THE SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS … · 2019. 11. 14. · the socialist republic of...
201
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT THE SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Hanoi, 2019
Transcript of THE SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS … · 2019. 11. 14. · the socialist republic of...
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
THE SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS
CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Hanoi, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 4
LIST OF FIGURES & MAPS ...................................................................................................... 5
INTRODUCTION OF 6th NATIONAL REPORT.................................................................... 1
Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level ............................... 2
Section III. Assessment of progress towards each national target ......................................... 27
Section IV. Description of the national contribution to the achievement of each global Aichi
Biodiversity Target ...................................................................................................................... 37
Aichi Biodiversity Target 1: Awareness of biodiversity increased ........................................... 37
Aichi Biodiversity Target 2: Biodiversity values integrated ..................................................... 39
Aichi Biodiversity Target 3: Incentives reformed ..................................................................... 44
Aichi Biodiversity Target 4: Sustainable production and consumption ................................... 49
Aichi Biodiversity Target 5: Habitat loss halved or reduced .................................................... 56
Aichi Biodiversity Target 6: Sustainable management of aquatic living resources ................. 70
Aichi Biodiversity Target 7: Sustainable agriculture, aquaculture and forestry ....................... 80
Aichi Biodiversity Target 8: Pollution reduced ........................................................................ 89
Aichi Biodiversity Target 9: Invasive alien species prevented and controlled ......................... 98
Aichi Biodiversity Target 10: Ecosystems vulnerable to climate change ............................... 100
Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: Protected areas ........................................................................ 109
Aichi Biodiversity Target 12: Reducing risk of extinction ..................................................... 122
Aichi Biodiversity Target 13: Safeguarding genetic diversity ................................................ 132
Aichi Biodiversity Target 14: Ecosystem Services ................................................................. 137
Aichi Biodiversity Target 15: Climate resilience .................................................................... 142
Aichi Biodiversity Target 16: The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing ............ 147
Aichi Biodiversity Target 17: Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan .................................... 150
Aichi Biodiversity Target 18: Traditional Knowledge ........................................................... 154
Aichi Biodiversity Target 19: Sharing Information and Knowledge ...................................... 156
Aichi Biodiversity Target 20: Mobilize resources from all sources ....................................... 157
Section V. Describe the contribution of the country to achieve the objectives of the Global
Strategy for Plant Conservation (complete this section as an option). ................................. 170
Objective GSPC 1: An online flora of all known plants ......................................................... 176
Objective GSPC 2: An assessment of the conservation status of known plant speciesfor
conservation actions ................................................................................................................ 178
Objective GSPC 3: Information, research and associated outputs, and methods necessary to
implement the Strategy developed and shared ........................................................................ 178
Objective GSPC 4: At least 15 per cent of each ecological region or vegetation type secured
through effective management and/or restoration ................................................................... 179
Objective GSPC 5: At least 75 per cent of the most important areas for plant diversity of each
ecological region protected with effective management in place for conserving plants and their
genetic diversity ...................................................................................................................... 179
Objective GSPC 6: At least 75 per cent of production lands in each sector managed
sustainably, consistent with the conservation of plant diversity ............................................. 181
Objective GSPC 7: At least 75 per cent of known threatened plant species conserved in-situ
................................................................................................................................................. 181
Objective GSPC 8: At least 75 per cent of threatened plant species in ex situ collections,
preferably in the country of origin, and at least 20 per cent available for recovery and
restoration programmes ........................................................................................................... 181
Objective GSPC 9: 70 per cent of the genetic diversity of crops including their wild relatives
and other socio-economically valuable plant species conserved, while respecting, preserving
and maintaining associated indigenous and local knowledge ................................................. 182
Objective GSPC 10: Effective management plans in place to prevent new biological invasions
and to manage important areas for plant diversity that are invaded ........................................ 183
Objective GSPC 11: No species of wild flora endangered by international trade .................. 183
Objective GSPC 12: All wild harvested plant-based products sourced sustainably ............... 183
Objective GSPC 13: Indigenous and local knowledge innovations and practices associated
with plant resources maintained or increased, as appropriate, to support customary use,
sustainable livelihoods, local food security and health care ................................................... 185
Objective GSPC 14: The importance of plant diversity and the need for its conservation
incorporated into communication, education and public awareness programmes .................. 185
Objective GSPC 15: The number of trained people working with appropriate facilities
sufficient according to national needs, to achieve the targets of this Strategy ........................ 186
Objective GSPC 16: Institutions, networks and partnerships for plant conservation established
or strengthened at national, regional and international levels to achieve the targets of this
Strategy .................................................................................................................................... 187
Section VI. Additional information on the contributions of indigenous peoples and local
communities (completion of this section is optional) .............................................................. 187
Section VII. Updated national profile on biodiversity ........................................................... 188
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Comparison of relevance between Vietnam NBSAP’s
objectives, tasks and measures and Aichi biodiversity
targets by corresponding indicators
4
Table 2. Measures and results achieved 21
Table 3. Implementation results of quantitative targets of Viet
Nam NBSAP
28
Table 4. Distribution and area of coral reefs in coastal
seawaters in Viet Nam
65
Table 5. Fishery production in 2017 72
Table 6. The sampling ratio exceeding the standards of air
environment parameters measured from 2012 to 2016
91
Table 7. Water quality index of urban rivers in Hanoi 92
Table 8. Risks of inundations due to sea level rise caused by
climate change to delta and coastal provinces
103
Table 9. Coral growth rate (%) in the South China Sea and CO2
emission
107
Table 10. Results of protected areas system review 110
Table 11. Development progress of biodiversity corridors to
2020
121
Table 12. GEF funded biodiversity related projects implemented
in Viet Nam from 2000 to 2017
162
Table 13. Projects and programmes from other development
donors for biodiversity
165
Table 14. Estimated annual expenditure of VNFF by objectives
during the period of 2011-2015
166
Table 15. 24 floral genera newly described to science recorded in
Viet Nam since 1993
178
LIST OF FIGURES & MAPS
Figure 1. Biodiversity maps of Xuan Thuy National Park and
other coastal islands
44
Figure 2. Map on distribution of coral reefs and seagrass beds
around the Ly Son island, Quang Ngai province
44
Figure 3. Changes in the area of natural forests and plantation
forests from 2010 to 2017
57
Figure 4. Changes in forest cover from 2010 to 2017 58
Figure 5. Forest cover and forest loss from 200 to 2017 58
Figure 6. Biodiversity Integrity Index 59
Figure 7. Ecological footprint 2009 59
Figure 8. Map of vegetation types 60
Figure 9. Changes in the area of mangrove forests from 2010 to
2017
61
Figure 10. Mangrove Forest Cover for the 21st Century (2014) 62
Figure 11. Distribution of Seagrasses by 2017 64
Figue 12. Distribution of coral reefs by 2010 67
Figure 13. Map of large dams and hypropowers in Viet Nam 75
Figure 14. Fishing zones in Viet Nam’s sea areas 77
Figure 15. High concentration area for juvenile fish (natural nursery
grounds) in Vietnamese seas
79
Figure 16. Map on proportion of land use for agriculture 81
Figure 17. Map on proportion of land use for forestry 84
Figure 18. Correlation between changes in bare-land and vegetation
cover from 1982-2016
85
Figure 19. Map on proportion of land use for aquaculture farming 88
Figure 20. Annual yields from aquaculture farming and fishing in
Viet Nam
89
Figure 21. Prospect of urban expansion to 2030 95
Figure 22. Dynamics of population density in Viet Nam 96
Figure 23. Map on nutritious and organic pollution (fertilizers,
pestisides) 2013
97
Figure 24. Map on ecosystems in Viet Nam 102
Figure 25. Marine ecological zones and clusters of marine protected
areas in Viet Nam
102
Figure 26. Map on inundation towards a sea level rise by 100 cm 105
Figure 27 Map on resilience scenarios of ecosystems to climate
changes
106
Figure 28. Distribution of coral reefs (2010) 108
Figure 29. Map on Viet Nam protected areas system in accordance
to Biodiversity Law
111
Figure 30. Map on national master planning for biodiversity
conservation to 2020
112
Figure 31. Biodiversity spots in Viet Nam 113
Figure 32. Protected Area Coverage (Terrestrial) 114
Figure 33. Proteced and Connected index for Viet Nam 114
Figure 34. Management effectiveness of protected areas 117
Figure 35. Human pressures on protected areas 119
Figure 36. Map on national planning for biodiversity corridors in
2014
122
Figure 37. Map on range distribution of threatened species in Viet
Nam
123
Figure 38. Threatened Species Richness (IUCN) 125
Figure 39. Maps on extent of suitable habitat (species richness and
endangered species richness)
129
Figure 40. Carbon stocks in Viet Nam 144
Figure 41. Carbon storage in protected areas and in the environment 145
Figure 42. VEA/BCA expenditure in equivalence to NBSAP
objectives in the period of 2011-2015
159
Figure 43. Expenditure share for implementing objectives of the
genetic resources program
160
Figure 44. Expenditure for biodiversity conservation recorderd
from 30 protected areas
161
Figure 45. Annual proportion of ODA projects for biodiversity
devided by sector from 2011 to 2015
162
Figure 46. Expenditure share for biodiversity by VNFF with
reference to NBSAP objectives
166
Figure 47. Private financing for biodiversity in the period of 2011-
2015
168
Figure 48. Expenditure for biodiversity from private sector
according to NBSAP objectives
168
Figure 49. Forest Areas and Regional Priorty Zones in Viet Nam 181
ABBREVIATION
5MHRP 5 Million Hectare
Reforestation Programme
ABS Access and Benefit Sharing
ACB ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity
ADB Asian Development Bank
AHP ASEAN Hertiage Parks
AMD Sustainable Agriculture and
Rural Development in the Coastal
Mekong Delta Project
ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council
ASEAN Association of South East
Asian Nations
BAP Biodiversity Action Plan to
2010 with vision to 2020
BCA Nature and Biodiversity
Conservation Agency
BCI Biodiversity Corridors Initiative
BIOFIN Biodiversity Finance
Initiative
CAGR Compound Annual Growth
Rate
CBD Convention of Biological
Diversity
CDF Community Development
Fund
CITES Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora
CORIN Asia Asian Coastal
Resources Institute-Foundation
DARD Department of Agriculture
and Rural Development
DONRE Department of Natural
Resources and Environment
EBA Ecosystem-based Adaptation
EIA Environmental Impact
Assessment
FAO Food and Agriculture
Organisation of the United Nations
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FFI Fauna & Flora International
FINIDA Finnish International
Development Agency
FSC Forest Stewardship Council
GAP Good Agricultural Practices
GBIF Global Biodiversity
Information Fund
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GEF Global Environment Fund
GIS Geographic Information System
GSPC Global Strategy for Plant
Conservation
IAS Invasive Alien Species
IFAD International Fund for
Agricultural Development
IPA Important Plant Areas
IPM Integrated Pest Management
IUCN International Union for
Conservation of Nature
IUCN-WCMC International Union
for Conservation of Nature – World
Conservation Monitoring Center
JICA Japan International
Cooperation Agency
MARD Ministry of Agriculture and
Rural Development
MERC Mangrove Ecosystem
Research Centre
METT Management Effectiveness
Tracking Tool
MOF Ministry of Finance
MOH Ministry of Health
MOIT Ministry of Industry and
Trade
MONRE Minstry of Natural
Resources and Environment
MOST Ministry of Science and
Technology
MPA Marine Protected Area
MRV Monitoring, Reporting and
Verification
NBAP National Biodiversity Action
Plan
NBDS National Database on
Biodiversity
NBSAP National Biodiversity
Strategy to 2020, Vision to 2030
NGO Non-Governmental
Organization
NTFP Non-timber forest product
NP National Park
NR6 6th National Report
NRAP National REDD+ Action
Program
ODA Official Development
Assistance
OECD Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development
PA Protected Area
PRAP Provincial REDD+ Action
Plan
R & D Research and Development
REDD+ Reducing Emissions form
Deforestation an Forest Degradation+
SIDE Sweden International
Development Agency
SNA System of National
Accounting
SNRM Sustainable Nature Reserve
Management
SNV Netherlands Development
Organization
SOFRI Southern Fruit Research
Institute
SUF Special Use Forest
TFF Trust Fund
TPA Terrestrial Protected Area
TRAFFIC The Wildlife Trade
Monitoring Network
TSP Total Suspended Particles
UNDP United Nations Development
Programme
UNESCO United Nations
Educational, Scientific, Cultural
Organization
USD United States Dollar
VACNE Vietnamese Association for
Conservation of Nature and
Environment
VASEP Viet Nam Association of
Seafood Exporters and Producers
VCF Viet Nam Special Use Forest
Conservation Fund
VEA Viet Nam Environment
Adminstration
VFMB Special Use Forest
Management Board
VINFARR Viet Nam Fund for
Aquatic Resources Reproduction
VND Vietnamese Dong (currency)
VNEFF Viet Nam Environmental
Protection Fund
VNFF Viet Nam Forest Fund
WWF World Wide Fund for
Nature
1
INTRODUCTION OF 6th NATIONAL REPORT
Viet Nam became a party of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in
1994. The first National Biodiversity Action Plan of Viet Nam was approved by the Prime
Minister in 1995. In 2013, the Prime Minister approved the “National Biodiversity Strategy to
2010, Vision to 2030” as Viet Nam’s third biodiversity strategy.
The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE), in cooperation with relevant
agencies, has developed the 6th National Report (NR) for the period 2014–2018 to provide an
overview of Viet Nam’s progress towards implementing the national targets established under
the NBSAP and the global Aichi Targets set under the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2010–2020
of CBD.
The 6th NR follows the guidelines for national reporting according to Decision XIII/27 of the 13th
Conference of the CBD’s parties in Cancun, Mexico and is organized into five sections:
Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level;
Section II. NBSAP implementation measures taken, assessment of their effectiveness,
associated obstacles and scientific and technical needs;
Section III. Assessment of progress towards each national target;
Section IV. Description of the national contribution to the achievement of each Aichi
Biodiversity Target; and
Section V. Description of the national contribution to the achievement of the targets of
the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation.
The NBSAP is designed to fulfil commitments under the CBD as well as to identify goals,
objectives, and tasks for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in accordance with
development during the period. Viet Nam’s NBSAP focuses on biodiversity conservation at the
levels of ecosystems, species, and genes. To achieve conservation of these three levels, six
groups of measures were developed. Specific measures and tasks are consistent with all 20
objectives of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
This 6th National Report describes Viet Nam’s progress towards these national targets and
towards the 20 global Aichi targets. This report captures multiple activities and initiatives taken
at the national and local level, including by local government, non-governmental organisations,
communities, and businesses. The 6th National Report shows that good progress has been made
over the reporting period in several areas, including legislation, policy development,
mainstreaming biodiversity, increasing forest cover, and protected areas. However, the 6th
National Report makes it clear that more work needs to be done and confirms Viet Nam was
unable to reach many targets in NBSAP and remains faced with the huge challenge of
conserving biodiversity throughout the country.
2
Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level
I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level
My country has adopted national biodiversity targets or equivalent commitments in line with
the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi Targets
or
My country has not adopted national biodiversity targets and is reporting progress using the
Aichi Biodiversity Targets for reference. (Move to section II. In section III, the Aichi
Biodiversity Targets should be used for the purpose of this report as the national targets and
progress should be assessed towards their achievement in the national context.)
National Target
Overall target to 2020: That naturally important ecosystems, endangered, rare, and precious
species, and genetic resources are preserved and used sustainably; to contribute to the
development of the green economy; and to adapt to climate change.
Specific targets:
- To improve the quality and increase the area of protected ecosystems, ensuring that the
area of terrestrial protected areas (TPAs) accounts for 9% of the total territorial area;
marine protected areas (MPAs) account for 0.24% of the sea area; forest coverage
reaches 45%; primary forest remains at 0.57 million hectares, and is coupled with
effective protection plans; that mangrove forests, seagrass beds, and coral reefs are
maintained at the current levels; that 15% of degraded critical ecosystems are restored;
and that the number of internationally-recognized protected areas is increased to 10
Ramsar wetlands, 10 biosphere reserves, and 10 ASEAN heritage parks.
- To improve the quality and populations of endangered, rare and precious species,
ensuring that no species become newly extinct, and significantly improve the status of
endangered, rare, and threatened species.
- To compile an inventory to store and conserve native endangered, rare, and precious
genetic resources (including animals, plants, and micro-organisms) to ensure that they are
not impaired or eroded.
Rationale for the national target
Viet Nam is endowed with extraordinary biodiversity, with many types of ecosystems, species and
genetic resources, including many of which are endemic. In Viet Nam, biodiversity brings direct
benefits to humans, contributing substantially to the national economy, especially to sectors such as
agriculture, forestry, and fisheries. It also ensures food security for the country; contributes to
maintaining genetic resources for farming animals and crops; and provides construction materials,
pharmaceutical materials and food, etc.
In the last two decades, recognizing the importance of biodiversity, the Government has issued a
relatively complete legal framework related to biodiversity conservation. Many laws relating to
natural resource management have been enacted. The Government has issued policies, strategies, and
plans in order to promote the conservation of biodiversity. By 2005, the Ministry of Natural
3
Resources and Environment (MONRE) had submitted the “Biodiversity Action Plan to 2010 with
vision to 2020” (BAP 2007) to the Prime Minister for approval. BAP 2007 was issued by the Prime
Minister in Decision 79/2007/QD-TTg, dated May 31, 2007. After three years of implementation of
BAP 2007, MONRE conducted a review and reported to the Prime Minister on the implementation
of Decision 79/2007/QD-TTg. The report pointed out that there had been a number of achievements
relating to biodiversity conservation, such as the increase in the area of protected ecosystems,
discovery of new species, and the conservation and development of genetic resources valuable in
selection and breeding. On the other hand, there were still many challenges, and these required a
vision and strategic approach in line with the internationally and domesticaly changing contexts,
including climate changes isues..Viet Nam’s BAP aims to both fulfil commitments under the
CBD, and to identify goals, objectives, and tasks for the conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity, including to:
1. Identify the main causes of biodiversity loss, thereby reducing the pressures directly
affecting biodiversity and preventing the decline of biodiversity in protected areas;
2. Properly resolve conflicts between conservation and development, especially in relation
to the conversion of land and water use in areas with high biodiversity;
3. Conserve the system of protected areas containing typical ecosystems, and various key
biodiversity areas, and promote ecosystem services. Priority is given to strengthening
conservation status in several protected areas of ecological importance;
4. Enhance biodiversity conservation and development at the levels of ecosystems, species
and genetic resources. Reduce, and then stop, the exploitation, illegal trade, and
overexploitation of biological resources, especially endangered, rare, and precious
species;
5. At a national scale, genetic resources are conserved and developed through the study and
inventory of biodiversity and biological resources, and indigenous knowledge on the use
of biological resources is conserved;
6. Promote the management of, and control the risks from, invasive alien species,
genetically modified organisms and their products to the environment and human health;
7. Benefits from biodiversity and ecosystem services are shared fairly and equitably with
communities. Develop, improve, and apply regimes on access to genetic resources and
benefit sharing. Develop payment for ecosystem services models to facilitate valuation of
conservation;
8. Evaluate the ability of biodiversity to adapt to climate change and propose appropriate
solutions.
Level of application
Regional/multilateral – please indicate area concerned
National/federal
Subnational – please indicate area concerned
Relevance of the national targets to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (Links
between national targets and Aichi Biodiversity Targets)
Main related Aichi Biodiversity Targets
4
1 6 11 16
2 7 12 17
3 8 13 18
4 9 14 19
5 10 15 20
Other related Aichi Biodiversity Targets
1 6 11 16
2 7 12 17
3 8 13 18
4 9 14 19
5 10 15 20
or
National target has no corresponding Aichi Biodiversity Target or relates to
other parts of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity
The three primary targets of Viet Nam’s NBSAP are conservation of biodiverse ecosystems,
species, and genes. This is consistent with objectives under Aichi Biodiversity Strategic goals B,
C and D. To achieve the three primary targets, six groups of measures were developed to carry
out five tasks in Viet Nam. Specific measures and tasks of Viet Nam’s NBSAP indirectly relate
to all objectives of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
Table 1. Comparison of the appropriateness of objectives, tasks and measures between Viet
Nam NBSAP and Aichi biodiversity targets by corresponding indicators
Targets, Tasts and solutions of Viet Nam’s
NBSAP
Aichi
Biodiversity
goals/
targets
Indicators (data, measures)
I. Specific Targets
1) To improve the quality and increase the area
of protected ecosystems, ensuring that the area
of terrestrial protected areas accounts for 9% of
the total territorial area; marine protected areas
account for 0.24% of the sea area; forest
coverage reaches 45%; primary forest remains at
0.57 million hectares coupled with effective
protection plans; mangrove forests, seagrass
beds, and coral reefs are maintained at the
current levels; 15% of degraded critical
ecosystems are restored; and the number of
internationally recognized protected areas are
increased to 10 Ramsar wetlands, 10 biosphere
reserves, and 10 ASEAN heritage parks.
B, C, D - Legal documents and policy mechanisms have
been developed and issued; these aim to improve
the quality and increase the area of protected
natural ecosystems.
- The number of protected areas reviewed,
added and updated in accordance to
Biodiversity Law
- Total area (ha)
- Number of terrestrial protected areas
(including special-use forest (SUF) and
interior wetland reserves)
- Area of terrestrial protected areas
(percentage of territorial area)
5
- Number of marine protected areas (for those
already established and planned)
- Area of marine protected areas (ha)
(percentage of marine area)
- Total forest area (ha)
- Area of primary forest (ha)
- Area of natural forest (ha)
- Area of plantation forest (ha)
- Forest coverage rate (%) (those forests
qualified for calculating coverage)
- The percentage of the area of degraded,
important, natural ecosystems that is restored
- The number of Viet Nam's protected areas
that are internationally recognized.
- Area of coral reef (ha)
- Area of seagrass bed (ha)
- Changing trends in statistics for the above
indicators measured possibly from 2010 or
from the previous reporting-period
2) To improve the quality and populations of
endangered, rare and precious species, ensuring
that no new case of species extinction is
reported, and significantly improve the status of
endangered, rare, and threatened species.
B, C, D - Legal documents and policies have been
developed and issued. These aim to prevent
from further extinctions and improve the
status of endangered species.
- Number of records on new extinctions
accounted from the previous reporting
period
-Status of those threatened species which
are listed in Decree 160/2013/ ND-CP
(abundance, dectection/ distribution of
species, especially those already set for
monitoring programs)
- Changing trends in populations of
threatened species (including migratory
ones) in forests, wetlands and seas
(possibly accounted from 2010 or from the
previous reporting-period).
3) To compile an inventory, store and conserve
native, endangered, rare, and precious genetic
resources (including animals, plants and micro-
organisms) to ensure that they are not impaired
or eroded.
B, C, D - Legal documents and policies have been
developed and issued. These aim to decrease
the loss of genetic diversity of animal and
plant species.
- Number of facilities/stations involving to
genetic resources storage and conservation.
- Number of cultivated plants and animals
being conserved on farms
- Number of species and genetic resources
6
collected, stored, evaluated, documented
(including with geographical information)
II. Major tasks
1) Conservation of natural ecosystems
B5; B10,
C11, C12;
D14,15
a) Consolidate and complete a system of natural
protected areas:
- Identify critical ecosystems and prepare plans
for expanding the system of protected areas;
continue to implement the plan to establish
marine and wetland protected areas; establish
biodiversity corridors connecting natural habitats
of threatened species prioritized for protection;
- Conduct a comprehensive review of
biodiversity–related provisions in the current
legal documents, and make proposals for
revision to ensure consistency; conduct research
on institutional structures in order to propose a
model for one mangement authority for
protected areas (highlighting the involvement of,
and benefits to, communities living in the buffer
zones);
- Improve the management system for protected
areas, ensuring they are all established with a
Management Board; review the functions, and
enhance capacity of Management Boards;
implement policies for incentives for staff
working in protected areas; upgrade
infrastructure to support activities; provide field
equipment for all protected areas, including
biodiversity monitoring and reporting systems;
- Develop and improve regulations on the
decentralization, ranking and classification of
protected areas, and the procedure for
establishing new protected areas; prepare and
implement management and financial plans,
monitoring and regulations for protected areas,
with the target to have these in place for all
protected areas by 2015;
- Conduct investigations and assess the values
and ecosystem services of natural protected
areas;
- Develop long-term plans for investment in the
buffer zones of protected areas and implement a
sustainable economic model for households in
these zones.
B5, C11,
C12, D14,
D15
- Legal documents and policies related to
protected area management developed and
issued.
- The current status of protected area
management and/or management
effectiveness (including the establishment of
management board, development and
implementation of management plans and
regulations for protected areas, etc.).
- Number of effective conservation and
livelihood models for communities in buffer
zones
- Levels of linking protected areas with
connected-landscape based approaches
- Number of publications on the economic
valuation of ecosystem services.
- The number of protected areas associated
with economic valuation of to their ecosystem
services.
7
b) Conservation of ecosystems that are of
national and international importance:
- Investigate and map ecological regions,
identifying areas of high biodiversity value,
degraded areas, and sensitive areas;
- Conduct research and develop a data bank and
maps of natural wetlands, seagrass beds, coral
reefs and other natural ecosystems;
- Strengthen protection activities in primary
forests and take measures to prevent
deforestation and illegal logging in natural
forests, special-use forests, and protected
forests;
- Continue to implement forest regeneration
and afforestation programs, enrich forests with
native plants, prevent forest fires and increase
fire response capacity for all types of forests;
- Continue to implement the targets and tasks in
the mangrove forest restoration program under
Decision 405/TTg-KTN dated 16 March 2009;
- Prepare and implement a national plan for
conservation and sustainable use of wetlands,
with priority given to critical river basins;
- Implement measures to protect and restore
coral reefs and sea grass ecosystems of
appropriate scale and scope;
- Prepare and implement a plan to nominate
protected areas for international recognition,
including wetlands of international importance,
biosphere reserves, and ASEAN heritage parks.
Develop and issue guidelines for the
management of internationally-recognized
protected areas and implement policies to
support capacity-building for effective
management of these areas.
B5, B10,
C11, D14,
D15
- New sets of maps with updated biodiversity
data: of ecological regions (land and sea);
forest vegetation; national forest cover, and
current status of protected areas;
- Statistis and maps for wetlands
- Number of cases of forestry law violations
(relevant to biodiversity)
- Volume of confiscated forest products
(timber, wild animals)
- Area of deforestation (for special-use forest,
protection forest, production forest)
- Number of cases of fishery Law violations
(relevant to biodiversity)
- Area of afforestation and regeneration,
including mangroves
- Number of effective models and measures
for protection, and restoration of coral reefs
and seagrass beds
- The area of wetlands under conservation
and sustainable use.
- Networking and management capacity for
for internationally-recognized protected areas
2) Conservation of wild species and
endangered, precious and rare breeding
species
C12,13
a) Preventing the decline of threatened wildlife
species, particularly endangered, rare and
C12 - Legal documents, programs, and projects for
conservation of endangered precious and
8
precious species prioritized for protection1:
- Continue to implement the targets of the
program to protect threatened aquatic species
until 2015, with a vision to 2020, as per
Decision 485/QD-TTg dated 2 May 2008 of the
Prime Minister;
- Investigate, monitor, periodically update and
publish the list of endangered, rare and
precious species prioritized for protection;
- Implement conservation programs for
endangered, rare and precious wild species
prioritized for protection, with priority given to
threatened large mammals: eg. elephants,
tigers, saola and primates;
- Investigate and assess the status of
endangered, rare and precious fauna and flora;
periodically update and publish the Viet Nam
Red Book.
rare species2 and livestock breeds and plants
prioritized for conservation
- Number of endangered precious and rare
aquatic species that have been protected.
- Number of protected areas have monitoring
program for endangered precious and rare
species
- Progress of updating the Viet Nam Red
Book
b) Conservation of native varieties of
domestized plants and animals and wild
relatives of such plant and animal varieties,
and of rare micro-organism strains:
- Take measures to conserve agricultural crop
varieties, livestock and their wild relatives;
increase the number of samples of crop
varieties that are stored and preserved in gene
banks;
- Assess and improve the effectiveness of
programs for on-farm conservation of rare
crop varieties and livestock breeds;
- Continue to implement the national ex situ
and in situ gene bank conservation program
for conservation of rare plant varieties,
livestock and micro-organisms.
C13 - Status of conservation programs for
endangered, precious, and rare plant
varieties and animal breeds on farms.
- Status of livestock breeds, crop plants and
wild relatives of plant varieties and
livestock that are prioritized for
conservation in gene banks.
- Status of the program to conserve and
store animal and plant genetic resources
and micro-organisms.
- Status in developing a new set of maps
with updated data; maps of the distribution
of precious and rare domestic native plant
varieties and livestock.
c) Develop and enhance effectiviness of ex-situ
biodiversity conservation facilities:
- Assess the status of ex situ conservation
facilities (zoos, botanic gardens, medicinal
plant gardens, gene banks, wildlife rescue
centers…); take measures to improve the
C12, C13 - Trends of planning and development of
conservation facilities and their
management perspectives;
- The status of Viet Nam’s Natural Museum
operation.
- The status of the Centre of Plant Genetic
1 Endangered, rare and precious species prioritized for protection: According to the Law on Biodiversity,
Endangered precious and rare species prioritized for protection means wild species, crops or domestic animals,
microorganisms or fungi which are endemic and of special scientific, medical, economic, ecological, scenic,
environmental or cultural-historical values, exist in few numbers or are in danger of extinction. 2 Endangered precious and rare species: According to national Laws, there are lists of forest and aquatic
endangered precious and rare species adopted by Government
9
effectiveness of ex situ conservation;
- Accelerate the construction of the Viet Nam
Natural Museum in accordance with the
Decision 86/QD-TTg dated 20 April 2006 of
the Prime Minister;
- Establish a network of rescue centers across
the country to ensure the needs of rescued
wildlife species by region and taxonomic
group; prioritize investment in upgrading
established rescue centers;
- Upgrade the Center of Plant Genetic
Resources to become a national lpant gene
bank that meets international standards.
Resources operation.
- The status of biodiversity maps and their
new development with updated distribution
of ex situ conservation facilities;
3) Sustainable use and fair sharing of benefits
from ecosystem and biodiversity services
A3, A4, B7,
C11, C12,
C13, D14,
16
a) Sustainable use of ecosystems:
- Conduct research, develop guidelines and
pilot the valuation of biodiversity and
ecosystem services; incorporate the values of
biodiversity and ecosystem services into the
national accounting system.
- Improve policies of payments for ecosystem
services for forests at a national scale; pilot a
policy for payment for ecosystem services for
marine ecosystems and wetlands;
- Instate a model for the management of
protected areas that involves community
participation, and implement mechanisms to
share benefits in an equitable way amongst
involved parties;
- Develop and enforce regulations on ecological
tourism in Viet Nam;
- Develop and implement policies to support
production of agricultural, forestry, and
fisheries products that meet international
standards for conservation and sustainable use.
A3, A4, B7,
C11, D14,
D16, E18
- Trends in appropriate valuation of
ecosystem services, and in developing
community-based conservation models and
equitable benefit sharing from ecosystem
services in protected areas
- Trends in implementing payment
mechanisms for forest ecosystem services and
in developing mechanisms and policies for
environmental services payment for wetland
and marine ecosystems
- Review legal documents, mechanisms and
policies for use of agricultural, forestry and
fishery products according to international
standards on conservation and sustainable use
- Production trends/ output fluctuations in
fishing outputs (intense)
- Trends in fishing and seafood outputs
- Trends in implementation of aquatic and
marine areas that have restrictions on
exploitation
- Trends in implementing international
standards of exploiting and conserving
agricultural, forestry and fishery products
according
- Status of applications for biosafety
certificates
- Review legal documents on ecotourism
b) Sustainable use of species and genetic
resources:
- Investigate, record, protect and develop
B7, C12,
C13 - Legal documents, mechanisms and policies
to control illegal exploitation and trade of
wild populations of animals and plants
10
valuable non-timber forest products (NTFP),
especially medicinal and ornamental plants;
effectively control the exploitation and cross-
border trafficking of wild species;
- Promulgate policies and guidelines on
management of breeding, farming and trading
of wild species;
- Review legal documents and mechanisms,
policies and develping guidelines on
management of breeding, farming and
trading of common wild species and
endangered species in the priority list of
protection.
c) Develop management mechanisms for access
to, benefit sharing and conservation of genetic
resources and associated traditional knowledge:
- Conduct research for, and develop
regulations on a mechanism for access to and
benefit sharing from genetic resources; pilot
models for access and benefit sharing (ABS)
that is focused on the interests of
communities;
- Collect, document, and develop a
geographical directory and conserve
traditional knowledge of genetic resources;
- Develop and implement an action plan for
capacity-building in order to implement the
Nagoya Protocol.
D16, E18 - Progress towards establishing effective
legal documents and management
mechanisms for access, benefit sharing and
protection of genetic resources and their
associated traditional knowledge;
- Options to development of guidelines and
implementation of ABS models.
4) Control activities that have negative
impacts on biodiversity
A2, A3, A4;
B6,7,8,9,
C12
a) Control activities considered unsustainable or
that cause environmental pollution, such as
conversion of land and water and agricultural
practices:
- Control the conversion of natural forest land
and water resources that are of conservational
value, to minimize negative impacts on
biodiversity;
- Limit overexploitation, and change methods
of agriculture, forestry and fisheries that are
unsustainable; implement measures to stop
destructive fishing and exploitation;
- Control environmental pollution that causes
adverse impacts on biodiversity.
A2, A3, A4,
B6, B7, B8 - Legal documents, mechanisms and policies
for land use management and control
established
- Legal documents, mechanisms and policies
on environmental protection, biological
resources and biodiversity conservation
established.
- Track changes in proportion of land and
water of protected areas of different
categories (special use forests, wetland
protected areas and marine protected areas)
that have been converted
- Track fluctations in areas of land / waters
for lease, especially forest land.
- Trends in the proportion of agricultural,
forestry and fishery products produced from
sustainable sources.
- Number of production facilities granted
sustainable production certificates (forest
certificates, legal aquatic product certificates,
Vietnamese Good Agricultural Practices
(VietGAP), etc.).
- Trends in the proportion of water bodies
11
with oxygen deficiency and algal blooms
(accounting for seasonal variability)
- Trends in discharging pollutants that affect
biodiversity into the environment
- Trends in the proportion of wastewater to be
treated before being discharged into the
environment.
b) Control illegal hunting, trade and
consumption of wild animals and plants:
- Encourage the broad participation of
communities and mass media in the detection
and prevention of illegal acts of exploitation,
trafficking and consumption of wildlife;
- Improve and implement inter-sectoral
coordination mechanisms between the
environmental police, customs, rangers, and
fisheries authorities in the detection and
enforcement of illegal exploitation, trafficking,
and consumption of wildlife;
- Advocate and conduct awareness programs to
prevent the use and consumption of wildlife
products nationwide;
- Strengthen cooperation with regional and
international law enforcement networks
(ASEAN WEN, Interpol…) in trafficking and
illegal transportation of wild plants and
animals.
A1, A4, C12 - Legal documents, mechanisms and policies
to control and prevent illegal exploitation,
trading and consumption of wild plants and
animals.
- Enforcement of existing measures for
control and conservation of threatened wild
animals and plants
- Effective inter-agency coordination in law
implementation and enforcement towards
environmental and biodiversity protection
- Television, radio and educational
/awareness programs on illegal exploitation,
trade and consumption of wild plants and
animals
- Cooperation between national law
enforcement bodies with international
institutions (ASEAN-WEN, Interpol,
ICCWC) to address environmental and
biodiversity crimes
c) Control, halt and prevent damage of invasive
alien species; enhance biosafety management of
genetically modified organisms:
- Investigate the status of invasive and
potentially invasive alien species at a national
scale, with emphasis on species in protected
areas, agricultural areas, and forest ecosystems;
- Implement the project to prevent and control
invasive alien species to 2020, under Decision
1896/QD-TTg, dated 17 Decmber 2012 of the
Prime Minister;
- Enhance cooperation and learn from other
countries’ experiences on the management of
genetically modified organisms, to improve the
technical and professional expertise of relevant
agencies and units;
- Increase investment in infrastructure and
resources to monitor and control the risks of
genetically modified organisms to biodiversity;
- Develop and promulgate legal documents on
B9, - Legal documents, mechanisms and policies
for effective control and prevention of
invasive alien species;
- Trends in strategies for management of
genetically modified organisms.
- Number of activities to prevent and control
invasive alien organisms in Viet Nam
- Number of television, radio and educational
/ awareness programs on invasive alien
species in Viet Nam
- Number of activities conducted that aim to
raise awareness and share information on
management of genetically modified
organisms
12
redress and liability in biosafety management
activities of GMOs.
5) Biodiversity conservation in the context of
climate change
B10, C11,
D15
a) Identification of climate change impacts on
biodiversity and promote biodiversity conservation
as a means to respond to climate change:
- Conduct research to assess and predict
impacts of climate change on biodiversity in
Viet Nam;
- Conduct research on the role of biodiversity
in the migitation of, and adaptation to, climate
change in vulnerable areas such as river basins,
coastal areas of the Red River and Mekong
River Deltas; take measures to increase
resilience of biodiversity in these regions.
B10, - Legal documents and policies related to
climate change
- Trends in research focused on pressure from
climate change to biodiversity (rising
temperatures, sea level rise, coral reefs,
species populations - habitats etc.)
- Research on roles of biodiversity in climate
change adaptation and mitigation
b) Development of biological corridors to increase
connectivity among forest ecosystems and critical
biodiversity areas to adapt to climage change:
- Develop policies for the management of
biodiversity corridors, including defining
management objectives, the use of land in
biodiversity corridors, and linking to land use
planning at the local level;
- Establish biodiversity corridors that connect
protected areas, and implement pilot projects in
the northern mountainous areas, central, and
western highland regions.
C11 - Legal documents and policy mechanisms for
building and managing biodiversity corridors.
- Trends in establishment of biodiversity
corridors
- Status and progress in developing a set of
maps with updated data on biodiversity
corridors.
c) Implementation of forest restoration programs
with relevant approaches targeting to biodiversity
conservation, carbon sequenstration,climate
change adaptation and mitigation:
- Integrate biodiversity conservation targets
into the implementation of the national program
on ‘Reducing greenhouse gas emissions
through efforts to limit deforestation and forest
degradation, sustainable management of forest
resources, and conserving and enhancing forest
carbon stocks’ (REDD+);
- Map areas of high biodiversity value in the
REDD+ program; promote the use of native
species for forest restoration in the framework
of REDD+;
- Reduce risks to biodiversity from
implementation of the REDD+ program by
applying stringent social and environmental
C11, D15 - Legal documents and policies on new
plantations and forest restoration in the
context of climate change.
- Status and progress of REDD+ program
implementation
- Integratation of indicators with reference to
biodiversity conservation into REDD+
implementation
- Creation and review of maps outlining areas
of high biodiversity value under the REDD+
programs.
13
conditions.
III. Solutions for implementation
1) Change in behavior and awareness of
communities and state management
organizations towards biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use
A1,2,3,4
Increase the awareness of agencies that are
responsible for biodiversity management; diversify
sources of support for, and mechanisms to share
information with, authorities at all levels;
A1 - Level of awareness of biodiversity
conservation by relevant management
agencies
- Number of ongoing or previously
completed awareness-raising activities for
agencies managing biodiversity
conservation
Promote education of, and regular communication
with, organizations, individuals, and communities
about the importance of conservation and
sustainable use of biodiversity; enhance the social
responsibility of the business sector in conservation
and sustainable use of biodiversity;
A1, A4 Information dissemination, education and
communication activities
Integrate biodiversity conservation content into
teaching programs, especially into extracurricular
programs, for appropriate education grades;
A1, A2 Progress towards integrating the principles of
biodiversity conservation into school and
university curricula
Promote and recognise organizations and
individuals that are outstanding role-models for
conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity;
A3 Activities to recognize relevant people and
organizations.
Develop and implement strategies for
dissemination of information on conservation and
sustainable use of biodiversity in mass media.
A1 Trends in communication on conservation
and sustainable use of biodiversity
2) Improve the legislative and institutional
system and strengthen law enforcement for
biodiversity issues
A4; E17,
E19
Amend, supplement, and promulgate legal
documents on biodiversity to ensure consistency
and efficiency
A4, E17 Trends in amending, supplementing and
issuing legal documents on biodiversity
Strengthen the biodiversity management system;
Develop and implement mechanisms for
coordination between biodiversity management
authorities;
A4 Effectiveness of the management agencies in
biodiversity conservation;
Degree of coordination among biodiversity
management agencies
Improve the capacity of law enforcement staff who
are involved in biodiversity conservation, from the
central to local levels;
A4 The capacity and law enforcement skills of
staff involved in biodiversity management
from the central to local levels;
14
Improve resources and training methods for staff
involved in biodiversity conservation at all levels
Effectiveness of resources and methods of
training individuals engaged in biodiversity
conservation at all levels.
Conduct research to establish a biodiversity
monitoring network;
Implement mechanisms for monitoring
biodiversity in protected areas;
Set up databases and establish mechanisms for
reporting and information sharing between
central authorities and local managers of
protected areas.
A2, E19 - Legal documents, policies, and data on
monitoring biodiversity in protected areas;
- Successful establishment and operation of a
biodiversity monitoring network;
- Successful establishment and operation of
databases, reporting regimes, and
mechanisms for sharing information on
biodiversity.
3) Strengthen integration of biodiversity
conservation in policy development
A2; A4
Develop criteria and guidelines to integrate
biodiversity conservation into strategies, master
plans, and planning documents at national, sectoral
and local levels;
A2 - Establishment of indicators for biodiversity
conservation at national and provincial levels,
and for protected areas and ecological
systems.
- Integration of biodiversity issues into
strategies, plans, programs, and socio-
economic development policies at the
national, sectoral, and local levels
Improve the quality of environmental impact
assessments for biodiversity.
A2, A4 Quality of assessments of biodiversity and
ecosystem services in environmental impact
assessments
4) Promote scientific research, and modern
technology into conservation and sustainable
use of biodiversity
A2, A4, B5,
D16, E19
Promote scientific research on the conservation and
sustainable use of biodiversity;
Focus research on the breeding and reintroduction
of species into nature, the sustainable use of species
and genetic resources, and on sustainable eco-
tourism activities;
B5, E19 - Number, and quality of legal documents and
mechanisms for scientific research on
biodiversity conservation and sustainable use
- Extent of impact of scientific research on
conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity, with a focus on research of
breeding and releasing species into the
wild,the sustainable use of species and
genetic resources, and effective ecotourism
models
Development, acquisition and use of new
technology relevant to biodiversity conservation
and sustainable use
A4, E19 Trend in R&D of new technology relevant to
biodiversity conservation and sustainable use
Participate in the World Bank’s program to
develop an inventory and valueing system for
ecosystem services, and promote the accounting of
national natural resources
A2 Status and trends of ecosystem services
Detection of genetic material that may have value
to economic and social development.
D16 Extent of exploration and research activities
on genetic materials and derivatives
15
The drafting process of the Strategy
In response to the request by CBD Secretariat to develop/update the National Strategic Plan for
Biodiversity for the period of 2011-2020, the Government, in cooperation with national and
international experts and together with the United Nations Development Program (UNDP),
5) Increase of financial resources for
biodiversity conservation
E20
The State shall ensure resources and budgets in
accordance with the level delegated to implement
the Strategy;
E20 - Legal documents, mechanisms and policies
on securing resources for implementing the
Strategy
- Trends in activities to ensure resources and
budget under the current decentralization to
carry out the duties of the Strategy
Encourage and mobilize community participation
and private-sector investment in biodiversity
conservation; conduct research on the
establishment of a biodiversity conservation fund;
develop mechanisms to diversify investment
sources for biodiversity conservation, particularly
in payments for environmental services,
biodiversity offsets, and other financial
mechanisms through carbon markets and private
sector investment;
E20 - Legal documents and mechanisms and
policies on diversification of investment
sources for biodiversity conservation,
especially in payment for environmental
services, biodiversity offsets and carbon
market and investment encouragement from
the private sector
- Trends in activities to encourage and
mobilize participation of community and
enterprises to invest financially for
biodiversity; research and implement the
biodiversity conservation fund etc.
Mobilize support by foreign organizations and
individuals in biodiversity conservation activities.
E20 Number of foreign organizations and
individuals who have partnered or invested in
biodiversity conversation activities
6) Promote international integration and
cooperation in conservation and sustainable
use of biodiversity
B5, E17,
E20
Implement international treaties related to
conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity;
E17 Effective participation in and implementation
of international treaties on biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use.
Promote and attract foreign investments for the
conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity;
E20 Establishment of partnerships with foreign
investors for conservation and sustainable
use of biodiversity
Strengthen learning and exchange of resources and
experiences with other countries and international
organizations.
B5, E17 Trends in capacity-building and educational
activities, exchange of resources and
experiences with countries and international
organizations on biodiversity conservation
16
developed the project ‘Developing Viet Nam National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan and
Integrating Biodiversity Conservation into Local Land Use Planning’. One objective of the
project was to support the development of the ‘National Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, vision to
2030’.
Pursuant to Decision No. 1426/QD-BTNMT dated July 9, 2011, a drafting team (28 members)
and an editorial team (19 members) were called on. Team members were from MONRE, the
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD), the Ministry of Science and
Technology (MOST), the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT), the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of Education and
Training, the Ministry of Transportation, the Ministry of Planning and Investment, the Ministry
of Information and Communications, the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Construction, the
Government Office, the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources belonging to the Viet
Nam Academy of Science and Technology, and the National Assembly Office.
Some milestones remarked the drafting process of the Strategy were:
August 2015: Selected and identified an international expert, who provided technical assistance
for the development of the NBSAP. This was Mr. Scott Perkin, who is the regional head of
biodiversity at IUCN in Bangkok.
October 2012 – April 2013: Established three groups to assess the current process and prepare
reports on the following topics: (i) policies and institutions; (ii) ecosystems; and (iii) genetic
species and sources.
October 2012 - March 2013: Organized consultations with stakeholders through face-to-face
interviews and workshops, including i identifying key issues of the Strategy:
May 2013, MONRE submitted the draft to the Prime Minister at the Proposal No. 47/TTr-
BTNMT dated May 28 2013. As a result, the Prime Minister then issued Decision No.1250/QD-
TTG dated July 31 2013 on approving the National Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, vision to
2030.
In addition, the Aichi Biodiversity Targets are also reflected in other relevant Government
strategies and plans, such as:
- Decision No. 1216/2012/QD-TTg dated September 5 2012 of the Prime Minister, on
approving the National Strategy for Environmental Protection to 2010, Orientation to
2020;
- Decision No. 57/QD-TTg. dated January 9 2012 of the Prime Minister on approving the National
Plan for Forest Protection and Development in the period of 2011-2020;
- Decision No. 126/QD-TTg dated February 2 2012 of the Prime Minister, on Piloting benefit-
sharing in management, protection and sustainable development of special-use forests;
- Decision No. 940 / QD-TTg dated July 19 2012 of the Prime Minister, on Approving an urgent
action plan to 2020 for the conservation of elephants in Viet Nam;
- Decision No. 799/QD-TTg dated June 27, 2012, of the Prime Minister on Approving the
National Action Plan for REDD+ in the period of 2011-2020;
17
- Decision No. 1896/2012/QD-TTg dated December 27, 2012 of the Prime Minister on approving
the project "Prevention and control of invasive alien species in Viet Nam to 2020";
- Decision No. 11/2013/QD-TTg dated January 24, 2013 of the Prime Minister, on Prohibiting
export, import, sale, transportation of specimens of certain animal species under the Convention
on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora;
- Decision No. 188/QD-TTg dated February 13, 2013 of the Prime Minister, on Approving the
program for protection and development of aquatic resources to 2020;
- Decision No. 763/QD-TTg dated May 21, 2013 of the Prime Minister, on approving the Viet
Nam Elephant Conservation Project in the period of 2013-2020;
- Decision No. 539/QD-TTg dated April 16, 2014 of the Prime Minister, on approving the
National Program for Tiger Conservation in the period 2014-2022;
- Decision No. 45/QD-TTg dated January 08, 2014, on approving the National Master
Plan for Biodiversity Conservation to 2020, Orientation to 2030;
- Decision No. 1976/QĐ-TTg dated October 30, 2014, on approving the Planning of national
special-use forest system to 2020, vision to 2030;
- Decision No. 218/QD-TTg dated February 7, 2014, on Approving the Strategy for Management
of Special-use Forest System, Marine Conservation Zones and Inland Water Conservation Zones
of Viet Nam to 2020, vision to 2030;
- Decision No. 120/QD-TTg dated January 22, 2015, on approving the Coastal Protection and
Development Plan to Cope with Climate Change in the period 2015-2020;
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg dated September 28, 2015 of the Prime Minister, on the
Program for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources to 2025,
Orientation to 2030;
- Decision No. 1141/QĐ-TTg dated June 27, 2016, on approving the Plan on Capacity-building
for management of access to genetic resources and fair and reasonable sharing of benefits
arising from the use of genetic resources in the period of 2016 - 2025;
- Decision No. 419/QD-TTg dated April 5, 2017, on approving the National Program on Reducing
Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Controlled Forest Loss and Degradation; Preserving and
Improvimg Carbon Content and Sustainable Management of Forest Resources to 2030;
- Decision No. 628 /QD-TTg dated May 10, 2017 of the Prime Minister, on approving the Urgent
Action Plan for Conservation of Viet Nam's Primate Species to 2025, Vision to 2030;
- Decision No. 626/QĐ-TTg dated May 10, 2017 of the Prime Minister, on approving the Plan to
Strengthen Management Capacity of the Protected Area System to 2025, Vision to 2030;
- Decision No. 886/QD-TTg dated June 16, 2017, on approving the National Target Program for
Sustainable Forest Development in the Period of 2016-2020;
- Decision No. 78/2018/QD-TTg dated on January 16, 2018 of the Prime Minister on approving
the National Action Plan to Prevent, Reduce and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated
fishing to 2025;
- Decree 59/2017/NĐ-CP dated May 12, 2017 of the Government regulating Management of
18
Access to Genetic Resources and Sharing of Benefits from the Use of Genetic Resources.
The process of developing the 6th national report on biodiversity
The MONRE acts as the national focal point for the CBD and was in charge of preparing the 6th
National Report. The process is summarized as follows:
- In May 2018, Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Agency started working with UNDP
on NR6 preparation plan and technical support for the report developmet
- In June 2018, the drafting team was established
- July and August 2018, the drafting team collected, analised data and draft the first version
of the report
- In August 2018, MONRE sent an official letter to provinces and cities under central
authority requesting they prepare reports for the NBSAP.
UNDP collaborated with BCA to organize three workshops with stakeholders in the
north, central and south of Viet Nam.
The NR6 preparation group analyzed the comments from provinces and cities under
central authority.
- From October – November 2018, based on information collected thus far, including
official comments from relevant ministries, central agencies and NGOs, a draft of the
NR6 was written in collaboration with the BCA.
- In December 2018, a fourth draft was prepared and sent for comments to the UNDP, UN
Environment and CBD.
- In January and February 2019, the expert group held a technical workshop and
subsequently wrote the sixth draft.
- In March and April 2019, MONRE continued consulation with stakeholders and worked
with experts to finalise the report.
Relevant websites, web links, and files
Draft report of National Biodiversity Strategy;
Decision No. 1250/QD-TTg dated on 31 July 20143 about national biodiversity stratety to 2020
forward to 2030;
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment;
Ministry of Science and Technology;
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development;
Vietnam Environment Administration;
Acess and Benefit Sharing in Vietnam;
19
Section II. Implementation measures taken, assessment of their effectiveness, associated
obstacles and scientific and technical needs to achieve national targets
NBSAP of Viet Nam has included six general measures as follows:
1. Promoting critical changes in awareness and attitudes of state agencies and communities
with references of their responsibilities on conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity;
2. Improving the legislative and institutional system and strengthening the capacity of law
enforcement for the implementation of laws on biodiversity;
3. Strengthening integration of biodiversity conservation into policy development;
4. Promoting scientific research; and development, application of advancing technology in
conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity;
5. Increasing financial resources for biodiversity conservation; and
6. Promoting integration and international cooperation in conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity
Description of the seconnd measure
Improving the legislative and institutional system and strengthening the capacity of law
enforcement for the implementation of laws on biodiversity
- Amend, supplement and promulgate legal documents on biodiversity to ensure consistency
and efficiency; review sanctions for violations of biodiversity provisions and their
effectiveness; mainstream biodiversity conservation into land use planning and into the
planning of a number of key sectors (agriculture, forestry, and fisheries) and of provincial
people’s committees.Strengthen the biodiversity management system; develop and
implement mechanisms for better coordination between biodiversity management
authorities; review functions, tasks and the organization of state agencies involved in
biodiversity management, including law enforcement on biodiversity conservation,
information sharing mechanisms, skills, and coordination.Improve the capacity of law
enforcement staff at the central and local levels; diversify training resources and methods
for staff; assess the need of state management agencies for capacity-building regarding
biodiversity conversation (especially the agencies and units under the MONRE, MARD
and Protected Area Management Boards); Consolidate and strengthen local biodiversity
management agencies; establish biodiversity management units under the Department of
Environmental Protection and assign specialized staff for biodiversity conservation;
Strengthen law enforcement on biodiversity conservation, including the implementation of
training for the enforcement of legislation to forest and aquatic rangers, environmental
police, market management staff and custom staff;Perform regular professional training on
biodiversity conservation for staff at provincial departments, units, and biodiversity
facilities focusing on issues such as: management, business planning, investigation and
monitoring of biodiversity; building and managing databases; collection, processing, and
preservation of fauna and flora specimens; identification and rescue of species; geographic
information systems (GIS); and reporting;Establish and implement a biodiversity
monitoring network, especially within protected areas; set up databases and establish a
mechanism for reporting and information sharing between central authorities and protected
20
areas; develop a set of biodiversity indicators and technical guidelines on biodiversity
monitoring that conform with international standards; and implement pilot projects for
biodiversity monitoring in the three major ecosystems (forest, wetland and marine).
For the implementation measure, please indicate to which national or Aichi Biodiversity
Target(s) it contributes.
Measure 1 of the Strategy contributes towards national objectives 1, 2 and 3; tasks 1, 2, 3 and
4 of NBSAP; and Aichi targets 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Measure 2 of the Strategy contributes towards national objectives 1, 2 and 3;tasks 1, 2 and 3 of
NBSAP; and Aichi Targets 2, 6, 7, 8, 17 and 19.
Measure 3 of the Strategy contributes towards national objectives 1, 2 and 3; task 5 of
NBSAP; and Aichi targets 2, 4 and 5.
Measure 4 of the Strategy contributes towards national objectives 1, 2 and 3; tasks 1, 2, 3, 4
and 5 of NBSAP; and Aichi targets 4, 5, 16 and 19.
Measure 5 of the Strategy contributes towards national objectives 1, 2 and 3; tasks 1, 2, 3, 4
and 5 of NBSAP; and Aichi target 20.
Measure 6 of the Strategy contributes to national objectives 1, 2 and 3; tasks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of
NBSAP; and Aichi targets 5, 17 and 20.
Assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation measure taken in achieving desired
outcomes:
Measure taken has been effective
Measure taken has been partially effective
Measure taken has been ineffective
Unknown
Measure for evaluating the effectiveness of implementation measures:
- Promoting critical changes in awareness and attitudes of state agencies and communities with
references of their responsibilities on conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity
- Strengthening integration of biodiversity conservation into policy development
- Strengthening integration of biodiversity conservation into policy development
- Promoting scientific research, development and application of advancingtechnology in
conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity
- Increasing financial resources for biodiversity conservation
- Promoting integration and international cooperation in conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity
21
Other relevant information, including case studies to illustrate how the measure taken has
resulted in (or is expected to result in) outcomes that contribute to the implementation of the
NBSAP
Case studies illustrate the measures presented in the table below:
Table 2. Measures and results achieved
Measures Activities and results
1) Promoting critical changes in awareness and attitudes of state agencies and
communities with references of their responsibilities on conservation and sustainable use
of biodiversity
Education and
awareness
- Since the Biodiversity Law was enacted in 2008, MONRE has
disseminated the Biodiversity Law and related documents. This has
fulfilled its basic objectives.
- Every year, MONRE coordinates with related parties to celebrate
International Wetlands Day and the International Day of Biodiversity.
- Many television programs have been created to introduce Viet Nam's
biodiversity and conservation areas, as well as biodiversity conservation
management. These programs have been shown on national television
channels and local channels in all regions.
- Various training materials on biodiversity have been compiled, including
those with contents on basic issues of biodiversity and biosafety; state
management of biodiversity and biosafety; protection and use of
biodiversity resources. Training courses on biodiversity conservation have
also been organized for central and local managers, especially for technical
staff and managers of protected areas.
- MONRE issued Official Letter No. 683 / BTNMT-TCMT dated
February 9, 2018 to localities - this primarily focused on promoting law
enforcement for, and dissemination of information on, biodiversity
conservation.
Integrating
biodiversity
conservation
concepts into the
curriculum
- A network of education and training for biodiversity conservation in
Viet Nam has been developed. Approximately 20 universities have
undergraduate majors related to biodiversity, including biology,
environmental management, forestry, agriculture and fisheries,
geography, and natural resources.
- Many universities have graduate and postgraduate training programs
related to biodiversity conservation, including the University of Natural
Sciences (Viet Nam National University, Hanoi), Hanoi National
University of Education, Hanoi Agricultural University, Forestry
University, Vinh University, Nha Trang University, Viet Nam National
University, Ho Chi Minh City and the Agriculture-Forestry University Ho
Chi Minh. Some private universities also have environmental science,
22
agriculture and forestry subjects.
Furthermore, in 2016, the Ministry of Education and Training mandated a
number of universities to compile teaching materials related to biodiversity
conservation.
2) Improving legislative and institutional systems and strengthening th capacity of law
enforcement and implementation of laws on biodiversity
A legal framework
on biodiversity
has been
developed
- At the highest level, the need for biodiversity conservation in Viet Nam
has been defined in the Constitution (adopted by the National Assembly on
November 21, 2013) as follows: The State has policies for environment
protection, nature and biodiversity conservation; for measures for strict
handling, remedy and compensation for damage by organizations and
individuals causing environmental pollution, depletion of natural
resources and reduction of biodiversity (Article 63).
- A number of laws regarding natural resource management have been
passed by the National Assembly, including but not limited to, the Law on
Forest Protection and Development (1991; amended in 2004 and amended
to the Forestry Law in 2017); Law on Land Use (1993; amended in 1998
and 2003); Law on Environmental Protection (1993; amended in 2005;
amended in 2014); Law on Water Resources (1998, amended in 2012); and
the Fisheries Law (2003, amended in 2017). The Biodiversity Law was
passed by the National Assembly in 2008 and came into effect in 2009,
marking a turning point for biodiversity conservation. Another important
law is the Law on Planning, which took effect in January 2019.
- Since 2008, the Government has developed and issued more than 140
legal documents on biodiversity conservation and as guidance for the
implementation of the above laws.
A system of state
management on
biodiversity
conservation have
been enhanced
implemented
- Article 6 of the Biodiversity Law 2008 stipulates that the Government is
responsible for unified state management of biodiversity; MONRE is to
take responsibility for performing state management of biodiversity;
Ministries and ministerial-level agencies are to, within the ambit of their
tasks and powers, perform state management of biodiversity as assigned by
the Government; and People’s Committees at all levels are to, within the
ambit of their tasks and powers, perform state management of biodiversity
when decentralized or assigned by the Government.
- MARD is responsible for the management of special-use forests and
marine protected areas. MONRE is responsible for the management of
protected wetland ecosystems, including Ramsar wetlands, and those listed
under Decision 1093/2016/QD-TCMT.- MONRE has been working with
the Ministry of Home Affairs to establish a structure of specialized
agencies that will assist provincial People's Committees with management
of natural resources and environmental issues by assigning a focal point to
advise on local implementation of the Biodiversity Law.
23
Technical
capacity bulding
on law
enforcement for
biodiversity
managing
institutions, both
central and local
levels, has been
implemented
- Many training courses regarding biodiversity conservation that have
been organized for central and local staff, especially for technical and
management staff of protected areas.
- Decision No. 626/QD-TTg dated May 10, 2017 of the Prime Minister,
approved the project "Strengthening management capacity of the
protected area system, to 2025 with a vision to 2030". This has an
overall goal of improving management of protected areas from central
to local levels throughout Viet Nam.
- From 2011 onwards, MONRE has organized training courses in three
regions of Viet Nam for managers of protected areas and for local
biodiversity conservation managers (DONREs, DARDs) regarding:
creation of biodiversity indicators; biodiversity monitoring processes;
developing a report on the status of biodiversity; provincial biodiversity
conservation planning; developing a management plan for protected
areas, etc.
Biodiversity
monitoring and
biodiversity
database have
been developed
From 2011 onwards, MONRE has completed the following activities:
- Drafted, published and distributed technical documents, specifically,
"Guidelines for monitoring and evaluating biodiversity of coastal
wetlands" and "Guidelines for development and use of biodiversity
indicators".
- Conducted monitoring on biodiversity in some protected areas, including
Xuan Thuy National Park, and Nam Dinh (2013-2015). The development
of biodiversity indicators and monitoring of the coastal wetland at Thai
Thuy, Thai Binh (2017-2018).
- Developed a national database on biodiversity (NBDS), and included
within it, the threatened species identified within the Viet Nam Red Book
(2007), as well as species surveys collected from the Xuan Thuy National
Park.
In addition to the work done by MONRE, MARD is currently developing
a forest information management system (FORMIS). MOST and MARD
have also developed a database on seeds and genetic resources for plants
and animals. In addition, the Viet Nam Academy of Science and
Technology has built a database on Vietnamese sea areas which includes
information on marine biodiversity.
Viet Nam became an associated member of the Global Biodiversity
Information Fund (GBIF) in 2017.
3) Strengthening integration of biodiversity conservation into policy development
Integrate
The following concepts of biodiversity conservation have been
integrated into Viet Nam’s national plans, programs, and policies:
24
biodiversity
conservation into
sectoral and
interdisciplinary
policies and
programs
- Viet Nam’s ‘Sustainable development strategy for the period 2011-
2020: Rational use and sustainable development of natural resources,
including biological resources and biodiversity’.
- Viet Nam’s green growth strategy, which promotes restructuring and
improving economic institutions to more efficiently use natural
resources, thus improving the competitiveness of the economy.
- Hunger eradication and poverty reduction strategy: a program of
planting 5 million hectares of forests, increasing the forest cover area
from 33% in 2000 to 41.45% in 2017;
- National strategy to respond to climate change, including improving
forest quality, afforestation, greening bare land and hills, ensuring
effective exploitation of forests to maintain and improve their ability to
prevent disaster, desertification, and land degradation;
- Strengthen the protection, management and development of mangrove
forests, wetland ecosystems, etc.
- Strategies for forestry, fisheries, and tourism development in relation
to biodiversity conservation.
- Territorial development plan: creating green corridors (biodiversity
corridors) that connect protected areas.
- Land use planning: The NBSAP project was piloted in Son La and
Lang Son provinces in 2015.
- Environmental protection and biodiversity conservation issues have
been integrated in action plans and programs to implement international
treaties that the Viet Namese Government has signed.
Improving the
quality of
assessing
biodiversity
conservation
requirements in
EIA and SEA
In 2015, MONRE, with the support of the Asian Development Bank,
undertook the project ‘Strengthening and use of country safeguards system
- Mainstreaming biodiversity considerations into the national
environmental safeguards system’. From this project, the ‘Technical
Guidance: Assessing biodiversity impacts in Environmental Impact
Assessments’ guidelines were developed.
4) Promoting scientific research, development and application of advancingtechnology in
conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity
Enhancing
scientific research
and application of
technology into
conservation and
sustainable use of
biodiversity
- Many research projects relating to biodiversity have been conducted,
including: surverys on the status and changes of biological resources in
coastal and marine ecosystems; surveys on flora and fauna in both
terrestrial ecosystems and aquatic organisms in inland waters; surveys
on threatened species, animals and plants, that should be prioritized in
the amendement of Viet Nam’s Red Data Book; research on techniques
and technology related to the conservation of threatened species,
specifically with high economic value and ecosystem restoration.
25
- After a project to develop the fauna and flora books of Viet Nam was
undertaken, the results were complied and published in the Red Data
Book, listing the threatened species in Viet Nam. From 1985, 52 books
of the flora and fauna of Viet Nam and the Viet Nam Red Data Book
have been published.
Thanks to an increase in equipment and improved research capacity,
Viet Nam has announced 1,023 new species of plants and animals (as
per the Institute of Ecology & Biological Resources of Viet Nam
Academy of Science and Technology and Viet Nam National
University). From 2014 to September 2018, 344 species of organisms –
208 species of animals, 136 species of plants - have been published in
scientific journals, including in the Journal of Biology of Viet Nam.
- The Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology and other
specialized institutes under the Ministry of Health, etc. have undertaken
projects to study high-value biological components from marine animals
and inland native plants. Many technological processes for extracting
products with high medicinal values from organisms have been developed.
- Projects to build and apply tourism models relating to biodiversity
conservation have been applied to protected areas and a biosphere
reserve.
Viet Nam has
instated the
application of
green criteria into
the system of
national socio-
economic
indicators
Research projets on economiv evaluation of ecosystems have been
developed and implemented. The results are then provided to central and
local management levels, to be considered when economic development
activites are undertaken. The aim of this is to ensure that the value and
conservation of biodiversity is taken into account. However, to date,
economic values from ecosystem services have not been included into the
national accounting system.
5) Increase of financial resources for biodiversity conservation
Budget for
biodiversity
conservation
According to the Biodiversity Law (2008), the Government of Viet Nam is
committed to allocating the state budget for biodiversity conservation and
sustainable development. The budget for biodiversity conservation at the
central level (about 60-80%) is concentrated between the MONRE,
MARD and MOST.
Encouraging the
participation of
communities and
enterprises in
financial
investment for
biodiversity
- Policies, mechanisms, and approaches for payment of forest
environmental services have been developed by MARD.
- There have been businesses which are willing to contribute financially to
biodiversity conservation.
- Funds to support biodiversity conservation and environmental protection
have been developed and include the Viet Nam Special Use Forest
26
Conservation Fund (VCF); Trust Fund (TFF); Viet Nam Fund for Aquatic
Resources Reproduction (VIFARR); Viet Nam Environment Protection
Fund (VNEPF); and the Community Development Fund (CDF).
Support of foreign
organizations and
individuals for
biodiversity
From the first cycle to the seventh cycle, the Global Environment Fund
(GEF) has provided Viet Nam $70,161,420 USD. In addition to funding
from the GEF, Viet Nam has also attracted Official Development
Assistance (ODA) from other development donors.
6) Promote integration and international cooperation in conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity
Participate in, and
implement
international
treaties on
biodiversity
Viet Nam has signed and ratified five conventions and two international
protocols related to biodiversity. Accordingly, the Biodiversity Law has
codified some basic contents of the United Nations Convention on
Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention.
Exchange
resources and
experiences with
countries and
international
organizations on
biodiversity
MONRE and MARD, along with other ministries, and localities, have
promoted international cooperation to implement the Biodiversity Law. In
addition, there have been a number ofinvestment projects funded by
foreign aid, which often focus on scientific research, community
development, education and awareness activities, etc.
Relevant websites, web links and files
Please indicate any relevant websites, web links or documents to additional related
information.
The article on intergrating biodiversity into sustainable tourism;
Biodiverisy in Bac Kan province;
Obstacles and scientific and technical needs related to the measure taken:
A number of obstacles have been encountered while implementing Viet Nam’s NBSAP. They
are as follows:
1) Lack of financial resources for implement NBSAP.
Recommendation: Need to mobilise financial resources, including from the state budget and
other kinds of support from dornors, GEF and other resources.
2) Viet Nam has not had adequate resources to assess the extent and impacts of invasive
species as well as solutions of control, prevention and mitigation of negative impacts of
invasive species in Vietnam.
Recommendation: Greater international cooperation and resources support (eg. funding,
experts) are required for research on invasive species, specifically for the Vietnamese
27
Academy of Science and Technology, MONRE and MARD.
3)Viet Nam has experienced limitations on the resources and tools available to carry out
species conservation, use DNA to identify the distribution of threatened species needed to be
prioritized for protection.
Recommendation: Greater cooperation and support (eg. funding, experts, and equipment) from
the international community are required.
4) There is a lack of capacity and resources available to carry out servey, monitoring and
evaluate status of biodiversity and ecosystem services, develop spatial tools related to
biodiversity management (eg. GIS) at the national and regional levels.
Recommendation: Greater international cooperation, technical and finalcial and support for
building capacity and techology transfer.
5) There are limitations on methodology available to research the impacts of climate change
on biodiversity in Viet Nam, as well as measures regarding mitigation and adaptation.
Recommendation: Greater cooperation and support (eg. funding, experts and equipment) from
the international community are required for increased research on the impacts of climate
change on biodiversity and measures for impact mitigation and adaptation.
Section III. Assessment of progress towards each national target
III. Assessment of progress towards each national target
Specific Target 1: To improve the quality and increase the area of protected ecosystems,
ensuring that the area of terrestrial protected areas accounts for 9% of the total territorial area;
marine protected areas account for 0.24% of the sea area; forest coverage reaches 45%; primary
forest remains at 0.57 million hectares, coupled with effective protection plans; that mangrove
forests, seagrass beds, and coral reefs are maintained at the current levels; that 15% of degraded
critical ecosystems are restored; and the number of internationally-recognized protected areas is
increased to 10 Ramsar wetlands, 10 biosphere reserves, and 10 ASEAN heritage parks.
Category of progress towards the implementation of the selected target
On track to exceed target
On track to achieve target
Progress towards target but at an insufficient rate
No significant change
Moving away from target
Unknown
Date the assessment was done
August 28, 2018
28
Additional information
The quantitative results of specific objectives of NBSAP are presented in the table below
Table 3: Quantitative results of implementing specific targets of Viet Nam NBSAP
Quantitativ
e targets
Results
achieved by
2014
Results
achieved by
2017
Possibility to
2020
Reasons
Target 1
The area of
terrestrial
protected
areas to
reach 9% of
the total
territorial
area
The area of
terrestrial
protected
areas as
special use
forests
accounted for
2.2 million ha
as indicated
by the
Decision
1976/QD-TTg
dated October
30, 2014 of
the Prime
Minister
approving the
master plan
for the
national
special use
forest system
to 2020 and a
vision to 2030
Data
unavailable
The area of
terrestrial
protected areas
has reached
2,269,426 ha,
accounting for
6.84% of the
territorial area
throughout the
country (data as
of 2018).
The area of
terrestrial
protected areas as
special use forest
will increase to
2.4 million ha by
2020 as stated at
the Decision
1976/QD-TTg
dated October 30,
2014 of the Prime
Minister
approving the
master plan for the
national special
use forest system
to 2020 and a
vision to 2030.
This is added
270,271 ha
planned for
marine Pas system
as indicated by
Decision 742/QD-
TTg dated May
26, 2015 of the
Prime Minister
approving the
planning for
marine PA system
by 2020; and
planned 45 inland
water PAs
(without
determination of
area) as indicated
The target was too
ambitious and the
total area of special
use forest also
altered, targeting
2,358,870 ha by
2020 in accordance
to land use
adjustment decided
by the National
Assembly at
Resolution
134/2016/QH13
dated April 9,
2016.
29
by Decision
1749/QD-TTg
dated October 13,
2008 of the Prime
Minister
approving the
planning for
inland water Pas
system by 2020
The area of
marine
protected
areas
(MPAs) to
reach 0.24%
of the sea
area
Nine of 16
planned
marine
protected
areas have
been
established
As of 2017, ten
of 16 planned
marine
protected areas
had been
established,
with a total area
of 187,810 ha
(of which
131,647 ha as
sea area),
equating to
0.19% of Viet
Nam's sea area.
The total area of
planned marine
PAs by 2020 is
270,271 ha (of
which 169,617 ha
as sea area) as
indicated by
Decision 742/QD-
TTg dated May
26, 2015 of the
Prime Minister
approving the
planning for
marine PA system
by 2020
The remaining 6
marine PAs have
not been officially
established as
planned due to
shortage of
technical support
and financial
source.
Forest cover
to reach
45%
40.43% (as of
2014,
consisting of
13,796,506 ha
of forest that is
made up of
10,100,186 ha
of natural
forest and
3,696,320 ha
of plantation
forest). Forest
cover is
13,382,444 ha
nation-wide.
41.45% (as of
2017, consisting
of 14,415,381 ha
of forest that is
made up of
10,236,415 ha of
natural forest
and 4,178,966 ha
of plantation
forest). Forest
cover is
13,717,981 ha
nation-wide
The Target
Program on
Sustainable
Forestry
Development of
Vietnam for the
period 2016-2020 ,
as indicated by
Decision 886/QD-
TTg dated June 16,
2017 by the Prime
Minister, has re-set
the target of
national forest
cover by 2020 that
is 42% or 14.4
million ha of
forests at all types
The target was too
ambitious and has
been decided to
change from 45%
to 42% by the
National Assembly
at the Resolution
134/2016/QH13
dated April 9,
2016,
Primary
forest to be
Data is not Approximately
0.5 million
No official target
found, but
- Lack of
implementing
30
kept at 0.57
million ha
and have an
effective
protection
plan
available hectares (exact
data not
available)
commitment on
effective protection
of natural forest
already set out in
the National Action
Program on
REDD+ in
accordance to
Decision 419/QD-
TTg dated April 5,
2017 of the Prime
Minister
programe for the
target
- Besides,
“Primary forest” is
not legally set as
an indicator for
annual forest
monitoring and/or
annual forest state
by MARD
The area of
mangroves
to be kept at
current
levels
(190,000 ha)
166,502 ha 213,142 ha The National
program on
protection and
development
coastal forests in
response to
climate changes
for the period
2014-2020” as
indicated by the
Decision 120/QD-
TTg dated January
20, 2015 of the
Prime Minister,
has set the
following targets:
(i) increases of the
coastal forests
area to 2020 by
356.753 ha
(including
mangroves),
securing its cover
by 19.5% by
2020; and (ii)
development of a
new plantation of
29,500 ha of
mangroves by
2020
- Successful
programs and
projects on
afforestation of
coastal
forestsmangrove
coverage has
increased; as well
as local effective
prevention of
aquaculture
farming expansion
from mangrove
deforestation,
particularly in the
Mekong Delta
Seagrass
area to be
kept at
17,000 ha
(Cao Van
Luong et al.,
No data
reference
Progress towards
target but
- No data found
sufficient or
updated because no
31
current
levels
(12,380 ha)
2012) seagrass
monitoring and/or
inventory nation-
wide set and/or
operated by
MONRE or
MARD
- Lack of
implementing
programe for the
target.
- Lack of financial
resourse
Coral reefs
to be kept at
at current
levels
(14,131 ha)
13,335 ha
(Nguyen Van
Long and Vo
Si Tuan, 2014)
No data
reference
Progress towards
target but at an
insufficient rate
- Local
institutions,
technical capacity
and inter-agency
collaboration for
managing and
protecting coral
reefs at the ground
that are not
adequate,
- Coral reef
protection was
taken priority over
neither
environmental
agenda nor socio-
economic
activities.
15% of
critical
ecosystem
area that has
been
degraded is
to be
restored and
conserved
Lack of
baseline data
as well as
monitoring
system
Data not
available
Specified by the
Target Program on
Sustainable
Forestry
Development of
Vietnam for the
period 2016-2020
as indicated by
Decision 886/QD-
TTg dated June
16, 2007 of the
Prime Minister,
targeting 15% area
- No data found
sufficient or
updated because no
“critical
ecosystem”
monitoring and/or
inventory nation-
wide set and/or
operated by
MONRE or
MARD
- inadequate
32
of the degraded
forest ecosystems
to be restored and
conserved with a
focus on special
use forests, which
is followed up by:
(i) by 2020, an
area of 100.000 ha
to be added to
special use forest
system; (ii)
securing 75.000 ha
to be newly
planted or
replanted in
special use forests
and protection
forest; plus forest
enrichment and
regeneration
implementation
programs and
resource for the
target.
Ten Ramsar
Sites
Five sites
established
Nine sites
established
On track to
achieve target
One more site to
be profiled for
Ramsar
submission by
2020
Ten
biosphere
reserves
Eight Nine reserves
with an area of
4,104,446 ha
On track to
achieve target
One more to be
recognized as a
Biosphere reserve;
a document for
this is being
prepared.
10 ASEAN
Heritage
Parks
Four Six On track to
achieve target
There are five
protected areas
that have had
documents
prepared in order
to submit them to
the ASEAN
Secretariat by
2020 for
consideration:
Bidoup-Nui Ba
National Park; Vu
33
Quang National
Park; Ngoc Linh
Nature Reserve;
Lo Go Xa Mat
National Park; and
Bach Ma National
Park.
Target 2
No increase
in the
number of
extinct
species
No species
recorded
extincted
No species
recorded
extincted
No species
recorded extincted
Conservation
programs/action
plans for critical
endangered
species have been
conducted:
the Urgent Action
Plan on Elephant
Conservation to
2020 (Decision
940/QD-TTg
dated July 19,
2012); the Overall
Project on
Elephant
Conservation for
the period 2013-
2020 (Decision
763/QD-TTg
dated May 21,
2013); the
National Program
on Tiger
Conservation for
the period 2014-
2022 (Decision
539/QD-TTg
dated April 16,
2014); and the
urgent action plan
to conserve
primate species in
Vietnam to 2025
and a vision to
2030 ( Decision
628/QD-TTg
34
dated May 10,
2017)
Significantly
improve the
situation of
species
threatened
Data not
available
A record by FFI
(2016), more
than 500
individuals of
red-shanked
douc langur
(Pygathrix
nemaeus
cinerea) were
discovered in
Kon Tum and
over 200
individuals of
barbea’s langur
(Trachypithecus
barbei) in Thanh
Hoa.
No indicative
target available,
but sound
commitments
presented in
several core
policies issued by
the Prime
Minister, such as
the Urgent Action
Plan on Elephant
Conservation to
2020 (Decision
940/QD-TTg
dated July 19,
2012); the Overall
Project on
Elephant
Conservation for
the period 2013-
2020 (Decision
763/QD-TTg
dated May 21,
2013); the
National Program
on Tiger
Conservation for
the period 2014-
2022 (Decision
539/QD-TTg
dated April 16,
2014); and the
urgent action plan
to conserve
primate species in
Vietnam to 2025
and a vision to
2030 ( Decision
628/QD-TTg
dated May 10,
2017)
Still lacking of a
comprehensive
and effective site-
based monitoring
of being-
threatened to
extinction species
at prioritized
habitats
Target 3
35
The number
of stored and
preserved
cultivar
specimets in
seed banks,
gene banks
and on
farms. By
2020, 80,000
- 120,000
samples
preserved.
No data
available
Stored about
60,000 samples,
including
genetic material
of 30,000
agricultural
seeds/genes;
over 2,000
species of forest
trees; 2,998
species of
medicinal
plants; the genes
of
approximately
70 domestic
animals; 2,999
aquatic species;
and about
22,000 strains
of micro-
organisms.
On track to
achieve target
In 2015, the Prime
Minister issued
Decision 1671 /
QD-TTg dated
September 28,
2015, approving
the program on
conservation and
sustainable use of
genetic resources
up to 2025,
orientation to
2030. According
to this decision,
the goal by 2020
is to collect,
import and safely
store at least
70,000 biological
genetic samples.
Indicators used in this assessment
Indicators used to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing specific objectives in the Viet Nam
NBSAP are presented in Table 1 in section I.
Please describe any other tools or means used for assessing progress
- Desk study: Developed guidelines for the implementation of NBSAP at a local level;
developed a set of indicators for evaluating the implementation of NBSAP at national and
provincial levels as well as in protected areas; developed frameworks for assessing the
effectiveness of the implementation of NBSAP;
- Local case study of one site for the implementation of NBSAP;
- Developed a set of performance indicators for NBSAP;
- Developed a measures/achievements/Obstacles matrix;
- Creation of data tracking tool, in addition to Excel spreadsheets and online CBD
reporting tool;
- Delphi method; and
- Stakeholder consultation
Relevant websites, web links and files
Guildline on biodiversity monitoring;
36
Level of confidence of the above assessment
Based on comprehensive evidence
Based on partial evidence
Based on limited evidence
Please provide an explanation for the level of confidence indicated above.
- Based on annual official reports provided by MONRE, MARD, MOST and other related
Ministries
- Based on reports provided by provinces and protected areas. However, not all provinces
and protected areas completed and submitted their reports on the implementation of
NBSAP to MONRE.
Adequacy of monitoring information to support assessment
Monitoring related to this target is adequate
Monitoring related to this target is partial (e.g. only covering part of the area or issue)
No monitoring system in place
Monitoring is not needed
Please describe how the target is monitored and indicate whether there is a monitoring
system in place.
Viet Nam’s national environmental monitoring system is now in operation, which collects data
on air, land and water in major river basins and coastal waters. It also require to monitor
indicators on animals, specifically, plankton/algae, benthic animals and fish, but the operaton is
not in place.
There is no monitoring indicators specific to biodiversity, despite MONRE publishing technical
guidelines. These guidelines include information regarding the development of biodiversity
indicators, the monitoring of wetlands, and technical information on reporting the status of
biodiversity in protected areas. In addition, MARD has also developed monitoring guidance on
forest biodiversity with references to selected ecosystems and populations.
Some of Viet Nam’s protected areas have conducted monitoring of threatened species, however
this has not progressed beyond the pilot phases. These pilots were conducted in Cat Ba National
Park and Na Hang Protected Areas to monitor primate species and in Phu Quoc National Park
and Con Dao MPA to monitor coral reefs and seagrass beds. There are only a few sites within
Viet Nam that regularly monitored bird activity. These included Thai Thuy in Thai Binh
province, Xuan Thuy in Nam Dinh province, Tram Chim in Dong Thap province, and Phu My in
Kien Giang province.
Relevant websites, web links and files
BirdLife International in Vietnam;
Participatory biodiversity monitoring for REDD+ in Vietnam;
37
Environment monitoring website;
Section IV. Description of the national contribution to the achievement of each global Aichi
Biodiversity Target
IV. Description of national contribution to the achievement of each Aichi Biodiversity
Target
Aichi Biodiversity Target 1: Awareness of biodiversity increased
Legal documents on communication activities to improve biodiversity awareness
In 2015, MONRE issued Decision No. 200/QD-BTNMT approving an awareness raising
program on the prevention and control of invasive alien species in Viet Nam in the period of
2015-2020
Communication and awareness-raising activities:
a) Celebration of international dates relating to biodiversity and events
- Annually, under the guidance of international conventions and treaties on biodiversity,
the MONRE issues a document to guide the implementation of internationally-recognised
days, such as Biodiversity Day (May 25th), Wetlands Day (February 2nd), and Migratory
Birds Day (May 11th-12th) etc. Associated activities have included hanging banners on
streets and at the headquarter of the MONRE and meetings held in some provinces and
cities across the country. Such activities have increased public attention on biodiversity.
b) Coordinate with relevant agencies and local authorities to raise awareness on biodiversity
- At the central level, MONRE and relevant ministries and agencies have developed and
deployed educational bulletins on conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. These
have been in the form of reports, as well as information distributed through mass media
(radio, television, newspapers).
- At the local level, communication activities have been well deployed. Provinces utilize
local protected area management boards to focus educational activities to communities
living in and around protected area buffer zones. These activites include leaflets, banners,
posters, and radio. Additionally, management boards of protected areas have conducted
various communication activities to raise awareness on the importance of biodiversity for
tourists visiting protected areas.
- Some coastal regions in which national parks and marine protected areas are located,
such as Cat Ba, Con Dao and Phu Quoc, have, in coordination with local authorities and
schools, regularly celebrated International Biodiversity Day. In 2017, MONRE received
23 provincial reports on their implementation of activities for International Biodiversity
Day.
c) Integrate biodiversity into national and international sectors, organizations, universities,
programs and projects
- An educational and training network for individuals working at managerial and technical
38
levels in biodiversity conservation has been developed. Nearly 20 universities provide
undergraduate programs consisting biodiversity-related subjects, including biology,
environmental management, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, geography, and natural
resources. Many universities also provide postgraduate programs, both Master and PhD
levels with specialization on biodiversity conservation, sustainable wetland management
and use. In 2016, the Ministry of Education and Training assigned several universities the
task of compiling teaching documents related to conservation and biodiversity.
- Viet Nam and other ASEAN countries have honored ASEAN heroes on biodiversity. In
2017, Dr. SS. Dang Huy Huynh, who is involved in environmental protection and
biodiversity conservation in Viet Nam, was honoured.
Level of awareness about biodiversity
a) Awareness of central government agencies
- At the highest level, the need for biodiversity conservation in Viet Nam has been defined in
the Constitution (adopted by the National Assembly on November 21, 2013). The
Vietnamese Constitution regulates the State has to develop policies for environmental
protection, nature and biodiversity conservation. In 2008, the National Assembly approved
the Law on Biodiversity, which has been formally enforced since 2009. Since then, the
Government and Ministries have issued many other legal documents directly related to
biodiversity conservation, as well as integrating conservation activities into specific
sectors.There has also been some awareness-raising activities focused on the prevention
and control of invasive alien species.
b) Awareness of local authorities
- Local authorities tend to focus on economic development and put less priority on
environmental protection. Decisions at the provincial level, where most land and water-
use decisions are made, have been made with a primary emphasis on economic growth
criteria, and environmental protection has not been encouraged. The value and role of
biodiversity has been underestimated.
c) Awareness of enterprises
- Until now, many enterprises have paid only for forest environmental services. According
to a preliminary report on eight years of payments for forest environmental services,
the total revenues collected by June 30, 2016 were VND 5,744,792 billion. However,
enterprises' awareness of biodiversity conservation has gradually improved.For example,
the internation cement company Holcim, located in Kien Giang, has committed to
donate 1 million USD to conserve limestone landscapes and threatened species,
including cacti species and the sarus crane. Staff of Holcim and the local community
have been trained on the importance of environment protection.
d) Awareness of the community
- The project “Assessment of awareness, attitudes and participation of local communities
in conservation and management of natural resources in Mu Cang Chai, Lao Cai
province” was implemented in 2012. Results show that generally, local people have a
basic understanding of the importance of local forests and forest resources – including
timber, firewood, cultivated land, and animals – especially in relation to their daily lives.
39
However, local people’s knowledge in the study area is still limited about risks and
potential impacts to forests, understanding about the value of biodiversity, and
information on existing protected areas remains insufficient. Furthermore, public
attitudes regarding forest protection is unclear.
- As part of the project to establish the wetland reserve in Thai Thuy, Thai Binh (to be
implemented in 2016-2018), a survey was conducted. Results show that most of the local
people (e.g. fishermen exploiting the mangrove canopies and mud flats, aquaculturists,
etc) are aware of the role of mangroves in protection of coastal environments.
- In 2017, the Women's Union of Thua Thien-Hue province organized communication
events on the topic of enhancing flood tolerance and ecosystem-based adaptation. This
attracted nearly 700 women. Members of the Women's Union have also been involved in
running training courses on management of small-scale community-based ecotourism
models, to generate economic benefits directly from mangroves. In addition, micro-
credit funds linked to both women's livelihoods and mangrove conservation have been
established. As a result, the flood resilience of 4,800 coastal residents has gradually
improved.
As reported from several proteted areas regarding annunal management activities, there is a low
level of awareness relating to biodiversity conservation in local communities, especially in their
understanding and observance of current laws on the exploitation of natural resources. This has
resulted in the illegal harvesting of timber and non-timber forest products, even in strictly
protected areas.Some limitations:
- Communication and awareness raising for biodiversity conservation has currently only
been done at the community level and by some related management officials. Education
and awareness-raising in high-level agencies, such as at the National Assembly, the
Government and to the provincial authorities has been limited.
- In 2018, after reviewing legal documents on biodiversity show that the provisions of the
Law on Gender Equality 2006 and requirements on gender mainstreaming are not clearly
reflected in the documents. Raising awareness of biodiversity conservation has therefore
not mentioned gender equality much, especially the role of women in conservation
activities.
- Awareness-raising on biodiversity conservation is a process that needs to be ongoing,
but at present there is no budget to carry out these activities regularly every year.
Aichi Biodiversity Target 2: Biodiversity values integrated
Viet Nam has integrated biodiversity into the strategies and plans of sectors and localities. Many
studies have been undertaken at different levels to estimate the value of ecosystem services, with
targets to include the results in the national audit system.
1. Integrating biodiversity conservation into sectoral and inter-sector policies and
programs
1.1. Integrating biodiversity conservation into inter-sector plans, programs and policies for
regional development
The contents of environmental protection have been integrated by Viet Nam’s Government into
national plans, programs and policies as follows:
40
- Hunger elimination and poverty alleviation strategies: objectives for environmental
protection and biodiversity include executing a program of planting five million hectares
of forest; increasing the forest cover from 33% in 2000 to 41.45% by 2017; and a focus
on addressing environmental degradation and promoting conservation of natural
resources.
- The national strategy on responding to climate change: This aims to improve the quality
of forests, promote afforestation and forest cover; to move towards efficient exploitation
of forests; to maintain and improve forests’ resilience against natural disasters,
desertification, erosion, and land degradation; and to enhance the protection,
management, and development of submerged forests and submerged land ecosystems,
with a target to increase forest cover to 42% by 2020.
- A plan to respond to climate change at various phases, especially in the period 2016-
2020 for different sectors.
- Territorial development plan: To form green corridors or biodiversity corridors
connecting protected areas.
- Land use planning: specifically, the project ‘To strengthen provincial capacity to
integrate biodiversity conservation priorities into local land use planning’ is a
component of NBSAP that was piloted in Son La and Lang Son provinces in 2015. Pilot
results show that, when adjusting the land use planning of Son La and Lang Son
provinces, contents related to biodiversity conservation should be considered. Both
national and provincial planning for land use need to include biodiversity related
indications, for instance the area of land set for protected areas as special use forest.
- Viet Nam has a ‘Sustainable Development Strategy in the period of 2011-2020: Toward
rational use and sustainable development of natural resources, including biological
resources and biodiversity’.
- Green Growth Strategy: this aims to accelerate the process of restructuring and
improving economic institutions towards using natural resources more efficiently and to
enhance the competitiveness of the economy, through increased investment in
technology, natural capital, and economic instruments. This will help Viet Nam to cope
with climate change, reduce poverty, and ensure sustainable economic development.
1.2. Integrating biodiversity conservation in the implementation of international conventions
Environmental protection and biodiversity conservation have been integrated into various
programs and action plans, to implementat international treaties that have been signed by the
Vietnamese Government. These include the UNESCO World Heritage Convention; the Ramsar
Convention; CITES; the Convention on Biological Diversity; the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety; the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in the period of 2007-
2010; and the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing;
1.3. Integrating biodiversity conservation into related sectors
Biodiversity conservation has been integrated into policies, strategies, plans, and programs of
relevant sectors, as well as inter-sector areas. This is reflected and regulated in decisions made
by the Government or Ministries through various proposed programs and plans, especially in
sectors such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries, natural resources, environment, tourism, industry,
education, training, science and technology.
41
Circular No. 29/2014/TT-BTNMT dated June 2, 2014, was introduced by MONRE to provide
guidance for the formulation and adjustment of land use that is integrated with biodiversity
conservation. MONRE has also developed a document named ‘Methodology and guidelines for
integrating biodiversity conservation into provincial land use planning’. Under a NBSAP project
implemented in 2015, the integration of biodiversity conservation into land use planning was
studied and piloted in Lang Son and Son La.
In 2015, MONRE, with the support of the Asian Development Bank, received support for the
project ‘Applying and improving the national environmental safety system - Integrating
biodiversity considerations into the environmental safety system of Viet Nam’. This developed a
technical guideline entitled ‘Impact assessment of biodiversity integrated in environmental
impact assessment’.
Some results:
The integration of biodiversity conservation into sector and inter-sector development policies has
achieved certain successes, especially in economic sectors. Some notable achievements are:
annual increases in forest cover; various programs such as development and cultivation of
valuable species and/or plantation of native trees, which have generated many commercialized
agro-forestry products, thereby reducing pressures on over-exploitation of natural resources; and
education, training, and awareness-raising on biodiversity conservation, especially for
conservation teams in local communities. It is essential to have biodiversity conservation
integrated into provincial land use planning, as this not only creates compatibility between the
two types of planning but, more importantly, gradually introduces biodiversity conservation into
the system for land legislation. In addition, demonstration and replication of conservation
oriented community livelihood models in and around the buffer zones of protected areas, linking
with poverty-alleviation programs, have facilitated improvement of villagers’ livings and
reduction of resource exploitation.
2. Studies on economic valuation of ecosystem services in Viet Nam
In order to evaluate the economic value of natural resources (environmental assets), some projects
examining ecosystem services were introduced in the late twentieth century. The ecological value of
mangrove ecosystems in Viet Nam was first identified by Nguyen Hoang Tri. Subsequently, Nguyen
Hoang Tri et al. (2000) calculated the total economic value of the Gio mangrove forest resources. In
terrestrial areas, Nguyen Duc Thanh (1996) studied the tourism value of Cuc Phuong National Park,
Le Minh Ngoc and Dinh Duc Truong (2006) studied Bach Ma National Park, and Pham Khanh Nam
(2003) assessed the tourism value of Hon Mun Reserve.
In recent years, more studies and economic valuation methods have been carried out and applied for
natural ecosystems in Viet Nam, including for forests, mangroves, coral reefs, and seagrass beds.
Research results show that services of natural ecosystems have contributed significantly to economic
development, livelihood, and human life. According to Nguyen Minh Huyen et al. (2010) and
Nguyen Quang Hung et al. (2013), the economic value of mangrove ecosystems is estimated at
0.204 to 1.67 billion VND /ha /year; coral reef ecosystems at 1.71-11.42 billion VND/ha/year; and
seagrass ecosystems at 0.656 billion VND/ha/year.
In a state-level project, Tran Dinh Lan et al (2015) estimated the goods and services of marine
ecosystem in Bach Long Vi island, Con Co and Tho Chu archipelago respectfully, as:
approximately VND 599 billion/year (approximately USD 26.62 million) equivalent to 94.3 million
VND/ha/year; VND 267.5 billion/year (approximately USD 12 million) equivalent to VND 307
42
million/ha/year and VND 565.2 billion/year (approximately USD 25 million), equivalent to VND
125.47 million/ha/year.
In the project ‘Overcoming barriers to improve management effectiveness of protected areas in Viet
Nam’ (2013), the economic value of Bidoup-Nui Ba National Park, Lam Dong province was
estimated by its goods and services at VND 25,747 billion/year. Meanwhile, total funding for the
park is about VND 40 billion/year, equivalent to just 0.16% of the value of its natural resources.
In the Thai Thuy wetland area of Thai Binh province, many studies have been conducted to
economically value the ecosystem. The Viet Nature Conservation Centre and Vietnature (2016)
estimated economic value through a quick assessment of coastal wetland ecosystem services. It was
shown that exploiting natural aquatic resources has brought the province up to VND 49.7 billion/year
(USD 2.23 million) and aquaculture and salt production VND 259,917 billion/year (USD 11, 66
million). The total economic value of the Thai Thuy wetland area was estimated at USD 14.94
million per year, plus an additional USD 60.26 million from carbon sequestration. Furthermore,
research on wetland ecosystem services in Thai Thuy under the Wetlands Project (ISPONRE, 2017)
estimated that the total economic value of the area was USD 3,034 million per year (given initial
assumptions that the possibility of a typhoon is high during 10%/year and that only Thai Thuy people
are willing to contribute to biodiversity conservation of the local wetland area).
Assessing the economic value of natural ecosystems and biodiversity helps decision-makers and
managers to identify conservation priorities and acts as basis for a trade-off between conservation
goals and development goals. However, in Viet Nam, economic valuation of ecosystems is still only
a research topic. Research results have been reported to local and central management for their
consideration when carrying out economic development activities but economic values from
ecosystem services have not yet been included in Viet Nam’s national accounting system.
In the current System of National Accounts, natural resources that are used in production are
considered as a contribution to the national income, rather than a depreciation of resources.
Many environmental products/services have not been fully evaluated and recorded in the current
accounting system, leading to inadequate recognition of the need for their conservation.
The United Nations has now introducted an integrated Green GDP calculation framework for
consistent application in member countries. The Government of Viet Nam has looked to
gradually integrate green accounting into the national accounts. The Prime Minister signed
Decision No. 43/201/QD-TTg dated June 2, 2010, on the National Statistical Indicator System,
which has developed and applied a green GDP target into the system of socio-economic
indicators from 2014. However, implementation has only reached the stage of experimental
calculation being carried out; specifically, in two seperate studies by the Central Institute for
Economic Management and the Office of Sustainable Development (the Ministry of Planning
and Investment).
3. Spatial data on biodiversity
3.1 National biodiversity map
During the 1980s and 1990s, Viet Nam built the Viet Nam National Atlas; this was then
published in 1996. The Atlas includes some maps of Viet Nam’s terrestrial and marine
biodiversity. In Viet Nam, national-level data on biodiversity is mainly in the form of
statistics,however there is also some limited data on forest cover and distribution of threatened
species in national maps and maps of protected areas. Forest cover maps have been created by
43
the Forest Inventory and Planning Institute under MARD and can be accessed.
Some other national biodiversity maps include those created by the WWF in collaboration with
MONRE of Viet Nam’s ecoregions and ecosystems. This report also includes a number of
biodiversity related maps provided by the UNBiodiversity Lab.
3.2 Maps of biodiversity in protected ares
Most terrestrial protected areas in Viet Nam have maps that show their division into functional
units. In addition, vegetation maps, as well as the distribution of threatened species of protected
areas, and/or of the whole territory, have been created as part of various scientific research
projects.
Map of wetland ecosystems in Xuan Thuy NP
in 2013
Biodiversity map of Con Co Island
Biodiversity map of Tho Chu Island Biodiversity map of Hon Cau Island
Figure 1: Biodiversity maps in Xuan Thuy National Park and some other coastal islands
(Source: Project “National Biodiversity Data System (NDBS JICA-BCA-VEA-MoNRE, 2014);
Project I.2 Research Institute for Marine Fisheries, 2015)
44
Figure 2: Map on distribution of coral reefs, seagrass beds along Ly Son island, Quang
Ngai province (Source: Nguyen Hao Quang, Luong Van Thanh, Ho Dinh Duan, 2015)
Aichi Biodiversity Target 3: Incentives reformed
1. The Government of Viet Nam aims to control activities that have negative impacts on
biodiversity
To implement the objectives in Viet Nam’s NBSAP, the Government aims to instate measures to
eliminate activities harmful to biodiversity. The Government shall also develop legal documents,
mechanisms and policies for the management, control, and monitoring of land use conversion for
the construction of agro-industrial works. The government has provided a wide range of policies
and incentives to facilitate and support local communities living in and round the protected
areas’ buffer zones to effectively participate in conservation and livelihoods development.
In Chapter III of the Environment Law 2015, environmental protection concerns are covered in
Articles 35, 36, 27, and 38. Specifically, these refer to environmental protection concerns during
the inspection, assessment, and development for the planning of utilization of natural resources
and biodiversity; protection and sustainable development of forest resources; and environmental
45
protection during survey, exploration, extraction and utilization of natural resources and
minerals.
The Prime Minister issued Decision No. 1216/QD-TTg dated September 5, 2012, on the
approval of the National Strategy for Environmental Protection to 2020, a vision to 2030. The
overall goal of this Decision is to control, and substantially reduce the level of environmental
pollution, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss. Additionally, working to continously
improve habitat quality, to enhance capacity to respond to climate change, and to implement the
goals of sustainable development.
The Prime Minister issued Decision No. 166/QD-TTg dated January 21, 2014 on the
implementation of the National Strategy for Environmental Protection to 2020, vision to 2030.
Accordingly, by 2020, facilities causing serious environmental pollution will be removed, in
accordance with Decision No. 1788/QD-TTg dated October 1, 2013, of the Prime Minister.
Policies to encourage businesses and service facilities to build and apply environmental
management systems up to ISO 14000 have also been implemented. The Decision also refers to
complying with quotas on emissions and forming a quota transfer market; regulations on
auditing waste and product life cycle assessment; promulgating regulations on the
responsibilities of companies engaged in mineral exploitation for investment in infrastructure
development, hunger reduction, poverty alleviation, job creation and healthcare of local
communities (where mineral exploitation takes place); and reviewing and adjusting the planning
for development of golf courses, hydropower projects, and mineral exploitation projects in order
to exploit and use effectively and sustainably local land, water, and forest resources.
In 2015, the Viet Nam Environment Administration (VEA), with support of the Asian
Development Bank (ADB), under the project "Applying and improving the national
environmental safety system - Integrating biodiversity considerations into the national
environmental safety system of Viet Nam" developed the Technical Guideline: Intergrating
Biodiversity Impact Assessment in Environmental Impact Assessment.
2. Activities with positive impacts on biodiversity
2.1. Assessed potential impacts of agro-industries
Along with socio-economic development, activities such as logging for commercial purposes, and
change of forest to other purposes (such as industrial tree planting, hydropower construction, mineral
exploitation, and road construction) are the main cause of loss and degradation of natural forest
ecosystems and have impacts on populations of threatened species. Accordingly, an environmental
impact assessment must be completed before the construction of all industrial, agricultural, and
mining facilities. Potential impacts of those projects on the environment and biodiversity can
thus be identified and evaluated, and mitigation measures proposed. All agricultural and
industrial sectors must comply with the provisions of the Law on Environment, the Law on
Biodiversity and other related legal documents.
Every year, the Forest Protection Department (Viet Nam Administration of Forestry) prepares
reports on forest protection using data on forest fires, and from violations of the Forest Law that
are prosecuted (published on the Forest Protection Department's website: www.kiemlam.org.vn).
2.2. Payments for forest environmental services
Paying for forest environmental services primarily aims to mobilize financial resources from
46
service users, mainly industries such as hydropower plants, water suppliers, and facilitate
community engagement in watershed forest protection and nature conservation. Many circulars
guiding the implementation of Decree 99/2010/ND-CP and its revision, Decree 147/2016/ND-
CP have been issued by MARD, such as Circular No. 80/2011/TT-BNNPTNT dated November
23, 2011, providing guidance on how to determine payments for forest environmental services.
Circular No. 20/2012/TT-BNNPTNT dated May 07, 2012, provides procedures for checking
and collecting payments for forest environmental services. Circular No. 60/2012/TT-
BNNPTNT dated November 09, 2012, stipulates the principles and methods of determining the
forest area incorporated into payments for forest services.
In 2008, payments for forest environmental services was promulgated and piloted in Lam
Dong and Son La provinces. Accordingly, water users, including hydropower plants, bottled
water companies, and other entities, are obligated to pay for environmental services. Total
payments for forest environmental services in three years until August 2014 were VND 3,329
billion (USD 157 million), most of which came from hydropower plants (97%), bottled water
facilities (2%) and tourism businesses (less than 1%).
According to a preliminary report on eight years of payments for forest environmental
services, the total revenues collected by June 30, 2016 were VND 5,744,792 billion.
2.3. Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) program: Since 2008, Viet Nam has been cooperating with the World Bank, the UN-REDD Program
and some international NGOs to implement REDD+, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by
reducing deforestation and forest degradation, and compensating those implementing
REDD+ activities at the local level. The Netherlands Development Organisation is currently
implementing a pilot project to integrate REDD+ into areas that are have high levels of
biodiversity, in order to promote conservation. REDD+ is an opportunity to mobi lize funding
for biodiversity conservation if conservation objectives are well integrated into the overall
goal of developing forest ecosystems.
2.4. Mobilizing funding from businesses: There are many cases in which enterprises are
willing to contribute to biodiversity conservation. In Kien Giang, Holcim International Cement
Company has pledged to contribute approximately USD 1 million to the conservation of
limestone karst landscapes and threatened species, including the silver-headed langur and sarus
crane. Holcim staff and local communities have been trained about environmental protection.
2.5. Establishing funds to support biodiversity conservation and environmental protection
activities
- Viet Nam Conservation Fund (VCF) is a trust fund from foreign aid that was
established in 2005, with a total amount of USD 15 million; this is non-refundable aid
from the World Bank, the Global Environment Facility and the Dutch Government.
VCF will provide financial and technical support to projects aiming to enhance the
management of special-use forests in Viet Nam. The Fund has offered support to about
70 protected areas, enabling them to carry out conservation-related activities. This is
an effective form of support, especially for small protected areas that have limited
local capital sources.
- Trust Funds (TFF), Viet Nam Conservation Fund (VCF): previously established to
support the implementation of the Vietnam Forestry Development Strategy 2006-2020
47
by ODA sources, and since 2016 they have been integrated into Viet Nam Forest
Protection and Development Fund (VNFF).
- In 2007, the Viet Nam Fund for Aquatic Resources Reproduction (VIFARR) was
established to support biodiversity conservation projects in the fisheries sector, but
there has been no progress in mobilizing resources to sustain its operation.
- Community Development Fund (CDF). This is a small fund developed for community
development projects by FAO, IFAD, ADB and JICA. It aims to assist local people in
poverty reduction, environmental protection and capacity building. Some projects have
been implemented in national parks that include Cat Ba, Xuan Thuy, Ba Be, Na Hang
and Bidoup-Nui Ba.
2.6. Models and initiatives to conserve biodiversity
In order to harmornize biodiversity conservation and economic development, it is important to
implement measures and models for sustainable use of natural resources that incorporate the role
of communities, since all conservation models aim to benefit communities. Within the scope of
international and national projects, Vietnamese experts, in collaboration with foreign consultants,
have developed and applied hundreds of models and initiatives to conserve biodiversity for many
localities, especially in buffer zones, ecological rehabilitation zones, and development zones of
protected areas and biosphere reserves. Some noteworthy conservation models include:
Community-based conservation models:
- With the support of a CARE International sub-project under the Mekong Wetlands
Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use Programme (2006) and a WWF-Coca Cola
project (2008-2010), a co-management model was piloted in Tram Chim National Park.
This encouraged local people to participate in the development of a plan to manage the use
of natural resources in accordance to guidance from the management board of the national
park, and to flexibly apply local knowledge.
- A model for tourism enterprises to participate in the management and reasonable use of
coral reef resources was developed and tested in various coral reefs in the central of Viet
Nam, specifically in Cu Lao Cham MPA, Nha Trang Bay, by Vo Si Tuan et al. (2011).
- A model of ‘Sustainable Livelihoods and Community-Based Conservation of Wetlands
Natural Resources’ was implemented at the Lang Sen Wetland protected area and
contributed to improving the livelihoods of people living in the buffer zone, raising
awareness about wetlands and experimenting with the co-management mechanism.
- In 2008, the Center for Natural Resources and Environment of Viet Nam National
University developed a model of integrated, community-based management of coastal
mangrove forest resources in Ha Thu hamlet, Hai Lang commune, Tien Yen, Quang
Ninh province.
- According to a report from Thua Thien Hue Provincial Department of Natural Resources
and Environment (2018), from 2015 onwards, 23 fishery protection zones in Tam Giang
and Cau Hai lagoons were established. These have an area of 614 ha for community-
based conservation. This model has been implemented and is supported by the
community of local fishermen.
- A model of conservation by the Vietnamese Heritage Tree was initiated by Viet Nam
Association for Conservation of Nature and Environment in 2010. In 2018, after 8 years
of implementation, the organization has identified the conservation of more than 4,500
48
trees that range in age from over 100 years to 2200 years. The identified trees are from
120 different species and are distributed in 54 of the63 provinces in Viet Nam.
Conservation management models:
- A system of MPAs were established in Tra Trao (Van Hung commune, Van Ninh
district, Khanh Hoa). This is an effective model for integrated coastal zone management
under Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia.
- The project ‘A model for integrating ecosystem-based climate change adaptation
measures’ was developed by the MONRE with the support of the World Bank, and in
collaboration with WWF, and was tested in some coastal areas.
- The project ‘A model of mangrove and seagrass bed rehabilitation and management’
was implemented in Thuy Trieu lagoon area in Cam Lam district in 2012-2014. Two
models of rehabilitation of mangrove species have been conducted in areas that are used
for shrimp farming and in deserted tidal flats.
Livelihood models for local communities:
- In 2013, pursuant to Decision No. 2920/QD-UBND of the People's Committee of Quang
Ninh, a project that aimed to commercially develop Quang Ninh Austriella corrugata
was undertaken. In collaboration with its research partner, by 2017, the Institute of
Marine Environment and Resources successfully establised a farming process for
Austriella corrugata and had modelled its benefits.
- A model of co-management was developed for sustainable extensive clam farming. In
2015, the Project Management Board of Xuan Thuy National Park implemented and
finalized a project of piloting co-management of clam farms in an ecological
rehabilitation zone of Con Lu.
- Ecotourism associated with biodiversity conservation: in Viet Nam tourism models have
now been developed in association with biodiversity conservation in protected areas and
biosphere reserves. Those models fall within the categories of green tourism, community
based ecotourism or sustainable tourism, and are based on with the belief that
biodiversity is a product to develop tourism, supporting socio-economic development
and improving community life, especially for communities in buffer zones. However,
tourism must simultaneously contribute to conservation and sustainable development of
biodiversity resources.
Agro-Forestry-Fishery combined models:
- A model of combined forestry – fishery was developed in an estuary in the northern
coast. A model of shrimp farming or mangrove rehabilitation has been implemented by
the Center for Natural Resources and Environment Research in Tien Hai, Thai Binh
- A model of mushroom production was developed in communes in the buffer zone of the
Xuan Thuy National Park. In 2010, with the support of the CORIN Asia project, models
for communes in the buffer zone of Xuan Thuy National Park were developed. Bee-
keeping was also applied for small- and large-sized gardens in Giao An and Giao Thien
communes.
- - In Kien Giang Biosphere Reserve, models generating alternative incomes for local
communities in wetland areas, especially for poor women and ethnic minorities, have
been implemented with the support of the GIZ Kien Giang project.
49
Aichi Biodiversity Target 4: Sustainable production and consumption
Sustainable production and consumption has been covered in UN Action Programs. The CBD
has also made recommendations on sustainable wildlife management.
1. Biological resources in the national economy and human well-being in Viet Nam
Although it has not been regularly recognised, the exploitation and use of biodiversity has
contributed substantially to the national economy, especially in such sectors as agriculture, forestry,
fisheries and the pharmaceutical industry. According to the Statistical Yearbook (2017), agriculture,
forestry and fisheries contributed significantly to gross domestic product (GDP), although their share
of the contribution decreased from about 20% in 2010 to about 17% in 2016, and their export value
increased from USD19 billion in 2010 to USD36.37 billion in 2017, accounting for 15% of Viet
Nam’s total export turnover. Approximately 20 million people depend on fisheries for most or part of
their income and exploit and use over 300 marine species and over 50 freshwater aquatic species of
economic value. Approximately 25 million people live in or near forests and derive 20-50 percent of
their income from non-timber forest products, including hundreds of species of medicinal plants and
latex plants. Natural ecosystems of high biodiversity also underpin much of Viet Nam’s rapidly-
expanding tourism industry. Eco-tourism is becoming popular in protected areas, which promotes
both the discovery and education of nature, and brings benefits to local people who provide the
service. In addition to these economic benefits, biodiversity supports a wide range of critically
important ecosystem services. The terrestrial and coastal water vegetation helps to regulate the
climate through carbon storage, filtering air and water, decomposing waste, and mitigating the
harmful effects of natural disasters such as landslides, floods, and typhoons.
2. Excessive exploitation and unsustainable use of biological resources in Viet Nam
Viet Nam is a highly populated country, but limited in territorial area. Increased development,
combined with high consumption, has put pressure on natural resources. For example, according
to the Institute for Seafood Research (2016), seafood resources, especially in coastal areas, have
been excessively exploited, leading to risk of deterioration. In recent years, it has also been
observed that in addition to over-explotiation, the production volumes are made up of relatively
small fish, indicating that many animals are not reaching sexual maturity. This fact reflects that
exploitation demands have exceeded the reproductive ability of fish populations. For terrestrial
biological resources, exploitation, trading and consumption of precious and rare wildlife
products and plants still take place.
3. Actions towards sustainable production and consumption in Viet Nam
3.1. Issuance of legal documents
Sustainable production and consumption is the use of goods and services that meet the basic
needs of people, as well as providing a better quality of life, without jeopardizing the ability of
future generations to meet their own needs. This includes minimizing the use of natural
resources, hazardous materials, and reducing emissions of pollutants throughout the product
life cycle. In the context of unsustainable exploitation and use of ecosystem services in Viet
Nam, the Government has issued legal documents, programs and plans that aim for sustainable
consumption. These include:
- Laws relating to biodiversity, such as the Law on Forestry, the Law on Fisheries and
50
the Law on Biodiversity (2008). These stipulate biodiversity conservation principles
and tasks at the central, ministerial, and local levels, creating a legal basis for local
communities to participate in the conservation of nature and biodiversity resources,
and through new mechanisms for benefit sharing.
- Decree No. 33/2010/ND-CP dated March 31, 2010, of the Government stipulates the
management of fishing activities of Vietnamese organizations and individuals in
coastal regions, with an objective toward having effective exploitation in parallel with
protection and development of aquatic resources.
- Decree No. 99/2010/ND-CP dated September 24, 2010, of the Government regulates
payments for forest environmental services. MARD has accordingly issued several
circulars guiding the implementation of Decree 99 such as Circular No. 80/2011/TT-
BNNPTNT dated November 23, 2011, providing guidance on how to determine
payments for forest environmental services; Circular No. 20/2012/TT-BNNPTNT
dated May 7, 2012, guiding procedures for checking and collecting payments for forest
environment services; and Circular No. 60/2012/TT-BNNPTNT dated November 9,
2012, stipulating principles and methods for determining forest areas that are subject to
payments for forest environmental services.
- Pursuant to Decision No. 1393/2012/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister the ‘National
Strategy for Green Growth in the period of 2011-2020, vision to 2050’ was approved
with the following specific objectives: i) to restructure the economic system toward
green growth for existing sectors and to encourage the development of economic sectors
of highly-added values and effective uses of energy and resources; ii) to study and
increasingly apply technology to more effectively use natural resources, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to Viet Nam’s response to climate change; iii)
to improve people's living standard, building environmentally friendly lifestyles through
creating jobs focused on green industrial, agricultural and services sectors, to invest in
natural capital, and to develop green infrastructure.
- Decision No. 899/QD-TTg dated June 10, 2013, approving a plan of restructuring the
agriculture sector in the direction of enhancing value and sustainable development.
- Pursuant to Decision No. 76/2016/QD-TTg dated January 11, 2016, of the Prime
Minister, the ‘National Action Plan on sustainable consumption and production to 2020,
vision to 2030’ was approved. Overall objectives of the plan are to gradually change
existing production and consumption patterns towards more efficient use of resources
and energy; to enhance the use of raw materials, renewable energy, and environmentally-
friendly products; to minimize, reuse and recycle waste; to sustain the ecosystem
sustainability at all stages of the product lifecycle from harvesting and supplying raw
materials to processing, distribution, consumption, and disposal.
- In Decision No. 886/2017/QD-TTg signed on 16/6/2017, the Prime Minister approved
the ‘Program for Sustainable Forestry Development for the period of 2016-2020’, with
specific objectives up to the year 2020 as follows:
o The growth rate of forestry production value ranges from 5.5% to 6.0% per year.
o The national forest cover will be 42% and the forest area will be 14.4 million ha.
o Average plantation productivity is 20 m3/ha/year.
o The value of wood and forest products exports ranges from USD 8 billion to USD
8.5 billion.
o Maintenance of 25 million of regular jobs, increase incomes, contribute to hunger
51
elimination, poverty reduction, and improve livelihoods of people working in
forestry, linking to implementation of “new-rural” programs, and ensuring
security and defense.
In addition, Viet Nam has participated in sustainable development programs from the United
Nations and has also issued the ‘Strategic orientation for sustainable development for Viet Nam’
(Agenda 21 of Viet Nam) and the ‘Sustainable Development Strategy for Viet Nam in the period
of 2011-2020’. In these, sustainable production and consumption are emphasized.
In 2017, the Prime Minister signed Decision No. 622/QD-TTg dated May 10, 2017, on the
introduction of the ‘National Action Plan to implement the Agenda 2030 for sustainable
development’. In this strategy, Goal 14 is to conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and
marine resources for sustainable development and Goal 15 is to protect, restore and promote
sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt
and reverse land degradation, and halt biodiversity loss.
As stipulated in the Law on Environmental Protection and the Law on Biodiversity, MONRE is
responsible for the unified state management of environmental protection and biodiversity. In
addition, in sectoral strategies and other national programs related to sustainable development,
MONRE is to coordinate with other ministries and sectors to undertake state management.
Accordingly, MONRE acts as a government agency to execute state management functions in
the fields of land and water resources; mineral resources and geology; the environment; hydro-
meteorology; climate change; surveying and mapping; general management of natural resources
and protection of sea and island environments; exploring; and state management of public
services in areas under its management.
3.2. Specific activities
To implement CITES
Viet Nam joined CITES in 1994 and since then has made great efforts to control trade in threatened
wild species. However, Viet Nam is still a hotspot for shipment of threatened species, especially
ivory and horns. Some parts of the population still see wildlife products such as rhinoceros’ horns,
tiger bone glue and bear's gall as magic medicines. Demand for these products continues.
The Prime Minister has issued many directives to prevent the of consumption and trade of threatened
species. For example, in 2016, the Prime Minister issued Directive 28/CT-TTgadopting a number of
urgent measures to prevent and fight against violations to wildlife species.
In the framework of the project ‘Strengthening biodiversity conservation through policy reform
and changing current wildlife consumption in Viet Nam’, MONRE developed a communication
strategy to reduce wildlife consumption and published leaflets about the need to stop the trade
and consumption of wildlife products.
Representatives of Governments and Regional Economic Integration Organizations gathered in
Hanoi on 17 November 2016 and agreed on the Hanoi Statement on Illegal Wildlife Trade. This
endorsed recommendations on combating the illegal trade and encouraged governments to take
strong actions against wildlife crime, both on the demand and supply sides.
In 2017, the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development promulgated Circular No.
04/2017/TT-BNNPTNT on the list of species of wildlife specified in the annexes of CITES.
52
In 2018, TRAFFIC developed a handbook to guide the reduction of demand for wildlife in
traditional medicine practices. The handbook provides key messages that need to be
communicated about the protection of wildlife and aims to educate towards eliminating wildlife
components in traditional prescriptions.
In order to end illegal wildlife trade and consumption in Viet Nam, Vietnamese regulatory
authorities have gradually strengthened the legal framework of, and policies on, the management
and protection of wildlife, supplementing shortcomings, gaps and inadequacies of existing
policies. This aims to strengthen the law and the penalties and decrease profits generated from
illegal wildlife trade; raise awareness and improve law enforcement; mobilize community
participation in wildlife protection; undertake capacity-building for law enforcement agencies to
control illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade; and conduct regular inspection of wildlife
hunting, transportation, and consumption at restaurants, hotels, processing and trading facilities.
Research activities on breeding, raising, rescue and artificial propagation of endangered,
precious and rare species
The raising and planting of species on the list of priority protection species is stipulated in
Article 13 of Decree No. 160/2013/ND-CP. Priority protection species are raised or planted in
biodiversity conservation facilities, and provincial people's committees are responsible for
reviewing, issuing, and certifying those facilities.
MONRE issued Circular No. 25/2016/TT-BTNMT dated September 22, 2016, on application
forms for certificates of biodiversity conservation facilities and report templates on the status of
species that are on the list of endangered precious and rare species prioritized for protection and
held in such facilities. This aims to to assist provincial people's committees in guiding
organizations and individuals to apply for certificates for such facilities.
Thanks to incentive policies for reproduction of threatened species and their high economic
value, some species that were extinct in the wild in Viet Nam have now been studied for
commercial raising. There are some noticable successes in raising wild and rare species at local
facilities such as:
- Crocodylus siamensis, which is in danger of extinction in the wild, has now been released
through a reintroduction program into Cat Tien National Park. According to a preliminary
assessment, the released population of crocodiles has been established.
-
- Glyptostrobus pensilis has been studied and there has been some initial success achieved in
clonal propagation, opening up hopes for conservation and development of this threatened
species.
- As a result of various research projects, the fisheries sector has succeeded in reproducing
breeds such as as Semilabeo obscurus, Catlocarpio siamensis, Hemibagrus guttatus and
Bagarius rutilus, which are considered rare species in the Red Book of Viet Nam (2007).
-
- In 2010, the Institute of Oceanography, Nha Trang studied and achieved success in
reproducing a Hippocampus kellogi that was 35 cm long. This is a rare sea horse species, as
defined in the Red Book of Viet Nam, IUCN Red List (2007) and Appendix II of CITES.
- In 2017, the Institute of Marine Resources and Environment succeeded in artificial
reproduction and commercial raising of Austriella corrugata – a species of high economic
53
value in the Quang Ninh mangrove area.
Implement the Sustainable Forestry Development Program
According to the draft 2018 report of the Government on the results of three years of
implementation of the ‘Program for Sustainable Forestry Development’ for the period 2016-
2020, some targets and tasks have been achieved, as following:
- Forest protection: Between 2016-2018, the number of violations regarding to forest
protection that annually recorded and reported by the Forest Protection Department was
at an average of 17,665 cases, accounted for an average reduction of 9,600 cases per year
compared to the 2011-2015 period. It is estimated that the period 2016-2020 period could
reduce 39% of the total record compared to that given to the period 2011-2015.
- Decrease in the area of the damaged forests: Between 2016-2018, the average damaged
forest area is 2,430 ha per year, decreasing by 270 ha per year, equivalent to 10%
decrease compared to that occured in the period 2011-2015. It is estimated that the 2016-
2020 period will be 30% lower than in the period 2011-2015.
- Forest areas allocated to households, individuals and communities for forest protection
increased from 4,944 million ha / year in 2011-2015 to 6,143 million ha / year.
- Forest plantations: In the 2016-2018 period, total area for forest plantations is 675,000
ha, including 627,000 hectares production forest and 47,400 ha special-used forests .
- Sustainable forest management: as of August 2018, the total area of forest certified FSC
was 229,281 ha (147,667 ha of planted forest and 81,604 ha of natural forest) in 17
provinces. There have been 36 certificates granted to four households and 32 forestry
companies. Timber production is at 2.0 million m3, and certified wood has a 10-15%
higher selling price than unlicensed wood.
Payments for forest environmental services
According to a preliminary report on eight years of payments for forest environmental
services, the total revenues collected by June 30, 2016 were VND 5,744,792 billion.
- By management levels: The Central Fund collected VND 4,236.558 billion (accounting
for 74% of the total), while provincial funds collected VND 1,508.234 billion
(accounting for 26%).
- By types of services: Revenues collected from hydropower plants was VND 5,586,497
billion (97% of the total), from water treatment facilities was VND 149.680 billion
(2.5%) and VND 8.615 billion from tourism services (accounting for 0.2%).
- By years: In 2011, payments received were VND 282,928 billion, VND 1,183,915
billion in 2012, VND 1,096,389 billion in 2013, VND 1,335.013 billion in 2014, VND
1,327,779 billion in 2015, VND 518.766 billion in the first half of 2016.
Out of the VND 5,744,792 billion collected, the amount paid to forest owners and non-forest
owners was VND 4,549,620 billion (minus 0.5% for management fee at the central fund, 10%
at provincial funds, 5% for reserve and VND 370.571 billion approved by the Prime Minister
for other purposes). The disbursement to forest owners and non-forest owners has reached
86.71% (Source: A brief of eight years of operation of the Forest Protection and Development
Fund (2008-2015) and five years of implementing payments for forest environmental services
(2011-2015), MARD, 2016).
Development of organic agriculture
54
According to information from MARD (2018), Viet Nam now has 33 provinces and cities
under central authority that have organic agriculture. Although Viet Nam is behind many
countries around the world in the production of organic products, the efforts of businesses and
farmers have brought Viet Nam to the list of 170 countries participating in the production of
agricultural organic products.
Many kinds of organic crops have been exported to global markets, including the United
States, Japan, Australia and Korea, for example, Hoa Sua rice by Vien Phu Organic & Healthy
Food Company (Ca Mau province) and/or Tam Viet rice by Mr. Vo Van Tieng (Dong Thap
province). Furthermore, the TH Group is currently operating an organic dairy cow farm with a
herd of 1,000 cows. Ca Mau is one of 33 provinces participating in large organic agricultural
production, with the main product being organic shrimp. The province now has 12 associated
businesses producing organic shrimp on an area of 20,000 hectares, with 4,000 farming
households and a total organic shrimp output from 8,000 to 9,000 tons / year.
Establishment of agro-based production procedures under GAP
The Vietnamese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (belonging to MARD) has developed
hundreds of accredited technology processes, including GAP agricultural production processes,
value chain enhancement, safe agricultural production, and protection of appellations of origin.
Most of these technology has also been completed and transferred to most provinces in the
country.
Development of aquaculture facilities granted with Sustainable Seafood Certification
According to the Vietnamese Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers (VASEP), as of
early 2013, Viet Nam has applied sustainable seafood certification from the Aquaculture
Stewardship Council (ASC). Implement the strategy for cleaner production in industry
According to Viet Nam’s Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the Sustainable
Development Goals (2018), the cleaner production strategy in industry has been deployed in
63 provinces and cities under the central government and has the participation of more than
9,000 enterprises in various industries, including mining, steel production, the food and
beverage industry, chemical industry, construction and other processing industries. Many
models of sustainable production in industry and in sustainable product design have been
initially developed, mostly thanks to support from development partners, but broader
implementation is still limited.
Periodic environmental reports by corporates
Purusant to Circular No. 36/2015/TT-BTNMT, corporate entities should prepare an annual
report on hazardous waste management according to a template in Appendix 4 (A) issued in
Circular No. 36/2015/TT-BTNMT and submit it to Departments of Natural Resources and
Environment through the Environmental Protection Agency.
For facilities whose reports on environmental impact assessment have approved, their detailed
plans for environment protection must include monitoring and evaluation of waste
management once three months and a synthesized monitoring report is to be submitted to the
state management agency once a year.
Developing and applying tourism models associated with biodiversity conservation
55
In Viet Nam, the tourism sector only contributes 3.8% of GDP (2016 data); however, this is
still not commensurate with tourism potential. Tourism models associated with biodiversity
conservation have been developed and operated at several national parks and biosphere
reserves. Biodiversity can be product to develop tourism, socio-economic development and
community life, especially for communities in protected area buffer zones. However, tourism
development has not generated significant contribution in returning to the conservation and
sustainable development of biodiversity resources.
Develop renewable energy sources and increase efficiency in use of energy
According to Viet Nam’s ‘Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals’ (2018), Viet Nam recently issued and implemented several
policies to encourage the development of renewable energy sources. Many renewable energy
development projects have been implemented, such as wind and solar power projects. The
country currently has 77 industrial wind power projects registered in 18 provinces and cities
across the country, with a total capacity of 7,000 MW. However, there are only three projects
completed and connected to the national electricity system, with a capacity of 48.2 MW. If all
registered projects are put into operation, it will help Viet Nam achieve the Government's goal
of developing and using wind capacity of 6,200 MW by 2030. The use of biomass has also
been developed in many rural areas and is expected to reach 2,000 MW by 2030.
Increasing energy efficiency in production and consumption is one of the significant solutions
for reducing the impact of economic growth on the environment. Over the past decade, Viet
Nam has implemented a series of policies and measures in this direction, such as prioritizing
the development of renewable energy in accordance with Viet Nam's conditions; and
encouraging efficient use of energy in production and living through the application of energy-
saving technologies. In the period 2011-2015, Viet Nam's energy saving rate reached 5.6%,
equivalent to total energy savings of nearly 11.3 million tons of converted oil. In particular, the
energy use of the energy-intensive industrial production sectors decreased gradually: the steel
industry decreased by 8.1%, cement fell by 6.3%, and yarn down by 7.3%. Resolution of the
National Assembly No. 142 / QH13 / 2016 on the 5-year national socio-economic development
plan for 2016-2020 has brought the target of reducing energy consumption on GDP into the
national socio-economic criteria system.
Activities to enhance sustainable consumer awareness
According to Viet Nam’s ‘Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals’ (2018), Viet Nam has applied green labeling that was
initiated by MONRE in 2009. This encourages production and consumption of products that
use resources and energy efficiently. To date, MONRE has developed and issued criteria for
issuing green labels for nine groups of products in the manufacturing sectors, such as
packaging, washing powder, printing ink, batteries, electric lights, office equipment and
building materials.
With a view to sustainable consumption, Viet Nam has applied a number of economic tools,
such as a tax on mineral exploitation and water resources, environmental protection tax, and
environmental protection fees for wastewater. The Law on Environmental Protection Tax
issued in 2010 applies to eight groups considered to be essential goods and have a large impact
on life.
56
Viet Nam aims to apply a green GDP into the national socio-economic indicator system
Assessing the economic value of natural ecosystems and biodiversity helps decision makers and
managers to identify conservation priorities and act as basis for a trade off between conservation
goals and development goals. However, in Viet Nam economic valuation of ecosystems is still only a
research topic. Research results have been reported to local and central management for their
consideration when carrying out economic development activities so that biodiversity and the value
of natural ecosystems is guaranteed. Although provided, economic values from ecosystem services
have not been included in the Viet Nam national accounting system.
In the current System of National Accounts, natural and environment resources which are used in
production are considered a component to the national income, rather than a depreciation of
resources. Many environmental products/services have not been fully evaluated and recorded in
the current accounting system, leading to inadequate recognition of their growth. The United
Nations has now introducted an integrated Green GDP calculation framework for consistent
application of member countries.
Following the same framework, the Government of Viet Nam has looked to gradually integrate
green accounting into the national accounts. The Prime Minister signed Decision No.
43/201/QD-TTg dated June 2, 2010, on the National Statistical Indicator System, which plans to
develop and apply the green GDP target in the system of socio-economic indicators from 2014.
The implementation has reached the stage of experimental calculation carried out in two seperate
studies by the Central Institute for Economic Management and the Office of Sustainable
Development (the Ministry of Planning and Investment).
Aichi Biodiversity Target 5: Habitat loss halved or reduced
1. Changes in typical ecosystems in Viet Nam
1.1. Forest ecosystems
Forests in Viet Nam are the habitat of most terrestrial wildlife species, and contain the highest
levels of biodiversity. In 1990, the forest cover rate was only 27.8%, made up by 9,175,000 ha of
forests.However, due to forest plantations, forest area has gradually increased and reached to
14,415,381 hectares in 2017, accounted the forest cover by 41.45%. However, this was still
lower than expected as bare land and hills still constitute over 2 million hectares.
A draft report authorized by the Government in 2018 documenting the results of 3 year
implementation of the Target Program on Sustainable Forestry Development for the period
2016-208 has provided some sets of accomplishment as follows:
- Forest protection: Between 2016-2018, the number of violations regarding to forest
protection that annually recorded and reported by the Forest Protection Department was
at an average of 17,665 cases, accounted for an average reduction of 9,600 cases per year
compared to the 2011-2015 period. It is estimated that the period 2016-2020 period could
reduce 39% of the total record compared to that given to the period 2011-2015.
- Decrease in the area of the damaged forests: Between 2016-2018, the avarage damaged
forest area is 2,430 ha per year, decreasing by 270 ha per year, equivalent to 10%
decrease compared to that occured in the period 2011-2015. It is estimated that the 2016-
2020 period will be 30% lower than in the period 2011-2015
57
- Afforestation: in the period 2016-2018 a total area of 675,000 ha as intensive plantation
done, equivalent to an average of 225.000 ha yearly, of which the area of production
forest was 627,000ha, or 209,000 ha per year, plus 47,000 ha for special use forest and
protection forest, equivalent to 15,800 ha per year;
However, given that plantations are normally monocultures, the diversitywithin plantation
forests is much less than that of multi-storey, natural, evergreen tropical forests.
Figure 3: Changes in the area of natural forests and planted forests from 2010 to 2017
Figure 4: Changes in Forest cover from 2010 to 2017
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
ha
Natural Forest
Planted Forest
38.5
39
39.5
40
40.5
41
41.5
42
2012 2014 2015 2016 2017
R
a
ti
o
%
2010 2012 2013
58
Figure 5: Forest cover and forest loss in the period 2000 – 2017
(source: UNBiodiversityLab, 2018)
Figure 6: Biodiversity Intactness Index Figure 7: Human Footprint 2009
(source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018) (source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
59
Figure 8: Map of vegetation types
60
(Source: ICEM, 2010)
1.2. Mangrove Ecosystems
Mangroves are plant communities formed in coastal tidal areas and tidal estuaries in
tropical regions and tropical Asia. They are considered a very important ecosystem
in coastal tidal areas; this is especially applicable to estuaries, which have the
highest biological productivity. Mangroves are home to many animal species in their
juvenile life stages and home to many other marine species. There has been a strong
downward trend in the area coverage of coastal mangroves in Viet Nam, from
408,500 ha in 1943 to 83,288 ha in 2003 (83,288 ha). This means that in 60 years,
four fifths of mangrove areas in Viet Nam have been lost.
Figure 9. Changes in the area of mangrove forests from2010 to 2017
For the period of 2010 to 2017, according to statistics by MARD, there has been
little overall change in the mangrove forest, except in 2015. The area of mangrove
was lowest in 2015, with 57,211 ha. In 2017, it reached 213,142 ha. Studies show
that from 1975 onwards, clearance for shrimp farming and other aquaculture,
together withland use conversion for infrastructure and residential construction were
the main causes of the reduction of mangrove forests. The subsequent increase can
be explained by areas being newly afforestated.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
2010 2011 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017
ha
Area
61
Figure 10: Mangrove Forest Cover for the 21st Century (2014)
(source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
1.3. Seagrass ecosystem
Viet Nam has 14 seagrass species in its coastal sea grass ecosystems, which are
distributed in almost all tidal areas ofwater bodies along the coast and along the
shores of Vietnamese islands (except tidal areas such as the large estuaries of the
Red River in the north and the Mekong River in the south). Seagrass ecosystems are
high in biomass and have a diverse marine fauna. Communities in seagrass beds in
Viet Nam are estimated to number nearly 1,500 different species of creatures, of
which coastal grasses have more than 1,000 species (Nguyen Thi Thu, Cao Van
Luong et al. (2011). In particular, the seagrass beds of Phu Quoc island are home to
Dugon dugon, which is globally listed as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. Nguyen
Thi Thu, Cao Van Luong et al. (2011) identified that the area of seagrass beds in
Viet Nam is over 20,000 ha. In particular, the coastal strip accounts for about 50%,
62
equivelent to about 10,000 ha. The areas with large and concentrated grass cover are
found only in coastal lagoons of the central region, and account for more than 75%
of the total area of coastal grass.
However, coastal seagrasses have been seriously degraded. In 10 years, the area of
coastal seaweed lost has been an average of 40-50%. According to Nguyen Van
Tien (2013), Viet Nam's seagrass area is 18,130 ha.
According to remote sensing conducted by Cao Van Luong et al. (2012), the area of
seagrass beds in coastal waters of Viet Nam was about 17,000 ha, scattered in bays,
islands and lagoons. In the same study, it was shown that the area of seagrass beds
had declined by 50% compared to 1999. In particular, the seagrass beds in Tam
Giang - Cau Hai have been reduced by 60% of its area when compared to 1999
figures.
Cao Van Luong et al. (2014) investigated and identified 2,858 ha of seagrass beds in
the western coast of Tonkin Gulf of Viet Nam.
Threats to the existence of seagrass beds result from economic activities such as
maritime operations, fishing using destructive techniques, tourism, aquaculture, land
reclamation, etc. These activities have exerted pressure on seagrasses through waste-
water discharges, by damaging habitats, degrading water and altering sediment
loads. In addition, natural disasters such as hurricanes, together with coastal flows,
transport of sediments during floods, and global sea level rise are also great threats
to seagrass beds. According to a survey by WWF in 2003, Phu Quoc and Con Dao
are the two remaining sea regions in Viet Nam in which sea cows (Dugong dugon)
live, but there are fewer than 100 individuals. However, according to the
management board of Phu Quoc Protected Area (2016), Dugong dugon is no longer
being seen in the seagrass beds that are under the management of the protected area.
63
Figure 11: Distribution of Seagrasses by 2017
(source:UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
1.4. Coral reef ecosystems
According to the book South China Sea monograph, Volume IV: Marine Biology
and Ecology (Publishing House for Natural Science and Technology, 2009), the
geographical positions and natural conditions of Viet Nam's seas are generally
favorable for coral development, especially for coral reefs. Apart from estuarines
and river mouths, which have light salt levels and are muddy, corals are distributed
mostly on continental and island crusts and are particularly developed in the Hoang
Sa and Truong Sa archipelagos in the South China Sea. In terms of distribution,
corals in the southern seas (South Central, East, Southwest, Truong Sa archipelago)
are richer in composition than are those in the north. There are four major coral
regions in Viet Nam: the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagos; the central coastal
regions and the south east islands; the west of Tonkin Gulf; and the south-west sea.
64
Studies have recorded nearly 400 species of coral reefs in Nha Trang Bay, Ninh
Thuan, and for Con Dao, over 300 species (Vo Si Tuan, 2003). There are 236
species of coral in the south-western region (Nguyen Huy Yet 2007; 2009). Surveys
in 2010, 2011 and 2015 recorded 444 species of coral in 19 islands in the Viet Nam
Sea, of which 378 species are of hard coral (Do Van Khuong et al., 2015).
Studies show that coral reefs in Viet Nam are rich in biodiversity and diverse in
species composition. It can be said that reef habitat has the largest number of species
compared to other marine habitats, with representatives of almost all major animal
and plant species living in seas and oceans. Studies show that there are about 2,100
species of fauna in coral reefs in Viet Nam. Of this, the most diverse group is coral
reef fish with 763 species, followed by the molluscs with nearly 700 species,
crustaceans with more than 250 species, polychaete worms with about 170 species
and echinoderms with nearly 100 species.
According to survey and research conducted in 2008-2010 by the Institute of Marine
Resources and Environment, the total actual area of coral reefs in Viet Nam is about
14,130 ha. According to Nguyen Van Long and Vo Si Tuan (2014), the total area of
coral reefs in Viet Nam's waters is 13,355 ha.
Table 4: Distribution and area of coral reefs in coastal waters in Viet Nam
(*: Marine protected areas (MPAs), in accordance with Decision 742/QD-TTg)
Area
Locations Estimated Coral
Reef Area (ha)
Within
existing
MPAS (ha)
Number of
Hard Coral
Species
The Gulf
of Tonkin
Dao Tran* NA NA 48
Co To* 370 370 121
Ha Long-Cat
Ba* 500 500 171
Bai Tu Long NA NA 115
Bach Long Vi* 1,578 1,578 93
Hon Me* NA NA 72
Con Co* 274 274 166
The
coastal
central
Hai Van-Son
Cha* NA NA 102
Da Nang 105 NA 226
65
Source: Nguyen Van Long and Vo Si Tuan (2014)
As part of the project ‘Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in the South China Sea and
Gulf of Thailand, UNEP/GEF/SCS’ led by the Institute of Oceanography, a survey was
conducted in 200 coral reefs along the coastal Viet Nam. Findings show that only 1% of the
studied reefs had high coral cover, while those having low coral cover accounted for 31%. The
reefs having average and fair coral cover accounted for 41% and 26%, respectively.
areas Cu Lao Cham* 311 311 227
Ly Son* 1,704 1,704 79
Phu Yen 303 NA 139
Van Phong 1,618 NA 292
Nha Trang* 731 183 350
Ninh Hai (Nui
Chua*) 2,330 1,070 310
Hon Cau* 506 506 184
Phu Quy* 1,488 1,488 239
The
eastern
and
western
southern
coasts
Con Dao* 903 903 307
Nam Du 80 NA 126
Phu Quoc* 474 292 251
Tho Chu 80 NA 198
Total 13,355 9,179 403
66
Figue 12. Distribution of coral reefs by 2010
(source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
According to the project, coral cover in coastal areas has been declining, with a decrease of more
than 30% over the last 10 years in many areas. Some identified threats to coral reefs include:
overexploitation, destructive fishing, sedimentation, pollution, outbreak of pests such as sea-
buckthorn (Acanthaster planci), sea urchin,invasion of porifera (sponges), and natural disasters.
These include events such as algal blooms in Ca Na Bay in 2002; sea-buckthorn bursts in Nha
67
Trang Bay, Van Phong and Cu Lao Cham (2002 - 2004); the umulative effects of high
temperatures and low salinity for a short period, as with, for example, Con Dao in 2005; the
effects of floods from the mainland, such as to Cu Lao Cham coral reefs (2006); and bleaching of
corals, such as in the waters of Phu Quoc (2010) (Vo Si Tuan et al., 2005; 2013). Studies of the
current status of reef resources in coastal areas of Viet Nam also reflect the poor diversity of
aquatic organisms, such as fish, mollusks, Echinodermata, crustaceans (Vo Si Tuan et al., 2008).
Coastal coral reefs are facing serious deterioration due to overexploitation, unreasonable use and
environmental pollution.
2. Legal documents on preventing losses of important natural ecosystems
Important natural ecosystems of high biodiversity value, such as terrestrial forests, wetland
forests, coral reefs, and seagrass beds have shrunk or degraded in quality. As such, the
Government of Viet Nam has developed and issued a number of legal documents, together with
management policies and mechanisms. These relate to natural ecosystems, especially those that
are of high biodiversity value but very sensitive to human impacts, such as natural inland forests,
mangrove forests, coral reefs, and seagrass.
- The Biodiversity Law (2008) has a whole separate chapter on conservation and
sustainable development of natural ecosystems; this has 21 articles. In other laws, such
as the Forestry Law (2017) also contains a chapter on forest protection, and, in
particular, Article 37 stipulates the protection of forest ecosystems. In addition, the
Fisheries Law (2017) contains Article 15 on marine protected areas and Article 17 on
aquatic resource protection areas.
- According to Viet Nam’s NBSAP, the first specific target is identified as: To improve
quality and increase the area of protected natural ecosystems; primary forest remains at
0.57 million hectares coupled with effective protection plans; mangrove forests, seagrass
beds, and coral reefs are maintained at the current levels; 15% of degraded critical
ecosystems are restored.
- Pursuant to Decision 45/QD-TTg dated January 8, 2014, the ‘National Master Plan for
Biodiversity Conservation to 2020, orientation to 2030’ was approved. In this, plans for
existing protected areas were systematically organized and 46 new protected areas were
declared, bringing the total number of existing and newly-planned protected areas
nationwide to 219 with a total area of about 3,067,000 ha and distributed evenly through
the country.
- Decree No. 29/2019 / ND-CP dated March 8, 2019 of the Government, detailed a
number of articles and measures to implement the Law on Fisheries (2017).
- Decree No. 156/2018/ND-CP dated November 16, 2018 of the Government, detailed the
implementation of a number of articles of the Law on Forestry (2017).
- Decree No. 40/2015/ND-CP dated April 27, 2015 of the Government, on amending and
supplementing a number of articles of Decree No. 157/2013/ND-CP dated November 11,
2013, on administrative sanctions for violations to the provisions on forest management,
forest development, forest protection, and forest product management.
- Decision No. 742/QD-TTg dated May 26, 2010 of the Government, on approving the
master plan of the system of marine protected areas in Viet Nam to 2020.
68
- Decision No. 07/2012/QD-TTg dated February 8, 2012 of the Prime Minister, on
introducing a number of policies to strengthen forest protection.
- Decision No. 57/QD-TTg dated January 9, 2012 of the Prime Minister, on approving the
‘National Plan for Forest Protection and Development’ in the period of 2011-2020.
- Decision No. 218/QD-TTg dated February 7, 2014 of the Prime Minister, on approving
the ‘Strategy on Management of Special-use Forests, Marine Protected Areas and Inland
Water Conservation Areas in Viet Nam to 2020, vision to 2030’.
- Decision 1976/QD-TTg dated October 30, 2014 of the Prime Minister, on approving the
planning of the national special-use forest system to 2020, vision to 2030.
- Decision No. 2295/QD-TTg dated December 17, 2014, approving the integrated coastal
management strategy in Viet Nam to 2020, vision to 2030.
- Decision No. 120/QD-TTg dated January 22, 2015 of the Prime Minister, on approving
the plan for coastal forest protection and development in response to climate change in
the period of 2015-2020.
In addition, there are other legal documents by MONRE and MARD that provide guidance for
the implementation of the aforementioned documents.
3. Measures and actions taken to protect important natural ecosystems
3.1. Preventing deforestation
According to a report created by MARD (2016), forest protection and development activities
have been implemented as follows:
- In furtherance of Directive No. 1685/CT-TTg dated September 27, 2011 on
strengthening the direction and implementation of forest protection measures, preventing
deforestation and actions against public officials, governments of all levels have paid
more attention to forest management and protection. Together with many local socio-
economic development programs and forest protection and development projects,
positive impacts on forest protection have been recorded.
- Exercising the intention of socializing forest protection and management, ensuring that
each forest has its owner identified through the policy of land and forest allocation.
Average contracted forest area per year has increased from 2,600,000 ha/year in the
period of 2006-2010 to 4,900,000 ha/year from 2011 to present.
- Regularly organizing awareness-raising and education activities to mobilize
communities and local authorities to pay more attention to forest protection and
management. This aims to change local awareness at different levels, especially at the
grassroot level, and promote the participation of local people in forest protection. Over
62,000 agreements on forest protection and development have been signed among
village communities.
- The Central Steering Committee for urgent issues in forest protection, and forest fire
prevention and fighting, regularly organizes meetings, assigning responsibilities to each
member for directing and urging localities. Inspection teams have annually visited hot
spots of deforestation and key areas of high forest fire risk, to inspect and urge localities
69
to take initiative in forest protection and forest fire prevention and fighting. Provinces
have strengthened their approach to forest fire prevention, reviewing and completing
forest fire prevention and fighting plans under the "4 on-the-spots" practice. MARD
regularly publishes and provides information and warnings about forest fires on mass
media (TV, radio and newspaper) so that forest owners are informed and take preventive
measures.
- The organizational system of the forest protection force has been strengthened from the
central to the local level. There have been 42,000 forest protection groups established in
the country.
- A steering committee has been established in 58 out of 63 provinces to take care of
urgent issues in forest protection, forest fire prevention and fighting. A steering
committee has also been established in more than 460, out of 520, forest districts and in
4,816, out of 5,985, forest communes. These committees direct, administer, and promote
forest owners to take actions on forest protection, forest fire prevention and fighting at
the local level and, at the same time, take care of combatting deforestation and forest fire
fighting at grassroots levels.
- In the period of 2011-2015, afforestation, including reforestation, totalled 1,088,700 ha;
area zoned for regeneration totalled 361,000 ha/year on average, contracted forest area
for protection totalled 4,900,000 ha; and rehabilitation and restoration totalled 11,800 ha,
at an average of 2,360 ha per year.
- For coastal protection forest, area newly planted by November 30, 2015 reached 1,968
ha (1,103 ha of mangrove forest, 301 ha of sand-shielding forest, 564 of combined
protection and production forests). Furthermore, area zoned for regeneration and
rehabilitation totalled 1,105 ha (763 ha of mangrove forests, 343 ha of sand-shielding
forests); and area of forest contracted for protection totalled 12,681 ha (protection forest:
12,326 ha, production forest: 355 ha).
- Implemented ‘Program for Sustainable Forestry Development for the period 2016’
sucessfully, which focus on:
o Forest protection: reduce the number of violations of law on forest protection
(39%), and the damaged forest area (30%);
o Forest plantations: In the 2016-2018 period, total area for forest plantations is
675,000 ha, including 627,000 hectares production forest and 47,400 ha special-
used forests;
o Applying sustainable forest management certificate: As of August 2018, the total
area of forest certified under the FSC system is 229,281 ha, in 17 provinces with
36 applications certificates.
3.2. Payments for forest environmental services
Payments for forest environmental services was promulgated and piloted in 2008.
Total payments for forest environmental services in three years to August 2014 were VND 3,329
billion (USD 157 million), most of which came from hydropower plants (97%), clean water
facilities (2%) and tourism businesses (less than 1%).
70
According to a preliminary report on eight years of payments for forest environmental services,
the total revenues collected by June 30, 2016 were VND5,744,792 billion.
3.3. Wetlands Inventory Updates
In 2016, within the framework of the project: ‘Conservation of Important Wetlands and
Associated Habitats’, MONRE and a consultant agency undertook inventory updates of wetlands
in Viet Nam and completed a detailed list and map of listed important wetlands. Accordingly, the
total wetland area of Viet Nam is currently 11,847,975 ha (excluding the area of rivers and
streams that are seasonally flooded, springs, spots of hot water, and mineral water), accounting
for 37% of Viet Nam’s total land area. In addition, there are 74 important wetland areas (at
international and national levels). A wetland database has also been established. These data can
be used as up-to-date statistics on wetland areas and their distribution in Viet Nam.
3.4. Research of coral reef rehabilitation and regeneration
The Institute of Oceanography in Nha Trang and the Institute of Marine Environment and
Resources in Hai Phong, under the Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology, have carried
out experimental research on planting and reproducing coral reefs. This has been done with the
participation of communities and enterprises in some marine protected areas, such as Con Co
(Quang Tri), Cu Lao Cham, Son Tra and Nha Trang Bay.
3.5. Models and initiatives of biodiversity conservation
To harmorize biodiversity conservation and economic development, it is nescessary to apply
measures and models for sustainable use of natural resources. In this, community participation is
of the utmost importance, as all conservation models should aim to serve the community. Over
time, and within the framework of international and national projects, Vietnamese experts
together with foreign consultants have developed and applied hundreds of models and initiatives
of biodiversity conservation for many localities, especially for buffer zones, ecological
rehabilitation zones, and biosphere reserves.
Aichi Biodiversity Target 6: Sustainable management of aquatic living resources
1. Aquatic living resources
Investigations of aquatic living resources in Vietnamese waters have been conducted by the
Institute of Marine Environment and Resources in Hai Phong, under the sub-project ‘Baseline
survey on the current status of and changes in marine resources in Viet Nam’ in the period of
2011-2015. The synthesis report (2016) provides some key information on Viet Nam’s aquatic
living resources as follows:
- Viet Nam’s sea is of high biodiversity value and has abundant marine species. According
to various surveys of marine resources in the period of 2011-2015, there are 941 species
of seafood, belonging to 462 varieties and of 191 families (of which the South East Sea
contains 619 species, the Central Coast 457 species, the Gulf of Tonkin 430 species and
the middle of the South China Sea 129 species).
- The total average reserve of key marine resources in Viet Nam is estimated at 4.36
million tons, 12.9% lower than in the period 2000-2005. The reserve of small surface-
dwelling fish is 2.65 million tons (accounting for 60.7% of the total stock of marine
resources); deep sea fish is 643 thousand tons (14.7%); crustaceans make up 38.1
71
thousand tons (0.9%); coral reef fish 2.6 thousand tons (0.1%); and large
surfacedwelling fish 1,031 thousand tons, (23.6%).
2. Fishing status
According to the Directorate of Fisheries, total output of aquatic products reached over 7.28
million tons as of the end of 2017 (+5.6% y/y). Production volume in 2017 was reported at 3,421
thousand ton (+5.7% y/y), of which marine fisheries catches reached 3,221 thousand tons (+5.7%
y/y), and domestic production was 200 thousand tons (+5.7% y/y).
According to the Research Institute of Marine Fisheries (2016), marine fisheries catches for Viet
Nam by species (from July 2014 to June 2015) were reported at 3.72 million tons. The Central
Coastal had the highest production, at 1.45 million tons, accounting for 39% of the total catch.
The catches of the south-eastern provinces were about 924 thousand tons (accounting for 25%);
the south-west’s was approximately 699 thousand tons (19%). The catches in the Gulf of Tonkin
was the lowest, at only 652 thousand tons (17%).
Table 5: Fisheries production in 2017
Units: Volume (1,000 tonnes); Area: (1,000 ha); Number of vessels (1,000); Number of
passengers (1,000); Export value (USD million); production value (VND billion).
No. Item 2017
Target
Actual 2016
performance
2017
estimates
Comparision (%)
to the
target to 2016
I Production value 105% 200,902 212,985 - 106
Catches
78,630 83,482 - 106.2
Culture
122,272 129,503 - 105.9
II Total output 7,000 6,895 7,279 104 105.6
1 Catches 3,300 3,237 3,421 103.7 105.7
Marine catches
3,047 3,221
105.7
Domestic production
190 200
105.3
2 Culture 3,700 3,658 3,858 104,3 105.5
Brackishwater prawn 675 657,2 683,4 101,2 104
- Black Tiger Shrimp 265 263,8 256,4 96,8 97.2
- CT Shrimp 410 393,4 427,0 104,1 108.5
Pangasius 120 1,187 1,250 104,2 105.3
III Culture area
1,071 1,103
103.1
Brackishwater prawn 700 694.6 721,1 103 103,8
- Black Tiger Shrimp 600 600.4 622,4 103,7 103,7
- CT Shrimp 100 94.2 98,7 98,7 104,7
Pangasius 5 5.05 5,227 104,5 103,5
IV
Number of fishing
vessels
109.9 109.6
99.7
Offshore teams
3,500 4,400
125.7
Number of vessels
10 12
120
72
Number of participants
100 120
120
V Export value 7,100 7,162 8,399
117.3
1
Shrimps of many
kinds
3,151 3,863
122.6
- White leg shrimp
1,958 2,535
129.5
- Black Tiger Shrimp
931 880
94.6
2 Pangasius
1,715 1,785
104.1
3 Tuna
508 597
117.1
4 Other fish species
1,139 1,328
116.7
5 Squid and octopus
439 620
141.3
6
Other aquatic
products
209 206
98.6
Source: The Directorate of Fisheries
3. Pressures on fisheries
3.1. Over-exploitation of fisheries resources
Over-exploitation of fisheries resources has been increasing in recent years. Details are as
follows:
- Many marine species are being considered over-exploited in sea areas, including in the
Gulf of Tonkin (silver fish, Evynnis cardinalis, Saurida tumbil, Saurida undosquamis);
the Central Coastal (Chinese squid, Indian squid, Priacanthus macracanthus, Goatfish,
Round scad); the South East (tuna, silver fish, Round scad, Saurida tumbil); and the
South West (Saurida umeyoshii).
- Sizes of fish species that dominate production volumes in coastal regions of Viet Nam
are relatively small, with animals not reaching sexual maturity. The proportion of sexual
immaturity in the Gulf of Tonkin is about 58%; 64% in the Central Coastal, 40% in the
South-east and 44% in the South-west.
- The total number of fishing vessels throughout the country as of May 2014, was 113,557
(according to the statistics of coastal provinces). In terms of fleet structure, vessels in the
coastal areas (<90 CV of capacity) make up the majority of the total fleet, while offshore
vessels (>90 CV of capacity) account for a much smaller share.
- Over 70% of the total number of marine fishing boats in Viet Nam operate mainly in
coastal waters, accounting for about 35% of the total seafood exploitation. However, the
coastal waters only occupy about 11% of the exclusive economic zone and, since this is
also the traditional fishing area of Viet Nam, it is continually over-exploited and the
pressures of exploitation in this area are increasing. The primary issues that contribute to
overexploitation are that the number of fishing boats is too large; small vessels conduct
their fishing activities freely; and there is an uncontrolled increase in the number of
fishing boats. These factors have all caused an imbalance between exploitation capacity
and natural reserves and the economic efficiency of this industry is gradually decreasing.
Although the total fisheries outputs have been increasing continuously, the average yield
(ton / cv / year) shows a declining trend.
- Investigations and studies on aquatic living resources in Vietnamese waters have been
conducted by the Institute of Marine Environment and Resources in Hai Phong, under
73
the sub-project ‘Baseline survey on the current status of and changes in marine resources
in Viet Nam’ in the period of 2011-2015. Study results show certain similarities: coastal
fish stocks are depleted due to over-fishing and illegal exploitation of fisheries; and
exploitation practices that destroy marine fisheries are being used, including bottom
trawling with small netting, the use of explosives, and the use of cyanide for fishing in
coral reef regions.
- Many high-value aquatic species have been severely affected in terms of their
abundance, such as brookfish, tilapia, lobster, abalone, etc. Destructive fishing
techniques such as use of explosives, toxins, and electric shocks to capture fish are
rampant and uncontrollable in both inland waters and offshore, posing a serious threat to
natural ecosystems.
3.2. Extensive development of hydropower dams
Hydropower dams and reservoirs have been built mostly on main rivers in uplands where are
homes to natural forests of high biodiversity values. This not only flooded valleys that were
originally covered by natural forests, but also created barriers for migratory fishes, leading to
changes in the reproduction, growth, and feeding behaviors of these aquatic organisms. This
construction also has many impacts on downstream rivers, including estuarine ones. Many
hydropower reservoirs have not followed standard processes, such as flood discharge, flows, etc,
which this has subsequently caused human and economic losses, severely affecting downstream
ecological systems.
74
Figure 13: Map of large dams and hypropowers in Viet Nam
(Source: ICEM, 2010)
75
3.3. Pollution caused by human activities
Rapid urbanization and industrialization in river basins and coastal areas has seriously affected
water quality. Untreated domestic and industrial waste water is discharged into rivers, lakes, and
coastal areas. This is not well-controlled, leading environment pollution, degrading aquatic
ecosystems, and reducing biodiversity. Specifically, such actions have caused the buoyancy of
floating plants in inland fresh lakes, and red tides in some coastal areas, causing mass death of
aquatic animals, especially fish.
3.4. The system of marine protected areas and inland wetlands is slowly evolving
Ten out of the 16 marine protected areas that are planned under the Marine Protected Area
Master Plan have now been established, including Cat Ba, Bach Long Vy, Con Co, Cu Lao
Cham, Ly Son, Nha Trang Bay, Nui Chua, Hon Cau, Con Dao and Phu Quoc.
The system of wetland reserves has been implemented slowly, even though wetland reserves are
mentioned in the National Master Plan for Biodiversity Conservation (2014). So far, only two
wetland reserves have been established in accordance with regulations in the Biodiversity Law;
these are the Dong Xuyen Bird Sanctuary and Species Conservation Area in Bac Ninh Province,
and the Phu My Species and Habitat Conservation Area in Kien Giang Province.
4. Legal documents on sustainable exploitation and use of aquatic resources
Aiming towards aquatic biodiversity conservation, and sustainable exploitation and use of fishery
resources, the Government has developed and promulgated a number of legal documents. These are to
serve as guidance for different sectors and localities and include:
- In 2008, the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development issued Decision No. 56/2008 / QD-
BNN on ‘Regulation on inspection and certification of sustainable aquaculture’.
- - Chapter 12 contained in The Law on Fisheries (2017), has 12 clauses on aquatic resource
protection and development. In particular, Clause 4, Article 13, stipulates that MARD
promulgates a list of locations in which fishing is prohibited, fishing gear that is not allowed to
be used, and a list of times in which it is prohibited to fish. Furthermore, in Clause 5, there is a
stipulation that provincial People's Committees are to provide for additional prohibited objects to
those already listed, in accordance with actual local fishing practices (after approval by MARD).
- Decision 485/QD/TTg dated May 2, 2008 of the Prime Minister, approved the ‘Proposal
for conservation of endangered precious and rare aquatic species to 2015, vision to
2020’. This is targeted towards preventing the decline of threatened species; carrying out
rehabilitation programs for endemic aquatic species of high value; biodiversity
conservation; and sustainable development of fisheries with community participation.
- - On that basis, the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development signed Decision No.
82/2008/QD-BNN, announcing a list of threatened species in Viet Nam that need to be protected
and rehabilitated. In general, threatened aquatic species recorded in this Decision have been
listed in Viet Nam’s Red Data Book, published in 1996, 1998, 2000 and 2007.
- In 2010, the Prime Minister approved the ‘Master Plan for the system of Marine Protected Areas
to 2020’.
- Decree No. 33/2010/ND-CP regulates the management of fishing activities in Viet Nam's sea
areas. It aims to instate effective exploitation accompanied with protection and development
76
aquatic resources; ensure safety for fishermen and fishing vessels operating in sea areas; and
ensure that Vietnamese fishing vessels fish in and out of Viet Nam's sea areas lawfully. Mapping
out routes for dividing sea areas into different fishing areas aims to appropriately allocate fishing
resources, thus contributing to improving the efficiency of fishing activities. Specifically,
organizations and individuals engaged in fishing activities in Viet Nam's sea areas must comply
with relevant regulations and follow lists of aquatic species banned from exploitation; not use
methods, trades and gears that are banned or restricted from use in sea areas; not operate in areas
where exploitation is prohibited; and not operate at times when exploitation is prohibited.
Figure 14 : Fishing zones in Viet Nam’s sea areas
(Issued along with Decree No. 33/2010/ND-CP of the Government
Dated March 31, 2010)
77
Decision No. 188/QD-TTg dated February 13, 2013 of the Prime Minister approving the ‘Program on
protection and development of aquatic resources to 2020’.
- The Government has developed and implemented the ‘National Strategy for
Environmental Protection to 2020, vision to 2030’ with one specific target: to mitigate
deterioration and exhaustion of natural resources and to restrain the degradation of biodiversity.
- In Decision No. 78/QD-TTg dated January 16, 2018, the Prime Minister approved the ‘National
Plan of Action on preventing, reducing and eliminating illegal, unreported and unregulated
(IUU) fishing to 2025’. This aims to prevent, reduce and eliminate illegal, unreported and
unregulated fishing activities of Vietnamese and foreign organizations and individuals in Viet
Nam's water; to promote the development of responsible and sustainable fisheries; to contribute
to national and regional security and international integration; and to terminate unlawful fishing
activities by Vietnamese fishermen and fishing vessels in other countries’ sea areas.
5. Activities to protect aquatic resources
- Coastal provinces have so far developed master plans for areas that are banned from being fished,
for areas in which exploitation is prohibited during specific periods, and published lists of trades
and gear that are banned from being used.
- By 2017, according to MARD data, ten marine protected areas had been established, including
Cat Ba, Bach Long Vy, Con Co, Cu Lao Cham, Ly Son, Nha Trang Bay, Nui Chua, Hon Cau,
Con Dao and Phu Quoc. Four others have had detailed master plans completed and applications
for approval are being finalised; these include Hon Me, Hai Van - Son Cha, Phu Quy and Nam
Yen. Master plans are being developed for two additional locations: Co To and Dao Tran.
- MARD organizes an annual program of aquatic resources release in various types of water bodies
such as rivers, lakes, and coastal areas, This has helped to boost regeneration and development of
aquatic resources.
- Within the ‘Program on protection and development of aquatic resources to 2020’, there
has research on raising some valuable aquatic species has been conducted, including:
o Successes in reproducing, and then commercially breeding, Semilabeo obscurus,
Catlocarpio siamensis, Hemibagrus guttatus, and Bagarius rutilus which are
listed as rare species in Viet Nam’s Red List and in the Red Data Book (2007).
o Thanks to aquaculture development, production volumes of aquaculture products
have accounted for more than half of Viet Nam’s total annual outputs. According
to a report by the Vitenam Directorate of Fisheries, in 2017, the total fishery
outputs reached over 7.28 million tons, including fisheries catches of nearly 3.42
million tons and production volumes of 3.86 million tons. Production share
accounted for 53% of total outputs (compared with 54% in 2016).
o In 2017, the Institute of Marine Resources and Environment researched the
artificial reproduction and commercial raising of Austriella corrugata - a species
of high economic value in Quang Ninh’s mangrove area.
- The project ‘Overall survey of the current status and changes of marine resources in Viet Nam’
was conducted in the period of 2011-2015 by of the Research Institute for Marine Fishery. Based
on the study of fish eggs and larve, the study established that there are high concentrations areas
of juveniles (natural nusery areas) in Vietnamese sea areas. The results are being used as basis for
78
the planning of marine resources protection areas in Viet Nam.
Northeast wind season Southwest wind season
Figure 15. High concentration area of fish juveniles (natural nursery grounds) in Vietnamese seas
(Source: The Research Institute for Marine Fishery: small Project I.9, Project 47 (2011-2015))
6. Development of sustainable fisheries
According to MARD, in 2009, clam products from Ben Tre province have attained MSC
certification. This helps clam producers to expand markets to European countries, North America
and Korea etc. Since then, the price of MSC certified clam products has increased by 25-30%,
helping to raise and guarantee incomes for farmers and, especially, making clam farming in this
area sustainable and environmentally friendly.
Up to 2014, sixenterprises were granted with sustainable seafood certification from the
Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC).
In addition, WWF-Viet Nam undertakes other activities, such as raising the awareness of
domestic consumers on the use of green seafood products; reducing demand for unsustainable
products; working with ocean tuna fishermen to encourage the rescue of hooked turtles, use
fishing hooks to reduce the impact on sea turtles, and communicating with people about
protecting sea turtles, marine mammals, sharks and offspring of exploited species (tuna). They
are also encouraging fishermen to use nets with larger mesh sizes in the green crab traps at Kien
Giang province to helps small crabs escape and send staff on board fishing vessels in order to
observe the impact of fishing on sea turtles and other protected species and and guide fishermen
79
about sea turtles rescues, etc.
A report by MARD (2018) shows that, given the above efforts, Viet Nam has achieved some
initial results in combating illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing (IUU). International
regulations on IUU fishing have been codified in the Fisheries Law of 2017 and guiding
documents have been basically enacted. Awareness-raising and dissemination of information
about IUU fishing has been conducted. Accordingly, awareness of fisheries management
agencies from central to local levels, of fishing communities and of businesses has been
enhanced. The situation of fishing vessels violating the waters of Pacific Island countries has
also almost ended. Finally, the inspection and control of fishing vessels operating on the sea has
been improved and international cooperation, participation in agreements and international
conventions on fisheries have made many positive efforts.
80
Aichi Biodiversity Target 7: Sustainable agriculture, aquaculture and forestry
1. Policies and mechanisms for sustainable agriculture
1.1. Agricultural land use
Viet Nam is considered the cradle of wet rice civilization. Accordingly, the agriculture sector is
quite developed, typically focused on wet rice cultivation. According to the General Statistics
Office in 2017, there are 8,890,600 hectares of cultivated area of cereal (rice, maize) in the
country.
A
B
Figure 16: Map on proportion of land use for agriculture
(A), Average agricultural land area per household (ha) (B), Forestry
Source: Epprecht, M. And Robinson, T. P. (Eds.). Agricultural Atlas of Viet Nam. A Depiction of the
2001 Rural Agriculture and Fisheries Census
There is a growing pressure resulted from convertion of agricultural land to higher-value non-
agricultural use, particularly for expansion of urbanization and industrial parks). Such conversion
has strongly driven an increase of intensive land use in the contexts of cheap labor costs, fertile
land in some areas and relatively good climatic conditions.
1.2. Policies/ mechanisms
The Prime Minister issued Decision No. 899/QD-TTg dated June 10, 2013, on approving the
81
‘Plan of restructuring the agricultural sector towards improving value added and sustainable
development’. This emphasized three pillars for economic, social, and environmental
sustainability in agricultural development and defined three policy issues:
- The first deals directly with green agriculture, including planning and zoning of land use,
requirements for environmental assessment, monitoring, and control of use of pesticide
fertilizers, food hygiene, and compliance to safety standards, and sanctions for
environmental violations.
- The second relates to market instruments to help agricultural producers to implement
environmentally-friendly agricultural practices. Policy tools in this group include carbon
emission credits, grants for research and application of green technologies, payments for
environmental services, establishment of environmental protection funds, and imposition
of environment protection fees and resource use taxes.
- The third deals with technology and education for awareness-raising, including
development of databases on green agriculture, conducting research and transfer of green
technologies, application of technology to planting, announcing cases of environmental
harms to communities, training and awareness raising, and forming eco-labels based on
environmentally friendly processes (e.g. VietGAP, UTZ Certificate).
MARD set up the Steering Committee on Sustainable Development in 2013 in order to prepare
action plans/programs for sustainable development. This aligns with the ‘Agricultural
Restructuring Plan for the period of 2015-2020’ and tries to integrate sustainable development
strategies into the policy-making process.
National policy tools
- Price subsidies: The Government offers price subsidies to companies purchasing rice left
on fields for temporary storage during the harvest and sets limits for price differences
among regions and seasons, aiming at a 30% return for farmers.
- Exemption of irrigation fees: Before 2009, farmers had to pay management and
maintainence costs for irrigation works. Exemption of irrigation fees have been applied to
most farmers since 2009, resulting in a significant increase in government support to
companies specialized in irrigation and drainage management.
- Providing seeds and livestock breeds: There have been many programs providing
genetically modified seeds and livestock breeds to farmers at favorable rates. At the
national level, such support is often provided as part of bailouts to farmers who have
suffered from natural disasters or diseases.
- Credit mechanism: Since 2009, several policy packages have been introduced to provide
farmers with cheaper credit to purchase machinery, equipment, and materials.
- Payment by area: In 2012, direct payments per hectare were applied to rice farmers as
part of measures to protect and promote paddy land development.
- Insurance: A pilot insurance program was introduced in 2011, supporting insurance
premiums for rice production, livestock breeding, and fisheries in 21 provinces.
- Income support: Since 2003, exemption and incentives of agricultural land use taxes have
been given to most farm households and organizations.
- Extension services: The central budget for agricultural extension has been allocated
through an open auction system since 2001. The allocation nature is the top down
approach, driven by actual needs.
82
1.3. Agricultural performances
According to MARD, crop production contributes 73% of the GDP in agriculture and accounts
for more than 50% of agricultural export value via various subsectors and products. Many crop
items have large export turnover. Specifically, out of the ten key export categories for which
export values are more than USD 1 billion, seven are major crops, notably pepper, cashew and
coffee, which ranked highest in the world. The quality of some agricultural products has been
significantly improved and some crops (e.g. rice, dragon fruit, lichi, longan, grapefruit, tea and
lemon) have successfully penetrated international markets such as the United States, Japan,
Australia, Korea and Europe.
According to MARD, the gross output value of animal husbandry (at 2010 comparable prices)
reached VND 15,401 billion (+4.1% y/y). A trend observed was population reduction, especially
the number of sows, which from 4.2 million heads will be 3 million heads by 2020. Meanwhile,
to maintain the productivity of 3 million head to be the as same as that of 4.2 million, it is
necessary to increase intensive farming and reduce individual livestock households.
Under the ‘Plan for restructuring the agricultural sector by products and regions for the period of
2017-2020’, there is to be a review of current plans and strategies by assessing the advantages
and market needs for three levels of products:
a) National key products (those with an export values of USD 1 billion or more as well as pork
and poultry meat): Review current plans and strategies to then develop intensive, large-scale
production areas that are linked to the value chain. This is to be done through cooperation with
various partners with the application of science and technology.
b) Provincial-level key products: Based on provincial advantages and market demands, this aims
to group those products for planning and investment in the same way as for national key products
but at the local level. Adoption of policies and measures to expand production and
competitiveness to integrate them into national key products is also envisaged.
c) The third group includes local specialties produced at a small scale and that are associated
with specific geographical areas. The strategy for these is in the form of "one commune, one
product".
Specific targets are to have the annual rate of growth of agricultural GDP reach 3% by 2020, and
that farmers' income is to have increased at least 1.8 times compared with 2015.
1.4. Development of organic agriculture
According to MARD (2018), Viet Nam is one of 170 countries participating in the production
of organic agricultural products. There are 33 provinces and cities under central authority that
have organic agriculture. So far, many kinds of organic crops (such as rice) and livestock
products (such as ducks, pigs, dairy cows, shrimp etc.) have officially arrived in world market
such as the United States , Japan, Australia, Korea.
1.5. Establishment of agro-based production procedures under GAP
The Vietnamese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (belonging to MARD) has developed
hundreds of accredited technology processes, including GAP agricultural production processes,
value chain enhancement, safe agricultural production, and protection of appellations of origin.
Examples include the process of preventing brown backed rice plant hopper, yellow dwarf,
83
twisted leaves and black dwarf stripes on rice; Integrated Pest Management (IPM) process for
greening on citrus; propagating Cayen pineapple by cuttings; production of vegetables under
VietGAP; grafting tomatoes to improve their ability to resist bacterial wilt and increase their
ability to resist flooding in the off-season conditions; creating disease-free seedlings by top-
grafted micrograss; propagating bananas invitro; technology for plant protection products; and
sustainable sloping land cultivation. The process of transferring mushroom production from the
household level to a larger farming scale, and from low-to high-grade mushrooms has also
been completed, placing mushroom production as a new profession that is included in the
National Product Program. High-tech flower growing has also been completed and transferred
to more than 50% of provinces in the country
2. Policies and mechanisms for sustainable forestry
2.1. Forestry land
According to MARD (2017), there were 16,033,696 ha of forestry land in the country, of which
protection forest land was 5,848,557 ha; special-use forest land equated to 2,228,888 ha; and
production forest land 7,956,251 ha. In 2016, the National Assembly issued Resolution No.
134/2016/QH13 dated April 9, 2016, on the adjustment of land use plan to 2020 and the national
land use plan for the last period (2016-2020). Accordingly, by 2020, there is a target to have
16,245,250 ha of forest land, of which protected forest land will constitute 4,618,440 ha; special-
use forest land 2,358,870 ha; and production forest land 9,267,940 ha.
A
B
Figure 17: Map on proportion of land use for forestry
Source: Epprecht, M. And Robinson, T. P. (Eds.). Agricultural Atlas of Viet Nam. A Depiction of the
2001 Rural Agriculture and Fisheries Census
84
Bare Ground Change (1982 – 2016)
Short Vegetation Change (1982 - 2016)
Figure 18. Correlation between changes in bare-land and vegetation cover from 1982-2016
(source: UN BiodiversityLab, 2018)
2.2. Forest land lease:
According to MARD data (2017): As of December 31, 2015, the forest area allocated or leased
to individuals was 14,061,856 ha, of which 10,175,519 ha was natural forests (accounting for
72%) and 3,886,337 ha was planted forests (28%).
2.3. Exploitation and use of forests. According to MARD (2017), in the period of 2011-2015,
natural forest timber that was harvested equated to 400,400 m3 and plantation forest logging
equated to 42.5 million m3.
The timber processing and products sector has developed strongly. Currently, there are about
3,500 enterprises, mainly private and foreign direct investment (FDI) enterprises. Some
enterprises have invested in products made from scrap, sawdust, and wood chips. Vietnamese
wood products have so far been exported to more than 100 countries and territories, with
developed markets such as the United States, the European Union, Japan, Korea and China being
the main importers. Export turnover of wood and non-timber forest products increased from
USD $2.8 billion in 2009 to USD $5.7 billion in 2013 and reached USD $7.1 billion in 2015.
2.4. Policies and mechanisms for payments for forest environmental services:
In 2008, payments for forest environmental services was implemented in Lam Dong and Son
La provinces. Accordingly, water users, including hydro power plants, bottled water
85
companies and other entities, must pay for environmental services.
Decree No.99/2010/ND-CP dated September 24, 2010 of the Government on payments for
forest environmental services. Further to that, many circulars guiding the implementation of
Decree 99 and Decision 126 have been issued by MARD, such as Circular No. 80/2011/TT-
BNNPTNT dated November 23, 2011, providing guidance on how to determine payments for
forest environmental services; Circular No. 20/2012/TT-BNNPTNT dated May 07, 2012, on
guiding procedures for checking and collecting payments for forest environmental services;
and Circular No. 60/2012/TT-BNNPTNT dated November 09, 2012, stipulating the principles
and methods of determining the forest area subject to payments for forest environmental
services.
Total payments for forest environmental services for three years until August 2014 were VND
3,329 billion (USD 157 million), most of which came from hydropower plants (97%), clean
water facilities (2%) and tourism businesses (less than 1%).
According to a preliminary report regarding eight years of payments for forest environmental
services, the total forest environmental services revenues at the national level was VND
5,744.792 billion by June 30, 2016, of which:
- By management levels: The Central Fund collected VND 4,236.558 billion (accounted
for 73.7%), provincial funds collected VND 1,508.234 billion (accounted for 26.3%).
- By types of services: Revenues collected from hydropower plants was VND 5,586,497
billion (97.25%), from water treatment facilities were VND 149.680 billion (2.59%),
and VND 8.615 billion from tourism services (accounting for 0.16%).
- By years: In 2011, payments received were VND 282,928 billion, in 2012 VND
1,183.915 billion, in 2013 VND 1,096.389 billion, in 2014 VND 1,335.013 billion, in
2015 VND 1,327.779 billion, and in the first half of 2016, VND 518.766 billion.
Out of the fees collected, the amount paid to forest owners and non-forest owners was VND
4,549.620 billion (minus 0.5% for management fee at the central fund, 10% at provincial
funds, 5% for reserve and VND 370.571 billion approved by the Prime Minister for other
purposes). The disbursement to forest owners and non-forest owners has reached 86.71%.
(Source: A brief of 8 years of operation of the Forest Protection and Development Fund (2008-
2015) and 5 years of implementing payments for forest environmental services (2011-2015),
MARD, 2016).
2.5. Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) program: Since 2008, Viet Nam has been cooperating with the World Bank, the UN-REDD Program
and some international non-government in capacity-building to implement REDD+, to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions through efforts to reduce deforestation and forest degradation, and
to compensate those implementing REDD+ activities at the local level. Currently, The
Netherlands Development Organisation (SNV) is implementing a pilot project to integrate
REDD+ into high biodiversity areas to promote biodiversity conservation during the
implementation of REDD+ projects. The implementation of REDD+ is an opportunity to
mobilize funding for biodiversity conservation and to integrate biodiversity conservation into
the overall goal of developing forest ecosystems.
2.6. Implement the Sustainable Forestry Development Program
According to the 2018 draft report authored by the Government on the results of three years of
86
implementation of the ‘Program for Sustainable Forestry Development for the period 2016 –
2020’, some targets and tasks have been achieved as following:
- Forest protection: In the 2016-2018 period, the number of violations of law on forest
protection and development on average 17,665 cases/year, an average reduction of 9,600
cases/year, when compared to the 2011-2015 period. It is estimated that the 2016-2020
period the number of cases will reduce 39% compared to the 2011-2015 period.
- In 2016-2018, the damaged forest area was 2,430 ha/year, decreasing by 270 ha/year,
equivalent to a 10% decrease when compared to the 2011-2015 period. It is estimated
that the 2016-2020 period will be 30% lower than in the 2011-2015 period.
- Forest areas allocated to households, individuals and communities increased from 4,944
million ha/year in period 2011-2015, to 6,143 million ha year in period 2016-2018.
- In the period from 2016 to 2018, the total area of plantation was 675,000 ha, equivalent
to the annual average area of 225,000 ha, of which the area of production forest was
627,000 ha, the annual average area of 209,000 ha, and 47,000 ha for special use forest
and protection forest, the annual average area of 15,800 ha.
Regarding sustainable forest management: As of August 2018, the total area of forest certified
under the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) system was 229,281 ha (147,667 ha of planted
forest and 81,604 ha of natural forest) in 17 provinces with 36 certificates granted including four
households (in Tuyen Quang, Yen Bai, Quang Tri and Quang Nam province) and 32 forestry
companies. Timber production is certified at 2 million m3. FSC-certified wood and products
fetch 10-15% higher than non-FSC certified products.
3. Policies and mechanisms for sustainable aquaculture
3.1. Status of aquaculture in Viet Nam
Viet Nam has a system of dense rivers and long coastline, forming a diverse range of water
bodies such as lagoons, bays and tidal flats that are very convenient for fishing and aquaculture.
According to the Viet Nam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers, Viet Nam's seafood
production has been growing steadily over the last 17 years at average rate of 9.07% per year.
Aquaculture has made great strides and its production has continuously increased at the average
rate of 12.77% / year, contributing significantly to the growth of total fisheries production of the
country.
According to a report by the Directorate of Fisheries, aquaculture production in 2017 were
estimated at 3,858 thousand tons increased by 5.5% compared to 2016 and aquaculture area was
1.1million ha. Aquaculture production accounted for 53% of country’s fishery production
(compared to 54% in 2016). That reduces the pressure of natural fishing.
87
Figure 19: Map on proportion of land use for aquaculture farming
Source: Epprecht, M. And Robinson, T. P. (Eds.). Agricultural Atlas of Viet Nam. A Depiction of the
2001 Rural Agriculture and Fisheries Census
88
Figure 20. Annual yields from aquaculture farming and fishing in Viet Nam
(Source: Viet Nam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers (VASEP), 2018)
3.2. Aquaculture planning:
- Decision No. 3529/2016/QD-BNN-TCTS approved revision of the ‘Master plan for mollusc
culture to 2020, orientation to 2030’. The target is to have an intensive mollusc culture area of
40,200 ha and total production outputs of 384,10 tons. Currently, clam farming area is 23,110 ha;
oyster 2,770 ha; sweet snails 1,000 ha; cockle 12,720; geoduck clam 190 ha; abalone 150 ha; and
pearl 260 hectares. Orientating to 2030, the aim is to have a mollusc farming area of 42,800 ha,
and total output of 514,000 tons.
- In Decision No. 79/2018/QD-TTg, the ‘National Action Plan to develop Viet Nam’s shrimp
industry to 2025’ was promulgated with the following specific objectives.
In the 2017 – 2020 period:
To increase yield, outputs, quality and value of Vietnamese shrimp products through the application of
scientific and technological advances and production structure; to reform the foundation necessary to
promote rapid, sustainable growth to the next stage. Some specific targets are as follows:
Shrimp export value to reach USD 5.5 billion (at CAGR of 10.79%), of which export
value of brackish shrimp exports is to reach USD 4.5 billion;
Total farming area of brackish shrimp to reach 710,000 ha; total area of cultured
crayfish to reach 30,000 ha; and lobster farming to reach 1,000,000 m3 of cages;
Total shrimp production outputs to reach 832,500 tons (at CAGR of 5.63%) with
800,000 tons of brackish water shrimp; 30,000 tons of giant river prawn; and 2,500 tons
of lobster.
89
In the 2021-25 period:
A hi-tech shrimp industry and large-sized eco-shrimp farming area will be built. Infrastructure and
technical services will be provided in a comprehensive, efficient and sustainable manner.
The total export value of shrimp products is to reach USD 10 billion (at CAGR of
12.7%), of which export value of brackish shrimp is to be USD 8.4 billion;
Total area of brackish shrimp farming is to reach 750,000 ha with 50,000 ha of crayfish
and1.3 million m3 cages of lobster;
Total shrimp production yields are to reach 1,153,000 tons (CAGR of 6.73%) with
1,100,000 tons of brackish water shrimp, 50,000 tons of lobster and 3,000 tons of lobster.
It is planned to develop large-scale production areas and use hi-tech and environmentally friendly
scientific achievements that are suitable for the ecological characteristics of each region, and to increase
productivity and product quality (organic shrimp certificate, GAP). The use of chemicals and antibiotics
in all aquaculture modes and stages of processing of shrimp products will gradually be phased out.
- According to a report by MARD, as of November 2016, the area of commercial pangasius
farming reached 4,552 ha with outputs of 1,047,000 tons. Farming area in 2016 was estimated at
nearly 5,000 hectares, with outputs of 1,200,000 million tons (+9% y/y). Total export value in
2016 was estimated at USD 1.67 billion (+6.6% y/y). In implementation of Decision No.
899/QD-TTg dated June 10, 2013, approving the ‘Plan to restructure the agriculture sector
towards enhancing value added and sustainable development’, the Minister of Agriculture and
Rural Development suggested that pangasius farmers should also follow strict regulations on
sustainable farming and operate in association with cooperative chains or cooperatives so as to
standardize raising processes towards VietGap or GlobalGap standards. Accordingly, Viet Nam’s
pangasius industry can develop sustainably.
3.3. Development of ASC certified aquaculture
According to Viet Nam’s Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers, in early 2013, Viet
Nam had five additional pangasius enterprises certified sustainable aquaculture by the
Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC).
In 2014, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) supported Quoc Viet Company in Ca Mau
province becoming an enterprise with a shrimp production area certified by ASC.
Aichi Biodiversity Target 8: Pollution reduced
1. Environmental pollution in Viet Nam
1.1. Air environment
Nguyen The Chinh (2017) summarized the air pollution in Viet Nam as follows: At traffic
intersections and construction sites, air pollution has been increasing, especially in large cities.
Along roadsides in Ho Chi Minh City, air pollutant concentrations (mostly CO) has increased by
1.44 times and PM10 dust by 1.07 times. In Ha Noi, if no solutions are implemented, annual dust
concentration could reach 200mg/m3 by 2020, ten times higher than the level recommended by
the World Health Organization.
According to the National State of the Environment Report 2016 (MONRE), in urban areas, the
proportion of Total Suspended Particles (TSP) samples that exceed the national technical
90
regulation of national monitoring programs is always over 80% of monitoring samples in the
year. In urban areas, the origin of NO2, SO2 and CO gases is mainly the engines of transport,
while SO2 arises from sources of sulfur and coal. Therefore, in urban areas, sites with traffic
always have the highest concentration of polluted gases. Ozone (O3) is a secondary pollutant
produced by the interaction between pollutants such as NOx, HC, VOC and the ultraviolet
radiation of the sun. At automatic monitoring stations near roads, O3 concentrations exceed the
Vietnamese Standards on many days of the year. SO2 and CO are generally within the
Vietnamese Standards, but O3 and NO2 especially have shown signs of increase in recent years.
Monitoring data for the period of 2012 to 2016 showed that the level of dust pollution (TSP) in
urban areas is still high, and there has been no sign of reduction in the last five years.
Table 6. The sampling ratio exceeding the standards of air environment parameters
measured from 2012 to 2016
Parameters 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
TSP (%) 86.73 87.19 89.52 85.36 88.89
SO2 (%) 1.18 1.88 0.74 0.00 0.00
CO (%) 5.75 1.51 1.65 0.97 1.27
NO2 (%) 2.21 0.94 1.87 4.24 0.66
Source: General data from national monitoring programs at 37 large cities, VEA (2016), in the
Environmental Status Report 2016
1.2. Water Environment
Environmental pollution, especially water pollution, has become increasingly more serious in
Viet Nam. Surface water sources in many places are polluted; this is especially the case in urban
areas, specifically around industrial parks and in craft villages. In river basins, pollution and
degradation of water quality mainly occurs in the middle and lower basins and several places are
suffering serious pollution, such as the Nhue-Day river, Cau river and Dong Nai river systems.
Most notable is the levels of organic pollution in river basins including the Ngu Huyen Khe (Bac
Ninh), Nhue River through Hanoi, and Sai Gon River through Binh Duong, Ho Chi Minh City.
There are also issues with heavy metals in ground water in the Northern Delta such as at Ha
Dong, Hoai Duc (Hanoi), Y Yen, Truc Ninh (Nam Dinh), and Thai Binh city.
Surface water in rivers, lakes, canals and ditches inside cities in Viet Nam have been mostly
polluted by waste from industrial and urbanization activities. Many lakes have become
wastewater reservoirs for their surrounding areas. Despite increased rehabilitation efforts, surface
water pollution in these areas is still a major problem in most cities. In addition, there are issues
with degrading water quality in rivers that flow through urban areas in some provinces and cities.
Table 7. Water quality index of urban rivers in Hanoi
91
No River
name
2012 2013 2014 2015
Dry
season
Rainy
season
Dry
season
Rainy
season
Dry
season
Rainy
season
Dry
season
Rainy
season
1 To Lich 8 10 7 7 6 11 7 8
2 Set 7 6 6 8 6 7 8 9
3 Lu 6 6 5 7 6 8 9 9
4 Kim Nguu 7 9 5 7 7 8 8 6
Source: Hanoi Department of Natural Resources and Environment, October 2016,
(Environmental Status Report).
The water environment of coastal urban areas has been directly affected by socio-economic
development such as seaport and tourism activities, concentrated urbanization, and the operation
of industrial clusters. About 70% to 80% of waste in the marine environment has been generated
from inland souces, specifically from factories, industrial zones, and residential areas. Untreated
solid waste is discharged into rivers and canals in coastal plains or directly into the sea.
In coastal cities, the quality of seawater is quite good, with most within the parameters set by
QCVN 10-MT: 2015/BTNMT. However, an issue facing coastal urban areas is the of pollution
of organic compounds in seawater. For example, in 2011-2015, the parameters of compounds
such as COD, NH4+ in the 2011-2015 period exceeded limits set by QCVN 10-MT:
2015/BTNMT (aquaculture and beaches), especially in urban areas that have seaports. Tho
Quang (Da Nang city) is a hotspot of marine pollution in recent years.
Mineral oil content in seawater has tended to increase and is quite common in seaports of coastal
urban areas. This can be mainly traced to the operations of vessels that leach oil and grease.
However, mineral oil content in all beaches has still been within limits set by QCVN 10-MT:
2015/BTNMT.
1.3. Soil environment
Status of heavy metal pollution
In large urban areas, such as Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, and in mining and manufacturing
centres, such as Thai Nguyen and Dong Nai, soil pollution has occurred as a result of waste
discharged from industrial and contruction activities, and from people’s daily activities. The
content of heavy metals in soil has been increasing. According to research, by 2020, soil
pollution will have increased 2-3 times compared to the current level, and the pollution index
will accelerate, resulting from the industrial development and urbanization rate (Nguyen The
Chinh, 2017).
According to the National State of the Environment Report 2016 (MONRE), soil quality in waste
treatment facilities located in urban areas has been affected by heavy metals. In areas affected by
industrial waste within Phu Tho province (Dong Boi, Dong Don, Dong Vac and Thach Son -
Lam Thao) and Hanoi (Tam Hiep Thanh Tri), the concentration of heavy metals, such as Cu, Pb,
Zn, has exceeded the thresholds defined by QCVN 03-MT: 2015/BTNMT for agricultural land.
For example, in the period of 2010-2014, Cu, Pb and Zn content in surface soil measured at three
sites of Phu Tho province were higher than those prescribed in QCVN 03-MT: 2015/BTNMT for
92
agricultural land.
The status of pollution of persistent organic pollutants (POP)
There are currently 240 locations across 15 provinces that contain residues from crop protection
chemicals at levels that cause serious and extremely serious environmental pollution. In
particular 23 points located in urban areas have not yet received treatment. In Dien Bien
province, monitoring conducted in the 2011-2012 period in local pesticide warehouses (such as
the Provincial Plant Protection Department based in Tuan Giao town, and the pesticide inventory
based in Tua Chua town) determined that the content of DDT (mg/kg) in soil had exceeded the
limit set by QCVN 15: 2008/BTNMT by 1.34-3.86 times.
According to the report on ‘Ten years of the implementation of the Stockholm Convention on
persistent organic pollutants in Viet Nam’ (MONRE 2015), thousands of pesticide chemical
residues have been discovered in investigated provinces and cities, mainly concentrated in the
north and north-central regions. Excluding a number of large drug stores and burial sites
(considered polluted hotspots), most detected point source of pollution are small and scattered in
rural areas. The concentration of pesticides in the soil at these sites usually ranges from 10 to 50
ppm; however, some places can reach hundreds of ppm. In the period of 2010 - 2014, as a result
of the GEF/UNDP project on residual pesticides, more than 400 new point source of pollution
across Viet Nam were discovered.
The GEF / World Bank project on PCBs in Viet Nam, conducted between 2012 and 2014,
focused on rapid analysis of chlorine in transformer oil. Results showed that among
approximately 39,000 transformers, there were 401 machines suspected of having PCB
contaminated oil at a content exceeding the thresholds set by the Stockholm Convention (50
ppm). Of these, 112 had concentrations above 200 ppm. For the inventory of PCBs outside the
electricity industry, results showed that there are over 35,712 devices suspected of being
contaminated with PCBs and the project had conducted inventory of 9,000 machines and stored
oil. Inventory results have detected a total of 930 tons of PCB-containing oil.
According to MONRE (2015), there were some urban areas still polluted by dioxin. Areas of
pollution are mainly concentrated in southern Viet Nam in areas now designated as military
airports and those containing residual toxic chemicals. However, an assessment of dioxin
contamination in the environment showed that, due to the environment exposureand cycles (sun,
heat, rain, flood, micro-organisms etc.), the amount of dioxin in many areas has dropped below
maximum recommended thresholds. Some studies have shown that in many areas that had been
sprayed with toxic chemicals in the past, the concentration of dioxin has now fallen below the
maximum recommended concentration and in some areas dioxin was not detected. In some areas
that were previously sprayed, such as Can Gio in southern Viet Nam, dioxin levels in sediments
are quite low compared with other areas in the north and central regions.
Survey results show that Viet Nam has many production activities that can release new POPs
(such as HBB, PBDE, PFOS, and HBCD) into the environment, and that these are potentially
dangerous to the environment and human health. A number of new POPs have been detected at
significant concentrations in solid waste and in sedimentation dust. However, other
environmental components are currently only detected at low concentrations.
2. Main sources of environmental pollution
According to a report by MONRE presented in the national conference on environmental
93
protection (2016), national socio-economic development has inflicted great pressure on the
environment. Annually, there are approximately 2,000 projects that are required to conduct an
environmental impact assessment (EIA). Notably, there have been 283 industrial zones created
nation-wide, with more than 550,000 m3 of wastewater dischared every day, and 615 industrial
clusters, of which only about 5% have concentrated wastewater treatment systems. Out of over
existing 500,000 production facilities, many contribute to environment pollution by having out-
of-date manufacturing processes and techniques.
There have been now 5,000 mining and construction enterprises established and over 4,500 craft
(manufacturing) villages are operating. More than 13,500 medical facilities are discharging more
than 47 tons of hazardous waste and 125,000 m3 of medical wastewater on a daily basic.
There are currently 787 municipalities that are discharging 3,000,000 m3 of wastewater daily -
this is mostly untreated. There are also nearly 43 million motorcycles and over 2 million cars in
circulation. More than 100,000 tons of plant protection chemicals are used in the country every
year. In addition, more than 23 million tons of domestic waste, 7 million tons of industrial solid
waste and 630,000 tons of hazardous waste are being discharged annually. There are 458 landfill
sites, including 337 unhygienic ones; and more than 100 small-scale domestic waste incinerators,
which have the potential to generate dioxin and furan.
2.1. Sources of urban water pollution
According to the National State of the Environment Report 2016 (MONRE), sources of polluted
water flowing into lakes and river of large urbans include:
i. Domestic wastewater: As a result of population growth and increased living needs,
domestic wastewater generated in urban areas has been continuously increasing. Sewage
discharge volumes fluctuate, depending on living standards and habits of people in each
urban area. According to water supply standards for urban areas, an average of about 125
liters/ person is to be supplied on a daily basis and wastewater weight is estimated to be
about 80% of supplied volume (100 liters/person). Statistical data show that the south-
east is the most populated urban area and has the highest amount of domestic wastewater.
Main pollutants in domestic wastewater are suspended solids, BOD5, nitrogen of
ammonium salts (N-NH4+), phosphates, chloride (Cl-) and surfactants. In addition,
domestic wastewater contains inorganic components, micro-organisms and other
pathogenic micro-organisms.
ii. Medical wastewater: In medical wastewater, apart from common pollutants such as
organic substances, animal oils and greases, there are also specific organic contaminants
and micro-organisms, viruses, drug preparations, disinfectants, chemical solvents,
antibiotic residues and possibly radioactive isotopes that are used in the diagnosis and
treatment of diseases. The amount of medical wastewater annually generated has been
increasing over time. Data show that the total amount of medical waste needing to be
handled by 2015 would be about 125,000 m³/24 hour.
iii. Other sources: In addition to domestic and medical wastewater, many industrial zones,
industrial plants and urban areas discharge untreated wastewater to rivers and lakes,
severely polluting these water sources. In some cities, such as Hanoi, there are still
industrial clusters based inside and just outside the city. Wastewater treatment by
industrial clusters, and of small production facilities located in residential and urban
areas has long been a daunting issue.
94
Figure 21. Prospect of urban expansion to 2030
(source: UN BiodiversityLab, 2018)
2.2. Sources of rural water pollution
In rural areas, pollution main occurrs in craft (manufacturing) villages and in industrial spots that
are intermingled with residential areas. There are still many handicraft villages operating in high-
risk activities, such as dealing with plastics, metals, lead batteries, livestock, and paper
production.
Intensive agricultural cultivation that includes the usage of chemical fertilizers and pesticides
produces and increases emissions of CH4, H2S and NH3, especially in specialized areas.
Agricultural use of fertilizers and pesticides is not in accordance with technical procedures. For
example, there are known issues in the Dong Anh (Hanoi), Hiep Hoa (Bac Giang), Yen Dinh
(Thanh Hoa) and Highland (Duc Trong, Da Lat) regions.
Mining activities have been causing numerous negative impacts on the surrounding environment,
including through soil pollution and wastewater discharge, discharge of dust, and the release of
95
slag ore into the water source or the environment.
2015
2020
Figure 22: Dynamics of Population Density in Viet Nam
(Source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
3. Impacts of environmental pollution on biodiversity
Rapid urbanization and industrialization have seriously affected water quality. Unregulated
domestic and industrial wastewater discharges into rivers and lakes have had negative impacts on
the biodiversity of those natural ecosystems. Urban lakes, especially lakes in Hanoi, have been
suffering eutrophication. This has become very common, causing algae blooms (mostly
Microcystis spp.), reducing dissolved oxygen, and leading to a mass death of fish in West Lake,
Hanoi.
In coastal areas, the red tide phenomenon has been seasonally seen in some areas, such as an
outbreak of Noctiluca scintillans in Van Phong Bay (Khanh Hoa province) used to result losses
for lobster farmers. Similar cases also happened in Binh Thuan province with the outbreak of
Phaecocystis globosa along the coastal areas in Phan Ri Bay, destroying aquatic species in the
area. Research on coastal toxic algae and red tide in Viet Nam shows that some microalgae
species tend to grow seasonally every year, especially from March to September, causing
damage to the aquaculture in coastal waters.
Extensive agricultural intensification, and usage of pesticides from a variety of sources is
increasingly common and uncontrollable in Viet Nam, contributing to the degradation of bird
and insect populations in villages and suburbs. Many useful bird species that destroy harmful
insects have been impacted, leading to disease outbreaks in the field.
Pangasius farming and industrial production of other aquatic species at high density in the
Mekong Delta is also contributing to organic pollution, affecting the ecosystems and aquatic
communities.
96
Activities such as mineral exploitation, hydropower, and construction have caused environmental
pollution including the discharge of polluted soil, wastewater, slurry, and slag ore into water
sources. This has caused degradation and increased soil/water pollution and affected
biodiversity. These impacts only add the other effects of these activities, which include
decreasing the area of natural ecosystems, dividing ecological landscapes and degrading
biodiversity.
Nutrient pollution (fertilizers) 2013
Organic pollution (pestisides) 2013
Figure 23: Map on nutritious and organic pollution (fertilizers, pestisides) 2013
(source: UN BiodiversityLab, 2018)
4. Legal documents on environmental protection
Water management in general and urban water environment management in particular, has been
specifically covered in environmental laws and under-law documents. The Environmental
Protection Law 2014 sets out regulations on environment management, water quality, and
wastewater and defines supporting tools for water pollution management. The Law on Water
Resources 2012 stipulates contents for prevention of water pollution, depletion of water
resources, water resources monitoring, and water protection corridors.
- Decision No. 1393/QD-TTg dated September 25, 2012 of the Prime Minister, approved
the ‘National Strategy for Green Growth in the period of 2011-2020, vision to 2050’ with
the following specific objectives:
o To restructure and improve economic institutions toward greening existing sectors
and encouraging economic sectors to efficiently use energy and resources;
o To study and apply advanced technologies to make better use of natural resources,
reducing greenhouse gas emissions and contributing to effective response to
97
climate change;
o To improve people's living standard, building an eco-friendly lifestyle by creating
jobs from industries, agriculture, green services, and by investing in natural
capital and green infrastructure.
The Decision also provided for measures to review and adjust the planning of manufacturing
industries; to gradually restrict economic sectors that generate large volumes of waste that
pollute and degrade the environment; creating conditions for the development of new green
manufacturing industries; and speed up afforestation and reforestation projects, by encouraging
enterprises to invest in afforestation to increase forest cover to 42% by 2020 and thus improving
forest quality, increasing CO2 absorption capacity, biomass, and guaranting a timber supply for
production and consumption.
- Decision No. 1659/QD-TTg dated November 07, 2012 of the Prime Minister, approved
The National Urban Development Program for the period of 2012-2020.
- Decision No. 2623/QD-TTg dated December 31, 2013 of the Prime Minister, approved
the project ‘Development of Viet Nam’s Cities in Response to Climate Change in the
2013-2020 period’.
- Decision No. 166/QD-TTg date January 21, 2014 of the Prime Minister, promulgating
the National Strategy for Environmental Protection up to 2020, a vision to 2030 with the
following objectives: to mitigate degradation and exhaustion of natural resources and to
control the rate of biodiversity decline.
5. Pollution mitigation measures
5.1. Wastewater treatment facilities
In recent years, there has been positive change in wastewater treatment in urban and residential areas,
which has contributed to limiting the increase of water pollution. However, the volume of domestic
wastewater that is treated is still low. According to data from 2015, 42 out of 787 (5.3%) urban areas
nationwide have wastewater treatment facilities that meet prescribed standards. According to the Ministry
of Construction, in 2015, 52 urban areas had ODA projects relating to water drainage and wastewater
treatment and implementation of those projects led to a total of 77 irrigation systems with a total design
capacity of about 2,400,000 m3/24 hours. Most hospitals in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City have built and
operate medical wastewater treatment system.
5.2. Classification, collection and treatment of domestic solid waste
In urban areas, the total collected domestic solid waste was about 31,600 tons/day in 2014 and
about 32,415 tons/day in 2015. According to the ‘National Strategy for Integrated Management
of Domestic Solid Wastes to 2025, a vision to 2050’, the goal of integrated management of urban
domestic solid wastes is to ensure by 2020 that 90% and by 2025 that 100% the amount of urban
domestic solid wastes to be properly collected and treated.
By 2015, 35 domestic solid waste facilities have been built and operated nation-wide. The
average capacity of those facilities was approximately 100-200 tons/day. Some have very large
capacities, including Da Phuoc with 3,000-5,000 tons/day and Cu Chi, Ho Chi Minh with 1,000
tons/day. Others have capacity of over 300 tons/day, including Xuan Son (Son Tay, Hanoi) with
700 tons/day; a facility in Binh Duong Province (Binh Duong province) with 420 tons/day; and
Dong Xanh (Dong Nai province) with 300 tons/day.
98
Aichi Biodiversity Target 9: Invasive alien species prevented and controlled
1. Status of invasive alien species in Viet Nam
There are growing concerns about the potential harms of invasive alien species to biodiversity,
human health and the economy, especially after golden snail (Pomacea canaliculata, P. insunarum)
was introduced into Viet Nam in the late 1980s and has now spread nationwide. As of 1997, yellow
snails had damaged 132,000 hectares of rice cultivation, causing millions of VND worth of damage
annually due to declining rice yields.
According to statistics, there have been 94 alien species imported into Viet Nam, including 42 known
invasive species, with 12 of those known to be fast-growing invasive species such as Mimosa pigra
and Eichhornia crassipes. In particular, the Mimosa, which was first discovered in Tram Chim
National Park (Dong Thap province) in 1995, has now become widespread and a major threat in
many wetlands.
In 2009, MARD announced a list of 48 aquatic aninal alien species that have invaded Viet Nam
through different pathways. Of these, 14 species are considered to have adverse impacts on aquatic
biodiversity. In addition to the golden snail (Pomacea canaliculata, P. insunarum), various other
species, such as red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) and freshwater lobsters, which are
known invasive species that negatively impact biodiversity, economic sectors and human health have
been imported into Viet Nam. For example, in 2010, Can Tho Seafood Import-Export Corporation
imported 40 tons of red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) from the United States for raising in
Can Tho Aquaculture Breeding Centre in Vinh Long province. Similarly, freshwater lobsters were
imported from the Untied States by Phu Thanh Company Limited into Vinh Chau District (Soc
Trang province) and then to raised in Tran De district. These species present severe potential impacts
if they are released into the wild.
In 2012, MONRE reviewed potential invasive alien species using international sources and issued
relevant documents. The list includes 130 species belonging to six different groups, including micro-
organisms, invertebrates, birds, reptiles, plants, and animals as well as some species that have not yet
appeared in Viet Nam’s territory.
2. Documents on management and control of invasive alien species
- In Section 3 of Chapter IV in the Law on Biodiversity 2008, there are five articles on control
of invasive alien species.
- In 2012, the Prime Minister issued Decision No. 1896/QD-TTg, approving the project
‘Prevention and control of invasive alien species in Viet Nam to 2020’. Accordingly, priority
has been given to implementing a program of control and eradication of specific invasive
alien species in Viet Nam, including Pomacea canaliculata, Mimosa pigra and Mimosa
diplotricha.
- On December 28, 2018, MONRE issued Circular No. 35/2018/TT-BTNMT regulating the
criteria for determining and promulgating the list of invasive alien species (replacing Circular
27/2013/TTLT-BTNMT-BNN issued in 2013).
- To strengthen the management and prevention of regulation violations involving invasive
alien species, the Government issued Decree No. 179/2013/ND-TTg dated November 14
2013, on sanctions for administrative violations in environmental protection. Specifically,
Article 45 stipulates sanctions for violations on the control of invasive alien species.
99
- MONRE issued Decision No. 200/BTNMT dated January 29 2015 approving the program
for awareness-raising regarding the prevention and control of invasive alien species in Viet
Nam for the 2015-2020 period. This provides guidance to localities for developing and
implementing communication activities, and for raising awareness about invasive alien
species.
3. Management and control of invasive alien species
MONRE have responsibity and carried out activities to manage and control invasive alien
species, as following:
Assume the prime responsibility for, and coordinate with MARD, other concerned
ministries, and ministerial-level agencies to introduce legal regulations and
relevant documents.
Conduct pilot removal of Mimosa diplotricha at Cuc Phuong National Park
(2013-2015). Pilot results showed effective removal through a combination of
chemical and silvicultural methods.
In the 2013-2015 period, within the framework of the ‘Project on Prevention and
Control of Invasive Alien Species in Production Forests and Protected Forests in
Southeast Asia’, MONRE carried out investigation and mapping of the
distribution of invasive alien species in national parks and nature reserves.
MARD have responsibity and carried out activities to manage and control invasive alien species,
as following:
Control the quarantine process for import of animals and plants to prevent
invasive alien species.
Control and eradicate harmful livestock species such as the swamp beaver
(Myocastor coypus), hamster, red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans).
Carry out a review of invasive alien species in plant protection and quarantine.
Thus far, MARD has written reports on the disease risks of eight species that are
potentially invasive to plant production and quarantine that both do and do not
already occur in Viet Nam, and has developed a map of the distribution of seven
known pest species.
The Ministry of Finance MONRE have responsibity and carried out activities to manage and
control invasive alien species, as following:
Allocate funds to execute tasks pursuant to Decision No. 1896/QD-TTg.
Organize training for quarantine officers at 47 quarantine stations and customs
officers at 18 international border gates. The training is to focus on identifying
invasive alien species, quarantine regulations, and border inspection.
At the local level, the control of invasive alien species has only focused on controlling some
invasive alien species that have the greatest influence on production, as well as local people’s
lives (e.g. yellow snails, mimosa and virgin crochet).
Shortcomings:
- There is inconsistency in the management mechanisms for invasive alien species,
including duplication of lists identifying invasive alien species among different legal
100
documents on biodiversity.
- Due to a shortage of financial resources, there has been no comprehensive investigation and
assessment of the risks and impacts of invasive alien species in Viet Nam, and little work on
measures required to control or eradicate such species.
- Efforts to eradicate invasive alien species are currently sporadic and inconsistent. They are
limited to places where invasive alien species have significantly impacted livelihoods,
production, and to some national parks and protected areas.
- The allocation of responsibility among management agencies in relation to invasive alien
species is unclear and overlapping. There is also no consistency in management and licensing
of invasive alien species that are proposed for import, or imported into, Viet Nam.
- Capacity to assess risk and to control invasive alien species remains limited.
- Specialized provincial agencies in the management of invasive alien species are the
Departments of Natural Resources and Environment. However, these provincial
departments have no full-time staff to carry out management of invasive alien species.
Aichi Biodiversity Target 10: Ecosystems vulnerable to climate change
1. Ecosystems of Viet Nam
Viet Nam's topography and climate have created a variety of natural ecosystems on the continental
shelf, with diverse forest ecosystems that include evergreen tropical rainforests, semi-evergreen
forests, evergreen broad-leaved limestone forests, coniferous forests, dipterocarp forests (deciduous
dipterocarp forests), natural drought forests (plants with thorns), melaleuca freshwater marsh forests,
bamboo forests, and mangrove forests. Scientists divide forest ecosystems in Viet Nam into 14 types,
based on ecological factors (Thai Van Trung, 1999). Based on climate, terrain, geology, and soil,
there are eight forest ecological zones in the continental part of Viet Nam and 47 sub-regions.
In addition to forests, Viet Nam also possess many other types of ecosystems, including grasslands,
limestone mountains, inland wetlands (streams, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, caves caverns), and sand
dunes.
Viet Nam has a coastline of more than 3,260 km (excluding that of islands) and has more than 3,000
large and small islands within the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagos. Viet Nam's Exclusive
Economic Zone is over 1 million km2. Vietnamese waters were divided by Nguyen Huy Yet (2000)
into six ecological zones, with following specific biodiversity characteristics:
- The Gulf of Tonkin (to the south of Con Co island, Quang Tri province)
- The Central Coast (Con Co island to Cape Dinh in Phan Rang - Cap Varella)
- The South-Central Coast (Cape Dinh to Cape Vung Tau)
- The South-Eastern Coast (Cape Vung Tau to Cape Ca Mau)
- The South-West Coast (Cape Ca Mau to Phu Quoc Island in the Gulf of Thailand)
- High seas (waters around the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagos).
In of those six zones, 20 marine ecosystems have been identified. Typical marine ecosystems in
coastal zones include tidal flats, estuarine mangrove forests, lagoons, bays, coral reefs, coral reefs,
and seagrass beds. In addition, there are ecosystems around coastal and offshore islands, especially in
deep waters and on the seabed (e.g. around the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagos).
101
Figure 24: Map on ecosystems in Viet Nam
Source: WWF Viet Nam 2013
Figure 25: Marine ecological zones and
clusters of marine protected areas in Viet
Nam
Source: Nguyen Huy Yet, 2000
2. Ecosystems most severely affected by climate change
Viet Nam is one of five countries most affected by climate change. In that context, fragmented
natural ecosystems are likely to be most affected by those changes and suffer high rates of loss
species. According to climate change and sea level rise scenarios modelled for Viet Nam (MONRE,
2016), the following has been analyzed:
Risk of flooding with 100 cm sea level rise:
- Approximately 16.8% of the Red River Delta area, and 4.79% of Quang Ninh province are at
risk of flooding;
- Approximately 1.47% of the land area of the central coastal provinces from Thanh Hoa to
Binh Thuan is in danger of being inundated. In particular, Thua Thien - Hue has the highest
risk (7.69% of the area);
- Approximately 17.8% of Ho Chi Minh City’s area and about 4.79% of the Ba Ria - Vung
Tau area is in danger of being inundated;
- The Mekong River Delta is a high-risk area (38.9% of the area);
- The highest-risk islands are Van Don, Con Dao and Phu Quoc. The risk of flooding for the
Spratly Islands is not high. Hoang Sa archipelago is at greater risk of flooding, especially for
some islands of Crescent Island and Tri Ton Islan.
102
Table 8. Risks of inundations due to sea level rise caused by climate change to delta and
coastal provinces
(Source: MONRE, 2016)
Province/City
Area
(ha)
Percentage of inundation (% area) corresponding sea
level rise
50 cm 60 cm 70 cm 80 cm 90 cm 100 cm
Quang Ninh 967,655 3.33 3.62 3.88 4.10 4.40 4.79
Red River Delta
Hai Phong 154,052 5.14 7.61 11.7 17.4 24.0 30.2
Thai Binh 158,131 27.0 31.2 35.4 39.9 45.1 50.9
Nam Đinh 159,394 26.0 32.5 39.1 45.8 52.3 58.0
Ninh Binh 134,70 8.29 11.0 14.0 17.1 20.5 23.4
Red River Delta in
total
1,492,73
9
6.93 8.55 10.4 12.5 14.7 16.8
From Thanh Hoa to Bình Thuan
Thanh Hoa 1,111,00
0
0.51 0.65 0. 0.98 1.2 1.43
Nghe An 1,656,00
0
0.1 0.17 0.22 0.27 0.32 0.51
Ha Tinh 599,304 0.86 1.00 1.2 1.39 1.81 2.12
Quang Binh 801,200 1.73 1.87 2.01 2.24 2.27 2.64
Quang Tri 463,500 0.71 0.97 1.22 1.49 1.91 2.61
Thua Thien - Hue 503,923 0.93 1.67 2.59 3.46 4.31 7.69
Đa Nang 977,8 0.7 0.78 0.87 0.6 1.04 1.13
Quang Nam 1,043,22
0
0.18 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.28 0.32
Quang Ngai 514,080 0.43 0.51 0.59 0.66 0.75 0.86
Binh Đinh 609,340 0.55 0.64 0.74 0.84 0.93 1.04
Phu Yen 503,690 0.55 0.63 0.74 0.86 0.97 1.08
Khanh Hoa 519,320 0.72 0.89 1.0 1.19 1.38 1.49
Ninh Thuan 335,630 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.30 0.33 0.37
Binh Thuan 796,833 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.17
Total 9,554,81
9
0.53 0.66 0.80 0.95 1.11 1.47
103
Ho Chi Minh city 209,962 11.4 12.6 13.9 15.2 16.5 17.8
Ba Ria - Vung Tau 190,223 2.13 2.53 3.01 3.52 4.16 4.79
Mekong Delta
Long An 449,100 0.61 1.36 2.85 7.12 12.89 27.21
Tien Giang 239,470 1.56 2.92 4.54 7.08 12.0 29.7
Ben Tre 235,950 6.21 7.58 9.87 12.8 17.0 22.2
Tra Vinh 234,120 0.80 1.02 1.33 2.38 4.93 21.3
Vinh Long 152,020 6.55 7.49 8.23 8.97 11.27 18.83
Dong Thap 337,860 0.36 0.69 0.96 1.28 1.94 4.64
An Giang 342,400 0.08 0.16 0.29 0.49 0.90 1.82
Kien Giang 573,690 7.77 19.8 36.3 50.8 65.9 76.9
Can Tho 140,900 1.44 1.59 1.90 2.77 6.54 20.52
Hau Giang 160,240 3.41 10.27 20.55 32.05 42.66 80.62
Soc Trang 322,330 2.46 5.88 10.8 16.7 25.8 50.7
Bac Lieu 252,600 3.65 7.65 14.5 23.4 33.8 48.6
Ca Mau 528,870 8.47 13.7 21.9 30.3 40.9 57.7
Mekong Delta in
total
3,969,55
0 4.48 8.58 14.7 21.0 28.2 38.9
With these sea level rise scenarios, 78 out of 286 critical habitats (equivalent to 27%), 46 protected
areas (equivalent to 33%), nine biodiversity areas of national and international value (23%) and 23
other biodiversity areas in Viet Nam would be severely affected. Many wild fauna and flora will
suffer increasing pressure due to changes in habitat, food sources, and natural disasters such as
floods, droughts, and storms. Some species of plants and vertebrates may be at risk of extinction in
the next century due to climate change. However, there has been limited research on the impacts of
climate change on biodiversity in Viet Nam.
The Red River Delta, Ho Chi Minh City and the Mekong Delta and other coastal areas are predicted
to be most severely affected by climate change.
104
Figure 26. Map on inundation towards a sea level rise by 100 cm
(Source: MONRE, 2016)
(a) Coastal areas of; (b) Red River Delta and Quang Ninh; (c) Mekong Delta
3. Climate change affecting ecosystems in Viet Nam
Climate change is characterized by factors such as rising temperatures, sea level rise,
precipitation, natural disasters etc. All ecosystems and living things are subject to climate change
impacts. However, how much each ecosystem is affected depends on the specifics of a particular
ecosystem, as well as on their sensitivity. WWF Viet Nam (2003) applied a geographic
information system (GIS) to assess the vulnerability of ecosystems in the context of climate
change in Viet Nam. From these results, it was predicted that terrestrial forest ecosystems and
mangroves will be affected by climate change at different levels.
(a)
(b)
(c)
105
Comprehensive Adaptability
Map of level of vulnerability
Figure 27. Map on resilience scenarios of ecosystems to climate changes
Source: WWF Viet Nam, 2013
3. Coral reef ecosystems are most vulnerable to climate change
3.1. Impacts on coral reefs
Threats to coral reefs identified include:
- Human impacts: over-exploitation and destructive exploitation of coral reefs and reef
animals; uncontrolled development of tourism; environmental pollution leading to
blooms of algae (e.g. in Ca Na Bay in 2002); and mainland floods causing sedimentation
(e.g. those affecting coral reefs of Cu Lao Cham in 2006) (Vo Si Tuan, Nguyen Huy Yet
and Nguyen Van Long, 2005).
- An outbreak of species such as sea-buckthorn (Acanthaster planci), sea urchins, invasion
106
of porifera (sponges) (e.g. an outbreak of sea urchins in Nha Trang Bay, Van Phong and
Cu Lao Cham in 2002 – 2004).
- Natural disasters (e.g. high temperatures and low salinity for a short period of time in
Con Dao in 2005 and bleaching of coral in the waters of Phu Quoc in 2010) (Vo Si Tuan
et al., 2005, 2013).
3.2. Coral reef ecosystems are most severely affected by climate change
In coastal waters, coral reef ecosystems are most vulnerable to climate change. Research on coral
reefs in Viet Nam shows that coral reef bleaching in 2010 could be traced to rising sea temperatures.
If the sea temperature is above 29oC for an extended period of time, coral will lose its symbionts,
leading to bleaching and death (Vo Si Tuan, Nguyen Huy Yet and Nguyen Van Long, 2005). After
Hurricane Linda and coral bleaching events in 1998, the area of coral reef in the seas around Con
Dao and Phu Quoc Islands sharply declined and some coral reefs in Con Dao were so severely
degraded that coral cover has declined to almost 0% (Vo Sy Tuan, Nguyen Huy Yet and Nguyen
Van Long, 2005).
According to Du Van Toan (2011), if the CO2 concentration in 2050 would be 560 ppm, the area of
coral reefs would be ruined, remaining to an area equivalent to 40% compared to that in 1950.
Table 9. Coral growth rate (%) in the South China Sea and CO2 emission
Year 1950 2000 2030 2050 2100
CO2 (ppm) 280 380 450 560 750
Coral (%) 100 80 60 40 20
Source: Du Van Toan, 2011
It has been modelled that the South China Sea is likely to suffer tremendous impact. The pH
content in many parts of the South China Sea would be reduced by 0.3, which means that the
ocean will likely experience high levels of acidification.
107
Figure 28. Distribution of coral reefs (2010)
(source: UN BiodiversityLab, 2018)
4. Legal documents and actions to mitigate climate change impacts on ecosystems
4.1. Legal documents
- In the Law on Environmental Protection 2014, Chapter IV with 10 articles stipulates Viet
Nam’s response to climate change.
- In Decision No. 2139/QD-TTg dated December 5, 2011, the Prime Minister approved the
National Strategy on Climate Change, including tasks related to biodiversity
conservationsuch as: ensuring improvement of forest quality, forest plantation,
108
reforestation of bare hilllands; securing effective harvesting of forests with maintenance
and enhancement of capacity for prevention of natural disasters and desertification as
well as soil erosion and depletion; strengthening protection, management and
development of mangroves and wetlands; striving for forest cover in 2020 increased by
45%; research and facilitating transformation of agricultural production structure in
responses to climate changes and sea level rise, taking considerations of locally
ecological contexts and utilizing opportunities for developing sustainable agriculture;
conserving biodiversity, focusing on protection and development of ecosystems and
species that are resilient to climate change; protecting and conserving genetic resources
and varieties being threatened to extinction by climate change; developing and
implementing REDD+ programs, sustainable forest management, conservation and
enhancement of forest carbon sequestration that integrated with improvement and
diversification of community livelihoods and adaptation support; developing and
implementing protection and sustainable management of the existing natural forests as
protection, special-use and production forests.
- In Viet Nam’s NBSAP 2013, Task 5 relates to biodiversity conservation in the context of
climate change. Specifically, it aims to identify climate change impacts on biodiversity
and promote biodiversity conservation as a means of responding to climate change; to
develop biological corridors to increase connectivity among forest ecosystems and
critical biodiversity areas; to implement forest regeneration programs using various
methods and approaches, such as biodiversity conservation and enhancing carbon stock.
- The Prime Minister issued Decision 120/QD-TTg dated January 22, 2015, to approve the
plan on coastal forest protection and development in response to climate change during
2015-2020. The plan sets the targets of: (i) protecting existing coastal forests with an area
of 310,695 ha; and (ii) developing 46,058 ha to increase the total area of coastal forests
by the year 2020 to 356,753 ha, with an increase in coverage from 16.9% (in 2014) to
19.5% to the year 2020.
4.2. Activities
- In 2010, the Prime Minister approved the planning of Viet Nam’s MPA system to 2020 to
include 16 marine protected areas. By 2017, 10 of 16 marine protected areas had been
established.
- Biodiversity corridors have been planned, linking protected areas. MONRE is
implementing the project ‘Greater Mekong Subregion Biodiversity Conservation
Corridors Project-Phase 2’, which is funded by the Asian Development Bank. The project
has been implemented since August 2011 and will be finished in 2019 The project covers
35 communes in six districts of Quang Nam, Quang Tri and Thua Thien Hue provinces.
- Some coastal provinces are implementing programs of planting and rehabilitating coastal
mangroves in response to climate change.
- Pilot models of coral reef plantation and rehabilitation are being undertaken. These have
the participation of communities and enterprises in some islands and protected areas,
including Co To, Cu Lao Cham, and Nha Trang Bay.
- Ben Tre province has focused on supporting livelihoods and capacity-building for
farmers for climate change adaptation.
- Accelerating the REDD+ program. Since 2008, Viet Nam has been cooperating with the
World Bank, the UN-REDD Program, and other international NGOs for capacity-
109
building to implement REDD+. The project has focused on reducing greenhouse gas
emissions by reducing deforestation and forest degradation, and payments for those who
carry out REDD+ activities at the local level. Currently, SNV is implementing a pilot
project to integrate REDD+ into management of high biodiversity areas.
- IUCN-WCMC collaborated with Viet Nam (2008) to develop a set of carbon and forest
maps under the REDD+ program.
- There have been projects on correlations between climate change and biodiversity. .
Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: Protected areas
1. Protected area system in Viet Nam
In Viet Nam, four types of protected areas have been established before the Biodiversity Law,
2008: Special Use Forests (the Law on Forest Protection and Development 2004), MPAs (Decree
No. 27/2005/ND-CP of the Fisheries Law 2003), inland protected areas (the Fisheries Law 2003)
and wetland reserves according to Decree 109/2003/ND-CP.
In 2010, the Prime Minister approved the planning of a system of MPAs in Viet Nam by 2020,
including a plan to have 16 marine protected areas (MPAs). By 2017, ten marine protected areas
had been established with a total area of 187,810 ha (out of the 131,647 ha planned). These
MPAs account for 0.2% of the sea area and includes Cat Ba, Bach Long Vy, Con Co, Cu Lao
Cham, Ly Son, Nha Trang Bay, Nui Chua, Hon Cau, Con Dao and Phu Quoc. There have been
plans completed for four additional MPAs and planning approval for them is being finalized
(Hon Me, Hai Van - Son Cha, Phu Quy, Nam Yet). Finally, planning is underway for another
two MPAs to be established: Co To and Tran Island.
As of 2018, there are 172 protected areas with a total area of 2,493,844 ha: 33 national parks, 65
nature reserves, 18 species and habitat protected areas, and 56 landscape protected areas.
According to recent data from MARD (2016), by 2015 there were 2,228,888 ha of special-use
forest land, accounting for 7% of the territory.
Table 10. Results of protected areas system review
Types of protected area
Amount
Total area (ha)
National Parks
33 1.147.863,7
Nature Reserve 65 1.150.237,7
Species and habitat conservation 18 100.639,78
Landscape protection areas
56 95.182,49
Total 172 2.493.843,67
Source: Decision 1107/2015 / QD-BTNMT (updated)
110
Figure 29. Map on Viet Nam protected areas system in accordance to Biodiversity Law
(Source: VEA, 2014)
In 2014, the ‘National master plan on biodiversity conservation to 2020, with orientations toward
2030’ was approved. Accordingly, the existing protected area system was mapped. The
establishment and installment of 46 new protected areas, with a total area of about 567,000 ha,
was planned; raising the number of protected areas in Viet Nam to 219, with these having a total
area of about 3,067,000 ha. The protected areas would be distributed in eight
geographical/ecological regions on the mainland (Northeast, Northwest, Red River Delta, North-
central, South-central, the Central Highlands, Mekong River Delta) and four marine regions
(Northern, Central, Southeast and Southwest).
111
Figure 30. Map on national master planning for biodiversity conservation to 2020
(Source:VEA, 2014)
A number of protected areas and areas with high biodiversity value have been recognized by
international or regional organizations, including:
- Six ecoregions have been listed in the Global 200 ecoregions recognized by WWF:
rainforests on the Truong Son Range; dry forest of Indochina; the Mekong River basin;
northern Indochina sub-tropical rainforests; southeast China – Hainan rainforest; and the
Tay Giang river (Bang river - Ky Cung).
112
- Eight Ramsar Sites: Xuan Thuy National Park - Nam Dinh (1989); Bau Sau in Cat Tien
National Park - Dong Nai (2005); Ba Be Lake - Bac Kan (2011); Tram Chim - Dong
Thap (2012); Nui Ca Mau National Park (2013); Con Dao National Park (2014); Lang
Sen Wetland Reserve - Long An (2015); and U Minh Thuong National Park - Kien Giang
(2016).
- Nine Biosphere Reserves: Can Gio - Ho Chi Minh City (2000); Dong Nai (2001); Cat Ba
- Hai Phong (2004); Coastal delimitation of the Red River Delta - Thinh Binh, Nam
Dinh, Ninh Binh (2004); Kien Giang (2006); Western Nghe An (2007), Mui Ca Mau - Ca
Mau (2009); Cu Lao Cham - Quang Nam (2009); Langbiang - Lam Dong (2014). These
biosphere reserves have a total area of 4,105,446 ha
- One World Heritage Site: Phong Nha Ke Bang - Quang Binh (2003);
- Six ASEAN Heritage Sites: Ba Be National Park (2003); Kon Ka Kinh National Park
(2003); Chu Mom Ray National Park (2003); Hoang Lien National Park (2003); U Minh
Thuong National Park (2012); and Bai Tu Long National Park (2016).
- 63 important bird areas, accounting for about 5% of the total land area of the country
confirmed by the BirdLife International.
- 104 Key Biodiversity Areas cover an area of 3.35 million ha, accounting for 10% of the
land area on the continental part of Viet Nam confirmed by BirdLife and the IUCN in
2013.
Figure 31. Biodiversity spots in Viet Nam
(source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
113
Figure 32: Protected Area Coverage (Terrestrial)
Source: UNBiodiversity Lab 2018
Figure 33. Proteced and Connected index for Viet Nam
(source: UN Biodiversity Lab 2018)
114
2. Legal documents related to management of nature reserves
In Viet Nam, the Government has paid much attention to biodiversity conservation and has
issued several legal documents on this issue. The management strategy for the protected areas
system in Viet Nam was been approved by the Prime Minister in Decision No. 192/2003/QD-
TTg dated September 17, 2003.
In Decree No. 57/2008/ND-CP, the Government provided regulation on the management of
marine protected areas that are of national and international importance.
In 2010, the Prime Minister issued Decree No. 117/2010/ND-CP on the organization and
management of special-use forest systems. the Special-use Forest Management Board (VFMB)
must establish annual and five-year plans.
In 2014, the 'Strategy for Management of Special-use Forests system, Marine Protected Areas
and Inland Water Reserves of Viet Nam to 2020, a vision toward 2030’ was approved. The
objectives of the strategy are:
- By 2020, the area of of special-use forests, marine conservation zones and inland water
conservation zones shall be raised to 9% of the land area and 0.24% of the sea area of
Viet Nam.
- By 2020, special-use forests, marine protected areas and inland water reserves will have
access to new management practices such as co-management and benefit sharing.
- -To conserve threatened species in special-use forests, marine protected areas and inland
water reserves, and to preserve the number of species in decline.
- To implement international commitments on biodiversity conservation through programs
and projects, capacity-building for special-use forests, marine protected areas and inland
water reserves.
On May 10, 2017, the Prime Minister approved the ‘Scheme on enhancing capacity to manage
the protected area system by 2025 with a vision toward 2030’.
3. The status of protected areas
According to data, 80% of special-use forests3 have established their own management boards
(MARD, 2016). Special-use forest management is decentralized, depending on the type of
special-use forest, and is managed through the Forest Protection Unit and Special-use Forest
Management Boards. Of 33 national parks, there are six managed by MARD while the rest are
3 Special-use forest is term stipulated in the Law on forest protection and development 2004. In this in this
report, this term is used for protected areas, which were estsblished under the Law on forest protection
and development 2004.
115
managed by provincial People’s Committees. According to Decree No. 117/2010/ND-CP, a
special-use forest management board is a non-productive unit. As well as having investment
from, and being financed by, the state budget or supported by domestic and international
organizations and individuals, it obtains revenues from the provision of forest environmental
services. In addition, according to Le Ha Thu (2007), Viet Nam now has more than 1.06 million
ha of natural forest managed by the community. With the consent of the community, these
natural forest areas may be developed into community-managed protected areas.
Information on management of protected areas:
According to reports on the implementation of annual management plans, most management
activities have been implemented with certain effects.
A number of policy mechanisms have been developed and implemented to facilitate the
management of protected areas. Current legal documents on the management of special-use
forests that have contributed to the stabilization of the special-use forest system include Decree
No. 117/2010 / ND-CP, dated December 24, 2010, on management of special-use forest systems.
The Prime Minister's Decision No. 24/2012/QD-TTg dated June 1, 2012, on investment policies
for special-use forests in the 2011-2020 period paved the way for the reorganization and
improvement of the performance of Management Boards.. These are promising and effective
policies for the management and protection of special-use forests as they link the interests and
responsibilities of all stakeholders, especially the local community.
The project ‘Removing barriers hindering protected area management effectiveness in Viet Nam’
(‘the PA project’) was implemented by MONRE in the period 2011 – 2015. It had four focused
objectives: to i) create a complete and unified policy and legal framework to ensure sustainable
financing for PAs; ii) instate clear provisions on the functions and powers of institutions, as well
as financial management procedures for protected areas; iii) improve knowledge of sustainable
financing options; and iv) improve information on, and mechanisms for, information sharing on
the status of biodiversity in protected areas.
During five years of implementation, the PA Project has supported the development of Joint
Circular No. 160/2014/TTLT-BTC-BTNMT, which guides the management, use, and
provisioning of regular expenditure from the state budget to perform tasks and projects under
Viet Nam’s NBSAP. During the implementation of the Project, MONRE and MARD organized
35 training courses on management of biodiversity conservation and financial resources for
biodiversity; there were more than 850 participants, including managers at central and local
levels and protected area officials. In addition, to ensure the sustainability of training activities,
five training-of-trainers courses were organized. The project has also provided an effective
financial mechanism to increase revenue for protected areas. The project supported the piloting
of financial mechanisms to increase revenues at three demonstration sites; namely, Cat Ba,
Bidoup - Nui Ba, and Xuan Thuy national parks.
In 2018, MONRE used a management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) with 41 indicators of
five groups to evaluate the management effectiveness of six ASEAN Heritage Parks (AHP):Ba
Be National Park, Kon Ka Kinh National Park, Chu Mom Ray National Park, Hoang Lien
National Park, U Minh Thuong National Park ,and Bai Tu Long National Park. The results
showed that the six parks had a total management efficiency score of 65% to 80%. All
Vietnamese AHP are being encroached upon, and practices such as illegal logging and hunting
of animals have been taking place at differing intensities.
116
MOST supported the project ‘Research and develop a set of criteria and procedures for
monitoring and evaluating the management effectiveness of biosphere reserves of Viet Nam’ that
was conducted by the Institute of Resources and Environment at Viet Nam’s National University
in 2017-2018. One output was the creation of a set of 15 criteria that can be used to monitor and
evaluate the management effectiveness of the World Biosphere Reserves in Viet Nam. These
criteria were trialed in the Biosphere Reserves of Cat Ba and Cu Lao Cham-Hoi An. The process
of monitoring and evaluating the management effectiveness of Biosphere Reserves in Viet Nam
was developed.
Figure 34. Management effectiveness of protected areas
(source: UN Biodiersity Lab, 2018)
Remaining issues in protected area management:
Despite the achievements made, there remain issues pertaining to management of protected areas
in Viet Nam, which can be summarised as follows:
- There are inconsistencies in name, classification, and classification criteria for protected
areas between the Biodiversity Law 2008, the Forest Law 2017, and the Fisheries Law
2017. This leads to overlapping and conflicting classifications in the protected area
system and disagreement on functional areas and buffer zones of the areas. In addition,
there are inadequacies in management of protected areas that have mixed ecosystems; for
example, the areas that include forests, wetlands and/or seas;
117
- Inter-sectoral coordination in protected area management and protection is still limited
due to lack of consistency and coordination;
- Mechanisms and policies linking local communities to the management of special-use
forests remain inadequate;
- Many protected areas are too small and do not protect species well, as many large
mammals have wide habitat zones (e.g. Yok Don National Park, Cat Tien National Park,
Vu Quang Nature Reserve);
- The establishment of a wetland conservation system has progressed very slowly and, so
far, only two wetland reserves have been established: the Dong Xuyen Biosphere
Reserve-Bird Sanctuary (Bac Ninh Province) and the Phu My Biosphere Reserve-Bird
Sanctuary (Kien Giang Province);.
- There is no regulation on criteria for the functional sub-zones of nature reserves,
especially the strictly protected zone and ecological rehabilitation zone;
- Resources, including funds, equipment and management forces, for the conservation of
special-use forests are limited in terms of quantity and professional expertise.
There continues loss in protected areas due to following reasons:
- The policy of rapid economic development and management has some limitations;
- Illegal and overexploitation of biological resources;
- Conversion of land and surface watter use;
- Environmental pollution from economic activities;
- The introduction of invasive alien species.
In addition, other indirect causes of biodiversity loss in protected areas include:
- Poverty of local people in most of the buffer zones;
- Lack of arable land;
- Poor awareness by buffer zone communities;
- Lack of alternative livelihood models, which would improve standards of living in buffer
zone communities;
- Management boards have limited resources and management capacity.
118
Figure 35. Human Pressures to Protected Areas
(source: from UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
4. Protected area management with community participation
4.1 Protected area co-management models
The ‘Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation Program’ (2006) and the ‘WWF-Coca Cola
Project’ (2008-2010) were facilitated through support from CARE International. Since 2008,the
pilot co-management project has been conducted in Tram Chim National Park and has encouraged
participants to develop a Natural Resource Use Management Plan, as guided by the national park’s
Management Board, and incorporating the use of indigenous knowledge. The Plan is then
presented to a council that includes the management board of the national park, local authorities,
and community representatives. This provides a forum to discuss and make suggestions. Although
the national park’s management board is the final decision-making agency, the plan is discussed,
119
ensuring that local resource users can participate.
Legal access to natural resources in Tram Chim National Park has created an essential source of
income for the poor and is a way to counter impoverishment when there are no other sources of
income, especially during the flood season when it is impossible to cultivate agriculture. In 2009,
after two years of co-management in the park, the participating households received 30,000 to
50,000 VND for one day of fishing. Each participating household earns about 1.3 million VND per
month (Re-statistic, 2011). The success of the model encouraged the national park’s Management
Board to expand the co-management pilot site from 720 ha to 900 ha by 2010. A survey conducted
in 2010 found that 63% of the 120 respondents, including non-project participants, supported the
model as a means of reducing poverty and controlling pressure on forest resources.
4.2 Tourism companies – co -management of coral reef
This is a model developed and piloted by Vo Si Tuan and his colleagues (2011) in coral reefs
in central Viet Nam, including Cu Lao Cham Marine Protected Area (MPA) and Nha Trang
Bay MPA. Under this model, the MPA management boards and the environmental
management agencies develop policies and mechanisms that allow businesses to use
resources for tourism. This is done in a way that contributes to conservation and allows
businesses to reasonably use the reef areas for tourism.
During 2016-2020 period, MOST has been implementing a series of research projects to build
models for the participation of communities in the management and use of biodiversity resources
in Viet Nam’s biosphere reserves. This work has occurred within the framework of the project
‘Conservation of Important Wetlands and Associated Habitats’ funded by GEF through the
UNDP. The project has focussed on the establishment of the Thai Thuy Wetland Nature Reserve
(in Thai Binh Province), and the Tam Giang - Cau Hai Wetland Nature Reserve (in Thua Thien -
Hue Province).
5. Biodiversity corridors
Since 2004, a number of pilot projects and programs have been proposed in order to establish
biodiversity corridors, including:
Green Corridor
This project was conducted in 2004-2008 and planned a green corridor to connect Phong Dien
Nature Reserve with Bach Ma National Park in Thua Thien Hue province, a part of the Truong
Son ecological zone.
Biodiversity corridor in Lam Dong province
The small-scale project ‘The pilot program for a biodiversity corridor in Lam Dong province,
Viet Nam’ was conducted in 2005-2006. It selected a part of the extended belt of forest land that
occurs in Lam Dong Province from Chu Yang Sin National Park (Dak Lak) to Ta Dung Nature
Reserve (Dak Nong) to build a corridor.
Corridor linking Kon Ka Kinh National Park and Kon Chu Rang Nature Reserve
From 2006-2010, the project ‘Building corridors for Connection and Sustainable Management of
Kon Ka Kinh National Park and Kon Chu Rang Nature Reserve’ was studied and proposed for
implementation.
120
Initiative of conservation for a biodiversity corridor in the Greater Mekong sub-region
The Biodiversity Conservation Corridors Initiative (CEP-BCI), was piloted in Quang Tri and
Quang Nam in 2006-2011, and expanded into Cao Bang in 2010-2012.The Program proposed
the planning of six corridors with a total area of 130,000 ha, in Quang Tri, Quang Nam and Thua
Thien - Hue provinces.
Pilot activities in Cao Bang - Quang Tay commenced in 2010 in the transboundary biodiversity
corridor and aimed to improve connectivity in the border area between the New Bangliang
Nature Reserve of Guangxi, China and Cao Bang, Viet Nam. The primary objective was to
protect Nomascus nasutus (Eastern Back Crested Gibbon), a threatened species.
Greater Mekong Subregion Conservation Corridor Project – Period 2 (2011-2019)
MONRE cooperated with Quang Tri, Quang Nam and Thua Thien – Hue to implement this
project. There are currently three biodiversity corridors that have been officially established,
including: 1) the upstream area of the Vu Gia river system, upstream of the Thu Bon river system
in Quang Nam; 2) Phong Dien Natural Reserve and Ho Chi Minh roads in the area running along
A Luoi district, upstream of Ta Trach river in Nam Dong district of Thua Thien-Hue; and 3) Bac
Huong Hoa Nature Reserve and Dak Rong Nature Reserve in Quang Tri province.
Table 11. Development progress of biodiversity corridors to 2020
Ord. Name of the biodiversity corridor Planning progress
1. Thanh River - Sao La 2014 - 2019
2. Sao La - Phong Dien 2014 - 2019
3. Dac Rong - Bac Huong Hoa 2014 - 2019
4. Na Hang - Ba Be 2015 - 2020
Under the national biodiversity master plan, 21 biodiversity corridors have been reviewed and
developed.
121
Figure 36: Map on national planning for biodiversity corridors in 2014
(Source: VEA – BCA, 2014)
122
Aichi Biodiversity Target 12: Reducing risk of extinction
1. Species Diversity
Viet Nam is recognized globally as having of high levels of biodiversity . Up to now, approximately
51,400 species have been identified, including about 7,500 species of micro-organisms, about 20,000
plant species on land and in water, about 10,900 species of terrestrial animals, about 2,000 species of
invertebrates and fish in freshwater, and over 11,000 species of marine life. The number of endemic
species in Viet Nam is high (e.g. about 30% of terrestrial tracheophytas, 27% number of freshwater
snails and mussels, and about 58% of freshwater shrimps and crabs). In recent years, approximately
1,023 species have been newly described (Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology and VNU
Hanoi). For the period from 2014 to September 2018, 344 species have been newly described and
published in scientific journals (208 species of animals, 136 species of plants).
In addition to having a wide diversity of natural organisms, Viet Nam has a high diversity of
cultivated plant and animal genetic resources, including more than 6,000 rice varieties, about 800
plant species, and is the source of approximately 40 varieties of animals. Livestock and crops have
been developed for hundreds of years and have valuable genetic traits. These are the precious
indigenous genomes of Viet Nam need to be protected, preserved and developed.
Figure 37. Map on range distribution of threatened species in Viet Nam
(Source: UN BiodiversityLab, 2018)
123
2. Status of threatened species
According to the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), as of
2014, there were 362 species of animals, and 219 species of plants in Viet Nam listed as
threatened. In the Viet Nam Red Book (2007), the total number of threatened species is listed as
882 species, consisting of 418 animal species and 464 plant species. Of the latter figure, nine
species are considered extinct in the wild in Viet Nam, namely Dicerorhynus sumatrensis, Bos
sauveli, Tapirus indicus, Cynogale lowei, Procypris merus, Anguilla japonica, Cyprinus
multitaeniata, Cervus nippon, and Crocodylus porosus.
In terms of the flora, Paphiopedilum Vietnamese is extinct in the wild. Many plant species that
were previously classified as endangered are now classified as critically endangered, including
the Cypress species, Callitropsis Vietnamesis, Panax bipinnatifidum, and Panax pseudoginseng.
Monitoring in a number of important bird areas indicates that the number of threatened species,
especially of globally threatened migratory birds is declining, and some species have not been
seen for a number of years.
According to a survey conducted by WWF in 2003, Phu Quoc and Con Dao are two of Viet
Nam's last marine areas to have (Dugong dugon), but the population numbers are no more than
100. However, according to the management board of Phu Quoc Nature Reserve (2016), Dugong
dugon has not been recently seen in the reserve’s seagrass beds, most likely due to hunting and
degradation of habitat. The Dugong dugon population in Phu Quoc is closely related to the
dugong populations living in neighboring Cambodia.
(Source: Geographic Atlas of Viet Nam)
A project conducted in 2014-2017 entitled ‘Survey and assessment of endangered species should
be prioritized for the protection aimed at amending the Viet Nam Red Data Book’, that was
conducted by the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources of the Viet Nam Academy of
Science and Technology had the following results:
a) Evaluating and compiling information profiles for 2,119 threatened plant and animal
species
b) Proposed to update in the next version of the Red Data Book of Viet Nam 1,211 species
with new classifications
Thus, compared to the Red Data Book of Viet Nam 2007, in which the total number of
threatened species is 882 species, consisting of 418 species of animals and 464 species of plants,
the number of species proposed for the next version of the Red Data Book is much higher.
124
Figure 38. Threatened Species Richness (IUCN)
(Source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
3. Threats to threatened species
Major threats to species have been identified as following:
3.1 Illegal exploitation and over-exploitation of biological resources
Illegal hunting of wildlife as a source of income, recreation or trade has pushed many of Viet Nam's
species to the brink of extinction in nature. According to a report by the Forest Protection
Department, from 2010 to 2016, forest rangers nationwide detected and processed over 174,000
cases of violations of the law on forest management, development, and forest products. The number
of violations of regulations relating to wildlife in this period was 4,305 cases. Thousands of
kilograms of wildlife products were confiscated, and more than 60,000 individuals of various
wildlife species were intercepted, of which 3,418 were individuals of threatened species. By 2016,
customs had detected and intercepted 26 shipments of ivory and ivory products, totaling nearly five
tons, along with tons of pangolins, pangolin scales, turtles, bear hands, rhinoceros’ horn etc. These
items are smuggled for consumption in Viet Nam or transited to third countries.
The status associated with consumption and use of wildlife and their products has tended to increase.
Consumption of wildlife has become commonplace in restaurants and is sold publicly in markets,
despite this being prohibited by law. This is the cause of endangerment to many animals and plants.
In northern mountainous provinces, medicinal plants are commonly exploited to the point of local
extinction, to smuggle across borders. For example, in Cao Bang, Chinese traders have set up many
125
stations to buy and process local medicinal herbs. Many medicinal plants are illegally exported to
China but the economic value of this trade is currently unknown.
Overexploitation of plant species not only affects biodiversity, but also affects the livelihoods of the
households that are dependent on forest products. A lack of data limits the assessment of the extent of
this threat. However, overexploitation of many groups of plants, for example orchids, is known to be
very serious. Species that have high economic value are often at high risk of overexploitation, most
notably timber species. The forests of Viet Nam provide a large number of commercially valuable
timber species, including Erythrophleum fordii, Dalbergia spp., Dipterocarpus spp., Shorea spp.,
Hopea spp., and other coniferous species, such as Fokienia hodginsii. The abundance of species used
for timber have declined considerably in recent decades; however, the impact of this decline on the
long-term viability of these populations is not well known. Other species that are over-exploited
include Aquilaria crassna, a species of agarwood, and Panax Vietnamesis, used to produce tonic. It
is noteworthy that in areas with high forest cover such as in the North East, North West, Central
Coast and Central Highlands, there is high rates of poverty which contributes to the illegal over-
exploitation of forest resources, impacting biodiversity.
With an increasing population, leading to an increase in consumption, combined with ineffective
fishing manage, the over-exploitation of aquatic resources in inland and coastal waters has been
recorded. Many high-value aquatic species are severely affected by over-exploitation, such as the
Semilabeo notabilis, Hemibagrus, Bagarius bagarius, lobsters, abalones, and scallops. Illegal
exploitation using destructive techniques such as explosives, toxins and electric shocks is rampant in
both inland waters and the seas.
3.2 Degradation and fragmentation of natura ecosystems and habitats
Deforestation for commercial purposes: In Viet Nam, forests are the dominant habitat of most
plant and animal species that are threatened at the global level. However, the forests in Viet Nam
have been cleared for decades, leading to a sharp decline in area and quality, with very little primary
forest remaining. Annually, the Forest Protection Department intercepts tens of thousands of cubic
meters of rare roundwood and lumber. There are cases of poaching occurring in the core zone of
protected areas.
Conversion of forest to other purposes: The conversion of forest to industrial or agricultural
land is one of the main causes contributing to theloss of natural forest. Many natural forest areas have
been converted to agricultural land, for products such as sugarcane, tea, coffee, cocoa, rubber, pepper
and, most recently, cassava (exported to China as raw materials for biofuel production). In 2008,
150,000 ha of dipterocarpaceae forest in the Tay Nguyen province that was considered to be of high
biodiversity value was allowed to be converted to rubber plantation. The area of natural forest has
been seriously reduced; it is estimated that there are only about 0.5 million ha of primary forest in
Viet Nam, scattered in the Tay Nguyen and North Central Areas. Due to demand for the domestic
and international markets, the remaining forests are increasingly at risk of being converted into
industrial or agricultural land.
As of November 2016, 37,578 hectares as off-set plantation has been implemented nation-wide,
accounting for 55% of the total forest area which were already converted to other non-forestry
uses.
Regarding hydropower projects, the country currently has more than 1,020 hydropower projects
(total capacity of 24,246 MW) planned, of which 138 have been planned and approved for the main
126
streams of large rivers. Dams and reservoirs of hydropower plants are mostly located in upland areas
that have high biodiversity value. They not only cause floods in valleys that are often covered by
natural forests, but also present barriers to migratory fish, and impacting these species’ lifecycles.
They also cause impacts to the river behind the dam, and to the river’ estuaries. A number of existing
hydropower reservoirs do not operate properly, leading to inappropriate flood discharge and watter
flow, etc., which has caused both human and economic losses, and substantially affecting ecological
processes.
Deforestation due to shifting cultivation: This is a direct cause of deforestation or forest
degradation. However, there is also some evidence that in some areas that have populations of ethnic
minority people and where shifting cultivation is occurring, the impact to biodiversity is negligible.
Expansion of intensive agro-business production: Economic development and population
growth have resulted in extensive agricultural intensification in many deltas. In the Mekong Delta,
especially in the Plain of Reeds and the Long Xuyen Quadrangle, most natural grasslands have been
converted into rice-growing areas. This has decreased the habitat of some threatened species and
reduced the number of wild genetic resources in Viet Nam.
Conversion of coastal habitats:
Many mangrove forests, lagoons, and coastal tidal flats have been rapidly converted to intensive
aquaculture, including to shrimp ponds and clam enterprises. This has led to a near-complete loss of
mangrove forests in many provinces. Thousands of hectares of coral reefs and seagrasses have also
been lost due to exploitation and/or the use of aquaculture cages. Due to the drive to generate profits,
most of the coastal and inland aquaculture activities have shifted from extensive farming to less
sustainable farming, resulting in the depletion of mangrove forests, the loss of habitat for many water
birds and pollution of the environment.
3.3. Environmental pollution
Rapid urbanization and industrialization have seriously affected water quality. Untreated domestic
and industrial waste water is not being controlled, and is discharged into rivers and lakes, badly
affecting the biodiversity of these ecosystems. Agricultural intensification and unregulated use of
pesticides is increasingly common in Viet Nam, adding to the degradation of bird and insect
populations in rural areas and suburbs. Many beneficial bird species that feed on harmful insects
have been destroyed, leading to disease outbreaks in the field. Pangasius production in the Mekong
Delta is also a cause of organic pollution in many water areas, affecting the aquatic communities
there.
3.4. The introduction of invasive alien species
To date, there has been no comprehensive assessment of invasive alien species in Viet Nam.
However, concerns about the risk of harm to biodiversity, human health, and the economy from
invasive alien species is increasing, especially after the yellow snail (Pomacea canaliculata) was
introduced into Viet Nam in the late 1980s and has now spread to the whole country. As of 1997,
yellow snails had damaged 132,000 hectares of rice cultivation, causing millions of dollars (USD) in
damage each year due to declining rice yields.
According to existing information, 94 exotic species have been imported into Viet Nam, including 42
species that are known to be invasive and 12 of which are fast-growing invasive species, such as
Mimosa pigra and Eichhornia crassipes. Mimosa was first discovered in Tram Chim National Park
127
(Dong Thap province) in 1995 but is now widespread and has become a major threat in many
wetlands throughout the country. In 2009, MARD released a list of 48 exotic aquatic species that are
known to occur in Viet Nam, of which 14 species are considered to have adverse impacts on aquatic
biodiversity. In 2013, MONRE and MARD released a list of invasive alien species that are already
found within Viet Nam, or could potentially appear in Viet Nam.In December 2018, MONRE
released an updated list of invasive alien species and potentially invasive alien species.
3.4. Climate Change
Viet Nam is one of five countries that are most likely to be affected by global climate change. In that
context, fragmented natural ecosystems are more likely to be affected by these changes and lose high
numbers of species. Under climate change scenarios, sea level rise projections for Viet Nam
(MONRE, 2012) are as follows: if sea level rises from 75 cm to 1 m, about 20 - 38% of the Mekong
River Delta and about 11% of the Red River Delta area will be flooded, affecting 78 out of 286
‘critical habitats' (27%), 46 nature reserves (33%), nine nationally and internationally significant
biodiversity areas (23%), and 23 other biodiversity areas. Many fauna and flora will be under
increasing pressure due to changes in habitat, altered food resources, and natural disasters such as
floods, droughts, and storms. Some species of plants and vertebrates may become extinct in the next
century due to the effects of climate change. However, knowledge of the impacts of climate change
on biodiversity in Viet Nam is still insufficient.
3.5. Forest fires
Annually, incidents of forest fire in Viet Nam destroy hundreds of thousands of hectares of forest,
causing hundreds of billions VND worth of damage, and seriously affecting terrestrial habitat.
According to the General Statistics Office, in 2014, forest fires in Viet Nam affected 1775 ha; in
2016, this figure was 3321 ha. According to the Forest Protection Department (12/2018), in 2018,
10,318 locations of forest-firing were observed and/or reported nation-wide while this =figure in
2014 and 2016 were 11,386 and 12,043 respectively.
Viet Nam lacks modern fire fighting equipment at an appropriate resource level, making it
increasingly difficult to fight forest fires, especially in mountainous areas like Hoang Lien National
Park. In addition to investing in more modern fire fighting equipment, it is necessary to increase
awareness and management of people's activities when they go into the forest for the purposes of
cultivation or exploitation of resources.
128
Extent of suitable habitat - Species Richness
Extent of suitable habitat - Threatened
Species Richness
Figure 39. Maps on extent of suitable habitat (species richness and endangered species
richness)
(source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
4. Legal documents on the management of threatened species
In order to conserve threatened species, the Government, as well as a number of ministries and
branches, have promulgated various legal documents and approved multiple programs and
projects:
- In the Biodiversity Law 2008, Chapter IV covers the conservation and sustainable
development of species.
- In the Forest Law 2017, Article 38 outlines the protection of forest flora and fauna. In
particular, species are classified as ‘endangered, rare and precious forest flora and fauna’
(a term unique to Viet Nam and that does not have equivalence to the IUCN Red List
categories), and as wild plant and animal species listed under CITES.
- Decision 485/2008/QD/TTg. of the Prime Minister approved a project on protection of
endangered precious and rare aquatic species up to 2015, with a vision to 2020.
Accordingly, the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development signed Decision No.
82/2008/QD-BNN promulgated a list of aquatic species that need to be protected,
rehabilitated, and developed. In general, aquatic species listed in this Decision are also in
the Viet Nam Red Book.
- Decision 940/2012/QD/TTg. of the Prime Minister approving the ‘Emergency Action
Plan to 2020 for the Conservation of Elephants in Viet Nam’.
- Decision 763/2013/QD/TTg. of the Prime Minister approving the ‘Master Plan for
Elephant Conservation in Viet Nam for the period 2013-2020’.
129
- Decision No. 11/2013/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister on January 24, 2013, prohibits the
export, import, sale, or transportation of specimens of certain animal species that are
under CITES.
- Decision No. 188/QD-TTg dated 13/02/2013 of the Prime Minister, approved the
program for protection and development of aquatic resources up to 2020.
- Decision No. 1250/QD-TTg dated July 31st, 2013, approving the NPSAP Viet Nam. This
contains two specific targets: Improving the quality and number of populations of
endangered, precious, and rare species prioritized for protection; and preserving
indigenous, endangered, precious and rare gene sources (livestock, plants, micro-
organisms).
- On November 12, 2013, the Government issued Decree No. 160/2013/ND-CP on the
management of species on the list of endangered, precious, and rare species prioritized
for protection.
- - Decision 539/2014/QD/TTg. of the Prime Minister, on the approval of the National
Tiger Protection Program for the period 2014-2022
- - Directive 03/CT/TTg on February 20, 2014, the Prime Minister strengthened the
direction and implementation of measures for controlling and protecting endangered,
rare, and precious wild animals.
- Decision No. 294/QDTCLN-VP dated August 17, 2017 regulating the functions, powers,
and organizational structure of the Forest Protection Department under the Directorate of
Forestry.
On the basis of legal documents, conservation activities of threatened species is site-specific.
Most national parks and reserves are large enough to have plans for monitoring threatened
species, but only within the park area.
5. Activities for the conservation of threatened species
5.1. Surveying, inventory and evaluation of threatened species
From 2010 to 2016, the Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology collaborated with other
institutes under the Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research and MARD to implement the
Viet Nam Red Data Survey, Research, and Amendment Project. This project led to data on
threatened wildlife species being updated as the basis for the development of a new Red Book of
Viet Nam. Objectives included:
Compile and update information on threatened wildlife species;
Develop guidelines for biodiversity surveys, assessments, and reporting on the status of
threatened species;
Issue technical guidelines for the development of reports on protected areas at provincial
and national levels; provide technical guidance on baseline biodiversity surveys for seven
taxonomic groups, including vegetation, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals
(in Official Dispatch No. 2149/TCMT-BTĐDSH, 14 September 2016);
Pilot a mechanism of sharing information on the control of trade and consumption of
threatened species to law enforcement agencies such as Customs, the Environmental
Police, and Forest Protection Department.
5.2. In-situ conservation
130
To date, there are 167 protected areas in Viet Nam with a total area of 2,453,306 ha, including 33
national parks, 62 nature reserves, 17 species and habitat protected areas and 55 landscape
protected areas.
With the financial and technical support of international organizations, a number of new projects
that manage and monitor threatened species have been established such as, the establishment of a
protected area for saola in Quang Nam and Thua Thien Hue provinces, and the establishment of
a reserve in Quang Nam for Ngoc Linh ginseng. Furthermore, in 2015, the project ‘Urgent
conservation of elephants in Viet Nam' commenced and a reserve was established in Phuoc Ninh
commune (Nong Son district, Quang Nam province) There is also some monitoring of primate
species in Cat Ba National Park and Na Hang Nature Reserve, as well as monitoring of the
black-faced spoonbills in Xuan Thuy National Park and sarus cranes in Tram Chim National
Park and the Phu My Reservoir Nature Reserve, Kien Giang. Some mollusc species in national
parks and marine parks in the central, east and south-west coasts of Viet Nam are also being
monitored, as are some coral reefs and seagrass beds in Con Dao and Phu Quoc Islands.
However, monitoring and reporting of threatened species has not been implemented
continuously, mainly due to a lack of resources, (primarily financial resources).
5.3. Development of species
In 2013, MONRE carried out a review of ex-situ conservation facilies in Viet Nam. The review
assessed two zoos, nine animal rescue centers, seven botanical gardens, and some repositories of
genes, seeds, and genetic specimens.
In addition, relevant ministries/sectors have executed their management of endangered species:
- Since 2014, MONRE has provided feedback for nine cases of import and export of
specimens that are in CITES Appendices. Viet Nam’s CITES Management Authority has
granted permission to import specimens of tiger species (Panthera tigris), bison (Bos
gaurus gaurua) and small-clawed otter (Anoyx cinerea); export specimens of
Trachypithecus hatinhensis, red-shanked douc langur (Pygathrix nemaeus), gray-shanked
douc langur (Pygathrix cinerea), white-cheeked gibbon (Nomascus leucogenys), white-
cheeked crested gibbon (Trachypithecus francoisi), Delacour’s langur (Trachypithecus
delacouri) and bears (Ursus thibatenus).
- According to a report by FFI (2016), the conservation activities in recent years have led
to achievements such as some increase in restoration area of protected ecosystems; newly
discovered species to science, and conservation, restoration and development of
valuablegenetic resources. Recently, more than 500 individuals of red-shanked douc
langur (Pygathrix nemaeus cinerea) were newly observed in Kon Tum province and over
200 individual barbe’s langur (Trachypithecus barbei) were recorded in Thanh Hoa
province.
- Regulations on raising and planting of species that are on the list of priority protection
species are specified in Article 13 of Decree No.160./2013/ND-CP. Priority protected
species shall be raised and/or planted at biodiversity conservation facilities, and
provincial People's Committees are responsible for reviewing and issuing permits for
such facilities.
On September 22, 2016, MONRE issued Circular No. 25/2016/TT-BTNMT providing guidelines
131
on the administrative forms required for breeding facilities (termed as ‘biodiversity conservation
facilities’ in the Decree, but actually currently also covers enterprises that breed threatened
species for commercial gain). The guidelines aim to support provincial-level People's
Committees in providing advice to organizations and individuals in their registration and
application to establish such facilities.
132
Aichi Biodiversity Target 13: Safeguarding genetic diversity
1. Status of plant and animal genetic resources
As well as having approximately 51,300 known species, Viet Nam is one of the world's most diverse
sources of indigenous plant and animal genetic resources, and has more than 6,000 rice varieties,
approximately 800 agricultural plant species, and is the source of about 40 poultry breeds. Livestock
and crops have been developed for hundreds of years and have valuable genetic traits.
2. Legal documents related to the protection of genetic diversity
- The NBSAP of Viet Nam includes targets relating to the inventory and conservation of
indigenous, endangered, precious, and rare genetic resources (livestock, plants, micro-
organisms).
- Resolution No. 17/NQ-CP dated March 17, 2014, of the Government relates to the
Nagoya Protocol.
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg dated September 28, 2015, of the Prime Minister relates to
the ‘Program for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources by 2025,
orientation to 2030’.
- Decision No. 1141/QD-TTg dated June 27 2016, approves the ‘Scheme on Capacity
Building for Management of Access to Genetic Resources and the Equitable and
Reasonable Sharing of Benefits arising from the Use of Genetic Resources for the Period
of 2016 – 2025’.
- Decree No. 59/2017/ND-CP dated May 12 2017, is on ‘Access to Genetic Resources
Management and Benefit Sharing from the Use of Genetic Resources’.
3. Activities to protect the genetic diversity of plants and animals
3.1 Establishment of biodiversity conservation facilities
In addition to the in-situ conservation of species as species and habitat protected areas, the
development of ex-situ conservation facilities is also expanded, consisting of 11 wildlife rescue
centers, 03 zoos andbotanical parks (Thu Le; Bach Thao, Thao Cam Vien), 15 botanical gardens
within protected areas (about 8,000 ha), and 05 medicinal-hurb gardens (about 300 ha).
3.2 Preservation and storage of genetic specimens, evaluation of genetic resources, management
of information on genetic resources, copyright of traditional knowledge on genetic resources
In Viet Nam, conservation of genetic resources has been carried out since the early 1960s and
information has been used in agriculture, forestry, industry, health, aquaculture and other fields.
However, the Program for Conservation and Restoration of Animals, Plants and Micro-
organisms Genetic Resources was initiated in 1987, and carried on through until 2015. In 2010,
the Ministry of Science and Technology issued Circular 18, regulating the management of
scientific and technological tasks of genetic management. The Gene Funding Program has three
main tasks: conservation of genetic resources, exploiting and developing genetic resources, and
evaluation of genetic resources.
In 2015, the Prime Minister issued Decision 1671/QD-TTg, approving the ‘Program for the
Conservation and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources by 2025, with orientation to 2030’. This
is considered an important legal document for the conservation of genetic resources. According
to this Decision, the targets for 2020 are: (i) collecting, importing, and safely storing at least
133
70,000 biological genetic resources; (ii) evaluating and determining the value of genetic
resources, with initial evaluation of at least 20,000 (about 30%) collected biological genetic
resources of potential economic, environmental, and medical use; evaluation of at least 10% of
the total number of biogenetic resources assessed; (iii) evaluating the potential of at least 300
biological genetic resources of potential scientific and economic value; decoding and building a
genetic map of at least five endemic or high economic value gene sources or those which are key
products of Viet Nam; (iv) documenting genetic resources, initially setting up a database for state
management, scientific research, and information exchange about national genetic resources
(National Gene Funding Network); and (v) exploiting and developing at least 100 valuable genes
for use in agriculture, industry, medicine, culture, environmental protection, security and
defense.
The targets for 2025 are: (i) continuing to collect, import, store, preserve, and maintain at least
90,000 biological genetic resources; (ii) evaluating genetic resources, with initial evaluation of at
least 30,000 (about 40%) of the collected genetic resources of potential scientific,
pharmaceutical, and economic value, and with potential for development of seeds for production.
This is to be coupled with a detailed evaluation of at least 10% the total number of genetic
resources already evaluated; (iii) evaluating the genetic potential of at least 500,000 biological
genetic resource of potential scientific and economic value; decoding and building a genetic map
of at least ten endemic species of high economic value or those which are key products of Viet
Nam; (iv) improving the national information system for gene sources for public administration
and information exchange using the National Gene Funding Network; and (v) exploiting and
developing at least 200 of the most valuable genes for use in agriculture, industry, medicine and
pharmacy, culture, environmental protection, and national defense.
At present, a network of agencies has been established; this consists of a number of focal
agencies and 68 units from six ministries that are involved in the implementation of the program
of conservation and storage of gene sources. In 2016, MOST issued Circular No. 17/2016/TT-
BKHCN regulating the conservation and use of genetic resources to 2025, orientation to 2030.
The system of preserving genetic specimens in Viet Nam is quite varied:
(i) Medicinal plant genetic resources: The Ministry of Health has 12 units involved, with the
Institute of Pharmacy as the lead organization. The Ministry of Defence has three units involved,
with the Military Institute of Traditional Medicine as the lead organization.
- Medicinal plant gardens: Viet Nam has 3,948 species of plants and large fungi belonging
to 307 families that are being used as medicines. Over ten medicinal plant research
centers and more than 50 medicinal plants gardens have been established to conserve and
develop this rich resource.
- the National Institute of Medicinal Materials has preserved 905 genetic resources by in-
situ conservation and 630 species of medicinal plants by ex-situ conservation, of which
26 species are threatened.
(ii) Agriculture crop genetic resources:
- Genetic bank and genetic specimens: At present, four organizations in Viet Nam have
cold storage warehouses for seed preservation: the Viet Nam Academy of Agricultural
Sciences, the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Can Tho University, and the Field Crop
Research Institute. However, these cold storage warehouses are relatively small in size
134
and are only suitable for short- and medium-term storage.
- The Plant Resources Center of the Viet Nam Academy of Agricultural Sciences has
stored more than 20,000 varieties of nearly 250 species of plants in cold storage, and
preserved about 2,300 seedlings of 32 plant species. There has been a particular focus on
conserving rice species, including wild rice varieties that are resistant to insects and pests.
- In 2011-2015, the Plant Resources Center of the Viet Nam Academy of Agricultural
Sciences stored over 38,334 specimens and collected 7,721 seedlings from more than 100
plant species across Viet Nam belonging to plant various groups, including cereals,
legumes, vegetables, spices, and root crops. There has been a particular focus on
collecting genetic resources for plants that are at high risk of erosion and have important
value in agriculture.
- Forest tree seeds, imported plants and rare native plants with high economic value have
been stored, as a result of the ‘Conservation of forest tree genetic resources’ project
conducted from 2012-2015, as well as a plant varieties project conducted from 2010-
2015. –As a result, 86 provenances and 593 individuals were obtained from 79 species of
native, rare and / or economically valuable forest trees. Thus, the current seed bank stores
3,727 provenances (genetic resources) and individual seed lots of 90 native species and
imported tree species. All these genetic resources were initially assessed for their
suitability for long-term storage using seed depots of the National Research Institute of
Seed and Forestry Biotechnology. The storage was also computerized by the seed
management program from the Australian International Seed Center. The genealogy of
each seed lot is detailed on the computer. Periodic inspection of the germination rate of
each seed lot is also conducted. Furthermore, a room to store of the seeds of 89 species of
native and imported plants was also built.
- The Rubber Research Institute has collected and is preserving 3,340 genotypes and 200
seed specimens; it has also documented 2,000 genotypes of rubber trees.
(iii) Livestock group genetic resources:
- From 1989 to now, the National Livestock Research Institute has implemented the
Livestock Genetic resource conservation Scheme to conserve genetic resources and rare
livestock breeds. Under this project, 70 threatened livestock and poultry species have
been preserved; Recently, MARD has prioritized conservation of genetic resources as an
important part of promoting production.
(iv) Aquatic groups:
The fisheries sector has preserved and stored 43 aquatic genetic resources with a total of 4039
individuals, including imported species (original seeds), and rare and valuable native species. All
stored genetic resources have been evaluated for basic criteria, including morphological
characteristics, biological characteristics, and fertility, and sexual development in storage
conditions. Some genetic resources are assessed for population characteristics. In 2015, 11
species of microalgae as food for aquatic seed production were stored. To facilitate research and
information exchange, genetic data is updated at the website http://gca.ria1.org.
(v) Micro-organism genetic resource:
- The Center for Microbiology in Hanoi National University has classified and maintained
135
2,016 strains of fungi, bacteria, and micro-organisms that are used in the food , medicine,
animal husbandry, veterinary medicine, aquaculture and agriculture industries.
- From 2015 onwards, the task of preserving, protecting and storing the micro-organisms
of cultivation was undertaken by the Soils and Fertilizers Research Institute and the
Institute of Soil and Agriculture Chemistry both under MARD. The plant protection
micro-organism gene fund currently maintains 700 cultivated microbial gene sources,
including 622 bacterial gene sources and 48 bacteriostatic gene sources. It also regularly
stores 870 plant protecton microbial genetic resources, including 803 plant pathogen
microbial genetic resources and 67 useful microbial genetic resources.
Most of the stored genetic resources have been put in databases. Currently, the unified database
has more than 35,755 records of registration and background data, containing 46,914 data
records describing and initially evaluating genetic resources. More than 5,686 images of genetic
resources have been captured, processed, and managed.
3.2.1. Results of exploitation and development of genetic resources
Nearly 200 genetic resources have been selected as having good market potential to develop into
valuable commodities. Among them, more than 20 genetic resources have been successfully
researched and developed to scale up and process the product. There has been some experiment
in relation to the participation of enterprises, which may be able to generate stable revenue which
then can be reinvested for conservation.
- Agricultural and forestry crops: Over 80 genetic resources have been researched. The
Center of Plant Resources provides about 1,000 seed samples; these seed samples have
been used in research projects. For example, the Center has provided local rice varieties
to the Institute of Agricultural Genetics to decode genes.
- Medicinal plants: based on the directory of 40 valuable medical hurbs issued by Ministry
of Health, different material areas of medical hurbs have been developed, providing
materials for medicine processing.
- Livestock: Many gene sources have been developed in localities throughout the country,
such as cattle, pig, chicken, duck, and gene sources of professional dog for security.
- Aquaculture: Exploited and developed 10 rare, endangered, and high economic value
genetic resources. Using genetic resources of aquaculture for hybridization, breed
selection, and for breeding carp, tilapia, catfish, and giant river prawn. Aquatic genetic
data is updated at the website http://gca.ria1.org.
- Micro-organisms: Many strains of micro-organisms have been studied, isolated, selected
and utilized as yeast strains to produce IAA and GA3 growth promoters to produce
growth promoters, increase crop yield; Micro-organisms strains resistant to green wilt in
some plants such as peanut, sesame, chilli, tomato etc.; Highly pathogenic strains of the
virus, such as Gumboro, Newcastle; Some Micro-organism strains have been used
industrially for the production of protease, xylannase, phytase, biological insecticides etc.
3.2.2. Documentation Results - Database of Genetic Resources
- Agricultural crops: Website: www.pgrViet Nam.org.vn;
- The Viet Nam Institute of Forestry Science has published seven ‘Atlas of Viet Nam’
books on forest trees containing 800 species. In 2012 - 2015, the database of floral
136
resources has been updated and posted on the website www.vafs.gov.vn.;
- Medicinal plants: an software for genetic resources management has been developed and
applied by the Institute of Medicinal Materials;
- Livestock: The Institute of Animal Husbandry has developed software including
VietBiodiva and VietGen to manage livestock breeds;
- Micro-organisms: The Micro-organism Museum (National University of Hanoi) and
Food Industrial Institute have a website and an online catalog.
3.3. Limitations to conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources
During the implementation of the ‘Program for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Genetic
Resources in Viet Nam’, MOST (2018) identified the limitations of conservation and use of
genetic resources and their causes as follows:
Limit:
- Lack of strategic approach in conserving genetic resources has not been identified;
- Lack of research to improve conservation methods;
- The process of genetic resource assessment is very slow;
- Research on, and utilization and development of, genetic resources are still limited.
Reason:
- Lack of scientific and technological human resources and funding for gene conservation
(officials working on conservation and storage of genes are mostly part-time);
- Increased climate change, coupled with widespread international integration, has also led
to increased erosion of the genetic resources;
- Awareness of research on genetic diversity is still limited so it has not been properly
considered;
- Equipment and technical facilities are lacking or not synchronized, so the efficiency is
low.
- Dissemination of documents and professional training has not been carried out regularly,
- Some genetic resources of Viet Nam have been lost through gene exchange with foreign
countries.
3.4. Solutions to implement genetic resources conservation in the period 2016-2025
According to MARD (2016), in order to implement the ‘Program on conservation and
sustainable use of genetic resources to 2025, orientation towards 2030’, it is requested
implementation as the following:
Microbial genetic resources:
- Increasing resources for the conservation of microbial gene sources, especially facilities,
equipment, and funding;
- Expanding training and retraining of human resources, especially focusing on young
scientific and technological staff; intensifying international cooperation, learning and
sharing experiences and techniques in microbial genetic resource management.
Plant genetic resources:
- Improving scientific exchange in the field of conservation of genetic resources, especially
minimizing the possibility of native genetic resources erosion; assessing and sustainable
137
us of genetic resources.
Livestock genetic resources:
- It is reasonable to initially do in-situ conservation for the newly collected and discovered
genetic resources. Given the number of high number of livestock breeds, only
economically valuable varieties that can be developed into production should be
preserved longer-term.
- Livestock genetic resources need to be more fully incorporated into databases, focusing
on both phenotypes and genotypes.
Aquatic genetic resource:
- For aquacultural gene sources, in the period of 2016-2020, priority given to the
conservation and storage of fish species such as Epinephelus lanceolatus, Sinilabeo
lemassoni, Spinibarbus hollandi, Bagarius yarrelli, Mastacembelus armatus and
Epinephelus malabaricus, which are of high economic value but that have been
overfished and are threatened in the wild.
Aichi Biodiversity Target 14: Ecosystem Services
1. The ecosystem of Viet Nam
Viet Nam's topography and climate have created a variety of natural ecosystems on the land,
which include such forest ecosystems, including tropical evergreen rainforest, tropical humid
semi-evergreen forest; evergreen broad-leaved limestone forest; coniferous forest, deciduous
dipterocarp forest; Melaleuca freshwater swamp forest; bamboo forest; and mangrove forest. In
addition to eight types of forest ecosystems, forest scientists have also divided 14 types of forest
vegetation cover according to their ecological factors (Thai Van Trung, 1999). Based on the
natural factors of climate, terrain, geology, and soil, the continental part of Viet Nam is divided
into eight forest ecological zones with 47 sub-regions that have specific characteristics of
vegetation type and landscape.
In addition to forest ecosystems, Viet Nam also has diverse ecosystems on the continent, such as
grasslands, limestone mountains, inland wetlands (streams, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, cave
caverns), and sand dunes.
Viet Nam has a coastline of more than 3,260 km (excluding the coast of islands) with more than
3,000 large and small islands along the coast, including the Spratly and Paracel archipelagos.
Viet Nam's exclusive economic sea zone is over 1 million km2. On the basis of natural
conditions, marine environment and marine life, especially with the diversity of coral reefs,
Nguyen Huy Yet (2000) divides Vietnamese waters into six ecological zones with specific
characteristics of biodiversity which are:
- Gulf of Tonkin (to the South of Con Co Island, Quang Tri province)
- The Central Coast (Con Co Island to Dinh Cape in Phan Rang - Varella Cape)
- The South-Central Coast (Dinh Cape to Vung Tau Cape)
- The Southeastern coastal waters (Vung Tau Cape to Ca Mau Cape)
- The South West Coast (Ca Mau to Phu Quoc Island in the Gulf of Thailand)
138
- The high seas (waters around the Spratly and Paracel Islands).
In the six marine ecological zones of Viet Nam mentioned above, there are 20 types of marine
ecosystems. Typical marine ecosystems in coastal zones include tidal flats, estuaries, lagoons,
bays, coral reefs, coral reefs, seagrass beds, etc.
2. Economic assessment of ecosystem services in Viet Nam
To evaluate the total economic value of natural resources (environmental assets), several
projects were implemented in the late twentieth century, including ‘Quantifying
economic value of the first mangroves ecosystem’ by Nguyen Hoang Tri
et al. in 1996; an estimation of the total economic value of Can Gio mangrove forest by Nguyen
Hoang Tri et al. in 2000; a study on the tourism value of Cuc Phuong National Park by Nguyen
Duc Thanh in 1996; a study on Bach Ma National Park by Le Minh Ngoc and Dinh Duc Truong
in 2006; and an assessment of the tourism value of Hon Mun Reserve by Pham Khanh Nam in
2003.
In recent years, there have been an increasing number of studies and applications of economic
valuation methods for natural ecosystems in Viet Nam, including forests, mangroves, coral reefs,
and seagrass beds. Research shows that the services of natural ecosystems have contributed
significantly to economic development, livelihoods, and human life. Nguyen Minh Huyen et al.
(2010) and Nguyen Quang Hung et al. (2013) estimated that the economic value of mangrove
ecosystems varied from 0.204 to 1.67 billion VND/ha/year, while coral reef ecosystems provided
from 1.71 to 11.42 billion VND/ha/year, and seagrass ecosystems from is 0.656 billion
VND/ha/year.
During the project “Economic evaluating of typical marine island ecosystems to serve as basis
for sustainable development of farthest islands along coastal zone in Viet Nam” Tran Dinh Lan
et al. (2015) evaluated the services of marine ecosystems in Bach Long Vi, Con Co and Tho Chu
Island. The total economic value of marine ecosystems in the Bach Long Vi was estimated at
approximately 599 billion VND/year (26.62 million USD), which was equivalent to 94.3 million
VND/ha/year. The total economic value of the marine ecosystem in Con Co island reached 267.5
billion VND/year (approximately USD 12 million), which was equivalent to 307 VND
million/ha/year, and the marine ecosystem in the area of Tho Chu Island was estimated at 565.2
billion VND/year (approximately 25 million USD) or 125.47 million VND/ha/year.
In the project “Overcoming barriers in order to improve management in conservation areas in
Viet Nam” (2013), Bidoup-Nui Ba National Park in Lam Dong province was considered to have
the value of its goods and services in 2013 at 25,747 billion VND/year. Meanwhile, total funding
for the national park was about 40 billion VND/year, equal to 0.16% of the national park's
resources.
Many studies have evaluated the value of Thai Thuy wetland of Thai Binh province. The Center
of Nature Conservancy Viet and Merriman and Murata, (2016) estimated the wetland’s
economic value through rapid assessment of coastal ecosystem services and showed that
exploiting the natural aquatic resources reaped 49.7 billion VND/year (2.23 million USD), and
aquaculture, brackish water, and salt production reaped 259,917 billion VND/year (11.66 million
USD). Total economic value of Thai Thuy district was estimated at 14.94 million USD per year,
plus 60.26 million USD from carbon accumulation.
139
The Wetlands Project (ISPONRE, 2017) also assessed the economic benefits of the Thai Thuy
wetland area and estimated the economic value at 23,034 million USD per year (with initial
assumptions that the probability of a typhoon was 10% per year and only Thai Thuy residents
were willing to contribute to conservation in Thai Thuy wetland district).
3. Comments on ecosystem services
3.1. Ecosystems with high service values
Terrestrial ecosystems, coastal mangrove forests, tidal flats without mangroves, coral reefs, and
sea grass beds are considered the most valuable ecosystems. These ecosystems are, however,
affected by human activities and climate change. In particular, the reef ecosystems and seagrass
beds are highly sensitive to anthropogenic activities such as over- and illegal exploitation of
seagrasses and animals living among coral reefs, environmental pollution, and climate change.
Areas of coral reefs and seagrass beds have been substantially reduced in Viet Nam, which leads
to reduction in related support services; including lower quantities of marine animals sourced
from these areas and travelling into outer waters. On the continent, there has only been an
increase of area of plantation forest, which implies low biodiversity and indirectly reduces value
of non-profit services.
3.2. Coastal estuarine ecosystems provide important services to local communities
Mangrove forests and estuaries without mangroves are ecosystems in which local communities,
especially mostly female workers, use manual methods to exploit crustaceans and soft snails for
daily food or for sale in the market. Mud crabs exploited in mangroves forest and tidal flats are
sold to crab farm owners. In fact, under one wetland project (GEF-UNDP-VEA, MONRE 2016-
2018), the construction of some resorts in Thai Thuy has taken into account the use of the
wetlands for resources and the construction was undertaken in harmony with conservation and
development.
3.3. Factors reducing the value of ecosystem services
Factors that cause loss or degradation of ecosystem services include illegal exploitation of
biological resources, such as: illegal logging for commercial purposes; destruction of coral reefs,
seagrass beds and their creatures, shifting cultivation; conversion of land use for construction of
infrastructure, road, development of hydropower dams and for agriculture development;
environmental pollution; natural disasters; and climate change.
4. Activities to maintain and develop ecosystem services
4.1. Rehabilitation and development of forests
In the period of 2011-2015, afforestation, including reforestation, totalled 1,088,700 ha; area
zoned for regeneration totalled 361,000 ha/year on average; contracted forest area for protection
totalled 4,900,000 ha; and rehabilitation and restoration totalled 11,800 ha, at an average of
2,360 ha per year. Many localities have implemented forest seed management; large-sized timber
forestation has moved towards intensive farming and conversion of small-sized into large-sized
timber (up to nearly 20,000 ha); at the grassroots level, new varieties, mainly of acacia and
eucalyptus, have been planted; and technical advances were initially deployed in intensive forest
cultivation, such that growth of production forest afforestation has increased from 7-8m3/ha/year
to 12-15m3/ha/year, notably up to 30m3/ha/year.
140
As of November 2015, 1,968 ha of coastal areas were newly planted with ‘protection forests’ (of
which 1,103 ha were mangrove forests, 301 ha of wind and sand-shielding protection forests, and
564 ha of general protection forests); 1,105 ha of forest regeneration (763 ha of mangrove
forests, 343 ha of sand-shielding forests); and 12,681 ha of existing forest had forest protection
contracts placed on them (12,326 ha of protection forest and 355 ha of production forest).
According to the 2018 draft report of the Government, on the results of three years of
implementation of the Program for Sustainable Forestry Development for the period 2016 -
2020, some targets and tasks have been achieved and exceeded as following:
- Forest protection: Between 2016-2018, the number of violations of law on forest
protection and development on average 17,665 cases / year, an average reduction of
9,600 cases / year compared to the period 2011-2015. It is estimated that the period 2016-
2020 will reduce by 39% of cases compared to the 2011-2015 period.
- Between2016-2018, the damaged forest area was 2,430 ha / year, decreasing by 270 ha /
year, equivalent to 10% decrease compared to 2011-2015. It is estimated that the period
2016-2020 will be 30% lower than in the 2011-2015 period.
- Forest areas allocated to households, individuals, and communities increased from 4,944
million ha / year in 2011-2015 to 6,143 million ha / year.
- In the 2016-2018 period, the concentrated forestation will be 675,000 ha with an average
of 225,000 ha / year. To plant production forests of 627,000 hectares, an average of
209,000 hectares / year. Special-use forests, protection of 47,400 ha, average 15,800 ha /
year.
4.2. Payment for forest environmental services
Payment for forest environmental services (PFES) is considered a financial contribution
mechanism and a breakthrough policy for the socialization of investment sources. It also
contributes to sustainable financing for forest resource conservation. At least 80 terrestrial
protected areas as special use forest have been directly benefiting from this payment, adding
more finance for preventing forests and wildlife from illegal activities.
Decree No.99/2010/ND-CP dated September 24, 2010 of the Government, relates to payment for
forest environment services. MARD has issued circulars guiding the implementation of Decree
99, including Circular No. 80/2011/TT-BNNPTNT dated November 23, 2011 guiding the
method of determining PFES; Circular No. 20/2012/TT-BNNPTNT dated May 7, 2012, guiding
the procedures for checking and collecting PFES; and Circular No.60/2012/TT-BNNPTNT dated
November 9, 2012, stipulating the principles and methods of determining the area of forests in
the basin for PFES.
The total amount of PFES in the three years until August 2014 was 3,329 billion VND (~ 157
million USD), most of which came from hydropower (97%), water sanitation (2%) and tourism
agencies (less than 1%). According to a preliminary report on 8 years of PFES, the total forest
environmental services revenue to June 30, 2016, was 5,700 billion VND, which were allocated
as follows:
- According to the management level: the central fund collected 4,236.558 billion VND
(accounted for 73.7%) while the provincial fund collected 1,508.234 billion (accounted
for 26.3%).
- By type of services: Revenue from hydropower production was 5,586.497 billion VND
141
(97.25%), and revenue from water production and supply was 149.680 billion VND
(2.59%). Income from tourism services was 8.615 billion VND (accounting for 0.16%).
Of the total amount collected for forest environmental services (5,744,792 billion VND), the
amount of money paid to forest owners and non-forest owners was 4,549,620 billion VND
(minus 0.5% for central management fund, 10% for provincial management fund, 5% for reserve
fund and 370.571 billion VND that was approved by the Prime Minister for other purposes). So
far, disbursement to forest owners and non-forest owners has reached 87%
After nearly five years of implementation, PFES policy is considered one of the most remarkable
policies in Viet Nam. At a conference on 70 years of agriculture and rural development in Viet
Nam in November 2015, the policy was recognized as a positive achievement for the forest
sector in the period of 2011-2015.
4.3. Developing and piloting coral reef recovery model
A number of studies on coral reef restoration techniques have been applied in some marine
conservation zones, including Cu Lao Cham, Nha Trang Bay and Phu Quoc. According to the
Management Board of Cu Lao Cham Marine conservation zone, the Board has cooperated with
the Institute of Oceanography of Nha Trang and the Academy of Science and Technology of
Viet Nam to plant more than 6,000 coral reefs in Bai Loi, Hon Lao, Bai Tra, Bai Nen, and the
North Beach from 2013 onwards. In Phu Quoc marine conservation zone, the managers also
work with Nha Trang Oceanographic Institute to create two coral reef nurseries and replace dead
coral reefs.
4.4. Water supply for people's daily life
Viet Nam has low average surface water resources compared with the world. For domestic water
resources per capita, the amount of water is only 3,600 m3 / person / year. If water coming from
outside the territory is included, Viet Nam reaches 9,650 m3 / person / year (greater than 7,400
m3 / person / year - world average).
According to Viet Nam’s ‘Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals’ (2018), the Law on Water Resources and the National Strategy
on Water Resources are two of important policies for achieving Sustainable Development Goal
Six. As of June 2017, the proportion of the urban population supplied with water through
centralized water supply systems was estimated to be about 84.5% (an increase of 1% compared
to the end of 2016) and the rate of loss was about 23% (0.5% decrease compared to the end of
2016). Although the urban water supply capacity has increased 1.6 times compared to 10 years
ago, the water supply system has not met the demand for urban water use; this has mainly been
due to increasing urbanization, and the establishment of many industrial zones.
From 2010-2016, the percentage of households with hygienic water sources in the whole country
increased by 2.9%, from 90.5% to 93.4%. The average annual increase was 0.4% and, with this
rate, it is estimated to reach 100% of households being supplied hygienic water sources by 2032.
The National Environment Program for new rural construction in the period 2016-2020 is an
example of the implementation of this goal, especially for groups experiencing poverty, ethnic
minorities, and/or those living in remote areas. For many years, rural water supply has been
prioritized for investment, through many programs and projects from different funding sources.
142
The proportion of the rural population that is supplied with water through centralized water
supply systems is about 43.5%.
To ensure efficient and sustainable use of water, investigation of surface water and groundwater
resources has been focused and intensified over time. The Government has focused on finding
domestic water sources to combat drought for highland areas, to alleviate water scarcity, for
drought prevention, to manage saline intrusion and to respond to climate change. In addition,
water resource planning for cities and provinces for the period of 2020-2035 is also being
developed.
Viet Nam has shifted its approach from single sector management to integrated water resource
management with the proposal of establishing four river basin committees (Red-Thai Binh river
system, North Central river system, Nam Trung Bo river system and Dong Nai river system) and
implemented cooperation activities with member countries of the International Mekong River
Commission.
Aichi Biodiversity Target 15: Climate resilience
1. Restoration and development of ecosystems is an effective response to climate change
Afforestation and sustainable forest management are important measures to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions because tropical forest ecosystems absorb CO2 emissions. Planting mangroves
forest also develops mudflats that work against rising sea levels and typhoons. Therefore,
effective rehabilitation and management of ecosystems, especially forest ecosystems, is of great
significance in responding to climate change, and is an important way to help vulnerable
communities. Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change is an integrated approach that links
the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Integrated management of biodiversity and
climate change in the context of poverty reduction strategies and food security planning will be
critical to the achievement of the country's Millennium Development Goals.
Viet Nam's terrestrial ecosystem contains about 5.4 Gt of carbon (UNEP-WCMC, 2008). Studies
show that average carbon intensity is highest in areas that have growing forest vegetation; as
such, there is high biomass in special use, protection, and production forests. Research shows
that much of Viet Nam's vegetation with high biodiversity value (58%) has high carbon content,
and 19% of the area with the highest carbon stocks is also very important to threatened species.
Thus, actions to reduce emissions from land use change in Viet Nam can bring significant
biodiversity benefits. In total, 0.4 Gt of carbon is stored in areas that have high value in terms of
both carbon and biodiversity (UNEP-WCMC, 2008).
143
Figure 40: Carbon stocks in Viet Nam
(Source: SNV Trong Pham, T.T, Moeliono M., M. Nguyen, T.H., Nguyen H.T., Vu T.H.,
2012, Background of REDD+ in Viet Nam, Causes, Objectives and Institutions arrangement,
CIFOR Special Report)
144
Figure 41. Carbon Storage in protected area and in the environment
(source: UN Biodiversity Lab, 2018)
2. Legislation related to restoration of ecosystems
In order to have a legal basis for implementing measures to restore forest ecosystems in the
context of climate change, the Government of Viet Nam has issued the following documents:
- Decision 799/QD-TTg dated June 27, 2012, on the approval of the National Program of
Action on REDD+ in the period of 2011-2020.
- Decision No.1570/QD-TTg dated September 6, 2013, on the approval of the strategy for
sustainable exploitation and use of natural resources and environmental protection until
2020, vision to 2030.
- Decision No.120/QD-TTg dated January 22, 2015, on the approval of the Coastal
Protection and Development Plan to cope with climate change in the period of 2015-2020
with the following contents: (i) 310,695 ha; and (ii) newly planted area of 46,058 ha,
bringing the total area of coastal forest to 2020 to 356,753 ha and the coverage of closed
forest from 16.9% in 2014 to 19.5% by 2020.
- Decision No.419/QD-TTg dated April 5, 2017, on the approval of the national program
on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through forest loss and degradation and
conservation and enhancement of carbon stocks and sustainable management of forest
resources by 2030. By 2020, Viet Nam aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through
REDD+ activities, and by increasing national forest cover to 42% and the area of forest
to 14.4 million ha. In the period of 2021-2030, the natural forest area will be stabilized to
at least equal to that in 2020 and the national forest coverage will be to 45%, contributing
to the achievement of the national objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 8%
145
compared to the conventional development scenario (BAU) unconditionally. This would
increase up to 25% upon receipt of international assistance, as committed to in the Paris
Agreement on Climate Change.
- Decision No.886/QD-TTg dated June 16, 2017, approving the National Target Program
for Sustainable Forest Development for the period of 2016-2020.
- Government Resolution No.120/NQ-CP dated November 17, 2017 by the Government,
on Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Delta with adaption to climate change.
3. Ecosystem Restoration Activities in Viet Nam
3.1. Forest restoration and development
According to a report by MARD (2016), in 2011-2015, afforestation and reforestation reached
1,088,700 ha, while 361,000 ha of forest was regenerated on average; 4,900,000 ha was set aside
for forest protection and rehabilitation.
To implement the Decision of the Prime Minister, some coastal provinces are carrying out a
program of planting and rehabilitating coastal mangroves to adapt to climate change. According
to a report by MARD (2016), by 30 November 2015, plantation forest was 1,968 ha including
1,103 ha of mangroves, 301 ha of sand-shielding forests and 564 ha of protection forests,
regeneration forest was 1,105 ha including 763 ha of mangrove forests, 343 ha of sand-shielding
forests, and protection forest was 12,681 ha (including 12,326 ha of protection forest, and 355 ha
of production forest).
According to the 2018 report of three years of implementation of the Program for Sustainable
Forestry Development for the period 2016 - 2020, some targets and tasks have been achieved
and exceeded as following:
- Forest protection: Between 2016-2018, the number of violations of law on forest
protection and development on average 17,665 cases/year, an average reduction of 9,600
cases/year compared to the period 2011-2015. It is estimated that the period 2016-2020
will reduce by 39% of cases compared to the 2011-2015 period.
- Between 2016-2018, the damaged forest area was 2,430 ha/year, decreasing by 270
ha/year, equivalent to a 10% decrease compared to 2011-2015. It is estimated that the
2016-2020 period will be 30% lower than in the 2011-2015 period.
- Forest areas allocated to households, individuals and communities increased from 4,944
million ha/year in 2011-2015 to 6,143 million ha/year.
- In the 2016-2018 period, plantation forest is 675,000 ha, with an average of 225,000
ha/year; production forest is 627,000 hectares with an average of 209,000 hectares/year;
Special-use forestsis 47,400 ha, average 15,800 ha/year.
These figures show that the resilience of forest ecosystems can be improved in Viet Nam in
order to increase the value of forest ecosystem services, as well as increase carbon capture and
storage capacity, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the context of climate change.
However, new plantations are usually focused on monoculture so the value for biodiversity is not
high. Meanwhile, valuable natural forest has been reduced annually: according to the above
figure, the natural forest area has decreased by 68,401 ha in the period of 2010-2017.
Program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from efforts to reduce deforestation and
forest degradation (REDD+):
146
Since 2008, Viet Nam has been working with the World Bank, the UN-REDD program, and
several international NGOs to build capacity for REDD+ implementation, including focusing on
reducing deforestation and forest degradation, and payment for local people participating
REDD+ activities. Currently, SNV is conducting a pilot to integrate REDD+ into areas that have
high biodiversity value. Implementation of REDD+ is an opportunity to mobilize funding for
biodiversity conservation and, if done well, provides an opportunity to integrate biodiversity
conservation objectives into the overall goal of developing forest ecosystems.
According to Pham Quoc Hung (Bulletin No.2/2015, UN-REDD Program phase II), Viet Nam
has achieved results in the implementation of REDD+ by implementing pilot activities in many
localities across the country. By December 2014, 44 REDD+ projects were implemented in 21
provinces. The organizational structure of REDD+ implementation has also gradually established
from the central to the local levels.
According to information from Akiko Inoguchi (Bulletin No.2/2015, UN-REDD Program in Viet
Nam Phase II), the second phase of the UN-REDD Viet Nam Program is supporting the
development of the REDD+ Viet Nam Geographical Information Portal. It aims to provide
stakeholders with access to information on the progress of REDD+ implementation in Viet Nam.
One of the key features of the portal is that the mapping interface displays information on
REDD+ planning (for example NRAP, PRAP, or grassroots REDD+ action plan) and the change
in forest cover, based on Measures - Report - Verification (MRV) data. REDD+ Viet Nam’s
Geographic Information Portal is available at http://redd.vnforest.gov.vn/portal/index.html.
3.3. Build and test coral reef recovery model
There are a number of studies on coral reef restoration techniques that have been applied in some
marine protected areas, such as Cu Lao Cham, Nha Trang Bay, and Phu Quoc as mentioned in
part “4.3. Developing and piloting coral reef recovery model”.
3.4. Establishing biodiversity corridors
Since 2004, with international support, a number of pilot projects and programs have worked
towards establishing biodiversity corridors in Viet Nam, including:
The green corridor between Phong Dien Nature Reserve and Bach Ma National Park in Thua
Thien Hue province; a corridor in Lam Dong province from Chu Yang Sin National Park (Dak
Lak province) to Ta Dung Nature Reserve (Dak Nong province); a corridor connecting Kon Ka
Kinh National Park and Kon Chu Rang Nature Reserve; a cross-border corridor in Cao Bang -
Guangxi between the newly established nature reserve of Guangxi, China and Cao Bang, Viet
Nam to protect the Eastern black-crested gibbon (Nomascus nasutus). Recently, biodiversity
corridors were also officially established in three pilot provinces during the Greater Mekong
Subregion biodiversity conservation project - Phase 2 (2011-2019); specifically, a biodiversity
conservation corridor connecting Sao La Species and Habitat Conservation Area, the Thanh
River Nature Reserve, and the Elephant Conservation Area of Quang Nam Province. A
biodiversity corridor connecting Sao La conservation area and Phong Dien Nature Reserve, Thua
Thien-Hue province, as well as between Dak Rong Nature Reserve and Bac Huong Hoa Nature
Reserve in Quang Tri Province, has been established.
The role of stakeholders in restoring ecosystems
In the context of climate change, restoration of ecosystems, especially forest ecosystems, plays
147
an important role in increasing services and environmental protection. The subjects that use and
manage the ecosystems are very broad, including the central and local levels of Government,
communities, professional organizations, enterprises and organizations, and domestic and
international NGOs. Such stakeholders provide diverse contributions to ensure the effective
restoration of ecosystems in response to climate change, as well as increasing the livelihoods of
the community.
Aichi Biodiversity Target 16: The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing
Viet Nam has joined the Nagoya Protocol
MONRE has issued two key documents relating to the Nagoya Protocol: Resolution No.10/NQ-
CP dated February 12, 2014, relates to the accession to the Nagoya Kuala Lumpur
Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, and the
Government's Resolution 17/NQ-CP of March 17, 2014, relates to accession to the Nagoya
Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits.
Participating the Nagoya Protocol assists Viet Nam with such activities as: (i) creating a solid
legal basis for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the supplier on traditional
knowledge on genetic resources in Viet Nam; (ii) contributing to the fulfillment of obligations
towards international commitments to which Viet Nam is a party, in particular, the Biodiversity
Convention and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development; (iii) providing
opportunities for Viet Nam to access international resources in support of capacity-building on
this issue; and (iv) raising awareness on genetic resources management, promoting applications
of genetic resources, and managing traditional knowledge on genetic resources, as well as
improving the living standards of local communities and biodiversity conservation.
Genetic resource conservation has provided thousands of genetic materials for breeding,
agriculture, fisheries and medicinal plants. This in turn has a role in restoration of indigenous
genetic resources and to create products for consumption and export (e.g. sika deer, crocodiles,
Ngoc Linh ginseng, cardamom, agarwood etc.). This contributes to socio-economic development
as well as security. In parallel with the study of genetically modified animals with desirable
characteristics, measures to manage biosafety have been established in order to minimize the
potential risks to biodiversity and human health.
Legal documents on management, access to genetic resources and benefit sharing from
genetic resources
Clause 1 of Article 55 of the Biodiversity Law states that "the Government unifies management
of all genetic resources in Viet Nam’s territory"; as such, the Government assigns the right to
manage genetic resources to conservation area managers that include management boards,
organizations and individuals. In detail, the responsibilities are: (i) The management boards are
assigned to manage gene resources within the protected areas; (ii) Owners of biodiversity
conservation facilities, scientific research, and technological institutes that are involved in
preserving and storing genetic resources are to take charge of managing their own resources; (iii)
Organizations, households, and individuals that have been given land use, forests, and water
surface are to manage gene resources within the scope of their management and use; and (iv)
Commune People's Committees manage local gene resources.
Organizations, households, and individuals assigned to manage genetic resources have the right
148
to investigate, collect, exchange, transfer, and provide genetic resources in accordance with the
laws and to benefit from organizations and individuals that share genetic resources (Article 56).
Article 61 of the Biodiversity Law regulates sharing benefits arising from access to genetic
resources. The benefits are to be shared by all three parties: The Government; organizations,
households, and individuals assigned to manage gene sources; and Organizations and individuals
granted access permits, as well as any other related specified parties in the permits.
The regulation demonstrates Viet Nam's intent to implement the third objective of the
Biodiversity Convention. However, the issue is very new and difficult. In recent years, state
management agencies (namely MONRE) has tried to conduct pilots in some protected areas,
such as Bach Ma, Ba Vi, Cat Ba, Con Dao, Bidoup, Nui Ba, and Van Long Nature Reserve.
Communities living around these reserves have improved their quality of life through increased
employment and through biodiversity conservation.
Although the 2008 Law on Biodiversity has created a basic legal framework, there is a lack of
specific regulations on the procedures for issuing licenses for access to genetic resources. There
is also uncertainty about the competent authority of state management agencies to
grant/withdraw permits related to monetary and non-monetary terms of negotiation, as well as
procedures for signing contracts on access to genetic resources and sharing benefits among
stakeholders etc. Therefore, the issuance of a new document to improve the legal system for the
Nagoya Protocol is an urgent requirement for Viet Nam.
To further clarify the provisions of Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter V of the Law on Biodiversity,
legal documents guiding the implementation of this issue have submitted to Government,
including:
- Decision No.1141/QD-TTg dated June 27, 2016, approving the scheme on capacity
building for management of access to genetic resources, fair and equitable access, and
sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources in the period of 2016 - 2025;
- Decree No.59/2017/ND-CP dated May 12, 2017, on the management of access to genetic
resources and benefit sharing arising from their utilization. This decree clarifies concepts
in the Law on Biodiversity. Decree 59 also regulates the state management of access to
genetic resources and the sharing of benefits from the use of genetic resources for
ministries, sectors, and local levels. In particular, MONRE is responsible for developing
a national database on genetic resources, on traditional knowledge of genetic resources
and on benefit sharing from the use of genetic resources. MARD is responsible for
developing a database on genetic resources under its management and providing
information to MONRE. The Ministry of Health and other relevant ministries and
localities have the responsibility to provide, exchange, and share information and data on
genetic resources. Moreover, Decree 59 issued templates, contracts, and decisions related
to access to genetic resources.
Regarding the registration procedures and the application for licenses to access to genetic
resources, the Decree specifies steps for organizations and enterprises to follow. Registration of
access to genetic resources is to occur with competent state agencies; agreement and signing the
contracts is to occur with the suppliers; permission sought from Commune People's Committee
to confirm the contract; and dossiers of application for access permits for genetic resources
submitted to competent state agencies.
149
In relation to subjects who have to register and apply for licenses to access genetic resources,
Decree 59 stipulates requirements for Vietnamese organizations and individuals who need to
access genetic resources for research or for commercial purposes; for foreign organizations and
individuals who would like to access genetic resources in Viet Nam; and for organizations and
individuals aiming to provide gene resources abroad, except for non-commercial research
purposes.
Decree 59 also provides licenses for gene transfers abroad for study and research for non-
commercial purposes. This provision is intended to facilitate the promotion of scientific research
in genetic resources and is in accordance with the provisions of the Nagoya Protocol.
The activities in fact
MONRE has developed and implemented the project ‘Promoting the application of Nagoya
Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing in Viet Nam’, which is sponsored
by GEF/UNDP and was implemented from January 2016 to December 2019. The objective of
the project is to contribute to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity globally
through the strengthening of national capacity in the application of the Nagoya Protocol,
ensuring fair and reasonable sharing of benefits from genetic resources.
- Implement capacity-building and awareness raising activities: MONRE has coordinated
with national and international organizations to organize training courses and seminars
for capacity-building on access to genetic resources and benefit sharing and to raise
awareness on the importance of conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources.
- Conducting surveys, working with conservation institutions (research institutes,
universities), management boards of national parks, and conservation areas on access and
collection of genetic resources on site. Basic application documents about access to
genetic resources and benefit sharing have also been created and disseminated.
- Apply guidelines on access to genetic resources and benefit sharing after Viet Nam
joined the Nagoya Protocol, but before a valid Decree 59/2017/ND-CP. As the national
focal point, MONRE has received documents from domestic and foreign agencies and
organizations to guide the implementation of regulations on access to genetic resources
and benefit sharing. The majority of dossiers requesting guidance on access to genetic
resources are research cooperation activities between domestic universities, research
institutions, and foreign partners. Approaches include both commercial and non-
commercial purposes with clear benefit sharing provisions. MONRE has provided
guidelines for access to genetic resources by foreign organizations that comply with
Vietnamese regulations, plus are in accordance with the provisions of the Nagoya
Protocol.
- To receive, evaluate, and issue permits for dossiers of registration of access to genetic
resources after the effective date of Decree No.59/2017/ND-CP: As of August 2018,
there are 18 permits verified and issued for bringing gene resources abroad to serve non-
commercial purposes (i.e. as study and research); and three dossiers of application for
licenses to access genetic resources have completed the registration step (step 1).
150
Aichi Biodiversity Target 17: Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan
1. The legal system on biodiversity is developed and improved
Viet Nam is a member of the CBD. Moreover, Viet Nam is a member of international treaties
related to biodiversity conservation, such as the UNESCO Convention, the Convention on
Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar); CITES; the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety;
and the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing etc.
To follow up the Biodiversity Law that passed in 2008 at the National Assembly and took
effective from 2009, Vietnam has developed and promulgated the National Strategy on
Biodiversity to 2020 and Vision to 2030 which is indicated at the Prime Minister’s Decision
No1250/QD-TTg dated July 13, 2013, and lately the National Master Plan for Biodiversity
Conservation to 2020 and Orientations to 2030 indicated by the Prime Minister Decision 45/QD-
TTg dated January 8, 2014. To implement this law, in the period, the Government has also
promulgated regulations on access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing which are framed by
Decree 59/2017/ND-CP dated May 12, 2017. In addition, many other laws and regulations
supporting to biodiversity conservation by sectors are also developed, amended and/or renewed
in the period of reporting, such as:
Forestry Law passed in 2017 as an amendment for Forest Protection and Development
Law 2004; and its implementation regulations issued within 2018 such as Decree
156/2018/ND-CP;
Fishery Law (Amendment) passed in 2017
Decree 147/2016/ND-CP dated November 2, 2016 by the Prime Minister supplementing
the national policy on payment of forest environmental services
Decision 419/QD-TTg dated April 5, 2017 by the Prime Minister approving the
National Action Plan on REDD+ to 2030
Other national action plans to protect endangered species such as tigers, primates,
elephants
2. Viet Nam NBSAP
The National Strategy on Biodiversity to 2020, with a vision to 2030 was adopted in 2013.
The objective of the strategy was developed in accordance with the Aichi goals, which
emphasized the targets by 2020: the area of terrestrial nature reserves reaches 9% of the territory,
the areas of the areas marine conservation reaches 0.24% of the sea area, 45% of the forest cover
is maintained at 0.57 million ha and there is an effective protection plan, 15% of the natural
ecosystem area. With significant degradation being restored, the number of internationally
recognized nature reserves of Vietnam reaches 10 Ramsar sites, 10 biosphere reserve zones, and
10 ASEAN heritage parks.
By 2030, 25% of the area of natural ecosystems of international importance will be restored,
biodiversity will be conserved and sustainably used, bringing essential benefits to people. People
and make important contributions to the socio-economic development of the country.
151
The strategy includes the following tasks: Conservation of natural ecosystems, Conservation of
wild species and livestock species, endangered precious and rare plants, Sustainable use and
implementation of sharing mechanisms rational benefits from ecosystem services and
biodiversity, Control of activities that adversely impact biodiversity, Conserve biodiversity in the
context of climate change. The Strategy also approved in principle 07 national-level priority
programs and schemes to implement the Strategy.
The process of drafting the Strategy
As mentioned in previous section, the process of drafting the Strategy was conducted with
participation of various stakeholders, including state agencies at central and local levels, NGOs,
Scientists, international development partners …
3. Integrating biodiversity conservation into sectoral and cross cutting policies and
programs
3.1. Integrate biodiversity conservation into cross cutting sectors and regional development
plans, programs and policies.
The concepts of environmental protection and biodiversity conservation have been integrated by
the Government of Viet Nam into national plans, programs and policies as follows:
- Strategy for hunger eradication and poverty reduction: objectives for environmental
protection in general and biodiversity, in particular, include the program of planting five
million ha of forest and increasing the forest cover from 33% in 2000 to 41% by 2017.
- The National Strategy on Climate Change relates to issues of to improving the quality of
forests, afforestation, greening vacant land and bare hills, ensuring efficient exploitation
of forests to maintain and improve their preventive capacity against natural disasters,
desertification, erosion, land degradation. It also aims to enhance the protection,
management, and development of mangrove forests and wetlands, and to increase forest
coverage to 45% by 2020.
- Viet Nam’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2011-2020 aims for rational use and
sustainable development of natural resources, including biological and biodiversity
resources.
- The Green Growth Strategy aims to accelerate the process of restructuring and perfecting
economic institutions towards more efficient use of natural resources and enhancing the
competitiveness of the economy through increased investment in technological
innovation, natural capital, and economic instruments to cope with climate change,
reduce poverty, and ensure sustainable economic development.
3.3. Integrate the protection of biodiversity into related sectors
The integration of biodiversity conservation into the policies, strategies, plans, and programs of
relevant sectors, even interdisciplinary ones, is reflected through a set of decisions by the
Government or Ministries. For example, based on Circular No.29/2014/TT-BTNMT dated June
2, 2014, MONRE has developed the document ‘Methodology and guidelines for integrating
biodiversity conservation into provincial land use planning’. Under the NBSAP project
implemented by MONRE in 2015, a pilot of integrating biodiversity conservation into land use
planning was carried out in Lang Son and Son La provinces.
152
In 2015, MONRE, supported by the Asian Development Bank conducted the project ‘Applying
and improving the national environmental safety system - Integrating biodiversity considerations
into environmental safety system of Viet Nam’. This project developed a technical guideline on
integrating biodiversity impacts into Environmental Impact Assessments.
3.4. Some results:
The integration of biodiversity conservation into sectoral and inter-sectoral development policies
has led to certain successes, especially into economic sectors that now consider biodiversity
conservation as a development strategy. Examples of key results are: a plan on afforestation of
five million ha forest, working to increase the annual forest cover; cultivating valuable species,
by planting indigenous trees and creating commercial products, to reduce the pressure from
exploitation; and the creation of education, training and raising awareness on biodiversity
conservation among the public, especially the local communities.
Incorporating concepts of biodiversity conservation into provincial land use planning also creates
the opportunity for compatibility. Lastly, development of livelihoods models for communities
living in the buffer zones of protected areas, under hunger eradication and poverty reduction
programs, has enhanced the community's life and reduced the exploitive pressure onresources.
4. Other strategies, planning and plans related to biodiversity conservation
Apart from the "National Strategy on Biodiversity up to 2020, vision to 2030" (Viet Nam
NBSAP), the Government of Viet Nam has also issued a number of national strategies, plans,
programs, and projects, all of which have goals and contents consistent with the goals of Viet
Nam NBSAP and Aichi targets. These include:
- Decision No.1216/2012/QD-TTg dated September 5, 2012 of the Prime Minister, approving the
National Strategy for Environmental Protection up to 2010 and vision to 2020.
- Decision No.57/QD-TTg dated January 9, 2012 of the Prime Minister, approving the forest
protection and development plan during 2011-2020.
- Decision 126/QD-TTg dated February 2, 2012 of the Prime Minister, promulgating the piloting
benefit sharing mechanism of management, protection and development for special- use forests.
- Decision No. 940/QD-TTg of July 19, 2012, approved the urgent action plan for elephant
conservation in Viet Nam through 2020.
- Decision 799/QD-TTg dated June 27, 2012 of the Prime Minister, approving the national
REDD+ action programme in the period of 2011 – 2020.
- Decision No.1896/2012/QD-TTg dated December 17, 2012 approving the project
‘Prevention and control of invasive alien species in Viet Nam by 2020’.
- -Decision 11/2013/QD-TTg dated January 24, 2013 by the Prime Minister, on Prohibiting
Import, Export, Trade of Wildlife Specimen in CITES appendices.
- Decision No.188/QD-TTg dated February 13, 2013 of the Prime Minister, approving the
program on protection and development of aquatic resources through 2020.
- Decision No.763/QD-TTg dated May 21, 2013 of the Prime Minister, approving the Viet
Nam Elephant Conservation Project for the period of 2013-2020.
153
- Decision No.539/QD-TTg dated April 16, 2014 of the Prime Minister, approving the
National Program for Tiger Conservation in the period of 2014-2022.
- Decision No.45/QD-TTg dated January 8, 2014, approving the master plan on
biodiversity conservation through to 2020, with orientation toward 2030.
- Decision No. 1976/QD-TTg dated October 30, 2014, approving the master plan on the
national special-use forest system through 2020, with a vision toward 2030.
- Decision 218/QD-TTg dated February 7, 2014 of the Prime Minister, approving the
Strategy to manage systems of special use forests, marine reserves, and wetland areas
towards 2020, with a vision towards 2030;
- Decision No.120/QD-TTg dated January 22, 2015, approving the protection and
development of coastal forests to cope with climate change in 2015-2020 period
- Decision No.1671/QD-TTg dated September 28, 2015, of the Prime Minister on the
program for genetic resources conservation and sustainable use to 2025, vision to 2030.
- Decision No.1141/QD-TTg dated June 27, 2016, approving the scheme on capacity
building for management of access to genetic resources and fair, reasonable sharing of
benefits arising from the use of gene resources in the period of 2016 – 2025.
- Decision 419/QD-TTg dated April 5, 2017, on the Approval of the National Action
Programme on the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions through the reduction of
Deforestation and Forest Degradation, Sustainable Management of Forest Resources, and
Conservation and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks (REDD+) by 2030.
- Decision No.628/QD-TTg dated May 10, 2017 of the Prime Minister, approving the
Emergency Action Plan for the Conservation of Viet Nam's Primate Species to 2025,
vision to 2030.
- Decision No.626/QD-TTg dated May 10, 2017 of the Prime Minister, approving the
Scheme on strengthening the management capacity of the conservation area system up to
2025, vision to 2030.
- Decision No.886/QD-TTg dated June 16, 2017, approving the National Target Program
for Sustainable Forest Development for the 2016-2020 period.
- Decision No.78/2018/QD-TTg dated January 16, 2018 approving the National Action
Plan to prevent, reduce and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing by 2025.
- Decree 59/2017/ND-CP dated May 12, 2017, on the management of access to genetic
resources and benefit sharing from the use of genetic resources.
154
Aichi Biodiversity Target 18: Traditional Knowledge
1. Traditional, indigenous knowledge on exploitation and use of biological resources
In Viet Nam, traditional knowledge has played a key role in solving local livelihood issues.
During the process, protection of biological resources has also been taken up ethnic minorities.
In recent years, there has been research on indigenous knowledge in many areas relevant to the
use of natural resources, such as agriculture (intercropping, animal husbandry, pest management,
crop diversity, animal health care, crop breeding); biology (botany, fish farming); human health
care (by traditional remedies made from herbal medicines); use and management of natural
resources (land and water conservation and other forms of water management); education
(verbal, local languages) and poverty reduction in general.
Exploitation and use of medicinal plants: various institutes have conducted research on ethnic
botany for many years, focusing on the indigenous knowledge of mountainous ethnic groups in
conservation and use of natural resources. As a result, hundreds of medicinal plants and
traditional herbs have been collected from the Dao, Nung, Tay and H'Mong ethnic minority
groups.
The Institute of Medicinal Materials has conducted surveys on indigenous knowledge, collecting
medicinal plants and experience of ethnic minorities such as H'Mong (Lao Cai province), Muong
(Thanh Hoa, Hoa Binh, Yen Bai, Nghe An province), Dao (Ba Vi, Lao Cai, Hoa Binh, Vinh
Phuc province), Co Tu (Thua Thien-Hue province), Van Kieu (Tay Nguyen highland), Tay (Ha
Giang, Cao Bang, Bac Can, Lang Son, Thai Nguyen province), Nung (Lang Son province), San
Diu (Vinh Phuc province), and Khmer (An Giang province). A list of medicinal plants of 15
ethnic groups has been developed. The Institute has also collected and preserved 1,296 folk
medicine remedies; these drugs have served as a mean to study the screening, research, and
development of disease prevention products.
Knowledge/ experience in cultivation and husbandry: Pham Quoc Hung and Hoang Ngoc Y
(2009) identified that indigenous knowledge of the H'mong people in Hang Kia and Pa Co, Son
La province was passed verbally inter-generationally. This knowledge is focused on species,
forest animals, cultivation and breeding, the cycle of the weather and other characteristics of
nature. Regarding forest management, indigenous knowledge of local people is promoted,
including knowledge on cultivation, identification of forest trees, forest resources, harvesting and
using forest products. Forests are important to community life. Interviews with local people
indicate that most of them want to participate in forest protection and development; this is also
important for the development of community-based organizations and regulations on forest
management and protection.
Local customary law for forest and fishery protection: Some practices of ethnic minority groups,
such as protection of sacred forests and water bodies (habitats and breeding of many wildlife and
fish species), have been maintained and developed by the authorities. According to Tran Cong
Khanh and Nguyen Ngoc Sinh (2016), Ede ethnic customs in the Central Highlands have 236
regulations defining the responsibility of each individual and of individuals with the community,
with aims of creating equality between people. This prevents discrimination, preference for the
upper classes, and maltreatment of the lower classes in all aspects of the village life. For
example:
155
In addition, many folk festivals are carried out each year, such as the fish-seeking festival of the
coastal fishermen community. In recent times, organizations, researchers and managers have
become interested in the indigenous knowledge of ethnic minorities and the issue of forest
management and protection. There are projects that bring new experiences and knowledge to the
people for the purpose of changing living conditions and improving the effectiveness of forest
protection. However, there is not much information on the results of these projects.
Legal documents regulate the protection and sharing of traditional knowledge in Viet Nam
The Law on Biodiversity mentions the concept that traditional knowledge of genetic resources is
the understanding, experience and initiative of local people on the conservation and use of
genetic resources.
Clause 2 of Article 55 of the 2008 Law on Biodiversity, states that the organizations, households,
and individuals assigned to manage and use land, forests, and water surface shall manage gene
resources within the scope of their use;
Paragraph 3, Article 58 provides that contracts for access to genetic resources and benefit sharing
shall have provision on sharing benefits with the Government and other involved parties,
including the division of intellectual property rights on the basis of access to genetic resources
and traditional knowledge;
Clause 1 of Article 61, provides that Benefits derived from access to genetic resources shall be
shared among the following parties:
a) The Government;
b) Organizations, households, and individuals assigned to manage genetic resources;
c) Organizations and individuals with granted access to genetic resources and other related
parties defined in the licenses of access to genetic resources.
The above provisions of the Law on Biodiversity have basically fulfilled the Nagoya Protocol on
the Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Genetic Resources.
Regarding the origin of innovative materials, Circular No.01/2007/TT-BKHCN dated February
14, 2007, guides the implementation of Decree No.103/2006/ND-CP on detailing and
implementing articles of the Law on Intellectual Property, including industrial property. At Point
23.11, it is stated that: An application for registration of a patent relating to a gene resource or a
traditional knowledge shall also contain documentation demonstrating the origin of the genetic
resources and/or traditional knowledge that the inventor or applicant has received, if the
invention is directly based on that genetic resources and/or traditional knowledge.
In Viet Nam, there is no separate national action plan to protect, conserve and promote the
knowledge and practices of indigenous and local communities and to encourage the sustainable
use of biodiversity. However, the issues of research, investigation, preservation, and promotion
of indigenous knowledge of the community, especially ethnic minorities, on exploiting and
protecting biological resources are integrated in strategies and action plans on biodiversity,
hunger eradication, and poverty reduction.
156
Aichi Biodiversity Target 19: Sharing Information and Knowledge
1. Global Biodiversity Information Facility
Vietnam became member of the GBIF since 2018 and continue to collaborate with GBIF to
update its data to the facility. In 2009, when Viet Nam was not yet a member of GBIF, it
provided more than 100,000 records on 13,000 animals to GBIF.
2. Database and information on biodiversity of Viet Nam
Over the last two decades, data and information on Viet Nam's biodiversity have been improved
considerably. Biodiversity surveys and studies conducted in many parts of the country have
documented hundreds of species that are new to science, especially terrestrial plants,
invertebrates living in soil and freshwater, insects, reptiles, and frogs. Monitoring of some
critically endangered species has been established at several sites. Information on Viet Nam’s
biodiversity in general, as well as that in protected areas particularly, is updated by scientists
from research institutes of the Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology, as well as from
research institutions and universities. However, while there are databases on biodiversity
dispersed across many research and management agencies, there are large inconsistencies in
quality and there are substantial limitations in sharing and using information. The following are
considered as important developments:
a) Developing a database on biodiversity:
A National Biodiversity Database System of biodiversity (NBDS) was officially launched in
2015. To date, NBDS focus on species data in protected areas (http://nbds.vea.gov.vn).
b) The biodiversity indicator set to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation management: Within the scope of the NBSAP, a set of 36 indicators has been developed; these aim to evaluate
biodiversity at all levels. There are also 31 indicators collected at the provincial level (being
piloted in Son La and Lang Son provinces) and 30 indicators collected at the level of protected
areas.
The technical documents from the above project have been used for training managers, DARD
and DONRE officials, and protected area staff on biodiversity indicators, biodiversity
monitoring, biodiversity reporting for protected areas and biodiversity database management.
In 2018, MONRE used the management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) with 41 indicators
of five groups (to evaluate the management effectiveness of the six ASEAN Heritage Parks
(AHP).
In 2017-2018, the project ‘Research and develop a set of criteria and procedures for monitoring
and evaluating management the effectiveness of biosphere reserves in Viet Nam' was conducted
by the Institute of Resources and Environment at the Viet Nam National University. As a result,
a set of 15 criteria in six groups was developed to monitor and evaluate the management
effectiveness of biosphere reserves in Viet Nam. The criteria were experimentally applied in Cat
Ba, Cu Lao, And Cham-Hoi An.
c) Forest information management: MARD is currently developing a forest information
management system (see previous section).
d) Database of genetic resources conservation: MOST and MARD have set up a database on
157
breeds and gene resources of plants and animals. The Viet Nam Science and Technology
Academy has developed a database on Viet Nam’s marine environment, including marine
biodiversity.
e) Developing fauna and flora books: There has been research on the flora and fauna of Viet
Nam organized by the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, by institutes in the Viet
Nam Academy of Science and Technology, and by institutes outside the Academy since 1995.
From 2000 to date, 31 volumes on the fauna and 21 volumes on the flora of Viet Nam have been
published.
g) Developing Red books: To date, about 51,400 species of organisms have been identified as
occurring in Viet Nam. Among them, about 362 species of animals and 219 species of plants are
listed in the IUCN Red List (2014). The Viet Nam Red Book and Red List was published in
2007. From 2010-2015, the Vietnamese Academy of Science and Technology coordinated with
other institutes to implement a project that aims to culminate in a future revision of Viet Nam’s
Red Book.
Fauna Books of Viet Nam
Viet Nam Red Data Books
Aichi Biodiversity Target 20: Mobilize resources from all sources
Financial resources for biodiversity conservation
1. Budget for biodiversity conservation
According to the Law on Biodiversity (2008), the Government of Viet Nam has committed to
allocating state budget funds for conservation and sustainable development of biodiversity, from
the following sources:
a) State budget;
b) Investment and contributions of domestic and foreign organizations and individuals;
c) Revenues from payment of environmental services related to biodiversity and other
sources by law.
The budget for biodiversity conservation at the central level is mainly concentrated at MONRE,
MARD and MOST.
a) The budget for biodiversity conservation at central level
158
The budget for biodiversity conservation coordinated by the MONRE
According to the Decree No.36/2017/ND-CP dated April 4, 2017 of the Government,
regulating the functions, powers and organizational structure of MONRE, nature conservation
and biodiversity is one of ten main areas of the natural resources and environment sector.
However, investment in this area was limited.
Figure 42: VEA Expenditure Per Share for NBSAP objectives in the period of 2011-2015
The budget for biodiversity conservation coordinated by MARD
According to MARD (2013), investment sources for protected areas and the special-use forest
system came from different sources, including state budget, international support, and
contribution from private sectors and communities. Among those sources, the state budget and
international support are the main funding sources for nature reserves, while outside investments
include payment for environment and ecosystem services, including tourism. Sources from the
community and individuals are low level and there are no statistics to evaluate effectiveness.
The state budget has to obtain permission from MARD and localities. The budget for regular
costs relating to protected areas in the period of 2003-2010 was 410.6 billion VND, with a 13%
annual increase. Of this, the cost for central level activities was twice that of the provincial-level.
The fact that budget for protected areas is based on the number of its staff instead of its
conservation objectives leads to ineffective management of protected areas.
In addition to direct funding for protection and management of forests (reforestation, protection,
inventory) provided to the forestry sector and funding for fishery sector (eg: management,
development of aquatic resources), there is another revenue source for biodiversity activities.
159
MARD has implemented a pilot policy on benefit sharing in special-use forests. MARD has
undertaken related activities in a number of national parks, including Bach Ma, Xuan Thuy, and
Hoang Lien. It has also implemented a pilot of payment for ecosystem services and raised
awareness and responsibilities of related stakeholders.
According to a draft report (2018) of the Government on the results of three years of
implementation of the ‘Target Program for Sustainable Forestry Development in the period of
2016-2020’, from 2016-2018, VND 21,527 billion was used for the Program. In particular, VND
5,323 billion was sourced from payments for forest environmental services.
Budget for biodiversity conservation coordinated by MOST
Between 2011 and 2015, the Genetic resources conservation program was financed from the
state budget (MOST, 2014). Of financing allocated, 40% was spent on genetic resources
conservation activities implemented by different
ministries – by MARD for conserving genetic resources in fishery, agriculture, forestry and
seeds; by MOH for conserving pharmaceutical genetic resources; by the Ministry of Industry and
Trade (MOIT) for conserving plants and microorganisms used in industry and food processing,
etc.; 55% was spent on the targeted exploitation and development of genetic resources – annually
around 20 national level assignments for the exploitation and development of genetic resources
are issued, with on average VND 2,8 billion (USD 124,000) allocated per assignment; while 5%
was spent on the evaluation of genetic resources.
Figure 43. Expenditure share for implementing objectives of the genetic resources program
Source: Tran Thi Thu Ha, BER report, 2018, Viet Nam BIOFIN Project
b) Budget for biodiversity conservation in localities
According to the Joint Circular 160 and 45, the budget for biodiversity conservation at the local
level is taken from such local sources as the budget for environmental activities, for business
activities, for science and technology activities, for administration, and for investment and
development. However, the budget for local biodiversity conservation is quite limited and
depends on each local budget. Based on reports from of localities, financial resources are mainly
derived from the budget for environment activities, for business activities, and for science and
technology activities. The funds allocated towards biodiversity activities are focused on:
160
- Raising awareness on biodiversity on International Biodiversity Day, Environment Day
and other days related to biodiversity;
- Building a provincial plan for biodiversity conservation;
- Deploying a number of local actions on biodiversity.
In general, the local budget is limited, which leads to difficulties with implementation of plans
from the central level. Some local authorities do not even have a biodiversity conservation
budget and only set expenditure for protected areas. However, there are several provinces that
invest more heavily in biodiversity.
As of March 2018, based on information collected from 30 conservation areas (including one
marine protected area, 12 national parks, 13 nature reserves, and four protected areas of species
and habitats), of the total 730,987 ha that is in 30 conservation areas (accounting for 32% area of
164 protected areas and national parks in the country), 611,936 ha is forest land (equal to 31%
area of 164 protected areas and national parks). Expenditure for the 30 conservation areas is as
below:
Figure 44. Expenditure for biodiversity conservation recorderd from 30 protected areas
Source: Tran Thi Thu Ha, Report BER 2018, Viet Nam BIOFIN project
c) Expenditure from ODA source
According to an analysis by OECD (2015), fields such as environment protection, forestry,
agriculture, water sanitation, trade policies and regulations have received the most biodiversity-
related ODA funding (91%). Of this, environmental protection utilized 65% of the total
biodiversity-related ODA funding, while next highest categories were forestry (10%), agriculture
(9%), water supply and sanitation (5%), and trade policies and regulations (2%) (OECD, 2015).
Figure 27 displays the percentage of sector prioritizes biodiversity as main or important
objective, during 2011-2015.
161
Figure 45. Annual proportion of ODA projects for biodiversity devided by sector from
2011 to 2015
Source: OECD (2015)
One in the key sources of ODA funding in Viet Nam in the field of biodiversity is GEF. GEF
projects for biodiversity are listed in the following table:
Table 12. GEF funded biodiversity related projects implemented in Viet Nam from 2000
to 2017
No.
Projects/programmes
name
Partner Implementation
agency
Phrase/Time GEF
Funding
(USD)
1. Developing Protected
Areas for Resources
Conservation (PARC)
in Viet Nam Using a
Landscape Ecology
Approach
UNDP UNDP GEF1 6,011,840
2. The Biodiversity
Action Plan and
Conservation Training
UNDP MONRE GEF1 2,999,959
3. Building a Clearing-
House Mechanism of
the Convention on
Biological Diversity
UNDP MONRE GEF1 12,000
4. Onsite conservation of
Landraces pig
UNDP Gene and
Agriculture
Institute
GEF2 904,000
162
5. Hon Mun protected
area pilot project
World
Bank
IUCN GEF2 972,447
6. Conservation of Cuc
Phuong-Pu Luong
Limestone Landscape
World
Bank
FFI GEF2 724,885
7. Creating the
connection and
sustainable
management of Kon
Ka Kinh National Park
and Kon Cha Rang
Nature Reserve
UNDP Gia Lai People’s
Committee
GEF3 875,000
8. Conservation and
sustainable use of the
marine resources at
Con Dao National Park
UNDP WWF GEF3 970,450
9. Green Corridor Project World
Bank
WWF Indo
China
GEF3 998,634
10. Forestry development
project
World
Bank
MARD GEF3 9,000,000
11. Integrating Watershed
and Biodiversity
Management in Chu
Yang Sin National
Park
World
Bank
BirdLife
International
GEF3 973,000
12. Implementing a
national safeguard
framework
UNDP MONRE GEF3 997,800
13. Removing barriers
hindering protected
area management
effectiveness in Viet
Nam
GEF 4 3,536,360
14. Promotion of
Sustainable Forest and
Land Management in
the Viet Nam Uplands
GEF 4 654,545
15. Sustainable
management of forest
land according to
national framework
World
Bank
MARD GEF 4 4,195,000
16. Wildlife consumption World
Bank
MARD GEF 4 1,000,000
163
17. Removing Barriers to
Invasive Species
Management in
Production and
Protection Forests in
SE Asia
GEF 4 854,000
18. Coastal resources for
sustainable
development:
integrated spatial
planning for coastal
areas and sustainable
use
World
Bank
MARD GEF 5 6,500,000
19. Conservation of
Critical Wetland
Protected Areas and
Linked Landscapes
UNDP MONRE GEF 5 3,180,287
20. National Biodiversity
Strategies and Action
Plans (NBSAPs)
UNDP MONRE GEF 5 909,091
21. Integration of
biodiversity
conservation and
recovery of habitat
before climate change
and sustainable forest
management of Central
Truong Son area
ADB MONRE GEF 5 3,794,954
22. Capacity building on
implementation of the
Nagoya Protocol in
UNDP MONRE GEF 5 2,000,000
23. Biosphere reserves UNDP MONRE
GEF 6 6,660,000
24. Integrated approaches
to sustainable cities in
ADB MONRE GEF 6 8,256,881
25. Wetland project UNDP MONRE GEF 6 3,180,287
TOTAL GEF FUND
70,161,420
Source: www.thegef.org
Aside from GEF, Viet Nam also attracts official development aid from other development
partners, as shown in the following table:
164
Table 13. Projects and programmes from other development donors for biodiversity
Donor Sector granted with ODA Time
Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA)
National biodiversity database system
in (NBDS)
7/2011- 03/2015
Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA)
Sustainable Nature Reserve
Management (SNRM)
2015 - 2020
Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA)
Recovery and management of
protection forest restoration and
sustainable management
2012 - 2021
Asian Development Bank (ADB) Biodiveristy Conservation Corridor in
Greater Mekong subregion –
Component (loan)
7/2011- 12/2019
United Nations Environment
Programme UNEP/CaBi
Managing invasive species in selected
forest ecosystems of South East Asia
(IAS)
12/2011-11/2015
Sweden International
Development Agency (SIDA)
Integrating approaches based on
ecosystems to adapt to climate change
on the planning process of biodiversity
conservation (EBA)
6/2012-12/2013
Sweden International
Development Agency (SIDA)
Developing a pilot model on payments
for coastal wetland ecosystem services
in Mui Ca Mau National Park (PES)
2012 - 2013
ASEAN Center of Biodiversity
(ACB)
Building Capacity for Regionally
Harmonized National Processes for
Implementing CBD Provision on
Access to Genetic Resources and
sharing of Benefits
2015 - 2016
1.2. Payment for environment services related to biodiversity
a) Mechanism of payment for environmental services (PES):
In the period of 2011-2015, central and provincial funds collected 5,226,025 million VND (equal
to 232,26 million USD) from users of PES (MARD, 2017). The collected money was used for:
- Payments to more than 5,000 forest owners (households, communities and other
legal forest owners), which created motivation for better management and
protection of 5.87 million ha of forest.
- Investment in infrastructure to protect forest (for example: buying fire hydrants,
building watchtowers).
- Afforestation of forest in specific areas.
165
- Support of activities and events related to PES (for instance conferences and
workshops, training and capacity building, media and raising awareness).
According to VNFF (2017), in the period of 2011-2015, the rate of reimbursement of PES
reached 75%, including 47.5% of incomes being from forest land use changes. Based on this
data, the expenditure level of VNFF in the period of 2011-2015 was as per the table below:
Table 14: Estimated annual expenditure of VNFF by objectives during the period of
2011-2015
Unit: million VND
Objectives 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Payment for
forest owners 171,739 958,975 835,373 1,043,978 1,047,618 4,057,683
Enhancing
facilities for forest
protection
16,410 68,667 63,585 77,431 77,011 303,104
Reforestation
127 101 227
Financial support
for PFES 375 450 680 918 5,640 8,063
Total 188,523 1,028,093 899,638 1,122,453 1,130,370 4,369,077
Source: Tran Thi Thu Ha, BER 2018 report, BIOFIN Viet Nam project based on current
implementation of PES in year VNFF các năm 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 và 2016
Using rates of reimbursement and incomes of VNFF, the expenditure for biodiversity according
to the objectives of the NBSAP is as follows:
Figure 46: Expenditure share for biodiversity by VNFF with reference to NBSAP
objectives
Source: Tran Thi Thu Ha, BER 2018 report, BIOFIN Viet Nam project based on current
implementation of PES in year VNFF các năm 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 và 2016
During 2011-2015, VNFF paid 4,369,077 million VND (194.2 million USD) for biodiversity,
including 4,065,475 million VND (93%) for sustainable use and benefits from ecosystem and
166
biodiversity, as well as 303,331 million VND (7% total expenditure) to control impacts to
biodiversity (fire, land use change).
b) Carbon Finance: Up to now, there has been a lack of projects relating to carbon and
concerned with biodiversity. Of 50 projects of the Clean Development Mechanism that were
domestically registered, only one, on reforestation in Cao Phong, was related to land use and
forestry.
c) Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Since 2008, Viet
Nam has been cooperating with the World Bank, the UN-REDD program, and other international
NGOs to build capacity for REDD+. As part of this, payment is paid for implementation of
REDD+ at the local level. Currently, SNV is carrying out a pilot integration of REDD+ into
areas with high biodiversity value to serve as a basis for promotion of biodiversity conservation
in REDD+ projects. The implementation of REDD+ is a chance to mobilize fund for
biodiversity.
d) Biodiversity offsets: The legal framework and policy for biodiversity offsets is based on
Article 75 of the Law on Biodiversity, however, no programs on biodiversity offsets have yet
been conducted.
1.3. Investment and contributions of domestic as well as international organizations and
individuals
a) Expenditures from entrepreneurs: Many enterprises are ready to contribute financial support
to biodiversity conservation. In Kien Giang, international cement company Holcim has
committed to donate 1 million USD to conserve limestone landscape and endangered species,
including cactus and red-crowned crane. The staff of Holcim as well as the local community has
been trained on environmental protection.
b) Support funds to conserve biodiversity
- The Viet Nam Conservation Fund (VCF) is a mandated financial mechanism sourced
from international support that was established in 2005 with total budget up to 15 million
USD, granted by the World Bank, GEF and The Netherlands’ Government. The propose
of the VCF is to deliver technical and financial support for projects on management of
special-use forest in Viet Nam. The Fund has helped 50 special-use forest management
boards to implement conservation-related activities. The fund is considered a positive
support, especially for small protected areas and localities that have difficulties in asking
for funds.
- Trust Fund (TFF), VCF and REDD+: These funds were established to support the
Strategy on Forestry Development and are sponsored with official development aid
sources. From 2016, the funds were combined into VNFF.
- Viet Nam Fund for Aquatic Resources Reproduction (VIFARR) was founded in 2007 in
order to provide support for biodiversity conservation projects in the aquatic sector but
not yet under operation.
- Viet Nam Environment Protection Fund (VNEPF) was formed in 2014. It was a
Government finance agency under the supervision of MONRE. In 2015, the Government
spent 500 billion VND as the fund capital. VNEPF supports three sectors: (i)
environmental pollution; (ii) environmental education; and (iii) waste management.
- Community Development Fund (CDF): This is a small grant that is under the support of
167
development projects by FAO, IFAD, ADB and JICA. It aims to help local people with
poverty reduction, environmental protection and capacity building. Active projects
include those in Cat Ba, Xuan Thuy, Ba Be, Na Hang, and Bidoup-Nui Ba national parks,
where CDF has been set up to focus on biodiversity conservation.
According to data (albeit incomplete) from 2011 to 2015, there were about 20 biodiversity-
related projects conducted by NGOs (including organizations as IUCN, WWF, Birdlife
International) that provided support for protected areas and other communities in the buffer
zones of protected areas. Figures below provide expenditure for biodiversity from the private
sector in of 2011-2015.
Figure 47: Private financing for biodiversity in the period of 2011-2015
Source: Tran Thi Thu Ha, BER 2018 report, BIOFIN Viet Nam
Figure 48: Expenditure for biodiversity from the private sector according to NBSAP
objectives
Source: Tran Thi Thu Ha, BER 2018 report, BIOFIN Viet Nam
181,824
216,817231,333
195,239
152,349
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Biodiversity expenditure (million VND)
168
In 2011-2015, private spending on biodiversity in Viet Nam was relatively high but tended to
decrease (in line with the domestic and international economic hardship in this period). Total
private expenditure for biodiversity was estimated at 977.562 million VND (approximately 43.4
million USD), focused on increasing the sustainable use of natural ecosystems, ecosystem-based
approaches responding to climate change, and preserving threatened wildlife species.
Socialization of conservation areas is one of means of raising funds for conservation from
the community
In Viet Nam, all protected areas are currently managed by the state or at the central or provincial
level. In practice, the management of protected areas depends mainly on the limited and
unevenly-allocated state budget. The situation necessitates policy measures to mobilize more
resources (financial and human resources), including community involvement in the
management of protected areas. In that context, the Government encourages all economic sectors
to participate in the protection and development of special-use forests. Furthermore,
transforming well-managed community forests into community-managed protected areas is
considered to be a viable option. This aligns with the law as follows:
- Article 5 of the Land Law 2013 stipulates that domestic households, individuals and
communities are land users, and are assigned to use and hire land, are granted land use
rights and receive land use right transfers from the Government.
- Households and individuals in the country, as well as communities, are recognized as
forest owners (Article 8 of the Forest Law 2017).
- Article 16 of the Forest Law 2017 states that the State allocates special use forests
(without charging forest use fees) to community members who traditionally own and
manage their religious forest.
- Article 10 of the Fisheries Law 2017 on co-management in the protection of fisheries
resources states that community organizations are recognized and granted management
rights in the protection of aquatic resources when they meet all the conditions.
Based on your country's contribution to achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Target, please
describe the level and extent of this contribution that supports the implementation of the
Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Objectives by 2030:
Viet Nam is a of Party to the United Nations Sustainable Development Program. The Prime
Minister signed Decision No. 622/QD-TTg dated May 10, 2017, on the ‘National Action Plan to
implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’. Accordingly, in Viet Nam, targets
related to the objectives of the ‘National Strategy for Biodiversity to 2020, vision to 2030’ are:
Objective 14, on the conservation and sustainable use of marine resources for sustainable
development; and Objective 15, on the protection and sustainable development of forests,
biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, combatting desertification, and preventing
degradation of land resources. The objectives show that the Government has committed itself to
the implementation of the Aichi Biodiversity Objectives through the implementation of NBSAP,
as well as through the goals of the 2030 Agenda on the sustainable development of Viet Nam.
The following is a summary of some main results achieved in implementing SDG 14 and 15:
SDG 14
169
Viet Nam has been implementing control of marine pollution, as well as the management,
protection, and development of marine and coastal ecosystems and fisheries according to
objectives defined in strategic policy documents.
The quality of coastal and deep sea water is still quite good (see ABT 8), but there is a risk of
contamination as living and production activities release waste water in estuarine and coastal
areas.
Investigation of biodiversity in Vietnamese sea areas and islands has occurred, demonstrating
that there are research programs on marine systems (according to 5-year plans), following the
overall plan on surveys and management of marine resources (Project 47).
Ten out of planned 16 marine protected areas have been established.
SDG 15
Viet Nam has a biodiversity conservation master plan. As of 2018, there were 172 protected
areas in Viet Nam with a total area of 2,493,844 ha, including 33 national parks, 65 natural
reserves, 18 species and habitat conservation areas, and 56 landscape protection areas. Viet Nam
has nominated eight Ramsar sites, nine biosphere reserves, and six ASEAN Heritage Gardens
(AHP Zone).
Afforestation has been implemented, with an average of 225,000 ha of forests planted annually,
of which over 90% is production forests. The area certified for sustainable forest management is
about 225,000 ha, of which natural forest is 86,000 ha, and plantation is 139,000 ha. Natural
forest exploitation is managed more closely, closing natural forests nationwide in 2017. Thus, the
forest cover has increased rapidly, reaching 41% in 2017 (MARD, 2018).
Viet Nam has successfully implemented a policy of PFES, which has contributed to creating a
source of income for households to participate in forest protection, increased the value of
forestry production, and improved the efficiency of forest protection. On average, the country
earns over VND 1,200 billion annually from payments for over 5 million hectares of forests. In
2017, Viet Nam gained over VND 1,675,581 billion, achieving 101.5% of the plan for 2017, and
130% of it in 2016 (MARD, 2018).
According to Viet Nam’s ‘Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals’ (2018), the country has established a National Coordination
Committee to implement the UN Anti-desertification Convention and has integrated anti-
desertification initiatives and responses to climate change and disaster mitigation. This includes
piloting a financial strategy integrated with the global mechanism for the "hottest" areas for
desertification in Viet Nam; namely Ninh Thuan and Binh Thuan provinces.
Viet Nam has implemented activities to conserve threatened species despite limited results.
Wildlife habitats remain narrowed due to changing land use practices and many species are
declining at an alarming rate, facing high risk of extinction. Viet Nam already has and will
continue to develop a database of genetic resources and traditional knowledge about genetic
resources; it is also developing guidelines for access to genetic resources and benefit sharing Viet
Nam.
After the Biodiversity Law 2008 was approved, a system of about 140 legal documents was
developed to guide the implementation of the Law. In addition, there are two other Laws directly
170
related to biodiversity conservation that took effect from January 2019; namely, the Forest Law
and Fisheries Law.
Section V. Describe the contribution of the country to achieve the objectives of the Global
Strategy for Plant Conservation (complete this section as an option).
V. Describe the contribution of countries to achieve the goals of the Global Strategy for
Plant Conservation
Does your country have national goals related to GSPC Goals?
Yes.
Specific objectives of Viet Nam’s NBSAP
- Improve the quality and increase the area of protected natural ecosystems, ensuring that
the area of terrestrial nature reserves reaches 9% of the territorial area and marine
conservation areas reach 0.24% of the seas area; forest cover reaches 45% and primary
forest is kept at 0.57 million ha with effective protection; the area of mangroves,
seagrass beds and coral reefs is maintained at current levels; 15% of the critical
degraded natural ecosystem area is recovered; the number of internationally-recognized
protected areas in Viet Nam comes up to ten Ramsar sites, ten Biosphere Reserves, and
ten ASEAN Heritage Parks.
- Improve the quality and quantity of threatened species; significantly enhance the status
of some threatened species.
- Inventory and conserve indigenous, endangered, precious, and rare genetic resources
(domestic animals, plants, micro-organisms) to make sure they are not degraded.
or:
No, there is no national goal involved
Please provide information on any active networks available in your country for plant
conservation.
There are a number of Vietnamese sites related to plant conservation, namely
http://www.botanyvn.com; http://vncreatures.net
Please describe the main measures your country uses for implementing the Global
Strategy for Plant Conservation
1. Conservation of natural ecosystems
a) Consolidate and strengthen the system of nature reserves:
- Identify critical ecosystems and prepare plans for expanding the system of protected areas;
continue to implement the plan to establish marine and wetland protected areas; Establish
biodiversity corridors connecting natural habitats of threatened species; establish three
transboundary tiger conservation sites with Laos and Cambodia (Pu Mat National Park in
Nghe An province; Sop Cop Protected Area in Son La province; and Yok Don National
171
Park in Dak Lak province); and establish, in cooperation with Laos and Cambodia, a
transboundary conservation area for Virachay, Dong Am Phan and Chu Mon Ray;
- Conduct a review of biodiversity related provisions in the current legal documents, and
make proposals for amendments, to ensure consistency;
- Conduct research on institutional structures to propose a model for one management
authority for protected areas, highlighting the involvement of, and benefits to, the
communities living in the buffer zones;
- Improve the management system for protected areas, ensuring they are all established with a
Management Board; review and improve the functions and organizational activities, and
enhance capacity of Management Boards; implement policies that create incentives for staff
working at protected areas; upgrade infrastructure to support management; provide
equipment for all protected areas, including biodiversity monitoring and reporting systems;
- Develop and improve regulations on the decentralization and classification of protected
areas, and the procedure for establishing new protected areas; prepare and implement
management and financial plans, monitoring, and regulations for the management of
natural protected areas, with the target to have these in place for all protected areas by
2015; ensure that, by 2020, the area of terrestrial protected areas accounts for 9% of the
total territorial area; marine protected areas account for 0.24% of the sea area, and forest
coverage reaches 42%;
- Assess the values and ecosystem services of natural protected areas; and
- Develop long-term plans for investment in the buffer zones of protected areas and
implement a sustainable economic development model for households in these zones.
b) Conservation of ecosystems of national and international importance
- Investigate and map ecological regions, identifying areas of high biodiversity value,
degraded areas, and sensitive areas;
- Conduct research to assess the situation, and develop a data bank and maps of natural
wetlands, seagrass beds, coral reefs and other typical natural ecosystems;
- Strengthen protection of primary forests, ensuring the area of primary forest remains at
0.57 million ha, coupled with effective protection, taking measures to prevent
deforestation and illegal logging in natural forests, special-use forests, and protection
forests;
- Continue to implement forest regeneration and afforestation programs, taking measures to
enrich forests with native plants, and promote the prevention of forest fires and increase fire
response capacity for all forests;
- Continue to implement the targets for mangrove forest restoration program under Decision
405/TTg-KTN dated March 16, 2009;
- Prepare and implement the national plan for conservation and sustainable use of wetlands with
priority given to critical river basins;
- Protect and restore coral reefs and sea grass ecosystems; implement management at central and
provincial levels to protect and recover at least 15% of key ecosystems that are being degraded;
172
and
- Prepare and implement a plan to nominate protected areas for international awards,
including wetlands of international importance (Ramsar site), biosphere reserves, and
ASEAN heritage parks. Develop and issue guidelines for the management of
internationally recognized protected areas; and implement policies to support capacity
building for effective management of these areas; making best effort to have 10 Ramsar
sites, 10 biosphere reserves, and 10 ASEAN heritage parks by 2020.
2. Conservation of wildlife and threatened species
a) Preventing the decline of threatened species:
- Continue to implement the targets of the program to protect threatened aquatic species as per
Decision 485/QD-TTg dated May 2, 2008 of the Prime Minister;
- Investigate, monitor and periodically update the list of threatened species prioritized for
protection;
- Implement conservation programs for threatened species prioritized for protection; ensuring that
the number of species that are threatened with extinction do not increase; significantly improve
the status of at least 10 threatened species; and
- Investigate and assess the status of flora; periodically update, compile, and publish the Viet Nam
Red Book.
b) Conservation of native plant varieties, agricultural products, and wild relatives of species
- Conserve agricultural crop varieties and their wild relatives; increase the number of samples of
crop varieties that are stored in gene banks; ensure that precious and rare endemic genetic
resources will not be reduced and degraded;
- Review, and improve the effectiveness of on-farm conservation of rare and precious crop
varieties and implement economic incentives to encourage the involvement of farmers; and
- Implement the national ex-situ and in-situ gene bank conservation program for rare and
precious plant varieties, and micro-organisms.
c) Develop and enhance the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation units
- Assess the current status of ex-situ conservation facilities (botanic gardens, medicinal
plant gardens, and gene banks) and improve the effectiveness of ex-situ conservation;
- Upgrade the Center of Plant Genetic Resources to become a National Plant Gene Bank that
meets south-east Asian regional standards.
3. Sustainable use, fair and equitable access, and sharing of benefits derived from
ecosystems and biodiversity
a) Sustainable use of ecosystems:
- Conduct research, develop guidelines, and pilot the economic valuation of biodiversity
and ecosystem services. The economic valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services
should be put into the national accounting system;
- Improve the policies and institutions to implement payments for the environmental
173
services of forests at a national scale; and pilot a policy for payment for environmental
services applicable to marine ecosystems and wetlands; ensuring that by 2020, there will
be at least 15 protected areas applying benefit sharing mechanism;
- Replicate a model for the management of protected areas involving community
participation, and implement mechanisms to share benefits in an equitable way amongst
involved parties; Apply and implement effectively co-management mechanism in most
protected areas, ensuring the community involvement in the management of and sharing
benefits from protected areas through policies to encourage community involvement in
protected area patrolling and monitoring; implement and control strictly the mechanism
of allocating land of protected areas; jointly implement mechanism of payment for
ecosystem service and forest environment service leasing;
- Develop and enforce the regulations on ecological tourism in Viet Nam; Effectively
implement and manage ecological tourism to provide income for biodiversity
conservation and for local people; and
- Develop and implement policies to support production of agricultural, forestry, and
fisheries products that meet international standards for conservation and sustainable use
of biological resources; Research and evaluate granting certification to sustainable
products or environmental-friendly products from agriculture, forestry, and fisheries;
Supporting enterprises of agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture to register their
product to be internationally recognized as sustainable or environmental-friendly
products.
b) Sustainable use of organisms and genetic resources:
- Investigate, record and take measures to protect and develop valuable non-timber forest
products (NTFP), especially medicinal and ornamental plants; and effectively control
the unconstrained exploitation and cross-border trafficking of wild species; and
- Promulgate policies and guidelines on breeding, farming and trading of common wild
species; Conduct researches on breeding valued species and processing technology to
enhance their utilization value to contribute to local economic development and reduce
pressure on natural resources; Develop and issue technical guidelines on aquaculture
and trade of common wild species; Promulgate a list of common wildlife allowed to be
bred and traded as well as guidelines for registering and monitoring the breeding of
wildlife.
c) Establish a mechanism for managing access to genetic resources, sharing benefits, protection, and
traditional knowledge of genetic resources
- Conduct research and develop regulations guiding a mechanism for access to and benefit
sharing of genetic resources; pilot models for access and benefit sharing focusing on the interests
of communities;
- Collect, document, and develop a geographic directory and take measures to conserve
traditional knowledge of genetic resources; and
- Develop and implement the action plan for capacity building to implement the Nagoya Protocol
project.
174
4. Control activities that have negative impacts on biodiversity
a) Strictly control activities considered to be unsustainable or causing environmental pollution
such as conversion of land and water surface area use and agricultural practices
- Control the conversion of natural forest land use and water surface area of conservation
value, to minimize negative impacts on biodiversity;
- Control over-exploitation, harvesting, and breeding practices of agricultural, forestry,
and fisheries which have negative impacts on biodiversity; strictly appraise
environmental impact assessment and conduct ex-post evaluation of all development
projects related to high biodiversity areas, particularly protected areas;
- Take measures to control environmental pollution with adverse impacts on biodiversity;
limit impacts of environmental pollution to the ecosystems, species, and genetic
resources, particularly in watersheds and inland wetlands and coastal waters; and
support communities in monitoring and reporting water pollution to strengthen law
enforcement.
b) Control illegal hunting, trade and consumption of wild fauna and flora
- Encourage the broad participation of communities and mass media in the detection and
prevention of illegal acts of exploitation, trafficking and consumption of wildlife;
organize campaigns to against wildlife crimes and publish results on media;
- Improve and implement inter-sectoral coordination mechanisms between the
environmental police, market management, customs, rangers, and fisheries authorities in
the detection and enforcement of illegal exploitation, trafficking, and consumption of
wildlife by guiding and training the management and implementation of regulations on
biodiversity conservation, the identification of endangered species, the settlement of
confiscated species and the investigation of crimes;
- Advocate and conduct awareness program to prevent the use and consumption of
wildlife products nationwide; and
- Strengthen cooperation with regional and international law enforcement networks
(ASEAN WEN, Interpol) in trafficking and illegal transportation of wild plants and
animals.
c) Control, halt and prevent the damage caused by invasive alien species; and enhance
biosafety management of genetically modified organisms
- Investigate the status of invasive and potentially invasive alien species on a national
scale, with particular emphasis on protected areas, agricultural areas, and forest
ecosystems;
- Implement the project to prevent and control invasive alien species to 2020, under
Decision 1896/QD-TTg dated December 17, 2012 of the Prime Minister; ensuring that
the number of discovered invasive alien species will not increase compared to 2010;
- Enhance cooperation, exchange, and learning from experience on the biosafety
management of genetically modified organisms, to improve technical and professional
expertise of biosafety management agencies and units at all levels; and
175
- Increase investment in infrastructure and resources for implementation of measures to
monitor and control the risks of genetically modified organisms to the environment and
biodiversity; Develop and promulgate legal documents on redress and liability in
biosafety management activities of GMOs; and assess the status of the release of GMOs
and products containing GMOs to the environment, and their appearance in the market.
5. Biodiversity conservation in the context of climate change
a) Identify climate change impacts on biodiversity and promote biodiversity conservation as a
means to respond to climate change
- Conduct research to assess and predict the impacts of climate change on biodiversity of
Viet Nam;
- Conduct research on the role of biodiversity in the mitigation of, and adaptation to,
climate change in vulnerable areas such as river basins, coastal areas of Red River Delta
and Mekong River Delta; and take measures to increase the resilience ability of
biodiversity in these regions.
b) Development of biological corridors to increase connectivity among forest ecosystems and critical
biodiversity areas to adapt to climate change
- Develop policies for the management of biodiversity corridors, defining management
objectives, the use of land in biodiversity corridors, and their connection to the development of
land use planning at the local level;
- Establish biodiversity corridors connecting protected areas, making efforts to establish four
biodiversity corridors by 2020 and prioritize the implementation of pilot projects in the northern
mountainous areas, central and western highland regions; and apply mechanisms to assist
financial resources for forest corridors.
c) Implementation of forest regeneration program using methods and approaches such as biodiversity
conservation, enhancing carbon stock, and adaptation and mitigation of climate change
- Integrate biodiversity conservation targets into the implementation of the national action
program on “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through efforts to limit deforestation and
forest degradation, sustainable management of forest resources, and conserving and enhancing
forest carbon stocks” period 2011-2020 (REDD+) approved by the Prime Minister under
Decision 799/QD-TTg, dated June 27, 2012;
- Map areas of high biodiversity value in the REDD+ program; promote the use of native
species for forest enrichment and restoration in the framework of REDD+; provide
information of the implementation of national action plans on REDD+ and contribute to
reach two targets of biodiversity conservation and adaptation to climate change;
- Minimize risks to biodiversity from implementation of the REDD+ program through the
application of stringent social and environmental security mechanisms.
176
Progress towards the targets of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation at the
national level:
Target GSPC 1, 2, 3 ...
Go in the right direction to achieve the goal at the national level
Check this box if the measures have been taken and the current state of problems
resolved by the goal will be met before the target deadlines.
Progress aims toward national target levels but is insufficient
There is no significant change at the national levels
The tasks and solutions proposed to achieve the specific objectives of Viet Nam NBSAP:
After a period of implementation of the NBSAP's tasks, the positive aspects of
biodiversity conservation achieved in Viet Nam can be seen as follows:
- Legal documentation system related to biodiversity conservation is gradually
being finalized to serve as basis for conservation activities at both central and
local levels.
- Awareness of biodiversity conservation has been step by step improved at all
levels of society, especially at local levels and communities in areas with high
biodiversity values;
- Enhancing and development biodiversity conservation are carried out at
ecosystem, species, and genetic levels, in terrestrial, and marine environments.
- The benefits of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services have been
initially exploited and used for socio-economic development and are reasonably
shared to improve people's livelihoods (for examples ecotourism, conservation,
exploitation and use of species, genetic resources for livestock development,
cultivation, health, scientific research, payment for forest environment services
etc.);
- A number of quantitative objectives, such as mangrove area and grass cover, tend
to increase, while other indicators on area and percentage of the NR, forest cover
have not been obtained yet, but the trend is positive.
Objective GSPC 1: An online flora of all known plants
There are a number of Vietnamese sites related to plant conservation such as:
http://www.botanyvn.com and http://vncreatures.net.
There has not yet online flora of all known plants, but in the NBDS, there are list of plant
species occurring in protected areas, which has been being upadated.
Viet Nam is known to have approximately 20,000 terrestrial and aquatic plant species, of which
16,428 species are land plants, 13,747 are vascular plant species, 2,681 are species of
Marchantiophyta and monophyletic, and of which 30% are considered endemic to Viet Nam.
177
Table 15. 24 newly described genera of plants in Viet Nam since 1993
1. Hiepia (Asclepiadaceae) – 2012
2. Lockia (Orchidaceae) - 2012
3. - Theana (Orchidaceae) – 2012
4. - Lanonia (Arecaceae) – 2011
5. - Miguelia (Orchidaceae) – 2011
6. - Newmania (Zingiberaceae) - 2011
7. - Hayata (Orchidaceae) – 2009
8. - Hamularia (Orchidaceae) – 2006
9. - Xyloselinum (Apiaceae) - 2006
10. - Kontumia (Dryopteridaceae) - 2005
11. Vietorchis (Orchidaceae) – 2003
12. - Zeuxinella (Orchidaceae) – 2003
13. - Xanthocyparis (Cupressaceae) – 2002
14. - Caobangia (Dryopteridaceae) – 2002
15. - Metapanax (Araliaceae) - 2001
16. - Ascocentropsis (Orchidaceae) - 2000
17. - Rubovietnamia (Rubiaceae) – 1998
18. - Vidalasia (Rubiaceae) - 1998
19. - Fosbergia (Rubiaceae) – 1997
20. - Distichochlamys (Zingiberaceae) - 1995
21. - Viet Namochloa (Poaceae) – 1995
22. - Grushvitzkya (Araliaceae) – 1994
23. - Viet Namia (Asclepiadaceae) - 1994
24. - Christensonia (Orchidaceae) - 1993
Source: Missouri Botanical Garden, 2012
There have been many more plant species newly described in the period 2010-2017.
During the Prosea Project conducted in 1996-2005, botanists from the Institute of Ecology
and Biological Resources published 42 volumes of the book of PROSEA.
In the Flora Program of Viet Nam, conducted from 1995 to the present, 21 books on the flora
of Viet Nam have been published.
178
Objective GSPC 2: An assessment of the conservation status of known plant
speciesfor conservation actions
As of 2014, the IUCN Red List contained 219 plant species that occur in Viet Nam.
In Vietnam, IEBR had conducted review and assessment of status endangered species,
including plants, and developed Vietnam’s Red Data Book in 2007, in which 464 plant
species have been classified at different conservation levels (noting that these levels
differ to the IUCN Red List categories). Other assessments have been carried out to
develop the lists of endangered species in Vietnam to be taken conservation measures. In
Decree 160/2013/ND-CP, there are 17 species of plants and 15 plant cultivated varieties
listed as ‘endangered, precious, and rare species’ prioritized for protection in Vietnam.
As part of a project conducted from 2014 to 2017 by the Institute of Ecology and
Biological Resources under the Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology, an
assessment of species was undertaken with the objective of updating Viet Nam’s Red
Data Book. The following results on plants are relevant:
- A total of 1,217 species were assessed as being threatened, consisting of 1,114
species of Magnolia, 45 species of Pinophyta, 17 species of Polypodiophyta, one
species of Equisetopsida, two species of Lycopodiophyta, one species of
Psilotopsida, 14 species of Rhodophyta, six species of Ochrophyta, three species
of Chlorophyta, and 14 species of Monophyletic.
- The work proposed that up to 600 species of plants and fungi be included in the
Red Book, consisting of 515 species of Magnolia, 41 species of Pinophyta, seven
species of Polypodiophyta, two species of Lycopodiophyta, one species of
Psilotopsida, 11 species of Rhodophyta, six species of Ochrophyta, three species
of Chlorophyta, and 14 species of Monophyletic.
Objective GSPC 3: Information, research and associated outputs, and methods
necessary to implement the Strategy developed and shared
In the first half of the twentieth century, French botanists, under chief author H. Lecomte
published the General Indochina Flora Book Sets (Flore Générale de l'Indo-Chine) and
the complement (Suppléments à la Flore Genérale de l’Indo-Chine) with seven volumes
(1907-1952). Based on the Bentham & Hooker system, the authors classified and
described more than 7,000 species of plants belonging to over 200 families of vascular
plants in Indochina, including Viet Nam.
Since the 1960s, botanists from around the world and Viet Nam have been compiling
Flora of Cambodia, Laos and Viet Nam (more than 35 volumes have been published). Le
Kha et at. (1969-1976) published the Common Viet Nam Plants in six volumes. Pham
Hoang Ho (1970-1972) has published The most common plants in the South, which
describes 5,326 species of plants. Pham Hoang Ho also researched flora and published
An Illustrated Flora of Viet Nam in three volumes. This had sufficient number of species
to facilitate the study of plant diversity in Viet Nam until now.
In two thematic editions of the Journal of Biology (1994-1995), several authors
179
published on plant taxonomy for hundreds of species. It is noteworthy that the three
volumes of the list of Vietnamese plant species (2001, 2003, 2005) identified a list of
more than 20,000 plants and fungal species nationwide. This is the most comprehensive
and reliable document on Viet Nam’s flora. The book serves as the basis for research and
taxonomy. To date, 21 books on the flora of Viet Nam have been published.
The scope of research has covered both the continental and coastal territory of Viet Nam.
However, surveys are usually restricted to the existing nature reserves.
Most of the collections of plants in Viet Nam, specifically the collections of plant
samples at the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources at the Viet Nam Academy
of Social Sciences, have basic records for each specimen.
Objective GSPC 4: At least 15 per cent of each ecological region or vegetation type
secured through effective management and/or restoration
By 2018, there were 172 protected areas in Viet Nam with a total area of 2,493,844 ha,
comprising 33 national parks, 65 nature reserves, 18 species and habitat conservation
areas, and 56 landscape protected areas, in all ecological/geographical regions of Viet
Nam. The total area of nature reserves is 2,269,426 ha, which is equal to 6.8% of the
territory.
Objective GSPC 5: At least 75 per cent of the most important areas for plant
diversity of each ecological region protected with effective management in place for
conserving plants and their genetic diversity
Viet Nam's topography and climate have created a variety of natural ecosystems,
including tropical wet evergreen forest, tropical semi-deciduous forest, broadleaf
evergreen forest on limestone mountains, natural coniferous forest, sparse forest
(dipterocarp forest), Melaleuca freshwater marsh forest, bamboo forest, and mangrove
forest. In addition to these eight types of forest ecosystems, forest scientists divide
according to 14 types of forest vegetation (Thai Van Trung, 1999). Based on the factors
of climate, topography, geology, and soil on the continental part of Viet Nam, it is
divided into eight forest ecoregions, with 47 sub-regions, each with specific
characteristics, varying by vegetation type and landscape. The important areas for plant
diversity have been protected and managed under the system of protected areas.
180
Figure 49. Forest Areas and Regional Priorty Zones in Viet Nam
(source: ICEM, 2010)
181
Objective GSPC 6: At least 75 per cent of production lands in each sector managed
sustainably, consistent with the conservation of plant diversity
According to the General Statistics Office in 2015, there are 7,834,090 ha of agricultural
land in the country. At present, there is a trend towards developing organic agriculture in
Viet Nam, beginning with fruits and vegetables.
By 2015, the nation had 16,033,696 ha of forest land, of which 5,848,557 ha was
protected forest land, 2,228,888 ha was special-use forest land and 7,956, 251 ha was
production forest land. By 2020, the area of raising soft shell and brackish shrimp will be
about 780,200 ha. The area of Pangasius farming in 2016 was 4,552 ha. In some coastal
areas and in the Mekong Delta, a rotation culture of having fish in rice fields, mangroves
with shrimp and crab farming are expanding. To date, there has no indicator on the
percentage of production lands in each sector managed sustainably, consistent with the
conservation of plant diversity.
Objective GSPC 7: At least 75 per cent of known threatened plant species
conserved in-situ
According to a review conducted by MARD in 2018, the special-use forest system
covers an area of 2,269,426 ha, accounting for 7% of the territory. By 2018, there were
172 protected areas in Viet Nam with a total area of 2,493,844 ha area. The number of
threatened plant species is likely to increase in the proposed amended Red Book for Viet
Nam.
To date, there is no statistic on the percentage of known threatened plant species
conserved in situ in Viet Nam.
Objective GSPC 8: At least 75 per cent of threatened plant species in ex situ
collections, preferably in the country of origin, and at least 20 per cent available for
recovery and restoration programmes
Large botanical gardens in Viet Nam are Bach Thao and Thao Cam Vien. There are
also botanical gardens in protected areas (about 15 gardens, covering 8,000 ha),
medicinal gardens (about 50 gardens, covering 300 ha) and 600 ha of nursery gardens for
forestry.
In terms of gene banks and DNA specimens, at present, there are four organizations in
Viet Nam with cold storage for seed preservation: the Viet Nam Academy of
Agricultural Sciences, Southern Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Can
Tho University, and the Institute of Food Crops. During 2011-2015, the Center for Plant
Resources under the Viet Nam Academy of Agricultural Sciences stored over 38,334
specimens, collected 7,721 specimens of more than 100 plants species in the country, and
imported 231 genetic resources.
The Botanical Garden of Hanoi at the University of Pharmacy (precursor of the
University of Indochina), was built in the French colonial period from the early 1910s.
Originally, the garden was about 10,000 m2 with 500 species of medicinal plants taken
from all over Indochina. The botanical garden now has about 20,000 samples of Viet
Nam’s medicinal plants, collected from the period of its establishment up to now.
182
The Institute of Medicinal Materials of the Ministry of Health is the focal point for
preserving the genetic diversity of medicinal plants and, with this aim, has maintained a
network in seven ecological zones in Viet Nam. A total of 1,531 genes belonging to 884
species have been preserved in medicinal plant gardens. Of these, five medicinal plant
gardens managed by the Institute are preserving 1,168 genetic resources from 760
species.
Objective GSPC 9: 70 per cent of the genetic diversity of crops including their wild
relatives and other socio-economically valuable plant species conserved, while
respecting, preserving and maintaining associated indigenous and local knowledge
Vietnam has progress in conservation of genetic diversity of crops and their wild
relatives and other socio-economically valuable plant species.
In 2016, the Institute of Medicinal Materials (Ministry of Health) published a list of
medicinal plants in Viet Nam. This contains 5,117 species and subspecies of plants that
are used in medicine, belonging to 1,823 genera, 360 families of eight phyla of vascular
higher plants, and some taxons belonging to the groups of algae, moss, and mushrooms.
In addition, the Institute has conducted surveys of indigenous knowledge, collecting
medicinal plants and the indigenous knowledge of ethnic minorities, including H'Mong
(Lao Cai) Muong (Thanh Hoa, Hoa Binh, Yen Bai, Nghe An), Dao (Ba Vi, Lao Cai, Hoa
Binh, Vinh Phuc), Co Tu (Thua Thien-Hue), Van Kieu (Tay Nguyen highland), Tay (Ha
Giang, Cao Bang, Bac Can, Lang Son, Thai Nguyen), Nung (Lang Son), San Diu (Vinh
Phuc), and Khmer (An Giang). This project has collected and preserved knowledge of
approximately 1,296 medicine remedies held by the ethnic communities.
Over 10 research centers of medicinal plants and more than 50 medicinal herb gardens
have been established to conserve and develop these diverse resources. In Viet Nam,
there are projects on investigating and researching medicinal plants for each sub-territory
or indigenous knowledge on medicinal plants. For example, Dr. Nguyen Van Du, from
Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, has contributed results to the Plan of
"Investigation and research on medicinal plants used in ethnic medicine in the Central
Highlands and proposal on conservation measures" coded TN3/T10 (2011-2014) as
following:
1. The list of medicinal plants in the Central Highlands includes 1,633 species
belonging to 6 vascular plant species, among which 51 species are complement to
the list mentioned above. In the 88 species that have been recorded in the Viet
Nam Red Data Book (2007), the four most critically endangered species (CR) are
the Glyptostrobus pensilis (Staunt.) K. Koch, the Indian Rauvolfia serpentina (L.)
Benth. ex Kurz, the Cinnamomum parthenoxylon (Jack) Meisn, and the Kim cang
petelot - Smilax petelotii T. Koyama. Moreover, there are 37 species endangered
(EN) and 47 species vulnerable (VU).
2. Collect 2,400 samples of specimens of medicinal plants through ethnophytic
investigation of medicinal remedies of 14 different ethnic groups in the Central
Highlands.
3. Develop a digital map of precious and rare medicinal plants in the Central
183
Highlands for exploitation and use.
4. Build database of 531 samples of medicinal plants collected in the wild through
investigation of ethnic medicine in the Central Highlands.
5. Collect 362 ethnic medical remedies of ethnic minority peoples of Ba Na, Cil,
Cho Ro, Chu Ru, Dc medical remedies of ethnic minority
Objective GSPC 10: Effective management plans in place to prevent new biological
invasions and to manage important areas for plant diversity that are invaded
Vietnam is facing with some new plants invading in protected areas, such as Merremia
boisiana. This species was trongly invade plant within tropical secondary forests at
Vietnam such as Bach Ma National Park, Hai Van mountains, Son Tra natural reserve...
Local governments have carried out control plans but not yet success.
Objective GSPC 11: No species of wild flora endangered by international trade
The forests of Viet Nam provide a large number of commercially valuable timber
species, including Iron Wood (Erythrophleum fordii), Fragant Rosewood (Dalbergia
spp.), various species of timberwood species, such as Apitong (Dipterocarpus spp.),
Yellow Balau (Shorea spp.), Talauma wood (Hopea spp.) and other coniferous species
such as the Hinoki (Fokienia hodginsii). The abundance of most species that are used as
timber have declined considerably in recent decades but knowledge about the impact of
this decline on the viability of their populations remains incomplete. Other economically
threatened species that are over-exploited include Agarwood (Aquilaria crassna), a plant
for aloe wood, and Ngoc Linh Gingseng (Panax Vietnamensis).
In many mountainous provinces of northern Viet Nam, the depletion and local extinction
of precious medicinal plants for smuggling across borders is quite common. In Cao
Bang, Chinese traders have set up many stations to buy and process local medicinal
herbs such as white and yellow Stephania flower, Gynostemma, arrowroot, Millettia
reticulata, velvet grass etc. Many medicinal plants that are illegally exported to China
currently have unclear economic value and poorly-understood therapeutic use. Plant
species that are identified in CITES that are threatened by commercial harvesting from
natural forests, including orchids and cactus, also continue to be traded.
Viet Nam became a full member of CITES in 1994. From that time, the Vietnamese
Government has made efforts to implement the Convention. The country has enacted a
series of policies, principles, and regulations to legislate CITES, and has established a
system of enforcement agencies, CITES regulatory authorities and scientific bodies.
In 2016, Viet Nam held an international conference on illegal wildlife trade in Hanoi,
where a joint statement was issued on combating illegal trade of wild fauna and flora.
Subsequently, in 2017, the CITES Management Authority of Viet Nam hosted a meeting
to develop a CITES Action Plan that aims to combat the illegal trade of species between
Viet Nam, Laos, and China, and to strengthen cooperation in enforcement, control and
prevention of illegal transportation and trade of timber and timber products.
Objective GSPC 12: All wild harvested plant-based products sourced sustainably
In Viet Nam, products derived from plants include wood, medicinal plants, food, animal
food, fiber, firewood, and other derivatives. In Viet Nam, thousands of species are
184
exploited for the above-mentioned uses and many are heavily exploited for commercial
purposes. For example, Bac Kan province has over 1,000 species that are used as
resources. There are many species of high economic value, including Smilax glabra,
Millettia reticulata, Campanulaceae, Stephania, Smilax, Stemona tuberosa, Drynaria
fortunei, Keteleeria davidiana, and Anoectochilus setaceus. Although the potential for
medicinal herbs is high, there has been little attention paid to sustainable use of such
resources. The current situation of exploiting and trading medicinal herbs is quite
common and is not under the supervision of any management agency. Most medicinal
herbs are exploited by local people to meet market demands. The plant processing
facilities ship medicinal herbs to China every month, with the volumes involved being
that of up to hundreds of tones. To deal with the situation, Bac Kan People's Committee
issued Decision 435/2010 on management of exploitation and trading of medicinal plant
resources in the province.
Another example of managing medical herbs comes from Huu Lien Nature Reserve in
Lang Son Province. Actions undertaken there include:
- Invest in awareness-raising species conservation programs so that all local people
can understand and participate in conservations.
- Guide people to use plants to maximize health care, while not affecting the
growth and regeneration of natural herbs.
- Formulate a unified regulation on management in buffer zones;
- Invest in the construction of forest and home gardens to produce medicinal herbs
in a way that it is a reliable source for pharmaceutical materials for the market
place;
- Reduce pressure on natural source of herbs.
- Build a conservation garden of threatened species.
The Institute of Medicinal Materials, which is under the Ministry of Health, has carried
out activities such as research on the import and domestication of medicinal plants; on
various species’ biological characteristics; building technological processes for raising
medicinal plants and animals, ;on the selection of breeds; formulating seed standards;
organizing the assay; evaluation of medicinal plant varieties; and development of
regulations for producing safe medicinal herbs following good aquaculture practices
(Viet-GAP).
Thus, medicinal plant gardens in small protected areas have been created in Viet Nam.
There is also cultivation of medicinal plants at a larger scale, including in medicinal
garden in Tam Dao, Sa Pa, Hanoi, and Ho Chi Minh City.
The need to use high-value products exerts pressure on natural resources. Also
problematic is the widespread use of agrochemicals and unsuitable agricultural practices
in Viet Nam, which can undermine crop quality. Adoption of international standards on
sustainable harvesting of medicinal plants and essential oils (ISSC MAP) aims to ensure
sustainable management of medicinal plants during the processes of collection,
management, production and marketing.
185
According to the report (draft) of the Government of 2018 on the results of three years of
implementation of the Program for Sustainable Forestry Development for the period
2016 - 2020, as of August 2018, the total area of forest certified under the FSC system is
229,281 ha (147,667 ha of planted forest and 81,604 ha of natural forest) in 17 provinces
with 36 applications Certificates: four households (Tuyen Quang, Yen Bai, Quang Tri
and Quang Nam) and 32 forestry companies. Timber production is certified at 2.0
million m3, certified wood has a 10-15% higher selling price than unlicensed wood.
Objective GSPC 13: Indigenous and local knowledge innovations and practices
associated with plant resources maintained or increased, as appropriate, to support
customary use, sustainable livelihoods, local food security and health care
There have been some activities to survey and support to maintain and expand local
knowledge innovations and practices for livelihoods, local food security and healthcare.
The Institute of Ecology and Biology Resources, the Institute of Medicinal Materials,
Hanoi University of Pharmacy, and the Institute of Social Sciences have conducted
research on ethnic botany for many years. Such research investigates knowledge of
indigenous peoples on natural resource use and conservation. It has also built databases
on medicinal resources and collected and created a system for conserving genetic
resources of plants and animals and the experience of ethnic minority groups use of
medicinal plants. As a result, hundreds of medicinal plants and traditional herbs have
been collected from the Dao, Nung, Tay and H'Mong ethnic minority groups in the
mountains of Viet Nam. Some positive practices, such as the protection of sacred forests
and sacred waters (habitats for many species of wild fauna and flora), of ethnic
minorities are maintained by the authorities at all levels.
The Institute of Medicinal Materials has conducted surveys of indigenous knowledge,
and collected medicinal plants and the experience of ethnic minority groups in using
such medicinal plants, including for H'Mong (Lao Cai) Muong (Thanh Hoa, Hoa Binh,
Yen Bai, Nghe An), Dao (Ba Vi, Lao Cai, Hoa Binh, Vinh Phuc), Co Tu (Thua Thien-
Hue), Van Kieu (Tay Nguyen highland), Tay (Ha Giang, Cao Bang, Bac Can, Lang Son,
Thai Nguyen), Nung (Lang Son), San Diu (Vinh Phuc), and Khmer (An Giang), groups.
This has included the collection of 1,296 folk medicine remedies. Issues related to
indigenous knowledge, especially that of ethnic minorities, on the exploitation of
biological resources for health etc. are integrated into strategies and national action plans
on biodiversity.
Objective GSPC 14: The importance of plant diversity and the need for its
conservation incorporated into communication, education and public awareness
programmes
Viet Nam has botanical gardens for education and entertainment purposes. These include
botanical gardens in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. In addition, there are many botanical
gardens built for research and conservation in the protected areas; namely Cuc Phuong
Botanical Garden in Ninh Binh; Tam Dao Vegetable Garden in Vinh Phuc, Thai Nguyen;
and Bidoup Nui Ba Botanical Garden in Lam Dong Province.
Improving awareness is an effective measure of strengthening biodiversity conservation.
186
Therefore, since the Biodiversity Law came into effect, there have been activities aimed
at raising awareness of biodiversity. Extra-curricular activities on conservation often
bring students to the educational and recreational gardens. Internships for students who
are majoring in botany are usually undertaken at botanical gardens in protected areas.
Objective GSPC 15: The number of trained people working with appropriate
facilities sufficient according to national needs, to achieve the targets of this
Strategy
A network of education and training of managerial and technical human resources in the
field of biodiversity conservation in Viet Nam has been developed. About 20 universities
have specializations in biodiversity, including biology, environmental management,
forestry, agriculture and fisheries, geography, and natural resources. Many universities
have also postgraduate programs, including Masters and PhD degrees related to
biodiversity conservation, including University of Natural Sciences (Hanoi National
University), Hanoi University of Education, Hanoi Agricultural University, Forestry
University, Vinh University, Nha Trang University, National University at Ho Chi Minh
City and the University of Agroforestry at Ho Chi Minh City. Some private universities
with training in environmental science, agriculture, forestry, etc. also incorporate natural
resources and biodiversity into their curricula. In 2016, the Ministry of Education and
Training assigned a number of universities to compile teaching documents related to
biodiversity conservation.
Over ten research institutes have specialized majors related to biodiversity. For example,
the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources of Viet Nam’s Academy of Science
and Technology has four specialized research groups related to plants: i) Lab of Botany
(research on plant taxonomy); ii) Lab of Plant Ecology; iii) Lab of Plant Resources; and
iv) Lab of Ethnic Botany. In addition, there is Me Linh Biodiversity Station, an area of
about 200 ha forest land, which contains a collection of typical tropical plants and
animals of Viet Nam. Many generations of botanists of the Institute are the authors of
most books on flora that have been published in Viet Nam. Many researchers in botany
at institutions and universities across Viet Nam have been trained in botany at the
Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources. More information can be found at
http://www.iebr.ac.vn
Nha Trang Oceanography Institute of Viet Nam’s Academy of Science and Technology
has a laboratory for marine botany. More information can be found at
http://www.vnio.org.vn
The Institute of Tropical Biology in Ho Chi Minh City, which is under the Viet Nam
Academy of Science and Technology, has research groups in plant gene technology and
plant cell technology. More information can be found at http://itb.ac.vn/
The Southern Institute of Ecology in Ho Chi Minh City, which is under the Viet Nam
Academy of Science and Technology, has a research group in botany. More information
can be found at http://sie.vast.vn/
Over the past 20 years, a network for plant genetic conservation, storage, and
exploitation has been formed. The Plant Resources Center, overseen by MARD, is the
focal point of the network. There are about 500 people in the network; of these, 140
187
people are in the Plant Resources Center: two Associate Professors, ten staff with
doctorates, 34 staff with master’s degrees, 64 with Bachelor's degrees, and the rest are
technicians and technical staff.
The Viet Nam Academy of Agricultural Sciences is a special institute within MARD.
During the period of 2006 - 2012, the Institute graduated 103 staff with PhDs and 188
staff with Masters in the fields of plant resource management. Please refer to
http://vaas.org.vn/
The country has nearly 8,000 people with bachelor’s degrees who have experience
relating to the fields of biology, agriculture, fisheries and forestry. Every year, hundreds
of undergraduate students in biology and biotechnology graduate and approximately 50
masters and 10 PhDs complete their degrees in a range of fields relating to biodiversity
and natural resource management. In the above figures, people who have been trained in
botany and conservation accounts for about ¼ of the total number.
Objective GSPC 16: Institutions, networks and partnerships for plant conservation
established or strengthened at national, regional and international levels to achieve
the targets of this Strategy
Viet Nam has a system of botanic gardens, which has been mentioned above. Also, Viet
Nam’s protected area system has the function of preserving important national and
international ecosystems and threatened species. Many forest ecosystems and different
vegetation types are being conserved, including tropical evergreen rainforest, semi-
evergreen tropical, deciduous forest, broadleaf evergreen forest on limestone mountains,
natural coniferous forest, sparse forest (dipterocarp forest), Melaleuca freshwater marsh
forest on peat land, bamboo forest, and mangrove forest.
There is a botanic association under the General Biology Association of Viet Nam’s
Union of Science and Technology Association. The network of botanical gardens,
protected areas, and botanists are working towards conservation and sustainable
development of plant diversity and plant resources of Viet Nam, as well as the objectives
of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC).
Most research institutes and universities involved in botany have cooperative
relationships within the country, as well as cooperation with institutes and universities
internationally.
Section VI. Additional information on the contributions of indigenous peoples and local
communities (completion of this section is optional)
VI. Additional information on the contribution of indigenous peoples and local
communities to achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets if not provided in the above
sections.
Viet Nam has 54 ethnic minority groups, who predominantly live in forest and mountainous
areas that have high levels of biodiversity. Most ethnic groups have their own indigenous
knowledge relating to the use of natural resources, including resources in both forests and the
188
sea. Products from biological resources are abundant and used daily as food, medicine,
household goods etc.
Section VII. Updated national profile on biodiversity
VII. Updated national biodiversity profile (Please review and update the content currently
displayed at https://www.cbd.int/countries ).
Biodiversity events
Biodiversity of Viet Nam
1. Current status and trends in biodiversity, and benefits from biodiversity services and
ecosystems
Viet Nam's territory is located in the eastern part of the Indochinese Peninsula and extends over
15 latitudes from the north to the south, with a length of about 1,650 km and a total land area of
331,698 km2. The total area of wetlands in Viet Nam is 11,847,975 ha (not including seasonal
streams and springs, hot springs, and mineral water spots), accounting for 37% of Viet Nam’s
total natural land area Viet Nam. The country also has a coastline of 3,260 km (excluding island
coastlines) with more than 3,000 small and large islands along the coast as well as the spratly and
paracel archipelagos. Viet Nam's exclusive economic zone is over 1 million km2.
Viet Nam is recognized globally as having high biodiversity. To date, approximately 51,400
species have been identified in Viet Nam, including 7,500 species or varieties of micro-
organisms, 20,000 plant species, 10,900 species of terrestrial animals, 2,000 species of
invertebrates and freshwater and saltwater fish, and over 11,000 marine species. Of the known
organisms, the level of endemic is quite high (about 30% of terrestrial species, 4.6% of species
and subspecies of birds, 27.4% of freshwater mussels and snails, and 58% of freshwater shrimp,
crabs etc.). From 2014 to September 2015, 344 species of organisms have been newly described
(208 species of animals, and 136 species of plants).
In addition to having high diversity of natural organisms, Viet Nam is one of the world's most
diverse sources of cultivated plants and livestock, and has more than 6,000 varieties of rice,
about 800 species of crop plants, and is the source of 40 domestic animals. Livestock and crops
have been developed for hundreds of years and have valuable genetic traits. These are precious
indigenous genomes of Viet Nam that need to be protected, preserved, and developed.
Biodiversity resources have contributed to the livelihoods of Vietnamese people for generations
through the provision of food and health care. This is especially the case for people living in
remote areas who are directly dependent on resource extraction.
In 1990, national forest cover was only 28%, with an area of 9,175,000 ha. Thanks to the forest
plantations, the area of forest and forest cover increases every year. By 2017, the forest area
reached 14,415,381 ha, covering 41% of Viet Nam’s total national area. However, because
planted forest is a monoculture, the diversity of fauna living in such forest is much lower than
189
that in natural evergreen tropical forest. Primary forest covers only 0.5 million ha and is
fragmented, scattered in the Central Highlands, south-east and north-central regions of Viet
Nam. It is also exploited, which results in reduction of natural resources and ecological services.
The trend for mangrove forest in Viet Nam from 1943 (408,500 ha) to 2009 has shown a very
strong downward trend; the lowest of which in that period, 83,288 ha, was reached in 2003. This
means that, in 60 years, 4/5 mangrove forest area has been lost. Statistics on mangrove forest
area from 2010 to 2017 show that the area is still changing annually. As of 2015, the area of
mangrove again fell quite low, covering approximately 57,211 ha, however, by 2017, it had
reached an area of 213,142 ha due to reforestation projects.
Primary mangrove forests are only left in small areas in coastal Quang Ninh and Ca Mau. In fact,
62% of the mangrove forest area is a monoculture, newly planted and poor in biomass and
biodiversity. The area of mangrove forest has been reduced mainly due to being cleared for
shrimp and other aquaculture, as well as for construction of infrastructure, residential areas, and
other economic activities. Mangrove loss leads to serious damage to biodiversity, especially loss
of breeding and nursery areas for many marine species and habitats of bird species, as well as
loss in accumulation of estuarine sediments and reduction of pollution or erosion.
According to the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), there
were only 25 threatened species in Viet Nam in 1996; however, this jumped to 362 species of
animals and 219 species by 2014. In the Viet Nam Red Book (2007), the total number of
threatened species is 882 (418 species of animals and 464 species of plants), of which nine
species are considered extinct in the wild in Viet Nam. Notably, in 2011, the sub-species of
Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus was officially declared extinct in Viet Nam (Gersmann,
2011). For flora, Paphiopedilum Vietnamense is extinct in nature. Many of the plants that were
previously classified as endangered are now in critically endangered, including Cupressus
torulosa, Callitropsis, and Panax bipinnatifidus.
Monitoring of important bird areas indicates that the number of threatened species, especially of
globally-threatened migratory birds, is declining. Some species have not been seen for several
years.
A project conducted from 2014 to 2017 that focused on assessing threatened species to amend
Viet Nam’s Red Book, Viet Nam proposed the inclusion of 1,211 species, including 600 species
of plants and fungi, and 611 species of fauna. If this is undertaken, a new version of the Red
Book of Viet Nam will have a significantly high number of species.
As of 2018, Viet Nam has 172 protected areas with a total area of 2,493,844 ha in various
geographic/ecoregions on the continent and in four marine areas (Gulf of Tonkin, Central Viet
Nam, South East and the South West). This consists of 33 national parks, 65 nature reserves, 18
species and habitat conservation areas, and 56 landscape protected areas. The area of terrestrial
protected areas is 2,269,426 ha, accounting for 6.8% of Viet Nam’s territory. All forests that
have threatened species or important habitats can be found in those protected areas. In Viet
Nam’s ‘Master plan for national biodiversity conservation by 2020, vision to 2030’, there is a
plan to gradually add 46 new protected areas. The total number of existing and planned new
reserves nationwide would thus reach 219, spread cross 3,067,000 ha.
2. Main pressures and impacts on biodiversity (direct and indirect):
Threats to biodiversity in Viet Nam include population growth and increased consumption of
190
natural resources, illegal exploitation of timber and non-timber forest products, over-exploitation
and illegal fishing, and hunting and trading of wildlife (plants and animals). Other threats consist
of transforming forest land and water surface for infrastructure development, expanding
agricultural land and growing industrial crops, introduction of invasive alien species, pollution,
climate change, forest fires, and changing land use that decreases the total area of natural forest
and/or fragments the forest ecosystem and causes loss of habitat for wildlife.
Agricultural land increased from 6.7 million ha in 1990 to 7.8 million ha by 2015. Illegal logging
and timber exploitation are still widespread, even inside conservation zones. The construction of
roads for timber transport has facilitated the hunting and exploitation of non-timber forest
products, putting more pressure on wildlife populations.
For freshwater ecosystems, there is over-exploitation and illegal extraction of economically
valuable aquatic species, and the development of hydropower dams and plants. The later leads
to loss of habitat for many aquatic species as well as prevents migratory species from breeding,
resulting in changes to the reproductive cycle, growth and feeding behavior of organisms in the
river systems; it also causes huge impacts on downstream river systems, as well as coastal
estuarine areas due to changes in water circulation and saline intrusion.
Most of the coastal marine ecosystems are degraded, some seriously due to habitats being
heavily affected by development activities and environmental pollution. The increase of
consumption, coupled with the unsustainable exploitation of fisheries resources, has depleted
coastal fisheries. Overfishing and illegal exploitation of marine products continue. The size of
fish species dominating the catch in most Vietnamese waters is quite small and often does not
reach the length indicating sexual maturity. Destructive fishing techniques, such as the use of
explosives, toxins, and electricity, are used often in both inland and sea waters. This is
considered a serious threat to more than 80% of the coral reefs of Viet Nam. Off-shore fishing
vessels (capacity group > 90 CV) constitute a much smaller share of the fishing fleet than do
near-shore boats (capacity group <90 CV).
Measures to strengthen the implementation of the Convention
3. Implement the NBSAP
The first national biodiversity action plan of Viet Nam (NBAP) was approved by the Prime
Minister in 1995. The second NBAP was developed and approved in 2007, covering five more
broad objectives and containing specific and measurable goals and indicators. Its main objectives
are to strengthen and develop the special-use forest system; restore 50% of degraded watershed
forest; effectively protect plants and animals that are at risk of extinction; increase the area of
nationally and internationally important wetland protected areas to more than 1.2 million ha;
restore 200,000 ha of mangroves; publicize and perfect the conservation system in order to
effectively preserve indigenous, precious, and rare agricultural crop plants, livestock, micro-
organisms, and animal breeds with high socio-economic value; control and prevent the
exploitation, trading, and consumption of threatened wild animals and plants; inspect 100% of
species, varieties, and genetic resources of imported animals; undertake awareness-raising and
education in the community about the conservation, development, and sustainable use of
biodiversity; and strive for more than 50% of the population to regularly access information on
biodiversity and biosafety, as well as to contribute their opinions in issuing decisions on
biosafety certificates.
191
The Review of implementation of the Biodiversity Action Plan concludes that:
- The legal framework related to biodiversity conservation is gradually being finalized. The
Law on Biodiversity, which was prepared and promulgated in 2008, is considered the
most important legal basis for the management of biodiversity. A decree guiding the
implementation of the Law has also been promulgated.
- The system of nature reserves is continuing to be improved, including terrestrial, wetland
and marine conservation systems.
- The development of community-based models for sustainable use and the equitable
sharing of benefits from biodiversity resources have brought benefit both in terms of
biodiversity conservation and improved the living standards of people living in nature
reserves.
- Awareness-raising and educational programs on biodiversity for all levels of
management, people and students has been undertaken. Many communication programs,
and educational publications to introduce knowledge on biodiversity conservation and
biosafety have been built and are widely spread.
4. Overall actions taken to implement the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity in the period of
2011-2020
There have been remarkable developments in Viet Nam’s protected area system in terms of their
number, area and extent. In 2010, the total forest area (accounting for both natural and plantation
forest) was 13,388,075 ha but, as of 2017, reached 14,415,381 ha and covered 41% of Viet
Nam’s total area. There are 172 protected areas, with a total area of 2,493,844 ha, located in
various geographic/ecoregions and in four seas. Specifically, the area of terrestrial protected
areas is 2,269,426 ha, accounting for 6.8% of Viet Nam’s area. Furthermore, a system of 16
marine protected areas was approved by the Prime Minister in 2010. In 2014, the Prime Minister
approved the ‘National Master Plan for Biodiversity Conservation by 2020, vision to 2030’.
Accordingly, the existing protected area system was finalized and 46 new protected areas are
proposed to be gradually established. This will bring the total number of protected areas to 219
with an area of about 3,067,000 ha.
Protected areas, and those areas with international or regional importance are as follows: six
globally-recognized prioritized ecosystems recorded by WWF, eight Ramsar sites, nine World
Biosphere Reserves; three World Natural Heritage sites, six ASEAN Heritage Sites, 63 important
bird areas, and 104 key biodiversity areas.
In addition to in-situ conservation of species, ex-situ conservation has been developed. This
consists of 11 wildlife rescue centers zoos/botanical gardens (three large ones: Thu Le Zoo, Bach
Thao Zoo and Thao Cam Vien), botanical gardens and botanical collections within protected
areas (about 15 gardens with a total area of 8,000 ha); five medicinal gardens with an area of 300
ha; breeding centers of precious and rare species of high economic value; and genetic banks of
livestock, plants, and micro-organisms at research institutions.
Specifically, in the period 2011-2015, the Plant Resources Center of Viet Nam’s Academy of
Agricultural Sciences and it’s conservation network have safely conserved over 38,3404
accessions of crop species and crop wild relatives samples , collected 7,721 accessions of more
than 100 plant species, imported 231 genetic resources, multiplicated and evaluated 18,336
192
times crop accessions, documented 35,755 records of passport data and 46,914 records of
description data for15,534 crop accessions, more than 7,000 times of crop accessions were
provided for breeding, research and train, and 70 native species of livestock and poultry were
restored . Many mangroves have also been newly planted in coastal areas.
Community-based conservation management, sustainable use of biodiversity resources, and
ecotourism have become models that aim to enhance livelihoods and are used at local levels,
especially in protected areas and biosphere reserves. These livelihood models generate
employment and income for the local community, and work as a mechanism for the preservation
of indigenous knowledge. In addition, there have recently been studies on indigenous people’s
knowledge of botany, especially relating to their protection and use of natural resources.
Traditional cultural activities, such as the creation of sacred forests, establishment of erosion-
prone forest vegetation, and sacred streams for fish all are supported by local government and
play a role in the protection of biodiversity.
5. Mechanisms to support the implementation of national objectives (legislation, funding,
capacity building, coordination, integration, etc.):
Measures to protect the environment and the conservation and sustainable development of
biodiversity resources have been integrated into government policies, as well as sectoral and
inter-sectoral strategies, plans, programs in agriculture, industry, tourism, commerce, finance,
and education. National strategies regarding poverty reduction, hunger eradication, sustainable
development, attempts to combat desertification and climate change, to implement green growth,
as well as regional development plans all include measures to address biodiversity. Biodiversity
conservation has also been incorporated into the implementation of various international
conventions and decrees.
Some agencies have begun to collect environmental protection fees, and to inspect permits for
discharge of waste water. Recently, the concept of payment for ecosystem services has been
introduced in provinces as a pilot, to test this as a means of obtaining financing for biodiversity
conservation. Various laws, such as the Law on Biodiversity (2008) and Forest Law (2017),
provide a legal framework for the application of new policies and regulations regarding access
and sharing benefits from ecosystem services. In addition, infrastructure development projects
and strategic environmental assessments have integrated biodiversity indicators into their
planning by conducting environmental impact assessments.
The budget for conserving biodiversity has increased in recent years, as a result of the Five
Million Hectare Reforestation Program, the ‘Coastal Forest Protection to Cope with Climate
Change in the period of 2015- 2020’ project, the Viet Nam Environment Fund, the Viet Nam
Conservation Fund, Trust Funds, and the Viet Nam Fisheries Resources Restoration Fund. Of all
the funding sources for biodiversity conservation, official development assistance accounts for
an important share of total investment. The Government has committed to allocating 1% of the
total national budget for environmental protection and biodiversity conservation from 2006 (even
though from 2011 to 2015, total biodiversity expenditure accounted for only 0.16% of GDP and
0.58% of total state budget expenditures). Lack of investment in conservation is still a big
challenge for achieving the national targets in the NBSAP.
6. Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism:
193
The monitoring of biodiversity indicates that some of Viet Nam's threatened wildlife species are
critically close to extinction. In some monitoring sites, a number of globally-threatened
migratory birds have declined substantially or are no longer seen.
Technologies (e.g. remote sensing, geographic information systems, camera trapping) have been
used in biodiversity monitoring and have produced encouraging results. Approaches for
ecosystems typical in Viet Nam, such as forests, wetlands and oceans, have been developed and
published. Some technical guidelines on the monitoring of wetland, forest, and sea ecosystems
and guidelines for reporting on the status of biodiversity have been prepared and promulgated
since 2014. However, there is no long-term, systematic and comprehensive plan on monitoring
and evaluation of biodiversity across the country yet.
