Toxic and Radioactive Waste

download Toxic and Radioactive Waste

of 62

Transcript of Toxic and Radioactive Waste

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    1/62

    TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE

    WASTE DISPOSAL

    Master Applied Geophysics

    Prof.dr.eng. Cristian Marunteanu

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    2/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    3/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    4/62

    1. CLASSIFICATION OF WASTE1. CLASSIFICATION OF WASTEAND DISPOSAL METHODSAND DISPOSAL METHODS

    1.1. TYPES OF WASTE1.1. TYPES OF WASTE

    > After s !r"eAfter s !r"e ??

    @ +ndustrial waste 8including mining9@ +ndustrial waste 8including mining9

    @ Agricultural waste@ Agricultural waste

    @ :omestic 8municipal9 waste@ :omestic 8municipal9 waste

    Annual rate comparing with the total uantity of waste?Annual rate comparing with the total uantity of waste? /%A? 3B industrial waste 8from which *3B from mining acti ities9-/%A? 3B industrial waste 8from which *3B from mining acti ities9-22B agricultural waste- (B domestic waste 8 2(0 mil.tonesD922B agricultural waste- (B domestic waste 8 2(0 mil.tonesD9 Erance? * B agricultural waste- 2*B industrial waste- (B domesticErance? * B agricultural waste- 2*B industrial waste- (B domesticwastewaste

    @ ;adioacti e waste@ ;adioacti e waste

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    5/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    6/62

    1.6. METHODS OF WASTE DISPOSAL1.6. METHODS OF WASTE DISPOSAL

    A. After t#e $%t!re f t#e &%steA. After t#e $%t!re f t#e &%ste 8only solid waste8only solid wasteaccording to 4G 3& 200(9?according to 4G 3& 200(9?

    a9 disposal of ha'ardous wastea9 disposal of ha'ardous waste"9 disposal of non@ha'ardous waste"9 disposal of non@ha'ardous wastec9 disposal of inert wastec9 disposal of inert waste

    B. After t#e ; s t $ %>% $st t#e >r !$* s!rf%"e'B. After t#e ; s t $ %>% $st t#e >r !$* s!rf%"e'

    a9 surface disposala9 surface disposal"9 underground disposal"9 underground disposal

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    7/62

    1.6.1. S!rf%"e * s; s%,1.6.1. S!rf%"e * s; s%,

    a9 pen disposal 8inert waste9"9 %anitary disposal 8non@ha'ardous waste9

    c9 )cological disposal 8ha'ardous and non@ha'ardouswaste9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    8/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    9/62

    "9 %anitary disposal

    8"y compaction and co ering

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    10/62

    c9 )cological dispos

    8completely sealed9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    11/62

    1.6.6. U$*er>r !$* * s; s%,1.6.6. U$*er>r !$* * s; s%,

    a9 :isposal in deep a uifer formation

    "9 :isposal in dissolution ca erns

    c9 :isposal in underground e,ca ations

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    12/62

    /nderground disposal

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    13/62

    D s; s%, $ # *r >e , > "%, " ,,e"t rs'

    > Geological conditions?@ The in ection 'one must ha e porosity- hydraulic conducti ity andthic=ness suita"le for a safe in ection 8e.g. sandstones and ssuredlimestones9H@ The in ection 'one under the Iow le el of the underground water and

    separated from it "y impermea"le formations 8clay- salt9

    > Physical@chemical conditions?@ to pre ent the ad erse reaction with the reser oir roc=s 8e.g. thehydrocloric acid increases the hydraulic conducti ity of limestones-while the sulphonic acid decreases the porosity.

    > )conomic and legal conditions 8e.g. in the Great #ritain is not allowedthis =ind of disposal9

    > Monitoring 8"y deep and shallow drillings9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    14/62

    1. . CLASSIFICATION AND DISPOSAL OF THE1. . CLASSIFICATION AND DISPOSAL OF THERADIOACTIVE WASTERADIOACTIVE WASTE

    C,%ss ?"%t $ f t#e r%* %"t -e &%steC,%ss ?"%t $ f t#e r%* %"t -e &%ste ??

    a9 After the radioacti ity le el?

    @ low le el radioacti e waste@ intermediate le el radioacti e waste@ high le el radioacti e waste

    "9 After the radioacti ity duration ?

    @ short life waste 8half period less than 30 years9@ long life waste

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    15/62

    IAEA +I$ter$%t $%, At 3 " E$er> A>e$" 2 V e$$%9 C,%ss ?"%t $IAEA +I$ter$%t $%, At 3 " E$er> A>e$" 2 V e$$%9 C,%ss ?"%t $ RADWASS RADWASS +S%fet St%$*%r*s9+S%fet St%$*%r*s9

    @ ),empt 5aste 8Jfoarte sla" radioacti eK9 8)59? disposal "y dilution ordispersion.

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    16/62

    FINAL DISPOSAL OPTIONS OF THE RADIOACTIVEFINAL DISPOSAL OPTIONS OF THE RADIOACTIVE

    WASTE'WASTE'

    @$+$5 @ %$ waste can "e disposed in surface repositories8some countries- e.g. Germany- allow only underground disposal9

    @ $+$5 @ $$ si 4$5 waste must "e disposed in deep geologicalformations 8separately9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    17/62

    F $%, * s; s%, f t#e LILW(SL &%steF $%, * s; s%, f t#e LILW(SL &%ste

    Einal co er

    Eoundation Compactedloess

    Galery :isposalmodule :isposalcell

    :itch

    :itch +mpro ed land

    Romanian concept DFDSMA -Romanian concept DFDSMA -Saligny Saligny

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    18/62

    Location of the DFDSMA Saligny inside the safety areaof the NPP (CNE) Cernavoda

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    19/62

    Aerial iew with the print of the disposal facilities :E:%MA %aligny

    F $% * % f # LILW(SL &%F $% * % f t# LILW(SL &% t

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    20/62:E:%MA %aligny site F geotechnical and hydrogeological 'oning

    F $%, * s; s%, f t#e LILW(SL &%steF $%, * s; s%, f t#e LILW(SL &%ste

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    21/62

    %ite location F actual image

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    22/62

    +nterim disposal of $+$5@%$ waste inside PP Cerna oda 8:+:;9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    23/62

    The Centre and the disposal cells from lNAu"e F Erance 8opened in 1 &

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    24/62

    The surface repository from $a Manche 8Erance9

    O closed from 1 & 8(00.000 c.m.9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    25/62

    :;5 8: :;9 #aita #ihor 8from 1 (9 for $+$5 F %$ waste8other from Cerna oda PP waste9

    Transport containers

    )ntrance in the : :; #aita #ihor

    :isposal gallery in the : :;

    $ f $

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    26/62

    The principle of multiple "arriers

    F $%, * s; s%, f t#e LILW ( LL %$* HLW &%steF $%, * s; s%, f t#e LILW ( LL %$* HLW &%ste

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    27/62

    Pro ected repository in the salt dome Gorle"en 8Germany9

    Underground testingUnderground testing

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    28/62

    ),periments in theGrimsel Test %ite

    8%wit'erland9

    Underground testingUnderground testinglaboratories:laboratories:

    #elgium F Mol 8clays9%wit'erland F Grimsel 8crystallinroc=s9

    Erance F Meuse 4aute Marne 8clay9Germany F Asse 8salt9/%A F 5+PP@ ew Me,ico 8salt9 QM F e ada 8 olcanic tuL9%wedia F %tripa Ri Ssp 8crystallin

    roc=s9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    29/62

    U$*er>r !$* re; s t r es $ f!$"t $ +%9 r %;;r -e* +=9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    30/62

    U$ er>r !$ re; s t r es $ f!$ t $ +%9 r %;;r -e +=9

    WIPP Repository – New Mexico (S A) 85aste +solation Pilot Plant9? $$;58M9- T;/5- in salt

    Trans ersal geological section

    %urface and underground facilities

    la"orator depo'it

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    31/62

    "9

    @ ;epository pro ect n=alo @ l=iluoto +sl.8Einland9 for spent fuel- in crystalline roc=s- under the #altic%ea 8apro ed 2001- started in 2010- operational from20209

    @ ;epository pro ect Eorsmar=

    8%weden9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    32/62

    Interim storage of spent fuel

    +nterim storage of spent and reprocessed fuel inside the reactors8the nuclear waste are itri ed in the facilities of %ella eld F Great #ritain9

    * years disposal in pools (0 years dry disposal geological nal dispo

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    33/62

    Pool of spent fuel at the unit 1 PP Cerna oda

    Accident? 4anford 85ashington9- in 1 3- &(0.000 l of radioacti e wastelea=ed from a disposal reser oir 2 years old

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    34/62

    +nterim storage of spent fuel 8:+CA9 Cerna oda

    +nterim storage modules8in construction9

    $oading of spent fuelin disposal modules

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    35/62

    %wedish concept on radioacti e waste disposal

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    36/62

    %pontaneous nuclear reactor in a rich uranium ore deposit in clay8 =lo F Ga"on9 "egun 2 mill. years ago.

    +t suggests the safety of spent fuel disposal in clay

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    37/62

    6. ONING OF LAND SUITABILITY FORSURFACE WASTE DISPOSAL

    2.1. #asic principles of land suita"ility assessment?2.1. #asic principles of land suita"ility assessment?@ suita"le 'ones@ suita"le 'ones@ moderately suita"le 'ones@ moderately suita"le 'ones

    @ unsuita"le 'ones@ unsuita"le 'ones2.2. $and suita"ility map 8"y compiling of three parallel map2.2. $and suita"ility map 8"y compiling of three parallel map

    sheets9?sheets9? @ 2 documentation maps?@ 2 documentation maps?@ map of legally protected areas@ map of legally protected areas 8degree of legal8degree of legal

    protection9protection9

    @ map of geo@factors@ map of geo@factors8ris= of groundwater pollution and8ris= of groundwater pollution andpresence of ha'ardous geodynamic phenomena9presence of ha'ardous geodynamic phenomena9 @ 1 proper land suita"ility map@ 1 proper land suita"ility map

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    38/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    39/62

    LocalitiesForests,vineyards

    Rivers, la es

    Roads

    Ma! of legally !rotected areas

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    40/62

    Ma! of geofactors

    "olocene# sands, gravels

    Pleistocene# sands, gravels,red clay, loess

    Pannonian, Pliocene# clays,$arls, sands, gravels

    Drillings

    %o&ns

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    41/62

    Land s'ita ility $a!

    ns'ita le *ones

    Moderately s'ita le *ones

    S'ita le *ones

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    42/62

    . SITE SELECTION AND ANALYSIS CRITERIAFOR WASTE DISPOSAL

    3.1. Geological- pedological and hydrogeologicalcriteria?

    a9 characteristics and structure of the geological strataH "9 actual land use and fertility classH economical- nancial and sociale aluation for the local populationH c9 structure 8physical@chemical and "acteriologica characteristics9- depthand Iow direction of the underground waterH d9 distance from ri ers- la=es and water supply sourcesH e9 Iooding potential of the areaH f9 slope water Iow from precipitation.

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    43/62

    3.2. Climatic criteria? a9 main wind direction ersus human settlementsH "9 precipitation regime

    3.3. )conomical criteria? a9 capacity and duration of the waste depositH

    "9 transportation distance of waste from source to disposalH c9 necessity of secondary facilities 8access roads- utilities etc.9

    3.&. %upplementary criteria for the site? a9 isi"ilityH "9 accessH c9 topography

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    44/62

    5. SITE CHARACTERI ATION5. SITE CHARACTERI ATION

    5.1. Re> $%, >e , > "%, st!* es5.1. Re> $%, >e , > "%, st!* es

    5.6. H *r >e , > "%, st!* es5.6. H *r >e , > "%, st!* es

    5. . Ge te"#$ "%, st!* es5. . Ge te"#$ "%, st!* es

    5.5. Ge ;# s "%, $-est >%t $s5.5. Ge ;# s "%, $-est >%t $s

    @ Apparent ;esisti ity Method@ )lectromagnetic +nduction Methods 8+)M9@ )lectromagnetic ;eIection Method 8);M9 8Georadar9

    @ ;efraction %eismic @ #orehole geophysical logging @ thers

    $ fE % !% $ f # "% ! %

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    45/62

    . E-%,!%t $ f t#e >e , > "%, s! t%= , t. E-%,!%t $ f t#e >e , > "%, s! t%= , tf % s!rf%"e &%ste * s; s%, s tef % s!rf%"e &%ste * s; s%, s te 8P. #ohn98P. #ohn9

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    46/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    47/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    48/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    49/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    50/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    51/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    52/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    53/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    54/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    55/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    56/62

    7. E$- r $3e$t%, 3;%"t e-%,!%t $ f &%ste * s7. E$- r $3e$t%, 3;%"t e-%,!%t $ f &%ste * sMain impacts of waste disposal? @ pollution with the ma ority ofpollutants @ large areas of land co ered with

    land lls @ sta"ility of land lls

    )n ironmental impact matri, O structure of en ironmental criteriaand impacts

    +mpactCriteria

    5aterpollution

    Aesthetics oise andodour

    ;egimemodi cati

    on4ydrogeologicalconditions

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    57/62

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    58/62

    Classi cation of the magnitude m ,

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    59/62

    +mpact inde, 8%9

    ∑ ×= )( x x miS

    The higher is 8%9- the higher is the impact of the waste disposal and ten ironmental acceptance is lower

    + APPLICATION

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    60/62

    + (Toxic and Radioactive Waste Disposal – Master Applied Geoph sics!

    + I. ZONING OF LAND SUITABILITY FOR SURFACE WASTE DISPOSAL

    Short geological and geo$or!hological descri!tion of the area ($a-. / !age)

    0eological $a!

    %o!ogra!hic $a!

    Map o" le#all protected areas (overla!!ed on to!ogra!hic $a!)

    Map o" #eo$"actors (overla!!ed on geological $a!)

    Land s%ita&ilit 'ap # s'ita le *ones

    $oderately s'ita le *ones

    'ns'ita le *ones

    (overla!!ed on to!ogra!hic $a!)

    (with title, scale and legend! )

    Choice of three s'rface &aste dis!osal sites in different *ones of s'ita ility.

    Location on the land s'ita ility $a!.

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    61/62

    II EVALUATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL SUITABILITY OF THE THREE

    SURFACE WASTE DISPOSAL SITES For each site# the nine gro'!s of !heno$ena, !oints and

    1'stification of the assign$ent, classification of the site as !otential site for

    ha*ardo's &aste dis!osal &orthy of detailed e-!loration, co$!arison

    et&een the three sites.

    III )N*IRONM)NTAL IMPACT )*AL+ATION O, T-) T-R))

    .+R,AC) WA.T) DI.PO.AL .IT).

    For each site# environ$ental i$!act $atri-, 1'stification of theassign$ent of the significance of the i$!act (i$!ortance, i), i$!act inde- (S),

    inter!retation and co$!arison et&een the three sites.

    Theoretica !"e#tio$# #

  • 8/15/2019 Toxic and Radioactive Waste

    62/62

    Theoretica ! e#tio$# #

    +Classifications of &aste

    +2aste dis!osal $ethods# s'rface and 'ndergro'nd+Radioactive &aste# classification

    dis!osal o!tions for L3L2 SL

    dis!osal o!tions for L3L2 LL and "L2

    final dis!osal interi$ storage

    s'ita le geological for$ations for s!ent f'el

    dis!osal in Ro$ania

    +Site selection and characteri*ation criteria for &aste dis!osal+4oning of land s'ita ility for s'rface &aste dis!osal

    +Eval'ation of the geological s'ita ility of a s'rface &aste dis!osal site

    +Environ$ental i$!act eval'ation of a s'rface &aste dis!osal