Sensory Milk Properties at the Farm Level – the Terroir Dimension

download Sensory Milk Properties at the Farm Level – the Terroir Dimension

of 1

Transcript of Sensory Milk Properties at the Farm Level – the Terroir Dimension

  • 8/10/2019 Sensory Milk Properties at the Farm Level the Terroir Dimension

    1/1

    D E P A R T M E N T O F F O O D S C I E N C E

    F A C U L T Y O F L I F E S C I E N C E S

    U N I V E R S I T Y O F C O P E N H A G E N

    Sensory milk properties at the farm level

    the terroir dimensionJ.S. Vestergaard *1, T. Kristensen 2, K. Segaard2, W.L.P. Bredie11 The University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Food Science, Sensory Science, Denmark;2 University of Aarhus, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Food Science, Denmark; *[email protected]

    Introduction

    In recent years, the Danish milk market has shown an increase in the

    consumption of organic milk as well as a growing variety of milk with specific

    features including farm milk. The production of milk from a single farm and

    pasture-based (PB) feeding regimes is of special interest as it implies a sense

    of place or terroir.

    The PB feeding regimes vary with season and might also vary on a day-to-day

    basis. It is therefore important to understand the impact of the feed on the

    sensory properties of the milk (Croissant et al., 2007).

    This study aims at demonstrating how analytical sensory analysis can provide

    important information about the influence of breed, season and variation in farm

    management from PB feeding regimes on the sensory properties of organic

    farm milk.

    Experimental

    The study was performed in 2007 and 2008 during two seasons

    (spring/autumn) representing 28 milk samples from 7 organic farms with either

    Holstein or Jersey cows. PB feeding regimes were based on pastures with

    varying amounts of white clover together with perennial ryegrass and

    supplement feeding with silage and concentrates.

    Descriptive sensory analysis were performed on the fresh pasteurized

    unhomogenized full-fat milk with a trained panel (N=9-10, 3 replicates in 2

    sessions). The descriptive sensory data were analysed by ANOVA and PCA.

    Results and Discussion

    Significant results for the descriptive sensory analyses were found as

    expected for breed. In general the results revealed a larger variation in sensory

    flavour properties of spring milk and milk from Holstein cows. When comparing

    the two seasons within each year, a tendency of the milk being characterized as

    having a greener odour, sweet and maize-like flavour in spring and a more

    bitter taste in the autumn was found (results not shown here).

    Exploring selected sensory descriptive data where significant breed related

    attributes such as appearance were removed for both years reveals the variation

    between seasons as illustrated in Fig. 1.

    The results show a greater variation between seasons in 2008 than in 2007. In

    spring 2007 the farm milks had in general a more pronounced maize sweet and

    metallic flavour, a more bitter taste and a more green odour, whereas the

    farm milks in spring 2008 were characterized by a more astringent flavour. In

    general there is a tendency to less pronounced sensory characteristics of the

    farm milks in autumn compared to spring grazing.

    The results of the refined sensory data where attributes strongly correlated to

    breed are removed also reveal a tendency to differences between breed (milk

    from Jersey cows placed in the upper right corner of the biplot and milk from

    Holstein cows placed in the lower left corner). The explained variation in season

    and breed is however not clear and suggests complex relationships to

    production related parameters.

    Fig. 2 shows the projection of feed related parameters amount of pasture in

    the ration (Pasture, varying between 15-89%) and amount white clover in the

    pasture (Legume, varying between 5-44%) to a PCA of all sensory data.

    Feeding with high amounts of pasture in the ration is found to be associated to

    barn-like characteristics (both odour, flavour and aftertaste) of the milk.

    Relations to other production conditions such as composition of the

    supplement feed might also have an impact on the sensory characteristics of the

    milk and is currently being investigated.

    AcknowledgementsThe project Organic Milk of High Quality Development of Production Concepts Based on grazing of the Dairy Cows and Gentle

    Treatment of the Milk during Handling and Processing (2006-2009) is funded under the DARCOF III programme by the Danish Government.The authors wish to thank Carlo Piga and Rosaria Romano for assistance with the data analyses.

    ReferencesCroissant, A. E., Washburn, S. P., Dean, L. L., Drake, M. A. (2007). Chemical properties and consumer perception of fluid

    milk from conventional and pasture-based production systems. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 4942-4953.

    Conclusion

    A sensory analytical tool can provide important information about the sensory

    properties of organic farm milk, reflecting time and place

    Seasonal variations appear to be an important factor in the terroir dimension ofmilk

    The terroir dimension of milk may be more actively used in relation to

    communication of the sensory properties to the consumer

    ( 1 2:73,61%)

    0707

    07

    07

    07

    07

    07

    08

    08

    0808 08

    0808

    0808

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    07 07

    07

    07

    07

    07

    0

    20

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8

    1(45,19%)

    2(28,4

    1%)

    Fig. 1. Biplot (PCA) of descriptivesensory milkdata from grazing studieson seven organic farms (EMC-, HM-, JP-, KI-, OA-, UGJ-, WB-) witheither Holstein (-HF-) or Jersey cows(-JE-). Data from twoseasons(autumn; -A-, spring; -S-) and two years(-07, -08)

    ( 12: 61,53%)

    20

    0

    -1

    -0,75

    -0,5

    -0,25

    0

    0,25

    0,5

    0,75

    1

    -1 -0,75 -0,5 -0,25 0 0,25 0,5 0,75 1

    1(31,52 %)

    2(30,0

    1%)

    ( 1 2: 61,53 %)

    07

    0707

    07

    0707

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    08

    07

    07

    07

    07

    07

    07

    07

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    1 (31,52 %)

    2(30,0

    1%)

    Fig. 2. Projectionof the feed related data amountof pasture in the ration (Pasture) and 'amount of whiteclover in the grass'(Legume) to a PCA of descriptivesensory milkdata from seven organic farms (EMC-, HM-, JP-, KI-, OA-, UGJ-, WB-) witheitherHolstein (-HF-) orJ ersey cows (-JE-). Data from two seasons (autumn; -A-, spring; -S-) and two years(-07, -08)

    Archived at http://orgprints.org/16353