2012

The Hidden Secret of

Canned Tuna

Dwindling tuna stocks

Worldwide, up to 90% of stocks of large predatory fish

have already been wiped out.1

Fishing practices used by the global tinned tuna industry

are contributing to sharp declines in populations of

marine animals including top predators like sharks and

rays, and even rare and endangered sea turtles. Tuna

stocks themselves are in trouble – not only because of

overfishing, but also due to the widespread catching of

juveniles which have not yet had the chance to reproduce.

Between 1950 and 2006, the total global tuna catch

increased tenfold to 4.3 million tonnes.2

The increasing pattern of tuna overexploitation and its

associated bycatch is exacerbated by the enormous

increase in the capacity of tuna purse seine fleets and

the proliferation of the use of Fishing Aggregating Devices

(FADs). Larger boats with greater capacity are chasing

fewer and fewer fish.

Industrial purse seine vessels fishing to supply global

markets can catch up to 3,000 tonnes of tuna in a single

trip, almost double the entire annual catch some Pacific

Island nations take in their own waters.3

“Taking an overall view, at present it is clear that

the global catch level for tuna will not be sustainable

unless action is taken.” John West (UK) 4

Increasing fishing pressure – too many boats chasing too few fish

Despite the fact that tuna stocks are declining, the number

of vessels targeting tuna continues to increase worldwide.

Here in Korea, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and

Fisheries, (MIFAFF) developed a new vessel building

scheme in 2009 for distant water fishing (DWF) vessels

and plans to build around 40 vessels,19 of which will be

tuna purse seiners. MIFAFF wants to promote the Korean

DWF industry as it provides a significant level of income

through international trade, especially from tuna fisheries.

The Hidden Secret of

Canned Tuna

1

Canned Tuna in Korea

Korea currently ranks second globally in terms of its distant-water tuna catch. The total catch of Korea’s purse seine fleet

in 2010 was 278,227 t5 and most of these tuna was exported, especially to Thailand, for canned tuna production. Koreans

eat more canned tuna than any other Asian nation. The average annual consumption of canned tuna per person in Korea

is about 1 kg(about 5 cans) – that’s about 260million cans of tuna each year. In comparison, the annual consumption

for US is 1.6 kg (8 cans) per person. Spain leads Euorpe’s tuna consumption with 2.5kg(13 cans) per person per year,

followed by Italy with 2.1kg(10 cans), UK with 1.8kg(9 cans)and France with1.6kg(8 cans), and6 Korea’s canned tuna

market is worth around $370 million (US).7

In practice, Korea’s fishing companies catch more than 95% of their total catch in the Pacific (based on 2009 figures).8

Almost all of the canned tuna comes from the Pacific and after only a few decades of industrial fishing, many of the

commercial tuna species are now exploited at unsustainable levels

Big three in Korea

There are three big tuna companies controlling more than 95% of the tuna for Korea’s canned tuna market.

Fig 1 Catch share of Purse Seine tuna by company in 2010 9 10

Note: Sajo industries includes Sajo industry,

Sajo Daerim, Sajo Oyang, Sajo Seafood

Dongwon

Silla

Sajo industries

others

51.93%

26.64%

16.87%

5.00%

2

Dongwon

Dongwon Industries and the Dongwon F&B both are the subsidiaries under Dongwon group. In the canned tuna market,

Dongwon industries supplies the Pacific tuna caught by its purse seine fleet to produce canned tuna for the Korean market

under the brand “Dongwon”.

Dongwon has the biggest purse senier fleet in Korea with total 16 purse seiners, 22 longliners, , 3 trawlers and 4 reefer

carriers.11 14 Dongwon’s purse seiners are operating in the mid-western Pacific producing an estimated amount of

150,000 tonnes and 1 purse seiner in Atlantic ocean producing an estimated amount of 8,000 tons annually.12

Dongwon’s purse seiners use gigantic fishing nets of 2,500meter long and 300 meter depth with 700 meter diameter,

which is 5 times wider than usual soccer game ground. These vessels are equipped with cutting-edge facilities like

helicopters, radars and sonar. The main targeting fishes are Yellowfin and Skipjack for canning. With the biggest fishing

capacity, Dongwon accounts for more than 50% of purse seine tuna catch of Korea.

Dongwon has 4 factories in Korea to support the canned tuna production for local market. Their own factory in Changwan

has the production capacity of about 200 million cans per year, which is the biggest scale in Korea.

Sajo

Sajo industries includes Sajo industry, Sajo Daerim, Sajo Oyang, Sajo Seafood. Sajo has the biggest fleet among Korean

tuna companies and it also ranks first worldwide on its 52 tuna longliners. The current fishing fleet is 52 longliners, 6

purse seiners (+2 vessels under construction to be added), 8 trawlers, 4 bottom longliners for Cods, and 2 jiggers in

New Zealand13 , of which the total fleet is 72.

Sajo’s tuna longliners and purse seiners are operating mainly in the Pacific, Indian, Atlantic and Southern Indian Ocean

near the equator. The targeting species are Bluefin, Big eye, Yellow fin, Albacore, and Marlins.

According to the Sajo Industries’ business report submitted on 14th Nov 2011 to Financial Supervisory Service (FSS),

Sajo Industries specified of 2 more new vessels building plan. Both of them are new purse seiners, one supposed to

arrive in March 2012, and the other supposed to be introduced in May 2012. Sajo’s main canned tuna production is

done in their Goseong factory.

Ottogi (tuna supplied by Silla)

Ottogi is the second biggest tuna brand in Korea’s domestic market14. They source their tuna from a Korean tuna fishing

company Silla. Silla ranks third in distant water fishing companies in Korea in terms of the total catch volume and the

exports15 but rank secondly on purse senie’s tuna catch. The company owns 11 tuna longliners and 6 purse seiners

in relation to tuna fishery. Including all the vessels owned by the subsidiaries, their total fishing fleet is 28 vessels. The

annual catch from its longline fleet for sashimi tuna and purse seine fleet for canned tuna is 3,798 tonnes and 72,968

tonnes respectively.16

The company sold an old purse seiner for $ 14million to its overseas subsidiary and built a new vessel in 2011.

Furthermore the company decided to build a purse-seiner additionally at about $23million in 2012.

Canned tuna market

In this market, Dongwon F&B accounts for 69.8%, followed

by Sajo Haepyo with 16.5% and Ottogi with 13.1% in the

first semester of 2011. While Dongwon and Sajo are fishing

companies, ‘Ottogi’ sources the tuna mainly from Silla.

Ottogi has two factories and the main production plant is

located in Goseong.

Most of the canned tuna from these 3 brands have

‘Dolphinsafe’. This dolphin safe certification does not

guarantee their overall sustainability practices or safeguard

other bycatch species including juvenile tuna

3

Korea Canned Tuna ranking 2012

In order to understand the canned tuna brands in Korea, Greenpeace have done a survey on all three big tuna brands

in August 2012. The information can help consumers to understand about the canned tuna products and help them to

make a smarter choice when buying a canned tuna in Korea.

The tuna brands were ranked based on the following criteria:

Sustainability Policy It is essential that companies have in place an effective policy that ensures their

products are produced sustainably.

Traceability In order to ensure that their policies are being followed, companies must have full

traceability for all their tuna, from the point of capture to the final canned product.

Fishing methods used

Most tuna are caught using purse seine nets with fish aggregation devices (FADs),

a method responsible for high levels of bycatch including sharks and other marine

life as well as juvenile tuna from threatened species. In contrast, pole and line fishing

offers a less wasteful solution, with reduced bycatch. Pole and line fisheries also tend

to offer greater economic returns to local populations. Purse seine fishing without

FADs is an acceptable secondary option.

Tuna species used

Each tuna species is under different levels of pressure. Bigeye and Yellowfin tuna

are being fished at a very high rate, have declined significantly and are at risk.

Skipjack tuna is declining, but is the tuna species of least concern.

Equity

It is important that reasonable economic benefits are returned to the countries whose

water the tuna are caught in. Companies also need to ensure that workers on fishing

boats and in tuna canneries are fairly paid and work in safe and healthy conditions

Avoiding illegally caught fish

Illegal fishing accounts for up to 46% of fishing activity in the Pacific, exacerbating the

overfishing crisis. Companies should be able to guarantee their supply chain does

not include operators that engage in illegal, unregulated or unreported (IUU) fishing

Support for marine reserves

Companies should offer public support for the establishment of marine reserves, including

the proposed protected areas known as, the Pacific Commons. This will ensure the long-

term sustainability of fish stocks and healthy marine ecosystems.

Labelling

Providing comprehensive information on labels gives customers the opportunity to

make an informed choice based on the product’s sustainability information. Labels

should include the species name, catch method and the area the fish was caught in.

Driving change Tuna fisheries need to improve urgently, and companies have a responsibility to

help to drive improvement through both political and financial support

The information has been obtained from a combination of brand responses to a Greenpeace product survey,

correspondence with brands and companies, publically available information and product evaluation

4

Korea canned tuna league table

Good

Bad

Ottogi (Tuna supplied by Silla)

Ottogi has no public available sustainable policy for canned

tuna, but they worked closely with their tuna supplier Silla

when replying to Greenpeace’s survey. Ottogi claims that most

of their tuna are caught without FADs but they did not provide

the exact figures or evidence to prove this.

Work closely with main supplier to ensure traceability

use mainly skipjack from a healthy stock.

source some unsustainable yellowfin tuna.

No public policy that ensures sustainably or

equitably sourced canned tuna.

Ottogi has not made a public commitment to support

the creation of marine reserves to help safeguard

tuna for future generations.

Ottogi’s canned tuna product labels do not indicate

the fishing method or area of catch for the species.

no financial or political support for improving tuna

fisheries

Dongwon

Dongwon’s tuna are also supplied by their own fleet. As the biggest tuna brand in Korea with market share more than 50%, it is very

disappointing that Dongwon has no sustainability policy for canned tuna and they refused to provide information on their product’s

sustainability. Dongwon’s fleet also has the history of IUU record.

Has not responsed to Greenpeace canned tuna survey and refuse to provide any information on its products sustainability.

Sourcing unsustainable yellowfin for its canned tuna.

Relies on destructive FADs with purse seine nets.

No commitment to improve sustainably or equitably sourced canned tuna.

No public policy not to source from high seas pockets.

Labels the species name for most products but doesn’t disclose catch area or method.

no financial or political support for improving tuna fisheries

Sajo

Sajo has the biggest tuna fleet in Korea and they catch the tuna to supply their own brand canned tuna. Sajo responded positively

to Greenpeace’s tuna survey and they have their sustainability policy on their website. They also plan to improve equitable sourcing

by increasing the percentage of sourcing tuna from the local fleet from the Pacific. But the company is still sourcing unsustainable

bigeye and yellowfin for its canned tuna.

Sources mainly skipjack from a healthy stock

traceability as catch their own tuna

Has plans to increase sourcing tuna from the Pacific local fleet and canneries.

Relies on destructive FADs with purse seine nets.

Labels the species name for most products but doesn’t disclose catch area or method.

No guarantee not to source from high seas pockets.

Allow sourcing from vessels and companies that have been blacklisted for illegal activities

no support for marine reserves

no financial or political support for improving tuna fisheries

5

FADs

FADs are natural or artificial floating objects, often equipped with satellite-linked sonar devices, which are used to attract

tuna. Fish and marine life including tuna gather around the FADs, allowing the entire range of species associating with

the FAD to be scooped up in vast nets known as purse seines. These purse seines consist of a huge curtain of net that

encircles a school of tuna and then closes when a line is pulled, much like a draw-string purse. It is estimated that around

70% of the total global purse seine catch is taken using FADs but this varies depending on the ocean region, the fleet, and

the target species.17

The problem is, FADs attract all array of marine life, not just tuna – this gets scooped up too and is known as bycatch. The

International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) – which counts its members as the global giants of the tuna trading

industry – agrees that when used without FADs, “purse seine fishing has an average by-catch rate of less than 1 percent

(0.5-1%).”18 When used in combination with FADs, the bycatch is typically ten times greater19 – and can be much worse.

Most of this is made up of sharks and rays – although whales, dolphins and turtles are also common casualties. But the

problem is many times greater when you include the bycatch of juvenile tuna from high-value, at-risk species. According

to the ISSF, “purse seine fishing on FADs can also lead to greater catches of small tuna, typically of the bigeye and yellowfin

species. This can represent 15-20% of the catch…”20

Globally, it is estimated that FAD associated bycatch in purse seine fisheries may now be as high as 182,500

tonnes annually21 which would fill the equivalent of over1.1 billion cans of tuna every year.22

The dirty little secret of tuna brands

Less well-known is the effect tuna fishing is having

on other marine species. As a result of wasteful fishing

methods, our tuna catch is causing the widespread

death of endangered and threatened marine animals

– including sharks, rays, dolphins and turtles –

known collectively as ‘bycatch.’ In tuna purse seine

fisheries using Fish Aggregation Devices, or FADs,

for every 10kg catch, up to 1 kg is bycatch and a

further 2kg is undersized tuna.

http://www.greenpeace.org/korea/multimedia/

videos/oceans/tuna-crisis/

6

Turtles

A recent study has shown that the 85,000 turtles officially

recorded as killed annually in global fisheries may be a

gross underestimation.31

The main sources of turtle deaths are long line, gillnet

and trawl fisheries, but purse seiners using FADs can

also be responsible for killing turtles. Research from the

Pacific region shows 750-2,500 purse seine turtle deaths

annually between 1994-2004.

Bycatch from fishing with purse seines and FADs may

cause problems for Pacific turtle populations32 which are

found entangled in nets both below the FADs and on top

where they frequently climb up to rest.33 All five Pacific

sea turtles are listed as critically endangered, endangered

or vulnerable on the IUCN red list.34

Sharks and rays

Sharks and rays are being killed in vast numbers by

tuna fishing. More than 75% of the oceanic pelagic shark

and ray species are now classified as threatened or near

threatened by the peak scientific organisation for assessing

threatened species – the International Union for the

Conservation of Nature (IUCN)23 . Many of these species

are caught regularly in purse seine nets set on FADs

targeting tuna.24 These species are slow to reproduce,

making them highly vulnerable to overexploitation.25 Being

top of the food-chain, sharks are especially vital to the

marine ecosystem.

Silky sharks, oceanic whitetip sharks and whale sharks are

commonly caught in FAD in tuna purse seine fisheries.26

All three are on the IUCN red list27.

Cutting fins off sharks, often while they are still alive and

then throwing the shark back in the ocean, is also still in

practice on many tuna fishing boats. This practice is in

fact so lucrative to the vessels as tuna catches decline

that many vessels, especially longline boats have switched

to target sharks for the shark fin trade as part of their

operations. As stock assessments, management and the

ability to monitor the activities of longline vessels remains

poor this is a great concern.

Juvenile tuna and threatened tuna species

In 2010, the IUCN listed five out of eight tuna species

as being in trouble (critically endangered, endangered,

vulnerable, near threatened) and put all of them on the

IUCN red list.28 Now bigeye and yellowfin is listed as

vulnerable to extinction, with its global populations at

worryingly low levels.

Canned tuna is usually skipjack, which, while diminishing

fast, for now retains a healthier population. But significant

levels of bycatch of juvenile tuna threaten the long-term

health of these stocks, as juvenile tuna are taken out of the

water before reaching breeding maturity.

In 2009 the incidental catch of mostly juvenile bigeye

was 43,000 tonnes, roughly two-thirds the size of the

targeted catch.29 So the canned tuna on our shelves,

mostly caught using purse seines and FADs, is a major

factor in pushing yellowfin and bigeye stocks further into

depletion.30

7

The only way to protect marine ecosystems and guarantee sustainable stocks of fish like tuna is to change the way

oceans are used and managed. This change must include reducing the amount of fishing vessels and level of fishing

effort to long-term sustainable and precautionary levels, reforming fishing practices to more sustainable methods, ensuring

proper monitoring and enforcement of rules and applying the ecosystem approach to fisheries and setting aside large

areas as marine reserves – national parks at sea – where no fishing takes place to allow stocks and biodiversity to

recover. The creation of a large scale network of marine reserves is now widely recognized as essential by marine

scientists.36

We have a choice. Either we require our favorite brands to change the way they source their fish, or we face the real

possibility that our children will be the last generation to have tuna in their sandwiches and gimbap.

For each 1,000 tons of yellowfin tuna caught in FAD sets over three years,

fishermen caught nearly 111,000 other individual animals,

including turtles, sharks, rays and marlins.35

“ Time for change”

8

What the tuna brands should do

As a general rule, retailers should only source from stocks

that are being fished sustainably at sustainable levels.

Purchase tuna from healthy stocks.-Retailers and fish

producers should not buy from overfished Bluefin, bigeye,

yellowfin or albacore tuna stocks.

Purchase tuna caught using more sustainable methods-

many tuna brands have committed to 100% pole and line

fisheries for canned tuna, which is currently regarded as the

most sustainable form of fishing for tuna.

Provide FAD-free purse seine caught options- retailers

and tuna brands can also prioritize sourcing tuna caught

by purse seines, but on free swimming tuna not around the

FADs and seek to develop the market for ‘FAD-free’ purse

seined tuna as a more sustainable product.

The company has to increase their products’ traceability and

ensuring they don’t buy IUU caught tuna, both for purse

seine and longliner.

Support the creation of marine reserves- tuna companies

should support the creation of a global network of large

scale marine reserves, and should publicly support the call

for the high seas regions of the Pacific Commons37 to be

set aside as off-limits to fishing and ensure they are not

selling any tinned tuna caught in this area.

Label with care and accuracy- tuna brands must ensure

their product labels at least clearly identify the species, origins

and catch method.

By changing the way tinned tuna is caught and setting up

marine reserves to protect ocean ecosystems and allow fish

stocks to recover from overfishing, we can bring an end to

the extent of the damage that current tuna fishing practices

cause to the marine environment.

What consumer can do? Choose your canned tuna based on our suggestion.

Tell the tuna brand that you want a more sustainable

choice for canned tuna and to urge them to make public

commitments to improve sustainability in their products.

Help to spread this message to your family and friends

and to support Greenpeace oceans work by signing up

as our supporter

We must act now!

Time and tuna are running out!

9

1 R.A. Myers and B. Worm, ‘Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities’, Nature, 423, 2003, 280-3. [accessed 6.12.10]2 Seafish, ‘Yellowfin tuna - a global and UK supply chain analysis’, 2009. www.seafish.org/pdf.pl?file=seafish/Documents/Yellowfin%20tuna_

Global%20and%20UK%20supply%20chain%20analysis.pdf [accessed 14.12.10]3 WCPFC Area Catch Value Estimates 2009. http://ffa.int/node/425#attachments [accessed 16.12.10]4 Seafood Watch Seafood Report, ‘Yellowfintuna’. www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/content/media/

MBA_SeafoodWatch_YellowfinTunaReport.pdf Seafood Watch Seafood Report, ‘Bigeye tuna’. ww.montereybayaquarium.

org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/content/media/MBA. SeafoodWatch_BigeyeTunaReport.pdf Western Pacific Fisheries Management

Council, Press release, 21 August 2007. ww.wpcouncil.org/press/2007.08.21%20Press%20Release%20on%20WCPFC%20SC3.pdf and

www.iss-foundation.org/tsm5 KOFA Yearbook 20106 http://www.dongwonfish.co.kr/ezboard/ezboard.asp?mode=view&idx=12&id=report&page=17 Cha, Je Hun(2010). Dongwon F&B research report, 13 April 2010.Dongbu Securities8 KOFA Yearbook 20109 Sajo business report, submitted by Sajo at DART of FSS, Nov 14 2011, http://dart.fss.or.kr/report/viewer.do?rcpNo=20111114001643&dc

mNo=3196435&eleId=10&offset=46445&length=121084&dtd=dart3.xsd&displayImage=hide10 KOFA Yearbook 201111 Dongwon Industries business report 2011.11.4 submitted to FSS12 http://www.dwml.co.kr/20/2020.asp, http://www.dwml.co.kr/eng.asp, The business report 2011.11.1413 Sajo Industries homepage> Business> Deep sea fishing http://ind.sajo.co.kr/eng/business/pelagic.asp14 Ranking between Ottogi and Sajo is very variable every season.15 2011 KOFA Yearbook16 SILLA Corp business report submitted 2011.11.14 to FSS17 J. Hallier and D. Gaertner, ‘Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species’. http://hal.ird.fr/

docs/00/26/91/72/PDF/Hallier_GaertnerMEPS7180_Prev2.pdf18 ISSF, FAD: Fact Aggregating Document, http://iss-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/05/FAD-document.pdf19 Ibid.20 Ibid.21 The FAO reports 2007 purse seine catches of 2,607,201 t. As much as 70% of the 2,607,201 t global catch of purse seined tuna was

caught by FADs = 1,825,040.7 t. This is the RETAINED catch of tuna. i.e. if there was 10% bycatch then the retained 1,825,040.7 is 90%

of catch, therefore divide by 90, multiply by 100 to get 100% or total catch of 2,027,823 t.So 10% bycatch is 202,782.3 t. Based on the

standard 185g can of tuna, this could fill 1,096,118,918 cans. In other words: 1,096 million cans of bycatch or 1.1 billion cans of bycatch

(depends how your country defines a billion).22 Based on the standard 185g can of tuna, this could fill 1,096,118,918 cans. In other words: 1,096 million cans of bycatch or 1.1 billion

cans of bycatch.23 www.iucnredlist.org/24 MD CamhiCamhi MD, Valenti SV, Fordham SV, Fowler SL, Gibson C (2009). The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays.Report

of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group, Pelagic Shark Red List Workshop, 19-23 February, 2007, Tubney House, University of Oxford, UK.

Accessed Oct 2011 at: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/ssg_pelagic_report_final.pdf25 N.K. Dulvy et al, 2008, ‘You can swim but you can’t hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays’, Aquatic

Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18: 459-482 (2008). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.975/pdf [accessed

16.10.12]26 M.D. Camhi et al (2009). The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays. Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Pelagic Shark Red

List Workshop. Tubney House, University of Oxford, UK, 19-23 February 2007. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/ssg_pelagic_report_final.

pdf27 www.iucnredlist.org/28 www.iucnredlist.org/29 WCPFC Scientific Committee 7, Prospects for effective conservation of bigeye tuna stocks in the Western Central Pacific Ocean, Pohnpei,

Federated States of Micronesia, 9-17 August, 2011.30 University of Hawaii, ‘The Associative Dynamics of Tropical Tuna to a Large-Scale Anchored Fad Array’,2008. http://www.soest.hawaii.

edu/PFRP/biology/holland_itano_png.html31 ‘The total reported global marine turtle bycatch was~85,000 turtles, but due to the small percentage of fishing effort observed and reported

(typically<1% of total fleets), and to a global lack of bycatch information from small scale fisheries, this likely underestimates the true total by

at least two orders of magnitude’, Wallace et al, 2010. ‘Global patterns of marine turtle bycatch’. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/

j.1755-263X.2010.00105.x/full [accessed 9.12.10]32 D. Bromhead et al, ‘Review of the impact of fish aggregating devices (FADs) on Global Tuna Fisheries’, 200333 J. Franco et al, Design Of Ecological Fads, 2009. www.iotc.org/files/proceedings/2009/wpeb/IOTC-2009-WPEB-16.pdf34 IUCN Red List Categories: Vulnerable: high risk of extinction in the wild; Endangered: very high risk of extinction in the wild; Critically

Endangered: extremely high risk of extinction in the wild. www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/species/red_list/about_the_red_list/

[accessed 16.12.10]35 M. Hall, Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission reported in Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/24/dolphin-safe-tuna-

techpaperplastic08-cx_ee_0724fishing_2.html36 www.york.ac.uk/media/environment/documents/pg/marine_reserves_consensus-1.pdf and ‘Turning the Tide - Addressing the Impact

of Fisheries on the Marine Environment’. www.rcep.org.uk/reports/25-marine/documents/Turningthetide.pdf, paragraphs 8.59 and 8.63

[accessed 14.12.10]37 http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/oceans/marine-reserves/pacific-tuna-need-marine-reserves/

10

www.greenpeace.org/korea