TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON PULVERIZED FUEL SYSTEMS NFPA … · Address List No Phone Pulverized Fuel...

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON PULVERIZED FUEL SYSTEMS

NFPA 85 First Draft Meeting Agenda

March 2, 2017 10:00 AM – 2:00 PM Eastern Time Web Meeting/Teleconference

1. Call to Order. Joseph Bittinger, Chair

2. Introductions.

3. Approval of Meeting Minutes from January 7 – 8, 2014. (Attachment A)

4. Staff Updates. Laura Moreno, NFPA Staff

Committee membership update. (Attachment B)

Fall 2018 revision cycle schedule. (Attachment C)

Overview of NFPA Process.

5. Review of Public Inputs: NFPA 85 Chapter 9 (Attachment D)

6. Review of Fundamentals Technical Committee actions (Attachment E). The committee members are asked to review the actions and bring forward any items warranting further discussion.

7. Task Group Reports.

Operations, Section 9.6.

8. New Business.

9. Next Meeting.

10. Adjourn.

NFPA 85 (BCS-PFS) Technical Committee First Draft Meeting - Teleconference - March 2, 2017 of 87

Attachment A: Previous Meeting Minutes


MINUTES OF MEETING

Technical Committee on Pulverized Fuel Systems

January 7-8, 2014 Doubletree Hotel Orlando Airport

Orlando, FL

I. Attendance: Principal Members/Staff: Andy Smith, Technical Committee Chair, Global Risk Consultants, GA Denise Beach, NFPA, MA Joseph Bittinger, Jr. American Electric Power Co., OH Vaughn Boley, Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance Company, CT Qingsheng Lin, Babcock Power, Inc., MA William Martin, Babcock & Wilcox Company, OH (via teleconference) Cleveland Skinker, Bechtel Power Corporation, MD (via teleconference, Jan 8 only) II. Minutes of Meeting: 1. Call to order. The meeting was called to order at 8:10 a.m. on Jan. 7, 2014.

Chairman Smith thanked the committee members for their presentation. 2. Introduction. The committee members introduced themselves and identified their

affiliation. 3. Minutes Approval. The minutes from the January 2013 meeting were approved as

written. 4. NFPA Staff Report. The NFPA Staff Liaison reviewed the new document revision

process and tools, including the new terminology, the revision cycle timeline, and the online public input submittal process. (Attachment A) NFPA Staff reported that the NFPA Board of Directors approved a formal anti-trust policy at their November 2013 meeting (Attachment B).

5. Old Business. ASTM E1226. A new task group was established to look specifically

at ASTM E 1226. ASTM E 1226 requires that test samples have 95% of sample capable of passing through a 200 mesh screen (smaller than 75 microns). The typical coal fineness level for pulverizer product applied to a coal-fired utility boiler is between 65% and 85% passing through 200 mesh. In addition, Pmax listed in Table 6.8.3 , on page 6-146, Fire Protection Handbook (NFPA, 2008) shows Pmax is less than 10 Bar, from 8.4 to 9.1 bar, which is based on lab testing on different coals with a 20-liter container . The data was published by Eckhoff, initially by BIA. Finally, task group member Lin found a study performed in the the 1980s by EPRI. The EPRI-sponsored research program to study pulverized coal fires and explosions in the US utility industry included a series of laboratory experiments performed by the Central


Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) in UK. The results of experiments showed that Pmax in vessel (explosion chamber) was below 10 Bar for all tests. However, Pmax greater than 10 Bar was observed in pipe for some tests. The maximum Pmax in the pipe for these tests was 1182 psig (81.5 Bar).The testing was performed with full scale laboratory test rigs and coal fineness level of 90% passing through 200 mesh.

6. New Business. A. Document Revision. The committee reviewed the public comments and

created Second Revisions. The committee actions will be available in the Second Draft Report, which will be available no later than July 18, 2014.

B. Glossary Review. The committee reviewed the NFPA 85 definitions specific to pulverized fuel systems. The committee made several recommendations for definitions to be deleted (Attachment C). The committee established a task group to review the fan definitions specific to PFS and create recommendations for the Fundamentals technical committee. The chair of the taskgroup is Qinsheng Lin. Additional volunteers are needed to complete the recommendations.

C. BCS-FUN Actions. The committee reviewed the preliminary actions of the Fundamentals committee and determined that no action is necessary.

D. Task Group on 9.6, Operations. A new task group was established to perform a complete review of section 9.6 and related annex material to ensure that it is complete and accurate to current practices, and create recommendations for revisions or additional annex material.

7. Final Review of Revised Chapter 9. The committee reviewed the final draft of

chapter 9. in the chapter. The committee will review this further in the next revision cycle. The

this is new material that must be held until the next cycle. However, the new revision process has no mechanism for committee inputs to the next revision cycle. Finally, the committee reviewed the negative ballot submitted by committee member Erdem Ural. NFPA staff reminded the committee that a complete revision of the chapter dictated the First Revision being recorded as a single action item. The

items noted (8% volatile content, allowable stress, and coverage of dusttight pulverizers) originated in the 1956 edition of the standard. Therefore, the committee

presented to the existing text. It was only reorganized. Mr. Ural is encouraged to submit Public Input to the next revision cycle.

8. Next Meeting. The next meeting will be scheduled as needed following publication

of the 2015 edition. 9. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 a.m. EST on Jan. 8, 2014.


Attachment B: Committee Roster


Address List No PhonePulverized Fuel Systems BCS-PFS

Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Laura E. Moreno02/17/2017

BCS-PFS

Joseph E. Bittinger, Jr.

ChairAmerican Electric Power Corporation1 Riverside PlazaColumbus, OH 43147

U 08/09/2012BCS-PFS

Denise Beach

PrincipalFM Global1151 Boston-Providence TurnpikePO Box 9102Norwood, MA 02062-9102

I 08/17/2015

BCS-PFS

Vaughn Boley

PrincipalHartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance CompanyOne State StreetPO Box 5024Hartford, CT 06102

I 07/29/2013BCS-PFS

John C. Dage

PrincipalDTE Electric CompanyOne Energy Plaza, 558 G.O.Detroit, MI 48226Alternate: Roger D. Jenkins

U 3/1/2011

BCS-PFS

Rory G. Eastman

PrincipalGeneral Electric/ALSTOM Power Inc.2000 Day Hill RoadWindsor, CT 06095

M 7/1/1996BCS-PFS

Mark T. Fecke

PrincipalExponent, Inc.4580 Weaver Parkway, Suite 100Warrenville, IL 60555

SE 7/28/2006

BCS-PFS

Gray Kahl

PrincipalApex Power Services Pty Ltd.32 Hibiscus AvenueCarlingford, NSW 2118 Australia

SE 08/03/2016BCS-PFS

Qingsheng Lin

PrincipalRiley Power, Inc./Babcock Power Inc.5 Neponset StreetWorcester, MA 01606-2714

M 03/07/2013

BCS-PFS

William N. Martin

PrincipalBabcock & Wilcox Company20 South Van Buren AvenueBarberton, OH 44203Alternate: Yancy P. McWain

M 7/28/2006BCS-PFS

Jonathan R. Pranitis

PrincipalFoster Wheeler Energy CorporationPerryville Corporate ParkClinton, NJ 08809-4000

M 4/17/1998

BCS-PFS

Roy Reeves

PrincipalEmerson Process Management200 Beta DrivePittsburgh, PA 15238-2918Alternate: Glenn Richter

M 08/17/2015BCS-PFS

Cleveland B. Skinker

PrincipalBechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation12011 Sunset Hills RoadReston, VA 20190

SE 1/15/2004

BCS-PFS

Bill L. Smith, Jr.

PrincipalExothermic Engineering, a Div. of EAPC Industrial Services20424 Missouri City RoadLiberty, MO 64068

SE 04/08/2015BCS-PFS

William A. (Andy) Smith

PrincipalAmerican International Group, Inc. (AIG)1200 Abernathy Road NEBuilidng 600, 8th FloorAtlanta, GA 30328

I 08/03/2016

1NFPA 85 (BCS-PFS) Technical Committee First Draft Meeting - Teleconference - March 2, 2017 of 87

Address List No PhonePulverized Fuel Systems BCS-PFS

Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Laura E. Moreno02/17/2017

BCS-PFS

Erdem A. Ural

PrincipalLoss Prevention Science & Technologies, Inc.2 Canton Street, Suite A2Stoughton, MA 02072

SE 7/28/2006BCS-PFS

Frederick H. Wehe

PrincipalLuminant, Big Brown SESPO Box 948, 850 FM2570Fairfield, TX 75840

U 7/28/2006

BCS-PFS

Roger D. Jenkins

AlternateDTE Electric Company7940 Livernois, H-60 WSCDetroit, MI 48210Principal: John C. Dage

U 04/08/2015BCS-PFS

Yancy P. McWain

AlternateBabcock & Wilcox PGG Inc.20 South Van Buren AvenueBarberton, OH 44203Principal: William N. Martin

M 10/29/2012

BCS-PFS

Glenn Richter

AlternateEmerson Process Management18355 Tamarack DriveBrookfield, WI 53045-5469Principal: Roy Reeves

M 12/08/2015BCS-PFS

Laura E. Moreno

Staff LiaisonNational Fire Protection Association1 Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471

1/6/2015

2NFPA 85 (BCS-PFS) Technical Committee First Draft Meeting - Teleconference - March 2, 2017 of 87

Attachment C: Fall 2018 Revision Cycle Schedule


Fall 2018 Revision Cycle

Process Stage Process Step Dates for TCDates for TC

with CC

Public InputStage (First Draft)

Public Input Closing Date* 1/05/2017 1/05/2017

Final Date for TC First Draft Meeting 6/15/2017 3/16/2017

Posting of First Draft and TC Ballot 8/03/2017 4/27/2017

Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot 8/24/2017 5/18/2017

Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot - recirc 8/31/2017 5/25/2017

Posting of First Draft for CC Meeting 6/01/2017

Final date for CC First Draft Meeting 7/13/2017

Posting of First Draft and CC Ballot 8/03/2017

Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot 8/24/2017

Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot - recirc 8/31/2017

Post First Draft Report for Public Comment 9/07/2017 9/07/2017

Comment Stage(Second Draft)

Public Comment Closing Date* 11/16/2017 11/16/2017

Notice Published on Consent Standards (Standards that received no Comments)Note: Date varies and determined via TC ballot.

Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards (Standards that received no Comments)

Final date for TC Second Draft Meeting 5/17/2018 2/08/2018

Posting of Second Draft and TC Ballot 6/28/2018 3/22/2018

Final date for Receipt of TC Second Draft ballot 7/19/2018 4/12/2018

Final date for receipt of TC Second Draft ballot - recirc 7/26/2018 4/19/2018

Posting of Second Draft for CC Meeting 4/26/2018

Final date for CC Second Draft Meeting 6/07/2018

Posting of Second Draft for CC Ballot 6/28/2018

Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot 7/19/2018

Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot - recirc 7/26/2018

Post Second Draft Report for NITMAM Review 8/02/2018 8/02/2018

Tech SessionPreparation (&

Issuance)

Notice of Intent to Make a Motion (NITMAM) Closing Date 8/30/2018 8/30/2018

Posting of Certified Amending Motions (CAMs) and Consent Standards 10/11/2018 10/11/2018

Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards 10/26/2018 10/26/2018

SC Issuance Date for Consent Standards 11/05/2018 11/05/2018

Tech Session Association Meeting for Standards with CAMs

Appeals andIssuance

Appeal Closing Date for Standards with CAMs

SC Issuance Date for Standards with CAMs

TC = Technical Committee or PanelCC = Correlating Committee

As of 8/30/2016


Attachment D: NFPA 85 (Chapter 9) Public Input Report


Public Input No. 100-NFPA 85-2016 [ Global Input ]

Replace "practicable" with "practical"

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Something is practicable if it can be done by any means, no matter how impractical. Practical is a word engineers use to allow judgment when making engineering decisions.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Theodore Lemoff

Organization: TLemoff Engineering

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Oct 05 09:52:10 EDT 2016

Copyright Assignment

I, Theodore Lemoff, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights incopyright in this Public Input (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). Iunderstand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which thisPublic Input in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Input and that Ihave full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Theodore Lemoff, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignmentand the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronicsignature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...

1 of 1 1/6/2017 3:24 PM


Public Input No. 215-NFPA 85-2017 [ Global Input ]

All technical committees should review the proposed changes to the definitions of "trip," "interlock,"and "permissive," as well as the recommendations below:

Draft Definitions and Guidelines developed by the

NFPA 85 Correlating Committee and Fundamentals Committee

Draft definitions for interlock, permissive, and trip.

· Interlock: A function which prevents, limits, stops, or initiates the operation of equipment or a subsequentfunction.

o Annex language: An interlock can consist of a sensing function, a control function, and anoutput or a final control element. The interlock can be accomplished with the use of anycombination of electrical devices, mechanical devices, or logic.

· Permissive: An interlock that functions only to allow initiation of the operation of equipment or asubsequent function

· Trip: An interlock that shuts down equipment when a predefined set of conditions exists.

It was decided that permissive and trip should be subdefinitions under interlock, but they should also appear inalphabetical order with a reference back to the interlock section, similar to what is done for “coal” in 3.3.30.

Recommendations for other Chapters. The following recommendations have been developed for the use of“interlock” and related terms throughout the code:

· “Safety device”, “protective device”, “interlock device” and “safety interlock device” appear to besynonymous. The Fundamentals Committee suggests using "interlocks" or "interlocks and associated devices"as appropriate.

· “Safety function” is similar to the new definition of an interlock. The Fundamentals Committee suggestsusing the term interlock.

· “Master fuel trip device” is not defined in Chapter 3, and is only used in Chapter 7 and its Annex. If this isintentionally different from a master fuel trip relay, it should be defined in Chapter 3. Otherwise, it should bereplaced with “master fuel trip relay”.

· “Safety shutdown” is only used in Chapters 3, 4, and 5, and the Annex to Chapters 5 and 7. Forconsistency throughout the document, the Fundamentals Committee recommends replacement with “trip” or“master fuel trip”, as appropriate. The Fundamentals Committee will be removing the term from Chapters 3 and4.

· “Emergency shutdown” is used in Chapters 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10, and the Annex to Chapters 4, 6, and 7, aswell as Annex B. This appears to be the same as a safety shutdown, so the Committee recommendsreplacement with “trip” or “master fuel trip” as in the comment above. The Fundamentals Committee will beremoving the term from Chapter 4.

· “Abnormal shutdown” is only used twice, both times in Chapter 6. This appears to be synonymous with“trip” and for consistency, that term should be substituted.

· “Interlock system” is used in Chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. The Fundamentals Committee will be removingthe term from Chapter 4 by replacing it with “interlocks” and recommends replacement in other chapters.


To comply with the recommendations of the Fundamentals TC.


Submitter Full Name: Joseph Fehr

Organization: Sega, Inc.


1 of 2 1/6/2017 3:23 PM


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 04 15:10:04 EST 2017


I, Joseph Fehr, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this PublicInput (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights,including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Input in this or another similar or derivative form is used. Ihereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Input and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Joseph Fehr, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms andconditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon mysubmission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


2 of 2 1/6/2017 3:23 PM


Public Input No. 107-NFPA 85-2016 [ Section No. 9.4.3.2.2.1 ]

9.4.3.2.2.1*

All components of the raw fuel feeder system that are designed to be operated at no more than gaugepressure of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) with a design coal having P max of 10 bar-g (145 psig) or less shall be

designed for a maximum allowable working pressure of 344 kPa (50 psi) for containment of possibleexplosion pressures. P max is defined as the maximum pressure developed in a contained deflagration foran optimum mixture, which was obtained from ASTM E 1226, Standard Test Method for Explosibility ofDust Clouds.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

85-PC76_PFS.pdf NFPA 85 PC 76


NOTE: This Public Input appeared as "Reject by Hold' in Public Comment No. 76 of the (F2014) Second Draft Report for NFPA 85 and per the Regs. at 4.4.8.3.1.

1. P max is used the following sections, 9.4.3.2.2.1, 9.4.3.2.2.2, 9.4.3.2.2.3, 9.4.5.1.2.2, 9.4.5.1.2.3,9.4.5.1.2.4.2. However, the definition of P max, and the measuring method is not mentioned in chapter 9.3. Though the definition is mentioned in Annex A, the definition shall be mentioned in main body.


Submitter Full Name: TC ON BCS-PFS

Organization: NFPA TC ON Pulverized Fuel Systems

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Oct 18 14:28:05 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

288 of 372 1/9/2017 1:48 PM


Public Comment No. 76-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 9.4.3.2.2.1 ]

9.4.3.2.2.1 *

All components of the raw fuel feeder system that are designed to be operated at no more thangauge pressure of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) with a design coal having P max of 10 bar-g or less shall be

designed for a maximum allowable working pressure of 344 kPa (50 psi) for containment of possibleexplosion pressures. P max is defined as the maximum pressure developed in a containeddeflagration for an optimum mixture, which was obtained from ASTM E 1226, Standard TestMethod for Explosibility of Dust Clouds.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

1. P max is used the following sections, 9.4.3.2.2.1, 9.4.3.2.2.2, 9.4.3.2.2.3, 9.4.5.1.2.2, 9.4.5.1.2.3, 9.4.5.1.2.4.2. However, the definition of P max, and the measuring method is not mentioned in chapter 9.3. Though the definition is mentioned in Annex A, the definition shall be mentioned in main body.


Submitter Full Name: masahiko mishiro

Organization: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, ltd.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 01:06:28 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: It is not appropriate to include a definition in the mandatory text of a subject chapter. Thecommittee holds the comment so that the Fundamentals committee can consider addingthe definition to chapter 3 in the next revision cycle.


I, masahiko mishiro, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights incopyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). Iunderstand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which thisPublic Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Commentand that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am masahiko mishiro, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignmentand the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronicsignature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


1 of 1 10/15/2015 9:27 AM


Public Input No. 126-NFPA 85-2016 [ Section No. 9.4.4.5 ]

9.4.4.5 *

All ductwork, from the hot and tempering air supply ducts to individual pulverizers, including damperframes, expansion joints, supports, and hot primary air fans, shall be designed to contain the test blockcapability maximum head capability with ambient air of the pulverizer air supply fan.


There are inconsistencies in NFPA 85 regarding structural design being based on the maximum head capabilities of the fans versus the fan test block conditions. The fan test block condition is not the same as the maximum head capability but the Code seems to use the terms interchangeably. A typical centrifugal fan curve peaks before dropping to the test block point, so the most damage it is capable of is better represented by the maximum head capability of the fan rather than the test block. Ambient air should be utilized as the basis for determining the maximum head capability because the coldest air condition anticipated for the site would provide the highest maximum head for the fan. For this reason, the term test block, where it is currently used in the Code, should be replaced with maximum head capability and ambient air should be the basis for that determination.


Submitter Full Name: Dale Evely

Organization: Southern Company Services Inc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Nov 29 06:03:18 EST 2016


289 of 372 1/9/2017 1:48 PM


Public Input No. 127-NFPA 85-2016 [ Section No. 9.5.4.3 ]

9.5.4.3 *

All ductwork, from the hot and tempering air supply ducts to individual pulverizers, including damperframes, expansion joints, supports, and hot primary air fans, shall be designed to contain the test blockcapability maximum head capability with ambient air of the pulverizer air supply fan.


There are inconsistencies in NFPA 85 regarding structural design being based on the maximum head capabilities of the fans versus the fan test block conditions. The fan test block condition is not the same as the maximum head capability but the Code seems to use the terms interchangeably. A typical centrifugal fan curve peaks before dropping to the test block point, so the most damage it is capable of is better represented by the maximum head capability of the fan rather than the test block. Ambient air should be utilized as the basis for determining the maximum head capability because the coldest air condition anticipated for the site would provide the highest maximum head for the fan. For this reason, the term test block, where it is currently used in the Code, should be replaced with maximum head capability and ambient air should be the basis for that determination.


Submitter Full Name: Dale Evely

Organization: Southern Company Services Inc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Nov 29 06:05:16 EST 2016


290 of 372 1/9/2017 1:48 PM


Public Input No. 240-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. 9.6.4.2.2.1 ]

9.6.4.2.2.1

For pulverizers that are tripped and inerted while containing a charge of fuel in accordance with9.6.4.2.1.1 , one of the following procedures shall be used to clear fuel from the pulverizers and sweep thetransport lines clean as soon as possible after the trip and there is confirmation that there is no burning orsmoldering fuel:

Exception: When Integral Burner Igniter Systems is used, the first procedure shall not be used.

(1) Clear one pulverizer at a time under inert conditions into the furnace using the following procedure:

(2) Isolate from the furnace all shutdown or tripped pulverizers.

(3) Start up one pulverizer in accordance with the principles and sequences listed in 9.6.2.1(1)through 9.6.2.1(9) .

(4) Continue to operate the pulverizer until empty and in normal condition for shutdown. When theoperating pulverizer is empty of fuel, proceed to another tripped and inerted pulverizer and repeatthe procedure until all are cleared of fuel.

Exception: An exception to 9.6.4.2.2.1(1) (c) is to restart the feeder and return the pulverizerto normal operation if furnace conditions allow such operation.

(5) Clear one pulverizer at a time under inert conditions through the pyrites removal system using thefollowing procedure:

(6) Remove fuel through the pyrites removal system using operation of the pulverizer motor asnecessary.

(7) Start the pulverizer with an inert medium, using the starting sequences in 9.6.2.1(1) through9.6.2.1(9) .


Air/Coal ratio, a critical factor for good ignition, cannot be controlled during clearing operation and since an Integral Burner Igniter system is classified as Class 2, requiring special conditions, clearing into the furnace through Integral Burner Igniter System shall be strictly prohibited to prevent the possible accumulation of uncontrolled amount of coal dust in the furnace.


Submitter Full Name: Masaaki Kinoshita

Organization: Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



291 of 372 1/9/2017 1:48 PM


Attachment E: Review of Fundamentals Technical Committee actions


First Revision No. 102-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. 1.1.2 ]

1.1.2

This code covers strength of the structure, operation and maintenance procedures, combustion and draftcontrol equipment, safety interlocks, alarms, trips, and other related controls that are essential to safeequipment operation.


Submitter Full Name: Laura Montville

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jan 17 09:44:28 EST 2017

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: To align with the interlock definitions included in Chapter 3. (FRs 103, 104, 105)

Response Message:

Public Input No. 22-NFPA 85-2016 [Section No. 1.1.2]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://localhost:8084/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentParams=...

1 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Committee Input No. 135-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. 1.1.4 ]

1.1.4

Chapter 5, Single Burner Boilers, covers single burner boilers that fire the following fuels:

(1) Fuel Natural gas as defined in 3.3. 64 71 .10.

(2)

(3) Fuel oil as defined in 3.3.63.3

Fuel gas and fuel

(4) of Grades 2, 4, 5, or 6

(5) Gas and oil that are fired simultaneously for fuel transfer

(6) Fuel gas Gas and fuel oil that are fired simultaneously and continuously

(7) Non-commercial grade fuel gases




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The scope of Chapter 5 written in Chapter 1 needs to match the contents of the equipment specificchapter. The Fundamentals Committee will reconsider a revision to the Chapter 5 scope at theSecond Draft meeting, once additional language has been added to Chapter 5 by the SBBCommittee to cover the other fuels.

----

The SBB Committee wishes to amend the scope statement to define and address the use ofnon-commercial fuels in its chapter. Non-commercial fuels such as landfill gas, process off-gases,etc. are used in increasing single burner applications. The Technical Committee will continue to addmaterial to address specific concerns and requirements when using these types of fuels.

ResponseMessage:


* Other commercial grade fuel gas having a calorific value and characteristics similar to natural gas


2 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 108-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. 1.1.9.1 ]

1.1.9.1

Where solid fuel is fired simultaneously with other fuels (e.g., a solid fuel stoker fired in combination withfuel gas, fuel oil, or pulverized auxiliary fuel), additional controls and interlocks shall include those coveredin Chapters 5, 6, and 9.

Exception No. 1: The purge requirements of Chapters 5 and 6 shall not be required when the stoker isfiring and the boiler is on-line. In those cases, if no cooling air is being provided to the auxiliary burners, apurge of their associated air supply ducts shall be provided.

Exception No. 2: Where fuel oil or fuel gas is fired in a supervised manual system in accordance withChapter 5 , the excessive steam pressure interlock shall not be required.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The FUN Technical Committee decided that the STO and SBB Technical Committees shouldaddress these exceptions in their respective chapters.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 23-NFPA 85-2016 [Section No. 1.1.9.1]


3 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Committee Input No. 101-NFPA 85-2017 [ Chapter 2 ]

Chapter 2 Referenced Publications

2.1 General.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this chapter are referenced within this code and shall beconsidered part of the requirements of this document.

2.2 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2015 edition.

NFPA 31, Standard for the Installation of Oil-Burning Equipment, 2011 edition.

NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code, 2015 edition.

NFPA 56 Standard for Fire and Explosion Prevention During Cleaning and Purging of Flammable GasPiping Systems,2014 edition.

NFPA 68 Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting,2013 edition.

NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, 2014 edition.

NFPA 70® , National Electrical Code®, 2014 edition.

2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1 ASCE Publications.

American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400.

ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010.

2.3.2 ASME Publications.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.

ASME B31.1, Power Piping, 2012 2016 .

ASME B31.3, Process Piping, 2012 2016 .

2.3.3 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D388, Standard Classification of Coals by Rank, 2012 2015 .

ASTM D396, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, 2012 2016 .

ASTM D409/D409M , Standard Test Method for Grindability of Coal by the Hardgrove-Machine Method,2012 2016 .

ASTM D1655, Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels, 2012 2016c .

ASTM D2880, Standard Specification for Gas Turbine Fuel Oils, 2003, reaffirmed 2010 2015 .

2.3.4 CGA Publications.

Compressed Gas Association, 14501 George Carter Way, Suite 103, Chantilly, VA 20151-2923 1788 .

ANSI/ CGA G-2.1/ANSI K61.1 , Safety Requirements for the Storage and Handling of AnhydrousAmmonia, 1999 2014

2.3.5 FCI Publications.

Fluid Controls Institute, 1300 Sumner Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115.

ANSI/FCI 70-2, Control Valve Seat Leakage, 2006 2013 .


4 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


2.3.6 Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Publishing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, DC20402 20401-0001 .

Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1926.32, “General Safety and Health Provisions.”

2.3.7 IEC Publications.

International Electrotechnical Commission, 3, rue de Varembé, P.O. Box 131, CH-1211, Geneva 20,Switzerland.

IEC 61508, Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems,2010.

2.3.8 Military Specifications.

Department of Defense Single Stock Point, Document Automation and Production Service, Building 4/D,700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.

MIL-T-5624, Turbine Fuel, Aviation, Grade JP4, JP5, and JP5/JP8 ST, 1995.

2.3.9 Other Publications.

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.

2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections.

NFPA 13D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings andManufactured Homes,2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 40, Standard for the Storage and Handling of Cellulose Nitrate Film,2011 2016 edition.

NFPA 72® , National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code,2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 850, Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and High VoltageDirect Current Converter Stations, 2015 edition.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Jan 13 16:42:40 EST 2017

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee will review the referenced documents at the second draft meeting so that theywill have a more timely picture of what has been updated since the last edition was issued.



5 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.25.3 Manual Supervised Burner Management System.

A burner management system by which a furnace is purged and a burner is started, ignited, and stoppedmanually . Interlocks are included to ensure that the operation follows established, proper procedures. withsupervision by interlocks.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: To align with the definition of interlock revised by FR 103.

Response Message:



6 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 139-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. 3.3.63.2.1 ]

3.3.63.2.1 Pulverized Coal.

Coal that is reduced to fine particles.

A.3.63.2.1 Pulverized Coal is typically reduced to a size such that at least 50 percent can pass through a200-mesh (74 microns) sieve.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The definition is revised to remove requirements per the Manual of Style.

Response Message:


7 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.63.6 3.1* Liquefied Petroleum Gas ( LP-Gas) .

A material that

Any material having a vapor pressure not exceeding that allowed for commercial propane that iscomposed predominantly of

any of

the following hydrocarbons , either by themselves (except propylene) or as mixtures

thereof

: propane, propylene,

n-butane, isobutane

butane (normal butane or isobutane) , and butylenes. [58 2017]

A.3.3.63.3.1 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LP-Gas). In the pure state

propylene (Chemical Abstract Service 105-07- 01) has a vapor

pressure of 132.8 psig (915.72 kPa) at 70°F (21.1°C). The vapor

pressure of commercial propane (Chemical Abstract Service

74-98-6) at 70°F (21.1°C) is 124 psig (855 kPa). Although

commercial propane can contain some propylene, as in impurity,

propylene in the pure state does not meet the definition of

LP-Gas. Propylene in the pure state is commonly found in use

as an industrial fuel gas. (See NFPA 51.) [58 2017]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition is updated to be consistent with the applicable NFPA code, and the definition isrelocated to be a subdefinition of Fuel Gas.

ResponseMessage:


8 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.63.9 3.2* Natural Gas.

A gaseous fuel occurring in nature and consisting mostly of a mixture of organic compounds, normallymethane, material that is composed primarily of methane and that can contain minor quantities of ethane,propane, nitrogen, and butane. other components.

A.3.3.63.3.2

The calorific value of natural gases varies between about 700 Btu/ft 3 and 1500 Btu/ft 3 ( 26.1 MJ/m3 and

55.9 MJ/m3 (700 Btu/ft 3 and 1500 Btu/ft 3 ), the majority averaging 1000 Btu/ft 3 ( 37.3 MJ/m3

(1000 Btu/ft 3 ).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition is updated to be consistent with NFPA 59A Liquefied Natural Gas, with someappropriate modification, and moved to be a subdefinition of Fuel Gas.

ResponseMessage:


9 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.63.10 * Pulverized Fuel.

Solid fuel that is reduced to fine particles.

A.3.3.63.10 Pulverized fuel is typically reduced to a size such that at least 50 percent will pass through a200-mesh (74 microns) sieve.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The definition is revised to remove requirements per the Manual of Style.

Response Message:


10 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.64 63.3 Fuel Gas (Gas Fuel).

Gaseous fuels defined as Natural Gas (see 3.3.63.9) or LP-Gas (see 3.3.63.6).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Fuel gas belongs as a subdefinition of Fuel.

Response Message:


11 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.66 Fuel Trip.

The automatic The total shutoff of a specific fuel as the result of an interlock or operator action .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision is based on the revised and new definitions for trip and interlock. Note that theoperator action is considered an interlock.

ResponseMessage:



12 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.70 Hardwired.

The method of interconnecting signals or interlocks or devices to a logic system or between logic systemsusing a dedicated interconnection for each individual signal. When the term hardwired is applied to the logicsystem itself, it refers to the method of using individual devices and interconnecting wiring to program andperform the logic functions without the use of software-based logic solvers.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision is based on the revised definition of interlocks. Interlocks will now be defined as"functions" rather than "devices."

ResponseMessage:



13 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 141-NFPA 85-2017 [ Sections 3.3.73.1, 3.3.73.2, 3.3.73.3 ]

Sections 3.3.73.1, 3.3.73.2, 3.3.73.3

3.3.73.1 * Class 1 Igniter.

An igniter that is applied to ignite the fuel input through the burner and to support ignition under any burnerlight-off or operating conditions. Its location and capacity are such that it will provide sufficient ignitionenergy , generally in excess of 10 percent of full load burner input, at its associated burner to raise anycredible combination of burner inputs of both fuel and air above the minimum ignition temperature.


An igniter that is applied to ignite the fuel input through the burner under prescribed light-off conditions. It isalso used to support ignition under low load or certain adverse operating conditions. The range of capacityof such igniters is generally 4 percent to 10 percent of full load burner fuel input.


A small igniter applied particularly to fuel gas and fuel oil burners to ignite the fuel input to the burner underprescribed light-off conditions. The capacity of such igniters generally does not exceed 4 percent of the fullload burner fuel

A.3.3.73.1 The heat input of a Class 1 Igniter is generally in excess of 10 percent of maximum burner heatinput.

A.3.3.73.2 The heat input of a Class 2 Igniter is generally 4 percent to 10 percent of maximum burner heatinput.

A.3.3.73.3 The heat input of a Class 3 Igniter generally does not exceed 4 percent of maximum burnerheat input.

Supplemental Information

File Name Description

FR_141_A.3.3.63.1-3.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision removes the supplemental information from the igniter class definition, leaving theintended functional requirements intact, and relocates the supplemental information to theAnnex.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 211-NFPA 85-2017 [New Section after A.3.3.33]


14 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot







Public Input No. 201-NFPA 85-2017 [Sections 3.3.73.1, 3.3.73.2, 3.3.73.3]


15 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Committee Input No. 143-NFPA 85-2017 [ New Section after 3.3.73.2 ]

3.3.73.3* Class 2 Special Igniter: An integrated burner-igniter system that utilizes a staged ignition systemwithin the burner. The primary igniter shall utilize oil or natural gas, or a plasma arc to ignite a portion of themain fuel stream which then provides ignition to the remainder of hte fuel stream. It is also used to supportignition under low load conditions where the main flame is proven.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The addition of these definitions relating to plasma arc igniters is contingent on action by the MBBCommittee.

---

Problem statement: Existing igniter systems are typically independent of the burner they areintended to ignite. A new technology is available whereby a portion of the main fuel stream is ignitedinternally in the burner barrel using oil, gas or plasma. The technology necessitates adjustments inoperating methodology for proper function. A task group comprised of members from BCS-MBB hasstudied this technology. This paragraph, in conjunction with other proposed paragraphs, addressesthat new technology.

SUBSTANTIATION: The proposed code revisions will provide minimum safety requirements that canenable US coal fired power plants to respond to real time market conditions in a timely manner. Thetechnology is desirable as it reduces or eliminates the amount of premium fuel used to start a boiler.

The technology has been successfully applied outside the US with installations in over 1,000 coalfired boilers in both the plasma and oil igniter form, and is available from multiplesuppliers/manufacturers. These installations have helped determine the suitability of the technologyand gives confidence in its safety potential. To enhance user safety a new igniter classification (a"Special" derivative of the existing Class II) which requires usage under prescribed conditions only.

The key distinguishing characteristic between the igniter classes in NFPA 85 is the difference inigniter ability to tolerate process variations. Based on the igniter ability to function under difficultconditions, the implementation and the privileges of the igniter class vary, Class I can be used under'all credible' conditions (3.3.73.1) but Class II can be used under 'prescribed' conditions only(3.3.73.2)

The restrictions to prescribed conditions is also required due to the difficullty in igniter flame provingin some of these applications for the plasma arc style. The location of the igniter fllame inside theburner barrel, where it cannot be reliably sensed, requires the use of a proven main flame under'non-initial' start-up conditions for safe operation.

This revision will help avoid unsafe application of this new technology by providing clear and


16 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


consistent minimum safety requirements.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 157-NFPA 85-2016 [New Section after 3.3.73.2]



17 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



* Integrated Burner-Igniter System

An igniter integral to a staged ignition burner assembly, whereby a portion of the main fuel streamis raised to a temperature above its auto-ignition temperatureand this heated fuel then ignites theremainder of the main fuel stream as it enters the furnace.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


---

Problem Statement

Existing igniter systems are typically independent of the burner they are intended to ignite. A newtechnology is available whereby a portion of the main fuel stream is ignited internally in the burnerbarrel using oil, gas or plasma. The technology necessitates adjustments in operations methodologyfor proper function. A task group comprised of members from BCS-MBB has studied this technology.This paragraph, in conjunction with other proposed paragraphs, addresses that new technology.

Substantiation

The proposed code revision will provide minimum safety requirements of a new technology that canenable US coal fired power plants to respond to real time market conditions in a timely manner. Thetechnology is desirable because it reduces, or eliminates, the amount of premium support fuel usedto warm up a boiler and to bring on successive mill groups.

The technology has been successfully applied outside the US with installations in over 1,000 coalfired boilers in both the plasma and oil igniter form; and is available from multiplesuppliers/manufacturers. These installations have helped determine the suitability of the technologyfor US plants and give confidence in its safety potential. To enhance user safety the system is beingproposed as a new igniter classification (a “Special” derivative of the existing Class II) which requiresthe usage to be under defined conditions only.

The key distinguishing characteristic between the igniter classes in the NFPA 85 code is thedifference in igniter ability to tolerate process variations. Based on the igniter ability to function underdifficult conditions, the implementation and the privileges of the igniter class vary. Whereas Class Ican be used under “all credible” conditions (3.3.73.1), Class II can be used under “prescribed”(3.3.73.2) light off conditions only.

The restriction to prescribed conditions is also required due to the difficulty in igniter flame proving in


18 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


some of these applications for the plasma igniters form. The location of the igniter flame inside theburner barrel, where it cannot be reliably sensed with existing flame proving technologies, requiresthe use of a proven main burner flame under non initial start-up conditions for safe operation.

This revision will help avoid unsafe application of this new technology by providing clear andconsistent minimum safety requirements.

ResponseMessage:




19 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



* Concentrated Flame IgntiterAn integrated burner-igniter system that utilizes either oil or gas to raise the pulveized coal stream to itsautoignition temperature.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


---

Problem Statement


Substantiation




The restriction to prescribed conditions is also required due to the difficulty in igniter flame proving insome of these applications for the plasma igniters form. The location of the igniter flame inside the


20 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


burner barrel, where it cannot be reliably sensed with existing flame proving technologies, requiresthe use of a proven main burner flame under non initial start-up conditions for safe operation.


ResponseMessage:




21 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.73.xx * Plasma Arc IgniterAn integrated burner-igniter system that utilizes high temperature ionized gas to rapidly fracture coalparticles and ignite volatiles, as part of an integrated burner-igniter system.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:


---

Problem Statement


Substantiation




The restriction to prescribed conditions is also required due to the difficulty in igniter flame proving insome of these applications for the plasma igniters form. The location of the igniter flame inside the


22 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


burner barrel, where it cannot be reliably sensed with existing flame proving technologies, requiresthe use of a proven main burner flame under non initial start-up conditions for safe operation.


ResponseMessage:




23 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 104-NFPA 85-2017 [ New Section after 3.3.76 ]

3.3.76.1 Permissive.

An interlock that functions only to allow initiation of the operation of equipment or a subsequent function.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition for permissive has been revised to better represent how the term is usedthroughout the document. Additional First Revisions have been made to make usage consistent.

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 85-2016 [New Section after 3.3.76]


24 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.76.2 Trip.

An interlock that shuts down equipment when a predefined set of conditions exists.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition for trip has been revised to better represent how the term is used throughout thedocument. Additional First Revisions have been made to make usage consistent.

ResponseMessage:



25 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.76 Interlock.

A device, or an arrangement of devices, in which function which prevents, limits, stops, or initiates theoperation of one part or one mechanism of the device or arrangement controls the operation of anotherpart of another mechanism equipment or a subsequent function.

A.3.3.76

An interlock can consist of a sensing function, a control function, and an output or a final control element. The interlock can be accomplished with the use of any combination of electrical devices, mechanicaldevices, or logic .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition for interlock has been revised to better represent how the term is used throughoutthe document. Additional First Revisions have been made to make usage consistent.



26 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.94 Permissive.

See 3.3.76.1.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition for permissive has been added (3.3.76.1) to better represent how the term is usedthroughout the document. Additional First Revisions have been made to make usage consistent.

ResponseMessage:



27 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.119 Shutdown.

3.3.119.1 Combustion Turbine Normal Shutdown.

The normal sequence of events that automatically provides successful shutdown of the combustion turbinewith no abnormal conditions in the combustion system.

3.3.119.2 Normal Shutdown.

Stopping burner operation by shutting off all fuel and ignition energy to the combustion equipment.

3.3.119.3 Safety Shutdown (Single Burner Boiler).

Stopping burner operation by shutting off all fuel and ignition energy to the furnace.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition for Combustion Turbine Normal Shutdown contains requirements, which areprohibited in definitions by the NFPA Manual of Style. Language should be added to Chapter 8 tomaintain the requirement for no abnormal conditions prior to establishing purge credit.

The definition for Normal Shutdown is redundant to requirements already included in theequipment-specific chapters where normal shutdown sequences are described in detail.

The Single Burner Boiler definition for Safety Shutdown describes a Master Fuel Trip, which isdefined. The SBB Technical Committee can submit Public Comments on this action as they deemnecessary.

ResponseMessage:



28 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.127 Transmitter.

Any device that converts process measurements from a sensor into a variable signal to be received by adisplay, control, or protective device interlock .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This revision aligns with the revised definition for interlock (FR 103).

Response Message:



29 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.129 Trip.

See 3.3.76.2.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition for trip has been added (3.3.76.2) to better represent how the term is usedthroughout the document. Additional First Revisions have been made to make usage consistent.

ResponseMessage:



30 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



3.3.132.8 * Safety Shutoff Valve (Safety Trip Valve).

A An automatic fast-closing valve that automatically shuts off the gaseous or liquid fuel supply in responseto a normal, emergency, or safety shutdown signal. shutdown or trip signal.

A.3.3.132.8 The actua on values and me of ac on of the ini a on devices should be tuned to the furnace and

equipment on which they are installed. The me required for closing the valve should be selected to minimize the

possibility of equipment damage due to closing forces and hydraulic shock associated with rapid closure of large‐

diameter valves. Subject specific chapters must be consulted to determine if a specific me frame for valve closure

is required.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The types of shutdown signals were removed to be consistent with FR 105 which defines trip,and FR 112 that removes the definition of safety shutdown.

Annex material was added to clarify the term fast-closing and to signal to the user of the codethat other chapters should be referenced for specific closing speeds.

ResponseMessage:


31 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Committee Input No. 153-NFPA 85-2017 [ New Section after 4.1 ]

A task group will be created at the end of this cycle to look at common requirements that can potentially bemoved to Chapter 4 in the next cycle. The Fundamentals Committee will be looking for Task Groupvolunteers from all BCS Committees.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

A task group will be created at the end of this cycle to look at common requirements that canpotentially be moved to Chapter 4 in the next cycle. The Fundamentals Committee will be lookingfor Task Group volunteers from all BCS Committees.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 172-NFPA 85-2016 [New Section after 4.1]


32 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.2.4

The interlock system and protective devices shall interlocks and associated devices shall be tested jointlyby the organization responsible for the system design and by those who operate and operate or maintainsuch a system and devices .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision aligns with the revised definition for interlock (FR 103). Interlock system waspreviously undefined.

ResponseMessage:



33 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Committee Input No. 154-NFPA 85-2017 [ New Section after 4.3.2 ]

4.3.3* The owner or fuel provider shall specify the lowest Autoignition Temperature (AIT) for all fuels firedin the boiler and/or combustion system over the range of the expected operating conditions taking intoconsideration fuel composition, pressure and oxygen concentration.

A.4.3.3 Autoignition temperatures for various materials can be found in Table 4.4.2 of 2017 NFPA 497,Recommended Practice for the Classification of Flammable Liquids, Gases, or Vapors and of Hazardous(Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations in Chemical Process Areas. The value of autoignitiontemperature depends on the method of testing. The data provided NFPA 497 was developed usinginternationally accepted test methods. If a particular material is not included in this document, the dataobtained in a similar apparatus described by ASTM E659, Standard Test Method for AutoignitionTemperature of Liquid Chemicals, can be used.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

There are numerous instances in Chapter 8 as well as in Chapter 6 that reference AutoignitionTemperature (AIT).

Natural gas is usually a mixture of various gases, with the primary component being methane. Asearch of the internet for “the Auto-ignition Temperature of Natural gas” gave the AIT of natural gas(methane) to be 580°C. NFPA 497 did not specify an AIT for natural gas but gave 600°C formethane. Additionally, many HRSG’s are in refinery service that can use “refinery” gas in thecombustion turbine and/or the duct burner where the AIT can vary depending on the blend.

ResponseMessage:


34 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.3.2*

The integration of the various components, including boiler or HRSG, burner, fuel and air supply equipment,controls, interlocks and safety and associated devices, operator and maintenance functions, andcommunication and training, shall be the responsibility of the owner and the operating company.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision aligns with the revised definition for interlock (FR 103). Safety devices areundefined.



35 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.5.5

Interlock devices shall Interlocks shall be permitted to be temporarily removed from service in accordancewith the following:

(1) Removal of the interlock shall be authorized by a competent person and documented in accordancewith operating procedures.

(2) Alternate means shall be substituted to supervise this the interlock function in accordance withoperating procedures.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision aligns with the revised definition for interlock (FR 103). Interlock devices areundefined.

Response Message:



36 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.7.7* Ignition Subsystem.

The ignition subsystem shall meet the requirements of 4.7.7.1 through 4.7.7.13.

4.7.7.1

The ignition subsystem shall be sized and arranged to ignite the main burner input within the limitation ofthe igniter classification as follows:

(1) It shall be verified through testing that the igniters furnished meet the requirements of the classspecified in the design.

(2) Igniters shall be designated as Class 1, Class 2, or Class 3 as defined in 3.3.73.1, 3.3.73.2, and3.3.73.3 and as verified by test.

4.7.7.2

Class 1 igniters shall be permitted to be used as Class 2 or Class 3 igniters. Class 2 igniters shall bepermitted to be used as Class 3 igniters.

4.7.7.3

Where Class 2 igniters are used, the burner shall be operated under controlled conditions to limit thepotential for abnormal operation, as well as to limit the charge of fuel in the event that ignition does notoccur during light-off.

4.7.7.4

Class 2 igniters shall not be used to ignite the main fuel under uncontrolled or abnormal conditions.

4.7.7.5

Where Class 3 igniters are used, the igniter shall be turned off as a part of the burner light-off procedurewhen the time trial for ignition of the main burner has expired, to ensure that the main flame is notdependent on ignition support from the igniter.

4.7.7.6

Class 2 igniters shall not be used to extend the turndown range but shall be permitted to be used tosupport ignition under low-load or adverse operating conditions.

4.7.7.7

Class 3 igniters shall not be used to support ignition or to extend the burner turndown range.

4.7.7.8

Except for periods when the main burner is being scavenged, Class 3 special igniters shall not be usedunless supervision of the individual main burner flame is provided.

4.7.7.9*

Where Class 1 and Class 2 igniters are used, the tests described in 6.6.3.2.2, 6.7.3.2.2, and 6.8.3.2.2shall also be performed with the ignition subsystem in service to verify that the igniters furnished meet therequirements of the class specified in the design.

4.7.7.10

Tests shall be performed to determine transient limits in the ignition air and fuel supplies or in the main airand fuel supplies that do not extinguish the igniter flame or reduce the igniter's ability to perform itsintended function or adversely affect other burners and igniters in operation.


37 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


4.7.7.11

Igniters shall be permanently installed under the following conditions:

(1) They shall be supervised to verify that the requirements of 4.7.7.1 and 4.7.7.2 are met.

(2) This supervision shall include igniter capacity and individual igniter flame monitoring.

(3) The capacity shall be measured by igniter header pressure as a minimum.

(4) On single burner boilers, igniters shall not require supervision of igniter capacity.

4.7.7.12

The ignition equipment shall be located in an environment free of excessive heat and accessible formaintenance.

4.7.7.13

All igniter safety shutoff valves shall be located to minimize the volume of fuel that is downstream of thevalve in the individual igniter fuel lines or that could flow by gravity into the combustion chamber after anemergency shutdown or a burner shutdown.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The submitter of PI 133 has raised an important issue that illustrated differing interpretations ofthe material and allowances in 4.7.7 as a whole. A Task Group has been formed to review thissection and submit Public Comments.

ResponseMessage:



38 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.7.7.1

The ignition subsystem shall be sized and arranged to ignite the main burner input within the limitation ofthe igniter classification as follows:

(1) It shall be verified through testing that the igniters furnished meet the requirements of the classspecified in the design.

(2) Igniters shall be designated as Class 1, Class 2, Class 3 or Class 3 Special as defined in 3.3.73.1,3.3.73.2, and 3.3.73.3 and 3.3.73.4 and as verified by test.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

4.7.7.1(2) as currently written would not allow the use of a "Class 3 Special Igniter" as a validIgnition Subsystem, although later in the paragraph (4.7.7.8) restrictions/conditions are given forthe use of a Class 3 Special Igniter.

ResponseMessage:



39 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Committee Input No. 142-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. 4.7.7.10 ]

4.7.7.10 *

Tests shall be performed to determine transient limits in the ignition air and fuel supplies or in the main airand fuel supplies that do not extinguish the igniter flame or reduce the igniter's ability to perform its intendedfunction or adversely affect other burners and igniters in operation.

A.4.7.7.10 The Class 1 igniter design, and associated test plan, should address all credible combinationsof main burner inputs via first stating the high and low limits of those burner inputs, and then testing allcredible combinations of those burner input limits, including at least:

(1) Range of ultimate and proximate analyses of fuels to be fired

(2) Range of heat input from burner minimum to burner maximum

(3) Range of pulverized fuel product fineness entering the burners

(4) Range of coal/air (primary air) temperature entering the burner nozzle from the coal conduit

(5) Range of secondary air temperature

(6) Range of burner stoichiometric ratio, or burner air-to-fuel ratio




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Currently, there is no guidance on what type of tests need to be performed to verify the igniterclassification. This CI is to provides a starting point to review the issue. Public Comments areencouraged.

ResponseMessage:




40 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.7.7.13

All igniter safety shutoff valves shall be located to minimize the volume of fuel that is downstream of thevalve in the individual igniter fuel lines or that could flow by gravity into the combustion chamber after anemergency shutdown or a burner shutdown.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This is a concern for any type of shutdown, not just an emergency or burner shutdown.

Response Message:



41 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 155-NFPA 85-2017 [ New Section after 4.10.1.1 ]

4.10.1.2 Overpressure Protection.

4.10.1.2.1

Overpressure protection shall be provided in either of the following cases:

(1) When the supply pressure exceeds the pressure rating of any downstream component

(2) When the failure of a single upstream line regulator or service pressure regulator results in a supplypressure exceeding the pressure rating of any downstream component

4.10.1.2.2

Overpressure protection shall be provided by any one of the following:

(1) A series regulator in combination with a line regulator or service pressure regulator

(2) A monitoring regulator installed in combination with a line regulator or service pressure regulator

(3)* A full-capacity pressure relief valve

(4) An overpressure cutoff device, such as a slam-shut valve or a high-pressure switch in combinationwith an adequately rated shutoff valve

4.10.1.2.3

When a relief valve is used to comply with 4.10.1.2.1 , the relief valve shall be a full-capacity relieftype.

4.10.1.2.4

Token relief valves and internal token relief valves shall not be permitted to be used as the onlyoverpressure protection devices.

4.10.1.2. 5 * Setpoint of the Overpressure Protection Device.

The overpressure protection device shall be set to provide a maximum downstream pressure as follows:

(1) When the rated pressure of any component is less than 12 psi (83 kPa), the set point of theoverpressure protection device shall not exceed 150 percent of the rated pressure of the lowest ratedcomponent.

(2) When the rated pressure of any component is equal to or greater than 12 psi (83 kPa) but less than 60psi (414 kPa), the set point of the overpressure protection device shall not exceed 6 psi (41 kPa) above therated pressure of the lowest rated component.

(3) When the rated pressure of any component is equal to or greater than 60 psi (414 kPa), the set point ofthe overpressure protection device shall not exceed 110 percent of the rated pressure of the lowest ratedcomponent.

A.4.10.1.2.2 (3 )

Upon upstream pressure regulation failure, a full-capacity pressure relief valve (versus token relief valves)will limit the downstream pressure. Token relief valves only provide minimum pressure relief in cases whereambient temperatures increase the pressure inside the gas piping, which can occur during shutdownperiods, or relieves small increases of pressure due to high lockup pressures that occur during a shutdown.


42 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


A.4.10.1.2.5 The pressure limits in this section are consistent with 49 CFR Part 192.201,

Required Capacity of Pressure Relieving and Limiting Stations




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Overpressure protection is a common element in multiple subject chapters, therefore theFundamentals committee is moving it forward to Chapter 4. In addition, detail was added to clarifyapplication of overpressure protection and methods to achieve it.

ResponseMessage:



43 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.11.1 Interlock System Interlocks .

4.11.1.1

The basic requirement of an interlock system for a boiler or combustion system shall accomplish thefollowing interlocks shall :

(1) Protect personnel from injury

(2) Protect equipment from damage

(3) Protect operation by limiting actions to a prescribed operating sequence or by initiating a trip deviceswhen approaching an out-of-range or unstable operating condition

4.11.1.2*

Additional automatic trips interlocks shall be permitted.

4.11.1.3

Fuel-specific interlocks shall be provided for each design basis fuel.

4.11.1.4*

Operating personnel shall be made aware of the limitations of the interlock system interlocks .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision aligns with the updated and new definitions for interlock and trip. Interlocksystems are undefined.

ResponseMessage:



44 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.11.4

The burner management system interlock interlocks and alarm functions shall alarms shall be initiated byone or more of the following:

(1) One switch or transmitter dedicated to the burner management system

(2) Voting logic derived from two or more switches or transmitters

4.11.4.1 (a)

When multiple transmitters are used in the burner management system, such signals shall be permitted tobe shared with other control systems for control purposes.

4.11.4.2 (b) *

When signals from multiple switches or transmitters are provided to initiate interlock interlocks or alarmfunctions alarms , those signals shall be monitored in comparison to each other by divergence or other faultdiagnostic alarms.

4.11.4.3 (c)

When signals from multiple switches or transmitters are provided to initiate interlock interlocks or alarmfunctions alarms , the provided signals shall be generated by individual sensing devices connected toseparate process taps.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision aligns with the revised definition of interlock (FR 103).

The section was restructured because there was confusion about how they were to be applied.4.11.4.1 through 4.11.4.3 apply to the second list item under 4.11.4.

ResponseMessage:




45 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.11.8.2

The burner management safety functions system shall include but shall not be limited to purge interlocksand timing, mandatory safety shutdowns, trial timing for ignition, and all required interlocks and flamemonitoring.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Safety functions were undefined, and there was some confusion around the shall/shall notlanguage. This revision clarifies what is intended for the independent burner managementsystem.

ResponseMessage:



46 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.11.9 Momentary Closing of Fuel Valves.

4.11.9.1

Logic sequences or devices intended to cause a safety shutdown, once initiated, shall cause a burner orA burner trip, fuel trip, or master fuel trip , as applicable, and shall require operator action prior to resumingoperation of the affected burner(s).

4.11.9.2 *

No logic sequence or device shall be permitted that allows momentary full closing and subsequentinadvertent reopening of the main or ignition fuel valves.

A.4.11.9.2 This is not meant to apply to partial stroke testing of fuel valves.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision aligns with the new definition of trip (FR 105). It also removes the unenforceableterm "momentary" and clarifies the application of 4.11.9.2 with annex material.

ResponseMessage:



47 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.11.11 Documentation.

Documentation shall be provided to the owner and the operator indicating that all safety devices and logicmeet the the Burner Management System meets the requirements of the application.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Safety devices are undefined. Safety devices and logic are all part of the burnermanagement system.

Response Message:



48 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.12.1 Functional Requirements.

The basic requirements of any flame monitoring and tripping system shall be as follows:

(1) Combustion instability situations shall be brought to the attention of the operator for remedial action.

(2) An emergency shutdown A trip of the involved equipment shall be automatically initiated upondetection of serious combustion problems that will lead to the accumulation of unburned fuel.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This revision aligns with the new definition for trip created by FR 105.

Response Message:



49 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.12.2 System Objectives.

4.12.2.1

System objectives shall be developed and documented that include those requirements that arespecifically related to the combustion conditions typical for particular combustion chamber configurations,burner or firing systems, and fuel characteristics.

4.12.2.2

Such objectives shall be consistent with the individual manufacturer's design philosophy.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision has added a requirement to document the objectives to make this sectionenforceable.

Response Message:



50 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 125-NFPA 85-2017 [ Sections 4.13.2.1, 4.13.2.2 ]

Sections 4.13.2.1, 4.13.2.2

4.13.2.1*

Except as noted in 4.13.2.2 , under no circumstances shall airflow demand Airflow demand shall not beless than the minimum purge rate established by the designer.

4.13.2.2

For single burner boilers, airflow demand shall not be reduced below the low limit of the fuel-burningsystem as determined by the burner manufacturer and verified by operating test.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

To better organize the document, this exception should be addressed by SBB in Chapter5.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 45-NFPA 85-2016 [Sections 4.13.2.1, 4.13.2.2]


51 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 126-NFPA 85-2017 [ Sections 4.13.3.3.1, 4.13.3.3.2 ]

Sections 4.13.3.3.1, 4.13.3.3.2

4.13.3.3.1

Except as noted in 4.13.3.3.2 , automatic Automatic control of the fuel input(s) shall not be permittedunless the airflow is maintained in automatic control.

4.13.3.3.2

For HRSGs designed and operated in accordance with Chapter 8 , automatic control of fuel inputs shallbe permitted without automatic control of airflow.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

To better organize the document, this exception should be addressed by HRS in Chapter8.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 46-NFPA 85-2016 [Sections 4.13.3.3.1, 4.13.3.3.2]


52 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.13.3.5

The combustion control system shall not reduce the fuel feed to a pulverizer below the minimum feed rateestablished by the pulverizer manufacturer for the manufacturer's specified design fuel.

4.13.3.5.1

For fuels with ignition characteristics different from those of the manufacturer's design fuel, the combustioncontrol system shall not reduce the fuel feed rate below the value that ensures stable and self-sustainingcombustion at the burners served by the pulverizer.

4.13.3.5.2

The minimum feed rate for fuels not conforming to the fuel specifications used by the manufacturer in thedesign of the pulverizer system shall be determined by operational tests.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

To better organize the document, the FUN TC has proposed that this topic should beaddressed by MBB in Chapter 6.

ResponseMessage:



53 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 128-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. 4.14 ]

4.14 Power Supplies.

Precautions shall be taken to ensure the availability of a failure-free power supply (electric or pneumatic) toall control and safety devices burner management system components .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Safety devices are undefined. This revision clarifies the applicability of the requirement.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 48-NFPA 85-2016 [Section No. 4.14]


54 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



4.15.1

Except as noted in 4.15.1.1 and 4.15.1.2 , continuous Continuous trend display of steam flow rate,feedwater flow rate, total fuel flow rate, and total airflow rate as a percentage of the maximum unit load,drum level or waterwall flow as applicable , final steam temperature, main steam pressure, and furnace orcombustion chamber draft shall be simultaneously available at the operating location.

4.15.1.1 *

For single burner boilers, continuous trend display of operating parameters critical to operation shall beprovided.

4.15.1.2

For HRSGs, continuous trend display requirements are specified in 8.7.2.3 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

To better organize the document, these exceptions should be addressed by SBB in Chapter 5and by HRS in Chapter 8, including the associated Annex material.

Waterwall flow was added because not all boilers covered will have a drum level.

ResponseMessage:


Public Input No. 55-NFPA 85-2016 [Section No. A.4.15.1.1]


55 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 130-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. A.1.2.1 ]

A.1.2.1

Combustion explosions involve several considerations. The basic cause of uncontrolled fires or combustionexplosions is the ignition of an accumulated combustible mixture within the confined space of a furnace, aHRSG, or a pulverizer or the associated passes, ducts, and fans that convey the gases of combustion tothe stack.

A dangerous combustible mixture within the boiler, HRSG, or pulverizer enclosure consists of theaccumulation of an excessive quantity of combustibles mixed with air in proportions that result in rapid oruncontrolled combustion when an ignition source is supplied. An explosion can result from ignition of thisaccumulation if the quantity of combustible mixture and the proportion of air to fuel are such that anexplosive force is created within the enclosure. The magnitude and the intensity of the explosion depend onboth the relative quantity of combustibles that has accumulated and the proportion of air that mixes with thecombustibles at the moment of ignition. Explosions, including “puffs,” are the result of improper operatingprocedures by personnel, improper design of equipment or control systems, or malfunction of theequipment or control system.

Numerous conditions can arise in connection with the operation of a system that produce explosiveconditions. The most common of these are as follows:

(1) An interruption of the fuel or air supply or ignition energy sufficient to result in momentary loss offlames, followed by restoration and delayed reignition of an accumulation

(2) Fuel leakage into an idle combustion chamber and the ignition of the accumulation by a spark or othersource of ignition

(3) Repeated unsuccessful attempts to light off without appropriate purging, resulting in the accumulationof an explosive mixture

(4) The accumulation of an explosive mixture of fuel and air as a result of loss of flame or incompletecombustion and the ignition of the accumulation by a spark or other ignition source, such as couldoccur when an attempt is made to relight a burner(s)

(5) Purging with an airflow that is too high, which stirs up smoldering combustible materials

The listed conditions favorable to an explosion are typical examples, and an examination of numerousreports of explosions suggests that the occurrence of small explosions, puffs, or near misses has been farmore frequent than usually is recognized. It is believed that improved instrumentation, safety interlocks andprotective associated devices, proper operating sequences, and a clearer understanding of the problem byboth designers and operators can greatly reduce the risks and actual incidence of explosions.

In a boiler or a HRSG, upset conditions or control malfunction can lead to an air-fuel mixture that couldresult in a flameout followed by reignition after a combustible air-fuel ratio has been re-established.

Dead pockets might exist in a pulverized fuel system or in a boiler or HRSG enclosure or other parts of theunit, where combustible mixtures can accumulate under upset conditions. These accumulations could ignitewith explosive force in the presence of an ignition source.

Furnace or HRSG implosions involve another set of considerations. An implosion is the result of theoccurrence of excessively low gas side pressure, which causes equipment damage. Two conditions thathave caused implosions follow:

(1) A maloperation of the equipment that regulates the gas flow, including air supply and flue gasremoval, resulting in exposure to excessive induced draft fan head capability

(2) The rapid decay of gas temperatures and pressure resulting from either a rapid reduction in fuel inputor a master fuel trip

A combination of the two listed conditions has resulted in severe implosion incidents.



56 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This revision aligns with the updated definition of interlock.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 50-NFPA 85-2016 [Section No. A.1.2.1]


57 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



A.3.3.25 Burner Management System.

The burner management system can include the following functions as specified in this code: interlocksystem interlocks , fuel trip system, master fuel trip system, master fuel trip relay, flame monitoring andtripping systems, ignition subsystem, main burner subsystem, warm-up burner subsystem, bed temperaturesubsystem, and duct burner system.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision aligns with the revised definition for interlock (FR 103). Interlock system waspreviously undefined.

ResponseMessage:



58 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 132-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. A.4.4.1.1 ]

A.4.4.1.1

An example of an inspection and maintenance schedule is as follows:

(1) Daily: flame failure detection system, low water level cutout, and alarm

(2) Weekly: igniter and burner operation

(3) Monthly: fan and airflow interlocks interlock device(s) , fuel safety shutoff valves for leakage, highsteam pressure interlock device(s) , fuel pressure and temperature interlocks interlock device(s) forfuel oil, high and low fuel pressure interlocks interlock device(s) , and fuel gas strainer and drip leg

(4) Semiannually: burner components; flame failure system components; piping, wiring, and connectionsof all interlocks and interlock devices and shutoff valves; calibration of instrumentation andcombustion control system




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition of interlock revised by FR 103 indicates that interlocks are functions. The intentof this section is to inspect physical components.

ResponseMessage:



59 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 133-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. A.4.4.1.3 ]

A.4.4.1.3

When a system includes a built-in test mechanism that bypasses any safety device, it should beinterlocked interlock, the test mechanism should be designed to prevent operation of the system while thedevice is in the test mode, unless operation procedures specifically address this device or it is listed for thatpurpose.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Safety devices are not defined. This revision aligns with the revised definition of interlock.

Response Message:



60 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot



A.4.11.7

Logic systems include, among others, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), digital processing units(DPUs process automation controllers (PACs ), and and distributed control systems (DCSs).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The term "digital processing units (DPUs)" is an old term that is rarely used and is not foundanywhere else in NFPA 85. PACs have come on the market over the last decade or so and are asort of a cross between PLCs and DCSs. This change to the Annex text would better reflect thecurrently available system technologies that might be utilized to implement burner managementsystems.

ResponseMessage:



61 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


First Revision No. 134-NFPA 85-2017 [ Section No. A.4.13 ]


62 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


A.4.13


63 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Users of this code are encouraged to use judgment in the application of the following guidelines for allprocess and safety functions contained in a distributed control system.

(1) For data transmission, the following should be considered:

(2) Every input should be sampled at intervals of no more than 1 second. Every output should beupdated at intervals of no more than 1 second.

(3) For protective actions, the system should be able to convert a changed input sensor value to acompleted output control action in 250 milliseconds or less.

(4) Changes in displayed data or status should be displayed within 5 seconds.

(5) Data acquisition and transmission systems should be protected from noise pickup andelectrical interference.

(6) In redundant systems, the data links should be protected from common mode failures. Wherepracticable, redundant data links should be routed on separate paths to protect against physicaldamage that disables both data links.

(7) For hardware, the following should be considered:

(8) The hardware selected should have adequate processor capacity to perform all the functionsrequired for start-up sequencing, normal operation alarming, monitoring, and shutdown of thecontrolled equipment. Capacity also should be available for data storage and sorting; thiscapacity can be permitted to be located in a separate processor.

(9) Selection should take into consideration the requirements for reliability, maintainability, andelectrical classification.

(10) The hardware should provide for automatic tracking between automatic and manual functionsto allow for immediate seamless transfer.

(11) The hardware should be capable of stable dynamic control.

(12) The hardware should be capable of thorough self-diagnosis.

(13) Consideration should be given to all levels and types of electrical interference that can betolerated by the hardware without compromising its reliability or effectiveness.

(14) Fail-safe operation should be obtained through a thorough and complete analysis of eachcontrol loop and by providing for a failure of that loop (i.e., valve/actuator) to cause a fail-safeposition.

(15) For software, the following should be considered:

(16) The software package should be designed to include all logic to provide a safe and reliablecontrol system. When the software calls for the operation of a

field safety device

(a) final control element , a feedback signal should be provided to prove that the requestedoperation has taken place, and an alarm should be actuated if the action is not confirmed in aspecified amount of time.

(b) The software package should be checked to ensure that no unintended codes or commandsare present (e.g., viruses or test breaks). The software package should be tested and practicedbefore being loaded into the plant site computers or processors.

(c) The software system should be protected from inadvertent actions by operators and should betamperproof.

(d) Written procedures should specify the functions that can and cannot be accessed by theoperator and those functions that require additional authorization for access.

(e) The software should be permitted to provide for authorized on-line changes of the timers andset points, provided the safety of the operating equipment is not compromised.

(f) The software should implement and enhance the self-diagnostic hardware.


64 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Safety device is undefined and final control element is a generally understood term.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 54-NFPA 85-2016 [Section No. A.4.13]


65 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


Committee Input No. 152-NFPA 85-2017 [ Chapter K ]

Annex K Informational References

K.1 Referenced Publications.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this annex are referenced within the informational sections ofthis code and are not part of the requirements of this document unless also listed in Chapter 2 for otherreasons.

K.1.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2015 edition.

NFPA 31, Standard for the Installation of Oil-Burning Equipment, 2011 edition.

NFPA 51, Standard for the Design and Installation of Oxygen–Fuel Gas Systems for Welding, Cutting, andAllied Processes, 2013 edition.

NFPA 51B, Standard for Fire Prevention During Welding, Cutting, and Other Hot Work, 2014 edition.

NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code, 2015 edition.

NFPA 56, Standard for Fire and Explosion Prevention During Cleaning and Purging of Flammable GasPiping Systems, 2014 edition.

NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, 2014 edition.

NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, 2013 edition.

NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, 2014 edition.

NFPA 70 ®, National Electrical Code ®, 2014 edition.

NFPA 77, Recommended Practice on Static Electricity, 2014 edition.

NFPA 85, Boiler and Combustion Systems Hazards Code, 2007 edition.

NFPA 85, Boiler and Combustion Systems Hazards Code, 2011 edition.

NFPA 241, Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, 2013 edition.

NFPA 497, Recommended Practice for the Classification of Flammable Liquids, Gases, or Vapors and ofHazardous (Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations in Chemical Process Areas, 2012 edition.

NFPA 499, Recommended Practice for the Classification of Combustible Dusts and of Hazardous(Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations in Chemical Process Areas, 2013 edition.

NFPA 850, Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and High VoltageDirect Current Converter Stations, 2015 edition.

K.1.2 Other Publications.

K.1.2.1 ABMA Publications.

American Boiler Manufacturers Association, 8221 Old Courthouse Road, Suite 202 380 , Vienna, VA22182–3839 22182 .

ABMA 203, A Guide to Clean and Efficient Operation of Coal-Stoker-Fired Boilers, 2002.

ABMA 307, Combustion Control Guidelines for Single Burner Firetube and WatertubeIndustrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers, 1999.

K.1.2.2 AlChE Publications.

American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 120 Wall Street, FL 23, New York, NY 10005-4020.

Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 2008.


66 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


K.1.2.3 API Publications.

American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005-4070.

API STD 620, Standard for Design and Construction of Large, Welded, Low-Pressure Storage Tanks,2009 2013 .

API STD 650, Standard for Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage, 2008 2013 .

API RP 500, Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at PetroleumFacilities Classified as Class I, Division 1 and Division 2, 1998 (reaffirmed 2002) 2012 .

API RP 505, Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at PetroleumFacilities Classified as Class I, Zone 0, Zone 1, and Zone 2, 1997 (reaffirmed 2002 2013 ).

API RP 2003, Recommended Practice for Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Lightning, andStray Currents, 2008 2015 .

K.1.2.4 ASME Publications.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2007 2015 .

K.1.2.5 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D409/D409M , Standard Test Method for Grindability of Coal by the Hardgrove-Machine Method,2012 2016 .

ASTM D396, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, 2009 2016 .

ASTM E1226, Standard Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds, 2010 2012a .

K.1.2.6 EEMUA Publications.

The Engineering Equipment and Material Users Association, 63 Mark Lane, London UK EC3R 7NQ.

EEMUA Publication 191, Alarm Systems — A Guide to Design, Management, and Procurement, 20072013 .

K.1.2.7 IEC Publications.

International Electrotechnical Commission, 3, rue de Varembé, P.O. Box 131, CH-1211 Geneva 20,Switzerland.

IEC 61511, Functional Safety — Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector, 2003.

K.1.2.8 ISA Publications.

International Society of Automation, 67 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

ANSI/ISA 18.2,Management of Alarm Systems for the Process Industries, 2009.

ANSI/ISA 77.41.01, Fossil Fuel Power Plant Boiler Combustion Controls, 2005 2015 .

ANSI/ISA 77.42.01, Fossil Fuel Power Plant Feedwater Control System — Drum Type, 1999(R2006 reaffirmed 2011 ).

ANSI/ISA 77.43.01, Fossil Fuel Power Plant Unit/Plant Demand Development — Drum Type, 2002(R2008) , 2014 .

ANSI/ISA 77.44.01, Fossil Fuel Power Plant — Steam Temperature Controls, 2007 (reaffirmed 2013) .

ANSI/ISA 84.00.01, Application of Safety Instrument Systems for the Process Industry, 2004.

ISA TR18.2.4, Enhanced and Advanced Alarm Methods, 2012

ISA TR18.2.5, Alarm System Monitoring, Assessment, and Auditing, 2012.

K.2 Informational References.

The following documents or portions thereof are listed here as informational resources only. They are not apart of the requirements of this document.


67 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


K.2.1 Additional HRSG References.

The following documents provide additional information on iron fires.

Johnson, A. A., J. A. Von Franuhofer, and E. W. Jannett,“Combustion of Finned Steel Tubing During StressRelief Heat Treatment,” Journal of Heat Treating, Vol. 4, No. 3, June 1986, pp. 265–271.

McDonald, C. F., “The Potential Danger of Fire in Gas Turbine Heat Exchangers,” ASME 69-GT-38.

Theoclitus, G., “Heat Exchanger Fires and the Ignition of Solid Metals,” Journal of Engineering for GasTurbines and Power, Vol. 107, July 1985, pp. 607–612.

K.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections.

NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, 2014 edition. .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee will review the referenced documents at the second draft meeting so that theywill have a more timely picture of what has been updated since the last edition was issued.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 242-NFPA 85-2017 [Section No. K.1.2.5]


68 of 68 1/23/2017 5:00 PM

Draft R

evisions

Subject to B

allot


TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON PULVERIZED FUEL SYSTEMS NFPA … · Address List No Phone Pulverized Fuel...

Documents

Transcript of TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON PULVERIZED FUEL SYSTEMS NFPA … · Address List No Phone Pulverized Fuel...