Schmandt and Humphreys, 2011

14
Outstanding questions, controversial interpretations, and enigmatic observations: A seismic perspective Schmandt and Humphreys, 2011 - Tomographic velocity models - Upper mantle discontinuity structure - Anisotropic structure of lithosphere

description

Outstanding questions, controversial interpretations, and enigmatic observations: A seismic perspective. Schmandt and Humphreys, 2011. - Tomographic velocity models - Upper mantle discontinuity structure - Anisotropic structure of lithosphere. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Schmandt and Humphreys, 2011

Page 1: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Outstanding questions, controversial interpretations, and enigmatic observations: A seismic perspective

Schmandt and Humphreys, 2011

- Tomographic velocity models - Upper mantle discontinuity structure - Anisotropic structure of lithosphere

Page 2: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic tomography models from USArray (and other) data

Becker, 2012; see alsoPavlis et al., 2012

Berkeley model Oregon model ASU/Carnegie model

Page 3: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic tomography models from USArray (and other) data

Becker, 2012Berkeley model Oregon model ASU/Carnegie model

Page 4: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic tomography models from USArray (and other) data

Becker, 2012

Models for W. US are similar, but amplitudes different

Page 5: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic tomography models from USArray (and other) data

Schmandt and Humphreys, 2011

Page 6: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic tomography models from USArray (and other) data

Obrebski et al., 2011

Page 7: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic tomography models from USArray data: surface wave/ambient noise models

Wagner et al., 2012

Page 8: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Combining seismic tomography & MT

Kelbert et al., 2012

Page 9: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic tomography models: looking ahead

Burdick et al., 2012

Page 10: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic discontinuity structure of the lithosphere

Abt et al., 2010

Page 11: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic discontinuity structure of the lithosphere

Lekic et al., 2011

Page 12: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic anisotropy of the lithosphere: a relic of past deformation processes

Yuan et al., 2011

Page 13: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Seismic anisotropy of the lithosphere: a relic of past deformation processes?

Wagner et al., 2012

Page 14: Schmandt  and Humphreys,  2011

Summary• Seismic tomography models derived from USArray data in the

western US show a remarkable degree of robust, well-resolved heterogeneity on small spatial scales.

• The interpretation of many of the features in tomography models is still open to exploration/debate.

• Resistivity models obtained from the MT TA can provide constraints complementary to those obtained from seismic velocity models; joint interpretation can shed light on physical processes in crust and upper mantle.

• Several new and exciting results relating to the discontinuity structure of the North American lithosphere.• Nature of LAB? Is the asthenosphere wet/partially melted?• Nature of MLD?

• Anisotropic structure of lithosphere reflects past episodes of deformation. To what extent are these structures reflected in resistivity structure?