SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4,...
-
Upload
mark-gibson -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4,...
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies
S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman
LBNLNovember 4, 2008
Background and Goals
• Studies shown here are simple, almost “lines on paper”
• Have included some realism in lengths of staves and radial extent of disks based on module dimensions but don’t believe dimensions to the mm-level
• Previous reports are worth looking at to understand evolution – see for example talks here
2
Assumptions
• Minimum of four pixel hits• Cover || ≤ 2.5 for tracks |z| ≤ 10 cm (nominally
2 although needs to be confirmed as design of SLHC evolves)
• Define “pixel-only volume” bounded by (short) strip detectors (R ≤ about 35 cm but final boundary TBD) and beam pipe at inner radius
• Two pixel hits permanent• Two hits insertable from end/replaceable
3
June 2008 Layout 1
Radi
us(c
m)
Z(cm)
Insertable sectionSingle-sided staves here
Fixed section
“End-of-stave card”Arbitrary guess
Insertion tube
Boundary of silicon strip trackerDrawn width represents tiltModules both sides assumed here
AngleCommon support shell “End-of-disk card”
Not shown
June 2008 Layout 2• “Bent” stave to reduce material• Measurement mostly at larger R• Gap in coverage and bend?
Monolithic insertable pixel optionsMonolithic insertable pixel options
BOX Section Beam, single cooling circuit.
I Section Beam, single cooling circuit.
Buttable modules to avoid large gaps
Pixel Barrel Overall - ExamplePixel Barrel Overall - Example
Layer Number Staves Modules per Stave Total Modules Module Type0 15 32 480 Single Chip1 15 28 420 4Chip Active Edge2 32 32 1024 4Chip Normal3 40 32 1280 4Chip Normal
Disk Examples
• Hermetic by design (see local supports talk for how implemented)
• Overlaps in R and
10
Both sides One side
Push Outer Envelope• What is outer envelope?• Maintain space for support structure and
services at outer radius. • This is tight if outer envelope is about 34cm,
based on current experience
11
Disk 1 ave Z 79.685 cmDisk 2 ave Z 94.9 cmDisk 3 ave Z 109.264 cm
Disk 1 OD 28 cmDisk 1 ID 12.1 cm
Disk 2 OD 28 cmDisk 2 ID 12.1 cm
Disk 3 OD 20.1 cmDisk 3 ID 16.05 cm
Barrel ave R Z of active length in cm Z 1/2 active length in cm
3.7 cm 64.8 32.4007.5 cm 113.4 56.70016 cm 117.032 58.51620 cm 119.55 59.775
Support tube ave R10.5 cm
OD limit R33.85 cm
End-of-disk “cards”Same arbitrary area/moduleas for staves
More Outside Room
12
• Reduce radius of outer layers by 2 cm• Reduce disk size• May allow exterior support structure and
services routing or support from insertion tube and routing along it.
Disk 1 ave Z 83.97 cmDisk 2 ave Z 99.55 cmDisk 3 ave Z 110 cm
Disk 1 OD 26.75 cmDisk 1 ID 14.8 cm
Disk 2 OD 26.75 cmDisk 2 ID 14.8 cm
Disk 3 OD 20.58 cmDisk 3 ID 16.53 cm
Barrel ave R Z of active length in cm Z 1/2 active length in cm
3.7 cm 64.8 32.4007.5 cm 113.4 56.70014 cm 117.032 58.51618 cm 119.55 59.775
Support tube ave R11 cm
OD limit R33.85 cm
More Forward Hits• Possible to add more forward hits• Could keep all disks same and do this(not
shown here but easy to imagine)• Of course could add disk also….
13
Disk 1 ave Z 84 cmDisk 2 ave Z 100 cmDisk 3 ave Z 110 cm
Disk 1 OD 26.75 cmDisk 1 ID 14.8 cm
Disk 2 OD 26.75 cmDisk 2 ID 14.8 cm
Disk 3 OD 22.8 cmDisk 3 ID 14.8 cm
Barrel ave R Z of active length in cm Z 1/2 active length in cm
3.7 cm 64.8 32.4007.5 cm 113.4 56.70014 cm 117.032 58.51618 cm 119.55 59.775
Support tube ave R11 cm
OD limit R33.85 cm
My Comments• Staves are long(material?) and disks are big. Need reality check from
design and prototypes before expending too much effort on detailed layouts.
• Nearing end of utility of simple layout studies (at least for engineering)• Obvious information needs
– What is outer envelope of pixels?– What are the dimensions of end-of-stave and end-of-disk cards?– Insertion tube (only) or insertion+support outer layers? Stiffness and other
requirements (it’s not so large in diameter)– Thermal requirements for this tube– Feedback from services and support envelopes => change layout
• Time for some more detailed modeling with real engineering design input.
14