Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ? - APHC – International … · · 2018-02-12German P, et al....
Transcript of Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ? - APHC – International … · · 2018-02-12German P, et al....
Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ?
PHC 2018
PARIS
January 15th, 2018
Tarik Asselah (MD, PhD)
Professor of MedicineHepatology, Chief INSERM UMR 1149,
Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
PHC 2018 - www.aphc.info
Disclosures
• Employee of Paris Public University Hospitals (AP-HP, Beaujon’s Hospital) and University of Paris
• Principal investigator for research grants : Funds paid to Hospital (AP-HP)
• Consultant, expert and speaker for: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharp Dohme, Roche.
• Grants from : ANR, CNRS , INSERM , University of Paris, ANRS
2
1 Introduction
2 Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (Epclusa®)
3 Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®)
4 Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (Zepatier®)
5 Challenges to achieve HCV elimination
Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ?
Estimated 70 Million Persons Living With HCV
0% to < 0.6%0.6% to < 0.8%0.8% to < 1.3%1.3% to < 2.9%2.9% to < 6.7%
Prevalence(Viremic)
Polaris Observatory HCV Collaborators. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:161-176.
Direct-acting antivirals : a Revolution
Capsid
MetalloproteaseSerine protease
RNA helicaseEnvelope
glycoproteins
E1C E2
Non-structural proteinsStructural proteins5’NTR 3’NTR
NS1 NS2 NS3 NS4A NS4B
Cofactors
NS5A
Protease inhibitors« …previr »
Polymerase inhibitors« …..buvir »
NS5A inhibitors« ….asvir »
RNApolymerase
NS5B
ParitaprevirGlecaprevirGrazoprevirVoxilaprevir
LedipasvirVelpatasvirPibrentasvirOmbitasvirElbasvirDaclatasvir
Nucs Sofosbuvir
Non-Nucs
Dasabuvir
Asselah et al. Liver Int 2018, in press.
SOF + RBV12–24 weeks
SOF + SMV± RBV12–24 weeks
SOF/LDV± RBV8†–24 weeks
SOF + DCV± RBV12–24 weeks
OMV/PTV/RTV
± DSV ± RBV 12–24 weeks
SOF/VEL± RBV
12 weeks
GRZ/EBV ± RBV 12–16 weeks
GLE/PIB8–12 weeks
SOF/VEL/VOX12 weeks
Jan 2014 May 2014 Sept 2014 Nov 2014 Jan 2015 July 2016 July 2017
SOFVELLDV
SMV DCV
VOX
PIB
GRZ
EBV
GLE
PIB
PTV
DSVOMV
O
O
N
NF
F
O
O
OO
O O OS
NH
FF
HN
N
NH
Asselah et al. Liver Int 2018, in press.
SVR > 95%
Safety
Tolerability
Pangenotypic:
High barrier to resistance
Short duration; Low pill burden
Minimal drug–drug interactions
Access/cost
Priorities for Direct-acting antivirals
Top Priorities
SVR > 95%
Safety
Tolerability
High barrier to resistance
Short duration; Low pill burden
Minimal drug–drug interactions
Pan-genotypic
Access/cost
Priorities for Direct-acting antivirals
Top Priorities
Secondary Priorities
1 Introduction
2 Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (Epclusa®)
3 Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®)
4 Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (Zepatier®)
5 Challenges to achieve HCV elimination
Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ?
SOF Nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor
♦ Sofosbuvir (SOF)1,2‒ Potent antiviral activity against
HCV GT 1‒6
‒ Once-daily, oral, 400-mg tablet
SOF VEL
VELNS5A inhibitor
♦ Velpatasvir (VEL; GS-5816)3-5● Picomolar potency against GT 1‒6● 2nd-generation inhibitor with
improved resistance profile
♦ SOF/VEL Single Tablet Regimen (STR)● Once daily, oral, STR (400/100 mg)
1. Jacobson IM, et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1867-77; 2. Lawitz E, et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1878-87; 3. Cheng G, et al. EASL 2013, poster 1191; 4. German P, et al. EASL 2013, poster 1195; 5. Lawitz E, et al. EASL 2013, poster 1082.
Velpatasvir/Sofosbuvir: A Single Tablet Regimen (STR)
O
O
N
NF
F
O
O
OO
O O OS
NH
FF
HN
N
NH
Sofosbuvir (SOF)/Velpatasvir (VEL)SOF: Nucleotide polymerase inhibitor with
activity against HCV GT 1–6
VEL: Potent pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor
Voxilaprevir (VOX)HCV NS3/4A PI with potent antiviral activity against GT 1–6, including most RASs
SOF/VEL/VOXOnce daily, oral, fixed-dose combination (400/100/100 mg) for GT 1–6
VOXNS3/4A Proteaseinhibitor
VOXNS3/4A proteaseinhibitor
VELNS5A inhibitor
SOF Nucleotide polymerase
inhibitor
VOXNS3/4A proteaseinhibitor
VELNS5A inhibitor
SOF Nucleotide polymerase
inhibitor
Voxilaprevir/Velpatasvir/Sofosbuvir: STR
Velpatasvir/Sofosbuvir (Epclusa®) for 12 weeks across all genotypes (ASTRAL-1, ASTRAL-2 and ASTRAL-3)
AE: adverse event; D/C: discontinuation; LTFU: lost to follow-up; SAE: serious adverse eventAgarwal K, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #SAT-195; Jacobson I, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #SAT-168
SV
R12
(%
)
1015/1035
323/328
237/238
264/277
116/116
34/35
41/41
2 relapses
2 LTFU
1 D/C
1 D/C11
relapses
2 D/C1 death
• 2% of patients experienced one or more SAE; no SAEs were considered study drug related
• 2 patients discontinued treatment due to AEs
SOF/VEL (Epclusa®) is effective in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (ASTRAL 1, 2 & 3)
Asselah T, et al. Liver Int 2018, in press
Overall
98
CirrhosisAdvanced fibrosis
490/501
212/220
278/281
9699P
atie
nts
wit
h S
VR
(%
)
0
20
40
60
80
10097
1 2
97
2 3
97
2 4
99
1 6
100
0
10
96
3 5
95
412
100
0
98100
0
46
100
0
98
SVR12, %
GT 4
11
431445
150155
3636
126132
3941
222228
Total GT 1 Total GT 1a GT 1b GT 2 GT 3 GT 5 GT 6 Other
11
66
6869
SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 Weeks in DAA-Experienced Patients
Breakthrough 1* 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Relapse 7 2 2 0 0 4 1 0 0 0
Other 6 3 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0
*Patient had drug levels consistent with nonadherence.Roberts, EASL 2017, SAT-280
Integrated Efficacy Analysis of POLARIS-1 and -4
The SVR12 rate was 97% (431/445) in DAA-experienced patients treated with SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks; Rates were similar regardless of genotype
1 Introduction
2 Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (Epclusa®)
3 Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®)
4 Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (Zepatier®)
5 Challenges to achieve HCV elimination
Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ?
In vitro:1,2
● High barrier to resistance● Potent against common NS3 polymorphisms (eg.,
positions 80, 155, and 168) and NS5A polymorphisms (eg., positions 28, 30, 31 and 93)
● Additive/synergistic antiviral activity
Clinical PK & metabolism:
● Once-daily oral dosing● Minimal metabolism and primary biliary excretion● Negligible renal excretion (<1%)
G/P is co-formulated and dosed once daily as three 100 mg/40 mg pills for a total dose of 300 mg/120 mg.Glecaprevir was identified by AbbVie and Enanta.
Glecaprevir(ABT-493)
pangenotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitor
Pibrentasvir(ABT-530)
pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor
Collectively: G/P2nd generation3 2nd generation3
1. Ng TI, et al. Abstract 636. CROI, 2014. 2. Ng TI, et al. Abstract 639. CROI, 2014. 3. Pawlotsky, Gastroenterology 2016
Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®)
Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret) in Patients with HCV GT1, 2, 4-6 Infection with or without Compensated Cirrhosis
383387
193197
177186
9899
98
93
100 10099 99
100 100 100 100
SVR1
2 (%
)
348351
596606
nN
MAVIRET for 12 Weeks inTN/TE CC Patients:
EXPEDITION-1
MAVIRET for 12 Weeks inTN/TE CC Patients:
EXPEDITION-1
MAVIRET for 8 Weeks inTN/TE NC Patients:
ENDURANCE-1 and SURVEYOR-2
MAVIRET for 8 Weeks inTN/TE NC Patients:
ENDURANCE-1 and SURVEYOR-2
193197
3131
145146
8990
1010
BT 1 1
Relapse 2 2 1 1
Non-VF* 7 2 2 3
1616
22
77
All analyses are using the ITT population.TN, treatment-naïve; TE, treatment-experienced with IFN or pegIFN ± RBV, or SOF + RBV ± pegIFN; NC, non-cirrhotic; CC, compensated cirrhotic; ITT, intent-to-treat; BT, breakthrough; VF, virologic failure.*Includes patients who discontinued due to adverse events, lost to follow-up, or withdrew.
4346
22
MAVIRET Summary of Product Characteristics; Accessed August 2017.. Asselah T, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017
Integrated Efficacy Analysis: High SVR Rates with 8 and 12 Weeks of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in GT1–6 Patients without Cirrhosis
Puoti M, et al. J Hepatol 2017; 66(Suppl):S721 (poster presentation SAT-233).
BT, breakthrough; mITT, modified intent-to-treat, (excludes non-virologic failures); *TE, treatment-experienced (includes patients with prior SOF use); TN, treatment-naive Includes patients with prior SOF use (8-week Maviret [n = 7] and 12-week Maviret [n = 9]);† All GT3 patients were treatment-naïve.
Integrated efficacy analysis of 8- or 12-weeks Maviret treatment in non-cirrhotic patients with GT1–6 infection across seven phase 2 or 3 clinical trials
Integrated efficacy analysis of 8- or 12-weeks Maviret treatment in non-cirrhotic patients with GT1–6 infection across seven phase 2 or 3 clinical trials
Overall GT1 GT2 GT3 GT4 GT5 GT60
20
40
60
80
10099 99,7 99 97 100 100 10099,6 100 100 98 100 100 100
8 week G/P 12 week G/P
SVR12 (%)
383384
400400
193195
232232
177183
258262
4343
111111
22
2828
99
3131
807816
10601064
nN
TN/TE* (mITT)
†
2 BT
7 relapse
1 BT
3 relapse
Failure rate was similar between 8 and 12 week
Maviret®
Failure rate was similar between 8 and 12 week
Maviret®
GP—VHC—RMR—093—sept17—R—A—DLU sept18 v2
Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret) in Patients with HCV GT3 Infection with or without Compensated Cirrhosis
SVR1
2 (%
)
BT 1 1
Relapse 5 3 1
Non-VF* 2 7 3
nN
All analyses are using the ITT population.TN, treatment-naïve; TE, treatment-experienced with IFN or pegIFN ± RBV, or SOF + RBV ± pegIFN; BT, breakthrough; CC, compensated cirrhosis; NC, noncirrhotic; DCV, daclatasvir; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; SOF, sofosbuvir; TE, treatment experienced; TN, treatment naive; VF, virologic failure.*Includes patients who discontinued due to adverse events, lost to follow-up, or withdrew.
95 95
97
SVR1
2 (%
)
111115
222233
149157
nN
BT 1
Relapse 2
Non-VF* 1
MAVIRET for 8 or 12 Weeks inTN NC Patients:ENDURANCE-3
MAVIRET for 8 or 12 Weeks inTN NC Patients:ENDURANCE-3
MAVIRET8 weeks
MAVIRET12 weeks
DCV + SOF12 weeks
MAVIRET for 12 Weeks in TN CC Patients, or 16 Weeks in TE NC/CC
Patients: SURVEYOR-2 Part 3
MAVIRET for 12 Weeks in TN CC Patients, or 16 Weeks in TE NC/CC
Patients: SURVEYOR-2 Part 3
98
96
TN CC12 weeks
TE NC/CC16 weeks
MAVIRET Summary of Product Characteristics; Accessed August 2017.
3940
6669
1 Introduction
2 Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (Epclusa®)
3 Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®)
4 Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (Zepatier®)
5 Challenges to achieve HCV elimination
Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ?
HCV NS5A inhibitor, 50 mg
Elbasvir(MK-8742)
Grazoprevir(MK-5172)
HCV NS3/4A inhibitor, 100 mg
Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (Zepatier®)
• High activity in vitro1–3 • Efficacious in GT1 & GT4 treatment-naive and treatment-
experienced cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with HCV, and in HIV/HCV coinfected patients4–6
• All-oral, once-daily regimen
HCV = hepatitis C virus; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus.1. Summa V et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012:56;4161–4167. 2. Coburn CA et al. ChemMedChem. 2013;8:1930–1940. 3. Harper S et al. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3:332–336. 4. Zeuzem S et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:1–13. 5. Lawitz E et al. Lancet. 2015;385:1075–1086. 6. Rockstroh JK et al. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e319–e327.
EBR/GZR in Treatment-Naive Patients With Cirrhosis
LTFU/early discontinuation 1b 1b 0 0
Breakthrough 1 1 0 0
Relapse 1 1 0 0a mFAS excludes patients who discontinued treatment for reasons unrelated to study medication.bDeath (coronary artery disease).EBR/GZR = elbasvir/grazoprevir; RBV = ribavirin; FAS = full analysis set; SVR12 = sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the cessation of treatment; GT = genotype; LTFU = lost to follow up; mFAS = modified full analysis set.
1. Jacobson I et al. AASLD 2015, Abstract 42.
Patie
nts
Achi
evin
g SV
R12,
%66
98 96 100 100
0
25
50
75
100
5656
7376
135138
• Integrated analysis of patients with cirrhosis from 6 clinical trials in the Phase 2/3 clinical program
• Patient population● Treatment-naive● With or without HIV-1
coinfection
Efficacy of 12 Weeks of EBR/GZR Without RBV in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis99 97 100 100
66
5656
7375
135137
mFASa
FAS
Comorbidity - Stage 4-5 CKD
OAT/PWID ± HIV IBLD ± HIV HIV ± HIV ± HIV
Genotypes 1,4,6 1 1,4,6 1,4 1,4,6 1,4,6 1,4,6
Treatment Experience TN TN/PR-PTF TN TN/PR-PTF TN PR-PTF PR-PTF
12 Weeks EBR/GZR Without RBV 16 Weeks EBR/GZR +
RBV
Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (Zepatier): Efficacy in Different Patient Populations
210217
100106
299312
97103
104104
189198
115116
Phase 3 studies vs placebo
amFAS excludes patients who failed for reasons unrelated to study medication.EBR/GZR = elbasvir/grazoprevir; SVR12 = sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the cessation of treatment; CKD = chronic kidney disease;OAT = opioid agonist therapy; PWID = people who inject drugs; IBLD = inherited blood disorders; TN = treatment naive; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus;TE = treatment experienced; RBV = ribavirin; PR = peginterferon + ribavirin; PTF = prior-treatment failure; mFAS= modified full analysis set.1. Roth D et al. Lancet. 2015;386:1537–1545. 2. Dore GJ et al. EASL 2016, SAT-163. 3. Hezode C et al. EASL 2016, SAT-128. 4. Zeuzem S et al. Ann intern Med. 2015;163:1–13. 5. Rockstroh JK et al. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e319–e327. 6. Kwo P et al. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:164–175.
Patie
nts
Achi
evin
g SV
R12,
%
99 96 9496 97 94100
Overall mFASa SVR12 rates from the Phase 3 clinical trial program
Treatment-experienced
1 Introduction
2 Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (Epclusa®)
3 Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®)
4 Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (Zepatier®)
5 Challenges to achieve HCV elimination
Treatment of HCV : 100 % cure ?
ASCEND: Nonrandomized Phase IV Trial of HCV Treatment Outcomes by DAA Prescriber Type
• Pts (N = 600) from 13 urban, FQHCs in DC, all treated with LDV/SOF per FDA prescribing info; all providers given 3-hr training in AASLD/IDSA HCV guidance
Kattakuzhy S, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:311-318.
SV
R12
(%
)
100
80
60
40
20
0NP/PA Primary MD Specialist MD Overall
89 87 84 86
134/150
139/160
243/290
516/600n/N =
IFN-Free DAA Therapy: Opioid Substitution Therapy vs No Opioid Substitution Therapy
1. Feld JJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1594-1603.; 2. Puoti M, et al. AASLD 2014. Abstract 1938.3. Grebely J, et al. EASL 2017. Abstract FRI-236.; 4. Grebely J, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:1405-1411.5. Grebely J, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:1479-1481.; 6. Zeuzem S, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:1-13.7. Dore GJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:625-634.; 8. Grebely J, et al. EASL 2017. Abstract FRI-235. .
OBV/PTV/RTV + DSV + RBV[1,2]
OBV/PTV/RTV + DSV ± RBV[3]
LDV/SOF+ RBV[4]
n/N =0
60
80
40
20
100
49/51
966/984
98 96
455/473
54/56
269/296
299/316
66/70
1822/1882
96 97 95 91
SVR1
2 (%
)
9496 94
SOF/VEL[5] EBR/GZR[6,7]
No OST OST
140/ 149
4405/
4598
96 8897
7/8
424/437
SOF/VEL/VOX[8]
9895
40/ 41
543/570
12 Wks 8 Wks
The need to cure of all HCV infected Patients, No patient left behind
Asselah et al. Eliminating Hepatitis C within Low Income Countries – the need to cureGenotypes 4, 5, 6. Journalof Hepatology, 2018 in press
WHO region Map key Bestestimate
Africa 31,0
America 6,4
Middle East 62,5
Europa a 61,8
South Est Asia 14,8
West Pacific 6,0
Total 23,7
Incidence rate (per 100 000)
Hutin J-F, Suisse, WHO, EASL 2017
How to achieve HCV elimination
PREVENTION
• Harm reduction• Infection control• Blood safety
How to achieve HCV elimination
PREVENTION
• Harm reduction• Infection control• Blood safety
AWARENESS
• Increase awareness
• Fights barriers & stigma
• Advocacy
How to achieve HCV elimination
PREVENTION
• Harm reduction• Infection control• Blood safety
TEST AND TREAT
• HCV screening (universal)
• Linkage to care : Treat with optimal DAAs
AWARENESS
• Increase awareness
• Fights barriers & stigma
• Advocacy
How to achieve HCV elimination
PREVENTION
• Harm reduction• Infection control• Blood safety
TEST AND TREAT
• HCV screening (universal)
• Linkage to care : Treat with optimal DAAs
AWARENESS
• Increase awareness
• Fights barriers & stigma
• Advocacy
HCV elimination
Asselah et al. Liver Int 2018, in press.