Slide PIT IKA Solo
-
Upload
ismatul-amri -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
2
Transcript of Slide PIT IKA Solo
![Page 1: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
COMPARATION BETWEEN WHO 1997 AND WHO 2009 CLASSIFICATION
IN DENGUE HAEMORRAGHIC FEVER CHILDREN
Ismatul Amri, Rinang Mariko , Amrin Alkamar *Department of pediatric,
Medical Faculty of Andalas University /DR. M Djamil Hospital Padang.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
![Page 2: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Clinical presentations of Dengue vary widely with unpredictable clinical outcome 1.
• Changes in the epidemiology of dengue, lead to problems with the use of the existing WHO classification 1.
Background
1. Nathan Michael B. Dragar Renu D, Guzman Maria, et all. Dengue: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. WHO, 2009.
![Page 3: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• The new classification of Dengue Haemorraghic Fever (DHF) has been published in guideline of diagnosis and treatment DHF by WHO on 2009 1.
• The new classification has not been applied in M Djamil Hospital.
Background
1. Nathan Michael B. Dragar Renu D, Guzman Maria, et all. Dengue: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. WHO, 2009.
![Page 4: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• To compare • WHO 1997
Classification• WHO 2009
Classification
Objective WHO 1997 Classification
WHO 2009 Classification
![Page 5: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Subject without complete data was excluded.
• Data was analyzed with SPSS 15th version
Method ...
![Page 6: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Result . • There were 135 children enrolled this study,
but he common diagnosis based on WHO 1997 and 2009 classification was DHF grade 3 (45,9%) and severe dengue (54,1%).
Result
![Page 7: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Result
Male43%
Female57%
Sex
Under-nourish
44%
Wellnourish46%
Over-weight
2%
Obesity8%
Nutritional Status
![Page 8: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Result ...
Average age 7,3 years + 3,8
Days of fever 4,75+0,86
![Page 9: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Result ...
DHF grade 17%
DHF grade 240%
DHF grade 351%
DHF grade 4 1%
WHO 1997 Classification
Probable dengue10%
Dengue with warning sign36%
Severe dengue54%
WHO 2009 Classification
![Page 10: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Result . • There were 135 children enrolled this study, but he
common diagnosis based on WHO 1997 and 2009 classification was DHF grade 3 (45,9%) and severe dengue (54,1%).
• Comparation of WHO 1997 and WHO 2009 classification were ; DHF grade 1 and probable dengue with warning sign, DHF grade 2 and probable dengue with warning sign, DHF grade 3 and severe dengue, DHF grade 4 and severe dengue, which statistically significant (P=0,001, α <0,005).
Result ...
![Page 11: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Result . • There were 61 children enrolled this study. • The common diagnosis based on WHO 1997
and 2009 classification was DHF grade 3 (45,9%) and severe dengue (54,1%).
![Page 12: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Tabel Kesesuaian antara kriteria DHF WHO 1997 dan WHO 2009
WHO 2009 * WHO 1997 Crosstabulation
3 17 2 0 2275,0% 77,3% 7,1% ,0% 36,1%
0 0 26 7 33,0% ,0% 92,9% 100,0% 54,1%
1 5 0 0 625,0% 22,7% ,0% ,0% 9,8%
4 22 28 7 61100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Count% within WHO 1997Count% within WHO 1997Count% within WHO 1997Count% within WHO 1997
Dengan warning sign
Dengue Berat
Presumtif dengue
WHO2009
Total
1 2 3 4WHO 1997
Total
![Page 13: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Result
• DHF grade 1 and probable dengue with warning sign,
• DHF grade 2 and probable dengue with warning sign,
• DHF grade 3 and severe dengue, • DHF grade 4 and severe dengue, which
statistically significant (P=0,001, α <0,005).
Comparation of WHO 1997 and WHO 2009 classification
![Page 14: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Conclusion. • DHF grade 1 and 2 suitable with probable
dengue with warning sign, DHF grd 3 and 4 suitable with severe dengue
![Page 15: Slide PIT IKA Solo](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062412/577cca111a28aba711a5494a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Terima kasih