Spectrum for mobile A Swedish perspective for 2020 and …¶r-4G-och-5G.pdf · Outline for this...
Transcript of Spectrum for mobile A Swedish perspective for 2020 and …¶r-4G-och-5G.pdf · Outline for this...
Post- och telestyrelsen
Jan Boström
Expert Adviser, The Swedish Post and Telecom Authority
Section for Spectrum Analysis
Post- och telestyrelsen
Jan Boström
Expert Adviser
Section for Spectrum Analysis
• Technical studies and internal support
• Strategic planning of future spectrum use
Post- och telestyrelsen
Disclaimer: This is a research seminar
I will discuss things that go beyond the official PTS position to illustrate the kind of assessments and trade-offs we will have to do as a regulator
Analysis and statements should be seen a my personal views
First personal statement !
There is no spectrum shortage for mobile !!! But there might be sound reasons for allocating more !
Outline for this seminar
• Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
• New 4G spectrum in the pipeline
• Is this enough ?
• Spectrum for 5G ?
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden, low bands
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
450 10 MHz
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden, high bands
The expanded 1800 MHz exception
Since January 2015, the top 2*4,9 MHz in the 1800 MHz band is licence exempt in Sweden
• 23 GSM channels( expanded from 9 channels)
• LTE with a maximum BW of 3 MHz
• 3G/UMTS
Limited to: indoor use and 200 mW (23dBm) e.i.r.p.
Commission implementing decision (2011/251/EU)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 140 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden, high bands
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden, high bands
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden, high bands
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden, high bands
Statistics from Global mobile Suppliers Association (GSA)
Source:
GSA Chart: Spectrum
used currently in 360
commercially launched
LTE networks January 7, 2015
Source:
GSA REPORT:
Status of the
LTE Ecosystem Feb 16, 2015
Band 42 = 3,4-3,6 GHz
Band 43 = 3,6-3,8 GHz
Statistics from Global mobile Suppliers Association (GSA)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
Mobile operators = 590 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
Mobile operators = 580 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Mobile operators = 958 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
450 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
450 10 MHz
2,4 83,5 MHz
5 455 MHz 538 MHz
Mobile operators = 580 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Mobile operators = 958 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
450 10 MHz
2,4 83,5 MHz
5 455 MHz
All users
= 538 MHz
Mobile operators = 580 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Mobile operators = 958 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450
31 may 2017
Changes in current licenses until 2020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450
1800
1800
New auktion
Licence exempt
Changes in current licenses until 2020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450
31 dec 2017
Changes in current licenses until 2020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
3,7
2021 2022 2023
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
3,5 Regional
3,5 Regional
3,5 National
3,5 National
Changes in current licenses until 2020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450
Changes in current licenses until 2020
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
450 10 MHz
2,4 83,5 MHz
5 455 MHz
Mobile operators = 580 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Mobile operators = 958 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
All users
= 538 MHz
Changes in current licenses up until 2020
700 MHz band
Government Decision of 27 February 2014
• 700 MHz band to be released for “services other than broadcasting” from April 1, 2017
• Terrestrial TV broadcast to use Band III (174–230 MHz) and remaining part of Band IV/V (470–694 MHz) after 1 April 2017
• The European harmonised band plan (ECC/CEPT) allows for 2*30 MHz
FDD and up to 20 MHz SDL/DL.
700 MHz band
• The European harmonised band plan (ECC/CEPT) allows for 2*30 MHz
FDD and up to 20 MHz SDL/DL.
700 MHz band
700 MHz band
• The working assumption is to allocate 80 MHz (2*30+20) as block licenses
• Goal to make the 700 MHz band available to other services from April 1, 2017
• A number of reports relating to the 700 MHz band has ben published by PTS http://www.pts.se/sv/Bransch/Radio/Blocktillstand/700-MHz-bandet-/
•
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
Spectrum release plan until 2020
1452-1492 MHz band (1.5 GHz)
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2015/750, of 8 May 2015
• 40 MHz
• DL only
• No later than six months after the date of notification of this Decision, Member States shall designate and make available, on a non-exclusive basis…
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
Spectrum release plan until 2020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
Spectrum release plan until 2020
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
Mobile operators = 1168 MHz
All users = 20 MHz
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
If you think this outcome is good !
-> Respond to our consultations
and tell us why.
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
Mobile operators = 1168 MHz
All users = 20 MHz
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
If you think this outcome is good !
-> Respond to our consultations
and tell us why.
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
Mobile operators = 1168 MHz
All users = 20 MHz If you think this outcome is bad !
-> Respond to our consultations
and tell us why.
The World Radiocommunication Conference 2015 (WRC-15) will be held in Geneva, Switzerland, from 2 to 27 November 2015.
• An international UN Conference where nations meet to discuss radio related matters (rights and obligations)
• It is the job of WRC to review, and, if necessary, revise the Radio Regulations (RR)
• RR is an international treaty governing the use of the radio-frequency spectrum and the geostationary-satellite and non-geostationary-satellite orbits
Possible new bands from WRC15
• 1.5 GHz band, possible expansion from 40 to 90 MHz
• 2.7-2.9 GHz sharing with radar, 100-200 MHz
• 3.8-4.2 GHz sharing with satellite, < 400 MHz
What about WRC 15 ?
But WRC is international negotiations
Almost everything can happen
We could be presently surprised by the outcome
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
Mobile operators = 1168 MHz
All users = 20 MHz
2,4 83,5 MHz
5 455 MHz 538 MHz
5
Up to
320 MHz ?
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
2,4
5
700 MHz ?
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
Mobile operators = 1168 MHz
All users = 20 MHz
Will this be enough ?
• Will almost 1.2 GHz of licensed spectrum be sufficient ?
• Taking into account that licensed exempt will add an additional 700 MHz
Will this be enough ?
• Will almost 1.2 GHz of licensed spectrum be sufficient ?
• Taking into account that licensed exempt will add an additional 700 MHz
• Will 1.9 GHz of sub 6 GHz spectrum be sufficient ?
Will this be enough ?
First take: starting with the wrong question
Could we cope with the forecasted growth in mobile use ?
Forecasts
Cisco VNI Mobile Forecast, 2014 – 2019, Feb 3 2015
• In Sweden, mobile data traffic will grow 4-fold from 2014 to 2019, a compound annual growth rate of 33%.
Ericsson Mobility report, Nov 2014
• In Western Europe, mobile data traffic is expected to multiply 8-fold between 2014 and 2020 (≈ 40 % CAGR).
Forecasts
Cisco VNI Mobile Forecast, 2014 – 2019, Feb 3 2015
• In Sweden, mobile data traffic will grow 4-fold from 2014 to 2019, a compound annual growth rate of 33%.
(2015 -> 2020 ≈ 4 times)
Ericsson Mobility report, Nov 2014
• In Western Europe, mobile data traffic is expected to multiply 8-fold between 2014 and 2020 (≈ 40 % CAGR).
(2015 -> 2020 ≈ 5.4 times)
The starting point
• A high estimate is that 380 MHz is used for mobile broadband today
• Limited use of operator indoor networks
• Limited use of small cells
• 2x2 MIMO
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3 Mobiloperatörerna = 1168 MHz
Alla användare = 20 MHz
2,4
5
700 MHz ?
WRC 19
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
≈ 380 MHz used for
mobile broadband
today
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
2,4
5
700 MHz ?
WRC 19
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
≈ 380 MHz used for
mobile broadband
today
≈ Three (3) times
Remaining 1.33-1.8 times (2020)
Would have to be solved by implementing:
• Technology improvements, increased spectral efficiency
• Small cells outdoor densification
• Indoor offloading to indoor mobile networks(including LAA) and carrier WiFi
• …
Second take: the correct question
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Will this be enough ?
To allocating a certain spectrum band for mobile broadband the analysis need to show that this use would maximise the societal benefit in Sweden
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
To allocating a certain spectrum band for mobile broadband the analysis need to show that this use would maximise the societal benefit in Sweden
Mobile broadband needs to be a better use of the spectrum band than other alternatives
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
• The spectrum release plan becomes an option list.
• Before each release of new spectrum an assessment will be made
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
• The spectrum release plan becomes an option list.
• Before each release of new spectrum an assessment will be made
• Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
450 10 MHz
2,4 83,5 MHz
5 455 MHz 538 MHz
Mobile operators = 580 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Mobile operators = 958 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 700 MHz band:
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 700 MHz band:
The value proposition: more sub 1 GHz spectrum suitable for facilitating indoor and rural mobile broadband coverage
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 700 MHz band:
The value proposition: more sub 1 GHz spectrum suitable for facilitating indoor and rural mobile broadband coverage
80 MHz is an 62% increase on top of 800 and 900 MHz, similar properties
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 700 MHz band:
The value proposition: more sub 1 GHz spectrum suitable for facilitating indoor and rural mobile broadband coverage
80 MHz is an 62% increase on top of 800 and 900 MHz, similar properties
(80 MHz is an 8% increase on the total amount)
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 700 MHz band:
The value proposition: more sub 1 GHz spectrum suitable for facilitating indoor and rural mobile broadband coverage
-> More indoor and rural capacity at a lower production cost
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 700 MHz band:
The value proposition: more sub 1 GHz spectrum suitable for facilitating indoor and rural mobile broadband coverage
-> More indoor and rural capacity at a lower production cost
-> Some of the value of the band could be used to fulfil political policy targets (for example by adding coverage requirements)
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 2300 MHz band:
The value proposition: more “high” band spectrum suitable for boosting capacity in urban areas
100 MHz is an 10% increase on the total amount
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 2300 MHz band:
The value proposition: more “high” band spectrum suitable for boosting capacity in urban areas
100 MHz is an 10% increase on the total amount
-> more capacity in urban areas at a lower production cost
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 2300 MHz band:
Urban areas <-> national licenses ?
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 2300 MHz band:
Urban areas <-> national licenses ?
Combined area coverage, outdoor, mobile held to head.
GSM (900 MHz) ≈ 83% (90%)
LTE (800 & 900 MHz) ≈ 48% (62%) -> (90%)
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 2300 MHz band:
Urban areas <-> national licenses ?
LTE (2.6 GHz) ≈ 1% ( 3%) , allocated 2008
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 2300 MHz band:
Urban areas <-> national licenses ?
LTE (2.6 GHz) ≈ 1% ( 3%) , allocated 2008
The opportunity cost for allowing geographically orthogonal services in the remaining up to 90 % of the country could be extremely low !
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
Taking into account the current available spectrum and the declining marginal utility of adding more spectrum
A simplified example, 2300 MHz band:
Urban areas <-> national licenses ?
For high bands geographical restrictions and/or secondary use will be important issues
Can we allocate the amount of spectrum that maximise the societal benefit
PTS statistics Subscriptions, year on year growth (%)
+ 9 %
+ 2%
0 %
”Smartphone” subscriptions
Data only subscriptions
All mobile subscriptions
PTS statistics Number of Subscriptions (millions)
42 %
16%
”Smartphone” subscriptions
Data only subscriptions
All mobile subscriptions
PTS statistics Number of Subscriptions (millions)
42 %
16%
”Smartphone” subscriptions
Data only subscriptions
All mobile subscriptions
* Swedish population 9 767 357 , SCB 31 March 2015
*
Actual figures in Sweden
Ericsson 40 % CAGR until 2020
Doubling each year (1000 times)
Mobile data traffic increase (base 2010)
70 times
PTS statistics
Spectrum crunch ?
Actual figures in Sweden
Ericsson 40 % CAGR until 2020
Doubling each year (1000 times)
Mobile data traffic increase (base 2010)
70 times
The role of the operators
Actual figures in Sweden
Ericsson 40 % CAGR until 2020
Doubling each year (1000 times)
Mobile data traffic increase (base year 2010)
Price and usage caps
800
900 60
60 MHz
70 MHz
1800 140 MHz
10 MHz
”3G” 120 MHz
2,6 190 MHz
3,4-3,8 368 MHz
450 10 MHz
2,4 83,5 MHz
5 455 MHz 538 MHz
Mobile operators = 580 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Mobile operators = 958 MHz
All users = 10 MHz
Available 4G spectrum in Sweden
The role of the regulator
Actual figures in Sweden
Ericsson 40 % CAGR until 2020
Doubling each year (1000 times)
Mobile data traffic increase (base year 2010)
Production cost relating
to spectrum scarcity
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3
2,4
5
700 MHz ?
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
Mobile operators = 1168 MHz
All users = 20 MHz
Then what about 5G
• Harmonisation and repurposing spectrum normally has a lead-time of about 10 year
Then what about 5G
• Harmonisation and repurposing spectrum normally has a lead-time of about 10 year
• ITU-R will not allocate spectrum recourses for 5G, countries will
Then what about 5G
• Harmonisation and repurposing spectrum normally has a lead-time of about 10 year
• ITU-R will not allocate spectrum recourses for 5G, countries will
• If the target is 2020 we are already late
Then what about 5G
5G is supposed to be the solution for 2020-2030
• That is 5-15 years from now
• Forecasts of user behaviour and technology development more than 5 years into the future are normally unreliable
Then what about 5G
5G is supposed to be the solution for 2020-2030
• That is 5-15 years from now
• Forecasts of user behaviour and technology development more than 5 years into the future are normally unreliable
• 15 years…extremely…
Then what about 5G
With lead-times of about 10 year and forecasts unreliable at best
• We as an regulator needs to guarantee that we have the need flexibility for the 2020-2030 timeframe
• Planning for different future outcomes
Then what about 5G
40 % CAGR
20 % CAGR
60 % CAGR
Mobile data traffic increase (base year 2015)
≈18 times
difference
Then what about 5G
”Smartphone” subscriptions
Data only subscriptions
All mobile subscriptions
M2M subscriptions
Number of Subscriptions (millions)
5.6 million
2020
800
900
1800
”3G”
2,6
3,4-3,8
450 700
1,5
2,3 Mobiloperatörerna = 1168 MHz
Alla användare = 20 MHz
2,4
5
700 MHz ?
WRC 19
Planned 4G spectrum in Sweden 2020
Cost efficient use of 1.9 GHz
Then what about 5G
Likely new agenda item for WRC 19
• New mobile allocations and/or IMT identification of frequency bands in the 6 GHz to100 GHz range
• How much ? Hundreds of MHz lower bands A few GHz in higher bands
• Need for outdoor, indoor and short haul backhaul
20 GHz
20 GHz 30 GHz
30 GHz 40 GHz
40 GHz 50 GHz
50 GHz 60 GHz
60 GHz 70 GHz
70 GHz 80 GHz
80 GHz 90 GHz
18 GHz
23 GHz 26 GHz 28 GHz
38 GHz 32 GHz
70/80 GHz
70/80 GHz
90 GHz 100 GHz
10 GHz
42 GHz 50 GHz
52 GHz 55 GHz
95 GHz
60 GHz 65 GHz
60 GHz
31 GHz
15 GHz 13 GHz 11 GHz 10 GHz
95 GHz
P-P/P-MP
Mobile Reg1
Then what about 5G
Using radio link bands can be:
• A problem, while the current users need to move out of the band in high density areas.
Then what about 5G
Using radio link bands can be:
• A problem, while the current users need to move out of the band in high density areas.
• A possibility, the majority of p-p radio links in Sweden is operated by the mobile operators -> internal sharing (by design ?)
20 GHz
20 GHz 30 GHz
30 GHz 40 GHz
40 GHz 50 GHz
50 GHz 60 GHz
60 GHz 70 GHz
70 GHz 80 GHz
80 GHz 90 GHz
18 GHz
23 GHz 26 GHz 28 GHz
38 GHz 32 GHz
70/80 GHz
70/80 GHz
90 GHz 100 GHz
10 GHz
42 GHz 50 GHz
52 GHz 55 GHz
95 GHz
60 GHz 65 GHz
60 GHz
31 GHz
15 GHz 13 GHz 11 GHz 10 GHz
95 GHz
P-P/P-MP
Mobile Reg1
The 60 GHz band
• 9 GHz wide, RLAN indoor use !
• Harmonised by EU decision
• Addressed by existing WLAN standard, 802.11ad Up to 6,75 Gbit/s In room communication
Then what about 5G
60 GHz band
Picture from Agilent Application Note: Wireless LAN at 60 GHz - IEEE 802.11ad Explained
Then what about 5G
Then what about 5G
With lead-times of about 10 year and forecasts unreliable at best
• We as an regulator needs to guarantee that we have the need flexibility for the 2020-2030 timeframe
• Planning for different future outcomes
Invitation
The spectrum department is Always interested in new developments:
• In technology
• In usage
• In business cases
• Anything of relevance for future spectrum use
If you have information come and visit us !
+46 8 678 5886