Shared Services
-
Upload
taryn-higgins-gress -
Category
Documents
-
view
33 -
download
0
Transcript of Shared Services
1
Local Government Officials’ ConferenceOfficials Conference
Shared ServicesMarch 9, 2012
Mate RogonjicOhio Performance Team
Purpose• Increase understanding and awareness of
shared services– May help find ways to improve service delivery
and reduce costs in your local governments• Background of AOS work• Background of AOS work• Theory• Sources• Examples
Background of AOS Work:Phase 1
• Summit on Local Government Sustainability – Strategies and Solutions in a Time of Fiscal Crisisin a Time of Fiscal Crisis– November 19, 2009
• Conducted research and compiled data in a spreadsheet
2
Background of AOS Work:Phase 2
• Spreadsheet converted to searchable database
P t hi ith K t St t U i it– Partnership with Kent State University• Database maintenance and updates• Speaking Engagements – continuous
The Nature of the Problem
• Current economic climate creates the need to reassess practices and service delivery– Declining or stagnant revenues– Escalating costs– Reduction in Local Government Funding
Traditional Options
• Across-the-board reductions• Cut staffing • Reduce services• Reduce services• Increase taxes
3
“New” Options
• THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX– Shared Services
• Measure and reward effectiveness• Measure and reward effectiveness • Focus on causes• Be a copy-cat• Sacrifice sacred cows
Benefits• According to the International City/County
Management Association (ICMA) Report (2006), shared services:– Eliminate duplication of services– Provide services that otherwise could not be– Provide services that otherwise could not be
provided– Create increased flexibility– Achieve economies of scale– Help reduce costs– Lead to improved service quality and effectiveness
Basic Types (ICMA, 2006)• Joint service agreement: Two or more local
governments may cooperate to conduct an activity.• Delegated agreement: One or more local
governments may designate another jurisdiction to conduct an activity under their oversight.
• Transfer of functions: One or more local governments may transfer in entirety an activity to the responsibility of another local government.
• Consolidation of services: One or more local governments may transfer in entirety an activity to a new separate entity created to handle the activity.
4
Sources for Information - AOS
• Performance Audit Section• Database of Examples• Skinnyohio.org
AOS S f Ohi GFOA b• AOS Survey of Ohio GFOA members• Local Government Consolidation Reports
Sources for Information - Ohio
• Office of Budget and Management Shared Services Survey
Sources for Information - Ohio• EfficientGovNow• House Bill 153• The Government Cooperation and Efficiency
Project (Hamilton County)• The Ohio Commission on Local Government
Reform and Collaboration• Ohio Department of Development - Local
Government Services and Regional Collaboration Grant Program (2008-09)
5
Sources for Information - National
• ICMA: (Interlocal Service-Sharing Agreements, 2006)
• New Jersey’s Sharing Available Resources Efficiently (SHARE) Grant Program Handbook (2006)
• Somerset County, NJ• New York: Local Government Efficiency Grant
Program
Recent Examples Performance Audits
• Woodmere Village Police Department– Woodmere, Pepper Pike, Moreland Hills
and Orange merger study• City of Mansfield – Dispatch• City of Seven Hills – Dispatch
AOS Database of Examples: Shared Services Idea Center
• www.auditor.state.oh.us/sharedservices/default.htm • Search by county and/or subject area.• Governments can submit new examples.• Another internal database with nationwide examples.
6
Skinnyohio.org• Auditor Yost Initiative• Share best practices
• Planning and Financial Management• Human ResourcesHuman Resources• Fleet• Facility• Operations• Technology
AOS Survey• Survey administered to members of the
Ohio GFOA• Open from August 14 to August 28, 2009• Conducted to collect and share examples• Conducted to collect and share examples,
benefits, and obstacles of shared services
AOS Survey Results: Key Elements for Success
• Open communication and honesty• Iron out particulars and structure it properly
– Need for contracts to leave no gray areas• Both parties need to benefit• Depends on circumstances to be effective• Advances in technology should allow for
more shared service options
7
AOS Survey Results: Perceived Barriers
• Ability to absorb additional personnel and overhead costs– If unable, increased risk of becoming over-tasked
• Revenue sharing disputesRevenue sharing disputes• Decision-making• Relative size and budget• Loss of control• Unions• Politics (more rational thinking needs to prevail)
AOS Survey Results: Overall Rating
• How would you rate your organization's experience with the shared services agreement?
Rating # of RespondentsRating # of Respondents5 – most favorable 11
4 73 42 0
1 – least favorable 0
State Budget Bill (HB 153)• Intergovernmental Shared Services
– Grants authority for political subdivisions to enter into contracts with one another to provide services.
• Local Government Innovation ProgramORC Ch t 189– ORC Chapter 189
– Provides $45 million in FY 2013 to award competitive grants for qualified innovation projects.
– Applications should demonstrate one or more of the following: Efficiency, Shared Services, Coproduction, and Merger.
8
The Government Cooperation and Efficiency Project – Hamilton County
• Voluntary process • Use of a consulting firm• Existing and emerging collaborative efforts: Bulk Road
Salt Purchasing, Bulk Fuel and Daily Fuel Purchasing, Bulk Office Supply Purchasing Training and ProfessionalBulk Office Supply Purchasing, Training and Professional Development, Human Resources, Information Technology Services, Grant Coordination and Acquisition, Equipment Sharing / Contracting, Specialized Training, Fleet Maintenance, Fire Hydrant Maintenance, and Street Signs and Markings.
Public Safety
• Westshore Council of Governments– Regional dispatch center– Working toward regional Fire and EMS
• Stark County awarded funding through• Stark County awarded funding through EfficientGovNow for Countywide Dispatch – Annual Savings: $6.5 million
Public Safety• Police: Village of Lakemore contracts with Springfield
Township.• Joint Fire District: Villages of Genoa and Clay Center,
and Allen and Clay Townships• Combined Fire Department: Granville Township and
the Village of Granville – Funded by a township property tax
• Centralized Dispatch: Liberty and Brookfield Townships– In process; could serve other communities
9
Public Safety• Allegheny County’s (Pittsburgh) 130 municipalities
are patrolled by 104 police departments.– Cuyahoga County's 60 communities are patrolled
by 59 departments. • There are 33 regional police departments inThere are 33 regional police departments in
Pennsylvania, each serving multiple communities. • For the past 40 years, Pennsylvania has used state
and federal money to help merge local enforcement agencies.
• Source: Plain Dealer/Cleveland.com
Public Works• Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District is responsible
for wastewater treatment facilities and interceptor sewers for the City of Cleveland and all or portions of 60 suburban municipalities in Cuyahoga, Summit and Lorain Counties.
• Mifflin Township, Jefferson Township, and City of Gahanna share vehicle maintenance services at the Gahanna service garage (for police, fire, and road departments).
• City of Monroe provides public works services to Lemon Township (in addition to police and fire).
School Administration• Orrville CSD and the Rittman EVSD
– Share Superintendent, Treasurer, and other staff from Administrative Team
– Share teachers, order a larger volume of gsupplies, and share buses for field trips
10
Lorain County Community Alliance
• Council of governments• Explore more effective levels of public service,
develop mechanisms to save money, and benefit the member communities and the region in ways that could not be achieved separatelycould not be achieved separately.
• Some recent issues: transportation, water quality, storm water management, land use, railroad congestion, bulk purchasing, digital infrastructure, and utility concerns.
Technology• Ashland County
– $80,000 grant to study the implementation and maintenance costs of providing a collaborative high-speed Internet service for Ashland County
d it th l l tand its other local governments. – Increase opportunities for economic development,
provide more efficient emergency management, and better access to public services (e.g., county web sites and GIS systems).
Economic Development
• Northeast Ohio Joint Office of Economic Development– Ashtabula, Columbiana, Mahoning, Medina, Portage,
Richland, Stark, Summit, Trumbull, Wayne counties– Guiding principles
The Foreign Trade Zone program Recognized as a “Best– The Foreign-Trade Zone program – Recognized as a Best Practice”
• The City of Kent and Franklin Township: JEDD– Since 2007, the JEDD has generated $270,550 for Franklin
Township and $330,672 for the City of Kent
11
Transportation• Geauga County
– Building (2009) a transportation facility to serve the fleets of the Board of DD and the West Geauga LSD.
– One-time cost savings of $1.0 million with ongoing cost savings of $140,000 per year.
• Trumbull County Fuel AgreementTrumbull County Fuel Agreement– All local governments and school districts in Trumbull County
have the opportunity to piggyback off the county’s fuel price. – Trumbull County Roundtable – joint purchasing opportunities.
• County-wide (Shelby) public transit system administered by the City of Sidney.
Parks and Recreation
• City of Westlake, Fairview Park and Rocky River share a park.
• Granville Township (OH) joined with the Village of Granville and the GranvilleVillage of Granville and the Granville Exempted Village School District to create a Joint Recreation District. Six more townships will participate.
Health Services• On January 1, 2011, the Akron Health District
combined with the Summit County General Health District in an effort to provide optimal access to the highest quality public health access o e g es qua y pub c easervices in the most cost-effective manner to all who live in and visit the City of Akron and Summit County.– Projected Annual Savings: $206,000
12
QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION
Ohio Performance Team88 East Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Mate Rogonjic
Phone: (800) 626-2297Fax: (866) 647-0014
E-mail: [email protected]
88 East Broad StreetColumbus, Ohio 43215
Phone: (800) 282-0370 Fax: (614) 466-4490E-mail: [email protected]
www.auditor.state.oh.us