Should metal bioavailability be considered in the evaluation...
Transcript of Should metal bioavailability be considered in the evaluation...
Should metal bioavailability be considered in the evaluation of
treatment and remediation methodologies for acid mine
drainage?Vigneault, B.*, Neculita, C.M.**, Zagury, G.J.**, Kwong, Y.T.J.* and Tisch, B.** CANMET-Mining and Mineral Sciences Laboratories** École Polytechnique de Montréal
5th World Congres of the Society of EnvironmentalChemistry and Toxicology, Sydney, Australia, August 2008
Introduction : Context
• Treatment efficiency is often assessed based on metal removal alone
• More jurisdictions are implementing effluent toxicity requirements and discharge objective or limits based on generic water quality criteria
Introduction : AMD Treatment• Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) is the most
significant environmental issue related to mining world-wide
• AMD treatment most often involves of neutralization with lime
• AMD prevention and / or passive treatment are more preferable
• Prevention and treatment options include:- Water covers- Soil covers- Passive bioreactors
The current presentation highlights the relevance of metal bioavailability in assessing alternative methods for AMD prevention and treatment:
I. Shallow water coverII. Papermill sludge coverIII. Passive bioreactor
Introduction : Objective
AMD Prevention : Water Cover• Subaqueous disposal of reactive sulphide
tailings is an effective way to prevent AMD
• Shallow water cover of ~ 30 cm is preferable for geotechnical considerations
• Formation of a biofilm has been found at the surface of the tailings
Materials and Methods: Water Cover
• Geochemical measurements were completed at the water/tailings interface to assess the impact of biofilm:- Micro-profiles of O2 and pH- Profiles of metals, major ions,
sulphides and DOC - Biotic Ligand Model
(Hydroqual) to estimate the effect of DOC
Vigneault et al. (2001) Wat. Res. 35(4): 1066-1076.
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
[ ] (µg · L-1)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
0 10 20 30 40
Dep
th (c
m)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
Copper
Zinc
Cadmium
Water Cover: Trace metal profiles
AMD Prevention : Paper Mill Biosolids
• Paper mill biosolids are used to reclaim mine tailings
• If possible, paper mill biosolid covers will be use to grow energy crops
• Besides suppressing metal mobilization, the utilization of paper mill biosolids may impact effluent composition
Materials and Methods: Biosolid Covers
• Pulp and paper sludge were obtained from two Canadian mills
• Biosolids leachates tested for:
- Direct toxicity- Copper complexation capacity- Effect on copper toxicity
Materials and Methods: Metal Speciation
• Ion selective electrode for the determination of copper complexationcapacity
• Effect of leachates on copper toxicity to C. dubia (7 day survival and reproduction) tested in laboratory water
Biosolid Covers: Cu Complexation
Domtar
[Cu]Total (µM)12.9 33.8 71.3
{Cu2+
} (µM
)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Measured (ISE)Predicted (WHAM VI)
Biosolid Covers: Cu Toxicity
Survival Reproduction
Cu
LC50
/ IC
25 (µ
g · L
-1)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Control Domtar St. Marys
~
C. dubia
AMD Treatment : Passive bioreactors
• Field passive bioreactors are effective to increase pH and remove metals
• Bioreactors require an organic amendment and can release DOC in the treated effluent
Materials and Methods: Passive Bioreactor
• Bioreactor with a hydraulic retention time up to 10 days used to treat artificial AMD
• Reactive mixture composed of 60% organic materials (10% maple wood chips, 20% sawdust, 10% poultry manure and 20% leaf compost) and 40% inorganic materials.
Materials and Methods: Metal Speciation
• Ultrafiltration used to determine truly dissolved metals
• Cadmium, nickel and zinc speciation estimated using WHAM VI (Tipping 1998)
Neculita, Vigneault and Zagury (2008) Env. Toxicol. Chem. 27(8): 1659-1667.
Passive Bioreactor: Metal Speciation
• Treated effluent had a pH of 6.2 and a DOC of 7 mg · L-1
• The majority of cadmium and zinc was < 1 Kda
• Predicted fraction of metal bound to dissolved and particulate organic matter was only 0.2% for nickel and 0.4% for zinc and cadmium
Passive bioreactor: DOC Protective Effect
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Copper Cadmium Zinc
DOC
Effe
ct R
atio
s
Conclusions• Shallow water cover: metal toxicity can
potentially be reduced by 4 x to 25 x
• Biosolid covers: copper toxicity in limed effluent could be reduced by ~ 10 x as supported by the copper toxicity tests and copper speciation measurements
• Passive bioreactor: metal toxicity is not expected to be largely affected by the released organic matter
Conclusions• Expected organic matter releases are
significant (~ 101 mg · L-1) for the 3 tested methods
• Data suggest that the released organic matter can significantly affect metal toxicity and should be considered when using water quality guidelines to establish discharge objectives
Dissolved oxygen (µM)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Dep
th (m
m)
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
5700 Lux 18500 Lux >20000 Lux
Water Cover: Oxygen micro-profiles
Cu Zn Cd
Diff
usiv
e flu
x to
the
wat
er c
over
(m
ol ·
cm-2
· s-1
)
10-19
10-18
10-17
10-16
10-15
10-14
1998 2005
No flux
Water Cover: Trace metal fluxes
Materials and Methods: Toxicity Tests
• Canadian Metal Mining Effluent Regulations:- acute lethality to Daphnia magna
and rainbow trout
- sublethal toxicity to Pseudokirchneriellasubcapitata, Lemna minor, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephalespromelas
Biosolid Covers: Leachate Toxicity
Rainbow trout D. magna
LC50
(mg
C ·
L-1)
0
50
100
150
200
Domtar St. Marys
>
>
>
~
P. prom
elas
C. dub
ia
L. mino
rP. s
ubca
pitata
IC25
(mg
C ·
L-1)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Domtar St. Marys >
>
Biosolid Covers: Leachate Toxicity
Biosolid Covers: Cu Complexation
St. Marys
[Cu]Total (µM)15.0 37.0 73.0
{Cu2+
} (µM
)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Measured (ISE)Predicted (WHAM VI)