Spring ’15 Vol. 28 No. 2 bulletin - HHMI.orgContents Spring ’15 Vol. 28 No. 02 Web-Only Content...
Transcript of Spring ’15 Vol. 28 No. 2 bulletin - HHMI.orgContents Spring ’15 Vol. 28 No. 02 Web-Only Content...
4000 Jones Bridge Road Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815-6789www.hhmi.org
Address Service Requested
Aru
n S
amp
ath
ku
mar
an
d E
llio
t Mey
erow
itz
Plant PaversJigsaw puzzle-shaped cells bulging with chlorophylls (red) cover
the surface of leaves in many flowering plants. The fanciful pattern is more than just a whimsical quirk of nature, however. HHMI Investigator
Elliot Meyerowitz and his team have shown that, as plants grow, the indented regions and lobe-like outgrowths of these so-called pavement cells create internal stresses that reorganize cytoskeletal proteins. These microtubule proteins align along the cell walls (green), a process that in
turn reinforces them against stress – evidence of a subcellular mechanical feedback loop. Learn more about the role of force in the development of
animals, as well as plants, in “Show of Force,” page 12.
bulletin
hh
mi b
ulle
tin
• ho
wa
rd
hu
gh
es m
ed
ica
l inst
itu
te
• ww
w.h
hm
i.or
gv
ol. 2
8 / n
o. 2
Spring ’15 Vol. 28 No. 2
Small Forces,Big Impact
Mechanical stress plays avital role in the development
of both animals and plants
in this issue Neural Theory at Janelia
Marta Zlatic in the FootlightsBacterial Barcodes
12Like the creases in a sheet of origami paper, the stripes that pattern these fruit fly embryos guide forces that will govern their shape. As an embryo becomes longer and thinner, lines of protein are laid down along the growing fly’s head-to-tail axis. Each vibrant band consists of one of three members of the Toll receptor family. The receptors allow the cells to differentiate themselves from their neighbors and perform the directional movements necessary to remodel the growing embryonic tissue. A
dam
Par
é an
d Je
nn
ifer
Zal
len
HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015
Observations
Vic
to N
gai
With Theory Comes OrderThe gray matter of the human brain may not be as physically vast as the dark matter of outer space. But the challenge of crunching astronomical data pales compared to the complexity of parsing today’s deluge of data about the brain. Making sense of that torrent requires more than banks of supercomputers, says computational neuroscientist and essayist Olaf Sporns. To achieve fundamental insights, he posits, neuroscientists must do as astronomers do and apply a theoretical framework to their immense quantities of empirical data.
Neuroscience, it turns out, is on the brink of its own “big data” revolution. Supplementing more traditional practices of small-scale hypothesis-driven laboratory research, a growing number of large-scale brain data collection and data aggregation ventures are now underway, and prospects are that this trend will only grow in future years. Mapping the roughly one hundred trillion synaptic connections of a human brain would by some estimates generate on the order of a zettabyte of data (a zettabyte corresponds to one million petabytes). For comparison, that’s about equal to the amount of digital information created by all humans worldwide in the year 2010. And recently proposed efforts to map the human brain’s functional activity at the resolution of individual cells and synapses might dwarf even these numbers by orders of magnitude. The coming data deluge is likely to transform neuroscience, from the slow and painstaking accumulation of results gathered in small experimental studies to a discipline more like nuclear physics or astronomy, with giant amounts of data pulled in by specialized facilities or “brain observatories” that are the equivalent of particle colliders and space telescopes.
What to do with all this data? Physics and astronomy can draw on a rich and (mostly) solid foundation of theories and natural laws that can bring order to the maelstrom of empirical data. Theories enable significant data reduction by identifying important variables to track and thus distilling a torrent of primary data pulled in by sophisticated instruments into interpretable form. Theory translates “big data” into “small data.” A remarkable example was the astronomer Edwin Hubble’s discovery of the expansion of the universe in 1929. Integrating
over years of observation, Hubble reported a proportional relationship between redshifts in the spectra of galaxies (interpreted as their recession speeds) and their physical distances. Viewed in the context of cosmological models Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter formulated earlier, these data strongly supported cosmic expansion. This monumental insight came from a dataset that comprised less than fifty data points, compressible to a fraction of a kilobyte. When it comes to applying theory to “big data,” neuroscience, to put it mildly, has some catching up to do. Sure enough, there are many ways of analyzing brain data that are useful and productive for extracting regularities from neural recordings, filtering signal from noise, deciphering neural codes, identifying coherent neuronal populations, and so forth. But data analysis isn’t theory. At the time of this writing, neuroscience still largely lacks organizing principles or a theoretical framework for converting brain data into fundamental knowledge and understanding.
From The Future of the Brain: Essays by the World’s
Leading Neuroscientists, edited by Gary Marcus
and Jeremy Freeman. © 2015 by Gary Marcus and
Jeremy Freeman. Reprinted with permission
from Princeton University Press.
ContentsSpring ’15 Vol. 28 No. 02
Web-Only Content
Watch a zebrafish’s brain light up as it takes a virtual swim.
Witness tiny pores called stomata develop on a leaf.
See a mouse drink with gusto after a prompt from a light-triggered protein.
Travel inside the body to experience an allergy-induced immune cell reaction.
Observe how mechanical forces can shape cells and tissues.
Departments president’s letter03 AGenerationatRisk centrifuge04 MakingItReal05 Craftsman benchreport06 DiggingDeeperBeyondItch08 Autism’sGeneticRoots10 OpenandShutCase perspectives&opinions30 TheTheoryConnection32 Q&A–Whatbookhave youreadthatinfluenced yourwork? chronicle34 Science Education FromInsighttoAction36 Toolbox BarcodingBacteria38 Lab Book TCellBurnout GotThirst?Here’sWhy SalvagingSNAREs observations WithTheoryComesOrder
Features12 Show of Force Scientistsarelearningmyriad waysthatsmallforcesaddupto abigimpactonthedevelopment oforganisms,fromplants toanimals.
18 All the World’s a Stage MartaZlaticisascapable ofportrayingtheGreekheroine Hecubaassheisofpulling backthecurtainontheneural circuitryoffruitflylarvae. Atbothpursuits,she’swon wideacclaim.
24 Navigating the Torrent Experimentalneuroscientists andtheoristsatJaneliaare joiningforcestomakesense of–andimprove–thedelugeof datacomingoutoflabs.
All the World’s a Stage, page 18
www.hhmi.org/bulletin
Cover illustration:
Martin Nicolausson
This paper is certified by SmartWood for FSC standards, which promote environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests.E
liM
eir
Kap
lan
2 Spring 2015 / HHMI Bulletin
Gra
ham
Rou
mie
u,B
ryn
Nel
son
,Car
rie
Arn
old
,Dav
idF
ried
man
Contributors
Telephone (301) 215.8500 • Fax (301) 215.8863 www.hhmi.org© 2015 Howard Hughes Medical InstituteTheopinions,beliefs,andviewpointsexpressedbyauthorsintheHHMI Bulletindonotnecessarilyreflecttheopinions,beliefs,viewpoints,orofficialpoliciesoftheHowardHughesMedicalInstitute.
HHMI TRUSTEESKurt L. Schmoke, Esq., ChairmanPresident / University of BaltimoreJames A. Baker, III, Esq.Partner / Baker Botts. LLPAmbassador Charlene Barshefsky, Esq.Senior International Partner / WilmerHaleJoseph L. Goldstein, MDRegental Professor & Chairman Department of Molecular Genetics University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterGarnett L. KeithChairman & CEO SeaBridge Investment Advisors, LLCFred R. LummisChairman & CEO Platform Partners, LLCSir Paul Nurse, PhDPresident / The Royal SocietyDame Alison F. Richard, PhDSenior Research Scientist & Professor Emerita Yale UniversityClayton S. Rose, PhDProfessor Harvard Business SchoolAnne M. TatlockRetired Chairman & CEO Fiduciary Trust Company International
HHMI SENIOR EXECUTIVE TEAMRobert Tjian, PhD / PresidentCheryl A. Moore / Executive V.P. & Chief Operating OfficerKathryn S. Brown / Head of CommunicationsSean B. Carroll, PhD / V.P. for Science EducationJennifer L. Farris / Head of Administrative ServicesHeidi E. Henning / V.P. & General CounselMohamoud Jibrell / V.P. for Information TechnologyNitin Kotak / V.P. & Chief Financial OfficerErin O’Shea, PhD / V.P. & Chief Scientific OfficerGerald M. Rubin, PhD / V.P. & Executive Director, Janelia Research CampusKathy A. Wyszynski / V.P. for Human ResourcesLandis Zimmerman / V.P. & Chief Investment Officer
HHMI BULLETIN STAFFMary Beth Gardiner / EditorDana Cook Grossman / Story EditorJim Keeley / Science EditorNicole Kresge / Assistant Editor
ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTORSElaine Alibrandi, Michelle Cissell, Heather McDonald, Anne Sommer Pentagram Design / DesignAllied Printing / Printing & BindingBryn Nelson(“Autism’s
GeneticRoots,”page8)isaformermicrobiologistwhodecidedhewouldmuchratherwriteaboutmicrobesthanmutatethem.NowanovercaffeinatedsciencewriterbasedinSeattle,hehaspublishedarticlesinThe New York Times,Nature,Discover, Mosaic,andScientific American.
Carrie Arnold(“NavigatingtheTorrent,”page24)isafreelancescienceandhealthwriterlivinginVirginia.WhensheisnotwritingaboutthelivingworldforpublicationslikeNOVA Next,Scientific American,andNational Geographic,youcanprobablyfindherdrinkingcoffee,cycling,knitting,orannoyingthecat.
IllustratorGraham Roumieu(“DiggingDeeperBeyondItch,”page6)isthecreatorofthreefauxautobiographiesofBigfoot.HisworkalsohasappearedinThe Atlantic, The New York Times, Harper’s,ananimatedcommercialforcorndogs,andelsewhere.
Aphotographerandfilmmaker,David Friedman(“TheTheoryConnection,”page30)exploresstoriesofscience,technology,andhumannaturethroughportraitureandstorytelling.Hiscurrentprojectsincludeanongoinglookatthelivesofinventorsfromallwalksoflife.
3HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015Ja
mes
Keg
ley
President’s Letter
A Generation at Riskearlierthisyear ,IhadthegoodfortunetoattendadayofeventsattheWhiteHousethatcelebratedsciencestudentsandcalledonphilanthropieslikeHHMItocontinuehelpingtodrivescienceforward.ReflectingonsuccessfulSTEMscholars,PresidentObamasaidthis:
“It’snotenoughforustojustliftupyoungpeopleandsay,‘greatjob,waytogo.’You’vealsogottohavelabstogoto,andyou’vegottobeabletosupportyourselfwhileyou’redoingthisamazingresearch.Thatinvolvesusasasocietymakingthekindsofinvestmentsthataregoingtobenecessaryforustocontinuetoinnovateformanyyearstocome.”
Inrecognizingcommitmentstoemergingscientists,thepresidentcalledoutanewprogram,“FacultyScholars,”thatHHMIhascreatedwiththeBill&MelindaGatesFoundationandtheSimonsFoundation.Throughthisprogram,wewilltogetherawardupto70grants,everytwotothreeyears,toearlycareerbasicresearchersandphysicianscientistswhohavethepotentialtomakeuniquecontributionstotheirfields.ThefirstroundoftheFacultyScholarscompetitionlaunchedinMarch,andweplantomakethefirstgrantawardsinthefallof2016.Ourthreeorganizationswillinvestatotalof$148millioninresearchsupportovertheprogram’sfirstfiveyears.
Weplantoidentifyandsupportnotonlyaccomplishedresearcherswhohavealreadydemonstratedtheircapacityforimportantscientificcontributions,butalsopromisingscientistswhohavenotyetreachedtheirpotential.
Today’semergingscientistsfaceincreasinglytoughodds.ThepercentofallNIHresearchgrantfundingawardedtoscientistsundertheageof36hasdroppedfrom5.6percentto1.3percentoverroughlythepastdecade.Theaveragescientistisnow42yearsoldbeforeobtaininghisorherfirstR01NIHresearchgrant.Withthisreality,agrowingnumberofpromisingresearchersareleavingtheU.S.foropportunitiesoverseasor,worse,abandoningsciencealtogether,promptingsometolabelthem“agenerationatrisk.”
Scientistsatthebeginningoftheircareersneedadequatefundingtobeaggressivewiththeirresearchprograms.Inthatearlyphase,generallybetweenyears4and10,start-upfundsfromauniversitybecomeexhausted,justwhenit’stimetostartrampingup.For
thesescientiststopersist,theymusthavehelptoclearthepathway.
HHMIalreadysupportssomeexcellentearlycareerscientistsintheUnitedStatesandabroad.Butthereismuchmoretodotohelplaunchthenextgenerationofscientists.Weneedtoexpandourreach,nurturinggreaternumbersofearlycareerscientistswiththefunding,mentoring,collaboration,andtrainingtheyneedtosuccessfullyestablishcareerstoday.Doingthiswell,atscale,willrequiresignificant,sustainedleadershipandcollaboration–thekindofsupportbestprovidedbybig,strategicorganizationscomingtogethertocreatechange.
IpersonallylookforwardtomeetingthenewestmembersofHHMI’scommunitywhenourfirstcropofFacultyScholarsarrivesatHHMIformeetings.Waitandseewhattheywilldo.
“We need to expand our reach, nurturing greater numbers of early career scientists with the funding, mentoring, collaboration, and training they need to successfully establish careers today.”—roberttjian
Centrifuge4 Spring 2015 / HHMI Bulletin
Making It Realwhenshelectures aboutsexdeterminationtoherLifeSciences1bstudents,evolutionarygeneticistHopiHoekstragetspersonal.Reallypersonal.ShestartsbyscopingouttheundergraduatesinHarvard’sScienceCenterauditoriumandpickingamalestudentwhosayshe’snoteasilyembarrassed.Shestandsbesidehimandaskstheother450-somestudentstowatchhimwhilecountingtofiveinunison.After“...five,”Hoekstraasksforestimatesofhowmanyspermtheyoungmanproducedduringtheprecedingfewseconds.Thenshedeliverstheanswer:about7,500.
“Itrytogetthestudentsexcitedaboutthematerialbeforethelectureevenstarts,”saysHoekstra,anHHMIinvestigatoratHarvardUniversity.Hoekstracallsthis“motivatingthematerial.”
“Startinglectureswithastory–frompersonalstories,tomysteriesofthefield,tohistoricalfacts–helpsgetthestudents’imaginationsgoing.”Withoutthemotivation,Hoekstrasays,“it’sjustabunchoffacts.”
Tosetthestageforherlectureonepigenetics,sheusesafamilystory.Sheprojectsaphotoofhergrandmother,whosurvivedthe1944HongerwinterinNazi-occupiedHolland,andexplainsthathergrandmothersubsistedontulipbulbswhilepregnantwithHoekstra’smother.Wheninutero,Hoekstra’smotherwasformingtheovumfromwhichHoekstraherselfwouldeventuallydevelop.Through
thategg,Hoekstramayhavebeendirectlyaffectedbyhergrandmother’sprivation.Inotherwords,environmentalsignalsmighthavetriggeredepigeneticchangesinhermother’sova–heritablechanges,butonesthatalterhowgenesareexpressedratherthantheDNAitself.
“I’mpartofthislineage,”Hoekstratellstheclass.Thensheshowsasnapshotofherson,three-year-oldHenry.“He’stherealtestcase,”sheexplains–atestcaseforthe indirecteffectsofwhathisgreat-grandmotherendured.Researchhasshownthatepigeneticchangesinpeoplewhosufferedfrommalnutritioncanpredisposetheirdescendantstodiabetesandobesity.
It’sonlythenthatHoekstrasays,“Let’sseehowthisworksatthemolecularlevel.”She’sprettysurethatifshe’dskippedthestory
andsimplyannounced,“Today’slectureisaboutmethylation”–oneformofepigeneticalteration–herstudentswouldhavebeenfarlessengaged.
Hoekstra’sresearchinvolvesevolutionarychangesinwildpopulations,suchasdeermice.Butshethinksalotnotjustaboutevolution,butalsoabouthowtoteachit.Aftereverylecture,shejotscommentsonthebluefolderholdingherlecturenotes–suggestionstoherselfsuchas,“Canmovefasterthroughfirst
part”and“Leavemoretimeforrat-lickingexamples.”InJune2014,HoekstrawasawardedaHarvardCollegeProfessorship,afive-yearappointmentthatrecognizesexcellenceinteaching.
Shebelievesshe’llattractmorestudentstosciencebydemonstratingthatbiologyresearchisverymuchaworkinprogress.Forinstance,lastfallsheinformedherstudentsthat,asrecentlyastwoyearsago,theirtextbookdidn’tevenhaveachapteronepigenetics.“Theythinkofeverythingassolved,butthedoorstothishavejustopened.Theycanthink,‘Wow,there’ssomuchstilltobediscovered!’”—Cathy Shufro
Oli
vier
Ku
gle
r
5HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015Sa
mC
hiv
ers
Craftsmanwhengreghannon wasagraduatestudentatCaseWesternReserveUniversity,helikedtohangaroundthecivilengineeringdepartment.Friendstherewouldlettheyoungmolecularbiologistusethedepartment’swoodandmetalshops.
Helearnedtorunamillingmachineandoperatealathe.Hebuiltawinerack,bookshelves,andgelboxesforhislab.Thenoneday,inadustybackcornerofawoodstore,HannonfoundwhathebelieveswassomeofthelastCubanmahoganyimportedintotheUnitedStates.“Ispentmorethanamonth’sgradstudentsalaryonit,”recallsHannon,wholookedattherawmahoganyandsawadiningroomtable.“I’dneverbuiltsuchasubstantialpieceoffurniture,butIjustjumpedrightin.”
Hannonhadtheforesighttochooseatrestledesign:thetable’sstructurewassupportedbyfourwedgesthatcouldeasilybeknockedout,allowingittobedisassembledandtransported.WhenheleftCaseWesternin1992andheadedeastforpostdoctoralstudiesatNewYork’sColdSpringHarborLaboratory,Hannonbroughtthetable.
AtColdSpringHarbor,HannonwouldpioneerthestudyofRNAinterference:harnessingforresearchortherapeuticpurposesthenucleicacidsusedbycellstoregulategeneexpressionandproteinsynthesis.Healso
builtbenches,moretables,cabinets,adresser.Headdedaroomtohishouse.
There’ssomeoverlapbetweenhisavocationalandvocationalpursuits.Woodworkandappliedmolecularbiologyarebothexercisesinproblemsolving–handlinginevitableconfrontationswiththeunexpected.
Askilledbuilder“hasathoughtprocessgearedtowardthatandcanthinkaheadanynumberofsteps,”saysHannon.“Thinkingabouthowyoubuildthingsonamolecularlevel,theprocessisthesame.”
Inotherways,though,hefindsbuildingareleasefromthelab.Itrequirestotal,measure-twice-cut-oncefocus.“I’mnotameditationkindofguy,butIimagineit’ssomethinglikethat,”Hannonsaysofpottery-throwing,anotherofhis
manualpursuits.“Theclayknowswhatyourmoodis.”
Bothwoodworkingandpotteryalsooffermoreimmediategratificationthanhisworkusuallyprovides.“Youmakeprogresseveryday,”saysHannon.“That’snotalwaysthecasewithscience,whichispunctuatedbyperiodsofinsightfollowedbythelong,hardslogofmakingthingswork.”
Lastfall,after23yearsatColdSpringHarbor,HannonbegantorelocatehislaboratorytotheUniversityofCambridgeintheUnitedKingdom,withafulltransitionexpectedinJuneofthisyear.Itwasadauntingshift.HewentfrompostdoctofullprofessorandHHMIinvestigatoratalmostliterallythesamebench.
Butasdifficultasitwastomove,Hannonisfindingin
Cambridgeaneededchangeofpace:achancetodomoreappliedresearch,exposuretonewideas,ajoltoutofintellectualcomplacency.
Italsooffersawealthofhomeprojects.Heandhiswifearerenovatinga110-year-oldcountryhouse.They’reputtinginnewfloors,redoingthebathrooms,andbuildingchickenrunsandgoatpensforwhatmaywellbecometheirownhomedairy.
Hannonisalsorebuildingthehouse’smainstaircase.Heapproachesthisnewchallengewithsometrepidation;completingtherestorationcouldtakeyears.Butheknowstheresultswillbeenduring.Inthediningroomofthehousestandshis25-year-oldmahoganytable.—Brandon Keim
Bench Report
Digging Deeper Beyond ItchScientistsidentifyanimmunecellreceptorthatmaybeattherootofsomedrugallergies.xinzhongdonghas beenscratchinganitchforthepast14years.Likeacaseofhivesthatwon’tgoaway,theMrgfamilyofproteinshasbeennaggingatDongeversincehediscoveredthereceptorsonsensoryneuronsin2001.He’sbeenconsumedwithtryingto
figureoutwhattheproteinsdo.Andit’snoeasytask–thereare31differentversionsofthereceptorinmiceand8inhumans.Sofar,theHHMIearlycareerscientisthaslearnedthatsomeofthereceptorssenseitchandotherssensepain.Hislabteam’smostrecentdiscoveryissomewhatofananomaly:they’vefoundanMrgreceptoronimmunecellsthatplaysaroleindrugallergies.
AllergicreactionsoccurwhenimmunoglobulinE(IgE)antibodiesperceiveathreattothebody–oftenanotherwiseharmlesssubstancelikecatdanderorpollen.TheIgEantibodiesbindtothesesubstancesanddockontospecificreceptorsonmastcells.Theseimmunecellsarepackedwithgranulesofhistamineandotherproinflammatorymoleculesthatleadtothehives,irritation,orpainassociatedwithallergies.WhentriggeredbyIgEantibodies,mastcellsreleasetheirpayload,producinganallergicreaction.
Thoughmastcellsaretypicallyactivatedbyanallergy-specificIgEantibody,theycanalsobeactivatedbyawiderangeofotherunrelatedthings,explainsBenjaminMcNeil,apostdocinDong’slabatJohnsHopkinsUniversity.“Peoplewhodisplaysevereallergicreactionstoenvironmentalchemicals,FDA-approveddrugs,andparasites,forexample,oftendon’thaveanyIgEantibodiesagainstthesethings,”hesays.“Theirreactionsaremastcell-mediated,butviaadifferentpathway.”Themajorityofcompoundsthattriggersuchantibody-independentreactionsarecollectivelyknownas“basicsecretagogues,”becauseoftheirpositive,orbasic,chargeandtheirabilitytocausemastcellstosecretetheirgranules.
WhenMcNeiljoinedthelab,in2011,hepickedwhathethoughtwasafairlysimpleproject:figureoutthefunctionofahumanMrgreceptorcalledMRGX2.“Itwassupposedtobeastraightforwardproject,”McNeilsays.“Iwasaneuroscientistandwantedtostudysensorybiology.WethoughtthatMRGX2wasonneurons,too,sothiswasawayformetolearnthetechniquesinthelabwhilecharacterizingthereceptor.”But,asisoften
thecaseinscientificresearch,itwasn’tthatsimple.TheveryfirstthingMcNeildiscoveredwasthatMRGX2isnotexpressedinneurons.
In2006,agroupofJapanesescientistspublishedapapersuggestingthatMRGX2mightbeinvolvedinnon-IgEmastcellresponses.Followinguponthislead,McNeildiscoveredthatampleamountsoftheproteinwereexpressedinhumanandmousemastcells.Infact,hesays,“It’sthemostmastcell-specificgeneintheentiregenome.Theonlywaytoreallydefineamastcellisbythis.”Inotherwords,ifacellexpressestheMRGX2 gene,it’sdefinitelyamastcell.
Thenextstepwasconfirmingthereceptor’sfunction.AfterMcNeildiscoveredthatasimilarMrgprotein–Mrgb2–existsonmousemastcells,hecreatedmicethatdidn’texpressthegenetotesttheprotein’saffinityfordifferentcompounds.Chemicalsthattriggeredthereceptorwouldcauseanallergicreactioninnormalmicebutnotintheknockoutmice.McNeilwentontotesteverybasicsecretagoguehecouldgethishandson.Strikingly,everythinghetriedseemedtoactivatethereceptor.“Afterthat,Irealized,‘Okay,thisisareallybizarrereceptor,’andstartedexpandingthelistofcandidates,”herecalls.
6 Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
Intheend,thelistofcompoundsthatactivatedtheMrgmouseanalogreceptorwashuge.Itincludedinsectvenoms,cancerandHIVmedications,neuromuscular-blockingdrugscommonlyusedforanesthesiaduringsurgery,andseveralmoleculesinaclassofantibioticscalledfluoroquinolones.Allofthecompoundshadtwocharacteristicsincommon–theyweresmallandpositivelycharged.“Theyareotherwisecompletelyunrelated,structurallyspeaking,”McNeilsays.“Theycandifferbyafactoroftenintheirsizeandhavetotallydifferentcompositions.It’sreallyremarkablethatthere’sjustonesinglereceptorforallofthesesubstances.”
Thestudy,publishedinNatureonMarch12,2015,hasopenedthefloodgatesfordozensofnewexperimentsandcollaborationsin
theDonglaboratory.McNeilisscreeningothersuspectedallergy-causingcompoundsforbindingtoMRGX2.DonghasstartedworkingwithscientistsatGlaxoSmithKlinetofindsmallmoleculesthatcanblockMRGX2butstillallowIgE-mediatedactivityinmastcells.He’salsodevelopingadrug-bindingassayforMRGX2thatwillallowpharmaceuticalcompaniestotestwhethertheirnewcompoundselicitallergicreactions.
Andthere’salsomoreworktobedoneonotherMrgfamilymembers.“Westillhavemanyothergenestostudy,”saysDong.“Wedon’tknowexactlywheretheyarelocated,wherethey’reexpressedintissues,andwhattheirfunctionsare.”Clearly,it’sanitchhe’snotreadytostopscratchinganytimesoon.—Nicole Kresge
“It’s really remarkable that there’s just one single receptor for all of these substances.”—benjaminmcneilG
rah
amR
oum
ieu
7HHMIBulletin/Spring2015
Spring2015/HHMIBulletin8
Bench Report
Autism’s Genetic RootsUsing a fresh approach, researchers are making progress in unraveling the genetic complexities of the disorder.autismis notorious forthebroadrangeandvariableintensityofsymptomsthatcanimpairachild’sbehavior,communication,andsocialinteractions.Scientistshavelongknownthatdevelopmentaldisabilityisstronglyinfluencedbygenetics,butpinpointingacauseforautism’sonsethasprovenfrustrating.Evenidenticaltwinscanhavevastlydifferentformsofthecondition.
Apromising“genotype-first”strategypioneeredbyHHMIInvestigatorEvanEichleroftheUniversityofWashingtonisnowgivingthesearchforanswersamuch-neededboost.Insteadofbeginningwithadetailedcharacterizationofanindividual’ssymptomsandthenhuntingfortheresponsiblegeneormutation,EichlersequenceslargeamountsofDNAfrommultiplepatientsandthenseeksoutsharedgeneticvariantsthatmaypointtowardcommonpathstothedisorder.
Theapproachhasyieldedagrowinglistofautismsubtypesinwhichchildrenwiththesamemutationhaveahighlysimilarsuiteofsymptoms.“Ifeellikewe’rekindofwherecancerwasasafield20yearsago,”Eichlersays.Cancer,oncewidelyconsideredasingledisease,hassincebecomeanumbrellaofmorethan200types,eachwithitsowngeneticandenvironmentaldeterminants.“Iliketothinkthatthisiswhatwe’redoinginthecaseofautism:we’rehelpingtounravelthiscomplexity.Butwe’redoingitwithgeneticsfirst,”hesays.
Adecadeago,autismresearchersbeganfindinggeneticcluesinoftensporadic
mutationsknownascopynumbervariations,orCNVs,inwhichbigchunksofchromosomalDNAaremissingorduplicated.EichlerandhiscollaboratorsdiscoveredthatsomeoftheseCNVsoccurredalmostexclusivelyinchildrenwithautismordevelopmentaldelays.
Soonthereafter,aseriesoftechnologicalbreakthroughsbeganallowing“next-generation”DNAsequencingmethodstomorequicklyandcheaplyspelloutthegeneticcodeofautismpatients.Withthenewtools,Eichlerandcolleaguesbegansequencingtheexome–the1.5percentofthegenomethatencodesproteins–ofaffectedindividualsandtheirparents.Thistime,theresearchersfocusedonsinglebase-pairmutationsandsmallinsertionsordeletionstozeroinonspecificgenes.Evenwithonly20familiesinthatstudy,“wewerethrilledwiththecandidategenesthatwewereseeing,”Eichlersays.“Therewasalreadyhandwritingonthewallthatthiswasgoingtobeproductive.”
WhenheandotherresearchersappliedthesamestrategytoamuchlargercollectionofDNAfrompatients,parents,andunaffectedsiblings,theyfoundmoreevidenceforanexcessof“gene-killing”mutationsinautismpatients.Afterpoolingtheirresults,however,thelabteamsfoundthatthevastmajorityofmutationsmappedtoseparategenes.“JustastherearemanyroadstoRome,therearemanywaystogettoanautisticstate,”Eichlerexplains.Despitetheexcitementofseeingastronggeneticsignal,theresearchersrealizedtheywouldneedmanymoreDNAsamplestoprovetheinvolvementofanysinglegene.
Toscaleuptheeffort,Eichlerorganizedalargedata-sharingconsortiumoflabs,andaDecember2012paperinSciencetargeting44candidategenesdemonstratedthegroup’snewfoundpower.Bysequencingthegenesinnearly2,500individualswithautismspectrumdisorders,theconsortiumfounddisruptivemutationsinsixgenesthataccountedforanestimated1percentofallsporadiccases.
Asthesequencingeffortaccelerated,distinctgeneticsubtypesofautismbegantoemerge.Tellingly,individualswiththesamedisruptedgenetendedtosharesimilarphysical,clinical,andbehavioraltraits.BasedonearlyevidenceimplicatingagenecalledCHD8,forexample,Eichlerandcolleaguessequencedthe
geneagainin3,700individualswithautismordevelopmentaldelay.AstheyreportedinaJuly2014Cellstudy,theiranalysisyielded15independentmutations–andthetallyhassincesurpassed20.
Byhavingthechildrenre-evaluatedbypediatricians,psychiatrists,andotherclinicians,theresearchersdiscoveredthatalthoughonlyhalfoftheindividualsareintellectuallydisabled,mosthaveautismandmacrocephaly,oroverlylargeheads.Mostalsohaveexperiencedseveregastrointestinalproblems,andEichlersuspectsthatthesamegeneticsubtypemightcontributetoasleepdysfunctionthatkeepsthechildrenawakeforseveraldaysatatime.Inzebrafish,hislabfoundthatknockingouttheequivalentgeneresultedinfishwithsomewhatlargerheadsandimpaireddigestion.
AmongeightchildrenwithasporadicmutationinaseparategenecalledDYRK1A,bycontrast,Eichler’slabandcollaboratorsinAustraliaandEuropefoundthatallhaveautism,intellectualdisabilities,andunusuallysmallheads,ormicrocephaly.AsdescribedinaFebruary2015Molecular Psychiatrystudy,manyalsohavepointedchinsresultingfromaskulldeformitythatoftenrequiressurgerytoremoveovercrowdedteeth.Infruitflies,researchersdiscoveredthesamegenemutation20yearsagoandnamedit“minibrain”;DYRK1AisalsooneoftwogeneslinkedtocognitivedeficitsinDownsyndrome.
Eichlerandcolleaguesarenowscreeningthousandsoffamiliesformutationsin250candidategenesassociatedwithahalf-dozenproteinnetworkstentativelylinkedtoautism.Whenclinicianseventuallydeveloppotentialinterventionsforthedisorder,hesays,knowingwhichnetworkisimpairedinwhichpatientmayhelpdeterminetherightcourseoftherapy.
Intheinterim,henotes,ageneticdiagnosismayhelpparentsunderstandthebasisofautism,connectwithotherfamiliesforsupport,andrealizethatthey’renottoblamefortheirchild’scondition.“Ithinkitaddsacertainhumanaspecttoallofthisresearch,”Eichlersays.“Afteryearsofbeinginthisbusiness,IfindthisparttobesometimesbetterthantheNature andSciencepapers:thefactthatfortheseindividualgenes,we’rereallymakinganimpactonfamilies’livesinwhatfeelslikeverysubstantialways.”–Bryn Nelson P
atri
ckK
ehoe
“Just as there are many roads to Rome, there are many ways to get to an autistic state.”—evaneichler
Evan Eichler uses a genetics-first approach to unravel autism’s complexities.
Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
Open and Shut CaseResearchers are uncovering details of the molecules that control the development of stomatal pores on a leaf’s surface.it’s nowonder thatDominiqueBergmanntalksaboutherArabidopsiscellsactingliketoddlersandadolescents.Justthewayaparentmarksherkids’heightsonadoorframe,she’sspenthercareerchartingplantcelldevelopment.
“Howdoyougofromanaïvestemcellwithallsortsofpossibilitiestobeing
committedtoafateasadifferentiatedcell?”wondersBergmann,anHHMI-GBMFinvestigatoratStanfordUniversity.“Wedon’thaveanywhereawholerecordofhowanorganisbuiltfromthebeginningtotheend.”
ButBergmannhasnowmadehugestridesintrackingfromstarttofinishthedevelopmentofdiscretemulticellularstructuresonaleafandinplottingthedecisionstheircellsweremakingalongtheway.InanenterprisingnewstudypublishedApril6,2015,in Developmental Cell,herlaboratorytrackedtheshiftinggeneticprogramsofdevelopingleafcellsasstemcellsarise,differentiate,andformacompletestructure.
Theambitiousinvestigationwaspossible,inpart,becausethestructureshestudiesismadeupofjusttwospecializedguardcellsthatformaporeontheleaf’ssurface.Theso-calledstoma,Greekfor“mouth,”allowsplantstobreatheincarbondioxideandexpeloxygen.Stomataformationunfoldssimplyandelegantlyovertwodaysontheleafsurface,whereitcanbewatchedinrealtime.ThatgaveBergmannanedge:in2006and2007,herlabteamidentifiedthethreetranscriptionfactorsthatorchestrate,insequence,aleafcell’sentryintothestomatallineage,itsinitialcommitmenttobecomeaguardcellprecursor,anditsterminaldifferentiationintoaguardcell.
Whenthatsequenceisdisruptedbymutationsinthetranscriptionfactors,theappearanceofstomataonleavesisaltered.SPEECHLESS(SPCH)andMUTEmutantssportno“mouths,”whileFAMAmutants,namedfortheRomangoddessofspreadingrumors,produceanoverabundanceofdysfunctionalmouths.ThesethreemoleculesprovidedBergmannwithahandywayofisolatingcellsateachdevelopmentalstage,sothatherteamcoulddocumenthowchanges
inthecells’geneticprogramsmightdirectdevelopmentaldecisions.
“Ifyouthinkaboutthetransitionoftheadolescentyearsintoadulthood,alotofthingshappenduringthattime,”saysBergmann.“Wewantedtocapturethissortofgrowingupoverdevelopmentaltime.Whatgeneticswitchisflippinginthesecellstosay,‘I’mdonewithbeingastemcell;I’mgoingtocommitmyselftosomething’?”
Theteamsetouttouseknowncell-sortingtechniqueswithfluorescentlytaggedversionsofSPCH,MUTE,andFAMA,amongothermarkers,toidentifyandseparatethedifferentdevelopmentalstages.However,thosetechniqueswereintendedforfree-floatingmammalianimmunecells,notplantcellslockedtogetherbycellwalls.
AdaptingtechniquespioneeredbyHHMI-GBMFInvestigatorPhilipBenfey,Bergmann’sgroupwasabletodissolvethecellwalls,buttheystillhadtoamassenoughofthefleetingintermediatestemcellstogetanaccuratereadoutofthecells’entirearrayofactivelyexpressedgenes.Thesorting,combinedwithgenesequencing,revealedwhichgeneswereactiveateachtransitioninstomatadevelopment.
10
Bench Report To see an animation of 24 hours of stomata development, go to hhmi.org/
bulletin/spring-2015.
11HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015
theyfound,cellshadactivatedgenesrelatedtochromatinorDNAmodification,whichseemedtosignalcommitment.“Theysettleddown–theyarenotturningonabunchoffunctionalproteinsyet,buttheyarenolongerpluripotent,”Bergmannexplains.“They’velockedintothatdevelopmentalpath.”
Inthefinal,differentiatedguardcellstage,theteamsawsomeofthosefunctionalproteinscomeonline,includingactivegenesthatencodesensorysystemsandionchannelsthatregulatetheopeningandclosingofstomata.
Bergmannnowfeelsshehasanoverarchingviewofthestoma’sdevelopment–fromamessyinfancyfullofpotential,throughanadolescencefocusedonchoosingapath,toanadultphasewithitsfatelockeddown.“Weseethecellgofromachaoticstate,whereitcoulddoanything,tobecomingmoreandmorecontrolled,”shesays.
Thekeystothatprocess,itturnsout,arethetranscriptionfactorsthatherlabidentified:it’sSPCHthatopensthegeneticdoorstovariousnascentpossibilitiesandFAMAthatshutsthosedoorstolockinthecell’smaturefate.—Kendall Powell
Images from a time series in stomata formation. Cells at different developmental stages are marked by nuclei labeled green (SPCH, stem-cell like), pink (MUTE, committed), or blue (FAMA, differentiating). The first two panels show the same group of cells at an early time point; in the third panel, taken a day later, cells are maturing. Scale bar in each is 5 microns.
But,Bergmannadmits,“Itwasamiserableexperimenttodo,”requiringtensofthousandsofseedlingstogetatleast2,000cellsofeachtype.
Onceherteamhadalistoftheactivegenespresentineachdevelopmentalstageofastomatalcell’slife,theycomparedtheirgeneticprofilestothoseofplantcelltypesthathadbeencharacterizedinotherlabs.Theyfoundthattheearlieststemcells,taggedandsortedbySPCH,werehighlyvariableanddidn’tquitematchtheprofilesofanyotherplantcellsoutthere.
“Itwaslikeabunchoftoddlersrunningaround.Therewasgreatpromisethere,butyoucouldn’tpredictanything,”saysBergmann.“Weinterpretedthatasreflectingtheirpluripotency.”(Thisobservationcomplementedanotherrecentfindingbyherlabteam–thatSPCHoscillationsresetsomeleafcells’identitytothestem-cellstate,sothenumberofstomataontheleafcanadjusttoenvironmentalchanges,suchasintemperatureorhumidity.)
Tostudythenextdevelopmentalstage,inwhichcellsbecometheprecursorguardmothercells,theteamtaggedandsortedcellsusingMUTEasamarker.Atthisstage,
“How do you go from a naïve stem cell with all sorts of possibilities to being committed to a fate as a differentiated cell?”—dominiquebergmannB
erg
man
nla
b
byrachelehrenberg
Show of Force Scientists are learning myriad ways that small forces add up to a big impact on the development of organisms, from plants to animals.
illustrationbymartinnicolausson
JK
evin
Wol
f
14 Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
jenniferzallenhas scrutinizedmillionsofcells,butthedayshewitnessedafruitflycellinatug-of-warstandsout.
Zallen,anHHMIearlycareerscientistatMemorialSloanKetteringCancerCenter,wasexploringtheroleofmechanicalforcesinthedramaticelongationthatafruitflyembryoundergoesduringitsdevelopment.Overameretwohours,roughlyathousandcellsmobilizeenmasseandrearrangethemselvesintoanascentflythat’shalftheembryo’soriginalwidthandtwiceitslength.Previousworkhadimplicatedthemotorproteinmyosininthismassmovement,soZallen’steamlabeledmyosinwithafluorescenttagandriggedavideocameratothemicroscopesotheycouldwatchtheproteininaction.Then,herpostdocRodrigoFernandez-Gonzalezdelicatelypokedthetipofaglassneedleintotheembryoandsuckedinthetiniestbitoffluid,yankingonanearbycell.
Myosinfloodedtothesite,enablingthepinnedcelltocontractandthenescape,essentiallypullingitselfawayfromtheneedle.“Itwasfast,”saysZallen,“toofasttoinvolvechangesingeneexpressioninthenucleus.”Therewasnochangeinthecell’sgeneticmakeupandnochemicalsignalrecruitingmyosintotheneedle’stip.Yetthecell
anditsneighborshadexhibitedanimmediateandcollectiveresponsetothetugofthesuction.Justexperiencingmechanicaltensionappearedtobeenoughtokickmyosinintogear.
Thoseexperiments,publishedinDevelopmental Cellin2009,arepartofagrowingeffortbyscientiststoelucidatetheroleofmechanicalforcesinshapingbiologicaltissuesand,ultimately,entireorganisms.Theresearchisnotonlyyieldingnewinsightsintothestunningaestheticsofanimalandplantmorphology,
butitmayalsoleadtonewtricksforcontrollingplantarchitectureorforhaltingcancer’sspread.
Scientistshavelongappreciatedtheideathatmechanicalforcesareintegraltocreatingshapeandform.Nearlyacenturyago,intheintroductiontohistreatiseOn Growth and Form,ScottishscientistD’ArcyThompsonwrote,“Cellandtissue,shellandbone,leafandflower,aresomanyportionsofmatter,anditisinobediencetothelawsofphysicsthattheirparticleshavebeenmoved,moldedandconformed.”
Theimportanceofthosephysicallawstotheformationofhealthytissuesandorganshasalsolongbeenacknowledged:weight-bearingexerciseiscrucialformaintainingstrongbones,andturgorpressureoncellwallsofplantskeepsleavesandflowersfromwilting.Butduringthemolecularrevolutionofthe1990s,theroleofgenes,signalingmolecules,andproteinsindevelopmenttookcenterstage,partiallyobscuringtheimportantroleofphysicalforces.
Arevivalisnowunderway.Armedwithknowledgegleanedduringthemolecularera,alongwithnewtoolsformanipulatingandimagingcellsandunprecedentedcomputingpower,scientistsarereexaminingtheprofoundimpactofforce.Byzeroinginoncellsastheyaresqueezedandstretchedinrealtime,researcherscanuntanglethedevelopmentalconsequencesofforcegeneration,propagation,anddetection.Effortstoquantifytheseactions,aswellasthecellularplayersinvolved,areleadingtotestablemodelsthatmayeventuallyrevealhowtissuesandfullyfledgedorganismstakeshape.
Push and PullSomestrikingexamplesoftheimportanceofmechanicalforcesarecomingfromstudiesofthedevelopingembryoofthatworkhorseofthelab,thefruitflyDrosophila melanogaster.Unlikeplantcells,whichforthemostpartdon’tmove(thoughthereareexceptions),thecellsofdevelopingfliesandotheranimalsoftentravelastheyrealizetheirultimatefate.
“Duringdevelopment,cellsoftenmoveagreatdistancefromwheretheyareborntowheretheyneedtoendup,”saysZallen.“Thesecellshavetonavigatethroughcomplexmechanicalenvironments,andtheyareconstantlypushingandpullingoneachotherastheymove.”
ThemotorproteinmyosinII,bestknownforitsroleinmusclecontraction,hasemergedastheprimarymediatorofthispushingandpulling.SomeofmyosinII’sjobsincludehelpingcellsdivideandtravelastheycontributetothedevelopmentoftissue-levelstructuressuchasgroovesandtubes.
WhenZallenwasapostdocinthePrincetonUniversitylabofHHMIInvestigatorandNobelLaureateEricWieschausintheearly2000s,shewasinvestigatinghowturningoncertaingenesinaparticularspatialpatterncouldorientcellsastheDrosophilaembryoelongated.Here,myosinIIcameintoplay;duringelongation,theforce-generatingproteinaccumulatedatcellbordersalongthefly’shead-to-tailaxis.Continuingthisworkinherownlab,Zallenfoundthattheaccumulationandcontractionofmyosinwasdrivinga
Jennifer Zallen thinks that cells might use force as a compass, to help them move in the right direction.
15HHMIBulletin/Spring2015
coordinated,multicellularmovementthatledtoadramaticchangeintheembryo’sshape.
Zallenbegantowonderifcellsmightdetectandmakeuseoftheforcesgeneratedbytheirneighbors,inspiringthetug-of-warexperimentsandcementingtheroleofmechanicaltensioninregulatingmyosin’sactivity.Herteamshowedthatonceasinglecellstartstoconstrict,thatforcespreads:pullingonneighboringcellscausesthemtoconstrictaswell,producingacontractilecablethatextendsacrosscellularneighborslikealongrubberband.
“We’reveryinterestedinthepossibilitythatcellscouldusetheseforcesasacompasstohelpthemmoveintherightdirection,”saysZallen.“Thereisanincreasingappreciationthatforcescanactassignalsthatinfluencetheshape,fate,andbehaviorofcellstoenablethemtoassembleintotissuesduringdevelopment.”
Zallen’slabgrouphassinceshownthatastheDrosophilaembryoelongates,thecontractionoftheselongcablesofmyosin–andmyosin’spartnerincrime,thecytoskeletalproteinactin–drawscellsintounexpectedintermediatestructures,littleflower-likeconglomeratescalledrosettes.Theserosettesformwhencellsalignintocolumnsandshrinktheirconnectededgestogether,thankstothecontractingmyosincablethatpullsseveralcellsintocontactatasinglepoint.Therosettesthendisassembleinadirectionperpendiculartothewaytheyformed.Theprocesstransformsaclusterofcellsthatstartedoutastallandthinintoonethatisnowshortandwide,promotingelongationoftheflyembryo.
Nowtheresearchersarestartingtopinpointvariouscellularplayersthatguideandrespondtothejostlinginvolvedinembryoelongation.In2012,Zallenandherteamreportedthatrosettesdon’tformproperlyinembryosthataren’tabletomakethesignalingmoleculeAbl,anenzymethatenablescellstoadheretoeachotherundertensionandexecutegroupcellmovements.Herteamalsodiscoveredthecell-surfaceproteinsthatarelaiddowninboldstripesalongtheembryo’shead-to-tailaxisand
thatguidethedirectionofcellmovementstohelpmaketheembryolongerandthinner.Thispatterningdirectsmyosin’scontractilemachinery,orchestratingthemassmovementofelongation,reportedZallenandcolleaguesinNatureinNovember2014.
WieschauscomparesthepatterningthatprecedesforcegenerationinDrosophilatoimaginarydottedlinesonasheetoforigamipapershowingwherecreasesneedtogotofolditintoabird.“Onceyouhaveapattern,itgivesyouawaytolocalizeforces;thenyoucangetform,”hesays.Theideathattissueremodelingmightresultfromtheconcertedactionofassembliesofcellsratherthanfromindividualcellsisaviewofdevelopmentthat’sgainingtraction,headds.
“Webeganbythinkingoftheproblemasawholebunchofbricks.Ifyoucouldunderstandhoweachbrickbehaved,youcouldputthatalltogetherandsayhowitleadstoawholeorganism,”Wieschausexplains.“Butoverthepastcoupleofyears,we’vebecomeawarethatmaybeit’seasier–ormoreusefulormorecorrect–torealizethatchangesinmorphologyarebiggerthansinglecells.”
Mass MovementThere’sgrowingevidencethatnetworksofcontractilemyosincablesareaforcetobereckonedwithduringembryonicelongationinorganismsotherthanthefly.In2012,forexample,GerdWalzoftheUniversityHospitalFreiburginGermanyandHHMIEarlyCareerScientistJohnWallingfordoftheUniversityofTexasatAustinandcolleaguesshowedthatmyosincablesplayacrucialroleintheelongationofkidneytubulesintwomodelvertebrates,thefrogXenopus andmice.Otherresearch,byMasatoshiTakeichiandcolleaguesattheRIKENCenterforDevelopmentalBiologyinJapanandAnnSutherlandandcolleaguesattheUniversityofVirginia,revealedasimilarroleformyosincablesduringthedevelopmentofthechickandmouseneuraltube.
Recentworkalsoimplicatesphysicalforcesatworkinmetastaticcancer.ResearchfromValerieWeaver’slabattheUniversityofCalifornia,SanFrancisco,aswellasin
“During development, cells often move a great distance from where they are born to where they need to end up.”—jenniferzallen
Eric Wieschaus’s lab team studies how force influences the flow of groups of cells.
Kev
inW
olf
Eri
cR
eed
labselsewhere,hasfoundthatthephysicalstiffnessoftheextracellularmatrix,aweboffibersoutsidethecells,playsaprominentroleintheaggressivenessofbreastcancer.Enhancingthemechanicalstiffnessofthismatrixactivatesaproteinthataidsthetumor’sabilitytospread,Weaverandcolleaguesreportedin Cancer Researchlastyear.Thestiffness,whichputsphysicaltensiononepithelialcells,alsodrivesmalignancybydownregulatingthecells’productionofanimportanttumorsuppressorprotein,WeaverandhercolleaguesrecentlyreportedinNature Medicine.
Aviewofcellsassocialconstructs,whichrespondtomechanicalcuesenmasse,mightleadtowaystointerfere
withthosecueswhenthey’reimplicatedindisease,saysZallen.“Itmaybeusefultothinkaboutthemetastasisofcertaincancersasagroupactivity,”shesays.
Wieschaushastakenthisholisticapproachtotheextreme.Hislabhadbeeninvestigatingthedevelopmentoftheventralfurrow,aninwardfoldingofcellsthatcharacterizesthetransitionoftheDrosophilaembryofromasinglesheetofcellsintothreegermlayersthatultimatelydifferentiateintoadultorgansandtissues.Thisstageoccursrightafterthecellmembranesform,whenthefly-to-betransformsfromonegiantcell
withmanynucleitoanembryoof6,000cells.WorkingwithhisPrincetoncolleaguesOlegPolyakov,
KonstantinDoubrovinski,andBingHe,Wieschausdevelopedanapproachthatusestwo-photonimagingandfluorescentbeadstotracktheflowofcellsastheventralfurrowforms.Theresearchersdiscoveredthattheinfoldingresultsfrommechanicalforcesintheformofpulsingcontractionsdrivenbymyosinonthecellsurface.Mathematicalmodelingrevealedthatthecellswereflowingmuchlikeaviscousfluid–behaviorcapturedinthetidyStokesequationsofphysics,whichdescribetheflowofsuchfluidsaspaintandlava.Thisraisedthequestionofhowventralfurrowdevelopmentwouldproceediftheembryoweren’tpartitionedintotheindividualunitswecallcells.
Toinvestigatetheforcesintheabsenceofcells,Wieschaus’steamknockedouttwogenes– slamanddnk –thatdirectthedevelopmentofthecellmembranes.Remarkably,theyfoundthat,duringventralfurrowformation,afruitflyembryowithoutcellmembranesbehavedverysimilarlytoonewithcellmembranes.AstheteamreportedinNature inApril2014,theprocessproceededinamessierandslowerfashionthanitdidinanembryowithcellmembranes,but
theflowpatternswereessentiallythesame,upendingthecell-focusedview.
“Ascellbiologists,webelievethatcellmembranesarereallyimportantforeverything,”Wieschaussays.“Butwefoundthatwecouldeliminateallthepartitioning,havethisbiggooofcytoplasmflowinglikeafluid,andyettheembryogoesonanddoesitsstuff.”
Asimplemodelofmechanicalforcesviamyosinconstrictioncouldaccountforthechangesinshapethatleadtoventralfurrowformation,Wieschaussays.Similarsqueezingatacell’sapicalendoccursduringfoldinginotherplacesandotherembryos,includingduringthedevelopmentoftheDrosophilarespiratorysystemandtheclosureoftheXenopus neuraltube.Suchcommonalitiessuggestthattransmittingforceviaviscousflowmightbeanotherfundamentalmechanismforestablishingform.
Pattern and FormMechanicalforcesmayalsoexplainpatternsobservablewiththenakedeye,includinganenduringmysteryofplantarchitecture.Whilemanyanimalsundergoamassiverearrangementofcellstoformanembryothatthen,inessence,simplyenlarges,plants’growthisoftenindeterminate–thatis,theycanaddnewleaves,branches,andflowersuntildeath.Thisnewgrowthisn’thaphazard;itfollowsaconspicuouslyregularpatternthat’sobservablebylooking,forexample,head-onatthetipofanewshoot.Itturnsoutthatmechanicalforcesgeneratedinthehotbedofplantembryonicgrowth–theshootapicalmeristem,aconcentratedregionofdividingcells–arecrucialindrivingthispredictablegeometricmorphology.
EversincetheancientGreekscholarTheophrastusnotedthisstrikingregularityinthearrangementofleavesaroundaplantstem,botanists,physicists,andmathematicianshavebeentryingtoexplainhowsuchsystematicplacement,calledphyllotaxis,arises.(Moremodern-dayscholarswhohavestudiedthephenomenonincludeD’ArcyThompson,whonotedthecrisscrossingpatternsthatformspiralsinpineconesandsunflowerheads.)ItwasphyllotaxisthatturnedtheattentionofElliotMeyerowitz,anHHMIinvestigatorattheCaliforniaInstituteofTechnology(Caltech),towardtheroleofmechanicalforcesingeneratingform.
Usingliveimagingtechniques,Meyerowitzandhiscolleagueshadbeeninvestigatinghowdifferingconcentrationsoftheplanthormoneauxinrelatedtopatternsofplantgrowth.Ithadlongbeenknownthatauxinwascrucialindeterminingwhereeachnewflowerorleafappearedonaplant;experimentsdatingbacktothe1930sdemonstratedthatdaubingapasteofauxinontothemeristempromptedthegrowthofnewplantorgans.SoMeyerowitz–withateamthatincludedhisthenCaltechcolleaguesBruceShapiroandMarcusHeisler,plusHenrikJönsson,thenofLundUniversityinSweden,andEricMjolsnessoftheUniversityofCalifornia,Irvine–begantrackingtheconcentrationofauxininmeristemcellsofthemodelplantArabidopsis.
PreviousworkinseverallaboratorieshadsuggestedthatthemembraneproteinknownasPIN1wasprobablyanauxinpump,controllingthedirectionofthehormone’sflowoutof
Elliot Meyerowitz investigates the impact of mechanical stress on growth in plants.
16 Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
To see forces at work in plants and animals, go to hhmi.org/bulletin/spring-2015.
cellsintheplantshoot’smeristem.ButPIN1’slocationisn’tfixedincellmembranes:thepumpingproteincanmovearound,andsomethingwasdirectingittomembraneregionsthatwereadjacenttocellsalreadyhighinauxin.Meyerowitzandhiscolleaguessuspectedthatauxin’sinfluenceonthelocationofthePIN1pumpcouldleadtoaparticularspatialpatternofhighauxinconcentration,andthatthismightaccountfortheregularityofphyllotacticspiralsandwhorls.IfcellssomehowsensedtheirownhighauxinandrecruitedPIN1tothenearestmembraneregionsinadjacentcells,theauxinconcentrationwouldincreaseevenmoreintheoriginalcell.Thiswouldinducegrowthofanewleaforflower.Butasauxinconcentrationsincreasedlocally,neighboringcellswouldbecomedepletedinauxin,leavingaspotwithnoleaforflower.Cellsfartherawayfromthisauxin-depletedsitewould,bycomparison,havemoreauxinandthuswouldrecruitPIN1toattractmoreauxinandagaininduceanewleaforflower.
Theresearcherscreatedamathematicalmodelthatincorporatedthisproposedfeedbackmechanism.Whentheyrancomputersimulationsofthemodel,auxinpeaksemergedatregulardistances,capturingtheregularpatterningofphyllotaxis–afindingpublishedinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesin2006.
Butmysteriesremained,includinghowtheplantcellsweresensinglocalauxinconcentrations.Thehormonewasknowntoweakenplantcellwalls,leadingtheteamtowonderwhethermechanicalstressmightsignaltocellsthattheywereadjacenttoneighboringcellshighinauxin.This,inturn,wouldrecruitPIN1totheregionofthecellmembranenearestthehigh-auxinneighbor.
Inaseriesofelegantexperiments,includingonesinwhichthescientistsweakenedorobliteratedparticularplantcellwallswithalaser,mechanicalstressindeedemergedasthemediatorofPIN1’sdynamicbehavior.TheyfoundthatasPIN1directedtheflowofauxinfromanareaoflowtohighauxinconcentration,thecellshighestinauxinexpanded.Inplants,cellwallsareshared.Soitappearedthatmechanicalstressonacommonwallalertedthecellularneighborthatauxinconcentrationwashighnearby,thusbringinginPIN1.
“Basically,alltheobservationswereintheliterature,butnoonehadthoughttoputstressintotheequation,”saysMeyerowitz,whopublishedthefindingswithMarcusHeislerandothercolleaguesinPLOS Biology in2010.
Morerecently,Meyerowitzandhiscollaboratorshaveshownthatmechanicalstressplaysanimportantroleinshapingplantcellsbeyondthemeristem.Itturnsoutthatthe
puzzle-shapedpiecesoftheso-calledpavementcellsonaleaf’ssurfacecreateintracellularstressesthatcausereorganizationofthecytoskeletalproteinscalledmicrotubules.Theseproteinsthenhelpdialuptheproductionofcellulose,which,inturn,reinforcesthecellwallsagainstthestress,theteamreportedineLifeinApril2014.Combiningthemicrotubulefindingswiththeauxin-relatedresearchyieldsasimplemodeloffeedbackdrivenbyphysicalforces:“Mechanicalstresstellscellshowtogrow,andcellgrowthcreatesmechanicalstress–andmorphology,”Meyerowitzandhiscolleagueswroteina2014 Current Biology reviewpaper.
Otherlabsarefindingevidenceofphysicalstressorsaswell.Forexample,AudreyCreffandGwynethIngramoftheLaboratoiredeReproductionetDéveloppementdesPlantesinLyon,France,recentlyshowedthatamechanicallysensitivelayerofcellsintheseedcoatofArabidopsisrespondstostressexertedbytheseed’snutritivetissue,theendosperm,resultinginafine-tuningofseedsize.
TheMeyerowitzlabisnowlookingforcellularstresssensorsresponsibleforthecellwalleffectsonPIN1andforthedifferentsensorsthatmediatetheeffectsofstressonthecytoskeleton.Hebelievesthatagreaterunderstandingoftherelationshipbetweenmechanicalforceandplantgrowthisimportantnotjustforelucidatingaplant’scurrentgrowthpatterns;theresearchmayalsoleadtotechniquesforengineeringsuperiorfoodcrops–forexample,producewithmodifiedleafarrangementsthatmaximizephotosynthesisinaparticulargrowingregion.
“Nowthatwe’rebeginningtounderstandthefeedbackbetweenphysicalstressandgrowth,itmaygiveusanewwaytointervene–oratleastpredictwhatwouldhappenifwechangethings,”Meyerowitzsays.Andfordevelopmentalbiologyingeneral,bringingmechanicsbacktotheforemayhelpresolveoldermysteriesofshapeandform.
“Aspeoplestarttolookatthingsintermsofphysicalsignaling,notjustchemicalsignaling,itmayexplainquiteabit,”heobserves.“Itseemslikewecanmakesomerapidprogressinsolvingoldproblems.”
A view of cells as social constructs, which respond to mechanical cues en masse, might lead to ways to interfere with those cues when they’re implicated in disease.
17HHMIBulletin/Spring2015
18
All the World’s a
Stage
Marta Zlatic is as capable of
portraying the Greek heroine
Hecuba as she is of pulling back
the curtain on the neural circuitry
of fruit fly larvae. At both pursuits,
she’s won wide acclaim.
bysarahgoforth
19
photographybyelimeirkaplan
20 Spring 2015 / HHMI Bulletin
Iit’s hardto imaginetwosettingsmoredissimilarthanthevastrotundaofaGreektheaterandasmall,windowlessmicroscopyroomatHHMI’sJaneliaResearchCampus.ButGroupLeaderMartaZlaticisequallyathomeinbothspaces.Atthismoment,hermicroscope’snarrowbeamisilluminatingaDrosophilafruitflylarvaonitsownstage,thesemitransparentcreaturewrigglinginawaybarelyperceptibletothenakedeye.ToZlatic,thelarva’smovementsrepresentanuancedperformancefine-tunedbymillionsofyearsofevolution–andafoundationforunderstandingtheneuralbasisofbehavior.
Fifteenyearsago,whileshewasanundergraduateattheUniversityofCambridgeinEngland,Zlaticherselfwasinaspotlightonstage–asHecuba,theill-fatedqueenintheEuripidestragedy,The Trojan Women.Astudentoflinguisticsandneuroscience,ZlaticknewancientGreekandhadattendedtheauditionfortheplayoutofcuriosity.Lackingactingexperience,shewasassignedaroleinthechorus.Whentheleadactressquithalfwaythroughrehearsals,however,thedirector,impressedbyZlatic’sfluencywiththelanguageandtext,askedhertostepin.Audiencesandcriticscheeredtheperformance,andZlaticwentontolandastringofrolesknownfortheircomplexity:Electra,Medea,LadyMacbeth,evenOedipusRex.
“Anyonewhohasseenaplayshouldwonder:Howcanthiswonderfulsystem,thebrain,producesomanydifferentemotionsandbehaviors?”Zlaticsaystoday,seatedinhersparselydecoratedofficeupstairsfromthemicroscoperoominJanelia’seastwing.Threeemptychampagnebottles,oneforeachmajorpaperpublishedbyherlabinitsfiveyearsofexistence,sitnexttohercomputer.Thebottles,alongwiththehumblemodelorganismshehaschosenasherlife’swork,makeaquietstatementaboutthepatiencerequiredofscientistswhostudysuchambitiousquestions.Togobig,youmustoftenstartsmall.
Zlaticleansforward.Thehumanbrain,sheexplains,has100billion neurons,roughlyequivalenttothenumberofstarsintheMilkyWay.Fruitflieshaveonly100,000,andafruitflylarvajust10,000.Reduceanervoussystemtothatrelativesimplicity,andsuddenlyitbecomespossibletostudyitcomprehensively–notonlytodescribewhatitlookslike(mapitvisually),butalsotodeterminewhichcellsconnecttooneanother(mapitswiring,or“connectome”)andtofigureouthowthosenetworkslistenandrespondtosignalsfromtheoutsideworld(mapitsbehavior).Zlatic’steam,withaconstellationofcollaborators
atJaneliaandaroundtheworld,isbuildingsomethingakintoGoogleMapsforthelarvalbrain,placingtheselayersofinformationontopofeachotherlikesatelliteimagesoverlaidonroadways.Theyarenowbeginningtooutline,withneuron-by-neuronprecision,theneuralcircuitsthatdeterminehowalarvarespondstoitsenvironmentanddecideswhatactionstotake.
Itisnofrivolousexercise.“Wecanlookatthismuchsimplersystem,anditssmallerrangeofbehaviors,andseethatmanyofthethingswelearnarethesameacrossspecies,”Zlaticexplains.Forexample,Drosophila larvaehavethesamesensorymodalitiesasmostanimals–sound,light,odor,touch,andheat.Furthermore,they’reabletoprocessthisinformation,rememberit,andmakedecisionsbasedonit.Howdoesanervoussystemmakebehavioralchoicesbasedonpreviousexperienceandamultitudeofsensoryinputs?Whatcanunderstandingthissimplesystemtellusaboutthehumanbrainandourcapacityforlanguage,art,andthepursuitofknowledge?
Zlaticwantstoknowtheanswerstothosequestions.Byallaccounts,herteamisalreadytakingstepstowardconstructingamodelforabrainatlas–onegoalofthemultimillion-dollarBRAIN(BrainResearchthroughAdvancingInnovativeNeurotechnologies)InitiativethatPresidentBarackObamaannouncedin2013.
“Wearetryingtounderstandwhat’shappeninginthebrainduringsensingandbehaving,”saysTihanaJovanic,apostdoctoralresearcherinZlatic’slab.“Gainingabetterunderstandingofhowthebrainworkswillhelpuncoverinsightsintohowdifferentneuralprocessesareintegratedsoanorganismcanfunctioninanever-changingenvironment.”
A Renaissance MindZlaticwasborninCroatia,theonlychildofatheoreticalphysicistandaphilosophymajorwhoworkedattheMinistryofCulture.Herparentsweregregariousandecumenicalintheirthinking,andshegrewupimmersedinlivelyconversationaboutartandpolitics,ofteninmixedlanguages.Throughoutheryouth,thefamilywasaslikelytobetravelingabroad–herfather’sresearchcareertookthefamilytoGermany,England,andCaliforniaformonthsatatime–astobeathomeinZagreb.
“IgrewupwiththeideathatIwantedtodobiology,becauseIwasfascinatedbylivingbeings–especiallyanimalsandtheirbehavior,”Zlaticreflects.“Ialsolovedliteratureandart.Ialwayssawthesethingsascomplementary.”Shehadboththetalentandtheopportunitytopickuplanguages,addingEnglish,French,andGermantoCroatian.Byage12,shewasalsostudyingLatinandancientGreekinschool.Atage30,shespokesixlanguages,inadditiontobeingliterateinLatinandancientGreek.
“Ilovedgrammarandtherulesoflanguage,”saysZlatic,“butIwasalsointerestedinbiologybecauseIwantedtounderstandhowthebrainwascapableofcreatingandlearningthesesystems.”Inhighschool,sheheld“thenaïveview”thatshecouldsomedayunderstandindetailhowthebraincreateslanguage,andshesetthatasagoalforherself.ShestudiedlinguisticsandRussianattheUniversityofZagrebinCroatiabeforeearningafullscholarshiptoTrinityCollegeattheUniversityofCambridge,whereshepursuedneuroscience.Everysummer,shewouldreturntoZagrebtocontinueherlanguagestudies.
“Tome,itwaslikeavacation,toreturntoZagrebeverysummer,”saysZlatic.“Itdidn’toccurtomethatIwasdoingsomethingunusual.”
Inherlastyearasanundergraduate,ZlaticwasinspiredbythelecturesofCambridgeneuroscientistMichaelBate,whowasworkingtounderstandhowneuralcircuitsforminDrosophilaembryos.Shefoundirresistibletheideathatonecouldwatchhowanervoussystemcomes
21HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015C
ard
ona
lab
Shewasnolesstalentedinthelab.WithHuppertandtwootherfriends,shewonfundinginaninnovationcompetitiontoformabiotechstart-upaimedatfillinganeedapparentfromherresearch–fora“virgincollector,”away,thatis,tomoreeasilycollectvirginfemalefruitflies.Thecompanydevelopedasyntheticpheromonethat,intheory,wouldpreventtheinsectsfrommating.Thecompoundsuppressedmatingmostofthetime,butnotallthetime,andthecompanyfailed.Zlatictookthebumpinstride,saysHuppert.“Shewastryingtofillaneed,tosolveaproblem,andsheknewthatwhatshelearnedwouldmakeherbetteratsolvingotherproblems,”hesays.
AboutthetimethatZlaticandHuppertwereestablishingtheircompany,developmentalneuroscientistJimTruman,thenattheUniversityofWashington,visitedtheBatelabonsabbatical.Trumanwasstudyinghowstemcellsdevelopintodifferentkindsofneuronsinthelarvalbrain–workthatwouldlaterprovideafoundationforZlatic’sbrain-behaviormapping.Zlatic,Trumansays,stoodout:“Shewasfullofpointedquestions,tirelessinherresearchandallofheractivities.Irememberthinkingitwasexhaustingjustwatchingher.”
In2006,JulieSimpson,oneofJanelia’sfirstgroupleaders,invitedZlatictojoinherlabaspartofthecampus’svisitingscientistprogram.SimpsonwasusingthegenetictoolsdevelopedbyJaneliaExecutiveDirectorGerryRubinandotherstostudytheneuralandgeneticbasisofadultfruitflybehavior.Zlatic–whobythenwascompletingavisitingpostdoctoralappointmentatColumbiaUniversityonaprestigiousTrinityCollegefellowship–joinedSimpson’sgroupandbeganpiecingtogetherthefirstlarvalbehaviormap.“IcameherewiththeideaoftryingtomapcircuitsandfindthefunctionandbehavioroftheneuronsIusedtostudy,”shesays.“IquicklyrealizedthiswastheplacetobeforthekindsofquestionsIwasinterestedin–therelationshipbetweenstructureandfunctionofthenervoussystem.Atthattime,nooneelseatJaneliawasworkingonthelarva,butJuliejustletmeplaywithlarvaeanyway.”
Ayearlater,sheearnedalabheadpositionatJaneliaandstartedherowngroup.
“Some people play sports, other people study. Marta studies. If she is interested in something, usually she is intensely interested in it.”—albertcardona
intobeing,couldactuallywitnessneuronsfindingtheirpartnercellsandformingconnections,knownassynapses.ShesecuredaPhD-trackpositioninBate’slabtostudytheearlieststepsinthatprocess–herideabeingthatbystudyinghowthenervoussystemdevelops,shewouldgaininsightsintoitsfunctionand,ultimately,intothebiologicalrootsofbehavior.
Zlaticfocusedherattentiononsensoryneuronsinthelarvae,studyinghowtheyformtheextensions,calledaxonsanddendrites,thatallowthemtocommunicatewithotherneurons.Onceinplace,anaxonbranchesatitstipandconnectswithanotherneuron’sdendrite,formingpartofacircuit.Neuronsresponsiblefordifferentsenses,suchasthedetectionofheatortouch,sendaxonstotheregionofthefly’snervoussystemspecifictothatsensation.Zlaticwantedtounderstandwhatwasguidingtheirchoiceoftarget.Weretheaxonsbeingguidedbypositionalcuestoterminateataparticularlocation–aspecific“address”inthenervoussystem–andjustconnectingwithwhatevercelltheyfoundatthatlocation?Orweretheyseekingaparticularpartner,irrespectiveoftheaddress?“Theanswerisposition,becausealteringaxons’abilitytosensepositionalcuesresultedintheirovershootingtheaddresswheretheirpartnersarenormallyfound.Theydidnotappeartocarewheretheirpartnerswere,”shesays.“Butwhatwecouldn’ttellwaswhethertheirpartnerscaredaboutthem,”sheadds,becausenoonehadpiecedtogetheraneuralcircuitfortheDrosophilanervecord.
OutsideBate’slab,sheremainedanavidthespian.Onstage,Zlaticwas“theabsolutestar,”remembersherfriendJulianHuppert,thenafellowPhDstudentatCambridgeandnowamemberoftheBritishParliament.“Shewasjustspellbindinglygood.”
This digital “map” of a fruit fly larva neural circuit highlights a neuron (yellow) that’s able to sense vibrations.
22 Spring 2015 / HHMI Bulletin
understandatthelevelofsingleneurons;andthecausalrelationshipbetweenneuronsandbehavior.”
Meanwhile,Cardonawasformulatinghisowndreamproject–tolayoutthefruitflylarva“connectome,”amapofneuralconnectivityinthebrain.ThenhegotajobinZurich.Butbythattimetheirrelationshipwasfarfromjustameetingofscientificminds.Theymanagedtonotonlystayintouchfromafar,butalsotogettogetherperiodically,witheachworkingasavisitingscientistattheother’sinstitute,untilCardonawashiredasagroupleaderatJaneliain2011.Theygotmarried–andalsocementedtheirresearchcollaboration.“Somepeopleplaysports,otherpeoplestudy,”saysCardona.“Martastudies.Ifsheisinterestedinsomething,usuallysheisintenselyinterestedinit.”
And,notestheircolleagueJimTruman,“Albert’sapproachtoscienceisverydifferentfromMarta’s,inacomplementaryway.Withouthisabilitiestoreconstructthenervoussystemofthelarva,basically,wewouldbeshootinginthedark.”
A Larva’s LifeSpendmuchtimewithZlaticoranyoneonherteamtoday,andyoumayneverlookatamaggotthesameway.Underthemicroscope,itswrigglesbecomelessrandom,evenpurposeful:Outintheworld,larvaewillsensiblytrytoapproachfoodandpleasantaromas,notesZlatic–butatthesametime,theyhavetoavoidarangeofthreateningsituations.Therearemanywaystoescapefromdanger,dependingonthecontextandtheanimal’spreviousexperience.Inthesamewaythatsomemammalscanwalk,trot,orgallopaway,larvaehavedifferentmeansofescape.Someofthesemeansarefastbutcostlyintermsofenergyexpenditure;othersmaybeslowerbutlesscostly.Often,theyneedtostringtogethersequencesofbehavior.
Zlaticwantedtounderstandhowtheanimal’snervoussystemchoosesamongthesevariousbehaviors.Thisisaproblemfacedbyallnervoussystems,butintheDrosophilalarvaitisparticularlytractable.Herteamusedagenetictoolkit,developedbyRubin,toactivatedifferentsetsofneuronsandwatchwhatthelarvaedidinresponse,likeflippingswitchesinacircuitbreakertotestthewiringbehindthewalls.
Rubin’slabhaddevelopedmorethanathousandmutantflystrainswithagenecalled GAL4 insertedintospecificclustersofneurons.Zlatic’steamcrossedthosestrainswithotherflystrainsthathadbeenengineeredtoproduce,inthepresenceofGAL4,alight-sensitiveproteincalledchannelrhodopsin.ThisgaveZlaticaccesstotheswitchboard.Byshininglightonlarvaefromeachhybridstrain,shecouldselectivelyactivatewhateverneuronshadbeenengineeredtoincludeGAL4.
ThensheandTomokoOhyama,aresearchspecialistinherlab,startedflippingswitches,videotapingthegroupsoflarvaeastheyperformed.Rightaway,theygleanedsomesurprisinginsights,saysOhyama,becausetheysawvariationbetweenindividuallarvaewhenthesameneuronswerestimulated.Thatindicatedtothescientiststhateventhemostdiscretebehaviorsareprobabilisticandnot100-percentpredictable.Still,clearpatternsbegantoemerge.ZlaticandOhyamaenlistedthehelpofateamofmachinelearningspecialistsandstatisticiansintheJohnsHopkinsUniversitylabofCareyPriebe,whodevelopedanalgorithmtoclassifythebehaviorswithgreaterprecisionthanthehumaneyecoulddiscern.Inthespringof2014,thescientistspublishedtheirwork,widelydeemedanewframeworkformappingbehaviortoindividualclassesofneurons,inthejournalScience.Inall,theyhadanalyzedthemovementsofnearly40,000larvae.
Zlaticcallsthisachievement“justthebeginning,”asthepaperdescribesonlywhichneuronsevokeagivenbehaviorandnotthecircuitmechanismsbywhichitoccurs.Thenextstepistorelatethisknowledgetotheconnectomeandaneuralactivitymap.“Martahasbeenasparkplugtokeepthisgoing;again,itisherenthusiasmthatreallymakeslarvalsystemsworkinthiscohesiveway,”saysTruman.
A Marriage of MindsBythattime,JaneliahadbecomeabustlinghubforthestudyoftheDrosophilabrain.AlbertCardona,ayoungSpanishdevelopmentalbiologistandneuroscientistwithawidesmileandenthusiasticmanner,cametothecampusforJanelia’sfirstflybrainconference,organizedbySimpson.
“ThewholefieldwasexcitedabouttheflylinescomingoutofGerryRubin’slab,”heremembers,“andtherewasanenergyaboutwhatthesegenetictoolswouldmakepossible.ButwhatIrememberaboutthatmeetingisonlyMarta.”Twoencountersstandout:Inone,ZlaticwasseatedbyherselfinJanelia’sdarkenedauditoriumbeforeatalk,andshepattedtheseatnexttoher.“Shesaid,‘Sithere,’andIdid,”Cardonalaughs.Intheother,hehadjoinedherinJanelia’spub,Bob’s,todiscussdatacomingoutofherlab.“Irememberthatasweweresittingtheretogether,thisguywhowasabig-shotconferenceattendeewastherealso,talkingwithus.Irememberjustthinking,Go away.”
CardonajoinedSimpson’slabasavisitingscientistonapilotprojectthatallowedhimtotakehundredsofelectronmicroscopeimagesofasegmentoftheflylarvalnervecord.Thiswasproofofconceptthatitwaspossibletoreconstructwhataneuralcircuitlookslikeinaninsectnervoussystematthelevelofsingleneuronsandtheirsynapticconnections.Janelialatercommittedtocompletingthiswiringdiagramforthefulllarva,underCardona’sleadership.
JimTruman,whohadcometoJaneliain2007,wasbythenusinglightmicroscopytoimageRubin’sflystrains,eachofwhichhadbeenengineeredtoallowresearcherstostudysmallsetsofneurons.TheresultofbotheffortscombinedwasthatZlaticcouldnowmanipulateindividualneuronsandstudytheireffectonbehavior.Herambitiousaimwastostudynotonlyhowneuronsaffectedbehavior,butalsohowtheyworktogethertointegratemanykindsofinformation–pain,temperaturechanges,andodors,forexample–andthenselectabehaviorintheanimal’sbestinterest.
“Tounderstandthis,”sheexplains,“weneedtoknowthreethings:circuitstructure;physiologicalpropertiesofneurons,whichwecan
The label “MET” on the fruit fly specimens below refers to methoprene-tolerant protein, which controls metamorphosis in the developing flies.
23HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015E
liM
eir
Kap
lan
Itisalsoafeatthatfewscientistscanpulloff,giventhatitrequiresmarryingdisciplinesasdiverseasneurobiology,electronmicroscopy,andmachinelearning,saysRubin.“Alotofsmartpeopletalkthemselvesoutofdoingthingsbecausetheycan’tdoitallthemselvesorbeintotalcontrol,”hesays.“ThatisnotMarta’sstyle.Shesays,‘IhavethisbigproblemIwanttosolve,andIknowIcan’tdoitall.Ineedtogetthispiecefromthatperson,andthisotherpiecefromanotherperson,andtogetherwe’llmakeitwork.’That’saskillandatalent–likebeingagoodfieldgeneral.It’sanapproachtoscienceIadmire.”
Inthemeantime,ZlaticandCardonahavealsoembarkedonwhatshecallsthe“ultimateactofcreativity”–parenthood.Theirson,David,nowthree,ispoisedtomatchhismother’slinguisticabilities.
“MartaspeaksCroatiantoDavid,andhespeaksCatalanorEnglishtome.IunderstandabitofCroatian,though,andwhenIspeakittoDavidhecorrectsme,”laughsCardona,anativeofSpain’sCataloniaregion.Thedemandsoftwoactivelaboratoriesplusatoddlerkeepthefamilybusy,buttheymakeitwork;Zlatictakesthe“morningshift,”wakingupwithDavidandmakinghimbreakfast,whileCardonaheadstothecampusatsunrise.Sheworkslatewhilehemakesdinner,andthenthefamilyhasanhourortwotogetherbeforebed.“Itworksforus,”saysCardona,“becauseweknowwhatourprioritiesare.”
AndsoZlatichasgivenupactinginfavorofhergreaterloves–scienceandfamily.“WhatIlovemostaboutscienceisideas,”shesays.“Youlookatthedata,itinspiresideas,thenyoutestthem,thenyoulosethem,thenyoutryoutotherones.Thecreativeaspectofscienceiscomingupwithideasindialoguewiththepast.That’sverybeautifultome.”
“There’ssomethingaboutherthatIthinkistrueofalotofthereallygoodscientistsI’veseeninmycareer,”saysRubin.“They’rehappy.They’rehavingfun.Theysaythattobeasuccessfulscientistyouhavetomaintainyourchildlikecuriosity.Sheexudesthat.”
Marta Zlatic manipulates neurons in fruit fly larvae to study their effect on behavior.
“There’s something about her that I think is true of a lot of the really good scientists I’ve seen in my career. They’re happy. They’re having fun.”—gerryrubin
Navigating the Torrent
Experimentalneuroscientists andtheoristsatJaneliaarejoining
forcestomakesenseof–andimprove– thedelugeofdatacomingoutoflabs.
by carrie arnold
illustrationbycarmensegovia
26 Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
NJeremy Freeman built an open-source computer platform to help researchers analyze and share massive data sets.
neuroscienceis drowning indata.Sincethe1950s,thenumberofneuronsthatscientistscanrecordsimultaneouslyhasgrownatanexponentialpace,doublingroughlyeverysevenyears.Toutilizethisinformationaboutthebillionsofneuronsthatspitandsputterandmakeus,well,human,researchershavehadtocopewithanexponentialgrowthindata.
“Whatyouwoulddo,backintheday,ismaybelookatacoupleofneuronsinonepartofthebrainduringsimplesensorystimulation–averyfocusedstudy,”saysJeremyFreeman,aneuroscientistandgroupleaderatHHMI’sJaneliaResearchCampus.
Now,thependulumhasswungintheoppositedirection.Neuroscientistscanrecordtheactivityofnearlyalltheneuronsinthebrainsofzebrafishlarvae,andineverincreasingportionsofmouseandDrosophilafruitflybrains.
Asinglesetofexperimentscangenerateterabytesofinformation.Simultaneousincreasesincomputingpowermeanresearcherscanperformmoresophisticatedanalyses,studyingrelationshipsbetweengroupsofneuronsinsteadofanalyzingoneneuronatatime.Tostayafloatinthedelugeofdata,scientistsneedtodevelopanentirelynewwayofthinkingaboutexperiments–andmakingsenseoftheresultingtorrentofinformation.
“It’sreallyabigchangefromthinkingaboutwhatsingleneuronsdoto
thinkingaboutwhatlargepopulationsofneuronsdo.Withasingleneuron,anexperimentalistcouldusehisorherintuitionand,infact,peoplearequitegoodatthat,”saysLarryAbbott,aJaneliaseniorfellowandatheoreticalneuroscientistatColumbiaUniversity.“Whenyouhaveapopulationofneurons,andthey’reallinteracting,it’salmostimpossibletohavethatintuition.Youreallyhavetomakeamodelofitandfigureouthowyouthinkit’sgoingtobehave.”
AbbottandFreeman,togetherwithothertheoreticalandcomputationalneuroscientistsatJanelia,are
workingtobuildlifeboatsandlighthousesforotherscientiststohelpthemnavigatetheswirlingstormsofdata.Buriedinthistsunamiofstatisticsarethepatternsandinsightsthatwillenablethemtocrackthebiggestmysteryinscience:howthehumanbrainworks.
Computation as PartnerToJaneliaGroupLeaderKristinBranson,keepingyourheadabovewaterasdatapoursinrequirescomputerscienceasmuchasitdoesbiology.ShejoinedJaneliain2010,intendingtoimprovethecomputertrackingsoftwareknownasCtraxthatshehadbuiltwhileshewasapostdocattheCaliforniaInstituteofTechnology.ThepremisebehindCtraxwassimple.Atthetime,measuringtheeffectsofneuralactivityonbehaviormeantmeasuringhowafly’sbehaviorchangedafteragroupofneuronswasswitchedonoroff.Tomakesenseofthisbehavior,ascientistwouldhavetodeterminewhattheflywasdoingineachframeofvideo–animpossibletaskwhenasingleexperimentcanyielddaysofvideo.
EnterCtrax.Usingavarietyofcomputeralgorithmsthatallowamachinetoprocessandanalyzeimages,Ctraxenablesresearcherstotrackindividualfliesevenwhentheycongregateinlargegroups.Unlikeotherprogramsavailabletobiologists,Ctraxdoesn’trequireuserstoknowhowtocode.Instead,BransoncreatedaGUI(pronounced“gooey”andstandingfor“graphicaluserinterface”)thatallowsevennon-coderstousetheprogram.
WhenshefirstarrivedatJanelia,BransonhadideasforimprovingCtrax.ButthenumberofotherJaneliascientistsalsoworkingontrackingsoftwaregaveherpause,asdidherrealizationthatthetougherproblemwouldbeanalyzingthefly’sbehavior,notjusttrackingit.SoBransondevelopedJAABA,theJaneliaAutomaticAnimalBehaviorAnnotator,whichisfreelyavailabletoallresearchersthroughBranson’swebsite.Researcherscan“teach”JAABAtherelevantbehaviorstorecognizeandrecord,whichallowsthemtobegintofigureoutwhathappenstotheanimalwhenneuralactivityisaltered.
“Theideaisyouwanttoautomaticallybeabletosayforeveryframeandforeveryfly,Isthisflydoingthiscertainbehaviorornot?”Bransonexplains.“Isthisflychasinganotherfly?Isitwalking?Isitturning?”
BransonhasbegunusingCtraxandJAABAtoscreenalloftheneuronsinthefruitflybrain,tolinkspecificgroupsofcellstobehaviors.Tobegin,shetookadvantageofthe10,000linesoffruitflies,createdbyJaneliaExecutiveDirectorGerryRubinandhislabgroup,thatexpresstheproteinGAL4,whichscientistsusetoaffectgeneexpressionindifferentcells.ScientistscanselectthefliesthatexpressGAL4inspecificsetsofneuronsandthenusethefluorescentmarkerGFPtovisualizetheseneuronswithamicroscope.Bransoncrossed2,000differentlinesofGAL4flieswithfliescontainingTrpA,atemperature-sensinggene,whichallowshertoactivatetheseneuronsbyraisingthefly’sbodytemperatureafewdegrees.Placingthesefliesinanenclosedarena,BransontracksthemwithCtraxandrecordstheirbehaviorwith M
attS
tale
y
27HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015
Kristin Branson uses computation and machine learning to understand behavior.
JAABA.Usedtogether,thesystemsgiveherawaytolinktheactivityofspecificneuronsinflieswithmeasurablebehaviordifferences,suchaswalkingspeed.
Machinelearningsystemshavebenefitsbeyondjustmanagingtidalwavesofdata;Bransonhasalsofoundthatthesesystemscanrecognizeeffectsthatmightgounnoticedbyhumans.
“Itmightbeasubtlebehavioralchangethat’shappening,butyou’reobservingitlotsandlotsoftimes.Soifyouanalyzeabigenoughdataset,it’sgoingtocomeout,”shesays.“Maybeit’snotahugephenotypethatyou’reseeing–it’snotsomethingthatahumanwouldtypicallynotice–butifyoucompoundthiswithhowmanytimesyou’veseenit,it’ssomethingthatcan’tbeignored.”
Massive ComputationCtraxandJAABAmaybeabletohelpneuroscientistsidentifyandcatalogrelevantbehaviors,butresearchersalsohaveothertypesofdatatoanalyze.Theproblem,Freemanpointsout,isthatsomeofthesedatasetsarefartoobigforasinglecomputertohandle.Soresearchersareturningtoclustercomputing,usingmultiplecomputersworkingtogethertomakesenseoftheirfindings.
Historically,Freemansays,scientistshaveworkedtosolvethesetypesofproblemsonalab-by-labbasis.“Individuallabsbuildtheirownlittlelocalsolutionstosolveproblemsthataretotallycustomizedtotheirlabsandaremeanttoworkonasinglemachine,”hesays.“We’reat
apointwhereanindividuallabisstartingtoreachalimitofwhatitcandoinareasonableamountoftime.”
Thisprocessofcontinuallyreinventingthewheeldidn’tseemproductive,nordiditallowscientiststoeasilysharetheirdatawitheachother.SoFreeman,incollaborationwithothersatJaneliaandelsewhere,builtanopen-sourcecomputerplatformthatwouldallowresearcherstoanalyzeandsharemassivedatasets.HeutilizedtheApacheSparkplatform–anopen-sourceframeworkabletoprocesslargedatasetsoncomputerclusters–tocreateThunder,alibrarydesignedspecificallytoanalyzeneuraldata.DetailedinNature MethodsinSeptember2014,thelibraryisfreelyavailableforresearcherstouseandcontributeto.FreemanestimatesthatThunderisnowbeingusedbysome10to20labsaroundtheworld.He’susingittolookatlargedatasetstogainamoreholisticunderstandingofneuralfunction.
Inoneofhiscollaborations,hehasbeenworkingwithfellowJaneliaGroupLeaderMishaAhrenstoimagetheentirebrainofthezebrafishusingtwo-photonmicroscopy,whichcanrecordfluorescingcellsatadepthofuptoonemillimeter.FreemanandAhrensdisplayavisualpatterninfrontofthefish.Theywanttoknowwhichneuronsfirewhenthefishseesthepattern,whichonesareactiveasittriestoswim,andwhethertheanimal’smovementisfeedingbackintotheneuralactivity.Freemanhopestoanswerthesequestionsbothattheleveloftheentirebrainandonthelevelofindividualneurons.Justanhouroftheserecordings,however,cangeneratemorethanaterabyteofdata(theroughequivalentof16millionbooks),makingtheuseofThunderoranothertypeofclustercomputingsoftwareanecessity.
TheanalysesperformedbyThunder,however,areonlyasgoodastheexperimentsthatprovidethedata.ToFreeman,theoryandcomputationaren’tjustthingsyoudoafteryougetyourresults–theyneedtobeintegratedintoeveryaspectofthescientificprocess.
“Ifpeoplehandedmedata,andIwentawayforsixmonthsandanalyzedit,itwouldbeboring,”hesays.“That’snotreallythewaytoprogress.Youneedtobeconstantlyinteractingandfindingcoolstuffinthedatatogether.”
Modeling NetworksTheclosemarriageofcomputation,theory,andexperimentisn’tuniquetobiology–it’slongbeenafeatureofphysics.Perhapsthatexplainswhysomanytheoreticalneuroscientists,includingmanyofthoseatJanelia,gottheirstartnotinbiologybutinphysics.ShaulDruckmann,forexample,wasallsettostartagraduateprograminhigh-energyphysicsbutchangedhisfocustoneuroscienceafter
“If you could give me the structure of the circuit, it would serve as crucial inspiration for hypotheses regarding what the circuit is trying to do.”
—shauldruckmann
Mat
tSta
ley
28
Ph
oto:
Mat
tSta
ley;
Sci
ence
imag
e:F
reem
anla
b
hearingalecturebyatheoreticalphysicistwhoworkedonneuralnetworks.AftercompletinghisPhDincomputationalneuroscienceatJerusalem’sHebrewUniversity,whereheconcentratedondetailedmodelsofsingleneurons,DruckmannmovedtoJaneliaforapostdocpositionin2013andwassubsequentlyhiredasagroupleader.Sincecomingtotheresearchcampus,hehasfocusedondevelopingmodelsofworkingmemory,theprocessthatholdsinformationforbriefperiodsoftime.
Researchershadpreviouslybelievedthatifyouaskedmicetoremembersomethingforashortperiodoftime,theirneuralactivitywouldberelativelyconstant,sincealltheyweredoingwasremembering.Butwhenscientistsactuallyrecordedwhattheneuronsweredoing,theyfound
thatneuralactivityinthemicewasalloverthemap,constantlychanging.Druckmannwantedtobuildamodeltoshowwhysuchactivitywasalwaysshifting.Duringhispostdoc,Druckmannwasabletoshowthatasimplemodel,wherebyneuronsexchangeinformationbetweenthemselvesinaspecificmanner,showshowshiftingactivityisperfectlyconsistentwithrepresentinginformationthatisn’tchangingovertime.
“Theprobleminthebrainisthattypicallyyouhavenetworksofneuronsthatare
extremelystronglyconnectedtoeachother,soAtriggersB,BtriggersC,andthenCgoesbackandtriggersA.ButitalsotriggersD,E,andF,andeachoneofthesealsotriggersX,Y,andZ,andtheyallfeedbackintoeachother,”saysDruckmann.“And,it’sallnonlinear,whichmeansitisconsiderablymoredifficulttointuitcausesfromeffects,andallofthesemodelsbecomehardertothinkthrough.
Onceonedoesthemath,andunderstandshowthiscancomeabout,itisstraightforwardtoexplaintheintuitionbehindit,butwithoutgoingthroughthecalculations,itwouldbehardtoreachthatintuition.”
Atthesametime,anotherJaneliagroupleader,KarelSvoboda,wastestingshort-termmemoryinmice,whichgaveDruckmannachancetoseeifhisideaswouldmatchexperimentaldata.Thememorytaskpresentedtothemicewasrelativelystraightforward.First,theresearcherstrainedamousetorespondtoasensorycue–apoleitcouldlocatewithitswhiskers.Dependingonthelocationofthepole,themousewouldrespondbymovingrightorleftafterhearingabeep.Importantly,thesoundwasnotplayedimmediatelyafterthemousefoundthepole–theanimalhadtowaitsecondsbeforethebeepsounded.Thismeantthatthemousehadtorememberboththelocationofthe
poleandthedirectioninwhichitneededtomovewhileitwaited.Svoboda’steamalsousedoptogenetics–atechniquethatallowsscientiststocontrolneuralactivitywithlight–tostrategicallyturnoffdifferentgroupsofneuronsinthemousebraincortex.Theyfoundthatactivityinanareaofthebraincalledtheanteriorlateralmotorcortexwascrucialtotheanimalbeingabletoperformthememorytask.Whenscientistsswitchedoffthatarea,performancedramaticallydeclined.
Nowthathehasthisinformation,DruckmannisrevisinghismodelstomoreaccuratelyreflectSvoboda’sdata.Byunderstandingthesefluctuationsinneuralactivityontimescalesofjustafewhundredmilliseconds,Druckmannhopestounderstandwhatcomputationsaregoingonduringthistimeperiodandwhatkindofmechanismsmayberesponsibleforit.Akeypieceofinformationthatishardtogetatisthestructureofthebrain’sneuralnetworks,whichcantellscientistsalotabouthowthedifferentpartsofthebrainfunction.“Ifyoucouldgivemethestructureofthecircuit,itwouldserveascrucialinspirationforhypothesesregardingwhatthecircuitistryingtodo,”Druckmannsays.
Unifying PrinciplesCrackingjustoneneuralnetworkcangivescientistsinsightintomanyothernetworks.TheoreticalneuroscientistSandroRomani,alsoagroupleaderatJanelia,spenttheearlyyearsofhiscareermodelinghowprimatesperformworkingmemorytasks.DuringhispostdocattheWeizmannInstituteofScienceinIsrael,heworkedtounderstandhowhumansrememberlonglistsofwords.Later,atColumbiaUniversity,hewentontostudyneuralcircuitdynamicsinthehippocampus,aseahorse-shapedregiondeepinthebrain
This visual representation of neurons from the larval zebrafish brain shows calcium responses in the cells – an indicator of activity – measured using light sheet microscopy. Each circle marks a neuron’s position, with colors based on a functional categorization. Curves connecting the circles reflect a measure of neuronal coupling.
Shaul Druckmann focuses on developing models of working memory, the brain’s ability to hold information short-term.
Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
29HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015
thatcontrolsnavigationandlong-termmemory.Specifically,Romaniwaslookingatrecordingsfromplacecellsinthehippocampusoftherat,eachofwhichmapsaspecificplaceintheanimal’sworld.Askarattorunafamiliarmaze,andresearcherscantrackwhereitislocatedbywatchingwhichplacecellsfireinitsbrain.
Whenscientistslookedatthisfiringpatternmoreclosely,however,theyfoundthatthesignalswereevenmoreintriguingthanthey’dexpected.Inparticular,theynoticedaregularlyrepeatingsequentialactivationoftheplacecellsthatmovedmorequicklythantheratdid,indicatingthattheanimal’smovementwasn’tdrivingthisactivity.Instead,thecells’activitieswerelikelypredictingtherat’sfuturemovements.
Justasaratexploresnearbyplaces–whicharesimilarbutnotthesame–inasequence,itemsinmemorytendtoberecalledaccordingtohowsimilartheyare.Forexample,grabbingaboxofcakemixatthegrocerystoreremindsyoutopickupfrostingaswell,insteadoftriggeringyourmemorythatyoualsoneedsteak.Scientistsstudythiskindofmemorybyaskingpeopletorememberalonglistofwordsinwhat’sknownasthefreerecalltask.Asthelistbecomeslonger,peoplecanrecallmorewordsbutthefractionofthetotalgetssmaller.
Romaniandcolleaguesrealizedthatthenervoussystemmayusesimilardynamicsforbothsequencesofplacesandsequencesofwords,andtheydevelopedaneuralnetworkmodeltoshowthatthiscanbedonewitharealisticneuralarchitecture.
AtJanelia,RomanihasworkedwithGroupLeaderEvaPastalkovaonamodifiedversionofthemodeltoaccountforsomeofherexperimentalresultsonagroupofhippocampalneuronsshehasdubbed“episode”cells.Theseneuronsareactiveinasequencewhenaratstopsitsmotionthroughtheenvironmentwhileitisengagedinamemorytask.
“Onecontributionthattheoreticalneurosciencecanbringtothetableistostepbackalittlefromthephenomenaandtrytofindunifyingmechanismsandprinciplesbehindthem,”Romanisays.
Theoreticalmodels,Abbottpointsout,areanothersetoftoolsforpeopledesigningandcarryingoutexperiments–andshouldbetreatedassuch.“Inthepast,yougeneratedawholebunchofdataandyoujustthrewitatatheoristandsaid,‘Well,whatdoesitmean?’Butit’sbettertohavepeoplewithdifferentexpertiseintheprocess,”heexplains,“thesameasyoumighthaveanexpertmicroscopistintheprocessandsay,‘Howdowedesignthisexperimentsowecanget
thebestuseoutofthetools?’Theoryisoneofthetoolsindesigningandgettingthemostoutofanexperiment.”
It’saprocessAbbotthimselfuseswhiletryingtounderstandhowananimalrespondstostimuli.Forexample,theolfactorysysteminaflyhelpsittorecognizedifferentodorsinitsworld,everythingfromnutritiousfoodtothepresenceofpotentialmates.Butthefly’sbraindoesn’tstopatjustrecognizingodors;italsohelpsdrivethefly’sbehaviorinresponsetothoseodors.Aflymightmovetowardhealthyfoodbutawayfromfoodthatislessnutritious–responsesthatAbbott,workingwiththelabgroupsofGerryRubinatJaneliaandHHMIInvestigatorRichardAxelatColumbiaUniversity,hasbeguntoidentifyintheolfactorycircuit.
“Youseethistransformationfromarepresentationthat’sdominatedbytheoutsideworld–manyodorscomeinandactivatecells–tosomethingthat’sinternaltotheanimal,”Abbottsays.“Itdependsontheirexperience,whetherthey’rehungryornot,thosekindsofthings.”
Thetasknow,hesays,istoworkwithotherscientiststodesignexperimentstoidentifythoseexperiencesandinternalfactorsthatdrivechoices.AllthetheoreticalandcomputationalneuroscientistsatJaneliaagreethattheirworkisiterative.
“WhatIhopewillhappenatJaneliaisthattherewillreallybethiscloseshoulder-to-shoulderinteractionwithexperimentallabs:thedevelopmentofmodelsbasedonexperimentalobservations,whichinturngeneratespredictionstobetestedwithnewexperiments,”Romanisays.
Thispartnershipamongtheory,computation,andexperimentinneurosciencegivesresearchersanenhancedabilitytodeviseeffectivewaystopeerintothemysteriousdepthsofthebrain.Asbetterexperimentsyieldaclearerunderstandingofneuralprocesses,thesescientistsarehelpingresearcherstonavigatetheturbulentseaofneuralactivityandrowtowardthetruth.
“Theory is one of the tools in designing and getting the most out of an experiment.”—larryabbott
Sandro Romani studies the ability of the brain’s hippocampal cells to store sequences of places and words.
To see more of the data being analyzed by Janelia’s theorists, go to hhmi.org/
bulletin/spring-2015.
Mat
tSta
ley
Perspectives & Opinions
30 Spring 2015 / HHMI Bulletin
The Theory ConnectionNeuroscientist Jeremy Freeman believes scientific theory is all about making connections: between people, between labs, between biological systems. And he considers Janelia Research Campus, where he’s a group leader, to be an ideal environment for fostering those relationships.
wealllearned thescientificprocess.Formulateahypothesis,collectexactlytherightdatatotestthehypothesis,andthenevaluateit.Butit’sneverthatstraightforward.Moreoften,wecollectnot-really-the-rightdataandendupswimminginobservations,manyofthemunexpected.Somearecurious,somearetrivial,somearegroundbreaking.Howdowesortthroughthem?Howdoweplanthenextexperiment?Howdoweputitalltogether?
Tome,theoryisacollectionofstrategies,tools,andconceptsformakingsenseofexperimentaldata.It’sthehalfwaypointbetweendataandideas.Bydesign,IrarelyenteracollaborationorexperimentwithapreconceivednotionofwhatIhopeorexpecttofind.Iletmythinkingbedrivenbythedata,andallowmyselftobesurprised.Butdataanalysisquicklysuggestshypotheses
andmoretargetedexperiments.Idomybesttositinthemiddleofthatloop.
Thisapproachbecomesallthemorepressingaswestudyincreasinglycomplexsystems.Themagnitudeofdatabeingcollectedandtheexperimentalcapabilities,atJaneliaandelsewhere,areoutpacingourabilitytoanalyzethedata,letalonedevelopprinciplesforwhattheymeanandwhatexperimentstodonext.Wehaveunprecedentedaccesstotheinnerworkingsofthenervoussystemandcandoexperimentsthatafewyearsagowouldhaveseemedimpossible.Tokeepup,weneedtomodernizeouranalysis,makingitmoreefficient,morecollaborative.Anddoitfastenoughtoadjustourexperimentsinrealtime.
Onegreatexampleismylab’scollaborationwithNickSofroniew,inKarelSvoboda’slab.Nickhasdesignedanincrediblevirtualrealitysystemthatsimulatesatactileenvironmentthroughwhicharealmousecannavigate,runningonaballwhilewallsmovebackandforthstimulatingitswhiskers.Wecanmonitorneuralresponsesoverincreasinglylargeportionsoftheanimal’sbrainwhile
itperformsthisbehavior.Thecomplexityisdaunting–notonlyofthedatathemselves,butthesheernumberofpossiblebehavioralparadigmsandexperimentalmanipulations.Onewaytostartparingdownthatlististoanalyzethedataonline.Thisletsusmakeexperimentaldecisionsormanipulateneurons
basedonthemeasureddata,allwhilethemouseisstillontheball.Someofwhatwe’redevelopingisspecifictothissystem,butmuchofitisgeneral–boththetechniquesandtheideas–andwe’reactivelycollaboratingwithotherstodevelopsimilarapproachesinothersystems.
Establishingacomputationalcollaborationstartswithmakingapersonalconnection.Weneedtoopenandmaintainconversations,betweentheoristsandexperimentalgroups,andamongdifferentgroupswhomightfindit
usefultobeexposedtoeachother’sideas.Idon’tthinkit’sasurprisethatmostofthegreatdiscoveriesinsciencehavetwoormorenamesattachedtothem,andthatwillonlycontinueaswetacklelargerandmorecomplexproblems–together.
Janeliaisaphenomenalplacetodocomputationandtheorybecausetherearealmostnobarrierstobuildingtheserelationships.Everyoneissoopentolookingattheexperimentaldatawithothers.Janelianswanttocollaborate.
Thephysicalspaceinwhichweworkmattersalot,especiallywhenitcomestoproximity.Janeliaisrelativelysmall,soit’seasytorunintopeople.Onabig,sprawlingcampusitwouldbehardertogetcollaborationsofftheground.AtJanelia,ifIjustsitalldaybythecoffeebar,I’llhaveachancetotalkwithallofmycollaborators–andprobablyendupwithnewones.
Theorists’activitiesatJaneliaarediverse,butonethingwehaveincommonisthatweworkacrossdifferentsystems.TheoristsatJaneliahaveauniqueopportunitytositattheintersectionbetweenlabs,revealingprinciplesthatspananimalsandmodalities,andsharingideasandtechniques.Partofmyownworkisbuildingplatformsforanalysisofneuraldatathatmakeiteasiertocollaborateandcoordinate.Asthateffortgrowsbeyondourcampusandintothebroaderneurosciencecommunity,Janeliaitselfhasbeenamodelforwhatopennessandcollaborationcan,andshould,looklike.
Ioftenhearthatneuroscienceneedsmoretheorists.Maybeit’snotthatweneedmore;it’sjustthatweneedtodissolvethebarrierstomakingconnections.Allscientistsshouldworkclosertotheintersections.We’dallbethinkingalittlemoretheoretically,alittlemorecomputationally.Andthat’swherethebigideaswillcomefrom.–Interview by Nicole Kresge D
avid
Fri
edm
an
Jeremy Freeman—Jeremy Freeman is a group leader at the Janelia Research Campus.
31HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015Jeremy Freeman applies computational approaches to data analysis and experimental design.
32
Perspectives & Opinions
Spring 2015 / HHMI Bulletin
Erich JarvisHHMI InvestigatorDuke UniversityIhadmylabreadGeorgeGopen’sExpectations: Teaching Writing from the Reader’s Perspective,abookaboutwritingskillsfocusedonwhatscientistsandotherprofessionalsexpecttoreadinarticles,grantproposals,andbooks.Gopen,aDukeUniversityprofessorwhostudieswriting,claimsthatourprosecanbemoresuccessfulifweconsiderthecommonreader’sperspectiveandexpectations.AfterIstartedusingGopen’ssuggestions,Ifoundthatmygrantsandpapersweremoreunderstandable.Itdidn’tmeanthatmyreadersagreedwithme,butatleasttheygraspedwhatIwastryingtoexplain.
Nicole KingHHMI InvestigatorUniversity of California, BerkeleyWhenIwasingraduateschoolatHarvard,paleontologistAndyKnollhandedmeacopyofThe Evolution of IndividualitybyLeoBuss,whichopenedupanentirelynewwayofthinkingaboutevolutionanddevelopmentforme.Thebookprovidesabeautifullywrittenandcompellingframeworkforthinkingaboutthemeaningof“individuality”–atopicthatiscentraltomylab’sworkonmulticellularityandtheinteractionsbetweeneukaryotesandenvironmentalbacteria.Ithasbecomerequiredreadingforallnewmembersofmylab.
Oliver HobertHHMI InvestigatorColumbia UniversityAdisparagingremarkoftenheardfromreviewersandeditorsisthatapieceofworkis“toodescriptive.”Thisstatementneverceasestoperplexme.JavierDeFelipe’swonderfullyillustratedbookCajal’s Butterflies of the Soul: Science and Art–itspoeticnameisderivedfromCajal’sdescriptionofpyramidalneuronsintheneocortex–servesasabrilliantreminderoftheimportanceofdescriptivescience.Thebookconveysthebeautyofsuchworkandencouragesmetokeeppursuingseveralhighlydescriptivelinesofresearch.
Q&A What book have you read that influenced your work, and what effect did it have?Bookshavetheabilitytotakeusplaceswe’veneverbeen,toteachusconceptswedidn’tknow,andtointroduceustopeoplewe’venevermet.Often,longafterwe’veclosedabook,itscontentswillstaywithus.Here,fourHHMIinvestigatorsrecallsomeoftheirmemorablereads.–Edited by Nicole Kresge K
ing
:Ali
son
Yin
,Hob
ert:
Kev
inW
olf,
Jarv
is:J
onat
han
Fre
din
,Lee
:Kev
inW
olf
Jeannie LeeHHMI InvestigatorMassachusetts General HospitalInGeorgeOrwell’sAnimal Farm,IcametounderstandthatoneofSnowball’ssevencommandments–thetransfigurationof“Fourlegsgood,twolegsbad”to“Fourlegsgood,twolegsbetter”–wasasigntovalidateanimalmodels.Iamonceagainembracinghumancellularmodels.
ChronicleJa
net
Iwas
a,U
niv
ersi
tyo
fU
tah
34 scienceeducation FromInsighttoAction36 toolbox BarcodingBacteria38 labbook TCellBurnout GotThirst?Here’sWhy SalvagingSNAREs
Mostscientistshavelongbelievedthateachaminoacidinaproteinisspecifiedbyathree-lettercodefoundinmessengerRNA(mRNA).ButateamledbyHHMIInvestigatorJonathanWeissmanhasfoundanexceptiontotherule,illustratedinthisstructure.Withhelpfromacell’stransferRNA(darkblueandteal)andpartoftheribosome(whitetangles),aproteincalledRqc2(yellow)canassembleaprotein(green)intheabsenceofanmRNAblueprint.Butthere’sonecaveat.Rqc2recognizesonlyalanineandthreonine(abbreviated“A”and“T”),soitcreateswhatWeissmanreferstoas“CATtails.”Read more about the research in “A CAT Tale” on page 38.
Spring 2015 / HHMI Bulletin
Chronicle / Science Education
34 Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
From Insight to ActionPULSE, a national network of science education leaders, is helping transform college-level science teaching and student learning.s o m e t i m e s t h e b e s t waytosolvebig,nationalproblemsistostartbytalkingtoyourneighborjustdowntheroad.TakeJennyMcFarland,forexample,abiologyfacultymemberatEdmondsCommunityCollegeinLynnwood,Washington.Manyofhersciencestudentscontinuetheirstudiesatnearbyfour-yearuniversitiesandcolleges–butseldomdofacultymembersfromthevariousschoolsinteractwitheachother.Yetifprofessorsdon’tcoordinatetheirteach-ingofkeyconcepts,likethestructureofcellsorthegrowthoforganisms,thatcanhurtstudentswhotransfer.
Recently,McFarlandjoinedfacultyteamsfrom14schoolsintheNorthwestforathree-dayworkshoptothinkabouthowtheinstitutionscouldlearnfromoneanotherforthebenefitoftheirstudents.“Wewantedtolookatourregionasasystem,”saysMcFarland.“Howcouldweworktogether?Whatresourcescouldwedrawfromeachother?”Forsomeinstitutions–eventhosejust
afewmilesapart–itwasthefirsttimetheirfacultymembershadtalkedtooneanother.
TheworkshopwaspartofaregionalinitiativeconductedbythePartnershipforUndergraduateLifeSciencesEducation(PULSE),agroupformedafterthe2011publicationofareporttitled Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action.ProducedbytheAmericanAssociationfortheAdvancementofScience,withsupportfromtheNationalScienceFoundation(NSF),thereportofferedanumberofrecommendationstomakehigher-educationscienceteachingmoreeffective–includinggivingstudentsmoreresearchexperiences,urgingfacultymemberstomovebeyondthetraditionallectureformat,andcatalyzingdepartmental-levelchange.Tohelpturntheseideasintoconcreteactions,officialsatHHMI,theNSF,andtheNationalInstituteofGeneralMedicalSciencesworkedtogethertofoundPULSE.
“Wewantedtomakesurethatthisreportdidn’tjustgatherdustoneverybody’sshelves,”saysHHMI’sCynthiaBauerle,assistantdirectorofundergraduateandgraduateprograms(andacoauthorofVision and Change).
Theeffortgotunderwayin2012withtheappointmentof40PULSEFellows;oneofthemwasMcFarland,andallweremid-careerorseniorlifesciencefacultymembersatschoolsrangingfromcommunitycollegestolargeresearchuniversities.Sincethen,PULSEhasmadesignificantprogressinidentifying,measuring,andsupportingschools’effortstoimplementVisionandChangeprinciplesforexceptionallifescienceseducation.
Oneofthegroup’sfirstprojectswasdevelopingrobustregionalnetworks.Thesenetworksfocusonarea-specificinterestsandopportunities.Forexample,intheSoutheast,teamsofcampusleadersfromcommunitycolleges,smallprivatecolleges,researchinstitutions,andhistoricallyblackcollegesmetlastsummertodiscussstrategiesthatcouldhelpunderrepresentedminoritiespersevereandsucceedinthesciences.Upuntilthatmeeting,interactionbetweentheregion’shistoricallyblackcollegesandpredominantlywhiteinstitutionshadbeenrelativelyrare,saysBauerle.
Asecondkeyinitiativeisaprogramtorecognizeinstitutionsthathavedone
“We wanted to make sure that this report didn’t just gather dust on everybody’s shelves.”—cynthiabauerle
exceptionalworkimplementingVisionandChangerecommendations.Thisprocessdigsdeepintoschools’curriculaandapproaches:Areconceptssuchasevolutiontaughtexplicitlyandimplicitlythroughoutthecurriculum?Aremorethanhalfofsciencestudentsabletotakeadvantageofmentoredresearchopportunities?Areclassroomssmallanddesignedforrealinteractionbetweenstudentsandfacultymembers,asopposedtocavernous,theater-stylelecturehalls?
Groupmembersrecentlycompletedasuccessfulpilotstudywitheightschoolstoseeifthecriteriathey’ddevelopedaccuratelymeasuredwhetherschoolswereachievingVisionandChangegoals.Theresults,whichwillbesharedonthePULSEwebsitelaterthisspring,werepromising,saysKathyMiller,aPULSEFellowandchairofthebiologydepartmentatWashingtonUniversityinSt.Louis.Thegroupwilllikelyassessmoreschoolsinthenearfuture,sheadds.
Therecognitionprogramwillbothcommendtop-performingschoolsandhelpallschoolsunderstandsmartnextsteps,saysMcFarland.“Ifpeopleareassessingtheirdepartmentswiththeserubrics,andtheywanttoseewaysthattheycanimprove,theyhavearoadmap,”shesays.Peopletryingtomakeacaseforinvestmentinteaching,shecontinues,“aren’tjustsaying,‘Ihaveanideathat I wanttotryintheclassroom.’They’remakingthecasewithrubricsthathavebeenstandardized,vetted,andvalidated.”
AthirdmajorinitiativeisthecreationofVisionandChangeAmbassadors–teamsof
HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015 35C
ath
erin
eL
epag
eHHMIBulletin/Spring2015
facultytrainedtoguideconversationsaboutreformatotherinstitutions.“Theambassadorsmeetfacultymembersontheirownturfandtrytokick-startdepartmentalchange,”explainsMcFarland,“whetherthat’stogetthingsstarted,helpthemchangedirections,orguidetheminsomeway.”
AsthesevariousinitiativeswithinPULSEtakeshape,agrowingonlinecommunity–nownumberingsome1,500members,atpulsecommunity.org–isactivelysharingitssuccesses,challenges,andteachingpractices.It’sprovingthatastrongvisionstillallowsfor
varied,effectiveteachingapproaches,saysJimCollins,anecologistandevolutionarybiologistatArizonaStateUniversity.“I’mseeingalotofdiversityinthewaythatindividualsaremovingawayfromthe‘sageonthestage’model,”hesays.“Theymightuseclicker[technology]togatherinformation,theymighttryflippingtheclassroomwithvideo-basedlecturesthatstudentswatchontheirowntime,theymayworkwithsmallergroups.There’ssomuchrichness,andthat’sgreat.”
AsthemembersofPULSElookahead,theyhopetocontinuetofosterclose
connectionsamonginstitutions,toscaleuptherecognitionprogram,andtoprovideincreasedsupporttoinstitutionsandindividualswhowanttoimplementVisionandChangeprinciplesintheirclassroomsanddepartments,saysChuckSullivan,aprogramdirectorfortheNSF’sDivisionofBiologicalInfrastructure.“PULSEisexpandingitscircleofinfluence,liketheconcentricringsyouseeafterastoneisthrowninapond,”hesays.“Morepeoplearegettinginvolvedandreformingtheircourses.Andthat’swhatwehopedwouldhappen.”– Erin Peterson
36
Chronicle / Toolbox
Barcoding BacteriaDNA barcodes and a half-century-old equation help scientists track infection in the gut.f o r t h e b a c t e r i a thatcausecholera,thejourneythroughahost’sgutisnopicnic.Thefirststopisthestomach,filledwithgastricjuicessodeadlythatthevastmajorityofVibrio cholerae bacteriawon’tmakeitoutalive.Survivorsburrowintothewallofthesmallintestine,hopingtoavoidthetideofdigestedfoodrushingby.Theluckyoneswill
reproduce;thelessfortunatewillbeattackedbytheimmunesystemor,insomecases,killedbyantibiotics.
Theseebbsandflowsinpopulationsizehavelongfascinatedbiologists,whocanusetheinformationbothtogarnercluesaboutthegeneticfitnessofanorganismandtopinpointthebesttimestooverpowerapathogen.
“Fromatheoreticalperspective,it’smucheasiertofightaverysmallpopulationthanabigpopulation,”explainsPiaAbelzurWiesch,apostdoctoralfellowwhoworkswithTedCohen,aninfectiousdiseaseexpertatBrighamandWomen’sHospitalinBoston.“Ifyouhaveanantibioticorvaccineactingwhenthepopulationisespeciallyvulnerableandsmall,youhaveamuchhigherchanceofsuccessbecauseit’seasiertoeliminateafewbacteriathanalotofthem.”
Buthowcanresearcherstrackapopulationofmicroscopicbacteriainsideananimal’sgut?ZurWieschandherhusband,SörenAbel,alsoaninfectiousdiseasepostdoctoralresearcher,wereponderingthisquestionatdinneronenight,shortlyafterhejoinedthelabofHHMIInvestigatorMatthewWaldor,alsoatBrighamandWomen’sHospital.Thetwopostdocsdecidedtocombinehermathematicalexpertisewithhismicrobialknowledgetoanswerthequestion.Theirsolutioninvolvedcoupling500DNAbarcodeswitha50-year-oldmathematicalformulatoproduceatechniquethatcantracktheupsanddownsofprettymuchanycellpopulation–pathogenorotherwise.
ThetechniqueiscalledSTAMP,for“sequencetag-basedanalysisofmicrobialpopulations.”It’satwo-partprocedurethatboilsdowntotackingakindofbarcodeontobacteriaandthentrackingthebarcodefrequencytocalculatethesizeofafoundingpopulation.
ThebarcodesareshortstretchesofDNAthathelpthescientistsdistinguishonebacterialcellfromanother.“Thelabelsarejustlikelastnames,”sayszurWiesch.“Theydon’treallychangeanythingabouttheindividuals.Ifyouthinkaboutafewpeoplefoundingavillage,forexample,andyoujustfollowtheirlastnames,youcaninferhowmanypeoplethereweretobeginwith.”
Todeducethesizeofthefoundingpopulationfromthebarcodes,zurWieschmadeuseofamathematicalequationestablishednearlyahalf-centuryago.In1971,geneticistsCostasKrimbasandSpyrosTsakasshowedthatitwaspossibletousemarkerstoinferthesizeofapopulationattwodifferenttimepoints.KrimbasandTsakasusedtheirequationtofollowtheeffectsofaninsecticideonthepopulationdynamicsoffruitfliesthatfedontreatedolivetrees.
Inasimilarfashion,Abel,zurWiesch,andtheircolleaguesusedSTAMPtotracethegrowthanddeclineof V. choleraeinfectioninrabbits.Abeladdedabout500differentbarcodestothegenomesofabatchof V. cholerae.Heinfectedrabbitswiththelabeledbacteriaandthencollectedsamplesfromtheanimals’gutsatvarioustimepoints.NewdeepDNAsequencingtechnologyallowedhimtodeterminehowmanyofeachtypeoftaggedbacteriawereinthesamples.
Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
37Ju
stin
Ren
teri
aHHMIBulletin/Spring2015
“STAMP is applicable, in principle, not only to all pathogens, but also to commensal organisms and even to eukaryotic cells.” —matthewwaldor
Withthosenumbersinhand,theresearchersusedKrimbasandTsakas’sequationtotracethepopulationdynamicsofthetaggedV. choleraebacteria.Theycomparedtherelativeabundanceofthetagsintheinjectedbacteriatothenumbersinthedifferentintestinalsamples.Asamplewithalargechangeintagfrequenciesmostlikelyexperiencedabottleneck–someeventthatdrasticallyreducedthepopulationsizeand,intheprocess,alteredthedistributionoftags.Conversely,asamplewithasmallerchangeintagfrequenciesprobablywentthroughamorebenignpathwaythathadaminimaleffectonthebacteria,resultinginapopulationverysimilartotheonethathadinitiallyinfectedtherabbits.
Thecalculationsyieldedsomesurprisinginformationaboutthebacteria’sjourneythroughthegut.“Frankly,whenweappliedSTAMPtoVibrio choleraeinrabbits,wethoughtitwouldbekindofaboringexperiment,”saysWaldor.“Wethoughtthepatternofbacterialmigrationfromthestomachtotheanuswouldbeaforegoneconclusion.Butthat’snothowitturnedout.”Instead,theteamdiscoveredthat,afteracertainpointintheinfection,
thebacteriachangeddirection,goinguptheintestinaltractinsteadofheadingdown.
“Wecouldn’thavefiguredthatoutwithanyothermethod,becausewewouldn’thaveknowntheidentityofthebugs,”saysWaldor.Thoughthescientistsaren’tsurewhytheV. cholerae reversedcourse,they’reinvestigatingafewideas.
Theresearchers’technique,publishedintheMarch2015issueofNature Methods,isn’tlimitedtobacteria,accordingtoWaldor.“STAMPisapplicable,inprinciple,notonlytoallpathogens–bacteria,viruses,andparasites–butalsotocommensalorganismsandeventoeukaryoticcells,”hesays.“Forexample,youcouldusethisincancermetastasisstudies,todeterminehowmanycancercellsmetastasizetoanewsite.”
Theimportanceofthemethod,saysWaldor,isthatitenablesscientists,inaretrospectivefashion,tofigureouthowmanycellsorbacteriawerethefoundersofaparticularpopulationandtoinferwherebottlenecksoccur.Thisisgoodnewsforhumans,butbadnewsforV. choleraeandotherpathogens,nowthatscientistscanpinpointwhenthey’remostvulnerable.–Nicole Kresge
38
Chronicle / Lab Book
I N B R I E F
SEEING REDAs a fish swims, nerve cells fire in its brain, sending signals racing along a neural network ending in muscles that make its fins flap and its tail swish. By using a molecule called CaMPARI to permanently mark neurons as they fire, scientists can now watch as signals light up such neural networks in live animals.
CaMPARI came out of a collaborative project spearheaded by Eric Schreiter, a senior scientist in Group Leader Loren Looger’s lab at the Janelia Research Campus. The team started with a protein called Eos, which emits a green glow until it’s exposed to violet light. The light changes the molecule’s structure, causing it to glow red. By combining Eos with the calcium-sensitive protein calmodulin, the researchers were able to couple Eos’s color
change to the burst of calcium that accompanies
neuronal signaling. The resulting molecule indelibly tags firing neurons with a red glow in the presence of violet light.
“Ideally, we would flip the [violet] light switch on while an animal is doing a behavior that we care about, then flip the switch off as soon as the animal stops the behavior,” Schreiter explains. “So we’re capturing a snapshot of neural activity that occurs only while the animal is doing that behavior.”
The scientists published their results February 13, 2015, in Science. Although they are still tinkering with CaMPARI to make it more sensitive and reliable, they’ve already made it available to scientists on Addgene and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. Janelia Group Leader Misha Ahrens is also distributing CaMPARI-expressing zebrafish.
IMMUNE RALLY CRYLike a Good Samaritan, a cell that’s been attacked by a virus warns
neighboring cells to shore up their defenses. These alerts are sent via a family of proteins called interferons, which are produced when surveillance proteins in the infected cell detect a pathogen. Although several different surveillance proteins scout for signs of pathogens, new research shows how the proteins all activate a single molecule called IRF3 to turn on interferon production.
There are three known pathways that trigger type 1 interferon production. In each case, the individual pathway’s unique surveillance protein uses its own adaptor protein to relay the message that an invader is present and interferon is needed. Siqi Liu, a graduate student in HHMI Investigator Zhijian “James” Chen’s lab at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, noticed that all three adaptor
proteins have similar stretches of five amino acids that became tagged with phosphate groups. As the team reported March 13,
2015, in Science, the addition of a phosphate molecule to that stretch of amino acids causes the adaptors to activate IRF3.
Now that they know how the interferon pathways converge, Chen and his team are examining them in more detail. Eventually, they hope to develop small molecules that treat immune disorders by interfering with the pathways.
A CAT TALEA central tenet of biology is that each amino acid in a protein is specified by a three-letter code found in messenger RNA (mRNA). That may be true most of the time, but HHMI Investigator Jonathan Weissman at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), along with Onn Brandman at Stanford University and UCSF P
hot
o:N
atio
nal
Inst
itu
teo
fAll
erg
yan
dIn
fect
iou
sD
isea
ses;
Illu
stra
tion
:Lei
fP
arso
ns
Winter2015/HHMIBulletin
T Cell BurnoutSome immune cells function better after taking a break.everylivingbeing needstorest.EvenourimmunecellsenteradysfunctionalstatecalledTcellexhaustionifthey’reoverworked.Infact,thisfatigueandtheensuingdowntimeareimportantpartsoftheimmuneprocess.
KillerTcellsgettheirnamefromtheirfunction.Theytargetsickenedcellsinvolvedinchronicinfections,killingthembefore
thevirusesinsidecanreplicateandspread.Butchronicinfectionscanbelengthy,andafterafewweeksofsustainedaction,cellularexhaustionoftensetsin.TheTcellsbecomelesseffectiveatslayingtheirtargetsandbeginproducingproteinsthatpreventthemfromrecognizinginfectedcells.
Oneoftheseproteinsiscalledprogrammedcelldeathprotein1,orPD-1.SusanKaech,anHHMIearlycareerscientistatYaleUniversity,discoveredafeedbackloopbywhichPD-1activationleadstoanincreaseinaproteincalledFOXO1.FOXO1,inturn,producesfactorsthatpromoteTcellexhaustion,includingmorePD-1.KaechsuspectedthateliminatingFOXO1mightcurtailTcells’exhaustionandmakethembetterkillers.
Whatshefoundwastheexactopposite.Whenherteamcreatedmicelackingthe FOXO1gene,therodents’TcellsdidproducelessPD-1comparedtoanimalswiththegene.Butthecellsweren’tbetteratcontrollingtheviralinfection.Instead,withouttherestaffordedthemintheirexhaustedstate,thecellsdied,andviralreplicationincreased.
The immune system’s T lymphocytes, like this one, need downtime to do their job properly.
KaechconcludedthatTcellsneedthisrespitetofunctionproperly.“Theyhavetoturndowntheirresponseorelsethey’llgetover-activated,andwethinkthatcausesthecellstodeteriorateanddie,”shesays.“We’restartingtoappreciatethatexhaustionisanimportantprocessthatishelpingtomaintainthispreciouspoolofTcells.”
Thefindings,publishedNovember20,2014,in Immunity,couldleadtodrugsthatmodulateFOXO1andhelpreinvigoratetheimmuneresponseofpatientsbeingtreatedforchronicviralinfectionsorevencancer.“Theremaybeapointwhereyoucanstopthecellsfromfullyenteringtheexhaustedstate–whereyousuppressPD-1,butnotsomuchthatthecellsdie,”Kaechsays.– Nicole Kresge
39
colleague Adam Frost, has discovered an exception to the rule.
Generally, protein synthesis requires three components: an mRNA template, a ribosome to read the template and assemble the protein, and transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules to supply the necessary amino acids. Weissman and his colleagues discovered that sometimes, when protein synthesis stalls, elongation can still continue without the mRNA template. This type of synthesis relies on only two components: a part of the ribosome called the 60s subunit and a protein named Rqc2 that recruits tRNA molecules. With these components, cells will continue to randomly add amino acids to the stalled peptide, with one caveat. Rqc2 recognizes only alanine and threonine (abbreviated “A” and “T”), so it creates what Weissman refers to as “CAT tails.”
“This is a mode of protein synthesis that we’ve missed for 50 years. It’s totally unprecedented,” says Weissman. He and his colleagues
published their findings January 2, 2015, in Science. They don’t yet know the function of CAT tails, but they have some ideas they’re pursuing. For example, the extra amino acids may trigger a stress response in the cell, or they could tag an incomplete peptide for destruction.
HOX PARADOX NO MOREDuring development in animals, the Hox gene family directs the formation of segment-specific anatomy along the head-to-tail axis. The genes are responsible for putting the head, thorax, abdomen, and other body parts in the right places. Surprisingly, all Hox proteins bind with high affinity to very similar stretches of DNA, which begs the question: how can Hox proteins find and activate their target genes if all binding sequences look essentially the same?
Janelia Group Leader David Stern recently revealed the answer to this long-standing paradox.
Stern’s team, in collaboration with Richard Mann’s lab at Columbia University Medical
Center, figured out that Hox proteins activate genes via weak interactions at
previously unrecognized DNA binding sites. The scientists discovered this by showing that a Hox protein
called Ubx controls expression of a gene called shavenbaby by binding weakly to two enhancer regions on DNA near the gene. These low-affinity binding sites conferred shavenbaby’s specificity for Ubx over other Hox proteins.
The findings, published January 15, 2015, in Cell, explain why scientists have been unable to predict where Hox proteins bind to DNA simply by looking at its sequence. “They’re not regulating genes by binding to the sites that everybody thought they were – they’re binding to these
sites that don’t look like good Hox binding sites,” explains Stern.
A TARGET FOR DYSKINESIASome human diseases occur episodically in people who appear otherwise healthy. One of these disorders is paroxysmal nonkine-sigenic dyskinesia (PNKD). The neurological disease’s symp-toms – involuntary movements in the limbs, torso, and face – are triggered by coffee, alcohol, and stress. In 2004, HHMI Investigator Louis J. Ptáçek at the University of California, San Francisco, discov-ered the gene that causes PNKD. Now, just over a decade later, he’s figured out what the gene does.
To deduce the function of the PNKD gene, Ptáçek’s team raised antibodies against the PNKD protein. This allowed them to isolate PNKD and its binding partners from mouse brain tissue. From these isolates, they discovered that PNKD interacts with two other proteins, called RIM1 and RIM2, that are involved P
hot
o:Z
uk
erla
b;I
llu
stra
tion
:Lei
fP
arso
ns
HHMIBulletin/Spring2015
Got Thirst? Here’s WhyScientists have pinpointed the neurons in the brain that control thirst.humanscantypically surviveonlythreetofivedayswithoutwater.Butwe’veallsaid“I’mdyingofthirst”wellbeforewe’vebeenwaterlessthatlong–albeitwithlittleunderstandingofthemechanismbehindtheurge.Butnowthebrainsignalsthatgovernthirstarenolongeramystery.AteamledbyHHMIInvestigatorCharlesZukerhasfiguredoutthatthemotivationtodrinkwateriscontrolledbytwosetsofneurons:onethatprovokesthestimulustosipandonethatquenchesit.
Researchershavelongsuspectedthatthesignalsdrivinganimalstodrinkoriginateinthebrain’ssubfornicalorgan,orSFO.Locatedoutsidetheblood-brainbarrier,whereithastheopportunitytodirectlysensetheelectrolytebalanceinbodyfluids,theSFOshowsincreasedactivityindehydratedanimals.YukiOka,apostdoctoralfellowinZuker’sColumbiaUniversitylab,tookacloserlookattheSFOinmiceandidentifiedtwotypesofnervecells:excitatoryCAMKII-expressingneuronsandinhibitoryVGAT-expressingneurons.Usingoptogenetics,Okaaddedalight-sensitiveproteintothecellsintheanimals’SFOs,allowinghimtoselectivelyactivatethemwithbluelight.WhenheflippedtheswitchandactivatedtheCAMKIIneurons,therodentsdrankwithgusto.
“Youhaveawater-satiatedanimalthatishappilywanderingaround,withzerointerestindrinking,”saysZuker.“ActivatethisgroupofSFOneurons,andthemousejustbeelinestothewaterspout.Aslongasthelightison,thatmousekeepsondrinking.”Okashowedthattheanimalsbecamesuchaviddrinkersthattheyconsumedasmuchas8percentoftheirbodyweightinwater–theequivalentof1.5gallonsforhumans.WhenOkausedthesametechniquetostimulateVGATneurons,thirstyanimalsimmediatelystoppeddrinkingandreducedtheirwater
intakebyabout80percent.TheresearcherspublishedtheirfindingsonlineJanuary26,2015,inNature.
AccordingtoZuker,theopposingneuronslikelyworktogethertoensureanimalstakeinenoughwatertomaintainfluidhomeostasis,includingbloodpressure,electrolytebalance,andcellvolume.Itremainstobeseenwhetherthesamecircuitcontrolsthirstinhumans;ifso,thefindingscouldonedayhelppeoplewithanimpairedsenseofthirst.– Nicole Kresge
The mouse brain contains CAMKII neurons (red) that trigger thirst and VGAT neurons (green) that quench thirst.
Watch a mouse begin to drink thirstily when prompted by a blue light.
Go to hhmi.org/bulletin/spring-2015.
40
Chronicle / Lab Book
in neurotransmitter release. As the scientists reported March 10, 2015, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PNKD normally suppresses neurotransmitter release, but the mutant form found in the disease does so less effectively. The result is excessive synaptic transmission, which leads to the involuntary movements experienced by people with the disease.
According to Ptáçek, RIM1 and RIM2 may be important targets for developing better medications for PNKD and other dyskinesias, such as those seen in Parkinson’s disease.
THE LONG LOST RECEPTORIn our cells, there is a widely expressed secreted factor called pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), which affects a bewildering array of bodily processes. The cellular receptors that bind PEDF are at the root of many useful activities, such
as preventing the formation of new blood vessels, protecting cells in the retina and brain from damage, and stopping cancer cells from growing. Despite considerable effort by scientists in academia and industry, the identity of the receptors had, until recently, remained a mystery. This long-standing puzzle was so intractable that it took HHMI Early Career Scientist Hui Sun and his team at the University of California, Los Angeles, seven years to solve.
“We were initially intrigued by this problem because of PEDF’s broad medical value in treating major diseases,” says Sun. “But the hunt for the receptor turned out to be an extremely challenging adventure.” His team methodically searched for PEDF’s binding partner by looking at various native tissues and cells, as
well as in databases of molecules with unknown functions. Finally, they found two proteins that fit the bill – PLXDC1 and PLXDC2.
As Sun’s team reported
December 23, 2014, in eLife, these two proteins confer cell-surface binding to PEDF, transduce PEDF signals into distinct types of cells that respond to PEDF, and function in a cell type-specific manner. Because of the critical role of these cell-surface receptors in PEDF signaling, they have high potential as therapeutic targets for cancer and other diseases.
UNIVERSAL PROTEIN SYNTHESISThe process of gene expression is, at its core, universal. But different organisms use different methods to carry out the “DNA makes RNA and RNA makes protein” recipe. For example, the signals used to recruit ribosomes and start protein synthesis in bacteria are not the same signals used by eukaryotes. Yet much of the structure and function of the ribosome, the molecular machine that translates RNA into proteins, is conserved in both types of organisms. This made HHMI
Early Career Scientist Jeffrey Kieft at the University of Colorado Denver wonder if a universal start signal existed that could be recognized by both eukaryotic and prokaryotic ribosomes.
A structured region of an RNA molecule dubbed an internal ribosome entry site (IRES), which is used by some viruses to initiate translation in eukaryotes, fit the bill. Taking a close look at the molecule, Kieft’s team discovered that it could also initiate protein synthesis in prokaryotes. This particular IRES, it turns out, binds both bacterial and eukaryotic ribosomes in a similar structure-dependent manner, but the bacterial interaction appears transient and weaker.
The findings, published March 5, 2015, in Nature, suggest there might be other naturally occurring structured RNAs that can initiate bacterial protein synthesis. One of Kieft’s next steps will be to determine if other such structures do indeed exist, and, if so, what they mean in terms of evolution and gene regulation.
Spring2015/HHMIBulletin
I N B R I E F
Scie
nce
imag
e:R
epri
nte
db
yp
erm
issi
onfr
omM
acm
illa
nP
ub
lish
ers
Ltd
:Nat
ure5
18,6
1-67
,cop
yrig
ht2
015;
Il
lust
rati
on:L
eifP
arso
ns
Salvaging SNAREsScientists catch a protein-recycling machine in the act.cellsarehuge proponentsofrecycling.Theyreuseeverythingfromtinyelectronstomassivemolecularcomplexes.Despitethispenchantforsalvage,scientistshaveneverbeenabletoseeoneformofcellularrecyclinginaction–untilnow.AgroupledbyHHMIInvestigatorAxelBrungerrecentlycapturedaproteinintheactofpullingapartaspentclusterofmembranefusionmolecules.
“Membranefusionisaprocessakintothemergingofsoapbubblesintolargerones,”saysBrunger,astructuralbiologistatStanfordUniversity.“Butthat’swheretheanalogyends,sincebiologicalmembranesdonotmergeallthateasily.”Tofacilitatetheprocess,
cellsusemembrane-boundSNAREproteins.Duringfusion,SNAREslocatedonopposingmembranesziptogetherintoastablecomplex,linkingthemembranes.Whenthetwomembraneshavebecomeone,aproteincalledNSFrecyclestheSNAREcomponents.
Brunger’steamusedatechniquecalledsingle-particleelectroncryomicroscopytofreezeNSFmoleculesboundtoSNAREcomplexesatseveralstagesandthencaptureimagesofthem.Theresultingsnapshotsprovidenear-atomicorbetterdetailoftheSNAREdisassemblyprocess.Likeaseriesofmoviestills,theimagesshowNSFlatchingontoaSNAREcomplex,thenNSFboundtoATP–themoleculethatpowersthesalvageoperation.YetanotherimagecapturedNSFafterithadfinishedworking,boundtoanenergy-depletedformofATP,calledADP.
TheSNAREcomplexresemblesaropewithaleft-handedtwist;theteam’simagesrevealedthatNSFusesadapterproteinscalledSNAPstograspthe“rope”inmultipleplaces.TheSNAPswraparoundtheSNAREcomplexwitharight-handedtwist,suggestingthatthedisassemblyoccursviaasimpleunwindingmotionthatfreesthezippedSNAREproteins.
Theresults,publishedFebruary5,2015,inNature,raiseotherquestionstheteamiseagertopursue.“ThereisalottobedoneinordertounderstandthemotionsandconformationalchangesneededtodisassembletheSNAREcomplex,”saysBrunger.“Ourelectronmicroscopestructuresnowenableustodesignfollow-upbiophysicalexperimentstoanswerthesequestionsataverydeeplevel.”– Nicole Kresge
A cell’s NSF complex uses SNAP proteins (orange) to grasp and unwind membrane-embedded SNARE proteins (red and blue helices).
12Like the creases in a sheet of origami paper, the stripes that pattern these fruit fly embryos guide forces that will govern their shape. As an embryo becomes longer and thinner, lines of protein are laid down along the growing fly’s head-to-tail axis. Each vibrant band consists of one of three members of the Toll receptor family. The receptors allow the cells to differentiate themselves from their neighbors and perform the directional movements necessary to remodel the growing embryonic tissue. A
dam
Par
é an
d Je
nn
ifer
Zal
len
HHMI Bulletin / Spring 2015
Observations
Vic
to N
gai
With Theory Comes OrderThe gray matter of the human brain may not be as physically vast as the dark matter of outer space. But the challenge of crunching astronomical data pales compared to the complexity of parsing today’s deluge of data about the brain. Making sense of that torrent requires more than banks of supercomputers, says computational neuroscientist and essayist Olaf Sporns. To achieve fundamental insights, he posits, neuroscientists must do as astronomers do and apply a theoretical framework to their immense quantities of empirical data.
Neuroscience, it turns out, is on the brink of its own “big data” revolution. Supplementing more traditional practices of small-scale hypothesis-driven laboratory research, a growing number of large-scale brain data collection and data aggregation ventures are now underway, and prospects are that this trend will only grow in future years. Mapping the roughly one hundred trillion synaptic connections of a human brain would by some estimates generate on the order of a zettabyte of data (a zettabyte corresponds to one million petabytes). For comparison, that’s about equal to the amount of digital information created by all humans worldwide in the year 2010. And recently proposed efforts to map the human brain’s functional activity at the resolution of individual cells and synapses might dwarf even these numbers by orders of magnitude. The coming data deluge is likely to transform neuroscience, from the slow and painstaking accumulation of results gathered in small experimental studies to a discipline more like nuclear physics or astronomy, with giant amounts of data pulled in by specialized facilities or “brain observatories” that are the equivalent of particle colliders and space telescopes.
What to do with all this data? Physics and astronomy can draw on a rich and (mostly) solid foundation of theories and natural laws that can bring order to the maelstrom of empirical data. Theories enable significant data reduction by identifying important variables to track and thus distilling a torrent of primary data pulled in by sophisticated instruments into interpretable form. Theory translates “big data” into “small data.” A remarkable example was the astronomer Edwin Hubble’s discovery of the expansion of the universe in 1929. Integrating
over years of observation, Hubble reported a proportional relationship between redshifts in the spectra of galaxies (interpreted as their recession speeds) and their physical distances. Viewed in the context of cosmological models Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter formulated earlier, these data strongly supported cosmic expansion. This monumental insight came from a dataset that comprised less than fifty data points, compressible to a fraction of a kilobyte. When it comes to applying theory to “big data,” neuroscience, to put it mildly, has some catching up to do. Sure enough, there are many ways of analyzing brain data that are useful and productive for extracting regularities from neural recordings, filtering signal from noise, deciphering neural codes, identifying coherent neuronal populations, and so forth. But data analysis isn’t theory. At the time of this writing, neuroscience still largely lacks organizing principles or a theoretical framework for converting brain data into fundamental knowledge and understanding.
From The Future of the Brain: Essays by the World’s
Leading Neuroscientists, edited by Gary Marcus
and Jeremy Freeman. © 2015 by Gary Marcus and
Jeremy Freeman. Reprinted with permission
from Princeton University Press.
4000 Jones Bridge Road Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815-6789www.hhmi.org
Address Service Requested
Aru
n S
amp
ath
ku
mar
an
d E
llio
t Mey
erow
itz
Plant PaversJigsaw puzzle-shaped cells bulging with chlorophylls (red) cover
the surface of leaves in many flowering plants. The fanciful pattern is more than just a whimsical quirk of nature, however. HHMI Investigator
Elliot Meyerowitz and his team have shown that, as plants grow, the indented regions and lobe-like outgrowths of these so-called pavement cells create internal stresses that reorganize cytoskeletal proteins. These microtubule proteins align along the cell walls (green), a process that in
turn reinforces them against stress – evidence of a subcellular mechanical feedback loop. Learn more about the role of force in the development of
animals, as well as plants, in “Show of Force,” page 12.
bulletinh
hm
i bu
llet
in • h
ow
ar
d h
ug
he
s me
dic
al in
stit
ut
e • w
ww
.hh
mi.o
rg
vo
l. 28
/ no
. 2
Spring ’15 Vol. 28 No. 2
Small Forces,Big Impact
Mechanical stress plays avital role in the development
of both animals and plants
in this issue Neural Theory at Janelia
Marta Zlatic in the FootlightsBacterial Barcodes