The future of the science publishing ego- system

81
The future of the science publishing ego-system Jan Velterop – LIBER 2013 – June 26 – München

description

The future of the science publishing ego- system. Jan Velterop – LIBER 2013 – June 26 – München. The future of the science publishing ego- system. E go-system? . Advertising scientific prowess. Publish or Perish. Read or Rot. Changes to the Current Publishing System. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The future of the science publishing ego- system

Page 1: The future of the science publishing ego- system

The future of the science publishing ego-system 

Jan Velterop – LIBER 2013 – June 26 – München

Page 2: The future of the science publishing ego- system

The future of the science publishing ego-system 

Page 3: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Ego-system? 

Advertising scientific prowess

Page 4: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Publish or Perish

Page 5: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Read or Rot

Page 6: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 7: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Changes to the Current Publishing System 

• Increasing Open Access — new models• Separation of Peer Review and Publishing• Changes to Peer Review — more open• More arXiv-oids• “Extrajournaleous” articles • User-defined formats• Et cetera, et cetera

Page 8: The future of the science publishing ego- system

User-defined Formats

Page 9: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Image courtesy of Kaveh Bazargan

Page 10: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Image courtesy of Kaveh Bazargan

Page 11: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Image courtesy of Kaveh Bazargan

Page 12: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Changes to journals or articles are not addressing the core of 

the problem 

However

Page 13: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Scholarly Articles Growth

Page 14: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Last 12 months

• 989195 new abstracts in PubMed• 525,600 minutes• i.e. a new article every half minute

Page 15: The future of the science publishing ego- system

15

DatarrhoeaPublicatarrh

Page 16: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 17: The future of the science publishing ego- system

17

Page 18: The future of the science publishing ego- system

18

Page 19: The future of the science publishing ego- system

19

Page 20: The future of the science publishing ego- system

20

Page 21: The future of the science publishing ego- system

21

Page 22: The future of the science publishing ego- system

22

Page 23: The future of the science publishing ego- system

23

Page 24: The future of the science publishing ego- system

24

Page 25: The future of the science publishing ego- system

25

Page 26: The future of the science publishing ego- system

26

Page 27: The future of the science publishing ego- system

27

Page 28: The future of the science publishing ego- system

28

Not just the difficulty, mind, but the

impossibility

Page 29: The future of the science publishing ego- system

29

search:

‘diagnostic imaging’ AND ‘cardiovascular system’:

limited to:

human studies, core clinical journals, Medline:

195 106

159 661

Page 30: The future of the science publishing ego- system

30

Assume you read:

5 papers/hour

8 hours/day

5 days/week

50 weeks/year

10 000 papers/year.

Page 31: The future of the science publishing ego- system

31

Reading all existing papers: 11 years and 124 days.

Meanwhile 82142 more papers added: another eight years and 78 days.

Before catching up, you need to read 408049 papers devoting 40 years and 295 days to it.

You would finish just in time to retire.

Being an expert in echocardiography

Page 32: The future of the science publishing ego- system

32

Speed of new relevant articles appearing

Speed of being able to read articles

Page 33: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Read it all? — Signal to noise low!

Page 34: The future of the science publishing ego- system

34

The fire of peer review?Or of marketing?

Top journal

Bottom dweller

Filter,Distill?

Page 35: The future of the science publishing ego- system

35

How are we filtering or choosing anyway?

35

Page 36: The future of the science publishing ego- system

36

Lens,Focus

Page 37: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 38: The future of the science publishing ego- system

38

Or maybe something more sophisticated?

Page 39: The future of the science publishing ego- system

39

hologramknowlogram?

Page 40: The future of the science publishing ego- system

40

Semantic triples

Subject Predicate Object

Page 41: The future of the science publishing ego- system

41

ACVR1 Fibrodisplasiais associated with

Semantic triples

Page 42: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Jan Velterop

Johannes Velterop

JJM Velterop

J Velterop

燕 德维尔村

presented

vertoonde

zeigte

présentait

显示

these slides

deze dia’s

diese Transparantien

cettes diapositives

这些幻灯片

Concept ‘Triples’ are language independent

Page 43: The future of the science publishing ego- system

• The entities have URIs. • This allows for disambiguation of synonyms & homonyms, so that the conceptual content of an assertion can be reflected, irrespective of the actual words used.          

Page 44: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 45: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 46: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 47: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 48: The future of the science publishing ego- system

48

3a6c5bd1-29b0-4946-b1a4-74e909a0cdf4

41c76d76-d676-4e95-9dc0-12b10ebe9257

ceeee1f7-203b-445b-9860-e9acffd46fa6

ACVR1

is associated with

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Page 49: The future of the science publishing ego- system

<rdf:Description rdf:about=”http://www.nbic.nl/cwa/relation/#26277419#13817745"><cwa:typeRelation rdf:resource=” http://predicate.conceptwiki.org/index.php/#2121378”/><cwa:direction>1,2</cwa:direction><cwa:strength>1.0</cwa:strength><cwa:author rdf:resource=”http://people.conceptwiki.org/index.php/#85094810”/><cwa:provenance rdf:resource=”http://article.conceptwiki.org/index.php/#121646370”/><cwa:timestamp>1240641052059</cwa:timestamp><cwa:annotated_by rdf:resource=”http://people.conceptwiki.org/index.php/#43065817”/><cwa:annotation rdf resource=”http://www.virusdb.org/viruses/av/Heliothis_virescens_insect”></rdf:Description>

Page 50: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 51: The future of the science publishing ego- system

51

Page 52: The future of the science publishing ego- system

5252

Page 53: The future of the science publishing ego- system

detail

Page 54: The future of the science publishing ego- system

54

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

ACVR1

is associated with

This ‘assertion‘ – triple – can also be enhanced with meta-information, such as provenance

And then it becomes a ‘nanopublication’

Page 55: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Nanopublication? 

Triple with attribution, provenance 

Page 56: The future of the science publishing ego- system

• A nanopublication is a single, machine-readable, citable scientific assertion along with associated provenance.

• Nano refers just to its smallness• Publication refers to its cite-ability; a nanopublication is the smallest possible textual publication that may be scientifically meaningful

Definition

Page 57: The future of the science publishing ego- system

• Publishers can extract and expose the nanopublications contained in their publications

• They conceptually ‘link’ data and literature, and foster citation of the literature

Page 58: The future of the science publishing ego- system

58

Challenge:to convert literature to nano-publications

On-the-fly

Page 59: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Why nanopublications and not just triples?

Page 60: The future of the science publishing ego- system

60

Nanopublications come with the idea that their authors/providers may gain credit for the use of these assertions by others

Because we don’t just live in a knowledge economy, but also in an acknowledge economy (the ‘ego-system’)

Page 61: The future of the science publishing ego- system

• Nanopublications can be cited and thus may credit authors, journals, databases, publishers

• And they are ‘linked’ – at least ‘linkable’ (URIs) – combatting the fragmentation of information that’s the bane of science

http://nanopub.org

Page 62: The future of the science publishing ego- system

• Nanopublications, even very large collections of nanopublications, do not – cannot – reflect full scientific reality in all its nuances

• But they help give direction, overview, hypothesis creation, etc.

Caveat

Page 63: The future of the science publishing ego- system

63

Page 64: The future of the science publishing ego- system

64

Page 65: The future of the science publishing ego- system

65

protein A

protein X

65

Reasoning

Page 66: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Triples (including nanopublications) can also be used to reason – ‘in silico’ – and therefore on a much larger scale

protein A

protein X

Page 67: The future of the science publishing ego- system

The upshot:

"Faced with information overload, we have no alternative but pattern recognition.”

Marshall McLuhan

Page 68: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Example 

The ‘nanopublication’ approach is being taken by the Innovative Medicine Initiative project Open PHACTS, aimed at significantly speeding up drug discovery

Page 69: The future of the science publishing ego- system

http://www.openphacts.org/open-phacts-explorer

Page 70: The future of the science publishing ego- system

70

Documents

Free semantic scientific PDF viewerhttp://utopiadocs.com

The semantic approach is also being taken by this Open PHACTS exemplar:

Page 71: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 72: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 73: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Semantic Concept Tagging

Target Disease DrugCompanyMicroRNAPathway Context& More

The semantic approach is being taken by this Pharma intelligence service, too:

http://scibite.com

Thousands of:PatentsScientific PapersNewsfeedsBlogsClinical Databases& More

in

Page 74: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 75: The future of the science publishing ego- system

75

Supporting scientific information with ‘infotisement’, making annoying advertising into useful added information

Even advertising can use this approachEven infotising can use this approach

Page 76: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 77: The future of the science publishing ego- system

E.g. associating ATPase p97— when mentioned in the text of an article —

with DBeQ

Page 78: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 79: The future of the science publishing ego- system
Page 80: The future of the science publishing ego- system

Scientific publications remain important

For the record (Minutes of Science)But perhaps not for readingAnd perhaps not in journals

But to provide the raw material for knowledge pattern recognition

Page 81: The future of the science publishing ego- system

81

Thank you!

[email protected]