Taking the bestPATH to Health System Integration · Q participants, plus direct HQO QI coaching and...
Transcript of Taking the bestPATH to Health System Integration · Q participants, plus direct HQO QI coaching and...
Partnering to accelerate best care, best health, best value
Des partenariats pour offrir de meilleurs soins, être en meilleure
santé, optimiser les ressources
Taking the bestPATH
to Health System Integration
Agenda
1. Introductions
2. What is bestPATH?
3. Vision for the initiative
4. Key features and program design
1
1. INTRODUCTIONS
2
3
Our Panelists Today
• Kim Baker, CEO, Central Local Health Integration Network – Moderator
• Don Ford, CEO, Central East Community Care Access Centre
• Steve Vanderherberg, Senior Manager of Community & Volunteer
Engagement, WoodGreen Community Services
• Don Harterre, Physician Lead, Primary Health Care Services of
Peterborough
• Kenneth Hook, Family Physician, STAR FHT, Tavistock
• Patti Cochrane, VP Patient Services, Quality & Practice / Chief Nursing
Executive, Trillium Site, The Credit Valley Hospital and Trillium Health
Centre
2. WHAT IS bestPATH?
4
Overview
• bestPATH is a broad, multi-year initiative aimed at
improving quality of care for individuals with complex
chronic illnesses
• bestPATH is:
• The consistent application of evidence-informed
effective practices – putting into practice what we
know works, all of the time
• More coordinated care delivery, with planning and
information sharing across health sectors
• Person-centred care
5
Person-Centred, Continuous Care
Person
Long Term Care
Hospitals
Primary Care
Community Care
6
3. VISION FOR THE INITIATIVE
7
8
Vision for bestPATH Person-centred, Appropriate, Timely Healthcare
Improve health outcomes, the experience of
care, and system effectiveness through
accessible and coordinated care for Ontarians
with complex chronic illness
9
best Care — Improve the care experience by making
care more accessible, and provide a smooth journey
through the system by ensuring clear communication and
strong engagement, both among providers and between
providers and care recipients
best Health — Improve outcomes for persons with
chronic conditions through the use of evidence-informed
best practices
best Value — Ensure care occurs in the most appropriate
setting, reducing the rate of unnecessary hospitalizations
and contributing to more appropriate resource utilization
Aims
bestPATH Partners
• HQO’s vision for bestPATH is partnership-based
• System partners from across many health care sectors are key to the
successful design and implementation of bestPATH including:
− Designing the key elements of bestPATH
− Identifying opportunities to align bestPATH with existing initiatives
− Developing and providing education
− Demonstrating leadership and building support for bestPATH
− Building capacity for change management
10
bestPATH Partners
Health Quality Ontario has already engaged with system leaders from
across the province in the development of bestPATH and will continue to
do so as the initiative rolls out:
• LHINs
• Professional/Educational Membership Organizations
• Clinical Specialty/Safety Organizations
• System Innovators and Researchers
• Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
11
4. KEY FEATURES &
PROGRAM DESIGN
12
13
Program Phases
• Phase I
– Focus on transitions of care
– Self-directed stream (Q and Q+)
• Future Phases
– Broaden focus to include chronic disease management,
independence and safety
– More intensive level of support
– Implementation later in 2013
14
Phase I - Self-Directed Stream
Transitions of Care
• Self-Directed “Q” (for Quality) – Individual organizations from any sector register directly with
HQO
– Able to access change packages and step-by-step guides to
improvement
– Able to participate in all virtual learning activities
– No obligation to report data, but encouraged to use the
reporting system to help them track their progress
15
Phase I - Self-Directed Stream
Transitions of Care
• Self-Directed “Q+” (Quality Plus) • Participating organizations benefit from all the materials offered to
Q participants, plus direct HQO QI coaching and other supports.
• Q+ organizations must:
– Undergo a readiness assessment
– Agree to become part of a QI team involving the local hospital,
CCAC and its providers, primary care, community care, and
long-term care
– Agree to basic data collection and reporting
16
What Participants Receive Change Packages
• Evidence informed and vetted by an expert panel and staff in the field
• Endorsed by leaders in Canadian and Ontario health care standards
HQO Quality Framework
• Includes the best of IHI Model for Improvement, Lean and Six Sigma
approaches to quality improvement
Links to Innovative and Leading Edge Healthcare Practitioners
• Partnerships with provincial, national and international leaders
• Links to organizations who have successfully implemented best practices
and addressed barriers to adoption
Web Based Repository of Best Practices
• Evidence-informed guides to best practices and implementation tips
• Guides on quality improvement, measurement for improvement, change
management
17
Targeted Focus for Maximum Impact
• Focus improvement efforts on an identified population:
– Analyze your population to determine local priority
– Consider CHF, COPD, Diabetes, CAD & Stroke
• Apply Evidence-Informed Interventions
– Implement list of best practices identified by HQO through
evidence reviews, success stories in literature
18
Model for Improvement for Phase I
1. What are we trying to Accomplish?
i) Improvements in 7 & 30 day readmissions
ii) Improvements in measures of patient experience for discharge
transitions
2. How will we know that a change is an improvement?
i) Changes in measures above
ii) Process measures for adoption of best practices
3. What change can we make that will result in improvement?
i) Best practices for transitions
Transitions Best Practices for Transitions
• Assess for risk of readmission within 30 days
of discharge; plan and schedule appropriate
follow up as per readmission risk
− For individuals deemed moderate to high risk for readmission (i.e.,
LACE score ≥ 10) treat discharge as a formal transfer of care
− Timely follow-up appointments confirmed prior to discharge
− “Warm handoffs” involving discharging and receiving clinician
19
Transitions Best Practices for Transitions
• Medication reconciliation at key transition points
• Conduct individualized care and discharge planning:
− Health literacy assessment at admission
− Use of “teach back” - ensure person understands care plan,
treatments, how to manage symptoms, when/who to ask for help
− Timely, written discharge documentation completed
− Written discharge instructions to patients
− Written discharge plans distributed to next care provider and
primary care
20
Independence / Safety
Future Phases:
Independence and Safety
• Enable the person to take a central role in their health and
create a safe environment:
− Assess health literacy and ensure person understands how to manage
their health and care
− Support the development of goals that are meaningful and important to
the person
• Enhance the person’s ability to live independently and safely :
• Implement OHTAC “Aging in the Community’ recommendations:
− Falls prevention
− Targeted conditioning / exercise / rehabilitation
− Caregiver support
21
Future Phases:
Chronic Disease Management
Chronic Disease Management
• Structured visits:
• Use chronic disease flow sheets and clinical practice guidelines
(CPGs) to guide care planning and discussion during each visit with a
patient with chronic illness
• Leverage information systems:
• Use alerts and/or electronic recall functions, flag patients who require
specific interventions, plan specialist consultations
• Coordinate care across disciplines including:
• Specialists, nurse practitioners and allied health care professionals,
creating a multidisciplinary team with shared accountability to provide
care
22
Experiences in the
Community
Presented by: Don Ford, Central East CCAC
25
Experiences in the Community
What we hear:
- “Don’t you people talk to each other?”
- “How often do I need to tell my story?”
- “Why won’t you listen to me?”
- “Don’t you already have that lab/X-ray result?”
- “Do you know who I should talk to if I need help?”
- “How can you be sure I won’t get lost in the system?”
What we surmise:
The components work, the system doesn’t … so …
We need to improve the experience, the transitions,
the hand-offs … which … Should help to improve satisfaction
26
Improve Transitions - Integrated Patient Care
“Patient care that is coordinated across professionals, facilities, and support systems; continuous over time and between visits; tailored to the patients’ needs and preferences; and based on shared responsibility between patients and caregivers for optimizing health.”
To measure integrated patient care, consider seven dimensions:
• Coordination with a care team
• Coordination across care teams
• Coordination between care teams and community resources
• Continuous familiarity with the patient over time
• Continuous proactive and responsive action between visits
• Patient-centred
• Shared responsibility
“Defining and Measuring Integrated Patient Care” Sara Singer & others, 2010
27
PATH
Partners Advancing Transitions in Healthcare
Change Foundation
• Provided funding for a 2 year initiative
• To a community/region committed to working differently to
understand and redesign processes to improve people’s
healthcare experience moving in to, out of and across the
continuum of care, to improve satisfaction with the care they
receive and their care outcomes
• Focused on seniors living with chronic health conditions and their
caregivers because they frequently navigate a wide range of
services
28
PATH
Partners Advancing Transitions in Healthcare
Northumberland Community Partnership chosen (patients, caregivers and 12
health and social care organizations)
Northumberland Proposals Key Elements:
• To build awareness through public education supported by an Aging Well Toolkit to
guide planned aging
• To capture personal stories in print and online to empower and ensure quality
transitions in a My Health Story document to be owned by and go with the patient
• To develop training and tools for local providers based on Experience Based
Design methodology to shift the local healthcare culture to a person-centred model
of care
• To establish transition partners to direct and coach seniors towards supportive
community resources, a role to complement and not duplicate CCAC Care
Coordinators
Patients At The Heart
29
A good patient experience encompasses:
• Clear, consistent reliable communication
• Access to information and exchange of information
• Coordinated and connected care
• Comprehensive care
• Engagement in decision making about care
• Respectful, empathetic and considerate interactions
• Timely and convenient care
“Winning Conditions to Improve Patient Experience”
Change Foundation, November 2011
Taking the bestPATH
to health system
integration:
South East Toronto
Presented by: Stephen Vanderherberg, WoodGreen
Community Services
31
Introductions
WoodGreen Community Services: • WoodGreen Community Services is one of the largest community service agencies in
Toronto. A founding United Way of Toronto member agency, WoodGreen has grown to
span 34 locations and serves 37,000 people each year. WoodGreen helps people find
safe, affordable housing, seniors live independently, internationally-trained
professionals enter the job market, parents access childcare, children and youth
access after-school programs, newcomers settle in to Canadian life, homeless and
marginalized people get off the streets and youth find meaningful employment and
training.
Solutions Network: • A voluntary network of health care providers in East Toronto that worked together to
improve care transitions for over a decade. The network includes:
• Toronto East General Hospital, VHA Home Healthcare, South East Toronto Family
Health Team, Toronto Central CCAC, South Riverdale CHC, East End CHC,
Sherbourne CHC, Toronto EMS, Toronto Public Health, Bridgepoint Healthcare,
Providence Healthcare, WoodGreen, SPRINT, Neighbourhood Link, Gerstein Health
Centre,
32
Integrated QI Initiatives
Network Successes
• Back office Solutions – shared e-learning modules
• Community Referrals by EMS (CREMS)
Member Successes
• Community Navigation and Access Program (CNAP)
• Geriatric Emergency Medicine RN Outreach to Long Term
Care
• House Calls Program
• Integrated Client Care Project (ICCP)
• Virtual Ward
33
Why Experience Based Co-Design?
Solutions Network
• The needed next step for many of our integrated care
efforts
• Learning from failed QI initiatives
• Patient Centred Care: Defining the common client
WoodGreen
• The opportunity to innovate
• Bringing in unheard voices
• Focus on wrap around service approach
34
Community Support Services
Perspective on Integrated Care
How might CSS agencies be involved in supporting integrated
care that aims to be patient/client centred?
– Addressing the individual complex social problems that have influence on
key health indicators
– Holistic Care: Seeing the whole picture
• Seniors Services: Variety of services to support independent living
• Housing Services: Addressing instability in housing
• Immigrant Services: Supporting ethno-cultural communities
• Mental Health Services: Individual focused supports & services
• Employment Services: Support to gain meaningful work
• Community Building Efforts: Community led problem solving
– Placed Based strategies to build healthy/supportive communities
35
Outreach to Diverse & Vulnerable
Seniors Program Program: Distributes funds to small grassroots organizations to
address prominent health related issues in their own community
using their own approach
• Focus on Health Equity
• Community Empowerment
Impact
• 50% reduction in ER visits and hospital days (for those with
preventable issues)
• Improvement in self management of chronic conditions
Challenge
• How to integrate the good work of niche programs serving
specific communities into bestPATH goals and systems
36
Next Steps
Solutions Network
• Starting the slow development of EBCD focused project on
a specific program in which at least 6 organizations share
clients
• Looking to other opportunities to continue our pursuit of
better integrated care through transitions by partnering
with patients and caregivers
WoodGreen
• Explore new ways to come at old problems
• Continue to build placed based strategies of intervention
• Explore how EBCD can shape our internal culture
Shared Care Optimizing Vascular Health
Presented by: Dr. Don Harterre, Peterborough Family Health Team
38
Disclosure
Dr. Don Harterre, Physician Lead, Primary Health Care Services of
Peterborough
CVDPMI – Shared Care, Optimizing Vascular Health
• No conflict of interest issue has arisen.
• Free of commercial bias.
39
Purpose
1. Develop a comprehensive, guidelines-based approach to
prevent, detect, and manage vascular disease by coordinating
primary and specialty care resources, providers, services and
strategies.
2. Implement and evaluate demonstrable
improvements to population health with outcomes at the patient,
provider and system levels.
3. Document and transfer model to communities interested
in adopting a similar approach.
Partner Role
Primary Care Core Steering Committee
Governance and Accountability, Lead Program Planning,
Design, Documentation, Administration, Implementation,
Evaluation Communication, Sustainability, Transferability
Business Planning, Program Design, Professional Support
(Legal, Communications, Evaluation, Strategic Alignment)
Specialty Care Core Steering Committee
Lead Clinical Model Development and Evaluation
Program Materials Contribution
Implementation in Highest Acuity Patients (VHN, PRNA)
Health System
Core Steering Committee (LHIN)
Co-Sponsor
Industry Core Steering Committee
Co-Sponsor also provided in kind Support (by invitation)
Collaboration
40
Building On Strength of Community Provider Networks
Clinical Partners
Peterborough
Networked Family
Health Teams
Primary
Care
Priority Alignment
Peterborough
Regional Vascular
Health Network
Cardiology
Referral from
CVDPMI Family
Physicians or
Hospital Emergency
Department
Peterborough
Regional Nephrology
Associates
Nephrology
Outreach to First
Nations, referral
from CVDPMI Family
Physicians or
Hospital Emergency
Department
Ministry of Health Central East LHIN Vascular Aim Canadian Heart
Health Strategy
41
42
Strategic Alignment Canadian Heart Health Strategy, C Change, Consensus
Guidelines
• CVDPMI is entirely consistent with the recommendations
and vision of the Canadian Heart Health Strategy Action
Plan.
• CVDPMI has demonstrated the ability to create a
community based model that seems to be working. No-
one has managed to get this far before. You should be
applauded.
• Overall, I am excited about this project which I certainly
hope is sustainable. I would be prepared to assist in any
way I can. Dr. Eldon Smith, Chair,
Canadian Heart Health Strategy
43
This approach:
• Enables management of “at-risk, a-symptomatic” patients
• Systematic, transferable approach for population based care
• Can be implemented in variety of practice settings
• Flexible, based on practice need & team care objectives
• Measurable to demonstrate impact on patient health and
system costs
Physicians and Teams are already providing
guidelines based care for “help seeking”
Patients
Algorithms • Hypertension
– Ace/ARB Therapy
– Calcium Channel
Blocker – Diuretic
Therapy
• Lipid Therapy
• ASA Therapy
• Diabetes
Consistent
Format
44
45
Proof of Concept
• Clinical Evaluation: Initial Findings After 3 Visits – "Based on projections from the initial screen of patients, 20 to 30 patients of
every 100 enrolled would be expected to have a cardiac event (heart attack or
stroke) within the next 10 years.
– By being entered in this program and altering their CVD risk profile, (based on
the preliminary analysis) we are able to reduce this number of people at risk for
a heart attack or stroke to from 20-30 to 10-15 out of the same hundred.
– This represents up to a 50 percent decrease, which is impressive and consistent
with what is typically seen in the clinical trial setting.
– This demonstrates that a community working together can achieve clinical trial
outcomes.
– A full outcome and economic analysis is currently underway."
• A multi-stakeholder partnership is feasible and can be used in a real world
setting as we aspire to obtain clinical study outcomes.
- Dr. Paul Oh, Medical Director, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Overall Analysis
• Preliminary data
on 689 men and
640 women, mean
age 59.3 (+/- 8.2)
• An average of 3.4
(+/- 1.5) visits, risk
factors improved
significantly
• All comparisons
were significant
p<0.001
Entry Exit
BMI 29.6 +/- 6.0 29.4 +/- 5.9
Waist 100.6 +/- 15.0 99.2 +/- 15.2
BP 128 (+/-17) 78 (+/- 9) 123 (+/-14) 76 (+/- 9)
TC 3.95 +/- 1.23 3.27 +/- 1.03
FRS 14.5 +/- 8.9 12.1 +/- 8.3
46
High Risk
Pilot Phase
Entry Exit
LDL 3.17 1.78
BP 142/84 126/74
Pure Group
Entry Exit
LDL 2.75 2.02
BP 134/79 126/76
FRS
>20%
Entry Exit
27.0% (+/- 3.5%) 22.1% (+/- 7.3%)
In the high risk stratum the 10 year predicted event rate fell by 18.2%
47
Moderate Risk
Pilot Phase
Entry Exit
LDL 3.33 1.90
BP 127/79 121/75
Pure Group
Entry Exit
LDL 3.04 2.34
BP 128/78 125/78
In the medium risk stratum the 10 year predicted event rate fell by 19.5%
FRS >10 to
<20%
Entry Exit
14.9% (+/- 2.6%) 12.0% (+/- 4.6%)
48
Low Risk
Pilot Phase
Entry Exit
LDL 3.23 1.75
BP 117/77 114/74
Pure Group
Entry Exit
LDL 3.14 2.71
BP 118/75 118/75
FRS
>10%
Entry Exit
6.4% (+/- 2.3%) 5.9% (+/- 2.7%)
In the low risk stratum the 10 year predicted event rate fell by 7.8%
49
50
Findings
• With appropriate systems in place significant change
can happen in the Primary Care setting.
• The present data is sufficient to prove the
effectiveness of the model and begin the roll-out to
other teams. The data supports the claim that the
algorithm works to improve cardiovascular risk.
• There are therapeutic and team benefits from working
collaboratively to implement the model, as evidenced
by the modification in risk factors for patients.
51
For Further Information
www.cvdpmi.ca
http://healthcouncilcanada.ca/audio/2011/P
odcasts/CVDPMI_CPedit_Sep15.mp3
BestPATH
How can we improve care for patients who are in
transition into, from, and and between our health care
institutions?
Presented by: Dr Ken Hook, STAR
Family Health Team, Tavistock
The Case of Mrs. H
• 87 years old
• Admitted from ER
• Sudden onset of loss of strength right leg
• Previous treatment for metastatic thyroid
cancer
• Co-morbidities- hypertension, hypothyroid,
anemia
• X-rays showed multiple boney metastases with
pathologic fracture of pelvis
53
The Case of Mrs. H
• The patient - minimal pain, her goals
• The previous family doctor
• The specialist
• The nurse
• The physiotherapist
• The occupational therapist
• The CCAC case manager
• The family doctor of the attached LTC
54
The Case of Mrs. H
• Discharged 12 days later
• Discharge summary dictated and transcribed
day of discharge, new family doctor notified
• Her new family doctor saw her at home 3 days
later
• Her radiation oncologist to call her
55
The Case of Mrs. H
• Satisfactory outcome for the patient
• Satisfying for the professionals involved
• Key component was timely assessments and
communication between all the providers in the
circle of care
• Don’t you wonder if we could have done it in
fewer days?
56
The Case of Mr. F
• 55 years old, schizophrenic, from LTC
• Admitted in heart failure to large urban hospital
• Stabilized and discharged
• Family doctor difficult to contact, seemed
uninterested
• Follow-up at hospital based clinic after 28 days,
no meds or meds list, visit “useless”
57
Barriers to smooth transitions
• Timely discharge summaries - dictated, typed, received by follow-up provider, including LTC?
• Primary care- able to provide timely follow-up? How soon to the next available appointment?
• When a patient is in trouble can they reach their family doctor or can they access acute care only through the ER? Does the ER try to contact the family doctor for information? Ward clerk could do!
58
More on barriers
• For house bound patients under care of CCAC is
their primary care physician willing to see them at
home in a crisis?
• If the family doctor is available, is she/he able to
arrange appropriate investigations and care in their
community?
• Is there any dialogue between providers at time of
transition- both admission and discharge?
• Are CCAC health reports completed by physicians in
timely manner?
59
More on barriers
• Do patients admitted to hospital have timely investigations and consults and who puts it all together?
• Timely transfers to long-term care? Weekends?
• For residents in long-term care is acute care available or are residents sent to the emergency room for acute problems that could be managed there?
60
Factors for improving patient transitions
• Timely responses and assessments by all
providers in the circle of care
• Effective communication between the team
members in the circle of care
• Effective bridges between key players-
primary care, hospitals, CCAC, long-term
care
61
How do we improve?
• Dialogue at the local level about how we can
build the bridges help each other to improve.
• The dialogue needs to include all the key
players- primary care, hospitals, CCAC, and
long-term care
• “What needs to happen to improve transitions
for our patients?” “How can we help you with
our patients”
62
How do we improve?
bestPATH can provide tools and resources to
facilitate local discussions
63
Why Focus on
readmissions?
Presented by: Patti Cochrane, The Credit Valley
Hospital and Trillium Health Centre
Why focus on readmissions?
• Most “acute illnesses” are now actually exacerbations of chronic
diseases, so patients never leave the hospital in a perfect state
of health
• Hospital admissions have become shorter, so patients are sicker
at discharge
• 1% of the population consume 34% of healthcare resources
• Large “voltage drop” in the intensity of care at the time of
discharge
Source: Irfan Dhalla. University of Toronto, 2010
65
Source: Irfan Dhalla. University of Toronto, 2010
66
Readm
issio
n R
ate
s
67
Readmission Rates for CHF, COPD and Pneumonia
19.3% 19.3%
15.7%
17.5%
15.1%
15.9% 18.5%
13.9% 15.7%
17.0%
9.7% 8.5%
9.3%
11.2%
7.4%
11.5% 11.6% 11.3% 11.7% 11.9%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Q1
Heart Failure wo Cor Angio Chronic Obstructive Pulmon Dis
Viral/Unspecified Pneumonia Grand Total
68
QIP Goal: Reduce unplanned readmissions to
hospital
Quality Dimension
Integrated
Indicator
Reduce unplanned
readmissions to hospital
Corporate Target
≤ 12.5%
Target Justification
3% Improvement
69
• Focus on integration activities (aligning best practices
across sites)
• Completion of an Integrated pathway for identification,
assessment and discharge planning of patients at high
risk for readmission using recommendations from
Enhancing the Continuum of Care: Report of the
Avoidable Hospitalization Advisory Panel submitted to the
Ministry of Health
• Single patient experience and plan of care across all sites
when fully implemented
Progress to date
70
Integrated Pathway
71
Progress to Date
Screening for
readmission risk
Aligning discharge
practices (discharge
checklist, discharge ,
bullet rounds)
Enhanced Teaching
Provision of follow
up care in
outpatient clinics
and with Primary
Care
• Automated tool at
THC-M site
• Paper based tool
at CVH site
• Application for
LHIN funding to
move automated
tool across all sites
• Collaboration with
IHI group to help
with development
protocol for those
with LACE >10
• Collaboration with QIP
ED wait time on
development
• Standardize content
provided
• Single discharge
envelope to be kept
with patients and for
patient to take to follow
up appointments
•Teach Back
Methodology
•Collaboration with
outpatient clinics to
use same content
and language
•Utilize discharge
envelope to keep
written content from
all professions
•Aligning processes
for access to
COPD/CHF clinics
•Building on current
processes to
minimize workload
on front line staff
while enhancing care
•Appointments to be
provided on
discharge
72
Post Discharge
Telephone Follow up
Rapid Response
Nurse/Virtual Ward
Medication Check in
patient home after
discharge
• Application for LHIN
funding to develop set of
questions specific to the
population and protocol
for follow up to identified
concerns
•Collaboration with IHI
group to help with
development protocol for
those with LACE >10
•Collaboration with
CCAC/PCP to follow high
risk patients upon
discharge providing a link
between hospital and
community
•Pilot at Trillium M site
•December 3, 2012-
launch date
•Collaboration with CCAC,
community pharmacists
and community partner to
provide service
•Application to Ministry of
Health for funding to
implement software
needed
Progress to date
73
Progress to date
Post Discharge Telephone
Follow up
Rapid Response
Nurse/Virtual Ward
Medication Check in
patient home after
discharge
• Application for LHIN
funding to develop set of
questions specific to the
population and protocol for
follow up to identified
concerns
•Collaboration with IHI
group to help with
development protocol for
those with LACE >10
•Collaboration with
CCAC/PCP to follow high
risk patients upon discharge
providing a link between
hospital and community
•Pilot at Trillium M site
•December 3, 2012- launch
date
•Collaboration with CCAC,
community pharmacists and
community partner to
provide service
•Application to Ministry of
Health for funding to
implement software needed
74
Most importantly…
• Firmly in the provider’s
hand
• -- The Baton -- the care
and treatment plan
• Must be confidently and
securely grasped by the
patient,
• If change is to make a
difference
• 8,760 hours a year.
75
www.hqontario.ca