Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark...

47
Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark Crosby, Engineer Victor McDaniel, Supervising Professional Engineer SJRWMD, Division of Surface Water Management June 6, 2000

Transcript of Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark...

  • Slide 1

Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark Crosby, Engineer Victor McDaniel, Supervising Professional Engineer SJRWMD, Division of Surface Water Management June 6, 2000 Slide 2 Purpose and Goals of Study Locate sources of high concentration of Total Phosphorus (TP) Identify contributing factors to these high concentrations of TP Investigate correlation between high on-site TP and high TP discharged at pump stations Use information to make recommendations regarding more effective on-site management practices to help reduce TP discharge loads Slide 3 Background 26,000-acre farm in Indian River County Bordered by Fellsmere Canal & C-54 to North Berry Groves and City of Fellsmere to East BCWMA to South SJWMA and Blue Cypress Marsh CA to West (Illustrated on following map) Slide 4 Sun Ag Local Area Map Slide 5 Sun Ag Land Use Land uses include Citrus, Pasture, Sod and Row Crops Slide 6 Sun Ag Irrigation & Drainage Western area primarily seepage irrigated by surface water from SJWMA Eastern area primarily microspray irrigated by groundwater Drainage is by 7 pump stations Slide 7 BCWMA-W BCWMA-E Fellsmere Canal SJWMA C-54 Blue Cypress Lake BCMCA S-96D S-96 S-96C S-96B BCMCA Plug S-254 Berry Groves Slide 8 Study Design Delineated farm according to three criteria: Land Use (Pasture, Sod, or Citrus) Soil Type (Muck or Sand) Irrigation Method (Microjet or Seepage) Then internal WQ sites were chosen to represent combinations of these criteria. Slide 9 Three Letter Code: Land Use P-Pasture C-Citrus S-Sod R-Row Crop Irrigation F-Seepage (Flood) M-Microjet S-Sprinkler Soils S-Sand M-Muck Criteria Delineation Slide 10 Sampling Frequency From 8/6/97 to 6/7/99 Limited by staff time Scheduled to coincide with pumping due to: Irrigation Storm Events 3 to 12 total sampling events per site Slide 11 Results of Internal Sites For internal sites, a TP concentration exceeding 0.500 mg/L was considered high. Three Sod sites and three Citrus sites exceeded an average TP concentration of 0.500 mg/L for the study period. These sites are located in the basins for pumps stations PS#4, PS#5, and PS#6. Slide 12 Average TP Summary for Internal WQ Stations Slide 13 Characteristics of High Average TP Internal Sites Slide 14 Field Blocks with High Average TP Extent of blocks with land use, irrigation and soils identical to block at WQ station Primarily muck areas in western portion of farm Sod fields on muck are directly adjacent to PS #4 and PS #5. Citrus runoff has greater distance to travel to discharge pump. Slide 15 TP Concentration for Sod Sites High degree of variation Higher concentration during wet season Correlation between SAI04 and SAI22 Slide 16 TP Concentration for Citrus Sites SAI05 has high degree of variation SAI05 (west, muck) and SAI11 (east, sand) show opposite temporal fluctuations (unexplained). Slide 17 Average TP Concentration Summary for Pump Stations Average concentration exceeding 0.300 mg/L considered high All PSs except #3 exceed this guideline. PS#2, #6 and #7 only slightly exceed 0.300 mg/L (~ +10%) PS#1 moderately exceeds 0.300 mg/L (~ +30%) PS #4 and #5 significantly exceed 0.300 mg/L (over +100%) Slide 18 Correlation between Internal Sites and their Pump Stations High r value suggests that runoff from blocks at internal site significantly affects discharge TP concentration at PS If % change in TP is -, then internal site may add to TP If % change in TP is +, then internal site may dilute TP Slide 19 Internal Sites vs. PS #1 Fair visual correlation between SAI15 and PS #1 (not statistically supported) Source of high TP concentration at PS #1 may be SAI19 (need more data to confirm) Slide 20 Internal Sites vs. PS #4 High r between SAI03, SAI20, SAI22 and PS #4 Low r between SAI04 and PS #4 possibly due to significant dilution effects downstream (possibly SAI03). Slide 21 Internal Sites vs. PS #5 Few data points High r between SAI17 and PS #5 Short distance between SAI17 and PS #5 = little treatment or dilution (~3% reduction) Slide 22 Internal Sites vs. PS #6 Fair correlation between SAI11 and PS #6 Significant treatment (reduction) or dilution between SAI11 and PS #6 (~ 65% reduction or 3.2% per 1000 ft.) Slide 23 PS #1 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Blue bars meet 0.300 mg/L guideline Decreasing trend Slide 24 PS #4 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Has never met the 0.300 mg/L guideline Decreasing trend Slide 25 PS #5 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Has never met the 0.300 mg/L guideline Increasing trend Slide 26 PS #6 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Blue bars meet 0.300 mg/L guideline Increasing trend Slide 27 Conclusion Summary Sources of High TP Concentration are sod fields and citrus on muck soils in west and SAI11 (citrus on sand) in east. High TP sites tend to drain through PS #4, #5, and #6. Sod farming and citrus on muck soils appear to be primary factors contributing to high TP concentrations. A theoretical average dilution/treatment efficiency of 2.7% per 1000 feet of canal distance traveled was calculated. PS #1 through #4, and #7 showed a long term decreasing trend of annual average TP concentration. PS #5 and #6 showed a long term increasing trend Slide 28 Potential Recommendations Efforts to reduce TP prior to discharge should focus on sod and citrus areas on muck soils in western portion. Efforts to reduce TP at the discharge point should focus on PS #4, #5, and #6. On-site reduction of TP may be achieved by lengthening the travel distance (t.o.c.) between fields and pump. Runoff should be routed through areas of lower TP concentration while maximizing travel distance. Sod fields near PS #4 and #5 are primary candidates for this approach due to their proximity to the pumps. Slide 29 Total Yearly and Monthly Discharge Data for Sun Ag (1995-99) Total Yearly and Monthly Rainfall Data for Sun Ag (1995-99) Total Phosphorus Loads Comparison of TP loads, Pumped Discharge, and TP Concentration Data Slide 30 Slide 31 Sun Ag Total Monthly Discharge (1995-99) Slide 32 Slide 33 Sun Ag Pump Station Discharges Slide 34 Sun Ag Total Phosphorus Loads Slide 35 Sun Ag TP Monthly Average Loads 1995-99 Slide 36 Sun Ag TP Loads by Pump Station Slide 37 Sun Ag Pump Station 1 Slide 38 Sun Ag Pump Station 2 Slide 39 Sun Ag Pump Station 3 Slide 40 Sun Ag Pump Station 4 Slide 41 Sun Ag Pump Station 5 Slide 42 Sun Ag Pump Station 6 Slide 43 Sun Ag Pump Station 7 Slide 44 Sun Ag TP Loading Data 1995-99 Slide 45 THE END Slide 46 Sun Ag TKN Load (Averaged from 1995-99) Slide 47