The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

104
The Evaluation The Evaluation of Limmud NY of Limmud NY 2009 2009

description

The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009. Methodology. Evaluation Methodology. Site visit to Limmud NY 2009 conference On-line survey to all 2009 Limmud NY participants during April 2009 (3 months after conference) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Page 1: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

The Evaluation of The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009Limmud NY 2009

Page 2: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

MethodologyMethodology

Page 3: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Evaluation MethodologyEvaluation Methodology

Site visit to Limmud NY 2009 conferenceSite visit to Limmud NY 2009 conference

On-line survey to all 2009 Limmud NY participants On-line survey to all 2009 Limmud NY participants during April 2009 (3 months after conference) during April 2009 (3 months after conference)

Shorter version of on-line survey to all previous Shorter version of on-line survey to all previous Limmud NY participants (also in April 2009). Limmud NY participants (also in April 2009).

2 follow-up survey mailings to non-respondents2 follow-up survey mailings to non-respondents

Page 4: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Response RatesResponse Rates

Page 5: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Response RatesResponse Rates

41% of Limmud ’09 participants who received the survey 41% of Limmud ’09 participants who received the survey responded (N=281)responded (N=281)

Compared to all 2009 registrants, the survey sample was more Compared to all 2009 registrants, the survey sample was more likely to comprise likely to comprise

female participantsfemale participants ‘‘returning’ participants, returning’ participants, more observant (e.g. Orthodox, Conservative and more observant (e.g. Orthodox, Conservative and

Conservadox) participantsConservadox) participants

An additional 93 people who had attended prior Limmud An additional 93 people who had attended prior Limmud conferences, but not the 2009 conference, responded to a conferences, but not the 2009 conference, responded to a shorter version of the survey. (These respondents comprised a shorter version of the survey. (These respondents comprised a very small proportion of prior (only) Limmud participants.very small proportion of prior (only) Limmud participants.

Page 6: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

ResultsResults

Page 7: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

ResultsResults

Participation PatternsParticipation Patterns DemographicsDemographics Jewish DemographicsJewish Demographics Motivations for Participating in LimmudMotivations for Participating in Limmud Satisfaction with LimmudSatisfaction with Limmud VolunteeringVolunteering CommunityCommunity Self-Reported ImpactSelf-Reported Impact Plans to Attend Limmud 2010Plans to Attend Limmud 2010

Page 8: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participation Participation PatternsPatterns

Page 9: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud Status: Limmud Status: Newcomers vs. Returnees, 2008 - 2009Newcomers vs. Returnees, 2008 - 2009

64 6358

26

36 3742

74

0

20

40

60

80

2006 2007 2008 2009

Percentage

Year

Newcomers Returnees

Page 10: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Return Participants by Year of Return Participants by Year of ParticipationParticipation

Previous Conferences Previous Conferences Attended by 2009 Attended by 2009

ParticipantsParticipants%%

20082008 40 40

20072007 2424

20062006 17 17

20052005 14 14

Page 11: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Total # of Limmud Conferences Total # of Limmud Conferences Attended by 2009 ParticipantsAttended by 2009 Participants

54%

24%

9% 7% 6%

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1 2 3 4 5

# of Limmud Conferences Attended

Page 12: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

DemographicsDemographics

Page 13: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Differences Between Limmud 2009 Differences Between Limmud 2009

Participants’ Demographics & Survey DataParticipants’ Demographics & Survey Data Females are over-represented in survey sample (68% in survey vs. 59% Females are over-represented in survey sample (68% in survey vs. 59%

registered)registered)

Fewer Orthodox survey respondents (20% registered, 14% responded to Fewer Orthodox survey respondents (20% registered, 14% responded to survey) and more Conservative survey respondents (32% registered, 44% survey) and more Conservative survey respondents (32% registered, 44% responded to survey). responded to survey).

Similar discrepancies between registrants and survey respondents found in Similar discrepancies between registrants and survey respondents found in 20082008

9% decrease in 2009 in proportion of 35-49 year olds and some increases in the 9% decrease in 2009 in proportion of 35-49 year olds and some increases in the 50+ categories.50+ categories.

Because of the decrease in participants ages 35-49, there was a corresponding Because of the decrease in participants ages 35-49, there was a corresponding decrease in the proportion of participants who have children decrease in the proportion of participants who have children

No differences in geographic distributions No differences in geographic distributions

Page 14: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud NY 2008 - 2009 Participants by Limmud NY 2008 - 2009 Participants by Geographic AreasGeographic Areas

Participants by Geographic Area: 2008 & 2009 2008    2009

  % %

    Upper West Side  22 23

    Upper East Side 3 3

    Other Manhattan 13 13

    Bronx 4 4

    Brooklyn 9 9

    Queens 4 2

    Staten Island 0 <1

    Nassau 5 9

    Suffolk 3 0

    Westchester 4 4

Total UJA Federation County Area 67 67

Other NY State 4 2

New Jersey 10 14

MA & CT 4 3

Other States 13 11

Other Countries 3 3

TOTAL 101 100

Page 15: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud Participants by Age, 2008-9Limmud Participants by Age, 2008-9

14

24

32

21

8

1

13

2723

25

9

2

0

10

20

30

40

18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65-79 80+

Age

Pro

po

rtio

n

2005-2008 2009

Mean Overall Age=39Mean Overall Age=39Median Overall Age=37 Median Overall Age=37

Page 16: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants’ Age Distributions, by Participants’ Age Distributions, by Gender*Gender*

3841 43

47

53575962

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

18-34 35-49 50-64 65+

Males

Females

There is greater gender parity among the older cohortsThere is greater gender parity among the older cohorts

**Registration DataRegistration Data

Page 17: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud NY 2009 Participants by Limmud NY 2009 Participants by Gender, Registration DataGender, Registration Data

58 59

4142

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2008 2009

Perc

enta

ge

Male Female

Page 18: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Gender: Registration vs. Participants by Gender: Registration vs. Survey Distributions 2008-2009Survey Distributions 2008-2009

4237

41

32

58 59

6863

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2008Registration

2008 Survey 2009Registration

2009 Survey

Male

Female

Page 19: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud NY 2009 Participants, by Limmud NY 2009 Participants, by Marital StatusMarital Status

Marital StatusMarital Status PercentPercent

Married/ Domestic Married/ Domestic PartnershipPartnership

4848

Not MarriedNot Married 4141

WidowedWidowed 33

Separated/DivorcedSeparated/Divorced 88

Page 20: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud Attendance by Family CategoryLimmud Attendance by Family Category

Family Category Family Category Percentage Percentage

Single > age 40 Single > age 40 3939

Married with childrenMarried with children 2222

Single age 40+Single age 40+ 2020

Empty nesterEmpty nester 1010

Married no childrenMarried no children 99

Page 21: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Employment StatusParticipants by Employment Status

4

2

5

11

16

62

3

1

5

14

21

56

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Other

Full-time homemaker

Retired

Working part-time

Full-time student

Working full-time

2008 2009

Page 22: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

ParticipantsParticipants by Number of Childrenby Number of Children

One, 9

Two, 19

Three or

more, 19

None, 52

2008

None, 57

Three or

more, 16

Two, 21

One, 6

fffff

2009

Page 23: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Russian Speaking Limmud NY 2009 Russian Speaking Limmud NY 2009 ParticipantsParticipants

7% of respondents (n=23) were Russian speaking Jews 7% of respondents (n=23) were Russian speaking Jews (RSJ’s) who were born in the FSU or whose parents were (RSJ’s) who were born in the FSU or whose parents were born in the FSU. born in the FSU.

RSJ’s did not differ significantly from non-RSJ’s in terms of RSJ’s did not differ significantly from non-RSJ’s in terms of their reactions to the Limmud conference or in their their reactions to the Limmud conference or in their interest in attending the 2010 conference. interest in attending the 2010 conference.

Page 24: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Sexual OrientationParticipants by Sexual Orientation

95

3 22 33 2

95

3 2

95 94

0

20

40

60

80

100

Heterosexual Gay / Lesbian Bisexual

2009 2008 2007 2006

Page 25: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Proportion of Limmud Participants Proportion of Limmud Participants who Received Scholarships, 2008-9who Received Scholarships, 2008-9

4852

44

56

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2008 2009

Per

cent

age

Yes No

Page 26: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Jewish Jewish CharacteristicsCharacteristics

Page 27: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Jewish Connections of Limmud NY Jewish Connections of Limmud NY 2009 Participants2009 Participants

Types of Jewish ExperiencesTypes of Jewish Experiences %%

Are members of a synagogue/ minyanAre members of a synagogue/ minyan 8484

Attend a prayer service at least once/monthAttend a prayer service at least once/month 8282

Participated in Jewish youth group in adolescence Participated in Jewish youth group in adolescence 7070

Attended a Jewish sleep-away campAttended a Jewish sleep-away camp 6969

Regard themselves as Jewish ‘leaders’Regard themselves as Jewish ‘leaders’ 6767

Participated in an educational program in Israel Participated in an educational program in Israel 6666

Attended multi-day Hebrew schoolAttended multi-day Hebrew school 4141

Attended Jewish day school/yeshiva before age 14Attended Jewish day school/yeshiva before age 14 3333

Attended Jewish day school after 8Attended Jewish day school after 8thth grade grade 2525

Page 28: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Denomination, Participants by Denomination, Registration Data: 2008-2009Registration Data: 2008-2009

05

101520253035

Perc

enta

ge

2008 2009

Page 29: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Denomination: Participants by Denomination: 2005-2009 (Registration Data) 2005-2009 (Registration Data)

17

35

10

38

14

37

11

38

1610

45

21

9

38

20

32

9

29 3239

0

20

40

60

Orthodox Conservative Reform Other

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 30: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Affiliation with Jewish Spiritual Affiliation with Jewish Spiritual Communities among Limmud NY Communities among Limmud NY

Participants (2005-9)Participants (2005-9)

11

89

52

77

20

80

49

65

21

79

40

66

21

89

52

77

18

82

42

75

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Neither

Either or Both

Minyan or Havurah

Synagogue

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 31: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Membership in Synagogue or Minyan by Membership in Synagogue or Minyan by Denomination, Limmud 2009 Denomination, Limmud 2009

ParticipantsParticipants

8475

67

90100

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Orthodox Conservative Reform Other Overall 2009Participants

Page 32: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Extent to which Synagogue/Minyan Members Extent to which Synagogue/Minyan Members Regard Themselves* as ‘Jewish Leaders’Regard Themselves* as ‘Jewish Leaders’

6770

55

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Synagogue/MinyanMembers

Non-Members Overall 2009Participants

         Synagogue/ minyan members are significantly more likely than non-members to regard Synagogue/ minyan members are significantly more likely than non-members to regard

themselves as ‘Jewish leaders’ although the overall proportion of Limmud NY 2009 themselves as ‘Jewish leaders’ although the overall proportion of Limmud NY 2009 participants who regard themselves as Jewish leaders is very high (67%). participants who regard themselves as Jewish leaders is very high (67%).

      *including ‘to some extent’ and ‘to a great extent’*including ‘to some extent’ and ‘to a great extent’    

Page 33: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Professional Jewish ExperiencesProfessional Jewish Experiences

12% currently work as Jewish professionals or 12% currently work as Jewish professionals or Jewish educators Jewish educators

55% are current or past Jewish professionals or 55% are current or past Jewish professionals or Jewish educators. Jewish educators.

42 % have worked as both Jewish professionals 42 % have worked as both Jewish professionals and Jewish educators. and Jewish educators.

45% have no history working either as Jewish 45% have no history working either as Jewish professionals or as Jewish educators.professionals or as Jewish educators.

Page 34: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Professional Jewish ExperiencesProfessional Jewish Experiences

No differences between Jewish professionals and No differences between Jewish professionals and non-professionals re. their satisfaction with non-professionals re. their satisfaction with Limmud 2009 conference.Limmud 2009 conference.

Jewish professionals are slightly more likely to Jewish professionals are slightly more likely to have volunteered in contexts other than Limmud.have volunteered in contexts other than Limmud.

Jewish non-professionals are slightly more likely Jewish non-professionals are slightly more likely

to say that they are definitely attending Limmud to say that they are definitely attending Limmud 2010 (32% vs. 24%).2010 (32% vs. 24%).

Page 35: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud NY 2009 Participants who Limmud NY 2009 Participants who Attended Yeshiva or Day SchoolAttended Yeshiva or Day School

3330

343330

0

10

20

30

40

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 36: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

JewishJewish Educational Experiences Educational Experiences (2005-9)(2005-9)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Hillel, or any other campus Jewishorganization

Jewish sleep-away camp during thesummer

College-level Jewish studies course

Jewish youth group as a teenager

Educational trip or program in Israel

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 37: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Early Jewish EducationParticipants by Early Jewish Education

9

5

15

41

30

10

6

10

41

33

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

None

Private tutoring / any othersource

Sunday or other once-weeklyschool

Hebrew school or other multi-day, part-time Jewish school

Full-time day school (Yeshivaor non-Orthodox)

2008 2009

Page 38: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Jewish BackgroundParticipants by Jewish Background

2008 2009

Raised Jewish96%

Converted to 

Judaism4%

Not Jewish0%

Not Jewish1%

Converted to 

Judaism3%

Raised Jewish96%

Page 39: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Spouses’ Jewish Participants by Spouses’ Jewish BackgroundBackground

2008

Not Jewish4%

Converted to 

Judaism4%

Raised Jewish92%

2009

Not Jewish6%

Converted to 

Judaism5%

Raised Jewish89%

Page 40: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants by Previous Year’s Participants by Previous Year’s Dating PatternsDating Patterns

19

20

24

52

58

86

18

13

25

47

50

72

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Been in a romatic relationship with someone who is not Jewish

Been on a non-Jewish dating site

Dated someone who is not Jewish

Been on Jdate or another online Jewish dating site

Been in a romantic relationship with someone Jewish

Dated someone Jewish

2008 2009

Page 41: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants’ Jewish Beliefs and Participants’ Jewish Beliefs and AttitudesAttitudes

84

86

89

90

93

97

83

89

96

97

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Caring about Israel is an important part of my beinga Jew.

I have a Jewish responsibility to care for people introuble.

It bothers me when people tell me there's one wayto be Jewish

I have a special responsibility to take care of Jewsin need around the world.

It is important to me to have friends who are Jewish

I have a strong sense of belonging to the Jewishpeople

2008 2009

Page 42: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants’ Jewish Beliefs and Participants’ Jewish Beliefs and Attitudes (cont.)Attitudes (cont.)

80

75

66

65

39

30

74

82

69

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

I really don't feel committed to any particulardenomination of Judaism

Most synagogue services are not interesting to me

I'd be upset if my child were to marry a non-Jew

I am concerned the number of U.S. Jews willdiminish over the next generations.

Even if I don't observe every aspect of the Sabbath,I do try to make it a special day.

I wish I knew more Jewishly

2008 2009

Page 43: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Motivations for Motivations for Attending LimmudAttending Limmud

Page 44: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Motivations for Attending Limmud: 2009 Motivations for Attending Limmud: 2009 vs. 2008vs. 2008

MotivesMotives% Extremely % Extremely

Important Important

20082008

% Extremely % Extremely Important Important

20092009

to engage in Jewish learningto engage in Jewish learning 4646 46 46

to experience community to experience community 2727 3131

to grow as a Jewto grow as a Jew 3232 2727

to see friends to see friends 99 1111

to see how I feel about Jewish learningto see how I feel about Jewish learning 77 55

Page 45: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Relationship between Prior Limmud Attendance Relationship between Prior Limmud Attendance & Importance of Community & Importance of Community

History of Limmud History of Limmud Attendance Attendance

Proportion Saying that “Experiencing Community” Proportion Saying that “Experiencing Community” was Very or Extremely Important to them when was Very or Extremely Important to them when

Deciding to Attend Limmud Deciding to Attend Limmud

Did not Attend Prior Did not Attend Prior Limmud Conferences Limmud Conferences

6868

Attended Prior Attended Prior Limmud Conferences Limmud Conferences

7777

Page 46: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Extent to which Initial Expectations Extent to which Initial Expectations were Metwere Met

ExpectationExpectation % ‘A Great % ‘A Great Extent’Extent’

to engage in Jewish learningto engage in Jewish learning 24 24

to see friends to see friends 1616

to grow as a Jewto grow as a Jew 1515

to have a meaningful volunteer experienceto have a meaningful volunteer experience 1313

to see how I feel about Jewish learningto see how I feel about Jewish learning 11 11

Page 47: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Satisfaction with Satisfaction with Limmud NY 2009Limmud NY 2009

Page 48: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Satisfaction Ratings by Conference Satisfaction Ratings by Conference Year, 2006-2009Year, 2006-2009

51

35

49

1

57

29

3 37

49

29

105 7

58

29

63 4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Neutral SomewhatDissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 49: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Satisfaction Ratings by Gender: Satisfaction Ratings by Gender: Proportion “Very Satisfied”Proportion “Very Satisfied”

73

81

68

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

Females Males

**significant gender difference in satisfaction ratingssignificant gender difference in satisfaction ratings

Page 50: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Satisfaction Ratings by Denomination: Satisfaction Ratings by Denomination: Proportion “Very Satisfied”Proportion “Very Satisfied”

5662

74

88

010

2030

405060

7080

90100

Orthodox Conservative Reform Other

Page 51: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Satisfaction withSatisfaction with Limmud NY 2009 by Family Limmud NY 2009 by Family Status: Percent ‘Very Satisfied” Status: Percent ‘Very Satisfied”

5752 50

35

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

EmptyNesters

Singleunder 40

Marriedwith

Children

Single 40+ Married nochildren

Page 52: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Relationships between Satisfaction Relationships between Satisfaction with Conference and Selected with Conference and Selected

VariablesVariables

Level of satisfaction Level of satisfaction notnot related to: related to: Marital statusMarital status Participating in conference with children Participating in conference with children Current or past professional Jewish experience Current or past professional Jewish experience Limmud volunteering experienceLimmud volunteering experience

Page 53: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Participants’ Attitudes Regarding Participants’ Attitudes Regarding Limmud Learning LevelsLimmud Learning Levels

Participants have Participants have consistently consistently indicated that the indicated that the level of learning is level of learning is “just about right.”“just about right.”

1 3

16

77

20 18

86

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009

Much too basic Too basic J ust about right

Too advanced Much too advanced

Page 54: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

VolunteeringVolunteering

Page 55: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud Conference PlanningLimmud Conference Planning

8% planned only Limmud 20098% planned only Limmud 2009

11% planned previous conference(s) 11% planned previous conference(s) andand Limmud Limmud 20092009

6% planned previous conference(s) but 6% planned previous conference(s) but notnot Limmud Limmud 20092009

23% of Limmud ’08 vs. 25% of Limmud ’09 23% of Limmud ’08 vs. 25% of Limmud ’09 participants had been involved in planning a Limmud participants had been involved in planning a Limmud NY conference.NY conference.

75% never planned a Limmud conference75% never planned a Limmud conference

Page 56: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Volunteering at LimmudVolunteering at Limmud

26% volunteered only at Limmud 2009 26% volunteered only at Limmud 2009

22% volunteered at Limmud 2009 22% volunteered at Limmud 2009 andand at at previous conferences previous conferences

7% volunteered at Limmud 2009 but 7% volunteered at Limmud 2009 but notnot at at previous conferencesprevious conferences

44% never volunteered at a Limmud Conference44% never volunteered at a Limmud Conference

Page 57: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud Volunteer History by Family Limmud Volunteer History by Family StatusStatus

Family StatusFamily Status

Volunteered at Volunteered at Conference Conference

Participated in Participated in Conference Conference PlanningPlanning

Younger SinglesYounger Singles 7575 3434

Older SinglesOlder Singles 4848 2929

Married without children Married without children 4545 3636

Married with children Married with children 4242 1414

Empty NestersEmpty Nesters 3030 1010

Page 58: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Presenting or Performing at LimmudPresenting or Performing at Limmud

17% presented/performed 17% presented/performed onlyonly at Limmud 2009 at Limmud 2009

7% presented/performed at Limmud 2009 7% presented/performed at Limmud 2009 andand at at previous conferences previous conferences

5% presented/performed at a previous conference 5% presented/performed at a previous conference but notbut not at Limmud 2009 at Limmud 2009

24% of ’08 participants vs. 29% of ’09 participants 24% of ’08 participants vs. 29% of ’09 participants had presented or performed at a Limmud conferencehad presented or performed at a Limmud conference

71% never presented/performed at any Limmud 71% never presented/performed at any Limmud conferenceconference

Page 59: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Hours Spent Planning Limmud Hours Spent Planning Limmud Conference, by Conference PlannersConference, by Conference Planners

35

9

15

37

4

0

10

20

30

40

>1 hour/ week 1-4 hours 5-10 hours 11-15 hours 15+ hours

Page 60: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Hours Spent Volunteering at the Limmud Hours Spent Volunteering at the Limmud NY 2009 ConferenceNY 2009 Conference

25

912

54

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1-4 hours 5-10 hours 11-14 hours 15+ hours

Page 61: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Overall Level of Volunteering at Overall Level of Volunteering at Limmud ConferencesLimmud Conferences

44

56

0

15

30

45

60

Perc

enta

ge

Never volunteered Volunteered at (at least) one conference

Page 62: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Relationship between Prior Limmud Relationship between Prior Limmud Attendance & Volunteering at Limmud 2009Attendance & Volunteering at Limmud 2009

History of Limmud History of Limmud Attendance Attendance

Proportion Volunteering at Limmud 2009 Proportion Volunteering at Limmud 2009 ConferenceConference

Did not Attend Prior Did not Attend Prior Limmud Conferences Limmud Conferences

4141

Attended Prior Attended Prior Limmud Conferences Limmud Conferences

7474

Page 63: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud 2009 Participants’ Ratings Limmud 2009 Participants’ Ratings of Volunteering Aspectsof Volunteering Aspects

Volunteering is…Volunteering is… %%

……an important component of the an important component of the

Limmud experienceLimmud experience

2525

……a good way to meet a good way to meet

peoplepeople

2121

...interesting...interesting 1313

……too demandingtoo demanding 33

Page 64: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Reasons why Participants Reasons why Participants Did Not Volunteer at LimmudDid Not Volunteer at Limmud

Lack of interestLack of interest Excessive time commitment Excessive time commitment Was not asked Was not asked Conflicted with work obligations Conflicted with work obligations Family / childcare responsibilitiesFamily / childcare responsibilities

Page 65: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Patterns of Volunteering in the U.S. Patterns of Volunteering in the U.S. vs. Volunteering at Limmudvs. Volunteering at Limmud

In U.S.In U.S.

44% reported being asked to volunteer44% reported being asked to volunteer

41% reported taking the initiative to volunteer 41% reported taking the initiative to volunteer

At LimmudAt Limmud 43% reported being asked to volunteer43% reported being asked to volunteer

31% reported taking the initiative to volunteer 31% reported taking the initiative to volunteer

Page 66: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Mean # of Volunteering Hours During Past Mean # of Volunteering Hours During Past Year: Limmud Participants vs. American PeersYear: Limmud Participants vs. American Peers

83

34

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

LimmudParticipants

U.S. Peer Group

Page 67: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Number of Volunteer Hours Per YearNumber of Volunteer Hours Per Year

Overall United StatesOverall United States

Mean=60Mean=60

Median =37Median =37

Limmud ParticipantsLimmud Participants

Mean=80Mean=80

Median =40Median =40

Page 68: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Community Community

Page 69: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Level of Contact with Limmud Friends during Level of Contact with Limmud Friends during the Year by Family Statusthe Year by Family Status

27

17

5

1414

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Married with Children Married no Children Empty Nesters Single 40+ Single under 40

Level of Contact: "Very Much" & "To a Great Extent"

Page 70: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Limmud Friends by Family StatusLimmud Friends by Family Status

9

55

3

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Single Non-Single

VeryMuch

GreatExtent

Singles are Singles are significantly more significantly more likely than non-likely than non-singles to consider singles to consider people they met at people they met at Limmud to be Limmud to be among their closest among their closest friendsfriends

Page 71: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Self-Reported Impact Self-Reported Impact

Page 72: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Reported Impact of Selected BehaviorsReported Impact of Selected Behaviors

SomewhatSomewhat

%%

Very Very MuchMuch

%%

Great Great ExtentExtent

%%

Increased interest in doing Increased interest in doing volunteer work in generalvolunteer work in general 2626 1414 44

Increased interest in doing Increased interest in doing Jewish-sponsored Jewish-sponsored volunteer workvolunteer work

2626 1212 44

Increased involvement in Increased involvement in Jewish activitiesJewish activities 2626 1010 55

Influenced you to consider Influenced you to consider new career directionsnew career directions 88 55 33

Page 73: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend Limmud 2010Plan to Attend Limmud 2010

Page 74: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend Limmud 2010Plan to Attend Limmud 2010

28 2927

12

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Definitely Yes Probably Yes Not Sure Probably No Definitely No

Page 75: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend* Limmud 2010 by Plan to Attend* Limmud 2010 by Family CategoryFamily Category

73

5754 52

48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Empty Nesters Single Under 40 Married with Children Single 40+ Married No Children

Includes both definitely & probably yesIncludes both definitely & probably yes

Page 76: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend* Limmud 2010 by Plan to Attend* Limmud 2010 by Denominational IdentificationDenominational Identification

24 23

16

34

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Conservative Orthodox Other Reform

*Definitely Yes*Definitely Yes

Page 77: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend Limmud 2010, by Plan to Attend Limmud 2010, by 2009 Conference Attendance2009 Conference Attendance

3

30

12

27

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

AttendedLimmud 2009

AttendedPrior Only

Definitely Yes

Probably Yes

Page 78: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend 2010 Conference by Plan to Attend 2010 Conference by Previous Limmud Conference Previous Limmud Conference

ParticipationParticipation

14

30

42

56

62

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Definitely Yes

'09 only

'09+1

'09+2

'09+3

'09+4

Page 79: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend 2010 Conference by Plan to Attend 2010 Conference by History of Limmud Conference History of Limmud Conference

VolunteeringVolunteering35

2931

16

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Volunteered NeverVolunteered

Definitely Yes

Probably Yes

People who have People who have volunteered at a volunteered at a Limmud conference Limmud conference are significantly are significantly more likely to plan to more likely to plan to attend the 2010 attend the 2010 conference. conference.

Page 80: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Plan to Attend 2010 Conference by whether Plan to Attend 2010 Conference by whether Participant had Attended Limmud Prior to Participant had Attended Limmud Prior to

2009 Conference 2009 Conference

14

31

42

28

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Definitely Yes Probably Yes

2009 FirstTimers

2009 + PriorConferences

Among Limmud 2009 participants, those who had also attended prior Limmud conferences were significantly Among Limmud 2009 participants, those who had also attended prior Limmud conferences were significantly more likely to indicate that they would “definitely” or “probably” attend Limmud 2010. more likely to indicate that they would “definitely” or “probably” attend Limmud 2010.

Page 81: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Reactions by Limmud 2009 Cohort to Other Reactions by Limmud 2009 Cohort to Other Possible Limmud ScenariosPossible Limmud Scenarios

Possible Scenario/ VenuePossible Scenario/ Venue YesYes Maybe Maybe NoNo

Limmud during summer in a summer camp Limmud during summer in a summer camp settingsetting

4343 4747 1010

Limmud during summer in a university settingLimmud during summer in a university setting 4343 5050 77

Periodic Jewish learning eveningsPeriodic Jewish learning evenings 4848 3131 2121

Day-long Jewish learning experiencesDay-long Jewish learning experiences 4040 3838 2222

Weekend learning retreatsWeekend learning retreats 4646 3838 1616

Programming outside of ManhattanProgramming outside of Manhattan 3939 3030 3131

Page 82: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Critiques and Critiques and RecommendationsRecommendations

Page 83: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Critiques of Limmud NY 2009Critiques of Limmud NY 2009

Facility and Heating RelatedFacility and Heating Related Every problem was due to the heating problemEvery problem was due to the heating problem

As soon as sessions started being cancelled (when the educators were present), then the conference lost As soon as sessions started being cancelled (when the educators were present), then the conference lost complete control. Until then at least you could argue that the program was not being compromised. But once the complete control. Until then at least you could argue that the program was not being compromised. But once the education started being sacrificed there was little else. education started being sacrificed there was little else.

It was so chaotic, so miserable in the absence of clear leadership, that I would not trust Limmud to offer a safe It was so chaotic, so miserable in the absence of clear leadership, that I would not trust Limmud to offer a safe space for learning again.space for learning again.

Again, don’t keep saying “apart from the heating problems”.Again, don’t keep saying “apart from the heating problems”.

I was upset that the Limmud leadership did not have a “Plan B’ in place.I was upset that the Limmud leadership did not have a “Plan B’ in place.

The leadership was incapable of dealing with the conference and kept on making poor decision after poor The leadership was incapable of dealing with the conference and kept on making poor decision after poor decision.decision.

There is no doubt in my mind that the conference should have been cancelled. There is no doubt in my mind that the conference should have been cancelled.

““All Volunteer” sounds like a great plan – unless something goes wrong. All Volunteer” sounds like a great plan – unless something goes wrong.

Page 84: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Critiques of Limmud 2009 NY, Critiques of Limmud 2009 NY, cont.cont.

Program RelatedProgram Related Too many choicesToo many choices It has become routineIt has become routine I don’t like when two classes of the same interest group such as singing and song leading I don’t like when two classes of the same interest group such as singing and song leading

are offered at the same time. are offered at the same time. I have many opportunities for Jewish learning in NYC and attend many conferences. I have many opportunities for Jewish learning in NYC and attend many conferences.

Limmud is not one that I want to make a priority. Limmud is not one that I want to make a priority.

Conflicting Opinions re. Program Level and ContentConflicting Opinions re. Program Level and Content I am not into dissecting text in the traditional Jewish manner.I am not into dissecting text in the traditional Jewish manner. I wish there had been more text-based learning opportunities. I like old-fashioned frontal I wish there had been more text-based learning opportunities. I like old-fashioned frontal

teaching, not touchy-feely ‘sharing’.teaching, not touchy-feely ‘sharing’. The quality of the speakers appears to have diminished over the years. I could find very The quality of the speakers appears to have diminished over the years. I could find very

few people at the Limmud NY 2009 that I wanted to hear. I am particularly interested in few people at the Limmud NY 2009 that I wanted to hear. I am particularly interested in Jewish history, Talmud and Bible learning and other more concrete subjects than were Jewish history, Talmud and Bible learning and other more concrete subjects than were offered at Limmud NY 2009. offered at Limmud NY 2009.

Children’s Program RelatedChildren’s Program Related I wish that the middle schoolers & even the elementary schoolers had some text I wish that the middle schoolers & even the elementary schoolers had some text

programs. programs.

Page 85: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Critiques of Limmud NY 2009, cont.Critiques of Limmud NY 2009, cont. Social Context RelatedSocial Context Related I didn’t find people to be friendly.I didn’t find people to be friendly.

While it was nice to see Jews from all levels of Judaism together, I found that they While it was nice to see Jews from all levels of Judaism together, I found that they didn’t interact with each other so much – each denomination stayed with their own.didn’t interact with each other so much – each denomination stayed with their own.

Too little effort to get single people to meet each other. Too little effort to get single people to meet each other.

The community feel is confusing because there are a lot of people there but there aren’t The community feel is confusing because there are a lot of people there but there aren’t many things people do together.many things people do together.

Too much of an Upper West Side setting – B’nai Jeshurun/ Ansche Chesed bubble. Too much of an Upper West Side setting – B’nai Jeshurun/ Ansche Chesed bubble. Diversity does not come natural in this setting, despite lip service.Diversity does not come natural in this setting, despite lip service.

Shabbat is overwhelming if you don’t know anyone. Shabbat is overwhelming if you don’t know anyone.

I found Limmud NY to be a New York-based learning/social opportunity. As someone I found Limmud NY to be a New York-based learning/social opportunity. As someone who does not live in New York, I did not find it to be a useful networking opportunity, who does not live in New York, I did not find it to be a useful networking opportunity, nor did I find myself engaged in the population. nor did I find myself engaged in the population.

Page 86: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Critiques of Limmud NY 2009, Critiques of Limmud NY 2009, cont. cont.

Volunteer RelatedVolunteer Related

I didn’t get to attend many sessions because I am a core volunteer. I didn’t get to attend many sessions because I am a core volunteer.

EntertainmentEntertainment Some of the evening entertainment may have been geared to a younger crowd Some of the evening entertainment may have been geared to a younger crowd

(e.g. the group at Havdalah time.)(e.g. the group at Havdalah time.)

The evening performance degenerated into amateur hour. The evening performance degenerated into amateur hour.

Religious ObservanceReligious Observance Lack of programming to teach the ‘nitty-gritty how to of different aspects of Lack of programming to teach the ‘nitty-gritty how to of different aspects of

traditional religious observance. traditional religious observance.

CostCost I felt it was an expensive weekend and I didn’t feel that it was worth that expense.I felt it was an expensive weekend and I didn’t feel that it was worth that expense...

Page 87: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Critiques of Limmud NY 2009, cont.Critiques of Limmud NY 2009, cont. DiversityDiversity

So few visibly queer/LGBT participantsSo few visibly queer/LGBT participants I’m most interested in secular Jewish expression, Jewish anti-I’m most interested in secular Jewish expression, Jewish anti-

nationalism and queer Jewish identity. I feel like these are all nationalism and queer Jewish identity. I feel like these are all increasingly marginalized in Limmud and that it’s an extension increasingly marginalized in Limmud and that it’s an extension campus of the Upper West Side Jewish yuppy clique. campus of the Upper West Side Jewish yuppy clique.

It was difficult for my wife to find learning opportunities that were open It was difficult for my wife to find learning opportunities that were open to her. Limmud is great for a Jewish community but still very closed to to her. Limmud is great for a Jewish community but still very closed to those that I may consider part of the Jewish community (my wife) but those that I may consider part of the Jewish community (my wife) but many others do not. many others do not.

Overall MissionOverall Mission I am unclear about Limmud’s mission which prevents me from getting I am unclear about Limmud’s mission which prevents me from getting

more involved more involved FoodFood There are too many onions in the salad.There are too many onions in the salad.

Page 88: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Positive Reviews of Limmud NY 2009Positive Reviews of Limmud NY 2009 Just do what you did in January 2009 and more. I loved it – and felt Just do what you did in January 2009 and more. I loved it – and felt

part of a great Jewish experience. Thanks you for all your hard work in part of a great Jewish experience. Thanks you for all your hard work in very difficult circumstances.very difficult circumstances.

Keep up the awesome programming.Keep up the awesome programming.

I am so in love with the entire concept of Limmud and the warmth and I am so in love with the entire concept of Limmud and the warmth and unity that Limmud really is amongst Jews.unity that Limmud really is amongst Jews.

Anything done to improve Limmud would probably price it out of Anything done to improve Limmud would probably price it out of range for those who most want to go. range for those who most want to go.

It’s an outstanding idea and a phenomenal concept and I hope to be It’s an outstanding idea and a phenomenal concept and I hope to be involved further. involved further.

Page 89: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary Summary

Page 90: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

SummarySummarySatisfaction with 2009 ConferenceSatisfaction with 2009 Conference

Limmud 2009 participants’ satisfaction with the conference Limmud 2009 participants’ satisfaction with the conference was generally comparable with the level of satisfaction was generally comparable with the level of satisfaction expressed by the participants who attended previous expressed by the participants who attended previous Limmud conferences. Limmud conferences.

Participants who did Participants who did not not identify as Orthodox or as identify as Orthodox or as Conservative/Conservadox were less likely to be ‘very Conservative/Conservadox were less likely to be ‘very satisfied’ with the conference. satisfied’ with the conference.

40+ year old single participants were also less likely to be 40+ year old single participants were also less likely to be ‘very satisfied’ with the conference. ‘very satisfied’ with the conference.

Page 91: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary, cont.Summary, cont.

Plans for Atending Limmud 2010Plans for Atending Limmud 2010

28% of Limmud 2009 participants indicated that they would ‘definitely’ 28% of Limmud 2009 participants indicated that they would ‘definitely’ attend Limmud 2010 and another 28% said that they would ‘perhaps attend Limmud 2010 and another 28% said that they would ‘perhaps attend’.attend’.

Although first-time Limmud participants and prior Limmud participants Although first-time Limmud participants and prior Limmud participants did not differ in the extent to which they were satisfied with the 2009 did not differ in the extent to which they were satisfied with the 2009 conference, first-time participants were significantly less likely to conference, first-time participants were significantly less likely to indicate that they plan to attend the 2010 Limmud Conference. indicate that they plan to attend the 2010 Limmud Conference.

‘‘Empty Nesters’ were most likely to plan to attend Limmud 2010 while Empty Nesters’ were most likely to plan to attend Limmud 2010 while married couples without children were the least likely. married couples without children were the least likely.

Limmud volunteers are significantly more likely than non-volunteers to Limmud volunteers are significantly more likely than non-volunteers to indicate that they plan to attend the 2010 conference. indicate that they plan to attend the 2010 conference.

Page 92: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary, cont.Summary, cont.

Other Limmud Conference OptionsOther Limmud Conference Options Participants were supportive of other Limmud options Participants were supportive of other Limmud options

including scheduling: including scheduling:

conferences during summer in a summer camp setting or conferences during summer in a summer camp setting or in a university settingin a university setting

periodic Jewish learning eveningsperiodic Jewish learning evenings

weekend learning retreatsweekend learning retreats

Page 93: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary, cont.Summary, cont.VolunteeringVolunteering

56% of all Limmud participants have volunteered at least once at a Limmud 56% of all Limmud participants have volunteered at least once at a Limmud conference.conference.

A substantial proportion (41%) of first-timers volunteered at the Limmud 2009 A substantial proportion (41%) of first-timers volunteered at the Limmud 2009 conference.conference.

The level of volunteering was considerably higher (74%) among return The level of volunteering was considerably higher (74%) among return participants. participants.

Younger (under 40) singles were the most likely to volunteer at the Younger (under 40) singles were the most likely to volunteer at the conference and ‘Empty Nester’ were the least likely to volunteer. conference and ‘Empty Nester’ were the least likely to volunteer.

Limmud participants volunteer at a considerably higher mean yearly (hourly) Limmud participants volunteer at a considerably higher mean yearly (hourly) rate than their American peers. However much of this difference is rate than their American peers. However much of this difference is attributable to a small proportion of Limmud volunteers who volunteer a very attributable to a small proportion of Limmud volunteers who volunteer a very substantial number of hours per year. substantial number of hours per year.

Page 94: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary, cont.Summary, cont.Strengthening the Limmud CommunityStrengthening the Limmud Community

Approximately one-third of participants reported that ‘experiencing Approximately one-third of participants reported that ‘experiencing community’ was an extremely important impetus for them to attend community’ was an extremely important impetus for them to attend Limmud.Limmud.

Fewer than 25% of conference participants maintain substantial Fewer than 25% of conference participants maintain substantial contact contact with their ‘Limmud friends’ during the year.with their ‘Limmud friends’ during the year.

Singles under age 40 were most likely to maintain contact with their Limmud friends during the year.

‘ ‘Empty Nesters’, who had the highest level of satisfaction with theEmpty Nesters’, who had the highest level of satisfaction with the conference as well as who indicated the greatest interest in returning,conference as well as who indicated the greatest interest in returning, are the participants who maintain the are the participants who maintain the least least amount of contact with theiramount of contact with their fellow ‘’Limmudniks’ during the year.fellow ‘’Limmudniks’ during the year.

Page 95: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary, cont.Summary, cont.

General DemographicsGeneral Demographics

Demographically, Limmud NY 2009 participants greatly resemble Demographically, Limmud NY 2009 participants greatly resemble those of previous yearsthose of previous years

Women outnumbered men , especially among the younger cohortsWomen outnumbered men , especially among the younger cohorts

In 2009, there was a 9% decrease in the proportion of 35-49 year olds In 2009, there was a 9% decrease in the proportion of 35-49 year olds and a corresponding decrease in the proportion of participants who and a corresponding decrease in the proportion of participants who have children have children

Over one-third of participants reside in ManhattanOver one-third of participants reside in Manhattan

Nearly 25% reside in one neighborhood - the Upper West Side of Nearly 25% reside in one neighborhood - the Upper West Side of Manhattan. Manhattan.

Page 96: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary, cont.Summary, cont.

Jewish ConnectionsJewish Connections

Nearly 60% identify as Conservative (including Conservadox) or Nearly 60% identify as Conservative (including Conservadox) or Orthodox, compared to 45% in New York area. Orthodox, compared to 45% in New York area.

The proportion of Limmud NY 2009 participants who identify as The proportion of Limmud NY 2009 participants who identify as Reform (9%) is substantially lower than among Jews in the New York Reform (9%) is substantially lower than among Jews in the New York area (29%).area (29%).

Page 97: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Summary, cont.Summary, cont. Jewish ConnectionsJewish Connections Limmud NY 2009 participants are overwhelmingly Jewishly connected & Limmud NY 2009 participants are overwhelmingly Jewishly connected &

Jewishly engaged. Jewishly engaged.

84% of Limmud NY 2009 participants are members of a 84% of Limmud NY 2009 participants are members of a synagogue/minyan compared to 43% of Jews in the New York area.synagogue/minyan compared to 43% of Jews in the New York area.

67% regard themselves as ‘Jewish leaders.67% regard themselves as ‘Jewish leaders.

55% are current or past Jewish professionals or Jewish educators. 55% are current or past Jewish professionals or Jewish educators.

25% attended Jewish day school after 825% attended Jewish day school after 8thth grade. grade.

Despite these high levels of Jewish connections, 25% have dated Despite these high levels of Jewish connections, 25% have dated someone who is not Jewish and 20% have been romantically involved someone who is not Jewish and 20% have been romantically involved with a non-Jew.with a non-Jew.

Page 98: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Recommendations for Improving Limmud NYRecommendations for Improving Limmud NY

Community BuildingCommunity Building

Create directed social programming. For example, one Create directed social programming. For example, one respondent suggest appointing a “cruise social director” type to respondent suggest appointing a “cruise social director” type to connect people who want to meet other people.connect people who want to meet other people.

Schedule an orientation for new peopleSchedule an orientation for new people

Make more of an attempt to build community, either through Make more of an attempt to build community, either through shared meals or other experiences (to lessen perception of shared meals or other experiences (to lessen perception of clique-ishness’).clique-ishness’).

Provide additional volunteer opportunities especially to sub-Provide additional volunteer opportunities especially to sub-groups (e.g., singles 40+) who might be alienated from other groups (e.g., singles 40+) who might be alienated from other Limmud community experiences.Limmud community experiences.

More ‘mixers’ for people with young children (e.g. a “Parents & More ‘mixers’ for people with young children (e.g. a “Parents & Me” type of experience).Me” type of experience).

Page 99: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Recommendations for Improving Limmud NYRecommendations for Improving Limmud NY

Community Building Community Building

Schedule at least one more whole-community activity Schedule at least one more whole-community activity beyond Shabbat.beyond Shabbat.

Increase ‘down time’ devoted to sharing and reflecting on Increase ‘down time’ devoted to sharing and reflecting on what participants have learned.what participants have learned.

Designate tables at meals for lone travelers (and not just for Designate tables at meals for lone travelers (and not just for singles) so that people who come without friends can meet singles) so that people who come without friends can meet new ones.new ones.

Consider inviting fewer people to the event – 300 - 400 Consider inviting fewer people to the event – 300 - 400 instead of 800. instead of 800.

Page 100: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Recommendations for Improving Limmud NYRecommendations for Improving Limmud NY

Learning RelatedLearning Related

Offer more “beginners” classes, including introduction to Judaism and Hebrew 101.Offer more “beginners” classes, including introduction to Judaism and Hebrew 101.

Introduce more tracking information regarding class levels (e.g. a rating system on a Introduce more tracking information regarding class levels (e.g. a rating system on a scale of 1-10). For ‘advanced’ material, perhaps provide examples of what ‘advanced’ scale of 1-10). For ‘advanced’ material, perhaps provide examples of what ‘advanced’ means. means.

Achieve a better understanding of the types of courses which appeal to “Reform’ Achieve a better understanding of the types of courses which appeal to “Reform’ identified individuals identified individuals

Include sessions on historical Judaism and text study.Include sessions on historical Judaism and text study.

Schedule events carefully so that conference room scan accommodate expected Schedule events carefully so that conference room scan accommodate expected audience.audience.

Page 101: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Recommendations for Improving Limmud NYRecommendations for Improving Limmud NY

Jewish ObservanceJewish Observance

Increase basic “how to” programming for people who want to learn Increase basic “how to” programming for people who want to learn about traditional Jewish observance. about traditional Jewish observance.

Make Friday night dinner more ‘Shabbat friendly’ by placing benchers Make Friday night dinner more ‘Shabbat friendly’ by placing benchers on the tables and by having communal singing.” on the tables and by having communal singing.”

Page 102: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Recommendations for Improving Limmud NYRecommendations for Improving Limmud NY

Expand Participant BaseExpand Participant Base

Increase outreach by advertising in Long Island and outer boroughs Increase outreach by advertising in Long Island and outer boroughs and also in Orthodox communities such as Flatbush, Crown Heights, and also in Orthodox communities such as Flatbush, Crown Heights, and Kew Garden Hills. and Kew Garden Hills.

Undertake more energetic outreach to Reform congregationsUndertake more energetic outreach to Reform congregations

Identify synagogues (especially Reform synagogues) who are Identify synagogues (especially Reform synagogues) who are considering scheduling retreats and invite them to overlap with considering scheduling retreats and invite them to overlap with Limmud ConferenceLimmud Conference

Page 103: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Recommendations for Improving Limmud NYRecommendations for Improving Limmud NY

Volunteer RelatedVolunteer Related

Implement clearer volunteer expectations and volunteer utilization.Implement clearer volunteer expectations and volunteer utilization.

Provide additional support to volunteers including helping the chairs to Provide additional support to volunteers including helping the chairs to strengthen the core team (steering committee) and encouraging team strengthen the core team (steering committee) and encouraging team leaders to build their teams (including opportunities for fun in team leaders to build their teams (including opportunities for fun in team meetings). meetings).

Broaden volunteer base and implement a more sophisticated Broaden volunteer base and implement a more sophisticated organizational model organizational model

Page 104: The Evaluation of Limmud NY 2009

Recommendations for Improving Recommendations for Improving Limmud NYLimmud NY

Diversity Diversity

More outreach to Jews of color, LGBT people including (and More outreach to Jews of color, LGBT people including (and especially) LGBT families with kids and converts.especially) LGBT families with kids and converts.

VendorsVendors

Have more vendors- at the CAJE conferences, the vendor room was Have more vendors- at the CAJE conferences, the vendor room was one of the things not to be missed; have more booksellers, vendors of one of the things not to be missed; have more booksellers, vendors of educational materials, Jewish software etc. educational materials, Jewish software etc.

Year-Round CommunicationYear-Round Communication

Set up a series of list-serves for specific interest groups.Set up a series of list-serves for specific interest groups.