Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study
description
Transcript of Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study
Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study
Public MeetingMarch 17, 2003
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Regional Context
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Study Area Boundaries
Model Area
Focus Area
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Study Focus Area
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Population & Employment Growth
2000 Draft 2 2020
% Increase
Draft 2 2030
% Increase
POPULATION
Maricopa 361,816 790,372 118 834,113 6
Pinal 150,807 295,894 96 518,171 75
EMPLOYMENT
Maricopa 120,821 385,050 218 441,026 15
Pinal 57,728 100,880 75 185,080 83
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
2002 Network: Number of LanesS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 22002 Network
Number of Lanes
2
4
6
8
10
HOV
Lanes
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBS
ON
ALMA
SCHOO
L
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREEN
FIELD
HIGLE
Y
RECKE
R
POWE
R
SOSS
AMAN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
2000 Link V/CS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 32000 Link V/C
A
B
C
D
E-F
(0 - .6)
(.61 - .7)
(.71 - .8)
(.81 - .9)
(.9 or higher)
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCK ELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SC
HOO
L
ARIZON
A
MC
QUE
EN
COO
PER
GILBERT
LINDSA
Y
VAL VIS
TA
GREENFIELD
HIG
LEY
RECKER
POW
ER
SOSSAM
AN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORTH
CRISM
ON
SIGNAL
BUTTE
MERIDIA
N
VINEYAR
D
8
10
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
2000 Intersection LOSS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 42000 Intersection LOS
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA
SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSS
AMAN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL B
UTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
-
A
B
C
D
E F
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
2002 Network Summary
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 36 0 425
Lane Miles 195 0 1491
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 6 NA 22
Maricopa County
Pinal County
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 28 0 148
Lane Miles 111 0 322
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 0 NA 0
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 5Future Base
Added Roadways
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
Coun ty
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALM
A SCHOOL
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Future Base: Added Roadways
• 385 miles of new arterial
• 22 miles of new freeway
• Cost = $1,155 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Future Base: Widened RoadwaysS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 6Future Base
Widened Roadways
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
• 586 miles of widened arterials
• Cost = $2,637 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Base/2030 Intersection LOSS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 7Base/2030 Intersection
LOS
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUPE
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRIC
E
DO
BSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZ
ONA
MCQ
UEEN
COO
PER
GILB
ERT
LIND
SAY
VAL V
ISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POW
ER
SOSSAM
AN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISM
ON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIA
N
VINE
YARD
8
10
-
A
B
C
D
E F
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Future Base Network: Number of LanesS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 8Future Base Network
Number of Lanes
2
4
6
8
10
HOV
Lanes
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOTILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUPE
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSO
N
ALM
A SCHOOL
ARIZO
NA
MC
QUE
EN
COO
PER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL
VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIG
LEY
RECKER
POW
ER
SOSSAM
AN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISM
ON
SIG
NAL B
UTTE
MERID
IAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Future Base Network Summary
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 63 0 554
Lane Miles 402 0 2827
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 22 NA 29
Cost (millions) $880 $0 $2,208
Maricopa County
Pinal County
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 28 0 482
Lane Miles 148 0 1962
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 0 NA 1
Cost (millions) $0 $0 $1,590
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Arterial Improvement Program Example Arterials
Arizona Ave Ironwood Rd Gilbert Rd Elliot Rd Higley Rd Queen Creek Rd Power Rd Riggs Rd Ellsworth Rd
Features to Consider Widening Express Bus Service Variable Message Signs Bus Priority Signal Coordination HOV Lanes Major Intersection
Improvement
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Widened State HighwaysS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 17Widened State
Highways
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUPE
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCK ELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
HOV Facility
New or Improved Interchange
Wi dento 4 Lanes
Wi dento 6 Lanes
Wi dento 8 Lanes andHOV
• 35 miles of highway widening
• Cost = $123 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 16Widened Freeways
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRIC
E
DO
BSON
ALM
A SCHO
OL
ARIZ
ONA
MCQ
UEEN
COO
PER
GILB
ERT
LIND
SAY
VAL
VISTA
GREENFIE
LD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POW
ER
SOSSAMA
N
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISM
ON
SIGNAL B
UTTE
MERIDIAN
VINE
YARD
8
10
HOV Facility
New or Improved Interchange
Wi dento 4 Lanes
Wi dento 6 Lanes
Wi dento 8 Lanes andHOV
Widened Freeways
• 42 miles of freeway widening, cost = $336 million
• 38 miles of HOV cost = $228 million
• 8 New/Modified Interchanges
• cost = $74 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Enhanced 2030 Intersection LOSS.E.Maricopa
N.PinalCountyTransportation
Study
Februaury2003
Enhanced/2030 Intersection LOS
A
B
C
D
E-F
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOTILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUPE
BASELINE
SOUTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERSTITION
BROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERTLINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Enhanced Network Summary
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 63 58 554
Lane Miles 504 116 2,827
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 23 NA 17
Cost (millions) $330 $198 $0
Maricopa County
Pinal County
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 17 5 482
Lane Miles 88 10 1,962
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 1 NA 1
Cost (millions) $112 $30 $0
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCK ELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSO
N
ALMA SC
HOOL
ARIZONA
MC
QUEEN
COO
PER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VIS
TA
GREENFIELD
HIG
LEY
RECKER
POW
ER
SOSSAM
AN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORTH
CRISM
ON
SIGNAL
BUTTE
MERIDIA
N
VINEYA
RD
8
10
Figure 10Williams Gateway Freeway Concept
Williams Gateway Freeway Concept
Projected Daily Volumes
• Loop 202 to N/S Corridor = 60,000 to 100,000
• N/S Corridor to US 60 = 5,000
• Cost = $750 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MC
QUEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Figure 11Price Freeway
Extension Concept
Price Freeway Extension Concept
• Projected Daily Volume = 96,000 to 140,000
• Cost = $390 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBS
ON
ALMA
SCH
OO
L
ARIZONA
MC
QUEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIE
LD
HIG
LEY
RECK
ER
POWER
SOSS
AMAN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORT
H
CRISMON
SIGNAL B
UTT
E
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Figure 12US 60 Freeway
Extension Concept
US 60 Freeway Extension Concept
• Projected Daily Volume = 35,000 to 65,000
• Cost = $117 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MC
QUEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Figure 13East Valley Corridor
Concept
East Valley Corridor Concept
Projected Daily Volumes
• I-10 to Higley = 84,000 to 110,000
• Higley to N/S Corridor = 63,000 to 84,000
• N/S Corridor to US 60 = 14,000 to 21,000
• Cost = $1,390 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 14Apache Junction-Casa
Grande Corridor Concept
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCH
OOL
ARIZONA
MC
QUEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAM
AN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORT
H
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTT
E
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Apache Junction – Coolidge Corridor Concept
Projected Daily Volumes
• US 60 to E/W Corridor = 60,000 to 88,000
• E/W Corridor to SR 287 = 55,000 to 110,000
• SR 287 to I-10 = 26,000 to 45,000
• Cost = $1,640 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Summary of New Corridor ConceptsS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 15Summary of New
Corridor Concepts
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOT ILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUP E
BASELINE
SO UTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION
BROWN
MCK ELLIPS
PRICE
DOBS
ON
ALMA
SCHOO
L
ARIZONA
MC
QUEEN
COOPER
GILBERT
LINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HA
WES
ELLSW
ORTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
• Cost = $4,287 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
New 2030 Intersection LOSS.E.Maricopa
N.PinalCountyTransportation
Study
Februaury2003
New/2030 Intersection LOS
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOTILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUPE
BASELINE
SOUTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERSTITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICEDOBSONALMA SCHOOLARIZONAMCQUEENCOOPERGILBERTLINDSAYVAL VISTAGREENFIELDHIGLEYRECKERPOWERSOSSAMANHAWESELLSWORTHCRISMONSIGNAL BUTTEMERIDIANVINEYARD
8
10
A
B
C
D
E-F
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
New Facilities Network Summary
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 96 58 539
Lane Miles 819 116 2,779
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 20 NA 15
Cost (millions) $1,590 NA $0
Maricopa County
Pinal County
MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL
Centerline Miles 90 5 482
Lane Miles 827 10 1,977
Congested Intersections/Interchanges 0 NA 1
Cost (millions) $2,620 NA $0
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
2030 Operational Comparisons
MEASURE 2000 NETWORK
FUTURE BASE ENHANCED NEW
CORRIDORS
VMT (million) 10.0 22.9 22.7 24.1
Lane Miles– % Congested 9 6 4 3
% Congested Intersections 26 45 38 32
Cost (millions) NA $3,088 $530 $1,550
Maricopa County
Pinal County
MEASURE 2000 NETWORK
FUTURE BASE ENHANCED NEW
CORRIDORS
VMT (million) 1.9 7.6 6.6 6.6
Lane Miles– % Congested 1 3 1 0
% Congested Intersections 0 5 4 0
Cost (millions) NA $1,590 $233 $2,737
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudyLocal Network &
Rural Transit AccessS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 19Local Network &
Rural Transit Access
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Proposed Regional ConnectionsS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 18Regional Connections
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Transit Service-Maricopa Expanded Fixed Route Service Regional Service
Main St Chandler Blvd. Southern Ave Germann Rd. US 60 Power Rd. Loop 101 Gilbert Rd. Country Club Dr/Arizona Ave
5 New Park and Ride 2 New Transit Centers
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Transit Service-Pinal Expanded Fixed Route Service
Extend Maricopa County Service to Apache Junction
Intra-county Service Within Individual cities
Express/Commuter Inter-city Service
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Draft NetworkS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
Februaury 2003
Figure 20Draft Network
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
High Capacity Corridor Cost UP Mainline Chandler
LRT - $461 million BRT - $226 million
Chandler Boulevard LRT - $684 million BRT - $306 million
Power Road LRT - $465 million BRT - $237 million
Main Street LRT - $374 million BRT - $185 million
UP Southeast Commuter rail - $567 million
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Non-Motorized System GapsS.E. Maricopa
N. Pinal CountyTransportation
Study
January 2003
Figure 10Gaps in the Non-
Motorized System
System Gaps
Existing Routes347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOTILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUPE
BASELINE
SOUTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERSTITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERTLINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
347
84
60
79
287
87287
87
County
CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE
FLORENCE
QUEEN CREEK
CHANDLER
GILBERT MESA
APACHE JUNCTION
MOBILE
HUNT
RIGGS
CHANDLER HEIGHTS
OCOTILLO
QUEEN CREEK
GERMANN
PECOS
WILLIAMS FIELD
RAY
WARNER
ELLIOT
GUADALUPE
BASELINE
SOUTHERN
BROADWAYAPACHESUPERSTITIONBROWN
MCKELLIPS
PRICE
DOBSON
ALMA SCHO
OL
ARIZONA
MCQ
UEEN
COOPER
GILBERTLINDSAY
VAL VISTA
GREENFIELD
HIGLEY
RECKER
POWER
SOSSAMAN
HAW
ES
ELLSWO
RTH
CRISMON
SIGNAL BUTTE
MERIDIAN
VINEYARD
8
10
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Non-motorized System
Eliminate Existing Gaps Expand Trail System Provide On-street Bike Lanes with Arterial
Construction/Widening
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Arterial & Highway Priorities New
Independent of Other Components Constructed with New Development
Widening Occurs as Segments Approach LOS D/E Bottleneck, Continuity, Safety Considerations
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Freeway Priorities Widening
Higher Priority than New Corridors Phased Based on Demand Benefit of HOV Lane
New Incorporate in Local Plans Preserve Right of Way Williams Gateway Freeway US 60 Freeway Extension Price Freeway Extension Apache Junction/Coolidge Corridor East Valley Corridor
Sout
heas
t M
aric
opa
/ Nor
ther
n Pi
nal C
ount
y So
uthe
ast
Mar
icop
a / N
orth
ern
Pina
l Cou
nty
Are
aA
rea
Transportation Transportation StudyStudy
Transit Priorities Fixed Route
Increase Service to Satisfy Growth Expand with New Development to Meet Density
Thresholds Regional Service
Compliment Fixed Route Service Serve Medium Distance Trips
High Capacity Facilities Connect Activity Centers Serve Long Distance Trips