United States Department of Agricultural Chemical Usage ... · Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002...

United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture

NationalAgriculturalStatisticsService

Ag Ch 1 (03)

Agricultural Chemical Usage2002 Field Crops Summary

May 2003

Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 1 NASS, USDA

Table of Contents

Page

Narrative Table Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Corn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6

Durum Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 21

Soybeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 31

Other Spring Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 25

Winter Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 52 Pest Management Practices - Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

Corn, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

Durum Wheat, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

Other Spring Wheat, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

Soybeans, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

Winter Wheat, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

Survey, Estimation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

Survey Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

Index of Active Ingredients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

Report Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101


Overview

The agricultural chemical use estimates in this report refer to on-farm use of commercial fertilizers andpesticides on targeted crops for the 2002 crop year. Farm and ranch operators were enumerated late inthe growing season after the farm operator had indicated that planned applications were completed. Thechemical use data were not summarized for geographical areas other than published in this report.

The data were compiled from the Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS) and from theObjective Yield Survey, with the main portion of data collection being conducted during the months ofOctober-December of 2002. Relevant portions of the survey instruments used in data collection areincluded in the back of this publication.

Targeted crops from the 2002 Objective Yield Survey included corn and durum, other spring, and winterwheat. Soybeans was the target crop from the ARMS.

Agricultural Chemical Use Survey Coverage, 2002

Crop

2002

StatesSurveyed

ReportsSummarized

U.S. AcreageIncl.

- Number -- Percent

Corn 7 1,250 65

Soybeans 20 2,526 97

Wheat, Durum 1 75 72

Wheat, OtherSpring

3 353 81

Wheat, Winter(Harvested)

10 1,006 75

This report excludes pesticides used for seed treatments and postharvest applications to the commodity. Spot treatments, which account for a very small percentage of total applications, are also excluded.


Highlights

Corn: Nitrogen was applied to 96 percent of the 2002 corn planted acreage in the Program States:Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Nitrogen applications ranged from94 percent of the acreage treated in Illinois and Iowa to 99 percent in Indiana and Ohio. Corn growersused an average of 1.7 applications per acre while applying 83 pounds of nitrogen per treatment. Thiscomputes to a crop year rate per acre of 137 pounds per acre. In the Program States, 79 percent of thecorn planted acreage received a phosphate application, while potash was applied to 68 percent of theplanted acreage.

Herbicides were applied to 89 percent of the corn planted acreage in 2002. Atrazine continued to be themost widely applied herbicide with 62 percent of the planted acreage being treated. It was applied at arate of 1.04 pounds per acre. Acetochlor, S-Metolachlor, and Nicosulfuron were the next three mostwidely applied herbicides with 25, 15, and 13 percent of the planted corn acreage treated respectively.

In 2002, 24 percent of the corn planted acreage was treated with insecticides. Tefluthrin was the mostwidely applied insecticide, with 6 percent of the planted corn acreage treated in the Program States.

Soybeans: Producers in the Program States (Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky,Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, NorthDakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin) applied nitrogen fertilizer to 20percent of the soybean planted acreage. The percent of acres treated ranged from 2 percent in Louisianato 64 percent in North Dakota. The average number of nitrogen applications per acre was 1.1 with anaverage application rate of 19 pounds per acre. Phosphate was applied on 26 percent of the soybeanplanted acreage in the Program States. Producers in North Dakota applied phosphate to a high of 59percent of the soybean planted acreage, whereas Iowa producers applied phosphate to a low of only 7percent of the planted acreage. Potash was applied to 29 percent of the planted soybean planted acreagein the Program States.

In the Program States, 99 percent of the soybean planted acreage was treated with herbicides. The mostwidely used herbicides were Glyphosate; applied to 78 percent of the soybean acreage, followed byImazethapyr and Pendimethalin; each applied to 9 percent of the acreage, and Trifluralin; applied to 7percent of the planted acreage. Chlorimuron-ethyl and Sulfentrazone were both applied to 6 percent ofthe soybean planted acreage.

Producers in the Program States applied insecticides to 6 percent of the soybean planted acres. Louisiana producers applied insecticides to 72 percent of the planted acreage followed by Virginia at 46percent of the planted acreage. Fungicides were applied to less than 1 percent of the soybean plantedacreage in the Program States.

Durum Wheat: Nitrogen fertilizer was applied to 88 percent of the 2002 North Dakota planted acreage. Fertilizers with phosphate were applied to 58 percent of the planted acreage and 5 percent of the plantedacreage received potash applications. North Dakota producers treated 100 percent of the durum wheatplanted acreage with herbicides; 2,4-D was applied to 55 percent of the planted acreage followed byMCPA, Fenoxaprop, and Dicamba at 36, 22, and 21 percent respectively.


Highlights (continued)

Other Spring Wheat: Nitrogen was applied to 86 percent of the 2002 other spring wheat plantedacreage in the Program States: Minnesota, Montana, and North Dakota. Phosphate was applied to74 percent of the planted acreage while potash was applied to 27 percent of the planted acreage in theProgram States. Spring wheat producers treated 91 percent of the other spring wheat planted acreagewith herbicides; MCPA was applied to 47 percent of the planted acreage followed by 2,4-D at 36percent.

Winter Wheat: Nitrogen was applied to 86 percent of the 2002 winter wheat harvested acreage in theProgram States: Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, andWashington. Winter wheat producers applied 68 pounds of nitrogen per acre for the crop year. In the Program States, 55 percent of the harvested winter wheat acreage received phosphate while potashwas applied to 15 percent of the harvested acreage.

Herbicides were applied to 38 percent of the 2002 winter wheat harvested acreage in the Program States. Metsulfuron-methyl and 2,4-D were both applied to 13 percent of the winter wheat harvested acreagefollowed by Chlorsulfuron at 10 percent.

Producers in the Program States treated 11 percent of the winter wheat harvested acreage withinsecticides. Zeta-cypermethrin was applied to 4 percent of the winter wheat harvested acreage whileChlorpyrifos, and Dimethoate were applied to 3 percent of the harvested acres.


Corn: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied

State PlantedAcreage

Percent of Acres Treated and Total AppliedNitrogen Phosphate Potash

1,000 Acres Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs

IL IN IA MN NE OH WI

Total

11,2005,400

12,3007,2008,4003,2003,650

51,350

94999495979998

96

1,698.3786.7

1,408.0839.9

1,195.5500.1325.0

6,753.5

77927286708587

79

754.1350.4515.8330.1220.3183.2102.2

2,456.1

77846978217888

68

1,028.7567.1607.4344.832.3

283.1202.2

3,065.6


Corn: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002

PrimaryNutrient

PlantedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied

1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs

Illinois Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Indiana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Iowa Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Minnesota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Nebraska Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Ohio Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Wisconsin Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Total Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

11,200

5,400

12,300

7,200

8,400

3,200

3,650

51,350

947777

999284

947269

958678

977021

998578

988788

967968

1.61.01.0

1.81.21.0

1.31.01.0

1.51.11.0

1.81.11.1

2.01.11.1

1.71.01.1

1.71.11.1

9983

115

7855

116

885670

774856

793316

765798

523154

835480

16187

119

14870

125

1225871

1225361

1463718

15867

113

913263

1376085

1,698.3754.1

1,028.7

786.7350.4567.1

1,408.0515.8607.4

839.9330.1344.8

1,195.5220.332.3

500.1183.2283.1

325.0102.2202.2

6,753.52,456.13,065.6


Corn: Active Ingredients and Publication Status

By Program States, 2002

Active IngredientProgram States

ALL IL IN IA MN NE OH WI

Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetic acid Acetochlor Alachlor Atrazine Bentazon Bromoxynil Butoxy. ester 2,4-D Carfentrazone-ethyl Clethodim Clopyralid Colleto. gloeospor. Cyanazine Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Dicamba, Sodium Salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P EPTC Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Foramsulfuron Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Halosulfuron Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Metribuzin Nicosulfuron Paraquat Pendimethalin Primisulfuron Prosulfuron Pyridate Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Trifluralin

PPPPPP *P *P *P *PPPPPPPPPP *PPP *PPPPPPPPPPPP *PPP * * *

P * *P *P

*

*

P

*PPPPPP *

P

* *P

PPPPP

P * *P * *PPP *

*P *P *P * *

* *P

PP *

*P

P

*P

PPP *P *P * *P *

*P * *

PP *P

P *P * *

P *

PPP *PPP *P * *PP

* * *PPP *P

P

PP

*

* * *P *P

P

*

P

PPP *PPP *P

PPP

P * *P

*P

PP *

*

PP

PPP

*

P

P

*PPP

PP

P

* *P * * * *PPP *P

PP *PP

* *

P

*P *P

* *

*

*PP * *PP *

P

P * *

P

P

P * * *

*PP

P

P *P

*

*

P

P *P

* * *

P

* *P * * * *

* *

P

P *

PP

*

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued


Corn: Active Ingredients and Publication Status



ALL IL IN IA MN NE OH WI

Insecticides Bifenthrin Bt (Bacillus thur.) Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorethoxyfos Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Ethoprop Fipronil Fonofos Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Permethrin Phorate Spinosad Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos Zeta-cypermethrin

Fungicides Mancozeb Propiconazole

P * *P *PPP * *P *PPP * *PPPP

* *

*

* *PP

*

*

P * *

PPP *

*

*

*PP

*P

*

*

PP *

P

P *

*

*

*

* *P *

*

*

* *

*

* * *

P *

*

PPP *

P

* *P

PPP *

*

*

* *

*

P *

* * * *

*

P *

* *

* *

* * *

P Usage data are published for this active ingredient.* Usage data are not published for this active ingredient.


Corn: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,

Program States and Total, 2002


Area Receiving and Total AppliedHerbicide Insecticide 1 Fungicide Other

1,000 Acres Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs

ILINIA 2

MNNE 2

OHWI

Total 2

11,2005,400

12,3007,2008,4003,2003,650

51,350

90909196839181

89

25,15711,53522,48510,00212,869

8,4245,304

95,777

3639126

381420

24

1,088729432212986125356

3,931 1 Total Applied excludes Bt’s (Bacillus thuringiensis) and other biologicals. Quantities are not available because

amounts of active ingredient are not comparable between products. 2 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied

Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs

Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetic acid Acetochlor Alachlor Atrazine Bromoxynil Carfentrazone-ethyl Clopyralid Cyanazine Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Dicamba, Sodium Salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P EPTC Flumetsulam Foramsulfuron Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Halosulfuron Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Metribuzin Nicosulfuron Paraquat Pendimethalin Primisulfuron Prosulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine

42

*251

6222

11 *1165

*672

*12 *39

*11988

*13 *152

1115

3

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

0.450.390.391.732.161.040.290.010.100.810.200.110.370.130.051.110.763.590.040.030.310.640.030.0020.0070.070.091.520.100.020.591.200.020.0090.011.331.04

0.450.390.391.742.161.120.290.010.100.810.200.120.370.130.051.110.763.590.040.030.320.710.030.0020.0070.070.091.540.100.020.591.200.020.0090.011.331.04

1,018488152

22,5561,281

35,76227210

577132

1,12934093350

1434,186

6841,299

26813

5333,307

925

331367

6,58939

131136777521062

10,2301,583



Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Insecticides Bifenthrin Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Dimethoate Fipronil Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Permethrin Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos Zeta-cypermethrin

2 *34

*32

*2461

*

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

0.060.930.940.0060.420.110.020.530.100.110.111.080.03

0.060.930.960.0060.420.110.020.530.100.110.111.080.03

59176

1,58111

125157179983

228334812

8* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Planted acres in 2002 for the 7 program states were 51.4 million acres.

States included are IL, IN, IA, MN, NE, OH and WI.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetochlor Atrazine Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Dicamba, Sodium Salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Lambda-cyhalothrin Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos

52372

595927

145422

10111111

48

165

3858

122

1.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.01.01.01.01.01.0

0.531.881.200.100.160.100.430.140.041.090.050.620.0020.0070.080.101.570.020.030.011.421.04

1.430.0060.020.110.111.01

0.531.911.360.100.160.100.430.140.041.090.050.720.0020.0070.080.101.570.020.030.011.421.04

1.430.0060.020.110.111.01

2894,890

11,00254

15160

4292633

1,65129

364( 2 )

186

1211,848

271010

2,488601

4445

1396

149208

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Illinois were 11.2 million acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Indiana, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Acetamide Acetochlor Atrazine Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron S-Metolachlor

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Fipronil Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin

52378

7644

10655

13684

22

6878

10

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.01.01.01.01.0

0.451.901.260.100.120.101.220.090.630.0020.0070.061.610.020.031.23

0.870.0060.130.110.13

0.451.901.320.100.120.101.220.090.630.0020.0070.061.610.020.031.23

0.870.0060.130.110.13

1202,3245,547

374021

25452

21912

42538

85

1,467

2912

484766

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Indiana were 5.40 million acres.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Iowa, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetochlor Atrazine Bromoxynil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P Flumetsulam Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor

Insecticides Bifenthrin Chlorpyrifos Tefluthrin

43

2960

31411

84882

1458

15121114

51212

222

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

0.440.431.740.940.250.100.170.120.310.051.160.790.040.320.600.080.081.830.020.020.011.64

0.071.000.10

0.440.431.740.990.250.110.170.130.310.051.160.790.040.320.690.080.081.830.020.020.011.64

0.071.000.10

244160

6,1287,287

8018422513316853

1,08821670

211715147119

2,519311117

2,415

2128628

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Iowa were 12.3 million acres.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Acetochlor Atrazine Bromoxynil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P Flumetsulam Foramsulfuron Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Mesotrione Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor

29374

1723

86744

1839

111127

722

6

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.0

1.580.580.320.100.250.120.300.051.590.920.040.030.310.660.080.020.020.011.78

1.580.590.320.100.250.120.300.051.590.920.040.030.310.730.080.020.020.011.78

3,2851,590

10112140563

12324

502292478

19657764359

18809

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Minnesota were 7.20 million acres.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetochlor Alachlor Atrazine Carfentrazone-ethyl Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Prosulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor

Insecticides Bifenthrin Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Dimethoate Fipronil Permethrin Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos

44

232

64495323698

11798778

20

346473693

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.01.11.01.01.01.11.01.01.0

0.510.311.541.950.910.010.090.320.110.390.050.760.030.670.050.081.160.020.020.010.010.88

0.050.740.0050.420.090.100.110.101.01

0.510.311.571.950.990.010.090.320.110.390.050.760.030.730.050.081.220.020.020.010.010.88

0.050.820.0050.420.090.110.110.101.01

150102

2,985408

5,3565

63129297112

36223

5034649

935141368

1,466

14307

312553255276

223 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Nebraska were 8.40 million acres.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetochlor Atrazine Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Isoxaflutole Metolachlor Nicosulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine

Insecticides Permethrin

11297986664

20595

2418

6

1.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.0

1.0

0.421.971.340.180.120.051.240.050.650.071.110.021.290.99

0.10

0.421.971.360.200.120.051.240.050.650.071.110.031.290.99

0.10

1401,8143,444

492110

2366

42211

3104

997555

19 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Ohio were 3.20 million acres.


Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetochlor Atrazine Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Pot. salt Flumetsulam Glyphosate Nicosulfuron Pendimethalin Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos

621472519

7271817

71410

5

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.0

0.391.500.900.120.180.420.040.740.021.270.011.60

0.48

0.391.500.900.120.190.420.040.780.021.270.011.60

0.48

861,1301,537

10512910340

50712

3135

588

82 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Wisconsin were 3.65 million acres.


Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied




ND 2,100 88 116.1 58 31.6 5 1.2

Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002

PrimaryNutrient

PlantedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


North Dakota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

2,10088585

1.61.01.0

402612

622612

116.131.61.2


Durum Wheat: Active IngredientsPublication Status

Active Ingredient ND

Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt Acetic acid Bromoxynil Bromoxynil octanoate Clodinafop-propargil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Prosulfuron Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin

Fungicides Propiconazole Trifloxystrobin

P * *P *P *P *P * *PPP * *P * *PP

* *



Durum Wheat: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,

North Dakota, 2002


Area Receiving and Total AppliedHerbicide Insecticide Fungicide Other


ND 1 2,100 100 1,238 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.

Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Clodinafop-propargil Dicamba Fenoxaprop Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin

55101221226

1436

71814

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

0.330.210.050.050.050.140.450.350.0080.0060.36

0.330.210.050.050.050.140.450.360.0080.0060.36

3824412222418

128273

12

103 1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Dakota were 2.10 million acres.


Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied




MN MT ND

Total

2,0003,7506,900

12,650

896697

86

129.097.8

499.8

726.6

835483

74

60.847.0

197.7

305.5

682119

27

44.714.930.6

90.2


Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002

PrimaryNutrient

PlantedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied



Montana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash



2,000

3,750

6,900

12,650

898368

665421

978319

867427

1.11.01.0

1.21.01.0

1.61.01.0

1.41.01.0

623632

332319

463424

463127

733733

402319

753524

633227

129.060.844.7

97.847.014.9

499.8197.730.6

726.6305.590.2


Other Spring Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status



ALL MN MT ND

Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Bromoxynil Bromoxynil octanoate Chlorsulfuron Clodinafop-propargil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Difenzoquat Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate

Fungicides Propiconazole Tebuconazole

PPPPPPPP * *P *PPPPPP * * *P *PP *

* *

PP

P *P *

P * *

P * * *PP

P

P

P *

P *P

PP

P

P

* *PPP * * * *P *PP *

P *P *

P * * * *P *PPPP

*

P *

P *

* *

* *



Other Spring Wheat: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,





MNMTND 1

Total 1

2,0003,7506,900

12,650

848995

91

8582,1713,749

6,778

8

8

6

15

53

68 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.

Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Bromoxynil Bromoxynil octanoate Chlorsulfuron Clodinafop-propargil Clopyralid Dicamba Fenoxaprop Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

Fungicides Propiconazole Tebuconazole

363

242182

1829

53

1547

72

104

12

23

1.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.41.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.01.1

0.340.460.240.290.010.040.080.050.060.070.130.440.310.0040.010.010.010.006

0.090.09

0.390.460.240.290.010.040.080.050.060.070.130.630.310.0040.010.010.010.006

0.090.10

1,785146716641

4621

1202394442

1,2351,808

33

1469

2543

1 Planted acres in 2002 for the 3 program states were 12.7 million acres.States included are MN, MT and ND.


Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Clodinafop-propargil Fenoxaprop Glyphosate MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

Fungicides Propiconazole

20355

306

5387

5

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.0

0.430.240.050.070.660.330.010.007

0.08

0.440.240.050.070.660.330.010.007

0.08

171170

54275

35121

7 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Minnesota were 2.00 million acres.

Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Chlorsulfuron Clodinafop-propargil Dicamba Fenoxaprop Glyphosate MCPA Metsulfuron-methyl Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

6584

13324

1915225

137

1.21.01.01.01.11.01.81.01.01.01.01.0

0.340.220.010.050.050.050.410.280.0040.0080.010.005

0.410.220.010.050.050.050.740.280.0040.0080.010.005

997661

22669

533155

3161

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Montana were 3.75 million acres.

Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Clodinafop-propargil Fenoxaprop Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

26307

4274

16621316

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

0.340.230.040.060.070.130.560.300.010.006

0.340.230.040.060.070.130.560.300.010.006

61748019

1893137

6281,302

117

1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Dakota were 6.90 million acres.


Soybeans: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied




AR IL IN IA KS KY LA MD MI MN MS MO NE NC ND OH SD TN VA WI

Total

2,95010,550

5,80010,400

2,7501,290

790490

2,0507,2001,4405,0504,7001,3602,6704,7504,2501,160

4801,540

71,670

71818

32421

223441112133136642037422540

20

5.237.517.49.3

12.29.60.12.7

24.416.13.7

11.823.114.444.114.132.514.53.69.2

305.5

3625247

25371817341220293636592741473335

26

57.8143.167.948.328.730.35.52.9

32.034.215.862.979.925.050.562.6

102.031.17.3

18.9

906.7

353846128

381826671020361141115615574648

29

66.1422.6276.0163.7

5.946.67.57.0

119.139.125.7

158.114.651.33.3

276.424.448.618.454.7

1,829.1


Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002

PrimaryNutrient

PlantedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Arkansas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash


Indiana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Iowa Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Kansas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Kentucky Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Louisiana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Maryland Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Michigan Nitrogen Phosphate Potash


2,950

10,550

5,800

10,400

2,750

1,290

790

490

2,050

7,200

73635

182538

182446

37

12

24258

213738

21818

231726

443467

111210

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.11.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

245462

2054

105

1748

102

2670

120

174326

316495

114054

223555

264682

203852

245563

2054

105

1748

104

2670

127

184326

356495

114054

243555

274687

203852

5.257.866.1

37.5143.1422.6

17.467.9

276.0

9.348.3

163.7

12.228.75.9

9.630.346.6

0.15.57.5

2.72.97.0

24.432.0

119.1

16.134.239.1



PrimaryNutrient

PlantedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Mississippi Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Missouri Nitrogen Phosphate Potash


North Carolina Nitrogen Phosphate Potash



South Dakota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Tennessee Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Virginia Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Wisconsin Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

1,440

5,050

4,700

1,360

2,670

4,750

4,250

1,160

480

1,540

122020

132936

313611

363641

645911

202756

374115

424757

253346

403548

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.31.01.0

1.11.01.0

1.11.01.4

1.11.01.0

1.01.01.0

1.01.01.0

225688

184487

154528

295191

193211

1349

103

185427

275473

294480

143573

225688

184487

164728

295191

263212

1549

103

205839

305773

294683

153573

3.715.825.7

11.862.9

158.1

23.179.914.6

14.425.051.3

44.150.53.3

14.162.6

276.4

32.5102.024.4

14.531.148.6

3.67.3

18.4

9.218.954.7



PrimaryNutrient

PlantedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied



71,670202629

1.11.01.0

194887

214989

305.5906.7

1,829.1


Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status



ALL AR IL IN IA KS KY LA

Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DB, Dimeth. Salt Acetamide Acetic acid Acifluorfen Alachlor Atrazine Bentazon Butoxy. ester 2,4-D Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Clomazone Cloransulam-methyl Dicamba Dichlorprop Dimethenamid Ethalfluralin Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Flumioxazin Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Halosulfuron Imazamox Imazaquin Imazaquin, sod. salt Imazethapyr Lactofen Linuron MCPA Metolachlor Metribuzin Oxyfluorfen Paraquat Pendimethalin Quizalofop-P-ethyl Quizalofop-ethyl S-Metolachlor Sethoxydim Simazine Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin Vernolate

PPPPPP *P *PPPPP * * *PPPPPPPPP *PPPPP * *PP *PPP *PP *PPPPP *

*

*

* *

*

* *

*P *

*

*

* *

* *

*

*

*

P

PP

* *

*PP

P * *

PP * * *PPP

P *

PP

*

*P

* * *P * *PP

P

* * *

*

*P * * *

*

PP

*PPP

*P

P

P

*P *

* *

P * *

*

* *P *

*

P *

P

PP * *

PPP

* *

P *

* *

*P *

*P

P * *

P

P

*

*

* * *

* *

*

* *

PP

*

P

P

*P

* *

* * *

*

P *

*

*

* * *

*

* *

* *P *

* *

P *

* *

* * * *

* *

*P *

*

P *

*

* * *

*P * *

P *

* * *PP

* *

*P



Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status



ALL AR IL IN IA KS KY LA

Insecticides Acephate Aldicarb Benzoic acid Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos Cypermethrin Dicrotophos Diflubenzuron Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Helicoverpa zea NPV Indoxacarb Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methomyl Methyl parathion Permethrin Phorate Thiodicarb Tralomethrin Zeta-cypermethrin

Fungicides Azoxystrobin Sulfur Thiophanate-methyl

Other Chemicals Sodium chlorate

* *PP *P * *PPP * *P * *PP *P *P

P * *

*

*

* *

*

*

* *

*

*

*

*

*

P *

*

*

*

*

P

* * *P

*

P *

P

P *P

P



Soybeans: Active IngredientsPublication Status

By Program States, 2002 (continued)


MD MI MN MS MO NE NC


*

*

*

* *

*

*

PP

*

*

* *

P *

*

* * * * *

*

*

*

*

*

* * *

* *

*PP

* *

P

*

* *

*

*

*

*

*

*

* *

*

PP * *

PPP

P

P *

*

P

* *

*

P *P

P *

*P *

*

P * *P

* * * *

*P *

P *

*

*

*

P *

* *

P

P

* *

*

P *

P

* * *P * *PP

*

*

*

P *

* *

P * * * *

*

*

*P

P * * *

*

* * * *

*PP

*

P *

*P

*P *

P

* * *

P

*

*

*

*

* *

P

* *

P

*

PP

*

*

*






MD MI MN MS MO NE NC




*

*

*

*

*

P

*

*

*

P

P

*

P

*

P

*

*

*

* *

*

*

P

P

*

*

*

*






ND OH SD TN VA WI


*

P

*

*

P * * *

*P *

P

P *

*

P *

P

* *

P

P *

* * *

*P * * *

* * *

PP

* *

P *

*P

P *

*

P * * * *

*

* *

*

* *

* *PP

*

*

P

* * *

*

*

*

PP * *

*P *

* *P *

*

* *

*

P *

* *

* * * * *

* *

*

P

*

P

*

PP

*

P

* *

PP

* *

P

*

P

*

* *

*

* * *

PP

P

P

* *

P *

*

*

*






ND OH SD TN VA WI




*

* *

*

*

*

P

*

P

* * *

*

*P *

* * *

*

*

*



Soybeans: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,





AR 1

IL 1

IN 1

IAKS 1

KYLAMDMI 1

MN 1

MS 1

MONENCND 1

OH 1

SDTN 1

VAWI 1

Total 1

2,95010,550

5,80010,400

2,7501,290

790490

2,0507,2001,4405,0504,7001,3602,6704,7504,2501,160

4801,540

71,670

90100100

9998

100989898999899

10095

100100100100

9486

99

2,94512,939

7,85313,143

2,9311,4791,257

7532,4967,0732,3925,9246,0141,3613,3506,3655,1171,496

5911,253

86,742

14

9

723

24

425

191046

6

112

58

470

24

3689

971

25

1,077

14

*

8

108* Applied on less than one percent of acres. 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DB, Dimeth. Salt Acetamide Acetic acid Acifluorfen Alachlor Bentazon Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Clomazone Cloransulam-methyl Ethalfluralin Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Flumioxazin Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazaquin Imazaquin, sod. salt Imazethapyr Lactofen Metolachlor Metribuzin Paraquat Pendimethalin Quizalofop-P-ethyl S-Metolachlor Sethoxydim Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin

5 * *12

*2

*62

*5

*23

* * *3

78521

*9

* *329

*22612

*7

1.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.41.41.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.51.01.11.0

0.400.030.170.400.251.250.960.0040.020.080.320.020.800.130.060.040.030.070.240.740.700.030.080.060.050.081.470.220.410.940.061.120.300.131.110.0030.0050.92

0.400.040.170.400.261.270.960.0040.020.080.320.020.800.130.060.040.030.070.241.071.000.030.080.060.050.091.470.230.480.950.061.140.300.131.670.0040.0060.93

1,3443

22328325802

1,1381

761451067169

215107121618

54659,9623,854

47822

34160

573440612

6,13225

1,355460531

1,57542

4,385See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Insecticides Benzoic acid Carbaryl Chlorpyrifos Diflubenzuron Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Permethrin Thiodicarb Zeta-cypermethrin

Fungicides Azoxystrobin

* * * * * *2

* * * *

*

1.01.21.01.01.11.11.01.31.01.21.0

1.0

0.060.880.620.040.380.030.020.590.070.320.04

0.07

0.061.070.630.040.440.030.020.780.080.410.04

0.07

1373

1875

471131

382546817

25* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Planted acres in 2002 for the 20 program states were 71.7 million acres.

States included are AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, ND, OH, SD, TN, VA and WI.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Arkansas, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Glyphosate 80 1.6 0.63 1.04 2,447 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Arkansas were 2.95 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Cloransulam-methyl Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazethapyr Lactofen Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin

1332755333

8156

1018711

1.01.01.01.01.01.21.01.01.01.41.61.01.01.41.01.01.01.0

0.380.440.160.020.060.020.120.050.280.730.780.030.050.111.140.120.0051.06

0.380.440.160.020.060.020.120.050.281.021.240.030.050.151.150.120.0051.06

518162

35143211351880

8,803618

195921

96392

1148

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Illinois were 10.6 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Indiana, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorimuron-ethyl Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazaquin Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone

811

552

8994

10547

1.01.01.01.01.01.41.11.01.01.01.01.0

0.300.020.150.050.270.840.800.070.060.160.920.11

0.300.020.150.050.271.220.930.070.060.160.920.11

13611411336

6,273470

173346

20841

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Indiana were 5.80 million acres.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Iowa, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Cloransulam-methyl Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Pendimethalin Sethoxydim Sulfentrazone Trifluralin

Insecticides Permethrin

45

10446

733

1119

35

18

4

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.31.11.01.01.01.01.0

1.0

0.160.0090.020.120.040.250.710.790.060.930.220.220.89

0.08

0.160.0090.020.130.040.250.990.940.060.940.220.220.91

0.08

615

235318

1687,497

25968

1,85775

1131,679

38 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Iowa were 10.4 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin

782

7578

1.01.41.41.01.21.0

0.330.670.580.050.200.94

0.330.960.820.050.250.94

642,171

1577

47194

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Kansas were 2.75 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kentucky, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Glyphosate Imazethapyr

11877

1.01.31.0

0.440.800.04

0.441.080.04

631,213

4 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Kentucky were 1.29 million acres.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Louisiana, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Glyphosate Imazaquin Paraquat Pendimethalin Sulfosate

Insecticides Benzoic acid Diflubenzuron Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Thiodicarb Zeta-cypermethrin


21277

6638

1593

561210

14

1.41.21.91.01.01.01.8

1.11.01.01.31.51.1

1.0

0.330.020.770.090.340.871.04

0.060.040.030.600.370.04

0.07

0.470.021.540.090.340.871.92

0.070.040.030.820.570.05

0.07

82

9374

1822

119

831

360564

8 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Louisiana were 790,000 acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Maryland, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Paraquat

722011

1.31.01.0

0.990.640.41

1.360.680.41

4826523

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Maryland were 490,000 acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr

829

12

1.21.31.0

0.860.710.06

1.060.920.06

1,79116314

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Michigan were 2.05 million acres.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazethapyr Pendimethalin Thifensulfuron Trifluralin

447

7096

1092

14

1.01.01.01.21.71.01.01.01.01.0

0.100.040.200.740.670.020.050.910.0030.77

0.100.040.200.901.160.020.050.910.0030.77

301395

4,5167321038

561( 2 )

761 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Minnesota were 7.20 million acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Mississippi, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Cloransulam-methyl Glyphosate Imazaquin Pendimethalin Trifluralin

Insecticides Benzoic acid Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion


6742

86643

613

2

9

1.01.31.41.02.21.01.01.0

1.01.11.1

1.0

0.840.200.0050.020.710.090.890.98

0.050.020.36

0.06

0.840.270.0080.021.620.090.891.04

0.050.030.40

0.06

78261

( 2 )2,013

85042

55

10

8 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Mississippi were 1.44 million acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorimuron-ethyl Cloransulam-methyl Flumiclorac-pentyl Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Paraquat Sulfentrazone

6893

8464

11

1.01.21.01.01.31.21.81.0

0.520.020.020.040.770.780.350.14

0.520.020.020.041.030.950.630.14

160996

4,32827912277

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Missouri were 5.05 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Alachlor Chlorimuron-ethyl Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin S-Metolachlor Trifluralin

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos

36

781314

317

45

*

1.01.01.31.51.01.01.01.01.0

1.1

1.170.020.730.670.050.260.850.770.72

0.52

1.170.021.001.040.050.260.860.770.72

0.59

1926

3,6616313533

671162166

26* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Nebraska were 4.70 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Carolina, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Glyphosate Imazethapyr Paraquat Pendimethalin

Insecticides Esfenvalerate Lambda-cyhalothrin

915

143

414

1.31.01.01.0

1.01.0

0.710.040.390.53

0.030.02

0.980.040.390.53

0.030.02

1,2083

7722

24

1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Carolina were 1.36 million acres.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Bentazon Ethalfluralin Glyphosate Imazamox Imazethapyr Pendimethalin Sethoxydim Trifluralin

243

501015112515

1.01.01.51.01.01.01.01.0

1.480.800.600.030.041.240.360.94

1.480.800.900.030.041.240.360.94

93969

1,2028

17367240369

1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Dakota were 2.67 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorimuron-ethyl Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone

41689

3483

14

1.01.01.61.51.01.01.01.0

0.530.020.800.660.050.220.680.08

0.530.021.301.040.050.220.680.08

10616

5,48017210799658

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Ohio were 4.75 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Pendimethalin

Insecticides Lambda-cyhalothrin

7239

12

1.51.41.0

1.0

0.710.680.99

0.02

1.100.950.99

0.02

3,359120371

10 1 Planted acres in 2002 for South Dakota were 4.25 million acres.


Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Tennessee, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Fluazifop-P-butyl Glyphosate Paraquat


15134

952

10

1.01.01.01.51.0

1.0

0.0060.120.110.710.40

0.01

0.0070.120.111.130.40

0.01

1185

1,24212

2 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Tennessee were 1.16 million acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Virginia, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Chlorimuron-ethyl Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Imazethapyr Paraquat Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone


7111083

4886

17

1.01.11.11.41.01.01.21.0

1.2

0.030.180.350.720.050.530.590.17

0.02

0.030.200.391.040.050.530.710.17

0.03

11120

4151

22265

2 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Virginia were 480,000 acres.

Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazethapyr Pendimethalin

565

45

2711

1.01.31.21.01.01.0

0.420.670.580.040.040.88

0.420.920.730.040.040.88

34924483

18154

1 Planted acres in 2002 for Wisconsin were 1.54 million acres.


Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied

State HarvestedAcreage



CO IL KS MO MT NE OH OK TX WA

Total

1,650650

8,100760750

1,520810

3,5002,7001,750

22,190

64969197887998926299

86

55.159.4

487.465.938.457.666.4

203.6124.0126.5

1,284.3

31766475814589592839

55

18.237.0

162.231.818.522.646.865.930.312.3

445.6

*748

74464

8847

11

15

0.046.824.540.84.82.1

51.46.45.43.5

185.7


Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002

PrimaryNutrient

HarvestedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Colorado Nitrogen Phosphate Potash


Kansas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Missouri Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Montana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash



Oklahoma Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Texas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

Washington Nitrogen Phosphate Potash

1,650

650

8,100

760

750

1,520

810

3,500

2,700

1,750

64310

967674

91648

977574

888146

79454

988988

92594

62287

993911

1.21.00.0

1.71.01.0

1.41.01.0

1.61.01.0

1.51.01.0

1.41.01.0

1.81.01.0

1.51.01.0

1.41.01.0

1.31.01.0

4435

547397

453136

535573

393013

343331

466071

413241

523829

531718

5335

957597

663136

895573

583014

483331

846572

643241

744029

731818

55.118.20.0

59.437.046.8

487.4162.224.5

65.931.840.8

38.418.54.8

57.622.62.1

66.446.851.4

203.665.96.4

124.030.35.4

126.512.33.5


Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002

PrimaryNutrient

HarvestedAcreage

AreaApplied

Applic-ations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied



22,190865515

1.51.01.0

453653

683754

1,284.3445.6185.7


Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status



ALL CO IL KS MO MT

Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt Acetic acid Atrazine Bromoxynil Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorsulfuron Clopyralid Dicamba Diclofop-methyl Difenzoquat Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate Imazamethabenz MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Paraquat Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Tralkoxydim Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Disulfoton Imidacloprid Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methyl parathion Zeta-cypermethrin

P *P *P *P *P * * * * *PP *PPP *PPPP * *PP *

PP * *P *PP

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

P

P

*

*

P *

P

P

P

* *P

*P *

P *

* *

*

P

*

*

P

P

*

*

P

*

* * * *P

*

* *P

*

P

P

* *P *

*



Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status



ALL CO IL KS MO MT

Fungicides Mancozeb Propiconazole Thiophanate-methyl Trifloxystrobin

*P * *

* *



Winter Wheat: Active IngredientsPublication Status



NE OH OK TX WA

Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt Acetic acid Atrazine Bromoxynil Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorsulfuron Clopyralid Dicamba Diclofop-methyl Difenzoquat Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate Imazamethabenz MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Paraquat Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Tralkoxydim Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Disulfoton Imidacloprid Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methyl parathion Zeta-cypermethrin

P

*

*

P

*

P *

* * *

P *

*

*

P

*

*

P

*

P

P

P

*

P

*

*

P

P

PP

* *P *

P

*

*

P

*

P * *

PP

*

*

P

* *P *P * * * * * * * *P *PPP

PPP

*PP

*



Winter Wheat: Active IngredientsPublication Status



NE OH OK TX WA

Fungicides Mancozeb Propiconazole Thiophanate-methyl Trifloxystrobin

* * * * *



Winter Wheat: Pesticide, Harvested Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,


State HarvestedAcreage



CO 1

IL 1

KSMO 1

MT 1

NE 1

OHOKTXWA 1

Total

1,650650

8,100760750

1,520810

3,5002,7001,750

22,190

12393212804931363487

38

6810

34712

433225

72155274856

2,456

7

3221

11

30

285291

665

3

*

37

42* Applied on less than one percent of acres. 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.

Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Bromoxynil Chlorsulfuron Dicamba Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Zeta-cypermethrin

Fungicides Propiconazole

13 *2

102

*341

13 *16445

33

* *4

*

1.11.01.01.01.01.01.81.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.01.01.11.11.0

1.0

0.370.470.210.010.030.100.400.300.170.0030.020.010.030.010.010.006

0.420.280.020.360.03

0.10

0.410.470.220.010.040.100.730.310.170.0030.020.010.030.010.010.007

0.430.280.020.410.03

0.10

1,19656862520

7541241

44913

391314

7

289156

39024

11* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Harvested acres in 2002 for the 10 program states were 22.2 million acres. States included are CO, IL, KS, MO, MT, NE, OH, OK,

TX and WA.


Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

3636

1.01.0

0.020.008

0.020.008

42

1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Illinois were 650,000 acres.

Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorsulfuron Dicamba Glyphosate Metsulfuron-methyl Sulfosulfuron Triasulfuron

Insecticides Zeta-cypermethrin

618

32

1633

7

1.11.01.12.21.01.01.0

1.0

0.310.010.020.340.0020.030.008

0.02

0.360.010.020.760.0020.030.008

0.02

162165

131392

14 1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Kansas were 8.10 million acres.

Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

1211

1.01.0

0.020.009

0.020.009

21

1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Missouri were 760,000 acres.


Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Dicamba Glyphosate Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Triasulfuron

5613301798

1.21.02.01.01.01.0

0.340.080.360.0040.020.01

0.410.080.740.0040.020.01

1758

168111

1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Montana were 750,000 acres.

Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Dicamba Metsulfuron-methyl Triasulfuron

317

1314

1.01.01.01.0

0.310.060.0040.02

0.310.060.0040.02

142613

1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Nebraska were 1.52 million acres.

Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

14787

1.01.01.01.0

0.350.350.020.007

0.350.350.020.007

40201

( 2 ) 1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Ohio were 810,000 acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.


Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Oklahoma, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorsulfuron Metsulfuron-methyl Sulfosulfuron

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Methyl parathion

8181913

766

1.11.01.01.0

1.01.01.1

0.300.010.0030.03

0.300.320.36

0.330.010.0030.03

0.300.320.41

9372

14

786990

1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Oklahoma were 3.50 million acres.

Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Metsulfuron-methyl Triasulfuron

Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate

177

13

138

1.01.01.0

1.01.0

0.520.0040.02

0.510.23

0.520.0040.02

0.540.23

23316

19749

1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Texas were 2.70 million acres.

Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Washington, 2002 1

ActiveIngredient

AreaApplied

Appli-cations

Rate perApplication

Rate perCrop Year

TotalApplied


Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Chlorsulfuron Glyphosate MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl

33227

113512208

27254

24

1.11.01.01.31.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.1

0.490.200.010.470.280.170.0050.010.030.010.020.005

0.550.220.010.650.290.170.0050.010.030.010.020.005

318832

1271793822

14512

1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Washington were 1.75 million acres.


Pest Management Practices - Highlights

The 2002 survey results showed comparatively similar trends compared with 2001 in terms of whichpest management practices were reported at high levels for corn and soybeans. Durum, other spring, andwinter wheat were last surveyed in 1999 and were published at the all wheat level.

The question for “weather monitoring” changed between 2001 and 2002 for soybeans from monitoring“to predict the need for pesticide application” to monitoring “to determine when to make pesticideapplications”. Therefore, data between years in not comparable.

The question for “scouting” was also changed between 2001 and 2002 for soybeans from “using asystematic method ” to “systematic sampling or counting”. Therefore, data between years in notcomparable.

Corn: Most pest management practices increased from 2001 for corn in the prevention, avoidance,monitoring and suppression categories. The percent of farms reporting prevention practices increasedfor virtually all practices in the 7 states surveyed.

Soybeans: As producers continue to increase the percent of soybean acreage planted to biotech varietieswith herbicide resistance (now ranging from 61 - 89 percent of total acres planted in the states surveyed),the need for pest management practices to control weeds declines.

Wheat, Durum: Producers in North Dakota reported a high level of scouting at 71 percent of farms. Rotating crops to control pests and cleaning implements after fieldwork were the next two most commonpractices reported by 68 and 55 percent of farms respectively.

Wheat Other Spring: Cleaning implements after fieldwork and rotating crops to control pests were thetwo most common practices; reported by 67 and 65 percent of farms respectively.

Wheat, Winter: Cleaning implements after fieldwork was reported by 45 percent of farms in theProgram States. Scouting was reported by 29 percent of farms in the Program States.


Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,

Corn, 2002

PracticeStates

IL IN IA MNPercent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms

Prevention Practices:

Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices

Avoidance Practices:

Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations

Monitoring Practices:

Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring

Suppression Practices:

Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides

66333114

99311

4113251923

219

121056

35102713

2758

251312162

82

22

28

3317329

9805

3411141113

1111

161247

4051502

68024

2311868

56

255

44



Corn, 2002 (continued)

PracticeStates Program

StatesNE OH WIPercent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms








Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides

56164320

86912

4929161113

2116

257

50

3221348

59011

3011236

13

64

167

36

1914163

11583

23884

11

63

32

34

4126349

87811

3213141012

118

157

44


Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,

Corn, 2002

PracticeStates

IL IN IA MNPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres




Biotech varieties with insect resistance only Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations




Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Biotech varieties with stacked gene Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides

65303313

189

9116

4815282226

3

12410

111157

36112916

74

757

271518154

6

*122

34

35

40203014

3112798

3813221718

7

31412

141442

4044435

294

8512

3017201510

11

41410

108

43* Less than one percent.



Corn, 2002 (continued)


StatesNE OH WIPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres




Biotech varieties with insect resistance only Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations




Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Biotech varieties with stacked gene Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides

55204020

345

6712

492714129

9

42316

277

48

45253713

6118917

349

251018

3

*83

99

40

2212195

1510676

3213147

12

9

294

63

42

47253413

( 1 )8

8011

3916211615

( 1 )

( 1 )1710

139

46* Less than one percent. 1 State data not available.



Durum and Other Spring Wheat, 2002Durum Other Spring


StatesND MN MT NDPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

Farms








Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides

2329552

346829

715

142

14

6

119

41

4644556

77524

4821189

21

20

231449

1159731

12489

59111537

3

221070

48327410

199151

5715266

35

28

281257

2949675

126521

5515186

17

13

231160



Durum and Other Spring Wheat, 2002Durum Other Spring


StatesND MN MT NDPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres









2931673

437535

685

214

21

10

161048

52485310

148739

6138241837

35

191854

2643673

295118

522323108

7

261147

63456714

268745

7223213

48

33

308

65

4545648

247333

6127231029

23

251255



Soybeans, 2002

PracticeStates

AR IL IN IA KSPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

Farms






Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring



2724293

1191

1922

14

7

262

5017222

6876

213141548

16

102535

235

17 *

1676

613111026

12

39

18

3212233

4838

311151551

15

163126

3313383

3736

*1764

20

11

91531

* Less than one percent.



Soybeans, 2002 (continued)

PracticeStates

KY LA MD MI MNPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

Farms









3419245

5804

*14101331

8

262027

49342010

7338

52090

80

13

21115

171416 *

9644

817189

41

23

261310

3236378

28713

*6

142

43

17

113430

2316351

*727

219153

45

15

51125





PracticeStates

MS MO NE NC NDPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

Farms









58274620

6185

333

*44

5

1474

391613 *

4693

*745

40

2

151420

31142010

19310

224181

57

19

351833

3251447

5678

17

199

59

12

151820

3335502

18321

*1623 *61

25

131848






StatesOH SD TN VA WIPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

Farms









3016254

2703

1583

34

8

71814

198

27 *

68311

326168

54

25

185

10

1911121

13609

716103

48

16

143121

251333 *

64710

815111058

16

305

16

141111 *

47414

29

11 *29

18

123028

3118263

4727

212128

42

13

121923




Soybeans, 2002

PracticeStates

AR IL IN IA KSPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres








Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides

5140507

4372

41744

23

6812

2125

5220223

4888

216161653

7118

123036

267

15 *

1703

310171834

8311

31216

3916282

4856

211172145

7518

182022

3920435

5614

*2083

22

8312

61926





PracticeStates

KY LA MD MI MNPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres









317

164

4813

*9

125

29

724

181620

4225124

6304

41612 *78

717

21210

311527 *

6704

320251046

8031

311210

40414015

19210

*7

162

48

7215

113636

2314332

*734

529173

42

7116

41219





PracticeStates

MS MO NE NC NDPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres









66315625

6246

4332

42

808

1964

451414 *

6662

*754

37

725

181115

37132112

19011

128221

55

8527

341837

3437552

6605

*9

151057

7817

251821

2740551

18315

*1725 *68

6120

102150






StatesOH SD TN VA WIPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

Acres








Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only 1 Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides

328

332

2712

14

158

42

7311

31511

273

31 *

97811

637227

57

8938

1568

189

121

10548

523177

48

( 1 )21

162424

188

271

65714

917151268

( 1 )21

335

13

241510 *

48210

213140

33

7829

144621

3717293

4746

216151045

( 1 )17

121822

* Less than one percent. 1 State data not available.



Winter Wheat, 2002

PracticeStates

CO IL KS MO MTPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

Farms









6649518

9596

4079

156

12

30117

5120305

537420

611145

12

9

469

3528503

30559

227624

7

115

15

4122431

325322

22212

2

72

30

2645705

447029

6526291117

21

203260



Winter Wheat, 2002 (continued)


StatesNE OH OK TX WAPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

FarmsPercent of

Farms









2422513

186322

199

131010

6

271022

396

27 *

517711

165

1634

5

171127

29303810

7175

3559

1410

9

105

17

4229434

63012

367448

2

111

15

51367310

486627

7038354

38

26

202264

3726454

295413

299

1058

8

138

21* Less than one percent.



Winter Wheat, 2002

PracticeStates

CO IL KS MO MTPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres









5239437

11597

371113157

17

24139

5023387

587815

551585

16

14

41211

3823524

32527

247636

7

96

16

5232402

285214

33322

3

116

22

2541693

416629

6131328

17

19

252963



Winter Wheat, 2002 (continued)


StatesNE OH OK TX WAPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

AcresPercent of

Acres









3130624

276012

352217118

8

251220

4211311

498711

214

1576

4

156

28

3431478

10268

386

111213

13

117

16

4944547

113612

34945

12

7

144

17

4333766

396323

6732317

35

24

222060

4030535

275112

3512127

12

11

149

23


Survey, Estimation Procedures, and Reliability

Survey Procedures: Data for corn, soybeans, and wheat were collected during the months of Augustthrough December of 2002. Data for soybeans were obtained from the 2002 Agricultural ResourcesManagement Survey (ARMS). Large screening samples were drawn from the NASS List SamplingFrame. This extensive sampling frame covers all types of farms and accounts for approximately 82% ofall land in farms in the U.S. The screening samples were selected in such a way as to insure that allfarms on the list had a possibility of being selected. Farms that were more likely to be producers ofsoybeans were more likely to be in the screening sample. The sampled farms were screened to determineif they grew soybeans in 2002. From this subpopulation of operations identified as producing soybeans,a subsample of farms was selected in such a way as to insure that each identified producer had anopportunity to be selected. In general, larger farms were more likely to be selected than smaller farms. Once a farm producing soybeans was selected, one soybean field was randomly selected from all thesoybean fields on the farm. The operator of the sampled field was personally interviewed to obtaininformation on chemical applications made to the selected field.

Data for corn, durum, other spring, and winter wheat were obtained from the Field Crop Chemical UseSurvey (FCCUS). The samples for FCCUS were drawn via the Objective Yield Survey (OYS). TheOYS samples were drawn from the NASS Area Sampling Frame. The Area Sampling frame covers theentire continental US, thus accounting for 100% of all land in farms in the targeted states. Largescreening samples were drawn, and acreage was screened to determine the presence of the crops ofinterest. From this subpopulation, individual acres of the targeted commodity were sampled for OYS. In FCCUS, data were collected for the field that contained the OYS sampled acre(s). A large field wasmore likely to be selected than a small field. FCCUS data for the field were only collected once, even ifa field contained multiple OYS samples. If an operation had multiple fields selected, then only one fieldwas used. The operator of the sampled field was personally interviewed to obtain information onchemical applications made to the selected field.

Field Crops Chemical Use Estimation Procedures: The chemical application data, reported byproduct name or trade name, are reviewed within each State and across States for reasonableness andconsistency. This review compares reported data with manufacturer’s recommendations and with datafrom other farm operators using the same product. Following this review, product information isconverted to an active ingredient level. The chemical usage estimates in this publication consist ofsurvey estimates of those active ingredients.

Estimates of the total amount of active ingredient applied are based on the acreage estimates published inthe annual NASS report “Crop Production - 2002 Summary” [Cr Pr 2-1(03)] for corn, soybean, durum,other spring, and winter wheat.

The estimates for total amount applied will not be revised even if there are subsequent revisions toacreage for a given crop.

Detailed data within a table may not multiply across or add down due to independent rounding of thepublished values.


Survey, Estimation Procedures, and Reliability (continued)

Field Crops Chemical Usage Reliability: The surveys were designed so that the estimates arestatistically representative of chemical use on the targeted crops in the surveyed states. The reliability ofthese survey results is affected by sampling variability and non- sampling errors. The results of thissurvey are subject to sampling variability. Sampling variability is a measure of how the estimates woulddiffer if other samples had been drawn. The sampling variability expressed as a percent of the estimate iscalled the coefficient of variation (cv). Sampling variability of the estimates differed considerably bychemical and crop. Variability for estimates of acres treated will be higher than the variability forestimates of application rates. This is because application rates have a narrower range of responses, arerecommended by the manufacturer of the product, and are generally followed. In general, the more oftenthe chemical was applied, the smaller the sampling variability. For example, estimates of use of acommonly used product, such as atrazine, will exhibit less variability than a more rarely used product.For more commonly used chemicals, cv's will range from 5-35 percent at the U.S. level and 5-75 percentat the state or regional level. Some rarer items could have cv's above 100 percent. These items haveinsufficient data for publication and these instances are noted with an asterisk (*). Non-sampling errorsoccur during a survey process, and unlike sampling variability, are difficult to measure. They may becaused by interviewers failing to follow instructions, poorly worded questions, non-response,problematic survey procedures, or data handling mistakes between collection and publication. In thesesurveys, all survey procedures and analyses were carried out in a consistent and orderly manner tominimize the occurrence of these types of errors.


Terms and Definitions

Active ingredient: Refers to the mechanism of action in pesticides which kills or controls the targetpests. Usage data are reported by pesticide product and are converted to an amount of active ingredient. A single method of conversion has been chosen for active ingredients having more than one way ofbeing converted. For example in this report, copper compounds are expressed in their metallic copperequivalent, and others such as 2,4-D and glyphosate are expressed in their acid equivalent.

Allelopathic: The release of chemical compounds from a plant that will inhibit the growth of anotherplant, such as weeds.

Application Rates: Refer to the average number of pounds of a fertilizer primary nutrient or pesticideactive ingredient applied to an acre of land. Rate per application is the average number of poundsapplied per acre in one application. Rate per crop year is the average number of pounds applied per acrecounting multiple applications. Number of applications is the average number of times a treated acrereceived a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient.

Area applied: Represents the percentage of crop acres receiving one or more applications of a specificprimary nutrient or active ingredient. This report does not contain acre treatments. However, acretreatments can be calculated by multiplying the acres planted (harvested for winter wheat) by the percentof area applied and the average number of applications.

Avoidance: May be practiced when pest populations exist in a field or site but the impact of the pest onthe crop can be avoided through some cultural practice. Examples of avoidance tactics include croprotation such that the crop of choice is not a host for the pest, choosing cultivars with genetic resistanceto pests, using trap crops, choosing cultivars with maturity dates that may allow harvest before pestpopulations develop, fertilization programs to promote rapid crop development, and simply not plantingcertain areas of fields where pest populations are likely to cause crop failure. Some tactics forprevention and avoidance strategies may overlap.

The following pest management questions were categorized as avoidance practices:

Did you adjust planting or harvesting dates to control pests?

Did you rotate crops for the purpose of controlling pests?

Did you choose planting locations to avoid cross infestation of insects or disease?

Beneficial Insects: Insects collected and introduced into locations because of their value in biologiccontrol as prey on harmful insects and parasites.

Chemigation: Application of an agricultural chemical by injecting it into irrigation water.

Common name: An officially recognized name for an active ingredient. This report shows activeingredient by common name.

Crop year: Refers to the period immediately following harvest of the previous crop through harvest ofthe current crop.

Cultivars: A horticulturally or agriculturally derived variety of a plant, as distinguished from a naturalvariety.


Terms and Definitions (continued)

Farm: Any establishment from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were sold or wouldnormally be sold during the year. Government payments are included in sales. Places with all acreageenrolled in set aside or other government programs are considered operating.

Fertilizer: Refers to applications of the primary nutrients; nitrogen, phosphate, and potash.

Fungi: A lower form of parasitic plant life which often reduces crop production and/or lowers the gradequality of its host.

Land in Farms: All land operated as part of a farming operation during the year. It includes crop andlivestock acreage, wasteland, woodland, pasture, land in summer fallow, idle cropland, and land enrolledin the Conservation Reserve Program and other set aside, conservation, or commodity acreage programs. It excludes public, industrial, and grazing association land and nonagricultural land. It excludes all landoperated by establishments not qualifying as farms.

Monitoring: Includes proper identification of pests through systematic sampling or counting or otherforms of scouting. Also, weather monitoring to predict levels of pest populations or to determine themost effective time to make pesticide applications, and soil testing where appropriate.

The following pest management practices questions were categorized as monitoring practices:

Was this crop scouted for pests (weeds, insects or disease) using a systematic method?

Was this field scouted for pest by performing systematic sampling or counting? (soybeans)

Where electronic or written records kept to track the activity or numbers of different pests?

Did you use field mapping of previous weed problems to assist you in making weed managementdecisions?

Did you use soil analysis to detect the presence of soilborne pests or pathogens?

Did you use weather monitoring to predict the need for pesticide applications?

Did you use weather data to help determine when to make pesticide applications? (soybeans)

Nematodes: Microscopic, worm-shaped parasitic animals. Damage to many crops can be severe.

Pesticides: As defined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), pesticidesinclude any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling ormitigating any pest, and any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator,defoliant, or desiccant. The four classes of pesticides presented in this report and the pests targeted are:herbicides - weeds, insecticides - insects, fungicides - fungi, and other chemicals - other forms of life. Miticides and nematicides are included as insecticides while soil fumigants, growth regulators,defoliants, and desiccants are included as other chemicals.

Pheromone: A chemical substance produced by an insect which serves as a stimulus to otherindividuals of the same species for one or more behavioral responses.


Terms and Definitions (continued)

Prevention: Is the practice of keeping a pest population from infesting a crop or field. It includes suchtactics as using pest-free seeds or transplants, alternative tillage approaches such as no-till or strip-tillsystems, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to insects or disease, irrigation scheduling to avoidsituations conducive to disease development, cleaning tillage and harvesting equipment between fields oroperations, using field sanitation procedures, and eliminating alternate hosts or sites for insect pests anddisease organisms.

The following pest management questions were categorized as prevention practices:

Did you clean tillage or harvesting implements after completing fieldwork for the purpose ofreducing the spread of weeds, diseases or other pests?

Did you remove or plow down crop residues to control pests?

Did you use practices such as tilling, mowing, burning, or chopping of field edges, lanes,ditches, roadways, or fence lines to manage pests?

Did you use water management practices, such as controlled drainage or irrigation scheduling,excluding chemigation, to control pests?

Suppression: Tactics include cultural practices such as narrow row spacings or optimized in-row plantpopulations, using cover crops or mulches, or using crops with allelopathic potential in the rotation. Physical suppression tactics may include cultivation or mowing for weed control, baited or pheromonetraps for certain insects, and temperature management or exclusion devices for insect and diseasemanagement. Biological pesticides and controls, including mating disruption for insects, can beconsidered as alternatives to conventional pesticides. Determining pest thresholds and alternatingpesticide active ingredients to avoid resistance buildup are suppression methods which minimizepesticide use.

The following questions were categorized as suppression practices:

Did you use scouting data and compare it to university or extension guidelines for infestationthresholds to determine when to take measures to control pests?

Did you use topically applied biological pesticides such as Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), insectgrowth regulators, neem or other natural products to control pests?

Did you maintain ground covers, mulches or physical barriers to reduce pest problems?

Did you adjust row spacing, plant density or row direction to control pests?

Did you alternate pesticides to keep pests from becoming resistant to pesticides (use pesticideswith different mechanisms of action)?

Trade name: A trademark name given to a specific formulation of a pesticide product. A formulationcontains a specific concentration of the active ingredient, carrier materials, and other ingredients such asemulsifiers and wetting agents.


Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes

The following is a list showing common name, associated class, and trade name of active ingredients inthis publication. The classes are herbicides (H), insecticides (I), fungicides (F), and other chemicals (O). This list is provided as an aid in reviewing pesticide data. Pre-mixes are not cataloged. The list is notcomplete for all pesticides used on corn, soybeans, durum, other spring, and winter wheat and NASSdoes not mean to imply use of any specific trade name.

Class Common Name Trade Name

H 2,4-D Agsco, Amine, Banvel + 2,4-D, Barrage, Class,Clean Crop, Curtail, Dacamine, Defy, Envy, Formula,Hi-Dep, Landmaster, Lithate, Riverside, RT Master,Salvo, Savage, Shotgun, Starane + Saber, Turret,Weed Rhap, Weedar, Weedone

H 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt Range Star H 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt Butoxone, ButyracH 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt Amine I Acephate OrtheneH Acetamide Axiom, Define, Domain, EpiH Acetic acid Esteron, LV 400 2,4-D Weed Killer, Starane + Salvo H Acetochlor Degree Xtra, DoublePlay, Field Master, Fultime,

Harness, Surpass, TopNotch H Acifluorfen Blazer, Conclude, Scepter, Storm H Alachlor Bronco, Bullet, Lariat, Lasso, Micro-Tech, PartnerI Aldicarb TemikH Atrazine Aatre, Banvel-K + Atrazine, Basis Gold, Bicep,

Buctril + Atrazine, Bullet, Degree, Extrazine,Field Master, Fultime, Guardsman, Harness, Laddok,Lariat, LeadOff, Liberty, Marksman, Moxy + Atrazine,Ready Master, Shotgun, Simazat, Surpass

F Azoxystrobin Quadris (Abound) H Bentazon Basagran, Conclude, Laddok, Rezult, Storm I Benzoic acid Intrepid I Bifenthrin CaptureH Bromoxynil Bromox/MCPA, Bronate, Buctril, Moxy + AtrazineH Bromoxynil octanoate BronateI Bt Condor H Butoxy. ester 2,4-D 2,4-D/Weedone LV6 I Carbaryl SevinI Carbofuran FuradanH Carfentrazone-ethyl AIM I Chlorethoxyfos FortressH Chlorimuron-ethyl Authority, Canopy, Classic, Reliance, SynchronyI Chlorpyrifos Chlorpyrifos, Lorsban H Chlorsulfuron Finesse, Glean

--- continued


Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes (continued)


H Clethodim Conclude, Select H Clodinafop-propargil Discover H Clomazone Command H Clopyralid Accent, Curtail, HornetH Cloransulam-methyl Amplify, FirstRate, Frontrow, Gauntlet H Colleto. gloeospor Collego (fungal spores) H Cyanazine Bladex, Cy-Pro, ExtrazineI Cyfluthrin Aztec I Cypermethrin AmmoH Dicamba Banvel, Celebrity, Clarity, Fallow Master, NorthStar,

Rave, WeedmasterH Dicamba, Dimet. salt Distinct, Range Star, SterlinH Dicamba, Pot. salt Banvel-K + Atrazine, Marksman H Dicamba, Sodium salt Celebrity, YukonH Dichlorprop WeedoneH Diclofop-methyl HoelonI Dicrotophos BidrinH Difenzoquat AvengeI Diflubenzuron DimilinH Diflufenzopyr-sodium Celebrity, DistinctH Dimethenamid Detail, Frontier, Guardsman, LeadOffH Dimethenamid-P Guardsman, OutlookI Dimethoate Cygon, DigonI Disulfoton Di-Syston H EPTC DoublePlay I Esfenvalerate AsanaH Ethalfluralin SonalanI Ethoprop MocapH Fenoxaprop Bugle, Cheyenne, Fusion, Puma I Fipronil Regent, Regent H Fluazifop-P-butyl Fusilade, Fusion, TyphoonH Flucarbazone-sodium Everest H Flumetsulam Accent Gold, Bicep, Broadstrike + Dual,

Broadstrike + Treflan, Frontrow, Hornet, Python H Flumiclorac-pentyl Resource H Flumioxazin Valor H Fluroxypyr Starane, Starane + SaberH Fluroxypyr 1-methyl Starane + Sword, Starane + SalvoH Fomesafen Flexstar, Reflex, TyphoonI Fonofos DyfonateH Foramsulfuron Option

--- continued




H Glufosinate-ammonium LibertyH Glyphosate Accord, Backdraft, Buccaneer, Clear-Out, Gly Star,

Cornerstone, Extreme, Fallow Master, Field Master,Glyfos, Glyphomax, Honcho, Landmaster, Mirage,RT Master, Rattler, Ready Master, Roundup

H Glyphosate diam. salt TouchdownH Halosulfuron Permit, YukonI Helicoverpa zea NPV GemstarH Imazamethabenz AssertH Imazamox RaptorH Imazapyr LightningH Imazaquin Backdraft, Detail, Scepter, Squadron, Steel H Imazaquin, sod. salt Scepter H Imazethapyr Extreme, Lightning, Pursuit, Steel I Imidacloprid GauchoI Indoxacarb Steward H Isoxaflutole Balance, EpiH Lactofen Cobra, Phoenix I Lambda-cyhalothrin Karate, WarriorH Linuron Lorox H MCPA Agsco, Bromox, Bronate, Cheyenne, Class, Curtail,

MCP Ester, MCP Amine, Rhomene, Rhonox, Starane + Sword, Sword, Weedone MCPA Ester

I Malathion MalathionF Mancozeb DithaneH Mesotrione Callisto I Methomyl Lannate I Methyl parathion Declare, Penncap-M H Metolachlor Bicep, Broadstrike + Dual, Dual, TurboH Metribuzin Axiom, Boundary, Canopy, Domain, Lexone,

Sencor, Turbo H Metsulfuron-methyl Ally, Canvas, Finesse H Nicosulfuron Accent, Basis, Celebrity, DPX-79406, Steadfast H Oxyfluorfen GoalH Paraquat Gramoxone, Gramoxone/CycloneH Pendimethalin Prowl, Pursuit, Squadron, Steel I Permethrin Ambush, Pounce I Phorate Thimet H Picloram TordonH Primisulfuron Beacon, Exceed, NorthStar, Spirit

--- continued




F Propiconazole Stratego, TiltH Prosulfuron Exceed, Peak, SpiritH Pyridate Tough/Lentagran, Tough H Quizalofop-P-ethyl AssureH Quizalofop-ethyl Assure H Rimsulfuron Accent, Basis, DPX-79406, Steadfast H S-Metolachlor Bicep, Boundary, DualH Sethoxydim Conclude B&G, Poast, Rezult, UltimaH Simazine Caliber, Princep, Simazat, Simazine O Sodium chlorate Sodium ChlorateI Spinosad Success H Sulfentrazone Authority, Canopy, Command, Gauntlet, Spartan H Sulfosate TouchdownH Sulfosulfuron Maverick F Sulfur SulfurF Tebuconazole Folicur I Tebupirimphos AztecI Tefluthrin ForceI Terbufos CounterH Thifensulfuron Ally, Basis, Canvas, Harmony, Pinnacle, Reliance,

Synchrony, CheyenneI Thiodicarb Larvin F Thiophanate-methyl Tilt, TopsinH Tralkoxydim AchieveI Tralomethrin ScoutH Triallate Buckle, Far-GoH Triasulfuron Amber, Rave H Tribenuron-methyl Ally Extra, Canvas, Express, Harmony, CheyenneF Trifloxystrobin Stratego H Trifluralin Broadstrike + Treflan, Buckle, Treflan, Tri-4,

Trifluralin, Trilin, TrustH Vernolate VernamI Zeta-cypermethrin Fury, Mustang

A FERTILIZER and NUTRIENT APPLICATIONS---SELECTED FIELD A


COMPLETION CODE forFERTILIZER and NUTRIENT EDIT TABLE

1 Incomplete/Refusal3 Valid Zero

200

1. Were any commercial FERTILIZERS (nitrogen, phosphate, and potash)applied to the selected field for the 2002 corn crop?

[Read the items to be included from the list below before accepting a “NO” answer.] . . . . . . YES=1

CODE201

INCLUDE EXCLUDE

Custom applied fertilizersFertilizer applied in the fall of 2001 andearlier,

if this field was fallow in 2001Commercially prepared manureApplications made by airplaneNitrogen applied with herbicides for “burn down”

Micro-nutrients (e.g., iron, zinc, boron)Lime and gypsumUnprocessed manureFertilizer applied to previous crops in this field

[If NO fertilizers applied, go to Section B.]

2. Record each fertilizer application on the selected field on aseparate line in the table below.

T-TYPE TABLE2 001

LINE99

OFFICE USELINES IN TABLE

213

1 2 3 4

LINE

MATERIALS USED What quantity wasapplied per acre?

UNIT CODE How many acres weretreated in thisapplication?

[Enter percentage analysis or pounds of actualplant nutrients applied per acre.]

[Show Common Fertilizers in Respondent Booklet.]

1 Pounds

12 Gallons

19 Pounds ofactual nutrients

[Leave this column blankif actual nutrientswere reported.]

NNitrogen

P2O5

PhosphateK2O

Potash ACRES

01205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

02205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

03205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

04205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

05205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

06205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

07205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

08205 206 207 208 209 212

•___

T-TYPE TABLE LINE0 000 00

COMPLETION CODE forPESTICIDE EDIT TABLE

1 Incomplete/Refusal3 Valid Zero

300


B PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS---SELECTED FIELD B

1. Were any PESTICIDES (herbicides, insecticides, fungicides or other chemicals)applied to the selected field for the 2002 corn crop?

[Read the items to be included from the list below before accepting a “NO” answer.] . . . . . . YES=1

CODE301

INCLUDE EXCLUDE

Custom applied pesticidesPesticides applied in the fall of 2001 and earlier,

if this field was fallow in 2001Defoliants or desiccantsBiological and botanical pesticidesApplications made by airplanePartial field treatments

Fertilizers reported earlier in Section ASeed treatmentsSpot treatments (with no discernable acreage)Adjuvants (e.g., wetting agents, stickers, spreaders)Fertilizers applied as foliar spraysApplications to fence rows, ditch banks, etc.

[If NO pesticides applied, go to Section C.]

2. Record all pesticide applications on the selected fieldin the table below.

T-TYPE TABLE

3 001LINE

99OFFICE USE

LINES IN TABLE319

LINE

1 2 3

NOTES

What productswere appliedto this field?

[Show product codes fromRespondent Booklet.]

Was this productbought in

liquid or dryform?

[Enter L or D.]

Was this partof a tank mix?

[If tank mix,enter line number offirst product in mix.]

01305 306

02305 306

03305 306

04305 306

05305 306

06305 306

07305 306

08305 306

09305 306

10305 306

11305 306

12305 306

13305 306

14 305 306

3. [For pesticides not listed in Respondent Booklet, specify --]

LINEPesticide Type

(Herbicide, Insecticide Fungicide, etc.)EPA No. or Tradename

and FormulationForm Purchased(Liquid or Dry)

Where Purchased [Ask only ifEPA No. can’t be reported.]


B PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS---SELECTED FIELD B

CODES for Column 6

1 Pounds12 Gallons13 Quarts14 Pints15 Ounces, fluid28 Ounces, dry30 Grams

4 OR 5 6 7 8

LINE

How much wasapplied per acre per

application?

What was the totalamount appliedper application

in this field?

[Enter unitcode

from above.]

How many acresin this fieldwere treated

with this product?

How many timeswas it applied?

ACRES NUMBER

01308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

02308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

03308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

04308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

05308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

06308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

07308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

08308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

09308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

10308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

11308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

12308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

13308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C

14308 309 310 312 313

C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C


C PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES---SELECTED FIELD C

T-TYPE TABLE LINE

0 000 00

Now I have some questions about pest management practices used on the selected field for the2002 corn crop. By pests, we mean weeds, insects and diseases.

1. Was this crop scouted for pests (weeds, insects or disease) using asystematic method? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

CODE446

2. Were electronic or written records kept to track the activity or numbersof different pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

447

3. Did you use scouting data and compare it to university or extensionguidelines for infestation thresholds to determine when to takemeasures to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

448

4. Did you use field mapping of previous weed problems to assist youin making weed management decisions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

449

5. Did you use soil analysis to detect the presence ofsoilborne pests or pathogens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

450

6. Did you use topically applied biological pesticides such asBt (Bacillus Thuringiensis), insect growth regulators, neem orother natural products to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

452

7. Did you use water management practices, such as controlled drainageor irrigation scheduling, excluding chemigation, to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

458

8. Did you remove or plow down crop residues to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1456

9. Did you use practices such as tilling, mowing, burning, or chopping offield edges, lanes, ditches, roadways or fence lines to manage pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

455

10. Did you clean tillage or harvesting implements after completing field workfor the purpose of reducing the spread of weeds, diseases or other pests? . . . . . . . . YES = 1

457


C PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES---SELECTED FIELD C

11. Did you adjust planting or harvesting dates to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

CODE460

12. Did you choose planting locations to avoid cross infestation of insectsor disease? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

464

13. Did you rotate crops for the purpose of controlling pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1462

14. Did you use weather monitoring to predict the need for pesticide application? . . . . YES = 1480

15. Did you alternate pesticides to keep pests from becoming resistant topesticides (use pesticides with different mechanisms of action)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

461

16. Did you adjust row spacing, plant density or row direction to control pests? . . . . . . YES = 1459

17. Did you maintain ground covers, mulches or physical barriers toreduce pest problems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1

454

[Enumerator Note:Code when all cells in this section are blank.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

COMPLETION CODE forPEST MANAGEMENT EDIT

1 Incomplete/Refusal

442


Index

-2-

2,4-D, 11, 13, 15, 17-19, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48-50, 59-622,4-D Dimeth. salt, 222,4-DB Dimeth. salt, 42, 552,4-DP Dimeth. salt, 55

-A-

Acephate, 36, 38Acetamide, 11, 14, 15, 17, 42Acetic acid, 11, 22, 28, 42, 44, 59Acetochlor, 11, 13-19Acifluorfen, 42, 44-47Alachlor, 11, 17, 42, 48Aldicarb, 36, 38Atrazine, 11, 13-19, 35, 55, 57Azoxystrobin, 43, 46, 47

-B-

Bentazon, 8, 42, 49Benzoic acid, 43, 46, 47Bifenthrin, 12, 15, 17Bromoxynil, 11, 15, 16, 23, 28, 29, 55, 59, 62Bromoxynil octanoate, 22, 28Bt (Bacillus thur.), 9Butoxy. ester 2,4-D, 8, 35

-C-

Carbaryl, 9, 43Carbofuran, 12, 36Carfentrazone-ethyl, 11, 17, 42, 55, 57Chlorethoxyfos, 9Chlorimuron-ethyl, 42, 44-50Chlorpyrifos, 12-15, 17, 19, 27, 43, 48, 59, 62Chlorsulfuron, 28, 29, 55, 59, 60, 62Clethodim, 8, 42, 44, 50Clodinafop-propargil, 23, 28, 29Clomazone, 42Clopyralid, 11, 13-17, 19, 22, 28, 55, 57


-C (cont)-

Cloransulam-methyl, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48Colleto. gloeospor., 8Cyanazine, 11Cyfluthrin, 12-14, 17Cypermethrin, 4, 9, 12, 36, 38, 43, 46, 55, 59, 60

-D-

Dicamba, 11, 13-19, 23, 28, 29, 35, 55, 59-61Dicamba, Dimet. salt, 11, 13-18, 22, 27Dicamba, Pot. salt, 11, 13, 15-17, 19Dicamba, Sodium salt, 11, 13Dichlorprop, 35Diclofop-methyl, 55, 57Dicrotophos, 36, Difenzoquat, 27, 55, 57Diflubenzuron, 43, 46Diflufenzopyr-sodium, 11, 13, 15-18Dimethenamid, 11, 13-18, 35, 37Dimethenamid-P, 11, 15, 16Dimethoate, 12, 17, 27, 43, 59, 62Disulfoton, 55

-E-

EPTC, 11Esfenvalerate, 9, 43, 48Ethalfluralin, 37, 42, 49Ethoprop, 9

-F-

Fenoxaprop, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44, 45, 47, 55, 57Fipronil, 12, 14, 17Fluazifop-P-butyl, 42, 44, 45, 47, 50Flucarbazone-sodium, 22, 27, 55, 57Flumetsulam, 11, 13-19, 42Flumiclorac-pentyl, 8, 42, 48Flumioxazin, 42Fluroxypyr, 22, 23, 28, 29, 55, 57, 59


-F (cont)-

Fluroxypyr 1-methyl, 23, 28, 29, 59Fomesafen, 42, 44, 45, 47, 50Fonofos, 9Foramsulfuron, 11, 16

-G-

Glufosinate-ammonium, 11, 15, 16Glyphosate, 11, 13-19, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44-50, 59-62Glyphosate diam salt, 8, 42, 44-50

-H-

Halosulfuron, 11, 35Helicoverpa zea NPV, 36, 38

-I-

Imazamethabenz, 55, 57Imazamox, 42, 44, 47, 49, 50Imazapyr, 11, 13, 14Imazaquin, 42, 44, 46, 47Imazaquin, sod. salt, 42Imazethapyr, 11, 13, 14, 42, 44-50Imidacloprid, 55, 57Indoxacarb, 36, 40Isoxaflutole, 11, 13-15, 17, 18

-L-

Lactofen, 42, 44Lambda-cyhalothrin, 12, 13, 43, 46-50, 59Linuron, 35, 37

-M-

Malathion, 36, 40, 55, 57Mancozeb, 9, 56, 58MCPA, 23, 28, 29, 35, 37, 39, 59, 61, 62Mesotrione, 11, 13, 15-17Methomyl, 36, 38


-M (cont)

Methyl parathion, 12, 43, 46, 47, 59, 62Metolachlor, 11, 13-19, 42, 48Metribuzin, 11, 42, 44, 45, 48, 49, 59, 62Metsulfuron-methyl, 28, 29, 59-62

-N-

Nicosulfuron, 11, 13-19

-O-

Oxyfluorfen, 35

-P-

Paraquat, 11, 42, 46, 48, 50, 55, 57Pendimethalin, 11, 19, 42, 44-50Permethrin, 12, 17, 18, 43, 45Phorate, 9, 36, 40Picloram, 28, 57, 59, 61Primisulfuron, 11, 13-17Propiconazole, 9, 22, 28, 29, 56, 59Prosulfuron, 11, 17, 22, 27, 59, 62Pyridate, 8

-Q-Quizalofop-P-ethyl, 42Quizalofop-ethyl, 35, 39

-R-Rimsulfuron, 11, 13, 15-17, 19

-S-

S-Metolachlor, 11, 13-19, 42, 48Sethoxydim, 42, 45, 49Simazine, 11, 13, 18, 35, 37, 39Sodium chlorate, 36, 38Spinosad, 9Sulfentrazone, 3, 27, 42, 44, 45, 48-50


-S (cont)-

Sulfosate, 8, 22, 27, 42, 46Sulfosulfuron, 59, 60, 62Sulfur, 36, 40

-T-

Tebuconazole, 28Tebupirimphos, 12-14, 17Tefluthrin, 12-15, 17Terbufos, 12, 13, 17Thifensulfuron, 8, 23, 28, 29, 42, 47, 59-62Thiodicarb, 43, 46Thiophanate-methyl, 36, 40, 56, 58Tralkoxydim, 55Tralomethrin, 36Triallate, 22, 27, 55, 57Triasulfuron, 22, 28, 29, 59-62Tribenuron-methyl, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44, 59-62Trifloxystrobin, 22, 56, 58Trifluralin, 8, 23, 27, 42, 44, 45, 47-49, 55, 57

-V-

Vernolate, 35, 37

-Z-

Zeta-cypermethrin, 12, 43, 46, 59, 60


Report Features

Released May 14, 2003 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural StatisticsBoard, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "Agricultural Chemical Usage" call ChrisCadwallader (202) 720-6146, office hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET.

The next "Agricultural Chemical Usage" report will be released July 16, 2003. This report will coveragricultural chemical use for the 2002 crop year for vegetables in selected states.

Listed below are persons within the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additionalinformation.

Chris Cadwallader, Environmental Statistician (202) 690-0392

Kevin Hintzman, Head, Environmental and Demographics Section (202) 720-0684

Linda Hutton, Chief, Environmental, Economics, and Demographics Branch (202) 694-5620

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on thebasis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation,and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilitieswho require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape,etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W,Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410, or call202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

ACCESS TO REPORTS!!

For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services:

INTERNET ACCESS

All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to theInternet and go to the NASS Home Page at: http:/www.usda.gov/nass/. Select “Today’s Reports” orPublications and then Reports Calendar or Publications and then Search, by Title or Subject.

E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION

All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your e-mail address. Startingwith the NASS Home Page at http:/www.usda.gov/nass/, click on Publications, then click on theSubscribe by E-mail button which takes you to the page describing e-mail delivery of reports. Finally,click on Go to the Subscription Page and follow the instructions.

AUTOFAX ACCESS

NASSFax service is available for some reports from your fax machine. Please call 202-720-2000, usingthe handset attached to your fax. Respond to the voice prompts. Document 0411 is a list of availablereports.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS

CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada)Other areas, please call 703-605-6220 FAX: 703-605-6900(Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ASSISTANCE

For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products orservices, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, ore-mail: [email protected].

United States Department of Agricultural Chemical Usage ... · Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002...

Documents

Transcript of United States Department of Agricultural Chemical Usage ... · Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002...