Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

download Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

of 8

Transcript of Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    1/8

    Urbanization bubble: Four quadrants measurement model

    Jingyang Zhou a,b, Xiaoling Zhang c, Liyin Shen b,d,

    a School of Management and Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, PR Chinab School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, PR Chinac Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Chinad International Research Center for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing, PR China

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 23 January 2015

    Received in revised form 15 April 2015

    Accepted 24 April 2015

    Available online 29 April 2015

    Keywords:

    Sustainable urbanization

    Urbanization bubble

    Urbanization rate

    Urbanization bubble velocity

    Coordinate method

    a b s t r a c t

    The proper understanding of the urbanization bubble is very important to assist local governments in

    adopting strategies to mitigate the effects of the bubble and guide urbanization toward sustainable devel-

    opment. This paper presents a method of measuring the urbanization bubble with particular reference to

    China. In referring to thedefinition of an economic bubble, this study defines the urbanization bubble as a

    dynamic process in which urbanization rate (UR) deviates from four urbanization performance variables

    comprising the proportion of urban population with registration (TRP), urban construction land area (TBA),

    level of industrial development (LID) and level of public facilities (LPF). Four coordinates are formed

    between the rate of urbanization and the four performance variables to examine the practice of urban-

    ization in terms of four quadrants. The ratios between changes in urbanization rate and the changes of

    the four urbanization performance variables are introduced to measure the urbanization bubble. The

    method is tested through a case study to show that the coordinate method has the potential to help pol-

    icy makers detect any bubble in the process of urbanization.

    2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    Urbanization, commonly defined as the migration of people

    from rural to urban areas, has been a major trend of the 20th

    and 21st centuries (United Nations, 2012). China is urbanizing at

    an unprecedented speed (Hogan, Bunnell, Pow, Permanasari, &

    Morshidi, 2012), and two in every three persons in China will live

    in urban areas by 2025 (DESA-UN, 2011). Urbanization plays a sig-

    nificant role in enhancing the value of societys total output and

    increasing economic growth (Brown & Neuberger, 1977). These

    benefits have motivated the Chinese government to implement

    various schemes to improve sustainable urban development

    (Shen & Zhou, 2014).

    However, the dramatically increasing levels of urbanization

    worldwide has created concerns for the sustainability of cities

    (Isendahl & Smith, 2013). This is especially the case in China, where

    many local governments increasingly place more emphasis on

    speed than quality when implementing urbanization strategies.

    Urbanization in China is of a typical government-lead style instead

    of one that is market-oriented (Xu, 2004). Previous studies suggest

    that ignoring the inherent law of urbanization will result in a mis-

    match between urbanization and industrialization, urban popula-

    tion growth and urban infrastructure development and cause a

    conflict of interests between rural migrant workers and urban res-

    idents (Fu, Liu, & Zhao, 2012; Zhang, 2006). In particular, these

    problems lead to a discrepancy between land use and economic

    growth. For example, from 1981 to 2011, urban construction land

    in China increased from 7415 km2 to 41,861 km2, with a 15% aver-

    age annual growth rate. However, the annual economic growth

    rate was far below 15% over the same period (China Statistical

    Yearbook, 2012). Some scholars (e.g.Wang, 2011; Xu, 2004) refer

    to this phenomenon caused by government-lead urbanization as

    the urbanization bubble, which results in social problems such as

    environmental pollution, population explosion, and steep increase

    in consumables prices hindering sustainable urbanization.

    There have been various attempts to address these problems.

    For example, research on the impact of urbanization on social

    and eco-environmental systems has been conducted to provide a

    reference for implementing sustainable urbanization strategies

    (Lehmann, 2012; Madlener & Sunak, 2011; Morinire, 2012).

    Assessment models have been established to understand concerns

    regarding sustainable urbanization and assess the quality of urban-

    ization from the perspectives of economic, social and environmen-

    tal performance (Bossel, 1999; Hemphill, Berry, & McGreal, 2004;

    Steurer & Hametner, 2011; Vera & Langlois, 2007). Various

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.007

    0264-2751/2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Corresponding author at: School of Construction Management and Real Estate,

    Chongqing University, Chongqing, PR China.

    E-mail addresses: [email protected](J. Zhou), xiaoling.zhang@cityu.

    edu.hk (X. Zhang),[email protected](L. Shen).

    Cities 46 (2015) 815

    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

    Cities

    j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / c i t i e s

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.007mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.007http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02642751http://www.elsevier.com/locate/citieshttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/citieshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02642751http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.007mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.007http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.007&domain=pdf
  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    2/8

    technological methods such as low carbon emission, air and noise

    pollution control and waste management have been developed to

    promote urban environment protection and sustainable urbaniza-

    tion (Haase, Haase, Kabisch, & Bischoff, 2008; Jantz, Goetz, &

    Shelley, 2004; Ward, Phinn, & Murray, 2000). In a recent study,

    Shen, Ochoa, Zhang, and Peng (2013)create an experience mining

    framework to assist city managers in implementing sustainable

    urbanization strategies so as to prevent the formation of the urban-

    ization bubble.

    The only extant research on the urbanization bubble as such is

    Wangs (2011) study of 35 Chinese cities from 1999 to 2008, which

    highlighted the general influence of provincial population, econ-

    omy and space. However, no other studies have developed more

    specific ways of measuring the urbanization bubble or understand-

    ing when a process of urbanization is turning into a bubble situa-

    tion. In particular, there is a lack of quantitative methods available,

    which is hindering urban managers and planners in selecting

    appropriate urbanization strategies. This paper aims to fill this

    research gap by developing a tool for measuring the urbanization

    bubble.

    2. Sustainable urbanization and the urbanization bubble

    2.1. Sustainable urbanization

    Urbanization is intimately related to economic development,

    human livelihood, and profound changes in patterns of human

    behavior (Bettencourt, Lobo, Helbing, Khnert, & West, 2007).

    It is a process in which industrial structure, peoples living envi-

    ronment, land and geographical space gradually transform to

    modern urban society (Ejaro & Abubakar, 2013). Sustainable

    urbanization aims to achieve an equilibrium between humans

    and the natural resources (Rasoolimanesh, Badarulzaman, &

    Jaafar, 2012). This is echoed in many other studies, arguing that

    sustainable urbanization involves the harmony and balance

    between economic, environmental and social necessities(Alberti & Marzluff, 2004; Hezri & Hasan, 2004; Shen, Peng,

    Zhang, & Wu, 2012; Yigitcanlar, 2009). Sustainable urbanization,

    as the embodiment of sustainable development, occurs only

    when the urbanization process harmonizes with the principles

    of sustainable development (Pivo, 1996). It focuses on keeping

    balance between economic benefit and the environment, ecology

    and society in order to realize the coordinated development

    between different regions and sectors. Therefore, cities or towns

    should develop their social and economic structure in such a

    way that resources of all kinds can be utilized as efficiently as

    possible without damaging their natural environment

    (Rasoolimanesh et al., 2012).

    In the case of China, sustainable urbanization not only involves

    an increase in the city and urban population, but must also bring

    about improvement of the level of infrastructure, efficiency of land

    use, level of industrialization, level of agricultural modernization

    and the quality of peoples lives (Wu, 2011; Wu & Sun, 2010).

    The ultimate goal of urbanization is to improve peoples welfare

    and quality of life through coordinated development between

    social, economic and environmental dimensions in order to satisfy

    the needs of both the current and future generations (Van den

    Berg, Hartig, & Staats, 2007).

    2.2. Urbanization bubble

    The term bubble is a focus of research for economists and

    financial market participants (Hommes, Sonnemans, Tuinstra, &

    van de Velden, 2008; Matsuoka & Shibata, 2012; Nneji, Brooks, &Ward, 2013; Painter & Yu, 2013; Stckl, Huber, & Kirchler, 2010).

    Aneconomic bubble, derived from Kindleberge in 1987, is defined

    as a process in which a continuously rising asset price suddenly

    collapses (Palgrave, 1987). Although there is disagreement and

    controversy over the definition of the bubble, most economists

    and financial market participants consider it to be the rational

    deviation of the price from an intrinsic value (Blanchard &

    Watson, 1983; Smith, King, Williams, & Boening, 1993).

    Furthermore, Noussair, Robin, and Ruffieux (2001) provide two

    conditions to determine whether there is a bubble in an asset mar-

    ket: (a) the median transaction price in five consecutive periods is

    at least 50 units of experimental currency (about 13.9%) greater

    than the fundamental value; and (b) the average price is at least

    two standard deviations (of transaction prices) greater than the

    fundamental value for five periods.

    The issue of bubble economy in China has also been a major

    research interest. Some economists believe that it is a state of

    economic growth in which there is a very high rate or expan-

    sion rate of scale (Ling, 1998; Xiong, 1998) and of a kind that

    cannot create any actual benefits to peoples living standard,

    income level or industrial structure of the national economy

    (Lu, 1998). As Muellbauer and Murphy (2008) indicate, house

    price bubbling is a systematic deviation of house prices from

    levels that are explained by fundamentals such as household

    income and rent. In reality, a bubble economy usually appears

    as an excessively quick rise of asset prices, such as real estate

    prices, stock prices, securities and other financial assets. For

    example, the house price bubble refers to a situation in which

    the excessive public expectation of future price increases causes

    real estate prices to be temporarily elevated (Case & Shiller,

    2003).

    Theurbanization bubble, sometimes called false urbanization or

    excessive urbanization, has not been clearly defined. The connota-

    tion of urbanization bubble has been explained from different per-

    spectives. From the population perspective, for example, the

    urbanization bubble is referred to as the increase in the proportion

    of urban population to the total population during a given time

    interval (Namboodiri, 1996; Zhao, 2005). In this situation, the life-style and living quality of migrations from rural to urban areas is

    not substantially improved. As far as land use is concerned, the

    urbanization bubble is a phenomena where the expansion speed

    of the urban area exceeds the speed of population urbanization

    (Ren & Li, 2006). This kind of urbanization relies on extensively

    enlarging urban areas to realize the local governments goal of

    becoming an international metropolis. From the economic per-

    spective, the urbanization bubble is primarily driven by demo-

    graphic forces, particularly rural to urban migration, rather than

    by economic and industrial activities (Agbola, 2005; Hartshorn,

    Dent, Heck, & Stutz, 1980). In this case, the speed of urbanization

    is much higher than that of economic industrialization, leading

    to the deviation between the urbanization level and economic

    development level. Others argue that urban infrastructure is akey ingredient in the success of a city in the business world

    (Shome, 2013). The urbanization bubble happens when cities can-

    not provide migrants with affordable and accessible public services

    and supporting facilities, such as regular water and electricity sup-

    plies, housing, health services and public transport (Ejaro &

    Abubakar, 2013).

    This suggests the need an equilibrium relationship between

    population increase, land use, industrial development and the level

    of public services and infrastructure in order to avoid an urbaniza-

    tion bubble. In other words, the process of urbanization needs to be

    harmony with the development of the urban economy and living

    standards. If the equilibrium relationship is disturbed, especially

    when the urbanization rate exceeds the level of other fundamen-

    tals such as public facilities and industrial development, an urban-ization bubble will form.

    J. Zhou et al. / Cities 46 (2015) 815 9

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-
  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    3/8

    3. Variables and measurements of the urbanization bubble

    3.1. Variables for measuring the urbanization bubble

    (1) The basic variables are:

    Population bubble. A population bubble means that the

    process of urbanization depends mostly on the inflow

    of migrant workers from rural areas. With Chinas house-hold registration system, which fails to recognize such

    migrants as urban residents, this means that many

    migrants cannot enjoy the same benefits as the estab-

    lished urban residents a situation in which, if suffi-

    ciently severe, a population bubble will appear.

    Therefore, for a bubble-free urbanization process, the rate

    of registration of migrant families as urban households

    should keep in pace with the development of

    urbanization.

    Land use bubble. A land use bubble reflects the expansion

    of urban construction land area being critically faster

    than that of the urban population. Therefore, an equilib-

    rium between the increase of urban population and

    urban area expansion is needed to avoid the development

    of a land use bubble.

    Industrial development bubble. An industrial develop-

    ment bubble reflects the difference in the level of indus-

    trial development and level of urbanization. An industrial

    development bubble will appear if the balance between

    the speed of industrial development and urbanization

    growth is disturbed.

    Infrastructure development bubble. An infrastructure

    development bubble means that the level of infrastruc-

    ture and facilities cannot meet the demands of the urban-

    ization process. In other words, if the level of urban

    infrastructure and facilities does not catch up with the

    speed of urbanization and expansion of the urban area,

    an infrastructure development bubble will be inevitable.

    (2) Based on the definition of a bubble from these four perspec-tives, therefore, the variables contributing to the urbaniza-

    tion bubble comprise the proportion of urban population

    with registration (TRP), urban construction land area (TBA),

    level of industrial development (LID) and level of urban

    infrastructure and facilities (LPF). To proceed further, it is

    necessary to normalize these variables because they are

    measured on different scales. These are represented asT0RP,

    T0BA, L0

    ID, andL0

    PF respectively.

    (3) The urbanization bubble reflects a change process in which a

    systematic deviation of urbanization rate (UR) from the

    levels explained by TRP, TBA, LID andLPFexists. The velocities

    VUR , VTRP, VTBA , VLID , and VLPF of the urbanization rate (UR)

    and the four variables describe these deviations.

    (4) Using the five velocities enables the derivation of the ratios

    aVUR

    VTRP

    bVUR

    VTBA

    rVUR

    VLID

    qVUR

    VLPF

    to identify the existence of an urbanization bubble.

    3.2. Measuring the variables

    3.2.1. Urbanization rate (UR)

    The urbanization rate (UR) is generally measured by the ratio of

    dwellers in urban areas to the total number of dwellers.1 The value

    ofUR changes with the dynamic migration of people from rural to

    urban areas. Therefore, there is a specific value ofURat a given time

    in the process of urbanization. The magnitude of the change in

    urbanization rate in a period of time from t1 to t2 can be measured

    by urbanization velocity (VUR ) as

    VUR U

    0Rt2

    U0Rt1

    t2 t1

    DU0R

    Dt 1

    where U0

    Rt2 and U0

    Rt1 are the values ofURafter normalization at t1and

    t2 respectively, DU0

    R is the variation of urbanization rate in the spec-

    ified time interval, and Dtis the increment of time interval.

    3.2.2. Proportion of urban population with registration (TRP)

    The proportion of registered urban population is measured by

    the ratio of registered urban residents to the total urban popula-

    tion. The value ofTRPvaries in the process of urbanization as both

    the former and latter vary. Therefore, the velocity of the proportion

    of registered urban population,VTRP, is used to measure the signif-

    icance of change of the ratio fromt1to t2 as

    VTRPT0RPt2

    T0RPt1

    t2 t1

    DT0RP

    Dt 2

    where VTRP is the velocity of the proportion of registered urban pop-

    ulation,T0RPt2 andT0

    RPt1are the value ofTRPafter normalization at t2

    andt1 respectively, DT0

    RPis the variation of proportion of registered

    urban population in the specified time interval, and Dtis the incre-

    ment of time interval.

    3.2.3. Urban construction land area (TBA)

    The urban construction land area (TBA) is the land areafor urban

    construction. The value of TBA varies during urban expansion.

    Therefore, there is a specific value ofTBAat a given time in the pro-

    cess of urbanization. The velocity of urban construction land area

    (VTBA ), which measures the significance of a change in urban con-

    struction land area duringt1 to t2 is

    VTBA T0BAt2

    T0BAt1

    t2 t1

    DT0BA

    Dt 3

    whereVTBA is the velocity of urban construction land area,T0

    BAt2and

    T0BAt1 are the values of TBA after normalization at t2 andt1 respec-

    tively and DT0BA is the variation of urbanization construction land

    area in a specified time interval

    3.2.4. Level of industrial development (LID)

    The variableLIDreflects the status of industrial development by

    a set of indicators in three aspects of industrialization, service

    industry and agricultural modernization as shown in Table 1.

    There is a specific value of the level of industrial development

    (LID) at a given point of time in the process of urbanization. The sig-nificance of a change in the level of industrial development from t1tot2, can be measured by industrial development velocity (VLID ) as

    VLID L0IDt2

    L0IDt1

    t2 t1

    DL0ID

    Dt 4

    where L0IDt2 and L0

    IDt1are the value ofLIDafter normalization att2and

    t1 respectively and DL0

    ID is the variation of the level of industrial

    development in a specified time interval.

    3.2.5. Level of urban infrastructure and facilities (LPF)

    The level of urban infrastructure and facilities (LPF) is measured

    by a set of indicators as shown in Table 2. These indicators are con-

    cerned with the aspects of energy, water resource, transportation,communication and environment.

    1 Although there are different definitions of urban area (Fay & Opal, 2000;Williamson, 1965).

    10 J. Zhou et al./ Cities 46 (2015) 815

  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    4/8

  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    5/8

    VLPF < 0 again indicate a bubble-free urbanization process.

    However,VTRP < 0,VLID < 0,VLPF < 0 mean the practice of urbaniza-

    tion is unsustainable as it occurs when the social and ecological sys-

    tems of a given city are so bad that its carrying capacity has been

    destroyed and the urban people to rural areas. In quadrant (III) in

    Fig. 1(b), the scenario of VUR < 0 and VTBA < 0, refers to a process

    of counter-urbanization and deceleration of urban expansion. This

    is bubble-free urbanization from the perspective of land use and

    the practice of urbanization is a sustainable process providing the

    changes in urbanization rate and changes of land use are consistent.

    0.5

    0

    III

    IVIII

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    -0.1

    -0.2

    -0.3

    -0.4

    -0.5

    0.5

    0

    III

    IVIII

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    -0.1

    -0.2

    -0.3

    -0.4

    -0.5

    (a) (b)

    0.5

    0

    III

    IVIII

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    -0.1

    -0.2

    -0.3

    -0.4

    -0.5

    0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5- 0.5 - 0. 4 - 0.3 - 0. 2 - 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5- 0. 5 - 0. 4 - 0.3 - 0.2 - 0. 1

    0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5- 0. 5 - 0. 4 - 0. 3 - 0. 2 - 0. 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5- 0. 5 - 0.4 - 0.3 - 0.2 - 0.1

    0.5

    0

    III

    IVIII

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    -0.1

    -0.2

    -0.3

    -0.4

    -0.5

    VTRP

    VUR

    VLID

    VLPF

    VTBA

    VUR

    VUR

    VUR

    (c) (d)

    Fig. 1. Coordinates for measuring urbanization bubble.

    Table 3

    The three scenarios in referring to a.

    Scenarios

    a > 1 a = 1 a < 1

    VUR > VTRP VUR = VTRP VUR < VTRPThis is considered a risk

    of population

    urbanization bubble.

    Measures should be

    taken to give more

    interests to the

    migrations from

    rural areas

    This is considered the

    perfect status of

    urbanization process.

    There is no bubble in

    the process of

    urbanization

    This is considered no

    urbanization bubble.

    Measures should be

    taken to improve

    urbanization process

    Table 4

    The three scenarios in referring to b.

    Scenarios

    b > 1 b= 1 b< 1

    VUR > VTBA VUR = VTBA VUR < VTBAThis is considered no

    bubble in industrial

    development.

    Measures should be

    taken to balance the

    relationship between

    urban expansion and

    population increase

    This is considered the

    perfect status of

    urbanization process.

    There is no bubble in

    the process of

    urbanization

    This is considered a risk

    of urbanization bubble

    in land use. Measures

    should be taken to

    expropriate urban

    construction land

    rationally

    12 J. Zhou et al./ Cities 46 (2015) 815

  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    6/8

    (4) Quadrant (IV)

    Quadrant (IV) in all the four coordinates inFig. 1represents the

    relationships:

    VUR > 0 and VTRP < 0 and VTBA < 0 and VLID < 0 and VLPF < 0

    where VUR

    > 0 indicates a growth of urbanization, VTRP

    < 0, VTBA

    < 0,

    VLID < 0, VLPF < 0 a deterioration of urbanization quality and

    decrease of urban expansion.

    In referring to the quadrant (IV) in Fig. 1(a), (c), (d), the threesce-

    narios: (a) VUR > 0 and VTRP < 0, (b) VUR > 0 and VLID < 0, and (c)

    VUR > 0 and VLPF < 0 indicate that there is a serious urbanization

    bubble and measures are needed to improve the quality of urban-

    ization. In quadrant (IV) in Fig. 1(b), VUR > 0 andVTBA < 0 indicate

    that urbanization managers are placing more emphasis on increas-

    ing urban population rather than the blind expansion of the urban

    area. Therefore, there is no land use bubble in the process of urban-

    ization. Another reason for this situation is that there is a serious

    lack of space for construction land usedue to a previouslyexcessive

    expansion of urban space in the urbanization process. There is

    therefore a risk of a shortage of urban land resources in the future.

    5. Application of the coordinate-based discrimination method

    to measuring the urbanization bubble

    This section presents a demonstration and test of the use of the

    coordinate-based discrimination method for measuring the urban-

    ization bubble of Qingdao, a coastal city of the Shandong province

    of China. Qingdao is atypical rapidly developing urbanized coastal

    open city. A research link with the Central Government of Qingdao

    ensures the quality of data available for analysis.

    5.1. Data collection

    The data for the urbanization rate and the four other variableswere collected for the period of 20052012 from the Statistical

    Yearbook of Qingdao, Statistical Yearbook of Shandong Province,

    China City Statistical Yearbook, the official website of the

    Qingdao government and other relevant published literature. The

    detailed data are listed inTable 7.

    5.2. Data analysis

    By applying the data in Table 7 to Eqs. (1)(5), the values ofVUR ,

    VTRP,VTBA ,VLID ,VLPF, and the four ratios (a,b,r,q) are obtained. Theresults are summarized inTable 8, showing thatVUR > 0,VTRP > 0,

    VTBA > 0, VLID > 0 and VLPF > 0. Therefore, the urbanization of

    Qingdao city from 2005 to 2012 can be allocated to quadrant (I)

    for all four coordinates. This indicates a growth of urbanization,

    and an improvement of urbanization quality and expansion of

    the urban area. The values of the ratios a, b, r, q are illustratedin Fig. 2, showing their considerable variation over the period.

    The urbanization in this period can also be analyzed in three con-

    tiguous epochs: (a) 20052009; (b) 20092010; and (c) 2011

    2012. This can be conducted by referring to the discrimination cri-

    teria inTables 36.

    The results in Fig. 2 represent the relationshipsa < 1, b< 1, r < 1andq < 1 in the 20052009 epoch. The discriminations a < 1,r < 1andq < 1 indicate a bubble-free urbanization process from the per-spectives of population, industrial development and infrastructure

    development. However, the relationb < 1 suggests there are risks

    of an urban land use bubble due to the speed of urban space expan-

    sion exceeding the speed of population urbanization. This is

    because the Qingdao government at that time was pushing to

    speed up urbanization by expansion of urban space.

    The relationships:a > 1,b > 1,r > 1 and q > 1 in the 20092010epoch. The discriminations a > 1, r > 1, and q > 1 indicate thatthere exists a serious urbanization bubble from the perspectives

    of population, industrial development and infrastructure develop-

    ment. Furthermore, the dramatic increase in the values ofa, r, andq indicate that the risks of a bubble in population, industrial devel-

    opment and infrastructure development were intensifying duringthe period. This is due to the Qingdao government vigorously pro-

    moting the urbanization process at the time. However, the urban-

    ization practice in Qingdao showed a typical authoritarian style, in

    which the local government accelerated the urbanization rate lar-

    gely by expansion of population, while neglecting the improve-

    ment of urbanization quality. Nevertheless, the relationship b > 1

    indicates that there was no bubble from the perspective of land

    use in this period.

    The relationshipsa > 1,b > 1,r > 1 andq > 1 in the 20112012epoch suggests that there is an urbanization bubble from the per-

    spectives of population, industrial development and infrastructure

    development. However, the bubble gradually diminishes, as indi-

    cated by the decrease of the values ofa, r andq in this period.

    This is because the Qingdao government realized the seriousurbanization bubble problems that were occurring at that time

    Table 5

    The three scenarios in referring to r.

    Scenarios

    r > 1 r = 1 r < 1

    VUR > VLID VUR = VLID VUR < VLIDThis is considered a

    risk of urbanization

    bubble in

    industrial

    development.

    Measures should

    be taken to

    improve industrial

    development

    This is considered the

    perfect status of

    urbanization process.

    There is no bubble in the

    process of urbanization

    This is considered no

    bubble in industrial

    development. Measures

    should be taken to

    improve urbanization

    process

    Table 6

    The three scenarios in referring to q.

    Scenarios

    q > 1 q = 1 q < 1

    VUR > VLPF VUR = VLPF VUR < VLPFThis is considered a

    risk of urbanization

    bubble ininfrastructure

    development.

    Measures should be

    taken to improve

    urban infrastructure

    and facilities

    development

    This is considered the

    perfect status of

    urbanization process.Thereis no bubble in the

    process of urbanization

    This is considered no

    bubble in infrastructure

    development. Measuresshould be taken to

    improve urbanization

    process

    Table 7

    Detailed data of urbanization rate and other four variables.

    Years UR (%) TRP(%) TBA (km2) LID LPF

    2005 63.20 60.32 178.8 0.087 0.046

    2006 63.59 61.14 227.5 0.194 0.269

    2007 63.90 61.45 250.7 0.320 0.371

    2008 64.31 61.77 267.1 0.457 0.421

    2009 64.68 62.71 272.9 0.557 0.514

    2010 65.81 62.84 282.3 0.704 0.588

    2011 66.52 62.98 291.5 0.772 0.707

    2012 67.14 63.15 374.6 0.831 1.000

    Note: the values of LID andL PFare the results after assessment by indicators inTables 1and2.

    J. Zhou et al. / Cities 46 (2015) 815 13

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-
  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    7/8

    and made the interventions necessary. For example, the 12th Five

    Year Plan of urbanization in this city was formulated by the end of

    2010, which addressed the problem of the urbanization bubble.

    Other policy measures have also been introduced subsequently

    that have provided effective guidance for sustainable urbanization

    practice. All in all, therefore, the process of urbanizationin Qingdao

    after 2010 appears to be moving toward healthy sustainable

    development.

    6. Conclusions

    Adequate evaluation of the urbanization bubble is very impor-

    tant to assist the state in adopting strategies to anticipate and mit-

    igate its effects and guide sustainable development. The findings of

    this study indicate that the urbanization bubble can be assessed by

    the urbanization rate (UR) and the four proportional dynamic

    urbanization performance variables of urban population with reg-

    istration (TRP), urban construction land area (TBA), level of industrial

    development (LID) and level of urban infrastructure and facilities(LPF). A coordinate-based discrimination method is developed for

    this purpose and demonstrated and tested in a case study of

    Qingdao to establish its effectiveness.

    The method introduced in this study is the first to detect the

    presence of the urbanization bubble and therefore contributes sig-

    nificantly to the development of research in this field. It enables

    the understanding of potential urbanization bubbles, from which

    precautionary measures and strategies can be developed in the

    earlier stages to mitigate bubble effects and ensure the process

    of urbanization leads to better sustainability. Nevertheless, it is

    appreciated that the proposed method is tested only in one case

    within the Chinese context. Further research is needed to investi-

    gate the effectiveness of the methodology by examining more

    cases to compare different urbanization practices and share goodexperiences in improving sustainable urbanization.

    References

    Agbola, T. (2005). Urbanization, physical planning and urban development in West

    Africa. In Paper presented at the NITP (2005) proceedings of CAP West Africa regionworld planners congress agenda setting workshop, Abuja.

    Alberti, M., & Marzluff, J. M. (2004). Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems:

    Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems,7(3), 241265.

    Bettencourt, L. M., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Khnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth,

    innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences, 104(17), 73017306.

    Blanchard, O. J., & Watson, M. W. (1983). Bubbles, rational expectations and financialmarkets. Mass., USA: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge .

    Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications.Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development Winnipeg.

    Brown, A. A., & Neuberger, E. (1977). Internal migration: A comparative perspective.Academic Press.

    Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (2003). Is there a bubble in the housing market? BrookingsPapers on Economic Activity, 2003(2), 299362.

    China Statistical Yearbook (2012). National Bureau of Statistics of China. Beijing.

    DESA-UN (2011). World urbanization prospects: The 2011 revision populationdatabase. Retrieved 17.04.13.

    Ejaro, S. P., & Abubakar, A. (2013). The challenges of rapid urbanization on

    sustainable development of Nyanya, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.

    Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 17(2), 299313.Fay, M., & Opal, C. (2000). Urbanization without growth: A not so uncommon

    phenomenon(Vol. 2412). World Bank-free PDF.Fu, Z. H., Liu, B. J., & Zhao, D. Q. (2012). Two major problems of urbanization in

    China: Peri-urbanization population and land use. Sub National Fiscal Research(4), 1821 (in Chinese).

    Guo, Q., & Li, R. X. (2003). An evaluation systemof development level of agricultural

    modernization. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 38(1), 97101 (inChinese).

    Haase, D., Haase, A., Kabisch, S., & Bischoff, P. (2008). Guidelines for the Perfect

    Inner City. Discussing the appropriateness of monitoring approaches for

    reurbanization.European Planning Studies, 16(8), 10751100.Hartshorn, T. A., Dent, B. D., Heck, J. I., & Stutz, F. P. (1980). Interpreting the city: An

    urban geography. New York: Wiley.Hemphill, L., Berry, J., & McGreal, S. (2004). An indicator-based approach to

    measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: Part 1, conceptual

    foundations and methodological framework. Urban Studies, 41(4), 725755.Hezri, A. A., & Hasan, M. N. (2004). Management framework for sustainable

    development indicators in the State of Selangor, Malaysia. Ecological Indicators,4(4), 287304.

    Hogan, T., Bunnell, T., Pow, C.-P., Permanasari, E., & Morshidi, S. (2012). Asian

    urbanisms and the privatization of cities. Cities, 29(1), 5963.Hommes, C., Sonnemans, J., Tuinstra, J., & van de Velden, H. (2008). Expectations

    and bubbles in asset pricing experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior &

    Organization, 67(1), 116133.Isendahl, C., & Smith, M. E. (2013). Sustainable agrarian urbanism: The low-densitycities of the Mayas and Aztecs. Cities, 31, 132143.

    Jantz, C. A., Goetz, S. J., & Shelley, M. K. (2004). Using the SLEUTH urban growth

    model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in

    the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B,31(2), 251272.

    Jiang, H. P., & Huang, D. L. (2006). Econometrics evaluation of China agricultural

    modernization. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 27(2), 8791 (in Chinese).Lehmann, S. (2012). Can rapid urbanisation ever lead to low carbon cities? The case

    of Shanghai in comparison to Potsdamer Platz Berlin. Sustainable Cities andSociety, 3, 112.

    Li, N., & Xia, Y. J. (2006). Comprehensive evaluation and prediction on the

    infrastructure modernization level of Ningbo city. Resources and Environmentin the Yangtze Basin, 15(2), 136141 (in Chinese).

    Ling, J. H. (1998). Deviation between tangible economy and symbolic economy.

    Economic Perspectives(6), 4549 (in Chinese).Lu, J. L. (1998). The theory of bubble economy. Economic News (in Chinese).Ma, Y., & Gong, X. S. (2010). Urbanization, agricultural modernization and the

    adjustment of industrial structure: The calculation and analysis based on VAR.Research and Development(5), 8891 (in Chinese).

    Table 8

    The values of velocities and ratios of all variables for Qingdao city.

    Years VUR VTRP a VTBA b VLID r VLPF q

    2005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

    2006 0.086 0.290 0.298 0.249 0.347 0.107 0.808 0.223 0.387

    2007 0.069 0.110 0.626 0.118 0.579 0.126 0.544 0.102 0.675

    2008 0.082 0.113 0.724 0.084 0.977 0.137 0.599 0.050 1.624

    2009 0.082 0.332 0.246 0.030 2.763 0.100 0.819 0.092 0.888

    2010 0.250 0.046 5.442 0.048 5.207 0.147 1.702 0.074 3.3682011 0.157 0.049 3.175 0.047 3.343 0.069 2.290 0.120 1.312

    2012 0.137 0.060 2.283 0.424 0.323 0.059 2.340 0.293 0.469

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Fig. 2. Distribution ofa, b,r,q from 20052012 for Qingdao city.

    14 J. Zhou et al./ Cities 46 (2015) 815

    http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0035http://esa.un.org/unuphttp://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0125http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0125http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0125http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0130http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0130http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0130http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0135http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0135http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0135http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0135http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0135http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0135http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0135http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0130http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0125http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0125http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0050http://esa.un.org/unuphttp://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0010
  • 7/24/2019 Urbanization Bubble Four Quadrants Measurement Model 2015 Cities

    8/8

    Madlener, R., & Sunak, Y. (2011). Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and

    energydemand: What canwe learn forurbanenergy planningand urbanization

    management? Sustainable Cities and Society, 1(1), 4553.Matsuoka, T., & Shibata, A. (2012). Asset bubbles, credit market imperfections, and

    technology choice.Economics Letters, 116(1), 5255.Morinire, L. (2012). Environmentally influenced urbanisation: Footprints bound

    for town?Urban Studies, 49(2), 435450.Muellbauer, J., & Murphy, A. (2008). Housing markets and the economy: The

    assessment.Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 133.Namboodiri, K. (1996). Population distribution.A Primer of Population Dynamics,

    211226.Nneji, O., Brooks, C., & Ward, C. (2013). Commercial real estate and equity market

    bubbles: Are they contagious to REITs?Urban Studies, 50(12), 24962516.Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2001). Price bubbles in laboratory asset

    markets with constant fundamental values. Experimental Economics, 4(1),87105.

    Painter, G., & Yu, Z. (2013). Caught in the housing bubble: Immigrants housing

    outcomes in traditional gateways and newly emerging destinations. UrbanStudies. 0042098013494425.

    Palgrave, N. (1987). A dictionary of economics. Lange-Lerner Mechanism, 3, 129131.Pan, S. Q., & Ma, C. Q. (2007). Evaluationindicators systemfor thecity infrastructure

    development level. Systems Engineering, 25(7), 8891.Pivo, G. (1996). Toward sustainable urbanization on Mainstreet Cascadia. Cities,

    13(5), 339354.Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Badarulzaman, N., & Jaafar, M. (2012). City development

    strategies (CDS) and sustainable urbanization in developing world.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 623631.

    Ren, T. Z.,& Li,M. (2006). The reasonanalysis of rough road of Chinese urbanization.

    Modern Urban Research (3), 3438 (in Chinese).Shen, L. Y., Ochoa, J. J., Zhang, X. L., & Peng, Y. (2013). Experience mining for decision

    making on implementing sustainable urbanizationAn innovative approach.

    Automation in Construction, 29, 4049.Shen, L. Y., Peng, Y., Zhang, X. L., & Wu, Y. Z. (2012). An alternative model for

    evaluating sustainable urbanization. Cities, 29(1), 3239.Shen, L. Y., & Zhou, J. Y. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of indicators for guiding

    sustainable urbanization in China. Habitat International, 44, 111120.Shi, F., & Liu, H. H. (2009). The evaluation of the comprehensive development level

    of modern service industry in China. Technology and Innovation Management,30(3), 328331 (in Chinese).

    Shome, S. (2013). Indias urbanization and business attractiveness by 2020. Cities,31, 412416.

    Smith, V. L., King, R., Williams, A. W., & Boening, M. V. (1993).The robustness ofbubbles and crashes in experimental stock markets. Oxford: Oxford Press.

    Steurer, R., & Hametner, M. (2011). Objectives and indicators in sustainable

    development strategies: Similarities and variances across Europe. SustainableDevelopment.

    Stckl, T., Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2010). Bubble measures in experimental asset

    markets.Experimental Economics, 13(3), 284298.United Nations (2012). World urbanization prospects: The 2011 revision: United

    Nations.

    Vanden Berg, A. E., Hartig, T.,& Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized

    societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of SocialIssues, 63(1), 7996.

    Vera, I., & Langlois, L. (2007). Energy indicators for sustainable development. Energy,32(6), 875882.

    Wang, J. (2011). Measurement of the urbanization bubble in China: Empirical study

    based on 35 large and middle cities. Urban Studies, 11, 006.Wang, X. Y., & Wu, J. N. (2006). Study on new comprehensive evaluation index

    system of industrialization. The Theory and Practice of Fiance and Economics,27(6), 123124 (in Chinese).

    Ward, D., Phinn, S. R., & Murray, A. T. (2000). Monitoring growth in rapidly

    urbanizing areas using remotely sensed data.The Professional Geographer, 52(3),371386.

    Williamson, J. G. (1965). Antebellum urbanization in the American northeast. TheJournal of Economic History, 25(4), 592608.

    Wu, X. H. (2011). Relationship among urbanization, citizenization and urbanrural

    income inequality: An empirical analysis based on time series data and panel

    data of Shandong province. Scientia Geograph Sinica, 31(1), 6973 (in Chinese).Wu, L. C., & Sun, P. Y. (2010). Chinas infrastructure developments impact on

    Chinas urbanization process. Chinas Population, Resource and Environment,20(8), 121125 (in Chinese).

    Xin, L., & Jing, H. P. (2010). Setting up evaluation index system and calculation

    development level of China agricultural modernization. Research of AgriculturalModernization, 21(6), 646650 (in Chinese).

    Xiong, L. J. (1998). Paraphrase and relative theoretical problems of bubble economy.

    Financial Research(10), 2426 (in Chinese).Xu, Q. (2004). The study on performance and cost of the government leading

    urbanization.Academia Bimestris(3), 8590 (in Chinese).Yang, J., Luo, Z. H., & Zhang, C. Y. (2005). Study on the evaluation system of new-

    pattern industrialization. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 44 (3),124129 (in Chinese).

    Yigitcanlar, T. (2009). Planningfor smart urban ecosystems: Information technology

    applications for capacity building in environmental decision making. Theoreticaland Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 3(12), 521.

    Zhang, W. Y. (2006). Lessons from excessive urbanization in Latin America and

    population control in Beijing. Population Research, 30(4), 8489 (in Chinese).Zhang, Y., Zhao, H. F., & Wang, C. (2008). Evaluation on development level of

    modern service industry of Anhui province based on Principal Component

    Analysis.Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Social Sciences), 22(4), 4852(in Chinese).

    Zhao, G. R. (2005). To prevent urbanization bubble. Zhongzhou construction (4), 41(in Chinese).

    J. Zhou et al. / Cities 46 (2015) 815 15

    http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0145http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0145http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0145http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0145http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0150http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0150http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0150http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0150http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0155http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0155http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0155http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0155http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h9000http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h9000http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h9000http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h9000http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0315http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0315http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0315http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0315http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0315http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0325http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0325http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0325http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0325http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0325http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0325http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0320http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0315http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0315http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0235http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h9000http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h9000http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0225http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0220http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0215http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0210http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0205http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0200http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0195http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0190http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0185http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0180http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0175http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0170http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0165http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0160http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0155http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0155http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0150http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0150http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0145http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0145http://-/?-http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0264-2751(15)00059-1/h0140http://-/?-