Se$ng producve, aainable educaonal goals for North Carolina · 1980 1990 2000 2010 High Social,...
Transcript of Se$ng producve, aainable educaonal goals for North Carolina · 1980 1990 2000 2010 High Social,...
Se$ng produc-ve, a1ainable
educa-onal goals for North Carolina
June 15, 2018
ECONorthwestECONOMICS • FINANCE • PLANNING
Takeaways • Technological change has demanded, and will con-nue to demand,
higher skilled labor • North Carolina’s postsecondary a1ainment gap (across various
defini-ons) is 11-15 percentage points • North Carolina’s postsecondary a1ainment (associate+) increased by
7 percentage points over the past decade • Sta-ng the obvious: postsecondary enrollment at age 19 is a predictor
of postsecondary a1ainment at age 26
• P12 goals should consider measures of hard and soR skills • Achievement gaps measured at age 5 have proven difficult to narrow
during K12, confirming the need for age 0-4 programming and measures
Educa-on and the economy
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Sout
h Da
kota
North
Dak
ota
Conn
ectic
utVi
rgin
iaCo
lora
doM
assa
chus
etts
New
Ham
pshi
reTe
xas
Geor
giaKa
nsas
Nebr
aska
Loui
siana
Mar
ylan
dNe
w Je
rsey
Utah
Arka
nsas
Min
neso
taM
ississ
ippi
Alab
ama
Iow
aRh
ode
Islan
dOr
egon
North
Car
olin
aSo
uth
Caro
lina
Tenn
esse
eOk
laho
ma
Was
hing
ton
Mai
neW
iscon
sinFlo
rida
Calif
orni
aNe
w Y
ork
Mon
tana
Penn
sylva
nia
Arizo
naIll
inoi
sId
aho
Indi
ana
New
Mex
icoVe
rmon
tM
issou
riKe
ntuc
kyOh
ioNe
vada
Wes
t Virg
inia
Haw
aiiM
ichig
an
Annu
al a
vera
ge G
DP p
er c
apita
gro
wth
, 197
0-20
07
Years of schoolingTest scoresTotal annual average GDP per capita growth
Contribu-ons to GDP per capita growth, 1970-2007
Economic benefits of a be1er-educated workforce
Source: Hanushek et al. (2017). Economic Gains from Educa-onal Reform by US States. Journal of Human Capital.
Other factors
Risk of job disrup-on Share of occupa-ons at high risk of automa-on
Percent Automation Risk
45% - 50%
50% - 55%
55% - 60%
60% - 65%
Source: Frey and Osborne (2017) & analysis by Ball State University
Lower Higher
Growing importance of social skills in the labor force
Actu
al
Pred
icte
d
Source: Deming, D.J. (2017). The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 132 issue 4.
1980 1990 2000 2010
High Social, High Math
Low Social, High Math
High Social, Low Math
Low Social, Low Math
Occupational Task Intensities based on 1998 O*NETSources: 1980-2000 Census, 2005-2013 ACS
Cumulative Changes in Employment Share by Occupation Task Intensity1980 to 2012
High Social, High Math
High Social, Low Math
Low Social, High Math
Low Social, Low Math
Early thoughts on goal se$ng
Early thoughts on goal se$ng
• Start at the end and work back
• Consider:
– Age range(s)
– Creden-al types
– Growth feasibility
– Exis-ng gaps by income, race/ethnicity, geography
– Time to goal
State-level goals versus current state-level a1ainment
Sources: Goals compiled by the Lumina Founda-on (HCM Strategists, Strategy Labs); ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS data; Georgetown CEW.
AKAZ
AR
CO
CT
GA
HIID
IA
ILIN
KS
KY
LA
MEMD
MAMN
MOMT
NV
NH
OH
ORRI
SC
SD
TN TX
UT
VT
VAWA
AL
FL
NJ
NM
ND
OK
WY
WI
20%
40%
60%
80%
20% 40% 60% 80%
Act
ua
l a
tta
inm
en
t (f
or
25
-34
or
25
-64
ye
ar
old
s, d
ep
en
din
g o
n g
oa
l)
Attainment goal
State postsecondary attainment goals and actual attainment, 2016
Legend:
Certificate+
Associate+
Bachelor's+
North Carolina postsecondary a1ainment (associate+) by age, 2016
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Age
North Carolina postsecondary a1ainment (associate+) by age, 2016
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Age
Ages 25-34: recent graduates
AA+ a1ainment:
43%
Ages 35-64: adult workforce
AA+ a1ainment:
42%
White
Black
Hispanic
North Carolina postsecondary a1ainment, by age and race/ethnicity, 2016
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
Postsecondary a1ainment (associate+) by NC region and race/ethnicity, 2016
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
North Central Northeast Northwest Piedmont-Triad Sandhills(South Central)
Southeast Southwest Western
Total White Black Hispanic
Postsecondary a1ainment (associate+), 2016
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
Younger (25-34) Older (35-64) All (25-64)
North Carolina 43% 42% 42%
Top state 58% 52% 53%
Difference -15 -10 -11
Lumina Founda-on’s Stronger Na-on (cer-ficate+), 2016
All (25-64)
North Carolina 47%
Lumina na-onal goal 60%
Difference -13
What’s feasible? Change in a1ainment (associate+) by state, 2006-2016, ages 25-34
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
ME WY NE OR CO DC TN IL MO TX CA UT VA OH MN SD NH NC WAMA RI NY KY CT AL NJ WI AR FL PA OK ID SC KS IA IN GA LA AZ MS NM AK WV HI MI NV VT MD DE MT ND
Change in associate+ attainment from 2006-2016, ages 25-34
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
DC IA NC SD MT MNWV OH IN SC PA NH WI GA NE VA MO KY TN MS AL ND WY MI NJ CO CT KS RI LA ME OR IL NY AR MA WA OK TX ID MD FL UT AZ HI NV DE CA AK NM VT
Change in associate+ attainment from 2006-2016, ages 35-64
What’s feasible? Change in a1ainment (associate+) by state, 2006-2016, ages 35-64
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
DC IA NC SD NE MN OH WY TN MO NH CO VA PA ME WI IN SC WV OR KY IL GA AL RI NJ MT CT NY TX MS MA KS WA UT LA AR MI ND OK ID FL CA AZ MD HI NV DE NM AK VT
Change in associate+ attainment from 2006-2016, ages 25-64
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
What’s feasible? Change in a1ainment (associate+) by state, 2006-2016, ages 25-64
Younger (25-34) Older (35-64) All (25-64)
Moderate +11 pp +8 pp +9 pp
Stretch +13 pp +10 pp +11 pp
Ambi-ous ? ? +13 pp
Poten-al a1ainment goals for North Carolina
Other measures that track progress toward the goal
Age 19 enrollment versus age 26 a1ainment for the cohorts born in 1988-90 (averaged), by state
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
North Carolina postsecondary enrollment, by age, 2016
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Age
NC enrollment, by age, compared with a top-performing state and neighboring states, 2016
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Age
MNVANCGATN
8th grade NAEP performance versus age 26 a1ainment for the cohorts born in 1988-90 (averaged), by state
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ACS PUMS and NCES NAEP data
K12 indicators: academic achievement, a1endance, gradua-on
Not proficient in elementary
reading Not proficient In elementary
math
No disciplinary incidents in grades 6-8
Steady attendance in
9th grade On-time
HS graduation
No on-time HS graduation
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ODE and NSC data
Postsecondary enrollment
Postsecondary outcomes
Achievement gaps measured at age 5 have proven difficult to narrow during K12
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
test
scor
esin
sta
ndar
d d
evia
tions
parent income in highest quartile
parent income in lowest quartile
age0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Source: White House Council of Economic Advisors (December 2014) The Economics of Early Childhood Investments. Figure 3, page 13.
Analysis to come
Example ques-ons answered by modeling
• What will happen through 2030 if we do nothing? • How much would high school gradua-on rates have to
improve to reach the postsecondary a1ainment goal by 2030?
• To what extent can the state increase overall a1ainment while reducing dispari-es across specified popula-ons given an-cipated upper bounds on postsecondary enrollment growth?
Modeling ac-vi-es
• Develop a baseline a1ainment forecast (current condi-ons/policy)
• Set targets for system performance needed to achieve the goal
• Evaluate contribu-ons of subpopula-on a1ainment to the goal
Example of goal-reaching approach to modeling: Establish the ul-mate goal and iden-fy condi-ons necessary to achieve this goal
(condi-ons can be independent of the means used to achieve the goal)
Baseline (certificates+)
Alternative trajectory (certificates+)