGM IPSLLGM climapClimates: Sensitivity tests
less condensationmore detrainmentless diffusivecontrol
Regional pre ipitation (mm/d)
δ18O
(h)Illimani
9/10
Is P-δ18O sensitive to model physics?
−7.5
−7
−6.5
−6
−5.5
−5
−4.5
−4
−3.5
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31−7.5
−7
−6.5
−6
−5.5
−5
−4.5
−4
−3.5
2xCO2 MIROChi 2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 IPSL4xCO2 IPSLpresent−day
Sensitivity tests
less condensationmore detrainmentless diffusivecontrol
Eemien IPS THC+
MH IPSLEemien IPSL
LGM IPSL THCoffLGM IPSLLGM climapClimates:
tropi al mean SST (◦C)δ18O
(h)
Regional pre ipitation (mm/d)
δ18O
(h)Illimani
◮ depending on the physics, δ18O controlled by upstream precipor by average temperature
9/10
Is P-δ18O sensitive to model physics?
−7.5
−7
−6.5
−6
−5.5
−5
−4.5
−4
−3.5
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31−7.5
−7
−6.5
−6
−5.5
−5
−4.5
−4
−3.5
2xCO2 MIROChi 2xCO2 ECHAM2xCO2 IPSL4xCO2 IPSLpresent−day
Sensitivity tests
less condensationmore detrainmentless diffusivecontrol
Eemien IPS THC+
MH IPSLEemien IPSL
LGM IPSL THCoffLGM IPSLLGM climapClimates:
tropi al mean SST (◦C)δ18O
(h)
Regional pre ipitation (mm/d)
δ18O
(h)Illimani
◮ depending on the physics, δ18O controlled by upstream precipor by average temperature
◮ not obvious which one is most realistic 9/10
Conclusion and perspectives
SST changes
precipitation changes
past
precipitation changesfuture
physical
processes
isotopicchanges
10/10
Conclusion and perspectives
SST changes
precipitation changes
past
physical
processes
precipitation changesfuture
physical
processes
isotopicchanges
10/10
Conclusion and perspectives
SST changes
precipitation changes
past
physical
processes
precipitation changesfuture
physical
processes
isotopicchanges
◮ To go further:
◮ better understand physical processes
10/10
Conclusion and perspectives
SST changes
precipitation changes
past
physical
processes
precipitation changesfuture
physical
processes
isotopicchanges
◮ To go further:
◮ better understand physical processes◮ CMIP5: link between physical processes at present, past
changes and future projections (but isotopes missing)
10/10
Conclusion and perspectives
SST changes
precipitation changes
past
physical
processes
precipitation changesfuture
physical
processes
isotopicchanges
◮ To go further:
◮ better understand physical processes◮ CMIP5: link between physical processes at present, past
changes and future projections (but isotopes missing)◮ any paleo-data synthesis effort planned for δ18O?
10/10