School Questionnaire
-
Upload
briar-maxwell -
Category
Documents
-
view
33 -
download
1
description
Transcript of School Questionnaire
![Page 1: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
School Questionnaire
National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008
![Page 2: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Content of the presentation
• Field trial participation• Field trial results• Draft questionnaire for the MS
![Page 3: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
FT participation
• Schools in survey 718
• Schools with quest. data 682
• NA 36
[DPC data]
![Page 4: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
FT participation
• 26 countries > 85%
• 2 countries 85-80%
• 3 countries < 80%
[FT Analysis Report Part II, Table 25]
![Page 5: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Principal characteristics
• Gender– Overall percentage: males 65%.– Gender distribution varies across
countries (male principals from 25% to 100%)
[T 29]
• Age– Two first categories collapsed
[T 28]
![Page 6: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Pooled sample
• School autonomy (Q4)– Two dimensions confirmed (EFA)– SCAUTMAN1 α .81 – SCAUTEDU α .79– Increased reliability: item a dropped – Item j to be reworded
![Page 7: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Participation in school governance (Q5)
– Only one dimension (EFA)
– SCTPART α .85
– Increased reliability: item e dropped
![Page 8: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Student opportunity for participation in community STOPACT (Q6) α .82– To report single items for descriptive
purposes
• Parents participation - (Q8) α .73 – To report selected single items
instead of scale scores
![Page 9: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Importance given to student opinion CSTUDIMP (Q10)
α .82 – To be deleted: not appropriate to
target grade students (also in TcQ)
• Student respect for school’s rules CSTURULE (Q11)
α .86– Minor changes in wording
![Page 10: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Sense of belonging to the school (Q12)– Three-dimensional structure confirmed
(EFA)– TCBELONG α .85 – STBELONG α .84 – NTBELONG α .88
![Page 11: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Issues of social tension – local area COMSOCT (Q14)
α .89
- changes in wording
- two items added (from Q15)
• Issues of social tension – inside the school SCHPROB (Q15)
α .81
[to be added to the TcQ]
![Page 12: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Other questions
• Students’ participation in school elections (Q 7)– High percentages of missing answers– However important – keep in– Minor changes in wording
• Resources available in the local area (Q13)– Items to be reported as single items– Minor changes in wording
![Page 13: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
• Implementation of CCE at school (Q16) [T 30]– Overlapping between answers– Consistency with NCS
• Aims of CCE (Q17) [T 31]– Different patterns across countries– Proposal: same as in TcQ (ex Q23-24)
• Responsibility for CCE (Q18) [T 32]– Differences across and within
countries
![Page 14: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Proposed ScQ for the MS
• Same sections
• Same number of questions (22 instead of 23)
• Minor changes based on FT results
• Changes in wording according to NRCs comments (NAFs)
• Additional explanatory notes included
![Page 15: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Proposed ScQ for the MS
• Some additional changes– Q5 and Q6 (MS draft): order of the
categories to be reversed
![Page 16: School Questionnaire](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070402/5681386a550346895da01b38/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Questions or comments?