Spectral functions in NRG

download Spectral functions in NRG

If you can't read please download the document

description

Spectral functions in NRG. Rok Žitko Institute Jožef Stefan Ljubljana, Slovenia. Green's functions - review. + if A and B are fermionic operators - if A and B are bosonic operators. NOTE: ħ =1. Also known as the retarded Green's function. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Spectral functions in NRG

PowerPoint Presentation

Spectral functions in NRGRok itkoInstitute Joef StefanLjubljana, SloveniaGreen's functions - review

Following T. Pruschke: Vielteilchentheorie des Festkorpers+ if A and B are fermionic operators- if A and B are bosonic operatorsNOTE: =1

Also known as the retarded Green's function.

Laplace transformation:Impurity Green's function (for SIAM):Inverse Laplace transformation:Equation of motion

Example 1:

Example 2:

Example 3: resonant-level model

Here we have set m=0. Actually, this convention is followed in the NRG, too.

Hybridization function: fully describes the effect ofthe conduction band on the impurity

Spectral decomposition

e=+1 if A and B are fermionic, otherwise e=-1.

espectral representationspectral function

Lehmann representation

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem

Useful for testing the results of spectral-function calculations!Caveat: G"(w) may have a delta peak at w=0, which NRG will not capture.Dynamic quantities: Spectral densitySpectral density/function:Describes single-particle excitations: at which energies it is possible to add an electron (>0) or a hole ( 1gmBB, but they note that thismight be non-universal behavior due to charge fluctuations inthe Anderson model (as opposed to the Kondo model).

Interrelated problems: systematic discretization errors and spectral broadeninga determines how d peaks are smoothed out!58The true peak position can be anywhere in the triangle ABC. This triangle corresponds to one sigma confidence region.Another tehcnical issue: spectral function broadening.

Pessimistic error barsRok itko, PRB 84, 085142 (2011)

Optimistic error barsThe correct result is obtained in the a0 limit!

NRGAgreement within error bars!

Experimental resultsfor Ti adatoms:F. Otte et al., Nature Physics 4, 847 (2008)NRG calculationR. ., submittedB=7 T62Model 1: when B is established, the model parameters remain the same, only Zeeman splitting is induced. In particular, orbital effects are ignored.Model 2: exchange J is allowed to change, in other words, T_K allowed to be different! Due, for example, to orbital effects.Splitting goes not depend on the direction of the field, thus the explanation based on orbital effects is perhaps not very convincing. The fact remains that the agreement is better, even though the reason is not entirely clear.It could also be a non-equibrium effect.

Kondo model