The asymptotic Structure and Size Distribution of fractal ... · PBE, (D f 3= 1.78) DEM Continuum...
Transcript of The asymptotic Structure and Size Distribution of fractal ... · PBE, (D f 3= 1.78) DEM Continuum...
The asymptotic Structure and Size Distribution of fractal-
like Aerosols made by Agglomeration
E. Goudeli, M.L. Eggersdorfer and S.E. Pratsinis
Particle Technology Laboratory, Institute of Process Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Process
Engineering, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 3, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Agglomeration refers to the formation of physically attached primary particles by coagulation. It occurs in
environmental and industrial processes, especially in low temperature regions where sintering or
coalescence are rather slow. Understanding agglomeration is essential for optimal process design for
manufacture of nanomaterials as their fractal structure affects their handling and processing and
eventually their performance. The high particle concentrations encountered during nanomaterial
manufacturing lead to formation of agglomerates with well-defined asymptotic structure and size
distribution given by their fractal-like dimension and self-preserving size distribution, respectively.
The growth and detailed structure of fractal-like aerosol particles undergoing agglomeration is
investigated here from the free molecular to the continuum regime by discrete element modeling.
Particles in the free molecular regime follow ballistic trajectories described by an event driven method
whereas in the near continuum (gas-slip) and continuum regimes Langevin Dynamics describe their
diffusive motion. The simulations are validated by the attainment of the collision frequency and self-
preserving size distribution (SPSD) of fully coalescing particles in free molecular and continuum regimes
as well as the corresponding asymptotic fractal dimensions, Df, of 1.91 and 1.78 by ballistic and
diffusion-limited cluster-cluster agglomeration, respectively.
The evolution of agglomerate structure from perfect spheres (Df = 3) to the above well-known
asymptotic fractal-like structures is simulated in detail and a simplified expression is extracted that can be
readily used in process design for synthesis of nanomaterials or in environmental models for ambient
aerosols (e.g. air pollution and climate forcing). Fractal-like agglomerates exhibit considerably broader
SPSD than spherical particles when made by coagulation-agglomeration: the number-based geometric
standard deviation of the radius of gyration of agglomerates in the free molecular and continuum regimes
is 2.27 and 1.95, respectively, compared to that of spherical particles of 1.45. The quasi-self-preserving
geometric standard deviation of the radius of gyration of agglomerates exhibits a characteristic minimum
of 1.65 in the transition regime at Knudsen numbers, Kn ≈ 0.2. In contrast, their Df linearly shifts from
1.91 in the free molecular to 1.78 in the continuum regime.
Keywords: agglomeration, fractal dimension, self-preserving size distribution, discrete element method.
Coagulation - Agglomeration of
Fractal-like Particles: Structure &
Self-Preserving Size Distribution
E. Goudeli, M.L. Eggersdorfer and S.E. Pratsinis
Particle Technology Laboratory
ETH Zürich, Switzerland
2
Continuum
Mesoscale
Molecular
dynamics Quantum
mechanics
Buesser B, Pratsinis SE, Annual Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 3 (2012) 103–127.
Multiscale Design of Aerosol Synthesis
3
Introduction
Structure: affects product characteristics (e.g. rheological
properties1) & performance, radiative forcing2, visibility3
1. Russel WB. (1987) Powder Technol., 51,15-25.
Reinforcing rubbers
Suspensions
(e.g. pigments)
Hard agglomerates:
catalysis, lightguide preforms, electroceramic devices
Soft agglomerates:
2. Martins JV, Artaxo P, Liousse C, Reid LS, Hobbs PV, Kaufman YJ. (1998) J. Geophys. Res., 103, 32041-32050.
3. Berry MV, Percival IC. (1986). Opt. Acta, 33, 577-591.
4
Introduction
Connect emissions to aerosol size measurements
Monitoring combustion emissions & atmospheric aerosols
IPCC, 2007
Negative
Radiative
Forcing
5
Motivation
Optimal aerosol reactor & process design
Close control of particle size & structure
catalytic activity and selectivity1
Open aggregates facilitate gas transport in and out of pellets
- Introduction of detailed structure (Df) in collision rates, β
,f cD d
Need a reliable Df descriptor
Controlled agglomeration can minimize costly separation
techniques
1. Christopher P, Linic S. (2010) Chem. Cat. Chem., 2, 78-83.
1. Eggersdorfer ML, Pratsinis SE. (2014) Adv. Powder Technol., 24, 71-90.
rm: mobility radius
free molecular regime
DMA
rva: volume-equivalent radius
rg: radius
of gyration
Light Scattering
Microscopy
Agglomerate Characterization
rm: mobility radius
continuum regime
2 10g
var
r
6
Filter weighing APM
TEOM
Previous Work
Brownian coagulation of spheres1,2
Non-spherical particles
determination of evolving structure4,5,6,7
4. Artelt C, Schmid H-J, Peukert W (2003), J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 511-534.
5. Kostoglou M, Konstandopoulos AG (2001), J. Aerosol Sci., 32, 1399-1420.
6. Schmid HJ, Al Zaitone B, Artelt C, Peukert W (2006), Chem. Eng. Sci., 61, 293-305.
7. Eggerdorfer ML, Kadau D, Herrmann HJ, Pratsinis SE (2011), Langmuir, 27, 6358-6367.
7
1. von Smoluchowski M. (1917), Z. Phys. Chem. Stoechiom. Verwandtschafts., 92, 129-168.
2. Buesser B, Heine MC, Pratsinis SE (2009), J. Aerosol Sci., 40, 89-100.
collisional growth and dynamics3
3. Rogak SN, Flagan RC (1992), J. Colloid Interface Sci., 151, 203-224.
8
SiO2 particles (like fumed silica), T = 27 oC
DLCA
2. Heine MC, Pratsinis SE. (2007). Langmuir, 23, 9882-9890.
Continuum regime Langevin Dynamics 2
Free molecular regime
Event-driven method 1
BCCA
3. Eggersdorfer ML, Kadau D, Herrmann HJ, Pratsinis SE. (2010). J. Colloid Interface Sci., 342, 261-268.
time
if N<N0/2
double
if N<N0/2
double
1. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ. (1991). Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, New York.
Simulation Method
9
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
0.3
1
5
β, 1
0-1
5, m
3/s
Kn = λair/rp
Free
molecular
(Kn >10)
Enhancement
due to
polydispersity
from the rapid
attainment of
SPSD
Validation – Full Coalescence
Collision Frequency Function, β
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
0.3
1
5
This work
1. Fuchs NA. (1964). Mechanics of Aerosols. Macmillan, New York. 2. Buesser B, Heine MC, Pratsinis SE. (2009). J. Aerosol Sci., 40, 89–100.
Fuchs1
7.34%
Continuum
(Kn <0.1)
17.9%
[2]
[2]
2 1
2 1
1 1
2N N
t t
10
Kn = λair/rp
3. Xiong Y, Pratsinis SE. (1991). J. Aerosol Sci., 22, 637-655. 4. Vemury S, Kusters KA, Pratsinis SE. (1994). J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 26, 175-185.
1. Otto E, Stratmann F, Fissan H, Vemury S. Pratsinis,SE. (1994). Part. Part. Syst. Char., 11, 359-366.
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Xiong & Pratsinis
Otto et al. DEM simulations
Continuum
Vemury et al. Landgrebe
& Pratsinis
σg,v
σg,n = 1.44
σg,n = 1.46 σg,n
σg,v = 1.33 σg,v = 1.307
2. Landgrebe JD, Pratsinis SE (1989). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 1474-1481.
σg
Validation – Full Coalescence
Geometric Standard Deviation
Free
molecular
Continuum
Free molecular
11
Agglomerate Dynamics - Size Evolution
Ave
rage
ag
glo
me
rate
ra
dii,
nm
1. Eggersdorfer ML, Pratsinis SE. (2014) Adv. Powder Technol., 24, 71-90.
2. Sorensen CM. (2011) Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 765-779.
Number of primary particles, np
33=27 times
overprediction of mass
1 10 100 100010
100
1000
1 10 100 100010
100
1000
1 10 100 100010
100
1000
rva
rg
rm np = 300 D
f ?
3a
g
v
r
r
Df = 1.91 – 1.78
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
12
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
Num
be
r of pri
ma
ry p
art
icle
s,
np
rp,0 = 15 nm
Df = 3, kn =1
(t = 10-5s) Df = 1.71,
kn = 1.44
(t = 10-3s)
Df = 2.5, kn = 1.08
(t = 2∙10-4s)
Df = 1.76, kn = 1.34
(t = 10-1 s)
Agglomerate radius of gyration, rg, nm
Evolution of Agglomerate Structure by
Coagulation
fD
g
p n
p
rn k
r
1.05pn
2.4pn
616pn
19pn
10 100 10001
10
100
1000
10000
13
100
101
102
103
104
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Number of primary particles, np
Evolution of Average Agglomerate Structure
PP radius:
1 nm
2 nm
7 nm
15 nm
100 nm
500 nm
( )f pD f n
Effe
ctive f
racta
l dim
ensio
n, D
f
1 10 100 1000 100001.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
14
Effective fra
cta
l dim
en
sio
n,
Df
1. Jullien R, Botet R. (1987). World Scientific, River Edge.
2. Tence M, Chevalier JP, Jullien R. (1986). J Phys, 47, 1989–1998.
KnD,m = λp/rm
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Df = 1.91 ± 0.03
Free
molecular
(BCCA)
Continuum
(DLCA)
Df = 1.78 ± 0.05
Agglomerate Structure Evolution
,( )f D mD f Kn
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
15
Number of primary particles, np
Po
wer-
law
exponent, k
n
100
101
102
103
104
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
PP radius:
1 nm
2 nm
7 nm
15 nm
100 nm
500 nm
Evolution of Average Agglomerate Structure
fD
g
p n
p
rn k
r
kn = 1.4 ± 0.2
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
16
Agglomerate Self-Preserving Size Distribution
Norm
aliz
ed c
oncentr
ation, ηΨ
Dimensionless volume, η=Nυ/V
PBE, (Df = 1.78)3
DEM Continuum regime
PBE, (Df = 1.91)3
DEM
Free molecular regime PBE, (Df = 1.91)1,2
PBE, (Df = 1.78)1,2
Large particles
excellent agreement
in DEM and PBE
Small particles
DEM higher than
PBE due to
“interpenetration
effect”
more significant in
FM regime
1. Fuchs NA. (1964). Mechanics of Aerosols. Macmillan, New York.
3. Thajudeen et al. (2012). Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46, 1174–1186.
10-1
100
101
1020.1
1
10
β,
10
-15,
m3/s
Kn = λair/rp
Free molecular
Continuum Thajudeen et al.2
Fuchs1
Thajudeen et al.3
Fuchs1,2
Transition Thajudeen et al.3
Fuchs1,2
2. Mulholland, G.W.; Samson, R.J.; Mountain, R.D.; Ernst, M.H. Energy Fuels 1988, 2, 481-486.
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
KnD,m = λp/rm 1. Vemury S, Pratsinis SE. (1995). J. Aerosol Sci. 26: 175-185. 17
σg,g,FM
= 2.27
σg
σg,v σg,v,C
= 1.31
σg,v,FM
= 1.41
agglomerates
spheres
σg,g: rg-based
σg,v: rva-based
σg,m
σg,g
σg,v
σg,g
, ,( )g g D mf Kn
σg,g,C
= 1.95
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Geometric Standard Deviation
(Df = 1.8) σg,v = 1.301 (Df = 2)
σg,v = 1.421
(Df = 1.91)
σg,g: rg-based
σg,m: rm-based
σg,v: rva-based σg,m,FM
= 2.03
σg,g, [2] σg,pa, [2]
2. Gröhn, A.J.; Eggersdorfer, M.L.; Pratsinis, S.E.; Wegner, K., (2014). J. Aerosol Sci. 73, 1-13.
18
Conclusions
• Geometric Standard Deviation:
, ,( )g g D mf Kn
• Df evolution from spherical to
fractal-like particles: ( )f pD f n
,( )f D mD f Kn• Structure:
Transition regime:
linear function
19
THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION!