Stability improvement of porous silicon surface structures by grafting polydimethylsiloxane polymer...
Click here to load reader
Transcript of Stability improvement of porous silicon surface structures by grafting polydimethylsiloxane polymer...
![Page 1: Stability improvement of porous silicon surface structures by grafting polydimethylsiloxane polymer monolayers](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100510/575020851a28ab877e9b2cce/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
www.elsevier.com/locate/tsf
Thin Solid Films 474
Stability improvement of porous silicon surface structures by grafting
polydimethylsiloxane polymer monolayers
Bing Xia, Shou-Jun Xiao*, Jing Wang, Dong-Jie Guo
State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, PR China
Received 5 July 2004; received in revised form 20 August 2004; accepted 26 August 2004
Abstract
Organic silicone, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), was covalently grafted onto the porous silicon (PS) surface to improve its stability to
oxidation. Transmission Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), photoluminescence (PL) and interferometric reflectance spectra have been
recorded to evaluate the surface modification and the passivation effect. After modification, the porous nanostructure retained, the stability
against oxidation was significantly improved and the PL still kept.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Porous silicon; Polydimethylsiloxane; Nanostructure; Photoluminescence
1. Introduction
Much attention has been attracted in the field of porous
silicon (PS) for its diverse applications in bio- and
chemical sensing [1–3]. Unique properties for theses
applications include the significantly increased surface
interaction area, simplicity and repeatability of fabrication,
and compatibility with the well-established silicon micro-
fabrication technology. But the major barrier preventing
commercial applications of PS is the instability of its
native interface with a metastable Si–Hx termination. The
metastable hydrosilicon can undergo spontaneous oxida-
tion in ambient atmosphere and results in the degradation
of surface structures. Therefore, surface passivation is
crucial for the technological success of this material. Many
organic molecules such as alkenes or alkynes had been
covalently grafted onto the PS surface by wet chemical
approaches to passivate its surface [4,5]. Recently, polymer
films, instead of hydrocarbon monomer monolayers, on PS
are of special interest because they provide a strong
0040-6090/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.121
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 25 83595706; fax: +86 25
83314502.
E-mail address: [email protected] (S.-J. Xiao).
armature to protect the surface nanostructure. To our
knowledge, the well-known and successful product of
hydrosilylation is polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) by the
reaction of hydrosilicone with vinyl silicone. With this in
mind, we grafted the vinyl silicone on porous silicon
surfaces. The grafted PDMS was characterized with the
transmission Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
(FTIR) and the contact angle goniometer. The retention
of the surface nanostructure is characterized by an
interferometric reflectance spectrometer. The stability and
photoluminescence (PL) of PS were tested under stringent
conditions to present the advantage of using PDMS for
preventing PS from oxidation and degradation.
2. Experimental
Silicon wafers were purchased from Huajing Micro-
electronics (China). Sylgard 184 Silicone Elastomer Base
(B) was purchased from Dow Corning (USA). Single side
polished (100) oriented p-type silicon wafers (7.3–9.0 V
cm resistivity) were cleaned in 3:1 (v/v) concentrated
H2SO4/30% H2O2 for 30 min at room temperature and
then rinsed copiously with deionized water (resistance N18
MV cm). The cleaned wafers were immersed in 40%
(2005) 306–309
![Page 2: Stability improvement of porous silicon surface structures by grafting polydimethylsiloxane polymer monolayers](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100510/575020851a28ab877e9b2cce/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Fig. 1. Transmission FTIR spectra for PS (a) freshly hydride-terminated
samples and (b) grafted with PDMS.
B. Xia et al. / Thin Solid Films 474 (2005) 306–309 307
aqueous HF solution for 1 min at room temperature to
remove the native oxide. The hydrogen-terminated surfaces
were electrochemically etched in a 1:1 (v/v) pure ethanol
and 40% aqueous HF for 30 min at a current density of 6
mA/cm2. After etching, the samples were rinsed with pure
ethanol and dried under a stream of dry nitrogen prior to
use. The freshly prepared PS surface (1.54 cm2) was
covered with 20 Al a vinyl-PDMS (Sylgard184 B) and
incubated in an oven at 80 8C for 2 h. The excess of
unreacted and physisorbed reagent was rinsed three times
with toluene at room temperature and dried under a stream
of dry N2.
Transmission FTIR spectra were recorded using a Bruker
IFS66/S spectrometer at 0.25 cm�1 resolution. Typically, 128
interferograms were acquired per spectrum. The samples
were mounted in a purged sample chamber. Background
spectra (except those for alkaline solution measurements)
were obtained using a flat untreated Si(100) wafer.
Contact angle measurements of the hydride-terminated
and PDMS-grafted surfaces with deionized water were
carried in air by the sessile-drop method with a contact
angle goniometry (Rame-Hart, USA). Readings were taken
after the angles were observed to be stable with time.
Reported data are an average of the readings taken at three
different spots for each sample.
Interferometric reflectance spectra of PS were recorded by
using an HR2000CG-UV-MR spectrometer (Ocean Optics,
USA) fitted with a bifurcated fiber optic probe. A Xe light
source was focused onto the center of a porous silicon
surface with a spot size of approximately 1–2 mm. Spectra
were recorded with a charge-coupled-device detector in the
wavelength range 400–1000 nm. The illumination of the
surface as well as the detection of the reflected light was
performed along an axis coincident with the surface normal.
The optical thickness of the porous silicon was determined
by Eq. (1) [6].
nd ¼ Dkk1k22 k1 � k2ð Þ ð1Þ
where n is the average refractive index of the porous silicon
film, d the film thickness, k1 and k2 the wavelengths of twoadjacent minima or maxima, respectively, and for two
adjacent minima or maxima the difference in order (Dk) is
1.0.
All of the PL spectra were measured at room temperature
in air by a SLM 4800 DSCF/AB2 fluorescence photo-
spectrometer (SLM, USA) using 450-W Xe laser, excited by
a 366-nm line.
A Si(100) wafer and a modified PS sample were put into
the boiling 0.01 M NaOH aqueous solution. The FTIR
spectra of the modified PS samples were recorded after 0,
5,10, 20, 40, 60 and 120 min treatment in the base solution
and thorough washing with water. Background spectra were
obtained by using a flat Si(100) wafer by the same treatment
with the base solution.
3. Results
The grafting of PDMS on the PS surface is confirmed by
the transmission FTIR. The spectrum of the freshly prepared
PS (Fig. 1) is similar to that reported by Buriak [4]. The
spectrum of a freshly hydride-terminated PS (Fig. 1a)
exhibits a typical tripartite band for Si–Hx (x=1–3) stretch-
ing modes (2087 cm�1 for tSi–H, 2114 cm�1 for tSi–H2and
2138 cm�1 for tSi–H3). The Si–Hx bending modes are
observed at 916, 669 and 630 cm�1. Fig. 1b is the spectrum
of PDMS-grafted PS. In the spectra, vibrations of CH3 in
PDMS are characterized by the aliphatic tC–H stretching
modes at 2961 cm�1 and deformation modes at 1440 cm�1.
The absorption peaks at 1260 cm�1 is attributed to the
stretching bands of Si–O. The unit Si–O constructs the
backbone of PDMS. Therefore, functionalization of porous
silicon with PDMS is successful from the FTIR measure-
ment. All bands of Si–Hx from PS after modification are still
observable but exhibit a significant decrease. The average
conversion efficiency E is related to the change in the
integrated intensity A of the Si–Hx region (2000–2200
cm�1) after modification:
E ¼ A0 � A1ð Þ=A0
where A0 and A1 are the integrated peak areas of the freshly
etched and the modified samples in the Si–Hx region (2000–
2200 cm�1), respectively. According to this equation the
value E is 13.4%, which corresponds well to the reported
average value 15% for organic monomer molecules [7].
Another evidence for the PDMS attachment is the
contact angle measurement. The measurement revealed that
the PS surfaces had an advancing contact angle of 1208,while the value for PDMS-grafted PS surfaces was found
to be 1078 [8].
The well-established method to analyze the surface
nanostructure of PS is the interferometric reflectance
spectra. The freshly etched and the modified PS samples
show well-resolved Frabry-Perot fringes in their reflection
spectra (Fig. 2). The spectra confirm the retaining of the
![Page 3: Stability improvement of porous silicon surface structures by grafting polydimethylsiloxane polymer monolayers](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100510/575020851a28ab877e9b2cce/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fig. 2. Interferometric reflectance spectra for (a) a freshly etched hydride-
terminated PS and (b) a PS sample grafted with PDMS.
Fig. 4. PL spectra of PDMS-grafted PS samples treated with 0.01 M NaOH
at room temperature for (a) 0, (b) 5, (c) 30, (d) 60 and (e) 90 min.
B. Xia et al. / Thin Solid Films 474 (2005) 306–309308
nanostructure of PS after grafting PDMS [9]. The freshly
etched PS sample typically displays an optical thickness (the
value from Eq. (1)) of 5131.94 nm, while the value for the
PDMS-grafted PS sample is 5255.9 nm. PDMS-grafted PS
samples have a slightly higher optical thickness because the
PDMS monolayer increases the value of d in Eq. (1).
In Fig. 3, the PL emission spectra of the freshly etched
and the PDMS-modified PS samples were collected with an
excitation wavelength of 366 nm at room temperature. The
hydride-terminated PS samples (Fig. 3a) exhibit a blue-red
PL emission between 400 and 800 nm. The maximum PL
emission is at 646 nm, and other two peaks at 488 and 797
nm, respectively. Fig. 3b shows the PL spectra of the PDMS
modified samples. It can be seen that the functionalization
does not change the maximum PL peak position at 646 nm,
but results in a reduction (75%) of the PL intensity. A
typical stringent PL test for PS is the treatment with an
alkaline solution. It is reported that the PL disappears in
seconds to minutes in this case for the freshly etched PS [4].
We placed our PDMS-modified samples into a 0.01 M
NaOH aqueous solution at room temperature for 0, 5, 30, 60
Fig. 3. PL spectra for (a) a freshly etched hydride-terminated sample and (b)
a PS sample grafted with PDMS.
and 90 min. Fig. 4 shows the evolution of PL for the base
treatment. With increasing the time, the maximum PL peak
at 646 nm due to the silicon hydride nanostructure gradually
shifts to 577 nm with a slightly decreased intensity. The
peak 488 nm due to the silicon oxide [10] becomes much
stronger and reaches its maximum at 60 min, then it begins
to decrease because of the degradation of the surface
nanostructures. The peak 797 nm due to the surface
dangling bonds disappears after 5 min.
To test the chemical resistance of the derivatized PS, we
select a stringent environment: exposure to a boiling
alkaline solution. The evolutional FTIR spectra were
recorded to witness the stability. Fig. 5 exhibits the spectra
of PDMS-modified PS samples after exposure to a 0.01 M
boiling NaOH aqueous solution for 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 and
120 min, respectively. It had been reported that under such a
stringent condition (an alkaline solution at pH=12), the
tSi–Hxcentered around 2100 cm�1 disappears completely
within tens of seconds [4]. However in our situation, the
tSi–Hxis observable even after 40-min exposure to the base.
The strong methyl bands exist even after 120-min exposure.
Fig. 5. Transmission FTIR spectra of PDMS-grafted PS samples treated
with a boiling 0.01 M NaOH solution for (a) 0, (b) 5, (c) 10, (d) 20, (e) 40,
(f) 60 and (g) 120 min.
![Page 4: Stability improvement of porous silicon surface structures by grafting polydimethylsiloxane polymer monolayers](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100510/575020851a28ab877e9b2cce/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
B. Xia et al. / Thin Solid Films 474 (2005) 306–309 309
No obvious stripping or degradation of PS structures was
observed during the first 40-min exposure.
4. Discussion
PL phenomena and Frabry-Perot fringes in the reflection
spectra are unique characters of PS. After modification, these
optical properties are still retained. PS is very sensitive to the
base solution and its surface nanostructures will be destroyed
very quickly. As a result, its PL will disappear after tens of
seconds or minutes if PS is inserted into a base solution.
While in our case, the PDMS-modified PS retains the PL
even after 90-min treatment of a NaOH solution at room
temperature. The blue-red peak at 644 nm shifts to 588 nm
indicates the existence and some change of surface Si–Hx
nanostructures. The Si–Hx structures are proved by FTIR
measurements (the spectra are ignored because of the
similarity with those in Fig. 5). The peak 488 nm becomes
much stronger due to oxidation of partial Si–Hx nano-
structures. The co-existence of both Si–Hx and Si–O
nanostructures contributes to the yellowish PL after the base
treatment. These results show that PDMS monolayers
provide a good protection and some characteristic improve-
ment for PL of PS.
The native Si–Hx terminated porous silicon surfaces do
not provide adequate stability for most potential applications.
Therefore, stabilization of the surface nanostructures of PS
through introduction of a tunable monolayer is exclusively
necessary and would be a revolution for technological
applications of PS. Not only limited for this, it is also
beneficial for fundamental studies such as the quantum
confinement effect of some embedded nanocrystallities in the
future. Though the chemical reaction does not consume all of
the non-oxidized Si–Hx (because of the steric hindrance at the
surface), the density of the covered organic species on the
surface is high enough to protect the remained Si–Hx bonds
against the oxidation. We used a stringent condition of a
boiling base solution to test its chemical resistance of the
PDMS-modified PS. The Si–Hx bond is observable after 40-
min treatment and the PDMS monolayer observable after
120-min treatment. This indicates that PDMS monolayer has
a strong chemical resistance to the base treatment at both
room and boiling temperatures. We also measured the PL of
the samples after the boiling treatment. Their PL disappears
after 10 min because the surface nanostructures are destroyed
(spectra not shown because of the similarity with Fig. 4).
From the above discussions, we conclude that the PL is
related not only to the surface components but also to the
surface nanostructures. The surface nanostructure retains at
room temperature but is vulnerable at the boiling temperature.
This is the reason to explain the difference of the PL observed
at both room and boiling temperatures. Such a long
endurance of PL and chemical resistance is rarely reported.
5. Conclusion
The results of FTIR and contact angle measurements
confirm the presence of PDMS after modification. The
passivation effect of the PDMS monolayer on PS was
investigated by FTIR and PL. The measurements show that
the PDMS monolayer provides a strong armature to PS
under a variety of stringent conditions such as in the base
solution. This passivation technique might have a bright
outlook for practical applications in the future.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Mr. Qing-Wei Hang,
Mr. Hong-Qi Shi, Mr. De-Jun Liu and the Center of
Analytical Instruments of Nanjing University for their
helps in FTIR and PL measurements. We are grateful to
the financial support of SRF for ROCS, SEM, the High
Technology (Industry) Project BG2003028 of Jiangsu
Province and the Nanjing University Talent Development
Foundation.
References
[1] V.S. Lin, K. Motesharei, K.S. Dancil, M.J. Sailor, M.R. Ghadiri,
Science 278 (1997) 840.
[2] J. Gao, T. Gao, M.J. Sailor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 (2000) 901.
[3] S. Letant, M.J. Sailor, Adv. Mater. 12 (2000) 355.
[4] J.M. Buriak, Chem. Rev. 105 (2002) 1271.
[5] D.D.M. Wayner, R.A. Wolkow, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
(2002) 23.
[6] G. Kraus, G. Gauglitz, Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 344 (1992)
153.
[7] J.M. Buriak, M.J. Stewart, T.W. Geders, M.J. Allen, H.C. Choi, J.
Smith, M.D. Raftery, L.T. Canham, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999)
11491.
[8] S.J. Clarson, J.A. Semlyen, Siloxane Polymers, Prentice Hall, Engle-
wood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
[9] A. Janshoff, K.-P.S. Dancil, C. Steinem, D.P. Greiner, V.S.-Y. Lin, C.
Gurtner, K. Motesharei, M.J. Sailor, M.R. Ghadiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
120 (1998) 12108.
[10] J. Chun, A. Boccarsly, T. Cottrell, J. Benziger, J. Lee, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 115 (1993) 3024.