THE NEW ART OF PROBLEM SOLVING New Art of Problem Solvi… · The Art of Problem Solving (AoPS)...
Transcript of THE NEW ART OF PROBLEM SOLVING New Art of Problem Solvi… · The Art of Problem Solving (AoPS)...
THE NEW ART OFPROBLEM SOLVING
A Guide to Your Decision Sciences Journey
www.mu-sigma.com | 2
Table of Contents3 Introduction
3 Businesses Must Learn to Capitalize on Change
4 Where to Focus: The River of Reasonable Return
5 What it Means for Today’s Solution Options
6 New Paradigms are Needed
7 Mu Sigma's Art of Problem Solving
8 Plan for Outcomes and Transformation in Harmony
12 Map the Interactions Across the Problem Universe
13 Encode Problems to Promote the Best Design
14
Harmonize the Creation and Consumption of Analytics
16
Pursuing a New Art of Problem Solving – While Doing Your Day Job
17
Charting the Course
17
The Right Governance
19
The Right Culture
22
Summary and More Information
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 3
IntroductionMu Sigma has a singular purpose: To instill a fundamentally new approach to decision making in large enterprises,
one designed to not just match capitalize on it. We call
it a New Art of Problem Solving, and it’s our pleasure to describe the concept in this paper.
, which is designed with
Businesses Must Learn to Capitalize on ChangeBig data tops many lists of business priorities, as the growing volume, velocity, variety, veracity and volatility of data
continue to fuel anxiety in business leaders. But that anxiety is misplaced. It’s not these clichéd Vs that you should
worry about. After all, big data is a symptom not a cause. The root cause of our anxiety is something that’s been
around forever: Change. And change continues to accelerate, creating more complexity and more data for our
businesses in shorter cycles.
Change isn’t new. We only have to look to nature for guidance. If Earth’s 4.5 billion year existence were compressed to
one 24-hour period, modern humans would be only one second old.
www.mu-sigma.com | 3
four
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 4
network that generates 22 billion minutes of online interaction each day. All industries are young. All business models
will continue to evolve rapidly.
learn to thrive in changing environments, organizations designed to capitalize on change will be more successful than
those who attempt to simply manage change.
understanding of the problem universe in which we operate. Then we’ll discuss how the solution space must
change as well.
Where to Focus: The River of Reasonable Return
We have a situation that is unique in the short history of humankind: An explosion of signals, more networks for
carrying those signals instantaneously to anywhere in the world, and a proliferation of market economies that reward
people for responding quickly to those signals. Decision supply chains now trump physical supply chains in terms of
importance, and data is now the new oil.
With so many signals and noise, the next question is, “Where
does one focus?” After all, not all problems are created equal,
and the problem space isn’t shifting at a leisurely pace. In this
climate, your organization must track two dimensions: The
frequency with which problems arise, and the impact of solving
them. And based on the resulting plots, identify where it makes
sense to allocate resources to develop solutions.
As we chart our results, three zones of opportunity become
visible (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Categories of business problems as measured by Frequency and Impact
Barren Desert of Low Return
Fertile Lands of Disproportionate
Return
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 5
Most businesses want to focus on the upper right section of the graph, where the combination of payback and
time-consuming problems. Management consultants will ply their heuristic, judgment-based approaches in the part of
this zone where business impact is highest, while independent software vendors (ISVs) promote algorithmic solutions
in the part where frequency is highest.
But most problems occupy the middle of the graph, in what we call the “River of Reasonable Return.” And that’s also
between removing one or two massive boulders versus dredging millions of smaller pebbles. Exploding the big rocks
growing in terms of frequency. They’re also interconnected. In fact, we might envision some connections between just
those four questions above.
That’s why the River of Reasonable Return represents the richest opportunity – because of its problem density and the
myriad interactions between those problems. The impact of solving any one of these problems in isolation is too small to
– the greater the impact you’ll experience, especially when compared with trying to solve the big shiny problems.
What it Means for Today’s Solution Options
Swimming in the current of these muddy, interconnected problems, many organizations face some challenges. For
one, the data and analytics domain is still nascent – new platforms emerge seemingly weekly, and analytical processes
can be immature or fragmented across industries. And don’t forget the lingering lack of analytical talent.
When it comes to external resources, although traditional solution providers have an important role to play in
exposed in a climate of fast change. For instance, we know that consulting and its inherent project-to-project
approach, doesn’t scale. We know that corporate IT, under pressure to just “keep the lights on,” is not known for its
problem domain.
C
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 6
integrated blend of math and business insights, tightly wound within software. Not “man + machine” but truly “man
machine.” Such a combination is a requirement for implementing our Art of Problem Solving System and something
we take great pride in at Mu Sigma.
New Paradigms are Needed
The scarcity of resources and inadequacy of solution options is just the start. A bigger problem is that, despite the fast
pace of change, many organizations rely on safe analytical paradigms.
of replicating it elsewhere. All too often this knowledge collects dust in KM repositories, loses relevance, and then
depreciates in value faster than that of a new automobile.
ideas across your company and your competitors.
The modes of thinking mentioned above might help you keep up with change, but they won’t help you capitalize
on that change. As such, they represent the opposite of what’s needed to thrive in today’s fast pace of change and
muddy, interconnected problems. Enterprises should instead follow these three principles:
1. Learning over Knowing. Rather than compete on knowledge that constantly breaks down, better
companies will compete on an ability to learn, where learning is the rate of change of that knowledge. The
best companies will compete on their speed and adaptability of learning.
2. Extreme Experimentation. Rather than rely on experts or expertize, rely on experiments. We are like
monkeys throwing darts at a moving dartboard. Our hubris wants us to believe that we can learn to throw
darts with greater accuracy. But if we can bring down the cost of experimentation – throwing many more
z
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 7
3. The New IP. Enough with isolated, protected approaches built around intellectual property. The new “IP”
stands for “interdisciplinary perspectives.” It’s open and wants to connect, as opposed to closed. The new IP
These three guiding principles underpin all that we do and believe at Mu Sigma. They serve as the bedrock on which
Mu Sigma's Art of Problem Solving is built.
Mu Sigma's Art of Problem SolvingThe Art of Problem Solving (AoPS) isn’t a project, but rather, a system comprised of a series of habits, artifacts, and
software – each of which must be continuously sharpened, but also applied daily to your problem solving work
(see Figure 2).
The four habits of Mu Sigma's Art of Problem Solving
Mu Sigma's Art of Problem
Solving
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 8
s of excellence (CoEs) or governing councils,
decentralized governance models. We discuss governance models later in this paper.
through mapping work, then into problem design, and ultimately execution (see Figure 3).
Don’t misconstrue this as a simple linear journey, however. Another way to visualize the habits and their companion
artifacts is as a spiral, where the further outside on the connected ring, the more broad we are in our thinking,
ultimately zeroing in on concrete actions and making the promise of Big Data real. No matter how you visualize it,
tight feedback loops will be required throughout.
If followed closely, AoPS will provide your company with the impetus to move beyond just mitigating the risks of
change, to actually taking advantage of those risks. In the following sections we review each habit and its companion
Mu Sigma artifact, but keep their treatment at a relatively high level.
1: Plan for Outcomes and Transformation in Harmony
Mu Sigma artifact: muOBITM
a course toward realizing measurable outcomes and transformative change. Figure 4 maps both dimensions to a
continuum, using an example many can relate to: Health.
muDSC
Harmonize the Creation and Consumption of Analytics
Figure 3: Habits and their artifacts aligned with a traditional lifecycle
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 9
be successful, one needs to constantly push boundaries laterally and seek transformation, but at the same time focus
on realizing measurable outcomes along the way.
The Vertical Axis: Planning for Outcomes
such a process, analytical teams typically begin bottoms-up as an
form of measurable outcomes.
Unfortunately, it’s all too common for the upfront planning around a
business problem to follow the same sequence – that is, beginning with
data. Instead, planning must be orchestrated as a top-down, deductive
process, beginning with desired outcomes. Hence the planning and
execution can be thought of as two macro cycles moving in opposite
direction, as illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 4: Planning (deductive) and execution (inductive) activities managed together
Figure 5: Planning (deductive) and execution (inductive) activities managed together
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 10
In our planning, we associate each business problem or network of business problems to be solved with a set of
design” process that backs into desired outcomes.
outcomes as derivatives of actions. But the “rational human” theories that have dominated economic and
management science theory, on which this traditional approach is based, have been disproven.
Simply put, human beings don’t always make rational choices. The actions they take come more from their behaviors
and habits
analyses to shape, and the insights needed to trigger those behaviors. In short, when trying to solve a problem, you
must strive to humanize the insights.
The Horizontal Axis: Planning for Transformation
The horizontal axis of the muOBITM grid recognizes that individual outcomes, behaviors, and insights themselves live on
a continuum. The continuum represents maturity and level of impact, ranging from the most basic on the left to the
most transformative on the right.
The path taken on the continuum is important (see Figure 6). Top-down thinkers usually peg themselves to driving
transformation and might miss out on the more basic raw materials, or products and services, needed to reach that
transformation. Bottom-up thinkers usually peg themselves to identifying the most basic and fundamental of solutions.
muOBITM nudges one to think about the entire journey towards transformation as a series of “Goldilocks state” steps.
Furthermore, we believe that the most value is, in fact, created not in the end zones, but in the region in the very middle.
Figure 6: The muOBITM artifact leads us to abductive conclusions
TM
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 11
Traversing the Two Dimensions of the muOBITM
The muOBITM seeks harmonized progress along the dimensions of both realization and transformation. But how should
one traverse this journey during execution?
transformation. This is typically how a functional business unit would go about things – using a very sequential
manner. But this approach prevents the seeds of transformation from being sown early enough and won’t create an
This process develops a constraint-driven mentality where goals are lost sight of, and there’s a clear risk of getting
bogged down.
The right way to move through this framework is by moving one step towards higher realization then coming one
step down to better transformation (see Figure 7). This movement will create some chaos or innovation and give up
on some order or realization. Order will be brought back by moving again to one higher step in the realization, and
then back again. This is what we mean by “Goldilocks states” – in this case between order and chaos. Move towards
the desired current outcomes constantly, but at the same time lay foundation for the next transformational result.
Figure 7: Traversing the muOBITM
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 12
2: Map the Interactions Across the Problem Universe
Mu Sigma artifact: muUniverseTM
Too often, analytics professionals get locked into a particular problem, seeing only their piece of the puzzle at a particular
point in time. But business problems – especially those in the River of Reasonable Return – are always interconnected.
There are two ways to take advantage of understanding problem interactions within AoPS: A bottoms-up manner and
a top-down manner.
problems. For example, a problem that’s seemingly rooted in email marketing might have deep connections with
problems like messaging relevance, customer retention, loyalty programs and targeting accuracy, to name just a few.
Understanding those interactions will help you solve the email marketing problem better. Furthermore, the nature of
these connections will help analytics teams uncover the downstream risks of approaching a problem a certain way, as
The top-down approach, using the muUniverseTM planning and visualization tool (see Figure 8), allows us to create a
problem universe, or a galaxy within that universe (e.g. revenue management), and build out the problems and their
connections to each other. Doing so will allow analytics functions to prioritize and defend their roadmap, using not
only the relationships, but the common language metadata encoded in muPDNATM. Furthermore, you can assess the
completeness of your muUniverseTM and discover gaps that might be your next data-powered opportunities.
Figure 8: Screenshot from the muUniverseTM planning and visualization tool
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 13
Upon closer inspection, you’ll see that the bottoms-up approach is algorithmic and machine-oriented, while the
top-down approach is more heuristic and manual. The muUniverseTM application enables us to harmonize these two
important perspectives.
same way. There’s an element of distance, which accounts for how closely related the two problems are. We also
use the thickness of the line connecting two nodes to describe the extent to which they share common business
objectives, factors, questions, hypotheses and data elements. These characteristics, along with the fact that our
muPDNATM application is embedded within muUniverseTM, will help you instill a common language for problem solving
across your organization.
3: Encode Problems to Promote the Best Design
Mu Sigma artifact: muPDNATM
The dynamic nature of businesses forces organizations to solve multiple problems on a daily basis, especially those
is required.
Asking the right questions is also key in this step. Let’s face it, traditional education and corporate performance systems
change, questions are more important than answers.
At Mu Sigma, we consider business problems to have an underlying DNA. In fact, the artifact muPDNATM stands for
“Problem DNA.” By encoding a problem’s DNA early in the process, we convert it into a construct or common language,
that can be shared across the organization and retrieved for use in future work. We encode each of the thousands of
breaks into three parts:
» A design element, which pushes us to front-load our thinking and have constructive debates earlier on in
for the business problem, so as to get to the right key questions. This element is most important, as it
captures our design for tackling the problem.
TM
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 14
» A representation element, which helps us visualize all the dimensions of the problem to ensure maximum
» A hypothesis element, which enables us to comb through the potential solution space to assess the
hypothesis exists to strengthen the design.
The muPDNATM activity and software application places a premium on asking the right question in the right way, with the
least amount of misinterpretation – rather than jumping to answers too quickly – and on asking questions that are both
forces problem solvers to be more deliberate and more top-down in nature – again, by design to inform the best design.
4: Harmonize the Creation and Consumption of Analytics
Mu Sigma artifact: muDSCTM
In a world where data is the “new oil,” organizations must manage the decision supply chain with the same rigor and
discipline that their compatriots in manufacturing do with physical chains.
Each day, thousands of decision supply chains operate continuously and simultaneously in your enterprise – whether you
recognize them or not (see Figure 10). Decision supply chains are similar to their physical brethren. You need to retrieve
can help accelerate your organization’s journey from data- or analytics-orientation to true decision sciences.
TM
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 15
Figure 10: The decision supply chain
One key tenet of managing a decision supply chain using the muDSCTM artifact is to ensure the harmony of analytics
creation and consumption. Too often, there’s a bias toward just creating analytics. For instance, a large retailer used
analytics to come up with a sound CRM framework. They procured the right customer behavior data, engaging
consultants to mine the data and build predictive models. But they didn’t align their models with the campaign
and their budget was cut. A proper decision supply chain would have forced the team to give early consideration to how
the insights would be used and consumed (see Figure 11).
A harmony of consumption and creation means that when groups create new analytics, they obsess over how those
analytics will be consumed. And when consuming analytics at the end of chain, they obsess on how to improve upon
and design new analytics.
Figure 11: Illustration from muDSCTM artifact, showing an emphasis on Creation activities
P
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 16
Pursuing a New Art of Problem Solving – While Doing Your Day Job
Let’s explore the important relationship between the art and day-to-day problem solving. Again, consider nature as
a good metaphor. Research suggests that the extinction of any species is inversely proportional to that species’ ability to thrive. And to thrive, a species needs three things: Scale (purely volume), diversity (e.g., heterogeneity in its blood
lines) and symbiotic interactions with its habitat.
The same requirements apply to problem solving in your organization. As an organization, you want to solve many,
many problems. You need an approach that scales. At the same time, you want to solve a wide diversity of problems.
work to scale. That’s where the AoPS comes in – to help scale diverse problem solving and to diversify your scale.
And most importantly, to promote symbiotic interactions between species and habitat (see Figure 12).
between the two serve to strengthen the species’ ability to evolve and thrive in change. It’s the artifacts and software
outlined previously that provide the connection between the two strands.
To make it more tangible, here are some examples of what we mean.
Figure 12: Artifacts nurture a symbiotic relationship between AoPS and day-to-day problem solving
Whether a centralized analytics function or some other group serves as steward for the AoPS, it’s important that you
to-day problem solving and sustains better decision making going forward. It’s also important to understand that the
strands, coming together at periodic intervals.
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 17
» An AoPS group works with frontline teams to create problem DNAs for each business problem they
encounter, pushing them to ask better questions in the process.
» An internal analytics team uses the decision supply chain construct at the problem level to ensure that
activities are in place to drive the consumption of analytics by the business.
»are involved and that the target outcomes account for downstream relationships.
»
» An analyst looks across multiple decision supply chains to identify common attributes of projects that
materially drive consumption, feeding those insights back to a central team.
Charting the CourseThis section addresses how to organize and govern an environment where the AoPS and the day-to-day grind of
nurture both habitat and species.
The Right Governance
A decision sciences program can be built on one of three constructs, each with pros and cons (see Figure 13):
Figure 13: Pros and cons of analytics governance models
four
-
short-term focused
TM
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 18
» Centralized. A single team owns the data and serves all analytical needs across business functions. While
this carries the promise of an integrated data infrastructure and economies of scale, it won’t provide the
» Decentralized. Each business function owns its data infrastructure and analytics team. While this model
ensures agility and a fast start to decision sciences, it fosters the proliferation of redundant tools and
» Federated. This model seeks the advantages of both the centralized and decentralized approaches.
day problems, a governing council ensures broad alignment on data policies and infrastructure, as well as
the AoPS habits and artifacts. The analytics teams embedded in the business apply these things, but also
provide feedback to improve them.
payback, stands to foster the most collaboration and is best suited for an Art of Problem Solving approach.
discussed later.
Figure 14: Federated governance models are designed to foster cross-organizational collaboration
14
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 19
The Right Culture
An environment conducive to the New Art of Problem Solving, and an ability to capitalize on change rather than fear,
some of which we readily pull from prior art:
1. A growth mindset. Most organizations look at big data as a collection of datasets to be harvested, skillsets
datasets.
2. Feedback loops.
upward trajectory of improvement (see Figure 15).
Figure 15:
Carol S. Dweck.
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 20
won’t uncover those problems with the potential to derail you.
Continuous work streams. Organizations looking to institute a New Art of Problem Solving shouldn’t
think about analytics as a project or initiative, but rather as an ongoing activity. After all, learning is a
every function within the organization and get inculcated into its DNA. A continuous mindset has a better
chance of doing this than a series of projects. Furthermore, a continuous work stream environment,
supported by the right governance model, will do a better job at uncovering latent needs, new ways of
thinking and opportunities for experimentation.
This also relates to how you should think about your problem space. The RoRR and the interconnected
nature of its business problems demand a continuous approach. In such an environment, thinking about
4. Constant prototyping.
it’s historically worked well because the business processes being automated were relatively static. But in a world
demands creativity, agility, and responsiveness, while IT has responded with process, security, and standardization.
anything but static. In decision sciences, the journey from problem to sustained solution goes through a
series of phases as indicated in Figure 16:
Figure 16: Stages of the analytics solution journey
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 21
But it’s important to recognize that not all solutions will go through this path completely. Some short
constant prototyping.
5. Signals of dysfunctional behavior. Builders of decision sciences groups must appreciate that they are,
in fact, creating teams of individuals from possibly disparate backgrounds who must work together toward
common goals. Hence, it falls upon the leaders to watch out for signs of team dysfunction. According to
accountability avoidance and inattention to results. Be sure to design mechanisms that signal dysfunctional
behavior, and develop corrective interventions.
2020 Mu Sigma Proprietary Information
www.mu-sigma.com | 22
This document is confidential and contains proprietary information belonging to Mu Sigma. Neither this document nor any of the information contained herein may be reproduced or disclosed under any circumstances without the express written permission of Mu Sigma.
Summary and More InformationAt Mu Sigma, we believe that organizations needn’t try to cope with or manage change, but should strive to capitalize
on it. You should have a hold on the roadmap of your organization’s analytical problems. We want your work to drive
We help enterprises institutionalize data-driven decision making and harness the potential of Big Data.
The purpose of our New Art of Problem Solving System is to instill large enterprises with a new approach to decision
structured problem solving and insight generation approaches supported by guided, white-box analytics.
For more information, visit www.mu-sigma.com or write to us at [email protected]
ABOUT US
enterprises systematize better data-driven decision making. The company’s interdisciplinary
companies approach problem solving in areas of marketing, risk and supply chain. With more than
preferred decision sciences and analytics partner for 140 of the Fortune 500.
ADDRESS
Mu Sigma Inc.
CONTACT US
four