System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman
-
Upload
eric-kingsbury-mba -
Category
Engineering
-
view
185 -
download
2
Transcript of System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman
![Page 1: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
AZ WFS PRESENTATION
SYSTEMS THINKING AND THE ARIZONA HOMELESS PROBLEM
Bob Bergman [email protected]
480-241-4651
![Page 2: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Quick intro to systems thinking
• Complex systems & wicked problems
• Homeless problem revisited as example of systems thinking / system dynamics
• Example simulation for policy creation
![Page 3: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Systems Thinking Traditional analysis focuses on the individual pieces of what is being studied. Systems thinking focuses on how the things being studied interact with the other constituents of the system.
Instead of isolating smaller and smaller parts of the system being studied, systems thinking works by expanding its view to consider larger and larger numbers of interactions as an issue is being studied.
Image Source: Flickr Creative Commons, by erwlas
![Page 4: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Systems: Key Points
• Many of the interconnections in systems operate through the flow of information.
• The least obvious part of the system, its function or purpose, is often the most crucial determinate of the system’s behavior.
• System structure is the source of system behavior. System behavior reveals itself as a series of events over time.
![Page 5: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Systems
Function of a system is a product of the interaction among the parts
![Page 6: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Importance of understanding the dynamics of the whole system
Falls at the rate of 1 tile per day
![Page 7: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Importance of understanding the dynamics of the whole system
Unintended Consequence or just bad understanding of the system?
![Page 8: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Systems Thinking
“ Reductionism is the sin of modern life ….reducing things to their component parts and thereby, too often, missing the meaning and the message….” Charles Handy : 1932
![Page 9: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Our Problem
![Page 10: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Characteristics of Complex Non-Linear Systems
– Tightly Coupled “Everything influences everything else” “You can’t just do one thing”
– Dynamic Change occurs at many time scales
– Policy Resistant Many obvious solutions to problems fail or actually worsen the situation.
– Counterintuitive Cause and effect are distant in time and space
– Exhibit Tradeoffs Long term behavior is often different from short term behavior
System dynamics: is concerned with the behavior of a system over time
![Page 11: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Social Problems are Wicked Problems
• Wicked problem is defined to describe a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements
• Wicked Problems as defined by Rittel and Webber have the following characteristics: – The solution depends on how the problem is framed and
vice-versa (i.e., the problem definition depends on the solution)
– Stakeholders have radically different world views and different frames for understanding the problem.
– The constraints that the problem is subject to and the resources needed to solve it change over time.
![Page 12: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Wicked Problems & Systems Thinking
• The nonobvious interrelationships among elements in a complex system often thwart people’s best intentions to sustainably improve system performance.
• The complex, nonlinear problems that most foundations & gov’t organizations address can be solved most effectively by thinking systemically instead of linearly about these problems.
![Page 13: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
System Thinking vs Linear Thinking
![Page 14: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Systems thinking creates a new language for
communicating about complexities and interdependencies
![Page 15: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Causal Loop Diagrams
• An approach to understanding a system, qualitatively
thing 1 adds to thing 2
thing 1 subtracts from thing 2
sales adds to revenue
product sales subtracts from finished goods inventory
resources interact with productivity to add to finished goods inventory
![Page 16: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Delay
• Thing 1 has a delayed positive influence over thing 2 (system lag time)
• The implications of interaction often take time
• Seldom does anything happen instantaneously
• Systems deceive us because of delays
![Page 17: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Reinforcing Loop Archetype
• Growth or decline of the state of the system
Positive feedback or reinforcing loop
![Page 18: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Balancing Loop
• Attempts to bring two things into agreement. Goal seeking.
Regulates system behavior Opposes system change from set goal Regulate system to provide stability
Negative feedback or balancing loop
![Page 19: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
System Archetypes Con’t
![Page 20: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Quick Fix Dilemma (Shifting the Burden)
• Traditional approaches cannot be used to solve Wicked Problems. A more systems approach is necessary in order to prevent side effects or unintended consequences.
• Examples of unintended consequences: – Homeless shelters perpetuate homelessness
– Food aid leads to increased starvation
– “Get tough” prison sentences fail to reduce fear of violent crime
![Page 21: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Homeless in the US through 2012
![Page 22: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Current Approach For Homeless Problem
• Federal Level $Billions spent through HUD – McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (1987) provided federal
funding for homeless students, emergency relief provisions for shelter, food, mobile health care, and transitional housing
– Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009 re-authorized McKinney-Vento… changed some definitions and HUDs role
• Maricopa county – Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) is a Council of
Governments that represents 27 cities—coordinates grants from HUD pertaining to homelessness
– 2014 homeless point in time count, 5,918 people had experienced homelessness in Maricopa County, with 1,053 of them reported to be sleeping on the streets and 4,865 people in shelters. Of the total people counted, 1,819 were children.
![Page 23: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Traditional Structure
![Page 24: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Systems Approach
• Factors that increase the risk of becoming homeless:.
• Individual risk factors
– a. Poverty, discrimination, and lack of education
– b. Substance abuse, mental illness, and domestic violence
– c. Lack of support for minors
– d. Absence of life management skills and low underlying self-esteem
– e. Vulnerability to scams, slum lords, and quick cash schemes
• Limited permanent, accessible, living wage jobs
• Financial problems stemming from the above, e.g. difficulties paying for medical emergencies and child support – essentials beyond rent and food
• Limited permanent, safe, affordable, supportive housing.
![Page 25: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Generalized Homeless Problem
Number of
Homeless People
Temporary
Shelters
Permanent
Housing
+
-
+
-
Visibility of
Homeless Problem
+
Pressure to make
changes
+
We need to help
people now syndrome
![Page 26: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Homelessness System in AZ
![Page 27: System thinking and the arizona homeless problem by Bob Bergman](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042820/55d05519bb61ebb97b8b4617/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Understanding the Dynamics of the Systems for Policy Development
http://forio.com/simulate/rlbergma/