STRATEGIC RESEARCH AND EXTENSION PLAN OF ...oriented, multidisciplinary in system, envisaging bottom...

STRATEGIC RESEARCH AND EXTENSION PLAN OF NALANDA DISTRICT

Under the Guidance of BIHAR AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT EXTENSION TRAINING

INSTITUTE (BAMETI)

Patna MANAGE, Hyderabad

2007-08

FOREWORD

A new Centrally Sponsored Scheme “Support to State Extension

Programme for Extension Reforms is being implemented through Agricultural

Technology Management Agency (ATMA) in all the districts of Bihar in addition

to 15 earlier Districts to revitalize the extension services in the State. ATMA has

been created in each of the districts to implement the new scheme. The

institution of ATMA has facilitated bringing together researchers, extension

workers, other stakeholders and farmer who are the principal stakeholder to

carry out joint diagnostic action and prepare and carry out plan in terms of

whether it is extension or the demonstration or trials for the research purposes.

The preparation of District action plan in tune with local needs and situations. To

perform this responsibility, ATMA has developed a demand driven, situation

specific multi agency oriented Strategic Research & Extension Plan (SREP). This

is the basic document that spells out the goals to be pursued, programme

service to be accomplished, mode of implementation and effective utilization of

all available resources.

The SREP has been prepared in consultation with the farmers taking into

consideration, their needs and aspirations through Participatory Rural Appraisal

methodology (PRA). The programme proposed to be undertaken in the SREP is

demand driven, agro-eco situation specific and multi disciplinary in nature.

I extend my sincere thanks to the Project Director, ATMA, Nalanda and district

heads of all departments in coordinating their efforts in bringing out this

valuable document. I appreciate the technical feedback and guidance provided

by the Scientists of Rajendra Agriculture University and the Facilitator of

MANAGE, Hyderabad in the preparation of this document. I hope this document

would go a long way in developing a cost effective and sustainable farming

system and shall facilitate the farming community in achieving increased

prosperity.

E.L.N.S. Bala Prasad Secretary

Govt. of Bihar Depaartment of Agriculture

Foreword

ATMA (Agricultural Technology Management Agency) Nalanda has

prepared the District Action Plan in tune with local needs and situations. In this

projects ATMA Nalanda has developed a demand driven situation specific multi

agency oriented "Strategic Research and Extension Plan (SREP). 'SREP' is the

basic document that spells out the goals to be pursued programme service to be

accomplished mode of implementation and effective utilization of all available

resources.

The SREP has been prepared in consultation with the farmers of different

villages of different blocks in the district taking into consideration their needs

and aspirations through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) methodology.

Programmes and activities in SREP are demand driven agro ecosystem specific

and multidisciplinary in nature.

I extend my sincere thanks to Project Director ATMA Nalanda, Sri Sudama

Mahto for preparing this manuscript in such a short duration. I am also thankful

to the officers and staffs of agriculture and allied department of Nalanda District

co-ordinating their efforts in bringing out this valuable manuscript.

I deem it to have a rare privilege to record my deep sense of gratitude to

the technical experts, Agricultural Scientists of KVK Harnaut for providing their

useful suggestions from time to time.

I am also thankful to all other persons who directly or indirectly involved

during investigation.

I hope this manuscript would go a long way in developing a cost effective

and sustainable farming system and shall facilitate the farming community in

achieving increased prosperity of the farming community of Nalanda District.

Anupam Kumar

District Magistrate,

Nalnada

Acknowledgement

I consider it a rare opportunity and privilege to express my reverential

gratitude to District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, ATMA Nalanda, for extending me

encouragement, inspiring guidance, ingenious suggestions, incisive and

constructive approach without which it would have not been only difficult, but

also impossible for me to successfully complete the Strategic Research &

Extension Plan (SREP).

I express my sincere and profound gratitude to Deputy Development

Commissioner-cum-Vice chairman, ATMA, Nalanda, for his valuable suggestions

and encouragement for preparing SREP.

My sincere gratitude to Mr. E.L.N.S. Bala Prasad, I.A.S. Secretary,

Government of Bihar for his kind support and encouragement.

I am thankful to Dr. B. Rajender, I.A.S., Director Agriculture, for his able

guidance in documenting the vision plan for the district.

I am indebted to Mr. R.P. Singh, State Nodal Officer, ATMA, Department

of Agriculture, Government of Bihar for moral support, cordial treatment,

constructive criticism, practical help to me at critical time.

I am thankful to Mr. Jagbir Singh, Sr. Consultant, MANAGE, Hyderabad

and Sri Anil Kumar, State Facilitator, BAMETI, Patna for imparting training to

District AES Team and under whose guidance the SREP is presented in its

current shape.

The much needed help to collect the relevant data used for making a

useful and realistic SREP, I am thankful to Technical Support Group (TSG) of

ATMA Nalanda. I am also thankful to Sri Manoj Kumar, Sri Bikram Kumar & Sri

Arun Kumar, State Facilitators, BAMETI who led the AES team and provided

constructive suggestions while collection of the data.

I am extremely grateful to members of governing council and

management committee of ATMA Nalanda for constant help, warm

encouragement and critical suggestions in preparing SREP.

It’s my duty to mention some of the individuals, who always encourage

me to carry out this piece of work to its destiny. Notable among them are Dr.

R.K. Sohane, Director, BAMETI. I hope I have live up to their expectation in

bringing the SREP to the present form.

In the end, I tender an apology for the errors and omissions which might

have crept in this manuscript inadvertently.

(Sudama Mahto )

Project Director, ATMA

Nalanda

INDEX

CHAPTER CONTENTS Pg. No.

I Introduction

II Methodology

III Background Information of the District

IV Description of Ongoing Extension &

Development Schemes of the District

V Identification, Description & Analysis of Existing

Farming System in each AES

VI Proposed Extension Strategies

VII Proposed Research Strategies

VIII Activity Schedule of Extension Strategies

IX Activity Schedule of Research Strategy

X Baseline Data & Vision

Chapter 1 Introduction

Agriculture is recognized to be the most vital sector of the Indian

economy contributing about 20 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP),

providing food to a population over a billion and sustains livelihood of about two-

thirds of population, and is the backbone of agro-based industry. In food sector

alone, agriculture contributes about Rs. 250 thousand Crores annually.

Agriculture has been and will continue to be lifeline of Bihar State economy. The

wheel of state economy revolves around this sector. The relevance of agriculture

to Bihar's economy is reflected at varying degrees at grass root level. Three

fourth of the people in Bihar, the third most populous state with a population

density around twice that of the country, is engaged in agriculture. More than

80% of the land holdings in the State are operated by small and marginal

farmers who depend on financial support from external sources for carrying out

the farm activities. This depicts the scenario of agriculture in the state and spells

out the need for reorienting the agricultural extension. Apparent scope for

diversification and intensification of agriculture to achieve a faster growth of the

state economy is quite evident. The Gangetic Plains of Bihar is endowed with

fertile soils, rich in water resources (groundwater and river systems) and

favorable agro-climatic conditions for intensive cropping systems. This sector

provides nutritional security, employment generation, ecological benefits. There

is wide scope for meaningful diversification for sustainable agriculture, and

profitable marketing including exports.

In view of increasing consumption of fertilizers, pesticides,

mismanagement of resources, deteriorating soil fertility, water table and

environmental pollution, there is a growing concern about the environment

which gives momentum to the concept of sustainable agriculture and eco-

friendly agriculture system. Sustainable development has been widely accepted

as a concept that must be central to all human endeavours. The concept can be

said to combine two basic notions: economic development and ecological

sustainability. If a system or an activity fails to include these two notions

tPoultry it does not represent sustainable development. This concept is more

relevant now than ever before.

Agriculture is contributing substantially to overall economic development.

However, there are three major challenges facing Indian agriculture. First,

increasing population pressure leading to more food requirement. The second is

decreasing per capita food availability and the third is sustainable growth of

agriculture.

How can we face these challenges and make sustainable development a

reality?

Agriculture research and extension played an important role in achieving

the green revolution but in post green revolution era our research and extension

are facing the challenges of sustainable agriculture development. The

development experience in the country over the past five decades indicates that

only crop production alone cannot sustain the livelihood of the farmers in long

term. Under such circumstances, research and extension system are needed to

be looked into afresh so as to meet out the needs and priorities of the farm

economy. This is only possible by removing the shortcomings of research and

extension system such are research and extension agendas based on limited

exposure to real problems, situations and needs, poor feedback systems, to

general technical recommendations usually covering the entire agro-climatic

zone where more than one farming situations are observed. Multiplicity of

technological transfer system, narrow focus of agriculture extension system,

lack of local capacity to validate and refine technology, lack of market oriented

production approach, inadequate man power availability, poor accountability and

financial constraints are other factors ailing our agriculture. In this context, the

extension system ought to be made more broad based and holistic in nature and

scope. Research and extension agendas are to be determined by clearly defined

farmers’ needs rather than perceptions by scientists or extension specialists.

The creation of Agricultural Technology Management Agency

(ATMA) with specific task is a welcome step in required direction. Under this,

different concerned line departments, institutions, organisations and farmers are

needed to be organized to introduce a new form of extension delivery system

which is decentralized, demand driven, farmer accountable, location specific,

system based, participating, well integrated with research-farmer-market

linkage, technically and financially sustainable in its orientation.

Aims and Objectives of ATMA

1. To identify location specific needs of farming community for farming system

based agriculture development.

2. To set up priorities for extension reforms to develop sustainable agriculture with

a farming system approach.

3. To draw plans for production based system activities to be undertaken by

farmers/ ultimate users.

4. To execute plan through line departments, training institutions, NGOs farmer’s

organisations and allied institutions.

5. To coordinate efforts being made by various line departments, training

institutions, NGOs farmer’s organisations and allied institutions strengtPoultry

Research-Extension-Farmer linkages (R-E-F-L).

6. To facilitate market interventions for value addition of farm produce.

7. To promote IPM, INM,IFS and any other activity related with the promotion of

sustainable agriculture.

ATMA is mandated to prepare the road map for the development of

agriculture in the district by preparing Strategic Research and Extension

Plan (SREP) of the concerned district. It has to be prepared through

Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) involving all stakeholders.

The strategies and the activities proposed to be undertaken in the SREP

are necessarily demand driven, agro ecological situation specific, market

oriented, multidisciplinary in system, envisaging bottom up approach with

practical implications.

The development and use of SREP would help in the following aspects -

Get an overview of the prevailing scenario in the district.

Explore and understand the problems and opportunities in different farming

systems, preferences and priorities of the farming community.

Facilitate long term visioning and strategic planning for agriculture development

in the district in a concerted manner.

Facilitate involvement of all actors at different levels in the development process

and, in the long run, share the load on the public extension system.

Facilitate integration of and redesigning the on-going developmental

programmes for the benefit of the farmers.

Development of annual action plan for each block in respect of the prevailing

Agro-Ecological Situation.

Develop farmer centered market oriented extension research management

system.

Chapter-2

METHODOLOGY

Nalanda district has been selected under Centrally Sponsored Scheme of “Support to State for

Extension Reforms Programme” (SSER) in Bihar. An autonomous society under the name of Agricultural

Technology Management Agency (ATMA) was registered in the district to carry out the project activities through

farming system approach involving different line departments like Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry,

Fisheries, along with the local Krishi Vigyan Kendra, NGO’s, and representative of various stakeholders of the

agricultural production system. The Strategic Research and Extension Plan for Nalanda was prepared following

the participatory methodology to reflect the issues, needs and expectations of farming community. The main

steps followed for preparation of Strategic Research and Extension Plan (SREP) are as follows:

SELECTION OF DISTRICT CORE TEAM

The selection of District Core Team representing different government development departments like

Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy, Fishery, Cooperative, Representative of NGO and Scientists from Krishi

Vigyan Kendra working in Nalanda district was done. The Orientation programme for the Core Team was

conducted at Nalanda headquarter to sensitize the team to the concept of extension reforms and preparation of

SREP.

TRAINING OF DISTRICT TEAM

The Training of Team of Farm Advisors (TOFA) Nalanda leading to SREP preparation was conducted at ICAR,

RCER, Patna under the aegis of Bihar Agricultural Management & Extension Training Institute (BAMETI), Patna.

The training programme was designed with the help of MANAGE facilitators. Besides conceptual clarity on ITD,

relevant management tools, techniques and methodological approaches were discussed at length. For each and

every tools brainstorming, group discussions and dummy exercises (at villages) were conducted to make the

particiBeetelts clear on the subject in order to make meaningful SREP. These selected officers and scientists of

District Team were trained on various theoretical aspects. The resource persons from MANAGE, Hyderabad

were also involved in the training programme:

The Workshop was conducted keeping the following objectives:

1. To orient particiBeetelts to SSER.

2. To know about roles and responsibilities of Team of Farm Advisors (TOFA).

3. To delineate the major Agro Ecological Situations (AES) of Nalanda district.

4. To build up the TOFA team for participatory probing and collection of primary data and information from the

representative AES villages.

The training also covered the following Management tools and other techniques:

a. A Systematic Approach (ASA)

b. Team Building

c. Participatory Rural Appraisal

d. Farming Situation Based Extension (FSBE)

e. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)

f. Gender Participation

g. Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

h. Indigenous Traditional / Technical Knowledge (ITK)

i. Documentation of Success story

j. Discussion on different formats and questionnaires

k. Steps and Participatory Procedure for preparation of SREP

IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR AGRO-ECOLOGICAL SITUATIONS (AES)

Nalanda district falls under the Agro Climatic Zone III B. The district was divided in three Agro-ecological

Situations (AES) on the basis of important factors like topography, type of soil, rainfall, altitude, the sources of

irrigation and flooding characteristics for preparation of situation specific, market led and demand driven farmers

oriented SREP.

Agro-ecological

situation

Characteristics Blocks covered Villages selected

far study

I.

Plain area under rain

fed condition

Biharsharif, Asthawan, Bind, Harnaut,

Sarmera, Noorsarai, Rahui, Rajgir,

Silao, Ben, Giriyak, Katrisarai, Hilsa,

Karaiparsuray, Chandi, Tharthari,

Nagarnausa, Ekangarsarai, Parbalpur,

Islampur

Kojpura

II.

Hilly area under rain

fed condition

Giriyak, Rajgir, Hindupur

III. Tal Area Sarmera, Harnaut, Chandi,

Karaiparsuray, Hilsa, Nagarnausa,

Bind, Tharthari, Parbalpur

Chero

IDENTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGES FOR EACH AES

For the study of respective Agro Ecological Situations (AES) two villages, one village from each AES’s, were

identified representing the entire AES. The selection of representative village was done after thorough

discussion among the team members and selection of village was done keeping in view that the village

should reflect broadly the farming system and farming situation of the concerned AES.

FORMATION OF AES TEAM

A multi-disciplinary group consisting of 7 members from trained TOFA were drawn from different line

departments and NGOs. These groups were entrusted with collection of primary information from the

representative villages using PRA techniques and participatory methods for the preparation of SREP.

TRAINING OF AES TEAMS:

Training programme for AES teams was organized at District Headquarter, Nalanda. The training programme

was to enable AES Team Members to carry out survey for collection of Data and information in a participatory

manner for preparation of SREP. The Resource Persons were from BAMETI, Patna and MANAGE, Hyderabad.

The members were trained on the various theoretical aspects which includes:

Concepts and Principles of Reforms in Extension

Participatory tools / techniques (PRA, FSA, FSBE etc.)

Sustainability issues – IPM, INM, SRM, NRM, ITK, etc

Marketing and processing information

Identification of success stories

Checklist / format for collection of data and information (primary and secondary)

AES I

AES II

AES III

The formats devised by MANAGE for the collection of field data through participatory method were explained

and given to each AES team members.

COLLECTION OF SECONDARY INFORMATION

Secondary information used for preparing the SREP were collected from different governmental departments like

Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy, Fishery, Cooperative Departments, Lead Bank Office, NABARD,

DRDA, District Statistical Office, NIC and other published source.

COLLECTION OF PRIMARY INFORMATION

Field exercises were conducted in the selected representative village of each AES’s of Nalanda district where

members of the multi-disciplinary group identified issues, collected data. The two AES teams took altogether

twenty days in collection of field data up to presentation of initial findings. The teams used the participatory tools

for the collection of field data. The primary data collected during field visits was cross-checked with various

groups in the villages as well as verified with other sources like secondary data collected from the departments.

The AES teams adopted a procedure to present the data/information collected by them to the villagers in the

village before coming out of the village for final consolidation and sharing of information with the villagers

Two days review workshop was organized at District Agriculture Office, Nalanda for verification and sharing of

data collected from the field. The collected data was summarized and presented by each AES team in presence

of senior officers from all concerning departments, district heads of all departments, and farmers’ representatives

from the district.

SUMMARIZATION AND PRESENTATION OF DATA

The District Core Team, facilitated by the BAMETI and MANAGE facilitators prepared the first draft of SREP on

the basis of analysis of primary and secondary data and consultation with the experts, Scientists and other

stakeholders. Emphasis has been given on intensification/diversification, value addition, agro-processing, post

harvest management of the produce, public-private partnership, formation of FIG, and developing a committed

army of service providers and marketing aspects so as to make the SREP for Nalanda a meaningful document.

Approval of SREP

After thorough scrutiny by the ATMA Management Committee, the draft SREP was submitted for approval to the

Governing Board. The suggestions given by Governing Board were incorporated in the final version of SREP

which was again submitted to the AGB for final approval. This SREP forms the basis for agricultural

development in the district as an authentic document.

Chapter-3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF DISTRICT

Nalanda, is famous all over the world for the the ancient International Monastic University established in 5th

century BC, which taught Vedas, Logic, Grammar, Medicine, Meta-Physics, Prose Composition and Rhetoric.

The rivers Phalgu, and Mohane flows through the district of Nalanda. The various sub divisions of the district are

Biharsharif, Rajgir, and Hilsa. The district is divided into blocks of Giriyak, Rahui, Nursarai, Harnaut, Chandi,

Islampur, Rajgir, Asthawan, Sarmera, Hilsa, Biharsharif, Ekangarsarai, Ben, Nagarnausa, Karaiparsurai, Silao,

PNalandapur, Katrisarai, Bind, and Tharthari.

It is spread over the area of 2,367 sq. kms. The total population of the district is 19, 97,995. The total number of

inhabited villages in the district is 1062 out of which 1032 is electrified. There are 241905 nos. of holding with

less than 1 ha. 35668 nos. of holding having 1-2 ha. and 17860 farmers having holding of more than 2 ha.

Nalanda district lies in south Bihar and a greater part of the district is comprised of Gangetic alluvial except

Rajgir hills. The entire district is dissected with small streams, majority of which are seasonal. Impounding of

water in some of the streams has been done by means of small structures. The entire district barring Rajgir hills

is covered by a thick horizon of alluvial matters with adequate aquifer suitable for ground water development on

large scale. Further on the basis of the homogeneity in soil, land use and topography and climate factors,

Nalanda falls under Agro Climatic Zone III B.

Agriculture is the main source of occupation. The farmers mainly grow paddy, apart from it they grow Potato, and

Onion. Nalanda is a predominantly agriculture based district. Majority of the population (85%) are dependent on

agriculture. The district has a normal rainfall of 1035 m.m. The district has a net cultivated area of 1,91,090

hectares out of which net irrigate area is 1,34,180 ha which is around 75%of the cultivated area. The distribution

of the land holding in the district indicates a pre dominance of small and marginal farmers. Land holding are not

only small but are fragmented also. The average size of land holding is 1.59 acres. The total number of

cultivators and agricultural laborers in the district constitute about 83% of working population indicating

predominance of employees in agriculture sector. The major crop grown in the district is paddy, wheat, Maize,

Pulses, oilseeds and vegetables (Especially potato, onion and cauliflower).

The agriculture department has a strong network to cater to the needs of the farmers. They arrange for

distribution of fertilizers, seeds and pesticides as also training to farmers. There are 222 PACS affiliated to

Nalanda DCCB which disburses mainly crop loan. Out of 222 PACS 24 are doing fertilizer business, 24 PACS

are doing Banking Business. PACs are having godown and are doing pledge loan business. Out of 222 PACS

only 40 PACS are in profit and remaining are incurring losses. The PACS are also purchasing paddy and wheat

and supplying to FCI.

The district is having 1218 hectares of barren and uncultivated land, 233 hectares of cultivable wastee land and

346 hectares of other fallow land which indicates potential for land development. The net cultivated area in the

district is 191090 hectares. The fertilizer consumption is low as well as imbalanced.

The district has 9548 hectares of land under Tal which needs development. Nalanda district has vast potential

for the horticulture development specially fruits like Guava & Mango. Areas around Islampur are traditionally

betelvine growing area called popularly ‘Magahi Beetel’. Farmers in the district can be encouraged to adopt

enterprises in Mushroom, Mulberry and Medicinal & Aromatic Plan.

In Nalanda District Fisheries is the sector which can change the economic situation of the farmers. Over 3466

hectares is water area in the district. The fishing is done by a fisherman community and altogether 31 Coop

Societies are there.

TABLE - 1 A

GENERAL FEATURES OF NALANDA DISTRICT, BIHAR

Sl. No

Name of the Block

Geograp-hical

Area (ha)

No.of Gram Beetelchaya

ts

No. of revenue village

Information Average Rainfall (in mm) and rainy days Temperature (0C) Relative Humidity (%)

2006 Actual rain fall



2006 2007 2008 2002 2003 2004

Avg. rain fall

in mm

No.of

rainy

days

Avg. rain fall

in mm

No. of rainy days

Avg. rain fall

in mm

No. of rainy days

Min-Max Min-Max Min-Max Min-Max

Min- Max

Min Max

1. Biharsharif 17090 20 74 283 48 284 50 285 51 9/41 10/42 10/43 70/90 68/90 70/90 2. Asthawan 13858 19 59 233 42 230 44 235 48 9/41 10/42 10/43 69/85 70/90 69/85 3. Bind 7332 7 35 4. Harnaut 18158 16 74 199 50 200 50 202 51 9/41 10/42 10/43 70/90 68/90 65/90 5. Sarmera 13555 9 35 289 51 289 50 291 48 8/41 9/42 10/43 70/90 68/90 65/90 6. Noorsarai 12341 17 66 234.5 48 233 48 240 49 9/41 10/42 10/43 69/85 68/90 69/85 7. Rahui 12426 16 66 184 47 186 45 188 46 10/41 10/42 10/43 68/86 69/86 68/86 8. Rajgir 14374 9 51 268.5 55 265 52 171.5 50 8/40 9/41 9/42 68/86 70/90 68/86 9. Silao 14374 14 49 10. Ben 10015 9 32 11. Giriyak 9303 10 44 280 56 279 54 282.5 55 8/40 9/41 9/42 70/90 68/86 70/90 12. Katrisarai 3076 5 14 13. Hilsa 14115 15 57 190.2 48 188.5 48 191 50 9/41 10/42 10/43 70/90 68/86 70/90 14. Karaiparsuray 6495 7 46 15. Chandi 14715 15 71 305.1 49 302 47 302.5 48 10/41 10/42 10/43 70/90 68/86 70/90 16. Tharthari 6203 7 30 17. Nagarnausa 7540 9 47 18. Ekanger sarai 13322 18 90 221 47 219 45 225 48 10/41 10/42 10/43 69/86 70/90 70/90 19 Parbalpur 6186 6 23 20 Islampur 22587 20 89 248.6 51 255 55 254 52 9/41 10/42 10/43 69/86 70/90 70/90

* The data of the blocks are combined.

TABLE: I B

INFORMATION ON OCCURRENCE OF DROUGHTS / FLOODS IN NALANDA DISTRICT

SL. No.

Name of the Block

Occurrence of drought / floods

Year (Last 5 Years)

Severity M / S / VS

Cropped area affected

Livestock Mortality (No. of

animals)

% of farm families affected 2004 2005

1. Biharsharif Nil - - - - - -2. Asthawan Flood 2007 M 20% - - -3. Bind Flood 2007 M 25% - - -4. Harnaut Flood 2007 S 30% - - -5. Sarmera Flood 2007 S 31% - - -6. Noorsarai Flood 2007 M 5% - - -7. Rahui Flood 2007 S 25% - - -8. Rajgir Nil - - - - - -9. Silao Nil - - - - - -10. Ben Flood 2007 M 7% - - -11. Giriyak Nil - - - - - -12 Katrisarai Flood 2007 M 5% - - -13 Hilsa Flood 2007 M 20% - - -14 Karaiparsuray Flood 2007 S 33% - - -15 Chandi Flood 2007 S 28% - - -16 Tharthari Flood 2007 M 8% - - -17 Nagarnausa Flood 2007 S 27% - - -18 Ekanger sarai Flood 2007 S 28% - - -19 Parbalpur Flood 2007 M 6% - - Flood20 Islampur Flood 2007 M 9% - - Flood

Note: M – Mild S – Severe VS – Very severe (As per GOI / States parameter)

Table No.2-A:

Spread of AES in the District NALANDA

Name of the ACZ

AES Area (ha)

%of geographical area of the district

Name of the Blocks

Area (ha)

%

ACZ - IIIB

I 768689

33%

Sarmera Harnaut Chandi

Karaiparsuray

HilsaBind

Nagnausa Tharthari

II 1505136

63%

Biharsharif Rahui

Silao

PNalandapur Ben

Ekangarsarai Islampur Noorsarai Katrisarai

Asthawan

III 95195 4% Rajgir Giriyak

Table No: 2-B Representative Village for Each Agro-Eco Situation for the District Nalanda

Sl. No.

Name of the

ACZ

Name of the AES

Blocks covered

Representati

ve village

1

ACZ - III B Tal Area 9

2.

Plain Area 20

3.

Hilly and Rain fed 2

Table No. 3-A Production and Productivity of Important Commodities under Each AES Enterprise-Wise For the District

Nalanda

Sl. No.

Name of the Commodity

1985 1990 1995 2000 2004

A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

1

Main Cropped Paddy

130000 340600 26.2 130000 291980 22.46 130000 318890 24.53

2 Wheat 93000 207762 22.34 93000 175770 18.9 93000 122975 20.75

3 Pulses 44060 74461 16.9 44060 69791 15.84 44060 75519 17.14

4 Oilseeds 741200 883028 18.74 741200 1E+06 16.34 741200 145645 19.65

5 Maize 1483 5205 35.1 1483 4989 33.64 1483 5184 34.62

A –Area in ‘000’ ha. Y - Yield (Productivity) in Kgs./ha. P -Production ‘000’ mt.

TABLE: 3B

DETAILS ON CROPS AND CROPPING SYSTEMS IN NALANDA DISTRICT (2004-05)

Sl. No. Blocks

Major Crops

Cropping system Kharif Rabi Summer

Name Area (ha) Name Area (ha) Name Area (ha)

1 Biharsharif Vegetable 6109 Vegetable 5498 Maize 611

2 Asthawan Paddy 6877 Wheat/Pulses/Oilseeds 4011 Pulses 573

3 Bind Paddy 1930 " 2412 Pulses 483

4 Harnaut Paddy 1549 " 7745 Pulses/Vegetable 6198

5 Sarmera Paddy 2222 " 7777 Pulses 1111

6 Noorsarai Paddy 7665 " 7658 Vegetable 958

7 Rahui Paddy 4934 " 3948 Pulses 987

8 Rajgir Paddy 6841 " 6821 Vegetable/Maize 1368

9 Silao Paddy 9011 " 8901 Vegetable/Maize 1012

10 Ben Paddy 5211 " 5168 Vegetable 668

11 Giriyak Paddy 7209 " 7188 Vegetable/Maize 8289

12 Katrisarai Paddy 2136 " 2109 Vegetable/Pulses 289

13 Hilsa Paddy 10019 " 9989 Vegetable 1272

14 Karaiparsuray Paddy 2124 " 2124 Pulses 1061

15 Chandi Paddy 1236 " 7421 Pulses/Vegetable 3710

16 Tharthari Paddy 3477 " 3464 Pulses 434

17 Nagarnausa Paddy 1884 " 3769 Pulses 628

18 Ekanger sarai Paddy 8678 " 8658 Vegetable 1082

19 Parbalpur Paddy 4132 " 4090 Vegetable 523

20 Islampur Paddy 14368 " 14211 Vegetable 1421

TABLE: 3C

INFORMATION ON LIVESTOCK STATUS IN NALANDA DISTRICT (2004 CENSUS)

Sl. No

Blocks

Milch Animals Draught Animals

Sheep Goats Poultry Birds

Poultry Farms

Piggery

Cows Buffaloes No. No. No. Backyard No. Exotic / Local

L UP E L UP E 1. Biharsharif 11914 1216 - 17548 911 - - 196 15509 51344 - 2372 2. Asthawan 8430 930 - 15480 294 - - 15702 122 39029 - 1931 3. Bind 2551 854 - 7102 198 - - 3 4005 4755 - 206 4. Harnaut 10459 4207 - 14311 26 - - 33 8524 13745 - 1783 5. Sarmera 4893 921 - 10155 9 - - - 12853 11154 - 1100 6. Noorsarai 6931 821 - 10155 9 - - 1093 6938 17517 - 810 7. Rahui 6656 626 - 11768 99 - - - 10055 21949 - - 8. Rajgir 10045 520 - 8357 95 - - 683 11826 11885 - 1142 9. Silao 16217 4081 - 13842 304 - - 727 11949 53771 - 1441 10. Ben 3916 - - 5073 - - - - 5284 4430 - - 11. Giriyak 10022 393 - 9763 - - - - 7895 12197 - 3163 12. Katrisarai 3457 205 - 4606 - - - 3450 4 3397 - 253 13. Hilsa 6481 56 - 12246 - - - 1388 11226 24534 - 2246 14. Karaiparsuray 4555 233 - 9170 - - - 284 3247 5830 - 624 15. Chandi 3213 3135 - 3018 221 - - 601 20 4874 - 929 16. Tharthari 1930 678 - 1689 455 - - 210 20 1618 - 978 17. Nagarnausa 3542 594 - 8272 377 - - 5 3821 15607 - 758

18. Ekanger sarai 8387 900 - 13663 64 - - 410 5345 10196 - 58

19 Parbalpur 4231 276 - 6404 240 - - - 3648 3220 - 518 20 Islampur 18309 17 - 18010 - - - 288 12618 18086 - 2200

L = Local UP = Upgraded E = Exotic

Table No.4-A: Information on Infrastructure Facilities under Various Departments

S.No Type of Infrastructure Utility No/Area Capacity Present status

Department of AGRICULTURE Nalanda 1. DAO office office Administration 1 - poor condition of

building 2. DAO extension " 5 - "3. SAO office , Biharsharif " 1 - "4. SAO office , Hilsa " Hilsa 1 - "5. Plant Protection office " Biharsharif 1 - "6. Plant protection centre 12 blocks 12 - "7. seed multiplication farm 7 blocks 7 - "8. Soil testing lab Biharsharif 1 - "

Department of ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, Nalanda 1. A.I. Centre office Adm. - poor condition of

building 2. Office of DAHO " 1 "3. BAHO " 20 "4. TVO " 14 "5. Dist. Veterinary hospital " 1 "

Department of FISHERIES, Nalanda 1. Office of Fisheries department office Adm. 1 2. Demonstration pond Fisheries - 3. Fish seed dev. pond Hatcheries 2 4.

KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA, HARNAUT 1. Administrative Building office Adm. 1 2. Demonstration farm Harnaut, 2

HOTICULTURE 1. Regional research centre of BEETEL office Adm. Islampur 1 2. Horticulture College Noorsarai 1 3 Office of DHO, SHO & Supervisor Biharsharif 1 4 Progeny Bag farm Islampur 1 5 Horticulture farm Islampur 1

TABLE 4-B:

ORGANIC INPUTS USED IN THE DISTRICT.

S.No. Year

Type of Input

Sources of availability

Quantity used % Of area

covered (ha)

% of farmers using

organic manure

1 2006

Vermi compost Farmers vermi compost , pit

0.5 1.60

2007 1.9 4.75 2008 2.5 6.87 2 2006 Bio fertilizer Market 2.0 20.00 2007 2.5 25.00 2008 2.9 29.00 3 2006 Bio Pesticides Market 0.3 25.00 2007 0.5 41.00 2008 1.0 41.60

Note:- Vermi-compost are in units, Bio-fertilizers in packets, Bio-pesticides are in ltrs, Tricoderma are in kgs.

Table: 4-C – CROPS PRODUCED UNDER ORGANIC FARMING

AES

Name of the block

Organic produce

Crop

Area Production No. of farmers

Ha % Tons % No. % I

Sarmera Pulses G.G/L Harnaut " L Chandi " G.G/L

Karaipursarai " G.G/L Hilsa " G.G/L Bind " G.G/L

Nagarnausa " G.G/L Tharthari " G.G/L

II

Biharsharif P/W V/P Rahui " P/W Silao " P/W

Nalanda " P/W Ben " P/W

Ekangarsarai " P/W

Islampur " P/W

III Rajgir " P/W Giriyak " P/W

G.G. – Green Gram , V-veg, L-Lentil, P-Paddy

Table: 4-D: DETAILS ON MEDICINAL, AROMATIC AND OTHER MINOR FOREST BY PRODUCE

Sl. No.

Name of the block

Crop

Organic

Inorganic

Area in ha.

Production

in Ton/ha

No. of farmers

No. %

1.

Biharsharif

Aromatic crops Medicinal crops

Non-timber forest produce

2.

Asthawan

Aromatic crops lemon

grass/mentha 2ha 60-70li. 8

Medicinal crops coleus/kalmegh 0.25ha - 6

Non-timber forest produce shisham/misc.

trees 5ha - 20

3. Bind Aromatic crops Medicinal crops


4.

Harnaut


grass/mentha 4ha 48-55l.i 20

Medicinal crops coleus/kalmegh 0.25ha - 8


trees 8ha - 18

5.

Sarmera



6. Noorsarai Aromatic crops Medicinal crops


7.

Rahui



8.

Rajgir



9. Silao Aromatic crops Medicinal crops


10.

Ben


grass/mentha 3 36-40li 8

Medicinal crops coleus/kalmegh 0.4 - 4


trees 6 - 16

11.

Giriyak



12. Katrisarai Aromatic crops Medicinal crops


13.

Hilsa


grass/mentha 3 36-40li. 18



trees 7 - 17

14.

Karaiparsuray



15. Chandi Aromatic crops

lemon grass/mentha

5 60-65li. 10



trees 10 - 20

16. Tharthari



17. Nagarnausa



18. Ekanger sarai



Medicinal crops coleus/kalmegh .2 - 3


trees 5 - 13

19. Parbalpur





trees 10 - 20

20. Islampur Aromatic crops Medicinal crops


Table:5A

DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF THE NALANDA DISTRICT Sl. No.

Name of the Blocks

Population (As per 2001 census Total)

% of Literacy

Male No Female No Workers No. Categories No.

Agri. Non - Agri SC ST

1. Biharsharif 39558 207709 187873 58154 201 2. Asthawan 143867 74813 69054 35688 43. Bind 56240 29543 26697 11919 54. Harnaut 143922 75709 68213 32356 15. Sarmera 78610 40948 37662 17543 396. Noorsarai 137267 71239 66028 32866 987. Rahui 1279475 66836 61139 29974 178. Rajgir 019136 57072 52064 26993 1259. Silao 122991 64105 58886 29786 910. Ben 72193 37780 34413 13996 36 11. Giriyak 75735 38957 36778 36778 10212. Katrisarai 37734 19530 18204 8536 3613. Hilsa 162546 85099 77447 29186 614. Karaiparsuray 60127 31461 28666 13388 115. Chandi 125990 65769 60221 27374 4616. Tharthari 52039 27335 24704 10109 2117. Nagarnausa 72475 37543 34932 17891 518. Ekanger sarai 145479 76222 69257 22576 6419 Parbalpur 58501 30422 28079 7402 020 Islampur 192113 100507 91606 31935 154

TABLE: 5B

INFORMATION ON OPERATIONAL LAND HOLDINGS IN NALANDA DISTRICT

SL. No.

Name of the Block Operational holding (number and area)Large

(More than 10 ha) Medium

(4 to 10ha)Semi medium

2 to 4 ha)Small

(1 to 2ha) Marginal

(Less than 1 ha)Total land holdings Landless

No. of holdings

Area No. of holdings




Area No. of families

Area No. of Families

1. Biharsharif 1700 4788 2459 4462 19200 70009 14344

2. Asthawan 1330 4161 2820 3835 19200 7000 12365

3. Bind 490 1533 987 1207 6720 2450 9332

4. Harnaut 1120 3504 2256 3178 15360 5604 10465

5. Sarmera 630 1971 1269 1645 8640 3056 8489

6. Noorsarai 1190 3723 2397 3397 1632 7336 10638

7. Rahui 1120 3504 2256 3178 15360 3608 9432

8. Rajgir 630 1971 1269 1645 8040 3432 7334

9. Silao 980 3066 1974 2740 1344 5334 6324

10. Ben 630 1971 1269 1645 8640 3240 8765

11. Giriyak 700 2190 1410 1840 9600 3473 6344

12. Katrisarai 350 1095 705 769 4800 1530 5401

13. Hilsa 1050 3285 2115 2959 15360 5811 8442

14. Karaiparsuray 490 1533 987 1207 6720 2341 4966

15. Chandi 1050 3504 2256 3178 14400 5831 9987

16. Tharthari 490 1533 987 1207 6720 2534 4578

17. Nagarnausa 630 1971 1269 1645 8640 3376 6438

18. Ekanger sarai 1260 3942 2538 3616 17280 6834 9344

19 Parbalpur 420 1314 987 988 5760 1643 3456

20 Islampur 1600 4489 3452 4163 19200 6900 13788

TABLE: 6A INFORMATION ON LAND USE PATTERN IN THE NALANDA DISTRICT. Area in ha

Sl. No.

Name of the Block

Geographical Area

Cultivatable Area

Cultivated Area

Cultivable wastee

Current Fallow

Forest

Past

ure Land put

to non agri. use

Land under misc

plantation

Barren & unculturable land (waste

land) Reserved Open

1 Biharshari 17090 12218 11818 400

9308 4462 Nil

4872 1948 2924

2 Asthawan 13858 11461 10978 483 2397 959 1438

3 Bind 7332 4825 4215 610 2507 1003 1504

4 Harnaut 18158 15492 15990 202 2666 1066 1600

5 Sarmera 13555 11110 10878 232 2445 978 1467

6 Noorsarai 12341 9582 8982 600 2759 1104 1655

7 Rahui 12426 9869 9482 387 2557 1033 1534

8 Rajgir 14374 13683 13343 340 69 276 415

9 Silao 14374 10120 9870 250 4254 1702 2552

10 Ben 10015 6660 6260 400 3355 1342 2013

11 Giriyak 1303 8279 7977 302 1024 410 614

12 Katrisarai 3076 2855 2753 102 221 89 132

13 Hilsa 14115 12720 12540 180 1995 798 1197

14 Karaiparsuray 6495 5309 498 328 1186 474 712

15 Chandi 14715 12369 11997 372 2346 938 1408

16 Tharthari 6203 4347 4274 73 1856 742 1114

17 Nagarnausa 7540 6281 5979 302 1259 504 755

18 Ekanger sarai 13392 10820 10420 400 2502 1001 1501

19 Parbalpur 6186 5233 4936 203 953 381 572

20 Islampur 22587 17847 16950 897 4740 1896 2844

Table No. 6-B: INFORMATION ON SOILS FOR THE DISTRICT (Area in Ha)

AES

Name of the block Black Red Soil Sandy Soil Sandy looms OthersArea % Area % Area % Area % Area %

I.

Biharsharif 3418 1372 Asthawan 2772 11086 Bind 733 6599 Harnaut 3632 14526 Sarmera 9489 4066 Noorsarai 2468 9873 Rahui 2468 9873 Rajgir 1437 5749 7187Silao 2874 11499

II.

Ben 1001 9014 Giriyak 2326 4652 2325Katrisarai 923 2153 Hilsa 2823 11292 Karaiparsuray 1948 4546 Chandi 1471 13243 Tharthari 1241 4962

III.

Nagarnausa 754 6786 Ekanger sarai 1322 11990 Parbalpur 1237 4949 Islampur 2259 20328

TABLE – 6C INFORMATION ON PROBLEM SOILS IN THE DISTRICT

Sl. No.

Name of the Block

Saline (Ar. in

ha)

Alkaline(Ar. in ha)

Acidic(Ar. in

ha)

Soil Erosion (Ar. in

ha)

Iron Toxicity (Ar. in

ha)

Micro-nutrients

deficiency (Ar. in ha)

Water logged

condition (Ar. in ha)

other(Ar. in

ha)

1. Biharsharif 854 1196 1880 3418 85 11963 2. Asthawan 693 770 1524 2772 69 9700 3. Bind 367 513 807 1466 36 5132 4. Harnaut 908 1271 1997 3632 91 12711 5. Sarmera 678 959 1491 2711 68 9488 6. Noorsarai 617 617 1358 2468 62 8639 7. Rahui 621 870 1367 2485 62 8698 8. Rajgir 719 1006 1581 2875 72 10062 9. Silao 719 1006 1581 2875 72 10062 10. Ben 501 701 1101 2003 50 7010 11. Giriyak 465 651 1023 1861 47 6512 12. Katrisarai 154 215 338 615 15 2153 13. Hilsa 706 988 1553 2823 70 9881 14. Karaiparsuray 625 455 714 1299 32 4547 15. Chandi 706 1030 1619 2945 74 10300 16. Tharthari 310 434 682 1241 31 4342 17. Nagarnausa 377 528 829 1508 38 5253 18. Ekanger sarai 666 933 1454 2664 67 2325 19 Parbalpur 309 433 6805 1237 63 4330 20 Islampur 1129 1581 2485 4517 113 15810

TABLE: 7 A INFORMATION ON RAINFED AND IRRIGATED AREA IN NALANDA DISTRICT (2005-

2006)

Sl. No.

Block Total cultivable

area

Rainfed area

% Bore wells / wells Canal(Ar. in ha.)

Total irrigation area

%

P A % P A % P A1. Biharsharif 12218 283.3 17090 11818 17090 400 17090 122182. Asthawan 11461 233.0 13858 10978 13858 483 13858 114613. Bind 4825 - 7332 4215 7332 610 7332 48254. Harnaut 15492 199.0 18158 15990 18158 202 18158 161925. Sarmera 11110 289.0 13555 10878 13555 232 13555 111106. Noorsarai 9582 234.5 12341 8982 12341 600 12341 95827. Rahui 9869 184.0 12426 9482 12426 387 12426 98698. Rajgir 13683 268.5 14374 13343 14374 340 14374 136839. Silao 10120 - 14374 9870 14374 250 14374 1012010. Ben 6660 - 10015 6260 10015 400 10015 666011. Giriyak 8279 220.7 1303 7977 1303 302 1303 827912. Katrisarai 2855 - 3076 2753 3076 102 3076 285513. Hilsa 12720 190.2 14115 12540 14115 180 14115 1272014. Karaiparsuray 5309 - 6495 498 6495 328 6495 82615. Chandi 12369 305.1 14715 11997 14715 372 14715 1236916. Tharthari 4347 - 6203 4274 6203 73 6203 434717. Nagarnausa 6281 - 7540 5979 7540 302 7540 628118. Ekanger sarai 10820 221.0 13392 10420 13392 400 13392 1082019 Parbalpur 5233 - 6186 4936 6186 203 6186 513920 Islampur 17847 248.6 22587 16950 22587 897 22587 17847

Note: P = Potential area A = Actual area irrigated % = Share of the total area under irrigation

Table No.7B: Information on irrigation projects nearing completion

Sl. No.

Type of the project * Name of the project Blocks covered Area irrigated (ha)Projected Actual

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

TableNo.8-A : Information on research and extension development activity in the district (2005-06)

Sl. No.

Sector(Central / state / district)

Name of the scheme Requirement of the scheme

Allocation of the year Shortfall / Surplus

Extn. Research Extn. Research 1 K.V.K. Harnaut Transfer of technology

project - - - - -

2. Dept. of Agriculture (i)Integrated Cereal Dev.programme (ii) Farm Mechanization (iii) Intensified field extension & Training (iv) IPM & INM scheme

- - - -

3. Dept. of Horticulture (i) NHM (ii) Macro Mode

- - - - -

4. - - - - -5. 6. 7. 8.

WORK PLAN

Table No. 8-B : Information on research and extension development activity in the district (2006-07)

Sl. No.

Sector(Central / state / district)

Name of the scheme Requirement of the scheme

Allocation of the year Shortfall / Surplus

Extn. Research Extn. Research1 K.V.K. Harnaut Transfer of technology

project

2. Dept. of Agriculture (i)Integrated Cereal Dev. programme (ii) Farm Mechanization (iii) Intensified field extension & Training (iv) IPM & INM scheme

3. Dept. of Horticulture (i) NHM (ii) Macro Mode

4. Horticulture college, Noorsarai

5. 6. 7. 8.

TABLE: 9 A INFORMATION REGARDING MARKETS IN THE NALANDA DISTRICT

Sl. No.

Name of the Block

Name of the market center

Periodicity (Weekly daily)

Important commodities handled Commodity wise quantity handled

(annual)

Area covered No. of farm families covered

Other information

regarding market 1. Biharsharif Krishi Bazar Daily

Wheat, Maize, paddy, potato, green gram, Onion, species, mustard, Vegetable,

Poultry, goat, meat, cow, buffalo, eggs, Farm implements

157810 mt. Nalanda Sheikhpura

Nawada Jharkhand

Jamui

Local Hats covered nearly

village, Panchayat and Blocks.

2. Asthawan Local Haat weekly 400 mt 3. Bind 4. Harnaut Local Haat weekly 7869 mt 5. Sarmera Local Haat weekly 11344 mt6. Noorsarai Local Haat weekly 15343 mt7. Rahui Local Haat weekly 26866 mt8. Rajgir Local Haat weekly 25844 mt9. Silao 10. Ben 11. Giriyak Local Haat weekly 2344 mt 12. Katrisarai 13. Hilsa Krishi Bazar Daily 112733 mt14. Karaiparsuray 15. Chandi Local Haat weekly 16. Tharthari 17. Nagarnausa 18. Ekanger sarai Local Haat weekly 19 Parbalpur Local Haat weekly 20 Islampur Local Haat weekly

Table – 9-B: Public–Private Partnership in Market related initiatives in the district

Type of partnership

Partners Activity undertaken

Volume of trade (Tons)

Value of trade (in Rs.)

Terms of reference I II III

Primary Agriculture Co-operation Society (PACS)

Public

CO-operati

ve Society

Bank Agriculture Credit and Input Supply

and Output selling

Seeds-150ml.

fertilizer 15000ml.

seed-3 crore

fertilizer-7.5 crore

Table –9-C: Movement and Flow pattern of Different Commodities from regulated markets to the District Nalanda

Name of

the commodity Market

Committee Quantity (volume) of the trade in Qtls. Value of the trade in Rs.

Inflow Outflow Inflow Outflowwheat 63435 mt 57810 mt 40471530 36940590Maize 123477 mt 112733 mt 51613386 47122394Paddy 29744 mt 26866 mt 79803152 72081478

Green gram 84347 mt 78691 mt 253041000 23607300 Potato 19435 mt 15343 mt 1166140 9005800Onion 14384 mt 11344 mt 86260848 68029968

Vegetable 28634 mt 25744 mt - -Mustard 2934 mt 2344 mt 23472000 18752000Spices 600 mt 400 mt 96000 640000

TABLE: 9D

INFORMATION ON MARKET INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES AVAILABLE IN THE NALANDA DISTRICT

Sl. No.

Name of the Block

Name of the structure

Type of service offered

Location of facility

Commodities handled

Capacity (M. T) Tariff if any Installed Used

1. Biharsharif Bazar Samiti Sale/purchase

of commodities

establish market

complex

paddy, wheat, Maize, Pulses,

oil seeds, spices and

Vegetable etc.

25 ha. 19 ha. Nil

TABLE: 10 Information on Agro- Processing Facilities Available In And Outside

The District But Serving The Need Of The Nalanda District Sl. No.

Name of the Block

Location of the processing unit

Name Commodities processed

Type of processing CapacityInstalled In use

1. Chandi Chandi Mini Rice mill

Rice and Puffed Rice mill

Paddy Millings & Polishing 10 + /day 5 +/day

2. Harnaut Harnaut " " " 5 +/day 3 +/day3. Giriyak Pawapuri Flour mill Wheat Value addition - -

4. Ekanger sarai Ekangarsarai Mini rice mill Paddy millings polishing 6 +/day 3 +/day

5. Hilsa Hilsa Rice mill

Puffed rice mill Paddy " 6 +/day 3 +/day

TABLE: 11 A List Of Credit Institutions In Operation For Agriculture And Allied Sectors In

Nalanda District

Sl. No.

Name of the Block

Type of credit Organization and amount distributed in a year Coop Banks LD Banks Nationalized Banks

No. of branc hes

No. of Borrower

Amount (lakhs)

No. of branc-

hes

No. of borrowers Amount (in

lakhs)

No. of

branches

No. of borrowers Amount (in lakhs)

ST MT LT ST MT LT ST MT LT

1. Biharsharif 1 502 - 12.725 - - - - - 11 6043 18.0952. Asthawan 1 847 - 21.175 - - - - - 2 1214 35.36

3. Bind - - - - - - - - - 2 816 23.45

4. Harnaut 1 1562 - 39.050 - - - - - 1 1185 33.445. Sarmera 1 804 - 20.100 - - - - - 1 916 26.356. Noorsarai 1 1134 - 28.350 - - - - - 2 1627 45.467. Rahui 1 915 - 22.875 - - - - - 2 304 8.468. Rajgir 1 1100 - 27.500 - - - - - 2 810 23.359. Silao - - - - - - - - - 2 915 28.2910. Ben - - - - - - - - - - - 11. Giriyak - - - - - - - - - 2 687 16.4812. Katrisarai - - -- - - - - - - 1 208 6.4513. Hilsa 1 1029 - 25.725 - - - - - 3 1085 29.3514. Karaiparsuray - - - - - - - - - 1 285 6.4415. Chandi 1 424 - 10.600 - - - - - 2 896 26.4916. Tharthari -- - - - - - - - - - - -17. Nagarnausa - - - - - - - - - 1 301 9.7818. Ekanger sarai 1 634 - 15.850 - - - - - 2 1013 29.4719 Parbalpur 1 956 - 23.900 - - - - - 1 208 6.4020 Islampur 1 - - - - - - - 3 1401 42.06

CONTD. TABLE – 11A

Regional Rural Banks Private Banks Others Total

No. of Branches

No. of creditors

Amount (lakhs)

Non of Branches

No. of Creditors

Amount(lakhs)

No. of Branches

No. of Creditors

Amount (lakhs)

No. of Branches

No. of Creditors

Amount (lakhs)

No. of farmers covered

No of farmers not covered

7 778 2.145 6 648 1.899 2 232 0.645 5 526 1.424 2 214 6.58 4 418 8.54 4 420 1.54 5 516 1.24 3 318 7.85 3 348 9.12 2 214 6.54 1 136 5.21 5 538 7.5 2 265 5.2 4 455 8.5

3 332 2.255 2 235 3.5 7 752 2.25 2 245 4.51 5 516 5.21

TABLE 11-B.

Information On Credit Extended By Other Than Local Banks

Sl. No. Name of the block SHG’s Associations Others No. of farmers Amount No. Of

farmers Amount

1. Biharsharif 2. Asthawan 3. Bind 4. Harnaut 5. Sarmera 6. Noorsarai 7. Rahui 8. Rajgir 9. Silao 10. Ben 11. Giriyak 12. Katrisarai 13. Hilsa 14. Karaiparsuray 15. Chandi 16. Tharthari 17. Nagarnausa 18. Ekanger sarai 19 Parbalpur 20 Islampur

Table No.12: Information on Input and Service Providers in the district NALANDA

Name of Enterprise: Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal husbandry/ Fisheries etc

Name of

the Block

Seed

Fertilizers

Pesticide

s Qtl./K.ltr.

Animal Feed & poultry

feed

Veterinary medicines

Fish feeds

Fish

Hatcheries

No. of

horticulture nurseries

Fodder

Repair Centre

s

Others

N

Q

No of

unit

Quantity (MT) N

Q

N

Q

N

Q

N

Q In

‘000’

N

Q

N

Q

* * Commodities

Q

N

Q

N

Q * N

* P

* K

1. Biharsharif 12 90 26 8341 5663 4453 20 5 20 8 8 1 - - - - 10 10000 - - - - - - 2. Asthawan 8 70 14 4534 4355 3536 7 4 11 5 7 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. Bind 7 65 10 4600 4234 3438 6 1 9 7 5 0.25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. Harnaut 9 60 15 4811 4744 3535 16 2 8 8 6 0.75 - - - - 5 7000 - - - - - - 5. Sarmera 8 70 12 4400 4234 3256 8 4 12 5 6 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6. Noorsarai 8 66 14 4700 4444 3255 19 3 9 4 6 0.25 - - - - 4 5000 - - - - - - 7. Rahui 8 68 13 4200 4152 3216 16 2 8 5 8 0.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8. Rajgir 8 70 14 4800 4653 3310 9 1 5 8 4 0.80 - - - - - - - - - - - - 9. Silao 7 63 13 4300 4135 3248 6 5 8 5 6 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 10. Ben 4 55 8 4800 4335 3132 7 1.5 4 6 6 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11. Giriyak 7 60 14 4600 4248 3045 8 .5 2 8 5 0.25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12. Katrisarai 8 58 13 4634 4501 3210 8 4 2 5 8 0.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - 13. Hilsa 9 70 22 3432 3234 2352 15 8 3 8 5 0.5 - - - - 4 6000 - - - - - - 14. Karaiparsuray 6 55 11 4447 4244 3012 6 9 4 5 4 0.85 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15. Chandi 7 65 14 4891 4653 3247 16 1 1 5 5 0.25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 16. Tharthari 9 61 9 4342 4251 3106 7 2 2 4 7 0.85 - - - - - - - - - - - - 17. Nagarnausa 8 72 10 4341 4122 3022 8 3 4 5 2 0.20 - - - - - - - - - - - - 18. Ekanger sarai 10 74 18 6352 5688 4330 16 5 5 8 7 0.25 - - - - 5 7000 - - - - - - 19 Parbalpur 8 65 22 5658 5452 4266 7 1 1 1 5 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 Islampur 9 66 16 6352 6053 5147 16 4 2 5 7 1 - - - - 3 4000 - - - - - -

Name of the block

Service Providers Public (Government) Extension Services

Private Agri-clinics Para-professionals Input dealers Agri-business

centers NGOs Farmers Field Schools

No. No. of farmers covered

No.


No.






1. Biharsharif 1 - - - - 70 2. Asthawan 1 - - - - 58 3. Bind 1 - - - - 46 4. Harnaut 1 - - - - 65 5. Sarmera 1 - - - - 44 6. Noorsarai 1 - - - - 48 7. Rahui 1 - - - - 40 8. Rajgir 1 - - - - 50 9. Silao 1 - - - - 42 10. Ben 1 - - - - 36 11. Giriyak 1 - - - - 45 12. Katrisarai 1 - - - - 48 13. Hilsa 1 - - - - 66 14. Karaiparsuray 1 - - - - 54 15. Chandi 1 - - - - 60 16. Tharthari 1 - - - - 30 17. Nagarnausa 1 - - - - 25 18. Ekanger sarai 1 - - - - 65 19 Parbalpur 1 - - - - 27 20 Islampur 1 - - - - 64

N= No. Of outlets ** Name of the fodder commodities Q= Quantity in metric tons N= Nitrogen, P= Phosphorous, and Potash.

Table No.13: List of Farmers groups and organizations working in NALANDA district

S.No. Name of the

Commodity Interest Groups / Farmers Interest Groups

Location

Area of operation

Commodity / Enterprise

Activities

undertaken

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Table: No.14:

Information and Communication system prevailing in the district NALANDA

S. No

Type of Communication facility

Sector Address with Tel. No. Fax.No.

Type of Services rendered

Area of operation

Public

No. Private

No. 1. Post Offices, 331 - 2. Telephone exchanges 22 - 3. Telephone booths (public) - 3256 4. Computer Service providing Centers (Imp.) - 6 5. Computer training center (Important) - 8 6. Internet centers - 25 7. T.V. Station - 1 8. Radio Station - 0 9. News Papers - 8 10. Periodicals - - 11. Radio clubs - - 12. TV Clubs - - 13. KCC - - 14. Cable Vs without Cable TV - 12 15. Any other com. facility - -

Table –14-A : Block wise information on the agricultural implements and farm machinery

Sl. No

Name of the Block

Agricultural Implements and Farm Machinery

Tractors

T/wells & Pump sets

Power tillers/ Cultivator

Sprayers

Dssc Harrow

Zero tillage

Harvester/ Thresher

Rota- vator

No. of House-holds

No.

No. of House-holds

No.

No. of House-holds

No.

No. of House-holds

No.

No. of House-holds

No.

No. of House-holds

No.

No. of House-holds

No.

No.

1. Biharsharif 1700 158 - 1275 - 80 - 1200 - - - - - - - 2. Asthawan 1330 58 - 1268 - 74 - 1185 - - - - - - - 3. Bind 490 35 - 958 - 13 - 598 - - - - - - - 4. Harnaut 1120 54 - 1158 - 19 - 845 - - - - - - - 5. Sarmera 630 26 - 298 - 9 - 705 - - - - - - - 6. Noorsarai 1190 48 - 585 - 14 - 890 - - - - - - - 7. Rahui 1120 18 - 159 - 13 - 870 - - - - - - - 8. Rajgir 630 24 - 258 - 11 - 568 - - - - - 1 - 9. Silao 980 26 - 448 - 20 -- 815 - - - - - - - 10. Ben 630 18 - 259 - 11 - 411 - - - - - - - 11. Giriyak 700 28 - 254 - 12 - 588 - - - - - - - 12. Katrisarai 350 18 - 157 - 9 - 369 - - - - - - - 13. Hilsa 1050 141 - 148 - 54 - 1022 - - - - - - - 14. Karaiparsuray 490 25 - 258 - 8 -- 375 - - - - - - - 15. Chandi 1050 58 - 169 - 36 - 841 - - - - - - - 16. Tharthari 490 20 - 178 - 12 - 410 - - - - - - - 17. Nagarnausa 630 35 - 298 - 15 - 562 - - - - - - - 18. Ekanger sarai 1260 56 - 1211 - 45 - 976 - - - - - - - 19 Parbalpur 420 28 - 258 - 15 - 366 - - - - - - - 20 Islampur 1600 85 - 958 - 58 - 1100 - - - - - 1 -

Chapter IV: Description of Ongoing Development Activities in the District

AGRICULTURE

S. No. Name of the scheme Sector

1. Macro Mode Management (MMM) Integrated Cereal Development Programme

Integrated Pest Management Fertility Management Programme

Agricultural Mechanization Programme

Central

2. Integrated Scheme of Oilseeds Pulses Oil palm & Maize (ISOPOM) Central 3. National Food Security Mission Central 4. Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojna Central 5. Micro Irrigation Scheme Central 6. Mational Crop Insurance Programme Central

HORTICULTURE 1. Chief Ministrer Horticulture Mission State 2. Macro Management Mode Central 3. National Medicinal Plant Board Scheme Central 4. National Horticulture Board Scheme Central 5. Coconut Development Board Scheme Central

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY 1. Capital Insurance Scheme Central

FISHERIES 1. Fisherman Development Agency Scheme

Training Construction of New Tank

Renovation / Construction of Old / New Ponds Input Assistance for New Ponds

Integrated Fish Farming Fish seed Hatcheries

Reproduction Hatcheries of Ornamental Fisheries

Central

2. Insurance Scheme for Fisherman Community Central 3. Scheme for Housing and other Citizen Scheme for Fisherman Community State 4. Fisherman Seed Producing & Distribution Scheme State

KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA 1. Farmers/ field staff trainings & other extension activities. Central 2. Conducting FLDs, OFTs & adaptive trials Central 3. Testing and revalidation of farm technology State 4. Seed multiplication State 5. Soil testing & diseases diagnostic services. State 6. Survey/studies on different farm related aspects. State

EXTENSION 1 Mass Media Support to agriculture Extension

Kisanvani Krishi Darshan

2 Kisan Call Centre FINANCE Kisan Credit Card Scheme Central

Chapter V Identification, Description and Analysis of Existing Farming System

under Each AES (Representative village level information)

Table No-15: Information on operational land holdings

Sl. No.

Name of the Village

Operational holding (number and area) Large* Medium* Small* Marginal* Landless

No. of holdings


Area No. of holding

s

Area No. of holding

s

Area Number only

1. Kojpura 1 13 2 12 42 65 196 64 97

2. Hindupur 17 131.0 45 96.0 61 77.0 88 96 107

3. Chero

Sources of information: Village Revenue Officer and Village Beetelchyat

Table No.16:

Demographic Information of the village

Sl.No.

Name of the

village

Population (2001)

Male

Female Children % of

Literacy

Workers No.

Categories No.

Agri. Non.-agri

SC ST OBC

1. Kojpura 1961 1009 952 627 54.37 149 99 114 13 1122 2 Hindupur 1506 738 768 325 30 193 115 160 52 883. Chero

* Sources of information: Village Revenue Officer and Village Beetelchyat

Table No-17:

Information on irrigated area in the village

Area in Ha.

Sl. No.

Name of the village

Rainfed

area

%

Irrigated area (source wise)

Major % Medium %

Minor % Lift % Wells %

Others % Total

%

1 Kojpura 117.8

5 82.56 - - - - 12 7.74 - - - - 15 9.68 144.85 99.98

2

Hindupur 241 60 - - - - 130 32.2 - - - - - - 130 32.2

3. Chero

* Sources of information: Village Revenue Officer and Village Panchayat, Irrigation Department, at block level

(Representative village level information)

Table No-18:

Information on irrigation projects nearing completion

Sl. No.

Name of the Village Type of the project *

Name of the project

Area irrigated (ha) Projected Actual

1. Kojpura - - - -

2. Hindupur - - - -

3. Chero

* Project such as major, medium, minor, and projects nearing completion * Sources of information: Village Revenue Officer and Village Panchayat, irrigation department, at block level.

Table No-19: Information on Land use pattern

(Area in Acre)

Sl. No.

Name of the village

Geographical Area Cultivable

Area Cultivated

Area Cultivable

wastee Current Fallow

1 Kojpura 144.85 - 124.85 - -

2 Hindupur 400 130 130 - -

3 Chero

Forest Pasture Land put to non

agri. Use Land under misc. plantation

Barren & unculturable land

(wastee land) - - 16.0 04.0 - - - 10 3 -

* Sources of information: Village Revenue Officer and Village Beetelchyat

(Representative village level information) Table No-20: Information on Soils for the Representative Villages

CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL WITH AREA UNDER PROBLEM SOILS (Area in Acre)

Sl. No.

Name of the village(s)

Black

Red Soil

Laterite / lateritic Soils

Alluvial soils Forest & Hill

soils

Deserts Salt Effected

Soils

Area %

Area % Area % Area % Area % Area % Area %

1 Kojpura - - - - - - 141.85 98.06 - - - - 3.0 1.942 Hindupur 241 60 130 32.21 - - - - - - - - - - 3. Chero

* Sources of information: Agriculture Department at village / block level

Note: Information on soil types such as heavy, medium, light, deep shallow may be given wherever necessary.

TABLE NO-21: PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY OF IMPORTANT COMMODITIES UNDER AGRICULTURE ENTERPRISE FOR REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE

Sl.No

Name of the Village

Name of the Commodity

1987 1992 1997 2002 2006

A P Y A

P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

1 Kojpura

Sugarcane 77.85 5449 700 28 1960 700 19 1330 700 1500 1050 700 9 630 700 Paddy 59 100.3 17 109.85 197.73 18 118.85 213.93 18 122.85 257.98 21 128.85 283.47 22 Wheat 59 88.5 15 109.85 175.76 16 418.85 190.16 16 122.85 221.13 18 128.85 270.01 21 Maize 06 6 10 6 6 10 6 6 10 7 7 10 8 8 10 Arhar 12 8.9 7 32 22.4 7 22 15.4 7 14 9.8 7 9 5.4 6

2 Hindupur

Wheat 105 315 33 90 270 30 95 266 28 106 278 27 103 257 25

Maize 8 48 60 12 69.6 58 18 90 50 12 70 58 16 88 55

Arhar 10 15 15 9 12.6 14 8 9.6 12 7 7.7 11 12 12 16

Mustard 7 84 14 29 29 10 9 8.1 7 5 4.0 8 - - -

3

Chero

Table No. 22:

DETAILS ABOUT NUMBER OF FAMILIES UNDER EACH KIND OF RESOURCE SITUATION IN THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE OF THE AES.

District: Nalanda

Sl. No. Categories No. of Families & Their Percentages AES I AES II AES III

No. % No. % No. % 1. Resource

Rich 45 13.31 17 3.75 24 3.4

2. Resource Poor

293 86.69 293 96.25 618 96.8

Table No. 23: DETAILS ABOUT PREDOMINANT EXISTING FARMING SYSTEMS (EFS) IN THE

REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE OF AN AES District: Nalanda

Sl.No.

EFS

No. & % of families associatedAES I AES-II AES-III

RR RP RR RP RR RP No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %

1.

Agriculture +

Animal Husbandry

28 8.28 208 61.53 12 3.87 199 64.19 11 1.71 503 78.34

2.

Agriculture + Horticulture +

Animal Husbandry

17 5.03 57 16.87 3 0.97 84 27.09 6 0.934 69 10.75

3. Agriculture + Horticulture - - 28 8.29 2 0.645 27 8.7 7 1.09 46 7.17

Table No. 24 : MAJOR ENTERPRISES ASSOCIATED WITH EACH EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM (EFS)

UNDER EACH RESOURCE SITUATION IN REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE District: Nalanda

Sl.No.

Type of enterprises/ commodities

No. of families (%) associated with 2-3 dominant enterprises/commodities in representative villages

AES-I AES-II AES-III

RR RP RR RP R R RP EFS-I EFS-II EFS-I EFS-II EFS-I EFS-II EFS-I EFS-II EFS-I EFS-II EFS-I EFS-

II

1 Agricultural irrigated

Wheat 65 45 75 55 65 80 45 65 85 90 90 95

Maize(R) 22 30 35 65 85 80 80 50 70 75 80 80 Mustard 22 65 60 55 50 55 40 50 35 40 65 85 Paddy 45 35 75 80 75 85 65 65 40 35 80 45 Sugarcane - - - - 20 20 - - 45 35 60 40

Rainfed

Wheat 35 55 25 45 20 20 40 30 35 40 - -K-Fodder 50 60 80 75 85 80 55 60 80 70 85 80

Mustard 80 70 75 65 30 25 40 40 35 30 45 40

Maize(K) 90 85 90 95 70 75 90 92 80 76 85 90

Paddy 55 60 80 65 25 20 75 10 25 20 10 12 2. -Horticultural crops

-Orchards Mango - 10 - - - 100 - 30 - 90 - 80

Litchi - 8 - - - 100 - 20 - 50 - 40

-Vegetables- Other vegetable 25 65 35 55 45 40 55 20 45 35 45 55

Potato 45 65 35 30 65 40 55 25 75 55 65 20 Cauliflower 10 25 25 40 25 30 45 55 45 60 45 55 Cabbage -Floriculture 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 -

3. Animal husbandry

-Cows 80 85 60 65 95 50 85 70 80 90 80 90

Buffalos 15 15 75 70 25 15 10 15 15 10 15 20 sheep - Goat - 25 20 18 40 25 10 8 25 20 10 15

Pigs - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. Fisheries - - - - - - - - - - - - 5. Sericulture - - - - - - - - - - - -6. Poultry - - - - - - - - - - - - 7. Agriculture labour - - - - - - - - - - - -8. Duckeries - - - - - - - - - - - - 9. Bee Keeping - - - - - - - - - - - - 10. Vermi-compost - - - - 10 20 10 - 3 - 2 4 11. Medicinal - - - - 10 10 - - - - - - 12. Any other - - - - - - - - - - - -

TableNo-25:

Contribution Of Different Enterprises Towards Annual Income Under Each Existing Farming System In Nalanda District.

Sl. No.

Contribution of different enterprises /Commodities (P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS Type of

enterprises /Commodities

AES-I AES-II AES-III RR RP RR RP RR RP

EFS- I

EFS- II

EFS- I

EFS-II EFS-

I EFS-II

EFS- I

EFS-II EFS-I EFS-II EFS-I EFS-II

1.

Agricultural Crops

Irrigated Wheat Maize

Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,500) P

(19,500) P

(15,400) P

(18,000) P

(19,000) P

(19,500) P

(17,000) (18,000)

P (24,000)

P 6,000

P

(18000) P

(17500) P

2.

Horticultural Crops

Orchard Mango Litchi

-Vegetables Potato

pointed Guard Other

vegetable

- (3,000)

T -

(2500) T

- (9,500)

S -

(6,000) T

- (12,000)

S -

(9,000) S

3.

Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(12,000) S

(9,000) S

(6800) S

(6850) S

(13,000) S

(11,000)

(11,000) S

(8,500) S

(11,000) S

(9,000) T

(11,000) S

(8,500) T

4. Fisheries - - - - - - - - - - - - 5. Sericulture - - - - - - - - - - - - 6. Poultry - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. Agriculture

labour - - - - - - - - - - - -

8. Duckeries - - - - - - - - - - - - 9. Bee Keeping - - - - - - - - - - - -

10. Vermi-

compost - - - - - - - - - - - -

11. Medicinal - - - - - - - - - - - - 12. Any other - - - - - - - - - - - -

P-Primary S-Secondary T-Tertiary

Table No.26:

TYPE OF IMPROVED FARMING SYSTEMS (IFS) EVOLVED BY INNOVATIVE FARMERS OR Recommended By Research Scientists for Each Resource Situation

District: Nalanda AES: III

Innovative farmer Name: IFS-I (RR)

Sl.No.

Type of

Enterprises/ commodities

No. of families associated and their %

AES-I AES-II AES-III

RR RP RR RP RR RP

IFS-I IFS-II IFS-

I IFS-II IFS-I IFS-II

IFS-I

IFS-II IFSI

IFS II

IFS I

IFS II

IFS III

1.

-Agricultural crops

-Irrigated

-Rainfed

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

2.

-Horticultural crops

- Orchards

Irrigated

Dry

-Vegetables

- Floriculture

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

3.

-Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

4. Fisheries - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Sericulture - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. Poultry - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Bee keeping - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Duckeries - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9. Agriculture labour - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10. Vermi-compost - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11. Medicinal & Aromatic

Plant - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Table No.27

CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT ENTERPRISES TOWARDS ANNUAL INCOME UNDER EACH IMPROVED FARM SYSTEM

(Recommended by Research)

District: Nalanda

No Recommendation by the Research based on farming System

Sl.No

Type of

enterprises/ commodities

Contribution of different enterprises in terms of P/S/T/Q and net income in Rs.

AES I AES-II AES-III

IFS I IFS II IFS-I IFS-II IFS-I IFS-II

RR RP RR RP RR RP RR RP RR RP RR RP

1. -Agricultural crops

-Irrigated - - - - - - - - - - - -

2.

-Horticultural crops

- Orchards

� Irrigated

� Dry

-Vegetables

- Floriculture

- - - - - - - - - - - -

3.

-Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

- - - - - - - - - - - -

4. Fisheries - - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Sericulture - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. Poultry - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. Bee keeping - - - - - - - - - - - -

8. Duckeries - - - - - - - - - - - -

9. Agriculture labour - - - - - - - - - - - -

10. Vermi-compost - - - - - - - - - - - -

11. Mushroom - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 Medicinal - - - - - - - - - - - -

Table No. 28 TREND ABOUT GROWTH OF EXISTING ENTERPRISES / COMMODITIES /LIVESTOCK IN THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGES.

District : Nalanda S. No Name of enterprises/

commodities / livestock Unit

TREND ABOUT NO. OF UNITS IN THE VILLAGE Remarks AES-I AES-II AES-III

2006 2000 1995 1990 1985 2006 2000 1995 1990 1985 2006 2000 1995 1990 1985

1.

Paddy Hact. 10 15 10 80 80 10 12 15 20 25 50 55 55 40 50 Arhar " 50 210 250 230 250 - - 5 8 15 - 5 20 20 30

Wheat " 340 335 335 330 310 70 75 70 60 50 120 110 85 80 70

Sugarcane “ - - - - - 30 35 40 45 38 40 60 85 90 100 Maize k “ 140 130 115 105 100 130 120 105 100 90 280 270 250 235 220

Maize -rabi 50 30 - - - 20 15 10 - - 60 40 - - -

Pea 30 80 115 150 200 - - 5 8 10 - 5 20 30 30

Mustard 210 400 350 280 250 25 25 10 10 10 60 50 40 30 30 Gram - - 50 160 140 - - 5 9 10 - 5 25 35 40 others 310 185 220 300 300 15 8 10 10 12 30 30 30 35 20

2

Horticulture

- Orchard “ 25 22 20 15 10 15 16 18 18 20 28 26 24 22 21

- Vegetables “ 32 35 40 40 45 8 8 8 7 6 15 18 15 15 12

- Flowers “ 2 0.5 - - - 1 0.5 - - - 1.5 1 0.25 - -

3

Animal husbandry

- Sheep No. - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -

- Goat " 850 880 920 980 1020 150 165 172 185 192 285 320 335 350 365

- Buffalo " 85 95 105 125 140 25 35 45 50 55 40 50 65 72 85

- Local "

- Graded

- Cow

-Local 20 125 155 300 685 1050 25 125 285 350 425 10 25 150 252 365

- Cross breed 550 500 285 130 50 10 400 250 120 65 12 560 285 85 25 10

- Pigs " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Poultry “ 50 10 - - - 80 40 - - - 80 60 - - -

- Commercial " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Back yard " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4 Fisheries " 1 1 2 5 8 4 3 2 1 1 5 2 2 1 2

5 Duckeries " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 Sericulture - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 Bee keeping Boxes 10 2 - - - 20 5 - - - 25 12 - - -

8. Vermi-compost No. 3 1 - - - 5 4 - - - 8 1 - - -

9

Produce from common land and others

- Fuel wood Qtls - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Minor forest produce " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 Agriculture labourer No. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 Tapping of toddy trees “ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12

Non-farm enterprise - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Regular service No. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Daily wage earning No. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Transport of material through - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tractor / Bullock cart “ 13 13 13 9 6 11 9 9 9 6 15 13 13 13 8

- Mat making “ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Rope making “ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Wood carving “ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Handloom etc. “ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pottery 12 12 12 14 23 16 16 14 18 18 22 22 24 36 36

Table No.30 A

ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS WITH REGARD TO EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

District: Nalanda AES: I Village: Kojpura Resource Rich Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No.


Combination of enter-

prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems

with each enterprise

No. of affected persons

(%)

Proposed solution Reasons for non-

adoption of proposed solution

Proposed strategy

1.

Agricultural Crops Irrigated Wheat Maize

Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,500) P

Sandy Soil ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of infrastructure, Damage /loss due to wild animal

75%

Soil and water management, insurance of crops, extensive extension work, Infrastructure availability, Formation of Farmers Group

Lack of Knowledge, Lack of good quality input retailers, short supply of inputs, Lack of initiative on part of different institutions to build infrastructure, No extension activity

Extensive extension activity, encourage pvt input suppliers for better coverage, insurance of crops, Policy initiative by govt. agencies

2.

Horticultural Crops Orchard Mango Litchi

-Vegetables Potato

pointed Guard Other vegetable

- - - - - -

3.

Animal Husbandry Cows

Buffalows Sheep Goat Pigs

(12,000) S

Lack of exotic varieties, lack of new technology, Lack of green fodder round the year, Lack of veterinary hospital and AI service.

80%)

Awareness program

should be organized at village level, bred up gradation, hospital and AI service centre

Lacking of dissemination of technology at village level

Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -

5. Sericulture - - - - - -

6. Poultry - - - - - -

7. Agriculture labour - - - - - -

8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -

10. Vermi-compost - - - - - -

11. Medicinal - - - - - -

12. Any other -

Table No.30 B


District: Nalanda AES: I

Village: Kojpura RR Name of the EFS= II

Sl.

No.


Combi-nation of

enter-prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems


No. of affecte

d person

s

(%)

Proposed solution Reasons for non- adoption of proposed

solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,500) P

Sandy Soil ,Lack of quality input and capital ,lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of infrastructure, Damage /loss due to wild animal

100%

Soil and water management, insurance of crops, extensive extension work, Infrastructure availability, Formation of Farmers Group, Linkage with FIs

Lack of Knowledge, Lack of good quality input retailers, short supply of inputs, Lack of initiative on part of different institutions to build infrastructure, No extension activity, Banks indifference in providing loans to the farmers

Extensive extension activity, encourage pvt input suppliers for better coverage, insurance of crops, Policy initiative by govt. agencies and FIs

2. Horticultural Crops


-Vegetables Potato


(3,000) T

Sandy Soil ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of road linkage, Lack of market facility, Damage /loss due to wild animal Blue bull

90 %

Soil and water management, regular power supply, road linkage, connecting to market ,insurance of crops



3. Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(9,000) S


100%)

Awareness program



Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -

10 Vermi-compost -

11 Medicinal -

12. Any other -

Table No.30 C


District: Nalanda AES: I Village: Kojpura RP Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No.



prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems



(%)

Proposed solution Reasons for non-

adoption of proposed solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(15,400) P

Sandy Soil ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of infrastructure, Damage /loss due to wild animal

75%

Soil and water management, insurance of crops, extensive extension work, Infrastructure availability, Formation of Farmers Group



2.

Horticultural Crops


-Vegetables Potato


- - - - - -

3.

Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(6800) S


80%)

Awareness program



Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -

10. Vermi-compost - - - - - -

11. Medicinal - - - - - -

12. Any other -

Table No.30 D



Village: Kojpura RP Name of the EFS= II

Sl.

No.


Combi-nation of

enter-prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems


No. of affecte

d person

s

(%)


solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,000) P

Sandy Soil ,Lack of quality input and capital ,lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of infrastructure, Damage /loss due to wild animal

100%

Soil and water management, insurance of crops, extensive extension work, Infrastructure availability, Formation of Farmers Group, Linkage with FIs


Extensive extension activity, encourage pvt input suppliers for better coverage, insurance of crops, Policy initiative by govt. agencies and FIs



-Vegetables Potato


(2500) T

Sandy Soil ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of road linkage, Lack of market facility, Damage /loss due to wild animal Blue bull

90 %

Soil and water management, regular power supply, road linkage, connecting to market ,insurance of crops



3. Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(6850) S


100%)

Awareness program



Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -

10 Vermi-compost -

11 Medicinal -

12. Any other -

Table No.30 E


District: Nalanda AES: II

Village: Hindupur RR Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No.



prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems


No. of affecte

d person

s

(%)

Proposed solution

Reasons for non- adoption of proposed

solution

Proposed strategy

1.

Agricultural Crops


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,000) P

Lack of quality input, lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of market facility

100% Soil and water management, regular power supply connecting to market ,insurance of crops


Introduction of new crops suitable for local condition, Extensive extension activity, encourage pvt input suppliers for better coverage, insurance of crops, Policy initiative by govt. agencies and FIs



-Vegetables Potato

pointed Guard Other

vegetable

- - - - - -

3. Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(13,000) S

Lack of exotic varieties,lack of new technology,Lack of green fodder round the year,Lakc of veterinary hospital and AI service.

100%)

Awareness program

should be organized at village level, bred up gradation,hospital and AI service centre


Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -

7. Agriculture labour

- - - - - -

8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -

10 Vermi-compost - - - - - -

11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.30 F


District: Nalanda AES: II Village: Hindupur RR Name of the EFS= II

Sl.

No.


Combi-nation

of enter-prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems


No. of affecte

d person

s

(%)


solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,500) P

Water logged area (Chour),Lack of quality input, lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of market facility

100%

Soil and water management, regular power supply connecting to market ,insurance of crops



2. Horticultural Crops Orchard Mango Litchi

-Vegetables Potato


(9,500)

S

Water loged area Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, ,Lack of market facility, Damage /loss due to wild animal Blue bull and bour and sahi

100 %




3. Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(11,000)

water lodged area Lack of exotic varieties,lack of new technology,Lack of green fodder round the year,Lakc of veterinary hospital and AI service.

100%)

Awareness program



Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -


11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.30 G


District: Nalanda AES: II Village: Hindupur RP Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No.



prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems


No. of affecte

d person

s

(%)

Proposed solution

Reasons for non- adoption of proposed

solution

Proposed strategy

1.

Agricultural Crops


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(17,000)

Lack of quality input, lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of market facility

100% Soil and water management, regular power supply connecting to market ,insurance of crops





-Vegetables Potato

pointed Guard Other

vegetable

- - - - - -

3. Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(11,000) S

Lack of exotic varieties, lack of new technology,Lack of green fodder round the year,Lakc of veterinary hospital and AI service.

100%)

Awareness program



Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -

7. Agriculture labour

- - - - - -

8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -


11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.30 H


District: Nalanda AES: II Village: Hindupur RP Name of the EFS= II

Sl.

No.


Combi-nation

of enter-prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems


No. of affecte

d person

s

(%)


solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,000) P

Water logged area, Lack of quality input, lack of irrigation, Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of market facility

100%





-Vegetables Potato


(6,000)

T

Water logged area Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, ,Lack of market facility,

100 %




3. Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(8,500) S

water lodged area Lack of exotic varieties, lack of new technology, Lack of green fodder round the year, Lack of veterinary hospital and AI service.

100%)

Awareness program



Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -


11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.30 I


District: Nalanda AES: III Village: Chero RR Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No.


Combi-ation of enter-

prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems



(%)

Proposed solution Reasons for non- adoption of

proposed solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(24,000) P

Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of market facility,

100% Soil and water management, regular power supply connecting to market, insurance of crops





-Vegetables Potato


- - - - - -

3.



(11,000) S

Lack of exotic varieties, lack of new technology, Lack of green fodder round the year,

Lack of veterinary hospital and AI service.

90%)

Awareness program



Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -


11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.30 J


District: Nalanda AES: III Village: Chero RR Name of the EFS= II

Sl.

No.


Combination of enter-prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems



(%)

Proposed solution Reasons for non- adoption of proposed solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

6,000 P

Lack of finance, ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, ,Lack of market facility

80%

Soil and water management, regular power supply, connecting to market ,insurance of crops, formation of farmers group and linkage with credit society and market





-Vegetables Potato


(12,000) S

Lack of finance , ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of market facility

90%

Soil and water management, regular power supply, connecting to market, insurance of crops, farmers groups formation and linkage with credit society and market.



3.



(9,000) T

Lack of finance, Lack of exotic varieties, lack of new technology, Lack of green fodder round the year, Lack of veterinary hospital and AI service.

85%)

Awareness program


farmers groups formation and linkage with credit society and market.


Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -


11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.30 K


District: Nalanda AES: III Village: Chero RP Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No.


Combi-ation of enter-

prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems



(%)

Proposed solution Reasons for non- adoption of

proposed solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18000) P

Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of

market facility,

100%

Soil and water management, regular

power supply connecting to market, insurance of crops

Lack of Knowledge, Lack of good quality input retailers, short

supply of inputs, Lack of initiative on part of different institutions to

build infrastructure, No extension activity, Banks indifference in providing loans to the

farmers

Introduction of new crops suitable for local condition, Extensive extension activity,

encourage pvt input suppliers for better

coverage, insurance of crops, Policy initiative by govt. agencies and

FIs



-Vegetables Potato


- - - - - -

3.



(11,000) S

Lack of exotic varieties, lack of new technology, Lack of

green fodder round the year,

Lack of veterinary hospital and AI

service.

90%)

Awareness program

should be organized at village level, bred up

gradation, hospital and AI service centre

Lacking of dissemination of

technology at village level

Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -


11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.30 L


District: Nalanda AES: III Village: Chero RR Name of the EFS= II

Sl.

No.


Combination of enter-prises in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific problems



(%)

Proposed solution Reasons for non- adoption of proposed solution

Proposed strategy

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(17500) P

Lack of finance, ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, ,Lack of market facility

80%

Soil and water management, regular power supply, connecting to market ,insurance of crops, formation of farmers group and linkage with credit society and market





-Vegetables Potato


(9,000) S

Lack of finance , ,Lack of quality input ,lack of irrigation ,Lack of knowledge, Lack of power supply, Lack of market facility

90%

Soil and water management, regular power supply, connecting to market, insurance of crops, farmers groups formation and linkage with credit society and market.



3.



(8,500) T

Lack of finance, Lack of exotic varieties, lack of new technology, Lack of green fodder round the year, Lack of veterinary hospital and AI service.

85%)

Awareness program


farmers groups formation and linkage with credit society and market.


Awareness Camps

and Demonstrations

4. Fisheries - - - - - -


6. Poultry - - - - - -


8. Duckeries - - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - - -


11 Medicinal - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Table No.31

TYPE OF CHANGING SCENARIO IN RURAL AREAS WHICH IS HAVING A BEARING ON EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

District: NALANDA

S.No. Type of changing scenario Effect of each scenario on farming

system (H/M/L)

Remarks

AES-I AES-II AES-III 1 Migration of people to urban areas M M M

2 Lack of animal draught power H H H

3 Increase in farm machinery H H H

4 Shortage of labour H H H

5 Reduction in availability of fodder M M M

6 Increase in number of

unemployed rural youth H H H

7 Increase in level of education H H M

8 Reduction in availability of

irrigation water H H H

9 Increase in rural indebtedness M H M

10 Better trasnport facilities H H H

11 Milk collection centers/route H H H

12 Marketing facilities at the L M L

village level

13 Slackness towards agriculture M M M

14 Low relative profitability from farming H H H

15 Absentee land lordism L L L

16 Selling land to others - - -

17 Purchasing land from others - - -

18 Any other - - -

Table No.32

TYPE OF NEW MARKET OPPORTUNITIES IN URBAN / RURAL AREAS WHICH ARE HAVING BEARINGS ON FARMING SYSTEM

Name of the Village: KOJPURA, HINDUPUR, CHERO District –NALANDA AES: I, II & III

S.No.

Type of new marketopportunities

Effect of each opportunity on farming System (H/M/L)

AES-I AES-II AES-III 1 Vegetables L H H

2 Fruits M H H

3 Mulberry silk L L L

4 Oilseeds H H H

5 Pulses H H M

6 Mushroom L L L

7 Flowers L M M

8 Meat (goat/sheep) L M M

9 Sale of Seeds to outside M M M

10 Sale of Organic products to outside L L L

11 Basmati rice L L L

12 Honey M H H

13 Handicraft L L L

14 Agri-Clinic H H H

Table No.33-A

Diversification and Intensification of Farming Systems

District: Nalanda AES: I Village: Kojpura Resource Rich Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No.

Type of

enterprises/ commodities

Contribution of different enterprises / commodities in terms of net income Intervention

(Diversification /

Intensification)

EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1.


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,500) P

- (29,000) 24,000) Intensification

2.


-Vegetables Potato


- - (20,000) (14,000) Diversification

3.



(12,000) S

- 25000 18000 Intensification

4. Fisheries - - 25,000 22,000 Diversification 5. Sericulture - - - - - 6. Poultry - - 15000 8,000 Diversification 7. Agriculture labour - - 4000 3,000 Diversification8. Duckeries - - - - - 9. Bee Keeping - - - - - 10. Vermi-compost - - 3000 2500 Diversification11 Medicinal - - 15,000 12,000 Diversification 12 Any other -

Table No.33-B

DIVERSIFICATION AND INTENSIFICATION OF FARMING SYSTEMS

District: NALANDA AES: I Village: KOJPURA RR EFS-II

Sl.

No.


Contribution of different enterprises / commodities in terms of net income

Intervention

(Diversification / Intensification)

EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1. Agricultural Crops Irrigated Wheat Maize

Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,500) P

- (30,000) (25,000) Intensification


-Vegetables Potato


(3,000) T


3. Animal Husbandry Cows


(9,000) S


4. Fisheries - - 25,000 20,000 Diversification

5. Sericulture - - - - -

6. Poultry - - 15000 8,000 Diversification

7. Agriculture labour - - 4000 3,000 Diversification

8. Duckeries - - - - -

9. Bee Keeping - - - - -

10 Vermi-compost - - 3000 2500 Diversification

11 Medicinal - - 15,000 10,000 Diversification

12. Any other -

Table No.33-C


District: Nalanda AES: I Village: Kojpura RP

Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No.



Intervention


EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(15,400) P

- 30000 P, W, Mz, O

(19,000) Intensification


-Vegetables Potato


- - 15000 8000 Diversification



(6800) S




6. Poultry - - 15000 8,000 Diversification

7. Agriculture labour - - 4000 3,000 Diversification




11 Medicinal -

12. Any other -

Table No.33-D




Sl.

No.



Intervention


EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,000) P

- Wheat, Mz,

M, P (21,000) P, W, Mz, O

(19,000) Intensification


-Vegetables Potato


(2500)

T -

V,P,O, S (20000)

Marigold, (5000)

V,P,O (16,000)

Diversification

3.



(6850)

S

-

1.C.B(H.F)

(7500)

1 Murrah

(5000)

Jumunapari-B.B Cross

(1800)

2 Murrah

(10,000)

Jumunapari-B.B Cross

(1800)

Intensification

4. Fisheries - - - - -


6. Poultry - - 2000 1800 Diversification

7. Agriculture labour - - - - -




11 Medicinal -

12. Any other -

Table No.33-E


District: Nalanda AES: II Village: Hindupur RR Name of the EFS= I

Sl.

No



Intervention

(Diversification

/ Intensification)

EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1. Agricultural Crops


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,000) P

(19,000)

P (30,000) (28,000) Intensification



-Vegetables Potato

pointed Guard Other

vegetable

- - 10000 8000 Diversification-

3. Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(13,000)

S




6. Poultry - - 20,000 12,000 Diversification

7. Agriculture labour - - 8,000 4500 Diversification



10 Vermi-compost - 3000

T 3,000 2400 Diversification

11 Medicinal - 30,000 40,000 30,000 Diversification

12. Any other -

Table No.33-F


District: NALANDA AES: II

Village: Hindupur RR EFS-II

Sl.

No



(Diversification /

Intensification)

EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,500) P

- (30,000) (28,000) Diversification


-Vegetables Potato


(9,500) S

- (14,000) (12,000) Diversification



(11,000)








10 Vermi-compost - - 3,000 2400 Diversification


12. Any other -

Table No.33-G


District: Nalanda AES: II Village: Hindupur RP Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No




EFS

OP-I


OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1.

Agricultural Crops


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(17,000) - (24,000) (22,000) Intensification

2.


-Vegetable

s Potato pointed Guard Other

vegetable


3.

Animal Husbandr

y Cows


(11,000) S - 18000 13000 Intensification

4. Fisheries - - 15,000 10,000 Diversification 5. Sericulture - - - - - 6. Poultry - - 20,000 12,000 Diversification 7. Agriculture

- - 8,000 4500 Diversification

8. Duckeries - - - - - 9. Bee Keeping - - - - -



11 Medicinal - 30,000 40,000 30,000 Diversification 12. Any other -

Table No.33-H


District: NALANDA AES: II

Village: Hindupur RP EFS-II

Sl.

No



(Diversification /

Intensification)

EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,000) P


2.


-Vegetables Potato


(6,000) T

- 10000 7000 Diversification-



(8,500) S










12. Any other -

Table No.33-I


District: Nalanda AES: III Village: Chero RR Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No



Intervention (Diversification / Intensification)

EFS

OP-I


OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1.

Agricultural Crops


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(24,000) P


2.


-Vegetable


vegetable


3.

Animal Husbandr

y Cows


(11,000) S








Table No.33-J


District: NALANDA AES: III Village: Chero RR EFS-II

Sl.

No



(Diversification /

Intensification)

EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1.

Agricultural Crops

Irrigated

Wheat

Maize

Mustard

Sugarcane

Paddy

6,000 T


2.

Horticultural Crops


-Vegetables Potato pointed Guard Other

vegetable

(12,000) P


3.

Animal Husbandry

Cows Buffalows

Sheep

Goat

Pigs

(9,000) S










12. Any other -

Table No.33-K


District: Nalanda AES: III Village: Chero RP Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No




EFS

OP-I


OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1.

Agricultural Crops


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18000) P



-Vegetable


vegetable


3.

Animal Husbandr

y Cows


(11,000) S - 18000 13000 Intensification







Table No.33-L


District: NALANDA AES: III

Village: Chero RP EFS-II

Sl.

No



(Diversification /

Intensification)

EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(17500) P



-Vegetables Potato


(9,000) S

- 10000 7000 Diversification-



(8,500) T










12. Any other -

Table: 34A GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR

PROMOTING THE MODIFIED FARMING SYSTEM District: Nalanda AES: I Village: Kojpura Resource Rich Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No.

Type of enterprises/

commodities

Contribution of different enterprises / commodity in terms of net income/acre

Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for gap

in Adoption

**

Proposed strategy

***

Existing farming system

Mutually agreed upon farming

system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,500) P 24,000) P -

Introduction of HYV, Better Water

Management, Balanced Fertilizer

Application, Mechanization

2


-Vegetables Potato


- (14,000) F - -

3



(12,000)

S 18000 P

Insufficient AI facilities, Poor AH

Management

AI facility under P-P-P Mode, Awareness &

Training

4 Fisheries -

22,000

F

Unavailability of seed &

fingerlings at local level, Lack of Knowledge, Fear of Loss, Availability of

Market

Availability of Input, Training, Group

Formation & Marketing Linkages

5 Sericulture - - - - - 6 Poultry - 8,000 - - -

7 Agriculture labour - 3,000 F

Lack of Skill, Lack of

Entrepreneurship, Fear of Loss

Training, Group Formation & Marketing

Linkages

8 Duckeries - - - - -9 Bee Keeping - - - - -

10 Vermi-compost - 2500 F Lack of

Knowledge & Input

Establishment of worm multiplication unit, Training, Market

Knowledge

11 Medicinal - 12,000 F Lack of

Knowledge & Input



12 Any other -

Table No.34-B GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District: NALANDA AES: I Village: KOJPURA RR EFS-II

Sl. No.


commodities

Contribution of different enterprises / commodity in terms of net income

Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for

gap in Adoption

Proposed strategy



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,500) P (25,000) P

Lack of Input Supply,

Awareness, Farmers do not follow,

Soil Erosion

Availability of Inputs, Training, Awareness,

Soil Management

2

Horticultural Crops


-Vegetables Potato


(3,000) T

14000 P



Availability of Inputs, Training, Awareness

3

Animal Husbandry Cows Buffalows

Sheep Goat Pigs

(9,000) S

18000 P

Awareness, Insufficient AI facilities,

Poor AH Management


Training

4 Fisheries -

20,000

F


fingerlings at local level,

Lack of Knowledge,

Fear of Loss, Availability of

Market






Entrepreneurship, Fear of

Loss

Training, Group Formation &

Marketing Linkages

8 Duckeries - - - - - 9 Bee Keeping - - - - -


Knowledge & Input

Establishment of worm multiplication

unit, Training, Market Knowledge

11 Medicinal - 10,000 F Lack of

Knowledge & Input



12 Any other -

Table No.34-C

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED FARMING SYSTEM

District: Nalanda AES: I Village: Kojpura RP

Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No.



Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for gap in Adoption

Proposed strategy



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(15,400) P

(19,000) P

Lack of Awarenes of technology,






2


-Vegetables Potato


- 8000 F



Availability of Inputs, Training,

Awareness

3



(6800) S

14000 P


Poor AH Management

AI facility under P-P-P Mode,

Awareness & Training

4 Fisheries -

20,000

F


fingerlings at local level,

Lack of Knowledge,

Fear of Loss, Availability of

Market






Entrepreneurship, Fear of

Loss

Training, Group Formation & Marketing Linkages



Knowledge & Input



11 Medicinal - F Lack of

Knowledge & Input



12 Any other -

Table No.34-D GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District: Nalanda AES: I


Sl. No.


commodities

Contribution of different enterprises / commodity in terms of net income Gap in adoption

of new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for

gap in Adoption

Proposed strategy



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,000) P

(19,000) P

Lack of Awarenes of technology,



Introduction of HYV, Better

Water Management,

Balanced Fertilizer


2


-Vegetables Potato


(2500) T

14000 P




Awareness

3



(6850) S

000 P


Poor AH Management


Training

4 Fisheries - - - - - 5 Sericulture - - - - -

6 Poultry -

1800

F

Lack of Awarenes of technology for Poultry

Management

Training, Awareness,

Group Formation, Marketing Linkage

7 Agriculture labour - - - - - 8 Duckeries - - - - - 9 Bee Keeping - - - - -

10 Vermi-compost -

1800

F Lack of

Knowledge & Input

Establishment of worm

multiplication unit, Training,

Market Knowledge

11 Medicinal - 12 Any other -

Table:34E GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District: Nalanda AES: II Village: Hindupur RR Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No.


commodities


Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for

gap in Adoption

**

Proposed strategy

***



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,000) P

(28,000) P

Lack of Marketing

facility, quality input, Awareness, Farmers do not follow

Introduction of HYV, Better Water Management,

Balanced Fertilizer Application,

Mechanization

2


-Vegetables Potato


- 8000 - - -

3



(13,000) S

16000 P


Poor AH Management


Training

4 Fisheries - 10,000 F

Lack of seed,

Technology, awareness, marketing linkages

Availability of Inputs, Training, Awareness, Marketing Linkages

5 Sericulture - - - -

6 Poultry - 12,000 F


Management

Training, Awareness, Group Formation, Marketing Linkage

7 Agriculture labour - 4500 F

Supply of Input, Lack

of marketing linkage





Knowledge & Input



11 Medicinal - 30,000 F

Lack of Knowledge

& Input, Marketing Linkages


12 Any other -

Table: 34 F GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District: NALANDA AES: II

Village: Hindupur RR EFS-II

Sl. No.


commodities


Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)


**

Proposed strategy

***



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(19,500) P

(28,000) P

Lack of Marketing




Mechanization

2

Horticultural Crops


-Vegetables Potato


(9,500) S (12,000) P

Lack of Input

Supply, Awareness, Farmers do not follow,


3


Sheep Goat Pigs

(11,000)

14000 P


Poor AH Managemen

t

AI facility under P-P-P Mode, Awareness

& Training


Lack of seed,






Management







8 Duckeries - - 9 Bee Keeping - -


Knowledge & Input




Lack of Knowledge



12 Any other -

Table No.34-G GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District: Nalanda AES: II Village: Hindupur RP Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No.



Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for gap in

Adoption

Proposed strategy



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(17,000) (22,000) N -


Management, Balanced Fertilizer Application,

Mechanization

2


-Vegetables Potato


- 7000 - - -

3



(11,000)

S 13000 P

Awareness, Insufficient AI

facilities, Poor AH Management


Training


Lack of seed, Technology, awareness,

marketing linkages



6 Poultry - 12,000 F Lack of Awarenes of

technology for Poultry Management


7 Agriculture labour - 4500 F Supply of Input, Lack of marketing linkage




10 Vermi-compost - 2400 F Lack of Knowledge &

Input

Establishment of worm multiplication unit, Training, Market

Knowledge

11 Medicinal - 30,000 F Lack of Knowledge &

Input, Marketing Linkages


12 Any other - F

Lack of seed, Technology, awareness,

marketing linkages


Table No.34-H GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED


Village: Hindupur RP EFS-II

Sl. No.


commodities


Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for

gap in Adoption

Proposed strategy



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18,000) P

(22,000) N -



Mechanization

2


-Vegetables Potato


(6,000)

T 7000 P


Awareness, Farmers do not

follow,


3



(8,500)

S 13000 P

Awareness, Insufficient AI facilities, Poor

AH Management

AI facility under P-P-P Mode, Awareness

& Training


Lack of seed, Technology, awareness, marketing linkages




Lack of Awarenes of

technology for Poultry

Management



Supply of Input, Lack of

marketing linkage





Knowledge & Input




Lack of Knowledge &



12 Any other -

Table:34I GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District -NALANDA AES: II Village: Hindupur EFS : I & II RR

Sl. No.


commodities


Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for

gap in Adoption

**

Proposed strategy

***



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(24,000) P

(28,000) P

Lack of Marketing




Mechanization

2


-Vegetables Potato


- 8000 P




3



(11,000) S

16000 P


Poor AH Management


Training


Lack of seed,






Management









Knowledge & Input




Lack of Knowledge



12 Any other -

Table: 34 J GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED


Village: Hindupur EFS : I & II RR

Sl. No.


commodities


Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)


**

Proposed strategy

***



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

6,000 T

(28,000) P

Lack of Marketing




Mechanization

2

Horticultural Crops


-Vegetables Potato


(12,000) P

(12,000) P




3


Sheep Goat Pigs

(9,000) S

14000 P


Poor AH Management


Training


Lack of seed,






Management









Knowledge & Input




Lack of Knowledge



12 Any other -

Table No.34-K GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District: Nalanda AES: III Village: Chero RP Name of the EFS= I

Sl. No.



Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)


Proposed strategy



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(18000) P

(22,000) P

Lack of Marketing





2


-Vegetables Potato


- 7000 F




Awareness

3



(11,000)

S 13000 P


Poor AH Management




Lack of seed,



Awareness, Marketing Linkages




Management

Training, Awareness, Group

Formation, Marketing Linkage








Knowledge & Input




Lack of Knowledge




12 Any other -

Table No.34-L GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING THE MODIFIED

FARMING SYSTEM District: NALANDA AES: III

Village: Chero RP EFS-II

Sl. No.


commodities


Gap in adoption of

new enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons for

gap in Adoption

Proposed strategy



system

1


Mustard Sugarcane

Paddy

(17500) P

(22,000) P

Lack of Marketing

facility, quality input,


follow




2


-Vegetables Potato


(9,000)

S 7000 F



follow,


Awareness

3



(8,500)

T 13000 P

Awareness, Insufficient AI facilities, Poor

AH Management




Lack of seed, Technology, awareness, marketing linkages


Awareness, Marketing Linkages



Lack of Awarenes of

technology for Poultry

Management




Supply of Input, Lack of

marketing linkage

Availability of Input, Training,

Group Formation & Marketing

Linkages 8 Duckeries - - 9 Bee Keeping - -


Knowledge & Input

Establishment of worm

multiplication unit, Training, Market

Knowledge


Lack of Knowledge &




12 Any other -

Table No.35 IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENT FARMING SITUATIONS

IN EACH CROP IN EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

Name of district : Nalanda Representative villages: Kojpura, Hindupur, Chero AES : I ,II, & III Farming Situation : Irrigated (Area in Hect.)

AES Crop Source of Irrigation Type of Soil

Previous Crop Time of Sowing

Canal Tube well

Tank Rain fed Loam Sandy Loam Clayee

I

Paddy Early - - - - - - - Wheat

Normal - 10 - - 6 4 - Wheat Late - - - - - - - Wheat

Wheat Early - 38 - 43 42 39 -

Normal - 113 - 68 35 146 - Wheat Late - - - 78 - 78 - Wheat

Mustard Early - 46 - 18 - 64 - Maize

Normal - 37 - 59 8 88 - Maize Late - 32 - 18 - 50 - Arhar

Maize Early - 18 - 14 - 32 - Paddy/ Pea

Normal - 26 - 49 - 75 - Wheat Late - 12 - 21 - 33 - Kh. Maize

Arhar Early - - - - - - - -

Normal - - - 38 - 38 - Maize Late - - - 12 - 12 - /Maize

Pea Early - 12 - - - 12 - Kh. Maize

Normal - 13 - - - 13 - Kh. Maize Late - 5 - - - 5 - Kh. Maize

II

Paddy Early - - - - - - - Wheat

Normal - - - 10 10 - - Wheat Late - - - - - - - -

Wheat Early - - - - - - - -

Normal - - - 24 18 6 - Kh. Maize Late - - - 46 14 32 - Paddy

Mustard Early - - - - - - - -

Normal - - - 14 4 10 - Paddy Late - - - 11 3 8 - Kh. Maize

Maize Early - - - 12 3 9 - Paddy

Normal - - - 36 11 25 - Paddy Late - - - 72 23 49 - Paddy

Sugarcane Early - - - - - - - -

Normal - - - 24 21 3 - Paddy Late - - - 6 5 1 - Paddy

III

Paddy Early - 18 - 5 7 2 14

Normal - 12 - 3 9 - 6 Wheat Late - 2 - 10 9 - 3 Wheat

Wheat Early - 12 - 10 9 13 Kh. Maize

Normal - 13 - 25 10 26 2 Paddy Late - - - 10 2 8 - Paddy

Maize Early - 64 - 15 34 24 11 Wheat

Normal - 79 - 48 46 52 29 Wheat Late - 12 - 62 46 16 12 Paddy

Mustard Early - - - - - - - -

Normal - - - 24 11 13 - Paddy/Maize Late - - - 36 5 31 Paddy/Maize

Sugarcane Early - 6 - - 6 - - -

Normal - 16 - 6 18 4 Wheat/Paddy Late - 5 - 7 9 3 Paddy

TABLE No- 36 TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL CROPS ARE

CULTIVATED Name of district: NALANDA

(Area in ha)

AES Crop Area & % under different farming situation

Total Area EFS I EFS II

Irrigated % Rainfed % Irrigated % Rainfed % Irrigated % Rainfed %

I

Paddy 6 100 - - 4 100 - - 10 100 - -Wheat 104 96 47 93 151 189

Mustard 60 47 55 48 115 95 Maize 32 32 24 52 56 84 Arhar - - 35 - 15 0 50

Mango - - - - 3 11 3 11 Litchi - - - - 2 9 2 9

Vegetables - - - - 28 4 28 4

II

Paddy - - 8 - - 2 - - 10 100 Wheat - - 44 - - 26 - - 70 100

Sugarcane - - 18 - - 12 - - 30 100Maize - - 64 - - 56 - - 120 100

Mustard - - 18 - - 7 - - 25 100Mango - - - - 3 4 3 4 Guava - - - - - - 1 100 - - 1 100 Litchi - - - - 3 4 3 4

Vegetables - - - - 8 100 - - 8 100 -

III

Paddy 18 11 14 66 7 33 32 18 Wheat 12 23 13 22 25 45

Sugarcane 13 6 14 7 27 13 Maize 87 65 68 60 155 125

Mustard - - 35 100 - - 25 100 - - 60 100 Mango - - - - 2 20 8 80 2 20 8 80 Guava - - - - 2 5 2 5 Litchi - - - - 4 7 4 7

Vegetables - - - - 15 - - 15 - -

TABLE No- 37-A (i) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY

FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS

Name of AES : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop : Paddy EFS: I & II Type of Farmer: RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated Sl.No. Items of package Recommended

practice Existing practice Gap in adoption

(F/P/N) (*) Specific reasons for the gap (**)

Farmer proposed extension strategy (***)

RR RP RR RP RR RP RR RP 01 Sowing :

- Time - Method

June-July Transplanting

June-Aug. Transplanting

Jul-Aug Transplanting

P

P

02 Varieties Rajendra Masuri - I Semi Dwarf, Rajendra Shweta, Prabhat, Rajendra Basmati I,

Local, Sita, Mahsuri

Local F

F

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 40-50 70-75 70-85 P 04 Seed treatment Streptocyclin+

Emisan/Bavistin - - F F

05 Organic manure (tons /ha)

15 0.5 - P F

06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha) - Basal (N+P+K) - Top dress (N )

G- 40+40+20 HY-50+40+20 G-40 HY-50

35 +12+0

70

30+10+0

45

F

P

P P

Total General- 80+40+20 HY-. 100+50+30

105+12+0

75+10+0

07 Method of fertilizer use : - Basal - Top dress

Placement Broadcast

Broadcast --do--

Broadcast do

P P

08 Micro nutrient (specify) : - Dose (kg/ha) - Method of application

25 Kgs Zn Broadcast as basal

-

-

F

F

09 Pest management IPM, Chemical Only chemical

Only chemical

P P

10 Disease management

IPM, Chemical Only chemical

Only chemical

P P

11 Post harvest management

Cleaning & drying Cleaning & drying

Cleaning & drying

N N

12 Weed management - Mechanical - Herbicide

Hand weeding Butaclor 2000 ml Anilophos 1320 ml 50% or 750 ml 75%

Hand weeding

Hand weeding

P

P

13 Water management : - Number of irrigations - Method of irrigation

25 Check & basin

10

Flooding

7-8

Flooding

P

P

14 Land management : - Salinity/ acidity - Water logging

Leaching of salt,

Amendment in soil by application of pyrite

-

-

-

F

15 Method of harvesting

Manual Manual Manual N N

16 Any other - - - 17 Average Yield (Q /

ha.) - Grain - Fodder

G-40

HY-55

G-25

G-22-25

P

P

TABLE No- 37-A (ii) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


Name of AES : II District : Nalanda Representative village: Hindupur Crop: Paddy EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended practice

Existing practice

Gap in adoption (F/P/N) (*)

Specific reasons for the gap (**)



- Time - Method


Jul-Aug. Transplanting


P

P



Local F

F




15 0.5 - P F


G- 40+40+20 HY-50+40+20 G-40 HY-50

35 +12+0

70

30+10+0

45

F

P

P P

Total General- 80+40+20 HY-. 100+50+30

105+12+0

75+10+0


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast

--do--

Broadcast

do

P

P



-

-

F

F


Only chemical

P P

10 Disease management IPM, Chemical Only chemical

Only chemical

P P



Cleaning & drying

N N



Hand weeding

Hand weeding

P

P


25

Check & basin

10

Flooding

7-8

Flooding

P

P


Leaching of salt,


-

-

-

F

15 Method of harvesting Manual Manual Manual N N 16 Any other - - - 17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)

- Grain - Fodder

G-40

HY-55

G-25

G-22-25

P

P

TABLE No- 37-A (iii) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


Name of AES : II District : Nalanda Representative village: Hindupur Crop: Paddy EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended practice Existing practice

Gap inadoption (F/P/N) (*)




- Time - Method




P P



Local F

F




15 0.5 - P F


G- 40+40+20 HY-50+40+20 G-40 HY-50

35 +12+0

70

30+10+0

45

F

P

P P

Total General- 80+40+20 HY-. 100+50+30

105+12+0

75+10+0


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast --do--

Broadcast do

P P



-

-

F

F


Only chemical

P P


Only chemical

P P



Cleaning & drying

N N



Hand weeding

Hand weeding

P

P


25

Check & basin

10

Flooding

7-8

Flooding

P

P


Leaching of salt,


-

-

-

F


- Grain - Fodder

G-40

HY-55

G-25

G-22-25

P

P

TABLE No- 37-A (iv) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


Name of AES : III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop : Paddy EFS: I & II Type of Farmer: RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated Sl.No. Items of package Recommended

practice Existing practice Gap in adoption

(F/P/N) (*) Specific reasons for the gap (**)



- Time - Method


June-Aug. Transplanting


P

P



Local F

F




15 0.5 - P F


G- 40+40+20 HY-50+40+20 G-40 HY-50

35 +12+0

70

30+10+0

45

F

P

P P

Total General- 80+40+20 HY-. 100+50+30

105+12+0

75+10+0


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast --do--

Broadcast do

P P



-

-

F

F


Only chemical

P P

10 Disease management

IPM, Chemical Only chemical

Only chemical

P P



Cleaning & drying

N N



Hand weeding

Hand weeding

P

P


25 Check & basin

10

Flooding

7-8

Flooding

P

P


Leaching of salt,


-

-

-

F


Manual Manual Manual N N



G-40

HY-55

G-25

G-22-25

P

P

TABLE No- 37-A (v) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


Name of AES : II District : Nalanda Representative village: Hindupur Crop: Paddy EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl.No.

Items of package





RR RP RR RP RR RP RR RP01 Sowing :

- Time - Method




P

P



Local F

F




15 0.5 - P F


G- 40+40+20 HY-50+40+20 G-40 HY-50

35 +12+0

70

30+10+0

45

F

P

P P

Total General- 80+40+20 HY-. 100+50+30

105+12+0

75+10+0


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast

--do--

Broadcast

do

P

P



-

-

F

F


Only chemical

P P


Only chemical

P P



Cleaning & drying

N N



Hand weeding

Hand weeding

P

P


25

Check & basin

10

Flooding

7-8

Flooding

P

P


Leaching of salt,


-

-

-

F


- Grain - Fodder

G-40

HY-55

G-25

G-22-25

P

P

TABLE No- 37-B(i)

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS

Name of Agro-Ecological Situation : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Wheat EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Nov-Dec Line sowing

Nov-Jan Broadcasting


P

P

02 Varieties Desi: C-306, K 8027, RW 3016 HY:Normal sown HUW-234, PBW-343, RW –346, RW 3413, HD 2733 Rajlakshmi, Jagdish, Sonali HY: Late sown Sonali, HP-1209, Ganga, Raj 3765, SD 2285

UP-262, Lok I, Sonalika

Local, Sonalika

F

F

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 125 150

100 110

90 95

P P

P P

04 Seed treatment Bavistin,/Vitavex, - - F F 05 Organic manure

(tons /ha) 15 6 4-5 P P


Desi: 40+30+20, HY: 60+60+40, Desi: HY: 60

40+30+0 40+40+0

40

30+20+0 40+20+0

30

P P

P

Total Desi:30+30+20, HY: 120+60+40

40+30+ 0 80+40+ 0

30+20+0 70+20+0

P


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast

--do--

Broadca

st --do--

P



-

-

F

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical - - F 10 Disease

management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemica

l P



Cleaning & drying

N


Two hand weeding. 2,4-D(Sodium Salt) 750 ml, Isoprutron 1500 gm

No hand weeding. 2,4-D(Sodium Salt) 750 ml

- -

P


4

Check & basin

3

Flooding

2

Flooding

P


Leaching of salt,


-

-

-


Manual/Combine Manual Manual P

16 Any other - - - 17 Average Yield (Q / Desi- 25 Desi-15 Desi-10


HY-50 Desi-50 HY-50

Desi-30

Desi-24

P

TABLE No- 37-B(ii)


AES : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Wheat EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rain Fed

Sl.No.

Items of package






- Time - Method

Nov-Dec Line sowing



P

P

3&4

1&2



Local, Sonalika

F

F

1, 5

2 & 5


100 110

90 95

P P

P P

1 1

04 Seed treatment Bavistin,/Vitavex, - - F F 1 205 Organic manure (tons

/ha) 15 6 4-5 P P 5 2


Desi: 40+30+20, HY: 60+60+40, Desi: HY: 60

40+30+0 40+40+0

40

30+20+

0 40+20+

0

30

P P

P

1, 2 & 5

1, 2, 3, &

5

Total Desi:30+30+20, HY: 120+60+40

40+30+ 0 80+40+ 0

30+20+0

70+20+0

P

-

-


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast

--do--

Broadc

ast --do--

P

1

1&2



-

-

F

1 & 5

1 & 5

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical - - F 1 1,2&5

10 Disease management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemical

P 1 1,2&5



Cleaning &

drying

N N N




- -

P 1 1&2


4

Check & basin

3

Flooding

2

Flooding

P

1

1,2&5


Leaching of salt, Amendment in

soil by application of pyrite

-

-

-

-

-

15 Method of harvesting Manual/Combine Manual Manual P 1 & 2 1, 3 & 5

16 Any other - - - - - 17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)

- Grain - Fodder

Desi- 25 HY-50

Desi-50 HY-50

Desi-13

Desi-26

Desi-9

Desi-18

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-B(iii)


Name of Agro-Ecological Situation : II District : Nalanda Representative village: Hindupur Crop: Wheat EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice





- Time - Method

Nov-Dec Line sowing



P

P



Local, Sonalika

F

F


100 110

90 95

P P

P P

04 Seed treatment Bavistin,/Vitavex, - - F F 05 Organic manure (tons

/ha) 15 6 4-5 P P


Desi: 40+30+20, HY: 60+60+40, Desi: HY: 60

40+30+0 40+40+0

40

30+20+0 40+20+0

30

P P

P

Total Desi:30+30+20, HY: 120+60+40

40+30+ 0 80+40+ 0

30+20+0 70+20+0

P


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast --do--

Broadcast --do--

P



-

-

F

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical - - F 10 Disease management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemical P 11 Post harvest

management Cleaning & drying Cleaning &

drying Cleaning & drying

N




- -

P


4

Check & basin

3

Flooding

2

Flooding

P


Leaching of salt,

Amendment in soil by application of

pyrite

-

-

-

15 Method of harvesting Manual/Combine Manual Manual P



Desi- 25 HY-50

Desi-50 HY-50

Desi-15

Desi-30

Desi-10

Desi-24

P

TABLE No- 37-B(iv)


AES : III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Wheat EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rain Fed

Sl.No.

Items of package






- Time - Method

Nov-Dec Line sowing



P

P

3&4

1&2



Local, Sonalika

F

F

1, 5

2 & 5


100 110

90 95

P P

P P

1 1


/ha) 15 6 4-5 P P 5 2


Desi: 40+30+20, HY: 60+60+40, Desi: HY: 60

40+30+0 40+40+0

40

30+20+

0 40+20+

0

30

P P

P

1, 2 & 5

1, 2, 3, &

5

Total Desi:30+30+20, HY: 120+60+40

40+30+ 0 80+40+ 0

30+20+0

70+20+0

P

-

-


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast

--do--

Broadc

ast --do--

P

1

1&2



-

-

F

1 & 5

1 & 5



P 1 1,2&5



Cleaning &

drying

N N N




- -

P 1 1&2


4

Check & basin

3

Flooding

2

Flooding

P

1

1,2&5




-

-

-

-

-



- Grain - Fodder

Desi- 25 HY-50

Desi-50 HY-50

Desi-13

Desi-26

Desi-9

Desi-18

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-B (v)


AES : III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Wheat EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice





- Time - Method

Nov-Dec Line sowing



P

P



Local, Sonalika

F

F


100 110

90 95

P P

P P

04 Seed treatment Bavistin,/Vitavex, - - F F 05 Organic manure (tons

/ha) 15 6 4-5 P P


Desi: 40+30+20, HY: 60+60+40, Desi: HY: 60

40+30+0 40+40+0

40

30+20+0 40+20+0

30

P P

P

Total Desi:30+30+20, HY: 120+60+40

40+30+ 0 80+40+ 0

30+20+0 70+20+0

P


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast --do--

Broadcast --do--

P



-

-

F

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical - - F 10 Disease management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemical P 11 Post harvest

management Cleaning & drying Cleaning &


N




- -

P


4

Check & basin

3

Flooding

2

Flooding

P


Leaching of salt,

Amendment in soil by application of

pyrite

-

-

-

15 Method of harvesting Manual/Combine Manual Manual P



Desi- 25 HY-50

Desi-50 HY-50

Desi-15

Desi-30

Desi-10

Desi-24

P

TABLE No- 37-B(vi)


AES : I II District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Wheat EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rain Fed

Sl.No. Items of package Recommended practice Existing practice





- Time - Method

Nov-Dec Line sowing



P

P

3&4

1&2



Local, Sonalika

F

F

1, 5

2 & 5


100 110

90 95

P P

P P

1 1


/ha) 15 6 4-5 P P 5 2


Desi: 40+30+20, HY: 60+60+40, Desi: HY: 60

40+30+0 40+40+0

40

30+20+

0 40+20+

0

30

P P

P

1, 2 &

5

1, 2, 3, &

5

Total Desi:30+30+20, HY: 120+60+40

40+30+ 0 80+40+ 0

30+20+0

70+20+0

P

-

-


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast

--do--

Broadc

ast --do--

P

1

1&2



-

-

F

1 & 5

1 & 5



P 1 1,2&5



Cleaning &

drying

N N N


Two hand weeding.2,4-D(Sodium Salt) 750 ml, Isoprutron 1500 gm


- -

P 1

1&2


4

Check & basin

3

Flooding

2

Flooding

P

1

1,2&5




-

-

-

-

-



- Grain - Fodder

Desi- 25 HY-50

Desi-50 HY-50

Desi-13

Desi-26

Desi-9

Desi-18

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-C (i)


AES : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Arhar EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rainfed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

May-June Line sowing.

June-July Broadcasting

July Broadcasting

P

P

3, 4 & 5

1,2 & 5

02 Varieties Bahar, Pusa 9 Local Local F

F

1, 5

2 & 5

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 20 14 10 P P 1, 2 2, 5 04 Seed treatment Rhizobium culture, Captan,

Thiram - - F F 1 2

05 Organic manure (tons /ha) 8 - - F F 2&5 2&5 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K) - Top dress (N )

15+40+0 _

_ _

- -

F _

F _

1

1&2

Total 15+40+0 _

_ _

-

F _

F _

1

1&2


Placement

_

_ _

_ _

F

F

1

1&2


25 Kg Zn Sulphate for six

consecutive Crops

_

_

F

F

1

1&2

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical - - F F 1 1,2&5 10 Disease management IPM - - F F 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest management Cleaning& drying Cleaning&

drying Cleaning& drying

N N N N


Two Hand weeding at 25 & 45 days

-

-

F

F

1

1&2


- - - - -

-

-


Leaching of salt, Amendment in soil by application of pyrite

-

-

-

-

-

-

15 Method of harvesting Manual Manual Manual N N N N 16 Any other - - - - - - - 17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)

- Grain - Fodder / Fuel

20 30

11-12 22-25

10-12 22-25

P

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-D (i)


AES : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Mustard EFS : I & II Farming situation: Irrigated Type of farmer : RR/RP

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct.

Line sowing

Oct Broadcasting

Oct Broadcasting

P

P

1

1& 2

02 Varieties Rajendra Sarso I, Swarna, Pusa Kranti, Varuna

Local & Varuna

Local P

P

1

2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 5 4 3 P P 1 1 04 Seed treatment Captan, Thiram - - F F 1 1 & 2 05 Organic manure (tons

/ha) 10 - - F F 1 1 & 2


30+40+ 40 30

40+30+0

20

40+30+0

12

P P

P P

1

1&2

Total 60+40+40 60+30+0 52+30+0 P P 1 1&2 07 Method of fertilizer use :

- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

P`

1

1 & 2


0.5% Zinc spray/ 25 Kg Zn Sulphate & 20 Kg. Sulphur

_

_

F

F

1 & 5

1 & 2,

5

09 Pest management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical P P 1 1,2&510 Disease management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical P P 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest

management Cleaning& drying Cleaning&

drying Cleaning&

drying N N N N


One Hand weeding at 25 & 30 days

Hand Weeding

Hand Weeding

P P 1

1&2


2

Check & basin

1

Flooded

1

Flooded

P

P

1,3 &

4

1,2&5



-

-

-

-

-

-



18 32

12-14 25-28

12-14 25-28

P

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-D (ii)


AES : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Mustard EFS : I & II Farming situation: Rainfed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct.

Line sowing

Oct Broadcasting

Oct-Nov Broadcasting

P

P

1

1& 2


Local & Varuna

Local , Varuna P P

1

2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 5 4 4 P P 1 104 Seed treatment Captan, Thiram - - F F 1 1 & 205 Organic manure (tons /ha) 10 - - F F 1 1 & 2 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)


30+40+ 40 30

30+30+0

20

30+30+0

12

P P

P P

1

1&2


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasti

ng

Broadca

sting

P`

P`

1

1 & 2



_

_

F

F

1 & 5

1 & 2, 5

09 Pest management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical

P P 1 1,2&5

10 Disease management IPM/Chemical - - P P 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest management Cleaning& drying Cleaning&


N N N N



Hand Weeding

Hand Weeding

P P 1

1&2


2

Check & basin

1

Flooded

1

Flooded

P

P

1,3 & 4

1,2&5



-

-

-

-

-

-

15 Method of harvesting Manual Manual Manual N N N N16 Any other - - - - - - -17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)


18 32

11-12 22-24

10-11 20-22

P

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-D (iii)


AES : II District : Nalanda Representative village: Hindupur Crop: Mustard EFS : I & II Farming situation: Rainfed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct.

Line sowing Oct Broadcasting


P P 1

1& 2


Local & Varuna

Local , Varuna

P

P

1

2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 5 4 4 P P 1 1 04 Seed treatment Captan, Thiram - - F F 1 1 & 2 05 Organic manure (tons /ha) 10 - - F F 1 1 & 2 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)


30+40+ 40 30

30+30+0

20

30+30+0

12

P P

P P

1

1&2


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasti

ng

Broadca

sting

P`

P`

1

1 & 2



_ _ F F

1 & 5

1 & 2, 5

09 Pest management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical

P P 1 1,2&5

10 Disease management IPM/Chemical - - P P 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest management Cleaning& drying Cleaning&


N N N N



Hand

Weeding

Hand

Weeding

P

P

1

1&2


2

Check & basin

1

Flooded

1

Flooded

P

P

1,3 & 4

1,2&5



- - - - -

-



18 32

11-12 22-24

10-11 20-22

P

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-D (iv)


AES : III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Mustard EFS : I & II Farming situation: Irrigated Type of farmer : RR/RP

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct.

Line sowing

Oct Broadcasting

Oct Broadcasting

P

P

1

1& 2


Local & Varuna

Local P

P

1

2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 5 4 3 P P 1 1 04 Seed treatment Captan, Thiram - - F F 1 1 & 2 05 Organic manure (tons

/ha) 10 - - F F 1 1 & 2


30+40+ 40 30

40+30+0

20

40+30+0

12

P P

P P

1

1&2


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

P`

1

1 & 2



_

_

F

F

1 & 5

1 & 2,

5

09 Pest management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical P P 1 1,2&510 Disease management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical P P 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest

management Cleaning& drying Cleaning&

drying Cleaning&

drying N N N N



Hand Weeding

Hand Weeding

P P 1

1&2


2

Check & basin

1

Flooded

1

Flooded

P

P

1,3 &

4

1,2&5



-

-

-

-

-

-



18 32

12-14 25-28

12-14 25-28

P

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-D (v)


AES : III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Mustard EFS : I & II Farming situation: Rainfed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct.

Line sowing

Oct Broadcasting


P

P

1

1& 2


Local & Varuna

Local , Varuna P P

1

2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 5 4 4 P P 1 104 Seed treatment Captan, Thiram - - F F 1 1 & 205 Organic manure (tons /ha) 10 - - F F 1 1 & 2 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)


30+40+ 40 30

30+30+0

20

30+30+0

12

P P

P P

1

1&2


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcasti

ng

P`

P`

1

1 & 2



_

_

F

F

1 & 5

1 & 2, 5

09 Pest management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical P P 1 1,2&5 10 Disease management IPM/Chemical - - P P 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest management Cleaning& drying Cleaning&

drying Cleaning&

drying N N N N



Hand

Weeding

Hand

Weeding

P

P

1

1&2


2

Check & basin 1

Flooded 1

Flooded P P

1,3 & 4

1,2&5



-

-

-

-

-

-



18 32

11-12 22-24

10-11 20-22

P

P

1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-E (i) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Kh. Maize EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

June - July Line sowing(60x20)

July – August Broadcasting


P

1,4

1,2,5

02 Varieties Shaktiman 1,2, Suwan, Deoki, Ganga 11, Shankar Makka 3

Local, Kanchan

Local, Kanchan

F

1,5

1,2,4,5

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 20 Kg/ ha 20 Kg/ ha 20 Kg/ ha N - - 04 Seed treatment Thiram,/ Captan 2.5 gm/ Kg

seed -

-

F 1 1,2

05 Organic manure (tons /ha) 10 ton/ ha 1-2 tons /ha 1-2 tons /ha

p 5 1,2,5


30+60+40 70

-

80+0+0

-

60+0+0

F

1,2

1,2,3

Total 100+60+40 80+0+0 60+0+0 07 Method of fertilizer use :

- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

1

1 & 2


25 kg zinc sulphate per ha. Basal

-

-

F 1 1,2

09 Pest management IPM/ Chemical Chemical Chemical p 1 1,210 Disease management IPM/Chemical - - F 1 1,211 Post harvest management Cleaning & Drying Cleaning &

Drying Cleaning & Drying

N - -


Manual Atrazine 1.5 kg ai

Manual --

Manual --

p 1 1,2


No need in Kharif ,

-

Flooding

-

Flooding

p

1,2 1,2


Leaching/Chemical,

Drainage

Leaching Drainage

Leaching Drainage

P N

1 -

1,2,4

-

15 Method of harvesting Mechanical/ Manual Manual Manual N - -16 Any other 17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)


30 Qt./ha 65 Qt./ha

25 Qt./ha 50 Qt./ha

20 Qt./ha 40 Qt./ha

TABLE No. 37- E (ii) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Rabi Maize EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct-Nov Line sowing(75x25)



P

1,4

1,2,5

02 Varieties Shaktiman 1-4,Deoki, Rajendra Sankar 1,2 Ganga 11

Local, Kanchan

Local, Kanchan

F

1,5

1,2,4,5

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 20 Kg/ ha 20 Kg/ ha 20 Kg/ ha N - - 04 Seed treatment Thiram,/ Captan 2.5 gm/

Kg seed -

-

F 1 1,2


p 5 1,2,5


40+75+50 80

-

80+0+0

-

60+0+0

F

1,2

1,2,3


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

1

1 & 2



-

-

F 1 1,2



N - -



Manual --

Manual --

p 1 1,2


5-6

Furrough Ridge Method

2-3

Furrough Ridge

Method

2-3

Furrough Ridge

Method

p

1,2 1,2


Leaching/Chemical,

Drainage

Leaching Drainage

Leaching Drainage

P N

1 -

1,2,4

-

15 Method of harvesting Mechanical/ Manual Manual Manual N - - 16 Any other 17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)


65 Qt./ha

125-130 Qt./ha 45 Qt./ha 95 Qt./ha

40 Qt./ha 80 Qt./ha

TABLE No- 37-E (iii) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : II District : Nalanda Representative village: Hindupur Crop: Kh. Maize EFS : I & II Type of farmer: RR/RP Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method




P

1,4

1,2,5


Local, Kanchan

Local, Kanchan

F

1,5

1,2,4,5


seed -

-

F 1 1,2


p 5 1,2,5


30+60+40 70

-

80+0+0

-

60+0+0

F

1,2

1,2,3


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

1

1 & 2



-

-

F 1 1,2



N - -



Manual --

Manual --

p 1 1,2


No need in Kharif ,

-

Flooding

-

Flooding

p

1,2 1,2


Leaching/Chemical,

Drainage

Leaching Drainage

Leaching Drainage

P N

1 -

1,2,4

-

15 Method of harvesting Mechanical/ Manual Manual Manual N - -16 Any other 17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)


30 Qt./ha 65 Qt./ha

25 Qt./ha 50 Qt./ha

20 Qt./ha 40 Qt./ha

TABLE No. 37- E (iv) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Rabi Maize EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct-Nov Line sowing(75x25)



P

1,4

1,2,5

02 Varieties Shaktiman 1-4,Deoki, Rajendra Sankar 1,2 Ganga 11

Local, Kanchan

Local, Kanchan

F

1,5

1,2,4,5

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 20 Kg/ ha 20 Kg/ ha 20 Kg/ ha N - - 04 Seed treatment Thiram,/ Captan 2.5 gm/

Kg seed -

-

F 1 1,2


p 5 1,2,5


40+75+50 80

-

80+0+0

-

60+0+0

F

1,2

1,2,3


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

1

1 & 2



-

-

F 1 1,2

09 Pest management IPM/ Chemical Chemical Chemical p 1 1,2 10 Disease management IPM/Chemical - - F 1 1,2 11 Post harvest management Cleaning & Drying Cleaning &


N - -



Manual --

Manual --

p

1 1,2


5-6

Furrough Ridge Method 2-3

Furrough Ridge

Method

2-3 Furrough

Ridge Method

p 1,2 1,2


Leaching/Chemical,

Drainage

Leaching Drainage

Leaching Drainage

P N

1 -

1,2,4

-



65 Qt./ha

125-130 Qt./ha

45 Qt./ha 95 Qt./ha

40 Qt./ha 80 Qt./ha

TABLE No- 37-E (v) GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Kh. Maize EFS : I & II Type of farmer: RR/RP Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method




P

1,4

1,2,5


Local, Kanchan

Local, Kanchan

F

1,5

1,2,4,5


seed -

-

F 1 1,2


p 5 1,2,5


30+60+40 70

-

80+0+0

-

60+0+0

F

1,2

1,2,3


- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

1

1 & 2



-

-

F 1 1,2

09 Pest management IPM/ Chemical Chemical Chemical p 1 1,2 10 Disease management IPM/Chemical - - F 1 1,2 11 Post harvest management Cleaning & Drying Cleaning &


N - -



Manual --

Manual --

p

1 1,2


No need in Kharif , -

Flooding

-

Flooding

p 1,2 1,2


Leaching/Chemical,

Drainage

Leaching Drainage

Leaching Drainage

P N

1 -

1,2,4

-



30 Qt./ha 65 Qt./ha

25 Qt./ha 50 Qt./ha

20 Qt./ha 40 Qt./ha

TABLE No- 37-F (i)


AES: I District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura Crop: Sugarcane EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

September- February

September- February

September- February

F

F

-

-

02 Varieties BO-130, BO-138, COP9206, BO 91, BO 110, BO 137, COP 9302

BO 130, BO 138, Local


P

P

1

2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 50-60 50 50 F F 2 304 Seed treatment Endosulphan, Bavistin - - F F 1 205 Organic manure (tons /ha) 20 8 8 P P 1 1 & 2 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)


70+85+60 80

40+60+30

50

40+40+20

50

P

P

1 & 2

1,2,3 & 5

Total 150+85+60 90+60+30 90+40+20 P P 1&2 1,2,3 & 5


Placement Broadcasting

Broadcasting

Broadcasti

ng

P

P

1

1 & 2


25 kgs. ZnSo4

Placement

-

-

F

F

1

1 & 2

09 Pest management IPM/Chemical Chemical Chemical P P 1 1 & 210 Disease management IPM/ Chemical - - N N 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest management Manual Manual Manual F F - - 12 Weed management

- Mechanical - Herbicide

2 Hand weeding at 35, & 60 Days. Spray 2-3 kg.Atrazine with in 2-3 days of sowing. 2,4-D @ 1 kg. 3 weeks after sowing

2 Hand

Weeding

-

2 Hand

Weeding

-

P

F

P

F

1 1

1 &2

1&2


6-7

Check & basin

3-4

Check & basin

3-4

Check & basin

P

P

1

1,2&5



- - - - -

-


900

600-800

550-700

P

P 1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-F (ii)


AES: II District : Nalanda Representative village: Hindupur Crop: Sugarcane EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rainfed

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

September- February

September- February

September- February

F

F

-

-




P

P

1

2



70+85+60 80

40+60+30

50

40+40+20

50

P

P

1 & 2

1,2,3 & 5

Total 150+85+60 90+60+30 90+40+20 P P 1&2 1,2,3 & 5



Broadcasti

ng

Broadcasti

ng

P

P

1

1 & 2


25 kgs. ZnSo4

Placement

-

-

F

F

1

1 & 2




2 Hand

Weeding

-

2 Hand

Weeding

-

P

F

P

F

1 1

1 &2

1&2


6-7

Check & basin

3-4

Check & basin

3-4

Check & basin

P

P

1

1,2&5



- - - - -

-


900

550-700

450-600

P

P 1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-F (iii)


AES: III District : Nalanda Representative village: Chero Crop: Sugarcane EFS : I & II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

September- February

September- February

September- February

F

F

-

-




P

P

1

2



70+85+60 80

40+60+30

50

40+40+20

50

P

P

1 & 2

1,2,3 & 5

Total 150+85+60 90+60+30 90+40+20 P P 1&2 1,2,3 & 5



Broadcasting

Broadcasti

ng

P

P

1

1 & 2


25 kgs. ZnSo4

Placement

-

-

F

F

1

1 & 2




2 Hand

Weeding

-

2 Hand

Weeding

-

P

F

P

F

1 1

1 &2

1&2


6-7

Check & basin

3-4

Check & basin

3-4

Check & basin

P

P

1

1,2&5



- - - - -

-


900

600-800

550-700

P

P 1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-G (i)


Name of Agro-Ecological Situation : I, II & III District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura, Hindupur, Chero Crop: Potato EFS : II Type of farmer : RP/RR Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Oct-Nov Planting

Oct-Nov Planting

Oct-Nov

Planting

F

F

-

-

02 Varieties K. Chandramukhi, K. Ashoka, K Badshah, K Sinduri, K Jyoti

K. Jyoti, K Badshah, K Sindoori &

Local

Local, K. Jyoti,

P

P

1

2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 25-30 18-20 12-15 P P 1 1 & 2 04 Seed treatment Mancozeb 2.5 g/Kg seed - - F F 1 2 05 Organic manure (tons /ha) 20 6 3-4 P P 5 2 & 5 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)


80+90+100 70

40+40+50

40

40+40+50

40

P

P

P

P

1,2 &

5

1,2, 3 & 5

Total 150+90+100 80+40+50

80+40+50

-

-

-

-


Placement Broadcast

Broadcast

Broadcast

P

P

1

1&2



- - F F

1 & 5

1,2, 3 & 5

09 Pest management IPM/Chemical Only chemical

Only chemical

P P 1 1,2&5

10 Disease management IPM/Chemical Only chemical

Only chemical

P P 1 1,2&5

11 Post harvest management Cleaning& drying Cleaning& drying

Cleaning& drying

N N N N


Hand weeding

Hand weeding

Hand weeding

F

F

-

-


8

Ridge & Furrow 5

Ridge & Furrow

4 Ridge & Furrow

P P 1

1,2&5



-

-

-

-

-

-


25-30

12-15

8-12

P

P 1

1&2

TABLE No- 37-H GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


Name of Agro-Ecological Situation : I, II & III District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura, Hindupur, Chero Crop: Onion EFS : I & II Type of farmer: RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package


Existing practice





- Time - Method

Nov- Dec. Line Sowing 15x10 cm

Nov – 15 Jan Line Sowing 15x15

Nov – 15 Jan Line Sowing 15x15

P

P

1

1,2

02 Varieties Poona Red, Patna Red, Nasik Red, Pusa Madhavi, Arka Pragati, Arka Bindu

Nasik Red, Patna Red, and Local

Nasik Red, Patna Red, and Local

P

P

1

1,2

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 6-8 Kg/ ha 8 Kg/ ha 8 Kg/ ha N N - - 04 Seed treatment Thiram/ Captan 2.5 Gm/

Kg seed -

-

F

F

1

1,2

05 Organic manure (tons /ha) 20 4-5 4-5 P P 1,2,5 1,2,3,5 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)


50+80+80 50

25+50+30

40

25+40+20

40

p

p

1,2,3

1,2,3,5

Total 100+80+80 65+50+30 65+40+20 - - - - 07 Method of fertilizer use :

- Basal - Top dress

Placement

_

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P`

P`

1

1 & 2


7 Kg Zinc Sulphate/20 Kg Sulphur Powder Basal Placement

-

-

F

F

1,5

1,2,5

09 Pest management IPM/ Chemical Chemical Chemical p p 1 1,210 Disease management IPM/Chemical - - F F 1 1,2 11 Post harvest management Cleaning & Drying Cleaning &


N N - -


Manual Basaline 2.5 lt / ha

Manual -

Manual -

P P

1,2,5

1,2,3,5


8-10

Check- Basin

8-10

Check- Basin

8-10

Check- Basin

- - - -


Leaching/Chemical,

Drainage

-

Drainage

-

Drainage

P N

P N

1 -

1,2,4

-

15 Method of harvesting Manual Manual Manual - - - -16 Any other Spraying of Melic

Hydrazide for checking Sprouting in Storage.

2500 ppm

-

-

F

F

1,2,5

1,2,3,4,5

17 Average Yield (Q / ha.) - Grain - Fodder / Fuel

250- 300 Qt./ ha

200 Qt/ ha

160-180 Qt/ ha

P

P

1

1,2

TABLE No- 37-I GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : I, II & III District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura, Hindupur, Chero Crop: Lentil EFS : I , II Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl.No.

Items of package






- Time - Method

15 Oct – 15 Nov Line sowing 25x 10 cm

Oct - Nov Broad casting

Oct - Nov Broad casting

P

P

1

1,2

02 Varieties BR 25, PL 406, K-75, Arun, PL 639

Local, Local, F F 1,2,3,5 1,2,3,5

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 40-50 70-80 70-80 P P 1 1,2 04 Seed treatment Trichoderm 3-5 gm/kg,

Bavistine 1.5 Gm, , Chloro pyri phos 8 ml/ kg of seed, Rhiazobium 5 Pocket/ ha

-

-

-

-

1,2,3,5

1,2,3,5

05 Organic manure (tons /ha) - - - - - - - 06 Fertilizer / nutrient (kg/ha)


20+40+0 --

25+0+0

-

- -

p

F

1

1,2

Total 20+40+0 25+0+0 25+0+0 - - - - 07 Method of fertilizer use :

- Basal - Top dress

Placement --

Broadcast

-

Broadcast

-

p

p

1

1,2


Multiplex 1.5 liter/ ha Foliar sprey

-

-

F

F

1,2,5

1,2,5

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical - - F F 1 1,2&510 Disease management IPM & Chemical - - F F 1 1,2&5 11 Post harvest management Cleaning & drying Cleaning &


N N - -


Manual Basaline 1.5 liter/ ha pre imergence

Manual -

Manual -

P

P

1,2,5

1,2,3,5


-

-

-

-

-

-

-


-

-

-

-

-

-

-

15 Method of harvesting Manual Manual Manual - - - - 16 Any other - - - - - - - 17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)

- Grain - Fodder

18-22Qt /ha 22-25 Qt/ha

12-16 Qt/ha 15-18 Qt/ ha

10-12 Qt/ha 15-18 Qt/ ha

P

P

1

1,2

TABLE No- 37-V GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : I, II & III District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura, Hindupur, Chero Crop: Cucurbitaceous

(Sponge Guard, Long Guard, Bitter Guard ) EFS : I , II, III Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated EFS : I , II, III Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice





- Time - Method

Summer Jan- Feb Kharif June- July Line sowing 2x1.5 m

Summer Jan- Feb Kharif Jun – Jul Line Sowing 1x1

Summer Jan- Feb Kharif Jun – Jul Line Sowing 1.x1

P

1

1,2

02 Varieties Long Gourd – Rajendra Chamatkar, PSPL, PSPR, Dholi Safed, Pusa Manjri, Pusa Meghdoot, Arka Bahar, Azad Sponge Gourd - Rajendra Nenua – 1, Pusa Chikni, DL 1 Bitter Gourd – Pusha Vishesh, Pusa Do mausmi, Arka Harit, Pria, Coimbatore Long, Kalyanpur Barahmasa

Local Local F 1 1,2,5

03 Seed rate (per ha.) Long Gourd – 3-4 Kg. per hectare Sponge Gourd - 3-4 Kg. per hectare Bitter Gourd – 5-6 Kg. per hectare

04 Seed treatment Captan/Thiram 2.5g / Kg Not Practiced Not Practiced

F 1,2 1,2,5


20 ton 2-3 ton 2-3 ton P 1,2 1,2


30+40+40 30

35+0+0 25

30+0+0 20

F 1,2 1,2,5

Total 60+40+40 55+0+0 55+0+0 07 Method of fertilizer

use : - Basal - Top dress

Placement & Broadcasting

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P

1,2

1,2


Multiplex 1.5l/hect. Folier spray

Not Practiced

Not

Practiced

F

1,2 1,2,5

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemical P 1,2 1,2,5 10 Disease management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemical P 1,2 1,2,5 11 Post harvest

management Hand Picking/ Storage

in plastic crates Handpicking/ Storage not preferred

Handpicking/

Storage not

preferred

P 1,2 1,2, 6

12 Weed management


Manual

Manual Manual P 1,2 1,2


Summer – 6-8

Drip Irrigation, Ridge furrough Method

Summer 4-5

Ridge furrough Method

Summer

2-3 Ridge

furrough Method

P

1,2

1,2, 5


Pyrite / Lime

-

Not Practiced

Not

Practiced

F

1,2

1,2

15 Method of harvesting Hand Picking Hand Picking Hand Picking

N - -

16 Any other 17 Average Yield (Q /

ha.) - Fruits

Long Gourd – 150-200 q. per hectare Sponge Gourd - 125-150q per hectare Bitter Gourd – 125-150q Kg. per hectare



(*) F = Full P = Partial N = Nil

TABLE No.38-A TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH IMPORTANT

HORTICULTURAL CROPS ARE CULTIVATED Name of district: Nalanda (Area in ha)

AES

Crop

Soil type

Number of Families (%) under different Farming Situations

Total

Irrigated Rainfed Area (%)

I

Mango Loam 1 3 4

Clay Loam 1.5 6 7.5

Sandy Loam 0.5 2 2.5

Litchi Loam 2 4 6

Clay Loam - 2 2

Sandy Loam - 3 3

Vegetables Loam 2 0.5 2.5

Clay Loam 2 0.5 2.5

Sandy Loam 24 3 27

II

Mango Loam 1 4 5

Clay Loam 2 - 2

Sandy Loam - - -

Guava Loam - 1 1

Clay Loam - - -

Sandy Loam - - -

Litchi Loam 1 1.5 2.5

Clay Loam 2 2.5 4.5

Sandy Loam - - -

Vegetables Loam - - -

Clay Loam 2 - 2

Sandy Loam 6 - 6

III

Mango Loam - 3 3

Clay Loam 2 4 6

Sandy Loam - 1 1

Guava Loam 2 2 4

Clay Loam - 3 3

Sandy Loam - - -

Litchi Loam 4 7 11

Clay Loam - - -

Sandy Loam - - -

Vegetables Loam - - -

Clay Loam 3 - 3

Sandy Loam 12 - 12

Total

TABLE No.38-B TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH IMPORTANT HORTICULTURAL CROPS ARE

CULTIVATED Name of district: Nalanda Representative village Name of hort. crop : All Name of agro-ecological situation: Area in ha : 123 ha.

AES Crop Area & % under different farming situation

Total Area EFS I EFS II

Irrigated % Rainfed % Irrigated % Rainfed % Irrigated % Rainfed %

I Mango - - - - 3 11 3 11 Litchi - - - - 2 9 2 9

Vegetables - - - - 28 4 28 4

II

Mango - - - - 3 4 3 4 Guava - - - - - - 1 100 - - 1 100 Litchi - - - - 3 4 3 4

Vegetables - - - - 8 100 - - 8 100 -

III

Mango - - - - 2 20 8 80 2 20 8 80 Guava - - - - 2 5 2 5 Litchi - - - - 4 7 4 7

Vegetables - - - - 15 - - 15 - -

TABLE No.39-A GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY /

INCOME FROM HORTICULTURAL CROPS Agro-Ecological Situation : I, II & III District : Nalanda Crop : Mango Type of farmer : RRF Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl. No

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice

Gap in adoption (F/P/N)

Specific reasons for the

gap

Farmer proposed Extension Strategy

01 Variety Bombay, Jardalu, Gulabkhas, Langda, Alphanso,Krishnabhog, Gopal Bhog, Fagali, Sukul, Sipia, Chausa, Amrapali , Mallika , Sindhu, Arka Arun

Langda Malda, Local (Biju)

p

1

1,2

02 Spacing (mts) 10x10 mts/ 2.5x2.5 mts for high density

Not maintaining proper distance

P 1 1,2

03 Manure (kg/plant) Planting time:Compost 40 Kg, Oil Cake 2 Kg Per Year; 60-80 Kg

Nil F 1,2 1,2,5

04 Major nutrients : - Dose (Kg/plant) - Method of application

Planting Time : Phosphate (ssp) 1kg, Mop 0.25 Kg, 10 Gm Forat Per Year NPK 1+.3+.7 Placement

Nil

F

1,2

1,2

05 Micro-nutrient - Dose (kg/plant) - Method of application

Borax 50-100gBasal,Multiplex 1.5 ml / lt of water foliar sprey

Nil

F

1,2,5

1,2,5

06 Weed management - Around the plants - In between the rows

Manual Manual Nil

- -

07 Pest management- IPM/ Chemical Nil F 1,5 1,2,5 08 Disease management- IPM/ Chemical Nil F 1,5 1,2, ,5 09 Water management

- No. of irrigations - Method of irrigation

According to the need Basin

According Basin

N

- -

10

Special practices - Training - Prunning

1-2 1-2

Not Practising

F

1

1,2

11 Harvesting - Method - Time (hour)

Manual -

Manual

-

N

- -

12 Farm level processing - Grading - Packing - Processing - Storage (months)

Grading according to size and Fruit quality - - -

Grading according to size and Fruit quality

N

-

-

13 Marketing - Location of market - Distance from farm - Mode of transport - Marketing by indivi- dual / group - Any other

Standard Market - - - -

Local Market - - - -

F

1,3 1,2,3

Average yield (T/ ha.) 22-30 10-12 P 1,5 1,3,5,6 (*) F = Full P = Partial N = Nil ** Reasons for gaps : *** Farmer proposed extension strategies :1. Lack of awareness 1. Demonstration & trainings. 2. Lack of finance 2. Link with credit Institutions. 3. Market problem in local area 3. To create processing unit etc. 4. Non-availability of good quality FYM 4. Encouraging vermin-composting by enhancing subsidy.5. Non-adoption of Package of Practices. 5. Creating awareness regarding balance dose of fertilizers. 6. Training regarding Pest & diseases management.

TABLE No.39-B

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME FROM HORTICULTURAL CROPS

AES : I & III District : Nalanda Crop : Guava Type of farmer : RRF Farming situation: Rain fed

Sl. No

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice


Specific reasons for the

gap

Farmer proposed Extension Strategy

01 Variety Allahabad Safeda, Sardar, Chittidar, Lalit, Safed Jam, Habsi,

Allahabad Safeda and Local

p

1

1

02 Spacing (mts) 6x6 Not Practicing F 1 1 03 Manure (kg/plant/Year) Per plant 30 Kg

Compost

Nil

F

1,4

1,4 04 Major nutrients :

- Dose (Kg/plant) - Method of application

At The Time of Planting SSP 2 Kg, MOP 1Kg, Foraat 10 gm Per Year :(NPK) 0.5+0.3+0.5 Placement (Ring)

Nil

F

1

1

05 Micro-nutrient - Dose (kg/plant) - Method of application

Multiplex 1.5 ml / lt of water foliar sprey

Nil

F

1,2,5

1,5

06 Weed management - Around the plants - In between the rows

Manual

Manual

Nil

-

-

07 Pest management- IPM/ Chemical Nil F 1,5 1,2,5 08 Disease management- IPM/ Chemical Nil F 1,5 1,2, ,509 Water management

- No. of irrigations - Method of irrigation

According to the need Basin

According Basin

N - -

10

Special practices - Training - Prunning

1-2 1-2

Not Practising

F

1

1,2

11 Harvesting - Method - Time (hour)

Manual -

Manual

-

N

- -

12 Farm level processing - Grading - Packing - Processing - Storage (months)

Grading according to size and Fruit quality - - -

Grading according to size and Fruit quality

N

-

-

13 Marketing - Location of market - Distance from farm - Mode of transport - Marketing by indivi- dual / group - Any other

Standard Market - - - -

Local Market

- - - -

F

1,3

1,2,3

Average yield (T/ ha.) 14 8-10 P 1,5 1,2 (+) RPF = Resource Poor Farmer RRF = Resource Rich Farmer @ Separately for each farming situation under each existing farming system (*) F = Full P = Partial N = Nil

** Reasons for gaps : *** Farmer proposed extension strategies :1. Lack of awareness 1. Demonstration & trainings. 2. Lack of finance 2. Link with credit Institutions. 3. Market problem in local area 3. To create processing unit etc. 4. Non-availability of good quality FYM 4. Encouraging vermin-composting by enhancing subsidy. 5. Non-adoption of Package of Practices. 5. Creating awareness regarding balance dose of fertilizers. 6. Training regarding Pest & diseases management.

TABLE No- 39-C GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY


AES : I, II & III District : Nalanda Representative village: Kojpura, Hindupur, Chero Crop: Cucurbitaceous

(Sponge Guard, Long Guard, Bitter Guard ) EFS : I , II, III Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated EFS : I , II, III Type of farmer : RR/RP Farming situation: Irrigated

Sl.No.

Items of package

Recommended

practice Existing practice

Gap inadoption (F/P/N) (*)




- Time - Method

Summer Jan- Feb Kharif June- July Line sowing 2x1.5 m

Summer Jan- Feb Kharif Jun – Jul Line Sowing 1x1

Summer Jan- Feb Kharif Jun – Jul Line Sowing 1.x1

P

1

1,2

02 Varieties Long Gourd – Rajendra Chamatkar, PSPL, PSPR, Dholi Safed, Pusa Manjri, Pusa Meghdoot, Arka Bahar, Azad Sponge Gourd - Rajendra Nenua – 1, Pusa Chikni, DL 1 Bitter Gourd – Pusha Vishesh, Pusa Do mausmi, Arka Harit, Pria, Coimbatore Long, Kalyanpur Barahmasa

Local Local F 1 1,2,5

03 Seed rate (per ha.) Long Gourd – 3-4 Kg. per hectare Sponge Gourd - 3-4 Kg. per hectare Bitter Gourd – 5-6 Kg. per hectare

04 Seed treatment Captan/Thiram 2.5g / Kg Not Practiced Not Practiced

F 1,2 1,2,5


20 ton 2-3 ton 2-3 ton P 1,2 1,2


30+40+40 30

35+0+0 25

30+0+0 20

F 1,2 1,2,5

Total 60+40+40 55+0+0 55+0+0 07 Method of fertilizer

use : - Basal - Top dress

Placement & Broadcasting

Broadcasting

Broadcast

ing

P

1,2

1,2


Multiplex 1.5l/hect. Folier spray

Not Practiced

Not

Practiced

F

1,2 1,2,5

09 Pest management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemical P 1,2 1,2,5 10 Disease management IPM & Chemical Chemical Chemical P 1,2 1,2,5 11 Post harvest

management Hand Picking/ Storage

in plastic crates Handpicking/ Storage not preferred

Handpicking/

Storage not

preferred

P 1,2 1,2, 6


Manual

Manual Manual P

1,2

1,2

13 Water management :

- Number of irrigations - Method of irrigation

Summer – 6-8 Drip Irrigation, Ridge

furrough Method

Summer 4-5 Ridge

furrough Method

Summer 2-3

Ridge furrough Method

P

1,2

1,2, 5


Pyrite / Lime

-

Not Practiced

Not

Practiced

F

1,2

1,2

15 Method of harvesting Hand Picking Hand Picking Hand Picking

N - -

16 Any other 17 Average Yield (Q /

ha.) - Fruits





TABLE No.40-A TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of district: Nalanda Name of animal: Cow Name of village: Kojpura AES: I Existing Farming System: I & II

Sl. No.

Ownership of land resource

No. of families (%) under different farming situations

Total

Local breed Improved breed (%) No % No % No %

1 Land Owners 131 66 197 Irrigated + Rainfed Only Irrigated Rainfed only 2 Landless 66 27 93 TOTAL

TABLE No.40-B

TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE

PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of district: Nalanda Name of animal : Cow Name of Representative village: Hindupur AES: II

Existing Farming System : I, II

Sl. No.



Total



TABLE No.40-C TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED Name of district : Nalanda Name of animal : Cow

Name of Representative village : Chero AES : III Existing Farming System : I&II

Sl. No.


No. of families (%) under different farming situations Total



TABLE: 41 A

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE PROPDUCTIVITY / INCOME OF MILCH AND MEAT ANIMALS

District: Nalanda AES: I Type of animal: Cow Farming situation: I & II Represesntative Village: Kojpura EFS – I

Sl. No.

Items of the package Recommende d practice

Existing practice

Gap in adoption (F/P/N) *

Reasons for gap in adoption (**)


1. Breed up gradation: *Artificial insemination: - Breed - Location * Natural insemination: - Breed - Location

HF/JR PVC/MPCS Nil

Local village

F F

N N

1, 2,3

A TO E

2. Feed management (per animal) - Green fodder (kg/day) - Dry fodder (kg/day) - Concentrates (gms/day) - Minerals (gms/day) - Vitamins (ml/day)

30-40 5-8 2000-5000 25-30 5-10

5 4 3000 - -

P P P F F

1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3

A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E

3. Inter calving period 12 15 P 1,3 A,B,C,D,E 4. Health care (per year)

- HSBQ (No. of vaccinations) - FMD - Rinder pest - Mastitis test - Thilaris - Deworming

Twice/year -”- 1/life time Daily On demand 1-2/years

Once Once - - - - -

P

P - - - -

- -

1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3

A,B,C,E

A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E A,B,C,E

5. General management:

- Washing (times/day) - Cleaning 9times/day) - Housing (Pacca/Katcha) - Drinking water (lts./day)

1-2 3 Pacca 50-100

1-2 0-1 Pacca 20

N N P P

1,3 1 ,2,3

1,3

A,C,E A,C,E

A,B,C,E A,C,E

6. Average milk yield (lt/day) 15-20 6 P 1, 2,3 A,B,C,E (*) F=Full P = Partial N = Nil ** Reasons for gaps: *** Farmer proposed extension strategies: 1. Lack of awareness A. Awareness Camp 2. Lack of fund and facilities B. Financial availability 3. Lack of Management practices C. Management Practices 4. Shortage of Bull D. Improvement in A.I facilities E. Exposure visits & demonstration

TABLE No.41 B

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME OF MILCH AND MEAT ANIMALS

District : Nalanda Type of animal : Cow Farming situation:Irrigated/ Rain fed RepresentativeVillage : Hindupur AES : II EFS : I & II Sl. No.

Items of the package Recommended

practice

Existingpractice


(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (**)

Farmer Proposed extension strategy

(***) 1 Breed upgradation :

* Artificial insemination: - Breed - Location * Natural insemination : - Breed - Location

HF/JR PVC/MPCS Nil

Local village

F F

N N

1, 2,3

A TO E

2 Feed management (per animal) - Green fodder (Kg/day) - Dry fodder (Kg/day) - Concentrates (gms/day) - Minerals (gms / day) - Vitamins (ml. / day)

30-40 5-8 2000-5000 25-30 5-10

5 4 3000 - -

P P P F F

1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3


3 Inter calving period (months) 12 15 P 1,3 A,B,C,D,E 4 Health care (per year) (+)

- HSBQ (No. of vaccinations) - FMD - Rinder pest - Mastitis - Thilaris - Any other


Once Once - - - - -

P

P - - - -

- -

1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3

A,B,C,E


5. General management :

- Washing (times / day) - Cleaning (times / day) - Housing (Paccca / Kutcha) - Drinking water (lts. / day)

1-2 3 Pacca 50-100

1-2 0-1 Pacca/Kutcha 20

N N P P

1,3 1 ,2,3

1,3

A,C,E A,C,E

A,B,C,E A,C,E

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 15-20 6 P 1, 2,3 A,B,C,E (*) F = Full P = Partial N = Nil ** Reasons for gaps: *** Farmer proposed extension strategies: 1. Lack of awareness A. Awareness Camp 2. Lack of fund and facilities B. Financial availability 3. Lack of Management practices C. Management Practices D. Improvement in A.I facilities E. Exposure visits & demonstration

TABLE No.41 C


District : Nalanda Type of animal : Cow Farming situation:Irrigated/ Rain fed RepresentativeVillage : Chero AES : III EFS: I & II Sl. No.

Items of the package Recommended

practice

Existingpractice


(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (**)




HF/JR PVC/MPCS Nil

Local village

F F

N N

1, 2,3

A TO E


30-40 5-8 2000-5000 25-30 5-10

5 4 3000 - -

P P P F F

1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3 1 ,2,3


3 Inter calving period (months) 12 15 P 1,3 A,B,C,D,E 4 Health care (per year) (+)



Once Once - - - - -

P

P - - - -

- -

1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3

A,B,C,E


5. General management :

- Washing (times / day) - Cleaning (times / day) - Housing (Paccca / Kutcha) - Drinking water (lts. / day)

1-2 3 Pacca 50-100

1-2 0-1 Pacca/Kutcha 20

N N P P

1,3 1 ,2,3

1,3

A,C,E A,C,E

A,B,C,E A,C,E

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 15-20 6 P 1, 2,3 A,B,C,E (*) F = Full P = Partial N = Nil ** Reasons for gaps: *** Farmer proposed extension strategies: 1. Lack of awareness A. Awareness Camp2. Lack of fund and facilities B. Financial availability 3. Lack of Management practices C. Management Practices D. Improvement in A.I facilities E. Exposure visits & demonstration

TABLE No.42-A

TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of District : Nalanda Name of animal : Goat Representative village : Kojpura AES: I EFS : I & II

Sl. No.




1 Land Owners 22 - - 22 Irrigated + Rainfed Only Irrigated Rainfed only 2 Landless 16 - - - TOTAL 16

TABLE No.42-B TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of District: Nalanda Name of animal: Goat Representative village: Hindupur AES : II EFS : I & II

Sl. No.



Total


1 Land Owners 9 50 - - 9 50 Irrigated + Rainfed Only Irrigated Rainfed only 2 Landless 9 50 - - 9 50 TOTAL

TABLE No.42-C TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of District: Nalanda Name of animal: Goat Representative village: Chero AES : III EFS : I & II

Sl. No.



Total


1 Land Owners 6 - - 6 Irrigated + Rainfed Only Irrigated Rainfed only 2 Landless 9 - - 9 TOTAL

TABLE No.43


District: Nalanda Type of animal: Goat Farming situation: Irrigated / Rain fed AES: I, II, III EFS: I , II

Sl. No.

Items of the package

Recommended

practice

Existing practice


(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (**)




Nil Jamanapuri

- - Local

F F

P P

1,2,3 1,2,3

1,2,3 1,2,3

A,B,C,D,E A,B,C,D,E


4-6 0.5 50-250 10-15 3-5

2-3 - - - -

N P P F F

1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3


3 Inter calving period (months) 6-7 month 6 N A,B,C,D,E 4 Health care (per year) (+)


- 1/year 1 /life time - - -

- - - - - -

F F F F F F

1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3


5. General management : - Washing (times / day) - Cleaning (times / day) - Housing (Paccca / Kutcha) - Drinking water (lts. / day)

- 2 p Ad. Lib.

- - Kutcha 1 ltr

P P F N

1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3


6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 0.2 – 0.3 -/12 F 1,2,3 A,B,C,D,E,F


. .

** Reasons for gaps: Strategies: *** Farmer proposed extension 1. Lack of awareness A. Awareness Camp 2. Lack of fund and facilities B. Financial availability 3. Lack of Management practices C. Management Practices D. Improvement in A.I facilities E. Exposure visits & demonstration F. Marketing provision

TABLE No.44 TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED Name of District: Nalanda Name of animal: Sheep

AES: I,II,III EFS: I,II

Sl. No.


No. of families (%) under differentfarming situations

Total


1 Land Owners - - - - - Irrigated + Rainfed - - - - - Only Irrigated - - - - - Rainfed only - - - - - - - - - - 2 Landless - - - - - TOTAL - - - - -

TABLE No.45


District : Nalanda Type of animal : Sheep AES: I, II, III

Sl. No.


Recommended

practice

Existing practice


(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (**)


(***)

1

Breed upgradation : * Artificial insemination:

- Breed - Location

* Natural insemination : - Breed

- Location

Corridale

Shahabadi

- - - -

2

Feed management (per animal) - Green fodder (Kg/day) - Dry fodder (Kg/day)

- Concentrates (gms/day) - Minerals (gms / day) - Vitamins (ml. / day)

2-3

0.5-1 250-400

5-10 5-10

- - - -

3 Inter calving period (months) 6-7 - - - -

4

Health care (per year) (+) - HSBQ (No. of vaccinations)

- FMD - Rinder pest

- Mastitis - Thilaris

- Any other

1 2 - - - -

- - - -

5.

General management : - Washing (times / day) - Cleaning (times / day)

- Housing (Paccca / Kutcha) - Drinking water (lts. / day)

Weekly Daily

P 3-4

- - - -

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 2-3 - - -

Table No.46-A TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED Name of District : Nalanda Name of animal : Buffalo Representative village : Kojpura AES: I EFS : I & II

Sl. No.





Table No.46-B TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED Name of District : Nalanda Name of animal : Buffalo

Representative village : Hindupur AES: I I EFS : I & II

Sl. No.




1 Land Owners 13 8 21 Irrigated + Rainfed Only Irrigated Rainfed only 2 Landless 4 - - 4 TOTAL

Table No.46-C

TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of District : Nalanda Name of animal : Buffalo Representative village : Chero AES: I II EFS : I & II

Sl. No.


No. of families (%) under differentfarming situations

Total



TABLE No.47 GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING

THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME OF MILCH AND MEAT ANIMALS District: Nalanda AES: I, II & III Type of animal: Buffalo Farming situation: I & II Represesntative Village: Kojpura, Hindupur, Chero EFS – I & II

Sl. No.


Recommended

practice

Existing practice


(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (**)




SURTI/ MURRAH PVC/MPCS Nil

- - Local Village

F F

N N

1,2,3 1,2,3

1,2,3 1,2,3

A,B,C,D,E A,B,C,D,E


30-40 5-6 500-250 20-30 5-10

6 4 1 - -

P P P F F

1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3


3 Inter calving period (months) 15-18 month 18 P 1,2,3 A,B,C,D,E 4 Health care (per year) (+)


- 2 /year 1/year 1/life time -

- - - - -

F F F F

1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3


5. General management : - Washing (times / day) - Cleaning (times / day) - Housing (Paccca / Kutcha) - Drinking water (lts. / day)

1 1 Pacca 30-50

1 1 Kutcha 30

P P P N

1,3 1,3

1,2,3 1,3


6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 10 5 F 1,2,3 A,B,C,E (*) F = Full P = Partial N = Nil

. ** Reasons for gaps: Strategies: *** Farmer proposed extension Strategies: 1. Lack of awareness A. Awareness Camp 2. Lack of fund and facilities B. Financial availability 3. Lack of Management practices C. Management Practices D. Improvement in A.I facilities E. Exposure visits & demonstration

TABLE - 48 GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE FISH

SEED PRODUCTION / INCOME Part I : Seed production and Rearing :

AES: I & II District: Nalanda Farming Situation: I & II

S.No

Item of package


Existing practice


Reason for gap

in adoption

Proposed extension strategy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 A Induced breeding (Happa)

(i) Carp (IMC) Harmonal Injection - F B Spontaneous breeding (common carp) Happa Open P 2 Nursery preparation a Routine manuring (i) Raw cow dung/Year 15000 kg//ha 1000-1200 kg/ha/year P (ii) Lime/Year 200-250 Kgs/ha 100-250 Kgs/ha P (iii) Urea 300 kg/ha/year 50-60 kg/ha/year P (iv) SSP 240 kg/ha/year 30-40 kg/ha/year P b Instant manuring (i) Inorganic fertilizer Yes - F (ii) Oil cake Yes Yes N (iii) Raw cow dung Yes - N 3 Insect control (a) Manual - - - (b) Oil, soap Yes Yes N 4 Spawn stocking (a) Single species - - - (b) Multi species Intensive Intensive N 5 Feeding schedule (a) Oil cake 1-3 % bdw 1-3 % bdw N (b) Rice bran 1-3 % bdw 1-3 % bdw N (c) Green leaf(Grass Carp) 50 % bdw 50 % bdw N 6 Disease Bio-control Bio-control N 7 Rearing period 1 Year 6-10 months P 8 Method of harvesting Netting Netting N (i) Yield within 15 days (Recovery %) Spawn-Fry 40 25 P (ii) Yield within 30 days (Recovery %) Finger lings 25 15 P (iii) Yield within 45 days (Recovery % Finger lings) 15 10 P 9 Marketing Pond site Pond site N

10 Production of fish (ton/ha) 4-5 3.2 P ** Reasons for gaps: *** Farmer proposed extension strategies:

1. 1ack of awareness a. Awareness camps2. Lack of funds & facilities b. Exposure visits. 3. Lack of tendency to adopt recommend practices. c. Print & electronic media. 4. Cumbersome leasing policy of the government Commercial fish production on scientific lines 5. Lack of enough community water bodies d. Entrepreneurship development for fish net production 6. Inadequate availability of good quality of seed and

fingerlings e. Promotion of fish feed production

7. Lack of fish feed production unit f. Hatchery Establishment

TABLE No, 48-A TYPE OF FARMING SITUATION UNDER WHICH THE FISH SEED PRODUCTION IS

MANAGED Name of District : NALANDA AES: I, II & III

* No Seed Production is taking place

S. No.

Source of Irrigation

No. of families(%) different farming situation

Total (%) Loam Sandy Loam

No. % No. % No. % 1. -Irrigated - - - - - - 2. -Rainfed - - - - - - Total - - - - -

TABLE No. 49 GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE

PRODUTIVITY / INCOME Part II : Commercial production and rearing :

District: Nalanda AES: I & II

S.No

Item of package


Existing practice


Reason for gap

in adoption

Proposedextensionstrategy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Culture components

(a) Indian Major carp

Catla-2000Rohu-5000 Mrigal-2000

Grass carps-2000 Silver carps-5000

Catla-750Rohu-1900 Mrigal-800

Grass carps-750 Silver carps-5000

P

4 a,b,c

(b) Exotic carp Common carp Common carp N - - (c) Prawn M. rosenbergii Poly culture start P 1 a,b,c (d) Cat fish C. batrachus - F 4 a,b,c 2 Pond preparation (a) Organic manure (kg/ha) 10000-15000 10000-15000 N - - (b) In organic manure (kg/ha) 800 500 P 1 a,b,c (c) Bio-fertiliser (kg/ha) - - - - - (d) Lime (kg /ha) 200-250 200-250 - - - (e) Water depth(Mtrs) 1-1.5 1-1.5 - - - 3 Weed control (a) Mannual Yes Yes N - - (b) Mechanical Yes Yes - - - (c) Chemical - - - - - 4 Stocking size / No./ha (a) Spawn 1 crore 1 crore N - - (b) fry 50000 1 lac P 5 a,b,c (c) Fingerlings 30000 20000 P 2 a,b,c5 Feeding schedule (a0 Rice bran 3-5 % bw 1-2 % bw P 2 a,b,c (b) Oil cake 3-5 % bw 1-2 % bw P 2 a,b,c (c) Green leaf(Grass carp) 50 % bw 10 % bw P 1 a,b,c6 Sample netting - Monthly Yes Yes N - - - Quarterly Yes Yes N - - - Half yearly Yes Yes N - - 7 Aeration Yes 5% P 2 a,b,c8 Disease Cifax,Acrafalavin Kmno4, CaCo3,NaCl P 2 a,b,c9 Harvesting method Netting Netting N - -

10 Culture method Intensive & Poly Intensive & Poly N - - 11. Average yield (ton / ha) 8-10 4-5 P 1-5 a,b,c

** Reasons for gaps: *** Farmer proposed extension strategies: 1. 1ack of awareness a. Awareness camps 2. Lack of funds & facilities b. Exposure visits. 3. Lack of tendency to adopt recommend practices. c. Print & electronic media. 4. Non-availability of exotic seed. 5. Due to mortility & sale Fingerlings.

TABLE No, 49-A TYPE OF FARMING SITUATION UNDER WHICH THE COMMERCIAL FISH PRODUCTION IS

MANAGED District : Nalanda Name of Represented Village: Hindupur AES: II

S. No.

Source of Irrigation

No. of families(%) different farming situation

Total (%)

Loam Sandy Loam

No. % No. % No. % 1. -Irrigated 1 100 - - 1 100 2. -Rainfed - - - - - - Total 1 100 - - 1 100

CHAPTER-VI

PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGIES

CHAPTER – VI

PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGIES

The proposed extension strategies are designed to bring overall growth rate

of agricultural sector in the district The strategies are also proposed taking into

consideration the per cent proposed growth rate in Eleventh Five Year Plan The

following major extension strategies are proposed for developing agriculture,

livestock and dairy, fisheries and sericulture in the district

A. Strategies Proposed for Agriculture and Allied Sector :

Farming System Approach

Improving & sustaining productivity and income

Promoting diversification and intensification of crops and enterprises

Mobilizations of farmer Groups

Increasing Research-Extension – Farmers linkages by organizing farmers-

scientists interaction, Field Days and Kisan Goshties

Farmers oriented activities for their capacity building regarding production,

post harvest management/value addition/processing and marketing

Farm information dissemination through district level exhibition, Kisan melas,

fruits, vegetables shows, Printed material, technology package,

electronic/print media

Mainstreaming gender concern

Strategies for removing the infertility inproductive animals

To evolve the pedigree of higher milking animals by artificial insemination

programme

Strategies for developing good cow and buffalo breeds

Strategies for reducing intercalving period

Developing of poultry, piggery, Goat and sheep rearing

Strategies for animals health care management

Strategy regarding quality fodder production

Developing fish farming

Increasing area under Horticulture crops – vegetables, fruit crops, Medicinal

& aromatics and floriculture

Rejuvenation of old orchards

Increasing area under mushroom cultivation

Promotion of Beekeaping

B. Special Strategies

Integrated Nutrient management

Integrated pest management

Seed multiplication and replacement

Availability of quality Horticulture planting material

Farm mechanization

Marketing and media strategies

A IMPROVEMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY : AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION SYSTEM Crop Critical Gap Proposed Extension Strategies AESs

Paddy

High seed rate Encouraging use of recommended seed rate

I & II

Over Aged transplanting of Seedling

Promoting timely transplanting as per package of practices

I & II

Use of untreated seeds Encouraging seed treatment I & II Lack of optimum plant Population

Popularizing the concept of maintaining optimum plant population

I & II

Imbalanced use of Fertilizers

Encouraging balanced dose of fertilizers as per package of practices

I & II

Excess use of N fertilizer as top dressing

Promotion of recommended doses of N Fertilizer

I & II

Flood Irrigation Encouraging controlled irrigation through bunding of fields

I & II

Inadequate Pest and Disease Management

Popularization of Integrated Pest and Disease Management

I & II

Low adoption of super fine varieties

Popularizing cultivation of superfine varieties or higher income

I & II

Non-Judicious use of irrigation water

Promoting the concept of judicious use of irrigation water

I & II

Low adoption of Hybrid varieties of Paddy

Encouraging use of recommended hybrid cultivars of Paddy as well as hybrid paddy seed production

I &II

Low Seed Replacement Rate of quality seed

Promoting quality seed production through FIGs

I &II

Low area coverage under short duration & drought tolerant variety

Motivating farmers for cultivating short duration & drought tolerant variety

I &II

Lack of awareness regarding varieties to be shown under normal situation / flood prone condition

Popularizing cultivation of suitable varieties for different situation

I &II

Lack of awareness regarding System of Rice Intensification (SRI) technology

Motivating farmers for adopting System of Rice Intensification (SRI) technology

I &II

Low coverage under BORO rice in non-rainy season

Motivating farmers for the cultivation of BORO rice

I &II

Wheat

Use of untreated seeds Encouraging seed treatment I & II

Delayed sowing of Wheat Use of ZTD, use of suitable varieties for delayed sowing

I & II

Sowing by broadcasting Popularizing sowing by seed cum fertilizer drill

I & II

Imbalanced use of fertilizers

Encouraging balanced dose of fertilizers as per package of practices

I & II

Method of fertilizer ( Basal Dose )

Popularizing seed cum fertilizer drill I & II

Using under dose of weedicides

Popularizing recommended dose of weedicides as per package of practice

I & II

Non adoption of organic manure

Promoting application of PSB, Azotobactor, Green manuring & FYM

I & II

Excess moisture in grain at the time of storage

Creating awareness about storage of grain below 0% moisture level

I & II

Damage by storage pests Promotion fumigation of stored grains in specific metallic bins & Pakka storage structures

I & II

Lack of awareness regarding Resource Conservation Technology (RCT)Such as Zero tillage, FIRBS & Laser Land leveling

Motivating farmers regarding Use of Resource Conservation Technology (RCT)Such as Zero tillage, FIRBS & Laser Land leveling

I & II

Sugarcane

Low Use of recommended variety

Popularizing use of recommended varieties

I & II

Seed Treatment Promotion of recommended seed treatment practices

I & II

Low application of organic manure

Popularizing application of FYM/Vermi compost/press mud as per recommendation

I & II

Imbalanced use of fertilizers

Creating awareness’ about recommended doses of fertilizers

I & II

Poor Disease & Pest Management

Promotion of IPM technology I & II

Sunflower

Low adoption of high yielding varieties

Popularizing high yielding Variety/ hybrids

I & II

Pest Management Popularizing IPM I & II Maize

Imbalance use of Fertilizer Popularizing INM practies I & II Pest Management Popularizing of IPM I & II Low Plant population Popularizing optimum plant

population I & II

Weed Management Popularizing IWM (integrated Weed Management)Including chemical weed control

I & II

Unawareness of QPM Popularization of QPM (Quality Protein Maize)

I & II

Low area coverage under intercropping in maize

Popularizing intercropping in maize I & II

Pulses Imbalanced use of fertilizer

Popularizing recommended dose of fertilizer

I & II

Non use of Bio fertilizes Popularizing application of rhizobium and PSB culture

I & II

Inadequate pest and disease management

Popularizing integrated pest and disease management

I & II

Poor adoption of improved verity

Popularization of improve verity I & II

Under utilization of rice fallow area for pulse crops cultivation

Motivating farmers for raising pulse crop in rice fallow area

I & II

Lack of awareness about proper drainage

Motivating farmers to adopt proper drainage technique

I & II

Oil Seeds Imbalanced use of fertilizer

Popularizing recommended dose of fertilizer

I & II

Non use of Bio fertilizes Popularizing application of rhizobium and PSB culture

I & II

Inadequate pest and disease management

Popularizing integrated pest and disease management

I & II

Poor adoption of improved verity

Popularization of improve verity I & II

Lack of awareness regarding using apiary boxes in mustard fields

Motivating farmers regarding using apiary boxes in mustard fields

I & II

JUTE Low adoption of recommended package of Practices

Increasing farmer for adoption of package of Practices

I & II

Poor management of pest & Disease

Popularizing IPM / IDM I & II

Lack of awareness regarding value addition

Popularizing Post-Harvest technology I & II

Poor Marketing Promoting the Group formation for better marketing

I & II

HORTICULTURE PRODUCTION SYSTEM Fruit Vegetable- Tomato, Bringer, okra, chilies, etc.

Least use of seed treatment technology

Increasing adoption of recommended seed treatment methods

I & II

Indiscriminate use of fertilizers

Promoting balance use of fertilizers as per soil test report

I & II

Non use of micronutrients

Increasing application of recommended micronutrients as soil application & foliar spray

I & II

Pest & disease management

Promoting adoption of IPM & IDM I & II

Least use of improved varieties/ hybrids resistant to biotic & abiotic stresses

Popularizing resistant varieties/ hybrids against various odds during cultivation

I & II

Cole crops- Cauliflower, Cabbage, Broccolis, Knol khol

Least use of seed treatment technology

Increasing adoption of recommended seed treatment methods

I & II

Indiscriminate use of fertilizers

Promoting balance use of fertilizers as per soil test report

I & II

Non use of micronutrients

Increasing application of recommended micronutrients as soil application & foliar spray

I & II



Least use of improved varieties/ hybrids resistant to biotic & abiotic stresses

Popularizing resistant varieties/ hybrids against various odds during cultivation

I & II

Inadequate availability of seed of improved varieties

Promoting seed production of improved varieties

I & II

Cucurbits- Gourds & Melons

Unavailability of seeds of improved varieties/ hybrids

encouraging seed production technology of cucurbits

I & II

Low production in diara land

Popularization of diara land cultivation technology for cucurbits

I & II

Pest & Disease Management

Popularizing adoption of IPM & IDM I & II

Non use of Micro nutrients

Application of recommended Micro nutrients

I & II

Low adoption of improved varieties

Creating awareness about use of quality seed for obtaining higher production/ income

I & II



Weed management Application of recommended weedicides and its doses

I & II

Peas & Beans

Non adoption of seed treatment

Persuading farmers to adopt recommended seed treatment methods

I &II



Low adoption of improved varieties

Creating awareness about use of quality seed for obtaining higher production/ income

I & II

Low adoption of recommended package of practices

Popularizing adoption of POP for obtaining higher yield as well as income

I & II

Root Veg.-Radish, Carrot, Sugar beat, etc.

No recommended Package of Practices

Identification of high yielding varieties

I & II




I & II

Bulb crops-. Onion & Garlic



I & II

Unavailability of recommended varieties

Promoting quality seed production I & II




I & II

Spices-Turmeric, zinger, Coriander, Fennel & Black cumin

Unavailability of recommended varieties

Promoting quality seed production I & II



I & II

Mango Alternate bearing Popularizing regular bearing cultivars/ Hybrid

I & II

Low Application of basal dose of manure and fertilizers

Promoting basal dose of manure and fertilizers

I & II

Inadequate plant protection measures

Promoting recommended plant protection measures

I & II

Mango malformation / Sterility (Jhumka)

Popularizing resistant varieties and adoption of cultural practices

I & II

Gummosis Popularizing balance fertilizers, micronutrients and timely plant protection measures

I & II

Very high aged trees Rejuvenation /replacement of aged trees

I & II

Lack of awareness about value addition

Motivating farmers for use of post harvest technology

I & II

Litchi Injudicious use of fertilizers

Promoting INM I & II

Inadequate plant protection measures against litchi mites & stem borer

Promoting IPM I & II

Very high aged trees Rejuvenation /replacement of aged trees

I & II

Low adoption of post harvest technology

Promoting use of post harvest technology

I & II

Banana Abundant use of fertilizers

Popularizing use of recommended dose of fertilizer.

I & II

Inadequate plant protection measures against panama wilt & borers

Promoting timely pest & Diseases control

I & II

Less availability of quality planting material

Promoting production of quality planting material

I & II

Guava Least use of improved varieties

Popularizing cultivation of improved varieties for higher yield & Income

I & II

Low adoption of PP measures

Creating awareness about management of pest & Disease

I & II

Less availability of quality planting material


I & II

Lack of interest/ awareness regarding Rejuvenating Guava orchards

Promoting the concept of Rejuvenating orchards for getting higher yield.

I & II

Papaya Abundant use of fertilizers

Popularizing use of recommended dose of fertilizer.

I & II

low adoption plant protection measures

Promoting timely pest & Diseases Management

I & II

Inadequate availability of quality seed/ planting material

Promoting production of quality seed/ planting material

I & II

Lack of awareness about importance of gynomonocious / gynocious varieties

Motivating Farmers to adopt lines of gynomonocious / gynoecious varieties

I & II

Flowers-Marigold, Roses & Tuberose

Poor nursery management

Popularizing concept of Nursery Management

I & II

Less application of organic fertilizers.

Motivating farmers towards using organic manures

I & II

Poor water management practices.

Creating Awareness regarding timely irrigation in flower crops

I & II

Lack of awareness about Grading, packing, transport, storage etc.

Promoting post harvest technology I & II

MAKHANA

Low adoption of Production technology

Motivating farmer to adopt production technology

I & II

Inadequate Marketing Facilities

Formation of MAKHANA producer’s group for establishing better marketing linkage

I & II

Low adoption of Processing technology

Popularizing post-harvest technology of MAKHANA

I & II

BETEL VINE

Poor nursery management

Popularizing concept of Nursery Management

I & II

Low adoption of PP measures

Promoting timely pest & Diseases control

I & II

Inadequate availability of quality planting material


I & II

Medicinal & Aromatic

Unavailability of pure planting material .

Capacity building of farmers about cultivation practices of aromatic plants

I & II

Plants cultivation and processing

Low recovery of oil from present variety due to admixture

Promoting multiplication of pure planting material by raising nursery

I & II

No sufficient area under aromatic plantation for economically operating installed processing units.

Popularizing cultivation of aromatic plants

I & II

No value addition and fractional distillation facilities available

Promoting Post Harvest Technology I & II

Inadequate marketing facilities

Promoting CIG/FIG for marketing linkage

I & II

HORTICULTURE

SNo Critical Gap Proposed Extension Strategies AESs Low area coverage under

organic cultivation of vegetable

Promoting organic cultivation of vegetable.

I & II

Lack of interest in Rejuvenating orchards

Motivating farmers to Rejuvenate their orchards

I & II

Inadequate availability of good quality planting material

Motivating farmers / Entrepreneur to take up production of quality planting material

I & II

Inadequate availability of quality seed of vegetable

Promoting seeds production of vegetable at farmers fields

I & II

Soil healt

h

Decreasing fertility of soil Lack of awareness about soil Fertility index Deterioration of soil physical properties Accumulation of Hazardous elements in soil

Promoting fertilizers Application based on soil analysis Organizing farmers’ trainings regarding soil analysis

I & II

Post Harve

st Manageme

nt

Significant post harvest losses due to lack of proper handling of produce No storage facilities for fruits and vegetables for short period Lack of grading facilities

Persuading farmers for constructions of pack houses Capacity building of farmers on post harvest management technology Formation of farmers groups Persuading farmers for construction of cold storage

I & II

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

Animal Critical gap Proposed Extension Strategies AES's Cow a)Artificial insemination

Partial adoption of AI

a) Providing awareness about AI with audio – visual aids b) Intensify the availability of technical staff c) Providing refreshment trainings to technical persons e) Intensify the availability of semen, semen storage and transportation f) Conducting fertility improvement camps g) Organizing Calf rallies h) Imparting Training to Paravets

I & II

b) Fodder Gap in adoption of quality (feed & fodder) feeding

a) Providing awareness about animal production capacity, its requirements and dairy economics b) Intensify the supply of good quality fodder seeds and root slips c) Growing green fodder crops to ensure availability round the year d) Promoting of urea molasses mineral blocks to meet fodder requirement in case of emergency (draught & Flood)

- do -

c) Minerals& vitamins Full gap in adoption of feeding minerals & vitamins

a) Intensify the awareness’ programmes about importance of feeding minerals & vitamins b) Holding infertility management camps

- do

d) Intercalving period Larger Intercalving period

a) Intensify the awareness programme about “a calf a year” b) Removing reproductive problems through AH camps

- do -

e) Health care Gap in health care management

a) Intensify the awareness programme about animal health, hygiene & Vaccination through trainings and field visits b) Intensify the conduction of animal health camps c) Intensify the conduction of mass deworming and external parasites control programmes d) Capacity Building of Technical staff of disease diagnostic labs at block level hospitals

- do -

f) General/Farm management

a) Intensify the awareness programmes about animal

- do -

Partial gap in Adoption of general/ Farm management

management through training and field visits b) Showing of Audio Visual Aids of good managed animal farms

g) Average milk yield Partial gap in average milk yield production

Awareness about Improved dairy management and economics ie all the above mentioned activities

Buffaloes a) Breed Up gradation Partial adoption of artificial insemination

a) Providing awareness programmes through training and field visits b) Intensify the availability of technical persons c) Providing refreshment training to technical persons d) Conducting fertility improvement camps e) Conducting of Buff Calf rallies

I & II

b) Feed management Partial adoption of feed management

a) Providing awareness programmes about the feed and fodder requirement of the animal b) Intensify the supply of fodder seeds

-do -

c) Intercalving period Larger Intercalving period

a) Conducting awareness programmes about breeding through training and field visits

- do -

d) Health care non adoption of deworming schedule

a) Providing the awareness about importance of deworming/ Ectoparasitic control b) Conducting deworming camps

- do -

Goat/Sheep

a) Breed Improvement Full gap in adoption of improved Breeds

a) Providing awareness programmes through training and field visits b) Intensify the availability of technical persons c) Providing refreshment training to technical persons d) To provide improve Buck suitable for the area

I & II

b) Feed management Full gap in adoption of feed management

a) Providing awareness programmes about the feed and fodder requirement for the goat b) Intensify the supply of fodder / multy purpose trees seeds

-do -

c) Health care non adoption of deworming schedule

a) Providing the awareness about importance of deworming/ Ectoparasitic control b) Conducting health care camps

- do -

Poultry/ Quail

a) broilers Farming Partial adoption of

a) Providing awareness about Improved broilers Farming for income

I & II

Improved broilers

generation b) Providing trainings to Farmers/ technical persons c) Provide the market linkage f) Promotion of backyard farming system

Piggery a) Piggery Farming Full gap in adoption of Improved breeds

a) Providing awareness about Improved breeds, Feeding, Health care & Vaccination etc b) Providing trainings to Pig Farmers/ technical persons c) Provide the market linkage

I & II

FISH PRODUCTION SYSTEM: Fish Prod-uction

Lack of awareness about physico- Chemical Parameters of soil and water of fish ponds

Creating awareness about physico- chemical Parameters

I & II

Improper stocking measures Promoting proper stocking measures

I & II

Non awareness about composite fish farming

Creating awareness about composite fish farming

I & II

Unscientific feeding Promotion of scientific feeding I & II Un-exploited potential of fish farming in water storage village ponds

Exploiting the potential of fish farming in water storage village ponds

I & II

Marketing of fish through unorganized sectors

Promoting marketing of fish through organized sectors/CIG

I & II

Non awareness about cold storage and processing of fish

Creating awareness about storing fish in cold storages and processing of fishes

I & II

Non availability of quality seed on time and places

Encouraging private entrepreneurs to setup fish seed hatcheries

I & II

Monoculture practice is common Diversification from monoculture to poly culture or composite culture

I & II

Less adoption of fresh water prawn culture

Introduction and Intensification of fresh water prawn culture

I & II

C SUSTAINABILITY

AGRICULTURE

S No

Critical gap Proposed Extension Strategies AESs

Inadequate and use of low quality organic manure

Popularizing improved method of composting and Vermi composting

I & II

Less use and Inadequate availability of Bio fertilizers

Creating awareness about importance of Bio fertilizers & increased production of Biofertilizers

I & II

Depletion of Soil fertility due to injudicious use of fertilizer

Application of fertilizers based on soil testing results

I & II

Deficiency of Micro nutrients Application of Micro nutrients on the basis of soil test results

I & II

Mono cropping system Crop rotation and mixed cropping system

I & II

HORTICULTURE S

N0 Critical gap Proposed Extension Strategies AES's

Depletion of soil fertility Popularizing Integrated nutrient management programme

I & II

Lack of cropping system Adoption of proper crop rotations I & II Inadequate pest and disease

control measure Popularizing IPM & IDM I & II

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

S No

Critical gap Strategic issue AES's

Artificial insemination in buffaloes

Adoption of AI by farmers to improve the genetic potential of improved breeds

I & II

Infertility problem i.e. - Anoestrous - Repeat breeding

Knowledge of green fodder to provide vitamins/minerals to overcome anoestrous / repeat breeding

I & II

Deworming problem leading to poor growth & less milk production

To impart Knowledge about deworming, improve milk production & general health

I & II

Inadequate pest and disease control measure

Popularizing IPM & IDM I & II

FISHRIES

Sl No

Critical gap Strategic issue AESs

Conservation of water resources Renovation of ponds I & II

D. INTEGRATED NUTRIENTS MANAGEMENT

TABLE No. 50-A

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Wheat , Previous crop: Fallow

Next crop: Cucurbits Crop under study : Wheat Moisture condition : Irrigated

District: Nalanda Village : Kojpura AES: I

Sl

No.

Particulars

Existingpractice Recommended

practice

Gap inadoption ( F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (* *)

Proposed strategy

(* ** )

1.

2.

Soil Testing / Soil Health Cards Use of manure (T/ha)

Nil

Yes F 1,5 1,2,3

- FYM 3 15-20 t. P 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 - Compost Nil - N Vermi compost Nil Yes F 1,2,5 1,2,3,4

3. Use of major fertilizers Basal dose (kg/ha) N 20 40 P 1,5 1,2,3 P

10 30 F 1,5 1,2,3

K Nil 20 F 1,5 1,2,3

4. Top dress (kg/ha) N 20 40 P 1,5 1,2,3

5. Use of micro-nutrients (Kg/ha) ZnSo4 Nil 25 N 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 -

6. Cultivation of legume - As rotational crop Nil - N - - - As inter crop Nil - N - - - As green manure Nil - N - -

7.

8.

Use of bio-fertilizer (Packets/ha)Azotobector

PSB

Nil -

N - -

Any other

* F = Full P = Partial N = Nil ** Code for reasons for gap in adoption *** Code for proposed strategy

1. Lack of awareness 1. Mass media2. On farm trial.

3. Trainig / demonstrations 4. Linkage with credit institutions or credit

thrift activity in self help group

2. Other farmers follow it 3. High residual effect of fertilizer / manure

used in previous crop 4. Fear of loss of yield .

5. Lack of finance

TABLE No.50-B PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Wheat , Previous crop: Maize ,

Next crop: Maize Crop under study : Wheat Moisture condition : Irrigated

District: Nalanda Village : Kojpura AES: I

Sl

No.

Particulars


practice


(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (* *)

Proposed strategy

(* ** )

1.

2.


Nil

Yes F 1,5 1,2,3

- FYM 5-10 15-20 P 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 - Compost Vermi compost Nil Yes F 1,2,5 1,2,3,4

3. Use of major fertilizers Basal dose (kg/ha) N 46 40 P 1,5 1,2,3 P 32 30 P 1,5 1,2,3

K Nil 20 F 1,5 1,2,3

4. Top dress (kg/ha) N 92 40 P 1,5 1,2,3


6. Cultivation of legume - As rotational crop Nil - N - - - As inter crop Nil - - - - - As green manure Nil - - - -

7.

8.


PSB

Nil -

N - -

Any other



3. Training demonstrations 4. Linkage with credit institutions or credit




5. Lack of finance

TABLE No.50-C PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Wheat , Previous crop: Maize,

Next crop: Cucurbits Crop under study : Wheat Moisture condition :

Irrigated/Rainfed District: Nalanda Village : Chero

Name of Agro-Ecological Situation: III

Sl No.

Particulars


practice


(*)

Reasons for gap in

adoption (* *)

Proposed strategy

(* ** )

1.

2.


Nil

Yes F 1,5 1,2,3

- FYM 5-10 15-20 P 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 - Compost Vermi compost Nil Yes F 1,2,5 1,2,3,4

3. Use of major fertilizers Basal dose (kg/ha) N 18 40 P 1,5 1,2,3 P 46 30 P 1,5 1,2,3

K 10 20 P 1,5 1,2,3

4. Top dress (kg/ha) N 60 40 P 1,5 1,2,3


6. Cultivation of legume - As rotational crop Nil Yes F 1,2 2,3 - As inter crop Nil - - - - - As green manure Nil - - - -

7.

8.


PSB

Nil 10

F 1,2,4,5 1,2,3,4

Any other







5. Lack of finance

TABLE No. 50-D PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Paddy , Previous crop: Gram,

Lentil , Next crop: Gram, Lentil Name of crop under study : Paddy

Moisture condition : Irrigated District: Nalanda Village : Hindupur

AES: II

Sl

No.

Particulars


practice


(*)

Reasons for gap in adoption

(* *)

Proposed strategy

(* ** )

1.

2.


Nil Yes F 1,5 1,2,3

- FYM 2 10 P 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 - Compost 1 10 P Vermi compost Nil 0.1 P 1,2,5 1,2,3,43 Use of major fertilizers Basal dose (kg/ha) N 20 50 P 1,5 1,2,3 P 40 60 P 1,5 1,2,3

K 20 40 F 1,5 1,2,34 Top dress (kg/ha) N 20 25 P 1,5 1,2,35 Use of micro-nutrients (Kg/ha) ZnSo4 Nil 25 F 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 - 6 Cultivation of legume - As rotational crop Gram/Lentil Gram/Lentil N 1,2 2,3 - As inter crop Nil Yes F - - - As green manure Nil Yes F - - 7 8

Use of bio-fertilizer (kg/ha) 1,2,4,5 1,2,3,4Algae Culture Nil 10 F 1,2,4,5 1,2,3,4

Azolla Nil 200 F 1,2,4,5 1,2,3,4Any other






used in previous crop 4. Fear of loss of yield.

5. Lack of finance

TABLE No. 50-E PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Maize, Previous crop: Wheat ,

Next crop: Wheat Name of crop under study : Maize Moisture condition :

Irrigated District: Nalanda Village : Chero


Sl

No.

Particulars


practice


(*)


(* *)

Proposed strategy

(* ** )

1.

2.


Nil Yes F 1,5 1,2,3

- FYM 5-10 15-20 P 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 - Compost Nil Yes F Vermi compost Nil Yes F 1,2,5 1,2,3,43 Use of major fertilizers Basal dose (kg/ha) N 10 40 P 1,5 1,2,3 P 5 75 P 1,5 1,2,3

K Nil 50 F 1,5 1,2,34 Top dress (kg/ha) N Nil 20 P 1,5 1,2,35 Use of micro-nutrients (Kg/ha) ZnSo4 Nil 25 F 1,2,5 1,2,3,4 - 6 Cultivation of legume - As rotational crop Nil Maize-Legume F 1,2 2,3 - As inter crop Nil Yes F 1,2 2,3 - As green manure Nil Sunhemp F 1,2 2,3 7 8

Use of bio-fertilizer (kg/ha) 1,2,4,5 1,2,3,4Azotobector PSB Nil 10 F

Any other


1. Lack of awareness 1. Mass media2. On farm trial .





5. Lack of finance

TABLE No.50-F PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Maize , Previous crop: Waterlogged , Next crop: Lentil

Name of crop under study : Mustard Moisture condition : Irrigated/Rainfed District: Nalanda Village : Chero


Sl No.

Particulars


practice


(*)


(* *)

Proposed strategy

(* ** )

1.

2.


Nil Yes F 1,5 1,2,3




Any other







5. Lack of finance

TABLE No.50-G PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Maize Previous crop: Wheat , Next crop: Wheat

Name of crop under study : Mustard Moisture condition : Irrigated District: Nalanda Village : Kojpura

Sl

No.

Particulars


practice


(*)


(* *)

Proposed strategy

(* ** )

1.

2.


Nil Yes F 1,5 1,2,3




Any other

* F = Full P = Partial N = Nil

** Code for reasons for gap in adoption *** Code for proposed strategy 1. Lack of awareness 1. Mass media

2. On farm trial. 3. Training demonstrations

4. Linkage with credit institutions or credit thrift activity in self help group



5. Lack of finance

Integrated

Nutrients

Management

1. To organize awareness campaign for INM

technologies

2. Identification and selection of feasible

wastee land where green manure seeds Bio

fertilizer can be produced through SHGs/Mahila

Mandal etc.

3. Organizing training for cultivators on

production on and use of bio fertilizer vermi

fertilizers compost and balance use of chemical

fertilizer on soil tests.

4. Organizing field day at the site of successful

Demonstration.

Inclusion of

organics in

nutrients

management

1. Awareness campaign for use of organic in

nutrient management

2. Organize farming for farmers for production

and inclusion of organics in nutrients

management

3. To organize field day on successful site.

4. To organize plantation of leaf manure crops

on wastee land or an common lands.

Promotion of

green manuring

through seed

production

1. Identification of areas and villages

cultivation of for green manuring crops

2. Multiplication of the green manure seed

varieties through co-operation of the farmers

3. Facilitate supply of critical inputs like and

through seed supplying agency.

4. Organizing demonstration and field days.

5. Exposure visit to successful site.

6. Farmers training on improved green manure

crop cultivation.

Micro nutrients

managements for

optimum field &

soil health along

with organics

1. Awareness campaign about micro-nutrients

management

2. Identify the specific areas where the soil

deficiencies in micro-nutrients such as zinc in

particular

3. Training to progressive farmers for proper

management of micronutrients.

4. Demonstration on specific crops like paddy in

which zinc deficiency often occurs.

5. Conduct field days at the site of successful

demonstration.

Checking

obnoxious weeds

like Phalaris

minor and

Parthinium

1. To identify the areas first where these obnoxio

are visible

2. To educate the farmers for judicious use of

weedicides

3. Organizing training for better knowledge of

pre and post emergence of weeds. To

cultivators including mechanical eradication.

Intensification of

zero tillage to

reduce exposure

oxidation of soil

organic matter

1. Awareness campaign about benefits of zero-

tillage machine

2. Demonstration successful site of zero tilling

and production of crops

3. Field day on the farm & other successful

cultivators.

4. Exposure visit to Agril Engineering

department/ Zero tillage machine supplier

Promotion of soil

test based

intensive

cultivation for

balanced

nutrition

1. Awareness campaign for benefit of soil

testing

2. Arrangement for collection of soil sample

through the line Deptt.

3. Facilitate with a soil testing kit to 10 blocks

of the district.

4. Arrangement for making available the soil

testing support as early as possible on receipt

of money from the cultivators.

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT TABLE No.51-A

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT Crop : Paddy Pest : WBPH

Season : Kharif District :- Nalanda

Sl. No.

Particulars

Existing practice

Recommendedpractice

Gap inadoption (F/P/N) *

Reasons for gap in

adoption (*)

Proposedstrategy

(**) 1 Cultural practices (Y/-) : - Summer ploughing N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Timely sowing N Y F 1,3 1,2,3 2 Resistant variety (specific) N Y F 1,2,4 1,2,3,4 3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications) - Neem product N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - NPV N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 4 Bio agent (Y/-) - Egg parasite - - - - Tricoderma. N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 5 Other practices (Y/-) - Pheromone trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Light trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 6 Pesticides (No. of applications) - Spraying Y Y N N N - Dusting Y Y N N N - Seed treatment N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Soil applications N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 7 Any other

TABLE No.51-B

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT Crop :Oil Seed Pest : APHID

Season :Rabbi District :- Nalanda

Sl. No.

Particulars

Existing practice

Recommendedpractice


Reasons for gap in

adoption (*)

Proposedstrategy

(**) 1 Cultural practices (Y/-) : - Summer ploughing N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Timely sowing N Y F 1,3 1,2,3 2 Resistant variety (specific) N Y F 1,2,4 1,2,3,4 3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications) - Neem product N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - NPV N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 4 Bio agent (Y/-) - Egg parasite - - - - Tricoderma. N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 5 Other practices (Y/-) - Pheromone trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Light trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 6 Pesticides (No. of applications) - Spraying Y Y N N N - Dusting Y Y N N N - Seed treatment N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Soil applications N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 7 Any other

TABLE No.51-C

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT Crop :Paddy / Maize Pest : STEM BORROR

Season :Rabbi / Kharif District :- Nalanda

Sl. No.

Particulars

Existing practice

Recommendedpractice


Reasons for gap in

adoption (*)

Proposedstrategy

(**) 1 Cultural practices (Y/-) : - Summer ploughing N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Timely sowing N Y F 1,3 1,2,3 2 Resistant variety (specific) N N N N N 3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications) - Neem product N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - NPV N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 4 Bio agent (Y/-) - Egg parasite - - - - Tricoderma. N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 5 Other practices (Y/-) - Pheromone trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Light trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 6 Pesticides (No. of applications) - Spraying Y Y N N N - Dusting Y Y N N N - Seed treatment N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Soil applications N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 7 Any other

TABLE No.51-D

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT Crop : Pulses Pest : POD BORER

Season :Rabbi / Kharif District :- Nalanda

Sl. No.

Particulars

Existing practice

Recommendedpractice


Reasons for gap in

adoption (*)

Proposedstrategy

(**) 1 Cultural practices (Y/-) : - Summer ploughing N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Timely sowing N Y F 1,3 1,2,3 2 Resistant variety (specific) N N N N N 3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications) - Neem product N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - NPV N F F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 4 Bio agent (Y/-) - Egg parasite N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 Tricoderma. N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 5 Other practices (Y/-) - Pheromone trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Light trap N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 6 Pesticides (No. of applications) - Spraying Y Y N N N - Dusting Y Y N N N - Seed treatment N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Soil applications N Y F 1,3,4 1,2,3,4 7 Any other

TABLE No.51-E

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT Crop : All crops Pest : Termite

Season : Rabi / Kharif District :- Nalanda

Sl. No.

Particulars

Existing practice

Recommendedpractice


Reasons for gap in

adoption (*)

Proposed strategy

(**) 1 Cultural practices (Y/-) : - Summer ploughing N Y F 1,2,3 1,2,3 - Timely sowing Y Y N N N 2 Resistant variety (specific) - - - - - 3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications) - Neem product N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - NPV N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 4 Bio agent (Y/-) - Egg parasite N Y F 1,2,3 1,2,3 5 Other practices (Y/-) - Pheromone trap N N N N N - Light trap N N N N N 6 Pesticides (No. of applications) - Spraying N N N N N - Dusting N N N N N - Seed treatment N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,34 - Soil applications N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 7 Any other

F = Full, P = Partial, N = NIL

TABLE No.51-F

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT

Crop :- Paddy/ Maize. Vegetable Pest : Grass Hopper Season : Kharif

District :- Nalanda Sl. No.

Particulars

Existing practice

Recommendedpractice


Reasons for gap in

adoption (*)

Proposed strategy

(**) 1 Cultural practices (Y/-) : - Summer ploughing N Y F 1,2,3 1,2,3 - Timely sowing N Y F N N 2 Resistant variety (specific) - - - - - 3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications) - Neem product N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - NPV - - - 4 Bio agent (Y/-) - Egg parasite - - - 5 Other practices (Y/-) - Pheromone trap N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 - Light trap N Y F 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 6 Pesticides (No. of applications) - Spraying N N N N N - Dusting N Y F 1,2,3 1,2,3 - Seed treatment - Soil applications 7 Any other

F = Full, P = Partial, N = NIL

* Code for reasons for gap in adoption ** Code for proposed strategy : 1. Lack of awareness 1. Mass media

2. On farm trial/demonstration 3. Tranig & Exposure visit .

4. Linkage with credit institutions or credit thrift activity in self help group

2. Other farmers follow it 3. Lack of Knowledge .

4. Lack of finance

Integrated Pest

management

1. Organize awareness campaign on IPM

technology.

2. Identification of critical areas where pest

infestation always occur

3. Organizing demonstration on crop pest

management

4. Organizing farmer’s field day to make the

farmers IPM experts.

5. Organizing training to farmers.

6. Facilitate supply of bio pesticides in set net

pheromone traps etc. on subsidized payment.

Pest Monitoring

Techniques

Pheromone-based pest (codling moth) traps;

agroecological monitoring protocols; assess

beneficial insects

Techniques to

Reduce & Replace

Pesticides

Pheromone mating disruption; foster biocontrol by

eliminating OPs from orchard; softer pesticides (Bt,

pheromones, ant baits); precise timing of pesticide

applications; reduced rates of application;

Ecologically selective pesticides; Avoiding early

season pesticide application;

Biocontrol &

Cultural

Techniques

Orchard sanitation; beneficial insect releases;

bird/bat boxes; Leaf pulling; beneficial insect

releases; cover crops to moderate vigor; Early

harvest; beneficial insect releases; cover crops;

irrigation management; optimizing plant nutrition;

resistant varietals; trap crops

F. SEED MULTIPLICATION & REPLACEMENT

TABLE No.52-A

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO

District: Nalanda Name of crop : Maize Preferred variety: ITC Agro-Ecological Situation : I

Sl. No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/ hybrid Quantity of seed used (of

preferred variety) (Q)

Area sown (ha)under the crop with different varieties

Quality of seed of

preferred variety (G/A/P)*

Preferredvariety

Other varieties

A Purchase from outside: - From Private dealer 24 13 11 A - - - - - From public sector B Use of self produced seed: - From own field 62 - - P - - - - - From others field 80 P - - - - C Any other 32 12 20 - Total 198 25 31

* G = Good A = Average P = Poor

TABLE No.52-B PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO

District: Nalanda Village: Kojpura Name of crop : Wheat Preferred variety : UP-262, Lok-1 AES: I

Sl. No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/ hybrid Quantity of seed used (of

preferred variety) (Q)


Quality of seed of


Preferredvariety

Othervarieties

A Purchase from outside: - From Private dealer 200 56 144 A - - - - - From public sector B Use of self produced seed: - A - From own field 90 15 75 A - From others field 125 25 100 G C Any other 55 35 20 - Total 470 131 339 A


TABLE No.52-C

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO

District: Nalanda Name of crop : Potato Preferred variety : K. Ashoka, Rajendra 1 & 2, K. Lalima, K. Badshah Agro-Ecological Situation: I

Sl. No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/ hybrid Quantity of seed used (of preferred variety)

(Q)


Quality of seed of preferred

variety (G/A/P)*

Preferredvariety

Othervarieties

A Purchase from outside: - From Private dealer 55 3 52 A - From public sector 115 115 - G B Use of self produced seed: - From own field 180 35 145 A - From others field - - - - C Any other - - - - Total 350 153 197 A


TABLE No.52-D PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO

District: Nalanda Name of crop : Paddy Preferred variety: Rajendra Mansuri, Sonam, Sita AES: I

Sl. No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/ hybrid Quantity of seed

used (of preferred variety) (Q)

Area sown (ha)under the crop with different

varieties

Quality ofseed of


Preferredvariety

Other varieties

A Purchase from outside: - From Private dealer 540 100 440 G - From public sector 440 80 360 G B Use of self produced seed: - From own field - - - - - From others field - - - - C Any other - - - -

Total 980 180 800 -

TABLE No.52-E

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO District: Nalanda Name of crop : Maize Preferred Variety: Shaktiman 1,2,3,4 AES: I & II

Sl. No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/ hybrid Quantity of seed used (of preferred variety)

(Q)


Quality of seed of preferred

variety (G/A/P)*

Preferredvariety

Othervarieties

A Purchase from outside: - From Private dealer 22.5 18 12 G - From public sector 75.0 60 26 G B Use of self produced seed: - From own field - - - - - From others field - - - - C Any other - - - - Total 97.5 78 38 -

TABLE No.52-F PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO

District: Nalanda Name of crop : Mustard Preferred variety: T-59 AES: I & II

Sl. No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/ hybrid

Quantity of seed used (of preferred variety)

(Q)


Quality of seed of

preferred variety

(G/A/P)* Preferred

variety Other

varieties A Purchase from outside: - From Private dealer 1.52 38 40 G - From public sector 1.36 34 33 G B Use of self produced seed: - From own field - - - - - From others field - - - - C Any other - - - -

Total 2.88 72 73 -


Strategies

1. Educating farmers to produce quality seed at their farm. 2. Sowing practices for quality seed production. 3. Providing quality seed in small quantity to popularize the use of quality

seed. 4. Cleaning, grading and proper storage of produce for seed purpose.

G. HORTICULTURAL PLANTING MATERIAL

Table No.53

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING PREFERRED

HORTICULTURAL PLANTING MATERIAL

Crop: Ber Sl. No.

Sources of preferred planting

Quantity of

planting

Area sown (ha) under the crop with

different varieties

Quality of preferred planting

material of horticultural

crops

material used of

preferred variety

Gola

Kethli

Umran

material required for the district

1. Purchase from outside

- from private nursery

- from public sector

-

8000 Grafting

-

6000 Grafting

- -

-

2000 Grafti

ng

Gola & Umran

2. Use of self produced planting material

- from own field

- from other field

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

Crop: Guava Sl. No.



crops

Quantity of planting material used of

preferred variety

Area sown (ha) under the crop with different

varieties

Quality of preferred planting material required for the district

Allahaba

di Safeda

L-49

Banarsi Surkha

1 Purchase from outside

- from private nursery

- from public sector

-

15000 Grafting

-

9000 Grafting

-

5000 Graftin

g

-

1000 Grafting

Allahabadi Safeda L-49 Banarsi Surkha

2. Use of self produced planting material

- from own field

- from other field

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

Crop: Mango

Sl.

No

.

Sources of

preferred

planting

material of

horticultural

crops

Quantit

y of

plantin

g

materia

l used

of

preferr

ed

variety

Area sown (ha) under

the crop with

different varieties

Quality of

preferred

planting

material

required

for the

district

Zardal

u ,

Langda

other

Local

1. Purchase from

outside

- from private

nursery

- from public

sector

100,000

50,000

30,000,

20,000

1000

ha.

Nucellar

seedlins of

proven

varities in

the tune of

1,00000

qality.

2. Use of self

produced

planting material

- from own

field

- from other

field

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Crop: Potato

Sl. No.



crops

Quantity of planting material used of

preferred variety

Area sown (ha) under the crop with

different varieties

Quality of preferred planting material required for the district

K. Ashoka. K.

Lalima.

K. Chand

ra mukhi

.

Local

1 Purchase from

outside

- from private

nursery

- from public

sector

30,00 Q.

12000

Q.

6000

Q.

Foundation

seed of

recognized

variety

from

Reaserch

Institute

2. Use of self

produced

planting material

- from own

field

- from other

field

For

100

ha.

Crop :- Banana

Sl.

No

.

Sources of

preferred

planting

material of

horticultural

crops

Quantity of

planting

material

used of

preferred

variety

Area sown (ha) under

the crop with

different varieties

Quality of

preferred

planting

material

required

for the

district

G.9,

AlBeet

el.

Rabue

ta.

Local

1 Purchase from

outside

- from private

nursery

- from public

sector

2,50,000

1,0000

0,

50,000,

1,0000

0

100

ha.

Tissue

Culture

planting

materials

and quality

suckers .

2. Use of self

produced

planting material

- from own

field

- from other

field

For

100

ha.

Crop: Turmeric

Sl. No.



crops

Quantity of

planting

material used

of preferr

ed variety

Area sown (ha) under the crop with different

varieties

Quality of

preferred

planting material required for the district

Rajendra

soniya

R.H.5

1 Purchase from

outside

- from private

nursery

- from public

sector

1,000 Q.

750.Q.

50 ha.

Quality

seed

materials

required

from

research

institution

2. Use of self

produced

planting material

- from own

field

- from other

field

Strategies

Decentralized

Production of

Seed & Planting

Material of Major

i. Awareness campaign

ii. Identification and promotion of FIGs’ for

decentralized vegetable seed production

iii. Exposure visit of FIGs’ to successful sites in

Vegetables. other district/state.

iv Training for seed production and certification.

v. Arrangement of foundation /certified seed of

location specific varieties from reliable sources on

payment for the interested FIGs’.

Intensification of

True Potato Seed

Production (TPS).

i. Awareness campaign and identification of areas

where farmers are ready to grow TPS.

ii. Training to interested growers at CPRI, Patna

particularly for nursery preparations

iii. Exposure visit to success sites

iv. Demonstration on farmers site

v. Linkage with research and extension

institutions.

Promotion of

FIGs for Planting

Material of

Horticulture

Plants and

Commercial

Floriculture

i. Awareness and Identification of FIGs in specific

areas to promote them for commercial cultivations

of floriculture.

ii. Special training to FIGs’ for production of

planting materials.

iii. Facilitate supply of critical inputs such as

planting material.

iv. Exposure visits to BTT members on –Group

Dynamics, IPNM, Water Budgeting, Vermi-

composting, Fodder crops and Plant Tissue

culture.

v. Exposure visit to successful sites for FIGs’.

H SUCCESS STORIES Table No.54

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING SUCCESS STORIES AND ITS REPLICATION

Title of success story

Whether it shall

spread on its own (Y/N)

Reasons behind non-

adoption ofsuccessfultechnology

*

Type of recommen

dation

Proposed

strategy++

* ++ A, Lack of awareness. A. Mass media. B. Hurdles in marketing B. OFT/demonstration. C. Lack of farm finance. C. Linkage with credit/mkting/processing units. D. Non-availability of quality inputs. D. Awareness campaign. E. Uncertainty/probable risk factor. E Any other (specify) F. Lack of technical know how. F. Technical Know how. G. Any other(specify) G. Availability of quality inputs.

I. NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Table No.55

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR MANAGEMENT OF LAND AND WATER

RESOURCES

District : Nalanda AES: I , II &III Critical gap Strategies Activities

Scanty and erratic rainfall

Unscrupulous

destruction of natural

vegetation

Afforestation of suitable trees Vanmahotsav,

Awareness

campain

Mass media

Shrinkage of fauna or

wildlife

Natural sanctuaries and National

park

Mass media

Less percolation of

water and high

surface runoff

Afforestation and exBeetelsion of

orchards

Construction of trenches for

enhancing infiltration rate

Mass media

Awareness

camp

Reduction in local

storage structures

Creation of local structure based

on indigenous knowledge

Awareness

camp

Mass Media

Soil Health

Decreasing soil

fertility and organic

matter.

Integrated Nutrient Management Trainings

Demonstrations

Non-judicious use of

fertilizers and

chemicals.

Use of fertilizers and chemicals on

soil test and need basis.

Trainings

Demonstrations

Poor management of

local farm yard

Digging of pits and proper

management of FYM and crop

Trainings

Demonstrations

manures and residues

resulting in high

incidence of white

grubs

residue. Exposure visit

Increasing soil

alcalinity.

Use of vermicompost and use of

improved methods of composting

EM activities pit , use of

Trichoderma, Bacillus for fast

decomposition.

Trainings

Demonstrations

Exposure visit

J. ISSUES FOR POLICY CONSIDERATION.

Table No.56

ISSUES FOR POLICY CONSIDERATION IN AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED

SECTORS

District: : Nalanda Agro-Ecological Situation : I ,II, III

Sl.

No.

Issue /

problem

Proposed policy intervention

1. Small and

fragmented land

holdings

Legislative measures for prevention of

further fragmentation and conversion

towards non-agriculture purposes.

Market oriented integrated farming system

approach to make best use of resources at

farm level.

2. Depleting soil

fertility

Propagation of INM, green manuring & IPM

to avoid excessive dependency on

chemicals.

3. Non judicious Soil testing labs at block

use of fertilizers

& chemicals.

Timely and balanced doses of inputs.

4. Increased

incidence of and

developing

resistance in

weeds & insects-

pests.

IWM, IPM, adoption of suitable of agro-

practices & crop/ varieties selection.

5. Non-availablility

of quality

planting

materials

More responsive administrative machinery.

6. Marketing of

agriculture

product

Barrier free, transparent and broad based

marketing network with modern amenities,

well developed agro-processing facilities

with strong linkages of farmers-producer.

Legislative support for contract farming &

related measures.

7. Functioning of

State Govt.

Poultry Farms

Functional and training Programme should

be developed for the farmers.

7. Post harvest

handling

Technical, financial, storage and value

addition facilities at farm/.local level need

to be strengtPoultryed.

K. FARM MECHANIZATION

Farm mechanization is a critical component concerning not only cost

effective and timely completion of different farm operations but also

encompssing the issues of farm level storage, processing and value addition.

Mechanization influences farm efficiency, profitability and sustainability too.

Farmers and extension personnel are needed to be continually exposed to

the new technological innovations in different kinds of farm related

machinaries and implements. Farmers` needs and requirements are to be

taken into consideration while devising new/modified

macPoultryary/implements as per changing farm, manpower and market

demands.

SNo Name of Implement Interventions Zero Tillage Machine Create awareness among

customers Hire base service

Supply on subsidized rate,

Demonstrations

Rotavator Reaper Binder Potato Planter/Digger Bed planter Laser Leveller Reaper Conoweeder, Marker Demonstrations

a. MARKETING & MEDIA STRETAGY

Efficient marketing is the key to the overall development of the farm sector.

Marketing sector is a bit neglected by the farmers as well as by the

Government, however, a change in the perception can go a long way

keeping in view the changing agro-economic situation of todays agriculture.

With increasing cost of production, farmer finds himself at a loss due to lack

of market orientation. Our unplanned agriculture production is becoming a

problem without proper market awareness of the farmers. Now farmers have

to cater to the national/ international market which is not possible without

farmer’s education about modern day marketing needs and practices. There

is a need of unbdertaking exposure visits of farmers to different markets to

understand marketing process as per the market demand. Encouraging

SHGs to create market facilities, opening agri-business centres and agri-

clinics in villages may help the farmers in this direction.The regular cycles of

glut and scarcity of one or the other agri-commodity can effectively be taken

care of through efficient and effective marketing system which is lacking our

state and country as well.

Processing, proper storage, efficient transportation and market intelligence

are needed for efficient marketing..

At this crucial time farmers need to know answer to question like what to

produce, wPoultry to produce, how much to produce, how to sell, where to

sell at what price.

Marketing strategies

Establishment of e-marketing facilities with modern networking.

Establishing backward and forward linkages of the farmers with

input dealers, service providers and processors.

Establishing chain of godowns, cold storage and other related

infrastructures with barrier free movement of agri-produce.

Farmers’ exposure visits.

Conducting proper training regarding safe packing and value

addition and storage.

Encourage Agri-clinic & Agri-business centers to provide single

window service in respect to input supply, technical know-how &

market information.

Linkage between rural produces and urban consumers through

positive approach.

To trained the farmers through Training and demonstration by

involving experts regarding value addition to their product.

Conducting market surveys and market intelligence services to

farmers.

Encourage buy back arrangement/contract farming for farm

produce with processors.

Establishment of SHGs to provide market facilities locally for farm

produce.

Encouraging local farmers’ organizations to serve as link

organization with external reputed market organization.

A.-Marketing Support And Value Addition

1. Revival of old and closed sugar mills with farmers management

2. Promoting private entrepreneurship to establish sugarcane

based industries (organic gur making.)-HRD component

3. Promoting private entrepreneurship for Maize based industries

for cattle and poultry feed and other value added products.-

Research and HRD component

4. Promotion of Kisan Ki Mandi. –Tech. Know-how, Publicity,

Contingency and Dovetailing with District Administration for

cost sharing & facilitation. -Five centres

5. Promotion of Commodity Cooperative Marketing.- Capacity

building

6. Promotion of Rural godowns and cold chambers.- Dovetailing

with Govt. departments.

7. StrengtPoultrying of FCI network, PACS and State Agril.

Marketing Board outlets.- Dovetailing with Govt.

8. Networking with COMFED (Sudha brand) outlets for marketing

mushroom, honey etc.

9. Popularizing very fine rice varieties along with milling,

processing and marketing. HRD, Exposure visit and forward

linkage.

10. Intensification of organic vegetables production. HRD,

Exposure visit and forward linkage.

11. Frequent market surveys for consumer preference to tailor

demand-linked production.(Market study & participatory

technology development)

12. StrengtPoultrying market information through IT and

FIAC.(Internet connectivity& hiring IT facilitators)

13. Develop and establish market information network from block,

district, state, national to international levels.(Through FIAC)

15. Studying the present market information network prevailing in

the district along with the gaps.

16. Establishing the need for improvement through information

technology network.

Finding out the commodities, market where information

network is necessary (Through FIAC).

17. Developing an information technology network at various

levels.

18. Developing an operational mechanism (For establishing net

work of FIAC with ATMA ).

19. Technical and managerial support to FIAC and BTTs

20. Studying the present status of dissemination of market

information by different organizations through various media.

21. Exploring possibility of news media-FM radio station (Hiring air

time )

22. Integrating of various media sources through developing

mechanism to be operationalized and monitored (Net working).

23. Exploiting possibility of news media like print internet, etc.

24. Identifying and studying of the existing farmers organizations.

25. Identification of success stories.

26. Identifying the farmers /farming community along with

communities with a possibility of promoting market oriented

organization, at various level.

27. Arranging exposure visits training etc.

28. Providing techno-managerial support.

29. Developing and operationalising a monitoring mechanism

(Convergence allowance)

30. Identifying and studying activities of various organizations

engaged in marketing operation along with commodities

handled.

31. Finding out the need for marketing the commodities by

farmers/farming community.

32. Providing technical and managerial support.

33. Exploring options for contract farming in medicinal and

aromatic plants and vegetables

34. Creation of Export promotion zone for fine scented basmati rice

(Through linkage).

35. Promotion of Commodity Interest Groups in major

commodities.

1. Formation of CIG through awareness and training

2. Survey /study/consultancy to establish viable processing

units.

36. Assessment of export oriented marketable commodity by

engaging marketing consultants /agencies for forecasting the

production and local consumption statistics for Patna district.

Media Strategies:

Providing information to farmers on market avenues, market

trend, prevailing market prices and other relevant information

periodically through TV, Radio, Kisan call centers & News paper.

Under the Support to State for Extension Reforms Programme all

the Block level Farm Information and Advisory Centres in the

district would be electronically linked to district, state and national

institutions. Central Govt. would support states in the use of

electronic linkages and computerization so that marketing,

research, extension and farming communities are linked to each

other, and into local, national and global networks. The objective

is to link all blocks of the district with national and international

networks in a phased manner.

This would include ATMA newsletter, success stories in film and

electronic form, technical messages in electronic form and on

electronic media, electronic access to all stake holder, through

NICNET, and video conferencing facilities being established at

DM’s Conference Hall, electronic mail access to ICAR institutes and

researches from Rajendra Agricultural University, Bihar along with

state and national administrative offices, and electronic access to

ARIS system databases and, eventually, to the World Wide Web.

N. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Through a systematic skill gap analysis compulsory training and skill

upgradation of all extension functionaries will be ensured by conducting “

DACUM’ methodology. Using resources of all training institutes viz. BAMETI,

MANAGE and other centres of excellence a bank of trainer would be

developed for ATMA from among the BTT and District Core Team.

Human resources development is vital component for the success of any

projects for effective implementation of the projects as well as for its

sustainability all the stakeholders including extension functions of

agricultural and allied department, NGOs private extension workers, inputs

handling agencies are required to be trained various aspects relating to their

roles & responsibilities. Training would be centered on Group Dynamics,

record keeping, accountancy, financial management of savings and credit,

identification of group business activities, and on imparting technical skill to

under take value added ventures for the promotion of farmers integration

with Agri-business. Table 8.4 gives the strategies to institutionalize the HRD

component.

Sr No

Strategy Cadre of Participants

Topics of Trainings Name of the instt

for training

AGRICULTURE - Concept of Crop

diversification -Farming system approach - NR Management -Organizing farmers -INM/IPM/IDM/IWM ` -Marketing strategy

Officers Farmers -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-

Crop Diversification -FS- approach -Cons of natural resources ---------do------------- -Organizing farmers -Nutrient management -Marketing techniques & opportunities

SAU/ KVK/ICAR

--do-- --do--

--do-- --do-- --do—

--do--

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY - Improving local breed of

milch animals - Seasonal disease management in animals - Reducing mortality rate in animals & poultry - General health care

Officers Farmers -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-

-Breed improvement techniques - Disease management techniques -Methods of reducing mortality rate in animals & poultry

SAU/ KVK/IC

AR --do--

--do--

HORTICULTURE

- Crop diversification -Farming system approach -Marketing strategy -Raising of flower crops -Promoting apiculture -Organic cultivation of vegetables -NR Management -IPM/IDM/INM in vegetables -Mushroom Cultivation -Post harvest technology -Precision farming

Officers Farmers -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-

-Crop Diversification -FS- approach -Marketing techniques & opportunities - Floriculture techniques -Bee keeping techniques -Organic farming -Cons of Natural Resources -IPM techniques -Drip/Sprinkler -Polly house

SAU/ KVK/IC

AR --do--

--do--

--do--

--do-- --do--

--do--

FISHERIES - Promotion of fish

Production and productivity - Value addition in fish Production

Officers Farmers --do-- -do-

- Fish production techniques - Value production techniques

Fish Instt --do--

Promotion of NGOs’ and Private Organizations’

Strength of NGOs’ in mobilizing communities into farmer organization FOs’/

FIGs/Market Associations can be effectively utilized. As such NGOs’

complement the public extension effort in several centrally sponsored

programmes. Also extension services are contracted out and out-sourced to

NGOs’ at the block level. In such case the NGOs’ substitute for public

extension. ATMA funds will be utilized to support NGOs’. A systematic

training, capacity building and technical back stopping mechanism, would be

supported through ATMA funds to provide extension services.

There is a great demand particularly for medicinal and aromatic, fruit, and

flower plants in the district. To meet this enhanced demand a Resource

Centre-cum- Gene Bank is being proposed to be set up in collaboration with

NGO partners. This NGO has a very good track record in promoting these

enterprises.

The NGOs and the private sector have started to play a greater role in

extension in the last two decades. There is an increasing realization that

public extension by itself cannot meet the specific needs of various regions

and different classes of farmers and the draft Policy Framework for

Agricultural Extension of the Ministry of Agriculture also affirms that the

"policy environment will promote private and community driven extension to

operate competitively, in roles that complement, supplement, work in

partnerships and even substitute for public extension".

The Ministry of Agriculture has initiated a scheme "Agricultural Extension

through voluntary Organizations" in the year 1994-95 with a view to

integrate their efforts with those of the main extension system. NGOs can be

funded for documentation of farming systems at the micro level, audio-

visual preparation and procurement, training and demonstrations, farmers

visit to research stations, administrative support and contingencies.

NGOs may be encouraged to take up extension activities. NGOs may be

given grants for specific projects related to heifer development, vermi-

composting etc, using the services of NGOs for implementing a number of

programmes related to organic agriculture. A number of programmes for self

employment in compost making, mushroom production, poultry

development. Farmers' Organizations and NGOs may be assisted to provide

agricultural consultancy services to farmers.

Empowerment of Farmwomen and Ensuring SRM

Village based and institutional training, formation of farm women SHGs, and

demonstrations should be a part of women specific programmes. These

programmes have made impact in terms of improving access to information

on agricultural technology, adoption of new technology and gaining benefits

from their use. However the planning and implementation of these

programmes could be considerably improved. Efforts should be made to

mainstream gender in agricultural extension, whereby the General Extension

System is drawn into providing services specifically to women farmers.

Cafetaria of approaches for implementation of women in agriculture may be

executed. Efforts should be made to exBeeteld the women in agriculture

programme to more blocks.

Farmwomen contribute significantly to agriculture production, livestock

production and household food security in the district. Their skills can be

improved to reduce drudgery and to improve the quality of work through

need based training. Women farmers could be involved in the decision

making process in NRM. Entrepreneurship development can also be

introduced among them. They can be involved in special production activities

including post-production activities to avoid physical strain, labour, time and

to improve the quality of work and value. Formation of women groups in the

concept of SHG or FIG is also considered essential for farmwomen.

O. FARMERS ORGANIZATION

Farmers' Organizations and producers co-operatives provide a wide range of

extension support to farmers, but their presence is restricted to very few

crops/commodities and specific regions. Notable among them is the

COMFED. Extension services provided by dairy co-operatives is exemplary.

Group approach is the corner stone of the restructured extension

mechanism. A major component of extension services will be the

mobilization of the community into farmers group-FIG’s, FO’s and SHG’s.

Farmers’ Organization will be linked with Panchayat through existing

statutory institutional arrangements. FO’s will be supported directly through

public funds and will be involved in the planning; implementation,

monitoring and feedback of programme. FO’s at the village level would be

federated at higher levels. Representative of FO’s would be members of

decision making bodies such as ATMA’s Block-level Farmers’ Advisory

Committee (FAC), Commodity Associations (CO’s) . the ultimate aim is for

FO’s to internalize extension services for its members and provide backward

(inputs, credit, technology) and forward linkages (post-harvest facilities,

markets, value addition) in a vertically integrated arrangement. Under the

new dispensation there would be paradigm shift from top down blanket

dissemination of technological packages, towards providing producers with

the knowledge and understanding to solve their own location specific

problems. FIGs’ will first generate a demand for information, technology and

management techniques, the extensionist would tPoultry respond to group

demand rather than disseminating routine messages. A summary statement

of strategies under each group for specific agro-ecological situation is given

in Table below.

F Farmers organizations

SNo Critical gap AESs Organizing interest group on the basis of commodities for

input supply, processing, packing and marketing I & II

To providing I T Training to progressive Farmers organizations

I & II

To providing credit facilities to Farmers organizations for input management

I & II

Technical and managerial Assistance to Kisan Club and other farmers organization

I & II

Involving input supply agencies for providing technical Services on payment basis

I & II

Preference to FIGs for granting Licenses for input dealing I & II

SNo Existing Farmers Organization Proposed Farmers

Organization

Strategy

A Cooperative Milk A-Milk Producer A- Arranging User and

Farmers federation federation run by COMFED

producer negotiations for better return

B Fish Farmers Association

C- Organic Farmer Association

C- Appropriates outlets or sale points will be created for marketing of various commodities

C Association of Medicinal & Aromatic plant production

D- Vermi compost Producers Association

D- Suggesting exposure visits for various to these FO's Organization

P. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

Input comBeetelies, especially fertiliser firms organise several extension

activities. The number of private consultancy firms providing agricultural

consultancy to farmers is on an increase. Private extension initiatives by

agri-business comBeetelies have been exBeetelding in India. Notable among

them are the recent efforts by several agri-business comBeetelies, such as

Mahindra & Mahindra, Rallis and ITC. Mahindra and Rallis model provide an

integrated service ranging from information, field visits, quality inputs,

reliable access to output markets and non-exploitative and timely credit. It

also reveals the increasing willingness of farmers to pay for quality services

in agriculture. Only a few states have tried to partner with the private sector

in extension.

S.

No

.

Strategic issues Activities Strategies

1. Upgradation of soil

health

Collection of soil and

water samples

Training.

Awareness.

Soil testing labs

2. Capacity building of

farmer/extension

worker

Training/awareness

camps.

Promoting funds

and literature.

3. Popularization of Demonstration Organizing field

organic farming

technologies

days and training.

4. Creating awareness

about environment

and natural flora and

fauna.

Exposure visits.

Establishing

information centres

and processing unit

for value addition.

Provision of funds.

5. Marketing and value

addition of surplus

horticultural

commodities.

Establishing

information and

intelligence centres.

6. Women

empowerment

Formation of Interest

groups.

Awareness camps

exploring

marketing

opportunities.

7. Awareness about

nutritional and food

security

Formation of FIGs. Awareness camps

exploring

marketing

opportunities.

8. Seed production Motivate of farmers

for quality seed

production.

- Seed village

concept

Training

awareness.

Q. Strategies for Agroforestry

The potential benefits from the adoption of agroforestry are both

economic and environmental. Nevertheless, the adoption of

agroforestry into farming systems has been constrained. In addition to

technical impediments, there are impediments associated with

economic uncertainties, distorted markets, and lack of a farm forestry

culture in most rural communities and among some agricultural

advisers and forestry professionals.

1. The strategic objective of extension and advisory programs should be

to promote the growth of a culture of continuous learning about

agroforestry and related issues, so as to facilitate informed decision-

making and successful adoption of agroforestry.

2. Extension programs for agroforestry should have in-built evaluative

components relating to processes, outputs and outcomes, so as to

facilitate on-going improvement.

3. To facilitate both research and extension, there should be close

collaboration between researchers, extension agents and landholders

in the design, conduct and application of research on agroforestry.

4. To achieve maximum efficiency and effectiveness, a whole-of-

government approach should be developed for the design and

implementation of publicly funded extension programs. This approach

should also take account of the capacity of the private sector and non-

government organisations to provide extension and advisory services.

5. Extension and advisory strategies should take account of the diverse

capacities, experiences, resources and needs of landholders and other

people who are, or who could become, involved in agroforestry.

Extension program planners should specify the categories of people

being targeted in each program, and why.

6. Extension strategies for agroforestry should aim to strengtPoultry the

capacity of landholders to:

o deal appropriately with risks;

o play an active part in research and development;

o engage in regular exchange of information with fellow tree-

growers and experimenters;

o recognise the link between farm forestry and farm viability;

o know the potential of their property thoroughly;

o develop appropriate links with government and/or industry;

o contribute to long-term community benefits.

7. Case studies providing objective analysis of the economic,

environmental and social impact of agroforestry at whole farm level

should be used to inform landholders and other stakeholders of its

potential benefits. These case studies should include information on

outcomes under various scenarios, and on ways of managing risks.

Television, radio and the rural press

8. Television, radio and the press should each be used to raise awareness

of agroforestry. Information sheets and booklets

9. Well prepared publications, which are regionally specific, should be

used as a cost-effective way of making basic information on

agroforestry available to large numbers of people.

Specialised periodicals

The Internet

10. Research findings, government reports, and publications on technical

and economic aspects of agroforestry should routinely be made

available not only in printed form but also on appropriate World Wide

Web sites.

One-to-one advice or information exchange

11. Qualified, independent, one-to-one advisory services on agroforestry

should be available. Although some agencies are currently providing

personalised services without charge, the trend is toward the provision

of one-to-one advice either by private consultants or on a cost

recovery / fee for service basis.

12. In addition to events such as field days and Agroforestry Expo, there

should be an array of opportunities for formal or structured education

and training relevant to agroforestry, including the following:

Training programs covering relevant ‘hands on’ skills such

as those associated with site preparation (e.g. earth works,

ripping, mounding, fencing), silviculture (e.g. planting,

monitoring, pruning, thinning, pest control), harvesting (e.g.

tree selection, felling, transporting) and plant operation (e.g.

tree planters, cherry pickers, chainsaws, harvesters);

Group facilitation and empowerment

13. Participatory methodologies involving group facilitation and

empowerment should be major elements in publicly funded extension

programs for agroforestry.

Knowledge and skills required by extension agents

14. In the recruitment and on-going professional development of extension

agents, attention should be given to the need for competence in

technical and economic aspects of agroforestry and also for skills in

communication, teamwork and group facilitation, together with a good

understanding of adult learning principles, rural communities, and

program planning and evaluation.

R. Sustainability of the Project.

Generally, provision of extension service given by the government, state

agriculture university, non governmental organization and private

comBeetelies under one umbrella to avoid multiplicity and contradictory

messages reaching the farmers. Most of the projects do not sustain after the

project wPoultry the funds are withdrawn. Cost sharing by the farmers and

building a Revolving fund by ATMA will be ensured for project sustainability

after the fund flow is withdrawn. At least there are some willing farmers who

can pay for cost of inputs and services for building up such a revolving

funds.

Sustainability of Project and Extension System

S.No

.

Strategy / Intensification (Relevant to All AES)

Sustainability of Project

1 Realistic cost recovery for agro-services offered by ATMA.

2 Cost sharing by farmers on sustainable issues like soil and

water conservation and NRM.

3 Building up revolving fund by collecting cost for supply of

inputs like bio-fertilizer, planting material, AI, and soil

testing.

3 Opening Agri-clinics and providing consultancy on

payment.

Sustainability of Extension System

1.Linkages of extension services provided by Govt,/ RAU/

NGOs’ and Private comBeetelies to improve quality of

message and avoid multiplicity.

1 Identification of different extension agencies their activities

and area of operation.

2 Development of common understanding regarding

approach methodology and delivery of content.

3 Providing technical support wherever necessary

4 Arranging interface of these organization with farmers

Advisory Committees (FAC)

5 Developing final modalities and monitoring mechanism by

management committee and governing board of ATMA.

6 Arrangement of refresher courses for these agencies to

display latest technology.

2.Establishing of strong linkage between research

extension farmers and services providing agencies.

1 Finding out different operators in the field of research and

support services and their ongoing activities.

2 Finding out the demand of the farmers from above

agencies and existing gap if any.

3 Developing and establishing mutually agreed linkage

mechanism.

4 Development and operationalising monitoring and

evaluation mechanism.

5 Creating friendly atmosphere among research and

extension workers and farming community.

3.To involve farming community to decision making and

delivering mechanism in agriculture extension.

1 Studying the present process and level of the involvement

of the farming community.

2 Studying the status and activities of different farmers

organization working in agriculture extension.

3 Identity needs and mechanism of farmers representing at

various level through farmers organization based on

activities and commodities.

4 Developing and operating a mechanism for adequate

representation of women.

Development and operationalising monitoring mechanism.

4.Handling over the extension system of the farming

community in the long run so as to operate an extension

system.

1 Find out and study the farmers organizations engaged in

extension services.

2 Identifying farmers organization ready to take over the

responsibility of extension

Arranging exposure visits ,training ,technical and

managerial support.

3 Developing Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) for

sharing responsibility between farmers organization and

public extension system.

4 Developing a monitoring and evaluation mechanism.

5.Encouraging farmers to share the cost of critical

extension services and inputs to reduce the burden on

public extension.

1 Identifying the present system of sharing the cost of

services provided by various organizations.

2 Developing a mutually agreed mechanism of cost sharing

for extension services and critical inputs Separately for

commercial and non-commercial purposes.

6.To review and redesign ongoing research and

development programmes in tune with the farming

community.

1 Establishing the need of farming community in terms of

research extension and development.

2 Studying the ongoing research and development

programmes

3 Dovetailing ongoing development programmes with needs

of farmers.

4 Modify the component of ongoing programmes wherever

necessary.

7. Documentation of the process so as to replicate in future.

1 Finding out the activities and Areas of Excellence to be

documented for wider replication.

2 Identifying the success stories in different areas and

analyzing them.

3 Documentation the process so as to replicate the same.

4 Providing technical support wherever necessary.

8. Creation of a bank of resource persons for HRD and

Capacity building

1 Making inventory of available resource persons /experts

especially retired from different fields both locally and from

outside the district.

2 Orientation of the resource persons about NATP project

objectives.

2 Inviting them to register with ATMA ,Patna for future

assignments.

3 Modalities for honorarium to be worked jointly with BAMETI

and MANAGE.

Sustainability of Support Services

S.No

.

Strategy / Intensification (Relevant to All AES)

Sustainability of Support Services

1 Increase mobility of research and extension functionaries

towards effective implementation of the project

2 Assessing the need and finalizing norms and modalities for

mobility support to different level of functionaries and

motivating them for higher responsibility.

3 Improve performance of research and extension

functionaries by provision of operational facilities at

different levels.

4 Identification of area and type of required support at

various levels.

5 Providing support within the budget and within world Bank

procurement and reimbursement procedures.

Improvement in Management of System of Extension

There is multiplicity of technology transfer system with little

programme coordination.

There is also need for more farmers training visits and demonstration.

The present system of extension being narrow focus with more

emphasis on Crop Management Practices.

There is lack of farmer forms on feedback in influenced Research and

extension priorities.

Week research – extension – linkage and lack of integration across

crops and livestock system.

Poor communication capacity.

Flow of information from research to extension top down rather than a

two way interactive communication process

Inadequate financial support to meet out operational expenses

Lack of incentive and knowledge to create working conditions in the

organization / institution level as well as at farmer or community level

R. Dovetailing Ongoing Schemes through ATMA

Dovetailing Ongoing Schemes Through ATMA

Strategy /Intervention Department Dovetailing of

Ongoing

Schemes

1. Empowering ATMA to

seek additional funds from

different ongoing Govt.

schemes.

a. District Rural

Development Agency

(DRDA)

b. Cooperative

Department

c. NABARD

d. Industries

Department

e. Fisheries

Department

g. COMFED

- Watershed

Management

Scheme.

- Swarna Jayanti

Gram Swarojgar

Yojana (SGSY)-

NAREGA

- Gramin Awas

Yojana

-Million Shallow

Tube well

Programme

ICDP

NPRI

2.Involving Block

Technical team(BTT) in

planning and

implementation of all

ongoing schemes.

a. Identification of

components of

different schemes to

different blocks.

b. Request by ATMA

for placement of funds

with BTT for

implementation of

schemes.

3.Increasing the efficiency

of extension workers by

providing mobility support.

a. Providing loan for

purchase of two-

wheelers by Govt. on

priority basis to BTT

members.

b. Provision for

convergence allowance

to field functionaries

by ATMA.

Integration of Govt., Public, Private and NGO’s sector programs

while making them farmer driven.

4. All development

programmes to be

reviewed for provision of

extension support while

preparing Annual/Seasonal

action plans.

ATMA and other line

departments

ATMA

Management

Committee and

ATMA Governing

Board to ensure.

5. Orientation of all non-

government organization,

private and public sector

units to NATP concept and

approach.

ATMA and other line

departments

ATMA

Management

Committee and

ATMA Governing

Board to ensure.

CHAPTER - VII

PROPOSED RESEARCH STRATEGIES

Summary statement of proposed research strategies under different AES in

District

Farmers participatory on farm research (SHORT TERM)

SNo Participatory Research Issues Relevance to AES

AGRICULTURE AES-I

AES-

II AES-III

PADDY

Non-Availability of labour for paddy

transplanting /

Mechanical transplanting

Direct seeding of paddy crop

Management of immerging deficiency of

Zinc/Sulfur /Boreal

Management of increasing incidence of sheath

blight/BLB/Blast/BPH through IPM

Reducing cost of cultivation

Poor adoption of Boro /Summer Rice Cultivation

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Developing / Selecting Submergence Tolerant

Rice Verities

Validation of Existing/emerging hybrid rice

Y

Y

Y

SUGARCANE

INM in Sugarcane

Intercropping in Sugarcane

IPM in Sugarcane

Management of Ratoon crop

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

PULSE

Unsynchronized maturity of pulse Crops (Moong,

Arhar, Urd)

Effective control of YVM (Yellow Vain Mosaic) -

Assessment of resistant Varieties

Control of Cuscuta on Pulses (Lentil &Gram)

Validation / Refinement of Farmers Technology

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

for Early production of Gram (Hara Chana)

WHEAT

Identification of suitable high yielding, heat

tolerant

varieties

Water management of wheat crop

Nutrient Management of wheat crop

Weed management in wheat crop

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

SUNFLOWER

Identification of suitable high yielding Hybrids of

Sun Flower

Nutrient management in sunflower

Management of insects, pest & Buds in

sunflower

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

HORTICULUTRE

POTATO

Identification of disease resistant high yielding

varieties

Study on low cost storage structures

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

CAPSICUM

Identification of disease resistant high yielding

varieties

Study on low cost drier of red chilies

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

TOMATO

Identification of high yielding Hybrids

N

Y

CUCURBITS

Raising of nursery in low cost poly-tunnel

Y

Y

PEA

Identification of high yielding disease resistant

Varieties of pea

Study on different sowing method of pea crop

Y

Y

Y

Y

SPICES

Identification / validation of Cultivating high

yielding varieties of Specifics spices

Y

Y

Modern techniques of spices Cultivation Y Y

MANGO

Management of pest and diseases Y Y

LITCHI

Evolution of fruit variety suitable for long

duration local storing condition

Y Y

BANANA

Standardization of Tissue culture technique Y Y

GUAVA

Identification of new wilt resistant Guava

Hybrids/Varieties

Y Y

MAKHANA

Improved Harvesting/ Post-

harvesting/Processing technology

Y Y

OTHERS

Trial on Micro irrigation system in fruit crops

Intercropping in orchards / Vegetables

Techniques of Value addition / Processing of

Different fruits & Vegetable at Farm level

Standardization of organic farming techniques

for different crops

Validation of farmers Production practices for

aromatics & medicinal plants

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

FLOWER

Identification of Specific flower varieties suitable

to local conditions

Y

Y

MUSHROOM

Identification of different species for summer

and rainy seasons

Replacement of wheat straw by paddy straw for

Y

Y

compost preparation for white button mushroom Y Y

BEE KEEPING

Management of mites/wax moth Y Y

ANIMAL HUSBANDARY

Identification & Management of Location specific

minerals in milch animals

Control of Endoparasites & Ectoparasites

Developing suitable cropping system/crop

rotation for green fodder availability round the

year

Validation & refinement of recommendation of

balance feeding of milch animals/ Poultry

Identification of Area specifics Metabolic

diseases & their control

Identification & Treatment of Gynecological

Disorders in Milch animal

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

LONG TERM RESEARCHABLE ISSUES

1. Identification of high yielding rice hybrids in Basmati and Non-Basmati

groups

2. Identification of high yielding pest resistant hybrids of vegetables

3. Developing suitable cropping system/crop rotation for green fodder

availability round the year

4. Recharging of depleting underground water table

5. Resource conservation technology

6. Integrated Weed management in wheat

7. Development of sunflower hybrids

8. Breed Improvement programme of Livestocks

9. To develop value added low cost Animals feeds

10. Identification & Validation, Documentation of Indigenous Technological

Knowledge in AH Sector

Identification of Poplar strains well suited to local condition .

Chapter VIII

Activity Schedule of Extension Strategy

Proposed extension

strategies

Proposed extension

activities

Relevance to AES

AGRICULTURE

PADDY

Encouraging use of

recommended seed rate

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Promoting timely

transplanting as per

package of practices

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit

Print Material

Encouraging seed

treatment

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Popularizing the concept

of maintaining optimum

plant population

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit

Field day

Encouraging balanced

dose of fertilizers as per


Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promotion of

recommended doses of

N Fertilizer

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Encouraging controlled

irrigation through

bunding of fields

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularization of

Integrated Pest and

Disease Management

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Popularizing cultivation

of superfine varieties of

higher income

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit

Field day

Promoting the concept

of judicious use of

irrigation water

Demonstration

Training (IS)

Exp Visit(IS)

Print Material

Encouraging use of

recommended hybrid

cultivars of Paddy as

well as hybrid paddy

seed production

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting quality seed

production through FIGs

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Motivating farmers for

cultivating short

duration & drought

tolerant variety

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


of suitable varieties for

different situation

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


adopting System of Rice

Intensification (SRI)

technology

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


the cultivation of BORO

rice

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

WHEAT

Encouraging seed

treatment

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Use of ZTD, use of

suitable varieties for

delayed sowing

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing sowing by

seed cum fertilizer drill

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Encouraging balanced

dose of fertilizers as per


Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing seed cum

fertilizer drill

Demonstration

Training

Popularizing

recommended dose of

weedicides as per

package of practice

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting application of

PSB, Azotobactor, Green

manuring & FYM

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit (IS)

Field day

Print Material

Creating awareness

about storage of grain

below 0% moisture

level

Training

Print Material

Promotion fumigation of

stored grains in specific

metallic bins & Pakka

storage structures

Training

Print Material

Motivating farmers

regarding Use of

Resource Conservation

Technology (RCT)Such

as Zero tillage, FIRBS &

Laser Land leveling

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

SUGARCANE Popularizing use of Demonstration

recommended varieties Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Promotion of

recommended seed

treatment practices

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Popularizing application

of FYM/Vermi compost

/press mud as per

recommendation

Demonstration

Training (IS)

Exp Visit(IS)

Field day

Print Material

Creating awareness’

about recommended

doses of fertilizers

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit(WS)

Print Material

Promotion of IPM

technology

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit(WS)

Print Material

SUNFLOWER

Popularizing high

yielding Variety /

hybrids

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Popularizing IPM Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

MAIZE

Popularizing IPM Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit(WS)

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing INM

practices

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Popularizing of IPM Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Popularizing optimum

plant population

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Popularizing IWM

(integrated Weed

Management)Including

chemical weed control

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularization of QPM

(Quality Protein Maize)

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing

intercropping in maize

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

PULSES

Popularizing

recommended dose of

Demonstration

Training (IS)

fertilizer Exp Visit (IS)


of rhizobium and PSB

culture

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Popularizing integrated

pest and disease

management

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Popularization of

improve verity

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


raising pulse crop in rice

fallow area

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Motivating farmers to

adopt proper drainage

technique

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Oil Seeds

Popularizing

recommended dose of

fertilizer

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


of rhizobium and PSB

Demonstration

Training

culture Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing integrated

pest and disease

management

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularization of

improve verity

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Motivating farmers

regarding using apiary

boxes in mustard fields

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

JUTE

Increasing farmer for

adoption of package of

Practices

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing IPM / IDM Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing Post-

Harvest technology

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting the Group

formation for better

marketing

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

HORTICULTURE

Fruit Vegetable-

Tomato, Bringer, okra,

chilies, etc.

Increasing adoption of

recommended seed

treatment methods

Demonstration

Training

Promoting balance use

of fertilizers as per soil

test report

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Increasing application of

recommended

micronutrients as soil

application & foliar

spray

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting adoption of

IPM & IDM

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing resistant

varieties/ hybrids

against various odds

during cultivation

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Cole crops-

Cauliflower, Cabbage,

Broccolis, Knol khol

Increasing adoption of

recommended seed

treatment methods

Demonstration

Training

Promoting balance use

of fertilizers as per soil

test report

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Increasing application of

recommended

micronutrients as soil

application & foliar

spray

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material


IPM & IDM

Training

Exp Visit


varieties/ hybrids

against various odds

during cultivation

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting seed

production of improved

varieties

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Cucurbits- Gourds &

Melons

encouraging seed Demonstration

production technology

of cucurbits

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Popularization of diara

land cultivation

technology for cucurbits

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing adoption of

IPM & IDM

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Application of

recommended Micro

nutrients

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Creating awareness

about use of quality

seed for obtaining

higher production/

income

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


IPM & IDM

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Application of

recommended

weedicides and its

doses

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Peas & Beans

Persuading farmers to

adopt recommended

seed treatment methods

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material


IPM & IDM

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Creating awareness

about use of quality

seed for obtaining

higher production/

income

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


POP for obtaining higher

yield as well as income

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Root Veg.-Radish,

Carrot, Sugar beat, etc.

Identification of high

yielding varieties

Demonstration

Training


IPM & IDM

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing IWM Demonstration

(integrated Weed



Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Bulb crops-. Onion &

Garlic


yielding varieties

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


production

Training (IS)

Exp Visit (IS)


IPM & IDM

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing IWM

(integrated Weed



Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


production


yielding varieties

MANGO

Popularizing regular

bearing cultivars/

Hybrid

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit (IS)

Print Material

Promoting basal dose of

manure and fertilizers

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Promoting

recommended plant

protection measures

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material


varieties and adoption

of cultural practices

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Popularizing balance

fertilizers,

micronutrients and

timely plant protection

measures

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Rejuvenation

/replacement of aged

trees

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


use of post harvest

technology

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Litchi

Promoting INM Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting IPM Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Rejuvenation

/replacement of aged

trees

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting use of post

harvest technology

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Banana

Popularizing use of

recommended dose of

fertilizer.

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Promoting timely pest &

Diseases control

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Promoting production of

quality planting material

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit (IS)

Print Material

Guava


of improved varieties for

higher yield & Income

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Creating awareness

about management of

pest & Disease

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


quality planting material

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


of Rejuvenating

orchards for getting

higher yield.

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Papaya

Popularizing use of

recommended dose of

fertilizer.

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


Diseases Management

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


quality seed/ planting

material

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Motivating Farmers to

adopt lines of

gynomonocious /

gynoecious varieties

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Flowers-Marigold,

Roses & Tuberose

Popularizing concept of

Nursery Management

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Motivating farmers

towards using organic

manures

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Creating Awareness

regarding timely

irrigation in flower crops

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting post harvest

technology

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

MAKHANA

Motivating farmer to

adopt production

technology

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Formation of MAKHANA

producer’s group for

establishing better

marketing linkage

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing post-

harvest technology of

MAKHANA

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

BETEL VINE

Popularizing concept of

Nursery Management

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


Diseases control

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material


quality planting

material

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Medicinal & Aromatic

Plants cultivation and

processing

Capacity building of

farmers about

cultivation practices of

aromatic plants

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting

multiplication of pure

planting material by

raising nursery

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Popularizing

cultivation of aromatic

plants

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting Post

Harvest Technology

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

Promoting CIG/FIG for

marketing linkage

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Field day

Print Material

ANIMAL HUSBADARY

COW

ARTIFICIAL

INSEMINATION

Providing awareness

about AI with audio –

visual aids

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

E-Package

Providing refresher

trainings to technical

persons

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Conducting fertility

improvement camps

Exhibition/

KishanMela/Show

Organizing Calf rallies Award

Exp Visit

Print Material

Imparting Training to

Paravets

Training

FODDER

Providing awareness

about animal production

capacity, its

requirements and dairy

economics

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Literature

Field Day

Intensify the supply of

good quality fodder

seeds and root slips ie

Lucerne, Rhodes,

Signal, Green panic and

Azola

Demonstration

Training (WS)

Exp Visit

Print Material

Growing green fodder Demonstration

crops to ensure

availability round the

year

Training

Print Material

Promoting of urea

molasses mineral blocks

to meet fodder

requirement in case of

emergency (draught &

Flood)

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

MINERALS AND

VITAMINS

Intensify the awareness’

programmes about

importance of feeding

minerals & vitamins

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

E-Package

Holding infertility

management camps

Training & Exhibition

Exp Visit

Print Material

INTERCALVING

PERIOD

Intensify the awareness

programme about “a

calf a year”

Training

Print Material

E-Package

Removing reproductive

problems through AH

camps

Demonstration/Exhibition

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

HEALTH CARE

a) Intensify the

awareness programme

about animal health,

hygiene & Vaccination

Trainings

Exposure visit

Demonstration

Print Material

through trainings and

field visits

E-Package


Intensify the conduction

of animal health camps

Trainings

Demonstration

Print Material


Intensify the conduction

of mass deworming and

external parasites

control programmes

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Capacity Building of

Technical staff of

disease diagnostic labs

at block level hospitals

Trainings

Print Material

GENERAL

MANAGEMENT

Intensify the awareness

programmes about

animal management

through training and

field visits

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

FIG

Showing of Audio Visual

Aids of good managed

animal farms

Training

Exp Visit

E-Package

MILK YIELD

Awareness about

Improved dairy

management and

economics ie all the

above mentioned

activities

Exp visit (IS)

Print Material

Training

Demonstration

BUFFALO

BREED

UPGRADATION

Providing awareness

programmes through

training and field visits

Training

Exp Visit (IS)

Print Material

Providing refreshment

training to technical

persons

Training

Exp Visit (IS)

Conducting fertility

improvement camps

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Exhibition/ Show

Holding of Calf rallies Award

Print Material

FEED MANAGEMENT

Providing awareness

programmes about the

feed and fodder

requirement of the

animal

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

E-Package


fodder seeds

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

INTERCALVING

PERIOD

Conducting awareness

programmes about

breeding through


Training

Print Material

Field Day

Exposure Visit

HEALTH CARE

Providing the awareness

about importance of

deworming

Training

Print Material

E-Package

Conducting deworming

camps

Demonstration

Exhibition

GOAT/SHEEP

BREED

IMPROVEMENT

Providing awareness

programmes through


Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

E-Package

Intensify the availability

of technical persons

Training

Exp Visit

Providing refresher


persons

Training

Print Material

To provide improve

Buck suitable for the

area

Demonstration

FEED MANAGEMENT

Providing awareness

programmes about the

feed and fodder

requirement for the

goat

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

E-Package

Exposure Visit


fodder / multy purpose

trees seeds

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

E-Package

Exposure Visit

HEALTH CARE

Providing the awareness

about importance of

deworming & Health

Care

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

E-Package

Conducting deworming

camps

Demonstration

Print Material

POULTRY/ QUAIL

BROILERS FARMING

Providing awareness

about Improved broilers

Farming for income

generation

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

E-Package

Providing trainings to

Farmers/ technical

persons

Training

Exp Visit

Providing refresher


persons

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Provide the market

linkage

CIG/FIG

Capacity Building/ Seed

money

Promotion of backyard

farming system

Training

Demonstration

PIGGERY

PIGGERY FARMING

Providing awareness

about Improved breeds,

Feeding, Health care &

Vaccination etc

Training

Demonstration

Exp Visit

Print Material

E-Package

Providing trainings to

Pig Farmers/ technical

persons

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

E-Package

Provide the market

linkage

CIG/FIG

Capacity Building/ Seed

money

FISH PRODUCTION

SYSTEM:

Creating awareness

about physico- chemical

Parameters

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Promoting proper

stocking measures

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Creating awareness

about composite fish

farming

Demonstration

Training

Print Material

Promotion of scientific

feeding

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Exploiting the potential

of fish farming in water

storage village ponds

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Promoting marketing of

fish through organized

sectors/CIG

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Creating awareness

about storing fish in

Training

Exp Visit

cold storages and

processing of fishes

Encouraging private

entrepreneurs to setup

fish seed hatcheries

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Diversification from

monoculture to poly

culture or composite

culture

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Introduction and

Intensification of fresh

water prawn culture

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material


of renovating the fish

ponds

Demonstration

Training

Exp Visit

Print Material

Chapter IX

Activity Schedule of Research Strategy

Proposed research

strategies

Proposed research

activities

Relevance to AES

AGRICULTURE

PADDY

Non-Availability of labour

for paddy transplanting

Mechanical transplanting

Front Line Demonstration

Direct seeding of paddy

crop

On Farm Trials

Management of

immerging deficiency of

Zinc


Management of increasing

incidence of sheath blight

through IPM

On Farm Trials

SUGARCANE

Late planting of

Sugarcane

On Farm Trials

Intercropping in

Sugarcane

On Farm Trials

IPM in Sugarcane On Farm Trials

MOONG

Identification of short

duration varieties in rice-

wheat system


WHEAT

Identification of suitable

high yielding, heat tolerant


varieties

Water management in

wheat crop

On Farm Trials

Nutrient Management in

wheat crop

On Farm Trials

Weed management in

wheat crop


GRAM


gram variety under

irrigated conditions


BARSEEM


variety of Barseem

On Farm Trials

SUNFLOWER


high yielding Hybrids of

Sun Flower


Nutrient management in

sunflower

On Farm Trials

Management of heliothis

in sunflower

On Farm Trials

HORTICULUTRE

POTATO

Identification of disease

resistant high yielding

varieties


Study on low cost storage

structures

Farmers Scientists

Interaction

CAPSICUM

Identification of disease On Farm Trials


varieties

Study on low cost drier of

red chilies

Farmers Scientist

Interaction

TOMATO

Identification of pest


varieties/

Hybrids

On Farm Trials

CUCURBITS

Raising of nursery in low

cost poly-tunnel


PEA


yielding

disease resistant varieties

of

Pea

On Farm Trials

Study on different sowing

method of pea crop

On Farm Trials

AJWAIN


yielding Varieties of Ajwain

On Farm Trials

Modern techniques of

Ajwain Cultivation

On Farm Trials

Assured Market Farmers scientist

interaction

MANGO

Management of pest and On Farm Trials

diseases

CHIKU ( SAPOTA )

Introduction and

propagation of chiku

plantation

On Farm Trials

GUAVA

Identification of new wilt

resistant Guava

Hybrids/Varieties

On Farm Trials

OTHERS

Trial on Micro irrigation

system in fruit crops

On Farm Trials

Intercropping in orchards On Farm Trials

MARIGOLD


varieties

On Farm Trials

MUSHROOM

Identification of different

species for summer and

rainy seasons

On Farm Trials

Replacement of wheat

straw by

paddy straw for compost

preparation for white

button

mushroom


BEE KEEPING

Management of mites/wax

moth


ANIMAL HUSBANDARY

Deficiency of minerals in

milch animals

On Farm Trials

Problem of Endoparasites

& Ectoparasites

On Farm Trials

Developing suitable

cropping system/crop

rotation for green fodder

availability round the year


LONG TERM

RESEARCHABLE ISSUES


yielding rice hybrids in

Basmati and Non-Basmati

groups

On Farm Trials


yielding pest resistant

hybrids of vegetables

On Farm Trials

Recharging of depleting

underground water table

On Farm Trials

Resource conservation

technology

On Farm Trials

Weed management in

wheat


Development of sunflower

hybrids

On Farm Trials

Identification of strains in

Poplar

On Farm Trials

Chapter-X BASE LINE DATA & VISION BASE LINE DATA IN RESPECT OF INTERVENTION LIKELY TO BE CARRIED OUT AGRICULTURE Commodity

Base line data Achievement by the end of project period

Intervention Area in ha.

Productivity Kgs./bales/ha.

Area in ha.

Productivity Kgs./bales/ha

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY FISHERIES MARKETING VALUE ADDITION & POST HARVEST MANAGEMENT.

STRATEGIC RESEARCH AND EXTENSION PLAN OF ...oriented, multidisciplinary in system, envisaging bottom...

Documents

Transcript of STRATEGIC RESEARCH AND EXTENSION PLAN OF ...oriented, multidisciplinary in system, envisaging bottom...