Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany...
-
Upload
jessie-poole -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany...
Status Report
particle identification with the RICH detector
Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany
• general overview
• focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle resolution
• Boris Polichtchouk: results from simulation
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
particle identification with RICH
• ring finding
ring finder: Hough Transform, Elastic Net to be implemented in framework
→ efficiencies ...
• determination of center and radius of ring/ Cherenkov angle
• matching of rings with tracks
→ tracking (momentum and position resolution), information from other detectors
• pid by combining ring radius and momentum information
detailed knowledge of resolution necessary!
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
main contribution !
ring radius resolution
N2 radiatorCherenkov angle/ ring radius resolution limited by:
• multiple scattering
• magnetic stray field in RICH
• emission point: particle trajectories do not pass through the center of curvature of the mirror smeared projection in dependence on (,)
• mirror surface: enlargement of focal spot in focal plane due to a deviation of the mirror surface from the ideal spherical curvature
• pixel size: resolution limited due to finite granularity of photodetector
• chromatic dispersion
investigate single rings!
resolution for overlapping rings different!
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
single photon – ring resolution
NR
σσ =• distinguish between Cherenkov angle resolution for single photons σ
and the resolution for a ring σR consisting of N measured photons
• table 1 from RICH-TDR of LHCb:
• aim at doing a similar study
2% of cmax
σsingle = 2.5mrad
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
multiple scattering
pp
ms
σσ =momentum dependent error of form
with 0
6.133
2
X
LMeVp =σ
[T. Ypsilantis, J.Seguinot, NIM A343 (1994) 30,
P. Glaessel, NIM A 433 (1999) 17]
typical value for a N2 radiator of 1m and p=1GeV: mradms
9.0=σ
→ mradms
4.1=σ for 2.5 m N2
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
magnetic stray field
pp
B
σσ =
Bp LBTm
GeV φπ
σ sin123.02
⋅=
momentum dependent error of form
with
o90=Bφ
being the particle angle relative to the magnetic field direction
Bφ
→ ⊥⋅= LBTm
GeVp
12
3.02
πσ
[T. Ypsilantis, J.Seguinot, NIM A343 (1994) 30,
P. Glaessel, NIM A 433 (1999) 17]
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
magnetic stray field (II)
gaussian shaped field asymmetric field
RICH front wall z=170cm
→ magnetic stray field (By) of order 10mT
length L=2.5m at maximum
z [cm] z [cm]
By
[T]
By
[T]
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
magnetic stray field (III)
pp
B
σσ =
Bp LBTm
GeV φπ
σ sin123.02
⋅=
momentum dependent error of form
with
o90=Bφ
being the particle angle relative to the magnetic field direction
Bφ
→ ⊥⋅= LBTm
GeVp
12
3.02
πσ
L2.5m, B=10mT GeVp 001.0≤σ→
p=1GeV → mradB1≤σ
[T. Ypsilantis, J.Seguinot, NIM A343 (1994) 30,
P. Glaessel, NIM A 433 (1999) 17]
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
emission point
rings() - polar angle, azimuth angle
• no diffusion at reflection
• no magnetic field, no multiple scattering
to do:
• quantify and correct for distortions at large
• improve focussing/ position of focal plane
• correct for remaining distortions
= 80o 60o 40o
20o
= 5o
10o 15o
20o 25o
30o 35o
one quarter of mirror/ photodetector:
→ restrict investigation of resolution to "good" area in central region and wait for optimized setup
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
mirror surface
Be-mirror prototype:
• optical surface roughness σh = 1.6nm (after glass polishing, Al covering and SiO2 coating)→ diffuse reflection of only 12% of total for = 150nm
• image diameter of a point source D0 = 0.4mm (contains 95% of reflected light)
→ angular deviation from nominal curvature σR = 0.03mrad
resulting radius resolution to be determined
Ph.D. thesis of G. Hering (2002), CERES:
ring center resolution of same order as local mirror deviation
→ σ < 0.1mrad
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
pixel size
• finite granularity of photodetector restricts resolution
• simple estimate can be made from comparing padsize d and ring radius R / Cherenkov angle
→ Boris Polichtchouk
cmd
3.02
==σ
mradL
d
L
R
L
dR
3.12
2tan~
tan ==−+
=−= σ
d=0.6cm padsize
R=5.5cm ring radius
L=225cm radiator length
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
chromatic dispersion
[nm] [mrad]
600 24.42200 26.15150 28100 36.75
• strong increase of n() in UV region
NR
σσ =
• however, dN/d also increases in UV region andN2:
→ Boris Polichtchouk
[Landolt Boernstein Series, 6th Edition, volume II/8
Ph.D. thesis of Annick Bideau-Mehu (1982)]
N2
4mrad
σ~2mrad
(~0.4cm)
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
total resolution (I)
• multiple scattering σ ~ 1 mrad (p=1 GeV)
• magnetic stray field σ < 1 mrad (p=1 GeV)
• emission point σ small because of corrections, optimization
• angular deviation of mirror σ < 0.1 mrad
• chromatic dispersion σ > 1 mrad (strongly dependent on min)
• pixel size σ ~ 1-2 mrad
couple of mrad contributions, independent errors
mradmrad
N
padBms
R
7.0...36.030...10
5...4
...2222
==
++++=
σσσσσ
c=24.4 mrad
σ ~2-3% of c
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
total resolution (II)
gaussian distributed Cherenkov angles/ radii
→ calculate separation power for e and π in terms of σ for different σ
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
ring – track matching
• matching: combine track and ring with closest distance
• ~ 2/3 of all rings from secondary interactions, very often not reconstructed
• difficulty due to high particle mutiplicities match ring to track (e.g. π) which is nearby
R
additional source for π-misidentification
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
pid versus R
1% momentum resolution1.3 mrad resolution in azimuth angle0.8 mrad resolution in deep angle200 m position resolution in mirror
• ideal tracking: with of R –distribution due to method for ring center determination
• finite tracking: distribution widened
• cut on R important for efficiency and purity!
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
efficiency, misidentification
efficiency of e-identification in dependence on a cut on R
R = 0.8cm: > 95%
ideal trackingfinite resolution
ideal trackingfinite resolution
π- misidentification in dependence on a cut in R
35 AGeV: 827 π / event
0.3/827 = 410-4 π-misid. (R = 0.8 cm)
= 610-4 π-misid. (60% acc.)
Claudia Höhne CBM collaboration meeting 9.-12.03. 2005
summary/ outlook
particle identification with the RICH detector
• aim: momentum dependent pid efficiency and purity
• efficiency: ring finders to come
• purity: started with detailed analysis of ring radius resolution
for σ=3% of c we have 3σ separation between e and π at 13.5 GeV/c
impact on detector layout: granularity of photodetector
maximum wavelength range for photodetection
• purity: extend tracking algorithms for extrapolation of tracks to photodetector plane
combine with information from other detectors