The Revival of the Design PatentThe Revival of the Design Patent A L k t D i P t t d th A Look at...
Transcript of The Revival of the Design PatentThe Revival of the Design Patent A L k t D i P t t d th A Look at...
The Revival of the Design Patent
A L k t D i P t t d th A Look at Design Patents and the Implications of Apple v. Samsung
Brian MoriartyBrian MoriartyMary Lou Wakimura
Darrell WongDarrell WongApril 24, 2013
Coming this Fall:Coming this Fall:We’re growing!
C d MA B t MAConcord, MA530 Virginia Rd
Boston, MA155 Seaport Blvd West
2nd Floor
Welcome!Welcome!
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung, Electronics, Inc., et al.USDC – Northern District of CaliforniaUS C o e s c o Ca o a
Case No. 11-CV-01846
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung, Electronics, Inc., et al.USDC – Northern District of CaliforniaUS C o e s c o Ca o a
Case No. 11-CV-01846
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?y g
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?y g
What can a Design Patent mean . . .What can a Design Patent mean . . .
To New Balance? To IBM? To your company?
Design Patent Protectionfor Consumer Productsfor Consumer Products
In many consumer products (e.g., products within the footwear and apparel industry) the purely visual aspects of pp y) p y pthe design of the product may be a key feature of its appeal
Short shelf-life for many consumer productsy p– Design patent protection is quicker and cheaper– Utility patent application directed to technology within a product might
not issue until after product is no longer on sale
Danger from counterfeit products that appropriate look of a product
C t f it d t ll d t i l d th lit f – Counterfeit product generally do not include the same quality of materials, workmanship and technology as the original product
– Design protection provides an additional weapon to use in defending against counterfeiting, especially where utility patent protection is not a ailableavailable
New Balance Minimus 10 Trail
Warrior Sports Home and Away Kitsfor Liverpool F.C. 2012/13for Liverpool F.C. 2012/13
OHIM Community Design Number: 001328231-0003Number: 001328231-0004
OHIM Community Design Number: 001328231-0001Number: 001328231-0002
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?y g
Design Patent D602,143
The Product
Design Patents for Software ProductsDesign Patents for Software Products
Part of a holistic approach including pp gCopyright, Utility Patents, Trademarks, Trade Secrets and Design Patents
“graphic designs” - Computer-generated Icons (MPEP 1504.01(a))Consumer vs “Non Consumer” products Consumer vs. Non-Consumer products
Apple's D604,305 patent - “Graphical User Interface For A Display Screen Or Portions Interface For A Display Screen Or Portions Thereof”
General Principles forC G dComputer-Generated Icons
Must be a non-functional element of design on gan “article of manufacture”
Patentability is reviewed by examining the overall appearance of the article, not individual element-by-element analysisInfringement is analyzed using the “ordinary Infringement is analyzed using the ordinary observer” test – whether the overall appearance of the patent and accused design are substantially the same in the eyes of an ordinary observer in light of the prior art Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc. 543 F.3d Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc. 543 F.3d 665 (Fed Cir. 2008)
Apple D604,305 (2009) IBM D424,544 (2000)
IBM D449,837 (2001)
15
Microsoft D675,221 (2013)
16
Questions?Comments?
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?y g
Design Patent No. D384,190 The Product
Pharmaceutical Design PatentsU.S. Design Patent No. D380,825 U.S. Design Patent No. D671,636
U.S. Design Patent No. D640,366 U.S. Design Patent No. D640,366
Considerations When Preparing D i f D i A li tiDrawings for Design Applications
Black Line Drawingsg– Design patent applications are usually filed with
black line drawings.Can broaden the scope of the claimed design– Can broaden the scope of the claimed design.
– Codes for a limited number of colors available.
20
Considerations When Preparing D i f D i A li ti
Photographs
Drawings for Design Applications
g p– Black and white photographs
acceptable in limited circumstancescircumstances.
– Color photographs or drawings can be submitted drawings can be submitted with a petition.
21
Considerations When Preparing D i f D i A li ti
Views
Drawings for Design Applications
– Recommend filing drawings with at least one perspective view, as well as top, bottom, front, back right and left side viewsback, right and left side views.
– An application with an insufficient number of views can be rejectedviews can be rejected.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Considerations When Preparing D i f D i A li ti
Formal Drawings
Drawings for Design Applications
g– Recommend filing design applications with formal
drawings.
– I use a draftsperson experienced in preparing design patent drawings.
– For U.S. applications, draftsperson can add appropriate surface shading to formal drawings.
29
30
Considerations When Preparing D i f D i A li ti
Informal Drawings
Drawings for Design Applications
g– Applications can be filed with informal drawings.
– Typically informal drawings not recommendedTypically, informal drawings not recommended.
Phantom Lines– Phantom (dotted) lines can be used to show
unclaimed features of the design, or show the environment of the design.
31
32
33
Considerations When Preparing D i f D i A li ti
Number of Designs in Application
Drawings for Design Applications
g pp– Usually file one design per patent application.
Can have multiple embodiments of the same design in one applicationdesign in one application.
34
Proper or Improper Drawing?
35
Proper or Improper Drawing?
36
Proper or Improper Drawing?
37
Questions?Comments?
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?y g
Design Patent No. D529,263 The Product
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?
Design Patent No. D538,114 The Product
y g
Patent StrategyPatent Strategy
Consider cost and time differencesbetween Utility patent application and Design patent application
Do not use a Provisional application as the first filing for protecting a design inventionfirst filing for protecting a design invention
B f h li iti th Titl i i Be aware of how limiting the Title is in a Design application
Questions?Comments?
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?y g
Design PatentNo. D537,098
The Product
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?
Design Patent No 617 720 The Product
y g
Design Patent No. 617,720 The Product
Is the Overall Appearance of the Product Substantially the Same as the Design?y g
Design Patent No. D388,332 The Product
Questions?Comments?
Join Us for our Upcoming Webcasts!
Legally Live
May 9th How to Protect Your Patent Rights in View of Public Disclosure Under the America Invents Act (AIA)12:00 – 1:00pm EST
June 19th Trademark Basics – How to Select Good Trademarks and Effectively Protect ThemProtect Them12:00 - 1:00pm EST
Register at www.hbsr.com