Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

download Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

of 19

Transcript of Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    1/19

    SpurringGrowthDuringCrisis

    Chandan Sapkotaou s a a c on ra e, conom cs an nv ronmen

    December 5, 2011

    www.sapkotac.blogspot.com

    Presentedat aguestlectureseriesinDepartmentofConflict,PeaceandDevelopmentStudies,Tribhuvan University, December5,2011,Kathmandu,Nepal[GlobalCollege]

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    2/19

    Economy during crisis

    Growth and political stability

    Why so? Consequences

    rowt strateg es ur ng cr s s

    Comments Discussion

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    3/19

    . w

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    4/19

    GDP and per capita growthThere are no instances of sustained rowth rate of over five ercent for three consecutive

    12

    years. Highest GDP growth rate (9.6 percent) was attained in 1984.

    The average GDP growth rate in the past five decades was 3.57 percent.

    6

    8

    10

    2

    4

    4

    2

    1961

    1963

    1965

    1967

    1969

    1971

    1973

    1975

    1977

    1979

    1981

    1983

    1985

    1987

    1989

    1991

    1993

    1995

    1997

    1999

    2001

    2003

    2005

    2007

    2009

    86

    GDP growth (annual %) GDP per capita growth (annual %)

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    5/19

    Rocky rates'erv ces sec or ma or con r u or o grow . gr cu ure sec or s con r u on s ec n ng

    Industrial sector is not growing and is marginally eroding. Services and industrial sectors

    after 1996?

    60.0 StructureofOutput(%ofGDP) 30.0 Growthofoutput(annual%change)

    50.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    .

    15.0

    10.0

    20.0

    5.0

    10.0

    0.0

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    5.0

    0.0

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    20111205 SAWTEE

    Agriculture Industry Services Agriculture Industry Services GDP

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    6/19

    2. Economy during crisis

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    7/19

    6Averagegrowthduringdifferentpoliticalperiods

    Not much impact on growthArmed insurgency had some impactGrowth is picking up but is below 5

    4

    5

    prereformed panchayat (importsubstitution era)

    Reformed ancha at structural

    3

    adjustment era)

    Constructional monarchy (economicliberalization and opening of economy

    era)

    2

    ao s nsurgency re orm nodevelopment reforms era)

    Post revolution (post monarchy era).

    1

    Consumption expenditure isincreasing

    Exports have plunged since the Maoistinsurgency began and imports are

    19711979 19801991 19921996 19972006 20072009

    Pre reformed

    panchayat

    Reformed

    panchayat

    Constitutional

    monarchy

    Maoist

    insurgency

    Post revolution

    increasing; Trade deficit is wideningInflation rate is still highFDI has decreasedValue added of all sectors exceptservices sector is decreasin

    20111205 SAWTEE

    GDP growth (annual %) GDP per capita growth (annual %)Revenue is increasing

    Remittances are increasing

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    8/19

    Government changes and coups had little impact on the

    trend of overall growth rate. This does not mean that conflict

    of other nature did not have impact on socioeconomic

    The insurgency intensified after 2001. The armedMaoists rebellion came to an end after the

    monarchy was abolished in 2006.

    20111205 SAWTEE

    n cators.

    changeisseenonGDPgrowthrate,whichnever

    crossedthe6.10%after2000,tosomeextent.

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    9/19

    3. Why so? Consequences

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    10/19

    Why? 14 Valueaddedaverageannualgrowth(%)

    gr cu ure an serv ces sec ors nterms of value added) are little affected

    during insurgency. Their growth rate was

    pretty much the same during the five

    periods. They have the highest weight on10

    12

    GDP and its growth rate.

    The industrial sector was the mostaffected. Our productive capacity eroded

    8

    . . .

    Exports hit.

    4

    6

    But,why

    growth

    rate

    continued

    to

    be

    2

    e ween o percen

    Agriculture and services sectorkept up the rocky growth and

    contribution to GDP.

    The loss in industrial capacity and

    19711979 19801991 19921996 19972006 20072009

    Pre reformed

    panchayat

    Reformed

    panchayat

    Constitutional

    monarchy

    Maoist

    insurgency

    Post revolution

    production was /is compensated byremittances and imports , thanks to

    our largest export, i.e. migrant

    workers

    20111205 SAWTEE

    Agriculture Industry Manufacturing Services

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    11/19

    Some of the consequences

    Migration

    Internal migration from rural to urban

    350

    400

    4000

    4500RemittanceinflowsandgrowthinNepal

    ,services compared to the increased demand

    External migration (around 25,000 each

    month) due to low job opportunities in theurban areas

    3003500

    physical infrastructures) and increase in

    imports. Clustering of firms in urban centers.

    Hard to do business in Nepal and

    competitiveness went down.

    200

    250

    2500

    3000

    Remittances kept the economy functioningand helped tremendously in brining down

    absolute poverty level. But, real estate andhousing bubbles plus symptoms of Dutch 100

    150

    1500

    2000

    Poor development and capital

    expenditure resulted in weakindustrial/productive capacity. 0

    50

    500

    1000

    Weak governance and over politicizationof bureaucracy, leading to corruption andmisappropriation of state resources

    No insurgency now, but still there are many

    500

    political and social fissures , the seeds ofconflict, that are ripping apart our economicpotential.

    20111205 SAWTEE

    Growth rate, % (right scale) Total inflows, in USD million (left scale)

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    12/19

    4. Growth strategies during crisis

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    13/19

    Right now the economy does not have the necessary conditions and

    institutions to sustain growth rate of over five percent even for even 2 years.

    This is partly contributed by the conflict, weak bureaucracy andgovernance, and loss of productive capacity.

    requ res a vibrant private sector

    entrepreneurial citizenry

    business-friendly fiscal policy

    less red tape

    infrastructure required for unleashing the entrepreneurial spirits in the economy

    A sustained growth rate of over five percent is not achievable from the.

    Even though the agricultural sector still account for over 35 percent ofsectoral value addition to GDP, almost all of the instances of growthincreases were in fact tri ered b rowth in industrial and service sectors.

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    14/19

    Conflict sensitive growth strategy Few resources but numerous economic and political problems. Cant address all of them at

    the same time. What generates the biggest bang for a buck?

    Identify for most binding constraint to economic activities,

    large positive effect on growth rate.

    Thelevelofpoverty/economicbackwardnessisthestrongestpredictoroftheonsetofviolenceinNepal.Thatswhyfocusingonthefactorthatstimulatesgrowththemostisasensibleandpragmatic

    strate .

    A10percentagepointincreaseinpovertyisassociatedwith25-27additionalconflict-relateddeaths.Meanwhile,geographicfactorsaresignificantlyassociatedwiththeintensityofviolenceafterits

    onset.

    Seepaper

    by

    Iyer and

    Do

    titled

    Geography,

    Poverty

    and

    Conflict

    in

    Nepal,

    HBS

    Working

    Paper

    -

    Geographicconditionsuchaselevationandthepresenceofmountainsandforestsexplainaquarterofthecross-districtvariationinconflictintensity.

    Conflictis

    significantly

    higher

    in

    places

    with

    greater

    poverty

    and

    lower

    levels

    of

    economic

    development.

    Peopleresidingindistrictsthatweresociallyandeconomicallybackward(irrespectiveofgeographic

    20111205 SAWTEE

    theopportunitycostsofjoiningthearmedrebellionwaslowforthemandtheeconomicandpolitical

    gainsfortheMaoistswashigh.

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    15/19

    Binding constrains to growthInadequate supply of infrastructure (road

    network, communication, hydropower, irrigation facilities, storage, etc.)

    During conflict infrastructures weredestroyed, which reduced productive capacityof our economy.

    The poor quality of existing infrastructureand a virtual absence of linkages betweenproduction and manufacturing sites in thehilly and mountainous regions has not only

    st mied structural transformation andimpeded a shift to new productive activities, itis also leading to a skewed spatial

    distribution of agents (firms and labor) andassets in the economy.

    etter n rastructure, g n ustr aactivities:

    Conflict led to clustering of firms in urban

    centers. The major firms are clustered in and

    around few cores like Kathmandu, Pokharaand Taraithe same places which have

    relativel low trans ortation costs and hi h

    potential for economies of scale.The road density in Tarai (24.99) is two and17 times higher than in hilly and mountainous

    regions respectively.

    Inadequate supply of infrastructure is the

    20111205 SAWTEE

    most binding constraint to growth atpresent. But, this does not mean other

    constraints are irrelevant.

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    16/19

    ,

    economic activity now.

    will go down, new firms and ventures will prop

    up, innovation, increase in competitiveness, exportrevenue

    Link production sites with markets by constructingroads

    New Structural Economics

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    17/19

    Fivereformagendastokick-startgrowth Growthstrategies

    n ras ruc ure e ec r c y an

    roads); Updated industrial and trade

    policies

    ,policiesshouldbesynchronizedwithIndias

    andChinas

    economic

    policies

    in order tomaximize neighborhood growth spillovers.

    Rather than exclusively focusing on markets inthe EU and the US, policies should be designed to

    Overhaul of education andhealthcare sectors

    Governance and regulations

    max m ze ra ngw ourne g ors, n aand Chinathe two emerging giants in the globaleconomy.

    Design policies toenticeFDIintransport

    infrastructure

    and

    large-

    and

    small-

    scale

    hydropowerprojects.

    sectors)

    Social safety nets

    To give the struggling industrial sector abreathing space so that they can compete in priceand quality in the international market, thegovernment should implementtheprovisionsoutlinedinInvestmentBoardandSEZordinances.

    The governmentshould

    facilitate

    foreign

    investmentinthetourismsector.

    The government should also facilitateforeignemploymentandinflowofremittances. ONLYFOR SHORT TERM UNTIL WE GET OURFINANCES IN ORDER!

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    18/19

    6. Conclusion

    Thelevelofpoverty/economicbackwardnessisthestrongestpredictorofthe

    onsetofviolenceinNepal.Thatswhyfocusingonthefactorsthatstimulates

    themost

    growth

    is

    asensible

    and

    pragmatic

    strategy.

    A10percentagepointincreaseinpovertyisassociatedwith25-27additional

    conflict-relateddeaths.Meanwhile,geographicfactorsaresignificantly

    associatedwiththeintensit ofviolenceafteritsonset.

    Connectpeople,connectmindsandgetconnectedwithregionaleconomies!

    20111205 SAWTEE

  • 8/3/2019 Spurring Growth During Crisis_2011-12-05

    19/19

    Discussion

    Comment on presentation Views on spurring growth during crisisAn thin thin related to econom

    20111205 SAWTEESAWTEE