The Intranational Business Cycle: Evidence from Japan · A high correlation between regions’...
Transcript of The Intranational Business Cycle: Evidence from Japan · A high correlation between regions’...
The Intranational Business Cycle:
Evidence from Japan
by
Michael Artis, Manchester University and CEPR*†
and
Toshihiro Okubo, Manchester University**
January 2008
Abstract: This paper studies the intranational business cycle – that is the set of regional
(prefecture) business cycles – in Japan. One reason for choosing to examine the
Japanese case is that long time series and relatively detailed data are available. A
Hodrick-Prescott filter is applied to identify the cycles in annual data from 1955 to 1995
and bilateral cross-correlation coefficients are calculated for all the pairs of prefectures.
Comparisons are made with similar sets of bilateral cross correlation coefficients
calculated for the States of the US and for the member countries of a “synthetic Euro
Area”. The paper then turns to an econometric explanation of the cross-correlation
coefficients (using Fisher’s z-transform), in a panel data GMM estimation framework.
An augmented gravity model provides the basic model for the investigation, whilst the
richness of the data base also allows for additional models to be represented.
JEL Classification : E32, F41, R11
Keywords: Intranational business cycle, Hodrick-Prescott filter, Optimal Currency Area,
Gravity Model, Market potential, Heckscher Ohlin theorem.
*†Professor of Economics, Manchester Regional Economics Centre, Institute for
Political and Economic Governance, Manchester University, Oxford Rd., Manchester,
M13 9PL. E-mail: [email protected]
**Research Associate, Manchester Regional Economics Centre, Institute for Political
and Economic Governance, Manchester University, Oxford Rd., Manchester, M13 9PL.
E-mail: [email protected]
†Denotes corresponding author Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to Tommaso Proietti, Len Gill, George
Chouliarakis, Pierre Picard, Denise Osborn and participants at seminars in Kobe and
Manchester Universities for their advice along the way. They are also grateful to Kyoji Fukao
and Hyeog Ug Kwon for providing data sets.
2
1. Introduction
The intranational business cycle is just the set of business cycles that characterize
the regions of a country (or, as we shall also use the term, the constituent countries of a
currency union). Although less commonly studied1, analysis of the intranational business
cycle offers a useful benchmark for comparison with the results obtained from
international business cycle analysis. For example, issues of adjustment and of
consumption-risk spreading, and more generally many of the predictions of Real
Business Cycle (RBC) theory which have been investigated at the international level can
also be analyzed at the intranational level – often with different results. Those
differences provide a challenge for explanation. Intranational cycles have also been
studied in the past in connection with propositions in the optimal currency area (OCA)
literature, particularly with respect to risk-sharing mechanisms and the like.2 In this last
respect Wincoop (1995) and Iwamoto and Wincoop (2000) offer leading examples.
Naturally the OCA perspective is not the only one that should be important in
studies of the intranational cycle. Indeed, as amplified below, many of the variables that
determine or are alleged to determine the degree of international business cycle
convergence, can have no salience in the study of the intranational context. We have
chosen to investigate the intranational business cycle in Japan. An advantage of choosing
Japan is that a relatively lengthy time series and reasonably comprehensive set of
regional accounts and factor endowments exists for Japan’s 47 prefectures.3 Furthermore,
the regional context of the intranational cycle draws attention to the need, instead, to take
up some of the themes and insights contained in traditional (Heckscher-Ohlin) and new
trade (the gravity model) theory, the new economic geography (Fujita, Krugman and
Venables, 1999; Fujita and Thisse, 2002) and the factor basis for production and trade
1 Of the handful of previous studies of the intranational business cycle among the better-known are
those by Wynne and Koo (2000), Hess and Shin (1999 and 2001) Del Negro (2001) and HM Treasury
(2003). 2 Traditional OCA theory (as identified with Mundell ,1961) points towards a trade-off between trade
and integration benefits against a loss of monetary sovereignty. The latter is assumed to imply a loss of
regional stabilization policy benefits. A high correlation between regions’ business cycles resolves the
trade-off because the common monetary policy of a currency union then appears appropriate for all the
regions. 3 See Table E for 47 Japanese prefectures list for details.
3
(foreign direct investment (FDI), fragmentation and “task trade”).4 These literatures in
recent years have seen greater attention paid to regional aspects.
In the next section we discuss ways to extract the cycle and provide some
comparisons with other intranational cycles; we show that the cohesion of the Japanese
intranational cycle, whilst pronounced for the recent period and in comparison with other
countries, exhibits some effects of the dramatic changes that the Japanese industrial
structure has undergone. In the subsequent section we move on to an attempt to explain
the set of bilateral cross-correlations in the cyclical deviates (and their variation through
time) that we identify for each of the regions. We recall that another purpose of an
intranational cycle investigation such as this is to measure and identify the extent and
nature of the risk-sharing mechanisms that exist. Whilst further investigation of this is
the topic of a further paper we shall note some graphical evidence of the extent of
consumption risk-sharing in Japan, which appears considerable.
Our main findings are that 1) Japanese prefectures have fairly high positive
business cycle correlations over several decades, although the imbalance of economic
growth across regions and factor movements in earlier years exacted a toll in reducing the
synchronicity of the regional cycles then. The high cross-correlations reflect the
homogeneity of Japanese society (law, political and economic institutions, culture, and
language) and support an optimal currency area. 2) Augmented gravity model variables
have considerable explanatory power in explaining the cross-correlations. Higher GDPs,
greater openness in trade and smaller distance between prefectures increase the
correlations. Market potential has a U-shaped relationship with the business cycle
correlation measure: pairs of low or high market potentials have higher correlations. 3)
The most recent decades (1980s-1990s) see more explanatory power in the capital-labor
ratio gap: a larger capital-labor factor endowment gap synchronizes the intranational
business cycle. These findings might be explained by the impact of globalization and
fragmentation of production processes across regions.
The paper is organized into 7 sections. The next section seeks to identify business
cycles and correlations across prefectures. Section 3 reviews Japanese economic history
in the post-war period and Section 4 conducts an econometric analysis. Section 5
provides some interpretations using previous studies, linked with several literatures. Then
4 Bergstrand (1985) explained the gravity model in new trade theory. Grossman and Rossi-Hansberg
(2006) proposed “task trade” to explain the fragmentation of production processes.
4
Section 6 touches on the linkage to consumption-risk sharing. Finally, Section 7 sets out
some conclusions.
2. Identifying the Business Cycle
Traditional business cycle analysis recognizes two types of cycle. There is the
“classical” cycle, which can be recognized from the fact that it involves an absolute
decline in economic activity from the peak and an absolute rise in activity from the
trough. The NBER for the US and the CEPR for the Euro Area provide chronologies of
such cycles. Clearly such cycles do not exist in growth economies and they are relatively
rare for European economies and for Japan. The other type of cycle is a deviation or
growth (occasionally growth rate) cycle where the underlying idea is that the business
cycle can be identified as a cycle relative to a trend. It is the concept of the deviation
cycle that we work with here. Consequently we need to use some kind of filter to provide
a measure of the trend, so that the cycle can be identified as the deviation from this trend.
In our case, where the original data are annual, there is a reasonable presumption that
high-frequency noise (seasonal and the like) is already filtered out. On this basis we use
a Hodrick-Prescott (HP) filter with a lambda value (dampening factor) set at 6.25,
following the suggestion of Ravn and Uhlig (2002): this corresponds to a maximum
periodicity of the cycle of 10 years just as the popular lambda value of 1600 does for data
at a quarterly frequency.5 The filter has been applied to the log of the GDP series for
each prefecture and for Japan as a whole. Figure 1 shows the national Japanese cycle
identified in this way and, alongside it the cycles for Tokyo, for Osaka (the second largest
city) and for Aichi (the capital city of which is Nagoya, the third largest city in Japan).
Perhaps not surprisingly the cycle for Tokyo follows that for Japan very closely: Tokyo
itself accounts for 15 to 20 per cent of Japanese GDP and the Tokyo Area for 30 per cent
over recent decades.6 It is clear from the Figure that Osaka and Aichi (Nagoya) follow the
national cycle less closely, with more volatility being evident.7
5 There remains a degree of controversy about the procedure, as exemplified most recently in the paper
by Meyers and Winker (2005), following earlier papers by Harvey and Jaeger (1993), Burnside (1998)
and Canova (1998) among others. However, an effective countercriticism can be found in Kaiser and
Maravall (2001, 2002). 6 The Tokyo Area is defined in our paper as Tokyo, plus its adjacent prefectures of Kanagawa, Saitama
and Chiba. In population size, Tokyo accounts for less than 10 per cent in total over recent decades, but
the Tokyo Area has 30 per cent. 7 Generally, the more localized regional business cycle might be expected to be more volatile than the
aggregate national cycle to the extent that more localization implies more specialization.
5
Our basic tool of analysis from here on is the bilateral cross correlation between the
cyclical deviates for any (and all) pairs of prefectures i and j. When econometric
explanation is attempted we use Fisher’s z-transformation of this cross-correlation of HP-
filtered GDPs to remove the potential limited dependent variable problem.8 The bilateral
cross correlation tools can be used to compare the Japanese intranational cycle with that
for the US (US gross state product (GSP) data being used) and with that for a synthetic
Euro Area (the data are just the data on the national business cycles for the countries that
eventually formed the EuroArea-12, i.e. prior to the entry of Slovenia into the Euro
Area)9. US intranational data have been used before, as providing a presumptive
benchmark for a currency area to reach (see Hess and Shin, 1998; Wynne and Koo, 2000;
HM Treasury 2003), whilst the countries forming the Euro Area have indeed formed a
new currency union. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the bilateral cross correlations of
the cyclical deviates for the 50 States over the periods 1990-1997 and 1997-2005 whilst
Figure 3 does the same for the EuroArea-12 countries over the period 1975-1995.
Turning to our discussion of the GDP correlation across Japanese prefectures, Figures 4-7
provide the same information for Japan, taken over 4 separate sub-periods (1955-1964,
1965-1974, 1975-1984, and 1985-1995).10
It is clear that the Japanese distribution
changed shape over the period considerably, reflecting what we know to be some
turbulent periods of structural change. The more recent of the distributions suggests a
greater degree of cohesion (fewer or no negative values and a bunching around quite high
values) than can be found in the earlier periods or for the other countries. Figure 8 shows
a time series generated as the 10-year moving average of the (unweighted) mean (the
upper panel of the Figure) and variance of the cross correlations (the middle panel of the
Figure) which indicate quite a lot of movement, especially in the earlier years. The
average and the variance are likely to be related, as for example when common shocks
dominate –yielding both high mean and small variance. The upper and middle panels of
Figure 8 indeed show a striking negative relationship between the two: when the mean is
high, the variance is low and vice-versa. The middle terms around from period 12 to 18,
i.e. the 1970s, as well as the latest terms (period 31), i.e. 1990s, experienced nearly zero
8 See the section “definitions” in the Data Appendix for Fisher’s z transformation. 9 Euro-12 countries are composed of Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland,
Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. See Data Appendix for data source. 10 See Tables A-D for HP filtered GDP cross-correlations, correspondent to the histograms of Figures
4-7. We have done the same for the full period as well as the two sub-periods. As a result, we can find
similar results to the four-sub-sample case.
6
variance and nearly unity in mean.11
The bottom panel of Figure 8 shows the scatter-plot
of variance against mean and the time-dated combinations of these variables. The figure
shows how the Japanese experience has involved over time an oscillation between high-
variance-low-mean and high-mean-low-variance attractors. Over the last two decades the
latter has been the dominant attractor. These results suggest that the Japanese GDP
correlations are high and convergent in most periods and stated differently, Japan is
composed of highly correlated prefectures.
Next, Moran’s I and Geary’s C statistics, which test for spatial autocorrelation
(Moran, 1948, 1950; Geary, 1954), indicate an absence of this phenomenon throughout
the sample period: values of these indices are shown in Appendix 1. Almost zero in
Moran’s I and almost one in Geary’s C imply that GDP fluctuations are spatially random
and thus have no positive nor negative correlations with neighboring prefectures (Figure
A).12 13
Finally, Figure B marks the geographical distribution of the cyclical correlation
of each prefecture with total Japan. The dense (bright) colors indicate higher (lower)
correlation with the Japanese national cycle. Central prefectures are likely to have high
values. However, it is quite difficult to see any spatial correlation; rather the maps seem
to agree with the “no spatial autocorrelation” outcome provided by the Moran’s I and
Geary’s C statistics. The correlation seems to be spatially random over time. As
explained briefly below, the economic history of Japan from the 1950’s on has reflected
considerable structural change.
3. The Japanese Economy over Decades
Before contemplating a factor analysis of the business cycle correlations across the
prefectures, we review the development in the Japanese economy over the post war years
to support our discussion.
The Japanese economy in the post-war period (in the 1960s and 70s before the first
oil shock) experienced a dramatically high growth rate. At the same time, Japan
experienced a notable convergence in income across regions. Many studies concerning
the Japanese prefectures observed the convergence of income (GDP per capita) and
11 Obviously the concept of business cycle convergence should be distinguished from that of income
convergence, studied in the Japanese context by, among others, Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1992b) and
Shioji (1991). 12 The fact of the absence of spatial autocorrelation, as shown in Figure A in the Appendix, tells us that
we need not use spatial econometrics concepts to explain the cross-correlations. 13 See sectoral HP filtered employment cross-correlations for Appendix 2 and Table C.
7
economic growth across the prefectures in the post-World War period, although we note
that our main focus is business cycle correlation. Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1992a) (1992b)
explained regional convergence as a result of technological progress and growth in factor
endowments appealing to the Solow growth model (Solow, 1956).14
Yue (1995), focusing
on factor endowments and mobility across prefectures, showed that public capital
accumulation as a result of government policy played a role in the convergence of GDP
per capita. In particular, public capital moved toward low labor productivity prefectures,
while private capital tended to flow to high labor productivity prefectures. Barro and
Sala-i-Martin (1992b) and Shioji (1991) by contrast showed that labor mobility
contributed to the convergence of GDP per capita across Japanese prefectures. Because
labor moved to higher income prefectures, the income distribution across prefectures
converged. Fukao and Yue (2000) suggested that larger public capital accumulation and
higher human capital growth in poor prefectures contributed to the catch-up on the high
income prefectures from 1955 to 1973. However, technological improvement and growth
in the working force contributed to income convergence after 1973.
Turning from economic growth to change in the industrial and urban structure, the
middle of the 1970s is generally recognized by students of Japanese history as an
important turning point, the oil crisis bringing to an end the period of rapid economic
growth. Many changes occurred inside Japan during the period of rapid economic growth
– the period of the 1960s and the early 1970s. As shown in Fujita and Tabuchi (1997),
industrial structure changed from a concentration on heavy industries to high-technology
and service sectors. In the 1980s, the electronics sectors expanded dramatically. Japan
also experienced a regional transformation, which shifted from a bipolar urban system
centered on Tokyo and Osaka to a mono-polar system centered on Tokyo. According to
Fujita and Tabuchi (1997, Figure 6), the major metropolitan areas (Tokyo, Osaka and
Nagoya) witnessed labor inflow (net migration) until the early 1970s continuing from a
peak in the previous decade. After the mid-1970s, the Osaka and the Nagoya areas
declined considerably and experienced zero or negative net migration, while Tokyo
retained a positive net migration (positive labor inflow). This led to the predominance of
Tokyo as a population and economic center in Japan.
Then we turn to geographical aspects. The Taiheiyou (Pacific Ocean) Belt
manufacturing area, the belt shaped area from Tokyo through Osaka to Fukuoka (South
14 Kawagoe (1999) re-estimated their regressions in Japanese prefectures using a Markov chain model.
8
West Japan), was created during the phase of Japanese industrialization before World
War II, in which Keihin area (Tokyo and Kanagawa), Chukyou area (Aichi, Mie and
Gifu), Hanshin area (Osaka and Hyougo) and Kita-Kyushu area (Fukuoka) are central
clustering areas of major heavy and light industries. The dramatic development of
railway and highway networks after the mid-1960s created various kinds of
manufacturing clusters in many other areas -if mainly in the Taiheiyou (Pacific Ocean)
Belt areas in early periods then subsequently in other areas as Japan acquired a good
transportation network access in later periods. After the 1980s, together with the
completion of the spread of transport network systems all over Japan, the Japanese
economy saw a large-scale unbundling of tasks and fragmentation across the Japanese
regions, and then firm location was split by the characteristics of tasks, i.e. production
process, correspondent to regional factor endowments. In detail, the spread of the
highway and high-speed train networks all over Japan promoted the relocation of mass
production points to rural areas, leading to the unbundling of tasks (Fukao and Yue,
1997).15
Furthermore, since the late 1980s the Japanese manufacturing has increased FDI
toward Asia in labor intensive production processes and increased re-imports of parts and
components (Fukao, et al. 2003).16
Together with these changes, headquarter services and
business points, i.e. human capital intensive production processes, have concentrated
heavily in Tokyo area and other big cities. Together with globalization, many
manufacturing and non-manufacturing (particularly, service) sectors inside Japan have
franchised, merged or spread firm/establishment networks across Japanese regions owing
to the development of telecommunications and transportation networks and this causes
the exit of local/ regional firms and business. This history of structural change needs to be
reflected in our estimation procedures as indicated below.
4. Explaining the Cross-correlations
In this section of the paper we turn to the study of the pattern of cross-correlations
that we found in the regional business cycle data in Section 2. Such studies, using panel
data estimation techniques, have become common in the international business cycle
15 Fukao and Yue (1997) examined the relocation of electronics machinery production in the period. 16 Japan steadily reduced tariff rates and trade barriers. Japan saw a large increase in both exports and
imports with a reduction in the national “border effect” (Okubo, 2004) over recent decades. In addition,
volumes of FDI and service trades greatly increased in the 1980s and 1990s.
9
literature, particularly since the papers by Frankel and Rose (e.g., Frankel and Rose 1997,
1998) which initiated the use of large scale panels in this field. The principal object of
this literature (see Gruben et al (2002) for a conspectus) was to establish the relationship
between trade between countries and the synchronization of their business cycles. The
development of the subsequent literature in the field has exploited the notion of a
business cycle as a product of a shock followed by a transmission mechanism; intra-
industry trade (or at least, horizontal intra-industry trade) – e.g., Fidrmuc (2004),
Fontagné (1999) - has been treated as evidence of a common vulnerability to shocks and
thus as predisposing to a high cross-correlation in business cycle experience whilst inter-
industry trade (and vertical intra-industry trade) suggest a degree of specialization likely
to result in a high frequency of idiosyncratic shocks, ultimately reflected in low business
cycle cross-correlations. Albeit Kenen (2000) has reminded us that “thick” trade
connections are liable to produce a shared business cycle fate regardless. The study of
the international business cycle has led also to the reflection that differences in the
propagation mechanism (including differences in policy response and even linguistic and
genetic differences (e.g. Spolaore and Wacziarg, 2006)) are liable to produce a different
business cycle. It is clear that many of these elements can have no salience in the setting
of the intranational cycle, where institutions and markets important to the propagation
mechanism are “national” in character and scope. This seems especially true in the case
of Japan which is ethnically homogeneous and benefits from institutions, markets and
welfare and taxation systems which are national in their scope and character. At the same
time, for the prefecture system we are dealing with here trade data (though some can be
retrieved for an alternative level of localization) simply do not exist.17
Nevertheless, as
will become clear below, the basic idea of choosing as explanatory variables those that
might reasonably proxy a common – or an idiosyncratic – vulnerability to shocks (and
hence predispose towards high or low cross correlations respectively) are ones with some
potential salience for the problem in hand. At the same time, the notion that any thick
flow of trade is likely to imply a common fate in the face of external shocks suggests that
any variables that might proxy trade (as those suggested by the gravity model for
example) will prove useful explanators.
17 Japan has regional trade data sets in the Inter-regional input-output (IO) Table assembled by METI
(Ministry of Economy and International Trade of Japan). However, the data are published every five
years (not annual data) and are not at prefecture level (47 prefectures) but regional level (9 regions).
For these reasons, the data sets are out of our scope. There are a few studies measuring the direct
impact of regional trade (Clark and van Wincoop, 2001; Chen 2004; Martincus and Molinari, 2007).
10
Data issues on one side there are some other important considerations to be taken
account of here. First, as already mentioned above, the incidence of structural change
reflected in other studies suggests that it will be unreasonable to treat the period as
homogeneous.18
Instead, we have broken the sample into four sub-periods of ten years
each, averaging the variables over these decades and applying panel data estimation
techniques. We also have to expect that as a result of structural change some variables
identified as significant in some periods may not be so important in others. Second,
general considerations suggest that there will be a substantial amount of endogeneity in
the data, which requires the use of an appropriate estimation technique: here, after some
(unreported) experimentation with OLS and GLS we decided to use GMM, nominating
as instruments the lagged values of our independent variables19
. Third, the left hand side
dependent variable, the set of bilateral cross-correlation coefficients, is potentially a
limited dependent variable as the values are bounded between -1 and +1; to overcome the
potential bias involved in not recognizing this we applied the Fisher “z” transformation to
the data. This implies that the estimating equation takes the following general form:
(1) ijtjitijtt
ijt
ijtDDDX ...
1
1log
2
1
where i j denote prefecture pairs, i and j, and t is a time subscript. ijt is the HP filtered
GDP cross-correlation between prefectures i and j at time t. tD and iD , jD denote time
and prefecture dummies respectively, whilst ijtX denotes the explanatory variables
employed in the estimation. Following the argument above we consider as independent
variables (generally expressed as the product of the values for prefectures i and j) all of
the following: market potential, squared market potential, GDP, private sector capital
stock, public sector capital stock, infrastructure, labor, human capital, openness, area,
geographical distance, a dummy for adjacency, manufacturing ratio, and specialization
index. Note that all factor endowment variables are expressed as a per-capita basis. These
18 The reason of taking such 4 sub-samples is that almost every ten years from 1955 Japan experienced
critical changes. For instance, the high-speed transport system and highway networks were first
developed in the middle 1960s, and then a rapid economic growth period provided until the middle of
the 1970s, but main manufacturing sectors shifted to machinery after the oil crisis after the middle
1970s, and then the Plaza Accord of 1985, which appreciated Japanese yen, promoted the Japanese FDI
and international trade. The highway networks and transport system were spread all over Japan and
were completed in the middle of the 1980s. This affected firm location together with globalization. 19 Using these same instruments IV (instrumental variables) estimation produces the same point
estimates of coefficient values though significance levels differ.
11
are all more or less self-explanatory but a detailed definition of each appears in the Data
Appendix.
Before discussing the estimation results in any detail we briefly consider what signs
we might associate with these variables. For distance, we would expect that a negative
sign would be obtained as is the gravity model. For openness, we expect a positive sign.
Measures of industrial structure seem attractive because they should proxy vulnerability
to common shocks if similar and to idiosyncratic shocks if different. Measures of GDP
are often employed as the “mass” variable in gravity trade models and to that extent
should be expected to have a positive coefficient here. Market potential is a composite
distance-weighted GDP variable which might be regarded as an alternative measure of
mass, and hence also could be expected to carry a positive sign.20
However, this
expectation is not as clear-cut as first appears. Figure 9 plots the median spline of HP
filtered GDP cross-correlations in terms of market potential from period 2 to 4. The
market potential (given that the variable is entered as a product) will have high values
when two large regions are considered and low values when two small regions are
considered. Considering these limiting values a positive sign would be anticipated but the
intermediate range combines large and small regions and medium-size and medium-size
regions and across these the sign is less obvious. In consideration of this the variable has
been entered in quadratic form, with results that vindicate the choice (see the discussion
of the results below)21
.
While implicit trade in the gravity equation is intra-industry trade between two
regions with similar productions (GDPs) (Helpman and Krugman, 1985), the one
explained by the Heckscher Ohlin theorem is inter-industry trade or task trade due to
fragmentation in production processes between two regions with different productions
and different factor endowments (Grossman and Rossi-Hansberg, 2006). The Heckscher
Ohlin theorem suggests that labor abundant regions export labor intensive products and
capital abundant regions export capital intensive products. We use a measure of the
capital labor ratio gap in the estimation when this is significantly positive, we obtain a
confirmation of the hypothesis. The variable “public sector capital” (per capita) turns out
to be quite significant, possibly because the practice of successive Japanese governments
has been to reward lagging areas with substantial public sector infrastructure investment
(per capita), so that the variable acts as a “branding” or for other reasons. The paper
20 See Data Appendix for more detail on market potential. 21 We owe to George Chouliarakis a valuable discussion of these points.
12
proceeds from here by first considering in brief the estimation results, then in Section 6
expanding on the interpretation of the results.
Let us see how these presumptions are borne out in the estimation. Given the
historical association in the literature between trade and business cycle synchronization
we can start with a simple model which predominantly reflects the gravity model of trade.
In many of the papers mentioned above (including the “foundation” papers of Frankel
and Rose (1997, 1998) the authors instrumented trade by the predictions of a simple
gravity model. Here we can look to variables measuring “mass” and distance as in the
simple model, supplemented by measures of openness and a dummy for a shared border.
Mass can be represented (as usual) by GDP and accompanied by distance. Or the
distance-weighted measure of market potential can be used, with (here) a negative effect
on the level of the variable but a positive effect on the squared value. Table 1 shows the
results of starting from such a model; as in the remaining estimations to be discussed,
constant term and prefecture dummies are also included with the latter not shown in the
interests of saving space (they are, commonly, significant). Starting from the classical
gravity model, the first set of results (the first and second columns of Table 1) yields the
expected positive sign on GDP products and the expected negative sign on distance.22
Similarly, measures of area and the border dummy, though themselves not changing with
time, could have time-varying effects but allowing for time-varying coefficients on these
variables also proved an unprofitable exercise. The second set of results shown in Table 1
(the third to the fourth columns) brings into play an additional variable – market potential
– alongside GDP and also introduces openness. As we predicted, squared market
potential terms are significantly positive whilst market potential terms are significantly
negative for periods 2 and 3. In period 4 we cannot see any significant relationships. This
implies that the market potentials have the U-shaped relationship with HP-filtered GDP
correlations except period 4, consistent with Figure 9. In the third set of estimates
reported in Table 1 (the fifth column) a further measure, “gap”, is introduced: this is the
absolute difference in GDP per capita between prefectures i and j. As can be seen, this is
significant, but to an extent and with a sign that varies between the periods. The variable,
“openness”, is mainly significantly positive. Two prefectures with high openness are
highly correlated with each other due to high interdependencies through more trade flows.
22 In principle, the effect of distance could vary through time but when we made allowance for this the
result was often to produce insignificant values of the coefficient.
13
In Table 2, the “gravity model” variables are supplemented by others relating to
factor endowments. Human capital is likely to be significantly positive. The variable
relating to public sector capital stock and infrastructure have a negative sign, perhaps
reflecting the “branding” argument that we mentioned above. As we expected, capital-
labor ratio gap between two prefectures have positive relations with GDP cross-
correlations. In particular, whilst market potential becomes insignificant the capital labor
ratio gap becomes significantly positive in period 4. Interestingly, we can say that GDP
correlations in period 4 can definitely be explained by the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem
rather than the Gravity equation.
In Table 3 the bank of explanatory variables is further augmented by variables
relating to the role of manufacturing in the prefecture. Though it is not so obvious, in
some cases the manufacturing percentage of the prefecture in total manufacturing of
Japan, CL, has a significantly positive sign. Prefectures with a high percentage of
manufacturing are likely to be more correlated in GDP. The vertical linkage through
intermediate good transactions within and across sectors might promote the correlation.
The coefficient on the manufacturing specialization index, CV, changes sign over the
periods. Period 2 is significantly positive, period 3 is significantly negative, and then
period 4 is indeterminate. This implies that manufacturing substantially contributed to
business cycle correlation in period 2, i.e. 1965-1974, whereas other sectors such as
service and non-manufacturing played a role in leading business cycle correlation in
period 3, i.e. 1975-1984. This seems to reflect what we know about the Japanese
economy.
There is a noticeable sensitivity of the results to changes through time. But the
arguments of a simple gravity-style trade model - as represented here by GDP and simple
distance – New Economic Geography- as represented market potential, and the
Heckscher-Ohlin model – as represented capital-labor ratio gap— and public capital or
infrastructure investments demonstrate the most reliable explanators business cycle
differences across the prefectures. We elaborate on this in the next section.
5. Discussion and Interpretations
The rich data base that we are able to exploit together with the structural change
documented for the Japanese economy enable us to incorporate several hypotheses in our
choice of explanatory variables. The results obtained confirm the salience of different
14
hypotheses at different times, even whilst strongly supporting the relevance through out
of the basic gravity model explanation.
5.1 Gravity Model Explanations and the Optimal Currency Area
Literature
Our results see fairly good fits to augmented gravity equations and the openness of
trade. Higher GDPs and smaller geographical distance increase the correlation between
prefectures. The salience of the gravity equation in explaining business cycle
convergence was initially highlighted in the empirical OCA literature: active (intra-
industry) trade between countries (Frankel and Rose, 1997; 1998) and a high openness of
trade (McKinnon, 1963) synchronize business cycles. Our results show that these
hypotheses in international business cycle studies are applicable to the intranational
business cycle. They confirm to this extent that the set of Japanese prefectures constitutes
an optimal currency area
5.2 Explanations from Globalization and New Economic
Geography
Market potential is one of the keys to firm location (Head and Mayer, 2002; Head et
al, 1995). Firms are likely to locate in high market potential regions. Trade costs
(distance) and market size are in trade-off. Even in small markets when they are far from
big cities, firms may have incentive to locate there. In periods 2 and 3 in our sample
(Figure 9), GDP cross-correlations have a U-shape with respect to market potential, in
which two regions with low market potentials as well as those with high market
potentials have higher correlations. Here, we can interpret two lower market potential
regions as belonging to the periphery while two higher potential regions are big cities or
manufacturing cluster areas. However, this explanation loses explanatory power in period
4. The U-shape finally weakens and fades out in period 4. Consistently, the market
potentials in our estimations are not significant any more in period 4. This might come
from the development of transport networks and the impact of globalization. Indeed, as
we discussed in Section 3, the periods after the 1980s saw the dramatic development of
transport networks and firm network all over Japan.
15
As currently discussed in the context of the heterogeneous firm trade model (Melitz,
2003) and many empirical papers (Bernard and Jensen, 1999a, 1999b, 2001) in the
international trade literature, trade cost reductions and trade liberalization cause a shift of
profits from low productivity local firms (non-exporters) to high productivity export
firms (profit shift effect) and the most efficient local firms may start exporting but some
least efficient local firms will exit the market (selection effect). Applying this idea to our
case, as international and interregional (domestic) trade costs decrease due to
globalization, severe competition expels the local firms in the periphery. Local firms in
the periphery produce and sell locally, i.e. only in peripheral prefectures. Indeed, Japan
saw a drastic decline of trade costs and on the other hand the 1980s and 1990s saw the
development of firm networks and franchises and excluded local/regional firms and
business. As a result, low market potential regions in the periphery definitely reduce the
correlation with one another and instead they are more correlated with core regions.
5.3 Task trade and Fragmentation within Japan
So, what factors are crucial in the 1980s and 1990s? Our estimation results point to
the capital-labor ratio gap rather than market potential. This might be affected by the
evidence that Japan saw fragmentation across regions and an unbundling of tasks in the
production process since the 1980s. The machinery sectors in particular have experienced
fragmentation and task trade within Japan, later expanding to Asia. The development of
the transport system has allowed the production process to be split up geographically. As
Grossman and Rossi-Hansberg (2006) suggest, the production process can be split
according to the Heckscher Ohlin theorem, in which the tasks in production are split over
regions and more mass production processes (tasks) locate in labor abundant regions and
human capital abundant regions specialize more in human capital intensive production
processes. This implies that factor endowments difference is a big factor in unbundling.
As a result, the unbundling of task will synchronize the business cycle between two
regions through a specialization of production process in each prefecture and then a
drastic increase in intra-firm and inter-firm trades due to fragmentation, which is
triggered by the Heckscher Ohlin theorem. Our estimation tells us that only period 4
observes a significantly negative capital-labor ratio gap whilst the U-shape relationship of
market potentials in cyclical correlation fades away and market potential terms are not
16
significant. This might indicate that task trades across Japanese prefectures from the
1980s occur between different factor-endowment regions and consequently the
Heckscher-Ohlin type trade may synchronize business cycle between them.
5.4 Public Capital Investment and Business Cycle Synchronization
Our results involve public capital per capita and infrastructure investments. The
coefficients on these variables are significantly negative, i.e. there is a negative impact of
public investments on business cycle synchronization. That is, two regions with higher
public capital or infrastructure per capita have lower correlation, whilst two regions with
lower public capital have a higher correlation. In Japan the public capital / infrastructure
per capita is higher in rural areas and lower in cities. Over decades Japanese governments
have invested in public capital through fiscal policy. This implies that the development of
industrial infrastructure, highway, road networks, ports and airports in rural areas does
not greatly contribute to business cycle synchronization with neighboring rural
prefectures. Rather than that, this investment fortifies the connection to cities and boosts
the correlation with them. By contrast with rural area, inter-city correlations are higher.
The highway between cities is the most utilized for economic activity. This suggests a
paradox that more public capital investment by central government reduces or does not
increase business cycle synchronization. If we transferred our evidence on this point to
Europe, it could be inferred that EU Structural Funds, in particular public investments in
poor peripheral regions, are not appropriate and might actually be vicious in the sense of
reducing business cycle synchronization, which is an essential criterion for an optimal
common currency.
6. Additional Discussion-- consumption risk-sharing
A stylized fact that comes strongly out of these data is that institutions in Japan do
appear to permit a high degree of consumption risk-sharing. We took the consumption
data for the 47 prefectures is our working sample and filtered them in the same way as
17
the GDP data.23
In the same way we also calculated bilateral cross-correlations of the
cyclical deviates of consumption for each pair of prefectures. Figure 10 plots these
consumption cross-correlations against the GDP cross correlations. RBC theory predicts
that (in the presence of complete asset markets) consumption-smoothing should result in
consumption cross-correlations which are higher than the corresponding output
correlations at business cycle frequency. In terms of the graphical evidence displayed in
Figure 10, this would lead as to expect that a majority of the observations would lie
below the 45 degree line, as they appear to do. This provides a counter-example to the
well-known “consumption/output” anomaly first uncovered by Backus et al. (1993). In
their (and many subsequent) studies the international evidence points to consumption
correlations being lower than output correlations. The contrary finding leads weight to
the presumption that the Japanese prefectures constitute a standard for an optimal
currency area, but leaves open the question of the quantification of the channels through
which this is achieved, which will be the subject of another paper. Iwamoto and Wincoop
(2000) is a precursor study. The fact that the channels (and degree) of consumption risk-
sharing may vary across countries needs documentation and provides a natural
complement to the resolution of the puzzle that international capital mobility seems to
have increased drastically without affecting conventional measures of risk-sharing
between countries (see Artis and Hoffmann, 2006)
7. Conclusions
In this paper we have identified the intranational business cycle in Japan using GDP
data for prefectures over the period 1955-1995. In the first section of the paper we
compared it with those for the US and for the Euro Area. A high degree of business
cycle synchronization within a prospective currency union has often been regarded as a
sine qua non of that union’s viability and ultimate survival; at the same time many
observers have assumed that the formation of a currency union can itself lead to an
increase in business cycle synchronization. In the Japanese case examined in this paper,
the degree of business cycle synchronization within the country emerges as strikingly
high by comparison with that in the US and the Euro Area for the periods considered.
But this is only clearly so for the more recent decades of Japanese history. Earlier, the
23 The consumption data are taken from Fukao and Yue’s Japanese prefecture data set.
18
well-documented and drastic changes that occurred in Japan’s industrial structure find a
reflection in the appearance of a much lower degree of business cycle synchronization.
We devote a short section of the paper to summarizing the empirical evidence on Japan’s
industrial development. This excursus provides as with valuable material, we believe, for
the interpretation of the estimation results we subsequently obtain. The paper then moves
on to explain the patterns of business cycle synchronization summarized in the set of
bilateral cross-correlations. There is a large literature which explains the pattern of
international business cycle cross-correlations, the later versions of which have
increasingly drawn on explanatory factors which are irrelevant to the explanation of the
intranational cycle – differences in labor markets, monetary policy, financial markets and
the like which play an important role in explaining international business cycle
differences are irrelevant in the setting of a single country. Our econometric explanation
of the pattern of bilateral cross-correlations between the prefectures of Japan draws
heavily, though, on a feature of earlier international cross-correlation work and that is the
idea that trade models – specifically the gravity model and the Heckscher Ohlin trade
model – and inspired by the new economic geography can help to explain business cycle
associations. We find that variables that can be associated with gravity model explanators
– GDP, distance, with economic geography represented as market potential supplemented
by openness, and with Heckscher Ohlin explanators--capital labor ratio gap supplemented
by endowment variables such as human capital and public capital investment are highly
significant in explaining the bilateral business cycle cross-correlation coefficients in a
GMM panel data estimation (fixed effects) framework. This is gratifying from several
points of view: it underscores the remarkable versatility of use of the gravity model and
allows us to integrate our knowledge of the development of the Japanese economy with
modern trade theory. A feature of working currency unions is that some mechanisms
usually exist to facilitate consumption risk-sharing; we find that overall risk-sharing
between the prefectures is a marked phenomenon but its precise measurement and
explanation remain a project for a future paper.
19
Data Appendix
The number of Japanese prefectures became 47 after the Okinawa prefecture was
returned from the United States in 1972. Due to data availability problems for Okinawa
Prefecture before 1972 and its position as both a geographical and economic outlier our
estimation sample is restricted to the 46 mainland prefectures from 1955 to 1995. Many
prefecture data sets for factor endowments and flow data are taken from Fukao and Yue’s
“Japanese prefecture data base”(Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan)
(http://www.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/~fukao/japanese/data/index.html) and Fukao and Yue (2000)
and Yue (1995).
The GDP data set for 12 EU nations for the HP-filtered GDP cross-correlations in
Figure 3 is taken from World Development Indicator (Edition September 2006, World
Bank). GDP is constant 2000 US dollars. The US GSP (gross state product) data sets for
the autocorrelation in Figure 2 are taken from Bureau of Economic Analysis, US
Department of Commerce (http://www.bea.gov/regional/index.htm#gsp). The unit of real
GSP is millions of chained 2000 dollars.
Definitions
The dependent variable
The bilateral cross-correlation of cyclical deviates from HP-filtered real GDPs in
two prefectures (prefectures i and j) in four sub-sample periods, transformed by Fisher’s z
transformation. The transformation is aimed at expanding the limited variation (from -1
to 1) in the cross correlation measure. Fisher’s z transformation is a one-by-one mapping
from a certain variable, , to a variable , utilizing a uniformly increasing monotone
function, defined as 1
1ln5.0 for -1< <+1
The independent variables
All the variables are related to two prefectures A and B, corresponding to the
correlation of the dependent variables. The variables are the average values in each sub-
sample period. These are period 1: 1955-1964; period 2: 1965-1974; period 3: 1975-1984;
and period 4: 1985-1995.
20
GDP (time period 1-4): GDP denotes the logarithm of the product of GDPs in
prefecture i and j. Real GDP is taken from Fukao and Yue’s “Japanese prefecture data
base” and Fukao and Yue (2000) and Yue (1995).
MKT (time period 1-4): Market refers to the logarithm of the product of Market
Potential in prefectures i and j. The market potential for prefecture i is defined as the
summation of GDPs weighted by geographical distance for all prefectures including the
home market of prefecture i, i.e. j ij
j
iD
GDPM where D stands for the distance between
prefectures i and j. The distance between prefectures is that between the locations of
central city offices in the prefecture capitals. The distance for the home market itself, iiD ,
can be derived as /)3/2( iii AreaD , in which Area is the geographical area (km2) of
prefecture i. (See Keeble, et al. 1982). (This formula implies one third of the radius of a
circle of the area.) The market potential variable has the largest values in Tokyo and
Tokyo Area over four periods. By and large, values for the Northern prefectures tend to
fall over time whilst those for the Southern and Western prefectures tend to increase.
MKT_square (time period 1-4): Square term of MKT.
Gap (time period 1-4): Absolute difference of GDP per capita.
CapLabor (time period 1-4): This is the variable of logarithm of capital labor ratio
gap between prefectures i and j. Capital stands for capital per capita in prefectures i and j.
This is private sector capital. Labor denotes working force ratio in total population. Both
capital and labor are taken from Fukao and Yue data sets and Yue (1995).
CapPub (time period 1-4): This is variable stands for public capital per capita. The
variable takes logarithm of the product of public capital in both prefectures. Fukao and
Yue data sets.
21
Infra (time period 1-4): This variable is the logarithm of the product of industrial
infrastructure per capita in two prefectures. Industrial infrastructure is a part of public
capital formation. Fukao and Yue data sets.
Human (time period 1-4): this stands for the human capital index calculated by
Fukao and Yue and then controlled by population size. The indices are derived from
relative wages conditioned on gender and educational level. The index is normalized to
be one for the male workers with less than the junior high school level education. Higher
values express more human capital endowment.
Openness (time period 1-4): This stands for the summation of the openness to trade
in two prefectures. Openness is derived as the value of net-exports divided by GDP. In
the estimation these data are summed across the two prefectures involved in each pair. A
higher value of the openness to trade means that prefectures export more to the other
prefectures and foreign countries. Thus, “Openness” is higher, both prefectures are open
each other and economically tied each other.
CL (time period 1-4): this is the summation of the manufacturing ratios of two
prefectures. The ratio is defined as the manufacturing worker population ratio of
prefecture i in Japanese total manufacturing workers, defined as
i
ii
ingManufactur
ingManufacturCL . This represents for percentage of manufacturing of prefecture i
in Japan. The data are taken from Manufacturing Census (Ministry of Economy and
International Trade of Japan (METI).
CV (time period 1-4): This index stands for the summation of two prefectures’
manufacturing specialization index. The index is defined as the deviation of
manufacturing worker in all working force (e.g. agriculture, manufacturing and service
sectors) in prefecture i from the average in Japan, i.e.
i
i
i
ii
WorkForce
WorkForce
ingManufactur
ingManufacturCV . When the value takes a higher positive
number, the prefecture i is relatively specialized in manufacturing. Otherwise, the
prefecture i is relatively specialized in service and agriculture. This reflects comparative
22
advantage of manufacturing. The data are taken from Manufacturing Census (Ministry of
Economy and International Trade of Japan (METI).
AREA: Area is the logarithm of the product of two areas ( 2km ).
Distance: Distance is the logarithm of the geographical distance between two
prefectures. The distance is measured between the capitals of the prefectures (km).
Neighbor: Dummy for share border between two prefectures.
Appendix 1: Moran’s I and Geary’s C statistics (Spatial
Autocorrelation)
These statistics are aimed at studying (global) spatial autocorrelation in terms of
GDPs across prefectures (Moran, 1948, 1950; Geary, 1954). Figure A shows two sorts of
spatial autocorrelation statistic in logarithm of the first difference of GDP for 47
prefectures from 1955 to 1995, i.e. Moran’s I (the left panel) and Geary’s C (the right
panel) statistics. I-statistics are bounded in value between -1 and +1. We used
geographical distance as weight matrix, W. The formula of Moran’s I is given as
1 1
2
1 1 1
( )( )
1( )
n n
ij i j
i j
n n n
ij i
i j i
W X X X X
I
W X Xn
Values for the I-statistics value closer to 1 indicate clustered (spatially concentrated) data
points with similar characteristics, whilst the values close to -1 imply gathering data
points with totally different characteristics. When the value is zero, it is randomly
distributed in space: no spatial pattern in distribution of characteristics. Likewise, C-
statistics take from 0 to 2, which is given as
n
i
n
j
iij
n
i
n
j
jiij
XXW
XXWn
C
1 1
2
1 1
2
)(2
])()[1(
23
A value of 1 means no spatial autocorrelation. As shown two panels of Figure A, the first
difference of GDP (growth) is not spatially correlated over time. GDP growth is sporadic:
some Metropolitan areas-Tokyo Area, Osaka and Nagoya--have predecessors of
economic growth (as shown in Figure 1) and experienced high growth.
Appendix 2: HP-filtered Cross-correlations
Figure B shows the HP-filtered GDP cross-correlations of each prefecture with total
Japan over four periods. The dark colors indicate higher cross-correlations with total
Japan. Consistently with the verdict of Moran’s I and Geary’s C statistics discussed in
Appendix 1, we cannot see a clear pattern of spatial correlations and see somewhat
random patterns, although central prefectures are likely to have high correlations.
Figure C shows the histogram of HP-filtered employment cross-correlations at 2
digit-level industries for two periods (1975-1984 and 1985-1995) for pairs of prefectures.
The data for the number of employees are taken from Manufacturing Census (METI). As
shown in Figures, almost all sectors experienced a convergence from the 1970s through
the 1990s. While the precision machinery, electronics machinery and food sector have a
little change, other sectors experienced the convergence.
All sectors see an increase in the average with a positive. In particular, general
machinery, transport machinery and textiles skew the correlation toward one. These
outcomes might be related to the Japanese FDI after 1985. After the mid-1980s, the
machinery and textile sectors relocated their own production points to Asian countries.
Japanese FDI greatly increased. FDI in Asia is mainly for the labor intensive production
process due to lower wage rates and re-imports to Japan have drastically increased. This
causes off shoring and reduces employment in Japan. Textiles for instance reduce the
number of employment in Japan, and as a result, the correlation becomes largely biased
toward one.
References
Artis, M and M. Hoffmann (2006) “The Home Bias and Capital Income Flows between
Countries and Regions”, CEPR DP 5691.
Backus, D.K., P.J. Kehoe and F.E. Kydland (1993) “International Real Business Cycles:
theory and evidence”, NBER Working Paper, No. 4493.
24
Barro, R. J., and X.Sala-i-Martin (1992a), "Convergence", Journal of Political Economy,
100, 233-251.
Barro, R. J., and X.Sala-i-Martin (1992b), “Regional Growth and Migration: A Japan-
United States Comparison”, Journal of the Japanese and International
Economies, 6, 1072-1085.
Bergstrand, J. (1985) “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some
Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” The Review of Economics
and Statistics, Vol. 67, No. 3, 474-481.
Bernard A. and Jensen, B. (1999a), ‘Exporting and Productivity: Importance of
Reallocation’, NBER working paper 7135.
Bernard, A. and Jensen, B. (1999b), ‘Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect,
or Both?’ Journal of International Economics 47, 1-26
Bernard A. and Jensen B. (2001), ‘Why Some Firms Export’, NBER working paper 8349.
Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce, US GSP data sets.
http://www.bea.gov/regional/index.htm#gsp
Burnside C. (1998), " Detrending and business cycle facts: A comment", Journal of
Monetary Economics, 41(3), 513-532.
Canova F. (1998), " Detrending and business cycle facts: A user’s guide", Journal of
Monetary Economics, 41(3), 533-540.
Chen, S. (2004). How Does International Trade Affect Business Cycle Synchronization
in North America? mimeo. Department of International Trade, Canada.
Clark, T., and E. van Wincoop (2001). Borders and Business Cycles. Journal of
International Economics 55 (1): 59–85.
Del Negro, M (2002) “Asymmetric Shocks among U.S.states”, Journal of International
Economics, 56 (2): 273-297.
Fidrmuc, J. (2004) “The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria, Intra-
industry Trade and EMU Enlargement”, Contemporary economic policy, 22, 1-
12.
Fontagné, L (1999) “Endogenous Symmetry of Shocks in a Monetary Union”, Open
Economies Review, 10, 263-287.
Frankel, J. and A.Rose (1997) “Is EMU more justifiable ex post than ex ante?”, European
Economic Review, 41, 753-760.
Frankel, J.A and A.Rose. (1998) “The Endogeneity of the Optimal Currency Area
Criteria”, Economic Journal, 108, 1009-25.
Fujita M., Krugman P. and A. Venables (1999) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions
and International Trade (Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press).
Fujita, M. and J.-F. Thisse (2002) Economics of Agglomeration, (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press).
Fukao, K, H.Ishido and K.Ito (2003) “Vertical Intra-industry Trade and Foreign Direct
Investment in East Asia”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,
17, 4, 469-506.
25
Fukao, K and X. Yue (1997) “Denki Meka no Ricchi Sentaku”(Location Choice in
Electronics Machinery Sector), Mita Keizai Zasshi, 90 (2) 11-39, Japanese.
Fukao, K and X.Yue (2000), “Sengo Nihon Kokunai ni okeru Keizai Shusoku to Seisan
Tounyu (Economic Convergence and Factor Endowments in post-war Japan)”,
Keizai Kenkyu vol. 51 No.2, 136-151, Japanese.
Fukao, K and Yue. X “Japanese prefecture data base” at http://www.ier.hit-
u.ac.jp/~fukao/japanese/data/index.html
Fujita, M and T.Tabuchi (1997)“Regional Growth in Postwar Japan.” Regional Science
and Urban Economics, 27(6), 643-70.
Geary, R (1954), The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping, The Incorporated
Statistician 5: 115–145.
Grossman, G. M., and E. Rossi-Hansberg, 2006, “Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of
offshoring,” NBER Working Paper 12721.
Gruben,W., Koo, J. and E.Mills (2002) How much does international trade affect
business cycle synchronization?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Texas Research
Department Working Paper, 0203.
Harvey, A..C. and A. Jaeger (1993), “Detrending, stylized facts and the business cycle”,
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8, 231-247.
Head, K and T. Mayer (2002) “Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Investment
in the European Union”, CEPR DP 3455.
Head, K, J.Ries and D.Swenson (1995), “Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice:
Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investment in the United States”, Journal
of International Economics, 38 (3-4), 223-247.
Helpman, E.M. and P. Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade,
Cambridge, MIT Press.
Hess, G. D. and Shin, K. (1997). “International and intranational business cycles”,
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 13, pp. 93–109.
Hess, G. D. and Shin, K. (2001).Intranational business cycles in the United States,
Journal of International Economics 44 (1998) 289–313
H.M Treasury (2003) The United States as a Monetary Union, EMU Study.
Hodrick, R. J., and Prescott, E. C. (1997), ‘Postwar US Business Cycles: An Empirical
Investigation’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(1), 1–16.
Iwamoto, Y., and E. V Wincoop. (2000) Do Borders Matter?: Evidence from Japanese
Regional Net Capital Inflows, International Economic Review 41, 241-69.
Kaiser, R. and A Maravall (2001) Measuring Business Cycles in Economic Time Series,
Lecture Notes in Statistics 154, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kaiser, R. and A. Maravall (2002) A complete model-based interpretation of the
Hodrick-Prescott filter: spuriousness reconsidered, at
http://www.bde.es/servicio/software/tramo/mhpfmodel.pdf.
Kawagoe, M (1998) “Regional Dynamics in Japan: A Reexamination of Barro
Regressions”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 13, 61–72.
26
Keeble, D., Owens, P. and Thompson, C. (1982). Regional accessibility and economic
potential in the European Community. Regional Studies 16 (6): 419-432.
Kenen, P. B. (1969).”The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view”, in
Mundell R.and Swoboda A. K. (eds), Monetary Problems of the International
Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 41–60.
Kenen.P.B. (2000) Currency Areas, Policy Domains, and the institutionalization of Fixed
Exchange Rates, at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0467.pdf.
Martincus, C.Y and A. Molinari (2007) “Regional Business Cycles and National
Economic Borders: What Are the Effects of Trade in Developing Countries?”
Review of World Economics, Vol. 143 (1), 140-178
McKinnon, R. (1963). “Optimal Currency Areas.” American Economic Review, 53,
September: 717-724.
Melitz, M. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate
Industry Productivity, Econometrica, Vol. 71, 1695-1725.
Meyers, M. and P.Winker (2005)”Using HP filtered data for econometric analysis: some
evidence from Monte Carlo simulations”, Allgemeines Statistiches Archiv, 89:
303-320.
Ministry of Economy and International Trade of Japan (METI), Kougyou Toukei Hyou
(Manufacturing Census) (each year), Japanese.
Moran, P.A.P. (1948) The interpretation of statistical maps, Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society. Series B 10: 243–251.
Moran, P.A.P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17-23.
Mundell, R.A. (1961) A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas, American Economic
Review, 51, 657–65.
Okubo, T (2004) `Border Effect in the Japanese Market -A gravity model analysis',
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 18, 1-11.
Ravn, M., and H. Uhlig (2002). On Adjusting the HP Filter for the Frequency of
Observations. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (2): 371–376.
Shioji, E, (2004) “Initial Values and Income Convergence: do “the Poor Stay Poor”?
Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1), 444-446.
Solow, R. M. (1956) "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth." Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 70:65-94
Spolaore, E.and R. Wacziarg (2006) Development and Diffusion, CEPR DP NO. 5639.
Yue, X (1995) “Sengo Nihon ni okeru Kenminshotoku no Shukusyou to Kenbetu
Yousohuson no Henka (The Income Convergence and the Change of Factor
Endowments in the Japanese Prefectures in the Post-war Period Japan)”, Nihon
Keizai Kenkyu, No.29, pp 126-162, Japanese.
Wincoop, E.V (1995), ‘Regional Risksharing’, European Economic Review, 39(8), 1545–
67.
World Bank, World Development Indicator (Edition September 2006).
Wynne, M., Koo, J., (2000). “Business Cycles under Monetary Union: a Comparison of
the EU and US.”, Economica 67, 347–374.
Figure 1: GDP Cycles.
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
year
Tokyo
Aichi
Osaka
Japan
Figure 2: US Inter-state GSP Cross-correlations.
Histogram (US, 1990-1997)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fre
qu
en
cy
Histogram (US 1997-2005)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fre
qu
en
cy
Austr
iaB
elg
ium
Fin
land
Fra
nce
Germ
any
Gre
ece
Irela
nd
Italy
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgN
eth
erla
nd
sP
ort
ugal
Austr
ia
Belg
ium
0.3
767
Fin
land
-0.0
12
0.4
724
Fra
nce
0.5
386
0.6
557
0.4
43
Germ
any
0.6
752
0.5
731
-0.1
079
0.4
836
Gre
ece
0.3
072
0.5
862
0.1
309
0.5
574
0.7
059
Irela
nd
0.0
70.3
317
0.4
726
0.5
365
0.2
963
0.3
652
Italy
0.4
114
0.8
681
0.5
385
0.5
975
0.5
957
0.6
609
0.3
168
Luxem
bou
r0.2
891
0.3
527
0.0
34
0.3
424
0.5
983
0.6
389
0.0
713
0.3
824
Neth
erland
0.4
784
0.6
649
0.2
122
0.4
998
0.8
01
0.7
594
0.4
012
0.7
211
0.6
096
Port
ugal
0.4
974
0.6
34
0.3
797
0.6
972
0.3
474
0.2
711
0.3
346
0.6
334
0.2
217
0.3
084
Spain
0.4
32
0.6
821
0.3
752
0.7
689
0.4
226
0.3
646
0.4
996
0.5
965
0.3
331
0.5
68
0.7
727
Fig
ure
3:
EU
12
Co
un
trie
s G
DP
Cro
ss
-co
rre
lati
on
s.
EU
Cu
rre
nc
y A
rea
(12
EU
co
un
trie
s)
19
75
-19
95
02468
10
12
14
16
-1-0
.8-0
.6-0
.4-0
.20
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Frequency
Figure 4: Japanese GDP Cross-correlations
(1955-1964)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fre
qu
en
cy
Figure 5: Japanese GDP Cross-correlations
(1965-1974)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fre
qu
en
cy
Figure 6:Japanese GDP Cross-correlations
(1975-1984)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fre
qu
en
cy
Figure 7: Japanese GDP Cross-orrelations (1985-
1996)
0
50
100
150
200
250
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fre
quency
Figure 8: Means and Variance of HP-filtered GDP Cross-correlations.Note: Each sample is 10-year moving average.
The first period (number "1") is from 1955 to 1964. The last period (number "32") is from 1986-1995.
Average
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
average
Variance
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
variance
1
10
20 30
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
variance
av
era
ge
Figure 9: The Spline of Independent Variables in terms of Market Potentials.
.6.6
5.7
.75
.8
Media
n s
plin
e
27 28 29 30 31 32mkt_4
.4.5
.6.7
Media
n s
plin
e
26 27 28 29 30mkt_3
.75
.8.8
5.9
.95
Media
n s
plin
e
24 25 26 27 28mkt_2
Figure10: Consumption Risk Sharing.
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Consumption Correlations
Outp
ut C
orr
ela
tions
Fig
ure
A:
Sp
ati
al A
uto
co
rrela
tio
ns.
Mo
ran
's I S
tati
sti
c
-0.2
-0.1
8
-0.1
6
-0.1
4
-0.1
2
-0.1
-0.0
8
-0.0
6
-0.0
4
-0.0
20
19
55
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
Ye
ar
Geary
's C
sta
tisti
c
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.91
1.1
1.2
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
Year
1955-1
964
1965-1
974
1975-1
984
1985-1
995
HP
corr
ela
tions
0.9
5-1
0.9
-0.9
5
0.8
5-0
.9
0.8
-0.8
5
0.7
5-0
.8
0.7
-0.7
5
0-0
.7
Fig
ure
B: Japanese M
ap a
nd H
P-f
iltere
d G
DP
Cro
ss-c
orr
ela
tions.
GM
M1
23
45
De
pe
nd
en
t V
ar
Co
eff
icie
nt
z-v
alu
eC
oe
ffic
ien
t
z-v
alu
eC
oe
ffic
ien
t
z
-va
lue
Co
eff
icie
nt
z-v
alu
eC
oe
ffic
ien
t
z
-va
lue
MK
T2
-6.7
19
86
1-7
.27
**-6
.40
68
-6.9
1**
-6.1
73
88
6-6
.11
**
MK
T3
-6.8
06
30
9-5
.97
**-5
.53
61
-4.8
2**
-5.0
06
39
7-3
.77
**
MK
T4
-4.1
79
61
5-0
.87
2.0
34
20
.32
12
.69
67
81
.03
MK
T2_square
0.1
29
75
47
.14
**0
.12
30
6.7
3**
0.1
18
38
5.9
3**
MK
T3_square
0.1
18
25
55
.75
**0
.09
42
4.5
3**
0.0
84
46
33
.50
**
MK
T4_square
0.0
69
84
90
.84
-0.0
39
0-0
.35
-0.2
25
11
3-1
.05
GD
P2
0.0
69
65
.00
**0
.08
79
05
5.5
1**
0.0
74
50
44
.69
**0
.07
71
4.8
6**
0.0
88
12
74
.89
**
GD
P3
0.0
21
41
.48
0.0
11
72
90
.69
0.0
78
80
34
.53
**0
.08
81
5.0
8**
0.0
75
67
34
.15
**
GD
P4
0.1
07
67
.97
**0
.06
27
94
1.7
9*
0.1
28
03
24
.56
**0
.17
11
4.2
7**
0.1
62
96
73
.89
**
gap2
-0.3
08
36
5-3
.14
**-0
.18
80
58
-1.8
3*
gap3
0.1
63
11
61
.08
0.2
82
28
81
.69
*
gap4
0.7
91
27
61
.41
1.4
18
17
11
.60
Openness2
0.6
74
41
.77
*0
.68
29
26
1.6
9*
Openness3
0.8
31
33
.17
**0
.91
68
38
3.2
7**
Openness4
0.9
00
21
.55
1.5
57
97
11
.79
*
AR
EA
0.0
29
95
.24
**0
.04
85
08
8.7
2**
9.9
07
11
51
55
6.7
**0
.70
91
0.0
42
.85
34
42
26
.99
**
Neig
hbour
0.0
11
70
.46
0.0
10
12
30
.39
0.0
10
23
10
.42
0.0
10
60
.43
0.0
09
38
60
.36
Dis
tance
-0.0
29
6-2
.83
**-0
.03
17
14
-2.8
3**
-0.0
04
87
9-0
.36
81
.48
28
6.8
4**
-0.0
39
16
6-1
.49
tim
e2
-1.5
83
8-4
.09
**-2
.01
78
74
-4.6
7**
85
.17
63
7.1
6**
78
.07
22
4.8
7**
78
.26
32
6.0
4**
tim
e3
-0.8
25
7-1
.89
*-0
.56
44
91
-1.1
29
5.1
72
55
.96
**-3
1.5
09
1-0
.34
71
.22
40
83
.87
**
tim
e4
-3.2
65
5-7
.70
**-2
.01
70
26
-2.0
2**
58
.50
61
10
.83
-0.0
16
4-1
.09
-18
4.2
01
7-1
.04
Ha
nse
n's
J
0.0
00
0H
an
se
n's
J
0.0
00
0H
an
se
n's
J
0.0
04
4H
an
se
n's
J
0.0
04
Ha
nse
n's
J
0.0
17
7
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.35
85
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.36
78
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.34
93
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.34
8R
oo
t M
SE
=
0.3
79
1
Tab
le 1
: E
sti
mati
on
Resu
lts 1
(G
DP
, M
ark
et
Po
ten
tial
an
d O
pp
en
ness).
No
tes:
Th
e n
um
be
r o
f sa
mp
le 4
14
0
Co
nsta
nt
term
s a
re o
mitte
d.
Ind
ep
en
de
nt
va
r: H
P-f
ilte
red
GD
P c
orr
ela
tio
ns
* S
ign
ific
an
t a
t th
e 1
0 p
er
ce
nt
leve
l.
** S
ign
ific
an
t a
t th
e 5
pe
r ce
nt
leve
l.
GM
M1
23
4
De
pe
nd
en
t V
ar
Co
eff
icie
nt
z-v
alu
eC
oe
ffic
ien
t
z-v
alu
eC
oe
ffic
ien
t
z-v
alu
eC
oe
ffic
ien
t
z-v
alu
e
MK
T2
-6.1
05
61
-6.0
3**
-9.3
55
6-9
.30
**-8
.34
41
-8.1
9**
-8.8
82
76
-8.1
4**
MK
T3
-4.9
37
81
-4.0
7**
-6.5
86
6-5
.36
**-5
.45
14
-4.4
1**
-5.5
57
41
-4.1
4**
MK
T4
10
.67
21
.13
-4.6
39
8-0
.59
4.0
28
41
0.5
0-1
.83
14
3-0
.19
MK
T2_square
0.1
16
57
5.8
3**
0.1
72
27
8.7
5**
0.1
55
13
7.7
2**
0.1
63
27
7.6
5**
MK
T3_square
0.0
83
02
3.7
7**
0.1
06
35
4.7
7**
0.0
89
99
4.0
0**
0.0
88
78
3.6
9**
MK
T4_square
-0.1
89
46
-1.1
60
.06
22
50
.45
-0.0
73
9-0
.53
0.0
15
98
0.0
9
GD
P2
0.0
76
94
4.2
9**
1.3
15
42
9.6
3**
1.0
19
51
8.0
4**
1.3
09
35
9.2
7**
GD
P3
0.0
90
49
5.0
3**
0.8
96
26
4.4
1**
0.2
94
23
1.5
70
.66
25
42
.63
**
GD
P4
0.2
42
47
3.5
1**
0.9
47
06
1.3
5-0
.70
88
-0.9
50
.52
82
10
.55
Hum
an2
1.5
02
64
9.2
1**
1.1
47
76
7.5
5**
1.4
99
13
8.8
7**
Hum
an3
0.9
50
84
4.0
4**
0.2
81
92
1.3
00
.71
05
72
.47
**
Hum
an4
0.9
58
62
1.2
2-0
.95
72
-1.1
60
.47
06
40
.44
CapLabour2
0.0
59
50
.36
0.0
24
58
0.2
00
.02
77
80
.21
0.0
73
32
0.5
5
CapLabour3
0.0
53
89
0.2
30
.07
04
90
.43
0.1
07
44
0.6
00
.16
28
40
.91
CapLabour4
5.7
59
13
1.8
6*
5.6
15
79
2.6
5**
6.0
45
98
2.4
6**
6.6
60
98
2.6
8**
Cappub2
-0.5
13
2-4
.11
**-0
.29
91
1-1
.97
**
Cappub3
-0.8
53
-6.0
2**
-0.3
50
05
-1.6
5*
Cappub4
-2.3
06
1-6
.34
**-2
.14
49
5-2
.95
**
Infr
a2
-0.2
17
9-1
.95
*-0
.24
18
8-2
.10
**
Infr
a3
-0.4
77
4-3
.59
**-0
.49
44
-3.0
0**
Infr
a4
-0.8
53
7-1
.95
*-0
.10
08
7-0
.15
Openness2
1.1
98
82
.27
**3
.17
28
35
.92
**2
.65
87
64
.88
**3
.15
95
25
.80
**
Openness3
1.1
51
98
3.4
0**
2.2
31
16
4.3
5**
1.0
46
71
2.1
3**
1.7
47
57
2.9
4**
Openness4
1.4
47
08
1.7
8*
1.8
33
94
1.0
7-0
.79
88
-0.4
31
.00
61
60
.48
AR
EA
3.0
88
92
0.2
60
.03
62
0.0
02
2.7
94
42
47
2.7
0**
1.9
98
63
20
4.7
3**
Neig
hbour
0.0
07
30
.20
0.0
06
36
0.1
80
.00
67
10
.19
0.0
06
22
0.1
6
Dis
tance
-0.0
41
38
-1.7
2*
-0.0
13
9-0
.70
-0.0
29
2-1
.39
-0.0
21
99
-0.9
3
tim
e2
77
.90
43
6.0
0**
13
3.0
43
10
.04
**1
15
.89
38
.78
**1
26
.14
58
.73
**
tim
e3
70
.00
56
4.1
4**
10
2.2
51
5.9
0**
80
.17
82
4.6
5**
85
.80
69
4.4
5**
tim
e4
-15
8.7
31
-1.1
58
5.2
57
0.7
5-6
1.1
36
-0.5
34
1.2
00
60
.28
Ha
nse
n's
J
0.0
02
1H
an
se
n's
J
0.0
05
Ha
nse
n's
J
0.1
26
9H
an
se
n's
J
0.0
05
2
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.51
44
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.50
03
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.51
29
Ro
ot
MS
E
=
0
.54
55
No
tes:
Tab
le 2
: E
sti
mati
on
Resu
lts 2
(F
acto
r E
nd
ow
men
ts).
Th
e n
um
be
r o
f sa
mp
le 4
14
0
Co
nsta
nt
term
s a
re o
mitte
d.
* S
ign
ific
an
t a
t th
e 1
0 p
er
ce
nt
leve
l.
Ind
ep
en
de
nt
va
r: H
P-f
ilte
red
GD
P c
orr
ela
tio
ns
** S
ign
ific
an
t a
t th
e 5
pe
r ce
nt
leve
l.
GM
M1
23
45
Dependent V
ar
Coeffic
ient
z-v
alu
eC
oeffic
ient
z-v
alu
eC
oeffic
ient
z-v
alu
eC
oeffic
ient
z-v
alu
eC
oeffic
ient
z-v
alu
e
MK
T2
-8.1
932
-8.2
9**
-9.1
435
-8.6
0**
-9.8
948
-9.1
3**
-9.1
314
-8.4
4**
-9.3
514
-7.7
6**
MK
T3
-5.4
928
-4.4
8**
-5.0
82
-3.8
8**
-5.8
203
-4.5
9**
-5.1
579
-4.0
2**
-5.3
127
-3.6
9**
MK
T4
-12.5
851
-1.5
49.7
3802
0.5
7-0
.3228
-0.0
214.5
888
0.9
49.0
0097
0.4
9
MK
T2
_sq
ua
re0.1
547
8.0
3**
0.1
7099
8.3
2**
0.1
8222
8.7
5**
0.1
704
8.1
1**
0.1
7191
7.4
1**
MK
T3
_sq
ua
re0.0
951
4.3
1**
0.0
8552
3.7
1**
0.0
9378
4.1
9**
0.0
8575
3.7
7**
0.0
8483
3.3
4**
MK
T4
_sq
ua
re0.2
121
1.5
0-0
.1697
-0.5
9-0
.0122
-0.0
5-0
.2539
-0.9
7-0
.1691
-0.5
4
GD
P2
0.0
536
3.2
1**
0.7
4734
6.1
0**
1.1
9894
8.1
0**
0.7
6526
4.7
1**
1.1
9031
7.9
1**
GD
P3
0.1
066
5.8
5**
0.4
5189
1.4
91.2
7214
4.5
6**
0.4
719
1.5
91.0
5529
3.6
3**
GD
P4
0.1
857
4.8
5**
-2.0
277
-0.8
30.2
674
0.1
3-2
.6567
-1.2
0-0
.8875
-0.3
9
Hu
ma
n2
0.8
3604
5.8
9**
1.3
7693
7.8
8**
0.8
6167
4.5
0**
1.3
7073
7.6
5**
Hu
ma
n3
0.4
1356
1.2
21.3
7185
4.3
7**
0.4
596
1.3
71.1
4559
3.4
9**
Hu
ma
n4
-2.5
47
-0.9
30.2
0249
0.0
9-3
.2074
-1.3
0-1
.0982
-0.4
4
Ca
pL
ab
ou
r20.0
1416
0.1
00.0
1179
0.0
80.0
6426
0.4
60.0
7294
0.4
9
Ca
pL
ab
ou
r3-0
.0407
-0.2
0-0
.0514
-0.2
70.0
6666
0.3
50.0
6274
0.3
1
Ca
pL
ab
ou
r45.8
485
1.7
1*
5.5
0119
1.7
2*
7.4
6542
2.2
7**
7.2
8699
2.0
3**
Ca
pp
ub
2-0
.4481
-3.9
0**
-0.2
359
-1.6
5*
Ca
pp
ub
3-0
.7753
-6.3
4**
-0.4
032
-1.9
8**
Ca
pp
ub
4-2
.3448
-5.2
4**
-2.8
079
-4.3
9**
Infr
a2
-0.0
469
-0.3
9-0
.2319
-2.0
5**
Infr
a3
-0.2
184
-1.6
4*
-0.3
65
-2.3
6**
Infr
a4
-0.5
142
-1.3
30.2
8597
0.6
0
Op
en
ne
ss2
1.4
423
3.3
0**
2.3
5711
4.6
1**
3.2
6581
5.9
7**
2.5
556
4.4
8**
3.2
3176
5.6
6**
Op
en
ne
ss3
0.5
686
1.9
4*
1.5
1744
2.0
7**
2.5
3607
3.6
8**
1.4
8179
2.0
6**
2.2
4347
3.1
0**
Op
en
ne
ss4
0.7
612
1.3
0-0
.779
-0.2
01.3
8284
0.3
9-1
.9138
-0.5
2-0
.43
-0.1
1
CV
21.2
822
2.9
4**
1.1
7808
2.1
3**
0.6
5704
1.2
11.2
535
2.1
4**
0.6
4187
1.2
0
CV
3-2
.3634
-4.1
0**
-1.5
403
-2.0
3**
-2.7
533
-3.9
2**
-1.1
793
-1.6
5*
-2.1
422
-3.2
7**
CV
40.6
198
0.5
47.2
29
1.8
9*
3.4
2152
1.0
38.7
9369
2.4
1**
4.9
7852
1.4
7
CL
22.5
866
0.8
3-2
.4896
-0.6
90.3
6097
0.1
1-2
.9362
-0.8
10.3
4419
0.1
0
CL
312.0
914
4.2
2**
7.1
0655
1.4
711.1
432
2.5
9**
5.4
6303
1.2
69.4
764
2.2
5**
CL
411.8
518
2.7
0**
-29.9
94
-1.0
1-1
7.8
77
-0.6
6-4
0.9
17
-1.5
1-3
4.5
94
-1.1
9
AR
EA
0.0
045
0.0
00.0
2293
0.0
01.4
0269
0.0
60.0
2426
0.0
00.3
2325
0.0
1
Ne
igh
bo
ur
0.0
100
0.4
10.0
0649
0.1
90.0
0649
0.1
90.0
0596
0.1
50.0
058
0.1
5
Dis
tan
ce
0.0
072
0.4
2-0
.0353
-1.0
3-0
.02
-0.6
6-0
.0458
-1.4
0-0
.0381
-1.0
2
tim
e2
106.4
864
8.3
0**
124.8
75
8.8
6**
139.7
04
9.6
4**
124.9
65
8.7
8**
131.8
84
8.1
6**
tim
e3
76.5
540
4.4
5**
73.7
125
3.8
6**
92.4
228
5.0
2**
75.8
882
4.0
8**
83.8
577
3.9
7**
tim
e4
180.3
838
1.5
2-1
53.3
-0.6
021.0
529
0.1
0-2
23.3
3-0
.96
-118.2
2-0
.43
**
Hansen's
J 0.0
083
Hansen's
J 0.0
102
Hansen's
J 0.0
287
Hansen's
J 0.0
224
Hansen's
J 0.0
128
Root M
SE
=
0.3
471
Root M
SE
=
0.5
044
Root M
SE
=
0.4
885
Root M
SE
=
0.5
806
Root M
SE
=
0.5
72
Ta
ble
3:
Es
tim
ati
on
Re
su
lts
3 (
Ind
us
tria
l S
tru
ctu
re a
nd
Fa
cto
r E
nd
ow
me
nts
).N
ote
The n
um
ber
of sam
ple
4140
Consta
nt te
rms a
re o
mitte
d.
Independent var:
HP
-filt
ere
d G
DP
corr
ela
tions
* S
ignific
ant at th
e 1
0 p
er
cent le
vel.
** S
ignific
ant at th
e 5
per
cent le
vel.
Pre
fectu
re1
23
45
67
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1 20
.20
14
30
.30
05
0.6
51
9
40
.37
09
0.6
15
0.8
14
2
50
.07
13
0.4
48
30
.65
31
0.8
14
4
60
.53
0.5
63
30
.78
85
0.9
11
60
.80
65
70
.46
77
0.5
11
0.8
90
20
.87
70
.73
68
0.9
14
6
80
.30
32
0.3
53
80
.39
14
0.7
05
10
.59
91
0.5
85
0.4
15
3
90
.21
58
0.3
94
0.6
99
20
.91
93
0.7
45
10
.82
71
0.7
97
50
.73
33
10
0.4
10
.35
60
.34
20
.72
82
0.4
81
50
.63
64
0.5
51
30
.80
84
0.8
04
7
11
0.7
29
70
.67
44
0.7
96
70
.83
60
.51
43
0.8
22
80
.82
81
0.5
04
10
.62
31
0.5
58
7
12
0.6
91
90
.46
54
0.5
87
70
.88
22
0.5
72
10
.86
08
0.7
77
20
.66
44
0.7
96
0.8
15
10
.87
27
13
0.3
38
90
.54
82
0.3
89
50
.63
44
0.6
30
90
.77
67
0.4
70
10
.56
53
0.5
75
90
.51
02
0.4
94
70
.62
99
14
0.1
59
20
.44
85
0.6
80
10
.77
02
0.8
53
0.8
36
60
.69
24
0.4
30
20
.67
46
0.2
77
10
.55
28
0.5
77
0.7
73
6
15
0.5
13
40
.85
93
0.7
49
90
.66
81
0.5
83
90
.77
61
0.7
36
30
.36
79
0.4
39
80
.38
95
0.8
05
10
.59
55
0.6
21
0.5
60
6
16
0.4
50
40
.14
67
0.5
64
50
.76
79
0.7
44
80
.79
66
0.6
61
20
.79
04
0.7
81
90
.60
04
0.5
88
70
.72
89
0.6
22
90
.73
59
0.3
86
7
17
-0.1
55
4-0
.23
75
0.2
31
70
.14
17
-0.0
35
1-0
.08
53
0.2
59
8-0
.00
33
0.2
92
20
.19
69
0.0
39
30
.04
6-0
.60
62
-0.2
72
3-0
.25
69
-0.0
12
9
18
0.4
68
30
.69
33
0.6
90
10
.90
08
0.7
48
20
.85
73
0.8
23
60
.71
17
0.7
99
0.8
29
70
.81
88
0.8
57
0.6
11
50
.55
81
0.7
89
90
.62
85
0.0
81
7
19
0.3
66
70
.53
07
0.7
91
50
.91
43
0.7
19
10
.89
11
0.7
92
90
.76
66
0.9
26
70
.70
56
0.7
33
20
.80
06
0.7
21
0.7
64
50
.60
52
0.8
41
60
.04
38
0.7
81
6
20
0.5
06
10
.44
94
0.7
96
90
.92
49
0.7
43
0.9
23
70
.85
38
0.7
65
50
.90
70
.71
15
0.8
00
20
.85
89
0.6
62
70
.75
16
0.6
19
20
.90
86
0.0
93
40
.81
18
0.9
71
1
21
0.2
81
50
.28
78
0.8
07
0.8
20
70
.74
39
0.7
01
70
.78
08
0.6
20
40
.75
52
0.4
42
70
.68
65
0.6
29
70
.26
05
0.6
51
60
.43
20
.80
70
.38
20
.64
15
0.7
57
30
.83
53
22
0.6
61
60
.52
60
.68
57
0.8
32
0.5
66
60
.84
44
0.7
16
0.8
22
10
.77
83
0.7
50
80
.83
31
0.8
65
80
.69
10
.58
99
0.6
68
40
.83
08
-0.0
63
20
.80
32
0.9
13
40
.93
68
0.6
83
9
23
0.4
42
80
.42
99
0.8
27
60
.70
86
0.7
26
0.8
60
30
.80
23
0.4
08
70
.59
85
0.2
35
80
.69
05
0.5
68
40
.63
36
0.8
53
50
.70
75
0.7
70
9-0
.16
24
0.5
67
80
.77
61
0.8
20
40
.73
02
0.7
18
7
24
0.3
42
40
.50
03
0.8
54
60
.88
99
0.7
05
60
.81
82
0.8
09
70
.77
84
0.8
95
10
.66
89
0.7
39
0.7
28
80
.52
11
0.6
55
50
.59
27
0.8
24
0.2
38
90
.77
74
0.9
54
10
.95
38
0.8
67
50
.88
77
0.7
59
2
25
0.2
00
70
.54
84
0.9
11
60
.78
78
0.7
42
0.7
20
10
.83
35
0.2
96
10
.60
25
0.1
95
20
.73
66
0.5
33
50
.29
96
0.7
44
90
.64
12
0.5
44
80
.21
95
0.6
15
60
.64
40
.69
0.8
56
20
.51
50
.77
91
0.7
13
4
26
0.3
52
80
.75
48
0.8
47
80
.92
43
0.7
80
.92
12
0.8
13
20
.63
10
.80
76
0.5
62
30
.81
16
0.7
72
30
.79
17
0.8
57
90
.79
43
0.7
12
2-0
.14
65
0.8
17
70
.92
42
0.8
88
80
.69
76
0.8
38
50
.82
20
.85
65
0.7
66
7
27
0.4
96
30
.41
96
0.5
43
90
.80
32
0.4
23
30
.74
87
0.6
05
0.7
14
80
.83
37
0.7
77
0.7
03
0.8
70
80
.67
37
0.5
56
20
.41
53
0.7
11
50
.01
28
0.6
74
10
.88
60
.85
08
0.5
37
30
.87
73
0.5
12
60
.77
77
0.3
79
0.7
72
3
28
0.4
09
50
.24
74
0.3
05
60
.73
72
0.7
60
60
.72
57
0.5
21
10
.84
33
0.7
09
90
.77
19
0.5
24
50
.77
29
0.6
96
40
.61
17
0.4
02
20
.84
37
-0.1
58
50
.75
33
0.6
86
60
.74
79
0.5
82
70
.73
05
0.4
89
0.6
20
90
.34
86
0.6
28
0.6
41
2
29
0.6
54
30
.27
17
0.1
30
70
.40
91
0.1
72
90
.54
62
0.4
17
60
.46
39
0.4
61
10
.79
08
0.4
67
20
.68
08
0.5
41
50
.09
42
0.4
53
70
.36
05
-0.1
17
0.6
35
10
.45
60
.48
26
0.0
28
60
.61
71
0.1
91
70
.34
89
-0.1
00
30
.36
31
0.5
99
6
30
0.4
78
0.5
45
80
.90
39
0.8
47
80
.71
67
0.8
54
70
.93
35
0.5
92
70
.77
80
.59
86
0.8
20
90
.71
94
0.4
23
70
.58
88
0.7
64
90
.71
08
0.2
76
80
.84
71
0.8
21
90
.88
17
0.8
35
20
.80
74
0.7
96
30
.90
54
0.7
88
50
.79
89
0.5
86
9
31
0.2
65
0.4
68
30
.85
08
0.8
80
40
.82
93
0.8
28
30
.91
25
0.6
31
80
.86
57
0.6
44
50
.69
70
.68
36
0.4
04
20
.63
32
0.6
36
80
.73
13
0.3
73
30
.84
82
0.8
20
80
.86
48
0.8
70
60
.71
95
0.7
21
70
.90
06
0.7
91
50
.77
50
.55
97
32
0.1
07
80
.04
91
0.4
96
10
.65
25
0.7
35
60
.58
50
.62
0.7
31
70
.77
80
.65
81
0.3
41
40
.49
58
0.2
64
20
.43
51
0.2
45
90
.77
91
0.4
22
40
.63
49
0.6
63
70
.72
52
0.7
69
30
.57
90
.49
12
0.7
63
40
.46
10
.47
39
0.4
28
8
33
0.2
82
10
.43
71
0.7
69
30
.93
91
0.9
35
90
.91
24
0.8
62
80
.69
24
0.8
94
20
.62
79
0.6
95
80
.77
21
0.6
40
70
.85
80
.59
35
0.8
72
30
.10
02
0.8
20
60
.88
13
0.9
17
70
.86
71
0.7
61
80
.79
98
0.8
67
70
.79
24
0.8
68
60
.66
95
34
0.4
00
90
.38
11
0.5
36
90
.49
41
0.7
03
10
.76
49
0.6
41
30
.35
46
0.4
17
70
.27
40
.46
06
0.4
18
40
.70
07
0.6
81
20
.73
65
0.6
13
5-0
.38
12
0.5
68
90
.56
25
0.6
11
20
.40
08
0.5
62
90
.82
44
0.5
14
0.4
60
60
.63
30
.27
22
35
0.0
00
1-0
.15
40
.57
14
0.4
83
10
.34
41
0.3
79
10
.59
64
0.2
22
70
.65
29
0.2
89
90
.27
13
0.3
24
1-0
.11
98
0.3
02
1-0
.03
75
0.4
87
30
.76
81
0.2
50
40
.51
55
0.5
51
90
.70
19
0.3
15
60
.40
02
0.6
20
50
.52
36
0.3
0.3
86
3
36
-0.0
43
90
.08
72
0.6
54
90
.75
09
0.7
58
90
.61
57
0.7
19
0.4
83
20
.82
70
.45
09
0.4
05
0.5
09
60
.20
75
0.6
37
90
.17
71
0.7
03
40
.52
92
0.5
31
10
.68
27
0.7
17
40
.86
84
0.4
52
50
.55
70
.74
37
0.7
26
70
.57
0.4
72
4
37
0.3
77
70
.56
71
0.5
99
70
.87
27
0.8
94
50
.89
19
0.7
92
10
.66
53
0.7
71
80
.72
72
0.6
98
50
.80
43
0.7
26
20
.73
08
0.7
24
50
.71
2-0
.08
89
0.9
29
50
.74
32
0.7
86
20
.62
80
.71
29
0.6
41
70
.69
0.6
20
30
.80
76
0.5
86
5
38
0.2
23
90
.32
17
0.7
55
30
.89
77
0.9
09
20
.82
79
0.8
41
40
.65
21
0.8
64
10
.57
02
0.6
45
80
.70
83
0.4
70
10
.78
80
.48
34
0.8
53
0.2
60
70
.75
50
.81
18
0.8
71
80
.93
0.6
82
30
.74
72
0.8
46
90
.81
96
0.7
73
20
.58
36
39
0.3
52
50
.39
06
0.6
66
10
.90
46
0.9
16
80
.88
44
0.7
84
70
.79
96
0.8
62
40
.69
46
0.6
74
80
.79
04
0.6
71
50
.80
07
0.5
67
80
.92
18
0.0
23
90
.83
16
0.8
62
50
.91
40
.83
59
0.8
06
90
.75
39
0.8
49
20
.68
55
0.8
24
70
.67
79
40
0.1
53
70
.22
64
0.2
76
10
.55
95
0.7
60
20
.67
94
0.4
17
70
.71
35
0.6
28
60
.57
23
0.2
50
90
.48
39
0.8
24
30
.68
16
0.3
99
40
.76
67
-0.3
70
20
.57
18
0.6
71
80
.65
66
0.3
85
70
.61
11
0.5
76
10
.56
28
0.2
18
10
.61
06
0.5
01
2
41
0.4
53
1-0
.00
69
0.3
42
90
.27
35
0.2
03
30
.52
61
0.5
69
30
.12
95
0.4
27
50
.41
79
0.2
85
0.3
78
90
.29
24
0.1
74
20
.35
55
0.3
65
60
.16
11
0.3
78
50
.41
94
0.4
66
80
.16
75
0.4
23
30
.44
62
0.3
92
70
.08
84
0.2
67
50
.33
91
42
0.2
86
60
.38
80
.10
71
0.2
45
90
.54
92
0.4
36
80
.22
47
0.1
96
50
.00
36
0.0
63
10
.28
78
0.2
49
0.6
04
30
.49
90
.58
35
0.2
87
6-0
.70
03
0.3
92
70
.13
01
0.1
92
0.0
83
10
.22
73
0.4
25
90
.04
08
0.2
47
90
.37
09
-0.0
33
7
43
0.2
69
60
.14
17
0.1
82
40
.67
71
0.5
18
40
.55
63
0.4
81
90
.67
63
0.7
63
50
.91
28
0.4
15
30
.76
91
0.4
22
40
.30
96
0.1
68
60
.56
62
0.2
49
20
.71
54
0.5
63
40
.59
42
0.4
18
90
.54
54
0.1
20
30
.49
85
0.1
80
30
.43
11
0.6
66
6
44
0.3
38
60
.25
33
-0.2
10
2-0
.16
63
-0.3
17
9-0
.09
34
-0.0
98
0.0
69
6-0
.17
37
0.3
47
20
.07
48
0.0
63
7-0
.01
41
-0.5
35
70
.27
84
-0.3
17
3-0
.07
70
.24
04
-0.1
64
3-0
.16
12
-0.4
26
60
.08
8-0
.33
37
-0.1
45
6-0
.43
98
-0.1
63
2-0
.04
45
0.2
27
10
.42
82
0.9
11
60
.79
66
0.7
83
50
.83
86
0.9
42
0.3
65
20
.77
15
0.3
89
70
.65
05
0.5
70
50
.41
23
0.7
38
50
.64
40
.65
60
.28
89
0.6
85
70
.77
36
0.8
06
60
.80
59
0.6
07
0.8
47
0.8
17
30
.85
67
0.7
74
70
.47
52
46
0.3
94
80
.63
02
0.4
03
60
.76
23
0.4
37
50
.67
50
.54
29
0.4
90
50
.66
04
0.7
21
80
.69
45
0.8
45
40
.66
07
0.4
98
20
.52
05
0.3
85
5-0
.11
42
0.7
46
60
.63
34
0.5
94
20
.30
56
0.6
24
90
.28
04
0.4
79
50
.37
02
0.7
08
10
.79
13
47
-0.1
33
90
.09
83
0.6
98
90
.53
27
0.5
05
0.4
38
10
.61
20
.38
28
0.6
91
40
.31
08
0.2
64
50
.23
59
0.0
30
50
.38
85
0.1
76
70
.51
86
0.6
24
10
.36
47
0.6
25
20
.61
03
0.7
31
40
.40
34
0.5
16
60
.75
65
0.5
81
90
.45
03
0.3
49
4
To
atl
0.5
00
50
.55
34
0.7
21
0.9
04
80
.81
42
0.9
72
50
.81
55
0.7
22
40
.83
71
0.6
78
0.7
76
10
.85
28
0.8
53
10
.84
93
0.7
26
60
.86
57
-0.1
86
70
.83
98
0.9
29
80
.94
37
0.6
94
40
.89
92
0.8
39
60
.84
43
0.6
43
70
.93
43
0.8
03
2
Tab
le A
: H
p-f
ilte
red
GD
P C
ross-c
orr
ela
tio
ns in
Jap
an
(1955-1
964).
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
0.5
41
4
0.5
47
30
.41
51
0.6
18
10
.33
63
0.9
54
1
0.7
01
10
.29
63
0.7
29
10
.84
95
0.7
97
70
.31
04
0.8
39
20
.90
96
0.7
85
0.5
36
90
.42
07
0.6
56
90
.59
62
0.4
70
70
.64
77
0.1
42
-0.0
28
60
.56
56
0.6
51
30
.65
33
0.5
32
10
.06
58
0.5
25
6-0
.00
72
0.6
74
50
.83
02
0.8
17
70
.84
19
0.2
89
70
.84
37
0.8
59
40
.54
70
.75
70
.80
84
0.6
58
80
.89
35
0.7
01
80
.19
60
.58
76
0.7
45
10
.18
78
0.8
27
0.9
18
90
.83
38
0.9
77
30
.54
90
.63
88
0.9
16
40
.82
25
0.8
98
10
.38
92
0.8
05
0.8
67
80
.81
79
0.9
76
30
.65
94
0.4
33
0.7
70
40
.90
92
0.9
47
2
0.8
28
0.4
72
70
.46
13
0.5
37
60
.65
24
0.7
11
70
.75
04
0.0
79
80
.42
27
0.7
43
50
.61
02
0.7
87
3
0.2
09
90
.68
23
0.5
40
30
.46
95
0.4
31
10
.33
05
0.5
99
90
.41
79
0.2
37
50
.34
52
0.2
75
10
.31
21
0.3
82
2
0.5
16
20
.20
81
0.2
00
50
.16
77
0.0
65
40
.35
87
0.6
97
9-0
.51
04
-0.0
80
40
.59
98
0.2
58
10
.42
52
0.5
50
5-0
.00
88
0.8
00
20
.64
41
0.4
27
60
.55
68
0.6
35
70
.62
62
0.1
48
50
.32
42
0.5
50
90
.71
52
0.6
04
70
.67
97
0.5
31
70
.27
87
0.0
81
2
-0.0
36
70
.64
89
0.0
26
4-0
.09
68
-0.1
23
7-0
.31
55
0.0
39
3-0
.44
22
-0.5
43
90
.03
71
-0.3
95
4-0
.22
55
-0.0
64
10
.31
60
.07
83
0.1
20
9
0.4
19
0.2
02
20
.90
39
0.9
21
30
.68
25
0.8
58
20
.67
47
0.6
89
20
.79
95
0.6
96
0.8
56
80
.75
80
.45
76
0.5
46
20
.16
64
0.3
21
1-0
.27
16
0.5
94
80
.58
80
.41
54
0.4
24
50
.16
29
0.5
63
80
.17
55
0.0
40
90
.29
08
0.6
93
20
.45
53
0.5
51
50
.35
10
.09
75
0.2
32
50
.71
74
0.1
15
80
.32
26
0.1
81
4-0
.04
37
0.6
89
0.7
72
20
.75
69
0.6
07
90
.27
40
.88
78
0.8
20
10
.29
84
0.6
79
40
.52
08
0.2
77
10
.41
36
-0.3
52
30
.22
43
-0.3
34
70
.78
13
-0.0
20
7
0.8
12
10
.54
36
0.8
02
20
.78
49
0.6
10
90
.91
40
.74
91
0.3
06
70
.58
59
0.8
85
40
.81
75
0.9
20
60
.78
22
0.4
36
80
.46
0.5
80
8-0
.10
84
0.7
51
50
.67
72
0.4
06
2
Pre
fectu
re1
23
45
67
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1 20
.84
98
30
.96
64
0.8
01
6
40
.85
21
0.7
35
10
.89
05
50
.94
03
0.8
80
40
.85
97
0.8
03
1
60
.91
63
0.8
44
40
.87
74
0.8
38
30
.95
23
70
.92
94
0.8
25
40
.92
40
.72
51
0.8
98
60
.89
57
80
.60
40
.58
93
0.6
00
10
.80
74
0.6
51
40
.56
61
0.4
18
7
90
.67
07
0.2
90
50
.74
56
0.7
13
90
.52
05
0.6
29
30
.58
84
0.3
86
1
10
0.6
93
80
.60
13
0.7
42
0.8
04
40
.73
35
0.7
17
20
.67
04
0.8
15
0.6
51
8
11
0.6
86
80
.29
70
.75
22
0.6
40
60
.60
27
0.6
28
0.7
11
30
.43
96
0.8
08
20
.71
33
12
0.7
25
30
.49
75
0.8
08
50
.77
76
0.6
79
90
.78
30
.73
0.5
68
90
.84
69
0.8
58
50
.86
57
13
0.7
73
70
.56
22
0.8
69
20
.82
76
0.7
22
60
.78
39
0.8
14
50
.60
.79
97
0.8
84
70
.89
59
0.9
51
8
14
0.5
56
20
.31
53
0.6
22
80
.69
24
0.5
75
60
.57
44
0.5
42
60
.69
29
0.7
36
40
.93
41
0.8
24
0.8
57
0.8
73
3
15
0.7
33
60
.91
50
.70
17
0.7
63
40
.84
20
.78
29
0.7
07
50
.77
99
0.2
56
70
.78
13
0.3
12
10
.54
43
0.6
16
30
.52
59
16
0.7
35
40
.64
20
.79
11
0.8
71
10
.74
52
0.7
30
10
.69
32
0.8
21
30
.68
36
0.9
79
30
.68
88
0.8
23
20
.88
59
0.9
02
10
.79
83
17
0.8
65
20
.72
98
0.8
83
80
.90
98
0.8
76
10
.90
52
0.8
14
60
.75
57
0.7
67
0.9
32
80
.75
70
.91
44
0.9
16
60
.84
46
0.7
93
50
.93
48
18
0.9
30
60
.81
21
0.9
58
80
.88
66
0.8
82
60
.89
78
0.9
43
40
.57
46
0.6
66
40
.74
45
0.7
24
70
.76
17
0.8
75
40
.62
95
0.7
52
30
.80
81
0.8
76
19
0.6
57
30
.43
30
.77
47
0.5
82
80
.50
77
0.5
02
10
.76
48
0.2
94
60
.65
81
0.6
27
30
.77
35
0.6
55
40
.81
62
0.6
38
60
.39
19
0.6
85
10
.62
49
0.7
89
9
20
0.8
13
50
.79
24
0.8
61
40
.85
71
0.8
08
20
.79
74
0.7
94
60
.77
39
0.6
29
30
.94
61
0.6
35
10
.82
23
0.8
71
40
.79
31
0.8
73
0.9
58
60
.93
69
0.8
49
0.6
92
2
21
0.7
15
20
.44
85
0.7
76
20
.80
76
0.6
99
90
.79
38
0.7
05
60
.57
21
0.8
81
60
.85
64
0.8
68
10
.95
83
0.9
39
70
.89
63
0.5
27
80
.84
87
0.9
22
60
.78
24
0.6
49
20
.78
64
22
0.6
92
30
.54
51
0.7
82
70
.83
09
0.6
74
70
.72
60
.69
49
0.6
76
50
.79
24
0.9
51
20
.75
59
0.9
03
20
.93
76
0.9
21
80
.67
80
.96
50
.92
89
0.7
97
10
.73
43
0.9
19
70
.92
56
23
0.7
09
90
.45
92
0.7
90
40
.72
70
.67
12
0.6
66
30
.74
50
.63
48
0.7
33
10
.89
76
0.9
31
10
.90
35
0.9
57
40
.92
39
0.5
59
20
.86
91
0.8
60
.77
81
0.8
06
70
.83
40
.88
11
0.8
91
1
24
0.6
94
0.6
67
40
.73
60
.87
67
0.7
39
70
.73
51
0.6
17
70
.89
37
0.5
99
40
.96
89
0.5
91
70
.80
06
0.8
24
40
.85
54
0.8
48
0.9
72
40
.92
66
0.7
42
40
.51
91
0.9
42
10
.80
70
.91
72
0.7
98
4
25
0.8
12
50
.48
32
0.8
76
60
.78
55
0.7
01
20
.77
24
0.7
96
20
.46
20
.94
85
0.7
68
20
.90
33
0.9
17
40
.92
46
0.8
02
70
.44
89
0.7
89
80
.87
44
0.8
35
90
.79
89
0.7
70
80
.93
46
0.8
71
10
.87
05
0.6
95
1
26
0.8
07
20
.63
74
0.8
52
70
.88
17
0.8
22
50
.83
65
0.8
12
70
.72
27
0.7
26
30
.92
59
0.8
35
70
.88
82
0.9
60
.89
05
0.7
37
80
.93
78
0.9
53
60
.90
.73
56
0.8
95
80
.92
74
0.9
36
30
.92
57
0.8
94
70
.86
9
27
0.7
91
90
.60
13
0.8
50
.80
04
0.7
70
60
.74
53
0.8
10
20
.70
24
0.7
20
50
.94
32
0.8
67
30
.88
27
0.9
55
90
.91
34
0.6
96
10
.93
71
0.9
17
90
.85
23
0.8
17
10
.91
80
.87
66
0.9
29
70
.97
72
0.8
69
60
.87
26
0.9
60
2
28
0.4
78
90
.31
58
0.6
12
70
.67
81
0.4
27
0.4
62
30
.47
12
0.6
48
70
.72
70
.90
45
0.6
98
10
.82
22
0.8
43
0.9
24
50
.51
01
0.8
99
20
.78
16
0.5
85
90
.69
0.8
26
30
.81
22
0.9
36
70
.85
82
0.8
49
60
.75
98
0.8
03
20
.86
04
29
0.8
64
10
.68
08
0.8
27
80
.62
83
0.8
66
70
.77
59
0.9
03
30
.52
96
0.5
45
70
.74
10
.80
29
0.7
19
0.7
88
30
.67
75
0.6
49
20
.71
18
0.7
92
50
.81
60
.72
03
0.7
68
40
.68
90
.67
14
0.8
42
0.6
37
0.7
59
20
.81
0.8
73
1
30
0.9
51
10
.84
70
.97
31
0.9
18
30
.88
14
0.9
12
0.9
04
60
.61
39
0.7
35
40
.76
45
0.6
56
40
.78
30
.84
27
0.6
19
40
.77
38
0.8
30
20
.90
98
0.9
63
50
.72
12
0.8
90
10
.78
62
0.8
19
90
.72
84
0.7
85
10
.85
30
.85
96
0.8
22
6
31
0.6
87
40
.75
02
0.7
44
80
.68
56
0.7
14
70
.69
32
0.7
97
60
.53
42
0.4
50
30
.81
61
0.5
14
0.6
44
60
.78
36
0.6
64
10
.82
31
0.8
55
10
.77
99
0.8
27
80
.77
15
0.8
99
20
.64
87
0.8
33
70
.72
79
0.7
84
40
.64
86
0.8
15
30
.83
16
32
0.7
80
70
.78
28
0.7
74
40
.79
39
0.8
21
50
.82
45
0.7
81
10
.57
42
0.6
00
10
.79
20
.47
54
0.6
54
10
.73
26
0.6
48
60
.82
35
0.8
56
80
.85
76
0.8
46
10
.61
74
0.8
69
60
.73
05
0.8
36
10
.62
61
0.8
07
70
.71
81
0.8
18
70
.76
36
33
0.6
87
20
.50
23
0.7
65
20
.71
63
0.6
68
70
.65
06
0.7
14
90
.69
52
0.6
73
60
.93
87
0.8
60
90
.89
23
0.9
31
30
.92
62
0.6
31
0.8
97
0.8
67
70
.73
96
0.7
54
90
.88
04
0.8
44
80
.89
89
0.9
84
40
.84
95
0.8
15
90
.90
62
0.9
74
9
34
0.7
63
40
.46
42
0.8
38
20
.70
37
0.6
59
70
.77
47
0.7
86
30
.37
66
0.8
79
50
.70
10
.89
87
0.9
52
70
.90
82
0.7
23
60
.39
75
0.6
78
50
.82
88
0.7
72
40
.70
73
0.7
07
70
.90
35
0.7
88
50
.84
64
0.6
19
0.9
47
0.8
05
60
.81
03
35
0.7
80
20
.74
41
0.8
19
40
.89
79
0.8
13
90
.79
42
0.7
45
60
.84
61
0.6
04
60
.96
31
0.6
49
30
.80
13
0.8
74
30
.84
08
0.8
81
10
.98
38
0.9
43
50
.85
14
0.6
48
30
.97
0.8
16
20
.92
84
0.8
41
10
.97
68
0.7
45
80
.94
35
0.9
21
6
36
0.6
87
90
.51
04
0.7
45
40
.91
33
0.6
96
20
.74
91
0.5
90
80
.82
71
0.7
24
90
.87
97
0.7
46
90
.86
57
0.8
73
0.8
63
0.6
57
30
.88
73
0.9
08
60
.75
45
0.5
09
20
.80
57
0.9
03
20
.87
89
0.8
26
90
.90
98
0.7
80
80
.91
96
0.8
39
5
37
0.8
85
50
.87
44
0.8
50
90
.84
98
0.9
43
0.9
43
80
.83
03
0.7
54
10
.54
49
0.8
28
0.5
93
90
.79
21
0.7
79
60
.64
75
0.8
88
70
.81
12
0.9
32
10
.83
64
0.4
48
40
.88
58
0.7
55
50
.75
58
0.7
18
10
.85
46
0.7
00
80
.84
42
0.7
98
1
38
0.4
20
30
.40
29
0.4
94
80
.68
68
0.4
89
70
.48
44
0.3
83
60
.78
50
.52
06
0.9
23
40
.49
18
0.6
88
80
.71
89
0.8
81
40
.68
41
0.9
18
50
.77
60
.53
08
0.4
65
40
.82
48
0.7
27
60
.88
82
0.7
28
30
.92
67
0.5
73
60
.78
41
0.7
81
4
39
0.6
34
80
.72
34
0.6
23
0.6
93
0.6
70
90
.66
19
0.5
55
90
.62
40
.50
73
0.7
53
50
.24
54
0.5
47
60
.54
99
0.5
64
60
.79
96
0.7
99
20
.76
38
0.6
18
60
.39
63
0.8
35
30
.57
47
0.7
50
80
.46
60
.80
26
0.5
52
90
.63
09
0.6
20
4
40
0.9
24
0.8
42
90
.94
94
0.8
93
60
.87
37
0.8
54
30
.88
63
0.7
00
90
.68
85
0.8
57
50
.66
55
0.7
80
50
.85
83
0.7
07
90
.83
22
0.9
07
0.9
23
90
.93
70
.76
24
0.9
58
60
.77
14
0.8
67
50
.79
76
0.8
56
80
.82
92
0.8
86
50
.89
57
41
0.7
36
50
.68
90
.78
15
0.7
99
70
.77
33
0.8
58
70
.82
22
0.4
55
0.5
99
70
.71
53
0.6
20
40
.73
78
0.8
37
10
.63
19
0.7
08
70
.77
01
0.8
27
60
.90
56
0.6
66
40
.76
62
0.8
10
70
.81
10
.68
96
0.7
21
60
.75
24
0.8
78
10
.75
93
42
0.5
56
80
.67
01
0.5
91
70
.82
63
0.6
30
10
.63
60
.48
44
0.7
86
90
.39
72
0.7
76
10
.28
36
0.5
28
20
.61
82
0.6
15
50
.84
58
0.8
49
70
.75
54
0.6
82
30
.39
16
0.8
03
20
.60
63
0.7
72
60
.51
59
0.8
82
50
.47
67
0.7
45
90
.64
39
43
0.8
83
30
.69
49
0.8
44
60
.86
03
0.8
72
50
.93
48
0.8
02
30
.51
69
0.7
14
80
.59
90
.65
15
0.7
15
90
.73
18
0.5
31
90
.60
94
0.6
53
60
.83
42
0.8
72
50
.48
24
0.6
56
20
.79
26
0.6
61
70
.59
82
0.6
37
0.7
93
20
.79
56
0.6
62
4
44
0.7
30
30
.54
97
0.8
36
30
.71
76
0.6
47
90
.66
69
0.8
13
50
.48
88
0.7
48
40
.84
48
0.8
18
90
.84
09
0.9
37
70
.82
12
0.5
85
80
.86
76
0.8
28
20
.84
46
0.9
34
10
.87
24
0.8
26
50
.91
49
0.9
16
60
.75
28
0.8
85
90
.88
26
0.9
41
1
45
0.9
21
0.8
19
70
.87
51
0.8
71
20
.93
07
0.8
92
90
.86
27
0.6
33
20
.60
81
0.7
14
80
.59
39
0.6
30
20
.73
63
0.5
91
60
.78
87
0.7
92
10
.85
48
0.9
33
70
.62
79
0.7
99
70
.71
74
0.7
31
80
.65
19
0.7
41
0.7
49
30
.84
54
0.7
70
4
46
0.8
86
40
.79
88
0.8
54
40
.69
40
.79
83
0.8
25
40
.87
57
0.2
60
10
.53
90
.37
94
0.4
65
20
.49
11
0.5
76
60
.22
81
0.5
66
30
.47
47
0.6
35
50
.86
88
0.6
01
10
.58
42
0.5
12
90
.47
30
.42
51
0.4
03
60
.66
65
0.5
92
30
.52
76
47
0.8
79
60
.76
26
0.8
64
90
.69
04
0.8
05
50
.86
70
.91
32
0.2
22
90
.61
04
0.4
37
20
.55
94
0.5
98
30
.66
43
0.3
17
30
.54
84
0.5
10
40
.68
89
0.8
89
40
.64
53
0.6
11
60
.61
73
0.5
48
80
.50
83
0.4
32
70
.74
35
0.6
56
80
.58
84
Ja
pa
n0
.83
90
.65
14
0.8
97
60
.87
74
0.8
10
10
.82
79
0.8
32
90
.71
05
0.7
89
30
.94
10
.85
66
0.9
30
.97
74
0.8
95
40
.72
02
0.9
47
0.9
67
60
.89
57
0.7
81
0.9
34
50
.93
04
0.9
56
10
.95
02
0.8
96
60
.91
64
0.9
80
20
.98
16
Tab
le B
: H
p-f
ilte
red
GD
P C
ross-c
orr
ela
tio
ns in
Jap
an
(1965-1
974).
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
0.5
29
2
0.6
22
10
.76
22
0.7
14
50
.70
65
0.8
03
5
0.6
41
60
.65
20
.88
59
0.8
93
1
0.8
87
30
.82
74
0.7
13
70
.75
77
0.6
37
9
0.6
77
10
.74
08
0.7
80
90
.55
37
0.5
75
0.7
98
9
0.8
23
10
.73
80
.85
95
0.8
74
90
.86
95
0.8
73
0.6
57
8
0.7
89
60
.59
94
0.7
55
90
.60
14
0.6
73
50
.81
78
0.7
37
70
.88
72
0.5
60
70
.79
64
0.8
71
20
.71
68
0.7
88
10
.75
08
0.7
13
90
.87
66
0.7
96
9
0.9
10
10
.44
88
0.5
68
30
.73
12
0.7
14
10
.78
94
0.4
59
90
.87
71
0.8
04
70
.62
09
0.6
41
40
.46
60
.75
54
0.7
69
0.9
02
30
.53
91
0.4
12
20
.79
25
0.5
69
0.7
19
60
.74
91
0.7
20
30
.81
69
0.9
70
60
.87
81
0.9
00
80
.80
88
0.7
36
40
.92
45
0.7
60
80
.87
58
0.6
83
40
.80
75
0.5
80
40
.63
35
0.8
49
30
.82
83
0.8
66
10
.64
86
0.6
99
60
.81
09
0.7
49
20
.75
33
0.5
98
30
.61
09
0.8
02
4
0.6
57
0.3
72
60
.71
62
0.7
67
30
.83
90
.55
99
0.3
34
80
.87
82
0.7
66
70
.69
82
0.8
38
40
.81
79
0.7
53
0.7
50
3
0.3
91
30
.66
67
0.8
76
20
.53
62
0.7
52
60
.53
43
0.7
46
70
.69
82
0.7
61
70
.81
43
0.3
89
50
.54
17
0.7
73
60
.82
93
0.5
90
6
0.8
56
40
.78
55
0.8
19
40
.87
69
0.7
70
20
.90
12
0.8
14
60
.83
35
0.7
03
80
.66
24
0.7
00
70
.61
12
0.8
75
0.7
77
0.5
79
60
.58
67
0.4
90
70
.77
05
0.9
27
20
.76
68
0.9
03
70
.62
12
0.6
15
50
.83
37
0.7
18
20
.83
18
0.5
40
.71
80
.90
69
0.8
46
90
.74
16
0.9
00
30
.70
93
0.1
94
60
.65
07
0.8
72
10
.59
56
0.7
17
80
.36
60
.61
27
0.5
38
30
.42
27
0.6
73
0.1
21
90
.50
75
0.7
71
70
.73
49
0.4
30
70
.84
38
0.5
77
70
.85
3
0.2
68
90
.68
94
0.8
80
50
.63
18
0.7
38
0.4
42
80
.71
75
0.5
64
70
.47
46
0.6
99
0.1
71
80
.49
95
0.7
76
40
.80
39
0.4
18
20
.86
86
0.6
48
70
.84
10
.98
04
0.8
50
80
.83
56
0.8
89
50
.82
07
0.8
12
60
.94
21
0.8
63
10
.93
88
0.8
94
30
.85
25
0.7
78
10
.67
21
0.9
24
80
.82
52
0.6
98
40
.76
53
0.9
27
70
.81
87
0.6
06
50
.66
92
Pre
fectu
re1
23
45
67
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1 20
.70
6
30
.34
97
0.6
00
5
40
.63
77
0.7
54
20
.44
97
50
.84
48
0.2
95
60
.28
94
0.3
55
1
60
.79
54
0.7
60
.55
40
.89
73
0.6
45
7
70
.64
67
0.6
81
60
.72
40
.48
30
.49
96
0.5
79
7
80
.69
92
0.1
85
6-0
.00
82
0.1
64
80
.75
93
0.3
47
40
.57
37
90
.27
57
0.2
85
90
.47
74
-0.0
02
40
.21
69
0.0
03
0.5
26
30
.12
17
10
0.6
16
30
.48
41
0.4
45
60
.38
04
0.4
79
70
.42
13
0.5
34
70
.50
11
0.2
03
7
11
0.4
55
80
.33
74
0.3
49
50
.07
64
0.3
14
0.0
74
60
.70
64
0.6
10
60
.53
03
0.7
52
4
12
0.5
04
70
.51
71
0.1
92
70
.21
94
0.1
70
40
.10
69
0.4
38
80
.33
82
0.5
39
90
.73
31
0.8
01
1
13
0.6
45
30
.60
36
0.2
89
70
.85
96
0.4
18
60
.81
96
0.2
79
20
.21
22
-0.2
78
10
.52
64
0.0
92
0.2
28
8
14
0.6
44
20
.26
12
-0.0
33
30
.41
94
0.4
93
80
.30
54
0.3
81
40
.59
92
0.3
46
30
.50
91
0.6
09
50
.65
43
0.4
56
1
15
0.6
61
80
.28
81
0.2
01
80
.63
62
0.6
92
0.6
95
90
.50
09
0.7
24
-0.1
87
40
.56
06
0.3
44
50
.12
20
.69
55
0.5
67
6
16
0.3
83
40
.50
71
0.5
53
40
.29
78
0.1
97
10
.26
52
0.5
39
4-0
.02
40
.85
32
0.0
88
70
.35
42
0.4
38
20
.05
46
0.3
93
-0.1
29
4
17
0.7
56
90
.75
19
0.8
11
10
.68
90
.58
61
0.7
51
0.7
78
90
.33
72
0.4
70
50
.73
95
0.5
75
30
.54
51
0.6
42
0.5
00
60
.53
11
0.5
98
5
18
0.5
53
60
.09
92
-0.5
09
80
.21
87
0.4
31
10
.19
05
0.0
36
60
.69
53
-0.2
02
10
.37
31
0.3
25
60
.42
99
0.4
03
60
.72
38
0.5
53
-0.2
11
50
.05
47
19
0.3
02
10
.13
53
0.5
30
30
.21
74
0.3
93
50
.23
30
.61
39
0.4
88
0.3
41
50
.74
72
0.7
18
40
.40
89
0.1
71
10
.37
90
.58
0.0
86
30
.58
93
0.0
59
1
20
0.4
68
50
.15
03
0.5
78
90
.42
51
0.6
59
40
.56
35
0.4
05
0.3
43
0.0
70
10
.62
27
0.3
05
80
.07
35
0.5
60
70
.33
93
0.6
99
40
.09
36
0.7
02
90
.03
47
0.6
99
1
21
0.7
36
90
.24
34
-0.0
20
.43
71
0.6
92
70
.42
59
0.4
13
50
.79
11
0.2
10
.64
92
0.5
81
0.5
67
60
.47
51
0.8
86
90
.76
75
0.1
17
60
.49
38
0.7
91
20
.55
41
0.4
78
2
22
0.4
06
10
.58
80
.78
71
0.3
60
30
.19
96
0.3
12
10
.69
38
0.0
69
30
.75
74
0.6
04
60
.68
87
0.6
82
40
.23
30
.40
45
0.0
95
80
.77
64
0.8
34
6-0
.20
12
0.5
68
10
.42
04
0.2
55
2
23
0.7
00
70
.47
93
-0.0
05
10
.58
73
0.4
27
30
.47
16
0.2
40
90
.44
63
0.0
66
90
.72
22
0.4
74
80
.72
96
0.7
20
80
.81
75
0.5
73
10
.14
13
0.5
52
20
.75
72
0.3
12
70
.35
11
0.8
20
50
.34
27
24
0.5
54
70
.20
50
.19
21
-0.0
80
.53
93
0.0
34
70
.60
21
0.6
75
20
.72
48
0.4
46
90
.81
09
0.6
54
4-0
.10
39
0.6
61
20
.20
04
0.5
63
50
.45
44
0.3
64
30
.43
12
0.1
91
20
.58
90
.55
15
0.3
46
9
25
0.4
77
20
.72
80
.38
70
.83
09
0.1
41
80
.64
95
0.3
70
4-0
.02
67
0.2
92
20
.30
80
.06
82
0.3
97
20
.53
18
0.3
26
70
.28
33
0.4
17
40
.55
25
0.0
89
10
.17
64
0.1
29
70
.34
98
0.4
38
40
.52
25
-0.0
42
9
26
0.6
98
70
.37
67
0.2
45
20
.60
36
0.6
14
10
.57
04
0.5
96
20
.73
54
0.1
01
60
.76
45
0.6
48
50
.50
98
0.6
35
40
.78
25
0.9
02
10
.07
92
0.6
55
70
.61
76
0.7
31
60
.64
79
0.9
02
90
.38
58
0.7
67
0.4
49
40
.39
47
27
0.7
66
20
.18
4-0
.15
48
0.4
41
20
.79
66
0.5
25
0.2
20
60
.76
39
-0.0
44
90
.48
75
0.2
70
80
.30
30
.55
38
0.7
35
40
.78
68
-0.0
62
20
.36
17
0.8
31
80
.30
49
0.4
66
90
.91
37
-0.0
35
0.7
49
60
.38
88
0.2
69
90
.77
17
28
0.2
68
40
.28
94
0.3
66
80
.07
48
0.1
64
60
.05
48
0.0
83
4-0
.17
91
0.6
76
40
.42
77
0.2
88
10
.62
04
0.0
52
40
.27
21
-0.2
48
40
.58
41
0.4
83
6-0
.11
14
0.2
00
50
.21
26
0.1
87
90
.66
75
0.3
75
20
.37
49
0.3
84
80
.04
58
0.0
55
2
29
0.3
02
0.5
64
0.6
03
10
.60
01
0.1
40
20
.55
05
0.2
02
5-0
.38
89
0.4
29
30
.07
79
-0.1
86
40
.12
54
0.3
73
40
.03
9-0
.05
93
0.6
39
80
.56
56
-0.3
78
6-0
.02
21
0.2
56
2-0
.04
35
0.5
29
0.1
67
5-0
.10
43
0.7
41
6-0
.01
6-0
.04
11
30
0.5
37
0.5
81
90
.01
67
0.4
23
0.2
28
50
.43
75
0.4
28
80
.55
83
-0.2
87
0.5
76
0.4
36
0.4
45
80
.50
93
0.2
71
60
.52
63
-0.2
54
30
.29
70
.59
52
0.2
15
60
.02
45
0.4
31
40
.03
75
0.5
53
40
.12
78
0.2
66
20
.55
46
0.4
14
5
31
0.7
62
50
.69
05
0.6
30
80
.45
20
.59
26
0.5
49
10
.60
36
0.2
92
60
.68
80
.66
57
0.5
41
0.6
97
50
.39
29
0.4
99
60
.22
96
0.7
03
50
.86
23
0.1
09
90
.39
85
0.4
60
20
.48
43
0.8
05
70
.56
22
0.6
11
40
.53
55
0.4
44
40
.37
11
32
0.6
39
60
.44
93
0.5
58
50
.38
93
0.6
45
20
.54
72
0.6
58
30
.62
28
0.1
75
10
.89
77
0.6
41
0.4
62
70
.43
81
0.3
25
20
.68
34
0.0
02
80
.71
91
0.2
41
50
.82
87
0.7
14
10
.60
51
0.4
83
20
.48
94
0.3
92
0.2
80
50
.75
47
0.5
06
9
33
0.2
24
40
.38
17
0.7
90
70
.08
96
0.1
83
10
.13
83
0.7
91
70
.19
71
0.7
81
70
.43
74
0.6
97
0.4
44
9-0
.14
31
0.1
46
70
.05
30
.62
89
0.6
29
3-0
.37
78
0.6
77
50
.32
77
0.1
14
30
.84
56
-0.0
47
50
.58
51
0.1
99
80
.26
95
-0.1
89
2
34
0.8
33
20
.68
19
0.6
45
40
.52
10
.67
25
0.6
16
10
.80
47
0.5
69
40
.53
32
0.8
27
30
.77
30
.71
22
0.5
26
80
.64
81
0.5
47
10
.55
91
0.9
36
90
.28
24
0.6
32
60
.62
21
0.6
56
80
.80
14
0.6
44
50
.69
82
0.4
10
70
.73
47
0.4
95
4
35
0.3
36
7-0
.30
07
0.0
17
4-0
.14
50
.66
21
0.0
12
60
.24
53
0.5
77
0.4
51
60
.12
52
0.3
47
20
.07
32
-0.1
26
60
.54
89
0.3
53
50
.29
70
.21
23
0.2
64
30
.39
26
0.4
62
50
.56
16
0.1
62
50
.11
91
0.6
89
3-0
.23
46
0.3
86
90
.51
98
36
0.3
93
60
.23
20
.15
66
0.5
78
0.2
78
50
.34
77
0.3
59
20
.34
50
.31
59
0.4
99
80
.44
32
0.4
94
10
.41
42
0.7
45
70
.59
31
0.2
48
40
.48
32
0.3
98
90
.62
94
0.4
24
90
.77
17
0.4
25
10
.67
10
.29
17
0.6
38
80
.78
89
0.5
59
6
37
0.7
48
90
.34
29
0.1
07
90
.19
42
0.6
81
20
.34
34
0.6
28
0.8
17
40
.34
51
0.4
02
30
.66
05
0.4
69
0.2
67
30
.72
47
0.5
01
90
.40
55
0.4
86
30
.59
33
0.2
56
10
.26
34
0.6
57
40
.32
96
0.4
65
90
.83
61
-0.0
39
40
.58
70
.59
46
38
0.2
23
30
.28
51
0.2
94
5-0
.19
33
0.0
40
2-0
.21
54
0.4
76
90
.22
71
0.7
82
60
.47
23
0.8
15
30
.82
15
-0.2
56
80
.37
81
-0.2
16
30
.58
04
0.3
84
40
.04
18
0.3
82
1-0
.06
24
0.2
34
10
.72
79
0.2
41
80
.78
74
0.0
53
20
.17
06
-0.0
81
3
39
0.9
14
90
.73
99
0.4
10
40
.80
29
0.6
84
10
.81
69
0.5
74
0.5
04
80
.25
56
0.7
26
40
.45
08
0.6
03
20
.79
84
0.7
10
40
.68
50
.38
93
0.8
40
90
.50
69
0.4
10
80
.55
91
0.7
68
10
.53
27
0.8
53
40
.39
87
0.6
88
0.7
89
30
.73
11
40
0.7
55
10
.60
24
0.4
12
10
.34
24
0.5
56
60
.45
47
0.7
90
.65
29
0.4
12
40
.56
67
0.7
65
80
.60
46
0.3
93
0.6
33
80
.44
65
0.5
35
50
.70
87
0.3
87
70
.35
05
0.3
26
40
.52
50
.60
38
0.4
87
10
.77
30
.11
56
0.5
86
10
.39
16
41
0.8
43
30
.65
44
0.5
00
20
.84
29
0.7
63
70
.96
12
0.6
43
90
.51
28
0.0
92
40
.40
09
0.1
72
30
.10
85
0.7
57
80
.46
16
0.7
87
50
.32
34
0.7
49
10
.28
71
0.3
09
70
.61
80
.56
41
0.3
13
10
.47
99
0.2
12
70
.55
92
0.6
69
20
.63
99
42
0.6
78
80
.32
71
-0.0
03
90
.59
91
0.6
07
20
.64
35
0.0
51
10
.39
68
-0.3
10
10
.58
40
.08
79
0.2
61
90
.85
72
0.5
37
60
.70
61
-0.1
54
30
.46
66
0.6
52
50
.18
30
.57
89
0.6
69
60
.02
29
0.8
11
70
.02
43
0.3
38
70
.65
67
0.8
12
7
43
0.8
57
30
.65
58
0.7
13
20
.63
46
0.7
96
90
.77
79
0.8
36
0.5
74
30
.50
66
0.6
48
40
.56
39
0.4
38
10
.54
40
.56
54
0.6
50
30
.57
51
0.9
32
30
.17
46
0.6
01
0.7
10
10
.62
65
0.6
95
40
.49
55
0.5
88
70
.47
73
0.7
13
80
.54
05
44
0.7
24
40
.34
66
0.6
14
40
.38
89
0.8
86
80
.65
01
0.7
44
70
.69
10
.34
16
0.5
51
80
.47
71
0.1
55
10
.36
38
0.3
93
60
.71
20
.30
21
0.7
38
50
.13
37
0.6
63
90
.79
72
0.5
71
90
.44
65
0.2
58
50
.54
41
0.1
51
30
.65
96
0.5
54
1
45
0.6
66
90
.76
46
0.7
75
50
.84
22
0.5
40
.93
70
.73
0.2
55
10
.17
62
0.3
91
0.1
56
60
.07
74
0.6
63
60
.18
25
0.5
99
60
.39
76
0.8
08
8-0
.08
75
0.3
70
10
.58
38
0.2
77
30
.48
56
0.2
67
50
.06
58
0.6
37
40
.50
18
0.2
89
2
46
0.7
41
0.4
46
30
.33
76
0.7
63
50
.72
30
.81
37
0.3
73
80
.46
82
-0.0
22
40
.63
83
0.1
88
80
.24
10
.78
51
0.5
17
20
.83
46
0.0
36
0.6
74
40
.42
34
0.5
08
10
.74
98
0.7
35
50
.25
04
0.6
98
0.1
02
90
.59
12
0.7
92
70
.78
97
47
0.1
33
80
.39
30
.38
49
0.0
98
-0.0
60
30
.11
43
0.6
86
40
.24
28
0.2
45
90
.02
59
0.4
78
0.1
50
9-0
.03
34
0.0
69
50
.06
51
0.3
90
40
.27
36
-0.1
32
70
.12
69
-0.1
10
3-0
.10
95
0.3
76
2-0
.17
65
0.3
67
-0.0
84
30
.10
72
-0.2
84
9
Ja
pa
n0
.90
34
0.6
00
90
.39
06
0.6
18
60
.74
74
0.6
62
80
.67
58
0.6
92
30
.37
17
0.8
03
10
.68
90
.68
84
0.6
48
60
.82
62
0.7
25
10
.40
77
0.8
37
40
.56
89
0.5
84
60
.61
23
0.8
71
60
.59
81
0.8
28
90
.64
68
0.4
79
30
.88
22
0.7
60
7
Tab
le C
: H
p-f
ilte
red
GD
P C
ross-c
orr
ela
tio
ns in
Jap
an
(1975-1
984).
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
0.6
20
7
-0.2
49
7-0
.26
5
0.7
84
10
.61
77
0.1
61
0.2
31
60
.06
54
0.5
44
10
.58
87
0.3
92
90
.26
54
-0.0
18
90
.57
53
0.5
06
5
0.4
85
70
.32
82
0.4
11
0.8
83
60
.77
52
0.6
35
5
0.1
59
3-0
.11
26
-0.3
31
70
.28
37
0.2
19
50
.25
98
0.3
59
5
0.2
70
50
.25
74
0.1
65
20
.37
98
0.4
32
70
.26
61
0.4
86
0.3
26
8
0.0
17
2-0
.18
17
0.3
94
40
.48
03
0.3
75
70
.29
06
0.6
95
20
.59
44
0.2
19
8
0.5
94
0.0
16
70
.10
66
0.5
90
70
.28
84
0.7
11
50
.57
10
.21
83
0.1
84
0.4
36
3
0.4
06
20
.46
82
0.5
04
40
.79
03
0.6
61
60
.22
69
0.8
45
0.2
00
30
.63
20
.54
67
0.2
03
5
0.1
46
90
.00
95
0.4
90
20
.63
18
0.4
94
10
.50
45
0.8
45
10
.34
52
0.2
09
80
.91
04
0.5
66
40
.62
98
0.0
06
50
.44
80
.37
34
0.5
44
30
.54
78
0.1
85
20
.66
34
0.2
61
10
.43
35
0.5
17
8-0
.16
72
0.8
21
90
.55
13
0.1
53
80
.17
01
0.4
56
30
.38
66
0.4
96
1-0
.33
04
0.4
70
30
.12
49
0.4
08
60
.31
83
-0.2
45
60
.77
22
0.2
84
40
.62
66
0.3
55
20
.45
28
0.2
73
90
.82
49
0.7
35
40
.60
38
0.9
24
0.4
58
80
.49
78
0.6
48
0.3
22
30
.83
64
0.7
44
80
.84
87
0.4
57
5
0.1
21
60
.18
0.1
83
80
.59
38
0.7
68
90
.53
25
0.7
61
60
.62
45
0.3
37
0.6
15
80
.14
92
0.6
12
60
.61
35
0.7
66
20
.38
75
0.8
98
4
0.0
71
80
.60
72
0.3
14
80
.55
72
0.5
66
20
.41
48
0.6
34
80
.00
98
0.3
34
50
.27
16
-0.0
95
0.6
98
90
.45
60
.90
10
.38
50
.81
52
0.6
97
6
0.2
09
20
.38
87
0.3
68
80
.53
27
0.7
10
.04
69
0.6
15
40
.25
23
0.6
55
30
.27
71
-0.1
82
80
.85
84
0.2
82
70
.82
10
.84
29
0.7
20
50
.66
49
0.6
88
6
-0.3
30
2-0
.16
75
0.3
09
90
.05
30
.06
13
0.5
37
90
.30
69
-0.0
5-0
.13
10
.48
41
0.3
76
8-0
.00
41
0.6
44
70
.16
92
-0.3
90
50
.27
21
0.2
08
60
.29
62
-0.2
95
8
0.3
76
70
.24
48
0.4
88
50
.78
37
0.7
38
20
.37
93
0.9
28
10
.42
84
0.6
60
.73
29
0.3
93
20
.93
74
0.7
74
40
.74
07
0.6
77
70
.87
80
.72
29
0.5
80
50
.77
31
0.1
26
6
Pre
fectu
re1
23
45
67
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1 20
.50
8
30
.59
49
0.7
47
3
40
.83
27
0.6
59
70
.76
78
50
.85
05
0.5
19
0.6
07
20
.81
11
60
.74
25
0.5
98
30
.54
15
0.8
66
50
.81
31
70
.69
38
0.7
55
10
.66
27
0.8
89
20
.62
85
0.7
91
5
80
.64
93
0.6
69
90
.40
94
0.7
59
80
.80
09
0.8
21
90
.73
22
90
.60
46
0.5
64
50
.42
91
0.7
20
60
.65
46
0.8
30
40
.83
53
0.7
15
8
10
0.6
33
60
.46
53
0.2
63
20
.53
95
0.5
07
50
.67
70
.66
83
0.5
76
90
.58
68
11
0.7
71
10
.58
53
0.5
24
60
.78
07
0.5
98
50
.84
78
0.7
84
20
.62
70
.68
39
0.8
69
2
12
0.8
49
60
.67
75
0.6
38
10
.93
62
0.7
61
40
.88
01
0.8
83
80
.82
41
0.7
25
70
.73
51
0.9
07
5
13
0.3
93
50
.56
70
.41
55
0.5
88
80
.44
30
.72
56
0.7
35
60
.59
46
0.9
21
50
.49
27
0.6
44
10
.63
01
14
0.7
08
20
.56
31
0.6
50
60
.81
16
0.7
68
40
.89
93
0.7
58
50
.65
75
0.8
72
30
.54
27
0.7
59
10
.78
35
0.8
03
4
15
0.9
01
0.4
85
50
.47
37
0.8
80
20
.84
05
0.8
86
40
.73
88
0.7
70
90
.67
64
0.6
22
10
.78
14
0.8
77
0.4
47
70
.74
38
16
0.6
71
60
.49
32
0.4
22
20
.80
86
0.6
65
70
.94
21
0.8
27
50
.71
99
0.9
11
60
.67
07
0.8
32
40
.83
27
0.8
16
20
.90
41
0.8
25
17
0.7
03
10
.46
06
0.3
90
.62
84
0.6
34
10
.80
51
0.7
22
0.5
55
50
.86
73
0.8
15
50
.83
75
0.7
16
90
.77
59
0.8
51
30
.68
25
0.8
65
7
18
0.8
00
20
.35
20
.59
91
0.6
64
30
.59
33
0.5
59
50
.40
46
0.3
32
70
.17
71
0.5
10
20
.72
31
0.6
89
10
.07
90
.47
51
0.6
98
50
.40
96
0.4
26
9
19
0.6
13
50
.68
79
0.5
92
30
.66
14
0.6
39
60
.78
84
0.7
83
0.5
75
40
.85
27
0.7
34
70
.76
69
0.6
80
30
.80
46
0.8
11
90
.59
27
0.7
79
40
.90
07
0.3
69
5
20
0.6
50
10
.73
63
0.4
91
20
.75
02
0.6
61
80
.88
17
0.8
72
60
.78
97
0.8
77
80
.76
62
0.8
14
10
.82
10
.77
38
0.8
42
0.7
51
80
.89
94
0.8
55
80
.34
68
0.8
49
4
21
0.7
87
0.3
22
70
.35
31
0.6
83
60
.59
88
0.8
16
0.6
48
50
.47
73
0.7
22
0.7
58
20
.89
71
0.7
63
40
.61
34
0.7
93
20
.80
49
0.8
63
40
.90
38
0.6
60
90
.73
04
0.7
38
3
22
0.6
51
60
.49
60
.43
35
0.8
23
0.6
46
0.8
04
70
.90
61
0.7
58
50
.86
47
0.7
09
10
.76
43
0.8
53
50
.76
64
0.7
29
50
.73
01
0.8
62
0.7
54
80
.32
73
0.7
29
50
.79
33
0.6
89
23
0.5
93
80
.51
99
0.4
98
40
.78
14
0.5
91
20
.86
95
0.8
75
30
.62
29
0.9
09
0.6
90
70
.80
50
.78
45
0.8
31
30
.89
16
0.7
08
50
.95
78
0.8
75
50
.33
48
0.8
35
90
.90
04
0.8
03
50
.87
73
24
0.7
00
40
.67
67
0.5
46
50
.85
66
0.6
94
20
.93
28
0.9
21
70
.78
29
0.9
33
90
.71
90
.85
76
0.8
81
40
.85
96
0.8
70
60
.80
37
0.9
54
50
.85
70
.41
97
0.8
73
60
.92
65
0.8
01
20
.91
28
0.9
38
5
25
0.6
90
20
.52
11
0.4
04
60
.83
85
0.6
27
30
.87
79
0.9
03
60
.73
61
0.8
42
90
.75
46
0.8
41
50
.86
94
0.7
12
30
.73
98
0.8
37
50
.92
55
0.7
86
40
.43
26
0.7
50
50
.85
45
0.7
98
90
.94
31
0.9
06
10
.94
8
26
0.8
63
20
.16
0.3
29
90
.73
13
0.6
42
60
.60
56
0.5
73
80
.48
17
0.4
08
70
.58
57
0.6
87
60
.75
66
0.1
62
10
.50
95
0.8
52
80
.60
45
0.5
37
10
.75
66
0.3
24
20
.47
45
0.7
41
50
.62
04
0.5
27
70
.54
53
0.6
82
1
27
0.6
80
70
.42
41
0.3
42
20
.76
14
0.5
50
40
.83
96
0.7
23
30
.66
22
0.6
30
80
.70
58
0.8
63
60
.85
78
0.5
18
60
.72
59
0.8
40
80
.86
94
0.6
92
70
.59
22
0.5
19
60
.80
24
0.8
21
20
.71
33
0.7
96
40
.78
60
.83
48
0.7
55
8
28
0.6
14
80
.38
21
0.2
06
80
.56
47
0.4
02
70
.73
19
0.6
71
0.4
39
60
.78
01
0.6
61
80
.77
79
0.6
43
10
.68
06
0.7
11
40
.70
69
0.8
59
70
.85
50
.37
44
0.7
08
50
.79
15
0.9
00
60
.64
54
0.8
08
20
.80
48
0.7
97
30
.55
75
0.7
75
7
29
0.4
77
30
.61
01
0.5
32
60
.52
60
.61
14
0.7
52
90
.58
25
0.5
54
90
.74
51
0.6
60
70
.70
11
0.5
86
20
.78
68
0.7
94
50
.45
26
0.6
88
20
.82
80
.33
58
0.9
18
20
.75
18
0.6
38
40
.58
29
0.7
19
10
.75
54
0.5
70
30
.14
90
.43
72
30
0.8
54
70
.29
67
0.2
49
20
.61
39
0.7
15
40
.68
80
.50
22
0.5
28
70
.51
09
0.6
42
90
.67
35
0.6
43
90
.24
91
0.5
21
60
.87
26
0.6
21
50
.66
58
0.6
80
70
.56
01
0.5
69
40
.79
39
0.5
22
30
.49
73
0.6
14
90
.67
34
0.7
87
50
.61
76
31
0.3
56
90
.15
28
0.5
41
30
.58
62
0.4
85
90
.44
94
0.4
69
40
.35
32
0.4
81
0.1
14
90
.32
12
0.4
90
10
.47
39
0.6
66
0.3
29
90
.49
61
0.3
63
0.2
21
20
.28
62
0.3
50
20
.31
04
0.5
31
50
.56
16
0.4
25
20
.36
10
.36
61
0.3
97
9
32
0.7
79
90
.58
83
0.5
58
10
.86
61
0.7
16
80
.86
78
0.8
08
70
.74
05
0.6
12
90
.82
37
0.9
13
70
.92
75
0.4
96
40
.67
33
0.8
56
30
.78
07
0.6
90
90
.73
30
.69
31
0.7
65
20
.76
28
0.8
10
.74
83
0.8
35
10
.87
90
.74
60
.82
69
33
0.6
71
80
.53
22
0.4
23
60
.86
11
0.5
89
0.7
55
60
.84
51
0.7
87
50
.72
20
.45
86
0.6
71
90
.86
68
0.6
08
40
.64
13
0.8
11
10
.79
61
0.5
11
90
.39
01
0.4
53
40
.70
87
0.5
90
50
.84
18
0.7
16
50
.81
32
0.8
55
80
.68
03
0.7
9
34
0.7
05
30
.68
34
0.4
89
40
.84
34
0.5
82
20
.86
43
0.9
32
0.7
51
90
.85
71
0.7
07
40
.86
62
0.9
00
20
.77
56
0.7
77
30
.81
53
0.9
18
10
.78
03
0.4
43
10
.75
38
0.9
07
40
.78
74
0.8
74
80
.88
58
0.9
56
50
.94
50
.61
38
0.8
56
1
35
0.6
42
30
.30
46
0.4
01
20
.63
07
0.3
59
90
.62
03
0.6
03
60
.29
50
.37
85
0.7
45
30
.85
92
0.7
19
10
.28
76
0.5
44
60
.67
04
0.6
50
70
.63
50
.75
56
0.4
90
30
.59
37
0.8
11
20
.54
47
0.6
61
50
.59
89
0.6
88
40
.76
49
0.8
42
9
36
0.5
74
70
.73
24
0.4
82
20
.67
94
0.4
61
90
.73
97
0.8
89
60
.63
62
0.8
55
20
.78
02
0.8
33
90
.78
02
0.8
55
60
.70
70
.58
59
0.8
03
30
.83
36
0.3
07
40
.88
14
0.8
76
10
.71
06
0.8
34
10
.84
40
.91
32
0.8
46
70
.38
01
0.6
46
5
37
0.7
28
70
.62
34
0.4
27
80
.82
68
0.6
71
60
.74
13
0.8
24
90
.84
76
0.7
57
90
.44
33
0.6
18
10
.83
51
0.6
12
60
.63
70
.82
11
0.7
51
40
.53
44
0.3
52
10
.50
73
0.7
33
0.5
56
80
.79
13
0.6
50
70
.80
41
0.8
01
20
.62
30
.69
23
38
0.4
94
60
.80
04
0.4
29
40
.59
40
.61
33
0.6
42
70
.65
32
0.8
26
80
.68
04
0.3
81
10
.45
96
0.6
15
70
.63
97
0.5
04
70
.55
68
0.5
39
30
.44
78
0.1
57
90
.62
86
0.6
66
40
.31
24
0.5
84
50
.45
52
0.7
06
10
.58
0.1
50
40
.33
65
39
0.6
94
50
.41
60
.38
11
0.3
57
10
.51
03
0.2
24
0.1
96
40
.37
81
0.0
06
80
.37
70
.40
54
0.4
73
7-0
.10
43
0.1
50
70
.45
29
0.0
38
0.1
99
20
.70
59
0.1
64
30
.18
77
0.2
86
30
.08
87
-0.0
65
40
.13
97
0.1
00
90
.50
34
0.2
30
9
40
0.8
51
20
.64
93
0.6
06
10
.87
28
0.7
27
50
.89
38
0.7
53
50
.71
64
0.6
24
30
.68
79
0.9
13
40
.92
27
0.5
21
70
.75
68
0.9
13
70
.80
52
0.6
95
0.8
09
10
.66
41
0.7
76
60
.82
88
0.6
72
30
.70
79
0.8
25
10
.80
16
0.7
36
50
.86
52
41
0.4
44
60
.36
80
.22
65
0.3
67
80
.14
22
0.1
91
50
.23
45
0.2
40
7-0
.02
54
0.0
47
20
.30
01
0.3
87
7-0
.08
52
0.0
03
0.4
59
10
.11
17
-0.0
62
80
.52
59
-0.0
55
30
.10
93
0.2
18
10
.05
06
-0.0
51
40
.17
46
0.2
19
40
.41
51
0.3
31
9
42
0.6
82
30
.78
70
.75
72
0.7
27
80
.54
37
0.6
06
80
.64
33
0.4
81
30
.49
52
0.2
49
20
.57
40
.65
50
.43
18
0.6
16
80
.65
74
0.5
28
20
.42
75
0.5
97
90
.54
31
0.5
89
0.5
06
0.3
61
40
.46
74
0.6
13
0.4
86
90
.40
47
0.5
02
5
43
0.7
22
50
.66
82
0.6
46
60
.90
86
0.7
90
10
.97
77
0.8
51
30
.79
02
0.8
32
80
.63
99
0.8
33
80
.88
09
0.7
46
30
.88
21
0.8
52
50
.91
62
0.7
68
50
.55
38
0.8
26
0.8
60
80
.76
69
0.8
31
30
.87
67
0.9
50
90
.89
22
0.5
63
30
.77
62
44
0.6
00
20
.62
81
0.3
71
10
.60
66
0.4
27
50
.45
28
0.7
80
10
.61
45
0.5
98
90
.60
57
0.5
82
80
.68
78
0.5
17
70
.33
35
0.5
25
10
.47
55
0.4
95
60
.27
41
0.5
68
20
.57
20
.41
75
0.7
50
10
.48
57
0.6
66
60
.69
43
0.4
61
90
.38
88
45
0.5
90
80
.48
92
0.7
90
90
.79
27
0.5
28
80
.62
72
0.5
30
60
.38
85
0.3
22
80
.16
15
0.5
84
50
.68
14
0.3
18
80
.63
47
0.6
25
10
.52
44
0.2
88
30
.74
85
0.3
35
60
.39
83
0.4
89
20
.38
11
0.4
74
30
.51
71
0.4
55
0.5
21
30
.59
6
46
0.8
57
80
.66
36
0.6
79
40
.90
92
0.9
25
40
.81
77
0.7
39
70
.87
67
0.6
54
10
.46
07
0.6
52
0.8
74
60
.49
72
0.7
34
10
.86
83
0.6
80
80
.53
87
0.6
22
30
.57
21
0.6
77
30
.55
82
0.7
03
60
.58
45
0.7
47
40
.68
70
.66
04
0.6
26
1
47
0.5
60
60
.35
47
0.5
28
0.6
35
90
.34
24
0.3
42
60
.54
08
0.2
70
70
.43
79
-0.0
14
60
.34
70
.51
53
0.4
05
40
.40
94
0.4
82
90
.39
48
0.2
34
70
.39
02
0.2
56
10
.22
80
.37
52
0.4
55
90
.33
98
0.4
60
80
.43
55
0.4
65
10
.28
9
Ja
pa
n0
.75
04
0.6
48
80
.55
50
.86
72
0.7
05
70
.93
97
0.9
05
30
.77
09
0.9
18
40
.73
45
0.8
97
60
.91
31
0.8
43
80
.90
96
0.8
29
30
.96
99
0.8
83
20
.49
01
0.8
42
60
.93
21
0.8
54
70
.89
22
0.9
43
90
.98
48
0.9
28
90
.61
30
.84
99
Tab
le D
: H
p-f
ilte
red
GD
P C
ross-c
orr
ela
tio
n in
Jap
an
(1985-1
995).
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
0.5
43
9
0.6
94
70
.39
77
0.1
30
80
.33
19
-0.0
34
9
0.6
05
30
.59
60
.71
42
0.3
16
9
0.6
18
10
.28
10
.51
21
0.4
58
0.7
31
1
0.8
44
20
.58
41
0.6
12
50
.33
95
0.8
24
30
.89
01
0.6
84
70
.36
58
0.5
97
60
.26
19
0.7
92
10
.51
05
0.6
75
3
0.7
75
70
.74
47
0.4
75
20
.24
32
0.7
29
40
.67
25
0.9
05
80
.56
4
0.6
14
60
.33
04
0.5
86
20
.34
50
.67
19
0.9
55
80
.86
68
0.3
73
70
.68
31
0.4
00
30
.56
61
0.4
35
30
.03
69
0.5
22
90
.62
27
0.6
66
80
.02
33
0.6
76
20
.77
33
0.0
87
10
.15
58
0.5
36
4-0
.07
43
0.4
10
.20
98
0.2
02
0.2
93
30
.16
67
0.3
41
80
.33
86
0.7
17
80
.58
32
0.7
69
70
.27
59
0.9
09
40
.75
22
0.8
51
10
.77
58
0.6
94
50
.73
73
0.5
74
40
.51
51
0.2
66
6-0
.20
86
0.4
42
2-0
.29
58
0.3
23
90
.46
96
0.3
69
30
.30
50
.15
49
0.5
10
90
.36
21
0.5
70
40
.54
11
0.5
39
20
.40
51
0.5
19
0.1
60
70
.53
04
0.5
88
0.6
68
60
.43
03
0.5
47
90
.66
43
0.6
22
40
.48
19
0.7
70
30
.67
54
0.6
91
50
.75
49
0.6
43
0.4
55
20
.87
90
.76
59
0.8
75
90
.60
15
0.7
78
80
.74
53
0.6
79
20
.18
83
0.8
81
20
.21
18
0.6
60
4
0.4
62
60
.33
80
.48
18
0.0
63
40
.61
99
0.6
90
.72
19
0.3
29
60
.78
06
0.7
54
80
.70
44
0.4
15
0.5
25
30
.39
32
0.4
55
10
.52
28
0.3
22
0.3
15
60
.33
78
0.5
37
70
.60
93
0.5
79
0.5
32
0.5
72
90
.31
75
0.4
86
50
.26
66
0.3
08
20
.75
22
0.4
82
70
.75
21
0.6
74
20
.15
56
0.4
14
70
.50
92
0.6
47
40
.48
14
0.7
67
90
.78
62
0.7
11
50
.38
95
0.5
47
40
.84
63
0.7
35
10
.56
25
0.8
16
10
.40
44
0.6
98
50
.82
20
.58
83
0.6
70
4
0.3
80
60
.05
46
0.3
35
30
.34
83
0.3
18
60
.66
68
0.5
30
70
.23
14
0.3
93
0.6
73
30
.40
74
0.2
59
50
.47
29
0.5
91
50
.68
05
0.4
30
90
.55
19
0.6
08
50
.55
87
0.8
32
10
.74
34
0.6
25
40
.48
94
0.8
37
30
.82
13
0.9
58
90
.66
77
0.8
91
40
.80
17
0.6
37
60
.20
27
0.8
59
90
.19
34
0.6
28
30
.93
51
0.6
19
40
.56
76
0.7
58
50
.46
79
Table E: Japanese Prefectures.Name
1 Hokkaido
2 Aomori
3 Iwate
4 Miyagi
5 Akita
6 Yamagata
7 Fukushima
8 Ibaraki
9 Tochigi
10 Gunma
11 Saitama
12 Chiba
13 Tokyo
14 Kanagawa
15 Niigata
16 Toyama
17 Ishikawa
18 Fukui
19 Yamanashi
20 Nagano
21 Gifu
22 Sizuoka
23 Aichi
24 Mie
25 Shiga
26 Kyoto
27 Osaka
28 Hyougo
29 Nara
30 Wakayama
31 Tottori
32 Shimane
33 Okayama
34 Hiroshima
35 Yamaguchi
36 Tokushima
37 Kagawa
38 Ehime
39 Kouchi
40 Fukuoka
41 Saga
42 Nagasaki
43 Kumamoto
44 Oita
45 Miyazaki
46 Kagoshima
47 Okinawa