Submitting Medical Papers for Publication (How to avoid getting kicked in the stomach) and Reviewing...
-
Upload
melinda-ferguson -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Submitting Medical Papers for Publication (How to avoid getting kicked in the stomach) and Reviewing...
Submitting Medical Papers for PublicationSubmitting Medical Papers for Publication
(How to avoid getting kicked in the stomach)(How to avoid getting kicked in the stomach)
andand
Reviewing Medical Papers Reviewing Medical Papers
(How to kick others in the stomach politely)(How to kick others in the stomach politely)
Views from the victim and the mugger Views from the victim and the mugger
Professor Michael Gelfand(1912 - 1985)
University of Zimbabwe
KICK ME
Overview and Goals Overview and Goals
• How to avoid kicks
–writing a decent paper
• How to respond when kicked
- responding to reviewers
• How to kick others without being a bully
– reviewing
Defense Against the Dark Arts Defense Against the Dark Arts
• Title - 3 routes– Describe the Battle – Declare Victory– Declare you Won the War
• Authors ?– Does everyone qualify?– Have you left anyone out? – Order? Seen it? Never forge a signature
Defense Against the Dark ArtsDefense Against the Dark Arts
• Abstract – Only thing most people read – Data
• Introduction– Why did the study? Not a literature
review – Have to sell the idea (why should I
care?)
Defense Against the Dark ArtsDefense Against the Dark Arts
• Methods– IRB and informed consent– How you did the study – How you analyzed the data
• Results – What you found. Tell a story – Emphasize the positive– Don’t repeat data
Defense Against the Dark ArtsDefense Against the Dark Arts
• Discussion – So What ? – Tell a story, avoid bias - you’ve seen the same movie
(the data) – Not a literature review (but think)– Avoid Industry style – The function of statistics is to tell you if findings are
statistically significant
• Conclusion – Based on your data – How much speculation can you get away with ?
Defense Against the Dark ArtsDefense Against the Dark Arts
• References – Primary source often but not always – Reasonable number, avoid narcissism, Refman – Do you cite the journal submitting to? Style?
• Tables – Self Standing. Careful with Abbreviations – Data in Tables and text must match– Reasonable number
• Figures – Reasonable number – Abbreviations– Quality – Measures of spread
Defense Against the Dark ArtsDefense Against the Dark Arts
• Which Journal ?– Aim high or low?– Appropriate? – Instructions
• Cover Letter – responsibilities of the author– Not a book
• Don’t bug the Editor too much • Success = new, interesting,
important and valid
Kisses of DeathKisses of Death
• “We thus confirmed …”(New)
• No story (Interesting)
• Story and data do not match
Kisses of DeathKisses of Death
• Reader can’t understand what you did
• Fails the “So what test” (can’t understand
why you did it) (Important)
• Salami publication
• Invalid – Design, Analysis (Valid)
Bad FormBad Form
• Sloppy. Missing pages, illegible pages, wrong version, typos etc
Very Bad Form• Submitting to 2 journals at once, • blindsided authors
GOING TO JAIL FORM • Duplicate publication • Making up data
Telling a story Telling a story
• In the beginning ……
• So what?
• One sentence telegraphs the nextI bought a dog and a cat. There have been many burglaries in
my neighborhood. I work all day
• One paragraph telegraphs the next
• Imaginary Headings
• Proffread
Defense Against Dementors Defense Against Dementors how to respond when attackedhow to respond when attacked ? ? With graceWith grace
• If rejected take your
kicks (usually)
• If revising do it point by
point.
• Do what they asked
(usually)
• Show you did what they
asked.
• Don’t whine, grovel or bite
• Proffread
How to Kick Others in the Stomach and Have How to Kick Others in the Stomach and Have Them and You Feel Good About it. (With grace) Them and You Feel Good About it. (With grace)
• Responsibilities of a Reviewer – Conflict of interest – Confidentiality – Do it. Constructive
• Comments to Editor – Novel? Important? Interesting? Journal suitability? – Valid?
• Comments to Authors – Good Manners, this is not an attack – General – Blow by blow – How detailed ?
Bad Kicking FormBad Kicking Form
• Not doing the review• Doing it late • No comments for author• Making it difficult with comments to the author for the
editor to reject the paper • Getting personal• Handwritten review to authors
• Playing God • Shooting from the hip
• Not taking some responsibility for the quality
STOP
SUMMARY SUMMARY
• How to avoid kicks –writing a decent paper
SWEAT, THINK, ORGANIZE, PRACTICE
• How to respond when kicked - responding to reviewers
SWEAT, THINK, ORGANIZE, PRACTICE
• How to kick others without being a bully – reviewing others
SWEAT, THINK, ORGANIZE, PRACTICE