Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.)...

34
Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. ............................... 8-96 3M Innovative Props. Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp. ................... 8-53 318 Patent Infringement Litig., In re ................... 9-27, 17-11, 17-29 A Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., In re ................................................. 9-51 Abbott Labs. v. Baxter Pharm. Prods., Inc. ....................... 8-66, 10-13 Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc. ........................................................ 8-67 AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. v. Janssen Biotech, Inc. .................................................. 9-72, 17-24 Abele, In re ....................................................................... 7-37, 15-26 Abtox, Inc. v. Exitron Corp. ........................................................ 8-97 Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc. ............................ 9-72 Accenture Glob. Servs., GmbH v. Guidewire Software, Inc. ...................................................... 7-23 Acme Resin Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc. ..................................... 16-12 Acromed Corp. v. Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc. ................................ 4-8 Adams & Ferrari, Ex parte .................................................. 8-46, 8-47 Adang v. Fischhoff ..................................................................... 17-28 Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v. Rome Fastener Corp. ..................................................... 4-9, 10-7 Advanced Software Design Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc. ........................ 8-104 AFG Indus., Inc. v. Cardinal IG Co. .................................. 8-30, 8-73 Ajinomoto Co. v. ITC ............................................ 9-28, 9-31, 17-32 AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac ............................................ 8-29, 8-70, 9-24 Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. ...................... 8-103 T 1

Transcript of Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.)...

Page 1: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Table of Authorities

(References are to pages.)

CASES

01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. ............................... 8-963M Innovative Props. Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp. ................... 8-53’318 Patent Infringement Litig., In re ................... 9-27, 17-11, 17-29

A

Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., In re ................................................. 9-51Abbott Labs. v. Baxter Pharm. Prods., Inc. .......................8-66, 10-13Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc. ........................................................ 8-67AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. v.

Janssen Biotech, Inc. ..................................................9-72, 17-24Abele, In re .......................................................................7-37, 15-26Abtox, Inc. v. Exitron Corp. ........................................................ 8-97Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc. ............................ 9-72Accenture Glob. Servs., GmbH v.

Guidewire Software, Inc. ...................................................... 7-23Acme Resin Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc. ..................................... 16-12Acromed Corp. v. Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc. ................................ 4-8Adams & Ferrari, Ex parte ..................................................8-46, 8-47Adang v. Fischhoff ..................................................................... 17-28Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v.

Rome Fastener Corp. .....................................................4-9, 10-7Advanced Software Design Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc. ........................ 8-104AFG Indus., Inc. v. Cardinal IG Co. ..................................8-30, 8-73Ajinomoto Co. v. ITC ............................................ 9-28, 9-31, 17-32AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac ............................................ 8-29, 8-70, 9-24Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. ...................... 8-103

T–1

Page 2: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Akamatsu, In re ........................................................................... 15-6Aktiebolaget Karlstads Mekaniska Werkstad v.

U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n .................................................... 17-29Alappat, In re ...................................................................7-32, 15-21Alcon Research Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc. ............................................. 8-86Alcon Research Ltd. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ........................................ 9-16Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l .......................... 7-4, 7-5, 7-6,

....................................................................... 7-7, 7-8, 7-17, 7-25Allen, Ex parte ............................................................................. 7-39Allergan, Inc. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ................................................ 16-15Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. ..................................... 8-82, 9-9, 17-40Allvoice Computing PLC v. Nuance Commc’ns, Inc. ......9-29, 15-30AllVoice Devs. US, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. ................................... 7-3Alonso, In re .............................................................................. 17-22Al-Site Corp. v. VSI Int’l, Inc. ............................................8-38, 8-76Altris, Inc. v. Symantec Corp. ..................................................... 8-51ALZA Corp. v. Andrx Pharm., LLC ....................................9-23, 9-24Am. Acad. Sci. Tech. Ctr., In re ................................................. 19-10Am. Calcar, Inc. v. Am. Honda Motor Co. ............................... 10-15Am. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc. ............................................ 8-25Am. Original Corp. v. Jenkins Food Corp. .................................. 8-28Amgen, Inc. v.

Chugai Pharm. Co. ............9-34, 9-35, 9-36, 17-21, 17-27, 17-55Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. ........................2-20, 9-48Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. ..................8-86, 17-29Anascape, Ltd. v. Nintendo of Am. Inc. ...................................... 9-16Anchor Wall Sys. v. Rockwood Retaining Walls ........................... 8-94Ancol Co. v. Uniroyal, Inc. .......................................................... 8-47Andrew Corp. v. Gabriel Elecs., Inc. ............................................ 14-7Andrews, Ex parte ..................................................................... 11-13Angstadt, In re ........................................................................... 17-25Antares Pharma v. Medac Pharma Inc. ..............................19-4, 19-7Aoyama, In re ............................................................................ 15-31Apotex Inc. v. UCB, Inc. ........................................................... 10-14Apple Comput., Inc. v. Articulate Sys., Inc. .......................8-22, 8-24Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. ............................................... 11-7Applied Med. Res. Corp. v. U.S. Surgical Corp. .......................... 9-31Arbeit, In re ................................................................................. 8-41Arcelormittal Fr. v. AK Steel Corp. .............................................. 19-8Ariad Pharm., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co. ............. 9-11, 9-20, 9-71, 17-24Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. ................................. 7-41Aristocrat Techs. Austl. Pty Ltd. v.

Int’l Game Tech. .............................................. 9-67, 9-68, 15-31

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–2

Page 3: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Arrhythmia Research Tech., Inc. v.Corazonix Corp. ...................................... 7-31, 7-33, 7-34, 7-37,................................................15-17, 15-20, 15-22, 15-23, 15-26

Arzberger, In re ............................................................................ 13-2Asgrow Seedco v. Winterboer ....................................................... 13-2Ashow Ltd. v. Morgan Constr. Co. .............................................. 6-17Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v.

Myriad Genetics, Inc. ..................................................7-40, 7-42AstraZeneca AB v. Hanmi USA, Inc. ...............................16-5, 17-20AstraZeneca LP v. Apotex, Inc. ................................... 7-2, 7-41, 8-91AT&T Corp. v. Excel Commc’ns, Inc. .......... 7-27, 7-38, 15-17, 15-27ATD Corp. v. Lydall, Inc. ............................................................ 8-86Atl. Research Mktg. Sys. v. Troy Indus. ....................................... 9-15Atlas Powder Co. v.

E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. ....................... 9-27, 9-31, 9-32Atmel Corp. v. Info. Storage Devices, Inc. ......... 9-10, 9-67, 9-68, 9-79Auto. Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. BMW of N. Am., Inc. ....... 8-78, 9-25, 9-66Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v.

Crystal Imp. Corp. ................................... 4-10, 10-5, 10-6, 10-7

B

B. Braun Med., Inc. v. Abbott Labs. ............................................. 8-39Baldwin Graphic Sys., Inc. v. Siebert, Inc. ................................... 8-96Bankowski, In re .............................................................8-122, 8-123Baran v. Med. Device Techs., Inc. ............................................... 8-40Barker, In re ........................................................................9-10, 9-17Barr, In re .................................................................................. 16-17Bartlett, In re ............................................................................. 11-19Bass Pro Trademarks LLC v. Cabela’s, Inc. ................................. 8-25Bayer AG v. Schein Pharm., Inc. ................................................. 9-30Beauregard, In re ....................................................................... 15-13Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Tyco Healthcare Grp., LP ............... 8-52Beech Aircraft Corp. v. EDO Corp. ............................................... 4-3Beineke, In re .............................................................................. 13-2Bell, In re ................................................................................... 17-27Bell Commc’ns Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Commc’ns Corp. ......... 8-23Bergstrom, In re ......................................................................... 17-15Bergy, In re ................................................................................ 17-14Berkman, In re .....................................................................6-3, 9-11Bickell, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-120Bicon Inc. v. Straumann Co. ....................................................... 8-26Bilkington, In re .......................................................................... 8-67Billottet, Ex parte ......................................................................... 14-9

Table of Authorities

T–3

Page 4: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Billups-Rothenburg v. Associated Reg’l &Univ. Pathologists, Inc. ....................................................... 17-22

Bilski, In re ...........................................................................7-9, 7-41Bilski v. Kappos .................................................. 7-8, 7-9, 7-10, 7-14,

.........................................................7-18, 7-19, 7-21, 7-22, 7-24,

.............................................. 7-25, 7-27, 7-28, 7-41, 7-44, 15-16Biomedino, LLC v. Waters Techs. Corp. .............................9-10, 9-65Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc. ................................... 8-45Bisafe Inc. v. Google Inc. ............................................................... 7-7BJ Servs. Co. v. Halliburton Energy Servs. Inc. ........................... 8-93Blackboard, Inc. v. Desire2Learn, Inc. ................................8-86, 9-65Blaser, In re .................................................................................. 16-5Blumcraft of Pittsburgh v. Ladd ................................................. 11-14Bd. of Educ. v. Am. Bioscience, Inc. .....................................4-5, 4-10Boehringer Ingleheim Vetmedica, Inc. v.

Schering-Plough Corp. .......................................................... 8-24Bogese, In re ................................................................................ 8-99Boldt, In re ................................................................................ 11-20Boller, In re .......................................................................8-79, 16-17Bolton, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-120Bond, In re .................................................................................. 8-33Bondiou, Ex parte ........................................................................ 9-79Borkowski, In re ....................................................... 9-26, 9-38, 16-9Bos. Sci. Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson ....................................... 17-22Bourne v. Jones ............................................................................ 13-5Bowles, In re ................................................................................ 8-33Bowman v. Monsanto .................................................................. 17-5Bradford Co. v. Conteyor N. Am., Inc. ........................................ 8-85Brana, In re .............................................................. 9-6, 17-9, 17-13Brasseler, U.S.A. I, LP v. Stryker Sales Corp. ............................... 10-9BRCA1- and BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer Test Patent Litig.

(Univ. of Utah Research Found. v. Ambry Genetics Corp.),In re ...................................................................................... 7-41

Brenner v. Manson .................................................................... 16-11Brian, Ex parte ........................................................................... 16-17Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs., Inc. ..................................... 8-97Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Labs., Inc. .............8-22, 8-24Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v.

Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc. ............................. 10-10, 19-4, 19-10Brooktree Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices ............................... 9-40Brouwer, In re ............................................................................ 17-18Brown, In re .............................................................................. 14-14Brown v. 3M ....................................................... 8-102, 8-107, 8-116Brown & Saffer, In re ................................................................. 16-16

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–4

Page 5: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Bruno Indep. Living Aids, Inc. v.Acorn Mobility Servs. Ltd. .................................................. 10-10

Buchner, In re .....................................................................9-19, 16-7Bundy, In re ............................................................................... 17-30Burke, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-63Burke, Inc., In re ....................................................................... 8-111Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ................... 4-3, 4-4, 4-8buySAFE, Inc. v. Google, Inc. ...................................................... 7-17

C

Caldwell, In re ........................................................................... 16-18Callicrate v. Wadsworth Mfg., Inc. .............................................. 9-20Canter, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-121Capon v. Eshar .......................................................................... 17-23Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v.

St. Jude Med., Inc. .................................... 8-30, 8-82, 9-65, 9-67Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. Renishaw PLC ........................................... 8-72Carletti, In re ............................................................................... 11-4Carnegie Mellon Univ. v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. .........9-12, 17-22Carter v. ALK Holdings, Inc. ......................................................... 4-4Catalina Mktg. Int’l v. Coolsavings.com ..................................... 8-24Caterpillar, Inc. v. Sturman Indus., Inc. .................................4-4, 4-5Cattech LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc. ................................................. 8-96Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharm., Inc. ........................................ 9-22Centillion Data Sys., LLC v.

Qwest Commc’ns Int’l, Inc. ............................................... 8-104Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. Abbott Labs. ....... 9-11, 17-22, 17-23Cent. Soya Co. v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. ..................................... 4-6Certain Ltd.-Charge Cell Culture

Microcarriers, In re ................................................................. 9-9Certain Pers. Computs., In re .................................. 8-43, 8-45, 8-78Certain Slide Fastener Stringers, In re ................................8-27, 8-28Chatfield, In re .................................................................7-28, 15-17Checkpoint Sys., Inc. v. Knogo Corp. .......................................... 9-33Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Indus. Corp. ........... 9-28, 9-33, 9-39, 16-12Chi. Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. ........................... 8-110Chilowsky, In re .....................................................................9-5, 9-6Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc. ..........9-22, 9-23, 9-25, 9-27, 17-28Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v.

Cardinal Indus., Inc. ....................................................8-76, 9-68Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp. ......... 9-18, 9-30, 16-11CIAS, Inc. v. Alliance Gaming Corp. .......................................... 8-27Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC ......................... 7-41

Table of Authorities

T–5

Page 6: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc. .............................. 8-95Clement, In re ............................................................................. 19-4CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. .................................7-6, 7-22Cohesive Techs., Inc. v. Waters Corp. .......................................... 8-93Cold Spring Harbor Lab. v. Ropes & Gray LLP ........................... 9-74Cole, Ex parte .............................................................................. 11-6Cole v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. ...................................................... 8-39CollegeNet, Inc. v. Applyyourself, Inc. ........................................ 8-96Comiskey, In re ........................................................................... 7-10Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc. ....................................... 8-103Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Envtl., Inc. .......................................... 8-29Conopco, Inc. v. May Dep’t Stores .............................................. 8-93Consol. Aluminum Corp. v.

Foseco Int’l Ltd. ...................................... 9-33, 9-38, 10-2, 16-13Content Extraction v. Wells Fargo Bank ........................................ 7-7Cook, In re .................................................................................. 14-5Cook Biotech, Inc. v. Acell, Inc. .................................................. 9-80Corning Glass Works v. Sumitomo Elec. U.S.A. ......................... 8-23Credle v. Bond ............................................................................... 4-8Crish, In re ............................................................. 8-27, 8-31, 17-14Cross v. Lizuka .......................................................................... 17-10Crown Packaging Tech., Inc. v.

Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. ..........................9-16, 9-90Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v.

Tritech Microelectronics Int’l, Inc. .................... 8-30, 8-73, 8-96Curtis, In re ................................................................................. 9-15CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc. .....................7-10, 15-13

D

Daiichi Sankyo Co. v. Matrix Labs., Ltd. .................................... 16-2Dale Elecs., Inc. v. R.C.L. Elecs., Inc. .................................9-34, 9-37Dana Corp. v. IPC Ltd. P ’ship ..................................................... 9-35Dart Indus., Inc. v. Banner .......................................................... 9-80Datamize LLC v. Plumtree Software, Inc. ........................8-10, 8-115Davis, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-26Davis & Tuukkanen, Ex parte ................................................... 17-37Dayco Prods., Inc. v. Total Containment, Inc. ............................ 10-9DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P. ..............................7-9, 7-16Dealertrack, Inc. v. Huber ...................................... 7-22, 9-85, 15-31Deere & Co. v. Bush Hog, LLC ................................................... 8-94Deering Precision Instruments v.

Vector Distribution Sys. ...............................................8-94, 9-62

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–6

Page 7: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Default Proof Credit Card Sys., Inc. v.Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. ...............8-78, 9-10, 9-67, 9-68, 9-79

DeGeorge v. Bernier .................................................. 8-23, 9-29, 9-33Dense, In re ............................................................................... 8-121Deutsch, In re ............................................. 7-28, 7-30, 15-17, 15-19Dey, L.P. v. Sunovion Pharm., Inc. .............................................. 10-9DH Tech., Inc. v. Synergystex Int’l, Inc. ...................................... 2-15Diamond v. Chakrabarty ........................7-2, 7-39, 8-18, 13-2, 17-14Diamond v. Diehr ........................................................................ 7-26Digitech Image Techs., LLC v. Elecs. for Imaging, Inc. .......... 7-7, 7-17Dillon, In re ...................................................................16-19, 17-40Dinsmore, In re ........................................................................... 19-4Dippin’ Dots, Inc. v. Mosey ................................................8-28, 10-9Dolbear v. Am. Bell Tel. Co. ...................................................... 16-10Donaldson, Ex parte .................................................................... 11-3Donaldson Co., In re ........................................................8-41, 15-29Donoghue, Ex parte ..................................................................... 11-3Donohue, In re .................................................................14-9, 14-10Door-Master Corp. v. Yorktowne, Inc. ....................................... 11-16Dossel, In re .......................................................................8-78, 9-65Durden, In re ........................................................ 8-68, 17-17, 17-40Duva, In re ................................................................................ 8-123

E

Echerd, In re ................................................................................ 8-78Edwards Lifesciences AG v. Cook Biotech Inc. ............................ 18-5Edwards Lifesciences AG v. CoreValve, Inc. ................................ 9-28Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc. .......................................... 11-7Ehrreich, In re ........................................................................... 17-38Eickmeyer, In re ......................................................................... 17-20Ekchian v. Home Depot, Inc. .................................................... 10-14Elec. Molding Corp. v. Mupac Corp. ........................................... 11-5Eli Lilly & Co. v. Aradigm Corp. ................................................... 4-4Eli Lilly & Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ................................................ 9-30Elliot, Ex parte ............................................................................... 6-8EMI Grp. N. Am., Inc. v.

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. ..........................8-10, 8-102, 8-123Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v.

Alpine Elecs. of Am., Inc. ..................................................... 9-46Energizer Holdings, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ........................ 8-108Engel Indus., Inc. v. Lockformer Co. ........................................... 9-31Enovsys LLC v. Nextel Commc’n, Inc. ........................................ 2-11

Table of Authorities

T–7

Page 8: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Envirco Corp. v. Clestra Cleanroom, Inc. ................................... 8-39Envirotech Corp. v. Al George, Inc. ............................................... 9-6Enzo Biochem Inc. v. Applera ...................................................... 8-97Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Calgene, Inc. ............................................ 9-21Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe, Inc. ...........................17-25, 17-30EON Corp. IP Holding LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC ......... 9-68, 15-31Epcon Gas Sys., Inc. v. Bauer Compressors, Inc. ........8-23, 8-40, 8-61ePlus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc. .......................................... 15-30Erie Tech. Prods. v. Die Craft Metal Prods. ................................... 4-7Esquire, Inc. v. Ringer .................................................................. 14-2Ethicon, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp. .............................. 4-7, 4-8, 4-10Evans Med. Ltd. v. Am. Cyanamid Co. ..................................... 17-54Ex parte Adams & Ferrari ...................................................8-46, 8-47Ex parte Allen .............................................................................. 7-39Ex parte Andrews ...................................................................... 11-13Ex parte Bickell .......................................................................... 8-120Ex parte Billottet .......................................................................... 14-9Ex parte Bolton .......................................................................... 8-120Ex parte Bondiou ......................................................................... 9-79Ex parte Brian ............................................................................ 16-17Ex parte Burke ............................................................................. 8-63Ex parte Canter ......................................................................... 8-121Ex parte Cole ............................................................................... 11-6Ex parte Davis ............................................................................. 8-26Ex parte Davis & Tuukkanen .................................................... 17-37Ex parte Donaldson ..................................................................... 11-3Ex parte Donoghue ...................................................................... 11-3Ex parte Elliot ................................................................................ 6-8Ex parte Forman ........................................................................ 17-25Ex parte Foster ............................................................................. 13-5Ex parte Girt ................................................................................ 8-39Ex parte Gross ........................................................................... 8-107Ex parte Guinzburg ................................................................... 11-14Ex parte Gutta ............................................................................. 7-22Ex parte Halligan ......................................................................... 7-22Ex parte Hansen .......................................................................... 8-56Ex parte Harvey ......................................................................... 17-20Ex parte Head .............................................................................. 8-64Ex parte Hibberd ......................................................................... 7-39Ex parte Jackson ........................................................................ 17-36Ex parte Kluis & Kluis ................................................................. 13-5Ex parte Klumb ............................................................................ 8-37Ex parte Kubin ........................................................................... 17-22Ex parte Lakkala .......................................................................... 8-39

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–8

Page 9: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Ex parte Langemyr ....................................................................... 7-21Ex parte Levinn ........................................................................... 11-4Ex parte Lewin ............................................................................... 8-9Ex parte Lohman ....................................................................... 11-16Ex parte Lundgren ..................................................................... 15-11Ex parte MacAdams .................................................................... 8-68Ex parte Maizel .......................................................................... 17-27Ex parte Markush ....................................8-8, 8-28, 8-55, 8-62, 8-63,

.....................................................8-64, 8-65, 8-66, 8-106, 8-117,

....................................................8-122, 9-25, 9-26, 16-15, 17-38Ex parte Mewherter ..................................................................... 7-23Ex parte Miyazaki .......................................................................... 8-7Ex parte Moelands ..................................................................... 8-109Ex parte Moore ......................................................... 13-3, 13-4, 13-5Ex parte Nawathe ........................................................................ 7-22Ex parte Nolden ........................................................................... 8-47Ex parte Oetiker ........................................................................ 8-113Ex parte Palmer ........................................................................... 8-63Ex parte Pantzer & Feier .............................................................. 8-67Ex parte Price .............................................................................. 8-63Ex parte Reid ............................................................................. 8-116Ex parte Root ............................................................................... 11-9Ex parte Sanford ........................................................................ 11-14Ex parte Slob ............................................................................. 8-119Ex parte Smith ............................................................................ 8-39Ex parte Squires ............................................................................. 8-9Ex parte Stephens ...................................................................... 8-121Ex parte Strijland ................................................................11-3, 15-3Ex parte Tayama .................................................................11-3, 15-3Ex parte Velander ........................................................................... 6-6Ex parte Wolfer ............................................................................ 11-6Ex parte Xu .................................................................................. 7-23Exxon Chem. Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp. ...................9-44, 16-16

F

Fabrica, Inc. v. El Dorado Corp. .................................................. 14-2Falana v. Kent State Univ. ............................................................. 4-6Falkner v. Engliss .................................................... 9-11, 9-22, 17-25Ferguson, In re ........................................................... 7-2, 8-16, 8-21Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku

Kogyo Kabushiki Co. ............2-24, 5-4, 8-100, 8-101, 9-72, 12-14Fiddes v. Baird ........................................................................... 17-27

Table of Authorities

T–9

Page 10: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Fiers v. Revel .....................................9-12, 16-6, 17-21, 17-25, 17-27Fina Oil & Chem. Co. v. Ewen ..................................................... 4-5Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Grp., Inc. ........................................... 15-30Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp. .............................8-83, 15-7Fisher, In re ..................................................... 9-6, 9-23, 9-24, 17-13Flexiteek Ams., Inc. v. Plasteak, Inc ............................................ 9-73Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Mfg. Co. .................................. 2-22Fonar Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co. .................................................... 15-29Forest Labs., Inc. v. Ivax Pharm., Inc. ......................................... 19-3Forman, Ex parte ....................................................................... 17-25Foster, Ex parte ............................................................................ 13-5Fouche, In re ............................................................................... 9-26Foxboro Co. v. Taylor Instruments Co. ......................................... 6-5Frank’s Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc. v.

PMR Techs., Ltd. .................................................................. 4-10Freeman, In re ....................................................................7-26, 7-27Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int’l, Inc. ...................................... 8-65Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc. ......................................... 9-21Fromson v. Anitec Printing Plates, Inc. ....................................... 8-86Fuetterer, In re ..................................................................8-78, 8-118Fujikawa v. Wattanasin .............................................................. 17-13Fuller, In re .......................................................................8-78, 8-118Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. ............................9-68, 15-30

G

GAF Corp. v. AMCHEM Prods. .................................................... 4-8Galderma Labs., L.P. v. Tolmar, Inc. ............................................ 8-95Gardner, In re ............................................ 9-19, 16-11, 17-20, 17-35Garnero, In re ........................................................... 8-29, 8-66, 8-67Gaubert, In re .............................................................................. 8-64Gelnovatch, In re ..............................................................7-37, 15-26Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S ....................................... 17-28Genentech, Inc. v. Wellcome Found. ................................9-18, 17-36Gen. Elec. Co. v. Nintendo Co. ................................................... 8-23Gen. Elec. Co. v. Nitro Tungsten Lamp Co. .............................. 8-112Gen. Elec. Co. v. Wilkins .............................................................. 4-9Gen. Electro Music Corp. v. Samick Music Corp. ...................... 2-35Gen. Motors Corp. v. Toyota Motors Co. ...................................... 4-9Geneva Pharm., Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC ............................ 8-99Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. Berkline Corp. ................................8-10, 9-16Geo. M. Martin Co. v. Alliance Mach. Sys. Int’l LLC ................. 8-61Ga.-Pac. Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp. ............................8-111, 8-112

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–10

Page 11: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

GFI Inc. v. Franklin Corp. ......................................................... 10-10Ghiron, In re ............................................................................. 14-10Giannelli, In re ............................................................................ 8-43Gilead Scis., Inc. v. Lee .............................................................. 10-12Girt, Ex parte ............................................................................... 8-39Glavas, In re .............................................................................. 11-20Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Impax Labs., Inc. .................................. 9-72Go Med. Indus. Pty., Ltd. v. Inmed Corp. ................ 6-10, 9-28, 9-49Goeddel v. Sugano ..................................................................... 17-23Golden Bridge Tech., Inc. v. Apple, Inc. .................................... 10-15Golden Hour Data Sys., Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc. ....................... 10-11Goodman, In re ......................................................................... 17-26Gosteli, In re ......................................................................16-4, 16-5Gottschalk v. Benson ................................................................... 7-26Gould v. Mossinghoff .................................................................. 14-5Graco, Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co. ...................................................... 9-33Grams, In re ................................................................................ 7-26Grasselli, In re ............................................................................. 8-28Greenberg v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery ............................................. 8-80Gross, Ex parte .......................................................................... 8-107Guinzburg, Ex parte .................................................................. 11-14Gulack, In re ........................................................................7-2, 7-27Gustafson, In re .......................................................................... 8-47Gustausson v. Valenti, Bd. Pat. App. & Interf. ............................ 8-24Gutta, Ex parte ............................................................................ 7-22

H

Haemonetics Corp. v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. ........................... 8-22Halleck, In re ............................................................................... 8-79Halligan, Ex parte ........................................................................ 7-22Hallmann, In re ........................................................................... 8-78Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Sunbeam Prods., Inc. ................ 10-7Hamington Mfg. Co. v. White ....................................................... 6-7Hansen, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-56Harari v. Hollmer ........................................................................ 9-46Harari v. Lee ................................................................................ 9-80Harnisch, In re ....................................................... 8-63, 8-64, 8-116Harold Schoenhause v. Genesco, Inc. .......................................... 8-85Harvey, Ex parte ........................................................................ 17-20Hayes Microcomputer Prods., Inc. Patent Litig.,

In re .........................................................................15-29, 15-36Head, Ex parte ............................................................................. 8-64

Table of Authorities

T–11

Page 12: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc. ..................... 8-114Hibberd, Ex parte ........................................................................ 7-39High Point Design LLC v. Buyers Direct, Inc. ....................11-5, 11-7Hill-ROM Co. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. &

KCI Therapeutic Servs., Inc. ................................................. 9-89Hitzeman v. Rutter ........................................................................ 4-5H.K. Porter Co. v. Gates Rubber Co. ............................................. 6-5Hoffer v. Microsoft Corp. ............................................................ 8-45Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Burroughs Wellcome Co. .............. 8-113Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Promega Corp. .......................9-26, 9-71Hogan, In re ................................................................................ 14-6Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co. ............................... 8-118Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................... 8-11Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Sys. Corp. ................ 9-61Hoop v. Hoop .............................................................................. 4-11Howarth, In re ............................................................................. 9-19Hozumi, In re ................................................................................ 9-9Hruby, In re ................................................................................. 11-3Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States .......................................... 9-31Hutchison, In re ........................................................................ 8-119Hyatt, In re ................................................................................ 8-117Hyatt v. Dudas ............................................................................ 9-16Hybritech, Inc. v. Abbott Labs. .................................................. 8-113Hybritech, Inc. v.

Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. ....................... 8-110, 17-29, 17-39Hygienic Specialties Co. v. H.G. Salzmann, Inc. ......................... 11-4

I

Ibormeith IP v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC ................................ 15-31ICU Med., Inc. v. Alaris Med. Sys., Inc. ..................................... 9-90IGT v. Bally Gaming Int’l, Inc. ................................................... 8-97Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp. .................................................... 1-7IMS Tech., Inc. v. Haas Automation, Inc. ................................... 8-40In re ’318 Patent Infringement Litig. .................... 9-27, 17-11, 17-29In re Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. .................................................. 9-51In re Abele ........................................................................7-37, 15-26In re Akamatsu ............................................................................ 15-6In re Alappat ....................................................................7-32, 15-21In re Alonso ............................................................................... 17-22In re Am. Acad. Sci. Tech. Ctr. .................................................. 19-10In re Angstadt ............................................................................ 17-25In re Aoyama ............................................................................. 15-31In re Arbeit .................................................................................. 8-41

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–12

Page 13: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

In re Arzberger ............................................................................. 13-2In re Bankowski ..............................................................8-122, 8-123In re Barker ........................................................................9-10, 9-17In re Barr ................................................................................... 16-17In re Bartlett .............................................................................. 11-19In re Beauregard ........................................................................ 15-13In re Beineke ............................................................................... 13-2In re Bell .................................................................................... 17-27In re Bergstrom .......................................................................... 17-15In re Bergy ................................................................................. 17-14In re Berkman ......................................................................6-3, 9-11In re Bilkington ........................................................................... 8-67In re Bilski ............................................................................7-9, 7-41In re Blaser .................................................................................. 16-5In re Bogese ................................................................................. 8-99In re Boldt ................................................................................. 11-20In re Boller ........................................................................8-79, 16-17In re Bond ................................................................................... 8-33In re Borkowski ........................................................ 9-26, 9-38, 16-9In re Bowles ................................................................................. 8-33In re Brana ............................................................... 9-6, 17-9, 17-13In re BRCA1- and BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer

Test Patent Litig. (Univ. of Utah Research Found. v.Ambry Genetics Corp.) ......................................................... 7-41

In re Brouwer ............................................................................. 17-18In re Brown ............................................................................... 14-14In re Brown & Saffer ................................................................. 16-16In re Buchner ......................................................................9-19, 16-7In re Bundy ................................................................................ 17-30In re Burke, Inc. ........................................................................ 8-111In re Caldwell ............................................................................ 16-18In re Carletti ................................................................................ 11-4In re Certain Ltd.-Charge Cell Culture Microcarriers ................... 9-9In re Certain Pers. Computs. ................................... 8-43, 8-45, 8-78In re Certain Slide Fastener Stringers .................................8-27, 8-28In re Chatfield ..................................................................7-28, 15-17In re Chilowsky ......................................................................9-5, 9-6In re Clement .............................................................................. 19-4In re Comiskey ............................................................................ 7-10In re Cook ................................................................................... 14-5In re Crish .............................................................. 8-27, 8-31, 17-14In re Curtis .................................................................................. 9-15In re Dense ................................................................................ 8-121In re Deutsch .............................................. 7-28, 7-30, 15-17, 15-19In re Dillon ....................................................................16-19, 17-40

Table of Authorities

T–13

Page 14: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

In re Dinsmore ............................................................................ 19-4In re Donaldson Co. .........................................................8-41, 15-29In re Donohue ..................................................................14-9, 14-10In re Dossel ........................................................................8-78, 9-65In re Durden ......................................................... 8-68, 17-17, 17-40In re Duva ................................................................................. 8-123In re Echerd ................................................................................. 8-78In re Ehrreich ............................................................................ 17-38In re Eickmeyer ......................................................................... 17-20In re Ferguson ............................................................ 7-2, 8-16, 8-21In re Fisher ...................................................... 9-6, 9-23, 9-24, 17-13In re Fouche ................................................................................ 9-26In re Freeman .....................................................................7-26, 7-27In re Fuetterer ...................................................................8-78, 8-118In re Fuller ........................................................................8-78, 8-118In re Gardner ............................................. 9-19, 16-11, 17-20, 17-35In re Garnero ............................................................ 8-29, 8-66, 8-67In re Gaubert ............................................................................... 8-64In re Gelnovatch ...............................................................7-37, 15-26In re Ghiron .............................................................................. 14-10In re Giannelli ............................................................................. 8-43In re Glavas ............................................................................... 11-20In re Goodman .......................................................................... 17-26In re Gosteli .......................................................................16-4, 16-5In re Grams ................................................................................. 7-26In re Grasselli .............................................................................. 8-28In re Gulack .........................................................................7-2, 7-27In re Gustafson ........................................................................... 8-47In re Halleck ................................................................................ 8-79In re Hallmann ............................................................................ 8-78In re Harnisch ........................................................ 8-63, 8-64, 8-116In re Hayes Microcomputer Prods., Inc.

Patent Litig. .............................................................15-29, 15-36In re Hogan ................................................................................. 14-6In re Howarth .............................................................................. 9-19In re Hozumi ................................................................................. 9-9In re Hruby .................................................................................. 11-3In re Hutchison ......................................................................... 8-119In re Hyatt ................................................................................. 8-117In re Iwahashi .......................... 7-31, 7-32, 8-41, 15-6, 15-20, 15-22In re Johnson .......................................................... 7-36, 15-25, 16-7In re Johnson & Farnham ......................................................... 17-35In re Jolles ................................................................................. 17-10In re Joyce A. Cortright ........................................................9-5, 17-9In re Kanter ................................................................................. 8-68

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–14

Page 15: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

In re Katz Interactive Call ProcessingPatent Litig. ..................................................... 8-10, 9-68, 15-31

In re Kirk ..................................................................................... 17-9In re Klein ..........................................................................8-12, 9-54In re Knowlton .................................................................14-4, 14-10In re Koller .................................................................................. 9-20In re Kratz ................................................................................. 16-14In re Kubin ................................................................................ 17-16In re Land & Rogers .................................................................. 8-119In re Langdon ............................................................................ 8-122In re LeGrice ............................................................................... 13-5In re Lowry ................................. 7-2, 7-27, 7-32, 7-34, 15-21, 15-23In re Ludtke ........................................................................8-78, 8-79In re Lukach ................................................................................ 16-5In re Lundberg ............................................................................. 8-41In re Marzocchi ........................................................................... 16-9In re Mason ................................................................................. 8-43In re Metcalfe .............................................................................. 9-20In re Meyers .................................................................................. 6-4In re Miller .................................................................................... 7-2In re Moore ................................................................................. 9-18In re Morris ................................................................................... 1-2In re Nalbandian ....................................................................... 11-20In re Naquin .....................................................................9-19, 15-28In re Neugebauer ......................................................................... 8-68In re Ngai ................................................................. 7-2, 8-91, 17-15In re Nomiya ............................................................................... 9-51In re Nuijten ............................................................................. 15-13In re Ochiai ............................................................................... 17-18In re O’Farrell ............................................................................ 17-16In re Owens ............................................................................... 11-18In re Packard ................................................................................. 8-7In re Pardo ................................................... 7-28, 7-29, 15-17, 15-18In re Paulsen ................................................................................ 8-23In re Peters ................................................................................ 14-13In re Petrus A.C.M. Nuijten ........................................................ 14-6In re Phillips .....................................................................7-30, 15-19In re Pleuddemann ............................................. 17-17, 17-18, 17-40In re Rasmussen ........................................................................ 14-13In re Reinhardt .......................................................................... 17-30In re Roberts .............................................................................. 17-35In re Robins ............................................................................... 17-20In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh) ............................................... 7-45In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig. .................................... 19-3In re Rubinfield ..............................................................11-12, 11-13

Table of Authorities

T–15

Page 16: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

In re Ruff ..................................................................................... 8-65In re Ruschig ............................................................................... 16-6In re Sarett ................................................................................ 16-17In re Scarbrough ........................................................................ 14-10In re Schechter .................................................................8-63, 8-122In re Schilling .............................................................................. 11-4In re Schoenwald & Barfknecht ................................................. 16-14In re Serenkin .............................................................................. 19-4In re Seversky .............................................................................. 9-80In re Sherwood .................................7-35, 9-19, 15-24, 15-28, 15-33In re Smith ............................................................... 9-10, 9-11, 16-5In re Staats .................................................................................. 19-7In re Stephens ............................................................................. 9-34In re Steppan ............................................................................... 8-66In re Strahilevitz ...............................................................9-38, 17-26In re Swartz ................................................................................... 9-5In re Swinehart ............................................ 8-50, 8-78, 8-117, 8-119In re Tanaka ................................................................................ 19-3In re Tanczyn ................................................................................. 8-9In re Taner ........................................................................7-34, 15-23In re Thorpe .............................................................................. 17-39In re Toma ................................................... 7-28, 7-29, 15-17, 15-18In re Vaeck ............................................................ 8-123, 9-24, 17-25In re Veldhuis ...................................................................7-34, 15-23In re Venezia ................................................................................ 8-47In re Vickers ................................................................................ 14-5In re Wakefield ...................................................................16-7, 16-9In re Wallach ....................................................................9-11, 17-23In re Walter .................................................................................. 7-26In re Wands ........................................9-21, 9-22, 9-23, 17-25, 17-36In re Warmerdam .............................................................7-32, 15-21In re Webb ................................................................................... 11-6In re Wertheim .................................................................16-7, 17-20In re Wilder ........................................................................9-9, 14-13In re Winkhaus ............................................................................ 9-20In re Wolfensperger .................................................................6-3, 6-5In re Wolfrum ............................................................................ 8-116In re Wright ......................................................................9-10, 17-26In re Yamazaki ............................................................................ 19-4In re Youman ............................................................................... 19-8Ineos USA LLC v. Berry Plastics Corp. ....................................... 8-13Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm’t, Inc. .....................8-12, 9-54Insituform Techs., Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc. .......................... 8-97Intamin Ltd. v. Magnetar Techs. Corp. ....................................... 8-85Int’l Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp. ........................... 11-6

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–16

Page 17: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Int’l Standard Elec. Corp. v. Ooms .....................................9-18, 9-19Internet Patents Corp. v. Active Network, Inc. ......................7-7, 7-8Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc. .............................................. 8-7Intervet Inc. v. Merial Ltd. ........................................................ 17-22Intirtool, Ltd. v. Texar Corp. ........................................................ 8-24Inventio AG v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator Ams. Corp. .................... 8-39Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Mfg. LP ........................................... 8-27Invitrogen Corp. v. Clontech Labs, Inc. ....................................... 9-24IPIXL Holdings, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. ......... 7-2, 8-10, 8-16, 8-88Iwahashi, In re ......................... 7-31, 7-32, 8-41, 15-6, 15-20, 15-22

J

Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Co. .................................................. 6-3Jackson, Ex parte ....................................................................... 17-36J.E.M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int’l, Inc. ...........7-39, 13-2Jeneric/Pentron, Inc. v. Dillon Co. ......................................8-94, 9-89Johns-Manville Corp. v. Guardian Indus. Corp. ........................ 8-122Johnson, In re ......................................................... 7-36, 15-25, 16-7Johnson & Farnham, In re ........................................................ 17-35Johnson & Johnson Assocs., Inc. v. R.E. Serv. Co. ...................... 8-98Jolles, In re ................................................................................ 17-10Jones Knitting Corp. v. Morgan ......................................8-110, 8-114Joyce A. Cortright, In re .......................................................9-5, 17-9J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex, Ltd. ............................................... 10-2Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc. ........................................... 9-5

K

Kanter, In re ................................................................................ 8-68Katz Interactive Call Processing

Patent Litig., In re ............................................ 8-10, 9-68, 15-31KCJ Corp. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. ............................................ 8-96Kennecott Corp. v. Kyocera Int’l, Inc. ........................................ 17-20Keurig, Inc. v. Sturm Foods, Inc. ................................................. 8-82Key Pharm. v. Hercon Labs. Corp. ............................................ 17-38Kieselstein-Cord v. Accessories by Pearl, Inc. .............................. 14-2Kim Bros. v. L.A. Hagler .............................................................. 13-2Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Distrib. Co. ............... 4-7King Pharm., Inc. v. Eon Labs, Inc. ............................................. 8-11Kingsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister .......................... 10-2Kintner v. Atl. Commc’n Co. .................................................... 8-111Kirk, In re .................................................................................... 17-9

Table of Authorities

T–17

Page 18: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Klein, In re .........................................................................8-12, 9-54Kluis & Kluis, Ex parte ................................................................ 13-5Klumb, Ex parte ........................................................................... 8-37Knowlton, In re ................................................................14-4, 14-10Koehring Co. v. E.D. Etnyre & Co. ............................................... 4-8Kolen Corp. v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc. .......................... 8-93Koller, In re .................................................................................. 9-20Kraft Foods, Inc. v. Int’l Trading Co. ........................................... 9-68Kratz, In re ................................................................................ 16-14Kropa v. Robie .............................................................................. 8-22KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. ................................... 8-13, 8-14, 8-15,

......................................................9-52, 16-2, 16-3, 17-16, 17-19Kubin, Ex parte .......................................................................... 17-22Kubin, In re ............................................................................... 17-16Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc. ..............8-102, 8-107

L

L.A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co. .................................... 11-4Laitram Corp. v. Deepsouth Packing Co. .......................8-112, 8-114Lakkala, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-39Land & Rogers, In re ................................................................. 8-119Landes Mfg. Co. v. Chromodern Chair Co. ................................ 11-4Langdon, In re ........................................................................... 8-122Langemyr, Ex parte ...................................................................... 7-21Larson Mfg. Co. v. Aluminart Prods. Ltd. ................................... 10-9Lazare Kaplan Int’l, Inc. v. Photoscribe Techs., Inc. .................... 8-95Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp. ....................................2-23, 8-35LeGrice, In re .............................................................................. 13-5Leo Pharm. Prods., Ltd. v. Rea .................................................... 9-52Levinn, Ex parte .......................................................................... 11-4Leviton Mfg. Co. v. Universal Sec. Instruments, Inc. ............... 10-10Lewin, Ex parte .............................................................................. 8-9Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc. ..................................9-23, 9-25Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc. ...................... 8-103Litton Sys., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp. ........................................... 11-20Lizardtech, Inc. v. Earth Res. Mapping, Inc. .......................9-16, 9-25Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Space Sys./Loral, Inc. ......................... 8-44Loctite Corp. v. Ultraseal Ltd. ..................................................... 8-23Lohman, Ex parte ...................................................................... 11-16Loral Corp. v. B.F. Goodrich Co. ................................................. 9-37Lowry, In re ................................ 7-2, 7-27, 7-32, 7-34, 15-21, 15-23Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Gateway, Inc. ...................................8-27, 9-89Ludtke, In re .......................................................................8-78, 8-79

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–18

Page 19: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Lukach, In re ............................................................................... 16-5Lundberg, In re ............................................................................ 8-41Lundgren, Ex parte .................................................................... 15-11

M

MacAdams, Ex parte ................................................................... 8-68Maclaren v. B-I-W Grp., Inc. ..................................................6-3, 6-5MagSil Corp. v. Hitachi Global Storage Techs., Inc. ................. 8-124Maizel, Ex parte ......................................................................... 17-27Markush, Ex parte ...................................8-8, 8-28, 8-55, 8-62, 8-63,

.....................................................8-64, 8-65, 8-66, 8-106, 8-117,

....................................................8-122, 9-25, 9-26, 16-15, 17-38Marley Mouldings, Ltd. v. Mikron Indus., Inc. ........................... 8-11Mars, Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co. .............................................8-27, 16-18Marston v. J.C. Penney Co. ................................................8-24, 8-73Martin v. Mayer ......................................................................... 17-21Marzocchi, In re .......................................................................... 16-9Masco Corp. v. United States ...................................................... 8-40Mas-Hamilton Grp., Inc. v. LaGard, Inc. .................................... 8-38Mason, In re ................................................................................ 8-43Mass. Inst. of Tech. v. Abacus Software ...................................... 8-36Mathis v. Hydro Air Indus. ....................................................... 8-111Mattor v. Coolegem ....................................................................... 4-7Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc. ........................................... 8-69, 8-87, 8-98Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc. .................. 7-40McGrady v. Aspenglas Corp. ..................................................... 11-11McKesson Info. Sols., Inc. v. Bridge Med., Inc. ......................... 10-10MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc. ............ 8-90Med. Instrumentation & Diagnostics Corp. v.

Elekta AB ...................................................................9-66, 15-30Medichem v. Rolabo .................................................................... 8-27Medrad, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Grp. LP .................................... 19-3Medtronic CoreValve, LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp. ........... 9-46Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. .......8-40, 9-68Medtronic, Inc. v. Guidant Corp. ................................................ 19-5Mentor H/S, Inc. v. Med. Device All., Inc. .................................. 9-31Merck & Co. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc. ................................... 10-2Merck & Co. v. Olin Mathieson Chem. Corp. .......................... 16-14Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. ...................................... 8-93Merck KGaA v. Integra Life Scis. I, Ltd. ...................................... 17-4Metabolyte Labs., Inc. v. Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings ................ 8-25Metcalfe, In re ............................................................................. 9-20

Table of Authorities

T–19

Page 20: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Mettler-Toledo, Inc. v. B-Tek Scales, LLC .................................... 9-66Mewherter, Ex parte .................................................................... 7-23Meyers, In re ................................................................................. 6-4Microprocessor Enhancement Corp. v.

Tex. Instruments Inc. ............................... 7-2, 8-10, 8-16, 8-108Microsoft Corp. v. Multi-Tek Sys. .....................................9-57, 17-21Miller, In re ................................................................................... 7-2Miller v. Brass Co. ....................................................................... 8-87MIT v. A.B. Fortia ......................................................................... 9-9Miyazaki, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-7Moelands, Ex parte .................................................................... 8-109Moleculon Res. Corp. v. CBS, Inc. .............................................. 8-27Monsanto Co. v. Bayer Bioscience N.B. ...................................... 10-8Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. .............................8-54, 17-28Moore, Ex parte ........................................................ 13-3, 13-4, 13-5Moore, In re ................................................................................ 9-18Moore v. Stewart ...............................................................11-5, 11-15Morris, In re .................................................................................. 1-2MRC Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLP ............................... 11-7Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Indus., Inc. ..................................... 4-4MuniAuction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp. ......................................... 15-4

N

Nalbandian, In re ...................................................................... 11-20Naquin, In re ....................................................................9-19, 15-28Nartron Corp. v. Schukra U.S.A., Inc. ...................................4-5, 4-8Nat’l Recovery Tech., Inc. v. Magnetic Separation Sys., Inc. ......... 9-24Nationwide Chem. Corp. v. Wright ............................................. 14-6Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. ..........................8-7, 8-113Nawathe, Ex parte ....................................................................... 7-22Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc. .......................................... 15-31Netword, LLC v. Centraal Corp. ................................................. 8-44Neugebauer, In re ........................................................................ 8-68New Railhead Mfg., LLC v. Vermeer Mfg. Co. ....... 12-3, 12-9, 12-13Ngai, In re ................................................................ 7-2, 8-91, 17-15Nicholson v. Bailey ...................................................................... 13-5Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. .................................................. 9-49Noah Sys., Inc. v. Intuit, Inc. .................................................... 15-31Noelle v. Lederman ...........................................................9-15, 17-23Nolden, Ex parte .......................................................................... 8-47Nomiya, In re .............................................................................. 9-51Norian Corp. v. Stryker Corp. .................................. 8-28, 8-29, 8-97N. Am. Container, Inc. v. Plastipak Packaging, Inc. .................... 8-94

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–20

Page 21: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

N. Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp. ...................... 9-19, 9-38, 15-28N. Telecom Ltd. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. ..............................9-30, 9-40Northrop Grumman Corp. v. Intel Corp. ...........................9-26, 9-71Norton Co. v. Bendix Corp. ....................................................... 8-114Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. Eon Labs Mfg. Inc. ........................... 16-16Novo Industri A/S v. Travenol Lab., Inc. ..................................... 9-34Novo Nordisk Pharm. Inc. v. Bio-Tech. Gen. Corp. .................... 9-26Novozymes A/S v. DuPont Nutrition Biosciences APS ................ 9-12NTP, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd. ....................................... 8-104Nuijten, In re ............................................................................ 15-13

O

Ochiai, In re .............................................................................. 17-18Oetiker, Ex parte ........................................................................ 8-113O’Farrell, In re ........................................................................... 17-16Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps S., LLC ...................................... 8-95O.I. Corp. v. Tekmar Co. ............................................................. 8-37OIP Techs., Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. ........................................... 7-8O’Reilly v. Morse ..................................................................4-8, 7-39Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc. ........................ 8-111Ortho-McNeil Pharm., Inc. v. Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. ........... 8-93Ortho-McNeil Pharm., Inc. v. Mylan Labs., Inc. ......................... 8-86OSRAM Sylvania, Inc. v. Am. Induction Techs., Inc. ................. 8-13Outside the Box Innovations, LLC v. Travel Caddy, Inc. ..... 2-14, 10-9Owens, In re .............................................................................. 11-18

P

Pac. Coast Marine Windshields Ltd. v. Malibu Boats, LLC ....... 11-14Pacing Techs., LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc. ..................................... 9-87Packard, In re ................................................................................ 8-7Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc. ......................................... 8-93Palmer, Ex parte ........................................................................... 8-63Pan Am. Plant Co. v. Matsui ....................................................... 13-4Pannu v. Iolab Corp. ...................................................................... 4-7Pantzer & Feier, Ex parte ............................................................. 8-67Pardo, In re .................................................. 7-28, 7-29, 15-17, 15-18Parke, Davis & Co. v. Am. Cyanamid Co. ................................ 17-39Parker v. Bergy ........................................................................... 17-14Parker v. Flook ..................................................................7-37, 15-26Paulsen, In re ............................................................................... 8-23Perkin Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp. ............................. 8-23

Table of Authorities

T–21

Page 22: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

PerkinElmer, Inc. v. Intema Ltd. .................................................. 7-40Perspective Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. .....4-10, 10-7Peters, In re ............................................................................... 14-13Petrus A.C.M. Nuijten, In re ....................................................... 14-6Pfizer, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Labs., Ltd. ................................................ 8-55Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. ....................... 8-99, 9-29, 9-31Philco Corp. v. Admiral Corp. ........................................11-14, 11-15Phillips, In re ....................................................................7-30, 15-19Phillips v. AWH Corp. ................................................................. 8-39Pitney Bowes v. Hewlett-Packard Co. .......................................... 8-23Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS, LLC .........................................7-7, 7-17Playtex Prods., Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co. .............................. 8-94Pleuddemann, In re ............................................ 17-17, 17-18, 17-40Poly-Am., LP v. GSE Line & Tech., Inc. .............................8-23, 8-25Porter v. Farmer ’s Supply Serv., Inc. ............................................ 8-73Power-One, Inc. v. Artesyn Techs., Inc. ....................................... 8-79Pressure Prods. Med. Supplies, Inc. v. Greatbatch Ltd. ............... 9-66Price, Ex parte ............................................................................. 8-63Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. ....................... 16-2Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp. ........................ 8-28, 9-25, 17-37PSC Comput. Prods., Inc. v. Foxconn Int’l, Inc. ......................... 8-98Purdue Pharma LP v. Endo Pharm., Inc. ..................................... 9-71

Q

Quantum Corp. v. Rodine, PLC .................................................. 8-93

R

Rajchman v. Herbert & Simpson ................................................. 8-44Randomex, Inc. v. Scopus Corp. .................... 9-29, 9-30, 9-39, 16-12Rasmussen, In re ....................................................................... 14-13Rasmusson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. .......................9-23, 17-13Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc. ............................................................ 11-4Reed v. Edwards ........................................................................... 8-41Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly & Co. .......................... 17-48Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Oncor Inc. ................................... 8-97Reid, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-116Reifin v. Microsoft Corp. ....................................................8-10, 9-14Reinhardt, In re ......................................................................... 17-30Rembrandt Data Techs., LP v. AOL, LLC .................................... 8-10Research Corp. Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. .......... 7-6, 7-16, 9-17

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–22

Page 23: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Research Found. of State Univ. of N.Y. v.Mylan Pharm., Inc. .............................................................. 8-86

ResQNet.com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc. .............................................. 10-13Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. ......................... 9-90Richardson v. Stanley Works, Inc. ......................................11-4, 11-7Ring Plus, Inc. v. Cingular Wireless Corp. .........................9-51, 9-53Riverwood Int’l Corp. v. R.A. Jones & Co. ................................ 10-13Robert Bosch, LLC v. Snap-On Inc. ....................................8-39, 9-10Robert W. Brown & Co. v. De Bell .............................................. 11-5Roberts, In re ............................................................................. 17-35Robins, In re .............................................................................. 17-20Robotic Vision Sys. v. View Eng’g, Inc. .............................9-31, 15-29Rodime PLC v. Seagate Tech., Inc. .............................................. 8-39Root, Ex parte .............................................................................. 11-9Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), In re .............................................. 7-45Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig., In re ................................... 19-3Rowe v. Dror .......................................................................8-23, 8-60Rubinfield, In re .............................................................11-12, 11-13Ruff, In re .................................................................................... 8-65Ruschig, In re .............................................................................. 16-6

S

S3, Inc. v. nVIDIA Corp. ............................................................. 9-67Safe Flight Instruments Corp. v.

Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. ..................................7-37, 15-26Saffran v. Johnson & Johnson ..................................................... 9-66Sage Prods., Inc. v. Devon Indus., Inc. ...............................8-39, 8-87SanDisk Corp. v. Kingston Tech. Co. .................................8-96, 9-80Sanford, Ex parte ....................................................................... 11-14Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharm., Inc. ................................................ 9-87Sarett, In re ............................................................................... 16-17Saunders Grp., Inc. v. Comfortrac, Inc. ....................................... 8-85Scanner Techs. Corp. v.

ICOS Vision Sys. Corp. N.V. ............................. 2-35, 8-27, 8-97Scarbrough, In re ....................................................................... 14-10Schechter, In re .................................................................8-63, 8-122Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharm., Inc. ............................8-13, 17-15Schilling, In re ............................................................................. 11-4Schoenwald & Barfknecht, In re ................................................ 16-14Schumer v. Lab. Comput. Sys., Inc. .......................................... 8-102Scripps Clinic & Research Found. v.

Genentech, Inc. ............................................. 9-35, 16-16, 17-39Sealant Sys. Int’l, Inc. v. TEK Glob., S.R.L. ................................ 9-73

Table of Authorities

T–23

Page 24: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Seattle Box Co. v. Indus. Crating &Packing, Inc. ..............................................................8-114, 19-5

Semiconductor Energy Lab. Co. v. Samsung Elec. Co. .............. 10-10Serenkin, In re ............................................................................. 19-4Serrano v. Telular Corp. ............................................................... 8-37Seversky, In re .............................................................................. 9-80Sewall v. Walters ............................................................. 4-3, 4-4, 4-7Sherwood, In re ................................7-35, 9-19, 15-24, 15-28, 15-33Shields v. Halliburton Co. ............................................................. 4-7Shum v. Intel Corp. ....................................................................... 4-5Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Techs., Inc. ...........................8-79, 15-7Sinorgchem Co., Shandong v. ITC .............................................. 9-62SiRF Tech., Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ....................................... 7-16Sitrick v. Dreamworks, LLC ........................................................ 9-24SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc. .......................................8-10, 9-80Skinner Bros. Belting Co. v. Oil Well Improvements Co. ............ 8-47Slob, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-119SmartGene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Labs. ............................... 7-8Smith, Ex parte ........................................................................... 8-39Smith, In re .............................................................. 9-10, 9-11, 16-5SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp. ............................... 8-13Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. ......................................4-13, 8-10Soverain Software LLC v. Newegg Inc. ........................................ 15-4Spalding & Evenflo Cos. v. Acushnet Co. ................................... 9-30Spectra-Physics, Inc. v. Coherent, Inc. ..................... 9-33, 9-38, 14-5Squires, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-9Staats, In re ................................................................................. 19-7Staehlin v. Secher ........................................................................ 16-7Standard Oil Co. v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. ................... 8-114Star Sci. Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. .................................. 9-31State St. Bank & Tr. Co. v.

Signature Fin. Grp., Inc. ................................... 7-25, 7-27, 7-32,........................................................................ 7-37, 15-21, 15-26

Stephens, Ex parte ..................................................................... 8-121Stephens, In re ............................................................................ 9-34Steppan, In re .............................................................................. 8-66Stern v. Columbia Univ. ................................................................ 4-7Stiftung v. Renishaw plc ................................................................ 9-6Strahilevitz, In re ..............................................................9-38, 17-26Streck v. Research & Diagnostic Sys., Inc. .................................. 9-24Strijland, Ex parte ...............................................................11-3, 15-3Studiengesellschaft Kohle v. Eastman Kodak Co. ........................ 9-32Sunrace Roots Enter. Co. v. Sram Corp. ...................................... 8-86Superguide Corp. v. DirecTV Enters., Inc. .................................. 8-66

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–24

Page 25: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Suprema, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n .......................................... 8-83Swartz, In re .................................................................................. 9-5Swinehart, In re ........................................... 8-50, 8-78, 8-117, 8-119Symantec Corp. v. Comput. Assocs. Int’l, Inc. ........................... 8-24Symbol Techs., Inc. v. Lemelson Med., Educ. &

Research Found. .................................................................... 8-99Synthes USA, LLC v. Spinal Kinetics, Inc. .................................. 9-15

T

Tabuchi & Ave v. Nubell ........................................................... 17-30Taltech Ltd. v. Esquel Enters. Ltd. ....................................10-5, 10-14Tanaka, In re ............................................................................... 19-3Tanczyn, In re ................................................................................ 8-9Taner, In re .......................................................................7-34, 15-23Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Res., Inc. ....... 8-96Tavory v. NTP Inc. ........................................................................ 4-4Tayama, Ex parte ................................................................11-3, 15-3Tex. Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc. ....................................... 9-62Tex. Instruments, Inc. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............8-44, 9-30Therasense, Inc. v.

Becton, Dickinson & Co. ................................. 2-14, 8-86, 9-86,.......................................................................... 10-3, 10-6, 10-11

Thorpe, In re ............................................................................. 17-39Thyssen Plastik Anger KG v. Induplas, Inc. .......................9-34, 9-36Titanium Metals Corp. of Am. v. Banner ........................8-119, 9-44TiVo, Inc. v. EchoStar Commc’ns Corp. .............................8-96, 9-84Toma, In re .................................................. 7-28, 7-29, 15-17, 15-18Topliff v. Topliff ............................................................................. 1-2Toro Co. v. Deere & Co. .............................................................. 8-39Toro Co. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc. ........................................ 8-98Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. ...................................... 9-87Trans World Mfg. Corp. v. Al Nyan & Sons ................................ 14-2Transco Prods., Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. .............. 12-10Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v.

Maersk Contractors USA, Inc. ............................................. 9-27Trebro Mfg., Inc. v. Firefly Equip., LLC ....................................... 8-85Trimed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp. ....................................................... 8-39Tronzo v. Biomet ................................................................9-16, 9-70Tyco Healthcare Grp. v. Mut. Pharm. Co. ................................... 8-95Typhoon Touch Techs., Inc. v. Dell, Inc. ................................... 15-31

Table of Authorities

T–25

Page 26: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

U

Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC .......................... 7-6, 7-7, 7-17, 7-23Ultra-Precision Mfg., Ltd. v. Ford Motor Co. ................................ 4-7Unidynamics Corp. v. Automatic Prods. Int’l, Ltd. ............8-38, 8-39Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. ......................................... 8-104Union Carbide Corp. v. Borg-Warner Corp. ................................. 9-36Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Atl. Richfield Co. ................................. 9-10Union Pac. Res. Co. v. Chesapeake Energy Corp. ....................... 9-19United States v. Telectronics, Inc. ................... 9-21, 9-22, 9-24, 9-25U.S. Gypsum Co. v. Nat’l Gypsum Co. ...................................... 9-33U.S. Indus. v. Norton Co. ........................................................... 10-6Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly & Co. .................................................. 17-21Univ. of Pittsburgh v. Hedrick ................................................4-3, 4-5Univ. of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co. ..........................9-11, 17-24Univ. of Utah Research Found. v. Ambry Genetics Corp. ........... 7-41Utter v. Hiraga ..................................................................9-16, 17-25

V

Vaeck, In re ........................................................... 8-123, 9-24, 17-25Valmont Indus., Inc. v. Reinke Mfg. Co. ..................................... 8-75Vanderbilt Univ. v. ICOS Corp. ..............................................4-4, 4-7Vas-Cath, Inc. v. Mahurkar ......................................................... 9-12Vehicular Tech. Corp. v. Titan Wheel Int’l, Inc. .................8-28, 9-70Velander, Ex parte .......................................................................... 6-6Veldhuis, In re ..................................................................7-34, 15-23Venezia, In re ............................................................................... 8-47Versata Dev. Grp., Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc. ....................................... 7-8Vickers, In re ............................................................................... 14-5Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc. ................................................... 9-52Vizio, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ................................................ 8-25Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Elections Sols., Inc. ...................... 8-40

W

Wahl Instruments, Inc. v. Acvious, Inc. ........ 9-35, 9-36, 9-37, 16-13Wakefield, In re ..................................................................16-7, 16-9Walker Process Equip., Inc. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp. ........ 10-3Wallach, In re ...................................................................9-11, 17-23Walter, In re ................................................................................. 7-26Wands, In re .......................................9-21, 9-22, 9-23, 17-25, 17-36

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–26

Page 27: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

Warmerdam, In re ............................................................7-32, 15-21Water Techs. Corp. v. Calco Ltd. ................................................. 8-29Webb, In re .................................................................................. 11-6Welker Bearing Co. v. PHD, Inc. ................................................. 8-36Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chem. Co. .................... 9-39, 9-66, 16-13Wells Mfg. Corp. v. Littlefuse, Inc. .............................................. 8-60Wertheim, In re ................................................................16-7, 17-20White Consol. Indus., Inc. v.

Vega Servo-Control, Inc. ..............9-22, 9-39, 9-77, 15-29, 15-34Wilder, In re ........................................................................9-9, 14-13Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC ......................................8-38, 9-67Winkhaus, In re ........................................................................... 9-20WMS Gaming Inc. v. Int’l Game Tech. ....................................... 15-7Wolfensperger, In re ................................................................6-3, 6-5Wolfer, Ex parte ........................................................................... 11-6Wolfrum, In re ........................................................................... 8-116World Class Tech. Corp. v. Ormco Corp. .................................... 9-52Wright, In re .....................................................................9-10, 17-26Wyeth v. Abbott Labs. .......................................................9-24, 16-18

X

X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................. 9-84Xu, Ex parte ................................................................................. 7-23

Y

Yamazaki, In re ........................................................................... 19-4YBM Magnex, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n .................................. 8-98Yoder Bros. v. Cal.-Fla. Plant Corp. .......................... 13-2, 13-4, 13-5York Prods., Inc. v. Cent. Tractor Farm & Family Ctr. ................ 8-39Youman, In re .............................................................................. 19-8

Z

Z4 Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. ............................................... 8-97Zenon Envtl., Inc. v. U.S. Filter Corp. ........................................ 9-80Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co. ................................................. 8-29

Table of Authorities

T–27

Page 28: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

UNITED STATES CODE

TITLE 7

§ 2321 et seq. ...........7-39, 13-2§ 2321–82 .......................... 17-3§ 2402 ............................... 17-3

TITLE 17

§ 101 ........................14-2, 14-3§ 117 ................................. 14-2§ 901 et seq. ...................... 14-2

TITLE 18

§ 1001 ................................. 2-7

TITLE 19

§ 1337(a) ........................... 8-82

TITLE 20

§ 1001(a) ........................... 2-13§ 1003(21) ......................... 2-13

TITLE 35

§ 32 ................................... 10-3§ 101 ................... 1-3, 7-2, 7-9,

.............. 7-11, 8-16, 8-68,

....8-71, 8-72, 8-88, 8-123,

.......... 9-5, 9-7, 9-23, 9-40,

........... 9-59, 15-11, 16-10,

............. 17-8, 17-9, 17-10,

.......... 17-14, 18-21, 18-22§ 102 ........ 1-3, 7-11, 8-6, 8-11,

..... 8-12, 8-13, 8-16, 8-71,

.......... 8-124, 10-9, 11-19,

.............. 16-9, 17-8, 17-9,

.....................17-14, 17-19§ 102(b) .......................1-7, 5-5,

.......................9-11, 12-12§ 102(b)(2)(C) .................... 8-12§ 102(c) .............................. 8-13§ 102(d) ....................1-6, 11-19§ 102(e) ........... 12-6, 12-7, 12-9§ 102(f) .......................4-2, 8-17§ 102(g) ........... 1-2, 8-124, 9-86§ 103 ................. 1-3, 5-2, 7-11,

....... 8-6, 8-11, 8-12, 8-13,

....8-65, 8-71, 9-50, 11-19,

............. 17-8, 17-9, 17-15,

.......... 17-16, 17-17, 17-19§ 103(b) ............................. 19-7§ 103(c) .....................2-21, 2-34§ 111 ................................... 2-4§ 111(a) ......... 2-15, 2-36, 12-2,

.............. 12-4, 12-5, 12-6,

......................12-9, 12-10,

.....................12-13, 12-16§ 111(b) ...................12-2, 12-5,

.......................12-8, 12-13§ 111(b)(2) ......................... 12-9§ 111(b)(6) ......................... 12-5§ 111(b)(8) ..............12-9, 12-10§ 112 ............ 1-3, 1-6, 1-8, 2-3,

....... 2-22, 5-4, 7-24, 7-31,

....7-33, 8-6, 8-7, 8-8, 8-9,

..... 8-10, 8-11, 8-19, 8-30,

..... 8-36, 8-38, 8-39, 8-40,

..... 8-41, 8-42, 8-49, 8-55,

..... 8-56, 8-58, 8-72, 8-75,

..... 8-76, 8-77, 8-78, 8-88,

............ 8-98, 8-99, 8-101,

........ 8-110, 8-117, 8-120,

..... 8-122, 8-123, 9-4, 9-5,

..... 9-10, 9-17, 9-18, 9-23,

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–28

Page 29: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

..... 9-28, 9-33, 9-40, 9-49,

..... 9-55, 9-56, 9-59, 9-67,

..... 9-68, 9-70, 9-74, 9-78,

....9-79, 11-10, 12-8, 12-9,

......... 12-10, 12-11, 12-15,

............. 14-5, 14-9, 14-12,

......... 14-13, 14-14, 15-20,

......... 15-22, 15-28, 15-29,

......... 15-30, 15-34, 15-36,

............. 16-4, 16-7, 16-10,

......... 16-11, 16-12, 16-13,

........... 17-8, 17-10, 17-19,

......... 17-25, 17-30, 17-32,

.....................17-35, 17-39,

......................17-59, 18-21§ 112(b) ............................. 7-21§ 112(f) ............................ 8-125§ 112, ¶ 1 ................9-49, 12-8,

............. 12-9, 14-9, 15-28§ 112, ¶ 2 ................8-38, 8-78,

.....................15-36, 17-35§ 112, ¶ 4 .......................... 8-55§ 112, ¶ 6 .......... 8-8, 8-9, 8-30,

..... 8-36, 8-37, 8-38, 8-39,

..... 8-40, 8-41, 8-42, 8-76,

..... 8-78, 8-79, 9-10, 9-74,

............. 9-67, 9-68, 15-30§ 113 ................. 2-16, 6-3, 6-4,

............... 6-5, 14-9, 15-36§ 116 ................... 4-2, 4-7, 4-9,

.........................12-5, 13-5§ 119 .....................2-26, 11-19,

.........................12-4, 19-9§ 119(a) ..................9-29, 12-12§ 119(e) .............................. 12-3§ 119(e)(1) ................9-28, 12-6§ 119(e)(3) ......................... 12-2§ 120 .........................1-7, 9-28,

........... 10-16, 12-4, 17-34§ 121 ............. 2-20, 8-17, 8-99,

........ 8-105, 8-106, 8-116,

........... 9-48, 16-14, 17-36§ 122 ............................... 12-13§ 122(b)(1) ....................... 12-13

§ 122(b)(2)(B)(i) .................. 2-38§ 122(b)(2)(B)(iii) ................ 2-39§ 122(c) ................................ 1-7§ 132 ................................. 9-10§ 154 ................................. 12-2§ 154(d) .....................3-8, 8-69,

.....................12-13, 18-23§ 161 .......................13-1, 13-2,

............... 13-3, 13-4, 13-8§ 161–64 ...................7-39, 17-3§ 163 ................................. 13-2§ 171 ............ 11-2, 11-3, 11-13§ 172 ............................... 11-19§ 181 ....................18-11, 18-12§ 184 ....................18-11, 18-12§ 185 ............................... 18-11§ 202(c)(4) ......................... 2-12§ 251 ........................19-2, 19-7§ 251(a) ............................. 19-4§ 252 ................................. 19-5§ 253 ................................. 19-2§ 254 ................................. 19-2§ 255 ................................. 19-2§ 256 ................................... 4-9§ 261 .................. 2-8, 2-9, 2-11§ 271 ......................8-83, 17-39§ 271(a) ........................... 15-14§ 271(e)(1) ..................4-2, 17-4§ 271(f) .............................. 8-82§ 271(g) ...................8-82, 17-61§ 282 ......................9-28, 17-30§ 285 ................................. 10-2§ 287 ................................. 8-82§ 287(c) .............................. 8-97§ 301–07 ............................ 19-2§ 365 ................................. 2-26§ 371 .........................2-15, 3-2,

................... 3-3, 3-9, 3-10§ 371(b) ............................. 2-15§ 371(c)(1) ......................... 12-6§ 371(c)(2) ......................... 12-6§ 371(c)(4) ......................... 12-6§ 371(f) .............................. 2-15

Table of Authorities

T–29

Page 30: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

TITLE 35

§ 1.51(b) ............................ 2-30

TITLE 37

§ 1.1(e) ................................. 1-9§ 1.4(d) .............................. 2-40§ 1.7(a)(2)(iii) ..................... 9-47§ 1.9(a)(2) .......................... 12-2§ 1.10(a) ............................ 2-40§ 1.10(b) ............................ 2-40§ 1.14(a) ............................ 9-47§ 1.16 ................................ 2-30§ 1.16(t) ............................... 3-2§ 1.17 .............................. 11-21§ 1.17(b) .......................... 10-11§ 1.17(h) ...................2-32, 6-25§ 1.17(i) ............................. 2-17§ 1.25 ................................ 2-38§ 1.27 .......................2-11, 2-12§ 1.27(a)(2)(ii) .................... 2-12§ 1.27(a)(3)(ii)(A) ............... 2-13§ 1.27(a)(4)(i) ..................... 2-12§ 1.27(a)(5) ........................ 2-12§ 1.29 ................................ 2-13§ 1.29(i) ............................. 2-13§ 1.29(j) ............................. 2-14§ 1.31 .................................. 2-7§ 1.32(a) .............................. 1-3§ 1.34(a) .............................. 2-7§ 1.34(b) .............................. 2-8§ 1.41(b) .............................. 2-6§ 1.45(c) ............................. 12-5§ 1.46(b) ............................ 2-15§ 1.48(d) ............................ 12-6§ 1.48(e) ............................. 12-6§ 1.51 .........................2-4, 2-33§ 1.51(b) ............................ 2-30§ 1.51(c) ............................. 12-8§ 1.51(c)(1) ........................ 12-8

§ 1.51(c)(1)(viii) ................. 12-8§ 1.52 .......................2-18, 2-19§ 1.52(a) ............................ 2-19§ 1.52(b)(2) ........................ 2-19§ 1.52(b)(6) ...............2-19, 9-86§ 1.52(c) ............ 2-7, 2-19, 4-15§ 1.52(d)(1) ........................ 2-17§ 1.52(e) ................15-38, 17-34§ 1.52(e)(3)(i) ..................... 9-50§ 1.52(e)(3)(ii) .................... 9-86§ 1.52(e)(5) ...................... 17-34§ 1.52(f)(1) ......................... 2-21§ 1.53 ................. 1-9, 2-3, 12-8§ 1.53(b)(2)(ii) .................... 12-5§ 1.53(c) .......... 2-3, 2-17, 12-10§ 1.53(c)(1) ........................ 12-8§ 1.53(c)(4) ........................ 12-9§ 1.53(d) .............................. 2-4§ 1.53(f)(3) ..................2-5, 2-30§ 1.53(f)(3)(i) ...................... 2-30§ 1.55 ......................2-15, 2-27,

.........................9-47, 9-78§ 1.55(a)(2) ........................ 2-28§ 1.55(d) ............................ 2-27§ 1.56 ............ 4-14, 10-1, 10-2,

.............. 10-3, 10-4, 10-5,

.......................10-8, 10-11§ 1.56(a) ............................ 2-25§ 1.56(a)(1) ........................ 10-8§ 1.56(b) ............................ 2-25§ 1.56(c) ........................... 10-12§ 1.56(c)(3) ........................ 10-5§ 1.57(a) ...................9-78, 9-79§ 1.57(c) ............................. 9-78§ 1.58 ................................ 9-86§ 1.58(a) ............................ 9-86§ 1.58(b) ............................ 2-19§ 1.63 .......................2-27, 19-8§ 1.63(c) ............................... 2-6§ 1.64 .................................. 2-5§ 1.68 ...........................2-6, 2-7

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–30

Page 31: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

§ 1.69 .................................. 2-6§ 1.69(b) .............................. 2-6§ 1.71 ................................ 2-17§ 1.71–1.75 .......................... 1-6§ 1.71(d) .......................... 15-38§ 1.71(e) ..................9-85, 15-38§ 1.71(f) ............................. 2-19§ 1.71(g)(1) ........................ 2-21§ 1.72(a) ............................ 9-43§ 1.72(b) ...................2-24, 9-88§ 1.73 .......................2-22, 9-55§ 1.74 ................................ 2-22§ 1.75(a) ............................ 2-23§ 1.75(b) ............................ 8-54§ 1.75(b)(2) ........................ 8-54§ 1.75(c) ....................8-55, 8-59§ 1.75(d) .......................... 8-109§ 1.75(d)(1) ........................ 2-23§ 1.75(e) ............................. 8-60§ 1.75(f) ....................2-23, 8-54§ 1.75(g) ............................. 2-23§ 1.75(h) ............................ 2-23§ 1.76 ................................ 9-42§ 1.77 ................................ 9-42§ 1.77(a) ......... 2-17, 9-42, 9-50§ 1.77(b) .......................... 15-38§ 1.77(b)(5) ...................... 17-34§ 1.78 ......................2-15, 9-47,

.........................9-78, 12-3§ 1.78(a) ............................ 2-20§ 1.78(a)(1) ...............2-20, 9-48§ 1.78(a)(2) ..............9-42, 9-45,

.........................9-47, 9-48§ 1.78(a)(3) ...............2-20, 9-48§ 1.78(a)(4) ........................ 9-48§ 1.78(a)(5)(iii) ................... 9-47§ 1.78(a)(5)(iv) .................. 2-20,

.........................9-46, 12-9§ 1.78(b)(2) ........................ 9-48§ 1.78(d)(3) ........................ 9-49§ 1.81 .................................. 6-4§ 1.81(b) .................6-14, 15-37§ 1.81(c) ............................... 6-4§ 1.83(a) ....................2-17, 6-6,

............. 8-110, 9-73, 14-9

§ 1.83(b) .............................. 6-7§ 1.83(c) ............................. 2-17§ 1.84 ......................2-17, 6-15,

............. 6-16, 6-25, 15-38§ 1.84(a) ............................ 6-16§ 1.84(a)(1) ........................ 6-16§ 1.84(a)(2) ...............6-25, 9-58§ 1.84(b) .................6-24, 11-17§ 1.84(c) ............................. 6-19§ 1.84(f) ............................. 6-16§ 1.84(g) ............................. 6-16§ 1.84(h) ............................ 6-17§ 1.84(h)(2) ........................ 6-17§ 1.84(i) ......................6-9, 6-17§ 1.84(k) ............................ 6-17§ 1.84(l) ............................. 6-18§ 1.84(m) ..................6-18, 6-21§ 1.84(n) ..................6-18, 6-23,

.......................6-24, 14-11§ 1.84(p)(1) ........................ 6-18§ 1.84(p)(3) ........................ 6-18§ 1.84(s) ........................... 15-38§ 1.84(t) ............................. 6-18§ 1.85(a) ............................ 6-15§ 1.96(b) ....... 6-25, 9-48, 15-38§ 1.96(b)(1) ...................... 15-38§ 1.96(b)(2) ...................... 15-38§ 1.96(c) ........................... 15-38§ 1.96(d) .......................... 15-38§ 1.97(a) ............................ 2-25§ 1.97(b) .......................... 10-11§ 1.97(c) ........................... 10-11§ 1.97(d) .......................... 10-12§ 1.97(e) ........................... 10-12§ 1.97(f) ........................... 10-12§ 1.98 ....................2-34, 10-12,

.....................10-13, 11-21§ 1.98(a)(2) ...................... 10-16§ 1.98(b) .......................... 10-14§ 1.98(c) ........................... 10-16§ 1.98(d) .......................... 10-16§ 1.102 .............................. 2-28§ 1.115 ................................ 1-9§ 1.115(a) ...............2-24, 8-102§ 1.115(b)(1) ...................... 2-25

Table of Authorities

T–31

Page 32: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

§ 1.117(8)(a) ...................... 19-6§ 1.121(b)(3) ...................... 19-7§ 1.126 .............................. 8-54§ 1.131 .............................. 10-7§ 1.136 .................10-12, 17-34§ 1.139 .............................. 12-2§ 1.151 .............................. 11-8§ 1.152 ..... 11-16, 11-17, 11-18§ 1.152–1.155 .................... 11-8§ 1.153 ............................ 11-12§ 1.153(a) ...............11-9, 11-11§ 1.153(b) .......................... 11-8§ 1.154 .............................. 11-9§ 1.155 ...................2-28, 11-21§ 1.161 .............................. 13-6§ 1.162 .............................. 13-6§ 1.163(a) .................13-7, 13-8§ 1.163(c) ........................... 13-6§ 1.164 .............................. 13-9§ 1.165(a) ........................ 13-10§ 1.165(b) ........................ 13-10§ 1.166(b) ........................ 13-10§ 1.167 .............................. 13-6§ 1.167(a) .......................... 13-4§ 1.167(b) .......................... 13-5§ 1.171 .............................. 19-6§ 1.172 .....................19-6, 19-8§ 1.173(a) .......................... 19-7§ 1.173(b) .......................... 19-6§ 1.173(e) ........................... 19-6§ 1.175 .....................19-6, 19-8§ 1.176 .............................. 2-30§ 1.178 .............................. 19-6

§ 1.205(a) ........................ 8-102§ 1.291 ............................ 19-10§ 1.332 ................................ 2-9§ 1.334 ................................ 2-9§ 1.607(c) ......................... 10-10§ 1.704(b)(6) ...................... 2-25§ 1.704(c)(8) .................... 10-12§ 1.704(d) ........................ 10-12§ 1.801 ............................ 17-31§ 1.801 et seq. ........9-13, 17-31§ 1.801–1.809 .................. 17-31§ 1.802 ............................ 17-31§ 1.803 ............................ 17-32§ 1.804 .................17-31, 17-32§ 1.805 ............................ 17-31§ 1.806 ............................ 17-31§ 1.807 ............................ 17-31§ 1.808 ............................ 17-31§ 1.821 ............................ 17-33§ 1.821–1.825 .................. 17-32§ 1.821(c) ......................... 17-34§ 1.821(e) ......................... 17-34§ 1.823 ............................ 17-33§ 1.824 ............................ 17-33§ 2.15(a) ............................ 2-24§ 3.11 ................................ 2-10§ 3.31 ................................ 2-10§ 3.37(b) ............................ 19-6§ 3.61 .............................. 14-11§ 3.73(b) .............................. 2-8§ 5.11 .............................. 18-11§ 55 ................................... 2-27§ 78 ................................... 2-27

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINATIONPROCEDURE

§ 201.03 .............................. 4-9§ 201.11 ............................ 9-45§ 201.13 ............................ 2-26§ 201.14(b) ........................ 2-26§ 201.15 ............................ 2-27

§ 302.03 .............................. 2-9§ 302.05 .............................. 2-9§ 310 ................................. 2-20§ 403 ................................... 2-8§ 503 ................................. 2-39

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–32

Page 33: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

§ 509.02 ............................ 2-12§ 601 ............. 2-17, 8-19, 9-42,

............. 12-8, 12-9, 12-10§ 601.01 .............................. 2-4§ 601.01(f) ........................... 6-4§ 601.02 .............................. 2-8§ 602 ................................... 2-6§ 608.01(a) ..... 9-33, 9-42, 9-50§ 608.01(b) ...............2-24, 9-89§ 608.01(c) ................2-21, 9-50§ 608.01(d) ...............2-22, 9-78§ 608.01(g) ................2-22, 9-59§ 608.01(h) ........................ 2-22§ 608.01(m) .............2-23, 8-20,

.............. 8-51, 8-52, 8-53,

.........................8-54, 8-60§ 608.01(n) ...............8-58, 8-59§ 608.01(o) ........................ 9-16§ 608.01(p) .... 9-26, 9-55, 9-71,

...... 9-78, 9-80, 16-7, 17-9§ 608.01(r) ......................... 9-51§ 608.01(v) .... 8-121, 9-77, 9-85§ 608.02 .......... 2-16, 2-17, 6-3,

.............. 6-16, 6-22, 6-23,

.........................6-24, 6-25§ 608.02(b) .......................... 6-6§ 608.02(d) .......................... 6-7§ 609 ....................10-13, 10-14§ 609(2) ........................... 10-16§ 708 ................................. 2-28§ 801 et seq. ...................... 8-17§ 802.01 .......................... 8-105§ 803(II) ........................... 8-106§ 803.02 ..................8-62, 8-63,

.......................8-65, 8-106§ 804 ................................. 9-59§ 806.05 .......................... 8-106§ 809 ............................... 8-105§ 904.01(c) ....................... 11-20§ 1302.04(b) ........................ 8-9§ 1403 ............................... 19-5§ 1410 ............................... 19-6§ 1410.01 .......................... 19-8§ 1411 ............................... 19-6§ 1412.01 .......................... 19-7

§ 1412.02 .......................... 19-7§ 1412.03 .......................... 19-7§ 1414 ......................19-6, 19-8§ 1417 ............................... 19-9§ 1442 ............................... 19-9§ 1442.04 .......................... 19-9§ 1502 ............................... 11-2§ 1503.01 ..............11-9, 11-10,

.....................11-11, 11-12§ 1503.02 ............11-12, 11-16,

......... 11-17, 11-18, 11-19§ 1504 ........ 11-4, 11-19, 11-20§ 1504.01(b) .................... 11-10§ 1504.01(d) ...................... 11-5§ 1504.05 .............11-12, 11-13§ 1504.30 .......................... 2-28§ 1512 ............................... 11-8§ 1601 ............................... 13-3§ 1603 ............................... 13-6§ 1605 ......................13-8, 13-9§ 1606 ............................. 13-10§ 1607 ............................. 13-10§ 1609 ......................13-4, 13-6§ 1610 .......... 13-7, 13-9, 13-10§ 1612 ............................... 13-7§ 2001.06(a) ...................... 10-8§ 2001.06(b) .............10-8, 10-9§ 2001.06(c) ....................... 10-9§ 2001.06(d) .................... 10-10§ 2004(10) ......................... 10-6§ 2004(11) ......................... 10-7§ 2004(13) ....................... 10-15§ 2004(18) ......................... 10-7§ 2103(III) ......................... 7-11§ 2104 ............................... 7-11§ 2105 .............. 7-3, 7-11, 8-16§ 2106 ............................... 7-11§ 2106(I) .............................. 7-5§ 2106.01 .............15-28, 15-32§ 2106.02 ........................ 15-28§ 2107.02 .............16-11, 17-10§ 2111.02 .......................... 8-24§ 2111.03 .................8-27, 8-30§ 2113 ............................... 8-67§ 2141 ............................... 8-13

Table of Authorities

T–33

Page 34: Table of Authorities - NGB to Write a Patent... · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-96 3M Innovative Props.

§ 2143 ............................... 8-13§ 2144.05 .......................... 8-95§ 2163 ............................... 9-12§ 2163.03 .......................... 14-5§ 2164 ............................... 9-17§ 2164.02 .......................... 9-26§ 2165 ............................... 9-29§ 2172.01 ........................ 8-122§ 2173.01 ........................ 8-116§ 2173.05(e) ..................... 8-109§ 2173.05(g) ..................... 16-17

§ 2173.05(h) ............8-62, 8-63,........... 8-64, 8-116, 16-15

§ 2173.05(i) ....................... 9-87§ 2173.05(k) .............8-46, 8-47§ 2173.05(p) ...........8-67, 16-16§ 2401 et seq. .................. 17-31§ 2401–2421 .................... 17-32§ 2421.02 ........................ 17-33§ 2422–2431 .................... 17-34

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–34