scicreat2
-
Upload
efimerios-elaias -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of scicreat2
![Page 1: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 1/88
What Does Science Say
About Creation?
- Part 2 -
Dr. Heinz Lycklama
[email protected] www.osta.com
![Page 2: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 2/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Which Model Best Fits The Facts?
Creation and Evolution are the only two models
of origins
Both models should be considered as equal
alternatives and evaluated objectively in terms of their relative abilities to correlate and explain
scientific data
The model that incorporates the most data
and has the smallest number of unresolved
issues is the most likely to be true
![Page 3: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 3/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Basic Predictions of The ModelsCategory Basic Predictions of
Evolution Model
Basic Predictions of
Creation Model
Galactic universe Galaxies changing Galaxies constant
Structure of stars Stars changing into other types Stars unchanged
Other heavenly bodies Building up Breaking down
Types of rock formations Different in different “ages” Similar in all “ages"
Appearance of life Life evolving from non-life Life only from life
Array of organisms Continuum of organisms Distinct kinds of organisms
Appearance of kinds of life New kinds appearing No new kinds appearing
![Page 4: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 4/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Basic Predictions of The Models - 2
Category Basic Predictions of
Evolution Model
Basic Predictions of
Creation Model
Mutations in organisms Beneficial Harmful
Natural selection Creative process Conservative process
Fossil record Innumerable transitions Systematic gaps
Appearance of man Ape-human intermediates No ape-human
intermediatesNature of man Quantitatively superior to animals Qualitatively distinct from
animals
Origin of civilization Slow and gradual Contemporaneous with man
![Page 5: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 5/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Looking At The Scientific Evidence
Origin of matter, energy and natural law
Origin of the solar system
Teleology – study of evidences of design
in nature, e.g. Anthropic Principle
Classification of biological organisms
Natural selection and mutations (vestigal
organs)
![Page 6: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 6/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Scientific Evidence - 2 Origin of man
Origin of life – probability The fossil record
Geologic ages – Uniformitarianism vs.
Catastrophism Age of the earth
![Page 7: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 7/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Conditions For Increasing
Complexity in an Open System
Necessary, but not sufficient conditions:
1. Open System2. Available Energy
Additional requirements:
3. Mechanism for storing and converting
incoming energy
4. Program (to “direct” the growth of complexity)
![Page 8: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 8/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping Score
Creation Evolution
Laws of
Thermodynamics
TOTAL = 1 0
![Page 9: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 9/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Origin of The Solar System Predictions of evolution model:
Solar system is one of many
Earth, moon and planets should have same compositionand structure
Predictions of creation model: Solar system is unique
Earth, moon and planets each created for a specificpurpose, each with a distinctive composition and structure
Only the earth would be found to have a hydrospherecapable of supporting life
Only the earth would be found to have an atmospherecapable of supporting life
Evidence of decay and catastrophism would be found on
other planets and moons
![Page 10: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 10/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
![Page 11: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 11/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Solar System Was Created Based on statistical analysis and the evolution model:
One might expect to find many solar systems with planetsand similar characteristics to our solar system
The evolution model also assumes that the moon brokeaway from the earth
What we find: Our solar system is unique
Earth and moon have vastly different structure andcomposition and could not have come from the samecelestial “ancestor”
The chemical makeup of the moon rocks is very differentfrom that of rocks on the earth
The predictions of the creation model are exactly confirmedby moon landings and space probes
![Page 12: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 12/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping Score
Creation Evolution
Laws of
Thermodynamics
Origin of Solar System
TOTAL = 2 0
![Page 13: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 13/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Teleology Teleology is the study of evidences of design in
nature
The word is derived from the Greek word for endor purpose.
Evolution predicts: Mechanistic self-ordering process in nature
Mutations provide random changes
Natural selection concentrates the beneficial
features Creation predicts:
Evidence of design in nature
Carefully balanced equations, constants and
properties of matter
![Page 14: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 14/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Anthropic Principle
The Anthropic Principle states that the
universe appears to be carefully designed for
the well-being of mankind
Some evidence of this found in nature: Mass of proton
Gravitation force
Strength of electrical charges
Distance of moon from the earth
Distance of sun from the earth
etc.
![Page 15: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 15/88
![Page 16: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 16/88
![Page 17: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 17/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Strength of Electrical Charges
The strength of electrical charges, i.e. the
Coulomb force varies as the inverse square
of the distance between the charges. Since
the electrical force is much stronger than the
gravitational force, it has been measured to
an accuracy of 16 decimal places to be
2.0000000000000000 This reflects God‟s purposeful planning!
More on the “Just Right” Universe by Dr. Ray Bohlin
of Probe Ministries in next 14 slides …
![Page 18: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 18/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
29 Fine-tuned Parameters to the
Universe
Constants in equations for gravity,
electromagnetism, strong and weak
nuclear forces Ratio of proton to electron mass
![Page 19: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 19/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
51 Fine-tuned Parameters to our Galaxy,
Solar System, and Planet
Distance from the sun
Size, temperature, & type of sun
Size, axial tilt, rotation speed, moon, &
composition of earth
Stability of Jupiter and Saturn
![Page 20: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 20/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
10 – 53 - Probability of all 80 fine-tuned parameters occurring by chance
![Page 21: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 21/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
10 22 -Upper limit for number of stars inthe universe
Assume 1 planet per star
Therefore 1022 planets in the universe
![Page 22: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 22/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
So how do we determine how many planets
may be suitable for life?
10 -53 x 10 22 = 10 -31 or
0.0000000000000000000000000000001
planets suitable for life
![Page 23: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 23/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
Jupiter acts as a comet and asteroid magnet
shielding earth from catastrophic collisions
Our sun is located between spiral arms of the
Milky Way Galaxy where there are fewer
stars (less harmful radiation and disruptive
gravity) and less gas and dust (we can see therest of the galaxy and universe)
![Page 24: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 24/88
![Page 25: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 25/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
Since 1996, over 50 planets outside our solar
system have been found
Only 5% of stars have planets
The planets are either too large, too close to
their star, or with too erratic an orbit toharbor life
Have the probabilities changed?
![Page 26: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 26/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
There are now 123 parameters with a probability of 1 in 10161. When multiplied
with a very generous estimate of 1 planet/star or 1022 planets, the final number of planets inthe universe suitable for life is 10-139 or
0.00000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 planets
![Page 27: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 27/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe CNN (2/5/01) just released an article reporting that
some astronomers have hatched a plan to move
earth’s orbit
Sun is going to increase in size and heat output over the next few billion years eventually making earth
uninhabitable
Move the earth farther out (41 million miles)
gradually by passing a 62 mile diameter asteroid
within 10,000 miles of earth every 6,000 years
1 million fly bys should do it
![Page 28: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 28/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
But, . . .
“If the asteroid comes too close, it might break up or
conceivably even slam into Earth.”
“Another possible side effect . . . would be to
increase the planet's rotation. The encounters would
have to be planned so that while some would cause
the Earth to spin faster, others would slow it down
back to normal rotation speed.”
“It's also possible that the moon would be thrown
from its orbit around the Earth during these fly- bys.”
![Page 29: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 29/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What Does Evolution Say? Evolution is unable to deal with such
permanent properties of nature
Max Planck (1858-1947), a Nobel Prizewinner and founder of modern physics,stated: “According to everything taught by the exact
sciences about the immense realm of nature, acertain order prevails - one independent of the
human mind … this order can be formulated interms of purposeful activity. There is evidence of an intelligent order of the universe to which bothman and nature are subservient.”
![Page 30: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 30/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping ScoreCreation Evolution
Laws of
Thermodynamics
Origin of Solar System
Teleology (Design)
TOTAL = 3 0
![Page 31: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 31/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Classification of Biological Organisms
The evolution model predicts:
A continuum of all forms of life
No classification system would work
The creation model predicts: An array of clear-but distinct organisms
similar structures for similar functions, e.g. eyes
different structures for different functions, e.g.gills for fish, lungs for man
Science of taxonomy distinct kinds/species
![Page 32: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 32/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Science of Taxonomy The science of taxonomy is a problem for
evolution
The classification system introduced byCarolus Linnaeus applies to plants/animals intoday‟s world as well as to extinct plants andanimals A continuum of life forms does not exist
Intermediates have not been observed and/or identified in the fossils
The classification system introduced by Linnaeusstill works today
![Page 33: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 33/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Quoting an Evolutionist
The anti-creationist, Niles Eldredge,
wrote in 1985:
“And though a few of these eighteenth-
century systematists had vaguelyevolutionary notions, nearly all were
devoutly and orthodoxly religious. They
saw the order in their material, the grand
pattern of similarity running through the
entire organic realm, as evidence of God‟s
plan of creation.”
![Page 34: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 34/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Classification Observations
What we do see is:
Variations within species, e.g. varieties of
cats, dogs, cows, horses, mankind
No new kinds produced
Some kinds become extinct
Like begets like
Chalk up another one for the Creation Model!
![Page 35: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 35/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping ScoreCreation Evolution
Laws of Thermodynamics
Origin of Solar System
Teleology (Design)
Classification/Organism
TOTAL = 4 0
![Page 36: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 36/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Natural Selection and Mutations
Evolution model predicts: Small variations between members of a species
would confer differing degrees of advantage or disadvantage in the struggle for existence
Those with significant advantages would befavored
New and higher types of organisms wouldemerge
A mutation (structural change in a gene) is thesource of genetic variation
Mutations are primarily beneficial
![Page 37: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 37/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Natural Selection and Mutations - 2
Creation model predicts:
Variation and natural selection work to
assure genetic integrity and to enable theorganism to survive in nature
Characteristics can be adjusted, within
limits, to changes in the environment
Mutations are primarily harmful
![Page 38: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 38/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What We See Happening Today Variations within a kind, e.g. peppered moth
“evolving” to darker color as tree trunks grewdarker with pollutants during industrialrevolution
Adaptation to the environment for survival
Mutations are harmful to the organism
Mutations are random and not directed
Mutations are rare in occurrence Mutations almost always generate misfits
which soon die out
![Page 39: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 39/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
“Origin of Species” Never Observed All of Darwin‟s evidences turn out to be
descriptions of creative adaptation, not origin
According to Niles Eldridge (1986): “Darwin, it is now become commonplace to
acknowledge, never really addressed the „origin of species‟ in his book of that title.”
Darwin never really cited the origin of a new speciesby natural selection
The British evolutionist Colin Patterson noted: “No one has ever produced a species by
mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever gotten near it and most of the current argument in
neo-Darwinism is about this question.”
![Page 40: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 40/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
On Mutations and Natural Selection
The philosopher Janus Koestler noted that:
“The public continues to believe that Darwin
provided all the relevant answers by the magic
formula of random mutations plus natural
selection - quite unaware of the fact that random
mutations turned out to be irrelevant and natural
selections a tautology.”
Mutations turn out to be rare events, and
most of those are bad
They do not lead to improvements in the
species, as evolution predicts
![Page 41: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 41/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Vestigal Organs
At one time there were claimed to be 180 such
organs in man - appendix, tonsils, thymus
gland, pituitary gland, etc.
No useless vestiges of structures which wereuseful in a former evolutionary stage
All “vestigial” organs in man now appear to
have a use
The argument that vestigial organs prove
evolution is no longer regarded as valid
![Page 42: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 42/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping ScoreCreation Evolution
Previous score = 2
Teleology (Design)
Classification/Organism
Mutations/Selection
TOTAL = 5 0
![Page 43: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 43/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Origin of Man
Evolution model predicts:
Molecules -> man Man evolved from an ape
Creation model predicts:
Man’s appearance hasremained largely the same
![Page 44: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 44/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Ape To Man? In a Science Digest article written by Lyall
Watson, he states that: “The fossils that decorate our family tree are so
scarce that there are still more scientists than
specimens. The remarkable fact is that all thephysical evidence we have for human evolutioncan still be placed, with room to spare, inside asingle coffin.”
David Pilbeam and Steven Gould (twoevolutionists) report that: “Unfortunately, the fossil record of pongids (apes)
is nonexistent, making a glaring deficiency in thewhole story.”
![Page 45: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 45/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Famous “Hominid” Fossils
Neanderthal Man – 1856
Java Man – 1891
Piltdown Man – 1908
Nebraska Man – 1922
Ramapithecus – 1930
Lucy - 1974
![Page 46: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 46/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Neanderthal Man Fossil fragments first found in
France – 1856
Skull cap and some limb bones
Diagnosed as human with deformed vertebrae
Neanderthal Man’s Site in Krapina, 1899-1999 Another almost complete skeleton found in 1908
Reconstructed by Marcelle Boule to look ape-like
Based on pre-conceived evolutionary notions
Faulty reconstruction recognized in 1957
Neanderthal is now known to be fully human with a bone deformity
School textbooks still portray as man’s ancestor
![Page 47: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 47/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Java Man
Discovered by Eugene Dubois in 1891
Ape-like skull cap
Human-like thigh bone found 50 feet away one year later
Assumed they went together
Fossils dated at 500,000 years (guesswork based onassumed evolutionary model)
In 1940 Dubois admitted
He found two human skulls in same area as the humanthigh bone
Java Man now regarded as a hoax
Still included in textbooks as support for evolution
![Page 48: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 48/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Piltdown Man Fossil fragments found in 1908
Part of a human skull and part of alower ape-like jaw
Estimated to be 500,000 years old
Discovered to be a fraud in 1953
Lower jaw and tooth were fromorangutan
Tooth had been filed
Parts of lower jaw broken to hide thefact that it did not fit with the skull
Skull was dated at ~620 years oldand dyed to appear old
![Page 49: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 49/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Nebraska Man
Discovered in 1922
Dated to be one millionyears old
Fossil was only a single tooth Complete model of Nebraska Man, his family
and environment was constructed
Tooth discovered to be pig’s tooth in 1928 Still cited as evidence for evolution in the
1940’s
![Page 50: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 50/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Ramapithecus Found in India in 1930’s
Considered a human ancestor
Based on some jaw fragments and afew teeth
More fossil evidence found in 1970’s
Baboons in Ethiopia have same teethstructure as Ramapithecus
Now discarded as a possible “missing
link” Had been published as factual evidence
of human evolution worldwide
![Page 51: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 51/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Lucy
Discovered in 1974 by Donald
Johanson
40% complete skeleton
Dated at 3.5 million years old
Evidence:
Arm/leg ratio of 83.9 %
Hip/pelvis – walked upright
Knee joint – walked upright
![Page 52: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 52/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Lucy - 2
Digging deeper, we find that:
Leg bone broken in two places and one end was
crushed -> this invalidates the ratio
Hip/pelvis was incomplete, and thus reshapedto make it look as if it walked upright
Knee joint was found over one mile away and
200 feet deeper in strata from rest of bones Fossil remains of two different creatures
fitted to form a make-believe creature
![Page 53: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 53/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Summary of “Hominid” Fossils
Neanderthal Man – accepted as
homo sapiens
Java Man – artificial construct Piltdown Man – proven to be a hoax
Nebraska Man – an extinct pig
Ramapithecus – an orangutan
Lucy – make-believe creature
Another one for the Creation Model!
![Page 54: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 54/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
“For example, no scientist could logically dispute
the proposition that man, without having been
involved in any act of divine creation, evolved
from some ape-like creature in a very short space
of time – speaking in geological terms – without
leaving any fossil traces of the steps of the
transformation.”
Zuckerman, Solly. 1971. Beyond the ivory tower : The frontiers of public and private science. New York:
Taplinger Publishing Company. p. 64.
Lord Zuckerman Chimes In
![Page 55: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 55/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping ScoreCreation Evolution
Previous score = 3
Classification/Organism
Mutations/Selection
Origin of Man
TOTAL = 6 0
![Page 56: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 56/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Origin of Life - Probability
What is the probability that an explosion
in a junk yard would “create” a car?
What is the probability of creating aBoeing airplane from such an explosion?
What is the probability of 200 monkeys
pawing away at a typewriter could “write”a Shakespeare play?
![Page 57: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 57/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Origin of Life – Probability - 2
Take 200 parts and line them up in a specific order
200! ways of aligning these parts = 10**375
Try a new alignment 1 billion times a second
Assuming 20 billion years of time, we have 20 *10**18 seconds
The probability of finding the right alignment ispractically zero
Living organisms contain many more than 200
parts Human being contains 100 million cells
Only 10**80 “infinestimal” particles in the wholeuniverse
![Page 58: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 58/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Probability of Synthesis
Of DNA Molecule:
Medium protein includes about 300 amino acids
Too complex to arise by chance [no matter how long
the time or how big the universe]
By gradual accretion
System might advance from one part to a two-part
system, then to three parts, etc.
Requires each step to be immediately beneficial Probability of success would be incalculably small
![Page 59: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 59/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping ScoreCreation Evolution
Previous score = 4
Mutations/Selection
Origin of Man
Origin of Life (Prob.)
TOTAL = 7 0
![Page 60: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 60/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record The theory of evolution is based on two major
suppositions: Mutations and natural selection supposedly provided
the mechanism
The fossil record allegedly proved the “fact” of evolution Fossils should “prove” evolution since the fossil
record has long been considered as the mainevidence for evolution
The creation model predicts that organismspreserved as fossils will correspond to the sameclassification system as applicable to present-dayplants and animals
![Page 61: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 61/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 2 Evolution model predicts:
Many preliminary forms
Many transitional forms
Randomly distributed gaps between present kinds
and transitional forms Basic taxonomic categories should have been
evolving
Creation model predicts:
No preliminary forms No transitional forms
Clear gaps between types
Same taxonomic categories as at present
![Page 62: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 62/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 3
“Creation and evolution, between them, exhaust the possible explanations for the origin of livingthings. Organisms either appeared on the earth
fully developed or they did not. If they did notthey must have developed from preexisting species by some process of modification. If they didappear in fully formed state, they must have been
created by some omnipotent intelligence.” D. J. Futuyma, Science on Trial , 1983
![Page 63: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 63/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 4
Darwin admitted in 1859:
“Why then is not every geological formation and every
stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology
assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated
organic chain.”
Paul Moody wrote in a standard textbook:
“So far as we can judge from the geologic record,
large changes seem usually to have arisen
suddenly. ... fossil forms, intermediate between
large subdivisions of classification, such as orders
and classes, are seldom [read never ] found.”
![Page 64: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 64/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 5
Evolutionists say we should find transitionalforms:
Single cell to multi-cell creatures
Invertebrate to vertebrate Fish to reptile
Reptile to bird
Ape to man
To date no true transitional fossil forms have been discovered
![Page 65: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 65/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 6
“I fully agree with your comments on the lack
of direct illustration of evolutionary
transitions in my book. If I knew of any,
fossil or living, I would certainly haveincluded them. . .I will lay it on the line,
There is not one such fossil for which one
might make a watertight argument.”
140 years after Darwin, and still no credible transition form!
-- Dr. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist
at the British Museum of Natural History
![Page 66: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 66/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Coelacanth – A “Living Fossil” Coelacanth fish
Known by paleontologists of 19th and 20th centuries from the fossil record
“Extinct” about 70 million years ago
Candidate forerunner to first land animals
Living specimens
Found off west coast of Madagascar in 1938
More found later
No longer considered a link in evolutionary chain
Another evolution “theory” debunked!
![Page 67: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 67/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Fully Formed
“It is considered likely that all the animal
phyla became distinct before or during the
Cambrian, for they all appear fully formed,
without intermediates connecting one
phylum to another.”
Futuyma, Douglas J. 1986. Evolutionary biology.
2d ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. p. 325.
![Page 68: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 68/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record Summarized
Missing links are still missing
Different types of “living fossils” found
Sudden appearance of fully formed fossils in
the “Cambrian Explosion”
The same “kinds” still appear today
Some species are now extinct No new kinds evolved
Supports the Creation Model!
![Page 69: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 69/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Source: Dr. Duane Gish, ICR
![Page 70: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 70/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping ScoreCreation Evolution
Previous score = 5
Origin of Man
Origin of Life (Prob.)
The Fossil Record
TOTAL = 8 0
![Page 71: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 71/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Geologic Record
Evolution model predicts:
Uniformitarianism
Sediment layers deposited gradually More complex fossils in higher layers
Creation model predicts:
Catastrophism
Evidence for global flood
Sudden appearance of fully formed fossils
Conventional History Of The Earth
![Page 72: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 72/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Conventional History Of The EarthCenozoic
4,000
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
4,500
3,500
M i l l i o
n s o f Y e a r s B P
Precambrian
Paleozoic
Mesozoic
-Formation of the earth
-Crust forms
-First fossil prokaryotes
-Atmospheric Oxygen accumulation
(from cyanobacteria)
-First eukaryotic fossils
-First multicellular animal fossils
Origin of life
Human fossilsLast dinosaur fossils
First reptile fossilsFirst land plant fossils
The Geological Column
![Page 73: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 73/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Geological Column
P h a n e r o z o i c
P
r e c a m b r i a n
Cenozoic
Paleozoic
Mesozoic
Few fossils
Ediacarian fauna (odd marine organisms)
Very few fossils, maybe none
Many pseudo fossils
Dinosaurs
Mammals, cycads, conifers, angiosperms
Conifers, more reptiles and amphibians
“The age of fish” small land plants
Many fossils, all modern phyla ex. bryozoa
Many crinoids, amphibia and reptiles
Coal “forests” many primitive land plants
Jawless fish, strange land plants
Many marine organisms including bryozoa
Extinction of dinosaurs and many families
Jurassic
Cretaceous
Triassic
Devonian
Cambrian
Permian
Carboniferous
SilurianOrdovician
T e r
t i a r y
Paleocene
Oligocene
Eocene
Miocene
Proterozoic
Archean
M i l l i o n s o f Y e a r s B e f o r e P r e s e n t
300 -
100 -
400 -
500 -
200 -
![Page 74: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 74/88
Geologic
Time Scale[with
fossils]
![Page 75: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 75/88
Geologic
Column
Chart
![Page 76: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 76/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Geologic
Column[ some
more
details]
![Page 77: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 77/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Geologic Column Theory
Cambrian rocks began to form ~ 600My ago
[now believed to be 520-530My ago]
Cambrian period estimated to be ~ 80My
[now believed to be 5-10My] Precambrian rocks laid down during the prior
hundreds of millions of years
Should contain fossils of evolutionary ancestors of the
complex vertebrates
Should contain fossils of transitional forms linking the
complex vertebrates to common ancestors
![Page 78: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 78/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What Do We Find? Fossils of microscopic, soft-bodied, single-celled
organisms, such as bacteria and algae inPrecambrian rocks
No fossilized ancestors for any Cambrian
invertebrate
No trace of transitional forms between the variouskinds of invertebrates, e.g.
No linking sponges with jellyfish
No linking snails with trilobites
Fossils of a vast array of complex invertebratesabruptly appear fully formed in the Cambrian rocks
![Page 79: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 79/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Geologic Column
The “column” is not the column thattextbooks describe:
It rarely exists in its entirety in one location
All types of rocks, minerals, metals are found inall ages and strata
A progression of fossils through the ages“documents” evolution:
That’s errant, “circular reasoning”: i.e. fossilsdate rocks, yet the rocks date the fossils(evolution is assumed)
![Page 80: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 80/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Geologic Column
The creation / abrupt appearance column is the
result of a world flood:
Sorting action of water (smaller fossils end up going to
bottom)
Ordered destruction of different habitats
The geologic column illustrates a superficially valid
“successional tendency”, but it represents a very
fast time sequence, not slow Mt. St. Helens created a “mini Grand Canyon” in days,
and petrified wood in less than ten years!
![Page 81: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 81/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What Does Richard Dawkins Say?
“The Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600million years, are the oldest in which we find most
of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many
of them already in an advanced state of evolution,
the very first time they appear. It is as though they
were just planted there, without any evolutionary
history. Needless to say, this appearance of sudden
planting has delighted creationists.”
Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker . 1987.
![Page 82: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 82/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What Does Douglas Futuyma Say?
“It is considered likely that all the animal
phyla became distinct before or during the
Cambrian, for they all appear fully formed,without intermediates connecting one form
to another.”
Douglas Futuyma, Evolutionary Biology, 2nd Ed. 1986
![Page 83: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 83/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What We Find In The Fossils
Same gaps in fossils records as in the organismsfound today
All kingdoms and subkingdoms are represented
in the geologic record from the Cambrian onward All phyla of the animal kingdom are represented
from the Cambrian onward
All orders and families (as well as kingdoms,
phyla, and classes) appear suddenly in the fossilrecord, with no indication of transitional formsfrom earlier types
![Page 84: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 84/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Animal and Plant Kingdom Fossils
All classes of the animal kingdom are representedfrom the Cambrian onward, except:
Moss-coral (Ordovician onward)
Insects (Devonian onward)
Graptolites (Cambrian to Carboniferous) Trilobites (Cambrian to Permian)
All phyla of the plant kingdom are represented fromthe Triassic onward, except:
Bacteria, algae, fungi (Precambrian onward) Bryophytes, pteridophytes (Silurian onward)
Spermophytes (Carboniferous onward)
Diatoms (Jurassic onward)
![Page 85: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 85/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Origin of Vertebrates Fish believed to be the first vertebrate Origin appears sudden and dramatic
All three subdivisions of the bony fishes appear inthe fossil record at about the same time
Errol White, an evolutionist and expert on fishes,stated:
“But whatever ideas authorities may have on thesubject, the lungfishes, like very other major group of fishes that I know, have their origins firmly based innothing.”
E. White, Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. 1996.
![Page 86: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 86/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping Score
Creation Evolution
Previous score = 6
Origin of Life (Prob.)
The Fossil Record
Geologic Ages
TOTAL = 9 0
![Page 87: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 87/88
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Conclusions
Laws of science consistent with Creationism
Signs of intelligence in the universe
The probability of life from non-life is zero
Abrupt appearance of fully-formed animals
The missing links are still missing
Man did not evolve from apes
Catastrophism explains the “geologic column”
There is no credible evidence for evolution!
Science supports Creationism
![Page 88: scicreat2](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052607/577cdccb1a28ab9e78ab6bfc/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
7/28/2019 scicreat2
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scicreat2 88/88
Which Model Fits The Evidence Best?
So far … Creation 9
Evolution 0
Next …
Age of the earth?