STUDY OF CAVITY SURFACE EFFECT TO THE PLASTIC …umpir.ump.edu.my/3458/1/cd6259_97.pdf · ·...
Transcript of STUDY OF CAVITY SURFACE EFFECT TO THE PLASTIC …umpir.ump.edu.my/3458/1/cd6259_97.pdf · ·...
STUDY OF CAVITY SURFACE EFFECT TO THE PLASTIC FLOW
MUMTAZ BINTI NORMAN
Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements
for the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Manufacturing Engineering
Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG
JUNE 2012
v
ABSTRACT
The cavity surface of the mould will give an effect to the plastic flow during
injection. The project is to experiment the effects of the various surface roughness to the
plastic flow during injection. The parameters included the cavity roughness, feeding
design and metering parameters. The surface roughness can be determined by surface
comparator and machine by Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) die sinking. Cavity
pressure can be determined by cavity pressure sensor. Mould is designed by using 3D
software and analyse by Moldflow software. Result obtained by Moldflow software
need to be compared to the experimental to validate it.
vi
ABSTRAK
Permukaan acuan akan memberi kesan kepada aliran plastik semasa suntikan.
Projek ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan pelbagai kekasaran permukaan kepada aliran
plastik semasa suntikan. Parameter yang dikaji termasuk kekasaran rongga, parameter
reka bentuk dan pemeteran. Kekasaran permukaan boleh ditentukan oleh perbandingan
permukaan dan dimesin dengan menggunakan mesin pelepasan elektrik ‘die-sinking’.
Tekanan rongga boleh ditentukan oleh alat pengesan tekanan. Acuan direka dengan
menggunakan perisian 3D dan dianalisis oleh perisian Moldflow. Keputusan yang
diperolehi oleh perisian Moldflow perlu dibanding dengan eksperimen sebenar untuk
pengesahan.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
SUPERVISOR’S DECLARATION ii
STUDENT’S DECLARATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF SYMBOLS xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xvi
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Project background 1
1.3 Problem statement 2
1.4 Objective
1.4.1 Objective of the project
1.4.2 Impact
2
2
2
1.5 Scope of the project 2
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 4
2.1 Introduction 4
2.2 Material flow
2.2.1 Fundamental of mould flow
4
4
viii
2.2.2 Surface roughness
2.2.3 Effect of cavity surface roughness
2.2.4 Film or flash gate
4
5
6
2.3 EDM die-sinking
2.3.1 History
2.3.2 Fundamental
2.3.3 Applications
2.4 Injection moulding machine
2.4.1 Fundamental
2.4.2 Defects
2.4.3 Mould project in plastic injection mould
industries
2.5 Polypropylene (PP)
2.5.1 Properties of Propylene
7
7
7
8
9
9
11
11
12
13
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 14
3.1 Introduction 14
3.2 Flow chart of methodology 14
3.3 Literature Review 15
3.4 Mould design 15
3.5 Software
3.5.1 Moldflow software
3.5.2 DEWESoft software
3.5.3 Minitab software
21
21
27
29
3.6 Machining
3.6.1 Vertical milling machine
3.6.2 EDM die sinking
30
30
31
ix
3.6.3 Grinding machine
3.6.4 EDM super drill
33
35
3.7 Mould and sensor assembly 36
3.8 Injection moulding trial
3.8.1 Defects
38
42
3.9 Result and discussion 43
3.10 Conclusion and recommendation 43
CHAPTER 4 RESULT AND ANALYSIS 44
4.1 Introduction 44
4.2 Specific characteristics of semi-crystalline
thermoplastics
44
4.3 Cavity pressure curve 45
4.4 Data analysis
4.4.1 Moldflow analysis: gate thickness versus
pressure
4.4.2 Moldflow analysis: gate thickness versus filling
time
4.4.3 Moldflow analysis: gate thickness versus
pressure at V/P switchover
4.4.4 Injection moulding machine analysis
4.4.5 Cavity pressure sensor analysis
46
46
50
53
55
57
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Introduction 66
5.2 Conclusion 66
5.3 Recommendation
66
x
APPENDICES
APPENDIXES A
APPENDIXES B
APPENDIXES C
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page
3.1 Control factor and values for EDM die sinking machining 32
3.2 Fixed parameters in EDM die sinking machining 32
3.3 Fixed parameters in EDM Super Drill machine 35
4.1 Pressure for gate thickness 0.6 mm, 0.4 mm and 0.2 mm 48
4.2 Fill time for gate thickness 0.2 mm, 0.4 mm and 0.6 mm 51
4.3 Pressure for surface roughness 20 μ 54
4.4 Pressure for surface roughness 12 μ 55
4.5 Pressure for surface roughness 2 μ 57
4.6 Mean pressure for combined surface roughness 59
4.7 Cavity pressure for surface roughness 2 μ 61
4.8 Mean pressure for combined surface roughness 63
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title Page
2.1 Surface characteristic and terminology 5
2.2 Film gate with main parts 7
2.3 Working principle of EDM 8
2.4 Injection moulding machine with reciprocating screw 10
2.5 Main stages of a mould project in a typical mould-making
industry.
12
3.1 Flow chart of methodology 15
3.2 Dimension of the cavity insert and the product 16
3.3 Side view of the cavity insert with gate thickness 0.2mm 17
3.4 Side view of the cavity insert with gate thickness 0.4mm 17
3.5 Side view of the cavity insert with gate thickness 0.6mm 18
3.6 The location of the sensor (top view) 19
3.7 The location of the sensor (side view) 19
3.8 The location of the sensor (front view) 20
3.9 The location of the sensor (isometric view) 20
3.10 Mould assembly (isometric view) 21
3.11 Product by using Moldflow 22
3.12 Import file window 23
3.13 Mesh window 24
3.14 Analysis Sequence window for gate location 24
3.15 Change Property Type window for gate 25
3.16 Change Property Type window for runner 26
3.17 Analysis Sequence window for Cool + Fill + Pack + Warp 27
3.18 Hardware setup 27
xiii
3.19 Channel Setup 28
3.20 File storing 28
3.21 Data Analysis 29
3.22 Vertical Milling Machine 30
3.23 Electrode machined by milling machine 31
3.24 Surface Comparator 32
3.25 Electrical Discharge Machine (EDM) machine 33
3.26 Reciprocating Surface Grinding Machine 34
3.27 Floor Mounted Utility Grinding Machine 34
3.28 Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) Super Drill Machine 36
3.29 Cavity pressure sensor installation with spacer sleeve 37
3.30 Cavity pressure sensor 37
3.31 Complete mould assembly 38
3.32 Injection Moulding Machine 39
3.33 Mould opening 39
3.34 During ejection 40
3.35 Cavity side 40
3.36 Core side 41
3.37 Product 41
3.38 Short shot 42
3.39 Flashing 42
3.40 Bubbles 43
3.41 Warping 43
4.1 Graph cavity pressure versus time 45
4.2 Phase in cavity pressure curve 46
4.3 Pressure for 0.2 mm gate thickness 46
xiv
4.4 Pressure for 0.4 mm gate thickness 47
4.5 Pressure for 0.6 mm gate thickness 48
4.6 Graph injection pressure versus gate thickness 49
4.7 Fill time for 0.2 mm gate thickness 50
4.8 Fill time for 0.4 mm gate thickness 50
4.9 Fill time for 0.6 mm gate thickness 51
4.10 Graph fill time versus gate thickness 52
4.11 Pressure at V/P switchover for 0.2 mm gate thickness
53
4.12 Pressure at V/P switchover for 0.4 mm gate thickness
53
4.13 Pressure at V/P switchover for 0.6 mm gate thickness
54
4.14 Graph pressure at V/P switchover versus gate thickness 55
4.15 Graph pressure versus gate thickness for 20 μ surface roughness 58
4.16 Graph pressure versus gate thickness for 12 μ surface roughness 60
4.17 Graph pressure versus gate thickness for 2 μ surface roughness 62
4.18 Graph pressure versus gate thickness for combined surface
roughness
64
4.19 Graph pressure versus surface roughness 65
xv
LIST OF SYMBOLS
oC Celcius
μ Micron
xvi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
3D Three-dimensional
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
CAD Computer Aided Design
CPVC Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride
EDM Electrical Discharge Machining
ESC Environmental Stress Cracking
PA Polyamide
PE Polyethylene
POM Polyoxymethylene
PP Polypropylene
PVC Polyvinyl chloride
PVDF Polyvinylidene fluoride
STL STereoLithography
UV Ultraviolet
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter is discussed about the project background, the problem statement,
the objectives of the project and the project scope.
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND
Surface roughness plays an important role in filling the molten plastic into the
cavity (Ahsan, 2009). Surface roughness are expressed as deviation of the results of
various machining operations. Machined surface quality is characterized by precision
manufacturing with dimensions specified by the designer. Every machining operation
leaves evidence on the characteristics of machined surfaces. This evidence is in the
form of micro-fine irregularities left by the cutting tool. Each type of cutting tool leaves
its own pattern of individuals can be identified. This pattern is known as surface finish
or surface roughness.
For this project, the main objective is to determine the effects of the various
surface roughness to the plastic flow during injection. Different surface roughness gives
different effects to the plastic flow. There are several parameters that should be
considered and controlled which are injection pressure, surface roughness and different
thickness of the film gate while constant parameter is the size of the runner. Choosing
the best surface roughness is really important to produce very fine product. . Electrical
Discharge Machining (EDM) Die Sinking will be used to differentiate the surface
roughness based on the surface gauge comparator. There will be three different surface
roughness in this project. Each one of the surface roughness will have three different
gate thickness design.
2
1.3 PROBLEM STATEMENT
The terms surface finish and surface roughness are used very widely in industry
and are generally used to quantify the smoothness of a surface finish. Surface finish
could be specified in many different parameters. Due to the need for different
parameters in a wide variety of machining operations, a large number of newly
developed surface roughness parameters were developed (Mike, 1998). To determine
the best surface roughness, there are many parameters should be considered such as
injection pressure and the gate size. To overcome this problem, this research will help
the manufactures to predict the correct combination of parameters without wasting their
production time because the main purpose of this research is to determine the effects of
cavity surface roughness to the plastic flow.
1.4 OBJECTIVE
1.4.1 The objectives of this project are:
To determine effects of cavity surface roughness to the plastic flow.
To determine the suitable injection parameters.
To determine the effect of different thickness of gate to the plastic flow.
1.4.2 Impact
This research can be used in the manufacturing field for melt plastic flow
examination in the case of more complicated cavities and can help when having
some problems in processing because of part design. This research can help the
machinist to increase the productivity and can reduce troubleshooting time.
1.5 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT
This project will be carried out by the specific software and machine in the process
of designing the cavity. The research is limited to know the effect of cavity surface
roughness to the plastic flow by changing the parameters such as roughness, injection
parameters and types of gate. The software used are CAD modelling and , Moldflow
3
while for the machines are milling machine and surface grinding machine.There are
several limitations in this project which are:
i. Determine the best gate thickness for the film gate. Thickness of the gate
plays an important role for the molten plastic to flow into the cavity. If the
thickness is not suitable, the molten plastic might not fill the cavity totally.
In order to know what thickness is the best, many experiments have to be
conducted. Other parameters should also be considered such as injection
pressure.
ii. Determine the injection pressure inside the cavity. Pressure inside the cavity
can be measured by mold cavity pressure sensor only. To use the sensor
some wiring need to be done and the sensor have to be embedded to the
mold.
iii. The simulation software can not show exactly the defects that will occur.
The software just can show the defects that might occur on the product. Real
experiments have to be conducted in order to know the real defects.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter will provide the article review for this final year project. The article
review is about material flow, Die Sinking Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM),
Injection Moulding Machine and Polypropylene (PP).
2.2 MATERIAL FLOW
2.2.1 Fundamental of Mold Flow
The material flow in mould runners can be controlled by the design and
manufacturing technology of the mould as well as by the processing conditions in order
to obtain the moulded parts with expected morphology, properties, shape, dimensions
and surface (Bociaga, 2011). There are many parameters need to be considered in the
plastic material flow but in this project, there are two parameters that need to be
considered which are surface roughness and the thickness of the film gate because the
other parameters are constant.
2.2.2 Surface roughness
The challenge of modern machining industries is mainly focused on the
achievement of high quality, in terms of work piece dimensional accuracy, surface
finish, high production rate, less wear on the cutting tools, economy of machining in
terms of cost saving and increase the performance of the product with reduced
environmental impact. Surface roughness plays an important role in many areas and is a
factor of great importance in the evaluation of machining accuracy (Subramanyam,
2010). When the thickness of a cavity is decreased until the roughness is comparable to
5
the dimension of the cavity, the effects of surface roughness become increasingly
important (Ong, 2009).
Mould surface roughness effects on the cavity filling of polymer melt were
investigated experimentally. With the same process parameters, the mould cavity that
has a higher surface roughness will result in a smaller moulded part with higher surface
roughness. This is due to the higher resistance to the flow of polymer melt during cavity
filling. For the limited range of injection rate investigated, it is not significant on the
surface roughness effects. When the melt temperature is kept constant, an increase in
mould temperature will decrease the effects of surface roughness. When the mould
temperature is kept constant, the change of melt temperature within the range allowed
by the process is not significant for the surface roughness effect. (H. L. Zhang, 2008).
Figure 2.1: Surface characteristic and terminology
Source: Subramanyam 2010
2.2.3 Effects of cavity surface roughness
Cavity surface roughness can play a significant role in the cavity filling process.
Researches show that the cavity surface roughness can influence the cavity filling
process. The major reasons are:
1. Enhanced heat transfer rate. With an increase of surface roughness, the contact
area between molten plastic and mould wall increases. Therefore, heat transfer
between them is enhanced as heart transfer rate that is proportional to the contact
surface area.
6
2. Reduced slippage. Rougher cavity surface led to a more stable flow of molten
plastic and a more cosmetically appealing surface on the moulding. It is better to
create a mould with a rougher surface to prevent slippage during filling
(Christian D. Smialek, 2001).
3. Effects on turbulence in the molten plastic flow. There is a relationship between
tool surface finish and the level of turbulence in the melt flow by varying the
process parameters such as melt and mold temperature and injection speed (C A
Griffiths, 2007).
The applications of surface roughness are in the automotive industries
that often involve sliding components. Another application is in shipbuilding,
specifically ship hull surfaces and propeller. The surface roughness of these
components should be on the order of several micrometers for hydraulically
smooth surfaces in high speed ships.
2.2.3 Film or flash gate
A film or flash gate consists of a straight runner and a gate land across either the
entire length or a portion of the cavity. It is used for long flat thin walled parts and
provides even filling. Shrinkage will be more uniform which is important especially for
fiber reinforced thermoplastics and where warpage must be kept to a minimum.
The even cavity filling depends on the design of runner system which are the
number of injection points and their locations, the shape and dimensions of runners and
gates, the accuracy of runner system manufacturing and the shape and dimensions of
injection moulded parts including the wall thickness and its distribution in the part
(Kuldeep 2010).
The dimension of the film gate size is small, typically 0.25mm to 0.6mm thick.
The gate length must also be kept small, approximately 0.6 to 1.0 mm long depend on
the size and weight of the product.
7
Figure 2.2: Film gate with main parts
Source: Kuldeep 2010
2.3 DIE SINKING ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE MACHINING (EDM)
2.3.1 History
The history of EDM Machining Techniques goes as far back as the 1770s when
it was discovered by an English Scientist. However, Electrical Discharge Machining
was not fully taken advantage of until 1943 when Russian scientists learned how the
erosive effects of the technique could be controlled and used for machining purposes.
When it was originally observed by Joseph Priestly in 1770, EDM Machining
was very imprecise and riddled with failures. Commercially developed in the mid
1970s, wire EDM began to be a viable technique that helped shape the metal working
industry we see today. In the mid 1980s.The EDM techniques were transferred to a
machine tool. This migration made EDM more widely available and appealing over
traditional machining processes (Shailesh, 2010).
2.3.2 Fundamental
Electrical discharge machining (EDM) is one of the earliest non-traditional
machining processes. EDM process is based on thermoelectric energy between the
workpiece and an electrode (Kuldeep 2010). Electro-Discharge Machining (EDM) is a
metal removal process by means of electrical energy released by spark discharges
occurred between an electrode and the workpiece with electrical conductivity to
8
produce a desired -shaped form in a work-piece. The electrode is moved downward
toward the work material until the spark gap that is the nearest distance between both
electrodes small enough so that the impressed voltage is great enough to ionize the
dielectric. Short duration discharges measured in microseconds are generated in a liquid
dielectric gap, which separates tool and work piece. The material in the form of debris is
removed with the erosive effect of the electrical discharges from tool and work piece.
EDM does not make direct contact between the electrode and the work piece where it
can eliminate mechanical stresses chatter and vibration problems during machining
(Anand, 2010). EDM Die-sink uses a copper or graphite to produce an electrode that is
a reversed shape of the final product.
Figure 2.3: Working principle of EDM
Source: Kuldeep 2010
2.3.3 Applications
Die sinking electrical discharge machining (EDM) is one of the most widely
used techniques for the fabrication of die and mold cavities which are finally used for
mass production of metals and polymer products by replication such as die casting and
injection molding. In any replication process, it is expected that the quality mold will
faithfully duplicate its shape and surface texture (Ahsan, 2009). EDM process find
application in various fields such as the automotive, medical, aerospace, electrical and
electronic industries.
9
2.4 INJECTION MOULDING MACHINE
2.4.1 Fundamental
In recent years, plastic injection moulds are widely used for producing products
in various areas, such as aerospace, automotive, medical, electronics, and toys. The
quality of these products depends on the moulding parameters chosen. However, as the
wall thickness of plastic parts decreases, the injection moulding operation becomes
more difficult. During the production process, numerous factors cause defects in the
products, such as warpage, shrinkage, sink marks, and residual stress, which are
detrimental to the quality and accuracy of the products. Therefore, it is crucial that the
influencing factors are kept under control during the moulding procedure (Cebeli Ozek,
2012).
The injection moulding process requires the use of an injection moulding
machine, raw plastic material and a mould. These machines consist of two basic parts,
an injection unit and a clamping unit. The plastic is melted in the injection moulding
machine and then injected into the mould, where it cools and solidifies into the final
part. In this process, hot molten polymer is forced into a cold empty cavity of a desired
shape and is then allowed to solidify under a high holding pressure. The entire injection
moulding cycle can be divided into three stages: filling, post-filling and mould opening.
The injection moulding industry, the setting of machine process parameters has
crucial effects on the quality of products. Injection moulding manufacturers have to
obtain the optimal conditions for process parameters before they can produce faster,
cheaper and better quality product. Unsuitable machine process parameter settings can
cause production and quality problems, long cycle times and high production costs.
Final optimal process parameter setting is one of the most important steps in injection
moulding for improving the quality of moulded products Injection moulding processes
are affected by numerous parameters and it is not possible to identify the effects of all
these parameters. Therefore it is necessary to select the parameters that have major
effects on the output.
Some of the potential parameters for an injection moulding process might be the
material drying temperature, injection pressure, barrel temperature, injection time, pack
10
pressure, holding pressure, cooling time, mould temperature, injection speed and others.
In moulding industry, the machine set-up technician will choose the inputs of machine
process parameters and the outputs will depend on the product drawing and customer
requirements (S. Rajalingam, 2012).
Figure 2.4: Injection molding machine with reciprocating screw
Source: S. Rajalingam 2012
In injection moulding process, cavity pressure is the key factor to the product’s
quality and efficiency. If the cavity pressure can be momentarily measured and
monitored, it will provide evidence for the setup of V=P changeover and the end of
packing process, and so will help to cut the cost, shorten the moulding period, save the
mould and reduce the energy consumption. In the meantime, the study of cavity
pressure and melt flow characteristics during injection moulding can provide useful data
for evaluating the polymer’s process ability in injection moulding and designing the
process technology. Some progress has been made in the simulation and control of the
cavity pressure (Wu Hong-wu, 2007).
Manual ejection of the mould also added some variability into the process.
Several parts were plastically deformed while being removed, and gates and runners
were occasionally broken as well. If flatness were an important criterion being
considered, manual ejection would have caused a major effect on the response. In
addition, manual ejection caused some variability in the cooling time of the part. This
11
is because the mould cannot be removed and opened manually in a consistent amount of
time (A. Ghose, M. Montero, D. Odell).
2.4.2 Defects
In the injection molding process, hot melt of plastic is forced into a cold empty
cavity of desired shape called mold. Then, the hot melt is allowed to solidify. Solidified
net shape product is ejected out of the mold upon opening. Although the process is
simple, prediction of final part quality is a complex phenomenon due to the numerous
processing variables. Common defects in injection molding process can be classified in
to two ways. They are:
1. Dimensional related
2. Attribute related
Dimensional related defects can be controlled by correcting the mold
dimensions. But, attribute related defects are generally dependent on the processing
parameters. Some of the common attribute related defects are splay marks, sink marks,
voids, weld/meld lines, poor surface finish, air traps and burn marks. (D. Mathivanan,
2010).
2.4.3 Mould project in plastic injection mould industries
In the local mould-making industries, a large quantity of data is always involved
in every mould project. Mould data consist of data from the plastic product, the mould
design, mould manufacturing and mould testing. Additional data for every mould
project would also include the information of the costs involved in that particular mould
project.
The workflow of a mould project can be categorized into three main areas which
are mould design, mould manufacturing and mould testing. Within each of these main
areas, they can be broken down into stages and subsequently, be broken down further
into phases, within each stage. Figure 2.5 shows a general flowchart to depict the main
stages of a mould project in a typical mould-making industry. It can be seen that if the
start of the mould project were successful, it would then proceed on to have an initial
design stage followed by a detailed design stage. After the mould design, the tool start
can begin and the components are manufactured and assembled. The assembled mould