SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

31
SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11

description

Observational Studies Simply observing regular occurrences Researchers do not assign choices Can be RETROSPECTIVE or PROSPECTIVE

Transcript of SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Page 1: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

SP 2015CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS

Observational Studiesvs.

Experiments

Chapter 11

Page 2: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Observational Study vs. Experiment

Observational StudyObserve only, no manipulation of factors is used

ExperimentFactors are manipulated to create treatments and randomly assign subjects to the different treatments

Page 3: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Observational Studies

Simply observing regular occurrences

Researchers do not assign choices

Can be RETROSPECTIVE or PROSPECTIVE

Page 4: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Observational Studies

Useful for:Discovering trends and potential relationshipsUsed in public health and marketing

Observational StudiesDO NOT demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships

Page 5: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Retrospective Study

Not based on random samplesTypically used to estimate:

Differences between groups Associations between variables

Typically focus on small segment of entire population

Page 6: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Retrospective Study - STEPS

Steps:Select SubjectsDetermine their previous

conditions/behaviors Exam historic information

Pull records from data bases/sources (prior grades, classes, etc...)

Ask subjects questions in order to gather knowledge of past events

Page 7: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Retrospective Study - EXAMPLE

Example:Identify people with a diseaseLook at their history, heritage to

determine things which may be related to their condition.

Page 8: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Retrospective Study - WARNING

Data collected through asking subjects to recall past events tends to have errors!!!!!!

What did you eat last week, exactly?

Page 9: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Retrospective Study – WARNING 2

Lurking Variables

Page 10: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Prospective Study

Observe subjects over time

Identifying subjects in advanceCollecting data as events unfold

No treatments/conditions are intentionally controlled

Page 11: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Example

Page 12: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experiments

Manipulate factors to create treatments

Can show cause-and-effect relationships

Requires random assignment of subjects to treatments

Subjects are also referred to as Participants/ Experimental Units

Compares results from different treatment groups

Page 13: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experiments - BASICS

Requires a random assignment of subjects to treatments

Study the relationship between two or more variables

Must have at least one of each:Explanatory variable (Factor) to

manipulate&

Response variable to measure

Page 14: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experimenter - ROLE

Actively and deliberately manipulates factors to control the details of the possible treatments

RANDOMLY assigns the subjects to the treatments

Observes the response variableCompares responses for different

groups of subjects who have been treated differently.

Page 15: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experiments - WHO

Humans are commonly called subjects or participants

Other individuals (rats, days, petri dishes of bacteria) are commonly referred to by the more generic term experimental units.

Page 16: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experiments - WHAT

Factor – Variable whose levels are manipulated by the experimenter

Levels - Specific values chosen for a factorex. In a sleep study, we might assign participants to sleep for 4, 6, or 8 hours

Treatment – Process applied to a group of subjects. Treatments are the different levels of the factor.

Page 17: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Example - Continued

Treatments: Typical portions of 2 dog foods (1 from original company, 1 we know is

safe)

Response: Veterinarian’s assessment of test animals health

Page 18: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experimental Design - 3 Principles

ControlRandomizeReplicate

Page 19: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experimental Design - 3 Principles - CONTROL

We control sources of variation other than the factors we are testing by making conditions as similar as possible for all treatment groups.

For human subjects, we try to treat them alike.

Controlling sources of variation makes it easier to detect any differences caused by the treatments.

Page 20: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Control - Methods

Control treatment - baseline measurement

Control group - experimental units to whom the control treatment is applied

Placebo, Blinding

Page 21: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Blinding

People are so good at picking up subtle cues about treatments that it’s important to keep anyone who could affect the outcome or the measurement of the response from knowing which subjects have been assigned to which treatments.

2 groups: People who can influence the results (interviewer,

subjects, test administrator) People who evaluate the results (researcher,

doctors, judges)

Page 22: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Blinding

Single Blinding – when every individual in 1 of the groups is blinded

Double Blinding – when every individual in both groups is blinded

Recall: 2 groups People who can influence the results People who evaluate the results

Page 23: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Placebo & Placebo Effect

Placebo - A “fake” treatment that looks just like the treatments being tested.

Placebos are the best way to blind subjects from knowing whether they are receiving the treatment or not.

Placebo effect - when subjects treated with a placebo improve.

It’s not unusual for 20% or more of subjects given a placebo to report reduction in pain, improved movement, or greater alertness, or even to demonstrate improved health or performance.

Placebo controls are so effective that you shoulduse them as an essential tool for blinding whenever possible.

Page 24: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Blocking

We use blocking when there are pre-existing differences between groups of experimental units.

Randomization is introduced when we randomly assign treatments within each block.

Page 25: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experimental Design - 3 Principles - RANDOMIZE

Allows us to equalize the effects of unknown or uncontrollable sources of variation.

Note: Randomization cannot eliminate the effects of these sources, but it should spread them out fairly equally across the treatment levels

Page 26: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Experimental Design - 3 Principles - Replicate

2 Types of Replication

Type 1 - Within the experiment Apply each treatment to several subjects

Type 2 – Additional Experiment Replication of an entire experiment with different subjects

Page 27: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Example - Continued

In the experiment comparing animal food, how could you implement the principles of

control, randomization, and replication?•Control the portion sizes•Reduce possible variability from other factors:• (Standardize other aspects of their environments—housing the dogs

in similar pens and ensuring that each got the same amount of water, exercise, play, and sleep time.)

• Restrict the experiment to a single breed and age • Assign dogs to the two feed treatments randomly.

•To try and equalize traits, pre-existing conditions, and other unknown influences•Replicate by assigning more than one dog to each treatment to allow for variability among individual dogs.•If time and funding, possibly replicate the entire experiment using, for example, a different breed of dog.

Page 28: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Diagram of Experimental Procedure

Page 29: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.
Page 30: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Your Turn! – CW1

On the following slide, you will be asked to design an experiment. Follow these steps:

State what you want to know (in general)Specify the response variableSpecify the factors and treatments/levelsSpecify the Experimental UnitsDesign the experiment (Control, Replicate, Random)Create a diagram to show the processHow will you display resultsReflect – are the observations made, significant?

Page 31: SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.

Your Turn! – CW1