Students'health promotion at public health, kku.
-
Upload
chusot -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
124 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Students'health promotion at public health, kku.
Students’ Health Promotion Life style in Faculty of Public Health
Khon Kaen University and Sirhinhorn Public Health College, Khon Kaen
Province, ThailandChulaporn Sota1 , Pannee Banchornhathakit1
Boonraum kaewboonreung2
1Faculty of Public Health Khon Kaen University, Thailand.2Sirhinhorn Public Health College, Khon Kaen Province,
Thailand
E- mail: [email protected]
Introduction
• Disease Pattern is changed from communicable disease to be non communicable disease. (HT,DM,CA,HD)
• Health Promotion is the process of enabling people to increase control over, and to improve their own health.
Introduction
• Both Faculty of Public Health Khon Kaen University and Sirhinhorn Public Health College, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand are important institute for producing public health personnel for supporting society especially in the Northeast of Thailand. Therefore it’s very important for study students’ health promotion life style for useful in the future.
Research Objectives
1. Study predisposing factor on health promotion in students
2. Study enabling factor on health promotion in students
3. Study reinforcing factor on health promotion in students
4. Study health promotion behavior in students
MethodologyMethodology
• This descriptive research aimed to study health promotion life style of students from Faculty of public health, Khon Kaen University and Sirhinhorn Public Health College, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand.
• This descriptive research aimed to study health promotion life style of students from Faculty of public health, Khon Kaen University and Sirhinhorn Public Health College, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand.
Methodology
• The samples 863 students were recruited.• The data were collected by questionnaires
for quantitative data on the other hand using in-depth interview and focus group discussion in addition to observation for qualitative data.
• The samples 863 students were recruited.• The data were collected by questionnaires
for quantitative data on the other hand using in-depth interview and focus group discussion in addition to observation for qualitative data.
Data Collection
• The data were collected by questionnaires, focus group discussion and observation including AIC techniqueAIC technique ( ( Appreciate Influence Control)Appreciate Influence Control)
• Data analyzed by SPSS program for quantitative data. The statistics were analyzed for descriptive data : percentage, distribution, arithmetic mean and standard deviation.
• Qualitative data was analyzed by content analysis.
Exercise in KKU & Sirinthorn
The results The results
1. The subjects had mean score of predisposing such as knowledge and attitude toward health promotion including practice on health promotion in high level score.
2. Both institutes have been available enabling and reinforcing factors for health promotion lifestyle among students in both institutes and communities.
1. The subjects had mean score of predisposing such as knowledge and attitude toward health promotion including practice on health promotion in high level score.
2. Both institutes have been available enabling and reinforcing factors for health promotion lifestyle among students in both institutes and communities.
The results
• 3.Both institutes have conducted health promotion implementation by providing health promotion media and integrate in learning process as well as various activities such as exhibition, meeting, projects, research and interesting intervention for health promotion both inside and outside
Sex
21.8%
75.5%
sex
µ¥�®·� �
Characteristic Data
Age -
Single
First year
Diploma Age 16 - 20 year
Single
First year 1
Diploma
Health Training within 1year
72.862.4
75.1 68.7
54.8
69.3
55.4
01020304050607080
Predisposing factor for Heath Promotion
: Knowledge
Knowledge Level Knowledge
number
Percent
High Moderate Low
795
31
10
95
1
37.12
Knowledge of Health promotion 2765. (SD = 1.81)
Predisposing Factor in Health Promotion
96.3%
3% 0.7%
High
Moderate
Low
Attitude
Enabling factor in Health Promotion
74.9 72.1
52.3 52
01020304050607080
Motivation by teacher
supporting organization
Resource allocation
Health promotion teaching
Reinforcing Factor in Health Promotion
59.4 61
42.547.7
42.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1. Policy by Health
promotion
2. Supporting organization
3. Criterion in health
promotion
4. Organization responsible
5. Health promotion network
Behavior Practice Health Promotion
55.7
40.3
31
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Regolarly Frequently Rarely Never
Acknowledgement
• Thank Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University and Sirhinhorn Public Health College, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand
• Thank student devote their time in the research and good cooperation.
• Thank foundation of public health education institutes development plan for health promotion organization for financial support.