Speaker: Yi-Chun Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai Ku-Yaw Chang

14
Comparison of two gabor texture descriptor for texture classification 紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋紋 Speaker: Yi-Chun Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai Ku-Yaw Chang

description

Comparison of two gabor texture descriptor for texture classification 紋理 分類 法 中 使用 兩 種賈柏紋理 描述 子進行比對. Speaker: Yi-Chun Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai Ku-Yaw Chang. Outline. Introduction Material and Method Results Conclusion. Introduction. Traditional Garbo texture description - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Speaker: Yi-Chun Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai Ku-Yaw Chang

Page 1: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

Comparison of two gabor texture descriptor for texture classification紋理分類法中使用兩種賈柏紋理描述子進行比對

Speaker: Yi-Chun Ke

Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai

Ku-Yaw Chang

Page 2: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

2

Outline

Introduction Material and Method Results Conclusion

2009/10/06

Page 3: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

3

Introduction

Traditional Garbo texture description two-dimensional Gabor function m(x, y) = |gmn(x, y) i(x, y)|∗

μ : mean δ: standard deviation s: scale k: orientation Descriptors=2 × s × k + 2

2009/10/06

Page 4: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

4

Introduction

Rayleigh Garbo texture description 1-D Gabor function m(x) = |gmn(x) i(x)|∗

s: scale k: orientation Descriptors=s × k + 2

2009/10/06

Page 5: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

5

Introduction

Back propagation neural network(BPNN)

2009/10/06

Page 6: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

6

Method

Traditional Gabor texture descriptor S=4 scales K=6 orientations Descriptors=2 × s × k + 2=50

Rayleigh model Gabor texture descriptor S=4 scales K=6 orientations Descriptors= s × k + 2=26

2009/10/06

Page 7: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

7

Method

Back propagation neural network(BPNN) input nodes number:50 or 26 output nodes number: 4 hidden nodes: 10

2009/10/06

Page 8: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

8

Material

2009/10/06

Data 2

Data 1

Data 3

Page 9: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

9

Results

dataset 1

traditional Gabor descriptordataset 1

Rayleigh model Gabor descriptor

2009/10/06

Page 10: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

10

Resultsdataset 2

traditional Gabor descriptor

dataset 2

Rayleigh model Gabor descriptor

2009/10/06

Page 11: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

11

Resultsdataset 3

traditional Gabor descriptordataset 3

Rayleigh model Gabor descriptor

2009/10/06

Page 12: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

12

Results

2009/10/06

Page 13: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

13

Conclusion

2009/10/06

Rayleigh Traditional

Training time More Less

Computational expense Less More

Accuracy Low High

Lose some performance compared Easy Hard

Page 14: Speaker: Yi-Chun  Ke Adviser: Bo-Chi Lai       Ku-Yaw Chang

14

References James A. Freeman and David M. Skapura, Netuoral Networks

Algorithms,Applications,and Programming Techniques,1991,90-93

Sitaram Bhagavathy, Jelena Te si c, and B. S. Manjunath, On the Rayleigh Nature of Gabor Filter Outputs, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ICIP Volume 3,2005, I11 – 745- I11 – 748

Xu Zhan, Xingbo Sun, Lei Yuerong, Comparison of two gabor texture descriptor for texture classification , Information Engineering, 2009. ICIE '09. WASE International Conference on Volume 1, 2009, 52 – 56

Technology Exponent http://www.tek271.com/?about=docs/neuralNet/

IntoToNeuralNets.html2009/10/06