TCRP Teacher Training
-
Upload
cooper-delaney -
Category
Documents
-
view
43 -
download
0
description
Transcript of TCRP Teacher Training
TCRP TEACHER TRAINING
Module 1: TCRP Overview
PART 1: TCRP OVERVIEW
2
Agenda Objective By the end of the
session all teachers will be able to:
Session 1 Agenda and Objectives
3
1. Presentation on The College Ready Promise (TCRP) Initiative
1. Describe the current status of TCRP work and understand the intended future steps
2. Small group discussion of TCRP Priorities
2. Identify and explain the TCRP priorities
3. Presentation on research findings and the levels of performance
3. Explain the relationship between teacher performance and student achievement
4
College Ready Teaching
Framework
Clear expectations and definition of
effective teaching
Targeted & Timely Teacher Supports
Blended professional
development for real time support
Evidence-Based Evaluation Using
Multiple Measures
Observation, student achievement,
stakeholder feedback
Principal Leadership
Support for effective instructional leadership
TCRP: Designed for Teacher Development
5
Clear Expectations: The College Ready Teaching Framework
3 Instruction
1 Data-Driven Planning
2 Learning Environment
4 ProfessionalResponsibilities
Instructional Practice Relationships & Responsibilities
6
• Professional development aligned to the CRT Framework
• Online observation data collection and reporting of performance data
• Online, single-sign-on teacher portal with resources and videos to support practice
• Teacher leadership pathways to build coaching capacity at every site
Already in Place… Coming Soon…
Targeted & Timely Support
7
Evidence-Based Evaluation: Multiple Measures of Effectiveness
Observation of Teacher Prac-
tice; 40%
Parent and Family Feedback; 10%
Student Feedback ; 10%
Student Achievement Growth; 40%
How Does it All Connect?
8
Framework as expectation
• Informal observations• Goal-setting conference
Chart your course w/ supports
• Differentiated supports based on your performance, experience & grade/level
Collection of Evidence
• Classroom observation• Student Growth Data• Student and Family Feedback
Calculation of all Evidence
Professional Growth Plan
Compensation and career
path opportunities
9
• Visit: http://tcrpalliance.wordpress.com/
Want more Information?
PART 2: INTRODUCTION TO THE COLLEGE READY TEACHING FRAMEWORK
Defining Effective Teaching
10
39 Indicators, 4 levels of
performance
CRT Framework – Key Vocabulary
11
Domain 1: Data-Driven Planning and PreparationStandard 1.1 Establish standards-based learning objectives for instructional plans
IndicatorsA) Selection of objectivesB) Measurability of objectives
4 Domains
17 Standards
12
Four Domains of Teacher Effectiveness
3 Instruction
1 Data-Driven Planning
2 Learning Environment
4 ProfessionalResponsibilities
Instructional Practice Relationships & Responsibilities
39 Indicators with 4 Levels of Performance
13
14
Level I – Teaching shows evidence of not understanding the concepts underlying the component - may represent practice that is slowing student learning - requires immediate intervention.
Level II – Teaching shows evidence of knowledge and skills related to teaching - but inconsistent performance.
Level III - Teaching shows evidence of thorough knowledge of expected teaching practices. A level 3 teacher is accomplished. "I can teach you something and you'll learn it" Students are engaged in learning and are achieving or exceeding expected gains.
Level IV – Classroom functions as a community of learners with student assumption of responsibility for learning and are true life-long learners. Teacher orientation toward "I'm going to create an experience where you are going to learn something and have it forever."
Levels of Performance
TCRP Priorities across Levels of Performance
15
• Cognitive Engagement– Level III = students must be cognitively engaged – Level IV = cognition, meta-cognition, and student ownership of their
learning
• Constructivist Learning – Level III = practice has evidence of learning experiences designed to
facilitate students’ construction of knowledge – Level IV = students assume responsibility for self-assessing and
developing their own knowledge
• College-Ready Cognitive Strategies– Level III = practice includes evidence of objectives and activities that
promote academic rigor and the key cognitive strategies
– Level IV = students are learning in a college-like environment and spontaneously delving into rigorous depths of learning
15
16
Levels of Performance: Research-Base
Research Findings from Cincinnati (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010)• Teachers have substantial effect on student achievement• Correlation between the Framework for Teaching (FfT)
based evaluation and student achievement• Evaluation using the FfT found:
– Unsatisfactory and Basic: students had lower gains than expected– Proficient: students made expected gains– Distinguished: students made positive, and greater than expected
gainshttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1565963
• TCRP Framework is aligned with the FfT; Level III practice will be comparable to FfT “Proficient” and Level IV will be comparable to FfT “Distinguished” teachers.
1717
Levels of Performance and Student Achievement
“A year’s worth of growth”
9th grade 10th grade
1818
Levels of Performance and Student Achievement
LEVEL III
LEVEL IV
LEVEL II
LEVEL I
Wisdom of Practice
• Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:– What would you see?– What would you hear?– What would the students be doing or saying?– What might the teacher be doing outside of class time?
• Individually, write one idea per post-it note. Write as many ideas as you can generate.
20
Four Domains of Teacher Effectiveness
3 Instruction
1 Data-Driven Planning
2 Learning Environment
4 ProfessionalResponsibilities
Instructional Practice Relationships & Responsibilities
Connecting Your Wisdom to the Framework
• Review the domains, standards, and indicators.• Using the placemat, sort your table’s post-it notes to the
appropriate Domain and Standard.
22
Constructivism
Cognitive Engagement
College-Ready Instruction
College Ready Teaching Framework Priorities
College Success
• In numbered groups, highlight and summarize key concepts defining your assigned priority
Group 1: ConstructivismExcerpts from: Donald G. Hackmann. 2004. “Constructivism and Block Scheduling. Making the Connection..
Group 2: Cognitive EngagementAn excerpt from: Tharp, R. G., P. Estrada, S. S. Dalton, and L. A. Yamauchi. (2000). Teaching Transformed. Achieving Excellence, Fairness, Inclusion, and Harmony
Group 3: College ReadinessConley, D. (2007). Toward a more comprehensive conception of college readiness
• In “home” groups1. Record the definition of
each priority2. Identify where the priority
is most explicit in the Framework
3. Brainstorm examples of evidence of each classroom
4. Be prepared to share your work with the whole group
STEP 1: Define Key Concepts STEP 2: Align to Practice
Jigsaw: Three Priorities of the CRT Framework
• Constructivism means student construct new knowledge from their experiences and prior understandings. The learner does the learning; for example, through thinking, talking, writing or making.
• Cognitive Engagement means student give sustained, engaged attention to a task requiring mental effort and that are within the zone of proximal development of the learners
• College Readiness means students have the knowledge, skills and attributes to succeed in college (Conley defines as: Key cognitive strategies, Key content, Academic behaviors, or Contextual skills and awareness.)
24
TCRP Priorities
Exit Ticket – Table Groups
25
3 Things we’ve learned
2 Questions we could not answer
1 Suggestion