Should metal bioavailability be considered in the evaluation...

31
Should metal bioavailability be considered in the evaluation of treatment and remediation methodologies for acid mine drainage? Vigneault, B.*, Neculita, C.M.**, Zagury, G.J.**, Kwong, Y.T.J.* and Tisch, B.* * CANMET-Mining and Mineral Sciences Laboratories ** École Polytechnique de Montréal 5 th World Congres of the Society of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Sydney, Australia, August 2008

Transcript of Should metal bioavailability be considered in the evaluation...

Should metal bioavailability be considered in the evaluation of

treatment and remediation methodologies for acid mine

drainage?Vigneault, B.*, Neculita, C.M.**, Zagury, G.J.**, Kwong, Y.T.J.* and Tisch, B.** CANMET-Mining and Mineral Sciences Laboratories** École Polytechnique de Montréal

5th World Congres of the Society of EnvironmentalChemistry and Toxicology, Sydney, Australia, August 2008

Introduction : Context

• Treatment efficiency is often assessed based on metal removal alone

• More jurisdictions are implementing effluent toxicity requirements and discharge objective or limits based on generic water quality criteria

Introduction : AMD Treatment• Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) is the most

significant environmental issue related to mining world-wide

• AMD treatment most often involves of neutralization with lime

• AMD prevention and / or passive treatment are more preferable

• Prevention and treatment options include:- Water covers- Soil covers- Passive bioreactors

The current presentation highlights the relevance of metal bioavailability in assessing alternative methods for AMD prevention and treatment:

I. Shallow water coverII. Papermill sludge coverIII. Passive bioreactor

Introduction : Objective

AMD Prevention : Water Cover• Subaqueous disposal of reactive sulphide

tailings is an effective way to prevent AMD

• Shallow water cover of ~ 30 cm is preferable for geotechnical considerations

• Formation of a biofilm has been found at the surface of the tailings

Materials and Methods: Water Cover

• Geochemical measurements were completed at the water/tailings interface to assess the impact of biofilm:- Micro-profiles of O2 and pH- Profiles of metals, major ions,

sulphides and DOC - Biotic Ligand Model

(Hydroqual) to estimate the effect of DOC

Vigneault et al. (2001) Wat. Res. 35(4): 1066-1076.

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

[ ] (µg · L-1)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

0 10 20 30 40

Dep

th (c

m)

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

Copper

Zinc

Cadmium

Water Cover: Trace metal profiles

[ ] (mg · L-1)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Dep

th (c

m)

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4DOC

Water Cover: DOC Profiles

Water Cover: DOC Protective Effect

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Copper Cadmium Zinc

DOC

Effe

ct R

atio

s

AMD Prevention : Paper Mill Biosolids

• Paper mill biosolids are used to reclaim mine tailings

• If possible, paper mill biosolid covers will be use to grow energy crops

• Besides suppressing metal mobilization, the utilization of paper mill biosolids may impact effluent composition

Materials and Methods: Biosolid Covers

• Pulp and paper sludge were obtained from two Canadian mills

• Biosolids leachates tested for:

- Direct toxicity- Copper complexation capacity- Effect on copper toxicity

Materials and Methods: Metal Speciation

• Ion selective electrode for the determination of copper complexationcapacity

• Effect of leachates on copper toxicity to C. dubia (7 day survival and reproduction) tested in laboratory water

Biosolid Covers: Cu Complexation

Domtar

[Cu]Total (µM)12.9 33.8 71.3

{Cu2+

} (µM

)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Measured (ISE)Predicted (WHAM VI)

Biosolid Covers: Cu Toxicity

Survival Reproduction

Cu

LC50

/ IC

25 (µ

g · L

-1)

0

50

100

150

200

250

Control Domtar St. Marys

~

C. dubia

Biosolid Covers: DOC Protective Effect

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Copper Cadmium Zinc

DOC

Effe

ct R

atio

s

AMD Treatment : Passive bioreactors

• Field passive bioreactors are effective to increase pH and remove metals

• Bioreactors require an organic amendment and can release DOC in the treated effluent

Materials and Methods: Passive Bioreactor

• Bioreactor with a hydraulic retention time up to 10 days used to treat artificial AMD

• Reactive mixture composed of 60% organic materials (10% maple wood chips, 20% sawdust, 10% poultry manure and 20% leaf compost) and 40% inorganic materials.

Materials and Methods: Metal Speciation

• Ultrafiltration used to determine truly dissolved metals

• Cadmium, nickel and zinc speciation estimated using WHAM VI (Tipping 1998)

Neculita, Vigneault and Zagury (2008) Env. Toxicol. Chem. 27(8): 1659-1667.

Passive Bioreactor: Metal Speciation

• Treated effluent had a pH of 6.2 and a DOC of 7 mg · L-1

• The majority of cadmium and zinc was < 1 Kda

• Predicted fraction of metal bound to dissolved and particulate organic matter was only 0.2% for nickel and 0.4% for zinc and cadmium

Passive bioreactor: DOC Protective Effect

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

Copper Cadmium Zinc

DOC

Effe

ct R

atio

s

Conclusions• Shallow water cover: metal toxicity can

potentially be reduced by 4 x to 25 x

• Biosolid covers: copper toxicity in limed effluent could be reduced by ~ 10 x as supported by the copper toxicity tests and copper speciation measurements

• Passive bioreactor: metal toxicity is not expected to be largely affected by the released organic matter

Conclusions• Expected organic matter releases are

significant (~ 101 mg · L-1) for the 3 tested methods

• Data suggest that the released organic matter can significantly affect metal toxicity and should be considered when using water quality guidelines to establish discharge objectives

Acknowledgements

• Natural Resources Canada

• Vale Inco

• Teck Cominco

• INRS-ETE

Thank You !

Dissolved oxygen (µM)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Dep

th (m

m)

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

5700 Lux 18500 Lux >20000 Lux

Water Cover: Oxygen micro-profiles

Cu Zn Cd

Diff

usiv

e flu

x to

the

wat

er c

over

(m

ol ·

cm-2

· s-1

)

10-19

10-18

10-17

10-16

10-15

10-14

1998 2005

No flux

Water Cover: Trace metal fluxes

Materials and Methods: Toxicity Tests

• Canadian Metal Mining Effluent Regulations:- acute lethality to Daphnia magna

and rainbow trout

- sublethal toxicity to Pseudokirchneriellasubcapitata, Lemna minor, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephalespromelas

Biosolid Covers: Leachate Toxicity

Rainbow trout D. magna

LC50

(mg

C ·

L-1)

0

50

100

150

200

Domtar St. Marys

>

>

>

~

P. prom

elas

C. dub

ia

L. mino

rP. s

ubca

pitata

IC25

(mg

C ·

L-1)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Domtar St. Marys >

>

Biosolid Covers: Leachate Toxicity

Biosolid Covers: Cu Complexation

St. Marys

[Cu]Total (µM)15.0 37.0 73.0

{Cu2+

} (µM

)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Measured (ISE)Predicted (WHAM VI)

Passive bioreactor: Truly Dissolved Metals

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

Cd Zn

[ ] u

g / L Total

DissolvedPermeable