Transportation 2035: Investment Trade Offs Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation...
-
Upload
ada-phoebe-richard -
Category
Documents
-
view
237 -
download
5
Transcript of Transportation 2035: Investment Trade Offs Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation...
Transportation 2035:Investment Trade OffsTransportation 2035:Investment Trade Offs
Metropolitan Transportation CommissionTransportation 2035 Public Involvement
Program
June 13, 2008
Spring 2008 Public Involvement
Nine county workshops • Open to the public• Wide range of advertising• Over 400 attendees;
self-selected participants
Public Opinion Telephone Poll
• 3,600 registered voters
Spring 2008 Public Involvement
• Nine focus groups – 96 participants, registered voters recruited from telephone poll respondents
• Ten focus groups –155 participants recruited by community-based organizations
• Series of workshops with MTC advisors
% of Participants Attending First Public Meeting on Bay Area Transportation Issues
20% 21%24%
26%30%
9%
5%
37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
CC Napa SM Sol
31%
31%
20% 21%24% 26%
30%
9%5%
37%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Alameda ContraCosta
Marin Napa S.F. SanMateo
SantaClara
Solano Sonoma
At Workshops
Equal Support for 3E Goals at Workshops
05
101520253035404550
Alameda ContraCosta
Marin Napa S.F. SanMateo
SantaClara
Solano Sonoma
Economy Environment Equity
At Workshops
Maintenance
Higher Investment Priority: Maintain existing system vs. Build new roads, add more public transit
• Maintenance and Expansion Evenly Split
— Poll respondents 2007
• Maintenance over Expansion
— Workshop participants
• Expansion over Maintenance
— Community and Registered Voter Focus Groups
Key Observations on Maintenance
• Overall:
• A high priority, but clear support for reserving some funds for system expansion
• Many who supported expansion primarily support it for public transit plus bike/ped investments to improve their ability to get around, and to provide alternatives to the auto
• But can’t invest exclusively in transit; support to maintain roads for safety reasons, buses use roads, etc.
Congestion Relief
Investment Priority: Congestion ReliefHighways vs. Transit Alternatives vs. Walking/Bicycling Alternatives
• Consensus: support transit alternatives
— Poll respondents 2007
— Workshop participants
— Community Based Focus Groups
— Registered Voter Focus Groups
Key Observations on Congestion Relief
• Overall:• Majority support for investing in transit to relieve
freeway congestion, versus highway or bike/ped investments
• Support for transit overwhelming in urban core and in focus groups; less so in suburban areas, but transit still garnered a majority regardless of location
• Important to accommodate bikes on transit
• MTC advisors urge increased investment to improve transit performance and efficiency, e.g. improve schedule information, access to transit, route planning, security, and develop universal fare structure
Focused Growth
Higher Investment Priority: Communities building housing near transit vs. Even distribution among communities
• Even distribution among communities— Poll respondents 2007
• More to communities building TODs— Workshop participants
• Even distribution among communities— Community Based Focus Groups
• More to communities building TODs— Registered Voter Focus Groups
Key Observations on Focus Growth
Overall:
• Cluster jobs as well as housing. Santa Clara and Alameda county participants cited job sprawl
• Need to address safety — safety on bikes, crime on transit and at transit stops
Community Focus Groups:
• Support even distribution of funds — housing near transit may be beyond their financial reach and smaller communities with less transit shouldn’t be penalized
MTC Advisors:
• Stress accessibility in TOD design, as well as affordability
Access/Equity
Key Observations on Access/Equity
• Strong support for additional subsidies for
low-income riders — All participants
• Mixed support to reluctance for basing all transit fare subsidies on income rather than age or disability — Community & Registered Voter Focus Groups — Workshop Participants
(Question not asked in polls)
Key Observations on Access/Equity
Overall:
• Increase transit services — increase frequency and destinations — and provide seamless connections for all transit riders
• “It’s not fares that prevent people from taking transit, but more so whether transit goes where they need to go.”
— Workshop Participant
MTC Advisors:• Increase transit service hours and destinations,
improve connectivity, pursue regional accessible taxi ordinance and additional paratransit funds
Emissions Reduction
Transportation Investment Tradeoffs: Reducing Emissions Favored Over Making Driving Easier
• Focus on decreasing tailpipe emissions and encouraging alternatives to driving, as opposed to improving our ability to drive more easily around the Bay Area
— Poll respondents 2008— Workshop participants— Community Based Focus Groups— Registered Voter Focus Groups
Key Observations on Emissions Reductions• By encouraging alternatives to driving we will
reduce traffic congestion and improve traffic flow
• Top four choices for reducing emissions…
• More and less expensive public transit
• Focused growth funding incentives
• Bicycle/pedestrian improvements
• Subsidize purchase of newer/cleaner vehicles