Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

9
1 W. Wester Fermilab MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002 Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC ASIC Testing Group: W. Wester, C. Gingu, A. Dyer, A. Baumbaugh, and K. Knickerbocker Overall Goals Satisfy initial MINOS requirements Wafer scale testing Packaged parts testing Goal is to provide a ~99% chance of a good die Hardware Semi-automatic probe station WH14 Custom probe card for QIE7b Interface printed circuit board for QIE7b Tester box originally designed for KTeV QIE testing - Z80 processor controlled - analog and digital input and output Software Test instructions in Z80 Probe station control software DAQ software (visual basic): coordinates testing and probe station control Analysis software to determine good/bad die

description

Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC. ASIC Testing Group : W. Wester, C. Gingu, A. Dyer, A. Baumbaugh, and K. Knickerbocker Overall Goals Satisfy initial MINOS requirements Wafer scale testing Packaged parts testing Goal is to provide a ~99% chance of a good die Hardware - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

Page 1: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

1

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Testing update for theMINOS QIE7b ASIC

ASIC Testing Group: W. Wester, C. Gingu, A. Dyer, A. Baumbaugh, and K. Knickerbocker

Overall Goals Satisfy initial MINOS requirements Wafer scale testing Packaged parts testing Goal is to provide a ~99% chance of a good die

Hardware Semi-automatic probe station WH14 Custom probe card for QIE7b Interface printed circuit board for QIE7b Tester box originally designed for KTeV QIE testing

- Z80 processor controlled

- analog and digital input and output

Software Test instructions in Z80 Probe station control software DAQ software (visual basic): coordinates testing and

probe station control Analysis software to determine good/bad die

Page 2: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

2

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

The QIE7b ASIC for MINOIS

48 wafer production has arrived! Approx 699 chips per wafer (33.5K parts) Initial goal: Begin delivery of ~1250 known

good die (KGD) by mid Feb for assembly of MENU modules for the test beam.

Sig Input

Ref Input

Cur

rent

Spl

itter Four phase

Integrator

Sig Output

Cap IDExp

Clk

digitalcircuitry

Page 3: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

3

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Wafer testing before packaging

Somewhat of an academic exercise Testing after packaging can be done anyway

Some potential benefits Quicker initial look Study process variations versus wafer position Higher statistics for determining pass/fail criteria After chip packaging more efficient Maybe only wafer testing (saves ~2 months!)

Example of wafertesting result thatshows chips that pass testing but reside in a badarea on the wafer

CDF DDR device

Page 4: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

4

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Testing on the wafer

ProcedurePlace wafer on the chuck and alignStart probe station soft-ware

Some ProblemsHigher noise than with packaged partsSome system glitches we’re tracking downEach part gets tested 3 times for now

2000 parts per day with ~3 hrs work

Page 5: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

5

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Testing after packaging

QIE5b tested in this manner by KTeV SMQIE tested in this manner by CDF Procedure:

Insert packaged part into a clam shell Press a button Read pass/fail based upon a LED readout

Some difficulties Clam shells require periodic cleaning Human error always a possibility

About 2 chips can be tested per min or 1000/day

Page 6: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

6

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Test sequence

Nearly identical for wafer testing or for testing after packaging.Developed originally for the KTeV QIEUsed for other QIE versions as well

Check functionality and perform measurementsPower-on current measurement (2 supplies)Cap Ids rotating?Pull current out through input ref Inject current and see all 8 exponent rangesPedestal values (analog out is digitized)Look at AC/DC “impedence” (input voltage)Measure Aout (2 points in each range)Measure LVDS voltage levels for Cap ID and

exponent lines for high and low

Page 7: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

7

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Test data

Output of testing data is a text file with 43 lines per device. Also in .paw files

Visual Basic and Linux fortran analysis Web site will be set up

00

STATUS F 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 01  071007  001907  002907  006806  17B006  179F06  178904  37BF04  557804  455004  5FCB04  353804  637104  2AAC04  622604  24B904  5FAF04  221904  5FB504  1B2304  4FF9

04  282804  57570A  328E0A  328F0A  32890A  32890B  3484

0B  30BD0B  34840B  30B30B  34850B  30A40B  30BA0B  34840B  30B30B  34830B  30A30B  3484

0D  49500D  4C8D

12 V supply current 6V supply current

LVDS low voltageLVDS high voltage

Range 7 Aout at ~20% full rangeRange 7 Aout at ~80% full range

Status and range exponentsAout for pedestal

Page 8: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

8

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Some Results

Wafer 05636/699 die good91% yield

Failures mostly atthe wafer’s edge

Wafer 08628/699 die good90% yield

3 additional waferstested with similarresults

Page 9: Testing update for the MINOS QIE7b ASIC

9

W. WesterFermilab

MINOS Front End Jan 30, 2002

Long and short term goals

Two wafers have been tested: 90% yield! Bad die are inked and won’t be packaged Packaging at ASAT (two wafers are now in

Hong Kong). Should return by mid-Feb. with ~1250 good packaged parts

When parts arrive, they will be tested after packaging to determine whether additional failures are introduced or to perhaps to further select more uniform devices

Based upon our findings, we will decide whether packed part testing is needed for the remainder of the parts

Wafer testing to be finished by ~May